Hubbry Logo
English irregular verbsEnglish irregular verbsMain
Open search
English irregular verbs
Community hub
English irregular verbs
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
English irregular verbs
English irregular verbs
from Wikipedia

As a Germanic language, the English language has many irregular verbs, overwhelmingly of Germanic origin, except for some words such as catch, approaching 200 in normal use – and significantly more if prefixed forms are counted. In most cases, the irregularity concerns the past tense (also called preterite) or the past participle. The other inflected parts of the verb – the third person singular present indicative in -[e]s, and the present participle and gerund form in -ing – are formed regularly in most cases. There are a few exceptions: the verb be has irregular forms throughout the present tense; the verbs have, do, and say have irregular -[e]s forms; and certain defective verbs (such as the modal auxiliaries) lack most inflection.

Irregular verbs in Modern English include many of the most common verbs: the dozen most frequently used English verbs are all irregular. New verbs (including loans from other languages, and nouns employed as verbs) usually follow the regular inflection, unless they are compound formations from an existing irregular verb (such as housesit, from sit).

Irregular verbs typically followed more regular patterns at a previous stage in the history of English. In particular, many such verbs derive from Germanic strong verbs, which make many of their inflected forms through vowel gradation, as can be observed in Modern English patterns such as sing–sang–sung. The regular verbs, on the other hand, with their preterites and past participles ending in -ed, follow the weak conjugation, which originally involved adding a dental consonant (-t or -d). Nonetheless, there are also many irregular verbs that follow or partially follow the weak conjugation.[1]

For information on the conjugation of regular verbs in English, as well as other points concerning verb usage, see English verbs.

Development

[edit]

Most English irregular verbs are native, derived from verbs that existed in Old English. Nearly all verbs that have been borrowed into the language at a later stage have defaulted to the regular conjugation. There are a few exceptions, however, such as the verb catch (derived from Old Northern French cachier), whose irregular forms originated by way of analogy with native verbs such as teach.

Most irregular verbs exist as remnants of historical conjugation systems. When some grammatical rule became changed or disused, some verbs kept to the old pattern. For example, before the Great Vowel Shift, the verb keep (then pronounced /keːp/, slightly like "cap", or "cape" without the /j/ glide) belonged to a group of verbs whose vowel was shortened in the past tense; this pattern is preserved in the modern past tense kept (similarly crept, wept, leapt, left). Verbs such as peep, which have similar form but arose after the Vowel Shift, take the regular -ed ending.

The force of analogy tends to reduce the number of irregular verbs over time, as irregular verbs switch to regular conjugation patterns (for instance, the verb chide once had the irregular past tense chid, but this has given way to the regular formation chided). This is more likely to occur with less common verbs (where the irregular forms are less familiar); hence it is often the more common verbs (such as be, have, take) that tend to remain irregular. Many irregular verbs today have coexisting irregular and regular forms (as with spelt and spelled, dreamt and dreamed, etc.).

In a few cases, however, analogy has operated in the other direction (a verb's irregular forms arose by analogy with existing irregular verbs). This is the case with the example of catch given above; others include wear and string, which were originally weak verbs, but came to be conjugated like the similar-sounding strong verbs bear and swing.

In American English, the regular forms of verbs account for more than 90% of instances, whereas British English has a regular form frequency of 69% according to a 1991 study.[2]

The verb forms described in this article are chiefly those that are accepted in standard English; many regional dialects have different irregular forms, such as sneaksnuck and dive-dove, common in the United States, as opposed to standard sneaked and dived respectively. In particular, it is fairly common in some types of non-standard speech to use (standard) past tenses as past participles, and vice versa; e.g. "have went" instead of "have gone" in Southern American English.

Groups

[edit]

The irregular verbs of Modern English form several groups with similar conjugation pattern and historical origin. These can be broadly grouped into two classes – the Germanic weak and strong groups – although historically some verbs have moved between these groups. There are also a few anomalous cases: the verbs be and go, which demonstrate suppletion; the verb do; and the defective modal verbs.

Strong verbs

[edit]

Many irregular verbs derive from Germanic strong verbs, which display the vowel shift called ablaut, and do not add an ending such as -ed or -t for the past forms. These sometimes retain past participles with the ending -[e]n, as in give–gave–given and ride–rode–ridden, but in other cases this ending has been dropped, as in come–came–come and sing–sang–sung. This verb group was inherited from the parent Proto-Germanic language, and before that from the Proto-Indo-European language. It was originally a system of regular verbs, and in Old English and modern German the system remains more or less regular; however in Modern English relatively few verbs continue to follow such a pattern, and they are classed as irregular.

Verbs that retain a strong-type inflection in modern English and add -[e]n in the past participle include bear, beat, beget, bite, blow, break, choose, cleave, draw, drive, eat, fall, fly, forbid, forget, forsake, freeze, get (but with past participle got in British English), give, grow, know, lie, ride, rise, see, shake, shear, slay, smite, speak, steal, stride, strive, swear, take, tear, throw, tread, wake, weave, and write.

Those that do not add -[e]n in the usual past participle include become, begin, bind, burst, cling, come, drink, fight, find, fling, grind, hang, hold, let, ring, run, seek, shed, shine, shit, shoot, shrink, sing, sink, sit, slide, sling, slink, slit, spin, spring, stand, sting, stink, strike, swim, swing, win, wind and wring.

The verbs sow and swell are now usually regular in the past tense, but retain the strong-type past participles sown and swollen. Other verbs retain participles in -n for certain adjectival uses and distinguish them from other usage in perfect tenses ("He is drunk" vs "drunken sailor", "The shirt has shrunk" vs "shrunken hands" or "The ship was sunk" vs "sunken cheeks"). The participle in -n may sometimes be limited to certain specific usage, as in molten used only to refer to metals (compare "molten steel" vs "melted butter"). Sometimes the connection between the infinitive and the adjective (i.e. originally the past participle form) is not perceived as obvious any more, e.g. seethe – sodden. The verb crow is now regular in the past participle, but the strong past tense crew is sometimes used.

Some originally weak verbs have taken on strong-type forms by analogy with strong verbs. These include dig, dive (when dove is used as the past tense), hide, prove (when proven is used as the past participle), saw (past participle sawn), sew (past participle sewn), show (past participle shown), spit, stick, strew, string, and wear (analogy with bear).

For indication of the groups of strong verbs the listed words belong to, see the table at List of English irregular verbs.

Weak verbs

[edit]

Some other irregular verbs derive from Germanic weak verbs, forming past tenses and participles with a -d or -t ending (or from originally strong verbs that have switched to the weak pattern). The weak conjugation is also the origin of the regular verbs ending in -ed; however various historical sound changes (and sometimes spelling changes) have led to certain types of irregularity in some verbs. The main processes are as follows (some verbs have been subject to more than one of these).[3]

  • Some weak verbs with long vowels in their present tense stems (such as keep) took a short vowel in the past tense and past participle (kept).[4]
  • In some weak verbs ending in a final -t or -d, this final consonant coalesced (contracted) with the weak past ending to leave a single -t or -d in the past forms.
  • Some verbs ending in l or n had their past ending irregularly devoiced to -t, and in a few verbs ending with a v or z sound (leave, lose), both that sound and the past ending were devoiced. (The regular ending -ed is also devoiced after voiceless consonants in regular verbs, as described under English verbs § Past tense, but this is not now shown in the spelling – for example, the -ed in blessed and whipped is pronounced as a t, and these words were formerly written blest and whipt. The spelling -t following a voiceless consonant is retained for verbs that display an irregularity, as in kept and cost.)
  • Some weak verbs continue the vowel shift called Rückumlaut ("reverse umlaut"). Details of the history of these verbs can be found under Germanic weak verb; those with -gh- in the spelling were also affected by the Germanic spirant law.
  • A few weak verbs have undergone additional contractions or vowel shortenings in their past or present tense forms.
  • A few verbs are regular in their spoken forms, but have irregular spelling.

