Hubbry Logo
Farabundo Martí National Liberation FrontFarabundo Martí National Liberation FrontMain
Open search
Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front
Community hub
Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front
Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front
Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (Spanish: Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional, abbreviated FMLN) is a Salvadoran political party and former guerrilla rebel group.

Key Information

The FMLN was formed as an umbrella group on 10 October 1980, from five leftist guerrilla organizations; the Farabundo Martí Popular Liberation Forces (FPL), the People's Revolutionary Army (ERP), the National Resistance (RN), the Communist Party of El Salvador (PCES) and the Revolutionary Party of the Central American Workers (PRTC). The FMLN was one of the main participants in the Salvadoran Civil War. After the Chapultepec Peace Accords were signed in 1992, all armed FMLN units were demobilized and their organization became a legal left-wing political party in El Salvador.

On 15 March 2009, the FMLN won the presidential elections with former journalist Mauricio Funes as its candidate. Two months earlier in municipal and legislative elections, the FMLN won the majority of the mayoralties in the country and a plurality of the Legislative Assembly seats.[15] Funes was wanted by the Salvadoran authority for corrupt actions, such as illegally laundering more than $700,000 in his personal bank account and was found guilty of illegal enrichment by the Supreme Court. Funes and his family fled to Nicaragua, where they were granted political asylum by Daniel Ortega and became citizens. Funes died in exile in 2025.

Civil war and emergence

[edit]

Tensions began to build between the farmers and the elite class in the time leading up to the Salvadoran Civil War including political assassinations by the Salvadoran government on outspoken critics starting in the early 1970s. In 1979, farmers went on strike for higher wages and better working conditions on Hacienda California, a large farm in Tierra Blanca. Due to this strike, National Guard troops responded to the growing violence in Tierra Blanca using military force. As the violence spread into the residential areas of El Salvador, animosity heightened between the campesinos and the elite class. The previously politically withdrawn campesinos began to join the FMLN and other left-wing guerrilla groups.[16]

On 17 December 1979, in a period of national crisis, the three dominant organizations (FPL, RN and PCS) of the Salvadoran left formed the Coordinadora Político-Militar (CPM). The CPM's first manifesto was released on 10 January 1980, and the day after, the Coordinadora Revolucionaria de Masas was formed as a union of revolutionary mass organizations. CRM later merged with the Frente Democrático Salvadoreño to form the Frente Democrático Revolucionario.

It is alleged by the United States that some credit for the unity of the five organizations that formed the FMLN may belong to Cuba's Fidel Castro, who facilitated negotiation between the groups in Havana in December 1979. However, neither the Cuban nor Soviet government were significantly responsible for forming FMLN, although it received some of its arms and supplies from the Soviet Union and Cuba. While all five groups called themselves revolutionaries and socialists, they had serious ideological and practical differences, and there had been serious conflicts, even including in some cases bloodshed, between some of the groups during the 1970s.

On 22 May 1980, the success of negotiations led to the union of the major guerrilla forces under one flag. The Unified Revolutionary Directorate (Dirección Revolucionaria Unificada [es]) was created by the FPL, RN, ERP and PCS. DRU consisted of three Political Commission members from each of these four organizations. The DRU manifesto declared, "There will be only one leadership, only one military plan and only one command, only one political line." Despite continued infighting, DRU succeeded in coordinating the group's efforts and equipped forces.

Banner used until 1992.
Map of communist groups in El Salvador during the civil war

On 10 October 1980, the four organizations formed the Frente Farabundo Martí de Liberación Nacional (FMLN), taking the name of Farabundo Martí, the peasant leader during the 1932 Salvadoran peasant massacre. In December 1980, the Salvadoran branch of the Partido Revolucionario de los Trabajadores Centroamericanos broke away from its central organization and affiliated itself to FMLN. Thus the FMLN was composed of the following organizations at the time of the peace accords in 1992 (listed in the order of size):

Youth organizations of FMLN at the time of armed struggle included: Student unions (High Schools):

  • MERS – Movimiento Estudiantil Revolucionario de Secundaria (BPR)
  • BRES – Brigadas Revolucionarias de Estudiantes de Secundaria (MLP)
  • LPS – Ligas Populares de Secundaria (LP-28)
  • AES – Asociación de Estudiantes de Secundaria (PCS)
  • ARDES – Acción Revolucionaria de Estudiantes de Secundaria (FAPU)

Student unions (Universities):

  • AGEUS – Asociación General de Estudiantes de la Universidad de El Salvador
  • FUERSA – Frente Universitario de Estudiantes Revolucionarios "Salvador Allende"

Armed struggle

[edit]
A Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) soldier takes aim during a wartime “road advisory” near Suchitoto, El Salvador (1984).

After the formation of the FMLN, the group organized its first major military offensive on 10 January 1981. During this offensive, the FMLN established operational control over large sections of Morazán and Chalatenango departments, which remained largely under guerrilla control throughout the rest of the civil war. Insurgents ranged from children to the elderly, both male and female, and most were trained in FMLN camps in the mountains and forests of El Salvador to learn military techniques.

Another large FMLN offensive was in November 1989. In that offensive, the FMLN caught the Salvadoran government and military off guard by taking control of large sections of the country and entering the capital, San Salvador. In San Salvador, the FMLN quickly took control of many of the poor neighborhoods until denied support of violence and tried to avoid being at risk and involved in the conflict as the military bombed their positions—including residential neighborhoods[17] to drive the FMLN out. One of the most famous battles in San Salvador took place in the Sheraton Hotel, where guerrillas and army soldiers battled floor by floor. The FMLN's November 1989 offensive did not succeed in overthrowing the government. Many analysts pointed to the FMLN's show of strength in the 1989 offensive as the turning point in the war, where it became clear that the government would not be able to defeat the FMLN militarily. Soon after the November 1989 offensive, the U.S. government started to support negotiations to end the civil war, whereas up to that point they had pursued a policy of military defeat of the FMLN. Since the U.S. government was the major funder of the Salvadoran government and military, it exercised considerable influence over the course of events. When the U.S. began to advocate negotiations instead of a military solution, a negotiated peace accord between the FMLN and the Salvadoran government was reached in fairly short order in 1992, despite a few incidents that could have marred the accord, such as the high-profile murder of the peace-seeking FPL commandante Antonio Cardenal, aka Jesus Rojas.

The United Nations has estimated that the FMLN guerrillas were responsible for 5% of the murders of civilians during the civil war, while approximately 85% of all killings of civilians were committed by the Salvadoran armed forces and death squads.[18]

After the peace accords: participation in elections

[edit]
Schafik Hándal hands over a declaration of solidarity to the Ambassador of Venezuela

After the ceasefire established by the 1992 Chapultepec Peace Accords, the FMLN became a legal political party. The FMLN has now participated in elections since 1994.

An FMLN rally with Hándal in Jiquilisco, prior to the presidential election in 2004

The FMLN and the right-wing Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA) are the two dominant political parties in El Salvador. Since 2000, the FMLN has gone back and forth with ARENA in controlling the largest number of Legislative Assembly seats. The FMLN has controlled the mayor's offices in many of the large cities of El Salvador since 1997, including the capital, San Salvador, and the neighboring city Santa Tecla. The FMLN mayor of San Salvador, was Violeta Menjívar, the first female mayor of San Salvador, who was elected in a narrow victory in 2006. The death of the FMLN's long standing leader, Jorge Schafik, boosted Violeta Menjivar's political campaign which ultimately led her to narrow win in the election of San Salvador's mayor. Schafik's death also boosted several FMLN political candidates running for positions in El Salvador's Legislative Assembly. The FMLN mayor of Santa Tecla was Oscar Ortiz, who served in that position since 2000.

In the legislative elections, held on 16 March 2003, the FMLN won 34% of the popular vote and 31 out of 84 seats in the Legislative Assembly of El Salvador, becoming the political party with the most assembly members. The FMLN's candidate in the 21 March 2004 presidential election, Schafik Hándal, won 35.6% of the vote, but was defeated by Antonio Saca of ARENA.

In the 2006 legislative election, held on 12 March 2006, the FMLN won 39.7% of the popular vote and 32 out of 84 legislative assembly seats. The FMLN also retained the mayor's seats in the largest cities of El Salvador, San Salvador and Santa Tecla, and hundreds of other municipalities. This was possible because one of the largest progressive coalitions in El Salvador called The Popular Social Bloc formed a pact with FMLN to help the political party win more seats in the Legislative Assembly. However, most other coalitions and groups dedicated to social change have kept away from the political party. Two months before the elections of 2009, however, the FMLN lost the mayoralty of San Salvador.

At the 18 January 2009 legislative elections, FMLN won 42.6% of the vote and 35 seats. FMLN is the largest party in the Salvadoran legislature, though it did not have a governing majority.

On 15 March 2009, the FMLN's candidate Mauricio Funes won the presidential elections. He was inaugurated in June 2009 as the first president coming from the FMLN party. The FMLN also organized support groups during the 2009 election in order to secure votes as well as gaining more volunteers to help in the upcoming elections.

