Hubbry Logo
Low comedyLow comedyMain
Open search
Low comedy
Community hub
Low comedy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Low comedy
Low comedy
Low comedy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A traditional Punch and Judy booth, at Swanage, Dorset, England

Low comedy, or lowbrow humor, is a type of comedy that is a form of popular entertainment without any primary purpose other than to create laughter through boasting, boisterous jokes, drunkenness, scolding, fighting, buffoonery and other riotous activity.[1] It is characterized by "horseplay", slapstick or farce. Examples include the throwing of a custard pie into someone's face. The definition has expanded to include obvious physical jokes, such as the wedgie.

The term "low comedy" was coined by John Dryden in his preface to his play An Evening's Love.[2]

History

[edit]

This type of comedy has been a fixture ever since Greek plays. For instance Sophocles once wrote a satyr play, no longer extant, about satyrs who seek to persuade a king that they are worthy suitors of his daughter by bragging about their capacity for flatulence. Aristophanes claimed that he hoped his plays would not be too highbrow for the common people to understand though he acknowledged that his work presupposed a level of intelligence that was not normally assumed. Even the word 'comedy' is derived from a Greek phrase meaning either Song of Revelry or Song of The Village, the latter of which implies that it is meant for everyone including the lowest common denominator.

Low comedy was first denoted as comedy for the commoners because it was most often practiced by street performers. Over time, as low comedy began to include lewd jokes and more physical comedy, more mainstream performers began to practice this type of comedy: stand-up comedians, musicals, etc. This type of comedy also was employed in most cartoons. For instance, in Porky's Duck Hunt, Porky Pig is routinely subjected to physical slapstick. A 1945 Bugs Bunny cartoon which parodied and lampooned Hermann Goering included a scene wherein Bugs successfully tore off Göring's medals one by one and Göring's trousers fell off. Likewise Daffy Duck is routinely shot by Elmer Fudd in "wabbit season" cartoons.

Social context

[edit]
Main article: Low culture

Low comedy in society is quite well known; it can be found in a wide range of media, such as television and theatre. It can also be found in public and occupations[clarify], such as clowns, mimes and comedians. The term low is represented in association to low culture. This form of comedy is targeted and understood towards people who attain nonacademic high school education, meaning this form of comedy is not restricted to high levels of education and knowledge.[3] Low comedy is well known and popular today because it is considered suitable for all individuals. This form of comedy connects to popular culture by its easy to understand style.

Low comedy, however, has lacked appreciation from most of society and is looked down upon in contrast to high comedy. The sole purpose of low comedy is to evoke laughter in people. Because there is no contextual message in most forms of low comedy, it is not highly respected. This does not undermine the fact that it is still an effective form of comedy for its reputation to cause laughter.[4]

The classification of things considered to be low comedy constantly changes over time. As society changes, so do the ideas about what high and low comedy is. For example, due to the overdoing of sitcoms in the past, it is now considered shrill, vulgar, low society where everyone talk-screeches in some sub-human, mock-sophisticated language of incessant insult. Some sitcoms are somewhere in between low and high comedy. For instance the animated series The Simpsons routinely includes slapstick violence, yet has also satirized political issues and parodied classic films and literature.[5]

