Hubbry Logo
Gummy candyGummy candyMain
Open search
Gummy candy
Community hub
Gummy candy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gummy candy
Gummy candy
Gummy candy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Gummy candy
Collection of gummy candies at a market in Barcelona
Alternative namesGummies, jelly sweets
TypeConfectionery
Place of originUnited Kingdom
Germany
Main ingredientsGelatin/natural gum
VariationsGummy bear, Jelly Babies, gummy worms

Gummies, fruitgums, gummi candies, gummy candies, or jelly sweets are a broad category of gelatin- or gum-based chewable sweets. Popular types include gummy bears, Sour Patch Kids, Jelly Babies and gummy worms. Various brands such as Bassett's, Haribo, Albanese, Betty Crocker, Hersheys, Disney and Kellogg's manufacture various forms of gummy snacks, often targeted at young children. The name gummi originated in Germany,[1] with the terms jelly sweets and gums more common in the United Kingdom.

History

[edit]

Gummies have a long history as a popular confectionery. The first gelatin based shaped candy was the Unclaimed Babies, sold by Fryers of Lancashire in 1864.[2]

In the 1920s, Hans Riegel Sr. of Germany started his own candy company and eventually popularized the fruit flavored gummy candy with gelatin as the main ingredient.[3] By the start of World War II, the company started by Riegel employed over 400 people and produced multiple tons of candy each day.[3] The company was named Haribo, and it became a main producer of gummy bears.

Ingredients

[edit]

Gummy candies are made mostly of corn syrup, sucrose, gelatin, starch and water. In addition, minor amounts of coloring and flavoring agents are used. Food acids such as citric acid and malic acid are also added in order to give a sharp flavor to gummies. It is often that other gelling agents are used in place of gelatin to make gummy candies suitable for vegans or vegetarians, such as starch and pectin.[4]

Types of gummies

[edit]

Jelly Babies

[edit]
Main article: Jelly babies
Jelly Babies

The Jelly Babies gum candy was the first commercially available shaped gum candy. It originated in the United Kingdom. They were first produced by Fryers of Lancashire in 1864 and sold as "Unclaimed Babies". By 1918 they were (and still are) produced by Bassett's in Sheffield as Jelly Babies.[citation needed]

Bears

[edit]
Haribo gummy bears were first made in Germany.

The gummy bear originated in Germany, where it is popular under the name Gummibär (rubber bear) or Gummibärchen (little rubber bear). Hans Riegel Sr., a maker from Bonn, produced these sweets under the Haribo company name, which he started in 1920.[5]

Cola Bottles

[edit]
"Cola bottle" redirects here. For the Coca-Cola bottle design, see Coca-Cola bottle.
Various gummy food items: a cola bottle gummy, a gummy hot dog, a pizza, a hamburger, and a box of fries
Vegan rainbow sour belts with taste of strawberry made by Candy Plus, Czech Republic

Cola bottles are sweets in the shape of classic Coca-Cola-style bottles with a cola flavor. They are produced by numerous companies. "Fizzy Blue Bottles", made by Lutti (formerly part of the French division of the Leaf Company, now controlled by a private investment group), are sweets typically found in a pick and mix selection. These are very similar to cola bottle gummies in shape, but they are usually sour and coloured blue and pink. "Blue Bottles", a variation from another company, are identifiable by the small rims around the sides, and are chewier and thicker, with a sweeter taste. There are also Lime cola bottles which typically retain the brownish-red colour and replace the clear top with a green colour. and mint flavoured bottles which replace the cola flavor for a mint flavor and are typically green instead of brown-red.[citation needed]

Rings

[edit]
See also: Life Savers

Ring-shaped gummy is often covered in sugar or sour powder. The most common and popular flavor is the peach ring. Other flavors include green apple, melon, blue raspberry, strawberry, and aniseed — although these are typically coated in chocolate. A commonly known producer of gummy rings is Trolli, for which the gummy rings are an important asset.[6]

Red frogs

[edit]

In Australia, jelly confectionery in the shape of frogs has been very popular since the 1930s[citation needed]. They are colored red or green, although they are usually referred to as "red frogs". These have influenced the shape, structure, consistency and formula that makes gummy bears. Red frog gummies are not associated with the Red Frogs Association.[citation needed]

Roadkill

[edit]

In 2004, Trolli's U.S. arm introduced a roadkill themed gummy candy in the shape of flattened animals. In February 2005, following complaints by the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Kraft decided to stop production of the controversial Trolli U.S. Road Kill Gummies. The society complained that the products, shaped as partly flattened squirrels, chickens and snakes, would give children an incorrect message on the proper treatment of animals.[7]

Teeth

[edit]

In Australia, jelly confectionery in the shape of teeth has been very popular since the 1930s.[citation needed] They are colored pink and white, with pink representing the gums and teeth being white. They have a slight minty flavor, similar to mint toothpaste.[citation needed]

Vitamin

[edit]
Vitamin D gummies

There are also several multi-vitamin gummy products, usually marketed for children, such as Flintstones Chewable Vitamins.[8] They are more palatable and appealing to children than equivalent vitamin pills.

Worm

[edit]
Main article: Gummy worms

Worm-shaped gummy candy can be attributed to the German confectionery manufacturer Trolli in 1981.[9] They are a popular choice among Halloween trick-or-treaters, and sold with different flavors and coatings.

Health considerations

[edit]

Times Scientists have studied adding the tooth-protecting sugar substitute xylitol to gummies to fight tooth decay.[10]

Choking risks are higher with gummy candies; research shows that "hard, round foods with high elasticity or lubricity properties, or both, pose a significant level of risk," especially to children under three years of age.[11] This can be resolved with the Heimlich maneuver.

