Hubbry Logo
Roman emperorRoman emperorMain
Open search
Roman emperor
Community hub
Roman emperor
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Roman emperor
Roman emperor
Roman emperor
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Roman emperor was the ruler and monarchical head of state of the Roman Empire, starting with the granting of the title augustus to Octavian in 27 BC.[2] The title of imperator, originally a military honorific, was usually used alongside caesar, originally a cognomen. When a given Roman is described as becoming emperor in English, it generally reflects his accession as augustus, and later as basileus. Early emperors also used the title princeps ("first one") alongside other Republican titles, notably consul and pontifex maximus.

Key Information

The legitimacy of an emperor's rule depended on his control of the Roman army and recognition by the Senate; an emperor would normally be proclaimed by his troops, or by the Senate, or both. The first emperors reigned alone; later emperors would sometimes rule with co-emperors to secure the succession or to divide the administration of the empire between them. The office of emperor was thought to be distinct from that of a rex ("king"). Augustus, the first emperor, resolutely refused recognition as a monarch.[3] For the first three hundred years of Roman emperors, efforts were made to portray the emperors as leaders of the Republic, fearing any association with the kings who ruled Rome prior to the Republic.

From Diocletian, whose reformed tetrarchy divided the position into one emperor in the West and one in the East, emperors ruled in an openly monarchic style.[4] Although succession was generally hereditary, it was only hereditary if there was a suitable candidate acceptable to the army and the bureaucracy,[5] so the principle of automatic inheritance was not adopted, which often led to several claimants to the throne. Despite this, elements of the republican institutional framework (Senate, consuls, and magistrates) were preserved even after the end of the Western Empire.

Constantine the Great, the first Christian emperor, moved the capital from Rome to Constantinople, formerly known as Byzantium, in 330 AD. Roman emperors had always held high religious offices; under Constantine there arose the specifically Christian idea that the emperor was God's chosen ruler on earth, a special protector and leader of the Christian Church, a position later termed Caesaropapism. In practice, an emperor's authority on Church matters was frequently subject to challenge. The Western Roman Empire collapsed in the late 5th century after multiple invasions by Germanic barbarian tribes, with no recognized claimant to Emperor of the West remaining after the death of Julius Nepos in 480. Instead, the Eastern emperor Zeno proclaimed himself as the sole emperor of a theoretically undivided Roman Empire (although in practice he had no authority in the West). The subsequent Eastern emperors ruling from Constantinople styled themselves as "Basileus of the Romans" (Ancient Greek: βασιλεύς Ῥωμαίων, Basileus Romaíon) but are often referred to in modern scholarship as Byzantine emperors.

The papacy and Germanic kingdoms of the West acknowledged the Eastern emperors until the accession of Empress Irene in 797. After this, the papacy created a rival lineage of Roman emperors in western Europe, the Holy Roman Emperors, which ruled the Holy Roman Empire for most of the period between 800 and 1806. These emperors were never recognized in Constantinople and their coronations resulted in the medieval problem of two emperors. The last Eastern emperor was Constantine XI Palaiologos, who died during the Fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in 1453. After conquering the city, Ottoman sultans adopted the title "Caesar of the Romans" (kayser-i Rûm). A Byzantine group of claimant emperors existed in the Empire of Trebizond until its conquest by the Ottomans in 1461, although they had used a modified title since 1282.

Background and beginning

[edit]
See also: Crisis of the Roman Republic
Augustus depicted as a magistrate at the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek

Modern historians regard Augustus as the first emperor, whereas Julius Caesar is considered the last dictator of the Roman Republic, a view that is shared by the Roman writers Plutarch, Tacitus, and Cassius Dio.[6] Conversely, the majority of Roman writers, including Pliny the Younger, Suetonius and Appian, as well as most of the ordinary people of the Empire, thought of Julius Caesar as the first emperor.[7] Caesar did indeed rule the Roman state as an autocrat, but he failed to create a stable system to maintain himself in power.[8] His rise to power was the result of a long and gradual decline in which the Republic fell under the influence of powerful generals such as Gaius Marius and Sulla.[9]

At the end of the Republic no new or singular title indicated the individual who held supreme power. Insofar as emperor could be seen as the English translation of the Latin imperator, then Julius Caesar had been an emperor, like several Roman generals before him. Instead, by the end of the Caesar's civil wars, it became clear that there was certainly no consensus to return to the old-style monarchy, but that the period when several officials would fight one another had come to an end.

Julius Caesar, and then Augustus after him, accumulated offices and titles of the highest importance in the Republic, making the power attached to those offices permanent, and preventing anyone with similar aspirations from accumulating or maintaining power for themselves. Julius Caesar had been pontifex maximus since 64 BC; held the offices of consul and dictator five times since 59 BC, and was appointed dictator in perpetuity in 44 BC, shortly before his assassination. He had also become the de facto sole ruler of Rome in 48 BC, when he defeated his last opposition at the Battle of Pharsalus. His killers proclaimed themselves as the liberatores ("liberators") and the restorers of the Republic, but their rule was cut short by Caesar's supporters, who almost immediately established a new dictatorship.

Cameo of Augustus in a quadriga drawn by tritons at the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

In his will, Caesar appointed his grandnephew Octavian as his heir and adopted son. He inherited his property and lineage, the loyalty of most of his allies, and – again through a formal process of senatorial consent – an increasing number of the titles and offices that had accrued to Caesar. In August 43 BC, following the death of both consuls of the year, Octavian marched to Rome and forced the Senate to elect him consul. He then formed the Second Triumvirate alongside Mark Antony and Lepidus, dividing the Roman world among them. Lepidus was sidelined in 36 BC, and relations between Octavian and Antony soon deteriorated. In September 31 BC, Octavian's victory at Actium put an end to any effective opposition and confirmed his supremacy over Rome.

In January 27 BC, Octavian and the Senate concluded the so-called "First settlement". Until then Octavian had been ruling the state with his powers as triumvir, even though the Triumvirate itself disappeared years earlier. He announced that he would return the power to the Senate and People of Rome, but this was only an act. The Senate confirmed Octavian as princeps, the "first among equals", and gave him control over almost all Roman provinces for a tenure of ten years. This limitation was only superficial, as he could renew his powers indefinitely. In addition, the Senate awarded him the appellation of augustus ("elevated"). The honorific itself held no legal meaning, but it denoted that Octavian (henceforth Augustus) now approached divinity, and its adoption by his successors made it the de facto main title of the emperor. He also received the civic crown alongside several other insignias in his honor. Augustus now held supreme and indisputable power, and even though he still received subsequent grants of powers, such as the granting of tribunicia potestas in 23 BC, these were only ratifications of the powers he already possessed.[10]

Most modern historians use 27 BC as the start date of the Roman Empire. This is mostly a symbolic date, as the Republic had essentially disappeared many years earlier. Ancient writers often ignore the legal implications of Augustus' reforms and simply write that he "ruled" Rome following the murder of Caesar, or that he "ruled alone" after the death of Mark Antony.[11][12] Most Romans thus simply saw the "emperor" as the individual that ruled the state, with no specific title or office attached to him.

Augustus actively prepared his adopted son Tiberius to be his successor and pleaded his case to the Senate for inheritance on merit. After Augustus' death in AD 14, the Senate confirmed Tiberius as princeps and proclaimed him as the new augustus. Tiberius had already received imperium maius and tribunicia potestas in AD 4, becoming legally equal to Augustus but still subordinate to him in practice.[13] The "imperial office" was thus not truly defined until the accession of Caligula, when all of Tiberius' powers were automatically transferred to him as a single, abstract position that was symbolized by his sacred title of augustus.[14]

Powers under the Principate

[edit]
Politics of ancient Rome
Periods
Constitution
Political institutions
Assemblies
Ordinary magistrates
Extraordinary magistrates
Public law
Senatus consultum ultimum
Titles and honours

The legal authority of the emperor derived from an extraordinary concentration of individual powers and offices that were extant in the Republic and developed under Augustus and later rulers, rather than from a new political office. Under the Republic, these powers would have been split between several people, who would each exercise them with the assistance of a colleague and for a specific period of time. Augustus held them all at once by himself, and with no time limits; even those that nominally had time limits were automatically renewed whenever they lapsed.[15] The Republican offices endured and emperors were regularly elected to the most prominent of them: the consulship and censorship.[16] This early period of the Empire is known as the "Principate", derived from the title princeps used by the early emperors.

The most important bases of the emperor's power were his supreme power of command (imperium maius) and tribunician power (tribunicia potestas) as personal qualities, separate from his public office.[17] Originally, the powers of command where divided in consular imperium for Rome and proconsular imperium for the provinces. This division became obsolete in 19 BC when Augustus was given consular imperium – despite leaving the consulship in 23 BC – and thus control over all troops. This overwhelming power was referred to as imperium maius to indicate its superiority to other holders of imperium, such as the proconsuls of the few senatorial provinces and allies such as Agrippa.[18] The governors appointed to the imperial provinces only answered to the emperor himself, who could maintain or replace them at will.[19]

Denarius of Augustus (18 BC).[b]

The tribunician power (tribunicia potestas), first assumed by Augustus in 23 BC, gave him authority over the tribune of the plebs without having to actually hold the office – a tribune was by definition a plebeian, whereas Augustus, although born into a plebeian family, had become a patrician when he was adopted into the gens Julia.[19] By adopting the role of a tribune, Augustus was presenting himself as the representative of the common man and the protector of democracy.[20] As always, this was not a sudden grant of power; Augustus had been receiving several powers related to the tribunes, such as sacrosanctity, since 36 BC.[21] With this powers, he could veto any act or proposal of any magistrate, propose laws and convoke the Senate.[22] His sacrosanctity also made him untouchable, and any offence against him could be treated as a crime of treason.[23] The tribunician power was arguably the most stable and important of the emperor's powers.[24] Despite being a perpetual title, it was always renewed each year, which often coincided with the beginning of a new regnal year (although "regnal years" were not officially adopted until Justinian I).[25][c]

The office of censor was not fully absorbed into the imperial office until the reign of Domitian, who declared himself "perpetual censor" (censor perpetuus) in AD 85. Before this, the title had been only used by Claudius (47), Vespasian and Titus (both in 73).[26]

The emperor also had power over religious affairs, which led to the creation of a worship cult. Augustus became pontifex maximus (the chief priest of the College of Pontiffs) in 12 BC, after the death of the former triumvir Lepidus.[27] Emperors from the reign of Gratian (r. 375–383) onward used the style pontifex inclytus ("honorable pontiff"). The title of pontifex maximus was eventually adopted by the bishops of Rome during the Renaissance.[28] The last known emperors to use the title were Valentinian III and Marcian, in the 5th century.[29]

The only surviving document to directly refer to the emperor's power is the Lex de imperio Vespasiani, written shortly after Vespasian's formal accession in December 69. The text, of which only the second part survives, states that Vespasian is allowed to: make treaties; hold sessions and propose motions to the Senate; hold extraordinary sessions with legislative power; endorse candidates in elections; expand the pomerium; and use discretionary power whenever necessary. The text further states that he is "not bound by laws", and that any previous act was retroactively considered legitimate.[30] There is no mention of imperium nor tribunicia potestas, although these powers were probably given in the earlier clauses.[31] There is also no mention of any "imperial office", and the title of "emperor" is never used. The imperial titles are treated as inseparable of the person, which is reflected in the name Imperator Caesar Vespasianus Augustus. This Lex sometimes related to the Lex regia ("royal law") mentioned in the Corpus Juris Civilis of Eastern emperor Justinian I (r. 527–565), who cites the early 3rd-century writer Ulpian. This was probably a later construct, as its very name, which derives from rex ("king"), would have been utterly rejected in the West.[32] The Eastern Greek-speaking half of the Empire had always regarded the emperors as open monarchs (basileis), and called them as such.[33][34]

Succession and legitimacy

[edit]

The weakest point of the Augustan institution was its lack of a clear succession system.[35] Formally announcing a successor would have revealed Augustus as a monarch, so he and subsequent emperors opted to adopt their best candidates as their sons and heirs. Primogeniture was not relevant in the early Empire, although emperors still attempted to maintain a familiar connection between them; Tiberius, for example, married Julia the Elder, making him Augustus' son-in-law.