The irregular weak verbs (being in normal use) can consequently be grouped as follows:

  • Verbs with vowel shortening: creep, flee, hear, keep, leap, shoe (when shod is used), sleep, sweep and weep. (Of these, creep, flee, leap, sleep and weep derive from verbs that were originally strong.)
  • Verbs with vowel shortening and devoicing of the ending: deal, dream, feel, kneel, lean, leave, lose (originally strong) and mean. Some of the verbs in this and in the preceding group have alternative regular forms, such as dreamed and leaped.
  • Verbs with coalescence of consonants: bet, bid, cast, cost, cut, fit, hit, hurt, knit, put, quit, rid, set, shed, shut, split, spread, thrust, wed and wet. Some of these verbs have alternative regular forms, such as wedded and wetted. (The verb hoist behaves similarly to verbs in this group, but this was originally itself a past form of the now obsolete verb hoise; similarly clad was originally – and sometimes still is – a past form of clothe.)
  • Verbs with coalescence of consonants and devoicing of the ending: bend, build, lend, rend, send, spend.
  • Verbs with coalescence of consonants and vowel shortening: bleed, breed, feed, lead, light, meet, read (past tense and past participle also spelt read, but pronounced with a short vowel /ɹɛd/), and speed.
  • Verbs with devoicing of the ending and no other irregularity: burn, dwell, learn, smell, spell, spill and spoil. Most of these have regular -ed forms as alternatives.
  • Verbs continuing the Rückumlaut pattern: bring–brought, buy–bought, seek–sought, sell–sold, teach–taught, tell–told, and think–thought. The borrowed verb catch (caught) has also fallen into this pattern as a result of analogy.
  • Verbs with additional contractions and shortenings: have–has–had, make–made, say–says–said (where says and said are pronounced with a short vowel /ɛ/). (The verb do has a similar vowel shortening in does and done; see below.)
  • Verbs irregular only in spelling: lay–laid, pay–paid (although in the meaning "let out", of a rope etc., pay may have the regular spelling payed).

For weak verbs that have adopted strong-type past tense or past participle forms, see the section above on strong verbs. More information on the development of some of the listed verbs can be found at List of irregular verbs.

Anomalous cases

[edit]

The following verbs do not fit exactly into any of the above categories:

  • The modal verbs, which are defective verbs – they have only a present indicative form and (in some cases) a preterite, lacking nonfinite forms (infinitives, participles, gerunds), imperatives, and subjunctives (although some uses of the preterites are sometimes identified as subjunctives). Moreover, they do not add -s in the third person singular – this is because they derive either from preterites, or from Germanic preterite-present verbs, which were conjugated using the (strong-type) preterite form with present tense meaning. (Additional "true" preterites with past tense meaning were formed with the addition of dentals in the manner of the weak verbs.) The chief verbs of this closed class are can–could, may–might, shall–should, will–would, and must and ought (These last two have no preterites. They were originally preterites themselves). There are also dare and need, which follow the same pattern (no -s) in some contexts: "Dare he jump? She needn't worry" (dare derives from a preterite-present verb, but need is from an Old English regular verb). In some cases, used to is also listed as a modal verb. All the modal verbs both in their present and preterite forms-except for dare, need and used to-usually refer to the present or the future, not the past ("Could you do it now? Should I ask him for help?"). To express the past, modal verbs typically use suppletive forms (can – be able to, may – be allowed to, must – have to/be obliged to). The only two modal verbs that do distinguish the preterite forms are dare and need (dared (durst) and needed respectively). See English modal verbs § Etymology.
  • Two verbs (be and go) that contain suppletive forms, i.e. one or more of their parts came from an entirely different root. With go this applies to the past tense went, which is originally from the verb wend. With be it applies to a number of different forms (see below). For details, see Indo-European copula (for be) and the article on the verb go. Derived from be is the defective verb beware, which does not inflect in normal use and which appears only in those forms in which the plain form of be would be used, namely the infinitive, the imperative, and the subjunctive.
  • The verb do, which has the reduplicated form did for its past tense, an irregularity that is shared with other Germanic languages. Its past participle done can be compared to typical strong participles in -[e]n; however both this and the third person present tense does feature a short vowel in modern pronunciation: /dʌn/, /dʌz/.

Verbs with irregular present tenses

[edit]

Apart from the modal verbs, which are irregular in that they do not take an -s in the third person (see above), the only verbs with irregular present tense forms are be, do, have, say and an archaic verb wit (and prefixed forms of these, such as undo and gainsay, which conjugate in the same way as the basic forms).

The verb be has multiple irregular forms. In the present indicative it has am in the first person singular, is, which is pronounced with a Z sound, in the third person singular, and are, which is pronounced with an /α/ sound, in the plural and second person singular. (Its present subjunctive is be, as in "I suggest that you be extremely careful", though that is not irregular, as all verbs use the infinitive/imperative form for the present subjunctive.) It also has two past tense forms: was, which is pronounced with an /ə/ sound in US English, for the first and third persons singular, and were, which is pronounced with an /ə/ sound, for the plural and second person singular (although there are certain subjunctive uses in which were can substitute for was, as in "If I were you…" or "I wish I were there"). The past participle is been, which is pronounced with an /ɪ/ sound in US English, and the present participle and gerund forms are regular: being. For more details see Indo-European copula.

As mentioned above, apart from its other irregularities, the verb do, which is pronounced with an /u/ sound, has the third person present indicative does & past participle done pronounced with short vowels: /dʌz/ /dʌn/.

The verb have, which is pronounced with an /æ/ sound, has a contracted third person present indicative form: has /hæz/ (weak pronunciation /həz/). This is formed similarly to the verb's past tense had.

The verb say displays vowel shortening in the third person present indicative (although the spelling is regular): says /sɛz/. The same shortening occurs in the past form said /sɛd/. (Compare the diphthong in the plain form say /seɪ/.)

The verb wit is the only non-modal verb that is also a preterite-present verb and it does not take -s in the third person. It also has a vowel shift in the present tense as in "I wot".

For shortened forms of certain verbs and of their negations ('s, 're, won't, etc.), see English auxiliaries and contractions.

Coincident forms

[edit]

In regular English verbs, the past tense and past participle have the same form. This is also true of most irregular verbs that follow a variation of the weak conjugation, as can be seen in the list below. Differences between the past tense and past participle (as in sing–sang–sung, rise–rose–risen) generally appear in the case of verbs that continue the strong conjugation, or in a few cases weak verbs that have acquired strong-type forms by analogy – as with show (regular past tense showed, strong-type past participle shown). However, even some strong verbs have identical past tense and participle, as in cling–clung–clung.

In some verbs, the past tense, past participle, or both are identical in form to the basic (infinitive) form of the verb. This is the case with certain strong verbs, where historical sound changes have led to a leveling of the vowel modifications: for example, let has both past tense and past participle identical to the infinitive, while come has the past participle identical (but a different past tense, came). The same is true of the verbs listed above under § Weak verbs as having undergone coalescence of final consonants (and without other irregularities such as vowel shortening or devoicing of the ending): bet, bid, etc. (these verbs have infinitive, past tense and past participle all identical, although some of them also have alternative regular forms in -ed). The verb read /ɹiːd/ has the same spelling in all three forms, but not the same pronunciation for the past tense and past participle /ɹɛd/, as it exhibits vowel shortening.

In a few cases the past tense of an irregular verb has the same form as the infinitive of a different verb. For example, bore and found may be past tenses of bear and find, but may also represent independent (regular) verbs of different meaning. Another example is lay, which may be the past tense of lie, but is also an independent verb (regular in pronunciation, but with irregular spelling: lay–laid–laid). In fact the past tense verb lay derives from a causative of the verb from which lie derives. The two verbs are sometimes confused, with lay used in the intransitive senses prescriptively reserved for lie.

