Hubbry Logo
FarmFarmMain
Open search
Farm
Community hub
Farm
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Farm
Farm
Farm
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Church Farm in Norfolk, England
Typical plan of a medieval English manor, showing the use of field strips

A farm (also called an agricultural holding) is an area of land that is devoted primarily to agricultural processes with the primary objective of producing food and other crops; it is the basic facility in food production.[1] The name is used for specialized units such as arable farms, vegetable farms, fruit farms, dairy, pig and poultry farms, and land used for the production of natural fiber, biofuel, and other biobased products. It includes ranches, feedlots, orchards, plantations and estates, smallholdings, and hobby farms, and includes the farmhouse and agricultural buildings as well as the land. In modern times, the term has been extended to include such industrial operations as wind farms and fish farms, both of which can operate on land or at sea.

There are about 570 million farms in the world, most of which are small and family-operated. Small farms with a land area of fewer than 2 hectares operate on about 12% of the world's agricultural land, and family farms comprise about 75% of the world's agricultural land.[2]

Modern farms in developed countries are highly mechanized. In the United States, livestock may be raised on rangeland and finished in feedlots, and the mechanization of crop production has brought about a great decrease in the number of agricultural workers needed. In Europe, traditional family farms are giving way to larger production units. In Australia, some farms are very large because the land is unable to support a high stocking density of livestock because of climatic conditions. In less developed countries, small farms are the norm, and the majority of rural residents are subsistence farmers, feeding their families and selling any surplus products in the local market.

Etymology

[edit]
A farmer harvesting crops with mule-drawn wagon, 1920s, Iowa, US

The word in the sense of an agricultural land-holding derives from the verb "to farm" a revenue source, whether taxes, customs, rents of a group of manors or simply to hold an individual manor by the feudal land tenure of "fee farm". The word is from the medieval Latin noun firma, also the source of the French word ferme, meaning a fixed agreement, contract,[3] from the classical Latin adjective firmus meaning strong, stout, firm.[4][5] As in the medieval age virtually all manors were engaged in the business of agriculture, which was their principal revenue source, so to hold a manor by the tenure of "fee farm" became synonymous with the practice of agriculture itself.

History

[edit]
Main article: History of agriculture
See also: Timeline of agriculture and food technology
Map of the world showing approximate centers of origin of agriculture and its spread in prehistory: the Fertile Crescent (11,000 BP), the Yangtze and Yellow River basins (9,000 BP), and the New Guinea Highlands (9,000–6,000 BP), Central Mexico (5,000–4,000 BP), Northern South America (5,000–4,000 BP), sub-Saharan Africa (5,000–4,000 BP, exact location unknown), eastern North America (4,000–3,000 BP).[6]

Farming has been innovated at multiple different points and places in human history. The transition from hunter-gatherer to settled, agricultural societies is called the Neolithic Revolution and first began around 12,000 years ago, near the beginning of the geological epoch of the Holocene[7] around 12,000 years ago.[8] It was the world's first historically verifiable revolution in agriculture. Farming spread from the Middle East to Europe and by 4,000 BC people that lived in the central part of Europe were using oxen to pull plows and wagons.[9] Subsequent step-changes in human farming practices were provoked by the British Agricultural Revolution in the 18th century, and the Green Revolution of the second half of the 20th century.

Farming originated independently in different parts of the world, as hunter-gatherer societies transitioned to food production rather than food capture. It may have started about 12,000 years ago with the domestication of livestock in the Fertile Crescent in western Asia, soon to be followed by the cultivation of crops. Modern units tend to specialize in the crops or livestock best suited to the region, with their finished products being sold for the retail market or for further processing, with farm products being traded around the world.

Types of farms

[edit]
Farmland in the United States. The round fields are due to the use of center pivot irrigation

A farm may be owned and operated by a single individual, family, community, corporation, or a company, may produce one or many types of produce, and can be a holding of any size from a fraction of a hectare[10] to several thousand hectares.[11]

A farm may operate under a monoculture system or with a variety of cereal or arable crops, which may be separate from or combined with raising livestock. Specialist farms are often denoted as such, thus a dairy farm, fish farm, poultry farm or mink farm.

Some farms may not use the word at all, hence vineyard (grapes), orchard (nuts and other fruit), market garden or "truck farm" (vegetables and flowers). Some farms may be denoted by their topographical location, such as a hill farm, while large estates growing cash crops such as cotton or coffee may be called plantations.

Many other terms are used to describe farms to denote their methods of production, as in collective, corporate, intensive, organic or vertical.

Where most of the income is from some other employment, and the farm is an expanded residence, the term hobby farm is common. This will allow sufficient size for recreational use but be very unlikely to produce sufficient income to be self-sustaining. Hobby farms are commonly around 2 hectares (4.9 acres) but may be much larger depending on land prices.

Other farms may primarily exist for research or education, such as an ant farm, and since farming is synonymous with mass production, the word "farm" may be used to describe wind power generation or puppy farm.

Farm buildings

[edit]
Main article: Farmhouse

Farms have special buildings. Some buildings, such as barns, may hold animals. There may be separate buildings for chickens and pigs. On dairy farms, a milking parlor is an important building. It is where dairy cows are milked. The milk is kept in a milking parlor until a milk tanker comes to get it. There are also special buildings for keeping grain. A silo is a tall building where grains, such as wheat and oats are stored. Farmers also use small round metal buildings to store their grain. These buildings are called grain bins.

Specialized farms

[edit]

Dairy farm

[edit]
Main article: Dairy farming
A milking machine in action

Dairy farming is a class of agriculture, where female cattle, goats, or other mammals are raised for their milk, which may be either processed on-site or transported to a dairy for processing and eventual retail sale There are many breeds of cattle that can be milked some of the best producing ones include Holstein, Norwegian Red, Kostroma, Brown Swiss, and more.[12]

In most Western countries, a centralized dairy facility processes milk and dairy products, such as ice cream, yogurt, butter, and cheese. In the United States, these dairies are usually local companies, while in the Southern Hemisphere facilities may be run by very large nationwide or trans-national corporations (such as Fonterra).

Dairy farms generally sell male calves for veal meat, as dairy breeds are not normally satisfactory for commercial beef production. Many dairy farms also grow their own feed, typically including maize, alfalfa, and hay. This is fed directly to the cows, or stored as silage for use during the winter season. Additional dietary supplements are added to the feed to improve milk production. [13]

Poultry farm

[edit]
Main article: Poultry farming
Poultry farming

Poultry farms are devoted to raising chickens (egg layers or broilers), turkeys, ducks, and other fowl, generally for meat or eggs.[14]

Pig farm

[edit]
Main article: Pig farming

A pig farm is one that specializes in raising pigs for bacon, ham, and other pork products. They may be free range, intensive, or both.

Ownership

[edit]

Farm control and ownership have traditionally been a key indicator of status and power, especially in Medieval European agrarian societies. The distribution of farm ownership has historically been closely linked to a form of government. Medieval feudalism was essentially a system that centralized control of farmland, control of farm labor, and political power, while the early American democracy, in which land ownership was a prerequisite for voting rights, was built on relatively easy paths to individual farm ownership. However, the gradual modernization and mechanization of farming, which greatly increases both the efficiency and capital requirements of farming, has led to increasingly large farms. This has usually been accompanied by the decoupling of political power from farm ownership.[citation needed]

Forms of ownership

[edit]

In some societies (especially socialist and communist), collective farming is the norm, with either government ownership of the land or common ownership by a local group. Especially in societies without widespread industrialized farming, tenant farming and sharecropping are common; farmers either pay landowners for the right to use farmland or give up a portion of the crops.

Agribusiness

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Agribusiness.[edit]

Agribusiness is the industry, enterprises, and the field of study[15] of value chains in agriculture[16] and in the bio-economy,[17] in which case it is also called bio-business[18][19] or bio-enterprise. The primary goal of agribusiness is to maximize profit while satisfying the needs of consumers for products related to natural resources. Agribusinesses comprise farms, food and fiber processing, forestry, fisheries, biotechnology and biofuel enterprises and their input suppliers.

Studies of business growth and performance in farming have found that successful agricultural businesses are cost-efficient internally and operate in favourable economic, political, and physical-organic environments. They are able to expand and make profits, improve the productivity of land, labor, and capital, and keep their costs down to ensure market price competitiveness.[20]

Agribusiness is not limited to farming. It encompasses a broader spectrum through the agribusiness system which includes input supplies, value-addition, marketing, entrepreneurship, microfinancing, and agricultural extension.

In some countries like the Philippines, creation and management of agribusiness enterprises require consultation with registered agriculturists above a certain level of operations, capitalization, land area, or number of animals in the farm.

Farms around the world

[edit]

United States

[edit]
Farming near Klingerstown, Pennsylvania

The land and buildings of a farm are called the "farmstead".[21] Enterprises where livestock are raised on rangeland are called ranches. Where livestock are raised in confinement on feed produced elsewhere, the term feedlot is usually used.

In the US, in 1910 there were 6,406,000 farms and 10,174,000 family workers; In 2000 there were only 2,172,000 farms and 2,062,300 family workers.[22] The share of U.S. farms operated by women has risen steadily over recent decades, from 5 percent in 1978 to 14 percent by 2007.[23]

A typical North American grain farm with farmstead in Ontario, Canada

In the United States, there are over three million migrant and seasonal farmworkers; 72% are foreign-born, 78% are male, they have an average age of 36 and average education of 8 years.[24] Farmworkers make an average hourly rate of $9–10 per hour, compared to an average of over $18 per hour for nonfarm labor. Their average family income is under $20,000 and 23% live in families with incomes below the federal poverty level.[25] One-half of all farmworker families earn less than $10,000 per year,[26] which is significantly below the 2005 U.S. poverty level of $19,874 for a family of four.

In 2007, corn acres are expected to increase by 15% because of the high demand for ethanol, both in and outside of the U.S. Producers are expecting to plant 90.5 million acres (366,000 km2) of corn, making it the largest corn crop since 1944.[27]

Europe

[edit]
Traditional Dutch farmhouse

In the UK, farm as an agricultural unit, always denotes the area of pasture and other fields together with its farmhouse, farmyard and outbuildings. Large farms, or groups of farms under the same ownership, may be called an estate. Conversely, a small farm surrounding the owner's dwelling is called a smallholding and is generally focused on self-sufficiency with only the surplus being sold.