Storage

[edit]

Storage of gummy candies in conditions of high humidity will result in the moisture migration of water molecules from the surrounding environment into the candy. If gummy candies are exposed to an environment that is high in moisture content, it is likely that moisture will permeate the candy and increase its relative moisture content. An increase of the candies moisture content will increase the molecular mobility of particles in the candy, leading to a variety of unwanted outcomes such as:

  • Sucrose crystallization and subsequent grainy texture.
  • A sticky candy surface.
  • Diffusion of flavors out of the candy.
  • Possibility of microbial growth.

Moisture migration of gummy candies can be prevented by storing candies in conditions where the surrounding environment is equal to their own moisture content.[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gummy candy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Gummy candy is a chewy confectionery product primarily composed of gelatin derived from animal collagen, combined with sugar, corn syrup or glucose syrup, water, citric acid, flavorings, and colorings, which are heated, molded into shapes such as bears or worms, and dried to achieve a firm yet elastic texture. The genre originated in Germany, where confectioner Hans Riegel Sr. invented the first commercial gummy bears, known as "Dancing Bears" or Gummibärchen, in 1922 after founding Haribo in Bonn. This innovation relied on gelatin's gelling properties, derived from boiling animal bones and hides, to create a distinctive chewiness absent in prior sugar-based sweets. The production process involves dissolving in a hot mixture, incorporating flavors and acids for taste and preservation, depositing the liquid into starch-impressioned trays for shaping, and cooling for several hours to set before sanding with and packaging. Gummy candies gained widespread appeal through Haribo's expansion, evolving into diverse forms like rings, worms, and sour varieties coated in , with the global market valued at USD 8.55 billion in 2024 and forecasted to reach USD 13.03 billion by 2032 amid demand for textured, portable treats. Traditional formulations prioritize animal for optimal elasticity, though plant-based substitutes like have emerged for non-gelatin versions, altering the sensory profile.

History

Origins in Early Confections

The precursors to modern gummy candy can be traced to ancient confections involving mixtures of , fruit juices, and natural gelling agents, which produced chewy textures enjoyed by civilizations such as the and Romans. These early sweets, often formed by evaporating fruit purees or combining with boiled fruits like figs or dates, represented rudimentary attempts at preserving and texturizing sweetness without refined , which was unavailable until later trade routes expanded. Such preparations relied on natural from fruits or for partial gelation, providing a proto-gummy consistency that foreshadowed later innovations in chewy candies. In medieval Arabic cuisine, gelatin extraction emerged as a key technique, with recipes in texts like Kitab al-Tabikh (dating to around the 13th century, though drawing on earlier traditions) describing fish jellies made by boiling collagen-rich materials to create a setting broth, which could be sweetened for applications. This method, utilizing animal or fish byproducts for their gelling properties, marked an early systematic use of — the chemical process breaking down proteins into —predating European adaptations. In Europe, by the 13th and 14th centuries, English recipes for "geleye" involved meat, fish, or hides to extract , then clarifying and setting it with wine, spices, or sugar for both savory aspics and rudimentary sweets, demonstrating causal links between animal-derived gelling and structured confections. These practices, limited by labor-intensive extraction without industrial pressure cooking (invented in 1682), confined production to elite households but established the empirical foundation for scalable sweets. Middle Eastern starch-based jellies, such as precursors to (lokum), further influenced the lineage, employing cornstarch or agar-agar from seaweed boiled with sugar and rosewater to yield translucent, chewy blocks as early as Ottoman confectionery traditions before the documented 1777 invention of modern lokum by Hacı Bekir in . Candy historian Beth Kimmerle identifies as a direct descendant in the evolution of gummy candies, alongside glutinous rice-based chews from , due to their shared emphasis on elastic, fruit-infused gels achievable without pure . These early forms prioritized empirical trial-and-error in gelling agents— for opacity and chew, or for clarity and firmness—over theoretical chemistry, reflecting causal realism in development where texture stability directly enabled portability and appeal. By the , European adaptations sweetened and colored these gels, as seen in Hannah Glasse's 1747 recipes for fruit-flavored molds, bridging medieval aspics to 19th-century portable candies.

Invention of Gelatin-Based Gummies

, a German confectioner from , is credited with inventing the first bear-shaped gelatin-based gummy candies in 1922. After founding in 1920 with a small-scale operation using a copper kettle, Riegel drew inspiration from the trained dancing bears (Tanzbären) performing at local street festivals and markets to create these novel treats. The original Tanzbären differed from modern , being larger, slimmer, and initially produced in a single gold color with fruit flavors, relying on derived from animal for their signature chewy texture. This innovation built on prior gelatin applications in confections, such as the 1909 introduction of British wine gums by Gordon Maynard, but Riegel's bear design represented a pivotal advancement in shaping and techniques using licorice molds and manual processes. Riegel's wife, Gertrud, played a key role by testing recipes and aiding in production from their home kitchen. Although gelatin jellies and similar sweets predated Riegel's work—tracing back to Middle Eastern origins like refined in Europe—the gummy bear's compact, fruit-gum format enabled broader appeal and scalability, setting the foundation for the modern gummy candy industry. By the 1960s, refined the product into the multicolored Goldbears, but the 1922 prototype established the core -based formula that emphasized chewiness over firmer jelly textures.