Prefixed verbs

[edit]

Nearly all of the basic irregular verbs are single-syllable words. Their irregular inflected forms are generally single-syllable also, except for the past participles in -en like chosen and risen. However, many additional irregular verbs are formed by adding prefixes to the basic ones: understand from stand, become from come, mistake from take, and so on. As a general rule, prefixed verbs are conjugated identically to the corresponding basic verbs; e.g. understand–understood–understood and become–became–become, following the patterns of stand–stood–stood and come–came–come. However, there are occasional differences: in British English, for instance, the past participle of get is got, (as opposed to gotten as in North American English) while that of forget is forgotten.

Only a few irregular verbs of more than one syllable cannot be analyzed as prefixed compounds of monosyllables. There is begin–began–begun (this is from Old English bēgun "to be getting or be finding a way", making it equivalent to be- + gate, but it has moved away from gate in both form and meaning). There is also forsake–forsook–forsaken (this is from Old English forsōc "to legally act for or affair for", making it equivalent to for- + sake, but it has moved away from sake in both form and meaning). There is also beseech–besought–besought (this is from Old English besēcan "to seek or inquire about", making it equivalent to be- + seek, but it has moved away from seek in both form and meaning); however the form besought is now archaic, the verb normally being conjugated regularly (beseeched).

List

[edit]

The following is a list of irregular verbs that are commonly used in standard modern English. It omits many rare, dialectal, and archaic forms, as well as most verbs formed by adding prefixes to basic verbs (unbend, understand, mistake, etc.). It also omits past participle forms that remain in use only adjectivally (clad, sodden, etc.). For a more complete list, with derivations, see List of English irregular verbs. Further information, including pronunciation, can be found in Wiktionary. The list that follows shows the base, or infinitive form, the past tense and the past participle of the verb.

  • a- : for abide, arise, awake, see bide, rise, wake
  • be (am, is, are) – was, werebeen
  • be- : for become, befall, beset, etc. see come, fall, set, etc.
  • bearboreborne [spelt born in passive and adjectival uses relating to birth]
  • beatbeatbeaten
  • begetbegotbegot(ten) [Biblical past tense: begat]
  • beginbeganbegun
  • bendbentbent
  • betbetbet [past tense and participle also sometimes betted]
  • bewaredefective verb [see anomalous cases above]
  • bidbidbid [as in an auction]
  • bidbade/bidbidden/bid [meaning "request"]
  • bidebided/bodebided/bidden [but abide mostly uses the regular forms only]
  • bindboundbound
  • bitebitbitten
  • bleedbledbled
  • blowblewblown
  • breakbrokebroken
  • breedbredbred
  • bringbroughtbrought
  • buildbuiltbuilt
  • burnburnt/burnedburnt/burned
  • burstburstburst
  • buyboughtbought
  • cancould [defective; see anomalous cases above]
  • castcastcast [prefixed forms broadcast, forecast, etc. sometimes take -ed[5]]
  • catchcaughtcaught
  • choosechosechosen
  • cladclad/claddedclad/cladded [clad is also sometimes used as past form of clothe]
  • cleaveclove/cleftcloven/cleft [but regular when meaning "adhere"]
  • clingclungclung
  • comecamecome
  • costcost/costedcost/costed [but regular when meaning "calculate the cost of"]
  • creepcrept/creepedcrept/creeped
  • crowcrowed/crewcrowed [crew normally used only of a cock's crowing]
  • cutcutcut
  • dare – regular except for possible third person singular present dare (see anomalous cases above)
  • dealdealtdealt
  • digdugdug
  • divedived/dovedived [the form dove is chiefly American]
  • do (does /dʌz/) – diddone
  • dragdragged/drugdragged/drug [the form drug is chiefly dialectal]
  • drawdrewdrawn
  • dreamdreamed/dreamtdreamed/dreamt
  • drinkdrankdrunk
  • drivedrovedriven
  • dwelldwelt/dwelleddwelt/dwelled
  • eatateeaten
  • fallfellfallen
  • feedfedfed
  • feelfeltfelt
  • fightfoughtfought
  • findfoundfound
  • fitfit/fittedfit/fitted
  • fleefledfled
  • flingflungflung
  • flyflewflown [the form flied is common in the baseball sense]
  • for(e)- : for forgo, foresee, etc. see go, see, etc.
  • forbidforbade/forbidforbidden
  • forgetforgotforgotten
  • forsakeforsookforsaken
  • freezefrozefrozen
  • getgotgotten/got [past participle got in British English, gotten in American, but see have got]
  • gildgilded/giltgilded/gilt
  • givegavegiven
  • gowentgone [see also have been]
  • grindgroundground
  • growgrewgrown
  • hanghung/hangedhung/hanged [the form hanged is more common in the sense of execution by hanging]
  • have (has) – hadhad
  • hearheardheard
  • hewhewedhewn/hewed
  • hidehidhidden
  • hithithit
  • hoisthoist/hoistedhoist/hoisted
  • holdheldheld
  • hurthurthurt
  • in- : for inlay, input, etc. see lay, put, etc.
  • inter- : for interlay, interweave, etc. see lay, weave, etc.
  • keepkeptkept
  • kneelknelt/kneeledknelt/kneeled
  • knitknit/knittedknit/knitted
  • knowknewknown
  • laylaidlaid
  • leadledled
  • leanleaned/leantleaned/leant
  • leapleaped/leaptleaped/leapt
  • learnlearned/learntlearned/learnt
  • leaveleftleft
  • lendlentlent
  • letletlet
  • lielaylain [but regular when meaning "tell an untruth"]
  • lightlit/lightedlit/lighted
  • loselostlost
  • makemademade
  • maymight [defective; see anomalous cases above]
  • meanmeantmeant
  • meetmetmet
  • mis- : for misspeak, mistake, etc. see speak, take, etc.
  • mowmowedmowed/mown
  • mustdefective [see anomalous cases above]
  • need – regular except for possible third person singular present need (see anomalous cases above)
  • off- : for offset see set, etc.
  • oughtdefective [see anomalous cases above]
  • out- : for outbid, output, etc. see bid, put, etc.
  • over- : for overbid, overdo, etc. see bid, do, etc.
  • paypaidpaid [but sometimes spelt regularly when meaning "let out" (rope etc.)]
  • pleadpleaded/pledpleaded/pled
  • pre- : for prepay, preset, etc. see pay, set, etc.
  • proveprovedproved/proven
  • putputput [prefixed forms input and output sometimes take -ed]
  • quitquitted/quitquitted/quit
  • re- : for redo, remake, etc. see do, make, etc.
  • read /riːd/read /rɛd/read /rɛd/
  • rendrentrent
  • ridrid/riddedrid/ridded/ridden
  • riderid/roderidden
  • ringrangrung
  • riseroserisen
  • runranrun
  • sawsawedsawn/sawed
  • say (says /sɛz/) – saidsaid
  • seesawseen
  • seeksoughtsought
  • sellsoldsold
  • sendsentsent
  • setsetset
  • sewsewedsewn/sewed
  • shakeshookshaken/shook
  • shallshould [defective; see anomalous cases above]
  • shearsheared/shoreshorn/sheared
  • shedshedshed
  • shineshone/shinedshone/shined
  • shitshat/shit/shittedshat/shit/shitted
  • shoeshoed/shodshoed/shod
  • shootshotshot
  • showshowedshown/showed
  • shrinkshrank/shrunkshrunk
  • shriveshroveshriven
  • shutshutshut
  • singsangsung
  • sinksanksunk
  • sitsatsat
  • slayslew/slayedslain/slayed
  • sleepsleptslept
  • slideslidslid
  • slingslungslung
  • slinkslunkslunk
  • slitslitslit
  • smellsmelled/smeltsmelled/smelt
  • smitesmotesmitten
  • sneaksneaked/snucksneaked/snuck [snuck is chiefly American, and is regarded as informal. It was first cited in 1887[6]]
  • sowsowedsown/sowed
  • speakspokespoken
  • speedsped/speededsped/speeded
  • spellspelled/speltspelled/spelt
  • spendspentspent
  • spillspilled/spiltspilled/spilt
  • spinspan/spunspun
  • spitspat/spitspat/spit [the form spit rather than spat is common in America[citation needed]]
  • splitsplitsplit
  • spoilspoiled/spoiltspoiled/spoilt
  • spreadspreadspread
  • springsprang/sprungsprung
  • standstoodstood
  • stavestaved/stovestaved/stove
  • stealstolestolen
  • stickstuckstuck
  • stingstungstung
  • stinkstankstunk
  • strewstrewedstrewn/strewed
  • stridestrodestridden/strode
  • strikestruckstruck/stricken
  • stringstrungstrung
  • strivestrove/strivedstriven/strived
  • swearsworesworn
  • sweatsweated/sweatsweated/sweat
  • sweepsweptswept
  • swellswelledswollen/swelled
  • swimswamswum
  • swingswang/swungswung
  • taketooktaken
  • teachtaughttaught
  • teartoretorn
  • telltoldtold
  • texttexted/texttexted/text
  • thinkthoughtthought [Thunk is a pseudo-archaic past participle by analogy to Drink/Drunk]
  • thrivethrived/throvethrived/thriven
  • throwthrewthrown
  • thrustthrust/thrustedthrust/thrusted
  • treadtrodtrodden/trod
  • un- : for unbend, unweave, etc. see bend, weave, etc.
  • under- : for underlie, undergo, understand, etc. see lie, go, stand, etc.
  • up- : for upset see set, etc.
  • wakewokewoken
  • wearworeworn
  • weavewovewoven
  • wedwed/weddedwed/wedded
  • weepweptwept
  • wetwet/wettedwet/wetted
  • willwould [defective; see anomalous cases above]
  • winwonwon
  • windwoundwound [but regular in the meanings connected with air and breath]
  • with- : for withdraw, withhold, withstand, see draw, hold, stand
  • wringwrang/wrungwrung
  • writewrotewritten