Today, low comedy can be seen in almost any production. Sitcoms often base most of the plot on this type of comedy because of society influencing productivity and considering it a low form of comedy. Modern adaptations of Shakespeare's plays also use low comedy to convey a different understanding of the play.[dubious – discuss] As You Like It for example is the story of a woman named Rosalyn who meets her male love interest while disguised as a man and inadvertently arouses the affection of a woman named Phoebe who repeatedly rejects her male suitor because she is in love with the man that Rosalyn is pretending to be.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Low comedy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Low comedy is a of theatrical performance that emphasizes physical humor, actions, and crude or exaggerated situations to provoke immediate, visceral laughter from audiences, often lacking the subtlety or intellectual depth associated with more refined forms of . In contrast to , which relies on witty , social , and verbal ingenuity to engage the mind and elicit thoughtful amusement, low comedy prioritizes visual gags, bodily antics, and plot devices like mistaken identities or misunderstandings to drive its broad appeal. This distinction, rooted in classical , positions low comedy as an "elemental" style that appeals directly to basic human instincts rather than cerebral analysis. The origins of low comedy trace back to ancient Greek theater, where it emerged as a vital component of plays by , who incorporated farcical elements such as theriomorphic characters, physical confrontations, and absurd scenarios to heighten satirical effects and entertain diverse audiences. In Roman drama, playwrights like expanded these techniques in their farces, blending low-comic irreverence with stock characters and rapid-fire physical business to create irrepressible humor that influenced subsequent Western traditions. During the Renaissance, integrated low comedy as comic relief within his works, employing coarse wit, horseplay, and slapstick—such as the antics of characters like Bottom in or the gravediggers in —to balance tragic or romantic elements and broaden audience engagement. This enduring form persisted into later periods, manifesting in medieval farces, Restoration burlesques, and modern adaptations like sketches, where its emphasis on accessible, body-centered laughs continues to provide levity in mixed-genre productions.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Principles

Low comedy, also known as lowbrow humor, is a form of dramatic or performative humor that primarily relies on physical actions, visual gags, and references to bodily functions, distinguishing it from more intellectual or verbally sophisticated styles that emphasize or . Lowbrow humor is characterized as accessible, exuberant, and explicitly humorous entertainment that appeals to a broad audience without requiring specialized cultural knowledge. This approach prioritizes immediate, sensory engagement over nuanced dialogue, often manifesting through coarse jesting, buffoonery, and exaggerated behaviors that appeal to basic human instincts rather than refined thought. Unlike , which critiques social norms through clever language and character insight, low comedy disrupts expectations via tangible, often chaotic elements that provoke laughter through direct bodily or situational absurdity. At its core, low comedy operates on principles of , repetition, and to elicit instinctive responses, amplifying everyday mishaps or human frailties into over-the-top spectacles that bypass rational analysis. distorts normal actions—such as a simple trip becoming a sprawling tumble—to heighten the ridiculousness, while repetition reinforces the gag through insistent, escalating patterns that build comedic momentum without verbal complexity. , meanwhile, introduces illogical or improbable elements, like impossible physical feats or nonsensical scenarios, creating a of joyful disorientation that triggers spontaneous rooted in surprise and the of . These principles function collectively to stimulate as a physiological release, emphasizing the body's role in humor over the mind's. Philosophically, low comedy traces its roots to Aristotelian concepts in the Poetics, where comedy imitates characters of a "lower type"—morally average or inferior—featuring defects or ugliness that are not destructive but ludicrous, through the indulgence of base instincts like sexuality or folly. This contrasts with elevated forms such as , which purge and via the downfall of noble figures, as low comedy instead elevates the humble or ignoble through humorous triumph, offering emotional relief via the celebration of human imperfection rather than moral superiority. Such elements align with Aristotle's view of comedy as a ritualistic outlet for eros and the irrational, fostering communal release from societal constraints. The universal appeal of low comedy lies in its ability to transcend cultural or linguistic barriers, as seen in timeless gags like the pratfall—a sudden, clumsy fall—or the pie-in-the-face, which deliver instant visual humor by exploiting surprise and mild , the pleasure derived from witnessing harmless misfortune. These elements tap into innate responses to physical vulnerability and taboo-breaking, such as exaggerated bodily mishaps, making low comedy accessible and enduring across audiences by mirroring shared human experiences of and resilience without requiring contextual knowledge.

