Hubbry Logo
GlyceriusGlyceriusMain
Open search
Glycerius
Community hub
Glycerius
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Glycerius
Glycerius
from Wikipedia

Glycerius (died after 474) was Roman emperor of the West from 473 to 474. He served as comes domesticorum (commander of the palace guard) during the reign of Olybrius (r. 472), until Olybrius died in November 472. After a four-month interregnum, Glycerius was proclaimed as emperor in March 473 by Gundobad, the magister militum (master of soldiers) and power behind the throne. Very few of the events of his reign are known other than that an attempted invasion of Italy by the Visigoths was repelled by local commanders, diverting them to Gaul. Glycerius also prevented an invasion by the Ostrogoths through diplomacy, including a gift of 2,000 solidi.

Key Information

Glycerius was not recognized by the Eastern Roman emperor Leo I (r. 457–474), who instead nominated Julius Nepos (r. 474–475/480) as Western Emperor and sent him with an army to invade the Western Empire. Glycerius was without allies because Gundobad had abandoned him, and therefore was forced to abdicate on 24 June 474, and was succeeded by Nepos. He was appointed Bishop of Salona, which position he held until his death. He died, possibly in 480, and a nearly contemporaneous source blames him for the assassination of Nepos, but the records for this event are muddled.

Life

[edit]

Background

[edit]

The historian Penny MacGeorge states the summary that "almost nothing is known of Glycerius".[2] Glycerius was born probably in Dalmatia.[citation needed] His family is unknown, and may not have been aristocratic.[3] He rose to the office of comes domesticorum (commander of the palace guard), and likely served as such during the reign of Western Roman Emperor Olybrius (r. 472).[4][5] The Germanic magister militum (master of soldiers) Ricimer had deposed the Western Roman Emperor Majorian (r. 457–461) in 461, and thereafter installed a series of Western Roman emperors as puppets: Libius Severus (r. 461–465), Anthemius (r. 467–472), and Olybrius, enthroned in July 472, after Ricimer overthrew Anthemius.[6][7] Ricimer died on 18 August 472, forty days after deposing Anthemius, and was succeeded as magister militum and kingmaker by his Burgundian nephew Gundobad.[7][8] Olybrius died shortly thereafter, on 2 November 472, and an interregnum ensued for nearly four months, before Gundobad convinced Glycerius to assume the throne, and proclaimed him as emperor at Ravenna: the Fasti vindobonenses, a record of consular years, states that it was on 5 March 473, however, the Paschale campanum, also a consular record, asserts it was on the 3rd.[2][9][10][11]

Reign

[edit]

Few events of Glycerius' reign are known.[2][12] Glycerius is known from a few fragmented references in what historian Ralph Mathisen calls "jejune chronicles", such as the Annales of Marcellinus Comes, the Gallic Chronicle of 511, and the Chronicle of Saragossa, as well as some small references provided by the 6th-century writer Jordanes and the bishop Ennodius.[4] Under Glycerius, invasions by both the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths were repelled, through a mixture of diplomatic and military activities.[2][4][12] The Visigoths and Ostrogoths were Germanic groups that were settled in Gallia Aquitania, and Pannonia Prima and Valeria, respectively, as foederati.[13][14][15][16] In 473, the Visigothic king Euric (r. 466–484) ordered an invasion of Italy, but for reasons we don't know Euric chose instead to invade Gaul, occupying both Arles and Marseille. The Ostrogothic king Videmir (r. 469–474) proposed to invade Italy,[2][4][12] but Glycerius was able to dissuade Videmir through the gift of 2,000 solidi (high-value gold coins),[17][18][a] and diverted them from Italy to Gaul, where surrounding groups, described by Jordanes as "various peoples", later attacked them.[2][4][12] Mathisen comments that these actions to defend the empire may be the reason that Glycerius receives a generally favorable reception in Roman and Byzantine sources. The 9th-century historian Theophanes describes him only as a "not despicable man", but Ennodius, the bishop of Pavia, describes him more thoroughly in his Vita St. Epiphanius:[4]

