Hubbry Logo
Half Yellow FaceHalf Yellow FaceMain
Open search
Half Yellow Face
Community hub
Half Yellow Face
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Half Yellow Face
Half Yellow Face
Half Yellow Face
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Crow Indians by D.F. Barry. This may be the only photograph of Half Yellow Face, possibly the man wearing the cavalry coat.[1]

Key Information

Half Yellow Face (or Ischu Shi Dish[2] in the Crow language) (1830? to 1879?) was the leader of the six Crow Scouts for George Armstrong Custer's 7th Cavalry during the 1876 campaign against the Sioux and Northern Cheyenne.[3][4] Half Yellow Face led the six Crow scouts as Custer advanced up the Rosebud valley and crossed the divide to the Little Bighorn valley, and then as Custer made the fateful decision to attack the large Sioux-Cheyenne camp which precipitated the Battle of the Little Bighorn on June 25, 1876. At this time, the other Crow Scouts witnessed a conversation between Custer and Half Yellow Face. Half Yellow Face made a statement to Custer (speaking through the interpreter, Mitch Boyer) that was poetically prophetic, at least for Custer: "You and I are going home today by a road we do not know".[4][5]

Half Yellow Face fought in the Battle of the Little Bighorn with Major Marcus Reno's troops and thus survived. During the battle he acted heroically to save his friend and fellow Crow Scout White Swan, who had been severely wounded. After the battle he devised a special travois to get White Swan to the steamer Far West so he could get medical care from the Army surgeon. He continued to scout for General John Gibbon after the battle. Tradition has it that he died about 1879 while pursuing Sioux who had stolen Crow horses. Because he died shortly after the battle, he is the least known of the six Crow scouts who went with Custer.

Life before the Battle of the Little Big Horn

[edit]

Half Yellow Face led a group of 11 Crow, including a young warrior called Two Leggins, on a horse stealing raid against the Shoshonis. They started on foot because they hoped to return with stolen horses. They started from the area of the Yellowstone Valley, and went down into the Bighorn Basin near present-day Cody, Wyoming and then went west into the mountains. At one point they found themselves on the shores of Lake Yellowstone, after which they turned back east to re-enter the Bighorn Basin. Game was sparse, and they had little to eat but they came to four enemy tipis. Because they were weak from hunger, they risked going among the enemy's horse herd in the daylight and stealthily cut out 24 horses, which they slowly led off a distance, and then rode home to their village on the Bighorn River.[6]

Enlistment as a scout

[edit]

As the 1876 campaign against the Sioux got underway General John Gibbon was ordered to march from Fort Ellis (near present-day Bozeman, Montana) and cross the Bozeman Pass and travel east down the Yellowstone River to about opposite the mouth of the Rosebud and Tongue Rivers. This was to prevent the Sioux, who were known to be on the south side of the river, from crossing to the north.

While en route down the Yellowstone River, Lieutenant Bradley, Gibbon's Chief of Scouts detoured up the Stillwater River to the site of the Crow Agency (near present-day Absarokee, Montana) and enlisted Crow scouts on April 10, 1876.[7] The scouts enlisted for six months. One of these scouts was Half Yellow Face.

Half Yellow Face served as a scout with Gibbon's forces until June 21, 1876, at which time General Terry determined that Custer would take the 7th Cavalry and make a sortie from the Yellowstone River up Rosebud Creek with the goal of locating the Sioux/Cheyenne camp, then thought to be on upper Rosebud Creek, or in the Little Bighorn Valley. Six Crow scouts, including Half Yellow Face, were chosen to accompany Custer and the 7th Cavalry because they had hunted and traveled through this area, and were much more familiar with the country than the Arikara scouts whose home was on the Great Plains along the Missouri River, far to the east. On June 21 the scouts were detached from Gibbon's forces and reassigned to Custer and the 7th Cavalry.[7]

Pipe carrier and leader of the Crow scouts

[edit]

Half Yellow Face was the "pipe carrier" or leader-chief of the six Crow Indian scouts who were assigned to General George Armstrong Custer in June, 1876.[3] The other Crow scouts were White Swan, White Man Runs Him, Hairy Moccasin, Goes Ahead, and Curly.[3][4] Half Yellow Face was the "pipe carrier" of the Crow scouts because he was older (about 40) and as a traditional Indian male, he had participated in and led more war parties in the past than the other five Crow scouts, all of whom were in their early 20s. The Army recognized Half Yellow Face's role of leader-chief of the Crow scouts by giving him the rank of corporal. He received a military coat with corporal chevrons which he wore during the remainder of his life.

