Hubbry Logo
Of Mice and MenOf Mice and MenMain
Open search
Of Mice and Men
Community hub
Of Mice and Men
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Of Mice and Men
Of Mice and Men
Of Mice and Men
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Of Mice and Men is a 1937 novella written by American author John Steinbeck.[1][2] It describes the experiences of George Milton and Lennie Small, two displaced migrant ranch workers, as they move from place to place in California, searching for jobs during the Great Depression.

Key Information

Steinbeck based the novella on his own experiences as a teenager working alongside migrant farm workers in the 1910s, before the arrival of the Okies whom he would describe in his novel The Grapes of Wrath. The title is taken from Robert Burns' poem "To a Mouse": "The best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft agley" ("The best-laid plans of mice and men / Often go awry").

Although the book is taught in many schools,[3] Of Mice and Men has been a frequent target of censorship and book bans for vulgarity and for what some consider offensive and racist language. Consequently, it appears on the American Library Association's list of the Most Challenged Books of the 21st Century.[4]

Plot

[edit]

During the Great Depression in California, two migrant field workers—George Milton, an intelligent but uneducated man, and Lennie Small, a bulky, strong but mentally disabled man—are on their way from Soledad to another part of the state. They share a dream of settling down on their own piece of land. Lennie's part of the dream is merely to care for and pet rabbits. He loves touching soft animals, but he always pets them so hard that he accidentally kills them. George and Lennie fled from Weed after Lennie grabbed a young woman's skirt because he thought it was pretty. He would not let go, because he holds on tighter when stressed. This incident led to an accusation of rape, with a mob forming to find and lynch Lennie. Throughout the introduction of the novel, it becomes clear that Lennie relies on George because he is unable to function independently.

The pair are hired at a farm, where they are confronted by Curley, the short and aggressive son of the owner. Curley dislikes larger men and he targets Lennie, who is instantly attracted to Curley's flirtatious and provocative wife. The pair also meets Candy, an elderly ranch handyman with one hand and a loyal dog, and Slim, an intelligent and gentle jerkline-skinner whose dog has recently had a litter of puppies. Slim gives puppies to Lennie and to Candy, whose loyal, accomplished sheep dog was put down by fellow ranch-hand Carlson.

In spite of problems, their dream leaps towards reality when Candy offers to pitch in $350 toward the purchase of a farm, in return for permission to live with them. They will be able to buy a farm at the end of the month. The trio are ecstatic, but their joy is overshadowed when Curley attacks Lennie, who defends himself by easily crushing Curley's fist while urged on by George.

Nevertheless, George feels more relaxed. He even leaves Lennie behind on the ranch while he goes into town with the other hands. Lennie wanders into the stable, and chats with Crooks, the bitter, yet educated stable hand, who is isolated from the other workers because he is black. Candy finds them and they discuss their plans for the farm with Crooks, who cannot resist asking if he can hoe a garden patch on the farm, even though he scorns the possibility of the dream coming true. Curley's wife makes another appearance and flirts with the men, especially Lennie. However, she shows her spiteful side when she belittles them and threatens to have Crooks lynched. They hear the ranch hands returning, and she leaves.

The next day, Lennie accidentally kills his puppy while stroking it. Curley's wife enters the barn and tries to speak to him, admitting that she is lonely. Her dreams of becoming a movie star have been crushed. She finds out about Lennie's love of soft things and offers to let him stroke her hair, but when she feels his strength, she panics and begins to scream. Lennie becomes frightened and unintentionally breaks her neck. He runs away. When the other ranch hands find the corpse, they form a lynch mob intent on killing him, sending for the police before beginning the search. George quickly realizes that their dream is at an end and hurries to find Lennie, hoping he will be at the meeting place they designated in case he got into trouble.

George finds Lennie at the meeting spot, and the two sit together while George retells the beloved story of the dream, although he now knows it will never happen. George hears the lynch mob coming and shoots Lennie, giving him a more merciful death than the one he would receive at the hands of the mob. Curley, Slim, and Carlson arrive seconds later. Only Slim understands what has happened. He leads George away, trying to console him. Curley and Carlson look on, neither understanding why Slim and George are feeling the way they are.

Characters

[edit]
  • George Milton: A quick-witted man who is Lennie's guardian and best friend. His friendship with Lennie helps sustain his dream of a better future. He has been friends with Lennie since they were children. He is described by Steinbeck in the novel as "small and quick", every part of him being "defined", with small strong hands on slender arms. He has a dark face and "restless eyes" and "sharp, strong features" including a "thin, bony nose".
  • Lennie Small: A gigantic, physically strong imbecile who travels with George and is his constant companion.[5] He dreams of "living off the fatta' the lan'" and being able to tend to rabbits. His love for soft things is a weakness, mostly because he does not know his own strength, and eventually becomes his undoing. Steinbeck defines his appearance as George's "opposite", writing that he is a "huge man, shapeless of face, with large, pale eyes" and "wide, sloping shoulders". Lennie walks heavily, dragging his feet a little, "the way a bear drags his paws", adding that his arms do not swing at his sides, but hang loosely.
  • Candy: An aging ranch handyman, Candy lost his hand in an accident and worries about his future on the ranch. Fearing that his age is making him useless, he seizes on George's description of the farm he and Lennie will have, offering his life's savings if he can join George and Lennie in owning the land.
  • Slim: A "jerkline skinner", the main driver of a mule team and the "prince of the ranch". Slim is greatly respected by many of the characters and is the only character whom Curley treats with respect. His insight, intuition, kindness and natural authority draw the other ranch hands automatically towards him, and he is significantly the only character to fully understand the bond between George and Lennie. Slim is considered the "übermensch"[6] of this story by the god-like descriptions of Slim that he is the one that knows best out of the novel’s characters.
  • Curley: The Boss's son, a young, pugnacious character, once a semi-professional boxer. He is described by others, with some irony, as "handy", partly because he likes to keep a glove filled with vaseline on his left hand. He is very jealous and protective of his wife and immediately develops a dislike toward Lennie. At one point, Curley loses his temper after he sees Lennie appear to laugh at him, and ends up with his hand horribly damaged after Lennie fights back against him.
  • Curley's wife: A young, pretty woman, who is mistrusted by her husband. The other characters refer to her only as "Curley's wife". Steinbeck explained that she is "not a person, she's a symbol. She has no function, except to be a foil – and a danger to Lennie."[5] Curley's wife's preoccupation with her own beauty eventually helps precipitate her death: She allows Lennie to stroke her hair as an apparently harmless indulgence, only for her to upset Lennie when she yells at him to stop him "mussing it". Lennie tries to stop her yelling and eventually kills her accidentally by breaking her neck.
  • Crooks: Crooks, the black stable-hand, gets his name from his crooked back. Proud, bitter, and cynical, he is isolated from the other men because of the color of his skin. Despite himself, Crooks becomes fond of Lennie, and though he claims to have seen countless men following empty dreams of buying their own land, he asks Lennie if he can go with them and hoe in the garden. Crooks is a more relatable individual who sees things from a more rational and human perspective.
  • Candy's dog: A blind dog who is described as "old", "stinky", and "crippled", and is killed by Carlson.
  • Carlson: A "thick bodied" ranch hand, he kills Candy's dog with little sympathy.
  • The Boss: Curley's father, the superintendent of the ranch. The ranch is owned by "a big land company" according to Candy.
  • Whit: A young ranch hand.

Themes

[edit]

In every bit of honest writing in the world there is a base theme. Try to understand men, if you understand each other you will be kind to each other. Knowing a man well never leads to hate and nearly always leads to love. There are shorter means, many of them. There is writing promoting social change, writing punishing injustice, writing in celebration of heroism, but always that base theme. Try to understand each other.