In March 2014, Vice President of El Salvador from 2009 to 2014, Salvador Sánchez Cerén, was elected as the new President of El Salvador. Cerén's presidential win assured the FMLN would have a party member in the presidential office for another five years.[19]

Post-war splits and internal changes

[edit]

At the end of the civil war in 1992, the FMLN became a legal political party. At the end of the war, the FMLN still comprised the five political parties—FPL, CP, ERP, RN, PRTC—each of which retained its own organizational structure but with a leader. During the civil war, and continuing in the post-war period, people did not directly join the FMLN per se, but joined one of the five component groups.

1994 – ERP and RN leaders split

[edit]

After the end of the war, it became clear that there were serious divisions within the FMLN, some of which had existed during the war but had been somewhat hidden from the general public. Particularly it became clear between 1992 and 1994 that the leaders of the ERP and the RN had a number of disagreements with the leaders of the other parties. Soon after the 1994 Legislative Assembly elections, the leaders of the ERP and the RN left the FMLN, and took many of their members with them. The leaders of this split (including FMLN commandante Joaquin Villalobos of the ERP) then formed the Partido Democrata (Democratic Party), which was short-lived. Many members of the ERP and RN who had left in 1994 then returned to the FMLN.

1995 – Dissolving the five organizations to become a single party

[edit]

After the 1994 elections and the 1994 split, momentum grew to unify the FMLN into a single organization without separate internal parties. In 1995, the five parties that had formed the FMLN dissolved themselves. It is at that point that the FPL, CP, ERP, RN and PRTC ceased to exist, and what remained was a unified FMLN. Then people could join the FMLN directly instead of having to join one of its component parties. While this decision liquidated the parallel organizational structures inside the FMLN, there still remained strong loyalties along historic organizational lines, some of which can still be seen today.

Renovadores split

[edit]

In the 1999 presidential election, the FMLN ran Facundo Guardado as its candidate. This was a contentious decision, and many in the FMLN did not support Guardado, as they believed that his politics were moving to the right. Out of this internal conflict, two organized tendencies emerged in the FMLN—the Renovadores ("Renovators" or "Renewal Movement") and the Corriente Revolucionario y Socialista (CRS—Revolutionary Socialist Current). The two main leaders of the CRS were the historic FMLN leaders Schafik Hándal and Salvador Sanchez Ceren. The main leader of the Renovadores was Facundo Guardado. As a charismatic former FPL commander, Guardado had a base of supporters in the FMLN. He criticized the historic leadership as being too communist and called for a renovated ideology. The CRS criticized Guardado for advocating social democratic politics and for not being clearly against neoliberalism.

After a couple years of internal turmoil, in which the Revolutionary Socialist Current won the majority of the internal elections in the organization, Guardado became more frustrated, publicly attacked the FMLN leaders he didn't agree with, and took actions contrary to decisions the party had made. He was expelled from the party and some of his supporters left the FMLN. Guardado tried to form the Renovadores as its own political party, but they received negligible support in the 2003 election and then ceased to exist as a party.

After the Renovadores vs Revolutionary Socialist Current factionalism, the FMLN's leadership decided to stop organized internal tendencies, and none have emerged since then.

2005 – FDR split

[edit]

In 2004 and 2005, the FMLN experienced another split. Five FMLN Legislative Assembly members and a number of their supporters left the FMLN to form a new political party, the Democratic Revolutionary Front (Spanish: Frente Democratico Revolucionario). Some of the principal leaders of this split were Ileana Rogel and Francisco Jovel. The people who left to form the FDR chose this name because it has a legacy in the Salvadoran movement; an organization by the same name was formed under the leadership of the FMLN during the civil war to bring together parties and individuals doing legal political work during the civil war. As opposed to previous splits from the FMLN which openly proclaimed that they were ideologically 'center' or 'center-left' or were no longer self-declared "revolutionaries", the people who split to form the FDR claimed to still be part of the leftist legacy of the FMLN. In the 2006 elections, no FDR candidates won office, except for the incumbent mayor of Nejapa, Rene Canjura. Canjura was a popular FMLN mayor of the municipality of Nejapa for three consecutive periods, and therefore under FMLN statutes, would not have been eligible to run for a fourth consecutive period. So he left the FMLN and successfully ran in 2006 as the FDR candidate. No other FDR candidates won any electoral victories in 2006.

2009 and 2014 – FMLN candidates elected president

[edit]
A photograph of Mauricio Funes wearing the presidential sash with Salvador Sánchez Cerén
Mauricio Funes and Salvador Sánchez Cerén, the two FMLN presidents of El Salvador

On Sunday, 15 March 2009, an FMLN candidate, Mauricio Funes, was elected President of El Salvador.[20] On 10 February 2016, the El Salvador Supreme Court ruled that Funes would face a civil trial for charges of illegally laundering more than $700,000 in personal bank accounts. On 28 November 2017, El Salvador's second civil court found Funes guilty of illegal enrichment.[21]

In 2014 election Salvador Sánchez Cerén of FMLN was narrowly elected as the new President of El Salvador.[22]

In opposition (2019–)

[edit]

FMLN lost both 2019 presidential election and 2021 legislative election dominated by new Nuevas Ideas party of President Nayib Bukele.[23]

In the 2024 legislative election, FMLN lost all seats in both the legislative and municipal branches, becoming an extra-parliamentary party for the first time since participating in elections in 1994.[24]

Ideology

[edit]

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front was heavily inspired by Cuban Revolution and was based on Marxism-Leninism as well as liberation theology. The communist foundations of the party were however not aligned with Soviet communism, but with "Western Marxism" that developed from the ideology of Ernest Mandel, Trường Chinh and most importantly Ché Guevara; Marxist-Leninist thought was infused with the concepts of revolutionary nationalism and national liberation, and lack of national autonomy was considered an expression of landowning elite's interests.[25] Liberation theology, which in case of FMLN represents a strand of Catholic socialism,[26] was developed by radicalized priests connecting to the most depressed areas of El Salvador, founding Christian-based communities and worker associations and supporting rural communities through charity work and literacy campaigns. Middle-class youth of Catholic universities became exposed to the misery of the Salvadoran working class, and the teaching of liberation theology provided them with justification of violence and armed struggle in name of improving working and living conditions.[25]

Catholic clergy had a prominent role within the FLMN, as apart from being considered "authentic representatives" of Salvadoran people that legitimatized and popularized FMLN in the eyes of Salvadoran peasantry, Catholic priests would also join the party directly and become guerrillas, with at least one priest becoming a commander. Because of this, FMLN was described as "the merging of the popular church and the political opposition".[27] This was augmented with Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) overthrowing the Nicaraguan government in the 1979 Nicaraguan Revolution. In response to the growing radicalization and opposition to Somoza amongst the Church, FSLN incorporated a Catholic message into its program; this was augmented by left-wing Catholic organizations such as the Movimiento Cristiano Revolucionario joining the FSLN, whose members would assume high responsibilities within the Sandinista government. The Sandinistas were a source of inspiration and support for the FMLN.[28]

FMLN was born through liberation theology priests who promoted the "conscientization" of the Salvadoran working class, who argued that their desperation and poverty was not "God's will or the result of their own failures" but rather the consequence of capitalism; the party would even earn the support of Archbishop Óscar Romero, who believed that oppressive conditions made some forms of violence acceptable, stating: "Christians are not afraid of combat; they know how to fight, but they prefer the language of peace. However, when a dictatorship seriously violates human rights and attacks the common good of the nation, when it becomes unbearable and closes all channels of dialogue, when this happens, the Church speaks of the legitimate right of insurrectional violence." The clergy was further radicalized after Romero was murdered by a right-wing death squad, with priests such as Rogelio Poncel fleeing to mountains and joining the Marxist-Leninist ERP guerillas there, which would later become one of the co-founders of the FMLN. Justifying his decision, Poncel wrote: "The Bible confronts the established order. It must be seen from the point of view of the poor, and Christ was poor .... A Christian, a priest, must of necessity be a revolutionary. How can we conform what we preach with a system that oppresses and exploits?" Given the Catholic nature of the movement, most FMLN members and guerilla fighters were Catholics who "understood revolution in the language of religion".[29]

The FMLN has a symbiotic relationship with the Catholic Church marked by mutual support, leading political scientists to compare the party to the similarly pro-Catholic Sandinista National Liberation Front of Nicaragua. FMLN worked closely together with the Revolutionary Democratic Front led by Catholic Democrats who rebelled against the government following the murder of Enrique Álvarez Córdova. The FMLN built an extensive network of ties and connections to Salvadoran Catholic Democrats through churches and other religious organizations, with rural church-run communities known as Christian Base Communities (CEBs) becoming the main source of party's support, shelter and recruitment. Through liberation theology, Salvadoran clergy would radicalize the local peasantry into joining and aiding the FMLN; in 1977, one Jesuit remarked: "Slowly the peasants began to abandon their fatalism, slowly they began to understand that their hunger, their disease, their infant mortality, their unemployment, their unpaid wages, were not the will of God but the result of the greed of a few Salvadorans and of their own passivism."[5]

