Hubbry Logo
Extranuclear inheritanceExtranuclear inheritanceMain
Open search
Extranuclear inheritance
Community hub
Extranuclear inheritance
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Extranuclear inheritance
Extranuclear inheritance
Extranuclear inheritance
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Extranuclear inheritance or cytoplasmic inheritance is the transmission of genes that occur outside the nucleus. It is found in most eukaryotes and is commonly known to occur in cytoplasmic organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts or from cellular parasites like viruses or bacteria.[1][2][3]

Organelles

[edit]
Mitochondria contain their own DNA. They are passed on by mothers to their children via the cytoplasm of the egg.

Mitochondria are organelles which function to transform energy as a result of cellular respiration. Chloroplasts are organelles which function to produce sugars via photosynthesis in plants and algae. The genes located in mitochondria and chloroplasts are very important for proper cellular function. The mitochondrial DNA and other extranuclear types of DNA replicate independently of the DNA located in the nucleus, which is typically arranged in chromosomes that only replicate one time preceding cellular division. The extranuclear genomes of mitochondria and chloroplasts replicate independently of cell division, instead, they replicate in response to a cell's increased energy needs which vary throughout the cell's lifespan. Since they replicate independently, genomic recombination of these genomes is rarely found in offspring, contrary to nuclear genomes in which recombination is common.

Mitochondrial diseases are inherited from the mother, not from the father. Mitochondria with their mitochondrial DNA are present in the egg cell prior to fertilization by the sperm. In many cases of fertilization, the head of the sperm enters the egg cell, leaving its middle part, with its mitochondria, behind. The mitochondrial DNA of the sperm often remains outside the zygote and is excluded from inheritance.

Parasites

[edit]

Extranuclear transmission of viral genomes and symbiotic bacteria is also possible. An example of viral genome transmission is perinatal transmission. This occurs from mother to fetus during the perinatal period, which begins before birth and ends about 1 month after birth. During this time viral material may be passed from mother to child in the bloodstream or breastmilk. This is of particular concern with mothers carrying HIV or hepatitis C viruses.[2][3] Symbiotic cytoplasmic bacteria are also inherited in organisms such as insects and protists.[4]

Types

[edit]

Three general types of extranuclear inheritance exist.

  • Vegetative segregation results from random replication and partitioning of cytoplasmic organelles. It occurs with chloroplasts and mitochondria during mitotic cell divisions and results in daughter cells that contain a random sample of the parent cell's organelles. An example of vegetative segregation is with mitochondria of asexually replicating yeast cells.[5]
  • Uniparental inheritance occurs in extranuclear genes when only one parent contributes organellar DNA to the offspring. A classic example of uniparental gene transmission is the maternal inheritance of human mitochondria. The mother's mitochondria are transmitted to the offspring at fertilization via the egg. The father's mitochondrial genes are not transmitted to the offspring via the sperm. Very rare cases which require further investigation have been reported of paternal mitochondrial inheritance in humans, in which the father's mitochondrial genome is found in offspring.[6] Chloroplast genes can also inherit uniparentally during sexual reproduction. They are historically thought to inherit maternally, but paternal inheritance in many species is increasingly being identified. The mechanisms of uniparental inheritance from species to species differ greatly and are quite complicated. For instance, chloroplasts have been found to exhibit maternal, paternal and biparental modes even within the same species.[7][8] In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), the mode of chloroplast inheritance is affected by the temperature and the enzymatic activity of an exonuclease during male gametogenesis.[9]
  • Biparental inheritance occurs in extranuclear genes when both parents contribute organellar DNA to the offspring. It may be less common than uniparental extranuclear inheritance, and usually occurs in a permissible species only a fraction of the time. An example of biparental mitochondrial inheritance is in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. When two haploid cells of opposite mating type fuse they can both contribute mitochondria to the resulting diploid offspring.[1][5]

Mutant mitochondria

[edit]

Poky is a mutant of the fungus Neurospora crassa that has extranuclear inheritance. Poky is characterized by slow growth, a defect in mitochondrial ribosome assembly and deficiencies in several cytochromes.[10] Studies of poky mutants were among the first to establish an extranuclear mitochondrial basis for inheritance of a particular genotype. It was initially found, using genetic crosses, that poky is maternally inherited.[11] Subsequently, the primary defect in the poky mutants was determined to be a deletion in the mitochondrial DNA sequence encoding the small subunit of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA.[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Extranuclear inheritance

