Gilad Shalit
Gilad Shalit
Main page
1755398

Gilad Shalit

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Gilad Shalit (Hebrew: גלעד שליט, Gilˁad Šaliṭ listen; born 28 August 1986) is an Israeli former soldier who, on 25 June 2006, was captured by Palestinian militants in a cross-border raid via tunnels near the Israeli border.[1][2] Hamas held him captive for over five years until his release on 18 October 2011 as part of a prisoner exchange deal.

Key Information

During his captivity, Hamas rejected requests from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to visit Shalit, claiming that such visits could compromise his location. Several human rights organizations criticized this position, asserting that the conditions of Shalit's confinement were in violation of international humanitarian law. The Red Cross stated "The Shalit family have the right under international humanitarian law to be in contact with their son."[3] In the early months, the sole means of communication was through an intermediary who claimed that a low-ranking Hamas official, Ghazi Hamad, asked him to convey to Shalit's parents the assurance that Shalit was "alive and was treated according to Islam's laws regarding prisoners of war. In other words, he had been given shelter, food, and medical care."[4] The United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict called for Shalit's release in its September 2009 report.[5] In the G8's Deauville Declaration of 27 May 2011, they demanded Shalit's release.[6]

Many sources have categorized Shalit's capture as both a kidnapping and an abduction.[1][2][7][8][9] During his captivity, he was denied visits from the Red Cross and communication with family members, both of which he was entitled to as a captured soldier under the Geneva Conventions. Furthermore, his captors demanded a form of ransom, although not necessarily of a monetary nature, in exchange for his release. The only instances of contact between Shalit and the outside world during his captivity, prior to his eventual release, consisted of three letters, an audio tape, and a DVD. These were provided to Israel in exchange for the release of 20 female Palestinian prisoners.[10]

Shalit was captured near the Kerem Shalom crossing in Israel and was held by Hamas at an undisclosed location within the Gaza Strip.[11] Hamas's initial demands, which included the release of all female and underage Palestinians, as well as Marwan Barghouti, were not met.[12][13] On 18 October 2011, Shalit was eventually released in a negotiated agreement, securing his freedom after more than five years in isolation and captivity. In exchange, 1,027 Palestinian prisoners were released, some of whom were convicted of multiple murders and carrying out attacks against Israeli civilians. According to Israeli government sources, these released prisoners were collectively responsible for 569 Israeli deaths.[14][15][16][17][18]

Shalit was the first Israeli soldier to be captured by Palestinian militants since the incident involving Nachshon Wachsman in 1994.[19] Shalit held the rank of Corporal in the IDF's Armor Corps at the time of his capture, and he was subsequently promoted to Sergeant, Staff Sergeant, and Sergeant First Class just before his release.[20][21] He holds dual Israeli and French citizenship, the latter via his grandmother.[22]

Early life and education

[edit]

Shalit was born on 28 August 1986 in Nahariya, Israel, to Noam and Aviva Shalit. He has an older brother and a younger sister. He was raised from in Mitzpe Hila in the Western Galilee.[23] He graduated with distinction from Manor Kabri High School. Shalit began military service in the Israel Defense Forces in July 2005, and "despite a low medical rating, chose to serve in a combat unit, following his older brother, Yoel, into the armored corps."[24]

Capture by Palestinian militants

[edit]

Background

[edit]

The capture of Shalit was one of the more notable events that took place during the June/July 2006 flare-up of hostilities between Gaza and Israel, the others being the Gaza beach explosion and the Muamar family detention incident. Noam Chomsky has drawn attention to the cause-and-effect and also to the differences in treatment in the Western media between the Muamar detention that took place a day earlier, and the abduction of Gilad Shalit.[25] The Israeli army seized the two Palestinian Muamar brothers in an overnight raid into the southern Gaza Strip on 24 June 2006, who were accused of being members of Hamas and planning attacks on Israel. Hamas said they were sons of a member but were not involved in Hamas.[26]

According to a report by the Army Radio, published nearly a year after the occurrence, the IDF had received a warning on 24 June 2006, the day before Shalit was captured, about a planned abduction. Israeli security forces entered the Gaza Strip and arrested the two brothers. The report said that the brothers were transferred to Israel for interrogation, and that the information extracted formed the basis for the warning that militants would try to enter Israel through tunnels to capture soldiers stationed near Gaza.[27] As of January 2012 the brothers were still in an Israeli jail, held without trial for over five years.[28][better source needed]

Capture

[edit]
Shalit on a Hamas poster in Nablus, 7 May 2007 that reads: "Our champion captives. May we have a new Gilad each year”; and below: “They [Palestinian prisoners] are not alone".

Early on 25 June 2006, Palestinian militants from the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Popular Resistance Committees, and Army of Islam crossed into Israel from the Gaza Strip through a tunnel near Kerem Shalom and attacked an IDF post.[1][29] Two Israeli soldiers were killed and another two, apart from Shalit, were wounded. Two of the attacking Palestinian militants were also killed.[30] Shalit suffered a broken left hand and a light shoulder wound, and the militants captured him and took him via a tunnel into Gaza.[1][29]

Shalit's captors issued a statement the following day, offering information on Shalit if Israel were to agree to release all female Palestinian prisoners and all Palestinian prisoners under the age of 18.[31] The statement was issued by the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the Popular Resistance Committees (which includes members of Fatah, Islamic Jihad, and Hamas), and a previously unknown group calling itself the Army of Islam.[citation needed]

Shalit was the first Israeli soldier captured by Palestinians since Nachshon Wachsman, in 1994.[32] His capture and the following cross-border raid by Hezbollah, resulting in the capture of IDF soldiers Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev into Lebanon, occurred prior to the conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon during summer 2006.[citation needed]

The high-ranking Hamas commander whom Israel considers responsible for masterminding Shalit's capture, Abu Jibril Shimali, was killed during the violent clashes between Hamas and the al-Qaida-affiliated Jund Ansar Allah organization in Gaza in August 2009.[33]

Rescue attempt

[edit]

Israeli forces entered Khan Yunis on 28 June 2006 to restore quiet after repeated rocket attacks. Freeing Shalit was not one of the objectives of the mission called "Summer Rains". According to an Israeli embassy spokesperson, "Israel did everything it could in exhausting all diplomatic options and gave Mahmoud Abbas the opportunity to return the abducted Israeli… This operation can be terminated immediately, conditioned on the release of Gilad Shalit."[34] On the same day, four Israeli Air Force aircraft flew over Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's palace in Latakia, because Israel views the Syrian leadership as a sponsor of Hamas, according to an IDF spokesperson.[35] The operation did not succeed in finding Shalit.

On 29 June, the commander of the Israeli Southern Command, Aluf Yoav Galant, confirmed that Shalit was still in Gaza. Israel's minister of justice, Haim Ramon, added that Shalit was being held in southern Gaza, specifically. A military correspondent for the Israel Broadcasting Authority said that Shalit was being held captive in Rafah in southern Gaza, and that there was indication that he was still alive. However, IDF spokesperson Brig. Gen. Miri Regev said: "we are not convinced he is being held in southern Gaza… [only] that he is being held in Gaza".[36]

On 1 July, the BBC reported that Shalit had been treated by a Palestinian physician for a broken hand and a light shoulder wound. Israeli government authorities threatened that the "sky will fall" if Shalit were harmed.[37] On the same day, Shalit's captors demanded that Israel release an additional 1,000 Palestinian prisoners and end the assault on Gaza (in addition to the release of all female and minor prisoners, as previously demanded).[38]

Diplomatic efforts

[edit]
"Free Gilad" sidewalk painting

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert immediately ruled out negotiations with Shalit's captors, demanding his unconditional release. "There will be no negotiations to release prisoners," the Prime Minister's Bureau said in a statement. "The government of Israel will not give in to extortion by the Palestinian Authority and the Hamas government, which are headed by murderous terror organizations. The Palestinian Authority bears full responsibility for the welfare of Gilad Shalit and for returning him to Israel in good condition."[39]

The Apostolic Nuncio to Israel, Archbishop Antonio Franco, attempted to secure Shalit's release via the Catholic Church's Gaza-based parish. He was not successful. In September 2006, Egyptian mediators received a letter in which Shalit wrote that he was alive and well. The handwriting was confirmed to be that of Shalit.[40] In October, Egypt was also reported to be negotiating with Hamas on behalf of Israel for Shalit's release.[41]

On 28 October 2006, the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC) said in a statement that all three parties had agreed to a proposal by Egyptian mediators regarding Shalit's release. The PRC did not provide details but said that the Egyptian proposal would include the release of Palestinians held by Israel.[42] It was the first time since Shalit's capture that any of the factions indicated that his release might be imminent. In November 2006, Hamas leader Khaled Mashal indicated that Shalit was alive and in good health.[43]

On 9 January 2007, Abu Mujahed, a spokesman for the captors, asserted that Shalit:

...has not been harmed at all ... He is being treated in accordance with Islamic values regulating the treatment of prisoners of war.