After Olybrius, Glycerius ascended to the rule. With regard to whom I summarize, in my desire for brevity, the numerous things he did for the well being of many people. For, when the blessed man [Bishop Epiphanius of Pavia] interceded, he pardoned the injury done to his mother by some men under his authority.[4]

Mathisten states that the aforementioned injuries to Glycerius' mother may have been in reaction to his bribery of Videmir, but remarks that "such measures were a regular part of imperial policy", and speculates that the attackers may have been soldiers, explaining their lack of punishment.[4] Glycerius seems to have primarily reigned in northern Italy, as all the coins found from his reign but one were minted in either Ravenna or Milan. The only law enacted by Glycerius which has survived was dated 11 March 473, and issued to Himilco, the Praetorian prefect of Italy, and later reissued to the Praetorian prefects of Illyricum, the East, and Gaul, regarding simony (the selling of church offices). It was adopted not just by the prefects of Italy and Gaul, who were a part of the Western Roman Empire, but also by the prefects of Illyricum and the East, despite the fact that he did not have the authority to issue laws to them. The law was designed to grant Glycerius the support of the clergy,[4] but would likely also have appealed to the senatorial class, who were concerned about increasingly violent elections, as well as the use of church funds by clergy for personal reasons.[19] This law was also the last known one issued by a Western Roman emperor.[20]

It is possible that Glycerius attempted reconciliation with the Eastern Roman Empire, evidenced by the fact that Glycerius did not nominate a consul for 474, and instead accepted the eastern consul, the infant Emperor Leo II (r. 473–474).[4] Despite this, the Eastern Roman Emperor, Leo I (r. 457–474), refused to recognize Glycerius as emperor because he was merely a puppet of Gundobad. Emperor Leo instead chose to recognize one of his own men, Julius Nepos (r. 474–475/480), and sent him with a fleet to invade the Western Empire.[12] The 7th-century historian John of Antioch states that Leo made the decision to remove Glycerius after hearing that he had assumed the throne of the Western Roman Empire, but Mathisen comments that Leo must have hesitated for some time, as the actual invasion was delayed by the onset of winter, and Julius Nepos was forced to wait until the beginning of spring to launch his invasion.[21]

Glycerius was without allies, as Gundobad seemingly abandoned him, leaving him with no option but to surrender. After Nepos landed at Ostia in June 474, Glycerius abdicated on 24 June 474, in Ravenna, and Nepos assumed the throne.[12][22][23] The historian John Michael O'Flynn states that the "circumstances surrounding this speedy overthrow are obscure and, at first sight, puzzling", noting that while the forces of Nepos were likely small, Gundobad made no moves to counter them, but rather "disappeared entirely from the Italian scene." He speculates that, while Gundobad could have put up stiff resistance, rather than attempting to oppose the imperial legitimacy of Leo, he accepted Leo's authority to reject Glycerius as an imperial colleague and to install one of his own choosing. Additionally, Glycerius seems to never have attracted the favor of the Roman Senate or the Gallo-Roman aristocracy, which would make the decision to back him, and therefore alienate both, far less palatable for Gundobad.[24] Notably, as king of Burgundy, Gundobad (r. 473/474–516) enjoyed warm relations with the Eastern Roman Empire, which he served as a foederatus (treaty subject).[22][23] Mathisen suggests the alternatives that Gundobad was attempting to raise further troops in Gaul, or that he left to ensure he received his inheritance after the death of his father, King Gondioc (r. 437–473).[4]

Later life

[edit]

