Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
John Falstaff
View on Wikipedia
| John Falstaff | |
|---|---|
| Henriad character | |
Adolf Schrödter: Falstaff and his page | |
| Created by | William Shakespeare |
| In-universe information | |
| Gender | Male |
| Occupation | Knight |
| Religion | Christian |
| Nationality | English |
Sir John Falstaff is a fictional character who appears in three plays by William Shakespeare and is eulogised in a fourth. His significance as a fully developed character is primarily formed in the plays Henry IV, Part 1 and Part 2, where he is a companion to Prince Hal, the future King Henry V of England. Falstaff is also featured as the buffoonish suitor of two married women in The Merry Wives of Windsor. Though primarily a comic figure, he embodies a depth common to Shakespeare's major characters. A fat, vain, and boastful knight, he spends most of his time drinking at the Boar's Head Inn with petty criminals, living on stolen or borrowed money. Falstaff leads the apparently wayward Prince Hal into trouble, and is repudiated when Hal becomes king.
Falstaff has appeared in other works, including operas by Giuseppe Verdi, Ralph Vaughan Williams, and Otto Nicolai, a "symphonic study" by Edward Elgar, and in Orson Welles's 1966 film Chimes at Midnight. The operas focus on his role in The Merry Wives of Windsor, while the film adapts the Henriad and The Merry Wives. Welles, who played Falstaff in his film, considered the character "Shakespeare's greatest creation".[1] The word "Falstaffian" has entered the English language with connotations of corpulence, jollity, and debauchery.[2]
Role in the plays
[edit]
Falstaff appears in three of Shakespeare's plays: Henry IV, Part 1, Henry IV, Part 2, and The Merry Wives of Windsor. His death is mentioned in Henry V, but he has no lines, nor is it directed that he appear on stage. However, many stage and film adaptations have seen it necessary to include Falstaff for the insight he provides into King Henry V's character. The most notable examples in cinema are Laurence Olivier's 1944 version and Kenneth Branagh's 1989 film, both of which draw additional material from the Henry IV plays.
The character is known to have been very popular with audiences at the time, and for many years afterwards. According to Leonard Digges, writing shortly after Shakespeare's death, while many plays could not get good audiences, "let but Falstaff come, Hal, Poins, the rest, you scarce shall have a room".[3]
Henry IV, Part 1
[edit]
King Henry is troubled by the behaviour of his son and heir, the Prince of Wales. Hal (the future Henry V) has lost his authority at court and spends his time in taverns with low companions. He has become an object of scorn to the nobility and his worthiness to succeed his father is doubted. Hal's main companion in enjoying the low life is Sir John Falstaff. Fat, old, drunk, and corrupt as he is, he has a charisma and a zest for life that captivates the Prince.
Hal likes Falstaff but makes no pretence of being like him. He enjoys insulting his dissolute friend and makes sport of him. He and Poins pretend to go along with a plan by Falstaff and three friends to carry out a highway robbery, but then attack the robbers in disguise and in turn steal their loot, after which Hal returns it to its owner. Hal tells the audience that he will soon abandon this life and assume his rightful high place in affairs by showing himself worthy through some (unspecified) noble exploits. Hal believes that this sudden change will gain him additional approval and earn him respect at court.
Falstaff, who has "misused the King's press damnably",[4] by taking money from able-bodied men who wished to evade service and by keeping the wages of those he recruited who were killed in battle ("food for powder, food for powder")[5] is obliged to play a role in the Battle of Shrewsbury. Left on his own during Hal's duel with Hotspur, he feigns death to avoid attack by Douglas. After Hal leaves both Hotspur and Falstaff on the field and being thought dead, Falstaff revives, stabs Hotspur's corpse in the thigh and claims credit for the kill. Though Hal knows better, he is merciful to Falstaff, who subsequently states that he wants to amend his life and begin "to live cleanly as a nobleman should do".[6]
Henry IV, Part 2
[edit]
The play focuses on Prince Hal's journey toward kingship, and his ultimate rejection of Falstaff. However, unlike Part One, Hal's and Falstaff's stories are almost entirely separate, as the two characters meet only twice and very briefly. The tone of much of the play is elegiac, focusing on Falstaff's age and his closeness to death, which parallels that of the increasingly sick king.
Falstaff is still drinking and engaging in petty criminality in the London underworld. He first appears, followed by a new character, a young page whom Prince Hal has assigned him as a joke. Falstaff enquires what the doctor has said about the analysis of his urine, and the page cryptically informs him that the urine is healthier than the patient. Falstaff delivers one of his most characteristic lines: "I am not only witty in myself, but the cause that wit is in other men." Falstaff promises to outfit the page in "vile apparel" (ragged clothing). He then complains of his insolvency, blaming it on "consumption of the purse." They go off, Falstaff vowing to find a wife "in the stews" (i.e., the local brothels).
The Lord Chief Justice enters, looking for Falstaff. Falstaff at first feigns deafness in order to avoid conversing with him. When this tactic fails, Falstaff pretends to mistake him for someone else. As the Chief Justice attempts to question Falstaff about a recent robbery, Falstaff insists on turning the subject of the conversation to the nature of the illness afflicting the King. He then adopts the pretense of being a much younger man than the Chief Justice: "You that are old consider not the capacities of us that are young." Finally, he asks the Chief Justice for one thousand pounds to help outfit a military expedition, but is denied.

He has a relationship with Doll Tearsheet, a prostitute, who gets into a fight with Ancient Pistol, Falstaff's ensign. After Falstaff ejects Pistol, Doll asks him about the Prince. Falstaff is embarrassed when his derogatory remarks are overheard by Hal, who is present disguised as a musician. Falstaff tries to talk his way out of it, but Hal is unconvinced. When news of a second rebellion arrives, Falstaff joins the army again, and goes to the country to raise forces. There he encounters an old school friend, Justice Shallow, and they reminisce about their youthful follies. Shallow brings forward potential recruits for the loyalist army: Mouldy, Bullcalf, Feeble, Shadow and Wart, a motley collection of rustic yokels. Falstaff and his cronies accept bribes from two of them, Mouldy and Bullcalf, not to be conscripted.