Being initially a mix of Marxism-Leninism and liberation theology,[30] the FMLN would moderate in the late 1980s and hold peace talks with the Salvadoran government, demanding power-sharing and transition to democratic rule. The leaders of FMLN and FDR established alliances and agreements with social-democrats figures from Latin America, Canada and Europe, which caused their political mutation as the prospect of a negotiated settlement became more and more possible. After building a potent front of social democratic governments of Europe and Latin America that opposed U.S. policy in Central America, the FMLN gradually abandoned Marxism-Leninism and embraced democratic socialism between 1988 and 1991 while maintaining its close ties to the Catholic Church. Catholic allies of the FMLN would call the moderation of the party "its own aggiornamento, its own Vatican II."[2]

Party structure

[edit]

The FMLN's headquarters is located at 11 Poniente Street N. 1316. Colonia Layco in San Salvador, the country's capital city.[31]

Electoral history

[edit]

Presidential elections

[edit]
Election Candidate First round Second round Result Ref.
Votes % Votes %
1994 Rubén Zamora 325,582
24.90%
 378,980
31.65%
 Lost Red XN
1999 Facundo Guardado 343,472
29.05%
2004 Schafik Jorge Hándal 812,519
35.68%
2009 Mauricio Funes 1,354,000
51.32%
 Elected Green tickY
2014 Salvador Sánchez Cerén 1,315,768
48.92%
 1,495,815
50.11%
2019 Hugo Martínez 389,289
14.41%
 Lost Red XN
2024 Manuel Flores 204,167
6.40%
 [32]

Legislative Assembly elections

[edit]
Election Votes % Position Seats +/– Status in legislature
1994 287,811 21.39 Increase 2nd
21 / 84
 Increase 21 Opposition
1997 369,709 33.02
27 / 84
 Increase 6 Opposition
2000 426,289 35.22
31 / 84
 Increase 4 Opposition
2003 475,043 33.96 Increase 1st
31 / 84
 Steady Opposition
2006 624,635 39.69
32 / 84
 Increase 1 Opposition
2009 943,936 42.60
35 / 84
 Increase 3 Government
2012 804,760 36.76 Decrease 2nd
31 / 84
 Decrease 4 Government
2015 847,289 37.23
31 / 84
 Steady Government
2018 521,257 24.54
23 / 84
 Decrease 13 Government
2021 173,330 6.94 Decrease 4th
4 / 84
 Decrease 19 Opposition
2024 195,920 6.28 Increase 3rd
0 / 60
 Decrease 4 Extra-parliamentary

See also

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The National Liberation Front (FMLN; Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional) is a left-wing in , founded on 10 October 1980 as a coalition of five Marxist guerrilla organizations aimed at overthrowing the government through armed insurrection. Three of the FMLN's founding factions traced their origins to splits within the Salvadoran , reflecting its ideological commitment to Marxist-Leninist revolution. Named after the executed communist leader , the group coordinated its formation during meetings in involving and Soviet representatives, securing external support for its protracted guerrilla campaign. During the ensuing Salvadoran Civil War (1980–1992), the FMLN mobilized thousands of fighters, including child soldiers comprising over 20% of its forces at times, and employed tactics such as landmine deployment, assassinations, and attacks on civilian infrastructure to erode government control. The conflict, which claimed approximately 75,000 lives, ended with the FMLN's demobilization under the UN-brokered of 1992, allowing the group to reconstitute as a legal political entity. As a party, the FMLN achieved its greatest success by electing president in —the first leftist victory in Salvadoran history—followed by in 2014, though its governments faced criticism for persistent high crime rates, economic stagnation, and corruption scandals that contributed to its ouster in the 2019 elections.

Origins and Formation

Socioeconomic and Political Context in Pre-War El Salvador

El Salvador's socioeconomic structure in the decades preceding the was dominated by extreme land inequality, with a small oligarchic elite controlling the majority of while the rural population faced chronic and landlessness. , which accounted for 26 percent of gross national product in 1974, relied heavily on coffee exports, but the distribution of land ownership remained highly skewed, exacerbating rural and limiting access to productive resources for the majority of peasants. By the 1970s, the return of Salvadoran migrants from following the 1969 Soccer War had intensified land scarcity, swelling the ranks of landless peasants and pushing rural rates as high as 45 percent amid stagnant wages. These conditions persisted despite limited attempts at agrarian reform in the 1960s and 1970s, which failed to meaningfully redistribute land or alleviate income disparities rooted in an antiquated feudal-like system. This inequality traced back to the early , when commercial concentrated wealth among a few families, displacing subsistence farmers and indigenous communities from communal lands. The peasant uprising, known as , exemplified the violent suppression of rural discontent: triggered by economic grievances during the , including falling coffee prices and evictions, the rebellion involving communist-led peasants and Pipil indigenous groups was crushed by the military, resulting in the massacre of between 10,000 and 30,000 people over several weeks. This event entrenched military dominance and oligarchic control, setting a precedent for state repression against perceived threats to the status quo, while decimating rural organizing capacity for generations. Politically, endured continuous military rule from 1931 onward, characterized by authoritarian governments that maintained power through repression and co-optation of civilian elites rather than democratic elections. Regimes in the 1960s and 1970s, such as those under Julio Adalberto Rivera (1962–1967) and Fidel Sánchez Hernández (1967–1972), alternated between limited reforms—like infrastructure investments funded by coffee booms—and crackdowns on labor unions, student movements, and associations demanding redistribution. in the post-World War II era, driven by export agriculture, widened class divides without broad-based development, fostering urban migration, informal economies, and rising pressures by the late 1970s. By the mid-1970s, escalating protests against and economic exclusion—highlighted by the fraudulent 1972 presidential election won by —intensified government responses, including activities targeting left-leaning activists, clergy influenced by , and rural organizers. Military juntas, such as the one installed after the coup against General , attempted reforms but faced resistance from hardline security forces and landowners, perpetuating a cycle of unrest that radicalized opposition groups amid unresolved grievances over , , and lack of .

Establishment as Guerrilla Umbrella in 1980

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) was formed on October 10, 1980, as a coalition uniting five major Marxist guerrilla organizations in El Salvador to coordinate their insurgent activities against the government. These groups included the Farabundo Martí Popular Liberation Forces (FPL), the People's Revolutionary Army (ERP), the National Resistance (RN), the Communist Party of El Salvador (PCS), and the Revolutionary Party of Central American Workers (PRTC). Prior to unification, the factions operated independently, resulting in fragmented operations and internal rivalries that hindered effectiveness in the escalating conflict following the 1979 military coup and events such as the assassination of Archbishop Óscar Romero earlier that year. The establishment of the FMLN was influenced by external actors, particularly , which urged the groups to form a single command structure to enhance military cohesion and secure broader international support from socialist states. A central command was created with representatives from each organization to direct strategy, logistics, and operations, marking a shift from autonomous actions to a more unified guerrilla front modeled on successful revolutionary models like the Cuban experience. The FMLN positioned itself as the armed wing of the Democratic Revolutionary Front (FDR), a political umbrella that incorporated non-armed leftist and reformist elements, aiming to legitimize the through a dual military-political approach. This consolidation occurred amid intensifying government repression and U.S.-backed efforts, with the FMLN adopting the name of 1932 peasant uprising leader to evoke historical grievances against oligarchic rule. Initial estimates placed FMLN forces at around 6,000-8,000 fighters, though and external aid would expand this in subsequent years. The umbrella structure facilitated more effective and , but underlying ideological differences among the groups—ranging from orthodox communism in the PCS to more heterodox tendencies in the ERP—persisted, foreshadowing future tensions.

Role in the Salvadoran Civil War

Guerrilla Tactics and Military Operations

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) adopted guerrilla tactics centered on mobility, surprise, and attrition to counter the numerically and materially superior Salvadoran Armed Forces. Operating predominantly from rural base areas in northern departments such as Morazán, Chalatenango, and Cabañas, FMLN units conducted ambushes against military convoys, sabotaged transportation networks, and disrupted economic infrastructure to erode government authority and economic viability. These operations relied on extensive local intelligence networks and civilian support for , enabling small groups of 10-15 fighters to execute precision strikes while larger formations of up to 500 combatants launched coordinated assaults. External sanctuaries in facilitated arms resupply and training, sustaining the despite logistical challenges. Initially pursuing a strategy of rapid escalation through conventional-style offensives to provoke mass uprisings, the FMLN shifted to protracted after early failures, integrating actions with political agitation and . Tactics included widespread use of landmines, which inflicted civilian casualties due to limited oversight, and targeted destruction of agricultural assets like and to amplify economic strain. sabotage peaked in the mid-1980s, with 439 documented acts in 1982 causing approximately US$98 million in damages, and by mid-1987, 83 of El Salvador's 92 major bridges had been destroyed or severely damaged. Key military operations underscored this evolution. The "Final Offensive" launched on January 10, 1981—announced by FMLN commander on December 27, 1980—involved nationwide attacks on military installations by an estimated 4,000-6,000 full-time guerrillas plus supporters, aiming to seize control and spark a popular revolt. Lacking the anticipated urban uprising, the offensive faltered, incurring heavy losses including at least 500 FMLN deaths and failing to alter the military balance. Rural dominated the mid-1980s, with notable actions such as the June 21, 1984, assault on the Cerrón Grande hydroelectric complex, which killed 120 personnel and caused 238 million colones in damage. By the late 1980s, the FMLN escalated urban operations during the November 11, 1989, offensive, deploying commandos and mortars to overrun neighborhoods in and other cities, temporarily pushing back government forces. This campaign resulted in over 2,000 deaths—446 soldiers and 1,902 guerrillas—and 6 billion colones in property damage, demonstrating tactical adaptability but ultimately yielding military defeat while hastening negotiations. The offensive highlighted the FMLN's reliance on surprise and infiltration over sustained conventional engagements, contributing to a strategic stalemate.