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Extranuclear inheritance, also known as cytoplasmic inheritance, refers to the transmission of genetic material located outside the , primarily in organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts, which follows non-Mendelian patterns distinct from nuclear chromosomal inheritance. This form of inheritance involves DNA in these organelles— (mtDNA) and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA)—that encode essential components for cellular functions like energy production and , respectively. Unlike nuclear genes, extranuclear genes are typically inherited uniparentally, most often maternally, due to the cell's abundant containing numerous organelles compared to the sperm's minimal contribution. Key characteristics of extranuclear inheritance include its independence from nuclear DNA segregation during , leading to patterns such as vegetative segregation, where organelles are randomly distributed to daughter cells during , and potential , a state of mixed populations within a cell. In animals, mtDNA inheritance is strictly maternal in most , including humans, where the 16.5 kb circular mtDNA encodes 37 genes, including 13 proteins critical for the . Mutations in mtDNA can cause maternally inherited disorders, such as , highlighting its clinical significance. In , chloroplast inheritance is predominantly maternal but can be biparental in certain species, as first observed in studies of variegated leaves in Mirabilis jalapa (maternal) and Pelargonium zonale (biparental) by Carl Correns and Erwin Baur around 1909. These patterns were pivotal in establishing the concept of extranuclear inheritance, contrasting with Mendelian ratios and demonstrating cytoplasmic control over traits like leaf coloration and male sterility in crops. Overall, extranuclear inheritance plays a crucial role in , influencing genome dynamics, interspecies incompatibilities, and applications in and .

Overview

Definition and Scope

Extranuclear inheritance, also known as cytoplasmic inheritance, refers to the transmission of genetic traits controlled by genetic material located outside the cell nucleus, primarily within the cytoplasm or associated organelles. This form of inheritance involves vertical transmission of hereditary characters via DNA from cytoplasmic components, distinguishing it from the chromosomal segregation typical of nuclear genes. The scope of extranuclear inheritance encompasses (mtDNA), chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) in plants, and other cytoplasmic factors such as plasmids or infectious particles like viruses, while explicitly excluding nuclear DNA. It arises from genes in cytoplasmic factors or organelles, leading to traits that do not follow standard chromosomal recombination. Key characteristics of extranuclear inheritance include non-Mendelian patterns, where inheritance deviates from predictable ratios due to the lack of involvement; uniparental transmission, often maternal, as typically inherit from the maternal parent; rapid segregation through vegetative cell divisions; and , the coexistence of mutant and wild-type genomes within the same cell. Representative examples within this scope include the petite mutants in yeast (), which exhibit respiration deficiency due to mtDNA alterations and demonstrate cytoplasmic transmission. Another is the poky phenotype in the fungus , characterized by slow growth and mitochondrial defects inherited maternally via extranuclear elements. These illustrate how extranuclear factors, such as those in mitochondria and chloroplasts, contribute to trait inheritance beyond nuclear control.

Historical Discovery

The recognition of extranuclear inheritance began in the early with observations of non-Mendelian patterns in . In 1909, reported variegated leaf patterns in four-o'clock plants (), where offspring exhibited branch-specific inheritance of green, white, or variegated phenotypes regardless of nuclear genotypes, indicating a cytoplasmic basis for the trait. Independently in the same year, Erwin Baur described similar biparental transmission of leaf variegation in pelargonium (), where sorting led to sectoral patterns that did not follow Mendelian ratios, providing early evidence for plastid-mediated heredity. These findings challenged the dominance of nuclear and suggested the involvement of cytoplasmic factors, though the underlying genetic elements remained unidentified at the time. By the mid-20th century, studies in microorganisms further illuminated cytoplasmic inheritance mechanisms. In the 1940s, Boris Ephrussi and Hanns Hottinger identified "petite" mutants in (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), which formed small colonies due to respiratory deficiencies and displayed non-Mendelian, maternally biased transmission, pointing to cytoplasmic control of mitochondrial function. Concurrently, Carl Lindegren's extensive genetic analyses of in the 1940s and 1950s demonstrated irregular segregation patterns for traits like galactose utilization and respiratory competence, reinforcing the role of non-chromosomal elements in cytoplasmic inheritance and establishing as a key model for such studies. In plants, Marcus M. Rhoades advanced the field in 1931 by documenting in (Zea mays), where infertility was transmitted maternally without nuclear segregation, a discovery later expanded in his 1950 work on gene-induced mutations of cytoplasmic factors. The 1960s and 1970s brought direct evidence of genetic material in organelles through biochemical and microscopic techniques. In 1963, Margit M. K. Nass and Sylvan Nass used electron microscopy to visualize DNA-like fibers within chick embryo mitochondria, providing the first structural proof of (mtDNA) and linking it to cytoplasmic . This was complemented by the complete sequencing of the human mtDNA genome in 1981 by Simon Anderson and colleagues, revealing a 16,569-base-pair circular molecule encoding 13 proteins, 22 tRNAs, and two rRNAs, which confirmed its role in extranuclear heredity. For chloroplasts, Ruth Sager's pioneering research on from the 1950s to 1970s isolated streptomycin-resistant mutants with , mapped chloroplast genes into linkage groups, and, with K. S. Chiang, identified and characterized chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) in the 1970s, establishing uniparental transmission patterns and solidifying chloroplasts as autonomous genetic systems. These milestones shifted the paradigm toward understanding organelles as semi-autonomous entities with their own genomes.

