Hubbry Logo
CommaCommaMain
Open search
Comma
Community hub
Comma
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Comma
Comma
Comma
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

,
Comma
U+002C , COMMA (,)
、 ، ◌̦
Ideographic comma (CJK) Arabic comma combining comma below

The comma , is a punctuation mark that appears in several variants in different languages. Some typefaces render it as a small line, slightly curved or straight, but inclined from the vertical; others give it the appearance of a miniature filled-in figure 9 placed on the baseline. In many typefaces it is the same shape as an apostrophe or single closing quotation mark ’.

The comma is used in many contexts and languages, mainly to separate parts of a sentence such as clauses, and items in lists mainly when there are three or more items listed. The word comma comes from the Greek κόμμα (kómma), which originally meant a cut-off piece, specifically in grammar, a short clause.[1][2]

A comma-shaped mark is used as a diacritic in several writing systems and is considered distinct from the cedilla. In Byzantine and modern copies of Ancient Greek, the "rough" and "smooth breathings" (ἁ, ἀ) appear above the letter. In Latvian, Romanian, and Livonian, the comma diacritic appears below the letter, as in ș.

In spoken language, a common rule of thumb is that the function of a comma is generally performed by a pause.[3]

In this article, ⟨x⟩ denotes a grapheme (writing) and /x/ denotes a phoneme (sound).

History

[edit]
Main article: Punctuation § Western antiquity

The development of punctuation is much more recent than the alphabet.

In the 3rd century BC, Aristophanes of Byzantium invented a system of single dots (théseis) at varying levels, which separated verses and indicated the amount of breath needed to complete each fragment of the text when reading aloud.[4] The different lengths were signified by a dot at the bottom, middle, or top of the line. For a short passage, a komma in the form of a dot ⟨·⟩ was placed mid-level. This is the origin of the concept of a comma, although the name came to be used for the mark itself instead of the clause it separated.

The mark used today is descended from a /, a diagonal slash known as virgula suspensiva, used from the 13th to 17th centuries to represent a pause. The modern comma was first used by Aldus Manutius.[5][6]

Uses in English

[edit]

In general, the comma shows that the words immediately before the comma are less closely or exclusively linked grammatically to those immediately after the comma than they might be otherwise. The comma performs a number of functions in English writing. It is used in generally similar ways in other languages, particularly European ones, although the rules on comma usage – and their rigidity – vary from language to language.

List separator and the serial (Oxford) comma

[edit]
Further information: Serial comma

Commas are placed between items in lists, as in They own a cat, a dog, two rabbits, and seven mice.

Whether the final conjunction, most frequently and, should be preceded by a comma, called the serial comma, is one of the most disputed linguistic or stylistic questions in English:

  • They served apples, peaches, and bananas. (serial comma used)
  • They served apples, peaches and bananas. (serial comma omitted)

The serial comma is used much more often, usually routinely, in the United States. A majority of American style guides mandate its use, including The Chicago Manual of Style, Strunk and White's classic The Elements of Style, and the U.S. Government Publishing Office's Style Manual.[7] Conversely, the AP Stylebook for journalistic writing advises against it.

The serial comma is also known as the Oxford comma, Harvard comma, or series comma. Although less common in British English, its usage occurs within both American and British English. It is called the Oxford comma because of its long history of use by Oxford University Press.[8]

According to New Hart's Rules, "house style will dictate" whether to use the serial comma. "The general rule is that one style or the other should be used consistently." No association with region or dialect is suggested, other than that its use has been strongly advocated by Oxford University Press.[9] Its use is preferred by Fowler's Modern English Usage. It is recommended by the United States Government Printing Office, Harvard University Press, and the classic Elements of Style of Strunk and White.

Use of a comma may prevent ambiguity:

  • The sentence I spoke to the boys, Sam and Tom could mean either I spoke to the boys and Sam and Tom (I spoke to more than three people) or I spoke to the boys, who are Sam and Tom (I spoke to two people);
  • I spoke to the boys, Sam, and Tom – must be the boys and Sam and Tom (I spoke to more than three people).

The serial comma does not eliminate all confusion. Consider the following sentence:

  • I thank my mother, Anne Smith, and Thomas. This could mean either my mother and Anne Smith and Thomas (three people) or my mother, who is Anne Smith; and Thomas (two people). This sentence might be recast as "my mother (Anne Smith) and Thomas" for clarity.
  • I thank my mother, Anne Smith and Thomas. Because the comma after "mother" is conventionally used to prepare the reader for an appositive phrase – that is, a renaming of or further information about a noun – this construction formally suggests that my mother's name is "Anne Smith and Thomas". Because that is implausible, it is relatively clear that the construction refers to two separate people. Compare "I thank my friend, Smith and Wesson", in which the ambiguity is obvious to those who recognise Smith and Wesson as a business name.

As a rule of thumb, The Guardian Style Guide[10] suggests that straightforward lists (he ate ham, eggs and chips) do not need a comma before the final "and", but sometimes it can help the reader (he ate cereal, kippers, bacon, eggs, toast and marmalade, and tea). The Chicago Manual of Style and other academic writing guides require the serial comma: all lists must have a comma before the "and" prefacing the last item in a series (see Differences between American and British usage below).

If the individual items of a list are long, complex, affixed with description, or themselves contain commas, semicolons may be preferred as separators, and the list may be introduced with a colon.

In news headlines, a comma might replace the word "and", even if there are only two items, in order to save space, as in this headline from Reuters:[11]

  • Trump, Macron engage in a little handshake diplomacy.

Separation of clauses

[edit]

Commas are often used to separate clauses. In English, a comma is often used to separate a dependent clause from the independent clause if the dependent clause comes first: After I fed the cat, I brushed my clothes. (Compare this with I brushed my clothes after I fed the cat.) A relative clause takes commas if it is non-restrictive, as in I cut down all the trees, which were over six feet tall. (Without the comma, this would mean that only the trees more than six feet tall were cut down.) Some style guides prescribe that two independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so) must be separated by a comma placed before the conjunction.[12][13] In the following sentences, where the second clause is independent (because it can stand alone as a sentence), the comma is considered by those guides to be necessary:

  • Mary walked to the party, but she was unable to walk home.
  • Designer clothes are silly, and I can't afford them anyway.
  • Don't push that button, or twelve tons of high explosives will go off right under our feet!

In the following sentences, where the second half of the sentence is a dependent clause (because it does not contain an explicit subject), those guides prescribe that the comma be omitted:

  • Mary walked to the party but was unable to walk home.
  • I think designer clothes are silly and can't afford them anyway.

However, such guides permit the comma to be omitted if the second independent clause is very short, typically when the second independent clause is an imperative,[12][13] as in:

  • Sit down and shut up.

The above guidance is not universally accepted or applied. Long coordinate clauses, particularly when separated by "but", are often separated by commas:[14]

  • She had very little to live on, but would never have dreamed of taking what was not hers.

In some languages, such as German and Polish, stricter rules apply on comma use between clauses, with dependent clauses always being set off with commas, and commas being generally proscribed before certain coordinating conjunctions.

The joining of two independent sentences with a comma and no conjunction (as in "It is nearly half past five, we cannot reach town before dark.") is known as a comma splice and is sometimes considered an error in English;[15] in most cases a semicolon should be used instead. A comma splice should not be confused, though, with the literary device called asyndeton, in which coordinating conjunctions are purposely omitted for a specific stylistic effect.

A much debated comma is the one in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which says "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." but ratified by several states as "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." which has caused much debate on its interpretation.

Certain adverbs

[edit]

Commas are always used to set off certain adverbs at the beginning of a sentence, including however, in fact, therefore, nevertheless, moreover, furthermore, and still.

  • Therefore, a comma would be appropriate in this sentence.
  • Nevertheless, I will not use one.

If these adverbs appear in the middle of a sentence, they are followed and preceded by a comma. As in the second of the two examples below, if a semicolon separates the two sentences and the second sentence starts with an adverb, this adverb is preceded by a semicolon and followed by a comma.

  • In this sentence, furthermore, commas would also be called for.
  • This sentence is a bit different; however, a comma is necessary as well.

Using commas to offset certain adverbs is optional, including then, so, yet, instead, and too (meaning also).

  • So, that's it for this rule. or
  • So that's it for this rule.
  • A comma would be appropriate in this sentence, too. or
  • A comma would be appropriate in this sentence too.

Parenthetical phrases

[edit]

Commas are often used to enclose parenthetical words and phrases within a sentence (i.e., information that is not essential to the meaning of the sentence). Such phrases are both preceded and followed by a comma, unless that would result in a doubling of punctuation marks or the parenthetical is at the start or end of the sentence. The following are examples of types of parenthetical phrases:

  • Introductory phrase: Once upon a time, my father ate a muffin.[16]
  • Interjection: My father ate the muffin, gosh darn it!
  • Aside: My father, if you don't mind me telling you this, ate the muffin.
  • Appositive: My father, a jaded and bitter man, ate the muffin.
  • Absolute phrase: My father, his eyes flashing with rage, ate the muffin.
  • Free modifier: My father, chewing with unbridled fury, ate the muffin.
  • Resumptive modifier: My father ate the muffin, a muffin which no man had yet chewed.
  • Summative modifier: My father ate the muffin, a feat which no man had attempted.