In language acquisition

[edit]

Steven Pinker's book Words and Rules describes how mistakes made by children in learning irregular verbs throw light on the mental processes involved in language acquisition. The fact that young children often attempt to conjugate irregular verbs according to regular patterns indicates that their processing of the language involves the application of rules to produce new forms, in addition to the simple reproduction of forms that they have already heard.

See also Regular and irregular verbs § Linguistic study.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
English irregular verbs are those that deviate from the standard conjugation pattern of regular verbs, which form the simple past tense and past participle by adding the -ed (or -d after e) to the base form, such as walk becoming walked. Instead, irregular verbs employ unique and often unpredictable forms for these tenses, requiring learners to memorize their : the base form ( without to), the , and the past . Examples include go (base) → went (past) → gone (past participle) and bewas/werebeen. Despite comprising only a small fraction—fewer than 3%—of all verbs in , irregular verbs dominate everyday usage, accounting for the ten most frequent verbs such as be, have, do, go, say, can, will, see, take, and get. Estimates of their total number vary due to differences in , but linguistic analyses identify approximately 98 core irregular verbs in contemporary English, with broader counts reaching up to 200 when including less common or prefixed forms. These verbs often lack a consistent pattern, though some exhibit vowel alternations (ablaut) like singsangsung, while others use entirely suppletive forms, such as gowent. Historically, most English irregular verbs trace their origins to the strong verbs of (circa 450–1150 CE), which formed the through internal changes rather than suffixes, a inherited from Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Germanic ablaut systems. Over time, many of these—177 in Old English—have regularized due to linguistic evolution, with only 98 remaining irregular today, a trend driven by : high-use verbs resist change, while rarer ones adopt regular -ed forms more readily. Borrowed verbs from other languages, such as abide or strive, occasionally join this class, but native Germanic roots predominate. This irregularity poses challenges for language learners but underscores the dynamic morphology.

Overview

Definition and characteristics

English irregular verbs are those that deviate from the standard pattern of forming the past tense and past participle by adding the suffix -ed (or -d after a final 'e') to the base form, as seen in regular verbs like walk-walked-walked. Instead, they employ alternative morphological processes, such as internal vowel alternation known as ablaut, complete replacement of the stem through suppletion, or no alteration at all (zero modification). These irregularities primarily affect the past tense (preterite) and past participle forms, while the present tense and other inflections often follow more predictable patterns. In , there are approximately 200 to 250 irregular verbs, representing less than 3% of the total verb lexicon but encompassing nearly all of the most frequently used ones. For instance, the ten most common verbs in English—such as be, have, do, go, say, can, will, see, take, and get—are all irregular. This concentration ensures that irregular verbs dominate everyday language, accounting for a disproportionate share of verbal occurrences in corpora and spoken discourse, which underscores their practical utility despite their non-standard forms. The morphological irregularities in English verbs can be taxonomized into several key types without delving into etymological origins. Ablaut involves systematic vowel changes within the stem to indicate tense, as in sing-sang-sung. Suppletion features entirely distinct stems for different forms, exemplified by go-went-gone, where went derives from a different historical . Some verbs exhibit zero modification, retaining the base form across tenses like cut-cut-cut. These mechanisms allow irregular verbs to maintain distinctiveness in high-frequency contexts, prioritizing memorization through over rule-based derivation.

Comparison to regular verbs

Regular verbs in English, also known as weak verbs, follow a predictable conjugation pattern for forming the and by adding a dental , typically -ed, to the base form. For example, the "walk" conjugates as "walk-walked-walked," where the assimilates phonologically: it appears as /ɪd/ after stems ending in /t/ or /d/ (e.g., "need-needed"), /t/ after voiceless sounds (e.g., "walk" /wɔːkt/), and /d/ elsewhere (e.g., "play-played"). This system, rooted in morphology, ensures uniformity and ease of application across the vast majority of . In contrast, irregular verbs deviate from this standard by employing alternative methods, most notably ablaut—internal shifts—for tense marking, rendering them non-productive and morphologically complex. Strong verbs, the primary subclass of irregulars, are organized into seven ablaut classes based on patterned gradations inherited from Proto-Germanic, such as Class 1's ī-ō-i sequence in "ride-rode-ridden" or Class 5's i-a-u in "give-gave-given." These shifts, combined with occasional nasal infixes or endings like -en in participles, create forms that do not rely on suffixation, leading to a closed inventory of approximately 65 surviving strong verbs from over 290 in . The productivity of regular verbs far exceeds that of irregulars, as the -ed can readily extend to neologisms and borrowed words, exemplified by "google-googled" for the act of searching . Irregular verbs form a finite, non-expanding class, with new additions being exceedingly rare; one notable exception is "snuck," an innovation from the late that irregularized the originally regular "sneak" (sneaked) through analogy to strong patterns like "slink." This closed nature underscores the regularization trend in English, where many historical irregulars have shifted to weak forms over time. Phonological and orthographic variations in irregular verbs often result in dual forms, highlighting inconsistencies absent in regular conjugations. For instance, verbs like "dream" allow both regular "dreamed" and irregular "dreamt" (with a -t ending akin to archaic weak patterns), where "dreamt" predominates in while "dreamed" is more common in American usage. Such alternations arise from historical leveling and dialectal preferences, complicating and without the systematic rules governing regular -ed forms.