— John Steinbeck in his 1938 journal entry[7]

Steinbeck emphasizes aspirations throughout the book. George aspires to become independent, to be his own boss, to have a homestead, and, most important, to be "somebody". Lennie aspires to be with George on his independent homestead, and to quench his fixation on soft objects. Candy aspires to reassert his responsibility lost with the death of his dog, and for security for his old age—on George's homestead. Crooks aspires to a small homestead where he can express self-respect, security, and most of all, acceptance. Curley's wife dreams to be an actress, to satisfy her desire for fame lost when she married Curley, and an end to her loneliness.

Loneliness is a significant factor in several characters' lives. Candy is lonely after his dog is gone. Curley's wife is lonely because her husband is not the friend she hoped for—she deals with her loneliness by flirting with the men on the ranch, which causes Curley to increase his abusiveness and jealousy. The companionship of George and Lennie is the result of loneliness. Crooks states the theme candidly as "A guy goes nuts if he ain't got anybody. Don't make any difference who the guy is, long's he's with you."[8] The author further reinforces this theme through subtle methods by situating the story near the town of Soledad, which means "solitude" in Spanish.[9]

Despite the need for companionship, Steinbeck emphasizes how loneliness is sustained through the barriers established from acting inhuman to one another. The loneliness of Curley's wife is upheld by Curley's jealousy, which causes all the ranch hands to avoid her. Crooks's barrier results from being barred from the bunkhouse by restraining him to the stable; his bitterness is partially broken, however, through Lennie's ignorance.

Steinbeck's characters are often powerless, due to intellectual, economic, and social circumstances. Lennie possesses the greatest physical strength of any character, which should therefore establish a sense of respect as he is employed as a ranch hand. However, his intellectual handicap undercuts this and results in his powerlessness. Economic powerlessness is established as many of the ranch hands are victims of the Great Depression. As George, Candy and Crooks are positive, action-oriented characters, they wish to purchase a homestead, but because of the Depression, they are unable to earn enough money to fulfill their dream. Lennie is the only one who is basically unable to take care of himself, but the other characters would do this in the improved circumstances they seek. Since they cannot do so, the real danger of Lennie's mental handicap comes to the fore.

Regarding human interaction, the evil of oppression and abuse is a theme that is illustrated through Curley and Curley's wife. Curley uses his aggressive nature and superior position in an attempt to take control of his father's farm. He constantly reprimands the farm hands and accuses some of fooling around with his wife. Curley's Napoleon complex is evidenced by his threatening of the farm hands for minuscule incidents. Curley's wife, on the other hand, is not physically but verbally manipulative. She uses her sex appeal to gain some attention, flirting with the farm hands. According to the Penguin Teacher's Guide for Of Mice and Men, Curley and Curley's wife represent evil in that both oppress and abuse the migrants in different ways.[10]

Fate is felt most heavily as the characters' aspirations are destroyed when George is unable to protect Lennie (who is a real danger). Steinbeck presents this as "something that happened" or as his friend coined for him "non-teleological thinking" or "is thinking", which postulates a non-judgmental point of view.[7]

Of Mice and Men can be associated with the idea that inherent limitations exist and despite all the squirming and struggling, sometimes the circumstances of one's existence limits their capacity to live the fairy tale lives they wish to. Even the title of the novel itself references this "the title is, of course, a fragment from the poem by Robert Burns, which gives emphasis to the idea of the futility of human endeavor or the vanity of human wishes".[11]

Animals play a role in the story as well; the heron shifts from a beautiful part of the scenery from the beginning of the novel to a predator near the end. The ending chapter has the heron return, preying upon snakes that get too curious in a repetitive nature, symbolic of the dreams of men constantly being snatched away.

Development

[edit]

Of Mice and Men was Steinbeck's first attempt at writing in the form of novel-play termed a "play-novelette" by one critic. Structured in three acts of two chapters each, it is intended to be both a novella and a script for a play. It is only 30,000 words in length. Steinbeck wanted to write a novel that could be played from its lines, or a play that could be read like a novel.[12][13]

Steinbeck originally titled it Something That Happened (referring to the events of the book as "something that happened" because nobody can be really blamed for the tragedy that unfolds in the story). However, he changed the title after reading Robert Burns's poem "To a Mouse".[13] Burns's poem tells of the regret the narrator feels for having destroyed the home of a mouse while plowing his field.[14]

Steinbeck wrote this book and The Grapes of Wrath in what is now Monte Sereno, California. An early draft of Of Mice and Men was eaten by Steinbeck's dog. As he explained in a 1936 letter:[15]

My setter pup [Toby], left alone one night, made confetti of about half of my [manuscript] book. Two months [sic] work to do over again. It sets me back. There was no other draft. I was pretty mad, but the poor little fellow may have been acting critically.

In the introduction to Penguin's 1994 edition of the book, Susan Shillinglaw writes that Steinbeck, after dropping out of Stanford University, spent almost two years roaming California, finding work on ranches for Spreckels Sugar where he harvested wheat and sugar beets.[16] Steinbeck told The New York Times in 1937:[5]

I was a bindlestiff myself for quite a spell. I worked in the same country that the story is laid in. The characters are composites to a certain extent. Lennie was a real person. He's in an insane asylum in California right now. I worked alongside him for many weeks. He didn't kill a girl. He killed a ranch foreman. Got sore because the boss had fired his pal and stuck a pitchfork right through his stomach. I hate to tell you how many times. I saw him do it. We couldn't stop him until it was too late.

Reception

[edit]

Attaining the greatest positive response of any of his works up to that time, Steinbeck's novella was chosen as a Book of the Month Club selection before it was published. Praise for the work came from many notable critics, including Maxine Garrard (Enquirer-Sun),[17] Christopher Morley, and Harry Thornton Moore (New Republic).[18] New York Times critic Ralph Thompson described the novella as a "grand little book, for all its ultimate melodrama".[19][20] In the UK, it was listed at number 52 of the "nation's best loved novels" on the BBC's 2003 survey The Big Read.[21]

Censorship

[edit]

The novella has been banned from various US public and school libraries or curricula for allegedly "promoting euthanasia", "condoning racial slurs", being "anti-business", containing profanity, and generally containing "vulgar", "offensive language", and containing racial stereotypes, as well as the negative impact of these stereotypes on students.[22][23] Many of the bans and restrictions have been lifted and it remains required reading in many other American, Australian, Irish, British, New Zealand and Canadian high schools.

As a result of being a frequent target of censors, Of Mice and Men appears on the American Library Association's list of the Top 100 Banned/Challenged Books: 2000–2009 (number five)[24] and Top 100 Banned/Challenged Books: 2010–2019 (number 28).[25] Of Mice and Men has been proposed for censorship 54 times since it was published in 1936.[26] However, scholars including Thomas Scarseth have fought to protect the book by arguing its literary value. According to Scarseth "in true great literature the pain of Life is transmuted into the beauty of Art".[27]

Adaptations

[edit]

Stage

[edit]
Main articles: Of Mice and Men (play) and Of Mice and Men (opera)

As a "playable novel", it was performed by the Theater Union of San Francisco as written. This version opened on May 21, 1937 – less than three months after the novel's publication – and ran for about two months.[16]

To create a Broadway production, Steinbeck adapted and slightly revised his original text and this version, produced by Sam H. Harris and directed by George S. Kaufman, opened on November 23, 1937, in the Music Box Theatre on Broadway and ran for 207 performances.[28] It starred Wallace Ford as George and Broderick Crawford as Lennie.[28] The role of Crooks was performed by Leigh Whipper, the first African-American member of the Actors' Equity Association.[29] (Whipper repeated this role in the 1939 film version.[30]) The production was chosen as Best Play in 1938 by the New York Drama Critics' Circle.[31]

In 1939 the production was moved to Los Angeles, still with Wallace Ford in the role of George, but with Lon Chaney, Jr., taking on the role of Lennie. Chaney's performance in the role resulted in his casting in the movie.