In the final scene, Falstaff, having learned from Pistol that Hal is now King, travels to London in expectation of great rewards. But Hal rejects him, saying that he has now changed, and can no longer associate with such people. The London lowlifes, expecting a paradise of thieves under Hal's governance, are instead purged and imprisoned by the authorities.
Henry V
[edit]Although Falstaff does not appear on stage in Henry V, his death is the main subject of Act 2, Scene 3, in which Mistress Quickly delivers a memorable eulogy:
Nay, sure, he's not in hell! He's in Arthur's
bosom, if ever man went to Arthur's bosom. He
made a finer end, and went away an it had been any
christom child. He parted ev'n just between twelve
and one, ev'n at the turning o' th' tide; for after I saw
him fumble with the sheets and play with flowers
and smile upon his finger's end, I knew there was
but one way, for his nose was as sharp as a pen and
he talked of green fields. 'How now, Sir John?'
quoth I. 'What, man, be o' good cheer!' So he cried
out 'God, God, God!' three or four times. Now I, to
comfort him, bid him he should not think of God; I
hoped there was no need to trouble himself with
any such thoughts yet. So he bade me lay more
clothes on his feet. I put my hand into the bed and
felt them, and they were as cold as any stone. Then I
felt to his knees, and so upward and upward, and
all was as cold as any stone.
— Mistress Quickly, in William Shakespeare, Henry V, Act 2, Scene 3.[7]
The Merry Wives of Windsor
[edit]
Falstaff arrives in Windsor very short on money. To obtain financial advantage, he decides to court two wealthy married women, Mistress Ford and Mistress Page. Falstaff decides to send the women identical love letters and asks his servants – Pistol and Nym – to deliver them to the wives. When they refuse, Falstaff sacks them, and, in revenge, the men tell Ford and Page (the husbands) of Falstaff's intentions. Page is not concerned, but the jealous Ford persuades the Host of the Garter Inn to introduce him to Falstaff as a 'Master Brook' so that he can find out Falstaff's plans.
When the women receive the letters, each goes to tell the other, and they quickly find that the letters are almost identical. The "merry wives" are not interested in the ageing, overweight Falstaff as a suitor; however, for the sake of their own amusement and to gain revenge for his indecent assumptions towards them both, they pretend to respond to his advances.
This all results in great embarrassment for Falstaff. Mr. Ford poses as 'Mr. Brook' and says he is in love with Mistress Ford but cannot woo her as she is too virtuous. He offers to pay Falstaff to court her, saying that once she has lost her honour he will be able to tempt her himself. Falstaff cannot believe his luck, and tells 'Brook' he has already arranged to meet Mistress Ford while her husband is out. Falstaff leaves to keep his appointment and Ford soliloquises that he is right to suspect his wife and that the trusting Page is a fool.
When Falstaff arrives to meet Mistress Ford, the merry wives trick him into hiding in a laundry basket ("buck basket") full of filthy, smelly clothes awaiting laundering. When the jealous Ford returns to try and catch his wife with the knight, the wives have the basket taken away and the contents (including Falstaff) dumped into the river. Although this affects Falstaff's pride, his ego is surprisingly resilient. He is convinced that the wives are just playing hard to get with him, so he continues his pursuit of sexual advancement, with its attendant capital and opportunities for blackmail.
Again Falstaff goes to meet the women but Mistress Page comes back and warns Mistress Ford of her husband's approach again. They try to think of ways to hide him other than the laundry basket which he refuses to get into again. They trick him again, this time into disguising himself as Mistress Ford's maid's obese aunt, known as "the fat woman of Brentford". Ford tries once again to catch his wife with the knight but ends up beating the "old woman", whom he despises, and throwing her out of his house. Black and blue, Falstaff laments his bad luck.
Eventually the wives tell their husbands about the series of jokes they have played on Falstaff, and together they devise one last trick which ends up with the Knight being humiliated in front of the whole town. They tell Falstaff to dress as "Herne, the Hunter" and meet them by an old oak tree in Windsor Forest (now part of Windsor Great Park). They then dress several of the local children as fairies and get them to pinch and burn Falstaff to punish him.
The wives meet Falstaff, and almost immediately the "fairies" attack. After the chaos, the characters reveal their true identities to Falstaff. Although he is embarrassed, Falstaff takes the joke surprisingly well, as he sees it was what he deserved. Ford says he must pay back the 20 pounds 'Brook' gave him and takes the Knight's horses as recompense. Eventually they all leave together and Mistress Page even invites Falstaff to come with them: "let us every one go home, and laugh this sport o'er by a country fire; Sir John and all".
Origins
[edit]
John Oldcastle
[edit]Shakespeare originally named Falstaff "John Oldcastle", a real historical personage who died in 1417. Lord Cobham, a descendant of Oldcastle, complained, forcing Shakespeare to change the name. Shakespeare's Henry IV plays and Henry V adapted and developed the material in an earlier play called The Famous Victories of Henry V, in which Sir John "Jockey" Oldcastle appears as a dissolute companion of the young Henry. Prince Hal refers to Falstaff as "my old lad of the castle" in the first act of the play; the epilogue to Henry IV, Part 2, moreover, explicitly disavows any connection between Falstaff and Oldcastle: "Oldcastle died a martyr, and this is not the man."[8]
The historical Oldcastle was a knight from Herefordshire who became a Lollard who was executed for heresy and rebellion, and he was respected by many Protestants as a martyr. In addition to the anonymous The Famous Victories of Henry V, in which Oldcastle is Henry V's companion, Oldcastle's history is described in Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles, Shakespeare's usual source for his histories.