After being deposed, Glycerius was promptly ordained as Bishop of Salona.[12] According to the 5th-century Byzantine historian Malchus, Glycerius had some part in organizing the assassination of Julius Nepos in 480, after Nepos had been forced to flee Italy and was ruling in exile in Dalmatia, although the historical records for the assassination are muddled.[4][5][25] Glycerius died sometime after 474, possibly in 480.[12][5] He has sometimes been identified with a Glycerius who was Archbishop of Milan by King Odoacer (r. 476–493), but this is likely incorrect.[4][5] The source for the promotion of Glycerius to archbishop is an obscure line written by Ennodius, in which he praises an archbishop named Glycerius, among other archbishops of Milan, however, this section seems to have been either corrupted or added later, to identify the archbishop Glycerius with the emperor Glycerius.[5]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Glycerius (died after 480) was Western Roman emperor from 3 or 5 March 473 to 24 June 474, having previously served as comes domesticorum (commander of the imperial bodyguard) under Emperor . He was elevated to the throne at by , the Burgundian nephew and successor of the late powerbroker , amid the fragmented authority of the late Western Empire. During his brief reign, primarily based in northern Italy with coinage issued mainly at and , Glycerius confronted barbarian threats from the and through a combination of military interception and diplomatic diversion, successfully redirecting an Ostrogothic incursion toward . On 11 March 473, he promulgated an edict against , prohibiting the sale of ecclesiastical offices. Unrecognized by Eastern Emperor Leo I, who opposed his usurpation, Glycerius abdicated without resistance upon the arrival of Leo's nominee, , at near in June 474; Nepos spared his life and appointed him bishop of in . In this ecclesiastical role, Glycerius disappears from most records, though some accounts implicate him in the 480 assassination of Nepos.

Early Life and Career

Origins and Background

Little is known about Glycerius's early life, including his date and place of birth or family origins, as contemporary sources provide no detailed biographical information prior to his military service. He emerged in the historical record as comes domesticorum, the commander of the imperial (protectores domestici), during the short reign of Western Emperor , who acceded to power in April 472 under the influence of the . This position placed Glycerius in close proximity to the emperor and the levers of power in , the de facto Western capital, amid the empire's deepening political instability following the sack of Rome by in 455 and ongoing barbarian incursions. After Olybrius's sudden death from dropsy on 2 or 3 November 472, a ensued, with no clear successor amid factional strife and the absence of imperial recognition from the Eastern court in . , a Burgundian officer of Frankish royal descent and nephew of , who had served as per Gallias, assumed control and elevated Glycerius to the purple on 3 or 5 March 473 in , backed by the support of the local . This appointment, as recorded by the Lombard historian in the 8th century drawing on earlier , underscores the reliance on military endorsement rather than dynastic or senatorial legitimacy in the late Western Empire's fragmented authority structure. Glycerius's background as a palace official rather than a high aristocrat highlights the era's shift toward praetorian guard figures ascending amid the erosion of traditional Roman elite influence.

Rise in the Imperial Court

Glycerius rose through the ranks of the Western Roman military hierarchy to become comes domesticorum, the commander of the elite imperial unit known as the domestici. This role involved direct responsibility for the emperor's personal security and elements of the palace guard, granting significant influence in the court amid the empire's declining stability. The position of comes domesticorum had previously elevated other figures to imperial power, underscoring its prestige and proximity to circles. Glycerius' appointment to this office likely occurred in the early 470s, during or shortly after the reign of Emperor (r. 467–472), though primary records provide no precise inception date. His duties would have included managing select troops loyal to the central authority, a critical asset in an era dominated by Germanic magistri militum like . By late 472, following the death of Emperor on November 2 and a four-month marked by factional maneuvering, Glycerius' established loyalty as comes domesticorum positioned him as a viable candidate for elevation. , Ricimer's nephew and successor as , favored Glycerius over external rivals, reflecting a strategic choice for an insider capable of maintaining administrative continuity without challenging military dominance.