He also said: "We have managed to keep the soldier in captivity for six months and we have no problem keeping him for years."[44] On 17 January 2007, one of the captor groups, the Army of Islam headed by Mumtaz Dormush, claimed that Shalit was being held exclusively by Hamas.[45] On 8 March 2007, Jerusalem Post reported that an agreement had been reached with Hamas over the number of prisoners Israel would release in return for Shalit. Israel and Hamas were still negotiating specific prisoners who Hamas wanted freed in return for Shalit. On 7 April 2007, it was reported that Shalit's captors had transferred to Israel, through Egyptian mediators, a list of Palestinian prisoners they wanted freed. The list included names of approximately 1,300 prisoners, some of whom were high-ranking Fatah members.[citation needed]

On 25 June 2007, a year after Shalit's capture, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades released an audio tape on YouTube in which Shalit is heard sending a message to his family, friends, and the Israeli government and army, and appealing for a prisoner-swap deal to be reached to secure his release. Shalit said that his medical condition was deteriorating, and that he required immediate and lengthy hospitalization. On 4 February 2008, it was reported that Hamas had sent Shalit's family a second letter written by him. The handwriting was confirmed to be that of Shalit.[46]

Shalit's father, Noam, met with former United States President Jimmy Carter during Carter's April 2008 visit to Israel. Carter planned to visit Hamas leader Khaled Mashal in Damascus later. Noam Shalit said that the fact that Carter was not considered pro-Israel could be beneficial in securing his son's release. On 9 June 2008, it was reported that Hamas sent Shalit's family a third letter. The group had promised to send them a third letter after mediation from Carter. The handwriting was confirmed to be Shalit's.[47]

On 12 August 2008, Hamas said that it was suspending talks on Shalit's release, demanding a complete lifting of the Israeli siege. The decision angered Egypt, a mediator for Shalit's release. Hamas criticized the Egyptians for linking the opening of the Rafah border crossing with Shalit's release, a condition to which Hamas refused to agree.[48]

On 20 August 2008, in his briefing to the United Nations Security Council, the Under-Secretary-General of the UN appeared to link the decision to release 200 Palestinian prisoners to the case,[49] though a Hamas spokesman saw it as an attempt to increase Palestinian internal divisions by releasing only those loyal to the Fatah faction.[50]

On 11 May 2010, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called for Shalit to be freed "as soon as possible". He made the call while meeting Hamas leaders in Damascus, Syria. "The Russian president urged solving the problem of releasing Israeli citizen Gilad Shalit as soon as possible," his spokeswoman said. Russia is the only country that has direct dialogue with Hamas. Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal reportedly said Hamas would only consider releasing Shalit when Israel resumed talks to free Palestinian prisoners.[51]

German President Christian Wulff also helped call for the release of Gilad Shalit.[52]

Negotiations for release

[edit]

Shalit's father had blamed the U.S. for blocking talks on his son's release.[53] Netanyahu responded to a pilgrimage march, called by Shalit's father for his release, by saying he was willing to release 1,000 Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Shalit, but that top Hamas leaders would not be among those released.[54]

In early 2011, Egyptian-moderated negotiations continued between the Israeli government and Hamas, represented by Ahmed Jabari. Haaretz reported that Israel proposed a prisoner swap, and threatened that if Hamas rejected the proposal, no swap would occur. Hamas responded by warning that an end to negotiations would lead to Shalit's "disappearance." Negotiations were hung up over disagreements between the two parties regarding Israel's unwillingness to release all of the so-called "senior prisoners" into the West Bank—a demand Hamas rejects—and regarding the particulars of releasing prisoners who were leaders of Hamas and other organizations.[55] On 11 October 2011, the Pan-Arabist Al Arabiya network reported that Israel and Hamas had reached an agreement on Shalit. Netanyahu convened a special Cabinet meeting to approve the Shalit deal.[56]

Shalit's release negotiations include the release of 1,027 Hamas and Palestinian prisoners by Israel.[18][57][58]

Despite poor relations with Israel at the time, the Republic of Turkey played a significant yet silent role in Shalit's release.[59][60][61][62]

President Peres publicly thanked Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for showing compassion to Shalit. On 18 October 2011, Shalit was transferred to Israel. The IDF transferred him, via helicopter, to the base in Tel-Nof, where he was reunited with his parents and met the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In the base he went through medical tests; it was found that he was malnourished and suffered from vitamin deficiencies.[63] After the tests were completed, he was then transferred by helicopter to his home, where many who supported his release waited outside his house to see his return. Shalit subsequently began to rehabilitate with IDF assistance.[64]

Debate in Israel

[edit]
Shalit's parents, July 2010

The vast majority of Israel's citizens were in favor of the deal,[65] although a vocal minority opposed it, creating essentially two camps. One camp supported the release of Shalit on Hamas's conditions. According to the Dahaf Polling Institute, 79 percent of Israelis favoured this deal, which included the release of over 1,000 Palestinian prisoners and the deportation of some of them outside the territory of the Palestinian National Authority[66] or restricting them to Gaza.[citation needed]

A second camp said that Shalit should be released, but not on Hamas's conditions. They argued that the correct approach is to protect Israelis if the prisoners are released. According to the Dahaf Polling Institute, 14 percent of Israelis were in this camp.[65] Others believe that the disagreement among Israelis represented rifts and changes within Israeli society. Attorney Dalia Gavriely-Nur, a lecturer at Bar-Ilan University, said that the camp opposing the prisoners deal was holding onto a view of collectivist society, in which the individual was expected to sacrifice himself for the good of society; the camp supporting the prisoner release was expressing, however, a high value on the sanctity of life, that symbolizes a shift to a more privatized society.[66]

Poster: "Gilad is still alive"; February 2009

Noam Shalit, Gilad's father, urged the UN to take all possible measures to implement the findings of the Goldstone Report. The Goldstone Report called for Shalit's immediate release and, while he was in captivity, for access to him by the International Committee of the Red Cross.[67]

On the evening of Shalit's 23rd birthday, on 28 August 2009, thousands attended a vigil for Shalit at the Western Wall, and dozens of activists protested outside Defense Ministry headquarters in Tel Aviv, slamming Defense Minister Ehud Barak and criticizing IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi. The Jewish Internet Defense Force (JIDF) organized in August 2009 a pro-Shalit campaign on the social networking site Twitter. Twitter users drove Shalit's name to the second-highest trend on the day of his 23rd birthday. Tweets for Shalit ranged from the demand "Free Shalit", to requests for international supervision of the case.[citation needed]

Shalit Protest Tent in Jerusalem, May 2011

In several incidents during 2009, leaders of the campaign to free Shalit demonstrated at the prisons in which Palestinian detainees were held, preventing visits by Palestinian prisoners' families.[68][69][70] One such demonstration at the Erez crossing on the Gaza border blocked the passage of food and medicine to the Gaza Strip.[71] Israel said it would not ease its blockade of Gaza until Shalit was freed. Israeli opponents of such a deal spoke out, warning that releasing top Palestinian militants could result in the deaths of many Israelis in renewed attacks, as well as increased Palestinian motivation to abduct more soldiers in the future. Israeli analyst Dan Schueftan called the possible swap deal "the greatest significant victory for terrorism that Israel has made possible."[72]

On 17 October 2011, Purdue University Professor Louis Rene Beres made the case against freeing Shalit in an op-ed column in the Jerusalem Post:

No modern government has the legal right to free terrorists in exchange for its own kidnapped citizens, military or civilian. Under long-standing international law, every state has a primary obligation to protect its citizens. Yet it appears that tomorrow, Israel Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will exchange Palestinian terrorists for kidnapped IDF soldier Gilad Schalit. Any such exchange, however humane to Schalit and his family, would imperil thousands of other Israelis.[73]

Captivity

[edit]

In early December 2008, during a Hamas rally in Gaza City to mark 21 years since its founding, a Hamas member masquerading as Shalit was paraded by Hamas militia members. Hamas's refusal to negotiate about the status of Shalit or even to provide further information about his status strained the temporary Israel-Hamas cease-fire enacted in June 2008.[74]

At the start of the Gaza War, Hamas claimed Shalit had been wounded by Israeli fire.[75] On 11 January 2009, Abu Marzuk, Deputy Chief of the Hamas Political Ministry, told the London-based Arabic daily Al-Hayat that "Shalit may have been wounded, and he may not have been. The subject no longer interests us. We are not interested in his well-being at all, and we are not giving him any special guard since he is as good as a cat or less."[76]