Cobhams
[edit]It is not clear, however, if Shakespeare characterised Falstaff as he did for dramatic purposes, or because of a specific desire to satirise Oldcastle or the Cobhams. Cobham was a common butt of veiled satire in Elizabethan popular literature; he figures in Ben Jonson's Every Man in His Humour and may have been part of the reason The Isle of Dogs was suppressed. Shakespeare's desire to burlesque a hero of early English Protestantism could indicate Roman Catholic sympathies, but Henry Brooke, 11th Baron Cobham was sufficiently sympathetic to Catholicism that in 1603, he was imprisoned as part of the Main Plot to place Arbella Stuart on the English throne, so if Shakespeare wished to use Oldcastle to embarrass the Cobhams, he seems unlikely to have done so on religious grounds.
The Cobhams appear to have intervened while Shakespeare was in the process of writing either The Merry Wives of Windsor or the second part of Henry IV. The first part of Henry IV was probably written and performed in 1596, and the name Oldcastle had almost certainly been allowed by Master of the Revels Edmund Tilney. William Brooke, 10th Baron Cobham may have become aware of the offensive representation after a public performance; he may also have learned of it while it was being prepared for a court performance (Cobham was at that time Lord Chamberlain). As father-in-law to the newly widowed Robert Cecil, Cobham certainly possessed the influence at court to get his complaint heard quickly. Shakespeare may have included a sly retaliation against the complaint in his play The Merry Wives of Windsor (published after the Henry IV series). In the play, the paranoid, jealous Master Ford uses the alias "Brook" to fool Falstaff, perhaps in reference to William Brooke. At any rate, the name is Falstaff in the Henry IV, Part 1 quarto, of 1598, and the epilogue to the second part, published in 1600, contains this clarification:
One word more, I beseech you: if you be not too
much cloyed with fat meat, our humble author will
continue the story, with Sir John in it, and make
you merry with fair Katherine of France, where, for
anything I know, Falstaff shall die of a sweat, unless
already he be killed with your hard opinions; for
Oldcastle died a martyr, and this is not the man.
— William Shakespeare, Henry IV, Part 2, Epilogue.[9]
Sir John Fastolf
[edit]The new name "Falstaff" probably derived from the medieval knight Sir John Fastolf. The historical Fastolf fought at the Battle of Patay against Joan of Arc, which the English lost. His previous career as a soldier had earned him wide respect but he seems to have become a scapegoat after the debacle. He was among the few English military leaders to avoid death or capture during the battle, and although there is no evidence that he acted with cowardice, he was temporarily stripped of his knighthood. Fastolf appears in Henry VI, Part 1 in which he is portrayed as an abject coward. In the First Folio his name is spelled "Falstaffe", so Shakespeare may have directly appropriated the spelling of the name he used in the earlier play.
Robert Greene
[edit]It has been suggested that the dissolute writer Robert Greene may also have been an inspiration for the character of Falstaff. This theory was first proposed in 1930 and has been championed by Stephen Greenblatt.[10][11] Notorious for a life of dissipation and debauchery somewhat similar to Falstaff, he was among the first to mention Shakespeare in his work (in Greene's Groats-Worth of Wit), suggesting to Greenblatt that the older writer may have influenced Shakespeare's characterisation.[11]
Cultural adaptations
[edit]
There are several works about Falstaff, inspired by Shakespeare's plays:
Literature
[edit]- Falstaff's Wedding (1766), a drama by William Kenrick, was set after the events of Henry IV, Part 2. To restore his financial position after his rejection by Hal, Falstaff is forced to marry Mistress Ursula (a character briefly mentioned by Shakespeare, whom Falstaff has "weekly" promised to marry). The play exists in two very different versions. In the first version Falstaff is drawn into Scroop's plot to murder the king, but wins back Henry's favour by exposing the plot. In the second this story is dropped for a purely farcical storyline.[12]
- English lawyer and occasional writer George Radford sketched a "biography" of Falstaff based on clues drawn from plays in which the character appears, surmising, for example, that Falstaff was of Scandinavian descent and hailed from Norfolk.[13]
Music
[edit]
- Falstaff (1799), Antonio Salieri's opera, with a libretto by Carlo Prospero Defranceschi, which is based upon The Merry Wives of Windsor.[15]
- Falstaff (1838), an opera by Michael William Balfe to an Italian libretto by S. Manfredo Maggione that is based upon The Merry Wives of Windsor.[16]
- Die lustigen Weiber von Windsor (1849) by Otto Nicolai, based upon The Merry Wives of Windsor.[17]
- Le songe d'une nuit d'été (1850), an opera by Ambroise Thomas in which Shakespeare and Falstaff meet.[18]
- Falstaff (1893), Giuseppe Verdi's last opera, with a libretto by Arrigo Boito. It is mostly based upon The Merry Wives of Windsor.[19]
- Falstaff (1913), a "symphonic study" (or symphonic poem) by Edward Elgar, depicts Falstaff's life.[20]
- At the Boar's Head (1925), a short opera by Gustav Holst based on the Henry IV plays.[21]
- Sir John in Love (1929), an opera by Ralph Vaughan Williams based upon The Merry Wives of Windsor.[22]
- Plump Jack (1985/2005), an opera with both libretto and music by Gordon Getty, adapted from the text of Henry IV and Henry V .[23]
Stage
[edit]- Falstaff was a 1982 theater piece adapted from Shakespeare's Henry IV plays by Grey Cattell Johnson and Bill Cain. It was directed by Johnson and staged by the Boston Shakespeare Company.[24]
Film and television
[edit]- On film, Falstaff appeared in Laurence Olivier's acclaimed 1944 version of Henry V. Although Falstaff does not appear in the play, Olivier inserted an original scene depicting the fat knight – played by George Robey, who first previously performed the role in a stage production of Henry IV, Part 1 in 1935 – as a dying, heartbroken old man attended by Mistress Quickly, pathetically reliving in his mind his rejection by Henry. This was immediately followed by the actual scene from the play of Mistress Quickly describing Falstaff's death to his grieving followers.