Mechanisms

Cytoplasmic Transmission Patterns

Extranuclear inheritance, also known as cytoplasmic inheritance, typically follows uniparental patterns, where genetic material from organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts is transmitted predominantly from the maternal parent to . This maternal bias arises primarily from the unequal contribution of during fertilization: in animals, the contributes minimal , leading to dilution and exclusion of paternal organelles, while the provides the bulk of the cellular contents, including organelles. In , similar dynamics occur, with the dominating cytoplasmic content, though mechanisms can vary by . Biparental inheritance of extranuclear genomes is rare but documented in specific taxa, often involving paternal leakage of (mtDNA). A notable example occurs in marine mussels of the genus Mytilus, where both maternal and paternal mtDNA can be transmitted, resulting in heteroplasmic that carry distinct mitochondrial haplotypes linked to sex determination. This pattern contrasts with the typical uniparental mode and highlights exceptions driven by evolutionary pressures, such as doubly uniparental systems. Within cells, extranuclear genomes exist in states of homoplasmy or , influencing transmission stability. Homoplasmy refers to the presence of identical copies of DNA within a cell or , whereas involves a of variant genotypes, often arising from or biparental contributions. During , vegetative segregation promotes rapid sorting of these variants, potentially shifting heteroplasmic cells toward homoplasmy over generations through random partitioning of organelles. Transmission barriers further enforce uniparental patterns by selectively eliminating paternal organelles. In animals, cytoplasm dominance facilitates the degradation of sperm-derived mitochondria post-fertilization via processes like ubiquitination and . In plants, barriers include the exclusion of organelles from the or vegetative cell during fertilization, preventing paternal entry into the sac. Model organisms illustrate these patterns' consistency and exceptions. In , mitochondrial inheritance is strictly maternal, with paternal mitochondria actively eliminated during early embryogenesis to maintain uniparental transmission. Conversely, the alga exhibits predominantly uniparental chloroplast inheritance under standard conditions, but biparental transmission can occur in mutants or specific , disrupting selective DNA degradation mechanisms.

Genetic Elements Involved

Extranuclear inheritance involves genetic elements located outside the nuclear genome, primarily within organelles and , that exhibit distinct molecular structures and replication dynamics compared to nuclear DNA. These elements include (mtDNA), chloroplast DNA (cpDNA), and various non-organellar components such as plasmids, prion-like proteins, and molecules, each contributing to heritable traits transmitted cytoplasmically. Mitochondrial DNA in humans is a compact, double-stranded, circular genome approximately 16,569 base pairs in length, encoding 37 genes: 13 proteins essential for the electron transport chain, 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs), and 2 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs). Unlike nuclear DNA, mtDNA lacks introns and protective histones, rendering it highly susceptible to mutations at a rate 10- to 17-fold higher than nuclear DNA, which facilitates rapid evolutionary changes but also contributes to genetic variability. Replication of mtDNA relies on nuclear-encoded enzymes, including DNA polymerase γ (encoded by POLG), which performs error-prone synthesis due to limited proofreading and repair mechanisms, often resulting in heteroplasmy—the coexistence of mutant and wild-type mtDNA within cells. Transcription of mtDNA occurs as polycistronic units from heavy and light strand promoters, producing long precursor RNAs that are processed into individual mature transcripts. Chloroplast DNA, found in photosynthetic eukaryotes, forms larger circular genomes typically ranging from 120 to 160 kilobases, encoding approximately 100-130 genes that include ribosomal proteins, tRNAs, rRNAs, and components critical for such as the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (). Like mtDNA, cpDNA features compact organization with minimal non-coding regions and undergoes polycistronic transcription, where multiple genes are transcribed into long precursor RNAs that are subsequently processed by nuclear-encoded factors. Although cpDNA possesses some introns and exhibits a lower than mtDNA due to partial histone-like protections, its replication also depends on nuclear-encoded polymerases, allowing for coordinated expression with the nuclear . Beyond organellar genomes, extranuclear inheritance encompasses diverse elements such as cytoplasmic plasmids, prion-like proteins, and molecules. In , killer plasmids like those in are linear double-stranded DNA elements (e.g., pGKL1 at 8.9 kb and pGKL2 at 13.4 kb) that autonomously replicate in the and encode toxin and immunity functions, demonstrating stable cytoplasmic transmission. Prion-like proteins, such as the [KIL-d] element in , propagate through conformational changes that induce heritable antiviral states without involvement, exemplifying protein-based cytoplasmic inheritance. Certain molecules, including responsible for the killer phenotype in , also mediate cytoplasmic inheritance by replicating independently and conferring traits like toxin production across generations. These elements highlight the variety of non-DNA-based mechanisms in extranuclear , often lacking robust repair systems akin to those in organelles.