On 22 January 2009, Israel indicated that it was willing to swap Palestinians held in Israeli jails for Shalit as part of a longer-term truce after the three-week military operation in Gaza.[77] On 26 January 2009, it was reported that Israel was offering to free 1,000 prisoners in exchange for Shalit.[78] On 16 March 2009, it was reported that a prisoner-swap deal to gain Shalit's release was close, and the negotiation team was urged to wrap up the deal. Israel agreed to release more than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, but there were still disagreements over the number of prisoners.[79] The negotiation team however deadlocked over the release of 450 "heavyweight" prisoners. According to a senior source in the PM's Office, "a deal cannot be finalized on such terms, and there's nothing to vote on [in the government session] Tuesday".[80] In May 2009, President Shimon Peres invited Shalit's family to meet Pope Benedict XVI at the President's residence in Jerusalem.[81]

In June 2009, Israeli human rights group B'Tselem published an ad in the West Bank Palestinian newspaper Al-Quds, calling on Hamas to release Shalit "immediately and unconditionally", but the Gaza-based daily Palestine refused to print it, according to a B'Tselem spokeswoman.[82] In July 2009, Hamas TV in Gaza broadcast a short animated movie that depicted Shalit chained to a jail cell wall, pleading with a Palestinian boy to be set free. The boy refuses, saying he has relatives in Israeli prisons.[83]

In July 2009, Noam Shalit, Gilad's father, testified before the Goldstone Committee, which was investigating on behalf of the United Nations illegal conduct by combatants during Gaza War. Shalit told the committee that his son has lived without human rights for three years, and that no one, including the Red Cross, knows what happened to him or has paid him a visit.[84] The Jerusalem Post reported that it obtained photographs showing children at the graduation ceremony of a Hamas-run summer camp, reenacting Shalit's abduction. The photos were reported to show Osama Mazini, a senior Hamas political official in charge of the Shalit negotiations with Israel, attending the play.[85]

On 30 September 2009, Israel announced that it would release 20 female Palestinian prisoners in exchange for a video proving Shalit was still alive.[86] The video was attributed to intervention by Switzerland.[87] The exchange took place successfully on 2 October.

Hamas turned over a two-minute 40-second video to Israel. Senior IDF officers, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu viewed the footage, after which Barak spoke to Shalit's father Noam and grandfather Zvi by telephone. The video was sent to the Shalit family home in Mitzpe Hila, with the family reportedly viewing it together. Members of the Israeli negotiating team for Shalit's release viewed the footage to ensure it met with Israel's demands, primarily with regard to how recently it was filmed. The video on YouTube, the only contact from Shalit other than three letters written by him and an audio tape released in June 2007, was released to the public at around 4:00 in the afternoon on Israeli television. In the video, Shalit is seen sitting in a chair in a bare room, looking frail and emaciated but otherwise healthy. He addressed Netanyahu and his parents, and reminisced about times he spent with his family. At the end of the video, he stated that the "Mujahideen of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades are treating me very well". During the video, he held up a newspaper dated 14 September 2009.[citation needed]

Israel transferred 19 Palestinian women being held in Hadarim Prison near Netanya to the Ofer and Shikma detention facilities, ahead of their final release. As soon as it was determined that the video met Israel's demands, the detainees were released and turned over to Red Cross vehicles, which transported them to the West Bank. Another female prisoner was slated for release by the Israel Prison Service, but it was found that she had already been released for good behavior. Another female prisoner was then selected as her substitute and released on 4 October.[88]

Shalit's mother and brother at IPO solidarity concert

In 2010, at least two cathedrals in Switzerland turned off their lights for several minutes in solidarity with Shalit.[89] On the fourth anniversary of Shalit's abduction, the lights of the Colosseum were turned off. and so were the lights around the Old City walls in Jerusalem. A flotilla of ships, called The True Freedom Flotilla, sailed around the Statue of Liberty and past the United Nations.[90]

In late June 2010, Shalit's parents organized a march from Shalit's hometown to the Prime Minister's residence in Jerusalem and were joined by 10,000 people. Shalit's parents stated that they would not go home until he was freed. On the fifth day of the march, as it reached Hadera, Israel agreed to a German-mediated prisoner exchange deal. Under the deal, Hamas would release Shalit, and Israel would release 1,000 Palestinian prisoners. However, Israel stated that the released Palestinians would be barred from entering the West Bank, since this location would afford them access to Israeli cities. Israel also refused to release "arch-terrorists" as part of the deal. Hamas responded by saying that the problem was with who Israel was willing to release, not how many. Hamas demanded that Israel release 450 prisoners jailed for violent attacks on Israelis, but Israel refused to agree to release most of them. In an address, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said Israel was willing to pay a heavy price for Shalit, "but not any price". Shalit's grandfather Zvi called these comments a "death sentence" for Gilad.[91]

When a pro-Gilad Shalit release march entered Jerusalem on 8 July, it was met by a group of protesters holding signs "Gilad – Not at any cost" and "Don't give up to terror". The protesters had red ribbons on their hands symbolizing the blood of possible future terror victims resulting from any exchange in terrorists for Shalit's release.[92]

Graffiti for Shalit, Tel Aviv

In October 2010, Hamas officials claimed to have thwarted an attempt to locate Shalit. A collaborator in Hamas's military wing was allegedly caught planting bugs in two-way radios. Hamas leaders said the informer maintained relationships with top Hamas commanders in order to learn where Shalit was being held.[93]

At the end of November 2010, PA President Mahmoud Abbas called for Shalit to be released, comparing his situation to that of Arab prisoners held in Israeli prisons.[94] In June 2011, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel, at a joint press conference, issued a call for Shalit's release. This followed Shalit's father, Noam, filing a suit in France to investigate his son's abduction. Shalit is a dual citizen of Israel and France.[55]

Gilad Shalit prisoner swap deal

[edit]
Shalit salutes Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, 18 October 2011
Shalit meets his father after five years in captivity, 18 October 2011

Five years and four months after Shalit was captured by Palestinian militants in southern Israel, a deal was reached between Israel and Hamas to release Shalit in exchange for 1,027 Palestinian and Israeli Arab prisoners. The deal was brokered by German and Egyptian mediators and signed in Egypt on 11 October 2011. Its first phase was executed on 18 October, with Israel releasing 450 Palestinian prisoners and Hamas transferring Shalit to Cairo.[95]

Release

[edit]

On 18 October 2011, Shalit was returned to Israel as part of the agreement with Hamas.[96] Hamas militants during the exchange wore suicide belts in the event that Israel tried to change the terms at the last minute.[97] The first 447 Palestinian prisoners were also freed and transferred as part of the exchange, the prisoners were also exiled from Israeli territory.[98]

Shortly after his release, on 24 October 2011, President Shimon Peres visited Shalit at his home in Mitzpe Hila to congratulate him and wish him well. At this time, Peres called Shalit a hero, and said that he was proud of his ability "to withstand extremely difficult conditions in captivity." Noam Shalit thanked Peres for his efforts in obtaining Shalit's release.[99] France's President Nicolas Sarkozy sent a congratulatory letter to Gilad Shalit, mentioning France's role in pressuring Hamas to release him.[100]

In March 2013, the Jerusalem Post released information that Shalit conveyed to IDF investigators after his release.[101]

Location

[edit]

The location in which Shalit was held is unknown. According to Israeli Home Front Defense Minister Matan Vilnai, even the leaders of Hamas did not know Shalit's exact whereabouts. Only a small group of militants knew where Shalit was being held, and most of them had been killed in IDF operations. According to Vilnai, "there is a very small group of people who are holding Gilad Shalit who know, and a large number of them are no longer with us".[102]

Shortly after the abduction, locating Shalit became a top priority of Israeli intelligence, which soon received false information that he was being held in a fenced private residence on the outskirts of Gaza City. The information had been planted by Hamas to lure the Israelis into raiding the booby-trapped house. Planning for a rescue operation was underway when Israeli intelligence learned of the plot.[103]

In June 2007, Israeli media, citing Hamas sources, reported that Shalit was being held in the basement of a booby-trapped building near Rafah in Gaza, and was being cared for by two guards with whom he had established a cordial relationship. Shalit's living quarters were described as a two-room underground store with enough supplies for two weeks, accessible down a ladder through a 15-meter-deep shaft lined with explosives. The report added that the guards receive supplies and newspaper clippings every two weeks, and that they had been ordered to take good care of Shalit.[104]