- Orson Welles's Chimes at Midnight (1965) compiles the two Henry IV plays into a single, condensed storyline, while adding a handful of scenes from Richard II and Henry V. The film, also known as Falstaff, features Welles himself in the title role, with film critic Vincent Canby stating in 1975 that it "may be the greatest Shakespearean film ever made, bar none".[25]
- Falstaff appeared in the 1960 series An Age of Kings, which was actually a 15 part series depicting Shakespeare's history plays from Richard II to Richard III; in the Henry IV episodes he was played by Frank Pettingell.
- In the 1979 season of the BBC Shakespeare series, in both parts of Henry IV Falstaff was played by Anthony Quayle, and in The Merry Wives of Windsor which followed in the 1982 season, by Richard Griffiths.
- In Kenneth Branagh's acclaimed 1989 version of Henry V, Falstaff, here played by Robbie Coltrane, as in the Olivier version is given an original scene, this time dying in his bed and attended by Mistress Quickly, while downstairs his followers share a flashback – put together from various bits from both parts of Henry IV – showing the fat knight carousing with Henry back when he was "madcap prince" Hal, but it ends abruptly when the prince makes an ominous hint that some day when he becomes King he will be banishing his old friend. Later, prior to the actual scene where Mistress Quickly describes his death, there is a fleeting close-up shot of her sadly examining the knight's now deceased body one last time before going downstairs to his followers.
- Falstaff appeared in the Michael Bogdanov/Michael Pennington's English Shakespeare Company's presentation of Shakespeare's plays concerning The Wars of the Roses; originally taped live during their final tour with the series in 1989. In the Henry IV episodes, Falstaff was played by Barry Stanton, who later played the Chorus in Henry V. Although Falstaff never actually appeared in the production of Henry V, there is a humorous scene in silhouette prior to the scene where Mistress Quickly describing his funeral, depicting Falstaff's funeral procession, with a group of soldiers staggering under the weight of his coffin (an obvious nod to the final scene in Chimes at Midnight).
- Gus Van Sant's My Own Private Idaho is partially a retelling of the Henry IV plays, set in the contemporary US, and with the character of Bob Pigeon (William Richert) representing Falstaff.[26] In the scene immediately following Bob's first appearance in the film, Scott Favor (Keanu Reeves) – the film's version of Hal – is seen drinking from a bottle of Falstaff brand beer. Bob Pigeon's final scene in the film mirrors that of Falstaff, with Scott/Prince Hal delivering a version of the famous I know thee not, old man speech.
- In the 2012 television series The Hollow Crown, which likewise consisted of Shakespeare's plays concerning the Wars of the Roses, Falstaff was played by Simon Russell Beale. Just as in Olivier's and Branagh's film versions of Henry V, the Falstaff in this series appeared in the Henry V episode as well the Henry IV ones, sadly recollecting his rejection by his former friend while he is dying.
- In Phyllida Lloyd's 2017 all-female Donmar Warehouse production of Henry IV (combining both parts), which was videotaped and broadcast, Sophie Stanton played Falstaff.
- In the 2019 Netflix film The King, Falstaff (played by Joel Edgerton) proposes to Henry V the military tactics employed by the English in the Battle of Agincourt and dies in the battle.
- In the comedy series Upstart Crow, William Shakespeare, played by David Mitchell, is inspired by his wastrel father's antics to create a character called John Foulstuff.
- Alexander Smith (pseud.) "Sir John Falstaff a Notorious Highwayman" in A Compleat History of the Lives and Robberies of the most Notorious Highway-Men, Foot-Pads, Shop-Lifts, and Cheats, of Both Sexes (London: J. Morphew, 1714)[27]
- James White's book Falstaff's Letters (1796) purports to be a collection of letters written by Falstaff, provided by a descendant of Mistress Quickly's sister. She had inherited them from Mistress Quickly herself, who kept them in a drawer in the Boar's Head Tavern until her death in "August 1419".[28]
- The Life of Sir John Falstaff (1858), a novel by Robert Barnabas Brough.[29]
- Falstaff (1976), a novel by Robert Nye.[30]
- Volstagg the Voluminous, a Marvel Comics character and companion to Thor, is based on Falstaff.[31]
- "Falstaff, Fakir" is the alter ego of author Axel Wallengren, a name chosen to juxtapose the vanity, affluence and figure of Shakespeare's Falstaff with the asceticism of a fakir.[32]
References
[edit]Notes
- ^ Lyons 1989, p. 4.
- ^ McMahon 2004, p. 18.
- ^ Birch 2009, p. 475.
- ^ Henry IV, Part 1 4.2/12–13
- ^ Henry IV, Part 1 4.2/66–67
- ^ Henry IV, Part 1 5.4/76–169
- ^ Henry V 2.3/9–26
- ^ Henry IV, Part 2 Epilogue/34
- ^ Henry IV, Part 2 Epilogue/28–34
- ^ Maxwell 1930.
- ^ a b Greenblatt 2004, pp. 216–225.
- ^ Sutherland 1933.
- ^ Birrell 1885, pp. 200–232.
- ^ Edinburgh Literary Journal 1830.
- ^ Rice 2002.
- ^ Marek 2013, p. 8.
- ^ Brown 2002.
- ^ Hoenselaars & Calvo 2010.
- ^ Parker 2002.
- ^ Elgar 1913.
- ^ Kennedy 2002a.
- ^ Kennedy 2002b.
- ^ Rosenblum 2013.
- ^ Edelstein 1982.
- ^ Canby 1975.
- ^ Lyons 1994, p. 233.
- ^ McKenzie 2013.
- ^ Craik 1995.
- ^ Brough 2013.
- ^ Klein 2013.
- ^ Peterson 2013.
- ^ André 2019.
Sources
- André, Ingrid (6 July 2019). "Wallengren, Axel 'Falstaff, fakir' (1865–1896), författare" [... author] (in Swedish). Kulturportal Lund.