In 1958, a musical theater adaptation by Ira Bilowit (1925–2016) was produced Off-Broadway in New York City. The cast included several in-demand performers of their day, including Art Lund and Jo Sullivan, re-teamed after performing together in the hit musical The Most Happy Fella, as well as Leo Penn.[32] However, a newspaper strike negatively affected the production and it closed after six weeks.[33] A revival of the work was mounted at the Western Stage in Salinas, California in 2019.[33]

The play was revived in a 1974 Broadway production in the Brooks Atkinson Theatre starring Kevin Conway as George and James Earl Jones as Lennie.[34] Noted stage actress Pamela Blair played Curley's Wife in this production.

In 1970 Carlisle Floyd wrote an opera based on this novella. One departure between Steinbeck's book and Floyd's opera is that the opera features The Ballad Singer, a character not found in the book.[35]

A new version of the play opened on Broadway at The Longacre Theater on March 19, 2014 for a limited 18-week engagement, starring James Franco, Chris O'Dowd, Leighton Meester and Jim Norton.[36][37]

A ballet adaptation was created by Cathy Marston with original music by Thomas Newman. It debuted on April 27, 2022 at the Joffrey Ballet in Chicago.[38]

Film

[edit]
Poster for the 1939 film

The first film adaptation was released in 1939, two years after the publication of the novella, and starred Lon Chaney Jr. as Lennie, with Burgess Meredith as George, and was directed by Lewis Milestone.[30] It was nominated for four Academy Awards.[30]

A TV version, produced by David Susskind in 1968, starred George Segal as George, Nicol Williamson as Lennie, Will Geer as Candy, Moses Gunn as Crooks, and Don Gordon and Joey Heatherton as Curley and his wife, respectively.[39]

In 1981, a TV movie version was released, starring Randy Quaid as Lennie, and Robert Blake as George, and directed by Reza Badiyi.[40]

Another theatrical film version was made in 1992, directed by Gary Sinise, who was nominated for the Palme d'Or at Cannes.[41] Sinise played George, and the role of Lennie was played by John Malkovich, both reprising their roles from the 1980 Steppenwolf Theatre Company stage production.[42]

The 1992 Malayalam film Soorya Manasam directed by Viji Thampi is also based on the novel.[43]

Radio

[edit]

Of Mice and Men was adapted by Donna Franceschild as a radio play directed by Kirsty Williams starring David Tennant and Liam Brennan broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on 7 March 2010.[44] Earlier BBC productions were aired in 1966 and 1992.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Of Mice and Men

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
is a by American author , published on February 6, 1937, that chronicles the interdependent relationship between two itinerant ranch workers navigating economic hardship and personal limitations during the . The narrative, structured as a series of interconnected vignettes over a few days on a ranch, centers on George Milton, a shrewd but resentful , and Lennie Small, his physically powerful but intellectually impaired companion, whose shared ambition to own a self-sufficient farm underscores the fragility of human aspirations amid systemic instability. Steinbeck drew from his observations of migrant laborers in the to depict the causal chains of poverty, isolation, and impulsive behavior leading to inevitable tragedy, rejecting sentimentalism in favor of stark realism. The work achieved rapid commercial success, selling thousands of copies shortly after release and establishing Steinbeck's reputation for probing the material conditions shaping individual fates. Adapted by Steinbeck himself into a three-act play that premiered to acclaim in 1937, it later inspired multiple versions, including a 1939 production nominated for four , highlighting its dramatic potency and thematic depth. Despite its enduring place in literary curricula for illuminating the American Dream's elusiveness, the novella has faced challenges for its unflinching portrayal of violence, mental disability, and mercy killing, reflecting debates over representational fidelity versus moral discomfort.

Historical and Social Context

The Great Depression and Migrant Labor Realities

The , triggered by the Wall Street Crash of October 1929, led to severe economic contraction, with U.S. unemployment reaching a peak of 25% in 1933, affecting approximately 12.8 million workers out of a civilian labor force exceeding 51 million. Agricultural sectors faced parallel collapse, as falling commodity prices and credit contraction resulted in over 200,000 farm foreclosures in 1933 alone, concentrated in Plains states where debt burdens and environmental degradation compounded financial distress. These pressures, intertwined with the droughts from 1930 to 1936, displaced hundreds of thousands of tenant farmers and sharecroppers, prompting westward; over 300,000 individuals from and adjacent states arrived in during the decade, drawn by promises of agricultural employment in the Central Valley. Migrant labor in California's ranch and farm economy operated under acute supply-demand imbalances, with influxes of workers exceeding job availability and driving wages down to roughly $30 per month plus basic food and shelter for able-bodied hands by the mid-1930s. Tasks demanded intense physical endurance—such as herding, bucking hay, or harvesting under seasonal pressures—with high injury risks from machinery and weather, contributing to rapid turnover rates as workers moved between transient camps or "jungles" in pursuit of steadier pay. Employers often prioritized younger, robust males capable of heavy labor, leading to selective hiring that reflected practical productivity needs rather than blanket discrimination; this dynamic, fueled by migrants' high mobility and fragmented family units, perpetuated a fluid workforce where short-term contracts prevailed over long-term stability. Federal investigations, including (WPA) surveys and reports from the mid-1930s, documented widespread squalor in unauthorized squatter camps but also evidenced heterogeneous outcomes among migrants, with a subset achieving economic footholds through accumulated savings, kin networks, or opportunistic shifts to urban trades. WPA-established labor camps, such as the Arvin Federal Camp opened in 1936, provided temporary sanitation and job referral services that mitigated some health hazards and enabled modest self-reliance for residents, underscoring how individual resourcefulness amid structural scarcity—rather than deterministic victimhood—shaped divergent trajectories. These patterns highlight causal interplay between macroeconomic shocks, ecological stressors, and personal agency in labor adaptation.

Steinbeck's Personal Experiences and Broader Influences

In the summer of 1936, was commissioned by the News to investigate conditions in California's migrant labor camps, resulting in a series of seven articles published October 5–12 under the title . These reports detailed squalid living conditions in squatter camps and Hoovervilles, including exposure to Dust Bowl migrants—derisively called "Okies"—facing , , and exploitation by growers. Steinbeck observed interpersonal tensions among the workers, such as and conflicts over resources, alongside failed attempts at like strikes, which highlighted the fragility of solidarity under survival pressures. Steinbeck's direct encounters supplemented his earlier personal labor experiences, including seasonal work as a bindlestiff and stable hand in during the , which familiarized him with itinerant workers' transient lives and economic . These observations informed the portrayal of itinerant ranch hands in Of Mice and Men, though his accounts remained anecdotal rather than systematic surveys, lacking broader empirical data on migrant demographics or outcomes. Intellectually, Steinbeck drew from naturalist traditions emphasizing deterministic forces like and environment, akin to Darwinian dynamics, which underscored human vulnerability in his depictions of labor. Contemporaries such as influenced his focus on industrial exploitation, yet Steinbeck's reportage for a left-leaning outlet like the San Francisco News amplified dramatic elements, with later critiques noting tendencies to heighten past hardships for advocacy effect, as seen in responses to his portraying conditions as more uniformly dire than contemporaneous records suggested. By the 1940s, after a 1937 visit to the , Steinbeck expressed disillusionment with collectivist ideologies, viewing as a delusional rather than viable , marking a shift from his 1930s sympathies.

