Hubbry Logo
Bird louseBird louseMain
Open search
Bird louse
Community hub
Bird louse
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bird louse
Bird louse
Bird louse
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A bird louse is any chewing louse (small, biting insects) of order Phthiraptera which parasitizes warm-blooded animals, especially birds. Bird lice may feed on feathers, skin, or blood. They have no wings, and their biting mouth parts distinguish them from true lice, which suck blood.[1] [2]

Almost all domestic birds are hosts for at least one species of bird louse. Chickens and other poultry are attacked by many kinds of bird lice.[2] Bird lice usually do not cause much harm to a bird unless it is unusually infested as in the case of birds with damaged bills which cannot preen themselves properly. A blood-consuming louse that infests Galápagos Hawks is more numerous on hawks without territories, possibly because those individuals spend more time looking for food and less time preening than hawks with territories.

In such cases, their irritation may cause the bird to damage itself by scratching. In extreme cases, the infestation may even interfere with egg production and the fattening of poultry.[1] Unlike true lice, bird lice do not carry infectious diseases.[2] Having coevolved with their specific host(s), phylogenetic relationships among bird lice are sometimes of use when trying to determine phylogenetic relationships among birds.[3]

Earlier all chewing lice were considered to form the paraphyletic order Mallophaga while the sucking lice were thought to form the order Anoplura. However, reclassification (Clay, 1970) has combined these orders into the order Phthiraptera. The bird lice belong to two suborders, Amblycera and Ischnocera, although some members of these suborders do not parasitize birds and are therefore not bird lice.[4]: 2010–202 

The families which parasitize birds are:[4]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bird louse

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A bird louse is a small, wingless ectoparasitic belonging to the order Phthiraptera (within the superorder ), specifically the suborders Amblycera and Ischnocera, that infests birds worldwide by clinging to their feathers and skin. These lice measure 0.35 to 11 mm in length, feature dorsoventrally flattened bodies adapted for navigating , reduced compound eyes without ocelli, short antennae, and mandibulate (chewing) mouthparts for consuming host tissues. Of the approximately 5,000 known Phthiraptera species, around 4,000 parasitize birds, exhibiting high host specificity and co-evolutionary adaptations to avian hosts across diverse taxa. Bird lice undergo hemimetabolous development, progressing from eggs (nits) glued to through three nymphal instars to adults, with a full life cycle typically lasting 4 to 8 weeks on a single host. They feed primarily on barbules, down, fragments, and sebum, though some species in the Amblycera also ingest ; this feeding can cause damage, irritation, reduced , and secondary infections in heavily infested . Dispersal occurs mainly through direct contact during bird interactions (e.g., or ) or phoresy on hippoboscid flies, limiting their off-host survival to hours or days. Prevalence varies by region and host, with higher rates in humid environments like the Neotropics (over 50% infestation) compared to arid areas (e.g., 13% in ), and they are found on most avian families, from to wild . Morphological diversity includes ecomorphs specialized for body regions, such as head lice with robust mandibles or wing lice that insert between feather barbs to evade . While generally host-specific, some generalist like Menacanthus eurysternus can infest multiple bird types, potentially impacting production through reduced quality and bird health.