- Birch, Dinah, ed. (2009). The Oxford Companion to English Literature. Oxford Companions (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0192806871.
- Birrell, Augustine (1885). "Falstaff". Obiter Dicta (chapter written anonymously by George Radford). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
- Brough, Robert Barnabas (2013) [first published 1858]. The Life of Sir John Falstaff: With a Biography of the Knight from Authentic Sources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139542562. ISBN 978-1139542562 – via Cambridge Core.
- Brown, Clive (2002). "Lustigen Weiber von Windsor, Die ('The Merry Wives of Windsor')". Grove Music Online (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O009159. ISBN 978-1-56159-263-0.
- Canby, Vincent (2 March 1975). "Film View: The Undiminished Chutzpah of Orson Welles". The New York Times.
- Craik, T. W. (1995). "Jem White and Falstaff's Letters" (PDF). The Charles Lamb Bulletin (91). The Charles Lamb Society: 118–129.
- "Stephen Kemble and The Son of Neptune". The Edinburgh Literary Journal. Vol. 3, no. 74. Edinburgh. 10 April 1830. pp. 216–217. hdl:2027/wu.89094395365 – via HathiTrust.
- Elgar, Edward (1913). "Falstaff". The Musical Times. 54 (847): 575–579. doi:10.2307/908045. eISSN 2397-5318. ISSN 0027-4666. JSTOR 908045.
- Edelstein, David (16 March 1982). "Theater: Jack of all plays". The Boston Phoenix. Retrieved 8 August 2024.
- Gallop, David (1975). Plato's Phaedo. Clarendon Press. ISBN 9780198720492.
- Greenblatt, Stephen (2004). Will In The World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0393050578.
- Hoenselaars, Ton; Calvo, Clara (2010). "Introduction: Shakespeare and the Cultures of Commemoration". Critical Survey. 22 (2, Shakespeare and the Cultures of Commemoration). Berghahn Books: 1–10. doi:10.3167/cs.2010.220201. eISSN 1752-2293. ISSN 0011-1570. JSTOR 41556363.
- Kennedy, Michael (2002a). "At the Boar's Head". Grove Music Online (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O900239. ISBN 978-1-56159-263-0.
- Kennedy, Michael (2002b). "Sir John in Love". Grove Music Online (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O008391. ISBN 978-1-56159-263-0.
- Klein, Holger (2013). "Shakespeare und der historische: Roman Parallelen, Transformationen, Kontraste in der Henriade und bei Edith Pargeter, Denise Giardina, Robert Nye". AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik. 38 (2). Narr Francke Attempto Verlag: 129–159. ISSN 0171-5410. JSTOR 43025855.
- Lyons, Bridget Gellert (1989). Chimes at Midnight. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0813513393.
- Lyons, Donald (1994). Independent Visions: A Critical Introduction to Recent Independent American Film. Ballantine Books. ISBN 978-0345382498.
- Marek, Dan H. (2013). Giovanni Battista Rubini and the Bel Canto Tenors: History and Technique. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0810886681.
- Maxwell, Baldwin (1930). "The Original of Sir John Falstaff: Believe It or Not". Studies in Philology. 27 (2). University of North Carolina Press: 230–232. eISSN 1543-0383. ISSN 0039-3738. JSTOR 4172061.
- McKenzie, Andrea (2013). "Biting the Biter: Sex, Scatology, and Satirical Inversion in Augustan Highwayman 'Lives'". Huntington Library Quarterly. 76 (2). University of Pennsylvania Press: 235–256. doi:10.1525/hlq.2013.76.2.235. eISSN 1544-399X. ISSN 0018-7895. JSTOR 10.1525/hlq.2013.76.2.235.
- McMahon, Michael (2004). Sidney Lamb (ed.). CliffsComplete – King Henry IV, Part I. IDG Books. ISBN 9780544179165.
- Peterson, Jeff (7 November 2013). "Who's who in Thor: The Dark World". Deseret News. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
- Parker, Roger (2002). "Falstaff(ii)". Grove Music Online (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O901547. ISBN 978-1-56159-263-0.
- Rice, John A. (2002). "Falstaff (i) [Falstaff, ossia Le tre burle] ('Falstaff, or The Three Jokes')". Grove Music Online (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.O901546. ISBN 978-1-56159-263-0.
- Rosenblum, Joshua (September 2013). "Getty: Plump Jack". Opera and Oratorio. Opera News. 78 (3). Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 4 October 2017.
- Sutherland, James R. (1933). "Shakespeare's Imitators in the Eighteenth Century". The Modern Language Review. 28 (1). Modern Humanities Research Association: 21–36. doi:10.2307/3715883. eISSN 2222-4319. ISSN 0026-7937. JSTOR 3715883.
Further reading
- Bloom, Harold (1992). Falstaff: Give Me Life. New York: Chelsea House. ISBN 978-1501164132.
- Caldwell, Ellen M. (2007). "'Banish all the wor(l)d': Falstaff's iconoclastic threat to kingship in I Henry IV". Renascence. 59 (4). Marquette University Press: 219–245. doi:10.5840/renascence200759417. eISSN 2329-8626. ISSN 0034-4346 – via The Free Library.
- Cooper, Stephen (2010). The Real Falstaff: Sir John Fastolf and the Hundred Years War. Pen & Sword. ISBN 978-1848841239.
- Doloff, Steven (2008). "Falstaff's 'Honour': Homeric Burlesque in 1 Henry IV (1597–8)". Notes and Queries. 55 (2). Oxford University Press: 177–181. doi:10.1093/notesj/gjn016. eISSN 1471-6941. ISSN 0029-3970.
- Grady, Hygh (2001). "Falstaff: Subjectivity between the Carnival and the Aesthetic". The Modern Language Review. 96 (3). Modern Humanities Research Association: 609–623. doi:10.2307/3736733. eISSN 2222-4319. ISSN 0026-7937. JSTOR 3736733. S2CID 162130449.
