Hubbry Logo
FoamFoamMain
Open search
Foam
Community hub
Foam
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Foam
Foam
from Wikipedia

Top of a foamy drink

Foams are two-phase material systems where a gas is dispersed in a second, non-gaseous material, specifically, in which gas cells are enclosed by a distinct liquid or solid material.[1]: 6 [2]: 4 [3] Foam "may contain more or less liquid [or solid] according to circumstances",[1]: 6  although in the case of gas-liquid foams, the gas occupies most of the volume.[2]: 4 

In most foams, the volume of gas is large, with thin films of liquid or solid separating the regions of gas.[4]

Etymology

[edit]

The word derives from Old English fām, from Proto-Germanic *faimaz, ultimately related to Sanskrit phéna.

Structure

[edit]
Order and disorder of bubbles in a surface foam

One scale is the bubble: material foams are typically disordered and have a variety of bubble sizes.[5] At larger sizes, the study of idealized foams is closely linked to the mathematical problems of minimal surfaces and three-dimensional tessellations, also called honeycombs.[citation needed] The Weaire–Phelan structure is reported in one primary philosophical source to be the best possible (optimal) unit cell of a perfectly ordered foam,[6][better source needed] while Plateau's laws describe how soap-films form structures in foams.[7]

Foams are examples of dispersed media. In general, gas is present, so it divides into gas bubbles of different sizes (i.e., the material is polydisperse)—separated by liquid regions that may form films, thinner and thinner when the liquid phase drains out of the system films.[8][page needed] When the principal scale is small, i.e., for a very fine foam, this dispersed medium can be considered a type of colloid.[not verified in body]

Formation

[edit]

Several conditions are needed to produce foam: there must be mechanical work, surface active components (surfactants) that reduce the surface tension, and the formation of foam faster than its breakdown. To create foam, work (W) is needed to increase the surface area (ΔA):

where γ is the surface tension.

One of the ways foam is created is through dispersion, where a large amount of gas is mixed with a liquid. A more specific method of dispersion involves injecting a gas through a hole in a solid into a liquid. If this process is completed very slowly, then one bubble can be emitted from the orifice at a time as shown in the picture below.

One of the theories for determining the separation time is shown below; however, while this theory produces theoretical data that matches the experimental data, detachment due to capillarity is accepted as a better explanation.

Rising bubble from orifice

The buoyancy force acts to raise the bubble, which is

where is the volume of the bubble, is the acceleration due to gravity, and ρ1 is the density of the gas ρ2 is the density of the liquid. The force working against the buoyancy force is the surface tension force, which is

,

where γ is the surface tension, and is the radius of the orifice. As more air is pushed into the bubble, the buoyancy force grows quicker than the surface tension force. Thus, detachment occurs when the buoyancy force is large enough to overcome the surface tension force.

In addition, if the bubble is treated as a sphere with a radius of and the volume is substituted in to the equation above, separation occurs at the moment when

Examining this phenomenon from a capillarity viewpoint for a bubble that is being formed very slowly, it can be assumed that the pressure inside is constant everywhere. The hydrostatic pressure in the liquid is designated by . The change in pressure across the interface from gas to liquid is equal to the capillary pressure; hence,

where R1 and R2 are the radii of curvature and are set as positive. At the stem of the bubble, R3 and R4 are the radii of curvature also treated as positive. Here the hydrostatic pressure in the liquid has to take into account z, the distance from the top to the stem of the bubble. The new hydrostatic pressure at the stem of the bubble is p0(ρ1ρ2)z. The hydrostatic pressure balances the capillary pressure, which is shown below:

Finally, the difference in the top and bottom pressure equals the change in hydrostatic pressure:

At the stem of the bubble, the shape of the bubble is nearly cylindrical; consequently, either R3 or R4 is large while the other radius of curvature is small. As the stem of the bubble grows in length, it becomes more unstable as one of the radius grows and the other shrinks. At a certain point, the vertical length of the stem exceeds the circumference of the stem and due to the buoyancy forces the bubble separates and the process repeats.[9]

Stability

[edit]

Stabilization

[edit]
Marangoni effect of a film
Marangoni effect of a film (2)

The stabilization of foam is caused by van der Waals forces between the molecules in the foam, electrical double layers created by dipolar surfactants, and the Marangoni effect, which acts as a restoring force to the lamellae.