Historical Development

Origins in Proto-Indo-European

The irregular conjugation patterns of English strong verbs trace their roots to the (PIE) ablaut system, a mechanism of gradation that marked aspectual distinctions in verbal forms. In , ablaut involved alternations among full-grade (e.g., *e), lengthened-grade, o-grade (*o), and zero-grade (absence of the ), often combined with to form presents, while the perfect typically featured o-grade and the used e- or zero-grade. This system, inherited by the Germanic branch, repurposed ablaut for tense formation, replacing aspectual functions and leading to the alternations characteristic of strong verbs like sing-sang-sung. Reduplication in PIE, which prefixed a copy of the root's initial and to the present stem (e.g., *kʷe-kʷel- 'turn'), coexisted with ablaut but was lost in Germanic, leaving ablaut as the dominant irregularity. English strong verbs descend directly from PIE perfective stems exhibiting these gradations, systematized in Proto-Germanic into seven classes based on root patterns and interactions. For instance, Class 1 verbs derive from PIE roots with *ei or *ī, evolving to Germanic *ei-i-i patterns, as in *reisan 'to ride' from PIE *h₃reydʰ- 'ride', yielding English ride-rode-ridden. Suppletion in English irregular verbs arose from the early fusion of distinct PIE roots within paradigms, particularly for high-frequency verbs. The verb 'to be' exemplifies this, with present forms from PIE *h₁es- 'be' (*h₁ésmi > am, *h₁és-ti > is) and past forms from *h₁wes- 'remain, be' (*h₁wes-t > was), supplemented by influences from *bʰuH- 'become' in some aspects, creating a composite paradigm inherited through Indo-European. Comparative evidence from other Indo-European languages underscores the conservation of these PIE irregularities. The verb *bʰer- 'carry, bear' displays ablaut in Sanskrit present bharati (*bʰér-e-ti, e-grade) and reduplicated perfect bibhṛta (*bʰibʰr̥-té, zero-grade with o-influence), Gothic bairan-berun (e/o-grades), and English bear-bore-borne, illustrating the shared gradation system. Similarly, *seh₂- 'sow' shows patterns in Sanskrit sīte (lengthened e-grade), Gothic saiþan-seiþ (e/i), reflecting the original PIE ablaut that English partially retains in sow-sown.

Evolution in Old and Middle English

In , strong verbs formed the core of the irregular conjugation system, numbering approximately 367 strong verbs that relied on ablaut—internal gradation—to indicate tense and aspect, rather than adding suffixes. These verbs were organized into seven classes based on their : the , singular, plural, and past participle. For instance, the verb singan (to sing) conjugated as singan (), sang ( singular), sungon ( plural), and sungen (past participle), with distinct endings and alternations distinguishing singular and plural forms in the preterite. Vowel shifts, including i-umlaut (i-mutation), played a key role in shaping these patterns, where a following i or j caused fronting or raising of the stem vowel, as seen in class IIIb verbs like helpan (to help), which yielded healp (preterite singular) and hulpon (preterite plural). The erosion of inflectional endings during late Old English, due to phonological reductions, began merging distinctions such as preterite singular and plural forms, setting the stage for further simplification. Transitioning into Middle English (c. 1100–1500), the strong verb system underwent significant simplification, with the seven Old English classes undergoing mergers in the vowel system that obscured original ablaut patterns, though the seven-class structure was largely retained. This period saw only about 208 strong verbs surviving from the Old English inventory, influenced by ongoing vowel changes and the early stages of the , which altered pronunciations and contributed to form leveling, often favoring the preterite singular stem over the plural. Scandinavian contact, particularly from during the Viking settlements, introduced competing verbs that displaced native ones; for example, the Old Norse taka (to take) replaced the Old English strong verb niman (to take), leading to taken in Middle English. Additionally, many strong verbs weakened by adopting the regular dental (-ede or -de) through analogical extension, reducing the overall irregularity; notable examples include hlahan (to laugh), which shifted from a class VI pattern (hlāh, hlōgon) to the weak laughen/lauḥede in . This weakening affected roughly a third of the surviving verbs, promoting greater uniformity in the verbal paradigm.

Changes in Early Modern English

During the Early Modern English period (roughly 1500–1800), irregular verbs underwent significant shifts influenced by the rise of printing, which promoted uniformity in written forms, and the emergence of dictionaries and grammars that codified preferred inflections. The printing press, introduced in England in the late 15th century, facilitated the dissemination of standardized texts, particularly from London printers, reducing regional spelling and morphological variations in verb forms. By the mid-16th century, works like George Puttenham's The Arte of English Poesie (1589) advocated for London-based speech as the prestige standard, influencing irregular verb paradigms. Samuel Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language (1755) further entrenched these norms by listing preferred forms, such as treating "learned" and "learnt" as variants of the past tense and participle of "learn," though it leaned toward regularization in some cases. Dialectal variations persisted and diverged, particularly between emerging British and , often retaining older irregular forms in one variety while regularizing in another. For instance, the past participle of "get" as "gotten"—an older form—fell into disuse in Britain by the but was preserved in , reflecting colonial retention of pre-standardized patterns. Similarly, favored "learnt" for the and of "learn," aligning with strong patterns, while preferred the regularized "learned," influenced by 19th-century American grammars emphasizing simplicity. These differences highlight how transatlantic separation allowed American varieties to conserve archaic irregularities absent from British standardization efforts. Many irregular verbs experienced loss or regularization, shifting toward weak -ed endings, especially in less frequent or peripheral vocabulary, while core high-frequency verbs retained their strong forms through rote memorization and cultural entrenchment. Verbs like "chide," which once had the strong past "chode," fully regularized to "chided" by the 18th century, as evidenced in dictionary entries and literary usage. Others, such as "burn" and "spill," developed dual forms ("burnt"/"burned," "spilt"/"spilled"), where -t endings marked punctual aspects and -ed durative ones, though prescriptivists often promoted one over the other. High-impact verbs like "be," "go," "sing," and "write" resisted change, maintaining suppletive or ablaut patterns due to their centrality in everyday and literary discourse. Prescriptivism in 18th- and 19th-century grammars reinforced these trends, enforcing "correct" irregular forms to combat dialectal deviations and promote a polished standard. Robert Lowth's A Short Introduction to English Grammar () included a dedicated section on irregular verbs, advocating distinct and forms (e.g., "wrote"/"written" for "write") and standardizing "been" as the past participle of "be" over dialectal pronunciations like "bin" in regional or nonstandard speech. Grammarians like Lowth and later (1795) viewed such enforcement as essential for and national unity, purging variants seen as vulgar while preserving irregularities in foundational verbs. This prescriptive legacy shaped , balancing tradition with simplification.

Classification

Strong verbs

Strong verbs constitute the core category of irregular verbs in English, distinguished by their use of ablaut—a systematic internal modification of the stem —to form the and past participle, in contrast to the dental (-ed, -d, or -t) employed by regular weak verbs. This pattern reflects a direct inheritance from Proto-Germanic and Proto-Indo-European verbal systems, where vowel gradation served morphological functions without affixation. In contemporary English, approximately 70 strong verbs persist from an original inventory of around 300 in , with many others having shifted to weak conjugation over time due to analogical leveling and phonological changes. The conjugation of strong verbs adheres to a standard template across : the base form for the (with third-person singular adding -s, as in "he swims"), the ablaut-modified form for the tense, the past (often ending in -en or -n), and the present participle ending in -ing. Unlike some other irregular categories, strong verbs do not exhibit anomalies in the stem or third-person marking. For instance, the "swim" follows the pattern swim (present), swam (past), swum (past ), (present participle). Strong verbs are classified into seven traditional classes based on their specific ablaut series, a system largely preserved from but simplified in modern usage. These classes group verbs by shared vowel alternations in the principal parts, though some exhibit dialectal variations or optional weak forms. The following table summarizes the classes, their prototypical ablaut patterns (using broad phonetic notation), and representative examples:
ClassAblaut PatternExample
1/iː/ - /əʊ/ - /ɪ/write - wrote - written
2/uː/ - /əʊ/ - /əʊ/choose - chose - chosen
3a/ɪ/ - /æ/ - /ʌ/ (with i-mutation)sing - sang - sung
3b/ɛ/ - /ɒ/ - /ɒ/ (with )fight - fought - fought
4/eɪ/ - /ʊ/ - /əʊ/take - took - taken
5/ɪ/ - /eɪ/ - /ɪ/give - gave - given
6/eɪ/ - /ʊ/ - /eɪ/shake - shook - shaken
7Various (e.g., /ɔː/ - /ɛ/ - /ɔː/)fall - fell - fallen
Class 3 is sometimes subdivided based on whether the present stem shows vowel lengthening before certain consonants. Class 7 is the most heterogeneous, including verbs with minimal or no ablaut but distinctive -en endings in the . Some verbs show dialectal divergence, as with "dive," where the strong past form "dove" prevails in while "dived" (weak) is standard in .