Organelle Inheritance

Mitochondrial Inheritance

In most eukaryotes, (mtDNA) is inherited maternally, with transmission occurring primarily through the egg , while paternal mtDNA is actively eliminated shortly after fertilization. This uniparental ensures that receive mtDNA almost exclusively from the mother, as contribute minimal containing mitochondria. In mammals, paternal mitochondria are ubiquitinated during , marking them for degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system or lysosomal pathways in the oocyte, preventing their contribution to the . This mechanism maintains the integrity of the mitochondrial by avoiding potential conflicts from divergent paternal mtDNA variants. Exceptions to strict maternal inheritance occur in certain species and conditions, leading to paternal mtDNA leakage. In hybrid fruit flies (Drosophila), paternal mtDNA transmission has been observed at rates up to 20-40% in natural populations and interspecific crosses, resulting in heteroplasmy where both parental mtDNA types coexist. In mice, paternal leakage can be induced under specific stressors, such as in vitro fertilization or certain genetic backgrounds, though it remains rare and often transient. Heteroplasmy, the presence of more than one mtDNA type within a cell or individual, exhibits dynamic patterns influenced by random during embryonic cell divisions and tissue-specific segregation. A key feature is the threshold effect, where mitochondrial dysfunction manifests only when the proportion of mutant mtDNA exceeds 60-90%, depending on the and affected tissues; below this threshold, wild-type mtDNA compensates sufficiently to maintain normal function. This bottleneck during and random partitioning in dividing cells can shift levels across generations, contributing to variable expressivity in mitochondrial traits. Model organisms have been instrumental in elucidating mitochondrial inheritance patterns. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, petite mutants (rho⁻) retain deleted or rearranged mtDNA, leading to respiratory deficiency, while rho⁰ petites completely lack mtDNA and rely on for growth, demonstrating the non-Mendelian, cytoplasmic transmission of mitochondrial defects. Similarly, the poky mutant in the fungus features a maternally inherited mtDNA alteration, such as a 4-bp deletion in the mitochondrial rRNA , resulting in slow growth, reduced respiration, and deficiencies in mitochondrial ribosomes, highlighting the role of mtDNA in biogenesis. In humans, the mitochondrial genome comprises a circular 16,569 molecule encoding 13 proteins essential for , along with tRNAs and rRNAs. mtDNA haplogroups, defined by specific polymorphisms, trace maternal lineages across populations, providing insights into and evolutionary history due to their uniparental and lack of recombination.

Chloroplast Inheritance

Chloroplast inheritance, also known as plastid inheritance, refers to the non-Mendelian transmission of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) in plants and algae, where plastids are typically organelles of maternal origin but exhibit variation across taxa. In most angiosperms, cpDNA is transmitted predominantly through the , ensuring maternal , while paternal plastids are excluded during fertilization. This uniparental pattern arises from mechanisms such as the degradation of paternal plastid DNA in the , mediated by nucleases like DPD1, which specifically targets ptDNA in maturing male gametes. Exceptions to strict maternal inheritance occur in certain lineages, including biparental transmission in some gymnosperms and angiosperms. In like pines (Pinus ), cpDNA is often paternally inherited, with contributing viable to the . Similarly, such as exhibit maternal plastid inheritance, contrasting with the paternal bias in many other gymnosperms. Biparental inheritance is documented in angiosperms like , where both parental plastids can be transmitted, leading to in offspring. Plastid genetics distinguishes true cpDNA, which resides within chloroplasts, from nuclear-integrated sequences known as NUPTs (nuclear plastid DNA), which arise from transfers of plastid fragments to the nucleus and do not contribute to organelle function. Recombination between cpDNA molecules is rare, primarily due to the prevalence of uniparental transmission, which limits opportunities for inter-parental mixing; however, in biparental cases like Oenothera, no recombinant types are typically observed despite co-transmission. Model organisms have been instrumental in elucidating inheritance. In (geranium), variegated leaf phenotypes result from somatic segregation of mutant and wild-type , demonstrating cytoplasmic transmission independent of nuclear genes. The unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii serves as a key system for studying plastid mutations, such as resistance conferred by cpDNA alterations in genes, which exhibit uniparental inheritance from the mating-type minus parent. Chloroplast genomes feature structural elements that enhance stability and function, including large inverted repeats (IRs) flanking the small single-copy (SSC) region, which minimize rearrangements and mutations in cpDNA. These genomes encode essential proteins, such as the large subunit of (rbcL) for carbon fixation and subunits of (e.g., atpA, atpB) for .