The Marangoni effect depends on the liquid that is foaming being impure. Generally, surfactants in the solution decrease the surface tension. The surfactants also clump together on the surface and form a layer as shown below.

For the Marangoni effect to occur, the foam must be indented as shown in the first picture. This indentation increases the local surface area. Surfactants have a larger diffusion time than the bulk of the solution—so the surfactants are less concentrated in the indentation.

Also, surface stretching makes the surface tension of the indented spot greater than the surrounding area. Consequentially—since the diffusion time for the surfactants is large—the Marangoni effect has time to take place. The difference in surface tension creates a gradient, which instigates fluid flow from areas of lower surface tension to areas of higher surface tension. The second picture shows the film at equilibrium after the Marangoni effect has taken place.[10]

Curing a foam solidifies it, making it indefinitely stable at STP.[11]

Destabilization

[edit]

Witold Rybczynski and Jacques Hadamard developed an equation to calculate the velocity of bubbles that rise in foam with the assumption that the bubbles are spherical with a radius .

with velocity in units of centimeters per second. ρ1 and ρ2 is the density for a gas and liquid respectively in units of g/cm3 and ῃ1 and ῃ2 is the dynamic viscosity of the gas and liquid respectively in units of g/cm·s and g is the acceleration of gravity in units of cm/s2.

However, since the density and viscosity of a liquid is much greater than the gas, the density and viscosity of the gas can be neglected, which yields the new equation for velocity of bubbles rising as:

However, through experiments it has been shown that a more accurate model for bubbles rising is:

Deviations are due to the Marangoni effect and capillary pressure, which affect the assumption that the bubbles are spherical. For laplace pressure of a curved gas liquid interface, the two principal radii of curvature at a point are R1 and R2.[12] With a curved interface, the pressure in one phase is greater than the pressure in another phase. The capillary pressure Pc is given by the equation of:

,

where is the surface tension. The bubble shown below is a gas (phase 1) in a liquid (phase 2) and point A designates the top of the bubble while point B designates the bottom of the bubble.

Bubble for hydrostatic pressure

At the top of the bubble at point A, the pressure in the liquid is assumed to be p0 as well as in the gas. At the bottom of the bubble at point B, the hydrostatic pressure is:

where ρ1 and ρ2 is the density for a gas and liquid respectively. The difference in hydrostatic pressure at the top of the bubble is 0, while the difference in hydrostatic pressure at the bottom of the bubble across the interface is gz(ρ2ρ1). Assuming that the radii of curvature at point A are equal and denoted by RA and that the radii of curvature at point B are equal and denoted by RB, then the difference in capillary pressure between point A and point B is:

At equilibrium, the difference in capillary pressure must be balanced by the difference in hydrostatic pressure. Hence,

Since, the density of the gas is less than the density of the liquid the left hand side of the equation is always positive. Therefore, the inverse of RA must be larger than the RB. Meaning that from the top of the bubble to the bottom of the bubble the radius of curvature increases. Therefore, without neglecting gravity the bubbles cannot be spherical. In addition, as z increases, this causes the difference in RA and RB too, which means the bubble deviates more from its shape the larger it grows.[9]

Foam destabilization occurs for several reasons. First, gravitation causes drainage of liquid to the foam base, which Rybczynski and Hadamar include in their theory; however, foam also destabilizes due to osmotic pressure causes drainage from the lamellas to the Plateau borders due to internal concentration differences in the foam, and Laplace pressure causes diffusion of gas from small to large bubbles due to pressure difference. In addition, films can break under disjoining pressure, These effects can lead to rearrangement of the foam structure at scales larger than the bubbles, which may be individual (T1 process) or collective (even of the "avalanche" type).

Mechanical properties

[edit]

Liquid foams

[edit]

Solid foams

[edit]

In closed-cell foam, the gas forms discrete pockets, each completely surrounded by the solid material. In open-cell foam, gas pockets connect to each other. Solid foams, both open-cell and closed-cell, are considered as a sub-class of cellular structures. They often have lower nodal connectivity[jargon] as compared to other cellular structures like honeycombs and truss lattices, and thus, their failure mechanism is dominated by bending of members. Low nodal connectivity and the resulting failure mechanism ultimately lead to their lower mechanical strength and stiffness compared to honeycombs and truss lattices.[13][14]