Key Techniques

Low comedy employs precise timing in physical mishaps to heighten comedic effect, where performers execute falls, collisions, or chases with rhythmic precision to build anticipation before a sudden payoff, often escaping harm at the last moment to underscore . This technique relies on the incongruity between expected danger and improbable survival, subverting audience expectations through physical rather than verbal . Props play a central role in amplifying visual emphasis, such as the battacchio—a hinged wooden device from traditions used to produce loud, exaggerated slaps simulating violence without real injury—or everyday objects like pies for throwing, which transform ordinary items into catalysts for chaos. Escalation of chaotic scenarios further drives the humor, starting with minor disruptions like a tripped foot and rapidly building to increasingly absurd pile-ups or chain reactions involving multiple performers, maintaining momentum through layered mishaps that compound disorder. Bodily humor forms a core element, featuring clumsy movements, grotesque postures, and scatological references like flatulence jokes that emphasize the human body's vulnerabilities and functions for immediate, visceral laughs. These elements bypass higher cognitive processing by directly evoking emotional responses through relatable yet exaggerated depictions of physical awkwardness or , appealing to universal base instincts without requiring intellectual analysis. Performer-audience interaction enhances immediacy, often via exaggerated reactions that break the , such as direct glances or pleas for sympathy during a pratfall, drawing viewers into the chaos and fostering a shared sense of playful complicity. Psychologically, low comedy's techniques rest on incongruity theory, where physical actions disrupt anticipated outcomes—such as a dignified character slipping on a —creating from the sudden mismatch between setup and resolution.

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Origins

Low comedy traces its earliest roots to theater, particularly in the satyr plays performed during the Dionysian festivals of the BCE. These short, dramas, typically staged after a trilogy of tragedies, featured a chorus of satyrs—mythical half-human, half-beast creatures known for their lustful and boisterous behavior—engaging in phallic humor, drunken revelry, and crude antics that parodied serious mythological narratives. Playwrights like contributed to this genre with works such as Cyclops, where satyrs interact with the cyclops in scenes filled with sexual and , emphasizing Dionysian themes of excess and . In , low comedy evolved through adaptations of Greek models in the works of playwrights and during the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE. Plautus's fabulae palliatae incorporated stock characters like the servus callidus (clever slave), who used wit, deception, and physical to outmaneuver authority figures, often in farcical plots involving mistaken identities and romantic entanglements. Terence refined these elements in his more polished comedies, retaining the clever slave as a resourceful who drove the action through verbal banter, appealing to Roman audiences with relatable lowbrow escapades. This Roman style drew from earlier and rustic farces, blending verbal wit with visual gags to provide from societal norms. Medieval Europe saw the emergence of low comedy precursors in folk performances and festivals from the 13th to the 15th centuries, where mummery troupes of masked revelers enacted bawdy skits during winter celebrations, inverting social hierarchies through dances and obscene jests. These itinerant groups, performing in town squares and courts, featured rudimentary stock figures like fools and demons in improvised scenes of and sexual , laying groundwork for later improvisational forms. Such entertainments echoed earlier traditions but adapted to Christian contexts, using humor to mock clerical authority and celebrate communal excess. Central to these ancient and medieval expressions of low comedy were their ties to and traditions, serving as ritual outlets for social inversion. In Roman , celebrated from December 17, slaves dined with masters, hierarchies dissolved in feasting and role reversals, and comedic performances allowed bawdy critiques of power, rooted in agrarian renewal and temporary license. Similarly, Greek Dionysian processions with phallic symbols invoked and chaos, while medieval folk festivals like those preceding perpetuated this carnivalesque spirit, using humor to reaffirm community bonds through controlled disorder.