Non-Organelle Inheritance

Infectious Agents

Infectious agents contribute to extranuclear inheritance through transmissible cytoplasmic particles, such as viruses, viroids, and plasmids, that carry genetic elements capable of replicating independently of the nuclear genome and conferring heritable traits to host cells or organisms. These agents typically propagate within the and can be transmitted vertically during or gamete formation, as well as horizontally through direct or vector-mediated spread, thereby bypassing Mendelian segregation patterns. Unlike stable organelle genomes, infectious particles often exhibit dynamic stability, with traits lost in the absence of continuous or environmental support. A classic example is the kappa particles in the Paramecium tetraurelia, which are symbiotic bacteria of the genus Caedibacter (e.g., C. taeniospiralis) that endow the host with a "killer" trait by producing and secreting toxins lethal to sensitive strains while conferring immunity to infected cells. These particles reside in the and are maternally inherited through the egg's abundant , but the trait can be lost if the bacterial population declines due to insufficient nutrients or antibiotics, highlighting their dependence on host viability for persistence. Kappa particles can also spread horizontally between paramecia via conjugation, allowing infectious transfer of the killer . Transmission occurs cytoplasmically during binary fission, with the bacteria dividing in parallel to host cells, though rare paternal leakage has been observed. In (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the killer system is mediated by double-stranded (dsRNA) viruses, primarily the L-A totivirus and its M1 dsRNA, which together encode a secreted and host immunity protein. The L-A virus provides replication and packaging machinery for the non-autonomous M1 , enabling cytoplasmic propagation without integration into the host ; infected cells kill neighboring sensitive by releasing the , which disrupts cell wall synthesis. This system is transmitted cytoplasmically during and , with high fidelity in vegetative growth but potential loss under stress, such as elevated temperatures. The viruses form virus-like particles in the , ensuring stable akin to extranuclear elements. Plasmid-based examples include cytoplasmic linear DNA plasmids in certain yeasts, such as pGKL1 and pGKL2 in , which encode killer toxins, immunity, and replication factors with terminal protein covalently attached to their ends. These plasmids reside and replicate exclusively in the cytoplasm, independent of nuclear or mitochondrial machinery, and confer a killer phenotype similar to viral systems by producing secreted zymocins that target sensitive cells. Inheritance occurs cytoplasmically during , with infectious horizontal transfer possible via or spheroplast formation in laboratory settings, though vertical transmission predominates in natural populations. Unlike nuclear plasmids, these elements lack centromere-like structures and rely on host cytoskeletal elements for partitioning. In plants, viral cytoplasmic inheritance is exemplified by the wound tumor virus (WTV), a reovirus with a segmented double-stranded genome that replicates entirely in the cytoplasm and induces tumor-like in hosts like and . Associated satellite RNAs, which depend on WTV for replication and encapsidation, modulate severity and can alter host traits such as growth patterns; these satellites are transmitted systemically through infected and by vectors such as leafhoppers. Viroids, small circular single-stranded RNAs like those causing potato spindle tuber , also propagate cytoplasmically during systemic spread, though replication occurs in chloroplasts or nuclei, and they exhibit vertical through gametes with efficiencies up to 100% in some , alongside horizontal transmission by mechanical means or vectors. These agents demonstrate how infectious particles can establish heritable cytoplasmic modifications leading to phenotypic changes.

Symbiotic Microorganisms

Symbiotic microorganisms, such as endosymbiotic and residing in the host's , contribute to extranuclear inheritance by transmitting traits vertically through the maternal line, often influencing host , , and defense mechanisms. These symbionts typically establish long-term associations within host cells, bypassing Mendelian segregation and enabling rapid spread within populations due to their cytoplasmic localization. Unlike transient infections, stable endosymbionts co-evolve with hosts, leading to mutualistic or manipulative interactions that enhance host fitness or bias patterns. A prominent example is , an alphaproteobacterium infecting approximately half of insect species, including . This symbiont induces cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), where sperm from infected males fails to produce viable embryos in uninfected females, thereby promoting the spread of infected maternal lineages. Wolbachia transmission is strictly maternal, occurring via passage through the egg , with high fidelity ensured by symbiont replication synchronized to host . This reproductive manipulation favors Wolbachia-bearing females, driving its prevalence despite occasional fitness costs to hosts. Spiroplasma bacteria, another group of insect and plant endosymbionts, similarly exhibit cytoplasmic inheritance and alter host traits such as sex ratios and disease resistance. In species like Drosophila melanogaster, Spiroplasma poulsonii causes male-killing during embryogenesis, resulting in female-biased offspring ratios that enhance symbiont transmission through surviving daughters. Transmission occurs vertically via eggs or horizontally through hemolymph in some cases, with the symbiont residing in host tissues like the gut or reproductive organs. In plants, Spiroplasma species protect against pathogens, conferring resistance traits inherited cytoplasmically via infected vectors. These effects stem from toxin production, such as the Spaid protein, which targets male-specific processes.00606-X) In , the obligate endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola exemplifies nutritional mutualism through extranuclear inheritance, synthesizing essential absent from the host's diet. Housed in specialized bacteriocytes, Buchnera is transmitted vertically with near-perfect efficiency from mother to offspring via egg , ensuring nutrient provisioning across generations. Occasional occurs between lineages, potentially introducing , but vertical passage maintains stability and co-adaptation. This has persisted for over 100 million years, with Buchnera's reduced retaining key biosynthetic genes. Heritable rickettsia-like endosymbionts in ticks, such as certain Rickettsia species, confer traits like pesticide resistance or nutritional benefits through cytoplasmic transmission. These bacteria, often non-pathogenic, are passed transovarially from female ticks to eggs, maintaining infection across generations without horizontal spread in some lineages. Protozoan examples include Babesia species, which can undergo limited transovarial inheritance in tick vectors, influencing pathogen persistence and host susceptibility traits. Such symbionts reside intracellularly, adapting to the tick's hemolymph and ovarian tissues. The stability of these endosymbiotic relationships arises from the intracellular lifestyle, which minimizes exposure to external selective pressures and reduces opportunities for . Confined within host cells, symbionts experience bottlenecks during transmission, leading to clonal propagation and genome streamlining, with effective population sizes much smaller than free-living . This fosters co-evolution, where host and symbiont genomes align through complementary adaptations, such as synchronized replication cycles or . Over evolutionary time, such dynamics prevent symbiont loss and promote trait fixation in host populations.

