Hubbry Logo
English verbsEnglish verbsMain
Open search
English verbs
Community hub
English verbs
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
English verbs
English verbs
from Wikipedia

Verbs constitute one of the main parts of speech (word classes) in the English language. Like other types of words in the language, English verbs are not heavily inflected. Most combinations of tense, aspect, mood and voice are expressed periphrastically, using constructions with auxiliary verbs.

Generally, the only inflected forms of an English verb are a third person singular present tense form ending in -s, a past tense (also called preterite), a past participle (which may be the same as the past tense), and a form ending in -ing that serves as a present participle and gerund. Most verbs inflect in a simple regular fashion, although there are about 200 irregular verbs; the irregularity in nearly all cases concerns the past tense and past participle forms. The copula verb be has a larger number of different inflected forms, and is highly irregular.

Although many of the most commonly used verbs in English (and almost all the irregular verbs) come from Old English, many others are taken from Latin or French. Nouns or adjectives can become verbs (see Conversion (word formation)). Adjectives like "separate" and "direct" thus became verbs, starting in the 16th century, and eventually it became standard practice to form verbs from Latin passive participles, even if the adjective didn't exist. Sometimes verbs were formed from Latin roots that were not verbs by adding "-ate" (such as "capacitate"), or from French words (such as "isolate" from French "isoler").[1][2]

For details of the uses of particular verb tenses and other forms, see the article Uses of English verb forms.

Inflected forms

[edit]
Conjugation of have
Person Singular Plural
First I have We have
Second You have You have
Third It has They have

Principal parts

[edit]

A regular English verb has only one principal part, from which all the forms of the verb can be derived. This is the base form or dictionary form. For example, from the base form exist, all the inflected forms of the verb (exist, exists, existed, existing) can be predictably derived. The base form is also called the bare infinitive; that is, the infinitive without the to.

Most irregular verbs have three principal parts, since the simple past and past participle are unpredictable. For example, the verb write has the principal parts write (base form), wrote (past), and written (past participle); the remaining inflected forms (writes, writing) are derived regularly from the base form. Some irregular verbs have identical past tense and past participle forms (as the regular verbs do), as with send–sent–sent.

The infinitive, simple past and past participle are sometimes referred to as First (V1), Second (V2) and Third (V3) form of a verb, respectively. This naming convention has all but disappeared from American and British usage, but still can be found in textbooks and teaching materials used in other countries.[3][4][5][6]

Some speakers have only two forms, collapsing the distinction between V2 and V3, though this is considered non-standard. For most verbs the forms are V1 and V2 (have they went yet?, with 'gone' never being used, or a corporate-ran company rather than corporate-run), but for a few verbs they are V1 and V3 (I seen it, he done it, with 'saw' and 'did' not being used).

The verbs do, say and have additionally have irregular third person singular present tense forms (see below). The copular verb be is highly irregular, with the forms be, am, is, are, was, were, been and being. On the other hand, modal verbs (such as can and must) are defective verbs, being used only in a limited number of forms. For details on the forms of verbs of these types, see § Copular, auxiliary and defective verbs below.

Base form

[edit]

The base form or plain form of an English verb is not marked by any inflectional ending.

Certain derivational suffixes are frequently used to form verbs, such as -en (sharpen), -ate (formulate), -fy (electrify), and -ise/ize (realise/realize), but verbs with those suffixes are nonetheless considered to be base-form verbs. Also, many base-form verbs contain prefixes, such un- (unmask), out- (outlast), over- (overtake), and under- (undervalue).[7] Some verbs are formed from nouns and adjectives by conversion, as with the verbs snare, nose, dry, and calm.

The base form is used in the following ways:

For the verb be, which uses different forms for the simple present, and modal verbs, which are not used in the infinitive, imperative or subjunctive, see § Copular, auxiliary and defective verbs below.

Third person singular present

[edit]

Almost all verbs have a third person singular present indicative form with the suffix -[e]s. In terms of spelling, it is formed in most cases by adding -s to the verb's base form: runruns. However if the base form ends in one of the sibilant sounds (/s/, /z/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, //, //) and its spelling does not end in a silent e, then -es is added: buzzbuzzes; catchcatches. Verbs ending in a consonant plus o also typically add -es: vetovetoes. Verbs ending in a consonant plus y add -es after changing the y to an i: crycries.

In terms of pronunciation, the ending is pronounced as /ɪz/ after sibilants (as in lurches), as /s/ after voiceless consonants other than sibilants (as in makes), and as /z/ otherwise (as in adds). These are the same rules that apply to the pronunciation of the regular noun plural suffix -[e]s and the possessive -'s. The spelling rules given above are also very similar to those for the plural of nouns.

The third person singular present of have is irregular: has /hæz/ (with the weak form /həz/ when used as an auxiliary, also contractable to -'s). The verbs do and say also have irregular forms, does /dʌz/ and says /sɛz/, which however look like regular forms in writing.

For the verb be, modal verbs and other auxiliaries, see § Copular, auxiliary and defective verbs below.

The form described in this section is used with third person singular subjects as the simple present tense (in the indicative mood): He writes novels all the time. (This tense has other uses besides referring to present time; for example, in I'll be glad if he writes, it refers to future time.)

Past tense

[edit]

The past tense, or preterite, may be formed regularly or irregularly.

With regular verbs, the past tense is formed (in terms of spelling) by adding -ed to the base form (playplayed). Normal rules for adding suffixes beginning with a vowel apply: If the base form ends in e then only d is added (likeliked); if the base form ends in a consonant followed by y then the y is changed to i before adding the ending (trytried; an exception is the verb sky (a ball), which can form skied or skyed). Three words ending in -ay (lay, pay and say) change y to i and add -d (laid, paid, said).

Various rules apply for doubling final consonants. If the base form ends in a single vowel followed by a single consonant (except h, silent t, [citation needed] w, x or y), then unless the final syllable is completely unstressed the consonant is doubled before adding the -ed (shipshipped, but fathomfathomed). In general this is considered something to keep the vowel before the final consonant short (i.e. if the word were spelled shiped it would have a long i.) However, there are 2 words, control and patrol, which follow this rule even though the vowel before the final consonant is long. For most base forms ending in c, the doubled form used is ck, used regardless of stress (panicpanicked; exceptions include zinczincked or zinced, arc → usually arced, specspecced or spec'ed, sync → sometimes synched). In British English, the doubling of l occurs regardless of stress (traveltravelled; but paralleled is an exception), and when two separately pronounced vowels precede the l (dialdialled, fuelfuelled). If the final syllable has some partial stress, especially for compound words, the consonant is usually doubled: backflipbackflipped, hobnobhobnobbed, kidnapkidnapped etc. In some cases both alternatives are acceptable, e.g. dialog† → dialogued or dialogged†, hiccuphiccupped or hiccuped, programprogramed† or programmed. However catalog† → cataloged†, pyramidpyramided, formatformatted (but combatcombat(t)ed). Other variations not entirely consistent with these rules include busbused† or bussed, biasbiased or biassed† and focusfocused or focussed. (The forms marked † are not used in British English, and the doubled consonant is not used for many words of non-Anglo-Saxon origin.) [example needed]

The pronunciation of the past tense ending follows similar rules to those for the third person present tense ending described above: if the base form ends in /t/ or /d/ then a new syllable /ɪd/ or /əd/ is added (as in drifted, exceeded); if the base form ends in an unvoiced consonant sound other than /t/ then the ending is pronounced /t/ (as in capped, passed); otherwise the ending is pronounced /d/ (as in buzzed, tangoed). Consequently, in the 17th and 18th centuries, the latter two pronunciations were routinely spelled -'d, but -ed was later restored.

For the past tense of irregular verbs, see English irregular verbs. Many of these can be classed as Germanic strong verbs, such as sing (past sang), while others are weak verbs with irregularly pronounced or irregularly spelt past forms, such as say (past tense said /sɛd/).

The verb be has two past tense forms: was (first and third person singular) and were (plural and second person).