In Europe, traditional family farms are giving way to larger production units where industrial agriculture and mechanization brings large crop yields.[9]

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is one of the most important policies of the European Union and is helping in the change of farms from traditional family farms to larger production units. The policy has the objectives of increasing agricultural production, providing certainty in food supplies, ensuring a high quality of life for farmers, stabilizing markets, and ensuring reasonable prices for consumers.[28] It was, until recently, operated by a system of subsidies and market intervention. Until the 1990s, the policy accounted for over 60 per cent of the European Union's annual budget, and as of 2013 accounts for around 34 per cent.[29]

Asia

[edit]
Farmlands in Hebei province, China

Pakistan

[edit]
Main article: Agriculture in Pakistan

According to the World Bank, "most empirical evidence indicates that land productivity on large farms in Pakistan is lower than that of small farms, holding other factors constant." Small farmers have "higher net returns per hectare" than large farms, according to farm household income data.[30]

Nepal

[edit]
Main article: Agriculture in Nepal
Goat found in Nepal

Nepal is an agricultural country and about 80% of the total population are engaged in farming. Rice is mainly produced in Nepal along with fruits like apples.[31] Dairy farming and poultry farming are also growing in Nepal.

Australia

[edit]
Cattle grazing on a farm in Victoria, Australia
Main article: Agriculture in Australia
Goat found in Australia

Farming is a significant economic sector in Australia. A farm is an area of land used for primary production which will include buildings.

According to the UN, "green agriculture directs a greater share of total farming input expenditures towards the purchase of locally sourced input?(e.g. labour and organic fertilisers) and a local multiplier effect is expected to kick in. Overall, green farming practices tend to require more labour inputs than conventional farming (e.g. from comparable levels to as much as 30 percent more) (FAO 2007 and European Commission 2010), creating jobs in rural areas and a higher return on labour inputs."[32]

Often very small farms used for intensive primary production are referred to by the specialization they are being used for, such as a dairy rather than a dairy farm, a piggery, a market garden, etc. This also applies to feedlots, which are specifically developed for a single purpose and are often not able to be used for more general purpose (mixed) farming practices.

In remote areas, farms can become quite large. As with estates in England, there is no defined size or method of operation at which a large farm becomes a station.

Africa

[edit]
A typical farm in Namibia

A farm in Africa includes various structures. Depending on climate-related areas primarily farming is the raising and breeding of grazing livestock, such as cattle, sheep, ostriches, horses or goats. Predominantly domestic animals are raised for their meat, milk, skin, leather or fiber wool). You might even come across silk farms.[33]

Furthermore, there are plenty of hunting farms, guest farms and game farms. Arable] or irrigated land is often used for raising crops such as feed grains and hay for animal feeding.

On some farms (Astro Farm) star-gazing became very popular because of the excellent optical quality in the desert.[34] The High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) which investigates cosmic gamma rays is situated on Farm Göllschau in Namibia.

Farm equipment

[edit]
Main article: Agricultural machinery

Farm equipment has evolved over the centuries from simple hand tools such as the hoe, through ox- or horse-drawn equipment such as the plough and harrow, to the modern highly technical machinery such as the tractor, baler and combine harvester replacing what was a highly labour-intensive occupation before the Industrial Revolution. Today much of the farm equipment used on both small[35] and large farms is automated (e.g. using satellite guided farming).[36]

As new types of high-tech farm equipment have become inaccessible to farmers that historically fixed their own equipment, Wired magazine reports there is a growing backlash,[37] due mostly to companies using intellectual property law to prevent farmers from having the legal right to fix their equipment (or gain access to the information to allow them to do it).[38] This has encouraged groups such as Open Source Ecology and Farm Hack[39] to begin to make open source hardware for agricultural machinery. In addition on a smaller scale Farmbot[40] and the RepRap open source 3D printer community has begun to make open-source farm tools available of increasing levels of sophistication.[41]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Farm

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A farm is a tract of , along with its buildings and , devoted primarily to agricultural production, encompassing the cultivation of crops, rearing of , and related activities that generate products for sale or use. This definition typically includes operations producing at least a minimal threshold of output, such as $1,000 annually in agricultural products, to distinguish commercial-scale endeavors from hobby or subsistence plots. Farming emerged around 10,000 years ago as humans domesticated and animals, enabling the shift from nomadic lifestyles to permanent settlements and supporting through reliable surpluses. Key centers of origin included the for wheat and barley, alongside independent developments in regions like , , and the . Today, farms constitute the backbone of global , which occupies roughly half of the world's habitable and provides essential , , and , while sustaining rural economies and contributing to for billions in developing nations. Common types include arable farms specializing in crops, pastoral operations focused on , farms for production, and mixed systems integrating multiple enterprises to mitigate risks from market volatility or . Despite technological advances boosting fourfold over recent decades, farming grapples with challenges like and variability, underscoring the need for adaptive practices grounded in and agronomic principles.

Definition and Etymology

Etymology

The English word farm originated in the late 13th century as ferme, denoting a fixed rent or payment, typically , derived from ferme. This term stems from firma, referring to a stipulated or fixed annual rent for land or services, ultimately traceable to the Latin verb firmare, meaning "to make firm" or "to confirm," from firmus, "firm" or "steadfast." The underlying concept emphasized a binding, unalterable contractual , reflecting feudal practices where tenants paid lords in or labor rather than . By the early , the verb form to farm emerged, initially signifying the act of leasing or contracting to collect such revenues, including taxes, duties, or estate rents, often outsourced to private individuals for a fixed sum. This usage predates the agricultural connotation; for instance, historical records from the describe "farming the taxes" as a government practice in and . The shift to denoting cultivated land occurred around 1570, when farm began applying to a rented tract managed for profit through , paralleling the expansion of leasehold systems in rural economies. This evolution mirrors broader semantic changes in , where fixed tenancy arrangements facilitated the transition from subsistence to commercial , though the term's core association with contractual firmness persisted into modern definitions of farming as systematic .

Core Definition and Scope

A farm constitutes an of agricultural production managed under a single entity, encompassing all maintained thereon and all utilized wholly or partly for such production, including ancillary areas integral to the operation. This definition aligns with international standards from the (FAO), emphasizing systematic management for output generation rather than incidental . In practical terms, farms produce commodities such as crops, , , eggs, and fibers through deliberate cultivation and husbandry, distinguishing them from non-commercial gardens or wild harvesting. The scope of a farm extends beyond mere land to include infrastructure like barns, silos, irrigation systems, and machinery essential for operations, as well as labor inputs ranging from family members to hired workers. Globally, farm delineations vary: the (USDA) classifies a farm as any establishment producing and selling—or capable of selling—at least $1,000 annually in agricultural products, capturing both commercial scales and smaller holdings with market potential. This threshold accommodates diverse operations, from subsistence units in developing regions to large agribusinesses, while excluding hobby plots without significant output. Farms may span arable fields, pastures, orchards, or facilities, but their core function remains the controlled exploitation of biological processes for human benefit, subject to environmental, economic, and regulatory constraints. Farms differ from related enterprises like plantations (often specialized monocultures on vast estates) or processing facilities by prioritizing over downstream activities. Empirical data indicate that farms underpin global supply, with over 570 million farms worldwide as of recent FAO estimates, predominantly smallholder operations under 2 hectares contributing substantially to output in low-income . Scope also incorporates non-food outputs such as biofuels and timber, reflecting adaptations to market demands, though hinges on , water access, and technological integration rather than expansion alone.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Industrial Farming

The transition to farming began during the period with the independent of plants and animals in multiple regions, marking the shift from societies to settled around 10,000 BCE in the of Southwest . There, early farmers cultivated emmer wheat, einkorn wheat, , and lentils while domesticating sheep, , , and pigs, enabling population growth and surplus production. Similar developments occurred in East by approximately 9,000 BCE, where millet and were domesticated along the and Rivers, alongside pigs and dogs. In , squash cultivation started around 10,000 years ago, followed by and beans by 9,000 years ago. Ancient civilizations built on these foundations with techniques adapted to local environments. In , wooden plows appeared by the 4th millennium BCE, and by the BCE, seed-drill plows facilitated direct sowing; canals, constructed from around 6000 BCE, countered arid conditions to support and yields sufficient for urban centers. Egyptian farmers relied on the Nile's annual floods for basin , growing emmer and with simple tools like sickles and wooden plows pulled by oxen, achieving reliable harvests that underpinned pharaonic . In ancient , millet farming in the north and paddy systems in the south, dating to 7000 BCE, incorporated early water management like dikes and canals, with water wheels later enhancing efficiency. Pre-industrial farming in evolved through the with innovations like the three-field rotation system, adopted widely from the 8th century onward, dividing into thirds: one for winter crops like or , one for spring crops such as oats, , peas, or beans, and one left to restore soil nutrients. This replaced the less efficient two-field system, increasing cultivable land use from 50% to 67% and boosting productivity by allowing nitrogen-fixing to enrich soil. Open-field systems organized communal strips within villages, managed under manorial structures where lords and peasants shared labor and outputs; heavy moldboard plows, suited to northern 's clay soils and drawn by oxen or horses with improved collars, turned sod more effectively from the 7th century. Similar rotational practices existed in , such as rice-wheat cycles in , relying on animal traction and manual tools like hoes and sickles until the eve of industrialization. These methods sustained agrarian economies but constrained yields due to manual labor, animal power, and vulnerability to weather, pests, and depletion, with typical medieval outputs around 8-10 bushels per acre under optimal conditions. centers, as identified by , concentrated in mountainous and riverine areas, influencing crop spread and adaptation across continents. Overall, pre-industrial farming emphasized labor-intensive , for fertility, and rudimentary , laying groundwork for later while supporting dense populations through incremental efficiencies.

Industrial Revolution and Mechanization

The , originating in Britain during the late , marked a pivotal shift in toward , driven by advances in , steam power, and that enabled the replacement of manual labor with machines on larger scales. Preceding this, the had already boosted output through innovations like and crop rotations, but enclosures—formalized by Parliamentary Acts between 1760 and 1820—consolidated fragmented open fields into compact holdings, reducing land waste and facilitating machinery use by eliminating communal grazing constraints. This restructuring enclosed over 7,000 acts covering 20-25% of England's , promoting efficient farming but displacing smallholders who lost common rights, contributing to rural migration and social tensions. A landmark invention was the , patented by Scottish engineer Andrew Meikle in 1786, which used rotating drums and fluted rollers to separate grain from straw mechanically, powered initially by horses and later by steam. Prior to this, threshing consumed about one-quarter of agricultural labor through manual flailing, a labor-intensive process vulnerable to ; the machine processed sheaves up to ten times faster, slashing costs and time while allowing year-round operation in barns. Adoption spread slowly due to high initial costs and resistance from laborers fearing job loss—evident in the 1830 , where arson targeted over 100 machines—but by the 1840s, steam-powered variants dominated British farms, enhancing grain yields and supporting population growth from 10 million in 1801 to 18 million by 1851. Mechanization extended to field operations, particularly in the United States, where expansive prairies demanded scalable tools. Cyrus McCormick's mechanical reaper, demonstrated in 1831 and patented in 1834, employed vibrating sickles to cut grain while a platform collected it, enabling two workers to harvest 12-15 acres daily compared to 1-3 acres with manual sickles. Complementing this, John Deere's self-scouring steel plow, introduced in 1837, sliced through sticky Midwestern soils without clogging, unlike cast-iron predecessors, boosting plowing efficiency and farm expansion. These devices, manufactured at scale via emerging factories, reduced harvest labor by up to 80% in some cases, driving U.S. production from 100 million bushels in to over 500 million by 1900 and freeing workers for urban industries. Overall, these innovations yielded Britain's 19th-century crop outputs 80% above continental European averages, underpinning industrial urbanization by sustaining food supplies amid rapid population expansion. However, mechanization's labor-displacing effects exacerbated rural inequality, as larger proprietors adopted machines while cottagers faced , a dynamic critiqued in contemporary accounts but empirically tied to net gains through capital investment and scale. By the mid-19th century, traction engines further mechanized plowing and hauling, setting the stage for 20th-century , though uneven adoption reflected regional soil types, capital access, and policy variances between Britain and America.