Publication and Development

Writing Process and Inspiration

Steinbeck conceived Of Mice and Men as a hybrid form blending novelistic with dramatic to emphasize objective realism and natural , dividing the story into six self-contained chapters that function as stage scenes, each limited to a single setting. This approach allowed the work to be readable as or performable as theater, prioritizing auditory authenticity derived from observed speech patterns among laborers over descriptive exposition. The title derives from ' 1785 poem "," specifically the lines "The best laid schemes o' Mice an' Men / Gang aft agley," which encapsulate the theme of disrupting human aspirations, mirroring the protagonists' failed dream of . Steinbeck drew inspiration from direct encounters with migrant workers during his undercover reporting assignments in agricultural camps and his own seasonal labor on farms, grounding character dynamics and itinerant hardships in verifiable behaviors and conditions rather than idealized narratives. After his dog destroyed the initial in late 1936, Steinbeck rewrote the in approximately two months, refining it to a concise 107 pages that traces a tight chain of causal events— from arrival at the ranch to the inevitable climax—eschewing didactic commentary in favor of emergent consequences from character actions.

Publication Details and Commercial Performance

Of Mice and Men was published in February 1937 by Covici-Friede in New York as a hardcover first edition. The novella's concise length, spanning approximately 100 pages, and its dramatic structure—conceived by Steinbeck as a "play-novelette"—facilitated lower production costs and appealed to publishers seeking viable Depression-era releases. Selection as a Book-of-the-Month Club title upon release significantly amplified its initial distribution and market penetration. Commercial success materialized rapidly, with the first edition selling 500,000 copies. Subsequent editions, beginning in the period from publishers like Penguin, broadened accessibility to wider audiences beyond initial hardcover buyers. By the late , the work had been translated into 32 languages across 55 editions, extending its commercial reach globally. These factors underscored the novella's economic viability, contrasting with longer contemporaries by prioritizing brevity and adaptability for mass-market formats.

Narrative Elements

Plot Summary

George Milton and Lennie Small, two itinerant ranch workers, arrive in the and spend the night by a riverbank after being dropped off short of their destination . George instructs Lennie to return to this spot if trouble arises, and they discuss their shared aspiration of owning a small where Lennie can tend rabbits. The following day, they report to the ranch owned by the boss's son Curley, where they are hired despite initial suspicion about their close partnership; they meet the elderly handyman , the skilled mule skinner Slim, the aggressive Curley, his unnamed wife, the Black stable buck Crooks, and other workers. At the ranch, tensions emerge as Curley's wife flirts with the men, prompting George to warn Lennie to stay away from her and Curley. Slim gives Lennie a puppy from his litter, while Carlson pressures Candy to shoot his aging, ailing , which is done that evening. Overhearing George and Lennie's farm dream, Candy offers his life savings to join them in purchasing the property. Later, Curley picks a fight with Lennie, who instinctively crushes Curley's hand in defense, an incident hushed up to avoid scandal. That night, while most men visit a , Lennie visits Crooks's room, sharing the dream before Curley's wife intrudes and asserts dominance. The next day, alone in the barn, Lennie accidentally kills his puppy by petting it too forcefully. Curley's enters, allows Lennie to her hair, but panics when he grips too tightly; in his attempt to quiet her screams, Lennie breaks her neck, killing her. He hides the body in the hay and flees to the river as previously instructed. Candy discovers the corpse and informs George, who realizes Lennie is responsible and retrieves Carlson's . A posse forms to lynch Lennie, but George locates him first at the river, recounts their dream one last time, and shoots Lennie in the back of the head to spare him a worse fate. George rejoins the group, claiming against Lennie's supposed armed threat, with Slim alone grasping the truth.

Characters and Their Development

George Milton appears as a small, defined, and quick-witted whose sharp features and restless eyes reflect a street-smart vigilance honed by itinerant life. He functions as Lennie Small's guardian, demonstrating pragmatic through calculated decisions on , , and risk avoidance, though his guardianship fosters underlying expressed in candid rebukes of Lennie's burdens. Milton's arc reveals a tension between self-interested realism and loyalty, as his actions prioritize mutual protection amid hierarchies while contemplating solitary freedom. Lennie Small contrasts sharply as a massive, lumbering figure with immense physical power but profound mental impairment, evoking animalistic through habits like petting soft objects obsessively and mimicking George's directives without comprehension. His reliance on Milton manifests in childlike obedience and forgetfulness, with uncontrolled strength causing accidental damage during physical engagements or handling of living things. Small exhibits minimal development, persisting in gentle intentions thwarted by impulsive reactions, underscoring a static dependency that tests alliances. Curley, the ranch boss's son, embodies antagonism through his compact, aggressive build and combative posturing, targeting bigger men to compensate for stature via threats and brawls. His interactions highlight insecurity-driven dominance, escalating conflicts to assert over laborers. Slim, the tall, mule skinner with "God-like eyes," commands respect through skilled labor and equitable mediation, offering counsel that influences group dynamics without coercion. His moral steadiness shines in deliberate, empathetic responses to disputes, positioning him as a stabilizing force among hands. Crooks, the stable hand with a crooked back from , endures isolation in segregated quarters, enduring slurs and exclusion that interactions expose as entrenched racial barriers. His portrayal conveys guarded and accumulated resentment, articulated in defensive assertions of amid , revealing hierarchies through withheld camaraderie.

Literary Analysis

Style, Structure, and Symbolism

The adopts a cyclical , commencing and concluding in the same serene brush setting along the Salinas River, which reinforces the repetitive cycle of transient hopes and inevitable setbacks in the protagonists' lives. This circular pattern confines the action to four primary locales—the riverbank, ranch bunkhouse, Crooks's quarters, and —mirroring a play's progression with condensed transitions and unified time, thereby compressing events into a tight dramatic arc spanning mere days. Such organization amplifies the sense of , as the return to the initial idyllic spot underscores unfulfilled aspirations without linear progress. Steinbeck's style features sparse, objective with economical descriptions, short declarative sentences, and naturalistic that replicates migrant workers' —marked by contractions, repetitions, and regional idioms—to evoke authenticity and urgency. This minimalist approach minimizes authorial intrusion, prioritizing sensory details of the environment (e.g., the "golden foothill slopes" and "warm water" of the river) to immerse readers in the scene, while building dramatic tension through deliberate pacing and omission of extraneous backstory. The play-like format, including stage-direction-esque openings for each chapter, facilitates rapid shifts in focus and heightens immediacy, making the adaptable for theatrical and intensifying emotional stakes via visual and auditory economy. Symbolism permeates the text through recurring objects that concretize character vulnerabilities. Rabbits embody Lennie's childlike illusions of and responsibility, as he fixates on tending them on the envisioned farm, yet they also signal peril: George warns that misbehavior forfeits this privilege, linking the symbol to conditional dreams and looming consequences. Mice and Lennie's outsized hands represent inherent fragility and inadvertent destruction; Lennie petting mice to death despite affectionate intent parallels his broader pattern of crushing what he loves, with hands—described as "cultivated" yet paw-like—visually and tactilely signifying uncontrolled strength's capacity for harm. These symbols, drawn from the title's to Robert Burns's poem on disrupted plans, ground abstract perils in tangible, repetitive . Foreshadowing operates through reiterated motifs that establish causal trajectories, such as Lennie's prior incidents (e.g., the episode involving a woman's ) and his accidental killings of mice, pups, and birds, which predict escalation to human . The parallel mercy killing of Candy's aged by Carlson foreshadows George's decisive act, motif of euthanizing the helpless underscoring inevitability via analogous . These devices, woven into and action rather than overt , methodically heighten tension by rendering outcomes predictable yet emotionally charged, as repeated patterns (e.g., soft textures leading to breakage) trace direct lines from minor harms to catastrophic resolution, enhancing the novella's deterministic craftsmanship.