Irregular weak verbs

Irregular weak verbs in English are those that form their and by adding a dental (-d or, more commonly, -t) to the stem, similar to regular weak verbs, but deviate from the standard -ed ending through phonetic assimilation, modifications, or fossilized historical forms. Unlike strong verbs, which rely primarily on ablaut (vowel gradation) without a dental , these verbs retain the weak conjugation frame but exhibit irregularities due to sound changes or analogical leveling. This category includes approximately 20 to 30 commonly used verbs in , though broader counts of variants reach up to 56 when excluding those with additional alternations. Key patterns among irregular weak verbs include the use of a -t instead of -ed, often resulting from devoicing or assimilation after certain consonants, as seen in verbs like send-sent and feel-felt. Another pattern involves shortening in the past forms, where a long vowel in the present stem reduces before the dental suffix, creating alternations such as keep-kept, leave-left, and sleep-slept. Voicing changes or suppletive-like elements also appear, for instance in bereave-bereft, where the past form reflects assimilation of the stem-final /v/ to /f/ before the suffix. These deviations often allow dual forms in contemporary usage, such as dream-dreamt/dreamed or learn-learnt/learned, with the -t variant preserving older irregular patterns. Historically, many irregular weak verbs trace their origins to weak verb classes, particularly Class II, which featured stems with long vowels followed by the suffix -ode in the , leading to forms like brōhte (from bringan, modern bring-brought). In late and early (around the 11th–12th centuries), phonetic processes such as the merger of -de and -te after voiced consonants (e.g., sende > sent) and trisyllabic shortening (e.g., hleapan > hleapt, modern leap-leapt) fossilized these irregularities. For verbs like sell-sold, the past form derives from an older suppletive element influenced by with similar stems, rather than pure suffixation. These changes were driven by phonological assimilation and high-frequency usage, preventing full regularization over time. The distinction from strong verbs lies in their reliance on the dental suffix for tense marking, even amid irregularities; for example, dream-dreamt uses -t due to analogical extension from verbs like learn-learnt, contrasting with ablaut-only forms like sing-sang. This suffix-based irregularity often stems from sound mergers and leveling, preserving archaic features without shifting to full strong conjugation.

Preterite-present and modal verbs

Preterite-present verbs constitute a distinct class of irregular verbs in English, characterized by present tense forms that originate from the preterite (past tense) paradigms of strong verbs in (OE). These verbs, inherited from Proto-Germanic, initially conveyed meanings related to , , permission, or obligation, with their present indicative singular adopting the vocalism and morphology of the original preterite stem. In , they have largely evolved into defective modal auxiliaries, lacking infinitives, participles, and full conjugational paradigms, which restricts them to auxiliary functions without standalone use as main verbs. The core examples of these verbs include can/could (from OE cunnan, 'to know, be able'), may/might (from OE magan, 'to be able, have power'), shall/should (from OE sculan, 'to owe, be obliged'), and will/would (from OE willan, 'to want', which adopted preterite-present patterns). Other notable forms are must (from OE mōtan, 'to have permission or be allowed', with no distinct past) and semi-modals like dare (from OE durran) and ought (from OE āgan, 'to own'). Over time, these verbs underwent a historical shift from full lexical verbs capable of taking objects and adverbial modification to specialized auxiliaries that precede infinitival main verbs, losing much of their original concrete semantics in favor of abstract modal meanings. Conjugationally, preterite-present modals exhibit quirks such as the absence of the third-person singular -s ending in the (e.g., he can, not he cans) and forms derived directly from strong stems (e.g., could from the preterite of cunnan). They cannot form infinitives (e.g., no to can) or participles (e.g., no canning as a ), rendering them defective and unsuitable for non-auxiliary roles. Semantically, these verbs primarily express modality, including ability (can), permission (may), obligation (must, shall), and volition or prediction (will). English has approximately nine core modal verbs of this type: can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, and would. In American English, shall and should are notably rare compared to British English, often merging functionally with will and would for future and obligation expressions.

Anomalous verbs

Anomalous verbs in English are a small class of highly irregular verbs characterized by suppletion, where paradigmatic forms derive from multiple etymologically distinct roots rather than a single stem modified by predictable morphological processes. This results in forms that lack phonological or morphological relatedness, setting them apart from strong verbs (which use ablaut) or irregular weak verbs (which employ stem changes without full root replacement). The phenomenon arises historically from the merger of synonymous or near-synonymous verbs in Proto-Indo-European and subsequent stages, filling gaps in defective paradigms. The verb be exemplifies extreme suppletion, drawing from at least three Proto-Indo-European roots: h₁es- (yielding present forms like am and are), bʰuH- or bʰeh₂- (for infinitive be and participle been), and wes- (for past forms was and were). In Old English, it combined two verbs—bēon (from bʰuH-, used for future or habitual senses) and wesan (from wes-, for present states)—leading to a modern paradigm with over eight distinct forms: am, is, are (present indicative), was, were (past indicative), were (subjunctive), be (infinitive and imperative), being (present participle), and been (past participle). The present tense irregularities—am (first-person singular), is (third-person singular), and are (first- and second-person plural or second-person singular)—further highlight its uniqueness, while its role as a copula (linking subject and complement) extends to subjunctive uses like were for counterfactuals across all persons (e.g., If I were rich). Other key anomalous verbs include have and do, which exhibit milder suppletion but still deviate sharply from regular patterns. Have uses had for both and , derived from an Old English form hæfde that traces to a distinct stem within the same kap- ("to grasp" or "hold"), creating an unpredictable shift. Similarly, do employs did (past) and done (participle), with did stemming from Proto-Indo-European dʰed- (a or iterative form) while do and done derive from dʰeh₁- ("to put" or "place"). Do functions prominently as a pro-verb in emphatic constructions, questions, and negations (), such as Do you like it? or I do not agree, bypassing typical auxiliary rules. Only three to five verbs qualify as truly anomalous in contemporary English—primarily be, have, and do, with occasional inclusion of go (suppletive past went from wend-)—due to their resistance to regularization. Their retention persists because of exceptionally high token frequency; be ranks as the most common verb in English corpora, ensuring these forms remain entrenched despite analogical pressures toward regularity.

Special Patterns

Irregular present tenses

English irregular verbs exhibit non-standard forms in the , primarily through suppletion—where different roots supply forms for different persons—and the absence of the third-person singular -s typical of regular verbs. Suppletive patterns arise when unrelated stems are used across persons, creating unpredictable paradigms that must be memorized. This irregularity affects a small but functionally significant set of verbs, roughly 10 to 12 in , often those serving as auxiliaries. The verb be exemplifies suppletive presents, drawing from multiple historical roots: am (first person singular) from Proto-Germanic esmi, is (third person singular) from esti, and are (plural and second person singular) from aront. This results in forms like I am, you are, he/she/it is, and we/they are, diverging sharply from regular patterns like walk/walks. In contrast, have and do show irregular but non-suppletive third-person singulars as has and does, respectively, without the expected /v/ or long vowel retention; these stem from Old English strong verb presents, where dōn (do) had forms like dēþ (third singular) and hafan (have) had hæfþ. Preterite-present verbs, a legacy of Germanic strong verbs whose present tenses repurposed old past stems, further illustrate irregularity by omitting the -s ending entirely and often lacking infinitives or participles. Examples include modals like can, may, shall, and will, which conjugate uniformly across persons (e.g., he can swims, not cans) due to their historical preterite origins, such as Old English (can) with present cann and past cūþe. This class encompasses about nine verbs, including must and ought, preserving ablaut patterns over affixation. These irregularities play a key functional role in English, as affected verbs like do, have, and be form the backbone of questions, negations, and emphatics (e.g., doesn't like, hasn't eaten, isn't running), where standard -s or person agreement would disrupt auxiliary structures. In African American Vernacular English (AAVE), the verb be takes an invariant, uninflected form to mark habitual or repeated actions, as in "She be working" (meaning she habitually works), contrasting with non-habitual "She working" and highlighting dialect-specific present tense innovations.