Examples and Mutations

Human Mitochondrial Disorders

Human mitochondrial disorders, also known as mitochondrial diseases, arise primarily from mutations in (mtDNA), leading to impaired and energy production in affected tissues. These disorders exhibit maternal inheritance due to the exclusive transmission of mitochondria from the , with no evidence of paternal contribution in humans. A key feature is the bottleneck effect during , where a reduced number of mtDNA molecules are amplified, resulting in variable levels among offspring and potential amplification of pathogenic s. The overall prevalence of mtDNA-related disorders is estimated at approximately 1 in 5,000 individuals. Disease manifestation often follows a , where symptoms emerge only when the proportion of mutant mtDNA (heteroplasmy) exceeds a critical level, typically 60-90% depending on the mutation and tissue. Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is a paradigmatic example, characterized by acute or subacute bilateral vision loss due to atrophy, primarily affecting young adults. It is caused by point s in mtDNA genes encoding complex I subunits, with the m.11778G>A in MT-ND4 accounting for about 70% of cases worldwide. Other common variants include m.3460G>A (MT-ND1) and m.14484T>C (MT-ND6). LHON demonstrates strict maternal inheritance, with levels varying widely; homoplasmy (100% mutant mtDNA) is common, but incomplete occurs, particularly in females. Environmental triggers like may lower the threshold for symptom onset. Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, , and stroke-like episodes () syndrome represents another major mtDNA disorder, featuring recurrent stroke-like episodes, seizures, , and progressive neurological decline. The m.3243A>G in the MT-TL1 gene, which encodes tRNA-Leu(UUR), is found in approximately 80% of cases and impairs mitochondrial protein synthesis. Symptoms typically onset between ages 2 and 40, with reflecting defective energy metabolism. Like LHON, MELAS follows maternal transmission patterns, with influencing severity; levels above 70% often correlate with full syndrome expression. Diagnosis of these disorders relies on a of clinical evaluation, biochemical assays, and targeted testing. Muscle biopsy frequently reveals ragged-red fibers, indicative of subsarcolemmal mitochondrial proliferation, and deficiency. of mtDNA from blood, urine, or muscle confirms specific variants, with next-generation sequencing enabling detection of levels. Early is crucial, as the underscores the variability in clinical presentation even within families.

Plant Variegation Cases

Classic examples of extranuclear inheritance in plants include variegation patterns observed in the four o'clock plant () and the geranium (), first described by in 1909. In , leaf —resulting from mutations in chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) that impair synthesis—is inherited strictly maternally. Progeny of green branches produce uniformly green leaves, white branches produce white (albino) seedlings that do not survive, and variegated branches yield a mixture of green, white, and variegated offspring, demonstrating cytoplasmic segregation independent of nuclear genes. This pattern arises from the random distribution of mutant and wild-type chloroplasts during , leading to somatic sorting and resolution in different cell lineages. In contrast, exhibits biparental chloroplast inheritance, where variegated patterns can be transmitted from both maternal and paternal cytoplasm. Reciprocal crosses between green and variegated plants produce progeny with mixed plastid types, reflecting contributions from both parents' organelles. These early observations established the non-Mendelian nature of extranuclear inheritance and highlighted species-specific variations in transmission modes. Similar cytoplasmic defects occur in non-chromosomal stripe (NCS) mutants, primarily documented in but analogous to stripe phenotypes in where mitochondrial disruptions indirectly impair function. In these mutants, large deletions or rearrangements in the mitochondrial —such as in genes encoding cytochrome oxidase (coxII), ribosomal proteins, or subunits (nad4–nad7)—lead to striped leaves through somatic segregation of mutated mitochondria during embryogenesis and tissue differentiation. Affected sectors show pale green or white stripes with reduced CO₂ fixation, altered membranes, and halted maturation, as mitochondrial dysfunction disrupts energy supply and signaling for biogenesis. Inheritance follows a strict maternal , with appearing only in offspring of mutant females, highlighting the role of organelle instability in developmental sorting. Cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility (CMS) in maize provides another phenotypic case of extranuclear inheritance linked to mitochondrial mutations, where genome rearrangements create chimeric open reading frames (e.g., atp6c) that disrupt assembly specifically in anthers, causing pollen abortion without affecting ovules. This results in maternally transmitted sterility, observable as non-functional male gametes in affected lines, with fertility restored by nuclear restorer genes in some hybrids. Experimental from reciprocal crosses across these systems consistently demonstrates maternal bias: for instance, in maize NCS lines, only female transmission yields variegated or defective progeny, while paternal input produces normal offspring, affirming uniparental inheritance.