Activities before the Battle of the Little Big Horn

[edit]

In the days before the Battle of the Little Bighorn, as Custer advanced up the Rosebud River, Custer relied on Half Yellow Face and his other Crow Scouts because they knew the country through which he was passing.[3] Half Yellow Face usually remained with Custer while the other Crow scouts ranged over the country in front of the advancing 7th cavalry.

on June 24, the Crow scouts sent word back that the trail of the large Sioux-Cheyenne village had left the Rosebud and gone over into the Little Bighorn Valley.[3][4] Custer decided to follow the track of the Indians over to the Little Bighorn rather than continue up the Rosebud. Three Crow scouts continued ahead of the troop while Half Yellow Face guided the 7th cavalry on the June 24–25 night march that took them to the Rosebud/Little Bighorn divide.[4]

In the early morning hours of 25 June, the day of the battle, the Crow scouts had gone to a high point (the "Crows Nest") on the Rosebud-Little Bighorn divide.[3] As dawn broke, the Crow scouts looked westward toward the valley of the Little Bighorn, a distance of about 12 to 15 miles and saw indications of morning camp fires and a large horse herd, though the lodges of the encampment were out of sight on the valley floor, behind a screening line of bluffs.

The signs seen by the Crow scouts, though indistinct, indicated a camp much larger than anticipated. After sharing this news with the other scouts, all the scouts joined in warning Custer of the risks in attacking such a large encampment, but Half Yellow Face and some other Crow scouts also told Custer that the column had been observed several times that morning by Sioux and could not remain where he was—he had to either attack or go back. Other reports of contacts or sightings of the soldiers by Sioux that morning also caused Custer concern that he had been observed. Custer feared that if he delayed an attack the encampment would be warned of his presence and scatter into many smaller units, thus avoiding the decisive military confrontation the army was seeking.

Statement to Custer

[edit]

Half Yellow Face is often remembered by historians, for a poetic and prophetic statement that he made to Custer on the morning of 25 June 1876, after Custer had announced his decision to attack the as yet un-assessed Sioux-Cheyenne encampment. Another Crow Scout, White Man Runs Him recalled that after Custer had heard the warnings of the Crow scouts about the large size of the encampment, but disregarded these concerns, Half Yellow Face then said to Custer (speaking through the interpreter/scout Mitch Boyer),

You and I are both going home tonight by a road we do not know.[4][5]

Some historians recount the statement as being made by Bloody Knife, but that is contrary to the stated recollection of the Crow scout, White Man Runs Him, who was present.[4]

In a 2012 book entitled Custer, Larry McMurtry has questioned this statement,[8] on the basis that Half Yellow Face spoke no English, and Custer spoke no Crow. However, White Man Runs Him who was present, stated that Half Yellow Face spoke through the scouts' interpreter, Mitch Boyer[4] who spoke both English and Crow since he had a Crow wife, Magpie Outside. McMurtry's earlier 1999 book acknowledged Half Yellow Face's remark, and stated that it was "probably in sign".[9]

Whether the remark attributed to Half Yellow Face was made on the morning of June 25, 1876 through an interpreter or by sign language, two things about it are true. First, the remark, though possessing poetic power, probably made no impression on Custer who continued with his plan to divide his troops into separate units and attack the Sioux/Cheyenne encampment. Second the remark was remarkably prophetic for Custer and the five troops of cavalry who went with him.

Actions in the battle

[edit]

As the battle began, Half Yellow Face and another Crow scout, White Swan, went with Major Reno's detachment and took a direct and active part in the initial combat at the south end of the village on the valley floor.