Coincident forms

Coincident forms refer to patterns in English irregular verbs where two or more principal parts—the base form (infinitive/present), past tense, and past participle—are phonologically and orthographically identical. In irregular verbs, this coincidence often occurs without the -ed suffix, unlike regular verbs which use -ed for identical past and past participle forms. This coincidence simplifies the paradigm by reducing the number of distinct forms to memorize, though it can introduce ambiguities in usage due to homophony or identical spelling across tenses. Such patterns are prevalent among strong verbs and certain irregular weak verbs, contrasting with verbs like take–took–taken that maintain three distinct parts across classes derived from Proto-Indo-European ablaut series. The most common type involves the and past participle being identical, while differing from the base form; examples include buy–bought–bought, bring–brought–brought (an irregular weak with a -t ), and meet–met–met. Another type features the base form identical to the , often extending to the past participle as well, such as cut–cut–cut and put–put–put. A rarer subset has all three the same, like bid–bid–bid and hit–hit–hit, where no morphological change occurs across tenses. These types encompass dozens of s, primarily from strong verb classes 3B, 5, and 6, as well as miscellaneous irregulars. Historically, these coincidences arose during the transition from to through the erosion of inflectional endings on verb forms, caused by phonological reductions and with Norse and French. In strong verbs, distinct preterite plural and past participle forms often shared similar stems but differed in endings (e.g., sangon 'they sang' and sungen 'sung'); the loss of unstressed vowels and final syllables merged these into a single form like sung by , leveling the paradigm. This simplification reduced the original four of strong verbs to three in , promoting coincidences in irregular survivals while regular verbs analogized to a uniform -ed ending. While coincident forms ease acquisition by minimizing unique memorization (e.g., only two forms needed for buy–bought–bought), they complicate usage through potential homophones, as seen in read (base /riːd/ vs. past/past participle /rɛd/), requiring contextual or prosodic cues for disambiguation. In prefixed verbs, such patterns can extend analogically, but base form coincidences remain the core irregularity.

Prefixed and compound verbs

English prefixed verbs frequently inherit the morphological patterns of their base verbs, including any irregularities in past tense and past participle formation. For instance, the verb forgo conjugates as forwent and forgone, mirroring the strong ablaut pattern of its base go (went, gone). Similarly, undo follows undid and undone, retaining the irregularity of do (did, done). This retention traces back to Old English, where prefixes such as be-, for-, and ge- were commonly attached to verbs, preserving the base's strong or weak conjugation class without altering its core inflectional behavior. Among modern English irregular verbs, approximately 30 are formed by prefixation, deriving their forms directly from irregular bases. Examples include beget (begot, begotten) from get (got, gotten), and arise (arose, arisen) from rise (rose, risen). Some prefixed verbs adopt irregular weak patterns, such as understand (understood, understood), which parallels the base stand (stood, stood) by using a vowel change plus dental suffix rather than the regular -ed ending. These derivations do not introduce novel irregularities but extend existing ones through prefixation. Compound and phrasal verbs typically conjugate according to the irregularity of their main component. For example, the phrasal verb give up forms gave up and , inheriting the strong pattern from give. In rare cases, can lead to innovative irregular forms in dialects, such as sneak developing snuck as a past tense in , occasionally extending to phrasal uses like sneak up. Variability appears in some forms, as with foretell standardly using foretold but occasionally showing dialectal alternations influenced by regional pronunciation. Prefixes and compounding alone do not generate new irregularities; they propagate or rarely adapt those of the base verb.

Lists and Examples

Strong verbs by ablaut class

Strong verbs in English are classified into seven traditional ablaut classes based on vowel gradation patterns inherited from Proto-Germanic and , where tense is indicated by internal changes rather than suffixes alone. These classes organize approximately 68 verbs that remain irregular in , with inclusion typically limited to those appearing at a frequency greater than 1 per million words in large corpora like the . The principal parts include the form, (historically distinct in singular and plural forms in , though merged in ), and past participle; some classes show dialectal or alternative forms due to ongoing regularization. The following table summarizes the seven classes, their characteristic ablaut patterns (using representative vowel shifts), historical notes on past plural forms (which often differed from the singular in but are obsolete in modern usage), and selected examples with . Examples are representative, focusing on common verbs; obsolete forms like chide (chide-chid-chidden) are noted separately as they no longer function as fully strong in contemporary English.
ClassAblaut Pattern (Present - Past - Past Participle)Historical Past Plural NoteExamples (Principal Parts: Present - Past - Past Participle)
1ī > ō > i (high front to back rounded to short front)Often featured a short i-vowel, distinct from singular's long a (e.g., rīdan - rād - rīdon - riden)abide (abide - abode - abided/abode); ride (ride - rode - ridden); arise (arise - arose - arisen)
2ēo > ēa > o (diphthong to long front to short back)Used a u-vowel form, differing from singular (e.g., ceōsan - ceās - curon - coren)choose (choose - chose - chosen); fly (fly - flew - flown); freeze (freeze - froze - frozen)
3Short i/e > a > u (short front to low to back rounded)Featured u-grade, separate from singular (e.g., singan - sang - sungon - sungen)sing (sing - sang - sung); drink (drink - drank - drunk); swim (swim - swam - swum)
4ē > ǣ > o (long front to low front to short back)Matched singular in some, but often with o-grade extension (e.g., stelan - stæl - stǣlon - st olen)come (come - came - come); steal (steal - stole - stolen); tear (tear - tore - torn)
5ē > ǣ > ē (long front to low front to long front)Aligned closely with singular (e.g., sprecan - spræc - spræcon - sprecen)give (give - gave - given); speak (speak - spoke - spoken); bear (bear - bore - borne/born)
6a > ō > a (short low to long back to short low)Used a-vowel or o-extension, distinct in some (e.g., faran - fōr - fōron - faren)shake (shake - shook - shaken); stand (stand - stood - stood); take (take - took - taken)
7Varied (often a/e > ō/ē > a/e, with reduplication historically)Generally matched singular with -d- extension (e.g., healdan - heold - heoldon - healden)fall (fall - fell - fallen); hold (hold - held - held); mow (mow - mowed - mown)
Variants occur in several verbs due to partial regularization or dialectal preferences, such as dive (dive - dove/dived - dived/doven), where the strong past dove competes with the weak dived in American English. Class 4 shows splits like bear, where borne is used for the past participle in passive constructions and born for adjectival senses (e.g., "newborn"). Obsolete strong verbs, such as chide (now regularized to chided), highlight the ongoing shift toward weak conjugation in low-frequency items.

Other irregular verbs

English irregular verbs encompass several categories beyond strong verbs, including irregular weak verbs, preterite-present and modal verbs, anomalous verbs, and those with coincident forms across tenses. Irregular weak verbs typically form their past tense and past participle using a dental suffix (-d or -t) but often involve vowel shortening or other deviations from the standard -ed pattern, as seen in verbs like build-built-built. Preterite-present verbs, which originated from Old English strong preterites repurposed for present meanings, evolved into modern modals such as can-could. Anomalous verbs like be, have, and do exhibit highly irregular conjugations across all principal parts due to their auxiliary functions and historical anomalies. Verbs with coincident forms maintain identical base, past, and past participle, such as cut-cut-cut, simplifying conjugation but marking them as irregular. These categories collectively account for approximately 150 irregular verbs, excluding pure strong types, and are alphabetized below for clarity. Variants exist across dialects; for instance, British English often prefers learnt and burnt as past participles, while American English favors learned and burned, though both are acceptable. Rare forms include pled as an alternative past for plead in legal contexts. Prefixed verbs may inherit irregularities from their base forms, as in foretell-foretold-foretold, but full listings are omitted here to focus on unprefixed examples.