Post-World War II Modernization and Green Revolution

Post-World War II agricultural modernization in developed countries emphasized mechanization and chemical inputs to boost productivity and reduce labor needs. In the United States, tractor adoption surged, with farm machinery enabling a 50 percent decline in the agricultural labor force between 1950 and 1970, as operations shifted toward larger-scale, capital-intensive systems. This period saw sustained productivity gains, driven by wartime innovations repurposed for civilian use, including synthetic nitrogen fertilizers from munitions production and early pesticides like DDT, which expanded rapidly after 1945 to control pests and weeds. By the 1950s, U.S. farm output had entered a phase of consistent growth, with crop yields rising due to hybrid seeds, improved tillage, and irrigation, though this also increased dependency on fossil fuel-derived inputs and contributed to soil erosion in some regions. In Western Europe, agricultural production recovered to exceed pre-war levels by the early 1950s, reaching 100-122 percent of 1934-1938 outputs in countries like the Netherlands and Denmark by 1951, supported by mechanization and state-led reconstruction programs. The , beginning in during the 1940s under agronomist Norman Borlaug's leadership with support, developed semi-dwarf varieties that resisted and diseases, achieving national self-sufficiency in production by 1956 through integration with fertilizers, pesticides, and expanded . These high-yielding varieties (HYVs) spread to in the mid-1960s, particularly and , where adoption alongside chemical inputs nearly doubled yields between 1965 and 1970, preventing widespread amid pressures. Borlaug's work, which earned him the 1970 , emphasized empirical breeding techniques over ideological constraints, prioritizing causal factors like genetic resistance and nutrient responsiveness to maximize output per . Globally, the Revolution's technologies tripled production from the 1960s to the 1990s while cultivated land expanded only 30 percent, accommodating a doubling of and averting an estimated 18-27 million s of additional for agriculture. Despite these gains, the Green Revolution's reliance on uniform HYVs and intensive inputs fostered vulnerabilities, including genetic monocultures susceptible to new pests and nutrient depletion requiring ever-higher applications, as documented in long-term yield plateaus in adopting regions. In developing countries, adoption rates for s rose sharply—global use increased over tenfold from 1960 to 1990—but uneven access exacerbated inequalities, with smallholders often sidelined by credit and infrastructure barriers favoring larger operations. use similarly proliferated post-1945, enhancing short-term yields but prompting concerns over residue accumulation and , as evidenced by studies on insect resistance and ecosystem impacts. Empirical data from the era underscore the Revolution's causal role in —saving over 245 million lives through averted per statistical models—yet highlight trade-offs in resource intensity, informing ongoing debates on sustainable intensification without romanticizing pre-modern systems. Overall, post-WWII advancements transformed farming from labor-bound subsistence to input-driven commercial enterprise, with productivity metrics like U.S. rising 1.5-2 percent annually from 1948 onward.

Types and Classifications of Farms

Arable and Crop Farms

Arable and crop farms concentrate on cultivating annual or seasonal on land prepared by plowing and tilling, distinguishing them from operations that emphasize animal rearing on . These farms utilize fertile, well-drained soils capable of supporting and mechanized cultivation, typically excluding permanent or woodlands. Globally, suitable for such farming spanned approximately 1.38 billion hectares as of 2019, representing a key subset of the 1.57 billion hectares of total cropland reported in 2022. Primary crops grown on arable farms include cereals like wheat, barley, maize, and oats, which dominate production due to their high yield potential and versatility for food, feed, and industrial uses. Root crops such as potatoes and sugar beets, along with oilseeds like rapeseed, supplement these staples, often rotated to maintain soil fertility and mitigate pest buildup. Unlike livestock farms, which rely on grazing marginal lands unsuitable for plowing, arable systems demand intensive inputs like fertilizers and irrigation to maximize output on limited high-quality acreage. Farming practices on these operations typically involve annual cycles of soil preparation, planting, weed and , and , increasingly aided by machinery for efficiency. yields vary by region and technology; for instance, modern varieties and inputs have enabled production to exceed 3.5 billion metric tons annually worldwide. Economic viability hinges on market prices for commodities, resilience, and scale, with large-scale operations often outperforming smallholders in mechanized regions due to efficiencies. Arable farms contribute the bulk of global caloric supply, underscoring their role in amid projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050.

Livestock and Animal Husbandry Farms

Livestock and farms focus on the breeding, rearing, and management of domesticated terrestrial to produce , , eggs, , , and other products, as well as services like draft power. These operations encompass a range of species including , pigs, , sheep, and goats, with production systems varying from low-input to high-density confinement. Globally, livestock production utilizes the largest share of , either directly via or indirectly through feed crops. Major categories include farms, which raise animals primarily for through cow-calf operations producing calves for later finishing in feedlots, and farms specializing in production via regular milking of cows or other . In 2023, global production of key meats—, , and —reached 321 million tonnes, with dominating slaughter volumes at billions of birds annually. Swine operations focus on pigs for , often in large-scale facilities housing over 1,000 animals, while farms produce broilers for and layers for eggs, with the U.S. alone managing over 10 billion s, turkeys, pigs, and cows in food systems as of 2022. Animal husbandry practices differ fundamentally between extensive and intensive systems. Extensive systems rely on large areas for with minimal supplemental feed and labor, common in or settings where animals naturally, prioritizing over high yields per animal. Intensive systems, conversely, employ confined feeding operations (CAFOs) with high inputs of feed, , and veterinary care on smaller areas to maximize output, as seen in U.S. feedlots or barns where animals reach market weight rapidly. Intensive methods can reduce per unit of product due to faster growth cycles on nutrient-dense feeds, though they demand greater resource concentration. FAO classifications identify grassland-based, mixed crop-livestock, and industrial systems, with the latter prevalent in high-income regions for . Sheep and goat farms produce meat, milk, and fiber through similar husbandry, often in arid or marginal lands via extensive , with global goat populations exceeding 1 billion and sheep around 1.2 billion as mapped in FAO's 2020-aligned datasets. These farms contribute significantly to rural economies, providing 40% of agricultural GDP in developing countries, but face challenges like disease management and feed variability, addressed through and protocols inherent to .

Mixed and Integrated Farms

Mixed farming encompasses agricultural operations that simultaneously cultivate crops—such as food, cash, or feed varieties—and raise on the same landholding, allowing for diversified production outputs. This system leverages synergies between plant and animal components, such as using crop residues for and as for fields, thereby enhancing nutrient cycling and reducing external input dependencies. Globally, mixed farming systems account for over 50% of production and approximately 90% of supply, underscoring their dominant role in sustaining animal-derived food outputs. Integrated farming systems represent an advanced evolution of mixed approaches, emphasizing closed-loop circularity where byproducts from one enterprise directly nourish others, such as channeling animal waste into aquaculture ponds or production while integrating crops, , and fisheries to minimize waste and external resource needs. These systems optimize by combining annual crops, perennials, ruminants, and non-ruminants, which reduces production risks, bolsters , and improves overall farm resilience against market volatility or climatic variability. Empirical studies indicate that integrated models can lower total production costs, diminish through better management, and stabilize net margins compared to specialized or livestock-only operations. Key advantages of both mixed and integrated farms include risk diversification—mitigating losses from failure via income or vice versa—and labor spreading across seasons, alongside resource re-utilization that curtails and feed imports. For instance, in farm typologies, mixed operations comprise about 19.3% of total holdings, often balancing arable and to sustain without synthetic inputs. However, these systems demand intensive management and higher labor inputs, as feed optimization may conflict with priorities, potentially elevating operational complexity and costs for smaller-scale producers. In practice, integrated examples like --fish polycultures in demonstrate yield boosts of 20-30% through symbiotic flows, though remains constrained by expertise and initial setup investments.

Specialized Operations

Specialized operations in farming refer to agricultural enterprises deriving at least 50% of their income from a single dominant activity, such as production, rearing, or , enabling focused investment in tailored , , and protocols. These operations prioritize through specialization, often involving intensive systems that contrast with diversified by minimizing crop-livestock integration in favor of streamlined output maximization. Dairy farming exemplifies specialization through the year-round husbandry of lactating bovines, primarily breeds selected for high yields, with operations centering on twice- or thrice-daily milking, precise nutrition via total mixed rations, and veterinary protocols to sustain productivity. Modern facilities incorporate robotic milking parlors and automated feeding to reduce labor while monitoring udder health and output, yielding an average of 7 to 9 gallons of per cow daily . This focus demands continuous operation, as cows require feeding and care irrespective of market fluctuations, with U.S. dairy herds totaling approximately 9.3 million head as of 2023, down from prior decades due to consolidation into larger, more efficient units. Poultry operations specialize in either broilers for or layers for eggs, employing confined with control, measures, and breed-specific to achieve rapid growth cycles—broilers reaching market weight in 6-8 weeks. dominates, with producers contracting under large integrators for chicks, feed, and processing, contributing to U.S. poultry and egg sales of $76.5 billion across 168,048 farms in 2022, where 44% specialized exclusively in this sector. Intensive management minimizes land use but requires stringent waste handling to mitigate environmental impacts from high-density stocking. Aquaculture represents a water-based specialization in cultivating finfish, , or in controlled environments like ponds, cages, or recirculating systems, serving as a supplement to wild capture fisheries amid depleting stocks. U.S. operations over 1,500 aquatic using species-specific feeds and management, with output emphasizing through reduced pressure on oceans; global production exceeded 122 million metric tons in 2020, projected to meet rising demand without overreliance on capture methods. Challenges include control and effluent regulation, yet it supports by providing nutrient-dense protein. Horticultural specializations, such as greenhouse vegetable or nursery production, concentrate on high-value crops like tomatoes, peppers, or ornamentals using protected cultivation to extend seasons and optimize yields per square meter. These operations leverage or soilless media for precision nutrient delivery, often yielding multiple harvests annually, though they demand significant capital for climate control and services.