White Swan was severely wounded fighting on the valley floor, and as Reno ordered his soldiers to retreat from the valley floor to a place on the bluffs just above and to the east of the river, Half Yellow Face stayed behind to assist his friend. White Swan was lying on the edge of a thicket. Half Yellow Face crawled back and got the help of an Arikara scout named Young Hawk and together they dragged White Swan into some timber.[10] Eventually Half Yellow Face got White Swan on a horse and then led the horse through the timber and across the river and up the steep trail to the relative safety in the Reno hilltop entrenchments,[2][3][4][7] arriving at about 5 p.m.[11] This movement by Half Yellow Face and White Swan out of the valley was possible in the late afternoon because after driving Reno's troopers from the valley earlier in the afternoon, the Sioux had detected Custer and the other five troops coming toward their village from the east, and the main body of Sioux warriors left the valley to attack Custer's detachment, to protect the Sioux village from this new threat.

After getting White Swan to the hospital area in the Reno entrenchments Half Yellow Face continued to assist Reno. It was Half Yellow Face who rode south and contacted the Benteen contingent coming up from the south, in response to Custer's message directing Benteen to come to his aid bringing the ammunition packs. Half Yellow Face guided the Benteen contingent to the place where Reno had entrenched.[10][12][13]

After the battle

[edit]

After engaging the 7th Cavalry in combat on June 25, and after continuing to besiege the Reno/Benteen contingent in their hilltop entrenchments on the 26th, the Sioux/Cheyenne force became aware of Gibbon advancing on them from the north, and late on the 26th they took down their village and went south up the valley of the Little Bighorn River. On the 27th after the Sioux had left, Half Yellow Face made a special travois and moved the wounded Crow Scout White Swan twelve miles down the valley to the "Far West" steamship[7][3][2] so that White Swan got medical care with other wounded soldiers in a temporary hospital near the mouth of the Big Horn River.

Half Yellow Face and another Crow scout, Curly, dutifully stayed with Gibbon's forces on the Yellowstone until furloughed to visit their Crow village which was camped on Pryor Creek,[3] though the three other Crow scouts, White Man Runs Him, Hairy Moccasin and Goes Ahead had simply left the Reno entrenchments at about 4:45 on June 25, the day of the main battle, and went back to their Crow village. These Crow scouts abandoned the Reno entrenchments before Half Yellow Face and the wounded White Swan had come across the river and up the bluffs, and they were unaware that White Swan and Half Yellow Face had survived the fight in the valley. Thus, the scouts who returned to the village early reported that White Swan and Half Yellow Face were dead. This mistake was only corrected when the Crow scouts remaining with Gibbon were given permission to go back to their village on Pryor Creek.[14]

Death, burial and legacy

[edit]

In 1877, Lt. General Philip H. Sheridan commanding the Military Division of the Missouri sent his brother, Lt. Col. Michael V. Sheridan to the battlefield, to re-inter the bodies of the enlisted men, and to bring back the remains of certain officers. Lt. Col. Michael Sheridan visited the battlefield on July 2, 1877, seeking "some intelligible account of the massacre".[10] Although Half Yellow Face accompanied Col. Sheridan on his 1877 tour of the battlefield, Col Sheridan remarked he was not helpful, as he had been with Reno's contingent.[10]

Traditional Crow sources indicate that Half Yellow Face died in 1879, three years after the battle. He continued in the traditional role of a Crow warrior, and Indian oral reports state he was killed on the Yellowstone River while pursuing a Sioux raiding party who had stolen Crow horses.[15] The 1885 Census records confirm that Half Yellow Face had died leaving his wife Can't Get Up[16] and 3 children.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Half Yellow Face

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Half Yellow Face (Ischu shi dish; c. 1830 – c. 1879) was a warrior and the designated leader of the six who accompanied George Armstrong Custer's 7th during the Great Sioux War of 1876. As the eldest and most experienced among the scouts, he served as the pipe carrier, a role signifying authority in military tradition. Enlisted with the 7th Infantry on April 10, 1876, for a six-month term, Half Yellow Face participated in along the Rosebud and Little Bighorn valleys, providing critical intelligence on and positions. During the on June 25–26, 1876, he engaged in the valley and hilltop fights, warned Custer of the overwhelming enemy numbers through interpreter , and survived the defeat that claimed Custer's immediate command. His service reflected interests in countering Lakota expansion into their territory, aligning tribal objectives with U.S. military campaigns against non-treaty Native forces.

