Hubbry Logo
GattacaGattacaMain
Open search
Gattaca
Community hub
Gattaca
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gattaca
Gattaca
Gattaca
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Gattaca
Theatrical release poster
Directed byAndrew Niccol
Written byAndrew Niccol
Produced by
Starring
CinematographySławomir Idziak
Edited byLisa Zeno Churgin
Music byMichael Nyman
Production
companies
Distributed bySony Pictures Releasing
Release date
  • October 24, 1997 (1997-10-24) (United States)
Running time
106 minutes[1]
CountryUnited States
Languages
  • English
  • Esperanto
Budget$36 million[2]
Box office$12.5 million (domestic only)[3]

Gattaca is a 1997 American dystopian science fiction film written and directed by Andrew Niccol in his feature directorial debut. It stars Ethan Hawke and Uma Thurman with Jude Law, Loren Dean, Ernest Borgnine, Gore Vidal, and Alan Arkin appearing in supporting roles.[4] The film presents a future society driven by eugenics where children are conceived through genetic selection to ensure they possess the best hereditary traits of their parents.[5] The principal character, Vincent Freeman, played by Hawke, was conceived outside the eugenics program and struggles to overcome genetic discrimination to realize his dream of going into space.

The film draws on concerns over reproductive technologies that facilitate eugenics, and the possible consequences of such technological developments for society. It also explores the idea of destiny and the ways in which it can and does govern lives. Characters in Gattaca continually battle both with society and with themselves to find their place in the world and who they are destined to be according to their genes.

The film's title is based on the letters G, A, T, and C, which stand for guanine, adenine, thymine, and cytosine, the four nucleobases of DNA. It was a 1997 nominee for the Academy Award for Best Art Direction and the Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score. A follow-up series was in development at Showtime, but has been cancelled as of 2023.[6]

Plot

[edit]

In the "not-too-distant" future, eugenics is common. A genetic registry database uses biometrics to classify those so created as "valids" while those conceived naturally and more susceptible to genetic disorders are known as "in-valids". Genetic discrimination is illegal, but in practice genotype profiling is used to identify valids to qualify for professional employment while in-valids are relegated to menial jobs.

Vincent Freeman was conceived naturally, and his genetic profile indicates a high probability of several disorders and an estimated lifespan of 30.2 years. His parents, regretting their decision, use genetic selection in conceiving their second child, Anton Jr. Growing up, the two brothers often play a game of "chicken" by swimming out to sea as far as possible, with the first one returning to shore considered the loser; Vincent always loses. Vincent dreams of a career in space travel, but is always reminded of his genetic inferiority. One day, Vincent challenges Anton to a game of chicken and beats him. Anton starts to drown and is saved by Vincent. Shortly after, Vincent leaves home.

Years later, Vincent works cleaning office spaces, including that of spaceflight conglomerate Gattaca Aerospace Corporation. He gets a chance to pose as a valid by using donated hair, skin, blood, and urine samples from former swimming star Jerome Eugene Morrow, who was paralyzed after being hit by a car. With Jerome's genetic makeup, Vincent gains employment at Gattaca and is assigned as a navigator for an upcoming mission to Saturn's moon Titan. To conceal his identity, Vincent must meticulously groom and scrub down daily to remove his own genetic material, pass daily DNA scanning and urine tests using Jerome's samples, and hide his heart defect.

When a Gattaca administrator is murdered a week before a possible launch, the police find one of Vincent's eyelashes near the crime scene, but can only identify it as from an "unregistered" in-valid, and thus launch an investigation to find who owns the eyelash. During this, Vincent becomes close to a co-worker, Irene Cassini, and falls in love with her. Though a valid, Irene has a higher risk of heart failure that will bar her from any deep space mission. Vincent also learns that Jerome's paralysis is self-inflicted; after placing silver in the Olympics, Jerome threw himself in front of a car. Jerome maintains that he was designed to be the best, yet somehow wasn't, and is suffering because of this.

Vincent repeatedly evades the grasp of the investigation. Finally, it is revealed that Gattaca's mission director Josef killed the administrator because he threatened to cancel the mission. Vincent learns that the detective who closed the case was his brother Anton, who consequently has discovered Vincent's presence. The brothers meet, and Anton warns Vincent about his illegal actions, but Vincent asserts that he has gotten to this position on his own merits. Anton challenges Vincent to a final game of chicken. As the two swim out at night, Vincent's stamina surprises Anton, so Vincent reveals that he won by not saving energy for the swim back. Anton turns back and begins to drown, but Vincent rescues him and swims them back to shore.

On the day of the launch, Jerome reveals that he has stored enough DNA samples for Vincent to last two lifetimes upon his return and gives him an envelope to open once in flight. After saying goodbye to Irene, Vincent prepares to board, but discovers there is a final genetic test, and he currently lacks any of Jerome's samples. He is surprised when Dr. Lamar, who oversees background checks, reveals that he knows Vincent has been posing as a valid. Lamar admits that his son looks up to Vincent and wonders whether his son, who is genetically selected, but "not all that they promised", could exceed his potential just as Vincent has. The doctor changes the test results, allowing Vincent to pass.

As the rocket launches, Jerome dons his swimming medal and immolates himself in his home's incinerator. Vincent opens the note to find a lock of Jerome's hair.

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]
CLA Building complex
Marin County Civic Center

The film was shot under the working title The Eighth Day, a reference to the seven days of creation in the Bible. However, by the time its release was scheduled for the fall of 1997, the Belgian film Le huitième jour had already been released in the US under the title The Eighth Day. As a result, the film was retitled Gattaca,[7] which takes inspiration from the letters G, A, T, and C, derived from four of the nucleobases of DNA: guanine, adenine, thymine and cytosine.[8]

Filming

[edit]

The exteriors (including the roof scene) and some of the interior shots of the Gattaca complex were filmed at Frank Lloyd Wright's 1960 Marin County Civic Center in San Rafael, California.[9] The speakers in the complex broadcast announcements in both Esperanto and English; Miko Sloper from the Esperanto League of North America went to the recording studio to handle the Esperanto part.[10]

Design

[edit]

The movie uses a swimming treadmill in the opening minutes to punctuate the swimming and futuristic themes.[11] The production design makes heavy use of retrofuturism; the futuristic electric cars[12] are based on 1960s car models like Rover P6, Citroën DS19 and Studebaker Avanti.[13]

Title sequence

[edit]

The opening title sequence, created by Michael Riley, features closeups of body matter (fingernails and hair), which are later revealed to be from Vincent's daily bodily scourings, hitting the floor accompanied by loud sounds as the objects strike the ground. According to Riley, oversized models of the fingernails and hair were created for the effect.[14]

Music and soundtrack

[edit]
Gattaca: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
Soundtrack album by
Michael Nyman
ReleasedOctober 21, 1997 (1997-10-21)
GenreContemporary classical music, film scores, minimalism
Length54:55
LabelVirgin Records America
ProducerMichael Nyman
Michael Nyman chronology
Concertos
(1997) 		Gattaca: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
(1997) 		The Suit and the Photograph
(1998)
The Other Side
From the Gattaca soundtrack by Michael Nyman
Problems playing this file? See media help.