The past tense (preterite) form is used in what is called the simple past, in sentences such as We lit the fire and He liked to dance. One of the uses of this tense is to refer not to a past situation, but to a hypothetical (present or future) situation in a dependent clause: If I knew that, I wouldn't have to ask. This is sometimes called the "past subjunctive", particularly in the case of were, which can replace was in such sentences; see English subjunctive.

Past participle

[edit]

The past participle of regular verbs is identical to the preterite (past tense) form, described in the previous section.

For irregular verbs, see English irregular verbs. Some of these have different past tense and past participle forms (like sing–sang–sung); others have the same form for both (like make–made–made). In some cases the past tense is regular but the past participle is not, as with show–showed–shown.

For uses of the past participle, see § Non-finite forms below.

Present participle

[edit]

The present participle form, which is also used for the gerund, is formed by adding the suffix -ing to the base form: gogoing. A final silent e is dropped (believebelieving); final ie changes to y (lielying), and consonant doubling applies as for the past tense (see above): runrunning, panicpanicking.

Exceptions include forms such as singeing, dyeing, ageing, rueing, cacheing and whingeing, where the e may be retained to avoid confusion with otherwise identical words (e.g. singing), to clarify pronunciation (for example to show that a word has a soft g or ch), or for aesthetic reasons.

In standard English the ending is pronounced /ɪŋ/, although in many regional dialects the final consonant sound is pronounced /n/, sometimes represented in eye dialect by spellings such as huntin' (see g-dropping).

For uses of the present participle and gerund, see § Non-finite forms below.

Copular, auxiliary and defective verbs

[edit]

The copular verb be has multiple irregular forms in the present tense: am for first person singular (which together with the subject pronoun is often contracted to I'm), is for third person singular (often contracted to 's), and are for plural and second person (often contracted to 're chiefly after the pronouns you, we, they). It also has two past tense forms: was for first and third person singular, and were for plural and second person (also used as a past subjunctive with all persons; see English subjunctive). It has the following negative forms: third person singular present isn't, other present aren't (including first person for the question aren't I), first and third person singular past wasn't, and other past weren't.[8] The past participle is been, and the present participle and gerund is the regular being. The base form be is used regularly as an infinitive, imperative and (present) subjunctive. For archaic forms, see the next section.

English has a number of modal auxiliary verbs which are defective. These verbs mostly have only positive and negative present and past tense forms can/can't/cannot and could/couldn't, may and might/mightn't, shall/shan't and should/shouldn't, will/won't and would/wouldn't, as well as need/needn't. Ought and must are also defective and have only a positive and negative form. In some dialects, dare also has a negative form.[9]

Other verbs used as auxiliaries include have, chiefly in perfect constructions (the forms has /həz/, have and had can contract to 's, 've and 'd); do (does, did) in emphatic, inverted and negated constructions (see do-support).

For more detail of the above, including contractions of negated forms (isn't, won't, etc.), see English auxiliaries and contractions.

Another example of a defective verb is beware, which is used only in those forms in which be remains unchanged, namely the infinitive, subjunctive and imperative.

Archaic forms

[edit]
Archaic conjugation of have
Person Singular Plural
First I have We have
Second Thou hast Ye have
Third It hath They have

Formerly, particularly in the Old English period, the English language had a far greater degree of verb inflection than it does now (some other Germanic languages retain a greater variety of inflected forms than English does). Some of the forms used in Early Modern English have now fallen out of use, but are still encountered in old writers and texts (e.g. Shakespeare, the King James Bible) and in archaisms.

One such form was the third person singular form with the suffix -eth [əθ], pronounced as a full syllable. This was used in some dialects rather than the modern -s, e.g. he maketh ("he makes"), he runneth ("he runs"), he goeth ("he goes"). In some verbs, a shortened form -th appears: he hath ("he has"), he doth ("he does"; pronounced as if written duth), he saith or he sayeth ("he says"). The forms hath and doth are found in some proverbs ("Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned", "The lady doth protest too much").

Another set of forms are associated with the archaic second person singular pronoun thou, which often have the ending -est, pronounced as a full syllable, e.g. thou makest ("you make"), thou leadest ("you lead"). In some verbs, a shortened form -st appears: thou hast ("you have"), thou dost ("you do"; rhymes with must). In the case of the verb be, such forms included art (present tense), wast (past), wert (past subjunctive) and beest (present subjunctive; pronounced as two syllables). In all other verbs, the past tense is formed by the base past tense form of the word (e.g. had, did, listened) plus-'st, not pronounced as a full syllable, e.g. thou had'st ("you had"), thou did'st ("you did"), thou listened'st ("you listened"). Modal verbs except must also have -t or -st added to their form, e.g. thou canst ("you can"), thou wilt ("you will"), thou wouldst ("you would"), thou mightst ("you might"), except may, which is thou mayest ("you may").

For example, several such forms (as well as other archaic forms such as yea for "yes", thy for "your", and mine enemies for "my enemies") appear in Psalm 23 from the King James Bible:

The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.
He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.
He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.

For more information see Old English verbs, English subjunctive, and Indo-European copula (for the history of the verb be).

Syntactic constructions

[edit]

Expressing tenses, aspects and moods

[edit]

Besides the synthetic (inflected) forms described above, there are a number of periphrastic (multi-word) constructions with verb forms that serve to express tensed, aspectual or modal meanings; these constructions are commonly described as representing certain verb tenses or aspects (in English language teaching they are often simply called tenses). For the usage of these forms, see § Use of verb forms below. More detail can be found in the article Uses of English verb forms.

Progressive

[edit]

The progressive (or continuous) aspect is expressed with a form of be together with the present participle of the verb. Thus present progressive (present continuous) constructions take forms like am writing, is writing, are writing, while the past progressive (past continuous, also called imperfect) forms are was writing, were writing. There is a progressive infinitive (to) be writing and a progressive subjunctive be writing. Other progressive forms, made with compound forms of be, are described below.

Perfect

[edit]

The perfect aspect is expressed with a form of the auxiliary have together with the past participle of the verb. Thus the present perfect is have written or has written, and the past perfect (pluperfect) is had written. The perfect can combine with the progressive aspect (see above) to produce the present perfect progressive (continuous) have/has been writing and the past perfect progressive (continuous) had been writing. There is a perfect infinitive (to) have written and a perfect progressive infinitive (to) have been writing, and corresponding present participle/gerund forms having written and having been writing. A perfect subjunctive (have written) is also sometimes used. Future and conditional perfect forms are given below.

Future and conditional

[edit]

What is often called the future tense of English is formed using the auxiliary will. The simple future is will write, the future progressive (continuous) is will be writing, the future perfect is will have written, and the future perfect progressive (continuous) is will have been writing. Traditionally (though now usually in formal English only) shall is used rather than will in the first person singular and plural; see shall and will.

The conditional, or "future-in-the-past", forms are made analogously to these future forms, using would (and should) in place of will (and shall).

Imperative

[edit]

In the second person, the imperative mood is normally expressed with the base form of the verb but without a subject: Take this outside! Be good! It is possible to add the second person pronoun you for emphasis: You be good! The first person plural is normally expressed with the contraction let's (let us) and the base form.

More details can be found in the article imperative mood.

Expressing passive voice

[edit]

The passive voice in English is normally expressed with a form of the copula verb be (or sometimes get) together with the past participle of the main verb. In this context be is not a stative verb, so it may occur in progressive forms. Examples:

  • The house was built last year.
  • The house is being built at the moment.
  • The house will be built by our firm. (a prepositional phrase with by expresses the performer of the action)
  • I was given a blueprint. (here the subject of the passive corresponds to the indirect object of the active)
  • He was said to know the house's dimensions. (special construction related to indirect speech)

For details, see English passive voice.

Questions, negation, inversion and emphasis

[edit]

Questions are formed by subject–auxiliary inversion (unless the interrogative word is part of the subject). If there is otherwise no auxiliary, the verb do (does, did) is used as an auxiliary, enabling the inversion. This also applies to negation: the negating word not must follow an auxiliary, so do is used if there is no other auxiliary.