The parenthesization of phrases may change the connotation, reducing or eliminating ambiguity. In the following example, the thing in the first sentence that is relaxing is the cool day, whereas in the second sentence, it is the walk since the introduction of commas makes "on a cool day" parenthetical:

They took a walk on a cool day that was relaxing.
They took a walk, on a cool day, that was relaxing.

As more phrases are introduced, ambiguity accumulates, but when commas separate each phrase, the phrases clearly become modifiers of just one thing. In the second sentence below, that thing is the walk:

They took a walk in the park on a cool day that was relaxing.
They took a walk, in the park, on a cool day, that was relaxing.

Between adjectives

[edit]

A comma is used to separate coordinate adjectives (i.e., adjectives that directly and equally modify the following noun). Adjectives are considered coordinate if the meaning would be the same if their order were reversed or if and were placed between them. For example:

  • The dull, incessant droning but the cute little cottage.
  • The devious lazy red frog suggests there are lazy red frogs (one of which is devious), while the devious, lazy red frog does not carry this connotation.

Before quotations

[edit]

Some writers precede quoted material that is the grammatical object of an active verb of speaking or writing with a comma, as in, "Mr. Kershner says, 'You should know how to use a comma.'" Quotations that follow and support an assertion are often preceded by a colon rather than a comma.

Other writers do not put a comma before quotations unless one would occur anyway. Thus, they would write "Mr. Kershner says 'You should know how to use a comma.'"

In dates

[edit]

Month day, year

[edit]

When a date is written as a month followed by a day followed by a year, a comma separates the day from the year: December 19, 1941. This style is common in American English. The comma is used to avoid confusing consecutive numbers: December 19 1941. Most style manuals, including The Chicago Manual of Style[17] and the AP Stylebook,[18] also recommend that the year be treated as a parenthetical, requiring a second comma after it: "Feb. 14, 1987, was the target date."

If just the month and year are given, no commas are used:[19] "Her daughter may return in June 2009 for the reunion."

Day month year

[edit]

When the day precedes the month, the month name separates the numeric day and year, so commas are not necessary to separate them: "The Raid on Alexandria was carried out on 19 December 1941."

In geographical names

[edit]

Commas are used to separate parts of geographical references, such as city and state (Dallas, Texas) or city and country (Kampala, Uganda). Additionally, most style manuals, including The Chicago Manual of Style[20] and the AP Stylebook,[21] recommend that the second element be treated as a parenthetical, requiring a second comma after: "The plane landed in Kampala, Uganda, that evening."[22]

The United States Postal Service[23] and Royal Mail[24] recommend leaving out punctuation when writing addresses on actual letters and packages, as the marks hinder optical character recognition. Canada Post has similar guidelines, making only very limited use of hyphens.[25]

In mathematics

[edit]

Similar to the case in natural languages, commas are often used to delineate the boundary between multiple mathematical objects in a list (e.g., ). Commas are also used to indicate the comma derivative of a tensor.[26]

In numbers

[edit]
Main article: Decimal separator

In representing large numbers, from the right side to the left, English texts usually use commas to separate each group of three digits in front of the decimal.[27] This is almost always done for numbers of six or more digits, and often for four or five digits but not in front of the number itself. However, in much of Europe, Southern Africa and Latin America, periods or spaces are used instead; the comma is used as a decimal separator, equivalent to the use in English of the decimal point.[28] In India, the groups are two digits, except for the rightmost group, which is of three digits. In some styles, the comma may not be used for this purpose at all (e.g. in the SI writing style[29]); a space may be used to separate groups of three digits instead.

In names

[edit]

Commas are used when rewriting names to present the surname first, generally in instances of alphabetization by surname: Smith, John. They are also used before many titles that follow a name: John Smith, Ph.D.

It can also be used in regnal names followed by their occupation: Louis XIII, king of France and Navarre.

Similarly in lists that are presented with an inversion: socks, green: 3 pairs; socks, red: 2 pairs; tie, regimental: 1.

Ellipsis

[edit]

Commas may be used to indicate that a word, or a group of words, has been omitted,[30] as in The cat was white; the dog, brown. (Here the comma replaces was.)

Vocative

[edit]

Commas are placed before, after, or around a noun or pronoun used independently in speaking to some person, place, or thing:

  • I hope, John, that you will read this.

Between the subject and predicate

[edit]

In his 1785 essay An Essay on Punctuation, Joseph Robertson advocated a comma between the subject and predicate of long sentences for clarity; however, this usage is regarded as an error in modern times.

  • The good taste of the present age, has not allowed us to neglect the cultivation of the English language.
  • Whoever is capable of forgetting a benefit, is an enemy to society.

Differences between American and British usage in placement of commas and quotation marks

[edit]
See also: Quotation marks in English § Order of punctuation

The comma and the quotation mark can be paired in several ways.

In Great Britain and many other parts of the world, punctuation is usually placed within quotation marks only if it is part of what is being quoted or referred to:[31][32][33]

  • My mother gave me the nickname "Bobby Bobby Bob Bob Boy", which really made me angry.

In American English, the comma was commonly included inside a quotation mark:[31][32]

  • My mother gave me the nickname "Bobby Bobby Bob Bob Boy," which really made me angry.

During the Second World War, the British carried the comma over into abbreviations. Specifically, "Special Operations, Executive" was written "S.O.,E.". Nowadays, even the full stops are frequently discarded in British usage.[34]

Languages other than English

[edit]

Western Europe

[edit]

Western European languages like German, French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese use the same comma as English, with similar spacing, though usage may be somewhat different. For instance, in Standard German, subordinate clauses are always preceded by commas.

Comma variants

[edit]
<?>
This section contains uncommon Unicode characters. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of the intended characters.

The basic comma is defined in Unicode as U+002C , COMMA (&comma;), and many variants by typography or language are also defined.

Character Unicode point Unicode name Notes
, U+002C COMMA Prose in European languages
Decimal separator in Continental Europe, Brazil, and most other Latin American countries
، U+060C ARABIC COMMA Used in all languages using Arabic alphabet
Also used in other languages, including Syriac and Thaana
⸲ U+2E32 TURNED COMMA Palaeotype transliteration symbol – indicates nasalization
⸴ U+2E34 RAISED COMMA
⹁ U+2E41 REVERSED COMMA Used in Sindhi, among other languages
⹉ U+2E49 DOUBLE STACKED COMMA Used in the Eastern Orthodox liturgical book Typikon
、 U+3001 IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA Used in Chinese and Japanese writing systems (see § East Asia, below)
︐ U+FE10 PRESENTATION FORM FOR VERTICAL COMMA Used in vertical writing
︑ U+FE11 PRESENTATION FORM FOR VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA Used in vertical writing
﹐ U+FE50 SMALL COMMA
﹑ U+FE51 SMALL IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA
， U+FF0C FULLWIDTH COMMA
､ U+FF64 HALFWIDTH IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA

Some languages use a completely different sort of character for the purpose of the comma.

Character Unicode point Unicode name Notes
· U+00B7 MIDDLE DOT Used as a comma in Georgian
∘ U+2218 RING OPERATOR Used as a comma in Malayalam
՝ U+055D ARMENIAN COMMA
߸ U+07F8 NKO COMMA
፣ U+1363 ETHIOPIC COMMA
᠂ U+1802 MONGOLIAN COMMA
᠈ U+1808 MONGOLIAN MANCHU COMMA
⹌ U+2E4C MEDIEVAL COMMA
꓾ U+A4FE LISU PUNCTUATION COMMA
꘍ U+A60D VAI COMMA
꛵ U+A6F5 BAMUM COMMA
𑑍 U+1144D NEWA COMMA
𑑚 U+1145A NEWA DOUBLE COMMA
𖺗 U+16E97 MEDEFAIDRIN COMMA
𝪇 U+1DA87 SIGNWRITING COMMA

There are also a number of comma-like diacritics with "COMMA" in their Unicode names that are not intended for use as punctuation. A comma-like low quotation mark is also available (shown below; corresponding sets of raised single quotation marks and double-quotation marks are not shown).

Character Unicode point Unicode name Notes
ʻ U+02BB MODIFIER LETTER TURNED COMMA Used as ʻokina in Hawaiian
ʽ U+02BD MODIFIER LETTER REVERSED COMMA Indicates weak aspiration
  ‍̒ U+0312 COMBINING TURNED COMMA ABOVE Latvian diacritic cedilla above
  ‍̓ U+0313 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE Greek psili (smooth breathing mark)
  ‍̔ U+0314 COMBINING REVERSED COMMA ABOVE Greek dasia (rough breathing mark)
  ‍̕ U+0315 COMBINING COMMA ABOVE RIGHT
  ‍̦ U+0326 COMBINING COMMA BELOW Diacritical mark in Romanian, Latvian, Livonian
‚ U+201A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK Opening single quotation mark in some languages

There are various other Unicode characters that include commas or comma-like figures with other characters or marks, that are not shown in these tables.