- Taylor, Gary (1987). "William Shakespeare, Richard James and the House of Cobham". The Review of English Studies. New Series. 38 (151). Oxford University Press: 334–354. doi:10.1093/res/XXXVIII.151.334. eISSN 1471-6968. ISSN 0034-6551. JSTOR 515567.
- Wilson, J. Dover (1943). The Fortunes of Falstaff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. OL 6456735M.
External links
[edit]- Henry the Fourth part 1 at Project Gutenberg
- All lines spoken by Falstaff in
John Falstaff
View on GrokipediaSir John Falstaff is a fictional character in the works of William Shakespeare, depicted as a corpulent, boastful, and cowardly knight who serves as the comic foil and tavern companion to Prince Hal in the history plays Henry IV, Part 1 and Henry IV, Part 2.[1][2]
Falstaff reappears in the comedy The Merry Wives of Windsor, where he attempts to seduce two married women in a scheme to recoup financial losses, only to be repeatedly humiliated through pranks involving disguises and supernatural elements.[3][2]
In the Henry IV plays, his irreverent humor, thievery, and fabricated exploits—such as claiming to have slain numerous rebels at the Battle of Shrewsbury—highlight themes of honor, deception, and the tension between youthful indulgence and royal duty, culminating in his rejection by the newly crowned King Henry V with the words "I know thee not, old man."[1][2]
Though loosely inspired by historical figures like Sir John Fastolf, Shakespeare transformed the prototype into a vibrant embodiment of vice and vitality, whose linguistic prowess and larger-than-life persona have made him one of the dramatist's most enduring creations, influencing adaptations in opera, film, and literature.[4][5]
Origins and Creation
Historical Prototypes
Scholars identify two primary historical figures as potential prototypes for Shakespeare's Sir John Falstaff: Sir John Oldcastle and Sir John Fastolf, though the character's traits—boastful cowardice, corpulence, and roguish companionship—deviate significantly from both men's documented lives, suggesting substantial fictional embellishment.[5][6] Sir John Oldcastle (died January 1417) was an English knight who served under Henry IV in campaigns in Wales and France, demonstrating martial valor before aligning with Lollard reformers. Accused of heresy in 1413 for advocating vernacular Bibles and rejecting papal authority, he escaped from the Tower of London, led a failed rebellion against Henry V in 1414, and was captured and executed by hanging and burning. In the anonymous play The Famous Victories of Henry V (c. 1580s–1590s), a precursor to Shakespeare's histories, a debauched companion to Prince Hal bears the name Sir John Oldcastle, providing Shakespeare with an initial template for a wayward mentor figure; however, the historical Oldcastle's piety and bravery contrast sharply with Falstaff's irreligion and simulated feats.[4][5] Sir John Fastolf (c. 1378–1459), a Norfolk-born soldier in the Hundred Years' War, offers closer nominal and circumstantial links after Oldcastle's name was altered. Raised in the household of Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk—a detail echoed in Falstaff's self-description—Fastolf fought at Harfleur (1415), Verneuil (1424), and the Battle of the Herrings (1429), earning knighthood in 1416 and a place in the Order of the Garter in 1426. His reputation tarnished by a retreat at the Battle of Patay (1429), where French forces under Joan of Arc routed his command, leading to accusations of cowardice (though he was later exonerated), parallels Falstaff's fabricated battlefield lies and evasion of duty; Shakespeare's Henry VI, Part 1 (c. 1591) already lampoons Fastolf as a fleeing knight. Fastolf's longevity to age 78, wealth from marriage to Millicent Tiptoft in 1409, and possible ties to the Boar's Head Tavern further invite comparison, yet his overall competence as a commander and estate-builder at Caister Castle diverge from Falstaff's parasitic idleness.[6][5] These prototypes supplied Shakespeare with evocative names and episodic echoes from chronicles like Holinshed's, but Falstaff emerges as a composite exaggeration, unbound by historical fidelity, prioritizing dramatic vitality over biographical accuracy.[6][4]Name Alteration and Cobham Objection
In Shakespeare's Henry IV plays, the character now known as Sir John Falstaff was originally named Sir John Oldcastle, drawing partial inspiration from the historical Sir John Oldcastle (died 1417), a Lollard knight and associate of Henry V who was executed for heresy after leading a rebellion against the crown.[4] Oldcastle's portrayal as a Protestant martyr in Elizabethan Protestant historiography clashed with Shakespeare's depiction of the figure as a corpulent, cowardly, and dissolute knight, prompting objections from contemporaries who revered Oldcastle's memory.[7] The primary objection stemmed from William Brooke, 10th Baron Cobham (c. 1527–1597), who served as Lord Chamberlain from August 1596 until his death and whose family claimed descent from Oldcastle through his wife, making the Cobhams influential patrons and censors of the Lord Chamberlain's Men, Shakespeare's acting company.[8][9] Brooke reportedly protested the use of the name, viewing it as a slander against his ancestor's legacy, especially amid heightened political sensitivities where Oldcastle symbolized resistance to Catholic authority; this led to the character's renaming to Falstaff during the play's early performances in late 1596 or early 1597.[5][10] Evidence of the alteration persists in the 1598 quarto of Henry IV, Part 1, where Prince Hal addresses the character as "Oldcastle" in one line (likely an oversight or remnant), and in Henry IV, Part 2, where Doll Tearsheet refers to him as "my old lad of the castle," alluding to the discarded name.[4][9] The new name, Falstaff, derives from Sir John Fastolf (c. 1378–1459), a historical knight known for military service under Henry V but later satirized for cowardice in connection with the loss at the Battle of Patay (1429), providing Shakespeare a similarly resonant but less contentious historical echo without direct ties to revered Protestant figures.[5][7] This change allowed the plays to continue under patronage while evading further censorship, as the Cobhams held sway over theater licensing until Brooke's death in 1597, after which George Carey, another Cobham relative, assumed the Lord Chamberlain role.[8][10]Literary Influences