Inversion is also required in certain other types of sentences, mainly after negative adverbial phrases; here too do is used if there is no other auxiliary.

The construction with do as auxiliary is also used to enable emphasis to be added to a sentence.

For details of the above constructions, see do-support.

Use of verb forms

[edit]

This section describes how the verb forms introduced in the preceding sections are used. More detail can be found in the article Uses of English verb forms and in the articles on the individual tenses and aspects.

Finite forms

[edit]

In referring to an action taking place regularly (and not limited to the future or to the past), the simple present is used: He brushes his teeth every morning. For an action taking place at the present time, the present progressive construction is used: He is brushing his teeth now. With some verbs expressing a present state, particularly the copula be and verbs expressing a mental state, the present simple is generally used: They are here; I know that. However other state verbs use the present progressive or present simple depending on whether the state is considered temporary or permanent: The pen is lying on the table; Paris lies on the Seine.

For past actions or states, the simple past is generally used: He went out an hour ago; Columbus knew the shape of the world. However, for completed actions for which no past time frame is implied or expressed, the present perfect is normally used: I have made the dinner (i.e. the dinner is now ready). For an action in the course of taking place, or a temporary state existing, at the past time being referred to (compare uses of the present progressive above), the past progressive is used: We were sitting on the beach when... For an action that was completed before the past time being referred to, the past perfect is used: We had sat down on the blanket when...

For actions or events expected to take place in the future, the construction with will can be used: The president will arrive tomorrow. Future events are also often expressed using the be going to construction: She is going to arrive tomorrow. Planned events can also be referred to using the present progressive (She is arriving tomorrow) or, if precisely scheduled, the simple present (She arrives tomorrow). The future progressive and future perfect can be used analogously to the past equivalents: We will be sitting on the beach this afternoon; We will have left the house by 4 o'clock. However, in subordinate clauses expressing a condition or a time reference, present forms are used rather than the forms with will: If/When you get (not will get) there...

When expressing actions or events lasting up to a specified time, the appropriate perfect construction is used (with the progressive if expressing a temporary state that would generally be expressed with a progressive form): We have been having some problems lately; I have lived here for six years; We had been working since the previous evening; We will have been working for twelve hours by the time you arrive.

The use of tense and aspectual forms in condition and conditional clauses follows special patterns; see conditional mood. For use of tenses in indirect speech, see sequence of tenses. For the use of subjunctive forms, see English subjunctive.

Non-finite forms

[edit]

The bare infinitive, identical to the base form of the verb, is used as a complement of most modal verbs and certain other verbs (I can write; They made him write; I saw you write), including in negated and inverted sentences formed using do-support (He doesn't write; Did you write?).

Preceded by to, it forms the to-infinitive, which has a variety of uses, including as a noun phrase (To write is to learn) and as the complement of many verbs (I want to write), as well as with certain adjectives and nouns (easy to ride; his decision to leave), and in expressions of purpose (You did it to spite me).

The past participle has the following uses:

  • It is used with the auxiliary have in perfect constructions: They have written; We had written before we heard the news. (With verbs of motion, an archaic form with be may be found in older texts: he is come.)
  • It is used as a passive participle, with be or get, to form the passive voice: This book was written last year; Trees sometimes get gnawed down by beavers.
  • It is used to form passive participial phrases, which can be used adjectivally or adverbially (a letter written on his computer; Beaten to a pulp, he was carried away) and as complements of certain verbs (I got my car mended; They had me placed on a list).
  • It may be used as a simple adjective: as a passive participle in the case of transitive verbs (the written word, i.e. "the word that is written"), and as a perfect active participle in the case of some intransitive ones (a fallen tree, i.e. "a tree that has fallen").

The present participle has the following uses:

  • It is used with forms of be, in progressive (continuous) constructions: He is writing another book; I intend to be sitting on the beach.
  • It can form participial phrases, which can be used adjectivally or adverbially: The man sitting over there is drunk; Being a lawyer, I can understand this; I saw her sitting by the tree.
  • It can serve as a simple adjective: It is a thrilling book.

The same form used as a gerund has the following uses:

  • It forms verbal phrases that are then used as nouns: Lying in bed is my favorite hobby.
  • It forms similar phrases used as a complement of certain verbs: He tried writing novels.

The logical subject of a phrase formed with a gerund can be expressed by a possessive, as in I do not like your/Jim's drinking wine, although a non-possessive noun or pronoun is often used instead, especially in informal English: I do not like you/Jim drinking wine. The latter usage, though common, is sometimes considered ungrammatical or stylistically poor; it is given names like fused participle[10] and geriple[11] since it is seen to confuse a participle with a gerund. For more information see fused participle.

Gerund forms are often used as plain verbal nouns, which function grammatically like common nouns (in particular, by being qualified by adjectives rather than adverbs): He did some excellent writing (compare the gerund: He is known for writing excellently). Such verbal nouns can function, for instance, as noun adjuncts, as in a writing desk.

Objects and complements

[edit]

Verbs are used in certain patterns which require the presence of specific arguments in the form of objects and other complements of particular types. (A given verb may be usable in one or more of these patterns.)

A verb with a direct object is called a transitive verb. Some transitive verbs have an indirect object in addition to the direct object. Verbs used without objects are called intransitive. Both transitive and intransitive verbs may also have additional complements that are not considered objects.

A single (direct) object generally follows the verb: I love you. If there is an indirect object, it precedes the direct object (I gave him the book), although an indirect object can also be expressed with a prepositional phrase following the direct object (and this method is usual when the direct object is a personal pronoun): I gave the book to John; I bought them for you.

Other complements may include prepositional phrases, non-finite clauses and content clauses, depending on the applicable verb pattern. These complements normally follow any objects. For example:

  • I insist on coming. (this use of the verb insist involves a prepositional phrase with on)
  • I expect to arrive tomorrow. (this use of expect involves a to-infinitive phrase)
  • I asked him whether he was coming. (this use of ask involves a direct object (him) and an interrogative content clause)

More examples can be found at Verb patterns with the gerund.

English has a number of ergative verbs: verbs which can be used either intransitively or transitively, where in the intransitive use it is the subject that is receiving the action, and in the transitive use the direct object is receiving the action while the subject is causing it. An example is sink: The ship sank (intransitive use); The explosion sank the ship (transitive use). Other common examples include open, sink, wake, melt, boil, collapse, explode, freeze, start, sell.

For more details on how verbs are built up into clauses, see English clause syntax.

Phrasal verbs

[edit]

Many English verbs are used in particular combinations with adverbial modifiers such as on, away, out, etc. Often these combinations take on independent meanings. They are referred to as phrasal verbs. (This term may also include verbs used with a complement introduced by a particular preposition that gives it a special meaning, as in take to (someone).)