Farming Practices and Methods

Conventional Industrial Practices

Conventional industrial farming practices emphasize large-scale production of staple crops such as corn, , and , utilizing heavy machinery for , planting, and harvesting to maximize yields per acre. These methods incorporate synthetic , , and (NPK) fertilizers to replenish nutrients depleted by intensive cropping, with global fertilizer consumption reaching approximately 190 million metric tons in 2022, predominantly for such operations. Pesticides and herbicides, including glyphosate-based products, are routinely applied to control weeds, , and diseases, enabling the dominance of single-crop fields that cover vast areas and facilitate mechanized efficiency. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), engineered for herbicide tolerance or pest resistance, constitute over 90% of corn and acreage in major producing countries like the , reducing labor for pest management but tying crop selection to corporate seed providers. In livestock production, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) house thousands to millions of animals—such as 1,000 , 700 cows, or 125,000 chickens—in confined facilities for at least 45 days annually, prioritizing rapid growth through formulated feeds rather than pasture grazing. Routine administration of antibiotics and growth hormones mitigates disease risks and accelerates weight gain in high-density environments, with U.S. CAFOs accounting for over 90% of , 80% of , and nearly all production as of 2020. Manure management involves lagoons or pits for collection, often applied as liquid fertilizer to nearby fields, though this can lead to nutrient runoff if not precisely calibrated. Irrigation systems, including center-pivot setups, support crop growth in arid regions, drawing from groundwater or surface sources to sustain yields where rainfall is insufficient, as seen in 40% of U.S. cropland under irrigation. Hybrid seeds and precision application technologies further optimize input use, with global industrial crop output expanding 27% from 2010 to 2023 through these standardized protocols. Such practices, rooted in post-World War II innovations, have scaled agriculture to feed a global population exceeding 8 billion, though they demand fossil fuel-derived inputs and infrastructure investments.

Alternative and Organic Methods

Alternative and organic farming methods encompass production systems that prioritize ecological processes, , and over reliance on synthetic inputs such as chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and genetically modified organisms. These approaches include certified , which adheres to standards set by organizations like the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) and national bodies such as the USDA, emphasizing natural , composting, and crop diversification to sustain and services. In 2023, global organic farmland spanned nearly 99 million hectares, representing about 2% of total , with growth driven by consumer demand for residue-free produce and perceived environmental benefits. Key practices in these methods involve , which sequences diverse plants to disrupt pest cycles, enhance cycling, and boost yields by 5-10% compared to monocultures, as evidenced by long-term field trials in the US . , planting complementary species together, further improves land use efficiency, suppresses weeds biologically, and can increase overall productivity by 15-30% through better resource competition and reduced chemical needs, according to syntheses of agronomic experiments across temperate and tropical systems. Biological pest management, using natural predators like ladybugs or parasitic wasps alongside , minimizes synthetic interventions but requires integrated monitoring to maintain efficacy against outbreaks. Composting and green manures recycle to build organic carbon, though meta-analyses indicate these systems often achieve lower per-hectare yields—18-25% below conventional farming—due to limitations and higher susceptibility to variability. Regenerative agriculture, an umbrella term overlapping with organic but emphasizing active soil regeneration through , cover cropping, and livestock integration, aims to sequester carbon and restore microbial diversity; peer-reviewed reviews identify improvements as a core outcome, yet direct causal evidence for large-scale yield gains or net reductions remains sparse, with many claims derived from practitioner reports rather than controlled trials. , a design framework mimicking natural ecosystems with polycultures, , and water harvesting, shows promising results in European case studies, including 27% higher stocks, 20% lower , and yields comparable to industrial norms, though scalability is constrained by labor intensity and site-specific adaptations. Biodynamic farming extends organic principles with esoteric preparations (e.g., fermented sprays) to purportedly enhance cosmic influences on vitality; while some trials report parity with organics, systematic reviews find no empirically separable advantages beyond standard ecological practices, attributing benefits to overall input reductions rather than unique mechanisms. Environmental trade-offs persist: organic and alternative systems reduce residues and heavy metal accumulation like by up to 48% in crops, per meta-analyses of residue data, and support greater on-farm , but lower yields may necessitate expanded , potentially offsetting carbon benefits unless paired with precision diversification. Economic viability hinges on premium pricing for outputs, with organic premiums averaging 20-50% higher, though volatility in costs and challenges smallholders; empirical modeling suggests these methods excel in marginal soils or diversified operations but underperform in high-input staples like grains without subsidies. Ongoing research underscores the need for hybrid integrations, such as combining alternative practices with targeted conventional tools, to balance and resilience amid pressures.

Precision and Technology-Driven Approaches

Precision agriculture, also known as precision farming, involves the use of information technologies to gather, process, and analyze spatial and temporal data on , crops, and environmental conditions, enabling site-specific management decisions that address variability within fields. This approach contrasts with uniform field practices by applying resources like fertilizers, water, and pesticides variably based on real-time data, aiming to optimize yields while minimizing waste. Key technologies include Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) for GPS-guided auto-steering in tractors, yield monitoring sensors on harvesters, variable rate technology (VRT) applicators, drones for aerial imaging, sensors for moisture and nutrient levels, and (IoT) devices for continuous monitoring. Advanced integrations incorporate algorithms to predict crop health, pest outbreaks, and optimal planting times from and historical datasets. Empirical evidence demonstrates yield improvements from these methods; for instance, VRT adoption has been associated with 5-15% increases in crop yields for major grains like corn and soybeans by tailoring inputs to heterogeneity, as observed in U.S. field trials. gains include reductions in use by up to 20% and by 10-30% through targeted systems, lowering operational costs and environmental impacts such as nutrient runoff. In sustainability terms, precision tools have enabled farmers to cut applications by 10-25% via precise targeting, reducing chemical residues in waterways while maintaining or enhancing . Adoption rates have risen steadily since the late , with yield mapping used on over 50% of large U.S. farms by 2020, driven by falling costs and integration with existing machinery. GNSS-based guidance systems are employed on approximately 70% of U.S. farms exceeding 500 acres, correlating with higher profitability from input savings averaging $10-20 per acre. Globally, uptake is higher in mechanized regions like , where 32-45% of mid-to-large farms had implemented VRT by 2023, though smaller operations lag due to scale limitations. Despite benefits, challenges persist, including high initial costs—such as $8,000 or more per farm for basic setups—and ongoing expenses that can rise 20% from software and needs. Farmers report concerns over data privacy, with fears of competitive disadvantages from geospatial , alongside requirements for technical expertise that smaller operations often lack. issues between legacy equipment and new systems further hinder integration, potentially offsetting returns unless supported by subsidies or cooperative data platforms.

Economics and Ownership Structures

Forms of Farm Ownership

Family farms, defined as those where the majority of management and labor are provided by the farm operator and their relatives, constitute the predominant form of farm ownership worldwide. According to (FAO) estimates, family-operated farms account for over 80% of global food production and operate the majority of , with more than 570 million such farms existing as of recent agricultural censuses. In the United States, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports that 96% of farms were family-owned in 2017, encompassing sole proprietorships, partnerships, and family corporations, while these entities controlled 87% of farmland and generated 82% of agricultural production value. Nonfamily or corporate farms, owned by entities without direct familial ties to operators, represent a small fraction—about 2% of U.S. farms—but contribute disproportionately to output through scale advantages. Sole proprietorships and general partnerships form the simplest private ownership structures, where one individual or a small group holds full liability and control without formal separation. These are prevalent among small-scale operations, offering ease of setup but exposing personal assets to business risks such as or lawsuits from farm accidents. companies (LLCs) and corporations, including S-corporations for pass-through benefits, provide liability protection by distinguishing personal and business assets, making them suitable for larger s seeking to transfer ownership across generations or attract limited . corporations, restricted in some U.S. states to natural persons as shareholders, aim to preserve familial control while enabling . Cooperatives represent a model where farmers pool resources for shared ownership of processing, marketing, or supply entities, retaining individual farm ownership but distributing profits based on . This structure mitigates market risks through joint , as seen in organizations like U.S. or co-ops, though it requires consensus among members. State-owned or farms, historically prominent in centrally planned economies such as the Soviet Union's kolkhozes until their dissolution in the , involve government control of land and operations to prioritize national output over individual incentives, often leading to inefficiencies documented in production shortfalls. In contemporary contexts, public ownership persists in select developing regions via land reforms, but empirical data indicate lower compared to private structures due to misaligned incentives. Ownership forms influence capital access, risk distribution, and succession; for instance, U.S. family farms frequently use multiple entities—like separate LLCs for land, equipment, and operations—to optimize taxes and estate planning. Globally, tenure data from FAO censuses reveal that while family dominance prevails, land concentration in corporate or state hands correlates with higher yields per hectare in mechanized systems, though smallholder resilience sustains food security in diverse agroecologies.

Scale Economies: Small vs. Large-Scale Operations

In , economies of refer to reductions in average production costs per unit of output as farm size increases, primarily through , specialization, of inputs, and optimized . Large-scale operations, often exceeding 1,000 hectares in cropland or thousands of units, achieve these efficiencies by deploying capital-intensive like combine harvesters and automated systems, which spread fixed costs over greater volumes. Empirical analyses of U.S. farms from 1982 to 2012 demonstrate that productivity rises with size in the Heartland region, with farms over 2,000 acres showing levels 20-30% higher than smaller counterparts under 500 acres, driven by adoption and input efficiencies. Small-scale farms, typically under 50 hectares, face higher per-unit costs due to limited and reliance on manual labor, resulting in elevated variable expenses for seeds, fertilizers, and hired help. In the U.S. sector, for instance, farms with herds under 100 cows incur production costs averaging $25-30 per of , compared to $15-20 for operations exceeding 1,000 cows, with the gap widening as scale enables better feed efficiency and . These cost disparities contribute to structural consolidation, where small farms' net returns often fall below viable thresholds without subsidies, as evidenced by USDA data showing U.S. farm numbers declining from 2.2 million in to 2.0 million in 2017 amid rising average sizes. However, apparent productivity advantages of small farms—such as higher yields per in labor-intensive developing contexts—often stem from measurement artifacts like unaccounted land quality differences or intensive family labor inputs rather than inherent superiority. Corrected analyses reveal a positive farm size-productivity in total factor terms, with large operations outperforming on metrics like output per dollar of input across 5-70 scales globally. Small farms retain niches in diversified or high-value crops requiring manual oversight, but these are offset by risks from market volatility and limited access to , perpetuating inefficiencies absent distortions. Overall, causal factors like capital access and technological thresholds favor large-scale viability for staple commodities, though diseconomies emerge beyond optimal sizes due to managerial complexities.