Vespasian, who took power after the collapse of the Julio-Claudian dynasty and the tumultuous Year of the Four Emperors, was the first emperor to openly declare his sons, Titus and Domitian, as his sole heirs, giving them the title of caesar.[36] The Senate still exercised some power during this period, as evidenced by his decision to declare Nero a "public enemy",[37] and did influence in the succession of emperors. Following the murder of Domitian in AD 96, the Senate declared Nerva, one of their own, as the new emperor.[38] His "dynasty", the Antonine, continued the adoptive system until the reign of Marcus Aurelius (r. 161–180). Marcus was the first emperor to rule alongside other emperors, first with his adoptive brother Lucius Verus, who succeeded jointly with him, and later with his son Commodus, who was proclaimed co-augustus in 177.[39][d]

Despite being the son of a previous emperor and having nominally shared government with him, Commodus' rule ended with his murder at the hands of his own soldiers. From his death in 192 until the 5th century, there was scarcely a single decade without succession conflicts and civil war. During this period, very few emperors died of natural causes.[41] Such problems persisted in the later Eastern Empire, where emperors had to often appoint co-emperors to secure the throne. Despite often working as a hereditary monarchy, there was no law or single principle of succession.[42]

Latin inscription dedicated to Septimius Severus and Caracalla in Ostia Antica, AD 196.[e]

Individuals who claimed imperial power "illegally" are referred to as "usurpers" in modern scholarship. Ancient historians refer to these rival emperors as "tyrants". In reality, there was no distinction between emperors and usurpers, as many emperors started as rebels and were retroactively recognized as legitimate. The Lex de imperio Vespasiani explicitly states that all of Vespasian's actions are considered legal even if they happened before his recognition by the Senate.[30] Ultimately, "legitimacy was a post factum phenomenon."[43] Theodor Mommsen famously argued that "here has probably never been a regime in which the notion of legitimacy is as absent as that of the Augustan principate".[44] Imperial propaganda was often used to legitimize or de-legitimize certain emperors. The Chronicon Paschale, for example, describes Licinius as having been killed like "those who had briefly been usurpers before him".[45] In reality, Licinius was the legitimate emperor of the West (having been appointed by Galerius), while Constantine was the real "usurper" (having been proclaimed by his troops).[46]

There were no true objective legal criteria for being acclaimed emperor beyond acceptance by the Roman army, which was really the true basis of imperial power. Common methods used by emperors to assert claims of legitimacy, such as support of the army, blood connections (sometimes fictitious) to past emperors, distributing one's own coins or statues, and claims to pre-eminent virtue through propaganda, were pursued just as well by many usurpers as they were by legitimate emperors.[41] Septimius Severus notably declared himself as the adoptive son of the long-deceased Marcus Aurelius, hence why he named Caracalla after him.[47] Later Eastern imperial dynasties, such as the Doukai and Palaiologoi, claimed descent from Constantine the Great.[48]

What turns a "usurper" into a "legitimate" emperor is typically that they managed to gain the recognition of a more senior, legitimate, emperor, or that they managed to defeat a more senior, legitimate emperor and seize power.[49][50] Modern historiography has not yet defined clear legitimacy criteria for emperors, resulting in some emperors being included or excluded from different lists. The year 193 has traditionally been called the "Year of the Five Emperors", but modern scholarship now identifies Clodius Albinus and Pescennius Niger as usurpers because they were not recognized by the Roman Senate.[51] Recognition by the Senate is often used to determine the legitimacy of an emperor,[49] but this criterion is not always followed. Maxentius is sometimes called an usurper because he did not have the recognition of Tetrarchs,[52][53] but he held Rome for several years, and thus had the recognition of the Senate.[54] Other "usurpers" controlled, if briefly, the city of Rome, such as Nepotianus and Priscus Attalus. In the East, the possession of Constantinople was the essential element of legitimacy,[55] yet some figures such as Procopius are treated as usurpers. Rival emperors who later gained recognition are not always considered legitimate either; Vetranio had the formal recognition by Constantius II yet he is still often regarded as a usurper,[56][57] similarly to Magnus Maximus, who was briefly recognized by Theodosius I.[57] Western emperors such as Magnentius, Eugenius and Magnus Maximus are sometimes called usurpers,[52] but Romulus Augustulus is traditionally regarded as the last Western emperor, despite never receiving the recognition of the Eastern emperor Zeno.

Later developments

[edit]
The Colossus of Constantine. Portraits after the Tetrarchy stopped including realistic features, as the emperor began to be seen as a symbol rather than an individual.[58]

The period after the Principate is known as the Dominate, derived from the title dominus ("lord") adopted by Diocletian. During his rule, the emperor became an absolute ruler and the regime became even more monarchical.[59] The emperors adopted the diadem crown as their supreme symbol of power, abandoning the subtleties of the early Empire.[60]

Beginning in the late 2nd century, the Empire began to suffer a series of political and economic crises, partially because it had overexpanded so much.[59] The Pax Romana ("Roman peace") is often said to have ended with the tyrannical reign of Commodus. His murder was followed by the accession of Septimius Severus, the victor of the Year of the Five Emperors. It was during his reign that the role of the army grew even more, and the emperors' power increasingly depended on it.[61][62] The murder of his last relative, Severus Alexander, led to the Crisis of the Third Century (235–285), a 50-year period that almost saw the end of the Roman Empire.[63] The last vestiges of Republicanism were lost in the ensuing anarchy. In 238, the Senate attempted to regain power by proclaiming Pupienus and Balbinus as their own emperors (the first time since Nerva).[64] They managed to usurp power from Maximinus Thrax, but they were killed within two months. With the rise of the "soldier emperors", the city and Senate of Rome began to lose importance. Maximinus and Carus, for example, did not even set foot on the city.[62] Carus' successors Carinus and Numerian, the last of the Crisis emperors, did not bother to assume the tribunicia potestas either.[65]

After reuniting the Roman Empire in 285, Diocletian began a series of reforms to restore stability. Reaching back to the oldest traditions of job-sharing in the Republic, Diocletian established at the top of this new structure the Tetrarchy ("rule of four") in an attempt to provide for smoother succession and greater continuity of government. Under the Tetrarchy, Diocletian set in place a system of two emperors (augusti) and two subordinates that also served as heirs (caesares). When an emperor retired (as Diocletian and Maximian did in 305) or died, his caesar would succeed him and in turn appoint a new caesar.[66] Each pair ruled over a half of the Empire, which led to the creation of a Western and Eastern Roman Empire, a division that eventually became permanent.[67] This division had already a precedent in the joint rule of Valerian/Gallienus and Carus/Carinus.[68]

Diocletian justified his rule not by military power, but by claiming divine right.[67] He imitated Oriental divine kingship and encouraged the reverence of the emperor, making anything related to him sacer (sacred).[69] He declared himself Jovius, the son of Jupiter, and his partner Maximian was declared Herculius, son of Hercules.[70] This divine claim was maintained after the rise of Christianity, as emperors regarded themselves as the chosen rulers of God.[59]

The emperor no longer needed the Senate to ratify his powers, so he became the sole source of law. These new laws were no longer shared publicly and were often given directly to the praetorian prefects – originally the emperor's bodyguard, but now the head of the new praetorian prefectures – or with private officials.[71] The emperor's personal court and administration traveled alongside him, which further made the Senate's role redundant. Consuls continued to be appointed each year, but by this point, it was an office often occupied by the emperor himself,[f] who now had complete control over the bureaucratic apparatus.[72] Diocletian did preserve some Republican traditions, such as the tribunicia potestas.[73] The last known emperor to have used it was Anastasius I, at the start of the 6th century. Anastasius was also the last attested emperor to use the traditional titles of proconsul and pater patriae.[74] The last attested emperor to use the title of consul was Constans II, who was also the last Eastern emperor to visit Rome.[75] It's possible that later emperors also used it as an honorary title, as the office of consul was not abolished until 892, during the reign of Leo VI.[76]

During the Dominate it became increasingly common for emperors to raise their children directly to augustus (emperor) instead of caesar (heir), probably because of the failure of the Tetrarchy. This practice had first been applied by Septimius Severus, who proclaimed his 10-year-old son Caracalla as augustus. He was followed by Macrinus, who did the same with his 9-year-old son Diadumenian, and several other emperors during the Crisis. This became even more common from the 4th century onwards. Gratian was proclaimed emperor at the age of 8, and his co-ruler and successor Valentinian II was proclaimed emperor at the age of 4.[77] Many child emperors such as Philip II or Diadumenian never succeeded their fathers. These co-emperors all had the same honors as their senior counterpart, but they did not share the actual government, hence why junior co-emperors are usually not counted as real emperors by modern or ancient historians. There was no title to denote the "junior" emperor; writers used the vague terms of "second" or "little emperor".[78][g]

Despite having a successful reign himself, Diocletian's tetrarchic system collapsed as soon as he retired in 305. Constantine I, the son of tetrarch Constantius I, reunited the empire in 324 and imposed the principle of hereditary succession which Diocletian intended to avoid.[79] Constantine was also the first emperor to convert to Christianity, and emperors after him, especially after its officialization under Theodosius I, saw themselves as the protectors of the Church.[80] The territorial divisions of the Tetrarchy were maintained, and for most of the following century the Empire was ruled by two senior emperors, one in the West (with Milan and later Ravenna as capital) and another in the East (with Constantinople as capital).[h]

This division became permanent on the death of Theodosius I in 395, when he was succeeded by his sons Honorius and Arcadius.[81] The two halves of the Empire, while later functioning as de facto separate entities, were always considered and seen, legally and politically, as separate administrative divisions of a single, insoluble state by the Romans of the time.[82]

Roman coins (tremissis) of Romulus Augustulus and Julius Nepos, the last emperors of the Western Roman Empire.

In the West, the office of emperor soon degenerated into being little more than a puppet of Germanic generals such as Aetius and Ricimer; the last emperors of the West being known as the "shadow emperor".[83] In 476, the Heruli Odoacer overthrew the child-emperor Romulus Augustulus, made himself king of Italy and shipped the imperial regalia to the Emperor Zeno in Constantinople. Historians mark this date as the date of the fall of the Western Roman Empire, although by this time there was no longer any "Empire" left, as its territory had reduced to Italy. Julius Nepos, who was overthrown and expelled to Dalmatia in favor of Romulus, continued to claim the title until his murder in 480. The Eastern court recognized this claim and Odoacer minted coins in his name, although he never managed to exercise real power.[84] The death of Nepos left Zeno as the sole emperor of a (technically) reunited Roman Empire.[1]

Byzantine period

[edit]

The Roman Empire survived in the East for another 1000 years, but the marginalization of the former heartland of Italy to the empire had a profound cultural impact on the empire and its emperor, which adopted a more Hellenistic character.[i]

The Eastern emperors continued to be recognized in the Western kingdoms until the accession of Irene (r. 797–802), the first empress regnant. The Italian heartland was recovered during the reign of Justinian I (r. 527–565), but this was reverted by the end of the century. Rome technically remained under imperial control, but was completely surrounded by the Lombards. Africa was lost to the Arabs in the early 7th century, and Rome eventually fell to the Lombards in 751, during the reign of Constantine V. The Frankish king Pepin the Short defeated them and received the favour of Pope Stephen II, who became the head of the Papal States. Pepin's son, Charlemagne, was crowned Imperator Romanorum (the first time Imperator was used as an actual regnal title) by Pope Leo III in Christmas AD 800, thus ending the recognition of the Eastern emperor.[88] Western rulers also began referring to the Empire as the "Greek Empire", regarding themselves as the true successors of Rome.[89]

Miniature depicting Manuel II Palaiologos and his family, 1404.[j]

The inhabitants of the Eastern half of the Empire always saw the emperor as an open monarch. Starting with Heraclius in 629, Roman emperors styled themselves "basileus", the traditional title for Greek monarchs used since the times of Alexander the Great.[91] The title was used since the early days of the Empire and became the common imperial title by the 3rd century, but did not appear in official documents until the 7th century.[92] Michael I Rangabe (r. 811–813) was the first emperor to actually use the title of "Roman emperor" (βασιλεύς Ῥωμαίων, Basileus Romaíon). This was a response to the new line of emperors created by Charlemagne – although he was recognized as basileus of the Franks.[93] By the 9th century the full imperial title became "basileus and autokrator of the Romans", usually translated as "Emperor and Autocrat of the Romans".[94][k] The title autokrator was also used to distinguish a junior co-emperor (basileus) from his senior colleague (basileus autokrator).[94] By the times of the Palaiologos, there were two distinct ceremonies for the accession of an emperor: first an acclamation as basileus, and later a coronation as autokrator (which also included being raised on a shield). These rites could happen years apart.[96]

The Eastern Empire became not only an absolute monarchy but also a theocracy. According to George Ostrogorsky, "the absolute power of the Roman emperor was further increased with the advent of Christian ideas".[97] This became more evident after the Muslim conquests of the 7th century, which gave Byzantine imperialism a new sense of purpose.[98] The emperor was the subject of a series of rites and ceremonies, including a formal coronation performed by the Patriarch of Constantinople.[97] The Byzantine state is often said to have followed a "Caesaropapist" model, where the emperor played the role of ruler and head of the Church, but there was often a clear distinction between political and secular power.[99]

The line of Eastern emperors continued uninterrupted until the sack of Constantinople and the establishment of the Latin Empire in 1204. This led to the creation of three lines of emperors in exile: the emperors of Nicaea, the emperors of Trebizond, and the short-lived emperors of Thessalonica. The Nicean rulers have been traditionally regarded as the "legitimate" emperors of this period, as they recovered Constantinople and restored the Empire in 1261.[l] The Empire of Trebizond continued to exist for another 200 years, but from 1282 onwards its rulers used the modified title of "Emperor and Autocrat of all the East, the Iberians, and the Perateia", accepting the Niceans as the sole Roman emperors.[100] However, the Byzantine Empire had been reduced mostly to Constantinople, and the rise of other powers such as Serbia and Bulgaria forced the Byzantines to recognize their rulers as basileus. Despite this, emperors continued to view themselves as the rulers of an "universal empire".[97] During the last decades of the Empire, power was once again shared between multiple emperors and colleagues, each ruling from their own capital, notably during the long reign of John V.[101] Constantinople finally fell to the Ottoman Turks in 1453; its last emperor, Constantine XI Palaiologos, died in battle. The last vestiges of the empire, Morea and Trebizond, fell in 1461.[101]

Titles

[edit]

Imperator

[edit]
Main article: Imperator
Denarius of Julius Caesar marked caesar imp(erator)
Aureus of Vespasian marked
imp(erator) caesar vespasianus aug(ustus)

The title imperator – from imperare, "to command" – dates back to the Roman Republic and was given to victorious commanders by their soldiers. They held imperium, that is, military authority. The Senate could then award the extraordinary honor of a triumph; the commander then retained the title until the end of his magistracy. In Roman tradition, the first triumph was that of Romulus, the founder of Rome, but the first attested use of imperator was in 189 BC, on the triumph of Aemilius Paulus. It was a title held with great pride: Pompey was hailed imperator more than once, as was Sulla and Julius Caesar.[102] However, as noted by Cassius Dio, the meaning of the title changed under the new monarchy, and came to denote "the possession of the supreme power".[103] Both Dio and Suetonius refer to Caesar as the first one to assume imperator as a proper name (a praenomen imperatoris), but this seems to be an anachronism.[104] The last ordinary general to be awarded the title was Junius Blaesus in AD 22, after which it became a title reserved solely for the sovereign.[102]

Augustus used Imperator instead of his first name (praenomen), becoming Imperator Caesar instead of Caesar Imperator.[102] From this the title slowly became a synonym of the office, hence the word "emperor". Tiberius, Caligula and Claudius avoided using the title, but it is recorded that Caligula was hailed imperator by the Senate on his accession, indicating that it was already considered an integral part of the dignity.[105] It was not until the late reign of Nero, in AD 66, that imperator became once more part of the emperor's nomenclature.[106] Virtually all emperors after him used the praenomen imperatoris, with only a few variations under his successors Galba and Vitellius.[107] The original meaning of the title continued to be used for a time, with emperors registering the number of times they were hailed imperator.[103] The title became the main appellation of the ruler by the time of Vespasian.[102][108]

After the Tetrarchy, emperors began to be addressed as dominus noster ("our Lord"), although imperator continued to be used. The appellation of dominus was known and rejected by Augustus, but ordinary men of the Empire used it regularly. It began to used in official context starting with Septimius Severus, and was first officially adopted in coinage by Aurelian.[109]

In the East, imperator was translated as autokrator ("self-ruler"), a title that continued to be used until the end of the Empire. This is the modern Greek word for "emperor" (αυτοκράτορας). There are still some instances of imperator in official documents as late as the 9th century. Its last known use was on 866–867 coins of Michael III and his co-emperor Basil I, who are addressed as imperator and rex respectively.[110] In the West, imperator was transformed into a monarchical title by Charlemagne, becoming the official Latin title of the Holy Roman Empire.