Human Rights Violations and Atrocities Attributed to FMLN

The Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional (FMLN) engaged in systematic violations during the (1980–1991), including extrajudicial executions, abductions, indiscriminate attacks on civilians, summary executions of prisoners, and forced recruitment. The Truth Commission for , established under the 1992 , attributed approximately 5% of the 22,000 documented complaints of serious violence to the FMLN, encompassing over 800 cases, with nearly half involving deaths primarily through executions. These acts often targeted mayors, public officials, suspected collaborators ("orejas"), and military personnel, justified by the FMLN as military necessities but violating by failing to distinguish between combatants and civilians or provide . A deliberate FMLN policy approved by its General Command, particularly leaders Joaquín Villalobos and Jorge Meléndez of the faction, involved the assassination of civilian mayors between 1985 and 1988 to disrupt local governance in contested areas. The Commission documented at least 11 such executions, including those of María Ovidia Graciela Mónico Vargas and José Domingo Avilés Vargas in January 1985, Edgar Mauricio Valenzuela in March 1985, and Francisco Israel Díaz Vásquez in December 1988, often carried out after guerrilla investigations labeling victims as traitors. FMLN units conducted collective decisions or used special execution squads, publicly announcing "ajusticiamientos" (just executions) to deter collaboration. Prominent early incidents included the November 27, 1980, abduction and murder of six Frente Democrático Revolucionario (FDR) leaders—Enrique Álvarez Córdoba, Juan Chacón, Enrique Escobar Barrera, Manuel de Jesús Franco Ramírez, Humberto Mendoza, and Doroteo Hernández—in , executed by FMLN forces via bullets and strangulation. On June 19, 1985, the PRTC faction's Zona Rosa attack in killed four U.S. Marines and nine civilians using grenades and rifles, part of a broader policy targeting U.S. military advisors. Abductions for leverage included the September 10, 1985, kidnapping of President José Napoleón Duarte's daughter, Inés Guadalupe Duarte Durán, alongside Ana Cecilia Villeda and 22 mayors, exchanged after bodyguards were killed. Infrastructure sabotage, such as the June 21, 1984, attack on the Cerrón Grande Hydroelectric Power Station, resulted in 120 deaths. Indiscriminate attacks persisted into the war's final stages, exemplified by mortar barrages during the November 1989 offensive and May 1991 assaults on the First Brigade garrison in San Salvador, killing three civilians and wounding others in residential zones. The FMLN maintained a policy of executing prisoners of war and wounded combatants, as seen in the February 16, 1989, killing of former commander Romero García ("Miguel Castellanos") as a traitor without trial, and the January 2, 1991, execution of two wounded U.S. servicemen—Private First Class Earnest Dawson and Lieutenant Colonel David Pickett—after their helicopter was downed, which the FMLN later admitted as a criminal error without recorded punishment. Landmine deployment, poorly supervised, caused civilian casualties, including 31 deaths in 1985 and over 150 in 1988. Forced recruitment by the FMLN included adults and children, with estimates indicating up to 20% of combatants were under 18, particularly during 1980–1982 when some factions compelled minors into service, linking to disappearances and executions of resisters. The Commission noted no general policy of systematic child but confirmed forcible practices in irregular units, contributing to violations without . FMLN admissions during Commission inquiries acknowledged some acts' criminality but cited wartime conditions and incomplete records as mitigating factors, though evidence from witnesses, forensics, and documentation established sufficient to overwhelming proof of responsibility across factions like , PRTC, and FAL.

Peace Process and Transition to Legality

Negotiations and the 1992 Chapultepec Accords

The peace negotiations between the Salvadoran government under President and the FMLN accelerated after the FMLN's major offensive in November 1989, which penetrated urban areas including and exposed the stalemate, resulting in thousands of deaths and prompting international pressure following of six Jesuit and two others on , 1989. Both parties requested UN in September 1989, led by envoy Álvaro de Soto, establishing a framework for dialogue amid a mutually hurting where neither side could achieve outright victory. Initial talks focused on human rights verification through the UN Observer Mission in (ONUSAL), deployed under the San José Agreement of July 1990, which documented abuses by both government forces and FMLN amid ongoing hostilities. Subsequent partial agreements built toward comprehensive settlement: the Geneva Accord of April 4, 1990, outlined broad goals for ending the war, democratization, protections, and societal reunification; the Caracas Agenda in May 1990 addressed structural issues; the Mexico Agreement of April 1991 tackled military reductions; and the of September 1991 specified armed forces reforms, including an end to and purges of violators. These talks, conducted via single-text negotiation with input from international actors like the U.S., , and the , resolved sticking points such as FMLN demands for retaining limited armaments during transition and government resistance to deep military restructuring. The process reflected Cold War's end, reducing external support for FMLN and enabling compromises, though both sides continued sporadic violence until formal cessation. The , signed on January 16, 1992, at in , formalized the end of the 12-year , with a taking effect on February 1, 1992. Key provisions transformed the FMLN from an armed into a legal , legalized on December 15, 1992, guaranteeing its combatants full for reintegration. FMLN occurred in phases, with initial reintegration by June 30, 1992, and full completion by October 1992, supported by a National Reconstruction Plan providing land and benefits to approximately 47,500 former combatants through the Land Transfer Program (PTT), redistributing about 10% of rural land. Government concessions included halving the armed forces from 63,000 to 31,000 troops by February 1993, establishing an Ad Hoc Commission to screen officers for abuses, creating a separate National Civilian Police (PNC), and enacting judicial, electoral, and constitutional reforms. A Commission on the Truth investigated atrocities from 1980 onward, while an Ombudsman for Human Rights oversaw compliance, with ONUSAL verifying implementation. These measures aimed at demilitarization and institutional overhaul, though early challenges included delays in purges and land transfers due to bureaucratic and political resistance.

Disarmament, Demilitarization, and Party Formation

Following the signing of the on January 16, 1992, the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) initiated a phased of its armed forces, with combatants required to concentrate at designated verification sites under supervision. The ceasefire took effect on February 1, 1992, marking the start of the process, during which FMLN units deposited approximately 8,000 weapons and munitions caches with the Observer Mission in (ONUSAL). proceeded in stages: 20 percent of combatants by June 30, 1992; an additional 60 percent by August 31, 1992; and the remaining forces by October 31, 1992, after which all FMLN arms and equipment were to be destroyed between October 15 and 31. This demilitarization transformed the FMLN from an insurgent coalition into a entity, with former combatants reintegrated through land transfers, agricultural credits, and training programs coordinated by the and international donors, though implementation faced logistical delays and incomplete compliance in early phases. verification by ONUSAL confirmed the surrender of heavy weaponry and explosives, but light arms collection extended into 1993 due to hidden stockpiles, reflecting challenges in fully eradicating the FMLN's military apparatus. The process emphasized simultaneous political reintegration, allowing FMLN members to register for elections without prior military dissolution requirements being fully met. By December 1992, the FMLN had formally registered as a legal , enabling its participation in the March 1994 elections, where it secured 21 seats in the 84-member body. This transition dissolved the FMLN's five constituent guerrilla organizations into a unified structure, though internal factions retained influence, and the party adopted statutes emphasizing democratic participation over armed struggle. The accords' provisions for legal status without amnesty for wartime crimes positioned the FMLN as an opposition force, contingent on verifiable to prevent rearmament.