Commercialization and Global Spread

Haribo initiated commercial production of , known initially as Gummibärchen or Dancing Bears, in 1922 after their invention by founder in , . Early manufacturing relied on small-scale, artisanal methods, including a copper kettle for and manual molding, limiting output to modest volumes sold locally. By 1933, had scaled operations with a dedicated production facility and 400 employees, enabling broader distribution within . World War II disrupted production, but post-1945 rebuilding under Riegel's sons, Hans Jr. and Paul, drove rapid recovery; employment grew from 30 to 1,000 workers by 1950, facilitating European expansion in the 1950s and 1960s. The 1960 launch of Goldbears—featuring standardized shapes, five fruit flavors (, lemon, strawberry, pineapple, orange), and improved formulas—supported mass marketing across Europe, bolstered by the company's first television advertisements in 1962 using the slogan "Haribo makes children happy." Goldbears received protection in 1967, solidifying 's market position. International commercialization accelerated in the 1980s, with establishing a U.S. office in , , in 1982 to distribute imports amid rising demand. This followed domestic U.S. production starts, such as Herman Goelitz Candy Company's (later ) first American-made in 1981, which adapted the format for local tastes and spurred competition from brands like . 's U.S. presence strengthened over time, achieving the top gummi brand status by 2018 and planning a dedicated factory in , opening in 2023. Today, operates in over 120 countries with 16 global production sites, producing 160 million Goldbears daily, while the broader gummy category has expanded via licensees and rivals like Albanese and Hershey.

Ingredients and Formulation

Core Components

Gelatin is the primary gelling agent in traditional gummy candy formulations, derived from animal through , providing the characteristic chewy texture via thermoreversible gelation. It typically constitutes 6-10% of the dry weight in recipes, blooming in to form a hydrated network that sets upon cooling. Variations in bloom strength (e.g., 200-250 bloom) influence firmness, with higher strengths yielding denser gels. Sweeteners form the bulk of the formulation, traditionally comprising sucrose (40-50%) and glucose or corn syrup (35-50%) in conventional recipes, which dissolve during heating to create a viscous syrup and prevent sugar crystallization for a smooth mouthfeel. These carbohydrates contribute to sweetness, body, and shelf stability by maintaining low water activity, typically around 0.65-0.75 Aw to inhibit microbial growth. Natural and modern alternative sweeteners are discussed in the Alternative and Modern Additives subsection. Water, often 20-25% of the initial mixture, acts as the for hydrating gelatin and dissolving sugars, with final content reduced to 12-20% post-drying for optimal texture and preservation. Acidulants like (0.5-1%) are integral to core recipes, lowering pH to 3-3.5 for tartness, flavor enhancement, and to facilitate gelatin setting by stabilizing the gel matrix.

Alternative and Modern Additives

Alternative gelling agents have been developed to replace animal-derived in gummy candy production, primarily to accommodate vegan, vegetarian, kosher, and dietary preferences. , a extracted from fruits or apples, functions as a gelling agent in acidic, high-sugar environments, typically requiring 0.5-2% concentration for effective gel formation in confections. Agar-agar and , both derived from red seaweeds, provide firmer textures compared to ; agar-agar gels at lower concentrations (around 1%) but sets more rigidly, while enhances elasticity and stability in hybrid formulations. These plant-based alternatives often necessitate formulation adjustments, such as precise control and co-gelling with starches, to mimic 's chewiness, as their thermo-reversible properties differ. Starch-based modifiers, including modified corn or starch, serve as thickeners, binders, and stabilizers in gummy recipes, contributing to viscosity and preventing syneresis (water separation) during storage. and are additional hydrocolloids used in low dosages (0.1-0.5%) to improve texture and suspension of particulates, particularly in - or agar-based systems. Modern additives extend beyond structural roles to incorporate functional ingredients, transforming gummies into nutrient delivery vehicles. Vitamins such as C, D, B6, E, and are commonly fortified, with formulations enabling up to 100% daily value per serving while maintaining sensory qualities. peptides and minerals like calcium are added for purported and health benefits, often in gelatin-based gummies where the protein matrix aids . Natural colorants from fruits and , alongside alternative sweeteners such as , monk fruit extracts, allulose, honey, maple syrup, tapioca syrup, and brown rice syrup, address consumer demands for reduced sugar and artificial additives. There is no single universally agreed "best" natural sweetener for making gummies, as it depends on desired texture, flavor, and dietary preferences. Allulose is frequently recommended for achieving a chewy texture similar to traditional sugar gummies, as it mimics sugar's properties (including bulk, solubility, and non-crystallization) while being natural and low-calorie. Other popular natural options include honey or maple syrup (for flavor and simplicity in homemade recipes) and tapioca syrup or brown rice syrup (for invert sugar-like properties that improve chewiness). These alternatives may alter gel strength and require stabilizers like for moisture retention. not only imparts tartness but also acts as a by lowering , inhibiting microbial growth in high-water-activity products. These innovations, driven by market growth in functional confections projected to reach USD 2.4 billion by 2030, prioritize stability testing to ensure additive compatibility without compromising or texture.