The adverbial particle in a phrasal verb generally appears close after the verb, though it may follow the object, particularly when the object is a pronoun: Hand over the money or Hand the money over, but Hand it over.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
In English grammar, verbs constitute one of the principal parts of speech, primarily functioning to express actions, states, processes, or occurrences that relate to the subject of a sentence, while also serving to connect with additional information about them. They form the core of predicate structures in clauses and sentences, inflecting to indicate grammatical categories such as , and voice, though English exhibits relatively limited morphological compared to many other languages, with only a few obligatory affixes like the third-person singular present marker "-s" and the regular suffix "-ed." English verbs are broadly classified into finite and non-finite forms, where finite verbs conjugate to show , number, and tense, thereby agreeing with the subject—primarily in the tense through the "-s" ending for third-person singular subjects—while non-finite forms such as infinitives ("to walk"), gerunds ("walking" functioning as nouns), and ("walked" as adjectives) remain invariant and do not specify these categories. Functionally, verbs include main verbs that carry the primary lexical meaning (e.g., "run"), auxiliary verbs that support main verbs by adding grammatical nuance (e.g., "have" in perfect tenses), linking verbs that connect subjects to complements (e.g., "seem"), and modal verbs that express modality like possibility or (e.g., "might"). Regular verbs follow predictable patterns in forming and forms by adding "-ed" or variants, whereas irregular verbs—numbering around 200 common ones—undergo stem changes, vowel alternations, or suppletion (e.g., "go/went/gone"), preserving remnants of older Indo-European morphology. The English verb system encompasses twelve primary tenses formed through combinations of time (past, present, future) and aspect (simple, perfect, progressive, perfect progressive), enabling precise temporal and durational distinctions; for instance, the simple present denotes habitual actions ("They walk daily"), the present perfect indicates completion with present relevance ("They have walked far"), and the future perfect projects completion before a future point ("They will have walked by noon"). Additionally, verbs inflect for mood, including the indicative for statements of fact, the imperative for commands ("Walk!"), and the subjunctive for hypotheticals or wishes ("If I were king"), as well as for voice, contrasting active constructions ("The dog chased the cat") with passive ones ("The cat was chased by the dog") to shift focus on the agent or recipient. These features underscore the versatility of English verbs in conveying nuanced meanings, though their analytic nature relies heavily on auxiliary verbs and adverbs rather than rich inflectional paradigms.

Introduction and Classification

Definition and Role in Sentences

In , verbs are a major word class consisting of words that primarily denote actions, processes, events, states of being, or occurrences, serving as the core of predicate expressions in clauses. They express what the subject does, experiences, or is, distinguishing them from nouns, which typically name entities or concepts, and adjectives, which describe qualities or attributes without indicating tense or action. For instance, in the sentence "She runs," the verb "runs" conveys an action performed by the subject, while in "It is cold," the verb "is" links the subject to a state. The primary syntactic role of verbs is to form the predicate of a , which complements the subject to create a complete predication and convey essential information about time, manner, or condition through their inflectional properties. Unlike other parts of speech, verbs uniquely inflect to mark tense, enabling them to situate events in past, present, or future contexts. In declarative sentences, this predicate function is evident in structures like "The dog barks," where "barks" predicates an action of the subject, or "The book seems interesting," where "seems" predicates a state. Verbs also exhibit subject-verb agreement, requiring the verb form to match the subject's person and number, particularly in the , to ensure grammatical harmony within the . This agreement underscores the verb's relational role to the subject, as seen in singular "He walks" versus plural "They walk," preventing mismatches that would render sentences ungrammatical. Through these functions, verbs provide the dynamic backbone of English sentences, linking subjects to actions or states without which clauses cannot fully express meaning.

Types of Verbs

English verbs are classified into several syntactic types based on their valency, or the number and type of arguments they require or allow. Transitive verbs require a direct object to complete their meaning, as in "She reads ," where "book" is the direct object receiving the action. Intransitive verbs, by contrast, do not take a direct object and stand alone with the subject, such as "She sleeps" or "The baby cries." Ditransitive verbs take both a direct object and an indirect object, often indicating transfer or benefit, as in "She gave him ," where "gift" is the direct object and "him" the indirect object. Linking or copular verbs connect the subject to a complement that describes or identifies it, typically using "be" or similar verbs like "seem" or "become," as in "She is ," where "teacher" renames the subject. Beyond syntactic categories, verbs are also grouped semantically into stative and dynamic classes, reflecting whether they denote states or actions. Stative verbs express ongoing conditions or relations without implying change or effort, such as "know" in "I know the answer," which describes a persistent . Dynamic verbs, often called action verbs, indicate activities or events involving change and energy expenditure, like "run" in "I run every morning," which portrays a process that requires ongoing input. This distinction affects grammatical behaviors, such as the incompatibility of stative verbs with progressive aspect in . A notable subclass involves ergative verbs, which alternate between transitive and intransitive uses without form change, where the transitive object becomes the intransitive subject. For instance, "break" appears transitively as "She broke the " (with an agent causing the action) and intransitively as "The broke" (focusing on the entity's change of state). These verbs typically involve causation and result in a new state, distinguishing them from strictly transitive or intransitive patterns. The classification of English verbs by transitivity and related properties traces back to , where verbs were distinguished by their governance of accusative or other case-marked objects, a system that simplified in with the decline of inflectional cases and the rise of prepositional phrases.

Inflectional Morphology

Principal Parts and Regular Patterns

In , the principal parts of a consist of four fundamental forms: the base form (also known as the without "to"), the , the past , and the present . These parts provide the building blocks for deriving all inflected forms used in tenses, aspects, and voices. For regular verbs, which constitute the majority of English verbs, the and past share the same form, created by appending -ed to the base, while the present participle is formed by appending -ing. The standard pattern for regular verbs is exemplified by "walk," yielding the principal parts walk (base), walked (past), walked (past participle), and walking (present participle). This predictable inflection applies to most verbs, allowing speakers to form past and perfect constructions consistently, such as "I walked" or "I have walked," and progressive forms like "I am walking." Spelling variations occur to maintain phonetic clarity and orthographic consistency when adding these suffixes. For verbs ending in a , the -e is dropped before -ed or -ing (e.g., hope → hoped, hoping; dance → danced, dancing). Verbs ending in a plus -y change the -y to -i before -ed (e.g., study → studied), but retain the -y before -ing (e.g., studying). Monosyllabic verbs (or those with stress on the final ) ending in a single preceded by a single double the before both suffixes (e.g., stop → stopped, stopping; plan → planned, planning). Exceptions to doubling apply to verbs ending in -w, -x, or -y (e.g., row → rowed, ; fix → fixed, fixing). Phonologically, the -ed in regular verbs has three distinct realizations based on the final the base form. It is pronounced as /t/ after voiceless (e.g., walked /wɔːkt/, kissed /kɪst/), as /d/ after voiced or vowels (e.g., played /pleɪd/, buzzed /bʌzd/), and as /ɪd/ (with an extra ) after alveolar stops /t/ or /d/ (e.g., wanted /ˈwɒntɪd/, needed /ˈniːdɪd/). These rules ensure natural articulation without altering word stress.

Base Form and Infinitive

The base form of an English is its unmarked, uninflected form, typically the one listed as the headword, serving as the foundation for all other morphological derivations. For instance, the base forms "go" and "be" represent the core lexical entries from which inflections like "goes" or "went" are built. This form is neutral with respect to tense, number, and person, making it essential for non-finite constructions. The , derived directly from the base form, appears in two primary constructions: the bare , which lacks a particle and follows modal or auxiliary verbs (e.g., "can go" or "must be"), and the full , marked by the particle "to" preceding the base form (e.g., "to go" or "to be"). The bare is obligatory after modals like "can," "will," or "do" in questions and negations, as in "She can swim," where "swim" functions without additional marking. In contrast, the full with "to" is used in a wider array of syntactic environments, independent of modals. These distinctions arose in , with the bare form retaining properties from earlier Germanic structures. Infinitive constructions serve multiple grammatical functions, acting as subjects (e.g., "To err is human"), direct objects (e.g., "I want to leave"), or adverbials modifying verbs (e.g., "She came "). As subjects, infinitives often introduce abstract or hypothetical actions, while as objects, they complement verbs of , desire, or causation, such as "see" or "want." Adverbial infinitives express purpose or result, providing context for the main clause's action. These roles highlight the infinitive's versatility in non-finite clauses, allowing verbs to embed propositions without finite tense marking. Historically, the marker "to" evolved from , where the infinitive was typically formed with the dative "-an" (e.g., "gān" for 'to go'), but by Late Old English, "to" began to replace this as a preposed particle, a shift influenced by with prepositional phrases and completed in . This transition marked a move from a fusional to a more analytic structure in English verb morphology.