Greece

[edit]

Modern Greek uses the same Unicode comma for its kómma (κόμμα)[35] and it is officially romanized as a Latin comma,[36] but it has additional roles owing to its conflation with the former hypodiastole, a curved interpunct used to disambiguate certain homonyms. As such, the comma functions as a silent letter in a handful of Greek words, principally distinguishing ό,τι (ó,ti, 'whatever') from ότι (óti, 'that').[35]

East Asia

[edit]

The enumeration or ideographic comma (U+3001 、 IDEOGRAPHIC COMMA) is used in Chinese,[37]: 20  Japanese punctuation, and somewhat in Korean punctuation. In China and Korea, this comma (顿号; 頓號; dùnhào) is usually only used to separate items in lists, while it is the more common form of comma in Japan (読点, tōten, lit. 'clause mark').

In documents that mix Japanese and Latin scripts, the full-width comma (U+FF0C ， FULLWIDTH COMMA) is used; this is the standard form of comma (逗号; 逗號) in China. Since East Asian typography permits commas to join dependent clauses dealing with certain topics or lines of thought, commas may be used in ways that would be considered comma splices in English.[clarification needed]

Korean punctuation uses both commas and interpuncts for lists.

In Unicode 5.2.0, "numbers with commas" (U+1F101 🄁 DIGIT ZERO COMMA through U+1F10A 🄊 DIGIT NINE COMMA) were added to the Enclosed Alphanumeric Supplement block for compatibility with the ARIB STD B24 character set.[38][39]

West Asia

[edit]

The comma in the Arabic script used by languages including Arabic, Urdu, and Persian, is "upside-down" ⟨،⟩ (U+060C ، ARABIC COMMA), in order to distinguish it from the Arabic diacritic ḍammah ⟨ُ⟩ representing the vowel /u/, which is similarly shaped.[40] In Arabic texts, the Western-styled comma (٫) is used as a decimal point.

Hebrew script is also written from right to left. However, Hebrew punctuation includes only a regular comma ⟨,⟩.

South Asia

[edit]

Reversed comma (U+2E41 ⹁ REVERSED COMMA) is used in Sindhi when written in Arabic script. It is distinct from the standard Arabic comma.

Dravidian languages such as Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam also use the punctuation mark in similar usage to that of European languages with similar spacing.[41][circular reference]

Computing

[edit]

In the common character encoding systems Unicode and ASCII, character 44 (0x2C) corresponds to the comma symbol. The HTML numeric character reference is &#44;.

In many computer languages commas are used as a field delimiter to separate arguments to a function,[42] to separate elements in a list, and to perform data designation on multiple variables at once.

In the C programming language the comma symbol is an operator which evaluates its first argument (which may have side-effects) and then returns the value of its evaluated second argument. This is useful in for statements and macros.

In Smalltalk and APL, the comma operator is used to concatenate collections, including strings. In APL, it is also used monadically to rearrange the items of an array into a list.

In Prolog, the comma is used to denote Logical Conjunction ("and").

The comma-separated values (CSV) format is very commonly used in exchanging text data between database and spreadsheet formats.

Diacritical usage

[edit]
◌̦
Combining comma below
U+0326 ◌̦ COMBINING COMMA BELOW
Main articles: D-comma, S-comma, and T-comma

The comma is used as a diacritic mark in Romanian under ⟨s⟩ (⟨Ș⟩, ⟨ș⟩), and under ⟨t⟩ (⟨Ț⟩, ⟨ț⟩). A cedilla is occasionally used instead of it, but this is technically incorrect. The symbol ⟨d̦⟩ ('d with comma below') was used as part of the Romanian transitional alphabet (19th century) to indicate the sounds denoted by the Latin letter ⟨z⟩ or letters ⟨dz⟩, where derived from a Cyrillic ѕ (⟨ѕ⟩, /dz/). The comma and the cedilla are both derivative of ⟨ʒ⟩ (a small cursive ⟨z⟩) placed below the letter. From this standpoint alone, ⟨ș⟩, ⟨ț⟩, and ⟨d̦⟩ could potentially be regarded as stand-ins for /sz/, /tz/, and /dz/ respectively.

In Latvian, the comma is used on the letters ⟨ģ⟩, ⟨ķ⟩, ⟨ļ⟩, ⟨ņ⟩, and historically also ⟨ŗ⟩, to indicate palatalization. Because the lowercase letter ⟨g⟩ has a descender, the comma is rotated 180° and placed over the letter. Although their Adobe glyph names are 'letter with comma', their names in the Unicode Standard are 'letter with a cedilla'. They were introduced to the Unicode standard before 1992 and, per Unicode Consortium policy, their names cannot be altered. In the late 1920s and 1930s, the Latgalian orthography used in Siberia used additional letters with comma: ⟨c̦⟩, ⟨d̦⟩, ⟨m̦⟩, ⟨p̦⟩, ⟨ș⟩, ⟨ț⟩, ⟨v̦⟩, ⟨z̦⟩.[43]

In Livonian, whose alphabet is based on a mixture of Latvian and Estonian alphabets, the comma is used on the letters ⟨ḑ⟩, ⟨ļ⟩, ⟨ņ⟩, ⟨ŗ⟩, ⟨ț⟩ to indicate palatalization in the same fashion as Latvian, except that Livonian uses ⟨ḑ⟩ and ⟨ț⟩ to represent the same palatal plosive phonemes which Latvian writes as ⟨ģ⟩ and ⟨ķ⟩ respectively.

In Czech and Slovak, the diacritic in the characters ⟨ď⟩, ⟨ť⟩, and ⟨ľ⟩ resembles a superscript comma, but it is used instead of a caron because the letter has an ascender. Other ascender letters with carons, such as letters ⟨ȟ⟩ (used in Finnish Romani and Lakota) and ⟨ǩ⟩ (used in Skolt Sami), did not modify their carons to superscript commas.

In 16th-century Guatemala, the archaic letter cuatrillo with a comma (⟨Ꜯ⟩ and ⟨ꜯ⟩) was used to write Mayan languages.[44]

See also

[edit]
[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Comma

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The comma (,) is a mark employed in many written languages to denote a brief pause within a sentence, separate or phrases, distinguish items in lists, and set off nonessential or introductory elements. Originating from the term komma, meaning "a piece cut off" or "short ," derived from the koptein ("to cut"), the mark evolved from medieval notations for rhetorical pauses, such as diagonal slashes or points, before achieving its modern curved form through the standardization of printing in the late 15th century by figures like . In English usage, it primarily separates independent joined by coordinating conjunctions (e.g., and, but), divides elements in series (with debate over the optional "" or before the final item), follows introductory phrases, and clarifies appositives or parenthetical expressions to prevent . While essential for readability and grammatical precision, the comma's application remains a point of contention among style guides—such as the preference for the comma in outlets like versus its omission in others like the —highlighting ongoing variations in conventions that can alter sentence meaning, as in the classic example distinguishing "eats shoots and leaves" from "eats, shoots, and leaves."

History

Origins in ancient writing systems

The earliest systematic precursors to the comma arose in writing during the 3rd century BCE, when of Byzantium, head librarian at , introduced distinctiones—a trio of dots placed at varying heights to denote pauses in textual recitations. The low-placed dot (hypostigme), positioned at the baseline, marked the shortest pause for breath or minor clause break, functioning as a proto-comma; the middle dot (mesostigme) indicated an intermediate pause; and the high dot (ekstasis or aristostigme) signaled a . These marks addressed the limitations of , the unpunctuated, unspaced script dominant in Greek papyri and inscriptions, by aiding precise oral performance from written manuscripts, as inferred from surviving Hellenistic fragments where such dots appear sporadically to guide elocution rather than enforce grammar. Empirical evidence from manuscripts, including Ptolemaic papyri, confirms these proto-punctuation forms were not ubiquitous but emerged causally from the need to transcribe rhetorical pauses into durable written records for scholarly in libraries like Alexandria's, preserving intonation in an era when texts served primarily auditory dissemination. ' system prioritized prosodic rhythm over syntactic structure, reflecting the oral-literate interplay of , though adoption remained inconsistent until later Byzantine codices. This Greek innovation influenced Latin scripts, with adapting it in the 7th century CE in his , where he redefined the low point (subdistinctio) as a "comma" for short clauses, explicitly tying marks to interpretive meaning and elocutionary guidance in medieval manuscripts. The comma's distinct curved glyph later crystallized in Latin printing, but its ancient roots lie in these pause-indicating dots, evidenced by their persistence in patristic and classical codices as tools for bridging and written fidelity.

Development through medieval and Renaissance periods

In the transition from to the early medieval period, the Byzantine Greek hypodiastole—a low-placed mark resembling a modern comma used primarily for word division in continuous script and minor pauses—influenced Latin scribal practices, where similar low points (punctus) began denoting short rhetorical breaks in 8th-century manuscripts. During the Carolingian reforms around 780–800 CE, under figures like of York at the court of , scribes in minuscule script adopted systematic positurae—elevated, medial, or low points—to guide liturgical reading aloud, marking distinctions between brief pauses (comma-like) and longer ones, though primarily for oral cadence rather than fixed syntax. This represented a refinement driven by practical needs in monastic scriptoria, where uniform texts facilitated empire-wide education, but marks remained variable in height and placement across copies. By the high medieval period, in Gothic scripts prevalent from the 12th to 15th centuries, comma-like punctus marks integrated into vernacular languages, appearing in English and French literary manuscripts to signal pauses amid growing literacy in non-Latin texts. In Geoffrey Chaucer's works, such as 14th-century manuscripts of , scribes sporadically employed virgules or points for series separation and breaks, reflecting oral poetic over grammatical precision. These applications prioritized performative reading in courtly or clerical settings, with marks often added post-composition, leading to variations like the punctus elevatus for mid-sentence rests. Medieval punctuation's inconsistency challenges notions of innate or "intuitive" usage, as evidenced by divergent practices: legal charters and statutes from the 13th–15th centuries frequently omitted marks to maintain interpretive flexibility in disputes, preserving traditions for brevity and authority. In contrast, literary codices allowed scribe-driven additions for clarity in , yet even these layered multiple pointing systems over time, underscoring punctuation's role as an aid to voice modulation rather than a standardized syntactic tool. This genre-specific variability stemmed from causal priorities—legal rigidity versus literary flow—rather than uniform evolution, with empirical revealing no dogmatic consistency until later refinements.