Core Themes: Dreams, Loneliness, and

In Of Mice and Men, the pursuit of dreams centers on George and Lennie's shared vision of owning a self-sufficient , where they would "live off the fatta the lan'" and Lennie could tend rabbits, symbolizing and amid itinerant labor. This ideal recurs through repeated recountings, sustaining their bond, yet its elusiveness stems primarily from internal frailties rather than solely external barriers; Lennie's compulsive touching of soft objects escalates uncontrollably, leading to the accidental deaths of a and Curley's wife, which directly precipitate the dream's collapse as George recognizes Lennie's unrestrained impulses render stability impossible. Candy's tentative inclusion in the plan, offering his savings after his dog's euthanization, underscores how personal vulnerabilities—Lennie's mental limitations and George's enabling loyalty—undermine collective aspirations, independent of broader societal pressures. Loneliness manifests as an inherent human impulse for affiliation, evident in characters' behaviors seeking imperfect companionship despite social barriers. Crooks, isolated in the stable due to racial segregation, momentarily bonds with Lennie by sharing vulnerabilities, admitting "a guy needs somebody—to be near him," revealing isolation's psychological toll even as he retracts under habitual defensiveness. Candy, aged and maimed, clings to George and Lennie after losing his dog, his offer to invest in their farm driven by fear of expendability without ties. Curley's wife, unnamed and confined by her marriage, wanders the ranch confiding regrets to Lennie, Candy, and Crooks, her flirtations and complaints exposing unmet needs for validation amid spousal hostility. These flawed interactions—transient and strained—highlight connection's biological imperative, yet persistent divisions by race, age, gender, and intellect limit fulfillment. Steinbeck depicts through a naturalistic lens, portraying instincts as overriding rational control, reducing individuals to predatory or prey-like states akin to animals. Lennie's immense strength paired with childlike impulses exemplifies this, as his tactile fixations culminate in fatal violence despite George's repeated instructions to restrain himself, illustrating heredity's deterministic force over learned behavior. Carlson's pragmatic shooting of Candy's aged , justified by its infirmity and , mirrors the ranch hands' acceptance of the weak, while Curley's combative toward larger men reveals territorial instincts unchecked by . Animalistic pervades, from Lennie's mouse-killing hands to the heron's predation on pond creatures, reinforcing humans' subjection to base drives amid environmental harshness, where offers fleeting resistance but yields to imperatives.

Moral and Philosophical Dimensions

The central moral dilemma in Of Mice and Men revolves around George's mercy killing of Lennie, which emerges from a causal chain linking Lennie's and physical strength—manifesting in repeated accidental deaths of small animals and ultimately Curley's wife—to the predictable societal backlash of . This act underscores ethical realism over mystical , as outcomes stem from biological imperatives and environmental pressures rather than abstract fate; Lennie's condition, akin to impaired impulse control documented in early 20th-century psychological observations of intellectual disabilities, renders his behavior non-volitional yet foreseeably destructive. Philosophically, the novella engages determinism versus free will by depicting characters constrained by innate traits and socioeconomic binds—such as itinerant labor's instability—yet allowing pivotal agency in George's calculated intervention, which averts prolonged suffering while acknowledging deterministic biology's role in Lennie's recurrent harm to others. George's foreknowledge of consequences, drawn from prior incidents like Lennie's killing of a woman in Weed, positions his choice as a rational override of passive determinism, prioritizing causal prevention of worse outcomes over illusory autonomy. This tension rejects hard determinism's denial of responsibility, as George's deliberation implies accountability amid unchosen starting conditions. The limits of friendship appear in George's protective bond with Lennie, which fosters dependency that exacerbates risks rather than mitigating them; while mutual reliance provides emotional ballast in a isolating ranch environment, it enables Lennie's unchecked actions, questioning whether enduring loyalty overrides pragmatic separation for mutual viability. Critics observe this dynamic as a caution against codependency's unsustainability, where George's repeated rescues—financial, navigational, and disciplinary—ultimately converge in ethical collapse, highlighting friendship's boundary when one party's impairments impose perpetual threat. Parallels between human and animal mercy killings, such as Carlson's shooting of Candy's for its frailty and George's of Lennie to forestall mob violence, critique anthropocentric by equating diminished capacity across , yet affirm rooted in observable utility rather than sentimental . The 's painless end mirrors Lennie's, both justified by incapacity for and inevitable decline, but without endorsing ; human cognition's remnants in Lennie demand higher scrutiny of agency, reinforcing causal judgment over species-based leniency.

Reception and Critical Views

Initial Critical Reception

Upon its publication on February 2, 1937, Of Mice and Men received prompt acclaim from major outlets for its stark realism and dramatic intensity in depicting the hardships of migrant laborers. Fred T. Marsh's review in The New York Times on February 28 praised the novella's "sure, raucous, vulgar Americanism," its suspenseful structure akin to a thriller, and its authentic evocation of a "floating army of drifting ranch hands," arguing that it powerfully explored human endurance beyond physical sustenance. The book's rapid popularity was amplified by its pre-publication selection as a main Book-of-the-Month Club offering, which guaranteed broad distribution and propelled it to status amid the economic context of the . Contemporary critiques, however, tempered the enthusiasm by questioning the work's depth. characterized Steinbeck's approach as rooted in , where characters functioned more as instinct-driven organisms than fully realized individuals with social or ethical nuance, rendering the narrative technically adroit but thematically limited. Other reviewers faulted it for sentimentality in its tragic arc and for portraying impoverished, coarse figures in ways that risked simplification or undue determinism.

Long-Term Scholarly Interpretations

Scholarship on Of Mice and Men since the 1950s has increasingly applied interdisciplinary lenses, including and , to examine the novella's portrayal of human interactions with the natural world and individual limitations, while quantitative metrics underscore its pedagogical endurance. Ecocritical readings, gaining prominence from the 1990s onward, interpret Steinbeck's depiction of the and recurring animal motifs—such as rabbits symbolizing unattainable dreams and the heron's predation—as reflections of a disrupted ecological harmony mirroring human fragility during the . These analyses posit that Steinbeck's narrative integrates , where the land's barrenness causally reinforces characters' isolation and failed aspirations, without anthropocentric sentimentality. In , post-1970s examinations of Lennie's cognitive impairments focus on his childlike behaviors and physical strength as period-accurate representations of intellectual limitations in migrant labor contexts, rather than imposing contemporary diagnostic frameworks. Scholars note Lennie's dependency on George illustrates the era's lack of institutional support for the impaired, leading to pragmatic, if tragic, resolutions driven by survival imperatives, as George's mercy killing averts mob violence or institutionalization. This approach avoids anachronistic pathologization, emphasizing instead how Lennie's traits exacerbate social vulnerabilities in a competitive , where productivity norms marginalize the unfit. Certain interpretations, particularly those aligned with classical liberal perspectives, underscore the novella's implicit advocacy for personal responsibility amid economic adversity, portraying George's guardianship as a voluntary burden that critiques unchecked dependency and highlights self-reliant agency as essential for dignity. These readings argue that the protagonists' dream of land ownership embodies bootstraps individualism thwarted by external forces like job instability, yet George's decisive action reaffirms moral autonomy over passive victimhood. Such views contrast with collectivist undertones in Steinbeck's broader oeuvre, positioning Of Mice and Men as a cautionary tale on the limits of interpersonal welfare without reciprocal capability. The novella's scholarly persistence is evidenced by its high frequency in U.S. high curricula; a 2005 national survey of grades 9-11 English teachers ranked it among the top 10 most assigned texts, with over 30,000 students reporting exposure annually based on sampled data. Sales figures further quantify its impact, exceeding 7.5 million copies alone by the late 20th century and approaching 15 million globally, reflecting sustained academic integration over decades.