Caesar

[edit]
Main article: Caesar (title)

Originally the cognomen (third name) of the dictator Gaius Julius Caesar, which was then inherited by Augustus and his relatives. Augustus used it as a family name (nomen), styling himself as Imp. Caesar instead of Imp. Julius Caesar.[104] However, the nomen was still inherited by women (such as Julia the Younger) and appear in some inscriptions.[111] After the death of Caligula, Augustus' great-grandson, his uncle Claudius was proclaimed emperor. He was not an official member of the Julia gens,[112] but he was the grandson of Octavia, Augustus' sister, and thus still part of the family.[113]

Following the suicide of Nero, the last descendant of Caesar, the new emperor Galba adopted the name of Servius Galba Caesar Augustus, thus making it part of the imperial title. Five days before his murder he adopted Piso Licinianus as his son and heir, renaming him as Servius Sulpicius Galba Caesar.[114] After this Caesar came to denote the heir apparent, who would add the name to his own as heir and retain it upon accession as augustus.[109] The only emperor not to assume it was Vitellius, who adopted the name Germanicus instead. Most emperors used it as their nomen – with Imperator as their praenomen – until the reign of Antoninus Pius, when it permanently became part of the formula Imperator Caesar [full name] Augustus.[107] In the 3rd century, caesars also received the honorific of nobilissimus ("most noble"), which later evolved into a separate title.[115]

Coin of Constantius II marked: d(ominus) n(oster) constantius p(ius) f(elix) aug(ustus)

During the Tetrarchy the powers of the caesar increased considerably, but following the accession of Constantine I it once more remained as a title for heirs with no significant power attached to it. The title slowly lost importance in the following decades, as emperors started to promote their sons directly to augustus. In the East, the title finally lost its imperial character in 705, when Justinian II awarded it to Tervel of Bulgaria.[m] After this it became a court title bestowed to prominent figures of the government, and lost even more relevance after the creation of the title sebastokrator by Alexios I Komnenos.[116] Despite this, its regular use by earlier emperors led to the name becoming synonym with "emperor" in certain regions. Several countries use Caesar as the origin of their word for "emperor", like Kaiser in Germany and Tsar in Bulgaria and Russia.

After the Constantinian dynasty, emperors followed Imperator Caesar with Flavius, which also began as a family name but was later incorporated into the emperor's titles, thus becoming Imperator Caesar Flavius.[117] The last use of the formula, rendered as Autokrator Kaisar Flabios... Augoustos (Αὐτοκράτωρ καῖσαρ Φλάβιος αὐγουστος) in Ancient Greek, is in the Basilika of Leo VI the Wise (r. 886–912).[118]

Augustus

[edit]
Main article: Augustus (title)

Originally the main title of the emperor.[119] According to Suetonius, it was "not merely a new title but a more honorable one, inasmuch as sacred places too, and those in which anything is consecrated by augural rites are called "august" (augusta), from the increase (auctus) in dignity". It was also connected to the religious practice of augury, which was itself linked to Rome's founding by Romulus, and to auctoritas, the authority based on prestige.[120] The honorific was awarded as both a name and a title to Octavian in 27 BC and was inherited by all subsequent emperors, who placed it after their personal names. The only emperor to not immediately assume it was Vitellius, although he did use it after his recognition by the Senate.[121] Later emperors ruled alongside one or several junior augusti who held de jure (but not de facto) equal constitutional power.[n] Despite its use as the highest imperial title, it was generally not used to indicate the office of Emperor itself, as ordinary people and writers had become accustomed to Imperator.

In the East the title was initially translated as Sebastos, but the form Augoustos eventually became more common. Emperors after Heraclius styled themselves as Basileus, but Augoustos still remained in use in a lesser form up until the end of the Empire. In the West, the title was also used by Charlemagne and the subsequent Holy Roman Emperors as part of the formula Imperator Augustus. Both Eastern and Western rulers also used the style semper augustus ("forever augustus").[122]

Princeps

[edit]
Main article: Princeps

The word princeps, meaning "first", was a republican term used to denote the leading member of the Senate, and it was used by the early emperors to emphasize the continuance of the Republic.[109] The title had already been used by Pompey and Julius Caesar, among others. It was a purely honorific title with no attached duties or powers, hence why it was never used in official titulature.[123] The title was the most preferred by Augustus as its use implies only "primacy" (is in the "first among equals"), as opposed to dominus, which implies dominance. It was the title used by early writers before the term imperator became popular.[108] In his Res Gestae, Augustus explicitly refers to himself as the princeps senatus.[124] The title was also sometimes given to heirs, in the form of princeps iuventutis ("first of the youth"), a term that continued to be used during the Tetrarchy.[125]

In the era of Diocletian and beyond, princeps fell into disuse and was replaced with dominus ("lord");[126] the use of princeps and dominus broadly symbolizes the differences in the empire's government, giving rise to the era designations Principate and Dominate. The title is still found in some later sources, however. The poet Claudian, for example, describes Honorius as having been raised from "caesar" to "princeps" (instead of augustus).[74] The title survived the fall of the Western Roman Empire, as it was used by rulers such as Theodoric the Great.

Coin of Leo VI (r. 886–912) marked: leon en cristo basileus romeon

Basileus and autokrator

[edit]
Main article: Basileus

Basileus was the traditional Greek title for monarchs. It was first used by Alexander the Great (r. 336–323 BC) during his conquests.[127] The term was applied to emperors unofficially since the beginning of the Empire,[33] but in official records it was often used as the Greek translation of the title rex, with autokrator (αὐτοκράτωρ, the Greek equivalent to Latin imperator) reserved for the emperor. As a result, Western writers often associated basileus with "king" as opposed to "emperor", despite this distinction not existing in Greek.[128]

Basileus was first officially used by Heraclius in 629, after his victory over the Persians, and it became the main title of the emperor afterward. After the 9th century, the full imperial title became "basileus and autokrator of the Romans" (βασιλεύς καὶ αὐτοκράτωρ Ῥωμαίων), with autokrator distinguishing the senior emperor from the junior basileus.[94] In later centuries, the title was shortened simply as "autokrator of the Romans", resulting in a revival of that title.[129] In later centuries, an emperor would typically be acclaimed as basileus as an infant and then crowned by the Patriarch as autokrator.[96] Foreign rulers were usually referred to as rhex (ῥήξ, a Greek rendition of Latin rex), but the Eastern emperors were eventually forced to recognize other monarchs as basileus, such as the Latin,[130] Holy Roman, Serbian and Bulgarian emperors.[94]

Later assertions to the title

[edit]
Main articles: Succession of the Roman Empire and Succession to the Byzantine Empire

Despite overthrowing Roman rule, Odoacer never claimed the imperial dignity. His successor Theodoric the Great is sometimes said to have been an emperor in all but name, despite using the title of rex and recognizing the emperor in Constantinople. He also used the ancient title of princeps (in full, princeps Romanus) and dominus noster, actively trying to imitate the old emperors.[o][131][132] He even requested and received the regalia sent to Constantinople by Odoacer, although it appears that he only requested the purple robes and not the imperial crown nor scepter.[133]

The rebels Burdunellus and Peter, both active shortly after the fall of the West, are referred to as "tyrants" in sources. This may imply that they claimed the imperial dignity, although there is almost no information available for these rebellions.[134] The Berber governor Masties assumed the title of imperator shortly after 476, claiming to rule over the "Romans and Maurians."[135] The last attempt to restore the office of emperor in the West was during the Siege of Ravenna (539–540), when the Goths offered Belisarius the throne, which he refused.[136]

Number of emperors

[edit]
Portrait of Constantius II in Filocalus's Chronograph of 354

Several ancient writers tried to count the number of Roman emperors through history, but each of them gives a different count. The 4th-century historian Festus states that "From Octavian Caesar Augustus to Jovian, there were imperatores, 43 in number, through 407 years [reckoning from 43 BC]".[137] The 6th-century Chronicon Paschale calls Diocletian the "33rd Roman emperor". Adding the eight other emperors mentioned in the work would give a total of 41 emperors up until Constantine I.[45]

A few writers also attempted to make their own lists of emperors. The 4th-century calligrapher Filocalus, in his Chronographia, records 58 emperors from Augustus to Constantine.[138] His contemporary Epiphanius records 44 emperors in his work On Weights and Measures.[139] The 13th-century Chronicon Altinate records 46 emperors in the same time period.[140] These discrepancies arise from the fact that there was never a defining distinction between "legitimate emperors" and "usurpers".[141] Other emperors had such uneventful or brief reigns that they are unmentioned by literary sources, like Licinius's co-emperors Valerius Valens and Martinian.[142]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Roman emperor

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Roman emperor was the autocratic sovereign ruler of the , a position instituted by Gaius Octavius () in through a constitutional settlement that ended the Roman Republic's civil wars and centralized power under the guise of restoring traditional republican governance. As princeps civitatis ("first citizen"), the emperor accumulated extraordinary powers including imperium maius (supreme military command), perpetual tribunician authority, and the role of pontifex maximus (chief priest), enabling de facto absolute rule masked by senatorial deference. This system emphasized continuity with the , but amid the 3rd-century crises of invasions, , and political , it transitioned to the under (r. 284–305 AD), an overtly monarchical framework where the emperor was styled dominus ("lord") and portrayed as a divine, absolutist figure to enforce hierarchy and stability through reforms like the . The institution's success stemmed from the emperor's control over the legions, whose loyalty—secured via donatives, victories, and purges—determined tenure, leading to over 80 rulers in the West alone, many assassinated or overthrown in usurpations driven by military factionalism rather than institutional checks. Key achievements encompassed the Pax Romana's relative peace and prosperity, territorial peaks under , enduring legal codifications influencing later civilizations, and infrastructural feats like roads and aqueducts, though controversies included tyrannical excesses (e.g., Nero's persecutions, Commodus's megalomania), reliance on slave economies exacerbating inequalities, and the empire's division in 286 AD into Eastern and Western halves under co-emperors, culminating in the West's collapse with 's deposition by in 476 AD. The Eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperorship persisted, maintaining Roman imperial continuity amid adaptations to and feudal threats.

Origins in the Late Republic

Transition from Republic to Empire

The Roman Republic's institutions, designed for a , proved inadequate to govern the vast territories acquired through conquests during the (264–146 BC), leading to economic disparities, land concentration in elite hands, and reliance on slave labor that fueled social unrest. Military reforms by in the 100s BC shifted recruitment to the landless poor, who pledged loyalty to victorious generals rather than the state, enabling commanders like to march armies on Rome in 88 BC and establish a (82–79 BC) that temporarily restored senatorial dominance but set precedents for extralegal power seizures. Julius Caesar accelerated the Republic's decline by leveraging his Gallic command (58–50 BC) to amass wealth and legions, forming the with and Crassus in 60 BC to bypass senatorial opposition. Defying the Senate's order to disband his army, Caesar crossed the River on January 10, 49 BC, igniting civil war; he defeated at Pharsalus in 48 BC, pursued him to , and returned to as in 46 BC, later holding the office for life by 44 BC while enacting reforms like calendar standardization and that enhanced his personal authority over traditional magistrates. His assassination on March 15, 44 BC, by senators fearing , instead fragmented power further, as it eliminated the stabilizing figure amid ongoing factionalism. The ensuing power vacuum prompted the formation of the Second Triumvirate on November 27, 43 BC, a legal alliance ratified by the Lex Titia, uniting Caesar's heir Gaius Octavius (aged 19), , and to proscribe enemies and avenge the assassination. The triumvirs defeated the assassins Brutus and Cassius at in October 42 BC, dividing the empire—Octavian controlling the west, Antony the east—but tensions escalated as Antony allied with Cleopatra VII of , granting her territories and siring children, which Octavian propagandized as oriental excess threatening Roman liberty. was sidelined after 36 BC, leaving Octavian and Antony as rivals. The decisive clash occurred at the on September 2, 31 BC, where Octavian's admiral Agrippa outmaneuvered Antony's fleet off Greece's western coast; Antony and Cleopatra fled, losing 5,000 men and most ships, enabling Octavian to seize in 30 BC and emerge as 's unchallenged ruler with 45 legions under his command. Returning to , Octavian orchestrated a nominal restoration of republican forms in , resigning triumviral powers to the , which in response granted him the honorific Augustus, imperium maius (supreme military command), and princeps senatus status, allowing him to dominate without overt kingship—a veiled that ended the Republic's competitive magistracies and initiated the , with emperors succeeding as monarchs.