The strength of foams can be impacted by the density, the material used, and the arrangement of the cellular structure (open vs closed and pore isotropy).[citation needed] To characterize the mechanical properties of foams, compressive stress-strain curves are used to measure their strength and ability to absorb energy since this is an important factor in foam based technologies.[citation needed]

Elastomeric foam

[edit]

For elastomeric cellular solids, as the foam is compressed, first it behaves elastically as the cell walls bend, then as the cell walls buckle there is yielding and breakdown of the material until finally the cell walls crush together and the material ruptures.[15] This is seen in a stress-strain curve as a steep linear elastic regime, a linear regime with a shallow slope after yielding (plateau stress), and an exponentially increasing regime. The stiffness of the material can be calculated from the linear elastic regime [16] where the modulus for open celled foams can be defined by the equation:

Schematic stress-strain curve of an elastomeric foam, demonstrating the three regions which are linear elastic, cell-wall buckling, and cell-wall fracture, where the area under the curve specified represents the energy per unit volume the foam can absorb.[citation needed]

where is the modulus of the solid component, is the modulus of the honeycomb structure, is a constant having a value close to one, is the density of the honeycomb structure, and is the density of the solid. The elastic modulus for closed cell foams can be described similarly by:

where the only difference is the exponent in the density dependence. However, in real materials, a closed-cell foam has more material at the cell edges which makes it more closely follow the equation for open-cell foams.[17] The ratio of the density of the honeycomb structure compared with the solid structure has a large impact on the modulus of the material. Overall, foam strength increases with density of the cell and stiffness of the matrix material.

Energy of deformation

[edit]

Another important property which can be deduced from the stress strain curve is the energy that the foam is able to absorb. The area under the curve (specified to be before rapid densification at the peak stress), represents the energy in the foam in units of energy per unit volume. The maximum energy stored by the foam prior to rupture is described by the equation:[15]

This equation is derived from assuming an idealized foam with engineering approximations from experimental results. Most energy absorption occurs at the plateau stress region after the steep linear elastic regime.[citation needed]

Directional dependence

[edit]

The isotropy of the cellular structure and the absorption of fluids can also have an impact on the mechanical properties of a foam. If there is anisotropy present, then the materials response to stress will be directionally dependent, and thus the stress-strain curve, modulus, and energy absorption will vary depending on the direction of applied force.[18] Also, open-cell structures which have connected pores can allow water or other liquids to flow through the structure, which can also affect the rigidity and energy absorption capabilities.[19]

Differences between liquid and solid foams

[edit]

Theories regarding foam formation, structure, and properties—in physics and physical chemistry—differ somewhat between liquid and solid foams in that the former are dynamic (e.g., in their being "continuously deformed"), as a result of gas diffusing between cells, liquid draining from the foam into a bulk liquid, etc.[1]: 1–2  Theories regarding liquid foams have as direct analogs theories regarding emulsions,[1]: 3  two-phase material systems in which one liquid is enclosed by another.[20]

Examples

[edit]
Cleaning sponge
  • Bath sponge - A bath sponge is an example of an open-cell foam; water easily flows through the entire structure, displacing the air.
  • The head on a glass of beer
  • Soap foam[21] (also known as suds)
  • Sleeping mat - A sleeping mat is an example of a product composed of closed-cell foam.

Foam can also refer to something that is analogous to foam, such as quantum foam.

Applications

[edit]
Soap foam bubbles

Liquid foams

[edit]

Liquid foams can be used in fire retardant foam, such as those that are used in extinguishing fires, especially oil fires.[citation needed]

The dough of leavened bread has traditionally been understood as a closed-cell foam—yeast causing bread to rise via tiny bubbles of gas that become the bread pores—where the cells do not connect with each other. Cutting the dough releases the gas in the bubbles that are cut, but the gas in the rest of the dough cannot escape.[citation needed] When dough is allowed to rise too far, it becomes an open-cell foam, in which the gas pockets are connected; cutting the dough surface at that point would cause a large volume of gas to escape, and the dough to collapse.[citation needed][22] Recent research has indicated that the pore structure in bread is 99% interconnected into one large vacuole, thus the closed-cell foam of the moist dough is transformed into an open cell solid foam in the bread.[23][non-primary source needed]

The unique property of gas-liquid foams having very high specific surface area is exploited in the chemical processes of froth flotation and foam fractionation.[citation needed]

Solid foams

[edit]

Solid foams are a class of lightweight cellular engineering materials. These foams are typically classified into two types based on their pore structure: open-cell-structured foams (also known as reticulated foams) and closed-cell foams. At high enough cell resolutions, any type can be treated as continuous or "continuum" materials and are referred to as cellular solids,[24] with predictable mechanical properties.