Post-War Political Trajectory

Internal Factionalism and Splits

Following the 1992 , the FMLN transitioned from a guerrilla to a legal , but internal factionalism persisted due to the retention of organizational structures from its five founding groups: the Fuerzas Populares de Liberación (FPL), Ejército Revolucionario del Pueblo (), Resistencia Nacional (RN), Partido Comunista de El Salvador (PCS), and Partido Revolucionario de los Trabajadores Centroamericanos (PRTC). These groups maintained distinct ideological orientations rooted in their pre-unification strategies, with FPL and PCS adhering to orthodox Marxist-Leninist doctrines emphasizing prolonged revolutionary struggle, while and RN favored more pragmatic, urban-focused tactics and quicker transitions to power. This led to ongoing tensions between hardline elements prioritizing ideological purity and reformers advocating electoral moderation, resulting in ambivalent public rhetoric that combined democratic reforms with internal Leninist discipline. Early post-war divisions manifested in 1993 when a faction of the ERP, seeking greater autonomy, signed the "Pact of San Andrés" independently of FMLN leadership, prompting the expulsion of ERP founder Joaquín Villalobos in 1994 for alleged deviations from party unity. Despite formal dissolution of the five groups in 1995 to create a unified structure, factional blocks influenced candidate selections and policy debates, with orthodox leaders from ex-PCS and FPL dominating internal elections. By 2001, these rifts escalated into a major split as the "Renovador" wing, led by deputy Facundo Guardado and advocating for deeper ideological moderation and anti-corruption reforms, seceded to form a rival party; this resulted in the expulsion of six FMLN deputies by 2002, further weakening the organization's cohesion. Later factionalism intensified around leadership control and strategic direction, exemplified by the 2017 expulsion of rising politician from the FMLN after public criticisms of party and internal deficits, which he voiced during his tenure as San Salvador mayor. Bukele's ouster highlighted divides between war-era hardliners, such as those aligned with secretary-general Medardo González, and younger or reformist elements frustrated by the party's failure to adapt beyond its revolutionary legacy. These conflicts, compounded by electoral setbacks and governance scandals during the 2009–2019 administrations, eroded the FMLN's base, contributing to its marginalization by the late 2010s without resolving underlying orthodox-reformist antagonisms.

Electoral Engagements and Presidential Victories

Following the 1992 Chapultepec Peace Accords, the FMLN registered as a legal political party and contested its first national elections in 1994. In the presidential election on March 20, 1994, FMLN-backed candidate Rubén Zamora secured 25.6% of the vote in the first round, advancing to a runoff but ultimately losing to ARENA's Armando Calderón Sol. The party also gained 21 seats in the 84-member Legislative Assembly, establishing a foothold in opposition politics. The FMLN continued electoral participation in subsequent cycles, gradually building voter support amid economic challenges and dissatisfaction with ARENA governance. In the March 7, 1999 presidential election, candidate Facundo Guardado received 29.05% of the vote, placing second to Francisco Flores of . By the March 21, 2004 election, improved to 35.67%, though defeated by Antonio Saca's 57.71%. These campaigns focused on , , and critiques of neoliberal policies, consolidating the FMLN's base among rural and urban working-class voters. The FMLN achieved its first presidential victory on March 15, 2009, when , a centrist distancing himself from hardline guerrilla roots, narrowly defeated ARENA's in a contest marked by high turnout and economic discontent. Funes' platform promised social investments without radical restructuring, appealing to moderates and ending two decades of uninterrupted ARENA rule. In the 2014 election, the FMLN retained the presidency with , Funes' vice president and former guerrilla commander. Cerén won 48.93% in the February 2 first round, forcing a March 9 runoff against ARENA's Norman Quijano. Official results confirmed Cerén's victory by 50.11% to 49.89% after a manual recount amid fraud allegations from the opposition, validated by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal. This razor-thin margin highlighted polarized electorates but secured consecutive FMLN terms.

Governance Periods (2009–2019): Policies and Outcomes

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) governed El Salvador from 2009 to 2019 through successive presidencies of Mauricio Funes (2009–2014) and Salvador Sánchez Cerén (2014–2019), marking the country's first left-wing administrations since the civil war. Policies emphasized expanded social spending on poverty alleviation, education, and health, while maintaining dollarization and orthodox macroeconomic frameworks to avoid radical shifts. These efforts drew partial funding from alliances with Venezuela via Petrocaribe, which provided subsidized oil but later fueled corruption allegations. Economic policies under both leaders prioritized fiscal restraint alongside targeted redistribution, with public spending rising to support social programs like conditional cash transfers, school meals, and initiatives. GDP growth averaged approximately 2% annually during this period, reflecting modest recovery from the 2009 global recession but constrained by remittances dependency (around 20% of GDP) and low investment. rates declined from 36.5% in to 26.2% by 2017, attributed to these programs, though persisted in rural areas and inequality remained high with a near 0.40. Critics noted that growth failed to outpace population increases or address , hovering at 7-8%. Security policies centered on a controversial 2012 truce facilitated by Funes' administration between and Barrio 18, which temporarily halved from 69.2 per 100,000 in 2012 to 41.3 in 2013 by relocating gang leaders to lower-security prisons. However, the truce collapsed in 2014 under Cerén, leading to a surge to 103 per 100,000 in 2015, the highest globally at the time, as gangs rearmed and expanded territorial control without underlying reforms. By 2018, rates fell to around 52 per 100,000 amid intensified policing, but overall violence displaced over 200,000 and strained public finances. Foreign policy aligned with leftist regional blocs, strengthening ties to Venezuela's and later severing relations with in favor of in 2018 under Cerén, aiming for infrastructure investments but yielding limited tangible benefits amid China's global lending scrutiny. Outcomes included deepened debt vulnerabilities, with public debt rising to 70% of GDP by 2019, exacerbated by loans. Corruption scandals overshadowed achievements, particularly under Funes, who faced charges for embezzling $351 million in public funds, including via undeclared Venezuelan donations, leading to his 2018 conviction in absentia and asylum in . Cerén's term saw continued probes into FMLN-linked graft, contributing to voter disillusionment and the party's 2019 electoral defeat. Despite social gains, governance failed to curb entrenched gang power or ensure fiscal sustainability, as evidenced by persistent high violence and economic fragility.

Decline and Opposition Status (2019–Present)

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) transitioned to opposition following its defeat in the , 2019, , where of the Grand Alliance for National Unity () secured victory with 53% of the vote, ending the party's consecutive terms in office from to 2019. The FMLN's candidate, , placed third with approximately 22% of the vote, reflecting widespread voter disillusionment with the party's governance record amid persistent high homicide rates—peaking at over 100 per 100,000 inhabitants annually during its administrations—and . This loss compounded internal factionalism and corruption allegations, including the 2016 flight of former president to , where he received asylum amid probes into of public funds exceeding $300 million, later confirmed by his 2018 conviction in absentia. Subsequent electoral setbacks accelerated the FMLN's marginalization. In the February 28, 2021, legislative elections, the party secured only 4 of 84 seats in the Legislative Assembly, a sharp decline from 23 seats held prior, as Bukele's Nuevas Ideas party captured a supermajority of 56 seats amid voter approval for his early anti-gang initiatives. The 2024 general elections further diminished its presence: FMLN presidential candidate Manuel Flores garnered about 6.4% of the vote against Bukele's 84.7%, and the party won zero legislative seats despite receiving the third-highest national vote share in congressional balloting, underscoring a collapse in its voter base to Bukele's security-focused policies that reduced homicides to historic lows of under 3 per 100,000 by 2023. As the primary leftist opposition, the FMLN has criticized Bukele's extensions of the since March 2022—which facilitated mass arrests of over 70,000 suspected gang members—and accused his administration of authoritarian overreach, including judicial reforms and media restrictions. However, its influence remains limited by ongoing probes into former officials, such as those tied to Funes-era schemes involving state advertising contracts, and failure to adapt to public priorities on and economic recovery. By 2025, the party's legislative absence and internal leadership disputes have rendered it a peripheral force, with membership attrition and defections to exacerbating its organizational weaknesses.

Ideology and Doctrinal Evolution

Marxist-Leninist Foundations and Revolutionary Influences

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) coalesced on , 1980, through the unification of five guerrilla organizations—the (PCS), Farabundo Martí Popular Liberation Forces (FPL), People's Revolutionary Army (ERP), National Resistance (RN), and Revolutionary Workers' Party of (PRTC)—each rooted in Marxist-Leninist ideology emphasizing class struggle, , and the establishment of a via armed revolution. The PCS, founded in 1930 as El Salvador's orthodox communist party, adhered strictly to Soviet-style Marxism-Leninism, prioritizing disciplined cadre organization and alliance-building with urban workers. In contrast, the FPL, established in 1970 under Salvador , explicitly identified as Marxist-Leninist by 1975, advocating a mass-line approach blending Leninist with broader popular mobilization against oligarchic rule. The , formed in 1972 by dissidents from the PCS and FPL, professed Marxist-Leninist commitments but deviated toward more flexible, non-orthodox tactics, including urban actions and criticism of Soviet revisionism, while maintaining a focus on protracted rural insurgency. Similarly, the RN, splintering from the ERP in 1975, and the PRTC, emerging around 1977 with Trotskyist undertones but aligned on anti-imperialist goals, reinforced the FMLN's core doctrine of , where a centralized command enforced unity amid factional debates. This synthesis drew from Vladimir Lenin's emphasis on a professional revolutionary party to lead the , adapted to El Salvador's agrarian context of extreme land inequality and military repression, where over 70% of was held by 2% of the population by the late . Revolutionary influences profoundly shaped the FMLN's strategy, with the 1959 Cuban Revolution serving as a primary model for foquista guerrilla warfare—small mobile units expanding into liberated zones—directly inspiring leaders like Shafik Handal of the PCS, who trained in Cuba and sought to replicate Fidel Castro's success against U.S.-aligned dictatorships. The 1979 Sandinista triumph in Nicaragua further catalyzed the FMLN, providing logistical bases, training camps, and arms conduits from 1980 onward, as Nicaraguan advisors integrated into PRTC structures and facilitated cross-border operations emulating the Sandinistas' urban-rural coordination. These external models, combined with the legacy of Farabundo Martí's 1932 peasant uprising—crushed in La Matanza with 10,000–40,000 deaths—underscored the FMLN's conviction in armed struggle over electoral reform, rejecting peaceful transitions as capitulation to bourgeois interests. Cuban material aid, including weapons and doctrine, sustained the front's 1981–1992 insurgency, though internal documents reveal tensions over dependency on Havana's centralized model versus local adaptations.