Production Methods

Gelation and Shaping Processes

The gelation process in gummy candy production primarily relies on , a collagen-derived protein that forms a thermoreversible network upon cooling, providing the characteristic chewy texture. is first bloomed by hydrating it in cold water for 30-60 minutes to absorb moisture and swell, typically at a concentration of 6-12% by weight depending on desired firmness. This hydrated is then dissolved in a hot sugar syrup (containing , , and water) heated to approximately 105-110°C to achieve a level of 75-85%, ensuring complete solubilization while incorporating flavors, colors, and acids. Upon cooling to or below (often via controlled cooling tunnels at 10-20°C), the molecules undergo coil-to-helix transitions and aggregate into junction zones, forming a viscoelastic gel matrix above the temperature but with sufficient structure for demolding. Alternative gelling agents like , derived from or apple sources, enable vegan formulations but require distinct conditions for gelation, including high sugar content (typically >65%), low (2.5-3.5 via ), and calcium ions for low-methoxyl pectin or heat-activated cross-linking for high-methoxyl variants. Unlike gelatin's room-temperature setting, pectin gels form through a hot process where the mixture is heated to 80-100°C, deposited, and rapidly cooled to prevent syneresis, yielding a shorter, less elastic texture compared to gelatin's bounce. Pectin-based gelation accommodates better flavor release but demands precise and control to avoid weak or brittle results. Shaping follows gelation via deposition into molds, traditionally using starch moguls where cornstarch trays absorb excess moisture and define shapes like bears or worms during 12-48 hours of setting at 20-25°C and 50-60% . Modern starchless methods employ automated depositors to fill lubricated or molds with the hot gel mass (at 40-60°C to maintain flow), followed by cooling tunnels reducing temperature to 15-20°C over 20-30 minutes for rapid solidification without sticking. Demolding involves or air blasts to release pieces, often followed by oil or sugar coating to prevent adhesion and enhance shelf stability. These processes ensure uniformity, with variants for rope-like shapes cut post-gelation.

Quality Control and Variations

Quality control in gummy candy production emphasizes adherence to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) as mandated by regulatory bodies such as the U.S. (FDA), which require validation of processes to prevent and ensure product uniformity. Manufacturers implement in-line sensors for real-time monitoring of critical parameters, including cooking (typically 80-100°C to achieve proper gelatin bloom), Brix levels (solids content around 75-80% for optimal gelation), pH (adjusted to 3-4 for stability), and (below 0.65 to inhibit microbial growth). These controls mitigate variations in texture and , with automated systems rejecting batches exceeding tolerances, such as gelatin inconsistencies that could cause syneresis (moisture separation). Post-deposition quality assurance includes sensory and physicochemical testing, such as texture analyzers measuring chewiness and elasticity via compression force (e.g., 5-15 Newtons for standard bears), alongside microbial assays for pathogens like and mold counts limited to under 10 CFU/g per FDA standards. Contaminant screening verifies purity, including in gelatin (below 10 ppm lead) and absence of undeclared allergens, with periodic third-party audits ensuring compliance. and packaging systems further enhance precision, reducing overfill errors to less than 1% by weight through vibratory or vision-based verification. Variations in production arise from gelling agent selection, with traditional animal-derived (bloom strength 200-250) yielding chewy textures via molding—where slurry is deposited into cornstarch trays, cooled for 18-24 hours, and washed—contrasting - or -based vegan alternatives that require higher cooking temperatures (up to 110°C) and rapid cooling to prevent . processes for continuous production enable complex shapes like worms or 3D figures, differing from batch by using cooled depositors at 40-50°C for precise filling, though they demand tighter control (below 50% RH) to avoid sticking. Functional variations incorporate additives like vitamins or , necessitating adjusted drying times (4-8 hours at 20-30°C) to maintain homogeneity without compromising matrix integrity. Regional adaptations, such as European preferences for harder , reflect formulation tweaks for cultural texture expectations, verified through accelerated stability tests simulating 6-12 months of storage.

Varieties

Traditional Shapes and Flavors

The archetypal shape of traditional gummy candies is the bear, first commercialized as Haribo's Gold-Bären in 1922 by German confectioner Hans Riegel Sr. in Bonn. These candies, inspired by the trained "dancing bears" of German circuses, measure roughly 2 cm (0.8 in) in length and established the standard for fruit-flavored, gelatin-based confections molded into animal forms. Prior to bears, early gelatin candies from the 1860s, such as Fryers of Lancashire's Unclaimed Babies, adopted humanoid shapes, but these lacked the precise molding techniques that popularized bears globally. Traditional flavors for gummy bears center on five primary fruit varieties: (red), (green), (yellow), orange (orange), and (translucent or white). Haribo's formulation, unchanged in core profile since inception, uses these to evoke natural fruit essences through flavor compounds, with regional adaptations like apple replacing in some European variants post-2007. This palette derives from post-World War I ingredient availability, favoring and extracts for their stability in matrices, as documented in early production records. In Turkey, these gelatin-based confections are known as "jöle şekerleme," a term encompassing similar fruit-flavored gummy candies, often in shapes like bears and with flavors including strawberry, orange, and lemon. Beyond bears, other enduring traditional shapes include cola bottles and rings, emerging in the mid-20th century among European producers like those in the UK, mimicking beverage containers or simple loops for visual appeal and uniform chew. These maintain fruit flavors akin to bears, such as cherry for cola simulations or lime for rings, prioritizing sensory consistency over novelty. Empirical consumer data from the era indicates shape recognition enhanced perceived authenticity, with bears achieving over 100 million units sold annually by Haribo by the 1950s.

Novelty and Functional Types

Novelty gummies extend beyond conventional shapes to include creative forms such as worms, sharks, dinosaurs, replicas, slices, hamburgers, emojis, and space-themed objects, aimed at increasing visual novelty and market differentiation. These shapes often incorporate sour coatings or mixed fruit flavors to heighten sensory appeal, with examples like gummy sharks featuring blue-white oceanic designs and fruity tastes. Elongated worm shapes, distinct from the original bear invention, emerged as a popular variant in subsequent decades, contributing to the diversification of gummy offerings. Functional gummies integrate bioactive ingredients into the gelatin base to deliver targeted nutritional or therapeutic effects, such as vitamins, minerals, probiotics, or botanicals, positioning them as hybrid confection-supplements. Common formulations include multivitamin variants providing essentials like vitamin D3, CoQ10, lycopene, and omega-3 fatty acids (DHA/EPA), often marketed for adult daily intake. Other types feature apple cider vinegar for digestive support, ashwagandha for stress reduction, collagen for joint health, or mushroom extracts for immune enhancement, reflecting consumer demand for convenient wellness delivery. Ingredients like vitamin C, zinc, and selenium are frequently added for purported immune benefits, though efficacy depends on dosage and bioavailability. The functional segment has grown significantly, comprising about 29% of total gummy sales by 2025, driven by innovations in gelling agents and natural sweeteners to accommodate active compounds. Examples of functional enhancements also encompass pistachio green hull extract for antioxidants, stevia for low-calorie sweetening, and starch modifications to improve texture stability in nutrient-fortified recipes. Market analyses project the global functional gummies sector to expand from USD 22.54 billion in 2024 to USD 37.27 billion by 2032, underscoring their rising role in bridging confectionery and nutraceuticals. Despite added sugars in many products, sugar-free options using alternative sweeteners have proliferated to align with health-conscious preferences.