Controversies and Challenges

Censorship History and Recent Bans

Of Mice and Men has been subject to challenges primarily in educational contexts since its 1937 publication, with complaints centering on , , and offensive language. Early instances include a 1953 ban in Ireland attributed to profane content. In the United States, school districts frequently contested the during the mid-20th century, often in conservative areas citing moral objections to its depiction of hardships and interpersonal conflicts. The (ALA) documented Of Mice and Men as one of the most challenged books in the 1990s and 2000s, ranking it in the top 10 multiple years for reasons including offensive language, , and ; for instance, it faced removal attempts in schools in 1990 over . Between 1999 and 2000, challenges persisted in U.S. schools due to and violent elements, reflecting parental concerns in districts seeking to shield students from unvarnished depictions of 1930s-era struggles. Challenges intensified in recent years, with ALA and reporting spikes in U.S. school restrictions from 2023 to 2025, often for racial slurs and stereotypes; examples include library bans in Florida's Indian River County during the 2023-2024 period. Internationally, removed the novel from its English curriculum starting September 2025, citing concerns over and the use of racial slurs as outdated and potentially harmful language. These actions align with broader patterns of restrictions in both conservative U.S. districts historically and varied locales amid contemporary sensitivity to historical terminology. Opponents of such bans, including library associations, maintain that retaining unaltered original texts preserves historical linguistic accuracy and enables critical examination of past societal norms, arguing that diminishes educational depth without addressing root contexts. Despite ongoing challenges, the novel's inclusion in curricula has endured in many regions, underscoring debates over access to unedited literary works.

Debates on Euthanasia, Disability, and Violence

In John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men, George's deliberate shooting of Lennie Small at the novel's conclusion has sparked ethical debates framing the act as either a merciful euthanasia or an unjust vigilante killing. Proponents of the mercy killing interpretation argue that George's action spares Lennie from imminent lynching by a mob seeking retribution for Lennie's accidental killing of Curley's wife, as well as from the prolonged suffering of institutional confinement or execution, which were common outcomes for individuals with severe intellectual impairments in 1930s California. This view rests on deontological reasoning that prioritizes minimizing foreseeable harm, given Lennie's childlike inability to comprehend or endure trial, imprisonment, or mob violence. Critics counter that the killing represents a failure of protective loyalty, substituting euthanasia for sustained guardianship despite Lennie's repeated unintentional harms, and reflects a pragmatic expediency over moral accountability in a society where familial duty often entailed managing such dependents without lethal intervention. Empirical parallels from the era show that while state institutions for the "feeble-minded" expanded—housing over 50,000 residents by the early 20th century—overcrowding and underfunding led to abusive conditions, yet many families retained custody, underscoring viable non-lethal paths that George forgoes. Lennie's portrayal as a physically powerful man with profound intellectual disability—marked by impaired impulse control, literal-mindedness, and dependency—has drawn modern accusations of ableism for reinforcing stereotypes of the "gentle giant" whose docility enables exploitation and ultimate disposal within a patriarchal framework. Such critiques, often from disability studies perspectives, contend that Steinbeck's depiction pathologizes cognitive difference as inherently burdensome and violent, culminating in George's rationalized murder as a societal "solution" to unmanageable impairment. However, contextual analysis reveals a realist reflection of 1930s limitations, where institutional options were scarce and eugenics-influenced policies promoted segregation or sterilization over integration, leaving families like George's hypothetical one to navigate risks without modern supports. In the novel, Lennie's disability causally precipitates violence not through glorification but as an unavoidable outcome of mismatched strength and awareness in a labor-intensive migrant environment, where protective isolation proved insufficient. This contrasts with ableist charges by emphasizing environmental and relational failures over innate defect, as institutional data from the period indicate rising admissions but persistent familial retention amid inadequate state care. The novel's depiction of —encompassing animal killings, fistfights, and fatal accidents—serves as a naturalistic consequence of frailty and societal pressures rather than an endorsement, illustrating how desperation in Depression-era itinerant work amplifies latent aggressions without romanticizing them. Steinbeck presents acts like Lennie's crushing of mice or the as unintended extensions of his disability-driven , and broader conflicts as eruptions from economic , underscoring causal chains where unchecked impulses lead to absent intervention. Ethical scrutiny avoids viewing as glorified, instead highlighting its role in exposing the fragility of bonds; for instance, Curley's hand-crushing fight stems from jealousy, not heroism, mirroring real labor camp tensions without advocacy. Real-world analogs, such as altercations documented in during the , affirm this as empirical realism, where arose from stresses rather than inherent valor.

Political and Ideological Critiques

Some interpreters, particularly those influenced by Marxist frameworks, view Of Mice and Men as a condemnation of capitalist exploitation, depicting owners as antagonists who perpetuate worker alienation and thwart aspirations like George and Lennie's dream. This reading posits systemic forces—wage labor, economic scarcity during the —as the causal agents of failure, with individual flaws secondary to class oppression. However, such analyses, prevalent in academic circles with documented left-leaning institutional biases, underemphasize of worker agency and internal dynamics. Alternative ideological perspectives highlight the novella's realism in portraying owners not as ideological villains but as pragmatic opportunists navigating Depression-era constraints, where hiring itinerant labor was a low-risk to volatile markets rather than deliberate malice. Curley's , the boss, offers and advances wages without , reflecting standard employer incentives amid widespread job , while characters like Slim embody merit-based earned through competence, not inherited power. Worker setbacks stem more from personal and interpersonal failings—Lennie's uncontrolled strength leading to fatal accidents, Crooks's self-isolation amid racial tensions, and group infighting like Carlson's impatience with Candy's dog—than external capitalist structures, underscoring causal realism in over abstract systemic blame. From a right-leaning lens favoring , the narrative cautions against and romanticized interdependence, as George's loyalty to Lennie burdens his prospects and culminates in , with George's post-act reflection—"I could live so easy... get a job an' work an' no trouble"—affirming as liberating. This contrasts with Steinbeck's own collectivist sympathies, evident in his support for labor organizing and FDR's policies, yet unsubstantiated by the story's evidence where pooled dreams dissolve due to mismatched abilities, not cooperative . Steinbeck's later disillusionment with Soviet , expressed in private letters criticizing its brutality, suggests his early proletarian leanings projected ideals onto flawed realities without rigorous causal accounting. Empirically contextualizing the characters' frustrations, the Great Depression's persistence—unemployment lingering at 14-19% through 1939 despite interventions—arose from policy distortions like wage controls and cartelization under the , which stifled market signals and prolonged recovery compared to freer adjustments elsewhere. Full employment emerged via II's demand-driven mobilization and monetary expansion, including gold inflows doubling the money supply by 1941, rather than sustained fiscal programs alone, challenging narratives framing the era's hardships as inherent to unbridled . Thus, George and Lennie's thwarted ambitions align more with individual contingencies in a policy-constrained environment than ideological .