Moderation, Pragmatism, and Internal Ideological Conflicts

Following the 1992 , the FMLN moderated its ideology to facilitate transition from guerrilla insurgency to legal , reframing its revolutionary goals as democratic reforms aimed at addressing inequality within an electoral framework rather than through armed overthrow. This shift involved resignifying "revolution" as gradual change, accepting multiparty competition, and incorporating social democratic elements like poverty alleviation programs, influenced by the post-Cold War international context and domestic electoral imperatives that favored centrist positioning over explicit . Pragmatism became evident in the FMLN's strategic adaptations, such as allying with non-party figures like for the 2009 presidential campaign, which secured 51.3% of the vote by emphasizing and social welfare over radical restructuring, while preserving pro-capitalist macroeconomic policies inherited from prior administrations. In governance from 2009 to 2019, the party pursued targeted reforms—expanding social spending to 20% of GDP by 2014—without challenging or foreign investment, reflecting a calculated balance to sustain power amid right-wing opposition and economic constraints like dollarization and IMF-influenced fiscal limits. This approach, however, revealed : public moderation coexisted with internal retention of Leninist organizational principles and revolutionary rhetoric to mobilize its base, rooted in wartime experiences that prioritized ideological continuity for cohesion. Internal ideological conflicts arose from debates over moderation's depth, pitting renovadores (reformist moderates advocating pragmatic electoralism and shunning socialist labels) against ortodoxos (hardliners upholding Marxist-Leninist orthodoxy as the party's identity). These tensions, inherited from the FMLN's five pre-war factions, intensified post-1992, with renovadores like Joaquín Villalobos pushing for deeper accommodation to , leading to the 1993 split of the faction, which rejected ongoing radicalism. By 2001, similar disputes expelled renovador leader Facundo Guardado, who criticized the party's insufficient , while statutory changes in 2005 strengthened orthodox control by curbing factional autonomy. Such conflicts persisted, culminating in the 2017 expulsion of for challenging ideological rigidity, highlighting how —balancing voter appeal with cadre loyalty—fueled ongoing factionalism without fully resolving underlying divides between electoral and purity.

Organizational Framework

Party Structure and Leadership Dynamics

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) transitioned from a of five guerrilla organizations—the (PCS), Farabundo Martí Popular Liberation Forces (FPL), People's Revolutionary Army (), National Resistance (RN), and Revolutionary Party of Central American Workers (PRTC)—into a unified following its legalization in December 1992 under the . By 1995, the FMLN completed internal unification, formally dissolving the separate organizational structures of its founding groups while retaining a pluralistic framework with persistent factional tendencies derived from those origins. The party's structure includes a national congress for policy-making, a political commission for strategic direction, and executive bodies coordinated by a secretary-general, reflecting a centralized yet internally competitive model adapted from its insurgent past. Leadership dynamics within the FMLN have been dominated by tensions between the "ortodoxos" (orthodox or faction, primarily PCS-led and emphasizing ideological purity) and the "renovadores" (reformist or moderate faction, pushing for pragmatic adaptations to electoral politics). Influential figures like , a PCS veteran and co-founder, exemplified orthodox leadership until his death in 2006, advocating stricter Marxist-Leninist adherence amid post-war moderation debates. Reformists, including Joaquín Villalobos of the ERP (expelled in 1993 along with his faction) and Facundo Guardado (expelled in 2001 with other renovadores who formed the Democratic Party), favored deeper ideological shifts and democratic internal processes, often clashing with hardliners over candidate selection and policy priorities. These conflicts manifested in undemocratic practices, such as manipulated internal elections; for instance, primary elections for presidential candidates introduced in were abandoned by due to transparency failures favoring the orthodox bloc. Statutory reforms enacted five times by progressively consolidated orthodox control, sidelining moderates through expulsions and sanctions rather than consensus-building. Subsequent secretaries-general, including Medardo González, navigated these dynamics by balancing historical commanders like (president 2014–2019 and General Command veteran) with newer figures, though war-era leaders retained outsized influence, contributing to rigidity in . This factional imbalance has been cited as a factor in the party's electoral challenges, with critics attributing governance-era policy inconsistencies to unresolved internal power struggles.

Membership and Base Support

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) originated as a coalition of five Marxist guerrilla organizations during El Salvador's civil war (1980–1992), with active combatant strength peaking at an estimated 6,000 to 13,000 fighters, supplemented by broader militia and sympathizer networks totaling up to 15,000 personnel by the war's end. Declassified Salvadoran military estimates for individual factions, such as the Farabundo Martí Popular Liberation Forces (FPL), placed their numbers at around 3,300, while the overall FMLN maintained territorial control in rural zones equivalent to roughly one guerrilla per 500 inhabitants during peak periods. Following demobilization under the 1992 , the FMLN transitioned into a legal , incorporating former combatants and expanding membership through organizing, though precise militancy figures remain undocumented in public records; internal estimates suggested tens of thousands of affiliates by the early 2000s, aligned with electoral gains where the party captured 31–34% of legislative votes in 2000 and 2003. The FMLN's core base of support derived from rural peasants, landless laborers, and urban working-class communities, particularly in northern departments like Chalatenango and Morazán, as well as eastern regions and San Salvador's peripheral slums, where wartime guerrilla governance had fostered loyalty through agrarian reforms and in controlled territories. This demographic reflected causal factors such as socioeconomic grievances—high inequality, land concentration, and repression under prior regimes—rather than broad ideological appeal, with sympathizers often motivated by promises of redistribution and anti-oligarchic mobilization influenced by and international leftist networks. Urban intellectuals and ex-combatants provided organizational cadres, but the party's voter base rarely exceeded 30–40% nationally, constrained by entrenched right-wing structures and limited penetration among middle-class or business sectors. Post-2009 governance under FMLN presidents exposed fractures, leading to membership attrition from internal factionalism, scandals, and unmet economic promises, culminating in a sharp decline by the . Electoral proxies indicate base erosion, with presidential vote shares falling from 51.3% in 2009 to 6.4% in 2024, as former strongholds shifted toward amid dissatisfaction with persistent poverty, violence, and fiscal mismanagement. Remaining support clusters among aging veterans, ideological hardliners, and pockets of rural leftists, but systemic failures—such as alliances with gangs and authoritarian foreign ties—have alienated broader demographics, reducing the party to marginal status without verifiable current membership data exceeding low thousands.

Electoral Performance

Presidential Election Results

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) has fielded candidates in every Salvadoran since transitioning to a legal following the 1992 . Early contests reflected the party's limited electoral appeal amid lingering civil war divisions, with results improving gradually until breakthroughs in 2009 and 2014, followed by sharp declines. In the 1994 presidential election, FMLN candidate Rubén Zamora secured 25.6% of the vote in the first round, advancing to a runoff against (ARENA) candidate , whom he lost to with 31.6%. Facundo Guardado, the FMLN nominee in 1999, obtained approximately 29% of the vote, finishing second to ARENA's Francisco Flores, who won with over 51%. The 2004 election saw garner 35.7%, a notable increase but still a loss to ARENA's Tony Saca, who took 57.7%. The FMLN achieved its first presidential victory in 2009 when journalist defeated 's Rodrigo Ávila in a closely contested race, ending two decades of rule. In 2014, narrowly won with 50.11% against 's Norman Quijano, confirmed after a manual recount amid challenges from the opposition alleging irregularities. Subsequent elections marked a reversal. In 2019, FMLN candidate Hugo Martínez placed third with roughly 22% of the vote, behind Nayib Bukele's 53% and ARENA's 31.7%, as voter dissatisfaction with FMLN governance propelled the outsider Bukele to victory. The party's fortunes further eroded in 2024, when Manuel Flores received under 7% against Bukele's landslide 84.7% reelection, reflecting widespread rejection of FMLN policies on security and economy.