Present Tense Forms

In the present tense, English verbs exhibit limited primarily to mark and number agreement with the subject. For first-person singular (I), second-person singular and plural (you), and all plural forms (we, they), the verb takes its base form without additional suffixes; for example, "I walk," "you walk," "we walk," and "they walk." This uniformity across non-third-person subjects simplifies the paradigm and reflects the loss of distinct plural inflections in . The third-person singular (he, she, it), however, requires an inflectional ending of -s or -es added to the base form, as in "he walks" or "she watches." This marking is obligatory in declarative sentences and serves to distinguish singular from plural subjects in the . The choice between -s and -es depends on the verb's ending: -es is added to stems concluding in -o, -ch, -sh, -ss, -x, or -z to avoid awkward clusters, such as "go" becoming "goes." The pronunciation of the third-person singular ending varies phonologically based on the preceding sound, following rules of English . It is realized as /s/ after voiceless consonants (e.g., "walks" /wɔːks/), as /z/ after voiced consonants or vowels (e.g., "runs" /rʌnz/), and as /ɪz/ after to preserve syllable structure (e.g., "watches" /ˈwɒtʃɪz/). These allomorphs ensure ease of articulation and are consistent across regular verbs. An archaic second-person singular form, now obsolete in standard modern English, used the pronoun "thou" with verbs ending in -est or -st, as in "thou walkest." This inflection, derived from Old English, marked informal or intimate address but fell into disuse by the 18th century due to the generalization of "you" as the universal second-person pronoun, driven by social leveling and avoidance of perceived rudeness in singular usage. Additionally, the present tense system includes the present participle, formed by adding -ing to the verb stem (e.g., "walking" from "walk"), which indicates ongoing action but remains non-finite and untensed on its own. Spelling adjustments apply for stems ending in -e (drop the e before -ing, as in "write" to "writing") or single vowels before consonants (double the consonant, as in "run" to "running") to maintain phonetic regularity. This form underpins progressive aspects, though its primary role here is morphological. The simple present tense, built from these inflections, commonly expresses habitual actions.

Past Tense and Participles

In English, the past tense of regular verbs, also known as weak verbs, is formed by adding the -ed (or -d after vowels) to the base form of the verb, as in "walk" becoming "walked" or "love" becoming "loved". This pattern contrasts with strong verbs, which historically form the through vowel alternation in the stem, though most contemporary English verbs follow the weak pattern. The past participle of regular verbs is identical to the past tense form, created by the same -ed , and serves primarily in perfect constructions with like "have," as in "She has walked to the store". The present participle, denoting ongoing or continuous actions, is formed by adding -ing to the verb base, resulting in forms like "walking" or "loving". adjustments apply in specific cases: verbs ending in a drop the -e before -ing (e.g., "take" to "taking"); those ending in a after a single double the (e.g., "run" to "running"); and verbs ending in -ie change to -y before -ing (e.g., "die" to "dying")./02:_Book_2/2.02:_Review_Exercises/2.2.09:Spelling_Rules_for_Verbs_in_the_Present_and_Past_Tenses(and_Nouns)) Certain irregular verbs exhibit suppletive forms, where the and derive from entirely different roots, as seen in "go" (base), "went" (past), and "gone" (past ). This phenomenon, rooted in historical mergers of verbs, also appears in verbs like "be" (was/were/been). Such suppletive patterns are exceptions to regular and are limited to a small set of high-frequency verbs.

Irregular and Defective Verbs

English irregular verbs deviate from the standard pattern of forming the past tense and past participle by adding -ed to the base form, instead employing vowel alternations, unique endings, or entirely different stems. These irregularities trace back to Old English, where strong verbs underwent ablaut—a system of vowel gradation in the stem to indicate tense—while weak verbs used dental suffixes like -de or -te. Approximately 200 irregular verbs exist in modern English, though only about 50-100 are commonly used in everyday speech. Strong irregular verbs, the most numerous category, feature internal changes without added endings, as in sing (base), sang (), sung ( participle). Mixed verbs combine alternation with a dental , exemplified by have (base), had ( and participle). Suppletive verbs draw from multiple etymological roots for different forms, such as be (base), was/were (), been ( participle), or go (base), went (), gone ( participle). Some irregular verbs serve as auxiliaries, contributing to tense and aspect formation, but their paradigms remain incomplete in non-auxiliary uses. Defective verbs exhibit incomplete inflectional paradigms, lacking certain tenses, moods, or non-finite forms like infinitives and participles. Modal auxiliaries such as can, could, may, might, must, ought to, shall, should, will, and would are prototypically defective, appearing only in present or past tenses without third-person -s endings, infinitives (to can), or participles (canning). Non-modal defectives include , restricted to imperative and infinitive uses (e.g., ; I must beware), with no tensed forms or participles, and begone, limited to imperatives (e.g., Begone!). Ought functions only in present and past contexts with identical forms, lacking infinitives or participles. Regional variations affect some irregular forms, particularly in versus . For instance, the of dive is dove in , where it is twice as common as dived, while dived predominates in . The past participle remains dived in both varieties. Such differences arise from analogical extensions, with dove influenced by patterns like drive-drove. The following table lists 50 high-frequency irregular verbs based on corpus analyses of common usage, showing their principal parts: base form, , and (noting American variants where applicable).
Base FormPast Participle
bewas/werebeen
becomebecamebecome
beginbeganbegun
bringbroughtbrought
buyboughtbought
choosechosechosen
comecamecome
dodiddone
drinkdrankdrunk
drivedrovedriven
eatateeaten
fallfellfallen
feelfeltfelt
findfoundfound
flyflewflown
forgetforgotforgotten
getgotgot (gotten in )
givegavegiven
gowentgone
havehadhad
hearheardheard
keepkeptkept
knowknewknown
leaveleftleft
lendlentlent
letletlet
loselostlost
makemademade
meetmetmet
paypaidpaid
putputput
readread (/red/)read (/red/)
runranrun
saysaidsaid
seesawseen
sellsoldsold
sendsentsent
singsangsung
sitsatsat
sleepsleptslept
speakspokespoken
standstoodstood
swimswamswum
taketooktaken
teachtaughttaught
telltoldtold
thinkthoughtthought
understandunderstoodunderstood
wearworeworn
writewrotewritten