Augustus as Founder

Gaius Octavius, born in 63 BCE, rose to prominence following the assassination of his great-uncle Julius Caesar on March 15, 44 BCE, as Caesar's designated heir in his will. Upon learning of the adoption, Octavius assumed the name Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus and returned to Rome, where he leveraged Caesar's veteran legions and political alliances to counter the assassins led by Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus. In November 43 BCE, he formed the Second Triumvirate with Mark Antony and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, granting them extraordinary powers to proscribe enemies and consolidate control, culminating in the defeat of the assassins at the Battle of Philippi in October 42 BCE. Tensions within the escalated, leading to rivalry with Antony, whose alliance with VII of alienated Roman elites. Octavian's forces decisively defeated Antony and at the on September 2, 31 BCE, securing his unchallenged dominance over Roman territories. By 30 BCE, following the suicides of Antony and , Octavian controlled the entire Roman world, ending the republican era's civil strife and positioning himself as the architect of a new order. In January 27 BCE, the Roman Senate, in a carefully orchestrated ceremony, granted Octavian the honorific title Augustus, signifying reverence and authority beyond mere republican magistracies. He nominally restored the Republic by resigning his extraordinary powers and allowing elections for magistrates, yet retained de facto supremacy through grants of imperium maius (supreme military command), lifelong tribunician power (sacrosanctity and veto rights), and control over key provinces encompassing most legions. This system, known as the Principate, masked monarchical rule under republican veneer, with Augustus as princeps (first citizen), thereby founding the imperial framework that endured for centuries. Augustus implemented structural reforms to institutionalize his authority, including professionalizing the army with fixed 20-year terms, retirement pensions funded by a military (aerarium militare) established in 6 CE, and creating the as a personal elite force of 9 cohorts. Administratively, he centralized provincial by directly controlling imperial provinces with legates appointed at his discretion, while reforming taxation through a unified linking and provinces. These measures, rooted in pragmatic consolidation rather than ideological , ensured stability and loyalty, marking Augustus as the effective founder of the Roman Empire's enduring autocratic tradition.

Powers and Authority

The Roman emperor's military supremacy derived primarily from imperium maius, a form of proconsular elevated above that of other magistrates, first formalized for in the constitutional settlement of . This granted him unchallenged command over the legions stationed in imperial provinces—those with significant military presence—effectively centralizing control of Rome's armed forces under his personal direction for an initial ten-year term, renewable by the . By 23 BC, received perpetual imperium consulare, extending his military oversight even within the city of , where traditional consular authority had been limited. Subsequent emperors inherited and expanded this, maintaining sole rights to appoint generals, declare war, and negotiate treaties, as the 's role devolved into ratification. This structure ensured the emperor's dominance over approximately 28 legions by Augustus's death in 14 AD, supplemented by auxiliary forces totaling over 300,000 troops, with loyalty secured through direct oaths (sacramentum) to the emperor rather than the state. The , an elite urban cohort of 9,000–10,000 men established under around , further bolstered this by protecting the emperor and enabling rapid suppression of rivals, as demonstrated in its role during Tiberius's accession in 14 AD. Provincial governors in senatorial provinces lacked comparable forces, rendering any potential opposition militarily infeasible without imperial legions. Legally, the emperor's authority stemmed from tribunicia potestas, conferred on for life in 23 BC, which endowed him with the inviolable privileges of plebeian tribunes—including (personal immunity from violence), the (intercessio) over decrees and assemblies, and the power to propose or convene meetings. This effectively positioned the emperor as the ultimate arbiter of , allowing intervention in judicial proceedings, appeals from lower courts, and issuance of edicts (constitutiones) with binding force equivalent to statutes. Emperors like (r. 98–117 AD) exemplified this by hearing capital appeals personally, while later rulers such as (r. 117–138 AD) codified legal responses into perpetual edicts, streamlining administration under imperial oversight. The fusion of military and legal powers created a masked by republican forms; for instance, Augustus's control over troop discharges and bonuses via the aerarium militare (established 6 AD) tied soldiers' economic welfare directly to imperial favor, reinforcing allegiance. Challenges arose during usurpations, as in the (69 AD), where military backing determined legitimacy, underscoring that legal titles alone insufficient without legionary support. This system persisted until the late empire, when (r. 284–305 AD) formalized the emperor's role as dominus (lord), emphasizing absolute legal sovereignty over subjects as property.

Administrative and Religious Roles

The Roman emperor functioned as the apex of the imperial administration, consolidating authority over provincial governance, taxation, and legal adjudication while delegating tasks through a growing bureaucracy. Augustus established this framework in 27 BC by partitioning provinces into imperial holdings—directly administered by legates under his imperium maius—and senatorial provinces overseen by proconsuls, enabling centralized control over military frontiers while maintaining republican appearances. He appointed equestrian prefects for specialized roles, such as the Praetorian Prefect commanding the guard and urban cohorts, and created permanent curatorships for infrastructure like aqueducts and roads, staffed by senators and equites for sustained efficiency. Emperors intervened in senatorial provinces via proconsular imperium, as evidenced by Augustus's edicts in Cyrenaica between 6 and 4 BC regulating judicial practices. Administrative evolution intensified amid crises; (r. 284–305) subdivided the empire into four tetrarchic regions, each with prefectures and dioceses totaling about 100 provinces by 300 AD, decoupling civil governors from military commanders to curb usurpations and enhance fiscal oversight. This , numbering thousands of officials by the late empire, managed capitation taxes assessed in kind, grain requisitions, and operations, with emperors issuing rescripts—formal responses to petitions—that shaped policy across the realm. Religiously, emperors embodied the state's sacred order as pontifex maximus, a title assumed in 12 BC following Lepidus's death, granting oversight of the , ritual calendars, and auguries to secure divine favor for Rome's welfare. They regulated public sacrifices, temple dedications, and priestly appointments, integrating religious authority with political legitimacy; for instance, emperors consulted haruspices for omens before major decisions. The imperial cult amplified this role, venerating the emperor's (protective spirit) during life—especially in provinces via oaths and altars—and deifying deceased rulers by senatorial decree, as with Augustus's own divinization in 14 AD. Provincial priesthoods, such as the Augustales, maintained temples and festivals honoring the emperor alongside Roma, fostering loyalty across ethnic divides without equating living rulers to gods in proper. This system persisted until the , when Christian emperors like renounced the in 382 AD, subordinating pagan rites while asserting caesaropapist influence over hierarchies.

Titles and Nomenclature

Primary Titles and Their Meanings

![Silver denarius of Augustus showing imperial titles][float-right] The primary titles of Roman emperors were Imperator, Caesar, and Augustus, which collectively signified military command, dynastic legitimacy, and sacral authority, forming the basis of imperial nomenclature from 27 BC onward. These titles were not initially a single office but evolved from republican precedents to denote the emperor's unique position above traditional magistrates. Augustus, formerly Octavian, integrated them into his style to project continuity with the Republic while consolidating personal power. Imperator originated as an acclamation for victorious generals in the , denoting one who held —the right to command armies—and often preceded a triumph in . Under , it transformed into a permanent , emphasizing the emperor's role as supreme military leader over legions loyal primarily to him rather than the state. derived from the cognomen of , adopted by Octavian upon his inheritance and extended to successors regardless of blood relation, establishing a pseudo-dynastic tradition. Its is uncertain but possibly linked to caesaries (hairy) or caedo (to cut), referring to Caesarean birth myths; by the , it connoted imperial heirship and, later, emperor itself in derivative forms like and . The title was granted to Octavian by the on 16 January 27 BC, during the so-called Restoration of the Republic, carrying connotations of reverence, prosperity, and quasi-divine augmentation from the verb augere (to increase). Reserved exclusively for the emperor, it evoked religious sanctity akin to sacred spaces (augusta), distinguishing the regime from overt kingship while implying moral and cosmic elevation. Emperors also employed princeps ("first one" or "leading man"), an unofficial designation Augustus used to style himself as and princeps civitatis, underscoring primacy among equals in a republican veneer rather than monarchical dominance. This title persisted until the period, when more absolutist forms like dominus emerged.

Variations and Additions Over Time

The nomenclature of Roman emperors during the (27 BCE–284 CE) emphasized continuity with republican traditions, with core titles including (commander), Caesar (a originating from ), and (conferring reverence and granted to Octavian in 27 BCE). Emperors like and appended these to their personal names, often retaining princeps ("first citizen") to project collegiality, while accumulating honorifics such as ("father of the country," first used by Augustus in 2 BCE) and victory epithets like (awarded to Germanicus in 15 CE and later inherited). Republican magistracies, including repeated consulships and tribunicia potestas (tribune's power, granted to Augustus in 23 BCE), were integrated into titulature to legitimize authority without overt monarchy. By the Flavian and Antonine periods (69–192 CE), nomenclature expanded with dynastic elements; Caesar increasingly denoted heirs apparent, as seen in naming Caesar in 175 CE, while senior rulers monopolized Augustus. Additional adjectives proliferated on coinage and inscriptions, such as pius ("dutiful," common from onward) and felix ("fortunate," used by in 193 CE), reflecting military successes or propaganda needs. The (193–235 CE) further hybridized titles with eastern influences, incorporating parthicus maximus after campaigns, though core Latin forms persisted amid the Crisis of the Third Century's instability. The transition to the under (r. 284–305 CE) marked a shift to autocratic styling, with dominus ("" or "master") supplanting to denote absolute dominion, first formalized in administrative reforms around 286 CE and symbolized by court ceremonies like adoratio (). and his Tetrarchic colleagues adopted Persianate , including diadems and gemmed robes, while titles expanded to dominus noster ("our "), emphasizing hierarchy over republican veneer. Constantine I (r. 306–337 CE) retained dominus but blended it with Christian elements, adding maximus and victory titles like maximus constantinus, as inscribed on arches from 312 CE onward. In the later Roman and Byzantine eras (post-337 CE), Western emperors simplified amid fragmentation, but Eastern rulers in Constantinople Hellenized titles: autokratôr (for imperator), kaisar (for Caesar), and augoustos endured alongside basileus ton Rhomaion ("emperor of the Romans," prominent from the 6th century under Justinian I). Byzantine additions included theological qualifiers like pistotatos ("most faithful") after Christianization, with full regnal formulas growing verbose, as in Leo VI's (r. 886–912 CE) basileus kai autokratôr on seals and coins, reflecting the empire's Greek-Oriental synthesis while claiming Roman continuity.

Succession Mechanisms

Dynastic Principles

The dynastic principle underlying Roman imperial succession prioritized the hereditary transmission of power within the emperor's biological family, particularly to sons or close male kin, as a means of ensuring legitimacy and continuity, though it lacked formal legal codification and competed with , acclamation, and senatorial endorsement. This approach drew from the Roman monarchy's early traditions, where kingship often passed along familial lines, and was adapted by to blend republican facades with monarchical realities by favoring heirs tied to his Julian bloodline. provided symbolic stability, associating rule with divine favor and ancestral prestige, but its application was pragmatic, yielding to political necessities when natural heirs proved unfit or absent. Under the (27 BC–AD 68), dynastic principles manifested through a web of blood relations, adoptions, and marriages that preserved connections to ' lineage despite deviations from strict . groomed his grandsons (born 20 BC) and (born 17 BC) as heirs, granting them early honors like consul suffectus designations, but their premature deaths led to the adoption of (42 BC–AD 37), his stepson and Agrippa's widower, in AD 4. Succession then proceeded to ( Julius Caesar, born AD 12), ' great-grandson via ; (born 10 BC), a blood uncle; and (born AD 37), adopted into the family via Agrippina's marriage to . This pattern underscored a preference for over merit, as emperors invoked (familial duty) to justify hereditary claims, even as and assassinations disrupted lines—evident in the dynasty's collapse after 's suicide in AD 68 without direct heirs. Later dynasties amplified dynastic principles amid recurring crises, often installing young sons as co-rulers to cement familial rule, though success hinged on army loyalty rather than blood alone. (reigned AD 69–79) established the Flavian line by elevating his natural sons (born AD 39, succeeded AD 79) and (born AD 51, succeeded AD 81), achieving unbroken biological succession until Domitian's assassination in AD 96. The (AD 193–235), founded by , similarly passed power to sons (born AD 188, co-emperor from AD 198) and Geta (born AD 189, co-emperor from AD 209), with Caracalla murdering Geta in AD 211 to monopolize rule; this era marked heightened emphasis on hereditary legitimacy, as Severus advised his heirs to prioritize soldiers over or . (reigned AD 306–337) further entrenched the model by dividing empire among sons Constantine II (born AD 316), (born AD 317), and (born AD 323) after 337, promoting dynastic caesarship as a stabilizing force, though and civil wars exposed its fragility— ultimately consolidated power by AD 350. Despite these efforts, dynastic principles faltered without institutional enforcement, as incompetent heirs like (born AD 161, succeeded in 180 despite adoptive precedents) provoked revolts, highlighting how blood ties alone insufficiently guaranteed competence or acceptance. The absence of meant younger sons or collateral kin could claim precedence if supported by legions, leading to frequent usurpations; by the third century's (AD 235–284), over 20 claimants in 50 years underscored heredity's limits against meritocratic or elective alternatives. In the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) continuation, dynasties like the Heraclian (AD 610–711) and Isaurian (AD 717–802) persisted longer through intermarriages, but even there, coups by non-relatives prevailed when dynasts failed militarily. Overall, while privileging family bloodlines fostered short-term cohesion, it recurrently yielded unstable rule, as emperors' personal designations and force often overrode pure inheritance.