Reign as Western Emperor

Ascension to Power

Following the death of Western Emperor Olybrius on 2 November 472, Italy experienced a four-month interregnum amid ongoing instability after the recent passing of the influential magister militum Ricimer on 18 August 472. Gundobad, Ricimer's nephew and a Burgundian officer who succeeded him as magister militum praesentalis, wielded decisive military authority in the absence of a recognized emperor. Leveraging this position, Gundobad elevated Glycerius—previously serving as comes domesticorum, the commander of the imperial bodyguard—to the imperial throne on 3 March 473 in Ravenna. Glycerius' proclamation lacked endorsement from Eastern Emperor Leo I (r. 457–474), who regarded the appointment as presumptuous and unauthorized, reflecting the Eastern court's insistence on its prerogative to confirm Western rulers during this of divided imperial authority. Despite this, Glycerius assumed the without immediate opposition in the West, issuing coinage and edicts from to assert legitimacy. His rapid ascension highlighted the dominance of barbarian military leaders like in dictating imperial successions, as Glycerius possessed no independent power base beyond his patron's support. The event underscored the fragmented nature of late Roman governance, where palace officials like Glycerius could ascend through loyalty to a single general rather than broad senatorial or popular acclaim, a pattern evident in prior elevations such as that of by . Eastern sources, including chronicler Marcellinus Comes, dismissed Glycerius' rule outright, emphasizing the illegitimacy perceived in .

Administrative Policies

Glycerius's brief tenure as Western Roman emperor, from 3 or 5 March 473 to June 474, yielded limited documentation on administrative initiatives, reflecting the instability of the period and reliance on prior structures. His governance centered on maintaining fiscal and legal continuity in , where he primarily resided. One notable legislative act occurred shortly after his : on 11 March 473, Glycerius issued a law prohibiting —the sale of ecclesiastical offices—addressed to the Himilco and bearing his personal endorsement. This measure aimed to curb corruption within the church administration, aligning with broader late Roman efforts to regulate clerical practices amid declining imperial authority. Fiscal administration persisted through the minting of coinage in Glycerius's name, predominantly solidi at and , with one recorded silver issue at . These emissions supported military payrolls and in controlled territories, though their volume remains undetermined due to . In a gesture toward inter-imperial coordination, Glycerius accepted Eastern Emperor Leo I's consular nomination for 474, indicating a of nominal deference to despite lacking formal recognition there. Such actions prioritized short-term administrative harmony over expansion, amid threats from barbarian incursions.

Diplomatic and Military Challenges

Glycerius' brief reign was marked by persistent military pressures from Germanic tribes exploiting the Western Empire's vulnerabilities following the death of in 472. In 473, Visigothic forces under invaded southern , capturing Arles and Marseilles, while a raiding party led by Vincentius was defeated and its leader killed by Roman counts Alla and Sindila in . Concurrently, Ostrogothic remnants under King Vidimer threatened an invasion of ; Glycerius averted this through diplomatic maneuvering, redirecting the group to with gifts and promises, thereby preventing a direct assault on the peninsula. These actions demonstrated limited success in containing incursions via a combination of force and negotiation, though they underscored the empire's reliance on ad hoc responses amid depleted legions and fractured alliances. The most acute challenge stemmed from diplomatic isolation, as Eastern Emperor Leo I refused to recognize Glycerius' legitimacy, viewing his elevation by —a Burgundian and nephew of —as a usurpation. Glycerius attempted by accepting Leo's infant son as sole Western for 474, but this gesture failed to secure imperial unity. In response, Leo dispatched , son-in-law of the Eastern general Marcellinus, with a fleet and forces; Nepos landed at Ostia near between 19 and 24 June 474, compelling Glycerius to abdicate without significant resistance after a rule of approximately eight months. This Eastern intervention highlighted the West's subordination to and the fragility of Glycerius' power base, which lacked broad military or senatorial support.

Deposition and Later Life

Overthrow by Julius Nepos

In 474, Eastern Roman Emperor Leo I, viewing Glycerius's elevation by Gundobad as illegitimate and without imperial consultation, commissioned Julius Nepos—ruler of Dalmatia and a relative by marriage to Leo's wife—to lead an expedition against him. Nepos assembled a fleet and army in Dalmatia, awaiting favorable spring weather before sailing to Italy, as earlier Visigothic pressures under Euric had complicated any immediate action. Nepos's forces landed at Ostia, the port near , in 474, prompting Glycerius to confront the threat directly. By this point, Glycerius's key supporter, —the Burgundian who had proclaimed him emperor—had departed for opportunities in the Eastern , leaving Glycerius isolated without backing or barbarian alliances. Facing superior forces and devoid of resistance options, Glycerius surrendered peacefully at Ostia, abdicating between 19 and 24 474 to avert bloodshed. Nepos promptly entered Rome, securing recognition as Western Emperor and granting Glycerius clemency, though the deposition underscored the Western Empire's deepening reliance on Eastern validation amid internal fragmentation. The swift, unopposed transition highlighted Glycerius's precarious position, as no significant Roman or federate troops rallied to his defense.