An open-cell metal foam

Open-cell foams can be used to filter air. For example, a foam embedded with catalyst has been shown to catalytically convert formaldehyde to benign substances when formaldehyde polluted air passes through the open cell structure.[25]

Open-cell-structured foams contain pores that are connected to each other and form an interconnected network that is relatively soft. Open-cell foams fill with whatever gas surrounds them. If filled with air, a relatively good insulator results, but, if the open cells fill with water, insulation properties would be reduced. Recent studies have put the focus on studying the properties of open-cell foams as an insulator material. Wheat gluten/TEOS bio-foams have been produced, showing similar insulator properties as for those foams obtained from oil-based resources.[26] Foam rubber is a type of open-cell foam.

A closed-cell metal foam

Closed-cell foams do not have interconnected pores. The closed-cell foams normally have higher compressive strength due to their structures. However, closed-cell foams are also, in general more dense, require more material, and as a consequence are more expensive to produce. The closed cells can be filled with a specialized gas to provide improved insulation. The closed-cell structure foams have higher dimensional stability, low moisture absorption coefficients, and higher strength compared to open-cell-structured foams. All types of foam are widely used as core material in sandwich-structured composite materials.

The earliest known engineering use of cellular solids is with wood, which in its dry form is a closed-cell foam composed of lignin, cellulose, and air. From the early 20th century, various types of specially manufactured solid foams came into use. The low density of these foams makes them excellent as thermal insulators and flotation devices and their lightness and compressibility make them ideal as packing materials and stuffings.

An example of the use of azodicarbonamide[27] as a blowing agent is found in the manufacture of vinyl (PVC) and EVA-PE foams, where it plays a role in the formation of air bubbles by breaking down into gas at high temperature.[28][29][30]

The random or "stochastic" geometry of these foams makes them good for energy absorption, as well. In the late 20th century to early 21st century, new manufacturing techniques have allowed for geometry that results in excellent strength and stiffness per weight. These new materials are typically referred to as engineered cellular solids.[24]

Syntactic foam

[edit]

Integral skin foam

[edit]

Integral skin foam, also known as self-skin foam, is a type of foam with a high-density skin and a low-density core. It can be formed in an open-mold process or a closed-mold process. In the open-mold process, two reactive components are mixed and poured into an open mold. The mold is then closed and the mixture is allowed to expand and cure. Examples of items produced using this process include arm rests, baby seats, shoe soles, and mattresses. The closed-mold process, more commonly known as reaction injection molding (RIM), injects the mixed components into a closed mold under high pressures.[31]

[edit]

Foam scales and properties

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Foam is a colloidal dispersion of gas bubbles within a continuous or phase, where the gas typically ranges from 0.5 to 0.99, resulting in a lightweight, multiphase structure often stabilized by to minimize bubble coalescence and drainage. This configuration imparts foams with unique physical characteristics, such as opacity due to light by disordered bubble packing and the ability to behave like a gas (expandable with or ), a (flowable without rupture), or a (elastic under shear). In foams, bubbles are separated by thin surfactant-laden films and Plateau borders—curved channels where three films meet—while foams form when the phase gels or solidifies, preserving the cellular architecture. Foams are broadly classified by their continuous phase and cellular morphology: liquid foams (gas in liquid, transient and used in processes like ) versus solid foams (gas in solid, permanent and engineered for durability); within these, open-cell structures feature interconnected pores allowing fluid transport, while closed-cell types have isolated bubbles for impermeability and strength. Polymeric foams, such as or rubber-based variants, dominate industrial use due to tunable properties via foaming agents (e.g., releasing gas) and processing methods like supercritical CO₂ expansion. Key properties include low (often <0.1 g/cm³), enabling high specific strength; thermal conductivity as low as 0.01–0.03 W/(m·K) from gas-phase dominance; and viscoelastic behavior for energy dissipation, governed by principles like Laplace's law (ΔP = 2σ/r for spherical bubbles, where σ is surface tension and r is radius). Stability arises from surfactant adsorption reducing interfacial tension (e.g., from 73 mN/m in water to ~30 mN/m at critical micelle concentration) and electrostatic/steric repulsion between films, though challenges like coarsening (gas diffusion to larger bubbles) and drainage limit longevity. Notable applications leverage these attributes across sectors: in materials engineering, closed-cell polymeric foams provide thermal insulation in buildings and appliances, while open-cell variants absorb impacts in automotive bumpers and protective gear; biomedical uses include scaffolds for tissue engineering and hemostatic agents due to biocompatibility and porosity; acoustics and vibration control employ rubber foams (e.g., natural rubber with fine cells) for soundproofing in electronics and vehicles; and specialized roles extend to electromagnetic interference shielding via conductive fillers like graphene in silicone foams. Recent advancements focus on sustainable biobased foams from renewable polymers, enhancing environmental compatibility without compromising performance in insulation or cushioning. Overall, foams' versatility stems from their hierarchical structure, making them indispensable in modern engineering and daily products.