The score for Gattaca was composed by Michael Nyman, and the original soundtrack was released on October 21, 1997.[15]

Release

[edit]

Box office

[edit]

Gattaca was released in theaters on October 24, 1997, in the United States by Columbia Pictures and opened at number 5 at the box office; trailing I Know What You Did Last Summer, The Devil's Advocate, Kiss the Girls and Seven Years in Tibet.[16] Over the first weekend the film brought in $4.3 million. It ended its theatrical run with a domestic total of $12.5 million against a reported production budget of $36 million.[17]

Home media

[edit]

Gattaca was released on DVD on July 1, 1998,[18] and was also released on Superbit DVD.[19] Special Edition DVD and Blu-ray versions were released on March 11, 2008.[20][21] Both editions contain a deleted scene featuring historical figures like Einstein, Lincoln, etc., who are described as having been genetically deficient.[17]

Gattaca was released on Ultra HD Blu-ray in 2021.[22]

Reception

[edit]

Critical response

[edit]

Gattaca received positive reviews from critics. The film received an approval rating of 82% on Rotten Tomatoes based on 66 reviews, with a rating average of 7.1/10. The site's critical consensus states that "Intelligent and scientifically provocative, Gattaca is an absorbing sci-fi drama that poses important interesting ethical questions about the nature of science."[23] On Metacritic, the film received "generally favorable" reviews with a score of 64 out of 100, based on 20 reviews.[24] Siskel and Ebert gave the film two thumbs up on the October 25, 1997 episode of their program, with Gene Siskel commenting that the film had a "smart script".[25] In his other review for the Chicago Sun-Times, Roger Ebert stated, "This is one of the smartest and most provocative of science fiction films, a thriller with ideas."[26] James Berardinelli praised it for "energy and tautness" and its "thought-provoking script and thematic richness."[27]

Although critically acclaimed, Gattaca was not a box office success, but it is said to have crystallized the debate over the controversial topic of human genetic engineering.[28][29] The film's dystopian depiction of "genoism" has been cited by many bioethicists and laypeople in support of their hesitancy about, or opposition to, eugenics and the societal acceptance of the genetic-determinist ideology that may frame it.[30] In a 1997 review of the film for the journal Nature Genetics, molecular biologist Lee M. Silver stated that "Gattaca is a film that all geneticists should see if for no other reason than to understand the perception of our trade held by so many of the public-at-large".[31]

Accolades

[edit]
Award Category Recipient Result
Academy Awards Best Art Direction Jan Roelfs
Nancy Nye 		Nominated
Art Directors Guild Award Excellence in Production Design Jan Roelfs
Sarah Knowles
Natalie Richards 		Nominated
Bogey Awards Bogey Award Won
Gérardmer Film Festival Special Jury Prize Andrew Niccol Won
Fun Trophy Won
Golden Globe Awards Best Original Score Michael Nyman Nominated
Hugo Awards Best Dramatic Presentation Andrew Niccol Nominated
London Film Critics' Circle Awards Best Screenwriter of the Year Won
Paris Film Festival Grand Prix Nominated
Satellite Awards Best Art Direction and Production Design Jan Roelfs Nominated
Saturn Awards Best Costume Colleen Atwood Nominated
Best Music Michael Nyman Nominated
Best Home Video Release Nominated
Sitges – Catalan International
Film Festival 		Best Motion Picture Andrew Niccol Won
Best Original Soundtrack Michael Nyman Won

Continuation

[edit]

On October 30, 2009, Variety reported that Sony Pictures Television was developing a television adaptation of the feature film as a one-hour police procedural set in the future. The show was to be written by Gil Grant, who has written for 24 and NCIS.[32] A Gattaca television series was revealed to be in development at Sony and Showtime in March 2023. It was intended to take place one generation after the events of the film. Howard Gordon and Alex Gansa were tapped as showrunners, and were also expected to serve as screenwriters alongside Craig Borten. Gordon, Gansa, Glenn Gellar, and actor Danny DeVito (who produced the film) would have served as executive producers.[33] However, in June 2023, Showtime announced that they had abandoned plans to produce the show.[6]

Legacy

[edit]

Influence on In Time

[edit]

Writer-director Andrew Niccol has called his 2011 film In Time a "bastard child of Gattaca".[34][35] Both films feature classic cars in a futuristic dystopia as well as a caste privilege schism which the protagonist challenges and which prejudices the authorities into neglecting a thorough investigation in favor of condemning the protagonist.

Political references

[edit]

U.S. Senator Rand Paul used near-verbatim portions of the plot summary from the English Wikipedia entry on Gattaca in a speech at Liberty University on October 28, 2013, in support of Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's campaign for Governor of Virginia. Paul said that abortion rights advocates are advancing eugenics in a manner similar to the events in Gattaca.[36][37]

Transhumanism

[edit]
Main article: Transhumanism § Socioeconomic effects

In the 2004 democratic transhumanist book Citizen Cyborg, bioethicist James Hughes criticized the premise and influence of the film as fear-mongering, arguing:

  1. Astronaut-training programs are entirely justified in attempting to screen out people with heart problems for safety reasons;
  2. In the United States, people are already screened by insurance companies on the basis of their propensities to disease, for actuarial purposes;
  3. Rather than banning genetic testing or genetic enhancement, society should develop genetic information privacy laws, such as the U.S. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act signed into law on May 21, 2008, that allow justified forms of genetic testing and data aggregation, but forbid those that are judged to result in genetic discrimination. Citizens should then be able to make a complaint to the appropriate authority if they believe they have been discriminated against because of their genotype.[38]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gattaca

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Gattaca is a 1997 American dystopian science fiction film written and directed by Andrew Niccol in his feature directorial debut.
The story centers on Vincent Freeman (played by Ethan Hawke), a man conceived through natural means and deemed genetically inferior in a society where genetic enhancement at conception determines one's opportunities and social standing.
To achieve his dream of space travel, Vincent assumes the identity of Jerome Eugene Morrow (Jude Law), a paralyzed but genetically "valid" elite, enabling him to infiltrate the prestigious Gattaca Aerospace Corporation.
Featuring Uma Thurman as Irene Cassini, a co-worker grappling with her own genetic imperfections, the film explores themes of genetic discrimination, human determination overriding biological predestination, and the ethical perils of eugenics-like practices.
Released on October 24, 1997, by Columbia Pictures, Gattaca had a production budget of approximately $36 million and grossed over $50 million worldwide, achieving modest commercial success despite initial underperformance at the domestic box office.
Critically, it received an 82% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and praise for its intelligent scripting and visual style, with Roger Ebert awarding it 3.5 out of 4 stars for blending thriller elements with philosophical inquiry.
The film earned an Academy Award nomination for Best Art Direction and has since attained cult status, influencing discussions on genetic engineering and bioethics in popular culture.