Agribusiness and Market Integration

encompasses the integrated network of economic activities spanning agricultural input supply, farm production, , distribution, and of and products. This sector extends beyond traditional farming to include upstream suppliers of seeds, fertilizers, and machinery, as well as downstream processors and retailers, forming a value chain that coordinates production to meet demand. Market integration in agribusiness occurs through mechanisms such as vertical integration, where firms control multiple stages of the supply chain, and contractual arrangements that link producers to buyers. Vertical integration allows companies to streamline operations, reduce transaction costs, and ensure supply consistency; for instance, major firms like Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) engage in both commodity trading and processing, capturing value across stages. Contract farming, prevalent in livestock and poultry sectors, commits farmers to produce specific volumes under predefined prices and standards, integrating smallholders into larger markets but often shifting risks like price volatility to producers. In the U.S., over 40% of broiler chickens and 99% of hogs are produced under contracts, reflecting deep integration that enhances efficiency but raises concerns about dependency on integrators. Consolidation has intensified market integration, with a few corporations dominating key segments. In the U.S., the four largest firms control 60-100% of markets for , agricultural chemicals, and meatpacking, up from earlier decades, driven by mergers and that favor large operations. Globally, the top 10 companies generated $76 billion in revenues in 2023, a 57% increase from 2020, underscoring concentration in inputs and processing. This structure boosts —U.S. farm output doubled from 1982 to 2012 amid fewer but larger farms—but critics, including USDA analyses, highlight reduced competition, higher input costs for farmers, and vulnerability to corporate pricing power, as smaller producers face . Empirical data from the 2022 show U.S. small and mid-sized farms declining while large operations grew, correlating with dominance. Despite efficiencies, such integration can distort markets through subsidies and that entrench large players, with USDA reports noting that concentration in and biotech—led by firms like and —limits farmer choice and innovation diversity. In developing regions, FAO-documented linkages via contracts aid small-scale integration but often favor multinational buyers, perpetuating unequal bargaining. Overall, while drives global food supply— with the sector valued at $3.4 trillion in 2024—its necessitates scrutiny to preserve competitive dynamics essential for long-term resilience.

Technology and Equipment

Traditional and Mechanical Tools

Traditional farming tools relied on manual labor and simple implements designed for soil preparation, planting, cultivation, and . The hoe, one of the earliest devices, consisted of a attached to a for breaking clods, weeding, and creating furrows, with origins tracing to forked wooden limbs modified for agricultural use in prehistoric eras. Similarly, the featured a curved for efficient reaping of grains and grasses, enabling hand-held cutting close to the ground to minimize waste, and remained a staple from ancient times through the . employed flails—paired wooden sticks connected by a —to separate grains from stalks by beating, a labor-intensive process persisting in regions without machinery until the . The plow marked a pivotal advancement in traditional , with wooden ards or scratch plows scratching furrows rather than fully inverting , used as early as 3500 BCE to expand cultivable and boost yields by aerating for growth and retention. Animal traction amplified this by harnessing oxen or horses to pull plows around 4000 BCE, allowing farmers to larger areas—up to several acres daily versus manual digging's fractions—while reducing physical strain on laborers, though limited by and animal availability. Harrows followed to break clods and level fields post-plowing, often constructed from wooden frames with teeth or chains dragged by animals. Mechanical tools emerged in the 18th and 19th centuries, shifting reliance from human and animal power to rigid mechanisms for precision and scale. Jethro Tull's 1701 mechanized sowing by depositing seeds at uniform depths and spacing in rows, cutting labor by up to 90% compared to and enabling horse-drawn cultivation between rows without crop damage. Cyrus McCormick's 1831 mechanical reaper used vibrating blades and platform reels to harvest at rates exceeding manual sickles—up to 12 acres per day versus 0.5–1 acre—sparing farms from harvest labor shortages and facilitating grain belt expansion in the American Midwest. John Deere's 1837 steel plow, forged from polished cast steel, sliced sticky soils without clogging, unlike cast-iron predecessors, and by 1850 comprised over 75% of U.S. plow production, correlating with a tripling of corn output in from 1839 to 1859. Further innovations included horse-drawn mowers and binders in the , which cut and bundled hay or , and steam-powered threshers from the that automated separation at capacities of 200–300 bushels per hour versus flailing's handfuls. These tools, powered initially by animals or stationary engines, boosted overall farm —U.S. output per worker rose from 10 bushels of in 1800 to 25 by 1900—while exposing dependencies on draft , which consumed up to 25% of crop yields for feed. By the early , tractors began supplanting horses, but mechanical implements like cultivators and integrated with them retained core designs from this era.

Contemporary Innovations and AgTech

Contemporary innovations in , collectively known as AgTech, integrate digital tools, , and data to enhance , yield, and resource management on farms. represents a foundational advancement, employing GPS-guided machinery, sensors, and to enable site-specific management. This approach allows for variable rate application of inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides, tailored to micro-variations in field conditions, which empirical studies indicate can reduce chemical usage by 10-20% while boosting yields by up to 15% compared to uniform application methods. Drones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have advanced crop monitoring and intervention capabilities, equipped with multispectral cameras and AI algorithms to detect early signs of deficiencies, pests, or stress across large areas. Technological improvements in drone , including obstacle avoidance and transmission, enable precise aerial spraying that minimizes drift and overlaps, with field trials demonstrating labor savings of 30-50% and input reductions of 20% in applications like delivery. The integration of (IoT) sensors further supports this by providing continuous data on , temperature, and pH levels, facilitating automated systems that conserve —studies report potential savings of 25-40% in regions with variable rainfall. Robotics and artificial intelligence are transforming labor-intensive tasks, with autonomous tractors and harvesters capable of 24-hour operation guided by machine learning models for path optimization and obstacle detection. For example, AI-driven robotic weeders use computer vision to distinguish crops from weeds, applying targeted mechanical or chemical removal, which reduces herbicide needs by up to 90% in row crops like corn and soybeans without compromising yields. Predictive analytics powered by AI process historical and real-time data to forecast pest outbreaks or optimal harvest times, with verified implementations showing accuracy rates exceeding 85% in yield predictions. The global AgTech market, encompassing these technologies, was valued at approximately USD 21.68 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.2% through 2032, driven by adoption in large-scale operations despite barriers like high upfront costs for smaller farms.

Global Distribution and Variations

North America and Australia

Farming in features highly mechanized, commercial operations on expansive land holdings, with the and leading production of grains, oilseeds, and for domestic consumption and . In the , the 2022 reported 1,900,487 farms, a 7% decline from 2017, covering 880 million acres with an average size of 463 acres. Principal crops include corn, primarily in the Midwest for feed and ethanol; soybeans across the Midwest; and wheat on the . sectors dominate with in the Plains states, in the Northeast and , and poultry concentrated in the Southeast and . Canada's agriculture mirrors the in scale but emphasizes provinces for grains and , with the 2021 recording 189,874 farms, down 1.9% from 2016, operating 153.7 million acres of farmland. Average farm size approximates 812 acres, supporting major outputs like wheat, canola, and barley in and , alongside beef herds and dairy quotas in and . Both nations rely on , , and government subsidies to sustain productivity amid risks and variable weather. Australian farms emphasize extensive and dryland cropping across arid interiors, utilizing 55% of the continent's land for , or about 369 million hectares in 2023-24. and sheep prevail, with comprising 17% and 14% of farm sales value; key regions include for and for mixed grain-sheep operations. Broadacre farms vary widely in output, where the largest 10% generate 56.3% of production, reflecting in vast, low-rainfall areas. Droughts and climate variability pose persistent challenges, as seen in eastern Australia's recent dry spells reducing yields and prompting adaptive practices like . Despite lower rainfall, innovations in water-efficient varieties have boosted output in variable conditions.

Europe

European agriculture encompasses a diverse array of farm types across the continent, with the European Union (EU) accounting for the majority of organized production. In 2020, the EU hosted 9.1 million agricultural holdings, managing 155 million hectares of utilized agricultural area, equivalent to 37.8% of its total land surface. These farms are predominantly small-scale family operations, comprising over 93% of holdings, with an average size of approximately 14 hectares for family farms compared to larger non-family enterprises averaging 102 hectares. Farm numbers have declined sharply, from 14.4 million in 2005 to 9.1 million in 2020, reflecting consolidation driven by economic pressures and policy incentives. The (), the 's primary agricultural framework since 1962, shapes farming structures through direct payments, market support, and funds, allocating around €378 billion for 2021-2027. aims to ensure , stabilize markets, and promote , but critics argue it sustains inefficient small farms and favors larger operators via decoupled payments, distorting competition. Regional variations are pronounced: northern and features larger and farms in countries like the and , while southern Mediterranean regions specialize in olives, fruits, and wine, with smaller, labor-intensive holdings in and ; eastern states emphasize cereals on expansive arable lands in and . Contemporary challenges include climate variability, with annual losses exceeding €28 billion from droughts and floods, particularly in , and an farmer population—over 50% of farm managers were aged 55 or older in 2020—hindering generational renewal. Geopolitical disruptions, such as the 2022 , spiked input costs for fertilizers and energy, prompting protests in 2024 against stringent environmental regulations under the Green Deal, which mandate reduced use and emissions. Adaptations include adoption in wealthier regions and reforms emphasizing eco-schemes, though bureaucratic complexity persists as a barrier to . Outside the , post-Brexit UK farms face subsidy transitions to environmental payments, mirroring continental shifts toward sustainability amid productivity demands.

Asia and Developing Regions

Agriculture in Asia is predominantly conducted by smallholder farmers, with average farm sizes in South Asia declining from 2.6 hectares in 1960 to around 1.4 hectares by recent estimates, and most operations under 1 hectare. Small farms, typically family-operated and spanning less than 10 hectares, emphasize mixed cropping systems featuring rice and wheat, often combining rain-fed and irrigated methods. These holdings produce approximately 90% of food calories in Asia from farms under 5 hectares, underscoring their role in regional food security despite limited scale. Rice farming constitutes the backbone of Asian , accounting for over 90% of global production within the region, primarily through labor-intensive techniques in flooded paddies that demand substantial and inputs. Traditional practices persist, but adoption of innovations like direct-seeded is emerging in to reduce use and labor, though widespread mechanization remains constrained by fragmented land holdings. Land fragmentation, exacerbated by inheritance patterns, increases production costs, limits machinery deployment, and hampers efficiency, particularly in densely populated areas of , , and . In broader developing regions, including parts of Asia, smallholder systems face ongoing viability challenges as farm sizes continue to shrink due to population pressures and land subdivision, potentially leading to unprofitable operations without scale-enhancing reforms like consolidation or cooperative mechanization. Subsistence-oriented farms dominate, with limited access to credit, markets, and technology perpetuating low productivity; for instance, in Nepal and Bangladesh, poultry and goat rearing supplement crop income on tiny plots. Efforts to address these include policy pushes for land consolidation and machinery sharing, yet terrain difficulties and high equipment costs slow progress. Overall, these regions' farms highlight a tension between demographic-driven intensification and the economic imperatives of larger, mechanized units observed elsewhere.