Fundamentals

Etymology

The term "foam" originates from Old English fām, denoting froth, scum on a liquid, or saliva, which itself derives from Proto-Germanic *faimaz and ultimately from the Proto-Indo-European root (s)poi-mo-, connoting foam or froth. This root reflects early observations of bubbly aggregates on water surfaces, such as sea froth, and appears in related Germanic languages, including Old High German feim. Cognates appear in other Indo-European languages, including Latin spūma for foam or scum, also tracing to the same Proto-Indo-European (s)poi-mo-, and Ancient Greek aphrós, meaning sea foam or froth. The Greek term gained mythological significance in Hesiod's Theogony, where Aphrodite emerges from sea foam (aphrós), symbolizing her birth from the severed genitals of Uranus cast into the sea, thus linking the word to concepts of creation and beauty in classical lore. In scientific contexts, "foam" evolved from descriptive 17th-century natural philosophy to denote multiphase systems, with early studies by Robert Boyle and Robert Hooke examining soap films and their optical properties in works like Hooke's Micrographia (1665). By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the term entered chemistry and physics more formally, describing colloidal dispersions of gas in liquids or solids, and in the 1920s, it extended to materials science with the development of polymeric foams like latex rubber. Today, "foam" encompasses engineered cellular materials in fields from aerospace to biomedicine, retaining its core etymological sense of frothy dispersion.

Definition and Classification

Foam is defined as a colloidal dispersion in which gas bubbles form the dispersed phase within a continuous liquid or solid matrix. This structure distinguishes foams from other colloidal systems, as the gas phase imparts unique properties such as low density and high compressibility. Typically, foams exhibit gas volume fractions exceeding 0.74 for polydisperse bubble distributions, reflecting the close packing of bubbles beyond the random close-packing limit. Foams are primarily classified based on the nature of the continuous phase into liquid foams and solid foams. Liquid foams consist of gas bubbles dispersed in a liquid medium and are generally metastable, draining and coarsening over time to eventually collapse; examples include soap bubbles and whipped cream. In contrast, solid foams feature gas bubbles embedded in a solidified matrix, rendering them stable and permanent structures suitable for long-term applications, such as polyurethane insulation materials. Within solid foams, further classification distinguishes between closed-cell and open-cell types based on bubble interconnectivity. Closed-cell foams have isolated gas pockets sealed by solid walls, providing superior buoyancy and thermal insulation due to trapped air; common examples include polystyrene foams. Open-cell foams, however, feature interconnected voids that allow fluid permeation, resulting in higher flexibility and sound absorption, as seen in reticulated polyurethane foams. This classification sets foams apart from related colloids like emulsions, which disperse one liquid phase in another (e.g., oil in water), or aerosols, which suspend liquid or solid particles in a gas (e.g., mist in air), with the key difference being the gaseous dispersed phase in foams.