Modern Evolution

The marked a pivotal shift in low comedy with the emergence of in 16th-century , a professional theatrical form characterized by improvised performances and stock characters that emphasized physical antics and exaggerated gestures. Originating around 1551 in and gaining structure through troupes like the Gelosi by 1568, this style drew from traditions and featured mischievous servants such as (Arlecchino), a clever from known for acrobatic feats and routines. quickly spread across , influencing French playwrights like and reaching by the late 16th century, where its elements of , song, dance, and satirical physicality laid the groundwork for English as a tradition by the 18th century, with becoming a central figure in harlequinades. By the 19th century, low comedy evolved through in America and traditions in Europe, adapting to urban audiences in variety shows that blended , sentimental songs, and elements into accessible entertainment. , emerging in the 1880s as a "respectable" alternative to , featured fast-paced acts with to appeal to diverse crowds in theaters across the . In Britain, flourished from the mid-1800s, hosting performers who specialized in exaggerated physical humor; (1860–1904), a diminutive star renowned for his frenetic energy and character sketches of ordinary folk, became a leading figure, incorporating into roles like and drawing massive crowds to venues like . These traditions emphasized bodily exaggeration and situational mishaps, bridging folk performances to modern mass entertainment. The 20th century saw low comedy adapt to new media, particularly silent films and radio, where visual and auditory physicality allowed global dissemination without language barriers. Charlie Chaplin's character, debuting in 1914's , exemplified this shift through balletic and poignant physical gags that critiqued industrial society, as seen in films like Modern Times (1936), where the Tramp's chaotic gestures and falls conveyed universal struggles amid the . Radio sketches in the and , such as those by British comedians influenced by , translated into sound effects and verbal mimicry, further popularizing low comedy for home audiences. Post-World War II, the form transitioned to television sitcoms, with (1955–1956) incorporating and domestic blunders—such as Ralph Kramden's bombastic threats and physical pratfalls—to reflect working-class life and postwar American norms in a half-hour format that influenced subsequent family comedies.

Forms and Subgenres

Physical and Visual Forms

Slapstick exemplifies a core physical form of low comedy, defined as a style of exaggerated, often violent physical antics designed to elicit laughter through visual absurdity and bodily harm that defies realism. This subgenre prioritizes broad, cartoonish actions like pokes, slaps, trips, and collisions, where performers endure repeated mishaps with resilient recovery, emphasizing the body's vulnerability for humorous effect. In the films of from the 1930s to 1950s, such as their short subjects produced by , signature gags included eye-pokes to the face and elaborate pie fights, where characters hurled desserts in escalating chaos to punctuate comedic violence. These elements relied on precise physical timing to heighten the visual impact of the falls and impacts. Mime and pantomime traditions further illustrate visual low comedy through silent, gestural performance that conveys narrative humor exclusively via the body and imagined elements. Rooted in non-verbal expression, these forms use coordinated whole-body movements, facial contortions, and mimed props—such as invisible walls or ropes—to depict exaggerated scenarios of , pursuit, or , creating comedy from the performer's isolated physical struggle against unseen forces. Unlike spoken humor, the appeal lies in the immediacy of visual cues, where gestures amplify everyday actions into absurd, relatable predicaments, as seen in classic routines involving trapped escalator climbs or futile attempts to escape invisible traps. This bodily underscores low comedy's focus on universal physicality over intellectual . Burlesque contributed physical and visual dimensions to low comedy via its 19th-century American stage manifestations, featuring acrobatic feats and comedic falls to societal norms through exaggerated performances, often involving leg shows with and short costumes. Originating in variety shows like those of Thompson's British Blondes troupe in the , performers donned and short costumes for dances that revealed legs in exaggerated, motions, often culminating in playful tumbles or pratfalls that mocked elegance with clumsy physicality. These elements combined sensual movement with disruption, such as accidental wardrobe slips or acrobatic stunts gone awry, to deliver visual humor centered on bodily display and mishap. By the early , evolved as a structured routine in houses, where dancers like Millie DeLeon performed provocative cooch dances to enhance the comedic reveal. In contemporary media, animated cartoons like perpetuate physical low comedy through visuals defying natural laws, such as anvil drops that flatten characters into temporary pancakes before elastic recovery. These gags, prominent in Road Runner pursuits from the onward, exploit impossible physics—objects plummeting from cliffs or skies to cause explosive impacts—for sight-based laughs, amplifying via exaggerated scale and resilience. The humor emerges from the visual spectacle of destruction and instant restoration, as in Wile E. Coyote's repeated crushing under heavy weights, underscoring low comedy's enduring reliance on bodily exaggeration. Techniques like precise timing in these mishaps further enhance the comedic rhythm.