Legislative and Municipal Outcomes

The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) demonstrated steady growth in legislative representation during its early years as a following the 1992 , reflecting its mobilization of former guerrilla supporters and rural bases. In the inaugural post-war elections of March 20, 1994, the FMLN secured 21 seats in the 84-seat . This increased to 27 seats in 1997 and 31 seats in 2000, establishing it as a major opposition force against the ruling (ARENA). By 2006, the party held 32 seats, setting the stage for its 2009 breakthrough with 35 seats—the highest ever—capturing 35% of the vote and briefly becoming the largest bloc in the assembly.
Election YearFMLN SeatsNotes
199421Initial post-peace entry; 24% vote share.
200031Gains amid high abstention (62%); tied with .
200632Plurality but no majority; -PCN dominated.
200935Peak; largest post-Funes presidential win.
201231Slight decline; retained strong opposition role.
201531Stable amid internal divisions and economic discontent.
201823Drop linked to governance dissatisfaction; lost ground to .
20214Collapse; formed.
20240Total exclusion; Bukele's won 54 seats.
Legislative fortunes reversed sharply after 2015, coinciding with the FMLN's presidential governance (2009–2019), marked by and allegations that eroded voter support. The party lost 8 seats in amid rising crime and fiscal deficits, then plummeted to just 4 seats in 2021 as President Nayib Bukele's party capitalized on security reforms and anti-corruption rhetoric. By the February 4, 2024, elections, the FMLN failed to win any seats, receiving under 2% of votes, amid reports of irregularities but overwhelming public shift toward Bukele's agenda. In municipal elections, held concurrently with legislative contests every three years, the FMLN mirrored this trajectory, leveraging grassroots organization to control key urban and rural locales before succumbing to similar disillusionment. It won 17 of 262 mayoralties in 1997, surging to approximately 100 by 2000 and 60 in 2006. The 2009 vote yielded 96 mayors, including strongholds like briefly, bolstering local governance experiments in social programs. However, numbers eroded to around 30 by 2015 and fewer than 10 in 2018, as and emerging parties reclaimed terrain. By 2021, the FMLN held only 3 mayors, and in 2024, it secured none, losing even traditional bastions amid Bukele's nationwide sweep and voter fatigue with leftist administrations' unfulfilled promises on .

Controversies and Criticisms

Civil War Legacy and Accountability Debates

The (1980–1992) resulted in approximately 75,000 deaths, with the FMLN, as a of Marxist guerrilla groups, employing tactics including assassinations, kidnappings, and executions of suspected government collaborators, which the attributed to roughly 5% of documented violations. The Commission's 1993 , "From Madness to Hope," detailed FMLN responsibility for specific acts such as the People's Revolutionary Army () faction executing at least 11 civilian mayors between 1985 and 1988 to undermine local , alongside forced of civilians, including children, and urban terrorism like bombings that indiscriminately targeted infrastructure and personnel. These actions were framed by FMLN leadership as necessary for revolutionary defense, though the highlighted a pattern of systematic violence against non-combatants to instill fear and control territory. Post-war accountability efforts were shaped by the 1992 Chapultepec Peace Accords, which facilitated FMLN's transition to a legal political party but included a 1993 General Amnesty Law granting blanket immunity for political crimes committed by both sides, effectively shielding guerrilla commanders from prosecution. The Supreme Court invalidated this amnesty in 2010, citing constitutional violations of victims' rights, yet prosecutions predominantly targeted state forces for emblematic cases like the 1981 El Mozote massacre, with minimal pursuit of FMLN perpetrators despite evidence of their violations. FMLN leaders, including former commanders who later held presidential office, have consistently contested the Truth Commission's attribution of blame, arguing it underrepresented defensive necessities and overemphasized their actions relative to state repression, while advocating for reparations focused on government atrocities without parallel self-scrutiny. Debates over legacy persist, with critics contending that FMLN's evasion of —evident in resistance to international lawsuits, such as a 2012 U.S. civil judgment against ERP leader José Medardo Hernández for child soldier recruitment—perpetuates and distorts historical narrative by prioritizing victimhood over complicity in civilian suffering. Empirical assessments, including the Commission's analysis of over 22,000 complaints, indicate underreporting of FMLN crimes in rebel-held areas due to , suggesting the 5% figure may understate their causal role in deaths estimated at several thousand. During FMLN administrations (2009–2019), legislative efforts to revisit amnesties or fund truth initiatives stalled when implicating former guerrillas, fueling accusations of selective that undermines and privileges partisan interests over causal for war's human cost.

Governance Record: Economic Failures and Security Shortcomings

During the FMLN's tenure in power from to 2019, El Salvador's economy exhibited persistent underperformance characterized by low GDP growth rates averaging around 2% annually, significantly trailing regional averages and failing to generate sufficient or gains. This stagnation persisted despite increased public spending on social programs, which critics attributed to a lack of structural reforms, overreliance on remittances (comprising up to 20% of GDP), and insufficient private investment amid policy uncertainty. Public debt ballooned from approximately 50% of GDP in 2009 to nearly 65% by 2019, driven by fiscal deficits, pension system shortfalls, and borrowing to fund expansive welfare initiatives without corresponding growth or economic diversification. While the national headcount ratio declined from 37.8% in 2009 to 26.8% in 2019, this reduction was modest relative to the decade's challenges, including global financial shocks and internal inefficiencies, and masked persistent inequality and vulnerability to external fluctuations rather than robust success. Unemployment hovered around 7%, youth joblessness exceeded 15%, and the economy remained undiversified, with agriculture and informal sectors dominating amid failed attempts to attract beyond modest inflows. On security, FMLN administrations under Presidents Funes and Cerén presided over uncontrolled dominance, with intentional rates averaging over 60 per 100,000 inhabitants annually—among the highest globally—and peaking at 103 in following the collapse of a controversial 2012-2014 truce. The truce, negotiated secretly with and Barrio 18 leaders, temporarily halved murders but was widely condemned for empowering criminals through concessions like prison transfers and relaxed anti- laws, without dismantling their territorial control or networks that afflicted up to 70% of businesses and communities. Post-truce, rebounded sharply, with gangs exploiting weak state presence to enforce "taxes," displace residents, and orchestrate killings, resulting in over 50,000 homicides during the and massive . Security strategies emphasized dialogue and social prevention over aggressive enforcement, yielding limited results as , underfunding, and ideological reluctance to classify gangs as terrorist entities hampered decisive action. By , El Salvador's homicide rate stood at 36 per 100,000, still exceeding pre-FMLN peaks, underscoring the governance's inability to restore public safety or break cycles of impunity.

Allegations of Corruption and Ties to Authoritarian Regimes

During its presidencies from 2009 to 2019, the FMLN faced multiple high-profile corruption investigations targeting its leaders and affiliated entities. Former President , who led the party in office from 2009 to 2014, was accused by El Salvador's of embezzling approximately $351 million in public funds, with 83% allegedly diverted as cash through a network involving deposits in trash bags and other illicit transfers. Funes denied the charges but fled to in 2016 amid the probe, where he received political asylum from the regime; he remained there until his death in 2025. His successor, , who served from 2014 to 2019, was formally charged in 2021 with and illicit enrichment as part of the "Public Looting" , involving the diversion of millions in state resources during his administration. An arrest warrant was issued, but evaded capture by obtaining Nicaraguan citizenship in 2021, granted by President despite the outstanding charges. Separate probes implicated ex-officials from his government in a $184 million scheme, including of public contracts and funds. These scandals extended to FMLN-linked enterprises, notably Petróleos, a between the party and Venezuela's state-owned formed under Funes. Authorities alleged the entity laundered over $400 million through opaque oil-for-infrastructure deals, with funds diverted for political and personal gain, including electoral financing; U.S. sanctions later targeted associated Venezuelan officials for tied to such arrangements. The FMLN's governance era coincided with deepened financial and ideological ties to authoritarian governments in , , and , which facilitated alleged illicit funding streams. During the Chávez and Maduro eras, provided billions in oil credits and grants to FMLN administrations, often with minimal transparency, enabling graft as documented in Salvadoran probes. Historical FMLN guerrilla links to Cuban support during the 1980s civil war evolved into ongoing alliances, including refuge for fugitive leaders in under , whose regime shielded them from . These connections, part of broader leftist networks like the , drew U.S. scrutiny for undermining democratic norms and enabling corruption, with both Funes and Sánchez Cerén listed in State Department reports on undemocratic actors. Critics, including Salvadoran prosecutors, argued such ties prioritized ideological over accountability, exacerbating domestic graft.