Implications

Evolutionary Role

Extranuclear inheritance, particularly through uniparental transmission of (mtDNA), promotes clonal evolution by limiting recombination, which reduces within lineages but enhances the fixation of beneficial mutations while exposing deleterious ones to purifying selection. This mode of inheritance, typically maternal in most animals and , creates asexual mitochondrial genomes that are susceptible to —a process where irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations occurs due to the lack of recombination, potentially leading to in isolated populations. The evolutionary origins of extranuclear genomes are rooted in the endosymbiotic theory, which posits that mitochondria and chloroplasts arose from free-living engulfed by ancestral eukaryotic hosts, forming a stable that integrated prokaryotic genomes into eukaryotic cells. Over evolutionary time, extensive gene transfer from these endosymbionts to the host nucleus has occurred, reducing organelle genome sizes while relocating essential genes to the nuclear for coordinated expression and function, thereby streamlining cellular energy production and adaptation. This ongoing gene transfer continues to shape genome architecture, with organelles retaining only a core set of genes critical for their autonomy. Cytonuclear co-evolution arises from the tight functional interactions between nuclear-encoded proteins and genomes, driving adaptations in energy metabolism and stress responses, but it also generates Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities that manifest as hybrid breakdowns in interspecies crosses. These incompatibilities occur when divergent nuclear alleles from one lineage fail to interact properly with genomes from another, leading to reduced hybrid fitness, such as male sterility or inviability, and thus reinforcing and . Such co-evolutionary dynamics highlight the role of extranuclear inheritance in maintaining genetic barriers across populations. Although rare, horizontal transfer of mtDNA between species can introduce adaptive variants, as observed in mussels of the genus Mytilus, where interspecies mtDNA exchange has been linked to shifts in inheritance patterns and potential enhancements in environmental tolerance. In these bivalves, paternal leakage or capture of mtDNA facilitates across taxa, contributing to local adaptations, such as improved thermotolerance through altered mitochondrial function. This mechanism contrasts with the predominant uniparental mode and underscores occasional opportunities for rapid evolutionary innovation via exogenous genetic material. In , the strictly maternal inheritance of mtDNA results in higher coalescence times and distinct diversity patterns along female lineages, making it a powerful tool for phylogeographic reconstruction of historical migrations and demographic events. This uniparental tracing reveals fine-scale maternal ancestry and bottlenecks, often showing greater mtDNA variability in cosmopolitan species compared to nuclear markers, which informs evolutionary histories without the confounding effects of recombination.

Medical and Agricultural Applications

In , mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), also known as three-parent fertilization (IVF), has emerged as a key application of extranuclear inheritance to prevent the transmission of (mtDNA) diseases from mother to child. This technique replaces the faulty mitochondria in the mother's egg with healthy mitochondria from a donor egg, while retaining the nuclear DNA from the biological parents, thereby reducing the risk of inheriting pathogenic mtDNA variants. The became the first country to legalize MRT in October 2015 through amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, enabling its clinical use to avoid severe mitochondrial disorders such as and NARP (neuropathy, ataxia, and ). The first live birth resulting from MRT was reported in 2016, marking a milestone in intervention for extranuclear inheritance. As of 2025, eight healthy babies have been born in the using this technique. Heteroplasmy manipulation represents another targeted medical approach, leveraging gene-editing tools to reduce the proportion of mutant mtDNA in oocytes and embryos, thereby mitigating disease risk. Mitochondria-targeted TALENs (mitoTALENs), which consist of transcription activator-like effector nucleases fused to mitochondrial targeting signals, selectively cleave mutant mtDNA while sparing wild-type copies, promoting replication of healthy mtDNA and shifting levels toward normal. This method has shown promise in preclinical models, such as patient-derived cell lines and oocytes, where it reduced mutant loads by up to 40-70% without off-target effects on nuclear DNA. Such interventions address conditions like MELAS (mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, , and stroke-like episodes), where heteroplasmy thresholds determine symptom severity. In , (CMS) exploits extranuclear inheritance to facilitate production, enhancing crop yields through vigorous F1 hybrids. CMS arises from mitochondrial dysfunction that prevents formation, allowing maternal transmission of sterility without affecting , which is then restored in hybrids by nuclear-encoded restorer genes (Rf). This system is widely applied in , where BT-type CMS lines combined with Rf genes like Rf1a and Rf1b enable large-scale production of hybrid varieties that boost grain output by 10-20%. Similarly, in sunflower, PET1-CMS cytoplasm with nuclear restorers supports over 90% of commercial production, improving oil content and disease resistance. Symbiotic microorganisms like bacteria further illustrate agricultural and applications through cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), a form of extranuclear manipulation that disrupts reproduction in uninfected hosts. In , -infected Aedes aegypti populations are released to invade wild ones via CI, where matings between infected males and uninfected females produce non-viable , while infected females gain a reproductive advantage. This strategy blocks transmission by up to 77% in field trials, as Wolbachia inhibits viral replication within the mosquito vector, and has been deployed in regions like and to reduce outbreaks. Despite these advances, applications of extranuclear inheritance face significant challenges, including ethical concerns over and the variable of mitochondrial diseases. MRT and similar techniques raise debates about heritable genetic modifications, potential long-term risks to offspring, and the toward designer embryos, prompting calls for international oversight beyond national approvals like the UK's. Additionally, heteroplasmy-driven diseases exhibit unpredictable , where identical mutant loads can yield diverse phenotypes due to tissue-specific thresholds and environmental factors, complicating therapeutic predictions and .