Adoption and Election Practices

Adoption emerged as a primary succession tool in the Roman Empire during the Principate, enabling emperors without suitable biological sons to designate capable heirs through legal integration into the imperial family, thereby prioritizing administrative competence over strict heredity. This practice drew from longstanding Roman aristocratic customs, where adoption transferred paternal authority (potestas) to secure family continuity and political alliances, often involving adult males of proven loyalty or military prowess. Emperors formalized adoptions via public decrees or testaments, granting the adoptee privileges such as tribunicia potestas (tribunician power) and imperium (military command), which facilitated a smooth power transition upon the adoptive father's death. The mechanism gained prominence after the Julio-Claudian dynasty's instability, exemplified by the adoptive chain of the Nerva-Antonine emperors from 96 to 180 CE. , elevated by the following Domitian's assassination on September 18, 96 CE, adopted Marcus Ulpius Traianus () on October 27, 97 CE, to appease the and legions amid threats of revolt. reciprocated by adopting Publius Aelius Hadrianus () in 117 CE just before his death; then adopted Titus Aelius Caesar Antoninus () on February 25, 138 CE, stipulating that adopt Marcus Annius Verus () and Lucius Ceionius Commodus () as co-heirs. This sequence, spanning five rulers, correlated with relative stability and expansion, as each successor demonstrated prior administrative or military success, though it relied heavily on the outgoing emperor's authority to enforce the choice against rival claimants. Adoption's effectiveness waned when overridden by biological preference, as with designating his son in 177 CE despite lacking 's qualifications, precipitating the in 193 CE and subsequent dynastic turmoil. Earlier precedents included Augustus's of Claudius Nero in 4 CE, after the deaths of his grandsons and , which integrated Tiberius into the Julian gens via adrogatio ( of an independent adult) and ensured Julio-Claudian continuity until 's accession in 54 CE. No formal electoral process existed for emperors, as the monarchy lacked constitutional voting; instead, "election" denoted acclamation (acclamatio) by the military, particularly the legions and Praetorian Guard, whose oaths of allegiance (sacramentum) on January 1 each year bound soldiers to the ruler personally. The Senate's role remained confirmatory and ceremonial, ratifying the acclamation through decrees granting titles like Augustus or imperator, but its influence diminished post-Augustus, yielding to army endorsement in cases of contested succession. Successful transitions thus hinged on the heir securing troop loyalty via donatives, campaigns, or prior commands, with senatorial approval following de facto control, as seen in Trajan's uncontested rise after Nerva's adoption amid Praetorian unrest. This hybrid system, blending adoption's premeditation with military ratification, mitigated but did not eliminate civil wars, underscoring the empire's reliance on coercive power over institutional election.

Usurpations and Civil Wars

The Roman Empire's succession practices, lacking a rigid hereditary or elective framework, often devolved into usurpations where provincial governors, generals, or Praetorian prefects leveraged military loyalty to challenge or replace incumbents. This stemmed from the empire's vast expanse and decentralized legions, which prioritized acclaim by troops over senatorial or dynastic endorsement, as Tacitus observed: emperors could be "made elsewhere than at Rome." Virtually every major dynasty ascended through such violent overthrows or civil conflicts, underscoring the primacy of martial prowess in imperial legitimacy. The in 69 AD illustrated this dynamic after Nero's suicide on June 9, leaving a . Servius Sulpicius , governor of , was proclaimed emperor by his legions on June 8 but alienated the , leading to his assassination on January 15, 69; Marcus Salvius , the Guard's prefect, seized power but lost to Aulus Vitellius's Rhine legions at the First on April 14, prompting Otho's suicide on April 16. Vitellius's reign ended when Titus Flavius Vespasianus, acclaimed by Eastern forces on July 1, defeated him at the Second in October, securing the throne by December 20 after Vitellius's execution on December 22. A parallel upheaval occurred in the in 193 AD, triggered by Commodus's strangulation on December 31, 192. Publius Helvius Pertinax ruled briefly from January 1 until murdered by Praetorians on March 28, who then auctioned the purple to for 25,000 sesterces per guardsman on March 28; Julianus lasted until June 1. Concurrently, , legate of , declared himself emperor on April 9 with legions; he marched on , executing Julianus on June 1, then defeated at Issus on October 13, 194, and at on February 19, 197, founding the . The Crisis of the Third Century (235–284 AD) marked the zenith of usurpatory chaos, with at least 26 claimants to the throne in 49 years, averaging reigns under two years amid incessant civil wars, assassinations, and secessions. It began with the murder of on March 18, 235, by troops elevating ; subsequent usurpers like and II (April 238), and (April–July 238), and (244–249) fragmented authority, enabling breakaways such as the under (260–269) and the under Odenathus and (260–273). (270–275) briefly restored unity by reconquering these regions, but the era's endemic legionary revolts—driven by debased currency, inflation, and external invasions—nearly dissolved the empire until Diocletian's stabilization. These episodes highlight how usurpations, while enabling adaptive leadership amid crises, perpetuated cycles of internal strife that strained resources and legitimacy, often amplifying barbarian incursions and economic woes.

Major Dynasties and Periods

Julio-Claudian Dynasty

The comprised the initial five emperors of , commencing with in 27 BC and concluding with Nero's suicide in AD 68. This lineage derived its name from the gens Julia, linked to , and the gens Claudia, integrated through marriages and adoptions. , originally Gaius Octavius, secured his position after defeating at in 31 BC, receiving the title Augustus from the in 27 BC, which formalized his role as while preserving republican institutions. His reign initiated the , a system blending monarchical authority with senatorial facade, enabling administrative reforms, territorial expansion into and the , and the onset of relative internal peace known as the . Succession within the dynasty relied on biological descent supplemented by adoptions to bridge generational gaps and consolidate power, as adopted in AD 4 after the deaths of his preferred heirs. , reigning from AD 14 to 37, maintained military stability, suppressing revolts in and , but withdrew to in AD 26, delegating authority to the , whose execution in AD 31 followed accusations of conspiracy. Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, known as , ruled from AD 37 until his in AD 41; initial popularity waned amid reports of extravagance and erratic decisions, culminating in senatorial plots. Claudius, emperor from AD 41 to 54, ascended after Caligula's murder when Praetorian guards proclaimed him; he expanded the empire by annexing in AD 43 and invading Britain in AD 43, capturing (). His administration emphasized infrastructure, including aqueducts and ports, though influenced by freedmen advisors. , succeeding in AD 54 at age 16 under Agrippina's regency, initially governed competently but later pursued artistic pursuits, exacerbated by the in AD 64, which destroyed much of the city and prompted scapegoating of . Provincial revolts in and , coupled with senatorial opposition, led to his declaration as a by the in AD 68, prompting on June 9, AD 68. The dynasty's termination precipitated the in AD 69, a civil war involving , , , and , underscoring the fragility of dynastic legitimacy without 's stabilizing precedents.
EmperorReignKey Military/Administrative Actions
27 BC–AD 14Centralized administration; annexed (30 BC).
AD 14–37Suppressed Illyrian revolt (AD 6–9); financial reforms.
AD 37–41Invasion of aborted; assassinated by Praetorians.
AD 41–54Conquest of Britain (AD 43); improved grain supply.
AD 54–68Boudiccan revolt suppressed (AD 60–61); Great Fire response.

Flavian and Adoptive Emperors

The Flavian dynasty commenced with Titus Flavius Vespasianus, who ascended as emperor on 1 July 69 AD amid the civil strife known as the Year of the Four Emperors, following the suicides of Galba, Otho, and Vitellius. Vespasian, born in 9 AD, had commanded legions in Britain and Judaea, leveraging military support from the eastern provinces to claim the throne. His reign until 23 June 79 AD focused on fiscal stabilization, including a property tax across the empire and devaluation of the denarius to address debts from prior civil wars. Vespasian initiated the Flavian Amphitheatre (Colosseum) in 70 or 72 AD on the site of Nero's Domus Aurea, symbolizing a return to public benefaction over personal extravagance. Vespasian's elder son, Flavius Vespasianus, succeeded him on 24 June 79 AD and ruled until his death on 13 September 81 AD. completed the , dedicating it in 80 AD with games lasting 100 days that included gladiatorial combats and exotic animal hunts. His brief reign managed the catastrophic eruption of in 79 AD, which buried Pompeii and , prompting organized relief efforts despite personal losses, including the death of his father during the crisis. earned acclaim for competence but faced senatorial suspicion due to his prior role in of in 70 AD. The younger son, Titus Flavius Domitianus, assumed power on 14 September 81 AD after 's sudden death, reigning until his assassination on 18 September 96 AD. expanded military campaigns against the in and along the , fortifying the frontier with a limes system. Domestically, he pursued autocratic policies, assuming titles like dominus et deus (lord and god) and centralizing administration, which alienated the and prompted conspiracies leading to his murder by courtiers. The promptly declared him a public enemy, erasing his memory through . Following Domitian's overthrow, the Senate elected Marcus Cocceius Nerva as emperor on 18 September 96 AD, initiating the period of adoptive emperors to avert further instability. , aged approximately 65, reigned until 27 January 98 AD, adopting the general Marcus Ulpius (Trajan) on 27 October 97 AD to appease the and secure dynastic continuity amid threats of coup. This adoption marked a shift toward merit-based succession, prioritizing administrative and military competence over blood ties. Trajan succeeded on 28 January 98 AD, ruling until 8 or 9 August 117 AD, expanding the empire to its greatest territorial extent through conquests in (101-102 and 105-106 AD) and temporary gains in . On his deathbed, Trajan reportedly adopted Publius Aelius Hadrianus (), though the adoption's timing—possibly backdated—has been debated by ancient sources like the . acceded on 11 August 117 AD and governed until 10 July 138 AD, consolidating frontiers by withdrawing from , building in Britain (122 AD), and promoting cultural patronage including the Pantheon reconstruction. Hadrian adopted Titus Aelius Caesar (who died in 138 AD) and then as successor on 25 February 138 AD, requiring Antoninus to adopt Marcus Annius Verus (later ) and Lucius Ceionius Commodus (later ). reigned from 10 July 138 AD to 7 March 161 AD, maintaining stability with minimal military engagement and legal reforms emphasizing equity. co-ruled with from 7 March 161 AD until Verus's death in 169 AD, then solely until 17 March 180 AD, confronting the (165-180 AD) and (166-180 AD) while authoring on Stoic philosophy. This adoptive chain, spanning 96-180 AD, yielded effective rule but ended when elevated his biological son as co-emperor in 177 AD, reverting to hereditary principles.

Severan Dynasty and Crisis of the Third Century

The Severan Dynasty began in 193 AD when Lucius Septimius Severus, born in Leptis Magna in modern Libya, was proclaimed emperor by his legions in Pannonia following the assassination of Pertinax and the chaotic Year of the Five Emperors. Severus, a Romanized Punic aristocrat with equestrian origins, secured power through military victories over rivals Pescennius Niger and Clodius Albinus, consolidating control by 197 AD after campaigns in the East and Gaul. His reign until 211 AD emphasized military expansion, including renewed wars against Parthia that briefly captured Ctesiphon, and fortifications in Britain such as the extension of Hadrian's Wall. Severus raised legionary pay by 50 percent and favored the Praetorian Guard, establishing a precedent for soldier-emperors reliant on army loyalty over senatorial consensus. Severus' sons, and Geta, succeeded him as co-emperors in 211 AD, but murdered Geta in 212 AD and ruled alone until his assassination in 217 AD by a Praetorian officer amid paranoia and fiscal strain from his granting to most free inhabitants, ostensibly to expand . The dynasty continued through 's killer, (a non-Severan interlude in 217–218 AD), until , Severus' sister-in-law, engineered the elevation of her grandson (218–222 AD), whose scandalous religious reforms favoring the Syrian sun god Elagabal provoked senatorial and military backlash leading to his death. adopted his cousin , who ruled from 222 to 235 AD under heavy maternal influence from Julia Mamaea, attempting administrative reforms but facing mutinies due to perceived weakness against Germanic incursions. The dynasty's militaristic policies, including doubled military expenditures and debasement of the from 50 percent silver under Severus to under 5 percent by time, strained finances and fostered expectations of rapid enrichment among troops, eroding fiscal stability. Severus' deathbed advice to his sons—"Enrich the soldiers and scorn all else"—prioritized support, which sustained the dynasty but sowed seeds for institutional fragility by undermining civilian governance and provincial economies burdened with higher taxes. The Severan line ended on March 19, 235 AD, when and his mother were slain by mutinous troops near Moguntiacum (modern ) during a campaign against invaders, as soldiers resented his negotiations over combat and viewed him as overly influenced by Mamaea. This murder inaugurated the Crisis of the Third Century (235–284 AD), a 50-year epoch of anarchy marked by at least 26 claimants to the throne, most assassinated after reigns averaging under two years, amid ceaseless civil wars, secessionist empires, and external assaults. The crisis stemmed from intertwined causes: the Praetorian Guard's auction of the in 193 AD had normalized barrack-room elevations, fragmenting loyalty as frontier legions proclaimed their own generals, while economic pressures from overtaxation, currency debasement, and disrupted trade fueled inflation exceeding 1,000 percent in some commodities. External threats intensified, with Sassanid Persia under capturing Emperor Valerian in 260 AD—the only time a Roman emperor was taken alive by enemies—and Gothic and Alemannic raids sacking cities like in 267 AD, exploiting depleted legions thinned by internal strife. Secessions compounded division, including the (260–274 AD) under controlling , Britain, and , and the (260–273 AD) under dominating the East, reflecting centrifugal forces as provinces prioritized local defense over distant . Key figures included (235–238 AD), the first "" of Thracian peasant stock who drained treasuries on campaigns but faced revolts leading to his death; the brief Gordian dynasty (238 AD, the ) crushed by and , themselves soon killed; and (244–249 AD), who celebrated 's millennium in 248 AD amid mounting bankruptcies. The period's toll included population decline from warfare, the Cyprian Plague (250–270 AD) killing up to 5,000 daily in , and territorial losses, yet adaptive responses like Aurelian's reconquest of in 272 AD and Gallic restoration in 274 AD foreshadowed stabilization under . This era exposed the principate's vulnerabilities, shifting imperial power toward autocratic military rule and foreshadowing the .