Adaptations and Legacy

Stage Adaptations

The stage adaptation of Of Mice and Men was crafted by himself shortly after the novel's publication, designed with theatrical structure in mind to facilitate direct transfer from page to performance while preserving the original and scene divisions. The play premiered on Broadway at the Music Box Theatre on November 23, 1937, under the direction of , with portraying George and as Lennie, running for 207 performances until May 1938. This production emphasized the story's dramatic tension through live staging, amplifying the pathos of interpersonal dynamics and the characters' unfulfilled aspirations via physical proximity and real-time audience immersion, elements inherent to theater but requiring adjustments for pacing and visual symbolism not as pronounced in the . Subsequent Broadway revivals have maintained fidelity to Steinbeck's script, focusing on interpretive staging to heighten emotional realism. A 1974 revival at the Theatre, directed by Robert Symonds, ran from December 18, 1974, to February 9, 1975, for 61 performances, underscoring the play's enduring appeal amid economic themes resonant with post-Depression audiences. The 2014 production at the , helmed by and featuring as George and as Lennie, opened on April 16 and closed July 27, earning praise for its raw physicality and character-driven intensity that intensified the tragedy through minimalist sets and actor blocking. Beyond Broadway, the play has seen extensive international stagings and tours, often in translation, adapting to diverse cultural contexts while retaining core textual elements; licensing through entities like Concord Theatricals has enabled non-English productions worldwide, though specific directorial choices vary to accentuate local interpretations of isolation and labor struggles. These adaptations typically avoid major textual alterations, prioritizing dynamics and symbolic props—such as the dream farm motif—to evoke the novel's causal chain of human frailty and inevitability in live format.

Film and Other Visual Adaptations

The first major film adaptation of Of Mice and Men premiered on December 30, , directed by and produced by . portrayed George Milton, while played Lennie Small, with as Curley's wife, renamed Mae to avoid implying promiscuity under the . The black-and-white production, scored by , incorporated additional scenes to expand the narrative, such as extended ranch interactions, while softening depictions of violence—Lennie's killing of the puppy and Mae occur off-screen to comply with Production Code restrictions on graphic content. Cinematography emphasized stark landscapes, enhancing themes of isolation through visual contrasts between barren fields and fleeting visions of prosperity. Despite a modest box office of approximately $676,000, the film earned critical acclaim, securing four Academy Award nominations including Best Picture, Best Original Score, Best Sound Recording, and Best Cinematography. A television aired on , directed by , featuring as George and as Lennie. This version adhered closely to the novella's but condensed runtime to fit broadcast constraints, resulting in abbreviated subplots like Candy's . Visuals relied on studio sets with minimal , prioritizing intimate close-ups to convey emotional intensity over expansive scenery. Reception was positive among viewers, with an IMDb user rating of 8.1/10, though it lacked theatrical awards due to its made-for-TV format. The 1992 film, directed by and starring as George opposite John Malkovich's Lennie, marked a more faithful rendering in color, filmed on location in to capture authentic 1930s rural textures. Produced for television but released theatrically, it restored omitted book elements like Lennie's hallucinations, using practical effects and natural lighting to heighten realism and symbolism—such as recurring river motifs underscoring inevitability. Alterations minimized censorship impacts of earlier eras, allowing fuller portrayal of Lennie's accidental violence through implied rather than explicit visuals. Critically lauded with a 97% score, it competed at the , earning Sinise a nomination, though no Oscars. The adaptation's interpretive shift emphasized psychological depth, with Malkovich's physicality amplifying Lennie's childlike vulnerability.

Cultural Impact and Enduring Relevance

Of Mice and Men has maintained a prominent place in educational settings, serving as a core text for examining human relationships and societal constraints despite recurring challenges to its inclusion in curricula. In the , the was studied by the vast majority of students as of 2011, highlighting its role in fostering discussions on loyalty and aspiration. American educators similarly regard it as indispensable for delivering substantive literary analysis, emphasizing its capacity to illuminate interpersonal dynamics and economic hardships. The novella's linguistic elements have embedded themselves in broader cultural discourse, with phrases like "the best laid schemes o' mice an' men / Gang aft agley" from the epigraph—drawn from ' 1785 poem ""—entering common parlance to signify the unpredictability of intentions. Iconic lines, such as those depicting shared dreams of self-sufficiency ("live off the fatta the lan'"), recur in media analyses of ambition and disillusionment, reinforcing the work's influence on public expressions of hope and setback. On a philosophical level, Of Mice and Men sustains engagement with the inherent vulnerabilities of human endeavors, portraying dreams as susceptible to external forces and personal limitations, which prompts reflections on resilience amid isolation. This focus on fragility informs ethical inquiries into companionship's role in countering existential , with the narrative's structure underscoring causal chains where individual agency intersects with uncontrollable circumstances. Persistent scholarly and popular interest, evidenced by continued classroom adoption and thematic allusions, affirms its applicability to contemporary assessments of pursuit and loss.