Structure and Formation

Microstructure

In liquid foams, the microstructure consists of polyhedral bubbles separated by thin liquid films, with the liquid primarily concentrated in channels known as Plateau borders and at vertices where multiple borders intersect. These Plateau borders form along the edges where three thin films meet, creating a network that supports the foam's architecture at microscopic scales. In dry liquid foams, where the liquid fraction is low (typically below 0.36), the bubbles adopt irregular polyhedral shapes, approximating space-filling arrangements like those in soap froths. Plateau's laws govern the ideal geometry of this microstructure to minimize surface energy: three films meet symmetrically at 120° angles along each Plateau border, and four Plateau borders converge at vertices with angles of approximately 109.47°, equivalent to the tetrahedral angle cos1(1/3)\cos^{-1}(-1/3). These geometric constraints arise from the equilibrium configurations observed in soap films and are fundamental to understanding the mesoscopic scale of foam interfaces. Key parameters characterizing the microstructure include the bubble size distribution, which describes the range and frequency of bubble volumes or diameters within the foam, often measured via imaging techniques to assess uniformity. The polydispersity index (PDI), defined as the normalized standard deviation of bubble sizes (PDI = σ/dˉ\sigma / \bar{d}, where σ\sigma is the standard deviation and dˉ\bar{d} is the mean diameter), quantifies this variation; low PDI values indicate near-monodisperse foams, while higher values reflect broader distributions typical in real systems. The surface-to-volume ratio, a measure of interfacial area per unit volume (often normalized as β=S/(36πV2)1/3\beta = S / (36\pi V^2)^{1/3} for equivalent spheres), is particularly high in fine-bubbled foams and influences properties like stability and transport. In solid foams, the microstructure features solid cell structures derived from solidified liquid foam templates or direct processing, with open-cell variants consisting of interconnected voids supported by solid struts forming a skeletal network, and closed-cell variants enclosing isolated voids within thin solid membranes. Open-cell foams exhibit high permeability due to their strut-based architecture, while closed-cell foams provide better barrier properties from the intact membranes. Packing can be random, with irregular cell distributions common in processed metallic or polymeric foams, or ordered, as in engineered structures with uniform polyhedral cells for optimized performance.

Formation Processes

Foams are formed through the introduction and dispersion of gas into a liquid or solid matrix, creating a multiphase structure of bubbles. For liquid foams, the primary mechanisms involve gas injection techniques that promote bubble nucleation and initial growth, often facilitated by surfactants that reduce surface tension. These processes differ from those in solid foams, where gas generation occurs within a polymer melt or precursor, leading to expansion during solidification. In liquid foam formation, gas is typically introduced via methods such as whipping or sparging. Whipping entails mechanical agitation, such as using blenders, to entrain air at the liquid's free surface, generating bubbles ranging from tens of micrometers to millimeters in size through shear-induced breakup. Sparging, on the other hand, involves injecting gas through orifices or porous media like sintered glass discs, where bubbles detach due to buoyancy or shear forces, with sizes between 0.1 and 10 mm depending on flow rate and pore diameter. Nucleation sites, such as impurities or pre-existing gas cavities on solid surfaces, play a crucial role by lowering the energy barrier for heterogeneous nucleation, enabling bubble formation at lower supersaturations compared to homogeneous nucleation. Surfactants are essential in these processes, as they adsorb at the gas-liquid interface to lower surface tension (σ), thereby reducing the pressure required to form and expand bubbles according to the Young-Laplace equation: ΔP=2σr\Delta P = \frac{2\sigma}{r} where ΔP\Delta P is the pressure difference across the interface, σ\sigma is the surface tension, and rr is the bubble radius. This equation illustrates how decreased σ\sigma facilitates smaller bubble formation and easier dispersion. Solid foams, particularly polymeric ones, are created using techniques that generate gas within the material to induce expansion. Mechanical frothing incorporates air directly into a polymer resin through high-shear stirring, followed by curing or solidification to lock in the bubble structure, offering a simple, agent-free approach suitable for resins like epoxy or polypropylene. Chemical blowing agents, such as sodium bicarbonate, decompose thermally within the polymer melt to release gases like CO₂, nucleating bubbles that grow as the material expands; this method is widely used for foams from polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, and polyurethane. Physical expansion employs inert gases or supercritical fluids, such as CO₂ or N₂, impregnated into the polymer under pressure, with subsequent heating or pressure reduction triggering gas release and bubble growth, as seen in processes for polystyrene or polylactic acid foams. Initial bubble nucleation and growth in both liquid and solid foams are influenced by factors including viscosity and temperature. Higher liquid viscosity hinders bubble detachment and coalescence during gas injection, reducing nucleation rates and leading to larger, more polydisperse bubbles, while in polymer melts, increased viscosity can suppress excessive growth for finer cell structures. Temperature affects these dynamics by altering gas solubility, surface tension, and viscosity; elevated temperatures generally enhance nucleation by decreasing viscosity and increasing gas diffusion rates, though excessive heat may promote over-expansion in solid foams. These factors determine the initial bubble size distribution, which briefly influences the resulting microstructure, such as polyhedral bubble shapes in dense foams.