Africa and Subsistence Farming

Subsistence farming dominates agricultural practices in sub-Saharan Africa, where smallholder households operate the majority of farms, producing primarily for self-consumption with minimal market orientation. These operations typically involve plots smaller than 2 hectares, relying on family labor, rudimentary tools, and rain-fed cultivation of staples such as maize, sorghum, cassava, and yams. In countries like Malawi and Nigeria, 70 to 80 percent of smallholder farmers focus mainly on household needs at the start of the agricultural season. Small farms account for most food production in the region, with over 33 million smallholder operations, many rain-fed and vulnerable to inconsistent water supply exacerbated by climate change. Agriculture employs approximately 67 percent of the sub-Saharan African labor force and contributes around 20 percent to regional GDP, serving as the primary for rural poor populations. In , it supports over 70 percent of the populace, while in , it engages 52 percent. Despite this centrality, productivity remains low, with yields often one-third of potential due to factors like soil degradation, limited access, and pest pressures. Food insecurity affects 58 percent of the population moderately or severely as of 2021, with undernourishment prevalence at 19.1 percent in 2019—more than double the global average—and rising since 2015 amid conflicts and supply disruptions. Key challenges include land fragmentation from , which reduces farm viability, and inadequate hindering and input distribution. Crop raiding by further erodes nutritional security and income in subsistence communities. State interventions, such as distribution and extension services, have been implemented, but systemic issues like underinvestment and policy inconsistencies persist, limiting transitions to commercial farming. World Bank analyses emphasize that boosting smallholder productivity through efficiency gains could transform regional economies, yet subsistence systems endure due to entrenched and environmental constraints.

Environmental and Resource Impacts

Land Use and Soil Management

Agriculture occupies approximately 4,781 million hectares globally as of 2022, representing more than one-third of the Earth's area, with cropland accounting for 1,573 million hectares and permanent pastures the remainder. Of habitable —excluding deserts, mountains, and ice—roughly half is dedicated to farming, with over three-quarters of used for despite its lower caloric output per compared to cropland. This extensive land conversion, primarily from forests and grasslands since the era, has enabled food production for 8 billion people but contributes to and carbon release from disturbance. Soil management in farming focuses on preserving fertility, structure, and microbial activity against degradation processes exacerbated by intensive cultivation. Globally, human-induced degradation affects 1,660 million s, with over 60% occurring on agricultural lands through , depletion, salinization, and compaction. In conventionally tilled fields, rates average 10 to 100 times higher than under natural , losing 1-2 orders of magnitude more than production rates, which diminishes and yields over decades. In the United States, baseline on cropland with conservation practices stands at 2.32 megagrams per hectare per year, though rates have declined 45% since the 1980s due to policy-driven adoption of protective measures. Sustainable practices mitigate these effects by minimizing disturbance and enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC). No-till farming, which avoids plowing to leave crop residues on the surface, reduces by over 80% and increases SOC by preserving aggregates and root channels for water infiltration. Crop rotation, diversifying sequences beyond monocultures, boosts soil by up to 50%, improves aggregation, and elevates SOC levels by 45% in long-term assessments, as fix and residues feed microbial communities. Cover crops and reduced further cut runoff and loss, with meta-analyses showing 10-33% reductions in emissions and enhanced physical properties like in diverse rotations. These methods, while requiring initial adjustments in equipment and planning, yield net productivity gains by stabilizing soils against climate variability, though adoption varies by region due to short-term yield dips in transitional phases.

Water, Fertilizer, and Pesticide Effects

Agriculture consumes approximately 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, primarily through , which sustains crop production but exerts significant pressure on aquifers and resources. Excessive has contributed to the depletion of major aquifers, such as the in the United States, where levels have declined by up to 100 meters in some areas since the mid-20th century due to intensive pumping for irrigated farming. Additionally, improper practices promote salinization, where salt accumulation in the root zone impairs plant growth and reduces yields; this affects roughly 20-50% of irrigated lands worldwide, rendering less fertile and necessitating costly remediation. Synthetic fertilizers, particularly nitrogen-based ones, enhance crop yields by providing essential nutrients but often result in low uptake efficiency, with only 30-50% of applied absorbed by in a single , leaving the remainder vulnerable to leaching and runoff. Excess fertilizer runoff triggers in receiving water bodies, where nutrient overload stimulates algal blooms that deplete oxygen and create hypoxic "dead zones," as observed in the , where agricultural contributions from the basin have expanded the zone to over 15,000 square kilometers annually. from fertilizers exacerbates this, with global loads increasing 40-50% from 1980 to 2015, amplifying risks to aquatic ecosystems and fisheries. Pesticides applied in farming contaminate soil, water, and air, with studies indicating widespread non-target effects on beneficial organisms such as pollinators, earthworms, and predatory insects, disrupting ecosystem services like pollination and natural pest control. Insecticides and fungicides, in particular, reduce biodiversity in agroecosystems, with sublethal exposures altering behaviors in non-target species and contributing to population declines; for instance, neonicotinoids have been linked to bee foraging impairments and colony losses. However, integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, which emphasize monitoring, biological controls, and targeted applications, can reduce pesticide use by up to 95% while maintaining or increasing yields, as demonstrated in field trials on crops like watermelon, thereby mitigating environmental contamination without sacrificing productivity.

Biodiversity and Climate Interactions

Agricultural intensification, characterized by monoculture cropping and high-input practices, has led to localized declines in farmland biodiversity through habitat fragmentation and reduced habitat heterogeneity. Studies indicate that such systems often result in lower species richness for birds, insects, and plants within fields compared to more diverse or extensive farming, with pesticide applications exacerbating non-target effects on pollinators and soil invertebrates. For instance, a global meta-analysis found pesticides consistently reduce growth, reproduction, and elicit behavioral changes across taxa, contributing to broader biodiversity losses observed in agricultural landscapes. However, empirical evidence challenges simplistic narratives of uniform harm; intensive "land-sparing" approaches, by boosting yields on smaller areas, have spared an estimated 150-200 million hectares of potential cropland globally since the mid-20th century, allowing rewilding or preservation of natural habitats that support higher overall biodiversity than low-yield "land-sharing" mosaics in many tropical and temperate contexts. Certain farm management practices can mitigate biodiversity erosion, though evidence varies by taxon and biome. Crop rotation, hedgerows, and cover cropping enhance floral diversity and invertebrate populations, with meta-analyses showing less intensive methods benefiting overall without a one-size-fits-all solution. , for example, supports higher bat activity and soil microbial diversity in some trials, but systematic reviews highlight trade-offs, including lower yields that may necessitate land expansion elsewhere, potentially offsetting gains. Pesticide reductions via have demonstrated localized recoveries in abundance, underscoring causal links between chemical inputs and ecological simplification, yet comprehensive assessments emphasize that biodiversity conservation requires landscape-scale integration of semi-natural features rather than field-level tweaks alone. Farms contribute significantly to anthropogenic , with accounting for approximately one-third of global totals, of which on-farm and activities comprise about 48%, primarily via from and from s. Revised FAO estimates place at 12% of global emissions, lower than prior figures, reflecting methodological refinements that exclude non-farm elements like . Counterbalancing this, agricultural soils hold potential for through practices such as and perennial cover crops, with global estimates ranging from 0.4 to 5.5 Gt CO2 equivalents annually, though realization faces barriers like soil saturation limits and verification challenges. Regenerative techniques have shown soil organic carbon increases of 0.15-0.6 t/ha/year in long-term field experiments, enhancing resilience while drawing down atmospheric CO2, but critics note that chronic use can accelerate labile carbon turnover, limiting net gains. Climate change reciprocally influences farm biodiversity and productivity, with warming projected to reduce staple crop yields by 3-7% per degree Celsius globally, disproportionately affecting maize and tropical regions through heat stress, altered precipitation, and pest proliferation. IPCC assessments project increasingly detrimental impacts on productivity as warming exceeds 1.5°C, with observed slowdowns in maize and soybean gains attributable to temperature-moisture interactions. These shifts can cascade to biodiversity, as yield pressures incentivize further intensification or expansion into marginal lands, though adaptive practices like drought-resistant varieties may buffer some effects. In biodiversity hotspots, climate-driven range shifts exacerbate habitat pressures from farming, highlighting coupled dynamics where emission reductions via efficient agriculture could alleviate feedback loops.

Social, Ethical, and Policy Dimensions

Labor and Community Effects

and farm consolidation have substantially reduced agricultural employment opportunities, displacing manual laborers and contributing to wage suppression in affected regions. , hired farm labor totals about 1.5 million workers annually, predominantly in production, yet their average wages remain roughly 60% of those for comparable low-wage occupations outside , exacerbating economic . Globally, the estimates 450 million waged agricultural workers, many in low-productivity plantation sectors, where further diminishes labor demand across farming stages, prompting shifts to non-agricultural work but often at reduced pay. Migrant labor fills critical gaps in labor-intensive but introduces vulnerabilities for workers and strains host communities. In , migrants constitute approximately one-quarter of the agricultural workforce, frequently enduring violence, excessive hours, and substandard housing without adequate protections. In , temporary programs like the U.S. tie workers to employers, limiting mobility and heightening risks of exploitation, while their essential role sustains production amid domestic shortages. These dynamics foster for migrants, hindering community integration, and impose uneven burdens on rural services without commensurate economic benefits for locals. Farming transformations have accelerated rural depopulation by eroding local job bases and prompting out-migration. U.S. farm operations declined by over 140,000 between and 2023, part of a broader 66% drop since 1950 driven by productivity-enhancing technologies that consolidate land into fewer, larger units. Between 2010 and 2020, 67% of nonmetropolitan counties experienced loss, attributable in significant measure to agricultural efficiencies reducing on-farm from 22% of the in 1976 to under 4% by . In regions like the U.S. , 86% of rural counties saw declines from 1980 to 2010 due to such shifts, weakening community institutions like schools and stores. While net in-migration has recently offset some losses—adding modest growth post-2020—the underlying trend of structural decline persists, as amplifies farm amalgamation and diminishes resident labor needs.