Standardization in the printing press era

The advent of the movable-type in the mid-15th century, pioneered by around 1440, imposed typographic uniformity on by requiring standardized metal type for glyphs like the comma, enabling mass reproduction and reducing variability. This mechanical consistency causally drove the comma's evolution from an inconsistent rhetorical pause marker to a more reliable syntactic tool, as printers prioritized clarity for broader readership amid surging print volumes. Venetian printer advanced this process in his editions starting in the 1490s, where he systematically employed the comma to delineate clauses in complex classical and polyglot texts, alongside introducing italics and the for enhanced readability. His innovations, disseminated through high-volume Greek and Latin imprints, embedded the comma's modern curved form and placement into European printing norms, influencing subsequent typographic practices across languages. In 16th- and 17th-century , grammarians responded to elevated literacy—fueled by printed books and pamphlets—by formalizing comma rules on syntactic grounds. , in his (composed circa 1617, published 1640), prescribed the comma for logical separations within sentences, integrating rhetorical pause with grammatical structure to guide reader interpretation in prose and verse. By the , colonial printing presses replicated these conventions, as evidenced in American almanacs like those from Benjamin Franklin's shop (e.g., Poor Richard's Almanack, 1732–1758) and British pamphlets, which uniformly applied commas for list separation and clause delimitation, demonstrating 's role in transatlantic orthographic convergence without significant regional divergence in core usage.

Typographic Forms and Variants

Standard representations across scripts

The standard comma, designated as Unicode code point U+002C (COMMA), features a curved below the baseline in scripts such as Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek, ensuring uniform rendering across these typographic families. This , categorized as Other in the Basic Latin block, adopts a teardrop-like shape in many fonts to visually distinguish it from the while maintaining baseline alignment for consistent line flow. promotes its shared use to avoid script-specific re-encoding, facilitating cross-script compatibility in digital typography. In right-to-left scripts like , the dedicated U+060C (ARABIC COMMA) replaces the standard form, appearing as an inverted, upright stroke or reversed curve to align with directional conventions and avoid baseline conflicts in connected text. This variant, also employed in Syriac and , preserves readability in flows where the Latin comma's could disrupt joining behaviors. The modern curved form traces its evolution from the virgula suspensiva, a slash-like mark (/) employed in 13th- to 17th-century manuscripts to denote pauses, which printing presses in the refined into a compact, baseline-attached for metal type efficiency. This shift, accelerated by Venetian printer around 1500, prioritized legibility in dense text blocks over the slash's diagonal intrusion. Typographic rendering of U+002C involves font-specific metrics, with serif faces applying optical to account for the comma's tail curve against adjacent letters—such as tighter spacing with rounded glyphs like 'o'—while designs favor uniform geometric adjustments for simplicity in low-resolution displays. These variations ensure proportional harmony without altering the glyph's core baseline form across scripts.

Diacritical and modified uses

In certain writing systems, the comma shape has been repurposed as a diacritic to alter consonant or vowel articulation, distinct from its primary syntactic function. The cedilla, first appearing in 15th-century Spanish manuscripts as a small z (zeta) swash beneath 'c' to denote the affricate /ts/, gradually simplified into a comma-like hook underneath the letter, as seen in French (façade) and Portuguese (açúcar) to indicate the sibilant /s/ sound before back vowels. This evolution reflects phonetic adaptations in Romance languages, where the mark palatalizes or softens the base consonant, with the term "cedilla" deriving from Spanish cedilla, meaning "little z," by the 1590s. Similar comma-derived diacritics appear in other Latin extensions: Romanian employs a comma below (ș, ț) for postalveolar fricatives /ʃ/ and /ts/, explicitly termed virgulă (comma), while Latvian uses it analogously for ș and ģ to mark palatalization, distinguishing these from the hooked cedilla by their straighter, punctuational form. These modifications, standardized in the 20th century for national orthographies, prioritize phonetic accuracy over historical swash variants. In polytonic Greek orthography, developed from the 3rd century BCE, the rough breathing diacritic (῾)—a reversed comma or apostrophe placed over initial vowels or rho—signals aspiration (/h/ onset), as in ἥλιος (hēlios, "sun"), contrasting with unmarked smooth breathings; this system, attributed to Alexandrian scholars like Aristophanes of Byzantium, aided pronunciation for non-native readers until its partial abandonment in modern Greek by 1982. Such adaptations remain infrequent across global scripts, primarily confined to Indo-European derivatives influenced by Latin , underscoring the comma's dominant role as rather than modifier.

Core Syntactic Functions

Separating items in lists and series

In English syntax, commas separate the elements of a list or series containing three or more items, marking each as a distinct constituent to facilitate accurate and avoid conflation with adjacent phrases. For series of two items, no comma precedes the coordinating conjunction, yielding forms such as " and butter." With three or more, commas follow all but the final item, as in ", butter, and jam," where the optional comma before "and"—termed the serial or comma—explicitly delimits the last element from the conjunction. This convention reduces by signaling boundaries in the , ensuring the reader interprets the structure as parallel independent items rather than a compound final unit modifying the penultimate one. Linguistic examinations of treat the comma as a structural that mirrors hierarchical divisions in sentence , preventing misreadings where the absence of separation causes the final phrase to attach incorrectly to prior elements. Omission of the serial comma has demonstrably led to interpretive disputes, as evidenced by the 2017 U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decision in O'Connor v. Oakhurst Dairy. A overtime exemption listed activities as "The , processing, preserving, freezing, drying, marketing, storing, packing for shipment or distribution of: (1) Agricultural produce; (2) Meat and fish when provided by a ; and (3) Perishable foods," without a comma after "." The court found this phrasing ambiguous, ruling that dairy drivers' packing duties applied only to perishable foods under (3), not the broader list, thereby voiding the exemption and prompting a $5 million settlement for 120+ drivers. The thus acts as a causal safeguard, enforcing separation to preserve the intended enumeration's integrity against parsing conflations that could alter meaning in legal, technical, or everyday contexts. Classic ambiguities, such as "dedicated to my parents, and God" (implying the parents are Rand and God without the comma), illustrate how its inclusion preempts erroneous appositive readings of the final pair as a single modified entity. Consistent application prioritizes clarity over stylistic , aligning with principles that treat as a tool for unambiguous constituent isolation in series.

Delimiting clauses, phrases, and modifiers

Commas delimit non-restrictive and phrases, which provide supplementary information not essential to the sentence's core meaning, by enclosing them in pairs to signal their parenthetical nature. In contrast, restrictive and modifiers, which define or limit the noun they modify and are integral to the sentence's meaning, require no such punctuation. For instance, in "My brother who lives in is visiting," the clause identifies which brother and thus omits commas, whereas "My brother, who lives in , is visiting" adds non-essential detail about the only brother, necessitating commas. This distinction preserves semantic precision, as omitting commas from non-restrictive elements can alter interpretation, equating supplementary data with definitional constraints. For adjective phrases and modifiers, commas separate coordinate adjectives—those independently modifying the noun and interchangeable with "and"—from cumulative ones, where adjectives build sequentially without independent equivalence. Coordinate examples include "red, white, and blue flags," where inserting "and" yields "red and white and blue flags" without absurdity, justifying commas between all but the final pair. Cumulative cases, such as "a ," resist "and" substitution ("a red and brick house" sounds illogical), so no comma appears. This rule, rooted in hierarchical modification, prevents misparsing by clarifying adjectival independence. Empirically, commas facilitate sentence parsing by guiding eye movements, as demonstrated in eye-tracking studies where their presence reduces regressions and fixation durations compared to unpunctuated text. In Spanish reading experiments, sentences with standard commas elicited smoother gaze patterns than those without, underscoring punctuation's role in disambiguating syntactic boundaries. Causally, commas encode logical breaks that align with spoken intonation contours, visually replicating prosodic pauses and rises that segment information units in oral . This correspondence enhances by mirroring auditory processing cues, where non-restrictive elements correspond to lower prominence in speech contours.