Narrative Elements

Plot Summary

In a future society stratified by , children are routinely screened and selected for optimal traits, creating a divide between "valids"—those genetically enhanced—and "in-valids" born naturally with potential flaws. Vincent Freeman, conceived without genetic intervention, faces a predicted lifespan of 30.2 years due to conditions like heart defects and , barring him from elite opportunities despite his determination to become an . Growing up in the shadow of his genetically superior brother Anton, Vincent engages in perilous swimming races called "," ultimately surpassing Anton and saving his life, which fuels his resolve to defy genetic destiny. Rejecting a life of subservience, Vincent abandons his family and acquires the identity of Jerome Eugene Morrow, a paralyzed valid elite whose superior genetics allow access to Gattaca Aerospace Corporation, a prestigious space agency. Through rigorous daily regimens—including lending Jerome's blood, urine, skin, and hair samples, wearing contact lenses, lengthening his legs, and scrubbing his body to eliminate in-valid traces—Vincent impersonates Jerome, excelling in simulations and earning a navigator position on a mission to Titan, Saturn's moon. He forms a romantic connection with coworker Irene Cassini, a valid with a minor cardiac imperfection, who admires his apparent perfection but grows suspicious. Tensions escalate when Gattaca's mission director is murdered, triggering a thorough genetic investigation that uncovers an in-valid eyelash—Vincent's—at the scene, heightening scrutiny with mandatory DNA checks. Vincent confronts Anton, now a leading the probe, in another chicken race, winning again to assert his will over . The investigator, Dr. Lamar, reveals he has long known Vincent's secret, motivated by his own in-valid son, and allows the deception to proceed. As Vincent launches into space, Jerome, having secured enough genetic material for Vincent's lifetime, commits by in an incinerator.

Key Characters and Casting

Ethan Hawke stars as Vincent Freeman (also known as Jerome Morrow), the film's protagonist, a "natural" born individual classified as genetically inferior and thus barred from elite space travel opportunities in a eugenics-driven society. Hawke prepared for the role by undergoing intense physical training to depict Vincent's transformation into a seemingly superior "valid" through rigorous discipline and identity assumption. Uma Thurman portrays Irene Cassini, a genetically engineered employee at Gattaca Aerospace Corporation who harbors insecurities about her own imperfect genetic profile and forms a romantic connection with Vincent. Thurman's casting brought a poised vulnerability to the character, contrasting her enhancements with emotional depth. Jude Law plays Jerome Eugene Morrow, a former elite athlete crippled by an accident, who loans his flawless genetic identity and daily biological samples to Vincent in exchange for passive financial support and vicarious fulfillment. Law's performance, marking an early lead role, conveys Jerome's profound disillusionment and alcoholism amid genetic superiority. Supporting roles include as Anton Freeman, Vincent's genetically optimized younger brother and a law enforcement officer who repeatedly challenges Vincent in contests symbolizing their rivalry. appears as Director Josef, the stern overseer of the space mission selection process. embodies Dr. Lamar, the chief medical officer conducting genetic screenings with hidden sympathies. plays Detective Hugo, leading the investigation into a that threatens Vincent's deception.
ActorCharacterRole Highlights
Vincent FreemanProtagonist assuming superior identity
Irene CassiniRomantic interest with genetic doubts
Jerome Eugene MorrowGenetic donor and bitter enabler
Anton FreemanRival brother in law enforcement
Detective HugoInvestigator uncovering the scheme

Production Process

Development and Pre-production

Andrew Niccol conceived and wrote the screenplay for Gattaca, inspired by media reports on , , and emerging that allowed for disease prevention and trait selection in embryos. The narrative explores a "triumph-of-the-human-spirit" arc, where an individual defies societal discrimination rooted in genetic profiling. Originally titled The Eighth Day—a reference to a biblical extension of creation in the story's lore—the project changed names after a Belgian film claimed the title. Jersey Films, led by as with and , backed the production, marking Niccol's feature directorial debut with a $36 million budget. In , Niccol employed a visual method, filling notebooks with drawings to communicate conceptual designs to the art department and emphasize the film's retro-futuristic aesthetic. engaged geneticist French Anderson as a consultant to ground the script's scientific elements in plausible near-future . Location scouting identified Wright's as the exterior for the Gattaca Aerospace Corporation headquarters, chosen for its sweeping, optimistic curves symbolizing engineered perfection. Cinematographer collaborated early to develop a desaturated palette, including a yellow filter for exteriors to evoke an artificial, controlled environment. Public address systems were planned to use , underscoring the society's utopian pretensions.

Filming and Technical Execution

Principal photography for Gattaca occurred from April 22 to July 16, 1996, primarily in California locations to evoke a near-future aesthetic through existing modernist architecture. The Marin County Civic Center, designed by Frank Lloyd Wright, provided exteriors—including the notable roof scene—and select interiors for the Gattaca Aerospace Corporation headquarters, leveraging its sweeping, organic forms to suggest advanced institutional spaces without extensive set construction. Additional filming sites encompassed the Classroom/Laboratory/Administration Building at California Polytechnic University, Pomona, utilized for laboratory and residential scenes, alongside urban Los Angeles venues such as the 2nd Street Tunnel for transitional sequences and panoramic Marin County landscapes for establishing shots. The production employed 35mm film stock, captured with ARRIFLEX and Moviecam cameras in a 2.39:1 anamorphic aspect ratio, prioritizing practical cinematography over digital effects to maintain a grounded, introspective tone. Technical execution emphasized minimal visual effects, with the film's modest budget—under $36 million—favoring location-based shooting and subtle practical enhancements, such as custom prosthetics for genetic identity concealment, to depict genetic surveillance without relying on CGI spectacle.