Tetrarchy and Constantinian Dynasty

The Tetrarchy was established by Emperor Diocletian on 1 March 293 to address administrative and military challenges in the vast Roman Empire by dividing rule among two senior emperors (Augusti) and two junior emperors (Caesars). Diocletian retained the senior Augustus position in the East, appointed Maximian as co-Augustus in the West, elevated Constantius Chlorus to Caesar for the West (governing Gaul, Britannia, and Hispania), and Galerius to Caesar for the East (overseeing the Balkans, Asia Minor, Syria, and Egypt). This system aimed to ensure efficient governance and rapid response to threats through decentralized authority, with Caesars expected to succeed Augusti after a period of apprenticeship. In 305, and abdicated simultaneously, marking the first voluntary imperial retirements in Roman history; and ascended as Augusti, while Severus and Maximinus Daia were appointed . However, the system unraveled shortly after when died in 306 during a campaign in Britain, prompting his troops to acclaim his son Constantine as , bypassing Tetrarchic protocol. Concurrently, , son of , seized control in and , igniting that fragmented the as regional loyalties and familial claims superseded collegial rule. Constantine's rise culminated in his victory over at the on 28 October 312, securing the western provinces, followed by an alliance with , who controlled the East after defeating Galerius's appointees. Tensions escalated into war; Constantine defeated at the in 324, capturing and later executing him, thereby reuniting the empire under sole rule and effectively ending the after three decades of instability. Constantine I (r. 306–337) founded the , issuing the in 313 with to tolerate , refounding as in 330 as the new eastern capital, and implementing reforms that centralized power while incorporating Christian elements into imperial ideology. Upon Constantine's death in 337, the empire was divided among his three surviving sons: Constantine II (r. 337–340) in the West, Constans (r. 337–350) in Italy and Africa, and Constantius II (r. 337–361) in the East. Constantine II invaded Constans's territory in 340 and died in battle near Aquileia, allowing Constans to rule the West until his assassination in 350 by the usurper Magnentius. Constantius II defeated Magnentius at Mursa Major in 351 and became sole emperor, appointing his cousin Constantius Gallus (r. 351–354) as Caesar before executing him on suspicion of treason; Gallus's half-brother Julian was then elevated as Caesar in 355. Constantius II died en route to confront Julian in 361, leading to Julian's uncontested acclamation as Augustus (r. 361–363), who attempted to revive paganism but died during a campaign against the Sassanids in 363, extinguishing the Constantinian line with no direct heirs. The dynasty's rule marked a transition from Tetrarchic collegiality to hereditary monarchy infused with Christian legitimacy, stabilizing the empire temporarily amid ongoing external pressures.

Later Roman and Byzantine Emperors

Following the death of in 337 AD, his empire was divided among his sons , Constantine II, and Constans I, initiating a pattern of shared rule that often led to civil conflicts. emerged as sole ruler by 353 AD, appointing his cousin Julian as Caesar before Julian's brief reign as Augustus from 361 to 363 AD. acceded in 364 AD, dividing the empire with his brother in the East; perished at the against the in 378 AD. Theodosius I, proclaimed Augustus in the East on January 19, 379 AD, reunified the empire after defeating usurpers and Goths, ruling until his death on January 17, 395 AD as the last emperor to govern both halves undivided. He issued edicts enforcing Nicene Christianity as the state religion, suppressing paganism and heresies. Upon Theodosius's death, permanent division occurred: Arcadius ruled the East (395–408 AD), Honorius the West (395–423 AD). The Western line included Valentinian III (425–455 AD), whose assassination triggered puppet emperors like Petronius Maximus and Avitus, ending with Romulus Augustulus, deposed on September 4, 476 AD, by Odoacer, who ruled Italy without claiming the imperial title. The Eastern Roman Empire, centered at , continued uninterrupted under emperors bearing the Roman title , maintaining legal, administrative, and military continuity with prior Roman governance. The persisted in the East through (408–450 AD), who compiled the Theodosian Code in 438 AD, and (450–457 AD). Leo I (457–474 AD) founded the , strengthening defenses against and . (527–565 AD) codified Roman law in the (529–534 AD) and launched reconquests: captured Vandal by 534 AD and defeated in (535–554 AD), reclaiming in 536 AD and as capital, though wars depleted resources amid the (541–542 AD), killing millions. Later dynasties navigated invasions and internal strife while preserving Roman imperial ideology. The Heraclian dynasty (610–711 AD), under (610–641 AD), repelled but lost , , and to Arab conquests by 642 AD. The Isaurian dynasty (717–802 AD), led by Leo III (717–741 AD), halted Arab advances at in 718 AD and initiated to unify the military-themed administration. The (867–1056 AD) peaked under (976–1025 AD), who annexed in 1018 AD and doubled territory through campaigns in and . Komnenian (1081–1185 AD) and Palaiologan (1261–1453 AD) rulers recovered from Crusader and Seljuk losses but faced Ottoman encirclement; Constantine XI (1449–1453 AD) died defending 's fall on May 29, 1453 AD, ending the Roman emperorship. These emperors adapted Roman institutions—senatorial titles, legions evolving into tagmata, and claims to universal sovereignty—amid and Orthodox Christianity's dominance, rejecting Western "' legitimacy.

Institutional Evolution

Principate to Dominate

The , instituted by Octavian (later ) in following the Second Triumvirate's collapse and his consolidation of power, framed the emperor as —first citizen—while vesting him with extraordinary authority through a patchwork of republican magistracies, including imperium maius and tribunicia potestas. This system preserved the outward forms of the , with the retaining nominal legislative and advisory roles, though real decisions emanated from the emperor's consilium principis. Augustus's constitutional settlement, ratified by the Senate, emphasized collegiality and tradition to legitimize amid senatorial wariness of overt after Julius Caesar's assassination in 44 BC. Over two centuries, the endured through dynastic succession and occasional adoption, but its republican veneer increasingly strained under military anarchy and economic pressures, particularly during the Crisis of the Third Century (circa 235–284 AD), marked by over 20 emperors in rapid turnover, barbarian incursions, and hyperinflation eroding central control. Emperors like (r. 270–275 AD) temporarily restored unity via military prowess, yet the system's reliance on personal charisma and legions proved unsustainable against pervasive usurpations and provincial fragmentation. Diocletian's accession in 284 AD, after defeating rivals like , heralded the , a shift to unvarnished absolute rule where the emperor styled himself dominus (lord), divesting republican pretenses for overt despotism influenced by Eastern monarchies. Reforms included the —a collegial rule dividing the empire into two Augusti and two Caesares for administrative efficiency—and enhanced bureaucracy with equestrian prefects overseeing provinces subdivided into smaller dioceses and provinces, totaling about 100 units by 300 AD. Diocletian formalized court protocol, mandating prostration (adoratio) before the emperor as dominus et deus, symbolizing divine absolutism, and tied succession to Tetrarchic promotion rather than strict heredity, though familial ties persisted. This evolution centralized fiscal and military power, with the field army separated from border troops, expanding the former to roughly 400,000 men by Constantine's era, and imposing the in 301 AD to combat , though enforcement faltered. The Dominate's absolutism, while stabilizing the empire short-term, entrenched a hierarchical, servile , diminishing senatorial influence and paving for Constantine's further Christianizing modifications post-312 AD. Critics, drawing from Lactantius's De Mortibus Persecutorum, attribute Diocletian's tetrarchic experiment's partial failure to its rigidity, yet it outlasted the by adapting to existential threats through coercive state expansion.

Reforms Under Diocletian and Constantine

, ruling from 284 to 305 AD, implemented sweeping reforms to address the Roman Empire's administrative, , and economic crises following the third-century anarchy. He established the in 293 AD, dividing imperial authority among two senior emperors (Augusti) and two junior emperors (), with as the senior Augustus in the East and as his counterpart in the West; this structure aimed to facilitate governance over the vast territory and ensure orderly succession by designating as heirs after a 20-year term. Administratively, he subdivided the empire's approximately 50 provinces into over 100 smaller units grouped into 12 dioceses under vicars, while introducing a larger to separate civil and functions, thereby reducing corruption and improving local oversight. Militarily, Diocletian enlarged the army to around 500,000 troops, emphasizing mobile field armies () detached from frontier defenses () and recruiting more barbarians into border forces to counter invasions. Economically, he reformed taxation by introducing the jugum (a land-based unit) and capitatio (a ), assessed every five years via censuses to stabilize revenue amid ; however, his 301 AD , which capped over 1,200 to combat speculated profiteering, resulted in widespread evasion, black markets, and shortages, ultimately failing to curb and contributing to enforcement burdens. Religiously, Diocletian initiated the Great Persecution in 303 AD, ordering the destruction of churches, burning of scriptures, and sacrifices to Roman gods, targeting to enforce traditional cult unity but straining resources without fully eradicating the faith. Constantine I (r. 306–337 AD), emerging victorious from Tetrarchic civil wars, modified Diocletian's system while preserving its core. He abolished the Tetrarchy's collegial rule, centralizing power under a single emperor but retaining the expanded provincial structure and bureaucracy; he replaced the praetorian prefects—who held both civil and military roles—with civilian prefects of the praetory (praefecti praetorio) focused on administration, further entrenching the . Militarily, Constantine expanded the into a professional of elite and infantry, funding it through land grants and emphasizing loyalty to the emperor over regional ties. In religious policy, Constantine's in 313 AD, jointly issued with , granted tolerance to , restored confiscated properties, and allowed free practice of , marking the end of systematic persecution and enabling Christianity's growth from a marginalized sect to an imperial-favored faith; this shift facilitated church-state integration, as seen in his convening of the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD to resolve doctrinal disputes like . Economically, Constantine stabilized currency by introducing the solidus, a nearly pure weighing about 4.5 grams struck at 72 per Roman pound, which became a durable standard for over a due to its fixed value and resistance to debasement. He also founded in 330 AD on the site of as a new eastern capital, bolstering defenses and commerce while symbolizing a Christian-oriented empire. These reforms, building on Diocletian's foundations, temporarily arrested decline but imposed heavier fiscal demands that strained the empire's long-term sustainability.

Claims to the Title Post-Fall

Western Successors and Holy Roman Empire

Following the deposition of the child emperor by the Germanic chieftain on September 4, 476, the Western Roman imperial administration collapsed, with ruling as king while nominally subordinating himself to the Eastern Roman emperor Zeno. , who had been ousted from in 475 but retained control over , continued to be recognized by the Eastern court as the legitimate Western emperor until his murder on May 9, 480, marking the effective end of any continuous Western Roman claim. In the ensuing , no figure assumed the full imperial title in the West; instead, Germanic successor states—such as the under (r. 493–526), who governed as a of the Eastern emperor—emerged across former provinces, preserving select Roman administrative practices but without reviving the purple. The Western imperial title reemerged on December 25, 800, when crowned , King of the and , as "Emperor of the Romans" during Mass in . This coronation, undertaken amid Leo's conflicts with Roman nobles and with Charlemagne's military support, represented a deliberate assertion of Frankish dominion over Italian and Western Christian territories, invoking Roman imperial symbolism to legitimize rule over diverse peoples. 's realm, spanning modern , , and , adopted Roman legal codes, coinage standards, and administrative hierarchies, though it diverged in its feudal decentralization and emphasis on Germanic customs. The act provoked Byzantine objections, as viewed itself as the undivided Roman Empire's sole heir, but it established the principle of papal investiture, shifting imperial legitimacy from hereditary Roman lines to elected Western monarchs blessed by the Church. After the Carolingian Empire fragmented into rival kingdoms by the late 9th century, the imperial title lapsed until revived by Otto I (r. as king 936–973), who consolidated power in East Francia (the German stem duchies) through victories over Slavs, Magyars, and internal foes, including the Battle of Lechfeld in 955. On February 2, 962, Pope John XII crowned Otto emperor in Rome, formalizing the Holy Roman Empire as a polity linking German kingship with Italian overlordship and Roman precedent. Unlike the centralized ancient empire, the Holy Roman Empire operated as an elective monarchy, with emperors chosen by prince-electors (initially seven key nobles and prelates) and often requiring papal or self-coronation after 1508; it encompassed over 300 semi-autonomous territories by the 18th century, prioritizing defense against external threats and ecclesiastical alliances over uniform governance. Dynasties including the Salians (1024–1125), Hohenstaufen (1138–1254), and Habsburgs (1438–1806) sustained the institution, invoking translatio imperii—the doctrinal transfer of Roman authority westward—to justify continuity amid evolving feudal, Renaissance, and Reformation pressures. The Holy Roman Empire's Roman claims emphasized cultural and legal inheritance, such as the revival of Justinianic law under the Habsburgs and symbolic coronations with ancient like the of , but its fragmented structure—criticized by observers for lacking the ancient empire's cohesion—reflected medieval Europe's ethnic and jurisdictional pluralism rather than direct administrative succession. It persisted through the , the , and the (1618–1648), which reduced imperial authority via the Peace of Westphalia's confessional tolerances and territorial guarantees. Facing dissolution amid the , Emperor Francis II (r. 1792–1806) abdicated the throne on August 6, 1806, after Napoleon Bonaparte formed the from compliant German states, effectively ending the empire after 844 years of intermittent claims to Roman emperorship. This closure prompted no immediate Western successor, though Austrian Habsburgs retained an "Austrian imperial" title until , underscoring the empire's role as a symbolic bridge between antiquity and modern nation-states rather than a causal perpetuation of Roman institutions.