Physical and Sensory Properties

Texture Mechanics

The texture of gummy candy arises primarily from the formation of a thermoreversible network by gelling agents, which imbues the confection with viscoelastic properties characterized by elasticity and chewiness. , derived from , swells in hot water to form a sol that sets into a upon cooling, creating a three-dimensional matrix that immobilizes and provides rubbery resilience distinguishing gummies from softer jellies. This network's strength depends on gelatin's bloom value, a measure of gel rigidity where higher values (typically 175-250 for gummies) yield firmer, more chew-resistant products by requiring greater force for deformation. Viscoelastic manifest in gummies as a solid-like response where the storage modulus (G') exceeds the loss modulus (G"), indicating predominant elastic recovery over viscous flow during mastication. Chewiness, quantified as the work needed to reduce the to a swallowable state, correlates with gumminess ( multiplied by cohesiveness) and is empirically assessed via texture profile analysis instruments that simulate biting cycles. Factors such as concentration directly modulate this; increasing it from 6% to 8% enhances and rupture strength, while excessive drying reduces moisture content below 18-20%, heightening brittleness over desired pliability. Alternative gelling agents like produce distinct mechanics, forming calcium-mediated junctions for a shorter, less elastic compared to gelatin's protein coils, often resulting in softer textures suitable for vegan formulations but with lower stability. Hybrid systems, such as gelatin- blends at ratios like 6.5% gelatin to 0.5% , approximate pure gelatin's chewiness while altering melt profiles, though adjustments (around 3.2-3.5) are critical to optimize cross-linking without syneresis. Temperature influences dynamics, with gummies exhibiting near -10°C and softening above 30°C, where molecular mobility increases viscous dissipation. and further tune mechanics by plasticizing the , reducing hardness but enhancing perceived chew through balanced around 0.6-0.7.

Stability and Storage Factors

The stability of gummy candies, primarily gelatin-based confections with high sugar content and low (typically aw < 0.65), relies on maintaining low levels to inhibit microbial growth and preserve texture. Elevated promotes moisture migration into the candies, causing softening, stickiness, and potential syneresis (gel separation), while excessive drying can lead to hardening. Temperature fluctuations above 25°C (77°F) accelerate gelatin degradation and flavor volatilization, reducing from an optimal 12-18 months under controlled conditions to as little as 90 days at 35°C, as observed in studies tracking phenolic content decline. Optimal storage conditions emphasize a cool, dry environment at 15-21°C (59-70°F) and relative below 50% to minimize changes and prevent microbial proliferation, which is negligible at aw levels common in commercial gummies (pH 3.5-4.5 further enhances this). Airtight packaging, such as sealed pouches or jars, is essential post-opening to block oxygen ingress and exposure, which can otherwise trigger oxidation and mold in high-moisture variants. Exposure to direct or UV light degrades colors and flavors via , compounding textural issues. For functional or homemade gummies with added water-soluble components like vitamins, stability is more compromised, with recommended to mitigate losses during storage exceeding 45 days. Overall, commercial gummies exhibit robust stability under proper conditions due to their formulation, but deviations—such as improper avoidance in warm climates—can halve through accelerated .

Health and Nutritional Analysis

Compositional Breakdown

Gummy candies are predominantly composed of carbohydrates in the form of sugars such as and , which constitute the bulk of the product and provide sweetness, structure, and energy density. These sweeteners typically make up 70-85% of the dry weight, with contributing to chewiness and preventing , while enhances flavor intensity. , derived from hydrolyzed animal , serves as the primary gelling agent in traditional formulations, accounting for 5-10% of the composition and imparting the elastic, chewy texture through its protein network formed during cooling. ranges from 12-20%, essential for the gelation process but minimized to ensure shelf stability. Acids like (0.5-2%) are added for tartness and to balance sweetness, while minor components include flavorings (natural or artificial extracts), colorants (e.g., FD&C dyes or fruit-derived pigments), and occasionally stabilizers like or . Vegan alternatives substitute or for gelatin, altering the protein profile but maintaining similar carbohydrate dominance. Nutritional profiles reflect this makeup, with a standard 40-gram serving of gelatin-based delivering about 130 calories, nearly all from .
Nutrient (per 40g serving)Amount% Daily Value (approx.)
Calories130 kcal7%
Total Carbohydrates31 g11%
Sugars21 gN/A
Protein2 g4%
Total Fat0 g0%
Sodium10 mg<1%
Data derived from aggregated analyses of common commercial products; values vary by brand and formulation. Functional variants may incorporate vitamins or minerals, but these additives represent less than 1% by weight and do not substantially alter the high-sugar, low-fiber base. Micronutrients are negligible in standard gummies, with no significant contributions to vitamins or minerals unless fortified.