Design and Aesthetic Choices

The production design of Gattaca adopts a retro-futuristic aesthetic inspired by mid-20th-century , eschewing typical tropes of flashy gadgets in favor of clean, organic forms that evoke engineered sterility and social hierarchy. Principal filming locations included the , a 1960 structure designed by , whose sweeping curves and monumental scale provided interiors that embodied 1950s-era aligned with the film's near-future setting. Production designer Jan Roelfs crafted sets with a museum-like quality, utilizing brutalist elements, earthy tones like greens and yellows, and luminous surfaces to convey a world of precise, impersonal perfection devoid of human warmth. Costume designer drew from 1930s and 1980s menswear, tailoring simple suits and skirt suits in a restrained palette of grays and navies to reflect the elite "valids'" corporate uniformity and the film's minimalist visual restraint. Automobiles in the film incorporate retrofuturist styling, featuring modified classic models like a 1960s-era and a , which blend vintage elegance with subtle aerodynamic tweaks to suggest technological continuity rather than radical innovation.

Score and Sound Design

The score for Gattaca was composed by in a minimalist classical style characterized by flowing, free-floating textures that establish an overarching mood rather than adhering to sharp synchronization with on-screen action. Nyman's work, his first for a Hollywood production, features soft orchestral elements that complement the film's cold, futuristic ambience, with recurring themes for principal characters such as "Irene's Theme" and poignant cues like "The Departure." The original soundtrack album, containing tracks including "The Morrow" and "God's Hands," was released on October 21, 1997, by and earned a Golden Globe nomination for Best Original Score. Critics noted its emotional enhancement of scenes, blending melancholy and hope to underscore themes of human aspiration amid genetic , though it diverges from conventional sci-fi scoring by prioritizing atmospheric subtlety over dramatic swells. Sound design in Gattaca integrates diegetic effects to evoke a sterile, dispassionate dystopia, particularly within the Gattaca Institute, where echoing footsteps and metallic clinks amplify spatial isolation and institutional rigidity. Opening sequences emphasize falling objects—such as hair strands or genetic debris—with amplified, resonant impacts that symbolize vulnerability and imperfection, reinforcing the narrative's focus on biological scrutiny. Non-diegetic audio techniques, including omnipresent orchestral underscoring, heighten tension and reflection without overpowering dialogue, while surround mixes utilize reverb from PA announcements and ambient echoes to expand the auditory field, creating an immersive yet restrained sonic environment. This approach, less energetic in dynamic range but precise in spatial cues, supports the film's visual minimalism and thematic restraint, with later remixes like Dolby Atmos enhancing subtle details such as faint clinking sounds for greater immersion.

Release and Market Performance

Initial Release and Box Office Results

Gattaca was released theatrically on October 24, 1997, distributed by . The film opened on approximately 600 screens, earning $4,320,202 during its first weekend, which placed it in fifth position at the North American . Despite positive critical reception, the film struggled commercially, grossing a domestic total of $12,532,777 over its theatrical run. International earnings added roughly $3.6 million, for a worldwide total under $16.2 million. Produced on a of $36 million, Gattaca failed to recoup its costs theatrically, marking it as a disappointment relative to expectations for a major studio release. This underperformance was attributed in part to competition from higher-profile films and limited marketing emphasis on its cerebral themes over action-oriented spectacle.

Distribution and Home Media

Gattaca was distributed theatrically in the United States by Releasing, with a commencing on October 24, 1997, across 1,279 theaters. International distribution was handled by subsidiaries, though the film's performance was predominantly domestic, accounting for approximately 100% of its worldwide gross. Home video releases began with and DVD editions distributed by Columbia TriStar Home Video in 1998, including a DVD version launched around 30. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment later issued a DVD alongside an initial Blu-ray release on March 11, 2008, featuring remastered visuals and supplemental content. Subsequent high-definition upgrades included a remastered Blu-ray and a 4K edition released on March 23, 2021, in a limited SteelBook packaging, followed by a standard 4K UHD + Blu-ray + digital combo on June 15, 2021, both supporting and audio. The film has been available for digital rental, purchase, and streaming through platforms such as at Home (Vudu).

Contemporary Reception

Critical Evaluations

Gattaca garnered positive critical reception upon its 1997 release, with an aggregate score of 82% on Rotten Tomatoes from 68 reviews, reflecting praise for its intelligent handling of eugenics and discrimination themes, and a critics consensus praising it as an intelligent, provocative sci-fi drama exploring ethical questions about genetic engineering. Critics highlighted the film's taut narrative and visual restraint, avoiding heavy reliance on special effects in favor of character-driven tension. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave it 3.5 out of 4 stars, describing it as "one of the smartest and most provocative of science fiction films, a thriller with ideas" that effectively questions whether human essence lies in genetic perfection or inherent flaws. Janet Maslin in The New York Times lauded it as a "handsome and fully imagined work of cautionary futuristic fiction," commending director Andrew Niccol's extension of contemporary prejudices into a genetically stratified society. Performances received particular acclaim, with Ethan Hawke's portrayal of the determined "invalid" Vincent Freeman noted for conveying quiet resolve against systemic barriers, and Jude Law's Jerome Morrow praised for layering vulnerability into a genetically "perfect" but psychologically broken figure. The film's production design, utilizing real locations to evoke a sterile yet plausible future, was seen as enhancing its realism without extravagant CGI. However, some evaluations pointed to narrative contrivances, such as the improbability of Vincent's sustained amid pervasive genetic , and a deliberate pacing that prioritized philosophical undertones over action. Metacritic aggregated a score of 64 out of 100 from 20 reviews, indicating solid but not unanimous enthusiasm (generally favorable), with detractors occasionally viewing the script as overly didactic in its anti-determinism stance. Audience reception has been stronger, with an 87% Popcornmeter score on Rotten Tomatoes (over 100,000 ratings) and a 7.7/10 user rating on IMDb (over 344,000 ratings). Scientific commentators offered mixed assessments of the film's biological premises. While elements like mirrored emerging technologies of the era, geneticist Lee Silver critiqued the depiction of as near-totally predictive of traits and lifespan, arguing it exaggerated while downplaying gene-environment interactions and biological processes. This portrayal, Silver contended, served the film's moral against "genoism" but veered into unrealistic absolutism, as real genetic screening identifies risks rather than engineering flawless outcomes without trade-offs. Conversely, NASA's commendation of Gattaca as depicting "real science" underscored its grounded on space program selection criteria, aligning with empirical hurdles in like cardiovascular vulnerabilities. Overall, evaluations affirmed the film's enduring in debating causal influences on achievement, privileging empirical over alarmist dystopian tropes.