Stability

Stabilization Mechanisms

In liquid foams, surfactants play a crucial role in stabilizing the thin liquid films between bubbles by reducing surface tension and generating interfacial tension gradients through the Gibbs-Marangoni effect. This effect arises when a disturbance thins a film, causing surfactants to diffuse from areas of higher concentration to lower ones, thereby increasing local surface tension and inducing a restoring flow that opposes further thinning. Similarly, the Gibbs elasticity, which quantifies the film's resistance to deformation via surface tension variations, enhances stability by providing mechanical resilience to the interface. Proteins contribute to foam stabilization by forming viscoelastic adsorbed layers at the air-water interface, which resist deformation through elastic recovery and internal cohesion rather than purely diffusive mechanisms. These layers, often derived from globular proteins like whey or ovalbumin, unfold partially upon adsorption, creating a tangled network that imparts rigidity to the films and slows drainage. In contrast to surfactants, proteins provide longer-lasting stability in systems like food foams due to their slower desorption kinetics. For solid foams, such as polymeric or ceramic varieties, stabilization involves rigidifying the cell walls post-formation through cross-linking of polymers, which increases melt viscosity and prevents bubble coalescence during expansion. Sintering fuses solid particles at elevated temperatures to form durable struts, enhancing structural integrity, while incorporation of fillers like microspheres in syntactic foams reinforces walls against collapse. Drainage resistance in these foams, particularly in semi-solid states, can be modeled using an adaptation of Darcy's law for porous media: v=kμP\mathbf{v} = -\frac{k}{\mu} \nabla P where v\mathbf{v} is the drainage velocity, kk is the foam permeability, μ\mu is the liquid viscosity, and P\nabla P is the pressure gradient driving flow. This equation highlights how higher viscosity or lower permeability—achieved via cross-linking or fillers—reduces drainage rates, thereby extending foam lifetime. Environmental factors significantly influence foam stability duration by modulating interfacial properties and kinetics. Adjusting pH alters protein charge and solubility; for instance, near the isoelectric point, reduced electrostatic repulsion leads to denser interfacial layers and improved stability in protein-stabilized foams. Ionic strength affects electrostatic interactions, with moderate salt concentrations screening charges to promote adsorption and film thickening, though excessive levels can induce coalescence. Temperature impacts stability by influencing viscosity and surfactant/protein mobility; higher temperatures accelerate drainage via reduced viscosity but can enhance stability if they promote cross-linking or optimal adsorption rates.

Destabilization Factors

Foam destabilization refers to the physical processes that lead to the breakdown of foam structure over time, primarily through the loss of liquid phase, bubble merging, or gas diffusion. These mechanisms are driven by thermodynamic instability, as foams possess high interfacial energy that favors minimization through collapse. The primary destabilization factors include drainage, coarsening via , coalescence, and external influences such as mechanical vibrations, temperature variations, and antifoaming agents. Drainage is a key mechanism where gravity induces the flow of liquid from the foam's thin films into the Plateau borders, which are the curved channels at the edges of polyhedral cells formed by intersecting films. This process reduces the liquid fraction, thinning films and increasing the likelihood of rupture. In wet foams, drainage often follows Poiseuille-like flow in these borders, with velocity depending on border geometry and surfactant properties; for instance, rigid interfaces limit slip, slowing drainage compared to mobile ones. Coarsening occurs through Ostwald ripening, where gas diffuses from smaller bubbles to larger ones across the intervening liquid due to differences in Laplace pressure, leading to an overall increase in average bubble size. This diffusion-driven process is prominent in foams with soluble gases like air in aqueous systems, where the average bubble radius grows proportional to the cube root of time (t^{1/3}), as described by the Lifshitz–Slyozov–Wagner theory, and the rate is influenced by gas solubility and interfacial tension. Coalescence involves the rupture of thin liquid films separating adjacent bubbles, allowing them to merge and form larger bubbles. Film instability arises from thermal fluctuations or van der Waals forces, initiating a hole that expands rapidly. The retraction velocity of the film's rim follows the Taylor-Culick law, given by v=2σρhv = \sqrt{\frac{2\sigma}{\rho h}}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.