In October 2009, Asharq Al-Awsat reported that a senior Israeli defense official had told the newspaper that Israel knew exactly where Shalit was being held and was keeping the location under constant surveillance. The newspaper reported that Hamas was aware that Israel knew Shalit's location, and responded by booby-trapping the area, surrounding it with explosives in a 400–500-meter radius, and issuing a directive to kill Shalit if Israel mounted a military rescue operation.[105]

In June 2011, the Kuwaiti newspaper Al Jarida reported that Shalit had been transferred to a secret and secure location in Egypt ahead of an expected final deal. The newspaper quoted sources as saying that Shalit had been accompanied by Hamas commanders Ahmed Jabari and Mahmoud al-Zahar.[106]

Treatment

[edit]

Upon release, doctors stated that Shalit was pale, weak, and malnourished, suggesting that he was held in solitary confinement underground. In an interview, Shalit said that he was "very emotional. I haven't seen people in a long time." and that he was "... not really well." Shalit told his parents that he was initially treated "harshly", and that conditions improved toward the end.[107]

Video later released by Hamas shows Shalit in a large room containing a wall made out of metal bars.[108]

Shalit stated that he had some good things such as television, radio, food, and opportunities to play checkers and dominos with the guards. He stated that they "did not abuse [him] too much". Shalit stated that he kept a regular schedule such as getting up and going to bed at the same time every day, learned some Arabic, and chatted with his captors about sports.[109]

International law

[edit]

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) repeatedly asked Hamas for permission to visit Shalit to ascertain his conditions of detention and treatment. Hamas refused the requests.

An ICRC representative said that under international humanitarian law Shalit is entitled to regular and unconditional contacts with his family.[110] On 25 June 2007, the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem issued a statement saying "international humanitarian law absolutely prohibits taking and holding a person by force in order to compel the enemy to meet certain demands, while threatening to harm or kill the person if the demands are not met", and thus holding Shalit as a hostage to their demands is a war crime.[111] B'Tselem also noted that denying access to ICRC visitations is also a violation of international law.[111]

Human Rights Watch also stated that Hamas authorities were obligated by the laws of war to allow Shalit to correspond with his family, and noted that three letters and a voice recording cannot be counted as regular correspondence. HRW also called for him to receive visits from the ICRC, and said that the prolonged incommunicado detention of Shalit was cruel and inhumane and amounted to torture.[112]

A UN fact-finding mission headed by Judge Richard Goldstone assigned to investigate the Gaza War, which released its Report in September 2009, called for Shalit to be released.[5]

In June 2010, on the fourth anniversary of Shalit's abduction, Human Rights Watch made a statement describing Hamas' treatment of Shalit as "cruel and inhuman," saying it illustrates the UN definition of torture and violates the international rules of war by prohibiting him from having contact with his family or visits from the Red Cross.[113]

Gerald Steinberg, president of "human rights watchdog NGO Monitor", was quoted in October 2011 as saying that many human rights organizations, "such as the UN Human Rights Council, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network, Gisha, and the International Red Cross demonstrated very little interest" in the Shalit case.[114]

Campaigns for his release

[edit]
"Where are you, son?" Notes for Shalit, Jerusalem
Graffito in support of Shalit in Hendon, London (2011)

5th Anniversary Campaign (2011)

[edit]

In June 2011, the Zionist Federation, among other organizations, stepped up a campaign to ensure that Shalit and his abduction are not forgotten, encouraging members and sympathizers to contact their local MP, MEP and to write letters to newspapers and to Shalit's family with words of support.[115] This followed a two-week Gilad Shalit Awareness Campaign in February, organized by the Embassy of Israel alongside ten other community organizations.

Several prominent Israeli, Palestinian, and international human rights organizations issued a joint statement in June 2011 calling on Hamas to end its "illegal" and "inhumane" treatment of Shalit, including Amnesty International, B'Tselem, Bimkom, Gisha, Human Rights Watch, Palestinian Center for Human Rights, Physicians for Human Rights, Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, Rabbis for Human Rights, The Association for Civil Rights in Israel, Yesh Din;[116] though Noah Pollak, writing in Commentary, noted that the statement did not call for the release of Shalit.[117]

A protest was also held in August 2011 outside Benjamin Netanyahu's office to mark Shalit's sixth birthday in captivity.[118] Gilad Shalit's father Noam also spoke at the social justice protest in Tel Aviv.[119]

Gilad Shalit Worldwide Tehillim Project

[edit]

The Gilad Shalit Worldwide Tehillim Project[120] was established to support the reciting of Tehillim (Psalms) for Gilad Shalit. The goal was to have all of Tehillim recited daily.[citation needed]

Life after release

[edit]

The Israeli Defense Ministry, in anticipation of his release, determined that Shalit would be accorded the status of a disabled veteran with a minimum of 20% disability immediately following his liberation from captivity. At the time of his abduction, Shalit held the rank of corporal, but he was promoted to sergeant during his captivity. Upon his release, Shalit returned to his parents' residence in Mitzpe Hila, an event that garnered substantial attention both within Israel and internationally, resulting in the presence of numerous media outlets and ordinary citizens in Mitzpe Hila. In an act of consideration for Shalit's privacy, many Israeli media organizations committed to limiting extensive coverage of his return.[121]

Following his release from captivity, Shalit initiated medical treatment for his injuries. On 4 November, he underwent a surgical procedure at Rambam Medical Center in Haifa to extract shrapnel fragments lodged in his arm during his abduction. During the approximately two-hour surgery, medical professionals removed seven pieces of shrapnel from his elbow and forearm, two of which were exerting pressure on nerves.[122][123]

In January 2012, Noam Shalit, Gilad's father, declared his intention to participate as a candidate in the Israeli Labor Party's primaries for the Knesset.[124][125] On 18 April 2012, Gilad Shalit was honorably discharged from the IDF with the rank of sergeant major.[126]

Following his return home, Shalit held meetings with various dignitaries, including Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu[127] and French President Nicolas Sarkozy, at the Élysée Palace.[128] He also became a subject of media attention, often being photographed with public figures at sports and other events.[129][130][131]

In June 2012, Shalit, known for his enthusiasm for sports and his support for Maccabi Tel Aviv B.C., secured employment as a sports reporter for Yedioth Ahronoth, where he contributed a regular column covering Israeli and European basketball. His inaugural assignment took him to the United States to report on the 2012 NBA Finals in Oklahoma City.[132][133]

In February 2020, Shalit became engaged to his girlfriend of a year and a half, Nitzan Shabbat.[134] Additionally, in June 2021, Hamas released new videos that depicted Shalit during his captivity, engaging in activities such as exercise, shaving, tying his shoelaces, and playing with a ball in his cell.[135]

In January 2024, Shalit met with several hostages' families, expressed support for them, and talked about his own experience as a hostage.[136]

Honors bestowed by cities

[edit]
"Freedom for Gilad" poster in France

Shalit has been named an honorary citizen by several cities, including Paris, Raincy, Rome,[137][138][139] Miami,[140] New Orleans, Baltimore,[141] and Pittsburgh.[142] Grenoble city hall hung his photo on their building facade the week of 10 December 2008.[143]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Gilad Shalit (Hebrew: גלעד שליט; born August 28, 1986) is a former Israel Defense Forces soldier abducted by Hamas militants on June 25, 2006, while serving in a tank crew near the Gaza border and held captive in the Gaza Strip for over five years until his release on October 18, 2011.[1][2] The cross-border raid that captured Shalit involved Hamas and allied militants tunneling under the security fence, attacking an IDF outpost, killing two soldiers, and wounding others before dragging the 19-year-old conscript into Gaza.[3][4] During his isolation, Hamas denied Shalit access to the International Committee of the Red Cross, limited communication to sporadic proof-of-life videos, and held him in violation of international humanitarian law, prompting widespread protests in Israel and international condemnation.[1] Shalit was freed through a prisoner exchange brokered with Hamas, in which Israel released 1,027 Palestinian prisoners—many convicted of terrorism, including those responsible for deadly attacks—in return for his sole life, a deal that fueled debate over its long-term security costs as dozens of the freed militants later reoffended and were rearrested for involvement in attacks.[5][6][7]

Early Life and Military Service

Family Background and Upbringing

Gilad Shalit was born on August 28, 1986, in Nahariya, Israel, to parents Noam and Aviva Shalit.[8] [6] He was the second of three children in the family, with an older brother named Yoel and a younger sister named Hadas.[6] The Shalit family relocated from Nahariya to Mitzpe Hila, a moshav in the Western Galilee region near the Lebanese border, shortly after his birth, where Gilad spent the majority of his childhood and upbringing.[6] [9] This northern Israeli community provided a rural setting amid the region's security challenges, including proximity to conflict zones.[8] Noam Shalit, his father, later became prominent for leading public campaigns during Gilad's captivity, though details on the family's pre-captivity professions remain limited in public records.[10]