Empirical Health Risks

Gummy candies typically contain high levels of added sugars, such as and , often exceeding 70-80 grams per 100-gram serving, which can contribute to excessive caloric intake and associated risks of and when consumed in large quantities as part of a high-sugar diet. Empirical data from dietary pattern studies indicate that frequent intake of sugar-dense snacks like gummies correlates with elevated blood glucose spikes, particularly in individuals predisposed to , though isolated moderate consumption shows minimal direct causation without overall dietary excess. The chewy texture and adhesive properties of gummy candies promote prolonged contact with tooth surfaces, fostering bacterial production that erodes enamel and increases caries risk; sour variants exacerbate this through citric or malic , which can drop salivary below 5.5 for extended periods, as demonstrated in kinetic studies measuring changes post-consumption. and clinical observations confirm greater enamel lesion depths from sour gummy exposure compared to non-acidic candies, with pediatric data linking daily gummy intake to 25% higher caries rates due to similar mechanisms. For children under 4 years, gummy candies pose a significant hazard due to their firm, compressible shape and size, which can conform to airways upon ; health authorities classify them alongside hard candies as foods to avoid entirely in this age group, with emergency reports highlighting their role in non-fatal asphyxiation incidents. Gelatin-derived proteins in traditional gummies can trigger allergic reactions in sensitized individuals, manifesting as urticaria, gastrointestinal distress, or , with case reports documenting resolution upon avoidance; prevalence is low but includes risks from bovine or porcine sources, potentially compounded by . Excessive intake may also induce transient digestive upset from osmotic effects of sugars and undigested residues.

Assessment of Functional Claims

Functional claims for gummy candies often center on their role as vehicles for bioactive ingredients, such as vitamins, minerals, , and herbal extracts, with assertions of supporting immune function, levels, , or digestive wellness. These claims position gummies as convenient alternatives to traditional supplements, leveraging their palatable, candy-like format to encourage adherence, particularly among children and those averse to pills. However, empirical assessment reveals variable efficacy, influenced by formulation stability, , and the inherent high-sugar base typical of gummies. Peer-reviewed studies on specific nutrients provide mixed evidence for absorption equivalence or superiority in gummy form. For instance, a 2019 bio study found D3 gummies exhibited greater than equivalent tablets, with higher serum concentrations over time, suggesting potential advantages for achieving sufficiency in deficient populations. Similarly, pilot research on gummies demonstrated comparable absorption of vitamins E and B12 relative to tablets. Yet, these findings are not universal; gummy formulations frequently deliver lower nutrient doses than pills due to manufacturing constraints and stability issues under heat or humidity, which can degrade active ingredients. Added sugars in gummy supplements—often 2-3 grams per serving—undermine broader health claims, as they contribute akin to conventional candy, potentially exacerbating risks like or glycemic dysregulation rather than mitigating them. Independent testing highlights quality inconsistencies, with gummies showing the highest failure rates for meeting labeled potency in analyses of over-the-counter supplements. Industry-sponsored studies, such as those by vitafusion, claim parity with pills but warrant caution due to potential conflicts of interest. For or collagen-infused variants, evidence is preliminary; viable bacterial delivery is possible in stabilized gummies, but long-term gut health outcomes lack robust clinical validation. Causal realism dictates evaluating these claims against first-principles of nutrition: while gummies may facilitate intake for non-compliant users, their efficacy hinges on accurate dosing and minimal excipients, often compromised by the gelatin-sugar matrix. Claims of gummies as "healthy treats" or superior to diet-derived nutrients overstate benefits, as whole foods provide synergistic compounds absent in isolated fortifications. Consumers should prioritize verified labels and consult empirical data over marketing, recognizing that functional advantages are context-specific and not a blanket endorsement for routine use.