Taxonomy

Classification

Bird lice, also known as avian chewing lice, belong to the order Phthiraptera, which encompasses all lice as obligate ectoparasites of birds and mammals. Within Phthiraptera, bird lice are primarily classified in the suborders Amblycera and Ischnocera, both of which are characterized by chewing mouthparts adapted for feeding on feathers, skin debris, and blood from feather quills. These suborders distinguish bird lice from the suborder Anoplura, which includes mammalian sucking lice that pierce skin to feed on blood using specialized piercing mouthparts. Historically, bird lice were grouped under the Mallophaga, an informal designation for chewing or biting lice that included both avian and mammalian species with mandibulate mouthparts. This classification, dating back to the , treated Mallophaga as a separate order but is now considered obsolete and paraphyletic, as molecular and morphological evidence has integrated it into the monophyletic order Phthiraptera alongside sucking lice suborders. The modern Phthiraptera framework recognizes four suborders—Amblycera, Ischnocera, Anoplura, and Rhynchophthirina—with the first three encompassing the chewing lice lineages. Key families within these suborders include the Menoponidae in Amblycera, which comprises body lice that infest a wide range of bird species, and the Philopteridae in Ischnocera, which includes feather lice specialized for particular host groups. For example, the genus Columbicola (Philopteridae, Ischnocera) is notable for species like C. columbae, which parasitizes pigeons and doves. Other families, such as the Ricinidae (Amblycera), also contribute to avian louse diversity but are less dominant. Phylogenetically, bird lice exhibit strong co-speciation with their avian hosts, reflecting long-term evolutionary associations driven by host-switching events and . Amblycera represent a more primitive lineage, with broader host ranges and less specialized morphology, while Ischnocera are more derived, showing tighter host specificity and adaptations for feather-dwelling lifestyles. This pattern underscores the role of host phylogeny in shaping louse diversification, with molecular studies confirming congruent evolutionary histories between lice and birds.

Diversity

Bird lice (Phthiraptera: Amblycera and Ischnocera) exhibit remarkable diversity, with approximately 4,500 described worldwide, though estimates suggest the true total may exceed 40,000 when accounting for undescribed taxa. Of the described , around 1,200 belong to the suborder Amblycera, primarily in families like Menoponidae and Ricinidae, while roughly 3,000 are in the Ischnocera, dominated by the family Philopteridae. This diversity reflects the lice's close evolutionary ties to their avian hosts, with many yet to be discovered due to the challenges of sampling remote or cryptic populations. Notable examples illustrate this variety across host groups. Menacanthus stramineus, the chicken body louse (Amblycera: Menoponidae), is a widespread pest of domestic , particularly (Gallus gallus domesticus), where it feeds on feathers and debris. In wild birds, Columbicola columbae (Ischnocera: Philopteridae), the slender pigeon louse, specializes on columbids such as rock pigeons (Columba livia), often inhabiting wing feathers and causing irritation through feeding. The genus Myrsidea (Amblycera: Menoponidae) represents one of the most speciose groups, with over 380 described species primarily parasitizing birds, such as thrushes and warblers, where individual species show fine-scale adaptations to host feather structures. Patterns of diversity in bird lice are strongly shaped by host specificity, with most species restricted to a single genus or family of birds, often exhibiting monoxeny (one host species per louse species). This specificity has driven co-speciation, where louse phylogenies mirror those of their hosts, as evidenced by congruent evolutionary trees in genera like Columbicola and rock doves, reinforced by host defenses that limit interspecific transfers. Diversity is notably higher in tropical regions, where dense bird assemblages and stable environments support greater louse richness, with Neotropical passerines hosting multiple co-occurring species per individual. Endemism is pronounced among bird lice, particularly on insular or isolated hosts; for instance, species in the Brueelia complex are confined to endemic island birds like , facing risks parallel to their hosts. Similarly, lice on , such as those on Philippine eagles, highlight conservation concerns, with over 1,000 estimated species potentially threatened due to host declines.

Morphology

Adult characteristics

Adult bird lice, members of the order Phthiraptera (suborders Amblycera and Ischnocera), exhibit a range of morphological adaptations suited to their ectoparasitic lifestyle on avian hosts. Their bodies are typically dorsoventrally flattened, facilitating navigation through dense structures, with adult lengths varying from 0.3 to 11 mm depending on species and sex—females often larger than males by about 20%. Coloration in adult bird lice spans whitish to blackish tones, with many species displaying cryptic pigmentation that approximates the of their specific hosts to reduce detection during ; for instance, light-colored Columbicola lice on white rock pigeons (Columba livia) evolve matching hues over generations. The mouthparts are of the chewing type, featuring robust mandibles adapted for rasping and biting , skin debris, and secretions; while most Ischnocera feed primarily on feather material, certain Amblycera possess piercing capabilities to access or tissue fluids. Legs are sturdy and specialized for , terminating in tarsal claws—typically two per leg in bird lice—that hook onto barbs and rachises of feathers for during host movement. Head morphology differs between suborders: Amblycera have broader heads with short, conical antennae recessed into lateral grooves, whereas Ischnocera possess more elongated heads bearing slender, filiform antennae. Sensory adaptations are minimalistic, with reduced or absent compound eyes and no ocelli, relying instead on chemoreceptors primarily located on the antennae and head sensilla to detect host cues such as odors and contact chemicals.