Education and Pre-Military Activities

Gilad Shalit was born on August 28, 1986, in Nahariya, Israel.[8] He grew up in the northern Israeli community of Mitzpe Hila, where his family resided prior to his military service.[1] Shalit attended Manor Kabri High School, graduating with distinction in 2005.[11] [12] He was regarded as an exceptional student during his high school years.[13] Limited public details exist regarding his extracurricular or pre-enlistment activities, though he enlisted in the Israel Defense Forces shortly after graduation at age 19, fulfilling mandatory service requirements.[12]

Enlistment and Role in the IDF

Shalit enlisted in the Israel Defense Forces in July 2005, shortly after graduating from high school, as part of Israel's mandatory military service requirement for citizens.[14][2] Despite a low medical profile that often qualifies individuals for non-combat roles, he volunteered for assignment to a combat unit.[12] He underwent training and was posted to the Armored Corps, where he served as a tank crew member, operating Merkava tanks.[14] By early 2006, at age 19, Shalit had advanced to the rank of corporal (rav-turay) and was deployed with his unit to guard positions along the Gaza border, including outposts near Kerem Shalom.[11] His duties involved patrolling and securing the perimeter against infiltration threats from Gaza-based militants.[15]

The 2006 Capture

Planning and Execution of the Raid

The raid that resulted in the capture of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit was a joint operation conducted by militants from Hamas's Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the Popular Resistance Committees, and the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, with planning attributed primarily to Hamas military leader Ahmed al-Jabari.[16][17] The attackers prepared for approximately two months, focusing on constructing a tunnel extending roughly 250-300 meters into Israeli territory near the Kerem Shalom border crossing southeast of Gaza, a method that had been under development for several months prior to the assault.[12][18] Hamas claimed responsibility for the operation, framing it as retaliation for Israeli military actions in Gaza.[19] On the morning of June 25, 2006, a group of seven to eight militants emerged from the tunnel and initiated the attack on an Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) outpost positioned along the border, where Shalit was serving in a Merkava tank during a routine surveillance mission.[3][20] The assailants employed anti-tank missiles, rocket-propelled grenades, and small arms fire to disable two IDF tanks, killing the two tank commanders—Staff Sergeants Pavel Slutsker and Ludmila Peretz—and wounding four other soldiers, including Shalit, who sustained a minor shoulder injury.[21] Shalit was extracted from the tank, bound, and forcibly transported back through the tunnel into Gaza amid ongoing exchanges of fire, during which two militants were killed and the remainder escaped.[22][23] The entire incursion lasted less than 15 minutes, exploiting the element of surprise from the underground approach to breach IDF defenses at the tri-border area near Israel, Gaza, and Egypt.[24]

Circumstances of the Abduction

On the morning of June 25, 2006, a joint squad of approximately eight militants from Hamas's Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC), and the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) infiltrated Israeli territory via a tunnel dug underneath the Gaza-Israel border fence near the Kerem Shalom crossing.[19][25] The tunnel, extending several hundred meters into Israel, allowed the group to bypass security barriers and emerge undetected on the Israeli side adjacent to an IDF outpost.[21][15] The militants initiated the attack by targeting an IDF watchtower with anti-tank grenades and small arms fire, followed by strikes on an unoccupied armored personnel carrier and a Merkava Mark 3 tank conducting routine surveillance patrol nearby.[3][15] Corporal Gilad Shalit, aged 19 and serving as a tank loader, was aboard the tank with commander Lieutenant Hanan Barak, gunner Sergeant Pawel Czeslaw Monko, and driver Sergeant Ludmila (Lior) Shua. An RPG-7 rocket struck the tank, killing Barak and Monko instantly, critically wounding Shua, and injuring Shalit, who exited the vehicle and was captured at gunpoint by the militants.[3][15] The captors then transported the wounded Shalit back into Gaza through the same infiltration tunnel, evading immediate IDF pursuit amid the chaos of the assault, which also wounded two other soldiers at the outpost.[19][25] The raid resulted in the deaths of two militants during the exchange of fire, marking the first successful cross-border abduction of an IDF soldier since 1986.[26]

Immediate Aftermath and Confirmation

Following the cross-border raid on June 25, 2006, two Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers, Hanan Barak and Pavel Slutsker, were killed in the initial exchange of fire, while four others were wounded; Gilad Shalit, the sole survivor from his tank crew, was reported missing amid the chaos of the militants' withdrawal through a breached border fence into Gaza.[2] The IDF quickly assessed the scene, confirming the tank's destruction by anti-tank missiles and the absence of Shalit, leading to an official declaration of his capture by Palestinian militants within hours of the 5:30 a.m. attack.[6] Hamas's Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, in coordination with the Popular Resistance Committees and Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, publicly confirmed Shalit's abduction later that day via statements to media outlets, asserting they held an Israeli soldier and demanding the release of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails in exchange for information on his status.[15] These announcements included no immediate proof-of-life but specified the captors' intent to negotiate, marking the first official acknowledgment from the responsible factions and escalating the incident into a hostage crisis.[2] In response, Israel imposed a full blockade on Gaza, mobilized tens of thousands of reservists, and initiated Operation Summer Rains, comprising artillery barrages, airstrikes on Hamas infrastructure, and incursions targeting militant positions to pressure for Shalit's release; these actions resulted in over 200 Palestinian deaths in the ensuing weeks and broadened into the Second Lebanon War context amid heightened regional tensions.[27] Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's government rejected negotiation overtures, vowing military escalation until Shalit was freed unconditionally, while domestic protests and vigils began forming in Israel to demand action.[6]

Conditions of Captivity

Isolation and Treatment by Captors

Gilad Shalit was held in solitary confinement for the majority of his 2,032 days in Hamas captivity from June 25, 2006, to October 18, 2011, with minimal human contact and no visits from the International Committee of the Red Cross, contravening the Geneva Conventions' provisions for prisoners of war regarding access to neutral observers and family communication.[4] Upon his release, Shalit himself confirmed the isolation, stating he was kept alone but occasionally saw a few captors or intermediaries, underscoring the psychological strain of prolonged seclusion without external verification of his well-being. Israeli authorities and experts highlighted that such extended isolation, absent any independent oversight, likely inflicted severe trauma, drawing parallels to historical cases of IDF captives who struggled with reintegration due to similar deprivations.[28] Hamas captors denied torturing Shalit physically or mentally, asserting he received medical care for ailments, access to radio and television, and treatment superior to that of Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons, though these claims remained unverified due to the absence of third-party inspections.[29][30] In a 2021 reflection, Shalit noted that his captors preserved his life strategically, viewing a living soldier as a valuable asset for prisoner exchanges rather than a deceased one, which aligned with Hamas's use of him as a bargaining chip throughout the ordeal.[31] However, Shalit's frail, pale, and emaciated appearance upon crossing into Israel—having lost significant weight—suggested deficiencies in nutrition and overall care, prompting scrutiny of Hamas's detention practices despite their public assertions of humane treatment.[32] No audio, video, or written proof-of-life materials released by Hamas during captivity depicted conditions contradicting the isolation narrative, and post-release medical evaluations confirmed lingering health impacts from the confinement, though Shalit later shared coping insights with families of other hostages, emphasizing endurance amid adversity.[33]

Proof-of-Life Communications

Hamas provided sporadic proof-of-life communications from Gilad Shalit during his captivity, primarily in the form of videos and letters delivered through mediators, often tied to negotiation demands or prisoner exchanges. These were limited, with no visits permitted by the International Committee of the Red Cross, despite Shalit's status as a captured combatant entitling him to such access under international humanitarian law.[34][35] The first public proof came shortly after his June 25, 2006, capture, when Hamas released a video in July 2006 showing Shalit alive and speaking in Hebrew, French, and Arabic, confirming his identity but offering little detail on his condition.[36] A handwritten letter from Shalit, dated around September 2006 and addressed to his family, was later disclosed by his parents in 2009; in it, he expressed basic needs and family sentiments but provided no specifics on his treatment.[37] Further communications included a videotape and letter delivered to Egyptian mediators in early 2008, though the video was not publicly released at the time.[38] On June 9, 2008, Shalit's parents received another handwritten letter via Hamas channels, the first direct family communication since 2007, in which he described his ordeal as a "nightmare" and pleaded for his release.[39][40] The most significant recent proof prior to his release occurred on October 2, 2009, when Hamas aired a two-minute video filmed in mid-September, showing a pale but coherent Shalit holding a dated newspaper to verify timeliness; he appealed directly for freedom, stating he was in good health but enduring isolation. This footage was exchanged for the release of 19 Palestinian female prisoners by Israel.[41][42][43] An additional letter reached his family in September 2010 through Egyptian mediation, reiterating his desire to return home amid ongoing stalemate.[34] These intermittent messages underscored Hamas's strategy of using Shalit as leverage, releasing them only to advance bargaining while maintaining strict isolation otherwise.[44]