Economic and Cultural Dimensions

Market Dynamics

The global gummy candy market, encompassing fruit-flavored gelatin-based confections, was valued at approximately USD 38.18 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 47.65 billion by 2030 at a (CAGR) of 3.8%, driven primarily by demand for indulgent, chewy textures and innovative flavor profiles. Alternative estimates place the broader gummy segment at USD 23.93 billion in 2023, expanding to USD 52.24 billion by 2030 with a higher CAGR of 11.8%, reflecting variances in scope that may include adjacent supplement formats but highlighting consistent upward trajectories fueled by product diversification. Growth is propelled by rising consumer preferences for portable, visually appealing snacks, with commanding about 37% of global revenues in 2023 due to established distribution networks and high consumption. Key players dominate through brand strength and scale, with Haribo GmbH & Co. KG leading via its iconic bears and extensive flavor range, followed by (owner of brands like ), Mars Incorporated, and , which leverage acquisitions and marketing to capture shares in premium and mass-market segments. intensifies via mergers, such as Ferrara's integration into Ferrero Group, enabling economies in sourcing and packaging, though raw material volatility—gelatin prices tied to bovine supply fluctuations—poses cost pressures, with spikes noted in 2022-2023 from global disruptions. Market entry barriers remain high for independents due to on and labeling, particularly in the where strict additive rules favor incumbents with R&D capabilities. Regional dynamics reveal as the origin hub, with (Haribo's base) exporting over 80% of production and maintaining steady shares through tradition-bound consumption, while exhibits fastest growth at CAGRs exceeding 5% through and penetration in markets like and . In the U.S., private-label expansions by retailers like challenge branded players, contributing to price competition that has stabilized average retail prices at USD 0.05-0.10 per piece despite inflationary inputs. Challenges include shifting health perceptions amid concerns, prompting some firms to introduce low-sugar variants using alternatives, though these comprise under 10% of volume as core gelatin-based products retain dominance for sensory appeal. Overall, dynamics favor incumbents adapting to premiumization trends, such as organic certifications, which boosted segment growth by 15% annually in select markets from 2020-2024. Global consumption of gummy candy has expanded significantly in recent decades, driven by innovations in flavors, textures, and packaging that appeal to diverse demographics. The international gummy market reached an estimated USD 23.93 billion in 2023 and is forecasted to grow to USD 52.24 billion by 2030, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.8% amid rising demand for chewy, fruit-flavored confections. In the United States, non-chocolate candies, including gummies, accounted for approximately 31% of the confectionery market share in 2024, with steady growth attributed to their portability and sensory appeal. Per capita consumption remains highest in North America and Europe, where gummies constitute a staple snack category, though Asia-Pacific regions show accelerating uptake due to localized flavor adaptations like fruit-based varieties. Demographically, gummy candy enjoys broad popularity, with children aged 2-14 comprising the largest consumer segment owing to the product's playful shapes, vibrant colors, and emphasis on . Around 55% of gummy sales target young consumers through themed varieties such as animal figures or licensed characters. Adults, particularly younger cohorts like , contribute substantially, drawn to the tactile "squishy" experience and adult-oriented innovations including low-sugar or functional formulations with added vitamins. This cross-generational appeal sustains volume growth, even as awareness prompts shifts toward portion-controlled packs and alternative sweeteners, though traditional sugar-based gummies dominate sales at over 42% . Societally, gummy candy functions as a versatile treat embedded in celebrations, gifting, and casual , symbolizing joy and whimsy across cultures. In Western contexts, —modeled after anthropomorphic figures—evoke nostalgia and playfulness, with their origins tied to German circus-inspired designs from the fostering enduring affectionate associations. American adoption accelerated post-World War II through immigrant influences and military exchanges, integrating gummies into everyday rituals like movie nights or party favors. Globally, variants serve ceremonial roles, such as symbols of good fortune in certain Asian traditions or communal snacks in social gatherings, underscoring their role in fostering interpersonal bonds without deeper ideological connotations. Unlike more utilitarian foods, gummies prioritize sensory pleasure over , reinforcing their position as a non-essential yet culturally resonant that transcends mere caloric intake.