Verbal and Situational Forms

Verbal and situational forms of low comedy emphasize linguistic play and contrived scenarios to generate humor, often through , misunderstanding, and social awkwardness, rather than relying solely on physical actions. These elements create comedic tension via and plot machinations that expose human folly in everyday or heightened contexts. represents a key verbal and situational subgenre of low comedy, characterized by plot-driven absurdity involving mistaken identities, frantic chases, and improbable coincidences that propel characters into escalating chaos. In Michael Frayn's 1982 play , this is exemplified through the backstage pandemonium of a touring theater troupe, where miscommunications and hidden affairs lead to a cascade of verbal mix-ups and door-slamming pursuits, highlighting the genre's reliance on rapid-fire to sustain momentum. Such structures often incorporate witty banter and ironic revelations to amplify the absurdity, distinguishing farce from more static verbal humor. Bawdy humor, another prominent verbal form, employs crude such as , double entendres, and references to bodily functions to provoke through and shock value. In William Shakespeare's (circa 1597), this technique abounds in scenes featuring Falstaff's amorous pursuits, where characters trade toilet jokes and sexual wordplay, like the on "horn" symbolizing cuckoldry, to mock pretensions of sophistication. These elements underscore low comedy's tradition of using accessible, earthy to deflate authority and celebrate vulgarity. Situational comedy within low comedy thrives on absurd premises that trap characters in comically untenable scenarios, often revolving around and confinement. French boulevard theater around 1900 perfected this in bedroom farces by , such as A Flea in Her Ear (1907), where jealous husbands and mistaken hotel reservations spark a whirlwind of verbal accusations, hidden lovers, and frantic evasions in confined spaces. Feydeau's works exemplify how contrived plots and overlapping dialogues create relentless tension, turning ordinary domestic jealousies into farcical whirlwinds. Clowning archetypes like the fool or buffoon contribute to verbal low comedy through deliberate linguistic blunders, such as malapropisms—comically misused words that reveal ignorance or pomposity. In Elizabethan drama, Shakespeare's fools, including the buffoonish servants in his comedies, employ these verbal mishaps to undercut serious discourse, as seen in the malapropistic speeches of characters like Dogberry in (1598-1599), where garbled authority figures provide relief through phonetic absurdities. This persists in low comedy by using the fool's "wise foolishness" to deliver pointed, if crude, observations via twisted language.

Cultural and Social Context

Reception Across Societies

In Western societies, low comedy was widely embraced in working-class entertainment during the , particularly through British s, which served as affordable venues for laborers and tradesmen seeking escapist humor that mirrored their daily struggles and social conditions. Halls in working-class districts, such as those in London's East End, primarily drew upper-working-class and lower-middle-class patrons, including mechanics and clerks, who appreciated the rowdy, relatable sketches and songs performed amid communal drinking and interaction. In contrast, elite Victorian society often expressed disdain for these forms, perceiving comedy as vulgar, sinful, and emblematic of illegitimate that threatened moral respectability and social order. This class divide highlighted low comedy's role as a democratizing force for the masses, while reinforcing cultural hierarchies among the upper classes. Non-Western examples illustrate low comedy's integration into diverse societal fabrics, often as communal outlets for the common people. In , the folk theater form of incorporates bawdy elements such as erotic songs and dances filled with and sensual performances by female artists, which originated under Mughal and Maratha patronage as entertainment for soldiers and rural folk but faced ongoing societal criticism for obscenity while being upheld as vibrant expressions of subaltern Marathi identity. Gender dynamics in low comedy performances have historically reflected male dominance, with men traditionally leading enactments in Western circuits, where managerial structures and audience expectations prioritized male comedians in physical and verbal routines. However, by the early , female roles evolved significantly, as women performers like acrobats and serio-comics adopted diverse personas—from athletic feats to satirical sketches—that subverted conventional and contributed to the genre's respectability push, allowing greater agency amid shifting cultural norms. Low comedy's cross-cultural universality is underscored by shared reliance on physical humor, such as , evident in traditions where acrobatic displays—depicting feats like tumbling and balancing—emerged prominently during the (1368–1644) through integrations of variety acts with dramatic narratives, captivating audiences across social strata in temple and court settings. These elements, akin to Western , trace roots to ancient ritualistic origins but adapted to local performance contexts for broad societal engagement.