References

  1. https://digitalcollections.american.edu/Documents/Detail/fmln-guerrillas-in-jucuaran-el-salvador/30214
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319587701_Farabundo_Marti_National_Liberation_Front_El_Salvador
  3. https://media.defense.gov/2025/Apr/07/2003683788/-1/-1/0/20250407_ELSALVADOR_1979-92_FINAL.PDF
  4. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP86S00596R000200590001-4.pdf
  5. https://americanarchive.org/exhibits/newshour-cold-war/el-salvador
  6. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=xjur
  7. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/public/2023-10/40-219-6927378-007-006-2023.pdf
  8. https://cja.org/where-we-work/el-salvador/
  9. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-turnover-in-el-salvador/
  10. https://www.csis.org/analysis/el-salvador-fmln-sanchez-ceren-wins-presidency-whats-stake
  11. https://www.idea.int/news/new-government-el-salvador
  12. https://newleftreview.org/issues/i122/articles/harald-jung-class-struggles-in-el-salvador.pdf
  13. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/el-salvador-civil-war-natural-disasters-and-gang-violence-drive-migration
  14. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/122551468027660574/pdf/823120WP0P12330ssment0Final0English.pdf
  15. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/el-salvadors-military-massacres-civilians
  16. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1812
  17. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/elsalvador/9352.htm
  18. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/3d870c41-bd74-4f20-ab56-f6b17451d5a9/download
  19. https://arsof-history.org/articles/v3n1_paraiso_page_1.html
  20. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w30488/w30488.pdf
  21. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/politics-and-government/fmln-wins-legislative-elections-el-salvador
  22. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA308488.pdf
  23. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/file/ElSalvador-Report.pdf
  24. https://www.justice.gov/file/274826/dl?inline=
  25. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85M00363R000902060041-4.pdf
  26. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1147701.pdf
  27. https://www.hrw.org/reports/1992/WR92/AMW-08.htm
  28. https://glopoib.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/el-salvador.pdf
  29. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/pwks38.pdf
  30. https://www.csis.org/analysis/lessons-el-salvador-peace-process-afghanistan
  31. https://peaceaccords.nd.edu/accord/chapultepec-peace-agreement
  32. https://peacemaker.un.org/en/node/9167
  33. https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/irbc/1993/en/94207
  34. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-DDR-ElSalvador-CaseStudy-2009-English.pdf
  35. https://peacekeeping.un.org/fr/mission/past/onusalbackgr2.html
  36. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-DDR-ElSalvador-ResearchBrief-2009-English_0.pdf
  37. https://berghof-foundation.org/files/publications/Paper-2-El-Salvador-English-final.pdf
  38. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/ambivalent-moderation-the-fmlns-ideological-accommodation-to-postwar-politics-in-el-salvador/5A3668BF1012F4A24200DEB1C7A0703D
  39. https://english.elpais.com/international/2024-03-11/the-collapse-of-the-fmln-the-former-salvadoran-guerrilla-movement-nayib-bukele-wants-to-eliminate.html
  40. https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Elecdata/ElSal/pres94.html
  41. http://archive.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2099_94.htm
  42. https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Elecdata/ElSal/pre99.html
  43. https://pdba.georgetown.edu/Elecdata/ElSal/pre04.html
  44. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/17/world/americas/17salvador.html
  45. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/16/el-salvador-presidential-election-funes
  46. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2014/3/17/el-salvador-confirms-leftist-presidential-win
  47. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-26556803
  48. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/el-salvador-election-fight-looms-as-ex-rebel-claims-narrow-win-idUSBREA280I5/
  49. https://bti-project.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2022_SLV.pdf
  50. https://insightcrime.org/investigations/venezuela-el-salvador-exporting-aid-corruption/
  51. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=SV
  52. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/elsalvador/overview
  53. https://insightcrime.org/news/analysis/el-salvador-homicides-skyrocket-after-gang-truce-unravels/
  54. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/el-salvador
  55. https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/what-a-controversial-deal-in-el-salvador-says-about-chinas-bigger-plans/
  56. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R43616/R43616.31.pdf
  57. https://www.voanews.com/a/ex-el-salvador-president-accused-of-corruption/4431444.html
  58. https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-05-30/el-salvador-ex-president-mauricio-funes-sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison-for-negotiating-with-gangs.html
  59. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1768
  60. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-47113249
  61. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/latin-america-erupts-millennial-authoritarianism-in-el-salvador/
  62. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-37292716
  63. https://insightcrime.org/news/el-salvador-ex-president-funes-trash-bags-money/
  64. https://data.ipu.org/parliament/SV/SV-LC01/election/SV-LC01-E20210228
  65. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-68196826
  66. https://cispes.org/article/fraught-election-results-total-right-wing-legislative-control
  67. https://insightcrime.org/news/funes-saca-tapes-el-salvador/
  68. https://polarjournal.org/2019/04/15/the-fmlns-electoral-implosion-in-el-salvador-a-fiasco-foretold/
  69. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/caribbean-revolutions/armed-revolutionary-struggle-in-el-salvador/9BDC329BE36C4B76E2B058183F3B4B77
  70. https://ecumenico.org/the-ideological-origins-of-the-farabundo-martin-li
  71. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86s00596r000200590001-4
  72. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14682745.2010.545566
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336956776_El_Salvador%27s_FMLN_and_the_Constraints_on_Leftist_Government
  74. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13510347.2010.520549
  75. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9909&context=noticen
  76. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3787&context=gc_etds
  77. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85S00317R000300040003-1.pdf
  78. https://www.newsday.com/news/nation/el-salvador-election-fmln-bukele-c94940
  79. https://freedomhouse.org/country/el-salvador/freedom-world/2025
  80. https://1997-2001.state.gov/briefings/statements/1999/ps990309.html
  81. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3555995.stm
  82. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/outsider-wins-el-salvador-presidency-breaking-two-party-system-idUSKCN1PS03Y/
  83. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/el-salvador-president-bukele-poised-another-landslide-voters-head-polls-2024-02-04/
  84. https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/NDI%2520El%2520Salvador%2520Election%2520Bulletin-2009Feb.pdf
  85. https://cispes.org/programs/elections-and-democracy/municipal-legislative-election-results-in-el-salvador-add-to-tension-as-presidential-race-heats-up
  86. http://archive.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2099_00.htm
  87. https://www.electionguide.org/elections/id/2853/
  88. http://archive.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2099_e.htm
  89. https://data.ipu.org/parliament/SV/SV-LC01/election/SV-LC01-E20240204
  90. https://elsalvadorinenglish.com/2024/02/19/fmln-faces-devastating-defeat-in-latest-legislative-elections/
  91. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/212543/El-Salvador-parliamentary-municipal-elections_4-March-2018_EU-EOM-report.pdf
  92. https://apnews.com/article/el-salvador-election-fmln-bukele-27324f5b42889ffad61c5c2f3271ca42
  93. https://soaw.org/summary-of-1993-un-truth-commission-report-on-el-salvador
  94. https://www.hrw.org/reports/pdfs/e/elsalvdr/elsalv938.pdf
  95. http://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/el-salvador-supreme-court-judgment-unconstitutionality-amnesty-law
  96. https://www.amnesty.org/fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/amr290012001en.pdf
  97. https://reliefweb.int/report/el-salvador/el-salvador-faces-dilemma-over-prosecution-war-criminals
  98. https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/el-salvador-gdp/
  99. https://www.revistaenvio.org/articulo/4749
  100. https://oxfordre.com/politics/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1768
  101. https://tradingeconomics.com/el-salvador/government-debt-to-gdp
  102. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/slv/el-salvador/debt-to-gdp-ratio
  103. https://www.statista.com/statistics/818355/poverty-headcount-ratio-in-el-salvador/
  104. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/latinamerica/boosting-poverty-eradication-el-salvador
  105. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-investment-climate-statements/el-salvador
  106. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/VC.IHR.PSRC.P5?locations=SV
  107. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/slv/el-salvador/murder-homicide-rate
  108. https://insightcrime.org/news/analysis/repeat-el-salvador-gang-truce-failures/
  109. https://www.crisisgroup.org/latin-america-caribbean/el-salvador/064-el-salvadors-politics-perpetual-violence
  110. https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/why-has-gang-violence-spiked-el-salvador-bukele
  111. https://www.crisisgroup.org/latin-america-caribbean/el-salvador/081-miracle-or-mirage-gangs-and-plunging-violence-el-salvador
  112. https://www.elsalvadorperspectives.com/2018/06/ex-president-mauricio-funes-faces-351.html
  113. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250122-mauricio-funes-journalist-turned-el-salvador-president
  114. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/mauricio-funes-former-salvadoran-president-dies-nicaragua-2025-01-22/
  115. https://apnews.com/article/caribbean-el-salvador-a08341e381055b2602fe1b335c1ff706
  116. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/el-salvador-has-ordered-arrest-ex-president-sanchez-ceren-attorney-general-2021-07-23/
  117. https://www.occrp.org/en/news/nicaragua-grants-citizenship-to-former-salvadoran-president-wanted-for-corruption
  118. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/el-salvador-ex-officials-businessmen-under-investigation-184-mln-corruption-case-2022-08-23/
  119. https://www.expedientepublico.org/alba-petroleos-the-biggest-money-laundering-investigation-in-the-history-of-el-salvador/
  120. https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-investment-climate-statements/el-salvador
  121. https://tnsr.org/roundtable/policy-roundtable-reagan-and-latin-america/
  122. https://sv.usembassy.gov/section-353-corrupt-and-undemocratic-actors-report-2023/
  123. https://www.voanews.com/a/us-adds-central-american-ex-presidents-judges-lawmakers-to-corruption-list-/7188338.html
  124. https://www.wola.org/2021/07/bukele-el-salvador-anti-corruption/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.