Eggs and nymphs

Bird louse eggs, commonly referred to as nits, are typically oval or ovoid in shape and measure 0.4 to 1.0 mm in length and 0.15 to 0.30 mm in width, depending on the . These eggs feature a with species-specific markings, such as pits or smooth surfaces, and are equipped with an operculum—a - or dome-shaped —that lifts during to allow the to emerge. The eggs are firmly cemented to the barbs of host feathers using an adhesive sheath produced by the female louse, often in clusters of up to six per feather, which enhances their resistance to removal by the host's . This attachment mechanism, involving apophyses (bristle-like structures) on the in many , ensures the eggs remain securely in place on the despite the bird's grooming efforts. Upon hatching, bird louse eggs release first-instar nymphs, which undergo three nymphal instars before reaching adulthood, progressively increasing in size from approximately 0.5–0.7 mm in the first instar to nearly adult dimensions (1.3–1.5 mm) in the third. Nymphs closely resemble smaller versions of the adults in overall body shape and segmentation but possess a softer, less sclerotized exoskeleton, with thinner marginal carinae and less developed head structures in early instars. A key distinction from adults is the incomplete development of genitalia, which remains rudimentary or partially formed even in the third instar, reflecting the hemimetabolous nature of their development. Molting occurs directly on the host bird, where the nymphs shed their exuviae (molted cuticles) between instars, allowing them to remain in the protective plumage environment. These immature stages exhibit adaptations suited to their ectoparasitic lifestyle, with eggs' robust attachment providing protection against host preening and nymphs displaying limited mobility confined to the host's body to avoid dislodgement.

Life history

Life cycle

Bird lice (Phthiraptera: Amblycera and Ischnocera) complete their entire life cycle on the body of their avian host, undergoing incomplete metamorphosis without a pupal stage. The cycle consists of an egg stage, three nymphal instars, and the adult stage. Eggs are cemented to the base of feathers by the female and typically incubate for 3–7 days depending on temperature and species. Hatching is triggered by the warmth of the host's body, after which nymphs emerge and begin feeding immediately on feather barbules, skin debris, or occasionally blood. Nymphs pass through three instars, molting three times—each molt occurring after a period of feeding—to progress to the next stage. The first and second instars last approximately 3–4 days each, while the third instar takes 4–7 days, resulting in a total nymphal development period of 10–21 days. Upon the final molt, nymphs become sexually mature adults. Adults live 1–2 months on the host, with some species surviving up to several months, during which they continue feeding and, in females, oviposition. The overall life cycle from egg to adult typically spans 3–5 weeks, accelerated in warmer conditions such as those in poultry housing. Environmental factors like temperature and humidity influence development rates; for instance, higher temperatures shorten incubation and instar durations. Bird louse populations often align with host feather molting cycles, as lice may seek refuge in body feathers during periods of feather loss to minimize mortality.