Auxiliary and Modal Systems

Auxiliary Verbs

Auxiliary verbs in English are a small class of verbs that combine with main verbs to form complex constructions expressing tense, aspect, voice, and other grammatical categories. The primary auxiliaries—be, have, and do—originate as full lexical verbs but have grammaticalized to serve supportive roles without contributing significant independent meaning. Unlike modal auxiliaries, which primarily convey modality and are covered separately, the primary auxiliaries enable structural formations essential to English . The auxiliary be functions to form progressive aspect (indicating ongoing action) and passive voice (indicating the subject receives the action). In progressive constructions, be precedes the present participle of the main verb, as in "She is reading." For passive, be precedes the past participle, as in "The book was written by her." Be exhibits the most irregular paradigm among English verbs, with distinct forms for person, number, and tense: present tense includes am (first person singular), is (third person singular), and are (other persons); past tense includes was (first/third singular) and were (other persons); the past participle is been, and the present participle is being. Historically, be derives from Old English bēon and wesan, which fused into the modern suppletive paradigm by Middle English; its progressive use emerged in the 13th century from earlier periphrastic constructions involving be + verbal noun in -ing, becoming standardized in Early Modern English. The passive role traces back to Old English, where weorðan competed with bēon before the latter dominated. The auxiliary have forms perfect constructions, indicating completion or relevance to the present, by preceding the past of the main , as in "They have finished." It inflects for tense and : present forms are have (plural and first/second singular) and has (third singular); past is had for all; the past participle is had. This use evolved from habban in possessive constructions like habban + object + past participle, where the participle functioned adjectivally to denote possession of a completed state, gradually reanalyzed as a verbal auxiliary by Late . In , including English, this shift parallels the development of have-perfects, distinguishing them from be-perfects used for intransitives in earlier stages. The auxiliary do, known as "do-support," appears in questions, negations, and emphatic affirmatives when no other auxiliary is present, as in "Do you understand?" or "I do not agree." Its forms include present do (plural and first/second singular), does (third singular), past did for all, past participle done, and present participle doing. This periphrastic use arose in , initially as a habitual aspect marker derived from reinterpretations of causative do constructions or bare object nominalizations as infinitivals, spreading to questions and negatives by the despite prescriptive resistance. By , do-support became obligatory in standard varieties for these functions, marking a key innovation in English verbal syntax. Collectively, be, have, and do illustrate the grammaticalization path from full verbs to , losing semantic content while gaining syntactic privileges like inversion and contraction, a process common in but uniquely patterned in English. Modal verbs, also known as modal auxiliaries, are a distinct class of auxiliary verbs in English that primarily express modality, including notions of possibility, necessity, permission, and , without carrying primary tense or aspect marking themselves. The core modal verbs consist of nine forms: can, could, may, might, shall, should, will, would, and must. These verbs function by preceding a main in its base form, as in "She can swim," where can indicates . Unlike full verbs, modals are defective, lacking non-finite forms such as infinitives or participles; for instance, "to can" or "" are ungrammatical, requiring periphrastic alternatives like "to be able to." They also do not inflect for third-person singular with -s, so "He can" is correct, not "He cans." Additionally, modals participate in subject-auxiliary inversion for questions without *, as in "Can you help?" rather than "Do you can help?" The meanings of core modals fall into three primary categories: epistemic, deontic, and dynamic modality. Epistemic modality concerns the speaker's assessment of the proposition's truth or likelihood, such as possibility (may, might, could) or necessity (must), exemplified by "It may rain tomorrow" (possible) or "She must be home by now" (inferred certainty). Deontic modality involves obligations, permissions, or directives imposed by rules or authority, with may and can for permission ("You may leave") and must, shall, and should for obligation ("You must obey" or "You should apologize"). Dynamic modality pertains to the subject's inherent abilities, volitions, or circumstances, primarily expressed by can and could for ability ("He can drive") and will and would for willingness or habit ("She will help"). These categories are not mutually exclusive; for example, can can convey dynamic ability, epistemic possibility, or deontic permission depending on context. Pairs like can/could, may/might, shall/should, and will/would often represent present/past or root/non-root distinctions, though must lacks a past counterpart and uses periphrases like "had to." In addition to core modals, English employs semi-modals, which exhibit hybrid properties blending modal and full-verb behaviors. Ought to functions as a semi-modal expressing deontic obligation or advice, similar to should, as in "You ought to call her," but unlike core modals, it requires "to" before the infinitive and can inflect in certain contexts. Used to indicates past habits or states, as in "I used to live there," and shares modal-like defectiveness by not forming questions with do-support ("Did you use to...?"), though it takes "to" and has a distinct past sense absent in core modals. Other semi-modals like dare and need can alternate between modal and full-verb forms (e.g., "Dare he go?" vs. "He dares to go"), highlighting their intermediate status. Modals and semi-modals may combine with the perfect infinitive to express modal interpretations of past situations, such as "must have gone."

Copular Verbs

Copular verbs, also known as linking verbs, serve to connect the subject of a to a predicate that describes or identifies it, typically without expressing an action. In English, these verbs predicate a quality, identity, or location of the subject, forming copular clauses where the predicate is often a non-verbal element such as an (AP), (NP), or prepositional phrase (PP). The primary copular verb in English is be, which appears in various inflected forms to link the subject to its complement. For instance, in "She is happy," be equates the subject "She" with the adjectival complement "happy," ascribing a property to it. Similarly, nominal complements identify the subject, as in "Emily is a carpenter," and locative complements specify position, as in "The keys are in the room." The copular use of be differs from its auxiliary role in forming tenses or passives, though both share certain syntactic behaviors like allowing and inversion. Beyond be, English employs a range of other copular verbs that convey states of existence, sensory perceptions, or changes of state. Verbs of appearance and seeming, such as seem and appear, link subjects to complements expressing likelihood or , as in "It seems likely" or "They appear confident." Change-of-state copulas like become and get indicate transitions, exemplified by "He became a doctor" (nominal complement) or "The got colder" (adjectival complement). Sensory copulas, including feel, look, sound, smell, and taste, connect subjects to perceptual qualities, such as "The soup tastes delicious" or "She feels tired," often restricted to adjectival or nominal complements. These copular verbs exhibit specific restrictions, particularly with aspectual forms. Stative copulas like be and seem are incompatible with aspect when expressing inherent states, rendering sentences such as "*She is being happy" or "*It is seeming likely" ungrammatical in . In contrast, dynamic or change-of-state uses may permit progressives, as in "They are being silly" for temporary behavior, but sensory and pure stative copulas generally resist this construction to maintain their non-agentive semantics. Idiomatic extensions of these verbs can occur, such as feel in "I feel like a doctor," blending sensory and identificational senses.

Tense, Aspect, and Mood Constructions

Tense Formation

English verb tenses are formed through a combination of morphological inflections and periphrastic constructions involving auxiliary verbs, distinguishing between simple and compound forms. The language morphologically marks only two primary tenses—present and past—while future time reference relies on modal auxiliaries or semi-auxiliaries rather than dedicated inflections. This system establishes a deictic framework relative to the time of (absolute tense) and allows for relational specifications to other points (relative tense). Simple tenses are constructed directly from the verb's . The simple present tense uses the base form for most subjects, with a third-person singular adding -s (or -es after ), as in she walks to indicate habitual or general actions occurring at or around the present moment. The simple past tense employs the form, typically -ed for regular verbs (walked), though irregular verbs vary (went, saw). These absolute tenses locate the situation relative to the time: present for simultaneity or non-past reference, and past for anteriority. English lacks a morphological , instead expressing future time through the modal auxiliary will (or, less commonly in modern usage, shall) followed by the base form (will walk), or the periphrastic construction be going to plus the base form (is going to walk), which conveys intention or imminent futurity. Compound tenses incorporate auxiliary have to form perfect constructions, which add a layer of relative tense by indicating anteriority to the primary tense time. The present perfect combines the present tense of have (has for third-person singular) with the past participle (has walked), situating the event as completed before the present but relevant to it. The past perfect uses the past tense of have (had) plus the past participle (had walked), marking completion prior to a past reference point. Future perfect time is expressed periphrastically as will have followed by the past participle (will have walked), denoting anteriority to a future moment. These relative tenses thus embed the event within a temporal sequence anchored to another time, rather than solely to the utterance. The distinction between absolute and relative tenses can be visualized on a timeline where the utterance time (t0) serves as the deictic center. Absolute tenses position events directly against t0: simple present at or after t0, simple past before t0, and future constructions projecting beyond t0. Relative tenses, such as the perfects, shift the reference to a secondary point (t1), placing the event before t1 (anteriority), as in the past perfect where t1 is in the past relative to t0. This two-dimensional system—primary for absolute location and secondary for relational ordering—underpins English temporal expression, with aspectual modifications like ongoing or completed states addressed separately._analysis_of_tense)
Tense TypeFormationExampleTemporal Relation
Simple Present (Absolute)Base form (+ -s for 3sg)walksAt/around utterance time (t0)
(Absolute)Past form (-ed or irregular)walkedBefore t0
Simple Future (Periphrastic)will/shall + base; be going to + basewill walkAfter t0
(Relative)have/has + past participlehas walkedBefore present (t0) but connected to it
Past Perfect (Relative)had + past participlehad walkedBefore past reference (t1 < t0)
Future Perfect (Relative)will have + past participlewill have walkedBefore future reference (t1 > t0)