Handling interruptions, appositives, and vocatives

Commas are used to set off parenthetical interruptions, which are nonessential phrases or clauses that provide supplementary information without altering the sentence's core meaning. For instance, in the sentence "The conference, held annually in , attracts global experts," the phrase "held annually in Boston" is enclosed by paired commas because it interrupts the main clause and can be omitted without changing the essential assertion. This pairing follows the rule that both sides of the interruption require commas to maintain syntactic clarity, as outlined in grammars; a single comma suffices only if the interruption begins the sentence or follows an introductory element. Overuse of commas for such interruptions risks fragmenting sentences unnecessarily, a pitfall noted in linguistic analyses where excessive correlates with reduced in . Appositives, noun phrases that rename or explain a preceding , employ commas to distinguish restrictive (essential) from nonrestrictive (explanatory) types. Restrictive appositives, which define the without commas, convey indispensable , as in "My brother John lives nearby," where "John" specifies which brother. Nonrestrictive appositives, adding optional detail, require paired commas: "My brother, John, lives nearby," assuming a single brother. This distinction, rooted in 19th-century prescriptive reforms, prevents ; corpus studies of English texts from 1800–1900 show a marked increase in comma usage for nonrestrictives, shifting from sparse in earlier prose to mandatory enclosure by the to enhance precision amid lengthening sentences. Failure to punctuate appropriately can imply unintended restrictiveness, altering semantic intent, as evidenced in legal and where appositive clarity averts misinterpretation. Vocatives, words or phrases directly addressing a person or entity, are set off by commas to separate the address from the rest of the sentence. Examples include "Pass the salt, please" or "Yes, reader, consider this evidence," where the comma signals the interruption of direct speech. This convention, formalized in 18th-century grammars like Lindley Murray's English Grammar (1795), evolved from oral traditions in classical rhetoric to written norms, with early modern English texts often omitting such commas until standardization in the 19th century. In formal writing, vocatives at sentence starts or ends may use a single comma, but mid-sentence placement demands pairs to avoid run-on perceptions; style guides emphasize this to preserve intonation cues in text. Empirical reviews of edited corpora confirm that consistent vocative punctuation reduces parsing errors by 15–20% in reader comprehension tests.

Domain-Specific Conventions

In dates, times, and geographical references

In conventions for full dates in prose, a comma follows the day when the month-day-year format is used, as in "October 26, 2025," and an additional comma appears after the year if the date is embedded in a sentence requiring separation from subsequent elements. This placement aids readability by indicating a natural pause after the complete date. In contrast, typically employs the day-month-year format without commas, such as "26 October 2025," reflecting a preference for streamlined in non-American styles. For times of day, commas are generally absent in standalone expressions like "2:30 p.m.," but appear when integrating time with dates in sentences to separate clauses, for example, "The event begins October 26, 2025, at 2:30 p.m." This usage aligns with broader comma rules for delimiting introductory or interrupting elements rather than inherent time notation. Geographical references employ commas to distinguish hierarchical place elements in prose, such as between a city and its state or country: "Boston, Massachusetts" or "Paris, France." A comma also follows the state or country if the phrase continues, treating it as a nonrestrictive appositive for clarity. In international contexts, this convention holds for compound references like "," though headlines and telegraphic styles often omit commas to conserve space, yielding forms such as "Paris France." The standard prioritizes machine-readable formats like "2025-10-26" without commas, using hyphens for separation to enhance parsing efficiency across systems. However, in human-readable prose, commas persist for prosodic pause and syntactic disambiguation, underscoring a distinction between computational precision and flow.

In numerical notation and mathematical expressions

In numerical notation, the comma serves as a in many countries, particularly in , , and parts of , where numbers like 1,23 denote one and a equaling twenty-three hundredths. This contrasts with the decimal point used in the United States, , and several other English-speaking nations, where 1.23 represents the same value. The (ISO) in its standard ISO 80000-1 permits either the point or the comma as a marker but mandates consistency within a single document to avoid ambiguity. For thousands grouping, conventions invert: the comma appears in as in 1,000, while European standards often employ a point, , or , such as 1.000 or 1 000. These reciprocal usages, rooted in historical and national conventions, are codified by bodies like the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), which recognizes both separators in the (SI) while recommending alignment with local practice. In mathematical expressions, the comma universally separates arguments in functions, as in f(x,y)f(x, y), distinguishing variables or parameters without implying addition or other operations. This convention, drawn from centuries-old mathematical notation, extends to tuples, coordinates, and sequences, such as the vector (3,5,12)(3,5,12) or limits involving series like lim⁡n→∞∑k=1n1k\lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k}. ISO 80000-2 endorses the comma as the preferred separator for such enumerations or expressions, except where numbers might conflict with decimal usage, in which case alternatives like semicolons may substitute. Cross-cultural discrepancies in separators have led to documented errors in interpreting numerical data, particularly in international reports, financial transactions, and scientific exchanges, where misreading 1,234.56 as over a thousand versus one-point-two can skew analyses or decisions. Empirical cases from global business and data processing highlight such risks, underscoring the need for explicit notation standards in multinational contexts to mitigate cognitive and systemic misinterpretations.

In names, titles, and quotations

In personal names, generational suffixes such as "Jr." and "Sr." are traditionally set off by a comma preceding the suffix, as in ", Jr.," to indicate the suffix as parenthetical information, particularly in formal or legal contexts where clarity of lineage is essential. However, major style guides like the recommend omitting the comma before "Jr." or "Sr." to streamline usage, reflecting a shift away from the comma in contemporary for brevity without sacrificing readability in most identifiers. This omission is especially common in addresses and signatures, though in or official correspondence may retain the comma for traditional formality, as noted in social protocol resources. Academic and professional titles or degrees appended to names, such as "Ph.D." or "M.D.," are separated by commas to distinguish them as descriptors, for example, ", Ph.D., testified in ." In formal addresses or legal filings, these commas ensure the title integrates without ambiguity, particularly when multiple credentials follow, as in "Alice Brown, M.D., Ph.D.," where commas delimit each element. Prefix titles like "Dr." precede the name without a comma, but post-nominal forms require the comma for separation, aligning with institutional guidelines in professional and academic documentation to maintain precision. In quotations, especially dialogue within legal transcripts or formal reports, a comma introduces the quoted material after an attribution verb, as in "The witness stated, 'I object.'" When the dialogue tag follows the quotation, the comma replaces the period inside the closing marks if the quoted speech would otherwise end with a comma or similar pause, yielding "'No,' she replied." Style guides such as AP and both mandate placing commas inside closing quotation marks for dialogue, favoring conventional over purely logical placement external to the quote, which enhances visual consistency in printed formal texts despite occasional debates on attribution accuracy. This approach prioritizes readability in extended quotations, as seen in records where interrupting attributions demand clear to avoid misinterpretation.

Usage in Non-English Languages

In European and Western scripts

The comma in European and Western scripts inherits its form and primary function from Latin punctuation practices, which evolved from rhetorical notation marking short pauses (known as komma, or "cut-off piece") to delineate clauses in oral delivery, later formalized in printed texts around the by scholars like for Latin editions. This system was adapted into vernacular during the , with adjustments to reflect phonetic prosody and syntactic hierarchies unique to each, such as stricter clause demarcation in hypotactic Germanic structures versus more fluid Romance phrasing. In , comma usage tends toward restrictiveness, prioritizing essential separations like lists and appositives while omitting non-mandatory ones to maintain sentence rhythm; for instance, French employs the comma for brief pauses in subordinate clauses or enumerations but less frequently overall than in English, avoiding it before coordinating "et" in simple series and using it sparingly for non-restrictive elements. Spanish similarly delimits lists without a serial comma before "y" and integrates commas into inverted interrogative structures for clarity, as in "¿Vienes, o no?" to separate potential clauses, aligning with the language's tolerance for extended sentences. Germanic languages emphasize commas for hypotaxis, mandating them before subordinate clauses regardless of position to signal verb-final word order, as in "Ich weiß, dass er kommt," where the comma precedes subordinating conjunctions like "dass" to enforce structural embedding. This contrasts with Romance selectivity, where linguistic observations note greater omission of optional commas in non-essential modifiers, though quantitative corpus data on precise rates remains limited. Modern Greek retains the comma for denoting short pauses akin to lists and boundaries, mirroring Latin-derived English conventions but with polytonic script influences in earlier forms yielding to monotonic simplicity today. , such as Russian, largely parallel English in list separations but apply commas more rigorously to isolate dependent s amid flexible , eschewing them before coordinating "и" in basic enumerations unless linking phrases, with aspectual verb distinctions occasionally influencing pause placements for semantic precision.

In Asian, Middle Eastern, and South Asian scripts

In East Asian scripts such as Chinese and Japanese, punctuation analogous to the Western comma emerged primarily through 19th- and 20th-century Western influences, rather than indigenous development. Classical Chinese texts lacked standardized punctuation until the modern era, relying instead on reader interpretation of pauses via context and prosody; the full-width comma (，) was adopted in the early 20th century for separating clauses or enumerating items, mirroring English usage but adapted for horizontal or vertical text flow. Similarly, Japanese employs the touten (、), a small comma-like mark for listing items or indicating pauses within sentences, introduced during the Meiji Restoration (1868–1912) as part of broader typographic reforms inspired by European models, though traditional vertical writing prioritizes rhythmic segmentation over frequent delimiters. In Middle Eastern scripts, utilizes a reversed comma (،) for syntactic separation, a convention borrowed from European printing in the Ottoman period ( onward), while classical texts depended on oral recitation cues and lacked fixed commas; the (ٱ), a for eliding initial in liaison, serves phonological rather than punctuational roles in verse . Hebrew punctuation incorporates the standard comma (,) in modern usage for clauses and lists, but traditionally favored the maqaf (־), a supralinear for word compounding or pauses in biblical contexts, with pesiq symbols denoting chanting breaks rather than inline delimiters. South Asian Indic scripts, including , historically eschew the comma in favor of the (।), a vertical stroke marking phrase or sentence ends to preserve syllabic continuity and vertical aesthetics; classical and texts show near-exclusive reliance on danda for segmentation, with Western comma adoption confined to post-colonial modern prose (post-1947 in ), appearing in under 10% of pre-1800 Devanagari manuscripts per script analyses. This limited integration underscores a preference for script-inherent markers over imported delimiters, maintaining prosodic flow in recitational traditions.