Shakespeare drew the core conception of Falstaff from the anonymous Elizabethan play The Famous Victories of Henry V, likely composed in the 1580s and printed in quarto in 1598, which features a roguish knight named Sir John Oldcastle as a companion to the young Prince Henry. In the source play, Oldcastle—later renamed Jockey—is depicted as a corpulent, thieving figure who leads the prince in highway robberies and tavern brawls, including a scene where they rob luggage-bearers on Gad's Hill, directly paralleling the Gad's Hill robbery in Henry IV, Part 1. This dramatic predecessor provided Shakespeare with a template for the fat knight's criminal antics and bond with the heir apparent, though the original character lacks Falstaff's verbal dexterity, self-justifying soliloquies, and broader satirical scope.[11] Beyond The Famous Victories, Falstaff's characterization echoes elements of the Vice figure from medieval morality plays, such as the cunning, buffoonish tempters in works like Mankind (c. 1465–1470), who employ malapropisms, evasion, and mock authority to corrupt youth—traits amplified in Falstaff's recruitment of soldiers and evasion of responsibility.[12] Scholars note parallels in Falstaff's rhetorical bravado and physical comedy to stock comic knaves in earlier Tudor interludes, though Shakespeare synthesized these into a more psychologically complex portrait uninhibited by didactic constraints.[5] No direct Italian literary precedents, such as commedia dell'arte prototypes, are verifiably linked, despite superficial resemblances to bombastic zanni; instead, the influences remain rooted in native English dramatic traditions of chronicle history and festive misrule.[13]Depiction in Shakespeare's Canon
Henry IV, Part 1
In Henry IV, Part 1, Sir John Falstaff functions as Prince Hal's roguish companion and a source of comic relief, contrasting the play's themes of rebellion, honor, and kingship with scenes of tavern revelry and petty crime.[14] He embodies indulgence, wit, and pragmatic cowardice, rejecting abstract ideals like honor in favor of self-preservation and pleasure.[11] Falstaff first appears in Act 1, Scene 2, devising a highway robbery near Gad's Hill alongside Hal, Poins, and Bardolph, portraying himself as a leader of cutpurses who quips about his own impending execution.[15] The robbery proceeds in Act 2, Scenes 1 and 2, where Falstaff and his band plunder travelers, only for Hal and Poins to subsequently rob Falstaff himself, highlighting his corpulence as he flees empty-handed. Upon returning to the Boar's-Head Tavern in Eastcheap, Falstaff fabricates a tale of being beset by nearly three hundred attackers, exposing his boastful dishonesty when Hal reveals the truth.[16] The tavern scene in Act 2, Scene 4 escalates into a mock trial where Falstaff impersonates King Henry IV, rebuking Hal for his low associates before Hal reverses roles, defending Falstaff while critiquing his gluttony and theft—traits Falstaff justifies as necessities of survival.[11] This interplay underscores Falstaff's verbal dexterity and Hal's underlying detachment, foreshadowing the prince's reform.[14] Later, Falstaff enters the military sphere, recruiting vagrant soldiers for the king's army in Act 4, Scene 2, dismissing them as unfit while inflating his levy to profit personally. In Act 5, Scene 1, he delivers a soliloquy deriding honor as "a word" and "air," a mere scutcheon for the dead, rationalizing his aversion to combat risks.[11] During the Battle of Shrewsbury, Falstaff feigns death to evade Douglas, later claiming to have slain the rebel Hotspur—killed by Hal—thus exemplifying his manipulative opportunism.[17] Falstaff's traits—obesity, lechery, thievery, and cowardice masked by humor—manifest without malice, rendering him a liar who deceives transparently yet charms through vitality and rebellion against heroic norms.[11] His dynamic with Hal blends mentorship in dissipation with Hal's strategic use of Falstaff as a foil for princely maturation, evident in Hal's protection of him from authorities while planning eventual disavowal.[14]Henry IV, Part 2
In Henry IV, Part 2, Sir John Falstaff continues as a central comic character, providing levity amid the aging King Henry IV's struggles with rebellion and succession. Returning to London after the Battle of Shrewsbury, Falstaff falsely claims responsibility for Hotspur's death, prompting scrutiny from the Lord Chief Justice over his history of theft and evasion of justice.[18] Falstaff deflects the inquiry with promises of service to Prince John Lancaster's campaign against remaining rebels, securing a commission to recruit troops.[18] Tasked with raising an infantry company, Falstaff travels to Gloucestershire, where he exploits the hospitality of Justice Shallow and Justice Silence while selecting recruits. He conscripts physically weak men such as Shadow, Wart, Feeble, and Bullcalf, rejecting sturdier candidates like Mouldy and Bullcalf by accepting bribes to exempt them, thereby pocketing the recruitment fees for personal gain.[18] This corrupt practice highlights Falstaff's opportunism, as he marches his ragtag force toward the fray while complaining of the burdens of command and age.[19] In Eastcheap tavern scenes, Falstaff indulges in debts, brawls with officers, and carousing with Doll Tearsheet, unaware that Prince Hal and Poins overhear him disparaging the prince's character.[18] Falstaff's interactions with Hal remain sparse and strained, reflecting the prince's growing detachment as he confronts his father's illness and prepares for rule.[19] During the Gaultree Forest rebellion, Falstaff arrives late to the confrontation, captures the rebel knight Coleville of the Dale, but promptly surrenders his prisoners to Prince John after the rebels' deceptive capitulation.[18] He fabricates tales of his exploits upon returning to London as Henry IV nears death.[19] Falstaff's arc culminates in Act 5 upon Hal's coronation as Henry V, where he anticipates royal favor and reinstatement. Approaching the king amid coronation festivities, Falstaff is publicly rebuked: "I know thee not, old man; fall to thy prayers; How ill white hairs becomes a fool and jester." Henry V banishes him from within ten miles of the court for ten years, enforcing a policy against vice to reform the kingdom.[18][19] This rejection fulfills Hal's earlier vow of transformation and severs their surrogate father-son bond, emphasizing the inexorable demands of monarchy over personal indulgence.[19] Throughout the play, Falstaff exhibits signs of physical and rhetorical decline from Part 1, obsessing over health, urine samples, and the passage of time, yet retains his cynical wit in justifying cowardice and greed.[19] His diminished presence underscores themes of mortality and historical inevitability, contrasting his static hedonism with Hal's ascent to responsible kingship.[19]Henry V