Reproduction and behavior

Bird lice predominantly reproduce through sexual means, with occurring only in a few species and considered rare across the order Phthiraptera. Females typically mate multiple times during their adult life, with copulation in species like Columbicola columbae (Ischnocera) lasting approximately 10 hours and occurring 72–80 hours after the final molt, often at night. Males deposit spermatophores into the female's during insemination, facilitating sperm transfer. Over their lifetime, females lay up to 100 eggs, gluing them individually to host s using a gelatinous ; oviposition is completed rapidly near the feather rachis. Preferred sites include wing coverts (about 77% of eggs), tail feathers (15%), and occasionally abdominal feathers, locations that minimize exposure to the host's activity. Mating behaviors vary between suborders; in Ischnocera, such as subfeminal mating where the male positions himself beneath the female. Post-mating, females in species like C. columbae can resume receptivity within an hour after laying eggs, allowing multiple fertilizations. Bird lice exhibit gregarious behaviors, often clustering in dense groups within specific feather tracts, such as the wings, , or , to maximize resource access and minimize dislodgement. These aggregations facilitate direct transmission via host-to-host contact during or nesting. To evade host defenses, lice avoid by retreating into barbules during the day and actively hide from grooming; they position themselves in less-accessible feather regions, relying on the host's to be less effective against clustered individuals. and preening by birds can flush lice to safer body areas, but lice's sluggish movement and cryptic placement help sustain infestations. Feeding occurs diurnally when hosts are active, with lice consuming material, barbs, and scales or scurf using their mouthparts; the crop's triturating teeth aid in processing ous tissues. While most are strict keratin feeders, some Amblycera ingest or tissue fluids in addition to feathers and , supplementing their diet and potentially increasing nutritional intake. No significant differences in feeding habits exist between sexes or life stages, and or predation among lice is absent. Life cycle durations and reproductive traits vary between Amblycera and Ischnocera suborders, with ongoing genomic studies providing insights into these differences.

Ecology

Host specificity

Bird lice demonstrate a remarkable degree of host specificity, with the majority of species classified as monoxenous, meaning they are restricted to a single avian host , while others are oligoxenous, infesting only a limited number of closely related host . This strict fidelity is evident across diverse louse families, such as Philopteridae, where monoxenous predominate, comprising up to 80% of known taxa in some genera like Myrsidea. For instance, bombycillae, an amblyceran louse in the family Ricinidae, is exclusively associated with waxwings (Bombycilla spp.), feeding primarily on the feathers of these birds. Such patterns underscore the intimate parasitic relationships that limit and promote long-term associations with particular host lineages. This host specificity arises from co-evolutionary processes between lice and birds, where phylogenetic reconstructions of lineages often closely parallel those of their avian hosts, reflecting shared evolutionary histories. plays a central role in maintaining these associations, as lice are primarily passed from parents to offspring through direct physical contact during brooding and nesting, with limited opportunities for host-switching due to the lice's dependence on host body conditions. Studies of cospeciation in groups like the Philopteridae and Columbicola lice on pigeons confirm this congruence, with louse trees showing significant topological similarity to host phylogenies, supporting the role of co-diversification over widespread host shifts. Interactions between bird lice and their hosts are largely characterized by physical irritation rather than sophisticated behavioral manipulation. Lice feed by chewing on feathers, skin scales, and feather pulp, which can cause localized itching and discomfort, prompting hosts to engage in excessive or to remove the parasites. However, unlike neurotropic parasites in other systems, bird lice exert minimal influence on host behavior, such as foraging or social patterns, focusing instead on exploiting host resources without inducing broader phenotypic alterations. This passive dynamic allows lice to persist at low to moderate densities without severely disrupting host activities. A single often supports multiple species concurrently, typically ranging from two to five, which coexist through spatial partitioning across the host's body. For example, head lice (e.g., genera like Columbicola) specialize in feather-poor areas inaccessible to , while body lice (e.g., Physconelloides) occupy downy ventral regions, and wing lice target , reducing via microhabitat segregation. This niche differentiation is particularly pronounced in diverse host taxa like tinamous or , where up to four ecomorphs partition resources, enabling stable multi-species infestations without one dominating the entire host surface.