Awards and Recognitions

Gattaca earned one nomination at the 70th Academy Awards for Best Art Direction, credited to Jan Roelfs and Nancy Nye, but did not win; the category was awarded to Titanic. The film also received a nomination for Best Original Score by Michael Nyman at the 55th Golden Globe Awards. In genre-specific recognition, Gattaca garnered two nominations at the 24th Saturn Awards from the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films: Best Costume for Colleen Atwood and Best Music for Michael Nyman, though it secured no victories in those categories. Among its six total wins, Gattaca took the Best Film award at the 1997 Sitges Film Festival, alongside Best Original Soundtrack, highlighting its appeal in international circles. Additional honors included the Bogey Award for strong opening attendance in and the London Film Critics Circle award for screenwriter . These accolades underscore the film's technical and narrative strengths despite limited mainstream box-office success.

Scientific Portrayals and Accuracy

Genetic Technologies Depicted

In Gattaca, reproductive technologies enable parents to select or engineer offspring genetics prior to birth, minimizing predispositions to hereditary conditions and enhancing desirable traits such as cardiovascular health, vision, and estimated lifespan. Geneticists, acting as intermediaries, facilitate this process through fertilization combined with selection, where multiple embryos are screened and the optimal one—deemed a "valid" with probabilities like 97% for a healthy heart and 99% for unimpaired vision—is implanted, as illustrated in the film's depiction of Vincent Freeman's Anton being conceived under such intervention. This contrasts with "in-valids" like Vincent, conceived naturally without technological screening, resulting in documented genetic risks including a 99% probability of heart disorder and a projected lifespan of 30.2 years. Genetic screening extends beyond conception into daily societal functions, with routine assays of blood, urine, saliva, or hair follicles verifying an individual's genomic profile against employment and access requirements. These tests, performed by automated devices at facilities like the Gattaca Aerospace Corporation, detect not only congenital markers but also extraneous DNA traces, enforcing a de facto caste system where valids dominate elite roles due to their engineered superiority in traits like intelligence and physical prowess. The film's narrative highlights the precision of these identifiers, capable of distinguishing synthetic enhancements from natural genomes within seconds, underscoring a world where genomic data supplants phenotypic assessment for predictive judgments on human potential.

Empirical Critiques of Scientific Realism

The film's assumption of precise genetic —wherein preimplantation screening eliminates virtually all disease risks and predicts aptitudes with high fidelity—conflicts with empirical evidence from , which indicates that arise from polygenic architectures involving thousands of variants with small individual effects, compounded by gene-environment interactions and developmental noise. Polygenic risk scores, the closest modern analog to Gattaca's profiling, explain only a modest fraction of phenotypic variance for most traits; for example, scores for or cognitive ability capture less than 15% of differences in large-scale genome-wide association studies, underscoring inherent limits in rather than the near-perfect foresight depicted. This overreliance on genetic causation ignores findings from twin and studies, where identical twins reared apart exhibit discordance in traits like (concordance rates around 50%) or , attributable to non-shared environmental influences and epigenetic modifications that alter without changing DNA sequence. Critiques highlight the inaccuracy of portraying genetic tests as prognostic with 99% certainty, as in Vincent's risk; empirical data on cardiovascular conditions reveal polygenic contributions explaining 10-20% of , with modulated by factors like diet, exercise, and cellular events, leading to outcomes far less deterministic than the film suggests. Longitudinal cohort studies, such as those tracking APOE variants linked to Alzheimer's, show elevated risks (e.g., 3-15-fold for homozygotes) but no inevitability, as interventions like reduce incidence by up to 50% in at-risk groups, contradicting the film's causal realism where genes override agency. Moreover, the absence of depicted "valid" individuals free from all flaws aligns with reality—genetic selection via IVF and preimplantation diagnosis (PGD) mitigates monogenic disorders but cannot fully eradicate polygenic or multifactorial ones, as evidenced by residual disease rates in screened populations exceeding 1-5% for conditions like autism or . Broader genomic research repudiates strong by demonstrating bidirectional influences: environmental exposures reshape neural and physiological pathways, as seen in animal models where enriched rearing environments enhance cognitive performance despite fixed genotypes, and human epigenome-wide association studies linking patterns to lifestyle-induced trait variations. estimates, while high for some traits (e.g., 50-80% for adult IQ in meta-analyses of twin ), represent population-level variances rather than fates, with non-genetic factors accounting for the remainder through mechanisms like . These findings, drawn from large-scale consortia like the , reveal a causal landscape far more probabilistic and interactive than Gattaca's engineered hierarchy implies, where societal roles hinge on genetic scores treated as unerring oracles of potential.

Predictive Elements Versus Exaggerations

The film's depiction of preimplantation genetic screening to select embryos for desirable traits anticipated real-world advancements in (PGD), a technique available since the early for avoiding hereditary diseases and increasingly used for traits like or polygenic risk scores. This process mirrors Gattaca's "valid" conception, where parents discard "imperfect" embryos, though current applications remain limited by ethical regulations and technical challenges in editing complex traits. Concerns over genetic discrimination portrayed in the film, such as mandatory profiling for and , have manifested in policy responses, including the U.S. (GINA) of 2008, which prohibits such uses of genetic data in and jobs, directly addressing fears of a "genoist" society. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing, popularized by services like since 2006, has normalized personal genomic profiling, enabling predictions of disease risks that echo the film's urine and blood scans, though without the dystopian enforcement. The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in 2012 has brought Gattaca's vision of heritable genetic modification closer to feasibility, allowing precise alterations in embryos as demonstrated in controversial 2018 experiments in editing for resistance, raising parallels to the film's enhancement of , , and physical prowess. However, these technologies have not scaled to routine societal use due to off-target effects, mosaicism risks, and international moratoriums on editing, contrasting the film's seamless, widespread application. Exaggerations in Gattaca include an overstated genetic , where DNA rigidly dictates lifespan, career , and , ignoring epigenetic factors, environmental influences, and gene-environment interactions that research has since emphasized as crucial to outcomes. The film's portrayal of a binary class divide between "valids" and "in-valids" overlooks real-world and the incomplete of edits; for instance, polygenic traits like height or IQ involve thousands of variants, making "perfect" humans improbable without , as evidenced by persistent health issues in the film's characters. Societal descent into eugenics-driven discrimination assumes minimal resistance, yet regulatory frameworks, debates, and public backlash—such as against He Jiankui's 2018 embryo edits leading to his imprisonment—have curbed unchecked enhancement, preventing the film's unchecked corporate and institutional adoption. in Gattaca, reserved for genetic elites, exaggerates barriers; while private ventures like have advanced since 2002, selection relies on merit and training, not DNA profiles, with no evidence of genetic gating.