Health and Psychological Impact

Gilad Shalit's physical health during captivity was subject to limited external verification, as Hamas denied International Red Cross visits and family contact, isolating him from independent assessments. In a proof-of-life video released in October 2009, after over three years in captivity, Shalit appeared gaunt and explicitly warned that both his mental and physical health were deteriorating due to prolonged isolation.[45][46] Hamas representatives maintained that Shalit received adequate medical care, was not subjected to torture, and had access to television and radio, which they claimed supported his mental well-being. These assertions, however, were met with skepticism by Shalit's family, who described the early phase of captivity as particularly harsh, potentially involving physical and emotional duress before conditions stabilized.[29][47] Psychologically, experts anticipated severe trauma from the extended solitary confinement and uncertainty, with research on prior Israeli captives indicating risks of long-term mental health disorders, including difficulties resuming normal life post-release. The absence of external stimuli or support networks likely intensified effects such as anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal, compounded by the captors' control over all information and interaction.[48][28]

Israeli Responses During Captivity

Military Operations and Rescue Attempts

In the immediate aftermath of Gilad Shalit's capture on June 25, 2006, the Israel Defense Forces launched Operation Summer Rains, a limited ground incursion into the Gaza Strip on June 28, 2006, with the primary objective of rescuing the abducted soldier and disrupting Hamas operations.[49] [14] The operation involved tanks and infantry advancing into southern Gaza, including airstrikes on infrastructure such as bridges to hinder militant movements, alongside targeted raids to search for Shalit.[50] A key element was a commando raid in Khan Yunis, where IDF special forces conducted house-to-house searches based on intelligence suggesting possible holding sites, but the effort yielded no success in locating Shalit.[11] Hamas militants had rapidly relocated him through Gaza's tunnel network shortly after the abduction, rendering precise intelligence elusive and preventing any viable extraction.[51] The incursion resulted in clashes that killed several Palestinian militants and civilians, but Shalit remained hidden, with IDF officials later confirming that ongoing rescue efforts were unsuccessful due to inadequate location data.[52] Throughout Shalit's captivity, the IDF maintained continuous intelligence-gathering operations, including surveillance and covert insertions, but no additional large-scale rescue missions were executed, as military leaders assessed the risks of failure in Gaza's urban density and Hamas's compartmentalized custody as prohibitively high.[19] Broader campaigns, such as Operation Cast Lead from December 2008 to January 2009, aimed to degrade Hamas's military capabilities and rocket-launching infrastructure to exert pressure for Shalit's release rather than constituting direct rescue attempts, given the persistent uncertainty over his position.[17] These efforts underscored Israel's doctrinal preference for military recovery of captives when feasible, though Hamas's isolation tactics—limiting knowledge of Shalit's location even among many of its members—ultimately precluded successful intervention without negotiation.[51]

Domestic Political and Public Debate

The captivity of Gilad Shalit sparked extensive public mobilization in Israel, with his family and supporters organizing sustained campaigns to pressure the government for his release. From 2006 onward, protests included rallies and vigils, culminating in large-scale events such as a 2010 march that drew approximately 20,000 participants across the country to demand a prisoner exchange.[53] In June 2010, thousands joined a 12-day cross-country march organized by Shalit's parents to highlight the urgency of securing his freedom.[54] A protest tent erected by the family outside Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's residence in Jerusalem persisted for over four years, symbolizing public frustration, until it was dismantled on October 12, 2011, following the announcement of a deal.[55] Politically, the issue divided Israeli leaders between those prioritizing national solidarity and the return of soldiers at significant cost and those emphasizing long-term security risks from releasing convicted terrorists. Under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, negotiations advanced but stalled without agreement, as Olmert later claimed he rejected deals that would have freed more prisoners than the eventual 2011 exchange.[56] Netanyahu, who had previously criticized large-scale swaps, convened a special cabinet meeting in October 2011 to approve the release of 1,027 Palestinian prisoners for Shalit, despite opposition from ministers like Uzi Landau who argued it endangered public safety.[57] Critics within the government and security establishment warned that such exchanges incentivize further abductions, citing historical patterns where released prisoners resumed violent activities.[58] Public opinion strongly favored a deal, reflecting a cultural ethos valuing the redemption of captives. Polls in June 2011 showed 63% of Jewish Israelis supporting the swap of Shalit for 1,000 prisoners, including high-profile figures like Marwan Barghouti.[59] By October 2011, support reached 79% for the specific exchange of 1,027 prisoners, with only 14% opposed. Another survey indicated 69% approval, underscoring broad consensus despite awareness of the risks.[60] This sentiment, often framed as a moral imperative rooted in Jewish tradition, contrasted with strategic concerns but ultimately influenced policy toward compromise.[61]

International Diplomacy and Pressure

Following the abduction of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit on June 25, 2006, several countries issued immediate calls for his unconditional release, with Egyptian representatives lobbying Palestinian leaders to secure his freedom. The United States, European Union members, and others urged Hamas to adhere to international humanitarian law, emphasizing Shalit's status as a captured combatant entitled to protections under the Geneva Conventions. However, Hamas consistently denied access to Shalit by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) throughout his five-year captivity, a violation that drew criticism from bodies like the European Parliament, which in a November 2010 resolution demanded immediate ICRC visits and his release.[62] Egypt emerged as a primary mediator in negotiations between Israel and Hamas, facilitating talks from 2006 to 2009 under President Hosni Mubarak, which stalled amid disagreements over prisoner exchanges, and resuming efforts after the 2011 Egyptian revolution. Germany played a discreet but pivotal role, with mediators including Gerhard Conrad shuttling proposals between parties, particularly in 2009 attempts that nearly succeeded before collapsing, and providing intelligence support that aided the eventual 2011 breakthrough. These bilateral efforts were supplemented by multilateral pressure, as the UN Quartet (comprising the UN, US, EU, and Russia) reiterated demands for an end to Shalit's detention in statements such as its July 2011 communiqué condemning his ongoing isolation.[63][64][65][58][66] The United States maintained a firm stance, with officials like UN Ambassador Susan Rice meeting Shalit's father Noam in September 2011 and publicly insisting on Hamas's unconditional release of the soldier, framing it as a humanitarian imperative amid over 1,900 days of captivity. The EU echoed this through diplomatic engagements, including a July 2010 meeting between High Representative Catherine Ashton and the Shalit family to press for negotiation progress, alongside parliamentary resolutions highlighting the denial of family contact and ICRC access as breaches of norms. Despite these diplomatic initiatives and rhetorical pressure, concrete enforcement mechanisms remained limited, as Hamas's non-state status and control over Gaza constrained international leverage, resulting in stalled talks until domestic Israeli dynamics shifted.[67][68][69]

Negotiations and Release

Stalemate and Key Negotiation Milestones

Following the abduction of Gilad Shalit on June 25, 2006, Israel initially refused direct negotiations with Hamas, opting instead for military pressure and indirect channels mediated by Egypt, while Hamas demanded the release of Palestinian prisoners convicted of attacks against Israelis as a precondition.[17] This led to an early stalemate, exacerbated by Hamas's refusal to provide proof of Shalit's survival and Israel's insistence on excluding "heavy" prisoners—those serving life sentences for terrorism—from any potential exchange.[70] Egyptian mediation facilitated preliminary talks in 2007, but these collapsed amid disagreements over prisoner numbers and categories, with no progress during Israel's 2008-2009 Operation Cast Lead in Gaza.[35] In October 2009, Hamas released a video of Shalit to demonstrate he was alive, prompting renewed indirect negotiations in Cairo under Egyptian auspices and with the involvement of German mediator Gerhard Conrad, appointed by Chancellor Angela Merkel to bridge gaps on prisoner lists.[71] [72] These talks advanced to a draft agreement by December 2009 but failed due to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's reported intervention, which hardened positions against releasing certain high-profile prisoners, and Hamas's escalation of demands.[73] The impasse persisted into 2010, with public pressure mounting from Shalit's family, who established a protest tent outside Netanyahu's office in July 2010 after a march to Jerusalem.[14] Talks resumed in October 2010 via Conrad's channels, with Netanyahu confirming renewed contact with mediators, but stalled again by early 2011 over irreconcilable demands—Hamas seeking over 1,000 releases including top militants, Israel prioritizing Shalit's health and vetoing those deemed ongoing threats.[74] [75] The stalemate broke in September 2011 when Egypt, amid post-Mubarak political shifts seeking diplomatic wins, brokered a preliminary exchange: on September 30, Israel released 20 female Palestinian prisoners for a new proof-of-life video of Shalit.[34] This milestone paved the way for final talks, with Conrad shuttling between parties in Cairo in early October, leading to the comprehensive deal announcement on October 11, 2011, for Shalit's release against 1,027 prisoners in phases.[76] [77] The agreement reflected concessions driven by Egyptian pressure on Hamas and Israel's assessment of Shalit's deteriorating condition after five years in isolation.[78]