Distribution and dispersal

Bird lice exhibit a , occurring on avian hosts across all continents except perhaps the most isolated oceanic islands, with over 4,000 identified worldwide. Their presence follows the global range of , including high-latitude regions, and diversity is notably higher in tropical areas such as the Neotropics, where can reach approximately 48% in examined bird populations. In remote polar environments like , lice are present on , with genera such as Austrogoniodes and Nesiotinus adapted to these hosts, though overall research remains limited due to logistical challenges in such areas. Dispersal of lice primarily occurs through direct physical contact between hosts, particularly during , breeding aggregations, or nesting, allowing lice to transfer from one bird to another. An additional mechanism is phoresy, where lice hitchhike on more mobile ectoparasites like hippoboscid flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae), which can carry them to new hosts over short distances; this is especially relevant for wing-specialized lice that attach to flies feeding on bird . Off-host survival is limited, with dislodged lice typically perishing within a few days due to and lack of resources, restricting passive dispersal. Host migration plays a key role in long-distance spread, enabling lice to traverse continents alongside their avian carriers, as seen in the broad geographic ranges of species on migratory birds. In domesticated contexts, certain lice have been introduced to new regions through and transport of infested birds, contributing to their establishment in non-native areas. Despite these patterns, gaps persist in understanding louse distributions in understudied remote habitats, such as breeding colonies, where sampling is sparse.

Significance

Impact on birds

Bird lice, belonging to the suborders Amblycera and Ischnocera within the order Phthiraptera, inflict pathological effects on their avian hosts primarily through feeding activities that damage and . These ectoparasites chew on feather barbs, quills, and shafts, leading to breakage, loss, and overall deterioration of quality, which reduces the insulating properties of and impairs . Additionally, their movement and feeding cause severe , pruritus, and , often resulting in alopecia and nervous tension that disrupts sleep and diminishes host vitality. In cases of heavy infestations, particularly by species like Menopon gallinae, blood-feeding contributes to , while abrasions can facilitate secondary bacterial or fungal infections. In wild birds, lice infestations impose significant stress, especially on nestlings, where high parasite loads correlate with reduced body mass and compromised fledging success. For instance, in rough-legged hawks (Buteo lagopus), chewing lice negatively affect body condition across age and sex classes, with heavier infestations linked to lower overall fitness and potential survival costs. These effects stem from energetic demands of and repair, as well as that diverts resources from growth during critical developmental stages. Domestic birds, particularly , experience pronounced economic and productivity impacts from lice. Recent studies (as of 2024) indicate higher lice infestation rates in cage-free layer hens compared to caged flocks. Infestations reduce production by up to 30% through stress and poor condition, with one study reporting an average loss of 66 eggs per bird annually. is also hindered, with birds suffering losses of approximately 711 grams each due to irritation and energy expenditure on grooming. These factors contribute to substantial economic losses in farming operations, including downgraded and increased mortality in severe cases. Lice intensity on birds is generally low, with mean abundances often ranging from 1 to 10 individuals per infested host, though varies by and region (e.g., 7–10% in many populations). However, outbreaks exceeding 100 lice per can cause severe damage, amplifying loss, , and productivity declines in both wild and domestic contexts.