Eastern Byzantine Continuation

Following the deposition of Romulus Augustulus on September 4, 476 AD, the Eastern Roman Empire persisted without institutional rupture, governed continuously from Constantinople as the Roman polity's core. Emperor Zeno, ruling the East since 474 AD, directed Odoacer to administer Italy as a subordinate kingdom under Roman imperial authority, preserving legal and titular continuity rather than marking an empire's end. This arrangement underscored the East's primacy, with subsequent emperors like Anastasius I (r. 491–518 AD) stabilizing finances through monetary reforms that echoed Augustan precedents. Eastern rulers and subjects identified unequivocally as Romaioi (Romans), denominating their state the Basileia tōn Rhōmaiōn (Empire of the Romans) and themselves bearers of Roman imperial legacy, a self-conception maintained through primary sources and foreign perceptions until the . Titles evolved to Greek basileus kai autokratōr alongside retained Latin forms like Caesar , inscribed on coins and seals affirming unbroken succession from the onward. Roman administrative structures, including the sacrum consistorium and provincial thematic divisions post-7th century, perpetuated classical governance amid adaptations to Persian, Arab, and Slavic pressures. Under (r. 527–565 AD), this continuity manifested in ambitious restorations: captured Vandal Carthage in 533 AD, restoring as a , while subdued Ostrogothic by 554 AD, reinstating Roman senatorial rule and Ravenna's . Concurrently, the Corpus Iuris Civilis, promulgated 529–534 AD, consolidated prior edicts, , and imperial constitutions into a unified code, enforcing it empire-wide to reaffirm Roman legal sovereignty over diverse subjects. These reconquests, costing over 30 million solidi and exacerbating fiscal strains amid the 541–542 AD plague, temporarily expanded territory to 1.5 million square kilometers, embodying causal commitment to Roman universalism against barbarian fragmentation. Succeeding dynasties, including the Isaurians (717–802 AD) who repelled Arab sieges of in 717–718 AD using , and Macedonians (867–1056 AD) who reclaimed and , sustained Roman via tagmata elite units and thematic armies numbering up to 120,000 by the . The Komnenoi (1081–1185 AD) further consolidated against Seljuks at Manzikert's aftermath, preserving core Anatolian and Balkan provinces. This resilience, rooted in defensible urban centers, naval supremacy, and Orthodox cohesion, extended Roman emperorship nearly a beyond AD. The terminus arrived with (r. 1449–1453 AD), whose defense of against II's 80,000-strong Ottoman force culminated in the city's breach on May 29, 1453 AD; the emperor, aged 48, died amid the melee, his body unidentified amid rubble. This event severed the direct Roman line, though institutional echoes in Ottoman millet systems and Russian "Third Rome" ideology derived from prior Byzantine assertions of primacy. Unlike Western symbolic revivals, Eastern continuity rested on empirical governance of Roman heartlands, legal codices, and self-proclaimed Romanness, unmarred by the interpretive biases favoring Germanic successor narratives in post-Enlightenment .

Medieval and Renaissance Revivals

Emperor (r. 527–565) spearheaded a program of imperial restoration in the Eastern , reconquering the in by 534 and substantial Ostrogothic territories in by 554, with these efforts framed as reviving the 's extent under . His legal codification in the (completed 529–534) further reinforced centralized Roman authority, influencing subsequent medieval governance despite the unsustainable costs of reconquest that strained imperial resources. In the West, Otto III (r. 996–1002) advanced the explicit ideology of , adopting seals inscribed with this phrase from 998 and establishing his court in by January 1001 to emulate ancient administrative revival. He appointed Greek officials, wore Roman consular robes, and envisioned a renewed empire blending Christian universalism with classical Roman forms, though local revolts and his untimely death during a in Paterno on January 23, 1002, curtailed these ambitions. The witnessed an intellectual resurgence of Roman imperial models through , with scholars analyzing ancient texts to advocate emulation of emperors like for political stability and cultural prestige. Papal Rome integrated this ideology, as popes commissioned humanist works and architectural projects invoking triumphal arches and imperial motifs to legitimize temporal power as heirs to Roman sovereignty. Post-1453, Sultan invoked Roman succession by adopting the title Kayser-i Rum (Caesar of Rome) after capturing on May 29, 1453, positioning Ottoman rule over former Byzantine domains as a legitimate extension of imperial universality. Successors like (r. 1520–1566) perpetuated this, blending it with Islamic sultanic authority to claim dominion from to the . In Muscovy, the "Third Rome" doctrine, articulated by monk Philofei in epistles to III circa 1510–1521, cast as the sole guardian of Orthodox Christianity and Roman imperial heritage following the "falls" of the first two Romes, thereby elevating tsars to autocratic status akin to Byzantine basileis. This ideology, rooted in III's to Zoe Palaiologina (1472) and adoption of symbolism, underpinned Russian expansion and claims to protective overlordship over Eastern .

Achievements and Criticisms

Expansion, Stability, and Infrastructure

The Roman Empire achieved substantial territorial expansion under its emperors, incorporating regions that vastly increased its resources and strategic depth. Augustus, reigning from 27 BC to AD 14, consolidated control over the eastern Mediterranean by annexing Egypt in 30 BC following the Battle of Actium, securing grain supplies vital for Rome's population. Claudius expanded into Britain in AD 43, establishing provinces that yielded minerals and provided a buffer against northern tribes. Trajan's campaigns from AD 98 to 117 marked the empire's zenith, with conquests in Dacia by AD 106 adding gold-rich territories and brief incursions into Mesopotamia, extending the empire to approximately 5.9 million square kilometers. This expansion contributed to periods of internal stability, most notably the spanning from 27 BC to AD 180, a era of relative peace enforced by imperial legions that minimized large-scale civil wars and barbarian incursions within core provinces. Emperors like and the subsequent Julio-Claudians implemented administrative reforms, including provincial governors and tax systems, which fostered economic prosperity through trade routes like the Silk Road connections and Mediterranean shipping. The stability enabled population growth, urban development, and cultural integration, with and extended selectively to conquered elites, reducing revolts and promoting loyalty. Infrastructure developments underpinned this stability and expansion, with an extensive road network totaling over 200,000 miles (approximately 320,000 kilometers) by the empire's height, engineered with durable stone paving and drainage to support rapid troop deployments and commerce. Key arteries like the Via Appia, extended under imperial patronage, connected to distant frontiers, facilitating the movement of armies that deterred invasions and legions that projected power. Aqueducts, such as the 92.5-kilometer built in the 2nd century AD to supply , delivered fresh water to urban centers over long distances using gravity-fed arches, sustaining populations exceeding one million in alone through consistent supply. These engineering feats, often commissioned by emperors like for forums and harbors, enhanced , via , and military logistics, directly correlating with the empire's administrative cohesion and economic output.

Tyranny, Persecution, and Decline Factors

Caligula's brief reign from 37 to 41 AD epitomized imperial caprice, marked by the execution of rivals, senators, and even family members on unfounded suspicions, alongside demands for divine worship that alienated the elite. Nero, ruling from 54 to 68 AD, extended tyranny through the systematic elimination of perceived threats, including the philosopher Seneca in 65 AD and widespread purges of the , while his profligate spending strained provincial taxes. , from 180 to 192 AD, neglected administration in favor of personal gladiatorial spectacles, fostering court corruption and senatorial resentment that culminated in his . Domitian's rule (81–96 AD) involved similar paranoia-driven executions of officials and exiles of critics, eroding institutional trust. Persecutions under various emperors targeted groups seen as disloyal to Roman religious and civic norms, with Christians facing sporadic but severe repression. Following the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD, Nero scapegoated Christians, subjecting them to crucifixions, burnings as human torches, and arena deaths to deflect blame from himself. In 250 AD, Decius mandated empire-wide sacrifices to traditional gods, requiring compliance certificates; non-compliant Christians, including clergy, faced imprisonment, torture, or execution, aiming to unify the populace amid crises. The most systematic campaign occurred under Diocletian from 303 to 311 AD, involving edicts that demolished churches, burned scriptures, enslaved clergy, and conscripted soldiers into sacrifices, resulting in thousands of martyrdoms before partial rescindment under Galerius in 311 AD. These tyrannical practices and persecutions contributed to imperial decline by undermining administrative cohesion and economic stability. Frequent usurpations, such as the in 69 AD following 's suicide, stemmed from military disloyalty bred by erratic leadership, leading to civil wars that depleted legions and treasuries. Currency debasement initiated under —reducing silver content in denarii from 98% to 90% by 64 AD—escalated and fiscal distrust, exacerbating later shortages. in imperial courts, evident in Commodus's era sales of offices, hollowed out provincial , while persecutions diverted resources from border defenses, allowing barbarian incursions to intensify by the AD. Overall, such internal predation eroded the meritocratic military ethos, fostering reliance on unreliable auxiliaries and accelerating fragmentation.

Historiographical Debates

Republican Facade vs.

established the in by returning authority to the and of after , adopting the title princeps senatus (first among senators) and rejecting overt monarchical designations like rex, which evoked the overthrown kings and Julius assassination on March 15, 44 BC for similar ambitions. He accumulated republican offices—holding the consulship 13 times between 43 BC and 23 BC, perpetual tribunician power from 23 BC granting and inviolability, and imperium maius over all legions numbering around 28 by 23 BC—effectively vesting absolute control of military and provincial administration in one individual while the issued decrees that aligned with his directives. This structure maintained republican institutions like annual consuls and senatorial elections, but the emperor's dominance over 25 legions and client kings rendered them ceremonial, as provincial governors required his ratification for actions. Historians characterize the as a disguised , with the republican facade strategically deployed to legitimize power amid Roman cultural aversion to kingship, rooted in the 's founding myth of expelling in 509 BC. Augustus's , inscribed post-mortem around 14 AD, emphasized restoration of the , claiming he "restored the state" without abolishing traditions, yet contemporaries like in (c. 116 AD) described it as the origin of servitude under a single ruler, critiquing the Senate's complicity in transferring power on January 16, 27 BC. Scholars such as Barry Strauss argue the system theoretically preserved republican forms but practically functioned as , with Augustus navigating senatorial elites through incremental power accumulation rather than explicit , evidenced by his control over supply and public that bought popular loyalty. The facade's utility lay in preventing elite backlash, as demonstrated by the Senate's 21 acclamations of Augustus's powers by 23 BC, though real dissent, like from (c. 229 AD), highlighted the illusion's thinness. The debate centers on intentionality and evolution: proponents of a genuine republican dyarchy, like some modern analyses, point to Augustus's deference to senatorial advice in and legalistic power grants as evidence of shared , but empirical control—such as vetoing 700 senatorial proposals annually by Tiberius's era (14-37 AD)—undermines this, revealing causal primacy of imperial will over institutions. Critics, including (19th century), viewed the Empire as monarchical progress beyond republican dysfunction, prioritizing stability from Augustus's 40-year reign that reduced civil wars. By the 3rd century Crisis (235-284 AD), with 26 emperors in 50 years, the facade crumbled under military , culminating in Diocletian's (284 AD onward), which openly proclaimed the emperor as dominus () and divine, abolishing pretenses of with 4 tetrarchs sharing nominal power but Diocletian's supremacy evident in purges of 300 senators. This shift underscores the Principate's republican veneer as pragmatic camouflage for autocracy, sustained only while emperors like (96-98 AD) or (98-117 AD) cultivated senatorial harmony, but eroded by figures like (81-96 AD) who demanded , accelerating acknowledgment of monarchical reality.

Role in Roman Success and Fall

The imperial system established by in 27 BCE centralized authority, ending of the late and initiating the , a period of relative peace and stability lasting approximately 200 years until 180 CE. reformed the by creating a professional of about 28 legions totaling roughly 150,000 men, loyal to the rather than individual generals, which reduced internal power struggles and enabled effective border defense and expansion. Administrative reforms included reorganizing provinces into imperial and senatorial categories, improving collection and , while infrastructure projects such as roads, aqueducts, and temples fostered economic prosperity and cultural unity across the empire. Subsequent emperors like (r. 98–117 CE) expanded the empire to its greatest territorial extent, incorporating and parts of , which boosted wealth through conquests and trade. (r. 117–138 CE) consolidated frontiers with fortifications like , emphasizing defensive stability over further expansion, and invested in such as the Pantheon, enhancing administrative efficiency and civic pride. These efforts under the maintained Rome's military dominance, facilitated Mediterranean trade networks, and supported , with the empire's GDP per capita estimated higher than many pre-industrial societies due to and . However, the emperor's role shifted toward contributing to decline as weak leadership exacerbated structural vulnerabilities. (r. 180–192 CE) abandoned his father's stoic governance for personal indulgence and gladiatorial spectacles, sparking civil unrest and assassinations that destabilized the succession. The Third-Century Crisis (235–284 CE) saw over 20 emperors in 50 years, most assassinated or overthrown, amid , military anarchy, and invasions, as emperors prioritized short-term survival over reforms, depleting resources through constant civil wars. Roman historians like attributed decline to tyrannical emperors fostering corruption and punishing merit, eroding republican virtues and enabling bureaucratic despotism. blamed moral decay under ambitious rulers for shifting power to the undeserving, leading to class strife and economic stagnation. Later policies, such as Diocletian's (r. 284–305 CE) in 301 CE, failed to curb inflation and instead stifled trade, while the empire's division under Constantine (r. 306–337 CE) into East and West fragmented unity, leaving the West vulnerable to barbarian incursions. By 476 CE, Emperor was deposed by the Germanic chieftain , symbolizing the Western Empire's collapse due to emperors' inability to maintain fiscal solvency, military loyalty, or effective amid overextension. Historiographical analysis reveals emperors as both stabilizers and accelerators of fall; while early ones mitigated republic-era factionalism through , later ones' reliance on mercenaries diluted Roman identity and loyalty, with expanding and army costs—reaching unsustainable levels by the —straining the tax base without proportional benefits. Contemporary Roman views, as in Livy's histories, linked autocratic power struggles to gradual moral and institutional erosion, a causal chain where imperial absolutism initially resolved chaos but ultimately fostered dependency and over adaptive resilience.