The 2011 Prisoner Exchange Agreement

The prisoner exchange agreement for Gilad Shalit's release was finalized on October 11, 2011, following indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas, mediated primarily by Egypt with involvement from German intelligence.[79] [80] Under the terms, Israel agreed to release 1,027 Palestinian prisoners held in its custody in exchange for Shalit's freedom after over five years of captivity.[17] [81] Israel's cabinet approved the deal on October 11 after a six-hour debate, with 26 ministers voting in favor and three against, including hardline members who objected to the inclusion of prisoners convicted of deadly attacks against Israelis.[4] [78] The agreement stipulated a two-phase release: 477 prisoners in the first phase, coinciding with Shalit's handover on October 18, 2011, at the Kerem Shalom crossing near Gaza, followed by the remaining 550 prisoners approximately two months later, after Shalit's return to Israel.[17] [81] Among the released were individuals serving life sentences for terrorism-related offenses, with some required to relocate abroad as a condition to prevent immediate return to areas under Palestinian Authority or Hamas control.[17] [82] The deal represented a significant concession by Israel, as it included prisoners Hamas had long demanded, such as those involved in high-profile attacks, amid stalled talks since 2009 when a prior agreement collapsed over disagreements on prisoner lists and release conditions.[80] [34] Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the agreement as bringing Shalit home while maintaining Israel's security stance, emphasizing that it ended a humanitarian ordeal without endorsing Hamas's tactics.[4] Hamas leader Khaled Mashal hailed it as a "victory" for Palestinian resistance, crediting sustained pressure and prior exchanges as leverage.[83] The terms also implicitly addressed Shalit's health, as proof-of-life videos had shown his deterioration, though no explicit medical repatriation clauses were publicly detailed beyond his immediate transfer to Israeli authorities for evaluation.[34]

Execution of the Deal and Shalit's Return

On October 18, 2011, Hamas executed the first phase of the prisoner exchange by transferring Gilad Shalit to Egyptian mediators at the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt.[84][85] Shalit, who had been held captive since June 25, 2006, appeared pale and thin, later describing his confinement as living "in a hole under the ground."[84][22] Egyptian authorities facilitated the handover in the presence of Hamas military leader Ahmed Jabari, after which Shalit was escorted across the border into Israel via the Kerem Shalom crossing.[84][6] Upon entering Israel, Shalit underwent an immediate medical examination at a nearby military base and was assessed to be in good overall health despite his visible frailty.[22][6] He changed into an Israeli military uniform and was then helicoptered to Tel Nof Air Base south of Tel Aviv, where he reunited with his parents and siblings for the first time in over five years.[22] At the base, Shalit saluted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who greeted him alongside Defense Minister Ehud Barak.[22] Israeli forces simultaneously released 477 Palestinian prisoners as part of the initial tranche, transporting them by bus to Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, or abroad for exile via Egypt.[84][6] Shalit was subsequently airlifted by an Israel Air Force 669 search-and-rescue unit to his family home in the northern village of Mitzpe Hila, marking the completion of his return after 1,941 days in captivity.[6] The second phase of releases, involving the remaining 550 prisoners, occurred on December 18, 2011, fulfilling the terms of the agreement for a total of 1,027 Palestinian detainees exchanged for Shalit.[6][86]

Immediate Post-Release Medical and Family Reunion

Upon his release on October 18, 2011, Gilad Shalit was transported across the border into Israel at the Kerem Shalom crossing and immediately underwent initial medical evaluations by IDF personnel at a nearby base.[87] These preliminary checks determined that Shalit was in overall good health despite appearing gaunt, underweight, and fatigued after over five years in Hamas captivity.[88] He reported feeling unwell from the ordeal, prompting a more comprehensive medical examination to assess potential nutritional deficiencies and other effects of prolonged isolation.[89] Shalit spoke briefly by phone with his parents shortly after crossing into Israel, expressing relief and confirming his condition before being flown to Tel Nof Air Base for family reunion.[90] The emotional reunion occurred at the base, where he embraced his parents, Noam and Aviva Shalit, and younger brother Yoav amid tears and national celebration broadcast live across Israel.[91] His father later stated that Shalit required time to recover from both physical wounds—such as those from limited sunlight exposure and possible shrapnel—and psychological trauma sustained during captivity.[92] [93] Following the reunion and further tests that cleared him for discharge, Shalit was transported under medical supervision to his family home in Mitzpe Hila in northern Israel.[89] The next morning, October 19, IDF medical officers visited him at home, where he affirmed being in good health and expressed hope regarding the prisoner exchange's outcomes.[94] Initial assessments indicated no immediate life-threatening issues, though long-term rehabilitation was anticipated for his weakened state.[32]

Life After Release

Physical and Psychological Recovery

Upon his release on October 18, 2011, Gilad Shalit underwent an initial medical examination by IDF personnel at Tel Nof Air Base, which determined he was in stable health despite visible signs of deterioration including pallor, gauntness, and physical weakness from prolonged captivity.[89] [87] [91] He struggled to breathe during a brief post-release interview, highlighting immediate respiratory strain.[90] Medical assessments identified needs for treatment of shrapnel wounds sustained during his 2006 capture, vitamin deficiencies from lack of sunlight, and general rehabilitation from isolation.[87] [92] Shortly thereafter, Shalit underwent surgery at Rambam Hospital in Haifa to address lingering injuries from his abduction, after which he was reported to be recuperating well.[95] Psychologically, Shalit's five years in solitary confinement without International Red Cross visits or external contact inflicted profound trauma, as anticipated by experts prior to his release.[28] Post-release evaluations focused on potential post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), with recommendations to monitor sleep disturbances, weight fluctuations, and emotional reintegration challenges.[96] Former Israeli prisoners of war emphasized the likelihood of emotional hurdles, including anxiety and difficulty resuming normal life, underscoring the need for a media-free grace period.[97] [98] His family enforced strict privacy to support recovery, limiting public appearances and shielding him from intense scrutiny that could exacerbate isolation effects.[99] [100] In a 2013 session with an IDF psychologist, Shalit voiced fears regarding an impending military investigation into his capture, reflecting persistent anxiety.[101] Long-term details remain private, consistent with Israel's approach to POW rehabilitation, which includes specialized psychological support; Shalit's reclusiveness suggests ongoing adjustment rather than full public disclosure of treatment outcomes.[102] No verified reports indicate complete resolution of captivity's mental toll as of recent years.[103]

Education and Professional Development

Following his military discharge in April 2012, Shalit pursued higher education, enrolling in economics studies at the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya (now Reichman University) in October 2013.[12] His academic pursuits reflected a gradual reintegration into civilian life, though details on completion remain private.[33] Professionally, Shalit leveraged his longstanding passion for sports—particularly basketball, which he credited with helping him endure captivity—to enter journalism. In June 2012, he signed with Yedioth Ahronoth, Israel's largest-circulation newspaper, as a basketball columnist, initially collaborating with a ghostwriter due to his limited public exposure post-release.[104][105] His columns covered Israeli leagues, European competitions, and events like the NBA Finals, with his first major assignment involving Maccabi Tel Aviv's Euroleague success.[106] This role marked an early step in his professional development, aligning with his pre-captivity interests. By 2016, Shalit shifted to finance, joining Israel Discount Bank after training, reportedly in trading or investment advisory capacities.[107][108] This transition underscored his efforts toward financial independence and normalcy, though he has since maintained a low profile, avoiding detailed public commentary on his career trajectory.[33]

Recent Activities and Public Involvement

Shalit has worked as a sports columnist for the Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot, a role he began shortly after his military discharge in 2012 and which has involved covering events such as NBA games.[106][33] On June 23, 2021, Shalit married Nitzan Shabbat, his girlfriend of several years, in a small private ceremony held in Emek Hefer, central Israel.[109][110] In January 2024, during the Israel-Hamas war, Shalit met privately with families of Israelis abducted by Hamas on October 7, 2023. He shared details of his own five-year captivity, including coping strategies, and expressed optimism that the hostages could survive psychologically and recover upon release.[33][111] Shalit has otherwise avoided extensive public engagements, prioritizing privacy in the years following his release.[33]