References

  1. https://www.madehow.com/Volume-3/Gummy-Candy.html
  2. https://www.haribo.com/en-us/about-us/history
  3. https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-gummy-candy-market
  4. https://studyofsweets.com/blogs/news/history-of-gummy-candy
  5. https://www.bonappetit.com/entertaining-style/pop-culture/article/history-gummy-bears
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9963746/
  7. https://modernmedievalcuisine.com/2021/08/04/jelly-in-13th-and-14th-century-england/
  8. https://www.darlingii.com/rousselot/resources/blogs/2021/03/rousselot-a-brief-history-of-gelatin-manufacturing
  9. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/adkws0/what_is_the_history_of_using_gelatin_in_food/
  10. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-colorful-history-of-haribo-goldbears-the-worlds-first-gummy-bears-180980094/
  11. https://www.mentalfloss.com/food/candy/gummy-bears-food-history
  12. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chelseadavis/2020/03/27/20-fun-facts-about-haribo-the-original-inventor-of-the-gummi-bear/
  13. https://thehustle.co/04282022-gummy-bears
  14. https://www.encyclopedia.com/manufacturing/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/gummy-candy
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772502224000830
  16. https://future4200.com/t/gummy-formulation-recipes-and-references/165314
  17. https://www.supplysidesj.com/specialty-nutrients/generating-yummy-gummies
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11152653/
  19. https://www.fnp-gelatin.com/news/what-are-gummies-made-out-of--key-ingredients-uncovered.html
  20. https://ingreland.com/insights/pectin-in-gummies-faq/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10778822/
  22. https://www.ingredion.com/na/en-us/solving-a-challenge/resource-library/formulating-gelatin-free-gummies
  23. https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/FST-9.pdf
  24. https://candypros.com/blogs/make-gummy-candy/gummy-bear-ingredient-stabilizers-in-gummy-candy-manufacturing
  25. https://urjiva.com/ingredients-in-gummies
  26. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/functional-gummies-market-hit-usd-140100418.html
  27. https://gummygenix.com/factors-affecting-gummy-manufacturing-quality-consistency/
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268005X2100549X
  29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/vjch.202400211
  30. https://tgmachine.com/gummy-manufacturing-process/
  31. https://www.foodchem.com/gelatin-the-elastic-magician-behind-gummy-candies/
  32. https://www.palmerholland.com/in-the-news/Pectin-Vs-Gelatin-Differences
  33. https://darkcitymolds.com/blogs/news/choosing-wisely-pectin-vs-gelatin-for-gummies
  34. https://www.nutritionaloutlook.com/view/gelatin-versus-pectin-which-gummies-do-consumers-prefer-2023-supplyside-west-report
  35. https://tgmachine.com/the-industrial-gummy-making-process/
  36. https://sinofudetechnology.com/blog/gummy-candy-manufacturing-process/
  37. https://www.yinrich.com/blog-complete-guide-to-gummy-candy-manufacturing-how-to-produce-gummy-candy-at-scale
  38. https://gummygenix.com/gummy-production-compliance-usa/
  39. https://gummygenix.com/gummy-manufacturing-process-factors/
  40. https://www.yinrich.com/a-news-quality-control-measures-for-a-gummy-production-line
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10818720/
  42. https://nutreebio.com/mastering-gummy-production-ingredients-processes-and-quality-standards/
  43. https://www.urbanpackline.com/a-how-gummy-candy-counting-systems-improve-quality-control.html
  44. https://www.lechaocandy.com/3d-gummy-candy-vs-regular-gummy-candy/
  45. https://www.jscholaronline.org/articles/JMPH/A-Review-on-Manufacturing-and-Technology-Advancement-in-Gummies.pdf
  46. https://urjiva.com/history-of-gummies
  47. https://www.haribo.com/en-us/products/goldbears
  48. https://www.thetasteofgermany.com/haribo-gold-bears-gummies-classic-175g-made-in-germany/
  49. https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/mod/resource/view.php?id=104735
  50. https://www.firdosmarket.com/blogs/news/the-ultimate-guide-to-gummy-candy-from-classic-bears-to-quirky-shapes
  51. https://sweetytreatyco.com/blogs/news/from-bears-to-worms-unveiling-the-best-gummies-and-their-flavors
  52. https://candypros.com/pages/history-of-gummy-bears
  53. https://www.jellysupplier.com/news/the-most-unique-gummy-candy-shapes-75389289.html
  54. https://candyville.ca/blogs/news/top-10-gummies-you-ll-love-the-perfect-mix-of-taste-and-forms
  55. https://snackstack.net/2023/10/31/the-curious-history-of-gummi-worms/
  56. https://www.everydayhealth.com/diet-nutrition-products/best-gummy-vitamins/
  57. https://nutreebio.com/the-benefits-of-gummies/
  58. https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2025/09/23/functional-gummies-the-snackable-supplement-revolution/
  59. https://www.fudemachinery.com/the-rise-of-modern-functional-gummies.html
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024076126
  61. https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-functional-gummies-and-jellies-market
  62. https://www.scripps.org/news_items/7270-do-gummy-vitamins-really-work
  63. https://analyzing-testing.netzsch.com/en-US/application-literature/gummy-bears-colorful-temperamental-and-demanding-in-their-dynamic-mechanical-properties
  64. https://www.supplysidesj.com/market-trends-analysis/chewy-confections
  65. https://www.jymachinetech.com/the-sweet-science-technical-analysis-of-candy-gummy-shark-engineering/
  66. https://www.mt.com/dam/mt_ext_files/Editorial/Generic/1/SnackFoodNews_0602_05_Editorial-Generic_1155290951834_files/snackfood_news_2en5.pdf
  67. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19476337.2014.974676
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268005X01000443
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8292526/
  70. https://talcottlab.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2019/01/Moistuer-and-Sugar-in-Shelf-Life.pdf
  71. https://analyzing-testing.netzsch.com/_Resources/Persistent/2/4/7/4/24747a7dd7c74335d7db4455df1531953c7ce8fd/AN%2520358_The%2520Influence%2520of%2520Humidity%2520on%2520Gummy%2520Bears.pdf
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268005X22000558
  73. https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/614408-Microbiological-Attributes-of-Chewable-Gels-Gummies/
  74. https://www.pjbold.com/blogs/news/do-gummy-bears-go-bad
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268005X20313886
  76. https://www.nutritionix.com/i/great-value/gummy-bears/59438c0aa12ed7a375cf4fcc
  77. https://www.nutritionvalue.org/Gummy_bears_candy_566450_nutritional_value.html
  78. https://www.nutritionix.com/food/gummy-candy
  79. https://www.hrpub.org/download/20250630/FST11-11140126.pdf
  80. https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/food-types/how-does-sugar-in-our-diet-affect-our-health/
  81. https://marjaangroup.com/en/blog/gummy-candy-from-history-to-its-health-effects-on-children
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9601933/
  83. https://blog.ultrahuman.com/blog/the-bittersweet-impact-of-gummy-bears-on-glucose-metabolism/
  84. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/823d/f191911c8a0a780f91e471810471beaedefa.pdf
  85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19571054/
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2730604/
  87. https://www.thepediatricdentalteam.com/blog/the-sweet-trap-how-gummy-vitamins-are-secretly-sabotaging-your-childs-smile/
  88. https://www.cdc.gov/infant-toddler-nutrition/foods-and-drinks/choking-hazards.html
  89. https://solidstarts.com/choking-hazards-babies/
  90. https://journals.lww.com/ajg/fulltext/2022/10002/s2459_bad_news_gummy_bears__a_case_of.2460.aspx
  91. https://food-contact-surfaces.com/2018/08/3g-gummy-bears-gelatin-and-gi-distress/
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6566230/
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299123098645
  94. https://health.clevelandclinic.org/do-gummy-vitamins-work-as-well-as-traditional-vitamins
  95. https://time.com/5549874/do-gummy-vitamins-work/
  96. https://www.biospace.com/new-vitamin-studies-show-vitafusion-is-the-only-gummy-vitamin-with-clinically-proven-absorption-equal-to-traditional-pill-vitamins
  97. https://www.uclahealth.org/news/article/should-you-take-gummy-vitamins
  98. https://www.webmd.com/vitamins-and-supplements/what-to-know-about-gummy-vitamins
  99. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/jellies-gummies-market
  100. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/gummy-market-report
  101. https://www.metastatinsight.com/report/gummy-candy-market
  102. https://market.us/report/global-jellies-and-gummies-market/
  103. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/jellies-and-gummies-market
  104. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-jellies-and-gummies-market
  105. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/gummy-candies-market-14016
  106. https://www.gourmetpro.co/blog/confectionery-market-in-the-us
  107. https://www.globalgrowthinsights.com/market-reports/gummy-candies-market-108319
  108. https://www.fooddive.com/news/confection-giants-hershey-mars-wrigley-gummies-chocolate-snacking/715481/
  109. https://candyville.ca/blogs/news/how-gummies-became-a-popular-candy-across-the-globe
  110. https://vocal.media/lifehack/exploring-the-history-of-gummy-candy-flavors-and-the-rise-of-sour-treats
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.