Aspectual Constructions

In , aspectual constructions articulate the internal temporal constituency of events, distinguishing how actions or states are viewed in terms of completion, duration, or repetition, independent of their placement on the time axis provided by tense. These constructions primarily rely on auxiliary verbs to modify the main , allowing speakers to convey nuances such as ongoing activity or resultant states. Unlike tense, which locates events relative to the present moment, aspect focuses on the event's internal dynamics, such as whether it is presented holistically or in process. The simple aspect, the unmarked form of the verb, typically portrays events as unbounded or unitary wholes without explicit focus on their internal progression or boundaries. It is used for complete actions in the past or general truths and habits in the present, as in "She ate the apple," where the eating is viewed as a single, self-contained occurrence rather than divided into phases. This construction contrasts with more explicit aspects by not emphasizing duration or incompletion, often aligning with perfective interpretations in narrative contexts. The (or continuous) aspect highlights the ongoing or temporary nature of an action, formed by the auxiliary "be" followed by the present participle (-ing form) of the main . For instance, "She was eating the apple" depicts the action as in progress at the reference time, often implying limited duration or backgrounding in relation to other events. This construction is versatile across tenses, such as the present progressive "She is eating" for current activities or the future "She will be eating" for planned ongoing events. The perfect aspect signals the completion of an action prior to the reference time, with ongoing relevance to that time, constructed using the auxiliary "have" (or "has" or "had" depending on tense) plus the past participle of the main . In "She has eaten the apple," the focus lies on the resultant state or the action's anteriority to the present, rather than its internal stages. This aspect frequently conveys experiences up to now or changes over time, as in "She has lived here for years." The perfect progressive aspect merges elements of both progressive and perfect, using "have been" + -ing to indicate an action that began in the past, continued for a duration, and remains relevant, exemplified by "She has been eating apples all morning," emphasizing both process and completion. Aspectual constructions interact dynamically with tense markers to form complex expressions, such as the future perfect "She will have eaten the apple," which projects completion before a future reference point, underscoring anteriority in prospective scenarios. These combinations enable precise temporal layering, though their interpretation can vary by context and verb semantics.

Mood Expressions

In English grammar, the indicative mood is the default form used to express factual statements, questions, or assertions about real or perceived events. It conveys information that the speaker believes to be true, employing various tenses and voices without alteration for attitude. For instance, "She goes to the market every day" illustrates a straightforward declaration of habitual action. The subjunctive mood, by contrast, indicates hypothetical situations, wishes, suggestions, or conditions contrary to fact, often signaling unreality or non-factual attitudes. In the present subjunctive, the base form of the verb is used regardless of the subject, as in "It is essential that she be present," while the past subjunctive typically employs "were" for all persons, such as "If I were rich, I would travel." This mood appears in clauses following expressions like "suggest," "demand," or "wish," though it is largely confined to formal or written contexts. The expresses commands, requests, or instructions, utilizing the base form of the with the subject typically omitted, implying the second person. Examples include "Go now!" for a direct order or "Be careful" to urge caution. It is restricted to the and in standard usage, focusing on prompting immediate action. The articulates possibilities or outcomes dependent on certain conditions, often realized through modal verbs like "would" or "could" in if-clauses, such as "She would go if she had time." This construction highlights hypothetical dependencies rather than certainties. In , the has significantly declined, particularly in spoken and informal varieties, where it is frequently supplanted by indicative forms or modal constructions for simplicity. For example, "If I was you" has largely replaced "If I were you" in everyday speech, reflecting a broader trend toward analytic expressions over synthetic ones. This shift is more pronounced in than in , where the mandative subjunctive (e.g., after "suggest") shows some persistence in writing. Modal verbs, as discussed in the auxiliary systems, play a key role in compensating for this decline by conveying similar attitudinal nuances.

Voice and Syntactic Variations

Active and Passive Voice

In , voice refers to the relationship between the verb's action and its participants, particularly how the subject relates to the action expressed by the verb. The is the default construction where the subject performs the action denoted by the verb, making the sentence structure straightforward and direct. For example, in "The cat chased the mouse," the subject "the cat" is the agent carrying out the action of chasing. The , in contrast, shifts the focus by making the recipient of the action the subject, while the original agent may or may not be expressed. This construction is formed using a form of the "to be" followed by the past participle of the main , as in "The mouse was chased by the cat," where "the mouse" becomes the subject undergoing the action. The passive allows speakers and writers to emphasize the action or its effect on the patient rather than the doer, which is particularly useful in contexts requiring impersonality or when the agent is irrelevant. In passive constructions, the agent—the performer of the action—can be included using an agentive "by-phrase," such as "by the cat" in the example above, which explicitly identifies the doer. However, this by-phrase is frequently omitted when the agent is unimportant, unknown, obvious from , or overly lengthy, as in "The mouse was chased" or "All applications must be completed by Friday." Omission promotes conciseness and shifts attention to the action or result, especially in formal or scientific writing where the process itself is the focus. Not all verbs can form passives due to structural restrictions. Intransitive verbs, which do not take a direct object (e.g., "She " or "The bird flies"), cannot be passivized because there is no object to promote to subject position; attempting a passive like "*The sleep was slept by her" is ungrammatical in English. Only transitive verbs, which require a direct object, allow this transformation. A variant of the passive, known as the get-passive, uses "get" instead of "be" plus the past participle, often conveying a sense of adversity, change of state, or personal involvement, as in "The window got broken" (implying misfortune). This construction is more common in spoken and informal English than the be-passive and can include by-phrases, though it is less frequent in formal writing. Historically, the use of the in English has increased significantly, particularly in scientific and academic from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries, as it was perceived to enhance objectivity by de-emphasizing the human agent and focusing on phenomena or results. Diachronic studies confirm this trend, attributing it to evolving conventions in formal writing that prioritize over personal agency.

Progressive and Perfect Aspects in Context

The progressive aspect integrates with the to form the progressive passive construction, typically structured as a form of the "be" followed by "being" and the past participle of the main . This yields forms such as "The house was being built," which conveys that the action of building was ongoing at a specific point in the past while emphasizing the role of the subject. Such constructions are less common than simple passives but are grammatically standard in modern English, appearing in contexts requiring focus on the process rather than the agent. In parallel, the perfect aspect combines with the passive to produce the perfect passive, formed by "have" (or "had" for past perfect) plus "been" and the past participle, as in "It has been done." This structure highlights the completion of an action with to the present or a reference point, maintaining the passive orientation where the subject receives the action. The perfect passive is widely used in formal and narrative writing to denote accomplished events without specifying the doer, such as in or historical accounts. Stative verbs, which express enduring states like , possession, or (e.g., "know," "have," "see"), exhibit restrictions when used in the progressive aspect, even in passive or combined constructions. For instance, "*She is knowing the truth" is ungrammatical, whereas "She knows the truth" is acceptable, reflecting the incompatibility between the durative, non-dynamic nature of statives and the progressive's implication of temporariness or change. These restrictions persist across voices, though some verbs allow dynamic interpretations in specific contexts, such as "I'm thinking about the answer" (process) versus "I think it's correct" (state); however, true stative progressives remain infrequent and context-dependent in standard usage. The aspect finds particular contextual application in descriptions of personal experiences, where it underscores indefinite past events with ongoing relevance, often in passive or active forms combined with voice. Examples include "I have been to ," indicating a life experience without specifying time, or in passive "The city has been visited by millions," to summarize cumulative impacts. This experiential use aligns with the perfect's basic role in linking past actions to the present but gains nuance in or biographical contexts to evoke breadth of involvement.