Irregular Weak Verbs

These verbs use a dental for past forms but show irregularities like stem changes or alternative endings. Representative examples, alphabetized:
Base FormPast SimplePast Participle
bendbentbent
buildbuiltbuilt
buyboughtbought
catchcaughtcaught
creepcreptcrept
dwelldwelt/dwelleddwelt/dwelled
feelfeltfelt
fleefledfled
havehadhad
hearheardheard
keepkeptkept
kneelknelt/kneeledknelt/kneeled
leaveleftleft
lendlentlent
loselostlost
makemademade
meanmeantmeant
paypaidpaid
saysaidsaid
seeksoughtsought
sellsoldsold
sendsentsent
sleepsleptslept
spendspentspent
sweepsweptswept
teachtaughttaught
telltoldtold
thinkthoughtthought

Preterite-Present and Modal Verbs

These defective verbs lack full or forms and express modality; their past tenses often derive from stems. Alphabetized examples:
Base FormPast Simple
cancould
daredared/durst
maymight
must(no past; had to)
needneeded/need
ought to(no past)
shallshould
willwould

Anomalous Verbs

These core have unique, suppletive forms across tenses. Examples:
Base FormPast SimplePast Participle
bewas/werebeen
dodiddone
Have is sometimes classified here but aligns more with irregular weak: have-had-had.

Verbs with Coincident Forms

These maintain the same form for base, past, and past participle. Alphabetized representative examples:
Base FormPast SimplePast Participle
betbetbet
bidbid/badebid/bidden
broadcastbroadcastbroadcast
burstburstburst
castcastcast
costcostcost
cutcutcut
fitfit/fittedfit/fitted
hithithit
hurthurthurt
letletlet
putputput
quitquitquit
ridridrid
setsetset
shedshedshed
shutshutshut
slitslitslit
splitsplitsplit
spreadspreadspread
wetwet/wettedwet/wetted

Acquisition and Usage

In first language acquisition

Children acquire English irregular verbs through a combination of rote memorization and rule application, with early stages dominated by memorized forms from parental input. Between ages 2 and 4, children typically learn high-frequency irregular verbs like go-went via rote learning, reproducing exact forms heard in caregivers' speech without generalization, though occasional errors such as goed for went may occur as they begin experimenting with patterns. This initial phase relies heavily on frequent exposure, where high-frequency items like go or come are mastered earlier due to repeated input, supporting frequency effects in acquisition. As children progress to ages 4-6, overregularization peaks, where they apply the regular past-tense rule (-ed) to irregular verbs, producing forms like runned for ran or goed for went. This stage reflects the emergence of a productive rule system, with error rates around 3-5% in spontaneous speech during this period, often analyzed in corpora exceeding 2,000 utterances. The dual-route model explains this as competition between a memory-based route for irregulars and a rule-based route for regulars, leading to temporary suppression of stored irregular forms. Error patterns, particularly overregularizations in , decrease significantly by age 7 as memory strengthens and input reinforces correct irregulars, with studies showing reduced application of -ed to novel or low-frequency irregulars. Jean Berko's 1958 Wug test demonstrated children's resistance to irregularity by applying regular rules to novel words (e.g., wug-wugged), highlighting the productivity of the rule over memorized exceptions at this stage. By age 10, children achieve full mastery of most English irregular verbs, integrating both routes seamlessly, though rare errors may persist in low-frequency items; parental speech quality and quantity play a crucial role in accelerating this process by providing consistent models.

In second language learning

Non-native speakers learning English as a (L2) often encounter significant challenges with irregular verbs due to their unpredictable forms, leading to frequent errors such as overgeneralization, where learners apply regular endings like "-ed" to irregular verbs. For instance, beginners commonly produce forms like goed instead of went or swimed instead of swam, as they extend the productive rule of regular verb inflection to exceptions. This overgeneralization is particularly prevalent in early stages, with error rates as high as 62.4% among EFL learners in past perfect constructions. L1 interference exacerbates these difficulties, especially for speakers of like French or Spanish, who may expect more systematic conjugation patterns and thus struggle with English's ablaut-based changes. In multilingual contexts such as , where French L1 influences English learning, learners exhibit higher error rates in verb inflections (e.g., 61.1% incorrect forms) due to transfer from L1 tense systems that differ in marking. Similarly, Spanish speakers, accustomed to irregular but patterned verbs like ser (to be) becoming fui (I was), may analogize incorrectly, leading to persistent deviations in English forms. Effective strategies for overcoming these challenges include mnemonics and musical aids, which leverage and repetition to reinforce ablaut patterns in strong verbs. Research demonstrates that songs targeting irregular forms improve retention and reduce errors, with ESL students showing gains in irregular verb accuracy after music-based interventions compared to traditional methods. Frequency-based apps like and prioritize high-frequency irregular verbs (e.g., the top 100, such as go-went-gone), presenting them in contextual exercises to build . Immersion environments further mitigate errors over time, as bilingual children in English-medium schooling exhibit decreased inaccuracies after one year of exposure. However, in low-exposure settings, errors can fossilize, resulting in perpetual forms like runned despite further learning opportunities, particularly when L1 transfer reinforces non-target patterns. Pedagogical approaches emphasize grouping irregular verbs by ablaut class (e.g., starting with strong verbs like sing-sang-sung) to highlight patterns and facilitate memorization. with L1 irregulars, such as comparing Spanish ser-fui to English be-was/were, helps learners recognize differences and avoid transfer errors.

Modern variations and neologisms

In contemporary English, dialectal variations continue to influence the forms of certain irregular verbs, particularly in transatlantic differences. In , the irregular past tense "snuck" for "sneak" has become increasingly standard, rising from rarity in the mid-20th century to dominance in informal and spoken registers by the early . In contrast, largely retains the regular "sneaked," with "snuck" appearing only sporadically in informal contexts. Similarly, the verb "dive" exhibits regional preferences: "dove" as the irregular past tense predominates in , especially since the late , while "dived" remains the preferred regular form in and other varieties. These shifts reflect ongoing analogical pressures from other strong verbs like "drive-drove," though both forms are accepted in dictionaries across dialects. Neologisms in English overwhelmingly adopt regular inflection patterns, contributing few if any truly irregular forms since 2000. For instance, the verb "text," derived from the noun for electronic messaging, is conjugated regularly as "texted" in both past tense and participle, despite occasional informal uses of "text" as a zero-marked past in spoken American English; linguistic studies confirm no widespread irregular paradigm has emerged. Internet slang verbs like "ghost" (to abruptly end communication) follow suit, forming the regular "ghosted," with no evidence of irregular variants in corpora. Potential candidates such as "lurk" (to browse online anonymously) also inflect regularly as "lurked," aligning with the tendency for novel verbs to avoid irregularity unless phonologically similar to existing strong classes. Pop culture and media have occasionally amplified irregular forms through analogy, though without creating new paradigms. Terms like "," originating in as a past participle of "wake" meaning alert to social injustice, have entered mainstream usage via activism and entertainment since the , reinforcing irregular ablaut patterns by association but functioning primarily as an adjective rather than a conjugated . Corpus data from sources like Ngrams indicate mixed trends in irregular usage post-1950, with no emergence of major new classes but evidence of both stabilization and erosion. In , the regular "burned" overtook "burnt" around 1880 and has maintained higher frequency. For "," "dove" has increased in American texts since the mid-20th century, while "dived" gains ground overall, signaling gradual regularization. Broader studies reveal an ongoing erosion of low-frequency irregulars, with mathematical models predicting that verbs used less than once per 10,000 words regularize within centuries, as seen in historical shifts like "" and "sneak." High-frequency irregulars, however, remain stable, underscoring frequency as a key factor in morphological persistence.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.