Bishopric of Salona

Following his deposition by in June 474, Glycerius was ordained as bishop of , the metropolitan see of located near modern . This appointment, made without apparent resistance from Glycerius, exiled him to Nepos's native province while neutralizing a potential rival through elevation, a pattern seen in other late Roman depositions. Contemporary accounts, such as that of the sixth-century historian Evagrius Scholasticus, confirm Nepos's direct role in installing Glycerius in this position shortly after seizing power. As , Glycerius administered the amid the political fragmentation of the western provinces, with serving as a key ecclesiastical center under Dalmatian jurisdiction. Limited records survive of his tenure, but the see's prominence is evidenced by its hosting of regional synods and oversight of suffragan bishoprics like those in Jader and . One obscure reference in Ennodius suggests possible elevation to , though this lacks corroboration from primary fragments and may reflect later hagiographic inflation rather than historical fact. Glycerius retained the bishopric until his death, dated uncertainly after 474 and possibly as late as 480. The fifth-century historian , preserved in excerpts, implicates him in the conspiracy leading to Julius Nepos's assassination on 9 May 480 near , portraying Glycerius as orchestrating the plot from his episcopal seat—though this accusation relies on Byzantine fragmentary sources prone to anti-Western bias and requires caution absent independent verification. No trials or ecclesiastical repercussions followed, suggesting tacit provincial acceptance or the chaos of Odoacer's rising influence in .

Death and Final Years

Following his deposition by on 24 June 474, Glycerius was appointed bishop of in , a position likely granted as a means of and to neutralize potential threats from a former . This ecclesiastical role, in the heart of Nepos's Dalmatian power base, allowed Glycerius to reside peacefully under nominal oversight, though the exact circumstances of his consecration remain obscure in surviving records. He held the bishopric for several years, with no documented achievements or controversies during his tenure. Glycerius's final years coincided with political instability in after Nepos's expulsion from in 475. Ancient sources, including the fifth-century historian , allege Glycerius's involvement in the conspiracy leading to Nepos's assassination on 9 May 480 near , possibly motivated by lingering resentment or local factional intrigue; however, these accounts are fragmentary and lack corroboration, rendering the claim speculative. Glycerius himself survived this event and died sometime after 480, with no precise date recorded; his death marked the end of any notable imperial or clerical influence.