Questions, Negation, and Emphasis

In English, verb constructions adapt for interrogative, negative, and emphatic purposes through mechanisms like subject-auxiliary inversion and do-support, which involve repositioning auxiliaries or inserting the verb do to support syntactic requirements without altering the main verb's form. These adaptations are essential for forming questions that seek confirmation or information, negating statements, emphasizing assertions, and attaching confirmatory tags, ensuring clarity and focus in communication. Yes/no questions, which elicit affirmation or denial, rely on subject-auxiliary inversion when an auxiliary verb such as be, have, or a modal is present in the declarative form; for instance, the statement "She is going" becomes "Is she going?" by placing the auxiliary before the subject. In the absence of an auxiliary, introduces do, does, or did (matching the tense) before the subject, followed by the base form of the main verb, as in "You like tea" transforming to "Do you like tea?" This ensures inversion is possible for or past tenses without auxiliaries. Wh-questions, which inquire about specific details using interrogative words like what, where, when, why, who, which, or how, begin with fronting the wh-phrase to the sentence-initial position, followed by subject-auxiliary inversion similar to yes/no questions. For example, "She went to the store" becomes "Where did she go?" with the wh-word where fronted and did inserted via for inversion. If an auxiliary is already present, it inverts directly after the wh-phrase, as in "What is happening?" from "Something is happening." This dual process of and auxiliary relocation highlights the targeted element while maintaining structure. Negation of verbs occurs by adjoining not (or its contraction n't) immediately after the auxiliary verb when one exists, such as "She is going" negated to "She is not going" or "She isn't going." Without an auxiliary, do-support again provides the necessary structure by inserting do, does, or did before not, yielding forms like "She go" or "She doesn't go," with the main verb in its base form. This system preserves tense and aspect while embedding the negative element in a position that supports contraction and prosodic ease in speech. Emphasis on verbs or related elements can be achieved through emphatic , where do, does, or did is added before the main in affirmative declaratives to intensify the assertion, often contrasting expectations or reinforcing ; for example, "I like it" becomes "I do like it," with stress on do. Another method involves cleft constructions, which split the sentence to focalize a particular constituent, typically introduced by it or what for added prominence, as in "It was the that emphasized the action" to stress the 's role. Tag questions append a brief inverted query to a statement for confirmation, mirroring the statement's auxiliary and polarity: positive statements take negative tags, and vice versa, such as "She's going, isn't she?" using the auxiliary is from the main clause in contracted negative form. For statements without auxiliaries, do-support forms the tag, like "You like coffee, don't you?" in present simple. Special cases include am tagging as "aren't I?" in negatives (e.g., "I'm late, aren't I?") and imperatives briefly referencing negation via tags like "Don't go, will you?" though full imperative details align with broader mood structures. These tags typically use the same tense as the host clause, promoting conversational engagement.

Non-Finite and Multi-Word Verbs

Finite vs. Non-Finite Forms

In , finite verbs are those that indicate tense, mood, and subject agreement, typically through limited morphological marking, enabling them to serve as the main verb in an . For instance, in the sentence "She walks to the store," the verb "walks" is finite because it is inflected in the and agrees with the third-person singular subject "she." This feature allows finite verbs to anchor the clause temporally and syntactically, often determining and licensing elements like subjects or expletives in including English. Non-finite verbs, by contrast, lack such for tense, mood, or agreement, rendering them tenseless and unable to head an on their own. They include forms such as infinitives (e.g., "to walk"), , and participles, which function primarily as modifiers, complements, or constituents within larger . For example, in "Walking is fun," the "walking" acts as the subject of the , treating the verb-like form as a nominal element without tense specification. Non-finite forms thus contribute to embedding or modification rather than asserting a complete . A key distinction within non-finite -ing forms arises between gerunds and present participles, which share identical morphology but differ in syntactic and semantic roles. However, some modern grammars, such as the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, argue that this distinction is not sustainable in contemporary English and propose treating all -ing forms as a unified "gerund-participle" category due to their overlapping properties. Gerunds function noun-like, occupying positions typical of nouns such as subjects, objects, or complements of prepositions; for example, "His annoyed the " uses "singing" as a direct object with a . Present participles, however, retain more verbal properties and serve adjectival or roles, modifying nouns or clauses; in "The cheered," "singing" describes the noun "audience" as an ongoing action. This noun-like versus verbal distinction can be tested by possessives (acceptable with gerunds but not participles) and expandability into relative clauses (possible with participles). Non-finite forms frequently appear in complement positions, where they embed events or states subordinate to the main verb, often with or predicates. In "I saw her leave the room," the bare "leave" forms a non-finite complement controlled by the object "her," depicting a perceived event without independent tense. Similarly, they function as adverbials to provide circumstantial information, as in "Running late, she skipped breakfast," where the gerund-participle "running" adverbially modifies the main , indicating reason or manner without asserting a separate . These roles highlight non-finites' versatility in compacting complex ideas within sentences.

Phrasal Verbs

Phrasal verbs in English are multi-word constructions consisting of a verb combined with one or more particles, typically adverbs or prepositions, that together form a single semantic and syntactic unit with a meaning often distinct from the sum of its parts. These formations are a hallmark of , including English, where they evolved from verb-particle constructions that functioned similarly to separable prefixes in other . Common examples include (to surrender or cease an activity) and look after (to care for someone or something). Phrasal verbs are classified based on their syntactic behavior, particularly regarding separability and transitivity. Separable phrasal verbs allow the particle to be placed either immediately after the verb or after the object, especially when the object is a ; for instance, or turn the light off, but turn it off. In contrast, inseparable phrasal verbs require the particle to remain adjacent to the verb, even with objects, as in look after him (not look him after). Transitivity further divides them: intransitive phrasal verbs take no object (e.g., break down, meaning to fail mechanically), while transitive ones do, either nonseparable (run into someone, meaning to encounter) or separable (call off a meeting). Semantically, phrasal verbs range from literal, where the meaning is transparent from the components (e.g., put on clothes, meaning to place on the body), to idiomatic, where the meaning is non-compositional and unpredictable (e.g., put on an act, meaning to pretend). They often fall into functional categories such as aspectual, which mark the completion or progression of an action (e.g., eat up the food, indicating total consumption), and resultative, which denote an outcome or resulting state (e.g., boil away the water, leaving none). Stress patterns in phrasal verbs typically involve primary stress on the particle and secondary stress on the verb, distinguishing them from prepositional phrases where the verb receives stronger emphasis (e.g., ˈturn ˈoff vs. ˈturn to the expert). This prosodic feature aids in parsing, with separable verbs showing variable stress when objects intervene (e.g., stress shifts to the noun in make the writing out). Regional variations exist, particularly between British and American English; for example, British speakers commonly use fill in a form (to complete it), while American speakers prefer fill out.

Objects, Complements, and Valency

In , valency describes the capacity of a to require or a specific number and type of syntactic arguments, such as subjects, objects, and complements, which form the core participants in a . This concept, analogous to chemical bonding, determines the obligatory elements needed to complete the verb's meaning, with valency patterns stored in the and varying by verb subclass. For instance, monovalent verbs like require only a subject, while higher-valency verbs demand additional arguments to avoid ungrammaticality. Direct objects are noun phrases that typically follow monotransitive verbs, receiving the action denoted by the verb and answering "what?" or "whom?". These verbs, such as eat or build, exhibit monovalent complementation beyond the subject, as in "She ate the apple," where "the apple" functions as the direct object essential to the clause's semantic completeness. Direct objects are unmarked in position, immediately following the verb, and are restricted to certain syntactic tests, like passivization, confirming their argument status. Indirect objects appear with ditransitive verbs, which have trivalent valency requiring a subject, a direct object, and an indirect object denoting the recipient or of the action. These indirect objects, such as me in "Give me the book," precede the direct object and indicate to whom or for whom the direct object is transferred, as seen with verbs like give, send, or tell. Alternatively, indirect objects can be realized as prepositional phrases with to (for transfer) or for (for benefit), as in "Give the book to me," allowing flexibility while preserving the verb's core argument structure. Subject complements follow copular or linking verbs like be, seem, or become, providing additional about the subject and completing its predication through or attribution. These complements, which can be noun phrases or adjectives, link the subject to a descriptive element, as in "He is ," where "" identifies or characterizes the subject without receiving action. Copular verbs thus exhibit a valency pattern that licenses this subject-oriented complement rather than an object, distinguishing them from transitive constructions. A key alternation affecting valency realization is the dative shift, where ditransitive verbs permit two syntactic variants for expressing the indirect object: the double object construction (e.g., "She gave him the book") or the prepositional dative (e.g., "She gave the book to him"). This shift is verb-sensitive, with "give-type" verbs like give or sell uniformly supporting both forms under a caused-possession meaning, while "throw-type" verbs like throw or send may restrict the double object to possession interpretations only. Factors such as information structure and constituent heaviness influence variant choice, but the alternation underscores how constrains valency options without altering the verb's fundamental argument requirements.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.