Regional and Stylistic Variations

Differences between American and British conventions

In , commas preceding closing quotation marks in direct speech are placed inside the marks, treating the punctuation as integral to the quoted for consistent visual enclosure and readability. British English, however, situates such commas outside unless they form part of the original quoted text, following a of logical attribution that separates external sentence structure from the quotation itself. This American approach aligns with a dialogue-centric logic, where supports the representational integrity of spoken content, while the British typographic method prioritizes precision in sourcing marks to their origin. American conventions more routinely incorporate the in lists of three or more items, positioning it before the coordinating conjunction to delineate each element distinctly and preempt potential misparsing. British practice typically forgoes it absent demonstrable ambiguity, emphasizing economy in prose. A 2022 YouGov poll indicated that just 25% of Britons favor the , reflecting its optional status in writing compared to broader American endorsement. Linguistic corpora substantiate denser comma deployment in , with the () recording roughly one comma per 15 words versus one per 20 in the (BNC). This disparity highlights American tendencies toward explicit syntactic aids for clarity, potentially rooted in broader accessibility demands, against British inclinations for streamlined, inference-reliant brevity shaped by established traditions.

Influence of style guides and editorial practices

The (AP) Stylebook, a cornerstone for journalistic writing, prescribes omitting the in simple series to favor conciseness, as in "red, white and blue," reflecting the medium's emphasis on streamlined for time-sensitive reporting. This approach, codified in editions since at least the early 2000s, prioritizes brevity over exhaustive separation, though it permits the comma when needed to avert ambiguity, as updated in the 2020 edition. In contrast, academic and publishing guides like (17th edition, 2017) mandate the for lists of three or more items to ensure unambiguous parsing, arguing it signals completeness without relying on reader inference. Similarly, the (APA) Publication Manual (7th edition, 2020) requires it between all elements in series, citing clarity as essential for precise scholarly communication. The Modern Language Association (MLA) Handbook (9th edition, 2021) endorses serial commas preceding the conjunction in lists, aligning with its focus on rhetorical transparency in humanities writing, though it allows contextual flexibility for stylistic lists. These prescriptive divergences highlight domain-specific trade-offs: journalism's AP leans toward descriptive economy mirroring spoken rhythms, while academic styles impose stricter separation to minimize interpretive errors, often justified by the higher stakes of precision in formal analysis. Post-2000 revisions across guides reflect incremental shifts toward pragmatism; for example, AP's 2019 online updates explicitly softened mandates by emphasizing clarity exceptions, reducing rigid adherence in favor of case-by-case judgment. Oxford University Press, which popularized the via its 1905 under Horace Hart, continues to favor it in complex series but endorses occasional omission in straightforward ones, as articulated in New (2nd edition, 2014), prioritizing readability over dogma. This evolution underscores a broader tension between prescriptive authority—rooted in institutional conventions—and descriptive realities, where corpus analyses of post-2000 texts show hybrid usage: AP-influenced exhibits 70-80% omission rates in simple lists, per genre-specific studies, while Chicago-adherent maintains near-universal inclusion. Empirical outcomes, such as lower resolution times in serial-comma texts from controlled reading tasks, suggest that guide-driven consistency enhances more than isolated rules, though journalistic brevity yields comparable comprehension in high-context narratives when no arises.

Debates and Controversies

The serial comma (Oxford comma) dispute

The , also known as the Oxford comma, refers to the comma placed before the coordinating conjunction (typically "and" or "or") in a list of three or more items, such as in "red, white, and blue." Its use has sparked debate among linguists, editors, and authors, with proponents arguing it enhances clarity by preventing , while opponents view it as superfluous in straightforward lists, prioritizing brevity and traditional journalistic conventions. The ( advises against it in simple series to conserve space and maintain economy, as in where "the is red, white and blue," but permits it when ambiguity arises or in complex lists containing internal conjunctions. In contrast, recommends its consistent inclusion for thoroughness and to align with spoken pauses in enumeration. Advocates for the emphasize its role in averting misinterpretation, as omission can fuse the final two items into an unintended appositive or compound, exemplified by the sentence "This book is dedicated to my parents, and God," which without the comma implies the parents are and God rather than listing three dedicatees. This risk materialized in legal contexts, notably the 2017 U.S. First of Appeals ruling in O'Connor v. Oakhurst Dairy, where the absence of a serial comma in a Maine exemption —"The , , preserving, freezing, , , storing, packing for shipment or distribution"—created over whether "distribution" was a separate exempt activity or part of "packing for shipment." The court deemed the phrasing grammatically unclear, remanding the case and prompting a $5 million settlement in back pay to five delivery drivers in February 2018, underscoring how stylistic choices can impose substantial real-world costs. Opponents counter that the introduces redundancy in uncomplicated lists, where context and conjunction suffice to delineate items, potentially fostering imprecise writing by over-relying on rather than structural rigor. Journalistic traditions, rooted in print-era space constraints, favor omission for concision, as seen in AP guidelines, arguing that habitual use signals pedantry without proportional benefit in everyday prose. However, psycholinguistic evidence supports clarity's precedence: (ERP) studies demonstrate that commas facilitate syntactic during by modulating implicit prosody and reducing integration difficulties, with their absence correlating to heightened processing demands and error rates in comprehension tasks. A 2022 analysis further linked inconsistent comma usage, including in serial positions, to moderate deficits in among secondary students (r = 0.332), suggesting omission normalizes parsing inefficiencies rather than relying on reader intuition. These findings, alongside documented ambiguities in high-stakes applications, affirm that while stylistic suits informal brevity, unambiguous communication demands the serial comma's default inclusion to prioritize causal precision over convention.

Trade-offs between clarity, brevity, and tradition

The deployment of commas necessitates weighing clarity, which mitigates in conveying precise meanings; brevity, which streamlines expression to essential elements; and , which upholds conventions shaped by evolving linguistic norms. Brevity proponents, exemplified by Hemingway's minimalist approach, prioritize short, declarative sentences that minimize to achieve directness and , arguing that excess marks dilute narrative force. In contrast, neurophysiological evidence from studies demonstrates that commas induce prosodic cues during , enhancing syntactic disambiguation and reducing processing errors by facilitating boundary perception akin to natural pauses. This suggests that sparing use may impose undue interpretive burdens, particularly in dense or subordinate structures where causal linkages depend on explicit separation. Nineteenth-century English punctuation emphasized rhetorical flow, employing commas liberally to replicate spoken intonation and logical pauses, a practice that waned in the twentieth century toward syntactic for streamlined readability amid rising print efficiency demands. Style guides like the reflect this evolution, codifying rules that favor brevity and clarity but often err toward restraint, as seen in preferences for avoiding unnecessary commas to prevent clutter. Contemporary AI systems, trained on heterogeneous corpora exhibiting variable comma conventions, propagate inconsistencies that amplify misparsing risks; for instance, punctuation variances in input can cascade into outputs altering clinical or factual interpretations, underscoring how under-punctuation in modern data erodes reliable . Such lapses reveal a causal chain where aesthetic-driven in source texts—prevalent in journalistic and literary traditions—prioritizes visual economy over verifiable comprehension fidelity, potentially at the cost of accurate idea conveyance in high-stakes contexts.

Cognitive and Perceptual Processing

Effects on reading comprehension and eye movements

Commas serve as visual cues that signal syntactic boundaries, thereby reducing during reading by guiding eye movements and aiding initial parse of sentence structure. Eye-tracking studies demonstrate that their presence shortens fixation durations on subsequent words and decreases the likelihood of regressions, where readers backtrack to reprocess text. For instance, in experiments manipulating comma placement, target words followed by commas elicited shorter first-fixation times compared to those without, indicating faster syntactic integration. Omission of mandatory commas disrupts this facilitation, leading to measurable increases in processing effort. A 2023 study by Angele et al. examined English readers' eye movements in texts with and without required commas, finding that omissions resulted in longer fixation durations and elevated regression rates, with skilled readers experiencing 10-15% more regressions to resolve ambiguities; readers showed even greater disruptions due to higher baseline demands. This aligns with metrics of fixation duration, where commas act as low-level oculomotor signals that preempt cognitive overload by demarcating separations, allowing forward progression without immediate reanalysis. Regarding comprehension outcomes, comma usage correlates positively with overall understanding, particularly in languages enforcing strict rules. In a 2022 analysis of Spanish secondary-education students, proper comma placement showed a moderate positive association with scores (r = 0.332, p < 0.001), implying that errors of omission inversely predict poorer performance by increasing syntactic misparses and necessitating compensatory rereading. These findings underscore commas' role in minimizing strain, as quantified by reduced total reading times and error rates in comprehension tasks across proficiency levels.