Historiography and Legacy

Primary Historical Sources

The primary historical sources attesting to Glycerius' brief reign are limited to terse entries, a single surviving administrative document, and incidental allusions in writings, reflecting the fragmented nature of late fifth-century Western . No contemporary or survives, with most accounts composed decades or centuries later by Eastern or Gothic authors who viewed Western imperial successions through lenses of irregularity or barbarian influence. These sources provide essential but minimal details on his ascension, deposition, and diplomatic maneuvers, corroborated indirectly by numismatic evidence of his rule in . Marcellinus Comes, a sixth-century Eastern chronicler writing from a Byzantine perspective sympathetic to Emperor Leo I, briefly records Glycerius' deposition: "Glycerius Caesar Romae tenens a Nepote Marcellini quondam patricii sororis filio imperio expulsus in Portu urbis Romae a Nepote depositus est," emphasizing the Eastern-backed intervention at Ostia without detailing prior events. His account, preserved in a simple annalistic style, underscores the illegitimacy attributed to Glycerius' elevation by Gundobad but omits administrative or military specifics, consistent with Marcellinus' focus on Eastern affairs and brevity for Western "usurpers." Jordanes' Getica, a mid-sixth-century Gothic abridged from , offers slightly more context on Glycerius' irregular rise and : after ' death after eight months, "Glycerius was made Caesar at , rather by usurpation than by election," and he later bestowed gifts on the Gothic leader Vidimer to redirect him from to amid regional upheavals. , drawing on pro-Ostrogothic sources, portrays these actions as pragmatic but highlights the emperor's reliance on barbarian mediation, reflecting a prioritizing Gothic agency over Roman imperial continuity. A rare direct artifact from Glycerius' administration is a legal dossier comprising his imperial letter and an edict by Himelco condemning the sale of ecclesiastical offices (), preserved in two medieval manuscripts and addressed to church leaders in and Aquileia. This document, datable to 473–474, demonstrates Glycerius' engagement with religious governance and anti-corruption efforts, though its survival likely stems from later compilations rather than deliberate preservation of his legacy. Magnus Felix Ennodius, a late fifth-early sixth-century Italian bishop and contemporary witness, alludes to Glycerius' accession in his writings on episcopal successions, noting him as "admitted into royal power" before Nepos' arrival, within a context of ecclesiastical stability amid political flux. Ennodius' panegyric style, focused on Italian church figures like Epiphanius of Pavia, provides indirect corroboration of Glycerius' brief authority but prioritizes moral and religious themes over secular chronicle. These sources collectively affirm a reign marked by Gundobad's military backing and Eastern opposition, though their Eastern or clerical biases—such as Marcellinus' alignment with Leo I—warrant caution against uncritical acceptance of usurpation narratives without cross-verification from material evidence like Milan-minted solidi bearing Glycerius' image and titles.

Modern Assessments and Interpretations

Historians classify Glycerius among the "shadow emperors" of the late , whose ephemeral reigns from the 460s onward reflected the erosion of central authority and dependence on Germanic warlords for legitimacy. Elevated by , a Burgundian , on 3 March 473 without endorsement from Eastern Emperor Leo I, Glycerius's rule—lasting until 24 June 474—epitomizes the fragmentation where provincial commanders imposed candidates to safeguard local interests amid Vandal raids and internal strife. This lack of pan-imperial recognition, evidenced by the absence of Eastern acclamations in surviving records, underscores causal dynamics of military overriding traditional senatorial or dynastic succession. Scholarly evaluations highlight the paucity of primary evidence, relying on chronicles like those of Marius of Avenches and the Chronicon Paschale, which portray Glycerius as a functionary rather than innovator, with his administration maintaining fiscal operations through rare coin issues from and mints bearing the legend victoria auggg (victory of the Augusti). Modern analyses interpret his policies as continuations of prior regimes, focused on defensive alliances rather than reconquest, as seen in nominal overtures to the East that failed to avert deposition by Julius Nepos's fleet-borne expedition in 474. The brevity and obscurity of his tenure, spanning 15 months with no major legislative or feats recorded beyond routine administration, position him as symptomatic of systemic decay rather than a pivotal . Recent epigraphic and textual scholarship has reevaluated Glycerius through a preserved legal dossier comprising his letter and Himelco's edict against —the sale of ecclesiastical offices—issued circa 473, demonstrating adherence to Roman juridical norms amid ecclesiastical tensions. This artifact, critically edited in 2025, reveals stylistic features like clausulae (rhythmic endings) aligning with prose, suggesting clerical authorship and intent to curb corruption in bishoprics, a pragmatic response to the church's growing in a crumbling state. Interpretations frame this as evidence of administrative resilience, countering views of total paralysis, though the measure's enforcement remains unverified due to his swift overthrow. Glycerius's acquiescence to exile as of post-deposition, consecrated around 475, invites assessments of his or with the church, mirroring patterns among fallen emperors like , and highlighting the episcopate's role as a from secular retribution. Contemporary subordinates his significance to broader narratives of barbarian integration and imperial nominalism, with numismatic rarity—fewer than a dozen solidi extant—symbolizing the West's fiscal exhaustion. Overall, interpretations emphasize causal realism in the empire's fall: not idiosyncratic failures, but entrenched reliance on unreliable and diplomatic isolation from , rendering figures like Glycerius mere placeholders in inexorable decline.
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.