References

  1. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/february-6/of-mice-and-men-is-published
  2. https://datebook.sfchronicle.com/books/from-the-archives-john-steinbecks-of-mice-and-men-published-on-feb-6-1937
  3. https://sits.sjsu.edu/curriculum-resources/of-mice-and-men/critical-reception/
  4. https://www.sjsu.edu/steinbeck/resources/biography/awards-won-by-steinbeck.php
  5. https://www.stlouisfed.org/the-great-depression/curriculum/economic-episodes-in-american-history-part-3
  6. https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/chapter5
  7. https://www.encyclopedia.com/economics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/farm-foreclosures
  8. https://capitolmuseum.ca.gov/experiences/exhibits/the-dust-bowl-california-and-the-politics-of-hard-times/
  9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41815799
  10. https://migration.ucdavis.edu/rmn/more.php?id=788
  11. https://www.loc.gov/collections/todd-and-sonkin-migrant-workers-from-1940-to-1941/articles-and-essays/the-migrant-experience/
  12. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/eras/great-depression/ground-1936/
  13. https://www.nps.gov/places/weedpatch-camp.htm
  14. https://www.nber.org/digest/jul16/tracking-dust-bowl-migrants-1930s
  15. https://steinbeckintheschools.com/harvest-gypsies-overview
  16. https://steinbeck.stanford.edu/migrants
  17. https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD1704039.pdf
  18. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2008/winter/grapes.html
  19. https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Of-Mice-And-Men-Naturalism-Analysis-PJWAP2R4TDT
  20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/steinbeckreview.17.1.0037
  21. https://www.greenleft.org.au/1994/151/culture/long-retreat-john-steinbeck
  22. https://www.quora.com/Was-John-Steinbeck-a-communist
  23. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/28/nyregion/theater-review-of-mice-and-men-the-way-steinbeck-meant-it.html
  24. https://playbill.com/article/from-bestseller-to-broadway-a-history-of-john-steinbecks-of-mice-and-men-com-212613
  25. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/micemen/style/
  26. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/cliffsnotes/subjects/literature/where-did-the-name-of-mice-and-men-come-from
  27. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/john-steinbeck-biography-2
  28. https://storytellingarts.org/2016/03/1451/
  29. https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/64095/15-things-you-might-not-know-about-mice-and-men
  30. https://www.goodreads.com/work/editions/40283-of-mice-and-men
  31. https://www.burnsiderarebooks.com/pages/books/140946360/john-steinbeck/of-mice-and-men
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348376155_Of_Mice_as_Men_A_Transmedial_Perspective_on_Fictionality
  33. https://interestingliterature.com/2015/10/five-fascinating-facts-about-of-mice-and-men/
  34. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/46/article/172410
  35. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/micemen/summary/
  36. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/book-summary
  37. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/of-mice-and-men/summary
  38. https://sits.sjsu.edu/curriculum-resources/of-mice-and-men/plot-synopsis/
  39. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/character-analysis/george-milton
  40. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/character-analysis/lennie-small
  41. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/of-mice-and-men/characters/lennie-small
  42. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/micemen/character/lennie/
  43. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/character-analysis/curley
  44. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/micemen/character/curley/
  45. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/character-analysis/slim
  46. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/of-mice-and-men/characters/slim
  47. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/character-analysis/crooks
  48. https://sujo.usindh.edu.pk/index.php/KALICH/article/download/3902/2887/7286
  49. https://www.savemyexams.com/igcse/english-literature/edexcel/16/revision-notes/modern-prose/of-mice-and-men/of-mice-and-men-writers-methods-and-techniques/
  50. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/critical-essays/structure-of-the-novel
  51. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zwcx82p/revision/1
  52. https://khasellhka.weebly.com/uploads/2/8/9/9/2899319/aesthetic_features_and_stylistic_devices.pdf
  53. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/of-mice-and-men/symbols
  54. https://www.enotes.com/topics/of-mice-and-men/questions/symbolism-and-significance-of-hands-in-of-mice-3134817
  55. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/micemen/foreshadowing/
  56. https://www.enotes.com/topics/of-mice-and-men/analysis/style-form-literary-elements
  57. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zwcx82p/revision/2
  58. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/micemen/quotes/theme/the-impossibility-of-the-american-dream/
  59. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/of-mice-and-men/themes/the-american-dream
  60. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/of-mice-and-men/critical-essays/major-themes-2
  61. https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/micemen/themes/
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339230241_The_Naturalistic_Implications_in_John_Steinbeck%27s_Of_Mice_and_Men
  63. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1879&context=bts
  64. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/018e/6aa6c1c9530ff63f1dbdeecfe757c7f35014.pdf
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370392828_Mercy_Killing_or_Murder_A_Moral_Dilemma_Regarding_the_Death_of_Lennie_in_Of_Mice_and_Men
  66. https://typelish.com/b/steinbeck-and-determinism-of-mice-and-men-106786
  67. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/f/Stough_Mary_Thesis_Determinism%2520And%2520Free%2520Will.pdf
  68. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9780810867345.pdf
  69. https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Georges-Moral-Dilemmas-FCJLNKHGBU
  70. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/of-mice-and-men/themes/male-friendship
  71. https://www.cram.com/essay/Of-Mice-And-Men-Character-Analysis/PCHLPYKFTR
  72. https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Friendship-In-Of-Mice-And-Men-PJUP26PKG
  73. https://www.enotes.com/topics/of-mice-and-men/questions/parallels-between-deaths-in-of-mice-and-men-3121044
  74. https://hub.edubirdie.com/examples/of-mice-and-men-was-killing-lennie-an-act-of-mercy/
  75. https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Mercy-Killing-In-John-Steinbecks-Of-Mice-F5BF0384301F039D
  76. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2021/04/mice-men-murdering-misfits-dwight-longenecker.html
  77. https://www.nytimes.com/1937/02/28/archives/john-steinbecks-tale-of-drifting-men-of-mice-and-men-by-john.html
  78. https://shop.suntup.press/products/of-mice-and-men-by-john-steinbeck-artist-edition
  79. https://www.enotes.com/topics/john-steinbeck/criticism/steinbeck-john-vol-13/edmund-wilson
  80. https://www.enotes.com/topics/of-mice-and-men/critical-essays/critical-reception
  81. https://alscw.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/forum_4.pdf
  82. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/download/4509/1393
  83. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1754-6087.2007.tb00101.x/pdf
  84. https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/steinbeck/article/21/2/232/399226/Disability-Racism-and-Sexism-in-Steinbeck-s-Of
  85. https://cls.uok.ac.ir/article_63173.html
  86. https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/402/551
  87. https://www.cram.com/essay/Essay-On-Optimism-In-Of-Mice-And/F36GZMF2BXYQ
  88. https://darlingaxe.com/blogs/news/of-mice-and-men
  89. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/68/article/218349
  90. https://www.goodnovel.com/qa/many-copies-john-steinbeck-mice-men-sold
  91. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/banned-of-mice-and-men/
  92. https://study.com/academy/lesson/of-mice-and-men-and-censorship.html
  93. https://www.ala.org/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10/archive
  94. https://research.gfcmsu.edu/bannedbooks/ChallengedClassics
  95. https://www.ila.org/initiatives/banned-books-week/books-challenged-or-banned-in-1999-2000
  96. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO02/20220407/114616/HHRG-117-GO02-20220407-SD018.pdf
  97. https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/national/24816222.mice-men-kill-mockingbird-removed-welsh-gcse-curriculum/
  98. https://hanning419.medium.com/of-mice-and-men-137396e5c339
  99. https://www.enotes.com/topics/of-mice-and-men/questions/george-s-justification-and-morality-in-killing-3134850
  100. https://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels/4e.html
  101. https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/human-brain/lobotomy3.htm
  102. https://www.ipl.org/essay/Ableism-In-John-Steinbecks-Of-Mice-And-FJWEABWUYT
  103. https://cls.uok.ac.ir/article_63173_cfaadb7f151930262fa4b6da3d4cae00.pdf
  104. https://www.academia.edu/125285781/Literary_Disability_Studies_in_John_Steinbeck_s_Of_Mice_and_Men
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4202623/
  106. https://www.ipl.org/essay/Archetyping-In-John-Steinbecks-Of-Mice-And-F3KYM22PCED6
  107. https://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels/4d.html
  108. https://library.nashville.gov/blog/2025/05/banned-books-club-mice-and-men
  109. https://www.ipl.org/essay/Role-Of-Violence-In-John-Steinbecks-Of-PC5KUZTGZT
  110. https://www.cram.com/essay/The-Role-Of-Violence-In-John-Steinbecks/PCF5CPNYMDV
  111. https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Violence-In-John-Steinbecks-Of-Mice-And-3BFFB92185DD6E7E
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337692664_Exploitation_and_Estrangement_of_Migrant_Workers_in_a_Capitalist_Society_A_Marxist_Interpretation_of_John_Steinbeck%27s_of_Mice_and_Men
  113. https://www.ipl.org/essay/Capitalism-In-John-Steinbecks-Of-Mice-And-FJXFPX4NAU
  114. https://aleph.edinum.org/13877?lang=en
  115. https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1006106-steinbeck-a-dubious-choice-for-the-nobel-in-literature
  116. https://www.hoover.org/research/what-ended-great-depression
  117. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/theater/james-franco-and-chris-odowd-in-of-mice-and-men.html
  118. https://www.ibdb.com/broadway-production/of-mice-and-men-12320
  119. https://www.concordtheatricals.com/p/9822/of-mice-and-men
  120. https://www.ibdb.com/broadway-production/of-mice-and-men-3709
  121. https://www.ibdb.com/broadway-production/of-mice-and-men-495843
  122. https://variety.com/2014/legit/reviews/broadway-review-of-mice-and-men-starring-james-franco-chris-odowd-1201158417/
  123. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0031742/awards/
  124. https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/85392/of-mice-and-men
  125. https://variety.com/1938/film/reviews/of-mice-and-men-1200412014/
  126. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0284365/
  127. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1040322-of_mice_and_men
  128. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105046/awards/
  129. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-12829392
  130. https://www.winchesterstar.com/winchester_star/open-forum-the-indispensability-of-of-mice-and-men/article_0e02e7ec-d317-5b76-b7df-6afd581edbcb.html
  131. https://www.quora.com/What-does-the-phrase-best-laid-schemes-of-mice-and-men-mean
  132. https://www.audible.com/blog/quotes-of-mice-and-men?srsltid=AfmBOootMNUmkkvlRJRmVt-Hr2aK7dHBciQcikGSMeKyLH2WfW3iul6W
  133. https://k12learningskills.com/wp/a-deeper-look-into-steinbecks-of-mice-and-men/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.