Thematic and Philosophical Analysis

Genetic Determinism and Human Agency

In Gattaca, genetic determinism manifests as a societal dogma where DNA profiles predetermine life outcomes, stratifying citizens into "valids"—genetically engineered individuals with enhanced traits—and "in-valids" like protagonist Vincent Freeman, who face systemic exclusion from elite professions due to predicted vulnerabilities such as a 99% risk of and a 30.2-year lifespan. This portrayal exaggerates genetic predictability for narrative effect, as real-world polygenic risk scores explain only partial variance in , like 40% for in certain populations, leaving substantial room for environmental and behavioral influences. Vincent embodies human agency by rejecting his genetic prognosis through rigorous self-discipline, including daily physical regimens to extend his capabilities, and strategic —assuming the identity of the paralyzed valid Jerome Morrow to infiltrate Gattaca Aerospace. His pivotal victory over brother Anton in a contest, where he prioritizes unreserved effort over , underscores the film's assertion that willpower can surpass genetic advantages, as Anton, despite superior engineering, concedes Vincent's edge in resolve. Ultimately, Vincent secures a space mission, outliving predictions and affirming the narrative's core tenet: "No can tell you what you're capable of." Philosophically, Gattaca counters strict by illustrating agency as the capacity to exploit genetic potentials amid probabilistic constraints, akin to how effort modulates heritable traits in empirical studies where twin discordance highlights non-genetic factors. Yet critiques contend the film subtly reinforces , as Vincent's achievements hinge on Jerome's elite —lending physical samples and identity—rather than purely endogenous overcoming, potentially endangering missions with unenhanced limitations like vision or endurance unfit for standards. Similarly, depictions of flawed valids (e.g., prone to or ) undermine blanket but imply enhancement's post-human trajectory, subverting the anti-eugenics stance by valorizing transcendence over natural agency. This tension reflects causal realism: genes impose boundaries, but agency navigates them, though the film's resolution romanticizes individual triumph without addressing collective risks of genetic stratification.

Eugenics: Historical Context and Modern Parallels

Eugenics, as depicted in Gattaca, evokes the early 20th-century movement that sought to improve human populations through selective breeding and intervention, originating with Francis Galton's 1883 coinage of the term to describe the of enhancing hereditary qualities via controlled reproduction. The film's stratified society of "valids" (genetically engineered elites) and "in-valids" (naturally conceived underclass) mirrors historical negative practices, such as the ' forced sterilizations of over 60,000 individuals deemed "unfit" between 1907 and the 1970s, upheld by the Supreme Court in (1927), which authorized the sterilization of for purported feeblemindedness. These policies, influenced by pseudoscientific claims of inheritable traits like criminality and poverty, extended to Nazi Germany's programs from 1933 onward, including the 1933 Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring and the T4 initiative that sterilized or killed hundreds of thousands, escalating to the Holocaust's rationale. Gattaca's critiques this coercive legacy by portraying genetic screening as a tool for systemic exclusion, where societal roles are predetermined by DNA profiles, paralleling how eugenicists like advocated immigration restrictions and marriage laws to preserve "superior" stock. Post-World War II revulsion at Nazi atrocities discredited state-sponsored eugenics, leading to its formal repudiation in scientific circles by the 1950s, yet Gattaca anticipates a resurgence through voluntary, market-driven means rather than mandates. Modern parallels include (PGD) in IVF, enabling embryo selection for traits like disease resistance since the , and polygenic risk scores for complex attributes such as or , which could amplify inequalities if commercialized. The film's vision of routine genetic enhancement aligns with debates over CRISPR-Cas9 editing, demonstrated in He Jiankui's 2018 creation of edited twin embryos resistant to , sparking global condemnation for bypassing ethical norms and evoking "designer babies." Unlike historical top-down coercion, contemporary "liberal " emphasizes parental choice, but critics argue it risks devaluing natural variation and reinforcing class divides, as Gattaca's protagonist Vincent Freeman's imposture of valid status underscores the fragility of merit over in such systems. Empirical data from Iceland's near-100% screening for since 2003, resulting in termination rates exceeding 95%, illustrates how normalized selection can erode diversity without overt policy. While Gattaca exaggerates deterministic outcomes for dramatic effect, its eugenic caution resonates with ongoing polygenic embryo selection trials, where companies like Genomic Prediction offer scoring for non-medical traits, potentially shifting from therapeutic to enhancement applications and blurring lines between equity and engineered hierarchies. Proponents frame this as empowerment through technology, yet historical precedents highlight causal risks: unchecked selection could entrench heritable advantages, as modeled in simulations showing rapid divergence in population traits under iterated editing. The film's rejection of genetic fatalism—evident in Vincent's success through willpower—advocates causal realism, prioritizing environmental and behavioral factors over heredity, supported by twin studies indicating that shared environment explains only 10-20% of variance in outcomes like IQ beyond genetics. Thus, Gattaca serves as a lens for scrutinizing whether modern genomics revives eugenics covertly, demanding rigorous oversight to prevent discrimination while harnessing verifiable benefits like disease prevention.