Critical Perspectives

Scholars have argued that low comedy functions as a democratizing force in art, making humor accessible across social classes by relying on universal physical and situational elements that require no cultural sophistication. In early twentieth-century cinema, features like (1918) employed broad physical antics, such as chaotic store scenes and mishaps during horse races, to engage audiences from working-class to middle-class backgrounds, transcending class barriers through relatable, non-verbal . This appeal stemmed from the genre's evolution in the , where Keystone-style initially targeted laborers but expanded via affirmative narratives with youthful leads and sympathetic humor, drawing over 60% female attendance by 1918 and proving suitable for "any class of house." Similarly, Rob King's analysis of the Keystone Film Company highlights how such low comedy democratized mass entertainment, grossing millions and attracting diverse viewers through its inclusive, unpretentious physicality. Henri Bergson's seminal 1900 essay Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic provides a theoretical foundation for appreciating low comedy's physical forms, critiquing "mechanical inelasticity" as the core of humor—where rigid, repetitive actions clash with expected human adaptability, evoking in audiences regardless of background. Bergson posits that this inelasticity in gestures or situations, as seen in falls or automatized behaviors, serves a social corrective, promoting elasticity and vitality in society while rendering broadly accessible without reliance on intellectual wit. Critics, particularly from feminist perspectives, have lambasted low comedy for its and propensity to reinforce , especially in forms like that objectify performers. Kay Siebler's 2015 analysis in the Journal of Gender Studies contends that neo-burlesque often perpetuates patriarchal norms by commodifying female sexuality under the guise of empowerment, with mainstream acts like those of emphasizing titillating displays that replicate the and narrow traditional femininity. This , Siebler argues, lacks substantive political subversion, instead aligning with "raunch culture" that upholds of women as sexual objects, thereby limiting feminist potential in such performances. Freudian theory frames low comedy as a mechanism for releasing repressed instincts through base, tendentious jokes that circumvent social inhibitions. In Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious (1905), describes how vulgar humor, involving scatological or sexual elements, provides pleasure by discharging pent-up psychic energy, allowing audiences to express forbidden impulses in a socially acceptable form. This release, Freud explains, occurs via techniques like or displacement, where low comedy's crude acts temporarily liberate the unconscious from repression, offering particularly through its uninhibited, bodily focus. Postmodern defenses reposition low comedy as subversive, drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin's concept of the to celebrate its disruption of hierarchies. In (1965), Bakhtin analyzes medieval folk humor—marked by bodily exaggeration and inversion of norms—as a carnivalesque force that democratizes culture by temporarily overthrowing authority through bawdy, material laughter. This framework views low comedy's vulgarity not as debasement but as regenerative, fostering communal equality and critiquing power structures via its emphasis on the lower bodily strata.

Comparisons and Influences

Versus High Comedy

Low comedy, also known as lowbrow humor, emphasizes sensory and immediate forms of humor, such as physical and bodily exaggeration, prioritizing immediate, straightforward laughs through accessible and explicit means, in contrast to 's reliance on intellectual and verbal aimed at social . While low comedy provokes through visual gags and situational , often involving pratfalls or crude antics, high comedy employs clever dialogue and nuanced critique to expose societal flaws. For instance, the films of exemplify low comedy's focus on physical mishaps and repetitive chaos, appealing through universal, non-verbal humor. In opposition, Oscar Wilde's plays, such as , showcase high comedy's elegant banter and ironic commentary on Victorian conventions. Despite these distinctions, overlaps occur in hybrid forms where low and high elements blend, as seen in , which combined witty repartee with farcical physicality to entertain diverse theatergoers. Similarly, Molière's 17th-century works integrated farcical touches—like exaggerated physical humor and antics—into otherwise intellectual comedies of manners, enriching their satirical depth without fully abandoning low comedy's immediacy. Low comedy traditionally targets broad audiences with its accessible, less discerning appeal, often drawing working-class viewers through escapist and visceral entertainment. , by contrast, caters to sophisticated viewers, fostering critical reflection on social norms via verbal subtlety. This evolutionary interplay is evident in how low comedy's physical elements gradually infiltrated high forms, as in Molière's farcical infusions that heightened the comedic impact of his verbal satires.