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/extranuclear-inheritance
  2. https://microbenotes.com/extrachromosomal-inheritance/
  3. https://connects.catalyst.harvard.edu/Profiles/profile/1228390
  4. https://lod.nal.usda.gov/nalt-core/en/page/?uri=https%253A%252F%252Flod.nal.usda.gov%252Fnalt%252F31477
  5. http://www.ansci.cornell.edu/usdagen/dictionary.html
  6. https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/cytoplasmic1.pdf
  7. https://pressbooks.lib.vt.edu/cellbio/chapter/linkage-studies-pedigrees-and-population-genetics/
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12079397/
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8307225/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1288274/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC345306/
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20140454/
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982208008063
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2777209/
  15. https://cshmonographs.org/index.php/monographs/article/view/4303
  16. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.000245
  17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17837167/
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14808152/
  19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14086138/
  20. https://www.nature.com/articles/290457a0
  21. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.132.3438.1459
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC221252/
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC40394/
  24. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.91.16.7463
  25. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1672472
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8490015/
  27. https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.e15-10-0690
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5018771/
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-022-01323-7
  30. https://www.cell.com/developmental-cell/fulltext/S1534-5807(14)00204-4
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC301334/
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005272809002618
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005272898001613
  34. https://portlandpress.com/biochemj/article/481/11/683/234503/Mechanisms-and-pathologies-of-human-mitochondrial
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3046768/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6056719/
  37. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67943-1
  38. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-021-07598-y
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC338512/
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276515008114
  41. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005139
  42. https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy199419.pdf
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9873568/
  44. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.94.1.42
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51788553_Maternal_inheritance_of_plastids_and_mitochondria_in_Cycas_L_Cycadaceae
  46. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.14222
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3807264/
  48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3859732/
  49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1297296
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3237207/
  51. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11629-3
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-41287-y
  53. https://www.biologydiscussion.com/genetics/cytoplasmic-inheritance/notes-on-cytoplasmic-inheritance-genetics/37872
  54. https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/10/2/646/4830105
  55. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro1347
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC239427/
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8529275/
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/wound-tumor-virus
  59. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/1/3/1325
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4600008/
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9704703/
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-024-06431-y
  63. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.94.20.10792
  64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23761245/
  65. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1148263/full
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC94939/
  67. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2217278120
  68. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41396-019-0533-6
  69. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/63409
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7923091/
  71. https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-018-2856-y
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3673631/
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230571700_Evolutionary_stability_in_a_400-million-year-old_heritable_facultative_mutualism
  74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00554.x
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6019835/
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9526321/
  77. https://jbiolres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40709-017-0060-4
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5896580/
  79. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/15/suppl_2/102/1711603/15-suppl_2-102.pdf
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4571569/
  81. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-021-02567-w
  82. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12566
  83. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135758
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7238192/
  85. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2015.00187/full
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12962405_Interspecies_transfer_of_female_mitochondrial_DNA_is_coupled_with_role-_reversals_and_departure_from_neutrality_in_the_mussel_Mytilus_trossulus
  87. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2858eee483be68becf687b072ebf6c85b57d4856
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810668/
  89. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.002421
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4367903/
  91. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-024-10378-z
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5570689/
  93. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7492815/
  94. https://www.statnews.com/2025/07/16/ivf-first-births-mitochondrial-replacement-therapy-united-kingdom/
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471491420300629
  96. https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/33/R1/R92/7679413
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1383628/
  98. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1613792113
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3583994/
  100. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1112021108
  101. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39200
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5372994/
  103. https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/emmm.201606281
  104. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg3966
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.