Critiques of Dystopian Assumptions

Critics have argued that Gattaca's central dystopian assumption of rigid genetic determinism—wherein an individual's DNA profile unequivocally dictates life outcomes and societal roles—constitutes a straw man misrepresentation of genetic science, as no mainstream geneticist endorses such absolute predestination. Biologist Lee Silver, in a 1997 Nature Genetics review, described the film's portrayal as fabricating an extreme determinist position solely to enable its narrative demolition through the protagonist's triumphs, thereby unfairly vilifying genetic research rather than engaging with nuanced views that integrate genes with environmental influences. This assumption underpins the film's stratified society of "valids" and "in-valids," yet empirical genetics reveals that complex traits like intelligence or disease susceptibility arise from polygenic interactions, epigenetics, and non-genetic factors, undermining the depicted inevitability of genetic castes. The film's reliance on highly precise genetic predictions, such as Vincent's 99% projected of cardiac , exaggerates current and foreseeable capabilities, as polygenic risk scores in reality account for limited variance—for instance, explaining only about 40% of differences or modest probabilities, far short of deterministic forecasts. A in Genetics highlighted that achieving the film's level of predictive certainty would require improbable genetic configurations, ignoring gene-environment interplay and the probabilistic nature of traits influenced by thousands of variants. Genetic counselor Deanna Darnes has noted that popular media like Gattaca fosters misconceptions of as a binary "light switch" rather than a multifaceted "circuit," potentially amplifying unfounded fears of dystopian misuse over realistic advancements like CRISPR-enabled therapies. Furthermore, Gattaca's assumption of unchecked genetic discrimination evolving into total societal control overlooks countervailing mechanisms, such as legal protections and adaptive human behaviors, rendering the implausibly monolithic. The U.S. (GINA) of 2008, enacted partly in response to such cinematic warnings, prohibits certain discriminatory uses of genetic data in and , demonstrating policy responses that mitigate rather than enable the film's hierarchy. geneticist Paula Brady emphasized that the narrative disregards nurture's role, including parental and cultural influences, which empirical twin studies show can override genetic predispositions in outcomes like achievement or resilience. contributor Philip Yam critiqued the film as "science bashing" for prioritizing alarmism over evidence that enhancements could foster meritocratic benefits without collapsing into eugenic oppression.

Cultural and Societal Impact

Influence on Science Fiction and Media

Gattaca's distinctive retro-futuristic aesthetic, characterized by design elements juxtaposed against advanced genetic technologies, pioneered a visual subgenre within cinema by eschewing typical high-tech clutter for a clean, anachronistic elegance. This style influenced subsequent films, including (2001) and I, Robot (2004), where similar blends of vintage aesthetics and speculative futures enhanced thematic depth. The film's production design, drawing from and without overt gadgetry, contrasted with contemporaneous sci-fi trends, establishing a template for introspective dystopias focused on human elements over spectacle. The narrative's exploration of genetic determinism and societal stratification served as a precursor to later works addressing bioengineering ethics, such as Equilibrium (2002), which examines enforced emotional suppression, and The Island (2005), depicting cloned humans in a controlled . Director , who wrote and directed Gattaca, explicitly drew from its themes of inherited inequality in his 2011 film , where lifespan becomes a tradable mirroring genetic privilege, highlighting parallels in class-based futurism. Beyond direct cinematic echoes, Gattaca has shaped broader media discourse on , emerging as a pop culture artifact invoked in debates and journalistic analyses of advancements like . Its plausibility earned it recognition from scientists in 2011 as the most realistic , reinforcing its role in calibrating public and creative expectations for genetic futures in media. This enduring reference status underscores its indirect influence, as filmmakers and commentators reference its restrained dystopian vision to frame contemporary biotechnological anxieties without sensationalism.

Role in Ethical and Policy Debates

Gattaca has served as a prominent in bioethical discourse on , often cited to illustrate potential dystopian outcomes of widespread genetic screening and enhancement. The film's depiction of a stratified by genetic "valids" and "in-valids" underscores concerns over genetic determinism, where innate DNA profiles dictate life opportunities, prompting ethicists to question the societal acceptance of such technologies without robust safeguards against . This has influenced discussions on the ethical boundaries of human gene editing, emphasizing risks of reinforcing eugenic ideologies under the guise of health improvements. In policy arenas, Gattaca has been referenced to advocate for regulations mitigating , particularly in and insurance contexts. For instance, the film's portrayal of routine genetic profiling for job eligibility has paralleled real-world debates preceding laws like the (GINA) of 2008, though direct legislative citations remain anecdotal; it highlights the need for policies to prevent "genoism," defined as bias based on genetic predispositions rather than actual performance. Bioethicists have drawn on the movie to argue for proactive measures in germline editing, warning that unchecked parental selection could exacerbate social inequalities, as seen in critiques linking the plot to modern practices. Critics within genetics communities, reflecting on the film's 25th anniversary in 2022, note its role in framing public apprehension toward and similar tools, yet some contend it overstates by ignoring environmental and epigenetic factors that moderate genetic outcomes. This has spurred policy recommendations for and oversight, with institutions like universities using Gattaca in curricula to debate enhancement versus therapy distinctions, advocating for international frameworks to balance innovation with equity. Overall, while the film amplifies cautionary themes, its influence persists in shaping arguments for evidence-based policies that prioritize individual agency over presumed genetic fates.

Perspectives from Transhumanism and Enhancement Advocates

Transhumanists and proponents regard the genetic modifications in Gattaca as a prescient depiction of feasible biotechnological progress toward augmenting human physical and cognitive capacities, while dismissing the film's stratified society as a preventable policy failure rather than an inherent flaw of enhancement itself. They contend that the advantages enjoyed by "valids"—such as near-elimination of hereditary diseases and superior performance—mirror real-world potentials from technologies like CRISPR-Cas9, which enable precise edits to prevent conditions like sickle cell anemia, thereby reducing suffering and enhancing overall human potential. Bioethicist , a leading advocate for genetic enhancement, has countered "Gattaca-style" critiques by arguing that parental selection of advantageous traits constitutes a moral duty under of procreative beneficence, prioritizing offspring's welfare over egalitarian concerns, as genetic lotteries already produce vast disparities in and that enhancement could equitably address through widespread access. Savulescu notes that objections rooted in Gattaca's overlook how enhancements could foster virtues like resilience and , potentially yielding net societal gains, such as higher average IQs via polygenic embryo selection, without mandating the film's discriminatory exclusions. Analyses aligned with transhumanist ideals reinterpret Gattaca as subversively endorsing post-human perfectionism, where the protagonist's success via highlights not the rejection of but the aspirational value of engineered superiority, as unenhanced individuals strain to mimic valid traits, implying biotechnology's role in enabling transcendence of biological constraints. Proponents emphasize causal evidence from existing interventions, including fertilization combined with genetic screening, which has averted over 5,000 cases of severe disorders like Tay-Sachs disease in at-risk populations since the , arguing that scaling such practices would democratize benefits rather than entrench elites if decoupled from Gattaca's assumed rigid . Critics within enhancement circles, such as those in transhumanist forums, acknowledge the film’s caution against misuse—e.g., conflating genetic profiling with destiny—but advocate safeguards like universal enhancement subsidies to mitigate inequality, viewing the narrative's core as validation of human-directed over passive acceptance of genetic flaws. This perspective prioritizes empirical outcomes, such as projected lifespan extensions from editing, over speculative social harms, positioning Gattaca as a flawed but instructive blueprint for responsible augmentation.