Impact on Contemporary Entertainment

In contemporary film and television, low comedy persists through awkward physical humor in sitcoms like (2005–2013), where characters' clumsy mishaps and embarrassing interactions create cringe-inducing scenarios that drive the narrative's comedic tension. This approach, blending situational with visual discomfort, has shaped modern formats by prioritizing relatable, lowbrow physicality over intellectual wit. Similarly, animated series such as (1999–present) rely on cutaway gags that deploy and absurd physical antics for instant, broad-appeal laughs, often interrupting the plot with unrelated visual gags like pratfalls or exaggerated violence. These elements underscore low comedy's adaptability in sustaining viewer engagement across episodes. Digital platforms have exponentially expanded low comedy's influence since the 2010s, with skits and viral memes featuring rapid —such as staged fails, slips, and prop mishaps—garnering billions of views and fostering global participation. Creators exploit short-form formats to deliver accessible physical humor, which algorithms reward with widespread dissemination, turning everyday users into amateur comedians and amplifying lowbrow tropes to diverse international audiences. In theater and live performance, improv comedy troupes like those at integrate physical humor into spontaneous routines, using , props, and unscripted antics to generate immediate reactions during stand-up and ensemble sketches. This real-time execution keeps low comedy vibrant in front-of-audience settings, allowing performers to riff on physical exaggeration for dynamic, crowd-pleasing results. Low comedy also bolsters commercial entertainment, particularly in advertising where spots harness humorous fails and —like over-the-top reactions in Reese's campaigns—to capture mass attention and enhance brand memorability amid high-stakes viewership. Such tactics, emphasizing visual absurdity over subtlety, effectively engage broad demographics by evoking shared, lighthearted .