In Henry V, Sir John Falstaff does not appear on stage, as his rejection by the newly crowned King Henry V occurs at the play's conclusion in the preceding work, Henry IV, Part 2. His presence is limited to offstage references and a reported death, underscoring the new monarch's complete severance from his Eastcheap companions. The primary depiction of Falstaff comes in Act 2, Scene 3, set before a London tavern, where his former associates—Pistol, Nym, Bardolph, the Boy (his page), and Mistress Quickly (the hostess)—gather amid preparations for the invasion of France.[20] Mistress Quickly delivers a halting, malapropism-laden account of Falstaff's demise the previous Wednesday night, attributing it to a "sweat" (a feverish illness common in Elizabethan England, possibly exacerbated by grief).[21] She recounts his final delirium: raving of sack (his favored wine), "green fields" (evoking Psalm 23:2), and the king who "should have kept the crown" upon his head rather than in his pocket—a muddled reference to Henry's rejection and Falstaff's dashed hopes of influence.[20] Quickly claims Falstaff believed the rejection had "killed his heart," linking his end directly to the loss of royal favor.[22] Pistol announces Falstaff's death bluntly—"Falstaff he is dead"—prompting varied reactions: Bardolph wishes to join him in heaven or hell, while the group resolves to "yearne" (a pun on "yearn" for grief and "earn" profit) by enlisting in the king's army for France.[23] The Boy, entrusted with Falstaff's possessions (including a lute and bagpipes), dismisses their valor as thievery in disguise, highlighting the ragged remnants of Falstaff's world amid the play's shift to martial themes.[24] This scene, blending pathos and low comedy, contrasts the deceased knight's indulgent life with Henry's austere kingship, as the companions depart without further mention of him.[20] No other direct references to Falstaff appear, emphasizing his erasure from the heroic narrative.The Merry Wives of Windsor
In The Merry Wives of Windsor, composed around 1597–1601 and first published in quarto in 1602, Sir John Falstaff serves as the principal antagonist and comic target in a farce centered on middle-class Windsor society.[25] Unlike his more philosophical and roguish depiction alongside Prince Hal in the Henry IV plays, this Falstaff appears as a financially ruined knight who resorts to crude seduction schemes to replenish his purse.[26] Desperate after unspecified dissipations, he dispatches identical love letters to the wives of two prosperous citizens, Mistress Ford and Mistress Page, aiming to cuckold their husbands and gain access to their wealth.[25] The merry wives quickly compare notes on the letters and, incensed by Falstaff's predatory advances, collaborate to expose and punish him through escalating pranks. In the first scheme, Falstaff hides in Mistress Ford's house to evade the jealous Ford but is bundled into a laundry basket and dumped into the Thames, drenching his corpulent frame.[26] A second trap sees him disguised as the elderly "Witch of Brainford," only to be thrashed by Ford and local searchers mistaking him for a thief.[25] The play culminates at Herne's Oak, where Falstaff, lured by promises of a midnight rendezvous with Mistress Ford, arrives in antlers and anticipates rustic romance; instead, the wives, their husbands, and children costumed as fairies subject him to ritualistic mockery with pinches, burns, and taunts of his folly.[26] This iteration of Falstaff emphasizes physical comedy and humiliation over verbal dexterity, portraying him as a lustful buffoon whose schemes collapse under bourgeois ingenuity rather than royal intrigue.[27] Lacking the tavern camaraderie of Henry IV, he relies on a lackey, Bardolph, and Pistol and Nym—his former recruits, now serving Page—for meager support, highlighting his diminished status.[25] Scholars note the character's shift to a more emasculated figure, with the wives' triumphs underscoring themes of female agency and communal vigilance against aristocratic excess.[28] By the finale, a chastened yet unrepentant Falstaff joins the festive dance, his ego punctured but spirit intact, affirming his resilience as a comic archetype.[26]Character Traits and Dynamics
Core Personality and Wit
Sir John Falstaff's core personality revolves around hedonism, self-indulgence, and pragmatic cowardice, traits that prioritize sensory pleasure and survival over chivalric ideals. Portrayed as grossly corpulent, he revels in sack wine, food, and lechery, boasting of his exploits while evading real danger, as when he flees the Gad's Hill robbery and later inflates the assailants' numbers to eleven or more for self-aggrandizement. His rejection of abstract honor underscores this realism: in a soliloquy, he deems it "a mere scutcheon" that pricks no wounds nor aids the slain, favoring fleshly existence instead. This parasitic yet charismatic nature draws followers through tavern camaraderie, though it masks deeper flaws like deceit and manipulation.[29] Falstaff's wit manifests as verbal agility, irony, and philosophical deflation, transforming vices into comic triumphs. His speeches brim with puns, malapropisms, and logic inversions, such as catechizing honor as worthless "air" or jesting that his belly serves as armor. In role-playing King Henry to Prince Hal, he deploys hyperbolic flattery and mock gravity, eliciting laughter through exaggerated mimicry. This humor, rooted in cynical observation, forms the bedrock of his allure, enabling self-justification amid exposure—evident when he blames Bardolph's red nose on a "fire of youth" rather than drink.[30] Scholars identify this as "verbal virtuosity" and "logic tricks," positioning Falstaff as comedy's intellect, never earnest but always illuminating human folly. His paradoxical depth—scoundrel yet sage—stems from comprehending vice without endorsing virtue, blending levity with tragic undertones.[31]