Food Security and Productivity Trade-offs

Intensive agricultural practices, characterized by high-input methods such as synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and , have driven substantial increases in crop yields, enabling global food production to outpace and reduce undernourishment rates. For example, conventional farming systems typically achieve yields 20-25% higher than organic alternatives across major crops, supporting by maximizing caloric output per unit of . This productivity emphasis, accelerated by the technologies introduced in the mid-20th century, has been credited with averting widespread famines and contributing to a decline in global through enhanced agricultural efficiency. However, these gains involve trade-offs in long-term stability and resilience, as intensive systems heighten vulnerability to pests, diseases, and environmental shocks due to reduced and genetic uniformity. Historical examples, such as the Irish Potato Famine of 1845-1852 or modern corn blight outbreaks, illustrate how reliance on single crops can cascade into production failures, undermining when alternative buffers are absent. nutrient depletion and pest resistance further exacerbate these risks, potentially eroding productivity over time without diversified rotations or . Sustainable and diversified farming approaches, including polycultures and reduced chemical inputs, often yield lower outputs under optimal conditions—organic systems averaging 80% of conventional yields—but demonstrate superior performance during droughts or , with organic corn yields up to 31% higher than conventional in such scenarios. This resilience stems from enhanced and ecosystem services like natural , which buffer against variability increasingly relevant amid rising global temperatures. Yet, scaling these methods faces challenges, as broader adoption could require 20-30% more land to match conventional caloric production, straining resources in densely populated regions. Efforts to reconcile productivity and security emphasize "sustainable intensification," integrating precision technologies and to minimize , though empirical outcomes vary by context; for instance, agroecological diversification can enhance nutritional security via varied outputs but may not universally boost total yields. frameworks, such as those promoting assessments, underscore the need for context-specific strategies, prioritizing empirical yield data over ideologically favored low-input models that risk insufficient global supply.

Regulations, Subsidies, and Controversies

Governments worldwide enforce regulations on farming operations to mitigate , ensure , and address concerns, though enforcement varies and often faces pushback from industry groups citing economic burdens. In the United States, the Clean Act and related permits regulate concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), which house millions of , yet these facilities receive exemptions from certain air and standards that apply to other industries, leading to documented nutrient runoff and . European Union directives under the (CAP) mandate baseline environmental standards, such as nitrate vulnerable zones to curb fertilizer pollution, but compliance is tied to subsidy eligibility, creating incentives for minimal adherence rather than proactive stewardship. Agricultural subsidies, intended to stabilize farm incomes and ensure , total around USD 842 billion annually across OECD-monitored countries for 2021-2023, with the EU's allocating about €55 billion yearly—roughly one-third of the EU budget—primarily as direct payments to farmers. In the , the 2018 Farm Bill and extensions through 2023-2025 provide roughly $10-12 billion in annual direct payments, escalating to $40.5 billion projected for 2025 amid high prices, often from production levels to comply with WTO rules. These programs favor crops like corn and soybeans, with 10% of farms receiving 78% of benefits, disproportionately aiding large over small operations. Controversies surrounding these policies center on market distortions and , as subsidies lower production costs and guarantee incomes, encouraging that depresses global prices and inflates land values by up to 30% in subsidized regions. Critics, including economists at the IMF and , argue this fosters inefficient resource allocation, such as excessive fertilizer use exceeding $635 billion globally in direct supports that degrade and waterways, while imbalances disadvantage unsubsidized developing nations. Animal welfare regulations spark debates, with factory farming practices like gestation crates and debeaking persisting despite ballot initiatives and state laws in places like , as federal Farm Bill proposals have been accused of preempting stricter standards to protect industrial-scale operations. In the EU, CAP funds have been criticized for subsidizing intensive monocultures that erode , with reports attributing landscape degradation to payments prioritizing output over ecological health. Proponents counter that subsidies buffer against volatile markets, but empirical analyses show they exacerbate consolidation, reducing farm numbers by encouraging scale over diversity.