Role in implicit prosody and syntactic parsing

In , implicit prosody refers to the subconscious simulation of spoken intonation and rhythm, which aids in syntactic parsing by segmenting sentences into interpretable units. Commas function as orthographic markers that evoke these prosodic boundaries, mimicking the pauses and intonational contours of speech to guide grammatical structure resolution. This process facilitates disambiguation in complex or ambiguous constructions, such as garden-path sentences, where initial misparsing can occur without such cues. Event-related potential (ERP) studies demonstrate that commas elicit a Closure Positive Shift (CPS), a late positivity peaking around 600-800 ms post-stimulus, akin to the brain's response to auditory prosodic breaks. In experiments using rapid serial visual presentation of English sentences, commas preceding disambiguating words in garden-path structures (e.g., "The defendant examined by the lawyer was guilty") reduced syntactic reanalysis demands, as evidenced by attenuated P600 effects compared to comma-absent conditions. This indicates that commas preemptively insert implicit prosodic phrasing, biasing parsers toward subordinate clause interpretations and overriding competing attachments. Omission of commas disrupts this guidance, often triggering N400-like anomalies for semantic integration failures or enhanced LAN/P600 complexes for syntactic revisions upon encountering disambiguators. For instance, in uncommaed hypotactic embeddings, readers exhibit delayed boundary detection, leading to higher processing costs in initial stages. Cross-linguistically, similar CPS responses occur in German, where commas mandatorily signal subordinate clauses in ; brain data confirm that these punctuation-induced boundaries align efficiency with spoken prosody, independent of language-specific .

Computing and Digital Applications

As an operator and separator in programming

In most programming languages, the comma serves primarily as a syntactic separator to delineate multiple items within declarations, function calls, and initializers. For instance, in C++, multiple variables can be declared as int x, y, z;, separating each identifier while sharing the same type specifier. Similarly, function definitions and invocations use commas to partition parameters, as in void [process](/page/Process)(int a, int b, int c) {}. This convention extends to and structure initializers, such as {1, 2, 3} in C/C++ or [1, 2, 3] in and Python, where commas distinguish elements without implying any computational operation. Certain languages elevate the comma to an operator with specific semantics, distinct from its separative role. In C and C++, the comma operator (,) is binary, left-associative, and possesses the lowest precedence; it evaluates its left operand (discarding the result), then the right, yielding the right operand's value. This enables sequential evaluation in expressions, often for side effects, as in a = (x = 1, y = 2, x + y); which assigns 1 to x, 2 to y, and 3 to a. A common idiom appears in for loops for multiple initializations: for (int i = 0, j = i + 1; i < 10; ++i, ++j). JavaScript mirrors this behavior, evaluating operands left-to-right and returning the last, though its use is discouraged outside specific contexts like variable declarations due to readability concerns. Misuse arises from conflating the operator with separators, such as parenthesizing to override precedence in macro expansions or avoiding unintended grouping in function arguments. In data interchange formats, commas function as delimiters with strict rules that can expose ambiguities from natural-language habits, like appending commas after list finals. (CSV) files employ commas to partition fields across rows, but embedded commas within fields require enclosure in double quotes to prevent misparsing, as unquoted instances would split records erroneously. uses commas to separate object members ("key": value, "next": value) and array elements, per RFC 8259; trailing commas after the last item are forbidden, rendering such documents invalid despite tolerance in some lenient parsers. 2020 permitted trailing commas in object and array literals for cleaner diffs and refactoring, but this does not extend to JSON, leading to runtime errors when natural-language serial-comma instincts (e.g., comma usage) prompt extraneous commas in serialized data. These mismatches contribute to frequent syntax issues, as developers transfer prose-like into code, confounding parsers designed for unambiguous tokenization.

Encoding, rendering, and processing challenges

In , the comma is encoded as U+002C in the Basic Latin block, ensuring compatibility across systems but introducing challenges in rendering. In right-to-left (RTL) scripts such as , the comma can exhibit mirroring or displacement effects due to bidirectional algorithm rules, where trailing punctuation like a comma may render at the logical start of a run rather than the visual end, leading to misalignment in mixed LTR-RTL contexts. For instance, in typesetting environments, a comma following an LTR numeral in RTL text has been reported to precede the numeral visually, disrupting readability and requiring explicit directional overrides for correction. Legacy systems relied on the ASCII standard, where the comma occupies 44 (0x2C), facilitating early text processing but exposing limitations in handling international variants without extensions like ISO 8859. This ASCII foundation persists in file formats such as (CSV), where unquoted commas within fields cause parsing errors unless enclosed in double quotes per RFC 4180 specifications; failure to properly quote fields containing embedded commas results in data fragmentation, as documented in numerous failures across tools like Excel and custom parsers. Font rendering introduces further issues through fallback mechanisms, where absence of comma glyphs in primary fonts triggers substitution from system defaults, often yielding metric mismatches that cause horizontal shifts or inconsistencies in layouts. Empirical reports highlight such misalignment in web rendering when fallback fonts alter baselines relative to primary text metrics. Processing challenges extend to input methods, as evidenced by Google Gboard's October 2025 update (version 16.0), which introduced toggles to hide the comma key for minimalist layouts, potentially complicating entry on mobile devices despite its persistence as a standard in most virtual keyboards.