Controversies and Long-Term Consequences

Debates Over the Prisoner Swap Ratio

The Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange involved Israel releasing 1,027 Palestinian prisoners in return for the single Israeli soldier held captive by Hamas since June 25, 2006, culminating in Shalit's release on October 18, 2011.[58] This 1:1,027 ratio drew intense debate within Israel, with proponents emphasizing the intrinsic value of Israeli lives and the state's obligation to retrieve its citizens, while opponents highlighted the security risks of freeing convicted terrorists and the potential incentive for future abductions.[112] The Israeli cabinet approved the deal by a 26-3 margin, reflecting broad elite consensus despite vocal dissent.[61] Supporters of the ratio argued it aligned with Israel's longstanding policy of prioritizing the return of its captives, rooted in ethical and national imperatives to leave no soldier behind. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the exchange as fulfilling the duty to bring home every Israeli, irrespective of the numerical disparity, stating that the government shares the pain of victims' families but must uphold this principle.[113] Public opinion polls prior to the deal showed majority backing, with 58% of Israelis favoring a prisoner exchange for Shalit in May 2011, compared to 29% opposed, a sentiment that strengthened amid Shalit's prolonged captivity and isolation.[114] Advocates contended that the asymmetry underscored Hamas's leverage from holding high-value Israeli personnel, but insisted the moral calculus justified the cost to preserve societal unity and deterrence against abandoning captives.[61] Critics, including some cabinet ministers and victims' advocacy groups, condemned the ratio as a strategic windfall for Hamas, releasing over 300 prisoners serving life sentences for terrorism-related offenses and potentially emboldening further kidnappings.[58] One minister described it as "a great victory for terrorism," warning that the lopsided terms would encourage militants to view captures as lucrative bargaining chips rather than liabilities.[61] Families of terror attack victims protested vehemently, arguing the deal devalued Israeli lives lost to those released prisoners and eroded deterrence by signaling that mass exchanges could compel concessions.[113] The debate highlighted tensions between immediate humanitarian imperatives and long-term security calculus, with detractors asserting that such ratios perpetuate an asymmetrical conflict dynamic favoring non-state actors like Hamas.[115]

Recidivism and Security Impacts

In the 2011 Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange, Israel released 1,027 Palestinian security prisoners, many convicted of terrorism offenses including murder.[116] Israeli security assessments have documented extensive recidivism among these individuals, with Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar stating in January 2025 that 82% returned to terrorist activity post-release, including planning, incitement, and operational roles, while 15% directly carried out attacks.[116] This figure encompasses involvement in networks rather than solely direct violence, reflecting a pattern where released prisoners reconstituted terror infrastructures, often under Hamas direction from Gaza or abroad.[117] Specific cases illustrate the direct security threats. Yahya Sinwar, serving four life sentences for kidnapping and murder, was freed in the deal and rose to lead Hamas in Gaza, masterminding the October 7, 2023, attacks that killed approximately 1,200 Israelis and precipitated the ongoing Gaza war.[118] Ziad Hassan Awad, another releasee, murdered Israeli civilian Baruch Mizrahi via shooting on April 14, 2014, using a Kalashnikov rifle seized during his subsequent arrest.[119] By mid-2015, Shalit deal prisoners had been linked to the deaths of at least six Israelis through attacks since 2014, including stabbings and shootings.[120] Israeli intelligence operations mitigated some risks, with approximately 620 releasees returning to the West Bank and East Jerusalem; of these, 76 were redetained for terrorism by 2014, including during Operation Brother's Keeper, yielding weapons caches intended for shootings, abductions, and IED attacks.[119] Networks involving figures like Hisham Hijaz directed cross-border plotting from Qatar via Jordan, focusing on soldier kidnappings to replicate the Shalit model.[119] These efforts prevented numerous incidents but underscored the causal link: releases replenished Hamas's operational cadre, enabling sustained threats that endangered Israeli civilians and soldiers.[116] The broader security fallout reinforced incentives for hostage-taking, as Hamas viewed the exchange as a strategic victory that bolstered its recruitment and fortified leadership like Sinwar's, contributing to escalated violence including the 2023-2025 Gaza conflict.[121] Shin Bet data highlights that such swaps, while securing immediate returns, predictably amplify long-term risks through recidivist reintegration into terror ecosystems.[116]

Broader Policy Implications for Hostage Negotiations

The Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange of October 18, 2011, underscored a core tension in hostage negotiations: the prioritization of individual lives against the risk of eroding deterrence against non-state actors. By releasing 1,027 Palestinian prisoners, including convicted terrorists, in return for one Israeli soldier, Israel reinforced its longstanding policy of exhaustive efforts to repatriate captives, a stance rooted in the conscript nature of its military and societal expectations of state responsibility.[122] However, analysts contend that such lopsided ratios signal to groups like Hamas that abductions offer asymmetric leverage, potentially incentivizing future captures as a low-cost strategy to extract concessions and bolster intra-Palestinian political standing.[58] [122] Empirical patterns post-exchange support concerns over diminished deterrence. Immediately following Shalit's release, Hamas operatives publicly advocated for "another Shalit" to free additional prisoners, correlating with heightened kidnapping attempts; Israeli security forces reported thwarting dozens orchestrated by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other factions, often involving released prisoners who established new terror networks in Gaza.[123] The recidivism of figures like Yahya Sinwar—freed in the deal and later architect of the October 7, 2023, Hamas assault—exemplifies how swaps replenish adversary capabilities, leading to escalated violence that claims more lives than the hostages saved.[124] [58] This dynamic has prompted debates within Israeli policy circles on adopting stricter no-concession doctrines to disrupt the cycle, though domestic and operational pressures frequently compel engagement.[123] Broader implications extend to escalating demands in subsequent talks, as adversaries calibrate expectations upward based on precedents like Shalit, complicating resolutions and amplifying security trade-offs. For instance, the deal enhanced Hamas's legitimacy vis-à-vis rivals like Fatah, framing armed leverage as superior to diplomacy and influencing regional proxy dynamics.[122] Proponents of restraint argue that forgoing negotiations, while politically arduous, preserves long-term stability by raising the perceived cost of abductions, a principle echoed in critiques of similar exchanges historically.[58] Yet, the persistence of such deals reflects causal realities: non-state actors exploit humanitarian imperatives, turning captives into strategic assets absent robust countermeasures like preemptive operations.[123]

Perspectives from Palestinian and International Actors

Hamas leaders portrayed the October 18, 2011, prisoner exchange as a strategic triumph demonstrating the efficacy of armed resistance against Israel, with Gaza Strip residents generally responding positively amid celebrations for the release of 1,027 Palestinian detainees.[125] [126] Hamas officials, including those in Gaza, viewed the deal as a model for future negotiations, emphasizing Israel's concessions under pressure from the 2006 capture.[127] Some Hamas supporters argued the group could have secured even more favorable terms, reflecting internal confidence in their leverage.[128] The Palestinian Authority (PA), led by Mahmoud Abbas, publicly supported the swap while committing to ongoing efforts for the remaining prisoners' release, though PA lobbying had previously delayed similar deals to undermine Hamas's negotiating position.[126] [129] Palestinian public opinion polls indicated majority approval (55%) for the deal's conditions, including Israel's veto power over certain releases, despite 40% opposition from those favoring Hamas's harder stance.[126] Analysts noted the exchange bolstered Hamas's political stature relative to the PA, framing it as a win for resistance factions over accommodationist approaches.[130] Internationally, Western leaders emphasized the humanitarian aspect of Gilad Shalit's release after over five years in captivity. British Prime Minister David Cameron described the ordeal as a "long, cruel and unjustified" detention, expressing shared relief with Shalit's family.[131] Similarly, U.S. officials and EU representatives welcomed the soldier's return while voicing concerns over the release of prisoners convicted of terrorism, with EU High Representative Catherine Ashton highlighting the need for balanced approaches to prevent future abductions.[132] United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon praised the deal as a demonstration of resolve that should extend to broader peace efforts, urging adherence to international law in handling detainees.[133] However, international security experts and some governments, including the U.S., criticized the 1:1,027 ratio as likely to incentivize further hostage-taking by militant groups, given the inclusion of high-profile figures responsible for attacks killing dozens of civilians.[58] These perspectives underscored a divide between endorsing Shalit's freedom and apprehensions about long-term counterterrorism implications.

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.