References

  1. https://www.ncagr.gov/divisions/small-farms/small-farms-faqs
  2. https://agriculture.vermont.gov/water-quality/regulations/farm-definitions-and-determinations
  3. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-household-well-being/glossary
  4. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/development-agriculture/
  5. https://www.britannica.com/topic/agriculture
  6. https://ourworldindata.org/global-land-for-agriculture
  7. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/overview
  8. https://www.spudnik.com/13-different-types-of-farming-practices-around-the-world/
  9. http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2024/september/global-changes-in-agricultural-production-productivity-and-resource-use-over-six-decades
  10. https://www.etymonline.com/word/farm
  11. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/farm
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/the-origin-of-farm
  13. https://m.farms.com/ag-industry-news/origins-of-eight-common-farm-words-103.aspx
  14. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e6d7a673-cebd-4be6-9b77-686d50d9171c/content
  15. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/281545/
  16. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-structure-and-organization/farm-structure-and-contracting
  17. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1261522/
  18. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/9/agriculture-in-the-fertile-crescent--mesopotamia/
  19. https://www.digcorp.com/the-history-and-evolution-of-irrigation-techniques/
  20. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-019-0282-1
  21. https://engines.egr.uh.edu/episode/26
  22. https://www.bahs.org.uk/AGHR/ARTICLES/18n2a2.pdf
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10385243/
  24. https://www.mises.org/mises-wire/enclosure-movement-and-agricultural-and-industrial-revolutions
  25. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/the-enclosure-act/
  26. https://www.thelandmagazine.org.uk/articles/short-history-enclosure-britain
  27. https://engineeringhalloffame.org/profile/andrew-meikle
  28. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=4656
  29. https://blog.rootsofprogress.org/why-did-we-wait-so-long-for-the-threshing-machine
  30. https://www.thoughtco.com/american-farm-tech-development-4083328
  31. https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-american-agriculture-farm-machinery-4074385
  32. https://aspee.com/blog/analyze-how-the-industrial-revolution-spurred-innovation-in-agricultural-equipment-leading-to-the-development-of-more-efficient-machines/
  33. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/effects-of-the-agricultural-revolution/
  34. https://www.bahs.org.uk/AGHR/ARTICLES/11n1a2.pdf
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292709937_A_revolution_down_on_the_farm_The_transformation_of_American_agriculture_since_1929
  36. https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/7107/the-drivers-of-us-agricultural-productivity-growth.pdf
  37. http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2005/june/data-feature
  38. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1230932/agricultural-output-post-war-western-europe
  39. https://www.worldfoodprize.org/en/dr_norman_e_borlaug/extended_biography/
  40. https://www.hoover.org/research/father-green-revolution
  41. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0912953109
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3666715/
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908628/
  44. https://www.scienceheroes.com/borlaug
  45. http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2018/march/agricultural-productivity-growth-in-the-united-states-1948-2015
  46. https://teara.govt.nz/en/arable-farming/print
  47. https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/arable-farming-crops-system-definition-supplies
  48. https://clear.ucdavis.edu/explainers/cattle-and-land-use-differences-between-arable-land-and-marginal-land-and-how-cattle-use
  49. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/arable-land-by-country
  50. https://www.countryfile.com/farming/arable-farming-crops
  51. https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/land-and-sea-management/managing-land/farming-and-crofting/types-farming/arable-farming
  52. https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/explore-how-farmers-produce-food-sustainably/0/steps/60777
  53. https://www.alanboswell.com/resources/guide-to-arable-farming/
  54. https://amtec-group.com/faqs/produce/a/what-is-the-difference-between-pastoral-and-arable-farming
  55. https://homework.study.com/explanation/what-is-the-difference-between-arable-and-pastoral-farming.html
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/arable-farming
  57. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.ARBL.ZS
  58. https://www.agrivi.com/blog/all-aspects-of-proper-arable-crop-harvest/
  59. https://www.fao.org/livestock-systems/en/
  60. https://www.fao.org/4/v8180t/v8180t0y.htm
  61. https://www.fao.org/4/y4252e/y4252e05.pdf
  62. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/sector-at-a-glance
  63. https://www.fao.org/statistics/highlights-archive/highlights-detail/agricultural-production-statistics-2010-2023/en
  64. https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production
  65. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/24079424/factory-farming-facts-meat-usda-agriculture-census
  66. https://www.fao.org/4/i2414e/i2414e.pdf
  67. https://bloomranchofacton.com/pages/what-is-the-difference-between-extensive-and-vs-intensive-farming
  68. https://www.leap.ox.ac.uk/environmental-impacts-intensive-and-extensive-systems
  69. https://www.fao.org/4/x6627e/x6627e01b.htm
  70. https://www.fao.org/livestock-systems/global-distributions/en/
  71. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/2915bd92-25ba-43eb-b662-565198d3aadb/content
  72. https://www.fao.org/4/y0501e/y0501e03.htm
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Percentage-contribution-of-mixed-farming-systems-to-global-production_fig1_40121882
  74. https://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/53f8c7cf-a4e4-4a69-a34a-0a72a2db5eeb/download
  75. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1241675/full
  76. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14735903.2021.1932150
  77. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Farms_and_farmland_in_the_European_Union_-_statistics
  78. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/23628d6f-ea76-4981-8830-3c57c9a6c76e/content/y0501e07.htm
  79. https://www.fao.org/4/y5098e/y5098e04.htm
  80. https://prepp.in/news/e-492-specialized-farming-agriculture-notes
  81. https://www.dfamilk.com/stories-inspiration/articles/how-does-dairy-farming-work-there-s-more-to-dairy-farming-than-milking-cows
  82. https://thedairyalliance.com/blog/7-surprising-dairy-cow-facts
  83. https://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/industry-issues/vertical-integration/
  84. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2024/Census22_HL_Poultry.pdf
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722071145
  86. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/aquaculture-supports-sustainable-earth
  87. https://www.nationalaquaculture.org/about-u-s-aquaculture/
  88. https://atlas-scientific.com/blog/aquaculture-pros-and-cons/
  89. https://www.nal.usda.gov/farms-and-agricultural-production-systems/raising-specialty-crops/list-alternative-crops-and-enterprises-small-farm-diversification
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/conventional-farming
  91. https://www.nrdc.org/stories/industrial-agriculture-101
  92. https://www.epa.gov/npdes/animal-feeding-operations-afos
  93. https://ourworldindata.org/how-many-animals-are-factory-farmed
  94. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2024/september/global-changes-in-agricultural-production-productivity-and-resource-use-over-six-decades
  95. https://ourworldindata.org/agricultural-production
  96. https://www.ifoam.bio/news/global-organic-area-continues-grow-2025
  97. https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/organic-standards
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590332220300889
  99. https://academic.oup.com/jee/article/115/5/1350/6572575
  100. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22535250/
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308521X23001373
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8023280/
  103. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2338
  104. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01405-8
  105. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10.24072/pcjournal.521/
  106. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13165-022-00394-2
  107. https://journals.ashs.org/view/journals/horttech/23/6/article-p814.xml
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814746/
  109. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35545523/
  110. https://www.ars.usda.gov/oc/utm/benefits-and-evolution-of-precision-agriculture/
  111. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-105962
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11483651/
  113. https://extension.sdstate.edu/variations-field-and-variable-rate-technology-adoption
  114. https://www.aem.org/news/the-environmental-benefits-of-precision-agriculture-quantified
  115. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/105894/EIB-248.pdf
  116. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2021/03/adoption-of-precision-agriculture-technologies.html
  117. https://agecon.unl.edu/economic-assessment-precision-conservation-farm-precision-experiment-data/
  118. https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-precision-agriculture-2025
  119. https://qaltivate.com/blog/farm-data-management/
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X2100067X
  121. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/386784/
  122. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Newsroom/archive/2021/01-22-2021.php
  123. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-structure-and-organization/farm-structure-and-contracting/
  124. https://www.extension.msstate.edu/sites/default/files/publications/P3851.pdf
  125. https://www.farmers.gov/sites/default/files/documents/business-entities-selection-farmer.pdf
  126. https://nationalaglawcenter.org/overview/corporatefarminglaws/
  127. https://attra.ncat.org/publication/tips-about-farm-business-structures/
  128. https://www.gislason.com/choosing-a-business-structure-for-your-family-farm/
  129. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/241549c5-4771-44f0-ab8d-7fbfbbb1a7be
  130. https://farmoffice.osu.edu/sites/aglaw/files/site-library/LawBulletins/StructuringFarmBusinessSeries/Using_Multiple_Entities.pdf
  131. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/fao-unveils-new-public-tool-based-agricultural-census-data
  132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3489134/
  133. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2020/august/scale-economies-provide-advantages-to-large-dairy-farms
  134. http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2018/december/productivity-increases-with-farm-size-in-the-heartland-region
  135. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/e0055a60-fe07-5bd1-831a-6c82d33d8f2f/download
  136. https://www.ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/45868/17032_err47fm_1_.pdf?v=67905
  137. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26331/w26331.pdf
  138. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1093/ajae/aaz003
  139. https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/40974017/Research%2BSeries%2B34.pdf/64a10247-6fdd-e397-b75b-3d45767d956c
  140. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/741921468157179935/pdf/DRD2030Box37770rvey0of0the0evidence.pdf
  141. https://cafnrfaculty.missouri.edu/cookml/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2019/10/AJAE2010.pdf
  142. https://www.fao.org/4/a1446e/a1446e00.pdf
  143. https://www.ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/106795/EIB-256.pdf
  144. https://grain.org/en/article/7284-top-10-agribusiness-giants-corporate-concentration-in-food-farming-in-2025
  145. https://www.ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/88057/EIB-189.pdf?v=69138
  146. https://farmaction.us/2024/02/13/farm-action-responds-to-2022-census-of-agriculture-corporate-consolidations-impact-on-farmers/
  147. https://www.imarcgroup.com/agribusiness-market
  148. https://www.newrivernotes.com/agricultural-implements/
  149. https://www.joabj.com/Writing/Tech/History/2210-Plow.html
  150. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1456&context=tnas
  151. https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/5-farming-technologies-changed-world.htm
  152. https://aspee.com/blog/from-hand-tools-to-mechanization-the-evolution-of-early-agricultural-equipment/
  153. https://www.tstar.com/blog/history-of-agriculture-equipment-important-developments-and-examples
  154. https://www.farm-equipment.com/articles/4269-timeline-of-ag-equipment-firsts
  155. https://www.pequea.com/history-of-farm-machinery/
  156. https://www.crestcapital.com/tax/history_of_agriculture
  157. https://www.bayer.com/en/agriculture/article/technology-agriculture-how-has-technology-changed-farming
  158. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/precision-farming-market-1243.html
  159. https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/8/11/686
  160. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911925000292
  161. https://agtech.folio3.com/blogs/role-of-robotics-in-agriculture-in-2024/
  162. https://www.stellarmr.com/report/Agtech-Market/1804
  163. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2024/Census22_HL_FarmsFarmland.pdf
  164. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops
  165. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220511/dq220511a-eng.htm
  166. https://www.nfu.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Canadian-Ag-by-the-Numbers-2024.pdf
  167. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/agriculture
  168. https://migration.ucdavis.edu/rmn/blog/post/?id=2829
  169. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/research-topics/surveys/disaggregating-farm-size
  170. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/products/insights/effects-of-drought-and-climate-variability-on-Australian-farms
  171. https://www.reuters.com/investigations/less-rain-more-wheat-how-australian-farmers-defied-climate-doom-2025-07-29/
  172. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agriculture_statistics_at_regional_level
  173. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agriculture_statistics_-_family_farming_in_the_EU
  174. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-01/agricultural-outlook-2023-report_en_0.pdf
  175. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/04/eu-farms-5-3-million-fewer-in-2020-than-in-2005/
  176. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview_en
  177. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/international-markets-us-trade/countries-regions/european-union/common-agricultural-policy
  178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378022000899
  179. https://www.eib.org/en/press/all/2025-214-european-agriculture-faces-growing-climate-risks-that-eu-can-help-counter-new-study-finds
  180. https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/building-future-eu-agriculture-young-farmers-focus-2025-10-21_en
  181. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/780-the-challenges-facing-european-agriculture-crisis-or-opportunity-for-transformation
  182. https://agrifoodecon.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40100-025-00416-z
  183. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/media/news/eu-agricultural-outlook-2024-35-resilient-sector-adapts-climate-change-sustainability-concerns-and-2024-12-11_en
  184. https://ieep.eu/news/seeking-simplification-in-the-complex-environment-of-eu-agriculture-challenges-and-considerations/
  185. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221191242500029X
  186. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308521X01000336
  187. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/sustainability_pathways/docs/Factsheet_SMALLHOLDERS.pdf
  188. https://zerocarbon-analytics.org/nature/smallholder-farmers-agricultural-sustainability-and-food-security/
  189. https://www.fao.org/4/x6905e/x6905e04.htm
  190. https://www.foodunfolded.com/article/rice-in-asia-how-its-grown
  191. https://www.agtechnavigator.com/Article/2024/06/25/The-new-projects-aimed-at-transforming-rice-farming-in-South-Asia/
  192. https://www.asiapathways-adbi.org/2024/09/mechanization-driving-the-future-of-agriculture-in-asia/
  193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S074301672500244X
  194. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/287
  195. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389907836_The_Future_of_Smallholder_Farming_in_Asia
  196. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/731791/adou2021bp-farm-size-agri-productivity-asia.pdf
  197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2100066X
  198. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04559-8
  199. https://farmonaut.com/asia/central-asia-agriculture-2025-challenges-solutions
  200. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12534373/
  201. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/working-hard-and-not-being-counted-evidence-sub-saharan-africa-redefining-employment
  202. https://www.cnn.com/world/africa/africa-maize-agriculture-change-spc
  203. https://www.fao.org/4/y1860e/y1860e04.htm
  204. https://media.heifer.org/About_Us/Africa-Agriculture-Tech-2021.pdf
  205. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912420300857
  206. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2025.2480726
  207. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8661414/
  208. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/03/24/boosting-labor-productivity-in-sub-saharan-african-countries-could-bring-transformational-economic-benefits-to-the-regio
  209. http://openknowledge.fao.org/items/b5eb1991-e912-40de-80f4-9c3535f7496b
  210. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/12/1249
  211. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1948917/
  212. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362012516_Soil_Erosion_in_the_United_States_Present_and_Future_2020-2050
  213. http://ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=94923
  214. https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/no-till-farming-improves-soil-health-and-mitigates-climate-change
  215. https://farmonaut.com/blogs/crop-rotation-chart-soil-health-fertility-benefits-data
  216. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-44464-9
  217. https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13488
  218. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167198723001484
  219. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/conservation-basics/natural-resource-concerns/soil/soil-health
  220. https://www.fao.org/aquastat/en/overview/methodology/water-use/
  221. https://bwi.earth/how-irrigation-influences-water-resources-globally/
  222. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10838710/
  223. https://biolres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40659-020-00312-4
  224. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4672/5/3/21
  225. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1184421/full
  226. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56732-x
  227. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935124015251
  228. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8612243/
  229. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-labor
  230. https://www.epi.org/blog/the-farmworker-wage-gap-continued-in-2020-farmworkers-and-h-2a-workers-earned-very-low-wages-during-the-pandemic-even-compared-with-other-low-wage-workers/
  231. https://www.ilo.org/topics-and-sectors/industries-and-sectors/agriculture-aquaculture-plantations-other-rural-sectors
  232. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264999324001408
  233. https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/millions-migrant-farm-workers-exploited-europes-fields-says-oxfam
  234. https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/migrant-workers-vital-role-agriculture-conversation-alejandro-gutierrez-li
  235. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10804689/
  236. https://www.fb.org/market-intel/over-140-000-farms-lost-in-5-years
  237. https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/11/2/88
  238. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622823000012
  239. https://www.thenewlede.org/2025/06/the-role-of-farming-in-the-exodus-of-rural-america/
  240. http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2024/february/net-migration-spurs-renewed-growth-in-rural-areas-of-the-united-states
  241. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64319-9
  242. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/crop-yield-gap-between-organic-conventional-agriculture_en
  243. https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/general-information/staff-offices/office-chief-economist/sustainability/sustainable-productivity-growth-coalition/sustainable-agricultural-productivity-growth-what-why-and-how
  244. https://foodrevolution.org/blog/monocropping-monoculture/
  245. https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/horizon-magazine/rise-and-fall-monoculture-farming
  246. https://www.tabledebates.org/research-library/productivity-stability-trade-global-food-systems
  247. https://rodaleinstitute.org/blog/new-research-reveals-organic-agriculture-produces-higher-crop-yields-during-periods-of-extreme-weather/
  248. https://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/thelivestockproject/research-from-the-rodale-institute-shows-organic-yields-produce-higher-yields-than-conventional-during-extreme-weather/
  249. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3250154/
  250. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912419300719
  251. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211912422000359
  252. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-06650-1
  253. https://www.aspca.org/protecting-farm-animals/factory-farming-environment
  254. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_en
  255. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/subsidies-and-government-support.html
  256. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/02/farm-subsidies-wrecked-europe-environments-common-agricultural-policy
  257. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-sector-income-finances/farm-sector-income-forecast
  258. https://www.taxpayer.net/agriculture/2023-farm-subsidies/
  259. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2025/07/farm-bill-one-tenth-1
  260. https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/cutting-federal-farm-subsidies
  261. https://www.rstreet.org/commentary/the-high-price-of-federal-agriculture-subsidies-whats-the-true-cost-of-farming-as-usual/
  262. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/068/2024/002/article-A001-en.xml
  263. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/06/15/trillions-wasted-on-subsidies-could-help-address-climate-change
  264. https://www.humaneworld.org/en/blog/farm-bill-animal-welfare-nightmare
  265. https://www.johnlocke.org/farming-subsidies-disproportionately-hurt-small-farms/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.