References

  1. https://www.sonypictures.com/movies/gattaca
  2. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/
  3. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/plotsummary/
  4. https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/gattaca-1997
  5. https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0119177/
  6. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/gattaca
  7. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/awards
  8. https://www.gradesaver.com/gattaca/study-guide/summary
  9. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/gattaca/cast-and-crew
  10. https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/782-gattaca/cast?language=en-US
  11. https://talentdevelop.com/interviews/aniccol.html
  12. https://gizmodo.com/the-genetic-history-of-gattaca-361458
  13. https://movieweb.com/movies-produced-by-danny-devito/
  14. https://thecinemaholic.com/where-was-gattaca-filmed/
  15. https://movie-locations.com/movies/g/Gattaca.php
  16. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/locations/
  17. https://moviemaps.org/movies/5k
  18. https://www.sceen-it.com/sceen/3068/Gattaca/The-2nd-Street-Tunnel
  19. https://shotonwhat.com/gattaca-1997
  20. https://www.inverse.com/culture/gattaca-25-year-annivesarsy
  21. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/rtf-architectural-reviews/a14362-an-architectural-review-of-gattaca/
  22. https://www.reddit.com/r/RetroFuturism/comments/pnbi03/gattaca_retro_50s_design/
  23. https://cinemascopicravings.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/gattaca-a-nineties-high/
  24. http://www.imagesjournal.com/issue05/reviews/gattaca.htm
  25. https://theshadowzone.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/an-unfiltered-look-at-the-engineered-world-of-gattaca-1997-a-review/
  26. https://raypride.substack.com/p/brave-new-whorl-designing-gattaca
  27. https://www.anothermag.com/fashion-beauty/13150/salvatore-ferragamo-aw21-paul-andrew-gattaca-costume-designer-colleen-atwood
  28. https://www.thefader.com/2016/08/12/science-fiction-fashion-her-equals-ex-machina-blade-runner-costume-design
  29. https://i-d.co/article/the-ten-most-fashionable-sci-fi-films-of-all-time/
  30. https://www.theautopian.com/the-retrofuturist-cars-of-sci-fi-noir-film-gattaca-are-still-relevant-today-lets-make-more-of-them/
  31. https://www.filmtracks.com/titles/gattaca.html
  32. http://www.polarimagazine.com/classicmusic/michael-nyman-gattaca-1997/
  33. https://www.discogs.com/release/24559649-Michael-Nyman-Gattaca-Original-Motion-Picture-Soundtrack
  34. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1997/10/26/gattaca-music-composed-and-conducted-by-michael/
  35. https://www.gradesaver.com/gattaca/study-guide/literary-elements
  36. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/gattaca-film-techniques-8758619/8758619
  37. https://www.cram.com/essay/Gattaca-Film-Analysis/A8067908460E30B2
  38. https://www.soundandvision.com/content/gattaca
  39. https://www.cineluxe.com/review-gattaca/
  40. https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Gattaca
  41. https://bombreport.com/yearly-breakdowns/1997-2/gattaca/
  42. https://decider.com/2016/03/09/cult-corner-gattaca-is-the-futuristic-thriller-that-works-better-today-than-it-did-in-1997/
  43. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1684044015213864/posts/2364735243811401/
  44. https://www.amazon.com/Gattaca-Ernest-Borgnine/dp/0767805712
  45. https://www.ebay.com/itm/267100062605
  46. https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Gattaca-4K-Blu-ray/279537/
  47. https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Gattaca-4K-Blu-ray/289128/
  48. https://athome.fandango.com/content/browse/details/Gattaca/12934
  49. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/10/24/movies/film-review-the-next-bigotry-privilege-by-genetic-perfection.html
  50. https://www.deepfocusreview.com/reviews/gattaca/
  51. https://www.metacritic.com/movie/gattaca/
  52. https://www.depauw.edu/sfs/essays/gattaca.htm
  53. https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/8oig5g/til_nasa_has_named_gattaca_as_the_most_accurate/
  54. https://www.oscars.org/oscars/ceremonies/1998
  55. https://goldenglobes.com/film/gattaca/
  56. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/awards/
  57. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/gattaca-1997
  58. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9713434/
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01242-5
  60. https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/gattaca-movie-science-genetic-future-gene-altering
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898719/
  62. https://karger.com/hde/article/69/3/147/919765/The-Problems-with-Genetic-Essentialism-Determinism
  63. https://f1000research.com/articles/8-1705
  64. http://www.discoveryandinnovation.com/pgEd/movies/gattaca.html
  65. https://quillette.com/2019/07/08/how-prophetic-was-gattaca/
  66. https://www.rogerebert.com/features/revisiting-gattaca-in-the-age-of-crispr
  67. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/04/20/advances-gene-editing-crispr-close-sci-fi-thriller-gattaca/
  68. https://slate.com/technology/2022/08/gattaca-25th-anniversary-genetics-crispr.html
  69. https://medium.com/@cinemawizardboy/gattaca-a-relevant-tale-of-eugenics-and-determinism-42fdd5b81d48
  70. https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueFilm/comments/5qwy5m/my_thoughts_on_gattaca_determinism_and_genes/
  71. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/5117/511769287029/html/
  72. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/educational-resources/timelines/eugenics
  73. https://guides.loc.gov/chronicling-america-early-eugenics
  74. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/19/where-science-meets-fiction-the-dark-history-of-eugenics
  75. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08300-4
  76. https://cbhd.org/dignitas-articles/gene-editing-and-the-new-eugenics
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6342697/
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9635610/
  79. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ar.24849
  80. https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/movies/a7251/in-time-andrew-niccol-on-his-gattaca-inspired-new-film-6531927/
  81. https://filmobsessive.com/film/film-analysis/film-genres/sci-fi/revisiting-the-genetically-engineered-dystopia-of-gattaca/
  82. https://www.nature.com/articles/36250
  83. https://belonging.berkeley.edu/ethical-questions-posed-gattaca-more-pressing-ever
  84. https://metode.org/issues/monographs/surpassing-our-genes.html
  85. https://turia.uv.es/index.php/Metode/article/view/20673
  86. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/07/26/human-enhancement-the-scientific-and-ethical-dimensions-of-striving-for-perfection-2/
  87. https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/science-the-public/ethics-gene-editing-babies-crispr
  88. https://theconversation.com/the-ethics-of-gifted-genes-the-road-to-gattaca-45153
  89. https://www.reddit.com/r/transhumanism/comments/pndxv9/gattaca_genetic_engineering_society/
  90. https://www.mingong.org/blog-en/gattaca-1997-and-transhumanism-2017
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.