Modern Interpretations and Biases

Modern interpretations of the Roman emperor often emphasize the institution's evolution from Augustus's facade to later autocratic dominance, viewing it as a pragmatic adaptation that ensured stability amid republican dysfunction, though scholars debate the extent of continuity with republican traditions. Historians like in the 18th century framed the empire's trajectory as a decline from virtuous antiquity to barbarism and superstition, influencing subsequent views that prioritize internal decay over external pressures like invasions. Contemporary scholarship, drawing on archaeological data such as expanded urban infrastructure and legal codifications, credits effective emperors with fostering , a 200-year period of relative peace that facilitated trade and across three continents from 27 BCE to 180 CE. Biases in modern historiography stem partly from ancient sources' senatorial slant, which vilified emperors challenging elite privileges, a skew amplified by Enlightenment-era narratives like Gibbon's that projected liberal republican ideals onto Rome. Post-20th-century academic trends, influenced by Marxist and post-colonial frameworks, frequently highlight exploitation—such as slavery affecting up to 30% of Italy's population by the 1st century CE—and imperial conquests as proto-colonial violence, often underemphasizing empirical benefits like the standardization of weights, measures, and roads spanning 250,000 miles that boosted economic integration. This selective focus reflects systemic ideological tilts in Western academia, where left-leaning dominance—evident in surveys showing over 80% of humanities faculty identifying as liberal—prioritizes narratives of power imbalances and cultural erasure over causal analyses of how Roman governance reduced intertribal warfare and disseminated engineering feats like aqueducts supplying 1 million cubic meters of water daily to Rome. Western-centric biases further distort views of imperial continuity, as seen in the convention of dubbing the Eastern Roman Empire "Byzantine" from the onward, a term coined by to imply a degenerate break from classical rather than the self-identified Romaioi state that preserved and administration until 1453 CE, administering territories from Britain to at its peak. Popular modern analogies, including unsubstantiated theories of causing "mad" emperors like (r. 54–68 CE), perpetuate over evidence-based assessments, such as Nero's post-fire urban rebuilding that incorporated fire-resistant brick and widened streets. Public sentiment, per 2024 polling, skews positive among informed respondents—74% viewing favorably—contrasting academic tendencies to frame the system as inherently tyrannical, a projection that overlooks first-principles causalities like the empire's role in synthesizing Hellenistic, Etruscan, and indigenous elements into enduring institutions.

References

  1. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/auggie.htm
  2. https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/1320hist&civ/chapters/08romfal.htm
  3. https://www.historyextra.com/period/roman/roman-empire-history-facts-map-timeline-peak-when-start-when-split-how-long-tetrarchy/
  4. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/romes-transition-republic-empire/
  5. https://www.mpm.edu/research-collections/anthropology/anthropology-collections-research/mediterranean-oil-lamps/roman-empire-brief-history
  6. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/auggiero.htm
  7. https://www.ushistory.org/civ/6b.asp
  8. https://www.history.com/articles/julius-caesar-assassination-fall-roman-republic
  9. https://www.thoughtco.com/caesars-role-collapse-of-roman-republic-118345
  10. https://www.thecollector.com/second-triumvirate-mark-antony-octavian-lepidus/
  11. https://octavianchronicles.com/?page_id=600
  12. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/september-2/the-battle-of-actium
  13. https://www.steelsnowflake.org/post/augustus-republic
  14. https://www.join-invictus.com/p/how-augustus-saved-rome
  15. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Augustus-Roman-emperor
  16. https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/anc-augustus-reading/
  17. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2363/the-principate-of-augustus/
  18. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/905/reforms-of-augustus/
  19. http://faculty.washington.edu/alain/CLAS.HSTAM330/AugSettlement27BC.html
  20. https://www.unrv.com/fall-republic/why-was-augustus-so-successful.php
  21. http://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/empire-notes.html
  22. https://www.thecollector.com/augustus-roman-emperor-facts/
  23. https://fiveable.me/introduction-ancient-rome/unit-9/establishment-principate/study-guide/9GJLdZ37tDEqRIsi
  24. https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Roman-emperors-powers-like-tribunicia-potestas-and-imperium-maius-allow-him-to-control-the-Senate-and-military-effectively
  25. https://fiveable.me/the-ancient-mediterranean-world/unit-7/roman-emperors/study-guide/T5UEc6UXr1AfCCyM
  26. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1472/authority-in-ancient-rome-auctoritas-potestas-impe/
  27. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Diocletian/Domestic-reforms
  28. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2233&context=honorstheses
  29. https://www.britannica.com/place/ancient-Rome/Cult-of-the-emperors
  30. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/encyclopaedia_romana/greece/paganism/paganism.html
  31. https://historywithjackson.co.uk/blog/f/the-emperors-of-rome-and-their-titles
  32. https://www.crystalinks.com/RomanEmperors.html
  33. https://ancientromanhistory31-14.com/augustus/from-octavian-to-augustus-27-bc/restoration-of-the-republic-in-27-bc/
  34. https://www.historyextra.com/period/roman/roman-emperors-guide-facts/
  35. https://www.historywithjackson.co.uk/blog/f/the-emperors-of-rome-and-their-titles
  36. https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=roman%20emperor%20titles
  37. https://www.labrujulaverde.com/en/2023/11/from-principate-to-dominate-when-roman-emperors-became-boastful-autocrats/
  38. https://www.heraldica.org/topics/royalty/emperor.htm
  39. https://www.historyoftheancientworld.com/2014/08/born-to-be-emperor-the-principle-of-succession-and-the-roman-monarchy/
  40. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2021/2021.03.42/
  41. https://academic.oup.com/book/57638/chapter/478445349
  42. https://nathangoldwag.wordpress.com/2021/02/25/succession-crisis-the-roman-empires-hidden-weakness/
  43. https://samoburja.com/how-roman-emperors-handled-the-succession-problem/
  44. https://carolashby.com/adoption-in-the-roman-empire/
  45. https://europe.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-360.html
  46. https://amazingbibletimeline.com/blog/emperors-of-adoption-nerva-antonine-dynasty-96-192-ad/
  47. https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/senators.html
  48. https://historiamag.com/how-not-to-become-a-roman-emperor/
  49. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/article/usurpations-in-roman-empire-throughout-history/
  50. https://historum.com/t/was-troublesome-succession-one-of-the-major-causes-for-the-eventual-demise-of-rome.71159/
  51. https://academic.oup.com/book/10597/chapter/158556370
  52. https://www.unrv.com/early-empire/year-four-emperors.php
  53. https://www.history.com/articles/6-civil-wars-that-transformed-ancient-rome
  54. https://www.thecollector.com/year-five-emperors/
  55. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/thirdcenturycrisis_article_01.shtml
  56. https://www.thecollector.com/crisis-of-the-third-century-rome/
  57. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=resources&s=war-dir&f=wars_empirecivil
  58. https://blog.oup.com/2022/10/civil-war-and-the-end-of-the-roman-empire/
  59. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-julio-claudian-dynasty-27-b-c-68-a-d
  60. https://study.com/academy/lesson/emperors-of-the-julio-claudian-dynasty.html
  61. https://worldhistoryedu.com/julio-claudian-dynasty-origin-story-and-key-figures/
  62. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/article/history-of-julio-claudian-dynasty/
  63. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/tiberius.htm
  64. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~rauhn/Pax_Romana_cwc.htm
  65. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/FRAAHR/23%2A.html
  66. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/nero.htm
  67. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/Mizzou_Academy/World_History_A_B/05%253A_The_Roman_World/5.05%253A_The_Early_Empire
  68. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/the-last-julio-claudian-emperors/
  69. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/vespasia.htm
  70. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/impindex.htm
  71. https://exhibitions.kelsey.lsa.umich.edu/galleries/Exhibits/Empire2/intro/flavians.html
  72. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/the-nerva-antonine-dynasty/
  73. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/hadrian.htm
  74. https://roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu/marcaur.htm
  75. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-severan-dynasty-193-235
  76. https://www.italianartsociety.org/2018/04/lucius-septimius-severus-became-emperor-of-rome-on-14-april-193-and-remained-in-power-until-his-death-in-early-211/
  77. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/hadrians-wall/hadrians-wall-history-and-stories/septimius-severus/
  78. https://ancientromelive.org/the-severan-dynasty/
  79. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-famous-people/severan-dynasty-0018780
  80. https://www.unrv.com/emperors/severus-alexander.php
  81. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/HIST301-7.2-SeptimiusSeverus-FINAL.pdf
  82. https://www.romanemperors.com/roman-emperor-severus-alexander-222-235-ce
  83. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/crises-of-the-roman-empire/
  84. https://roman-empire.net/rise-and-fall/crisis-of-the-third-century-of-the-roman-empire
  85. https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/crisis-of-the-third-century/
  86. https://www.worldhistory.org/Crisis_of_the_Third_Century/
  87. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gip0QBO3oao
  88. https://worldhistoryedu.com/the-tetrarchy-and-why-was-it-established/
  89. https://www.ostia-antica.org/dict/topics/fourth-century/fourth-century-1.htm
  90. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/diocletian-and-the-tetrarchy/
  91. https://www.livius.org/articles/dynasty/constantinian-dynasty/
  92. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/roman-constitution/roman-empire/roman-dynasties/constantinian-dynasty/
  93. https://historycooperative.org/roman-emperors/
  94. https://www.thecollector.com/list-roman-emperors/
  95. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/roman-constitution/roman-empire/roman-dynasties/theodosian-dynasty/
  96. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/835/fall-of-the-western-roman-empire/
  97. https://www.historyhit.com/the-western-roman-emperors-from-the-sack-of-rome-to-the-fall-of-the-western-roman-empire/
  98. https://shadowsofconstantinople.com/roman-continuity/
  99. https://www.thecollector.com/what-was-justinian-reconquest/
  100. https://worldhistoryedu.com/10-most-famous-byzantine-emperors-and-empresses/
  101. https://www.thecollector.com/four-powerful-byzantine-emperors-heirs-of-rome/
  102. https://about-history.com/emperor-diocletian-and-the-period-of-dominate/
  103. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/roman-constitution/roman-empire/dominate/
  104. https://everything-everywhere.com/emperor-diocletian/
  105. https://worldhistoryedu.com/the-dominate/
  106. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/biographies/diocletian/
  107. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-worldhistory/chapter/diocletian-and-the-tetrarchy/
  108. https://www.ancient-history-sites.com/historical-insights/the-diocletian-reforms/
  109. https://romanempirehistory.com/roman-emperors/emperor-diocletian/
  110. https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/article/edict-of-diocletian-on-maximum-prices-from-301-ce/
  111. https://mises.org/faith-and-freedom/edict-diocletian-case-study-price-controls-and-inflation
  112. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/constantine/
  113. https://westernciv.com/syllabus/history-of-rome/spring/constantine-the-great/
  114. https://firstthings.com/the-ldquoedict-of-milanrdquo-years-later/
  115. https://awkng.com/how-constantines-conversion-impacted-the-early-church/
  116. https://learn.apmex.com/answers/what-is-a-gold-solidus/
  117. https://www.thecollector.com/diocletian-constantine-monetary-reforms/
  118. https://byzantium-blogger.blog/2024/06/15/10-achievements-of-constantine-i-the-great/
  119. https://roman-empire.net/collapse/julius-nepos
  120. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history/roman-succession-0021470
  121. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-westerncivilization/chapter/the-coronation-of-800-ce/
  122. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology-history-famous-people/otto-great-0021792
  123. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/otto-great-crowned-emperor-romans
  124. https://www.historytoday.com/archive/end-holy-roman-empire
  125. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history/rome-after-fall-0021427
  126. https://shadowsofconstantinople.com/romanidentity/
  127. https://novoscriptorium.com/2019/11/28/roman-identity-in-byzantium/
  128. https://gertitashkomd.com/justinian-i-and-the-roman-revival-r-527-565/
  129. https://law.gwu.libguides.com/romanlaw/corpusjuriscivilis
  130. https://shadowsofconstantinople.com/fall-of-constantinople/
  131. https://grantpiperwriting.medium.com/the-fall-of-the-last-roman-emperor-9d7dd077b0f0
  132. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=aujh
  133. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/acprod/odb_etd/ws/send_file/send?accession=osu1436456307&disposition=inline
  134. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03044181.2017.1285246
  135. https://www.ikgf.uni-erlangen.de/research/research-projects/prophecy-eschatology-and-apocalypse/the-renovatio-imperii-romanorum-of-emperor-otto-iii.shtml
  136. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/686099
  137. https://www.turkiyetoday.com/culture/why-ottomans-believed-they-were-true-heirs-of-rome-3204536
  138. http://www.kroraina.com/slav/stremooukhoff_1953.htm
  139. https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/1997-811-25-poe.pdf
  140. https://www.historyhit.com/the-growth-of-the-roman-empire-explained/
  141. https://www.rome.info/ancient/history/empire/
  142. https://www.ushistory.org/civ/6c.asp
  143. https://www.studentsofhistory.com/the-pax-romana
  144. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/history-magazine/article/200000-miles-roman-roads-provided-framework-empire
  145. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/pax-romana
  146. https://historycooperative.org/worst-roman-emperors/
  147. https://www.historyextra.com/period/roman/worst-bloodiest-emperors-history-tiberius-nero-commodus-caligula-domitian/
  148. https://romanempiretimes.com/the-five-worst-roman-emperors-a-legacy-of-tyranny-and-excess/
  149. https://globalchristianrelief.org/stories/why-did-the-romans-persecute-christians/
  150. https://teachdemocracy.org/online-lesson/religious-tolerance-and-persecution-in-the-roman-empire/
  151. https://europe.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-729.html
  152. https://hyperhistory.org/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-roman-empire/
  153. https://worldhistoryedu.com/what-was-the-roman-principate/
  154. https://brewminate.com/emperor-in-disguise-how-augustus-ended-the-roman-republic-while-pretending-to-save-it/
  155. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/empire-succession-and-army
  156. https://online.norwich.edu/online/about/resource-library/7-major-emperors-during-rise-roman-empire
  157. https://origins.osu.edu/milestones/august-2014-celebrating-roman-emperor-augustus
  158. https://fee.org/articles/how-roman-historians-explained-the-fall-of-rome/
  159. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/fall-of-ancient-roman-empire
  160. https://www.quora.com/Are-ancient-Roman-historians-biased-or-reliable-since-they-wrote-openly-with-the-endorsements-of-emperors-and-politicians-of-the-time-who-would-have-wanted-favorable-representations
  161. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/traces-ancient-rome-modern-world/
  162. https://criticaldebateshsgj.scholasticahq.com/post/2644-understanding-the-contemporary-west-through-a-closer-study-of-the-roman-empire-by-oliver-merkner
  163. https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/what-the-right-doesnt-know-about-rome
  164. https://worldhistoryedu.com/western-historians-somewhat-biased-labeling-of-the-eastern-roman-empire/
  165. https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/were-so-many-roman-emperors-crazy-due-to-lead-poisoning-b8dbbc48d6ce
  166. https://today.yougov.com/entertainment/articles/50546-what-americans-think-about-the-roman-empire
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.