References

  1. https://www.columbusstate.edu/theatre/_docs/theatre-appreciation-terms.pdf
  2. https://www.dbu.edu/mitchell/history-of-comedy/comedydi.html
  3. https://novaonline.nvcc.edu/eli/spd130et/typecomd.htm
  4. https://commons.nmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1176&context=conspectus_borealis
  5. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/893168ce-f96d-4d7c-916d-28bbc5b8fee6/download
  6. https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ClasDram/playreviews/section3/Aristophanes.pdf
  7. https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/ClasDram/playreviews/section4/plautus.pdf
  8. https://www.bju.edu/events/fine-arts/concert-opera-drama/archive/taming-of-the-shrew/taming-shrew-smart.pdf
  9. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc108158/m2/1/high_res_d/n_02899.pdf
  10. https://www.britannica.com/art/low-comedy
  11. https://cmsw.mit.edu/mit3/papers/kuipers.pdf
  12. https://www.cornellcollege.edu/classical_studies/lit/cla364-1-2006/05groupfive/Definitions.htm
  13. https://condor.depaul.edu/dsimpson/tlove/comic-tragic.html
  14. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/commedia-dellarte
  15. https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/clasdram/chapters/081earlygkcom.htm
  16. https://novaonline.nvcc.edu/eli/spd130et/ancientgreek.htm
  17. https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1350&context=honors_theses
  18. https://soar.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.12648/13721/4188_britney.ditocco.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  19. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=fll_etds
  20. https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/bawdy-bard-act-discovered-revealing-fifteenth-century-roots-of-british-comedy
  21. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/243965
  22. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=0&article=1559&context=dlsc_fa_fin_aid&type=additional
  23. https://open.bu.edu/bitstreams/891986c3-8233-444f-ac6c-b5bb613cec3c/download
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-greek-comedy/comedy-and-athenian-festival-culture/A0FCE295CDF90B21AC0EF3732ED06C7E
  25. https://www.worldmime.org/en/about-mime/liaisons/101-liaisons/257-commedia-dell-arte.html
  26. https://westonmuseum.org/a-plotted-history-of-panto-oh-no-it-isnt/
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/commedia-dellarte-in-context/commedia-dellarte-and-europe/E95CC885186274D116B08C630D033AC2
  28. https://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5764/
  29. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-standup-comedy/standup-in-the-united-kingdom/873C10058A32AA3B8BFD01CA325F89ED/core-reader
  30. https://victorianweb.org/mt/panto/richards1.html
  31. https://modernismmodernity.org/articles/birdwell-chaplin-modern-times-and-minstrel-tradition
  32. https://wsupress.wayne.edu/9780814333969/
  33. https://www.liveabout.com/slapstick-comedy-definition-801516
  34. https://www.backstage.com/magazine/article/slapstick-comedy-definition-examples-76449/
  35. https://snackstack.net/2023/02/22/a-brief-history-of-pie-throwing/
  36. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-016-9425-9
  37. https://daily.jstor.org/burlesque-beginnings/
  38. https://burlexe.com/burlesque/burlesque-history/the-history-of-burlesque-dancing/
  39. https://thewalrus.ca/looney-tunes-will-never-die-and-thats-all-folks/
  40. https://www.supersummary.com/noises-off/summary/
  41. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/54442/10-shakespeares-best-dirty-jokes
  42. https://books.google.com/books/about/Four_Farces.html?id=L_lmyOXVTb0C
  43. https://www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/wjer/article/viewFile/1260/1418
  44. https://www.victorianweb.org/mt/scott1.html
  45. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/theatre-research-international/article/minnie-cunningham-at-the-old-bedford/1441388A38911969CCF8719984BB0B96
  46. https://knowledge.uchicago.edu/record/3470/files/Sastry_uchicago_0330D_15965.pdf
  47. https://www.academia.edu/101584506/Rank_Ladies_Gender_and_Cultural_Hierarchy_in_American_Vaudeville
  48. http://en.chinaculture.org/library/2008-01/23/content_37739.htm
  49. https://asset.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/73DQGSPYVEBXW82/R/file-d6473.pdf
  50. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4352/4352-h/4352-h.htm
  51. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=englishfacpub
  52. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/25848/25848-h/25848-h.htm
  53. https://monoskop.org/images/7/70/Bakhtin_Mikhail_Rabelais_and_His_World_1984.pdf
  54. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/encyclopedia-of-humor-studies/book235990
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778606/
  56. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-devon-46762940
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309922929_J_Milner_Davis_Low_Comedy_In_Encyclopedia_of_Humor_Studies_ed_Salvatore_Attardo_2014_2_464-6_2_vols_Thousand_Oaks_CA_Sage_Publishing_ISBN_978_1412999090_At_httpsussagepubcomen-usnamencyclopedia-of-hum
  58. https://www.britannica.com/art/music-hall-and-variety
  59. https://bigthink.com/videos/why-the-awkward-humor-on-the-office-is-funny/
  60. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20211103-the-dark-side-of-21st-century-tv-comedy
  61. https://www.watchmojo.com/articles/top-10-shows-with-the-best-cutaway-gags
  62. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandrasternlicht/2022/09/06/top-creators-2022/
  63. https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/12/11/20991671/memes-decade-doge-baby-yoda
  64. https://www.chicagotribune.com/2022/06/09/review-if-you-havent-been-to-second-city-lately-do-the-right-thing-no-worries-if-not-is-worth-the-return/
  65. https://www.secondcity.com/classes/chicago/improv/physicality-is-phun-with-frank-caeti-chi
  66. https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/reese-super-bowl-ad-commercial-caramel-big-cup/
  67. https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/super-bowl-instant-replay-reeses-finds-its-groove-with-silly-humor/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.