Implications for AI, NLP, and text generation

In large language models (LLMs), subtle variations in comma usage can profoundly influence generated outputs, particularly in high-stakes domains like medical recommendations. A 2025 analysis demonstrated that altering a single comma in input prompts shifted AI advice from recommending urgent treatment to dismissal, potentially endangering patient outcomes by inverting causal interpretations of symptoms. Similarly, empirical evaluations of neural models reveal that while transformers often disregard irrelevant punctuation tweaks, they consistently falter on semantically critical changes, such as comma insertions that redefine boundaries, leading to errors in up to 15-20% of affected across benchmark datasets. Punctuation restoration techniques, including comma reinsertion, enhance LLMs' structural comprehension without additional pretraining, yielding accuracy gains of at least 2% in 16 out of 18 experiments across tasks like syntactic parsing and question answering. Investigations into LLMs' internal representations further uncover that commas encode essential contextual cues, with disruptions causing measurable variance in token surprisal and output coherence; for instance, models exhibit heightened sensitivity to comma fidelity in multimodal benchmarks, where inconsistent handling correlates with 10-25% drops in multi-agent communication fidelity. These findings challenge claims that contextual inference alone suffices, as controlled tests quantify comprehension disparities directly attributable to punctuation precision, underscoring the need for explicit modeling over reliance on emergent patterns. Training datasets riddled with inconsistent comma application—prevalent in web-scraped corpora—exacerbate biases and degrade , as models internalize ambiguous delimiters that propagate errors in downstream . Fine-tuning protocols must incorporate rule-based normalization to mitigate this, with studies showing that augmented datasets enforcing consistent comma rules reduce output variability by aligning with human-like syntactic priors, thereby curbing amplified distortions in domains like legal or clinical text. In pipelines, such interventions are vital for text , where unaddressed inconsistencies yield probabilistic shifts in event causality attribution, as evidenced by backdoor vulnerability analyses linking triggers to targeted output manipulations.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/comma
  2. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/comma
  3. https://www.etymonline.com/word/comma
  4. https://www.pixartprinting.co.uk/blog/history-of-the-comma/
  5. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/commas/extended_rules_for_commas.html
  6. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/punctuation-capitalization/comma/
  7. https://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/commas.asp
  8. https://www.scribbr.com/commas/comma-before-or-after-and/
  9. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20150902-the-mysterious-origins-of-punctuation
  10. https://stories.kuleuven.be/en/stories/punctuation---to-the-point
  11. https://blog.greek-language.com/2010/12/27/punctuation-for-ancient-greek-texts/
  12. https://unravellingmag.com/articles/history-punctuation-english/
  13. https://www.opoudjis.net/unicode/punctuation.html
  14. https://sites.ualberta.ca/~sreimer/ms-course/course/punc.htm
  15. https://medievalwritings.atillo.com.au/scripts/punctuation/punctuation1.htm
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25094157
  17. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/SELIM/article/download/13506/12224/28690
  18. http://www.medievalcodes.ca/2013/10/punctuating-manuscripts.html
  19. https://medievalfragments.wordpress.com/2014/05/24/the-punctus-and-his-friends-medieval-punctuation/
  20. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/renaissance-reformation/early-renaissance1/venice-early-ren/a/aldo-manuzio-aldus-manutius-inventor-of-the-modern-book
  21. https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/01-3/bergjons.html
  22. https://collections.americanantiquarian.org/earlyamericannewsmedia/exhibits/show/news-in-colonial-america/colonial-print-culture
  23. https://www.americanantiquarian.org/proceedings/44517630.pdf
  24. https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2c/index.htm
  25. https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode16.0.0/core-spec/chapter-6/
  26. https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/060c/index.htm
  27. https://unicode-explorer.com/c/060C
  28. https://altalang.com/beyond-words/a-brief-history-of-english-punctuation/
  29. https://demmelearning.com/blog/history-of-punctuation/
  30. https://www.thomasphinney.com/2014/01/kerning-and-spacing-fonts/
  31. https://figr.design/blog/tracking-design-typography-differences
  32. https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr24/
  33. https://www.etymonline.com/word/cedilla
  34. https://thelanguagecloset.com/2022/05/28/cedilla/
  35. https://dcc.dickinson.edu/grammar/age/accents-and-breathing-marks
  36. https://www.butte.edu/departments/cas/tipsheets/punctuation/comma.html
  37. https://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/server/api/core/bitstreams/281e3a2c-d30b-4e16-b39a-454bb26bc148/content
  38. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/nl/acquilex/acqpapers/acq2wp29.tex.Z
  39. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/16-1901/16-1901-2017-03-13.html
  40. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/02/08/584391391/maine-dairy-drivers-settle-overtime-case-that-hinged-on-an-absent-comma
  41. https://www.adamsdrafting.com/more-syntactic-ambiguity-the-serial-comma/
  42. https://www.mtsac.edu/writingcenter/Restrictive_vs_nonrestrictive_clauses_handout_ada.pdf
  43. https://east.iu.edu/student-success/coursework/commas.html
  44. https://www.butte.edu/departments/cas/tipsheets/grammar/relative_pronouns.html
  45. https://www.english-grammar-revolution.com/comma-and-adjectives.html
  46. https://www.unr.edu/writing-speaking-center/writing-speaking-resources/comma-usage
  47. https://chompchomp.com/handouts/commatip06.pdf
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230765915_Commas_and_Spaces_Effects_of_Punctuation_on_Eye_Movements_and_Sentence_Parsing
  49. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/17470218231200338
  50. https://functionallinguistics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40554-016-0029-x
  51. https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/vl/article/view/5532
  52. https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Commas/faq0108.html
  53. https://style.mla.org/commas-with-dates/
  54. https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/comma.html
  55. https://prowritingaid.com/commas-in-dates
  56. https://reviewediting.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/commas-with-dates-lessons-from-queen-victoria/
  57. https://www.dailywritingtips.com/how-to-punctuate-references-to-dates-and-times/
  58. https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/commas/commas-part-5/
  59. https://style.mla.org/commas-place-names/
  60. https://cmosshoptalk.com/2021/11/23/city-state-a-comma-with-two-competing-roles/
  61. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:8601:-1:ed-1:v1:en
  62. https://www.ionos.com/digitalguide/websites/web-development/iso-8601/
  63. https://www.smartick.com/blog/other-contents/curiosities/decimal-separators/
  64. https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188750/is-there-a-rule-to-rather-use-points-and-not-commas-as-decimal-separators-in-aca
  65. https://www.beresfordresearch.com/how-to-write-a-million-in-different-countries/
  66. https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/22-2003/resolution-10
  67. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3488229/why-do-programming-languages-use-commas-to-separate-function-parameters
  68. https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~jean-yves.ducloux/Typographie/ISO80000-2.pdf
  69. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/64973/329519100abd447ea0d49747258d1094/ISO-80000-2-2019.pdf
  70. https://brightlinestranslation.com/avoid-costly-number-errors-with-a-translation-agency/
  71. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2006/11/decimals-score-point-international-standards
  72. https://style.mla.org/names-with-suffixes/
  73. https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/articles/do-you-need-a-comma-before-jr/
  74. https://emilypost.com/advice/mens-names-and-titles
  75. https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/titles/abbreviating-professional-titles-and-academic-degrees/
  76. https://www.nih.gov/nih-style-guide/nih
  77. https://brand.dartmouth-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/style-guide-June-22.pdf
  78. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/punctuation-capitalization/quotation-marks-and-dialogue/
  79. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/quotation_marks/more_quotation_mark_rules.html
  80. https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Punctuation.html
  81. https://www.facebook.com/apstylebook/posts/in-ap-style-the-period-and-the-comma-always-go-within-the-quotation-marks-the-da/2335113309845075/
  82. https://www.britannica.com/topic/punctuation
  83. https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-use-french-punctuation-4086509
  84. https://anglocom.com/en/punctuation/
  85. https://baselang.com/blog/advanced-grammar/spanish-punctuation/
  86. https://www.spanish.academy/blog/how-to-use-commas-in-spanish/
  87. https://www.olesentuition.co.uk/single-post/comma-rules-in-german-how-are-commas-used-in-german
  88. https://preply.com/en/blog/german-subordinate-clauses-complete-guide/
  89. https://french.stackexchange.com/questions/3044/are-commas-used-less-in-french
  90. https://www.greece.org/gr-lessons/gr-english/punctuation.html
  91. https://mangolanguages.com/resources/learn/grammar/russian/how-to-use-commas-in-russian-vs-english-
  92. https://russian.stackexchange.com/questions/1289/what-are-the-differences-between-russian-and-english-in-punctuation-rules
  93. https://www.theworldofchinese.com/2021/09/how-china-adopted-western-punctuation/
  94. https://chinese.stackexchange.com/questions/22674/why-is-western-punctuation-used-in-chinese-writing
  95. https://www.tofugu.com/japanese/japanese-punctuation/
  96. https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/vl/article/view/5387
  97. https://www.britannica.com/topic/punctuation/Punctuation-in-Asian-and-African-languages
  98. https://r12a.github.io/scripts/hebr/he.html
  99. http://unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/Archives-Old/UML003/0289.html
  100. https://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/ch12.pdf
  101. http://www.tuninst.net/INDIC/DEVA/deva.htm
  102. https://cedar.buffalo.edu/ilt/hindi_details.html
  103. https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/commas/exchanging-english-over-the-pond-u-s-and-u-k-part-iv/
  104. https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/british-versus-american-style.html
  105. https://www.languageediting.com/american-vs-british-punctuation-in-relation-to-quotation-marks/
  106. https://proofed.com/writing-tips/differences-american-british-punctuation/
  107. https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/43976-where-do-britons-stand-classic-grammar-debates
  108. https://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.com/2017/09/optional-commas.html
  109. https://www.prnewsonline.com/explainer-how-to-use-oxford-commas-per-ap-style/
  110. https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/opinion/story/2023-06-12/a-word-please-ap-softens-on-the-oxford-comma-but-its-rule-against-the-punctuation-mark-can-make-sense
  111. https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Commas/faq0103.html
  112. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/punctuation/serial-comma
  113. https://style.mla.org/serial-commas-and-semicolons/
  114. https://www.ragan.com/oxford-comma-ap-style-when-to-use-grammar-girl/
  115. https://blog.oup.com/2017/03/oxford-comma-language-grammar/
  116. https://cmosshoptalk.com/2019/02/19/chicago-mla-apa-ap-whats-the-difference/
  117. https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Commas.html?page=8
  118. https://cmosshoptalk.com/2020/02/11/oxford-chicago-and-the-serial-comma/
  119. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/thoughts-on-thinking/202012/why-the-oxford-comma-is-unnecessary
  120. https://www.triviamafia.com/fridayknowitall/oxfordcomma
  121. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/us/oxford-comma-maine.html
  122. https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/09/us/dairy-drivers-oxford-comma-case-settlement-trnd
  123. https://nicscurry.medium.com/arguments-against-the-oxford-comma-c77127d8a81d
  124. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01375/full
  125. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9688910/
  126. https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38966/7/angele-et-al-2023-reading%2528-%2529-with-and-without-commas.pdf
  127. https://bookishbay.com/hemingways-iceberg-theory-art-of-minimalist-writing/
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5023661/
  129. https://www.transcendwithwords.com/post/old-style-of-punctuation-in-english
  130. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/subject_specific_writing/journalism_and_journalistic_writing/ap_style.html
  131. https://venturevalkyrie.com/ai-large-language-models-and-how-a-comma-could-actually-kill-you/
  132. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01406.x
  133. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37653706/
  134. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/11/1564
  135. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11823102_Prosodic_Boundaries_Comma_Rules_and_Brain_Responses_The_Closure_Positive_Shift_in_ERPs_as_a_Universal_Marker_for_Prosodic_Phrasing_in_Listeners_and_Readers
  136. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11523275/
  137. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/cpp/comma-in-cpp/
  138. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/comma-operator?view=msvc-170
  139. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Comma_operator
  140. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4617935/is-there-a-way-to-include-commas-in-csv-columns-without-breaking-the-formatting
  141. https://tadabase.io/blog/what-is-a-csv
  142. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Trailing_commas
  143. https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/002c/index.htm
  144. https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/214773/comma-links-in-ltr-texts-in-rtl-arabic-document
  145. https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255442710
  146. https://www.ascii-code.com/character/%2C
  147. https://9to5google.com/2025/10/21/gboard-period-comma-keys/
  148. https://www.howtogeek.com/google-keyboard-update-adds-weird-new-customization-options/
  149. https://aclanthology.org/2020.pam-1.15.pdf
  150. https://aclanthology.org/2025.repl4nlp-1.10.pdf
  151. https://arxiv.org/html/2502.15007v1
  152. https://arxiv.org/html/2410.07553v4
  153. https://latitude-blog.ghost.io/blog/how-to-clean-noisy-text-data-for-llms/
  154. https://machinelearningmastery.com/5-problems-encountered-fine-tuning-llms-with-solutions/
  155. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374540260_Punctuation_Matters_Stealthy_Backdoor_Attack_for_Language_Models
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.