Control and management

Prevention of bird louse infestations begins with measures in operations, such as quarantining new birds for at least two weeks to prevent introduction from external sources and regularly to remove where lice might harbor. In wild bird contexts, providing dust baths with materials like or allows natural grooming behaviors that dislodge lice, while limiting contact between domestic flocks and wild birds reduces transmission risks. (IPM) approaches in farms emphasize sanitation, such as thorough of coops and replacement, combined with monitoring for early detection to minimize reliance on chemical interventions. Treatments for established infestations typically involve targeted insecticides applied directly to birds and their environments. Permethrin-based sprays are commonly used on caged , applied at rates of about 0.5 ounces per bird, with a second treatment required after 10 days to target newly hatched nymphs since eggs are resistant to many chemicals. , administered topically or orally, effectively controls lice in when combined with premise treatments like Elector PSP to address off-host stages. In organic systems, non-toxic options such as or silica-based powders are dusted on birds and coops; these abrasives dehydrate lice by damaging their exoskeletons, offering a sustainable alternative without chemical residues. Challenges in control include the development of insecticide resistance, particularly from overuse of pyrethroids like , which can lead to treatment failures and necessitate rotation of chemical classes in IPM strategies. In conservation efforts for endangered birds, management focuses on monitoring rather than eradication, as excessive lice loads can indicate underlying host health issues like or stress; for instance, in seabird colonies, ectoparasite counts serve as bioindicators of population fitness, guiding non-invasive interventions to maintain ecological balance without risking co-extinction of host-specific louse species.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10628595/
  2. https://genent.cals.ncsu.edu/insect-identification/order-phthiraptera/
  3. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1096&context=parasittext
  4. https://darwin.biology.utah.edu/PDFs/Bush101.pdf
  5. https://phthiraptera.myspecies.info/sites/phthiraptera.info/files/41865.pdf
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020751994901953
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6160787/
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322857795_Bird_Lice_Mallophaga_Philopteridae_Menoponidae_of_Domestic_Pigeons_on_Specialized_Pigeon_Breeding_Farms_in_Poltava
  9. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1053820/full
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386420517_COSPECIATION_PATTERNS_OF_TWO_GROUPS_OF_CHEWING_LICE_INSECTA_PHTHIRAPTERA_ISCHNOCERA_AND_AMBLYCERA_INFESTING_ASIAN_SONGBIRDS_AVES_PASSERIFORMES
  11. https://wwv.inhs.illinois.edu/files/3313/4151/7290/Zool.Scripta.2003.pdf
  12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-024-03006-5
  13. https://darwin.biology.utah.edu/PDFs/chewingliceworld.pdf
  14. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/poultry/ectoparasites/lice-of-poultry
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8022949/
  16. https://arthropod-systematics.arphahub.com/article/63975/
  17. https://darwin.biology.utah.edu/PDFs/14.pdf
  18. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2533751100
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224420301012
  20. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/all-topics-z/disease-vectors/facts/factsheet-lice-phthiraptera
  21. https://darwin.biology.utah.edu/PDFs/Bush99.pdf
  22. https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/lice-12304/
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3277435
  24. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4ac8/0c6e7176b4a5c4bdc755b20121dd2cff8174.pdf
  25. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IG140
  26. https://www.veterinaryentomology.org/chicken-lice
  27. https://extension.entm.purdue.edu/4h/default.php?page=15
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28547687/
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324177406_Feeding_and_reproductive_behaviour_of_pigeon_slender_louse_Columbicola_columbae_Phthiraptera_Insecta_Ischnocera
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0020751908004062
  31. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10474784
  32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37129982/
  33. https://resjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/een.13416
  34. https://academic.oup.com/g3journal/article/11/2/jkab009/6114464
  35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4158819
  36. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12150
  37. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/9/1442
  38. http://research.amnh.org/users/rfr/Clayton.pdf
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405939025001157
  40. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2017.0196
  41. https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7007-10-52
  42. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/14/2/77
  43. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.3005
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250930230_Pathogenic_involvement_of_Mallophaga
  45. https://www.merckvetmanual.com/integumentary-system/lice/overview-of-lice-in-animals
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381316080_Differential_Effects_of_Chewing_Lice_on_Body_Condition_across_Host_Age_and_Sex_in_Rough-legged_Hawks_Buteo_lagopus
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348355215_Population_Dynamics_of_Chewing_Lice_Phthiraptera_Infesting_Birds_Aves
  48. https://www.wattagnet.com/egg/cage-free-laying-systems/news/15681778/cagefree-layers-more-likely-to-have-lice
  49. https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/farming/poultry-pest-management/
  50. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20183230762
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224423000494
  52. https://www.msdvetmanual.com/poultry/ectoparasites/lice-of-poultry
  53. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/norfli/cur/demography
  54. https://www.getstronganimals.com/post/managing-mites-lice-with-coop-recuperate
  55. https://www.veterinary-practice.com/article/preventing-avian-parasites
  56. http://extension.msstate.edu/publications/control-external-parasites-poultry
  57. https://elkovet.com/blog/poultry-lice-and-mites/
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10611074/
  59. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/oik.10746
  60. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx/article/coextinct-and-critically-coendangered-species-of-parasitic-lice-and-conservationinduced-extinction-should-lice-be-reintroduced-to-their-hosts/5C98C967427998D830D051AB3148E4CD
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.