Background and Tribal Context

Crow-Sioux Conflicts and Motivations for Alliance

The and Lakota tribes had sustained a profound enmity for generations, rooted in competition for prime hunting territories across the northern . This rivalry escalated in the mid-19th century as Lakota bands, bolstered by access to and firearms, expanded westward from the , repeatedly raiding Crow camps and appropriating buffalo-rich domains. By the 1860s, Sioux encroachments focused on the Powder River region in present-day northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana, a vital Crow hunting ground teeming with bison herds essential for tribal sustenance. Lakota warriors, including Oglala and Hunkpapa subgroups under leaders like Red Cloud and Sitting Bull, conducted aggressive campaigns to dominate this area, displacing Crow families and disrupting traditional migration routes amid broader pressures from Euro-American settlement. The establishment of the Bozeman Trail in 1863, cutting through Powder River country to link mining camps in Montana, further inflamed tensions, as Sioux viewed it as an infringement but Crow saw U.S. presence as a potential counterbalance to their foes. Faced with numerically superior Sioux forces that threatened their sovereignty and resources, the Crow pursued a pragmatic with U.S. expeditions, enlisting as scouts to exploit American campaigns against common adversaries. This , formalized through treaties like the 1868 Fort Laramie agreement recognizing Crow lands east of the , stemmed from calculated self-interest: aiding the Army promised protection of territorial claims and retribution against Sioux expansionism, which had already reduced Crow holdings by an estimated 35 million acres since the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie. Crow agents explicitly proposed fighting Sioux to reclaim Powder River hunting rights, prioritizing survival over pan-Indian solidarity. Half Yellow Face, a seasoned pipeholder and leader approaching age 40 by the 1870s, personified this strategic calculus, having led parties in defensive clashes against persistent raiders that ravaged Crow villages and livestock. Such encounters instilled a visceral stake in the alliance, framing U.S. cooperation not as subservience but as a tactical lever to repel existential threats from Lakota incursions.

Early Life and Rise as a Warrior

Half Yellow Face, whose Crow name was Ischu shi dish, was born circa 1830 in the traditional Crow homeland along the valley in what is now southern . Detailed records of his family and youth are limited, as Crow history prior to the mid-19th century relied primarily on oral traditions rather than written documentation, with kinship ties traced through clan affiliations such as the Bad War Deeds People or similar groups common among Apsáalooke . As a young man, Half Yellow Face participated in the Crow tribe's martial culture, which emphasized individual bravery, strategic raids, and counts of coup against enemies to secure horses, territory, and prestige. He accumulated war honors through repeated engagements with the Lakota Sioux, Cheyenne, and other Plains tribes vying for dominance in the northern Great Plains, where Sioux expansion threatened Crow hunting grounds essential for buffalo-dependent survival. These conflicts intensified after the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie, which defined Crow lands but proved ineffective against Sioux violations, prompting defensive warfare to counter horse thefts and territorial seizures that risked the tribe's autonomy and resource base. By the early 1870s, at around 40 to 50 years of age, Half Yellow Face had risen to the status of an elder warrior, recognized for his experience and in these survival-oriented campaigns. His proven record in intertribal raids positioned him as a pipe carrier—a role denoting respect for tactical acumen and valor—within Crow society, where such honors derived from verifiable deeds rather than , enabling him to guide younger fighters in against numerically superior foes. This preeminence reflected the pragmatic necessities of Crow defense amid demographic pressures from more populous aggressors like the , who sought to subjugate or displace them through relentless raiding.

Enlistment and Role in US Army Scouting

Recruitment into the 7th Cavalry

Half Yellow Face enlisted as a scout on April 10, 1876, at the Agency in , signing on for a six-month term under James H. Bradley of the 7th . This recruitment drive enlisted 23 warriors in total, driven by the tribe's longstanding enmity with the , who had repeatedly raided Crow hunting territories and trespassed into the Crow reservation established by in 1868. The Crows' willingness to ally with U.S. forces stemmed from strategic incentives, including military support to counter aggression and opportunities for warriors to accrue honors in battle, as articulated by leaders responding to Bradley's overtures. Half Yellow Face, estimated to be in his 40s and recognized for prior combat experience, was chosen for his maturity and dependability over younger recruits, qualities deemed essential for guiding columns through hostile terrain. These scouts' initial assignments involved reconnaissance patrols in the for the 7th Infantry's Montana Column under Colonel , amid heightened U.S. efforts to enforce compliance with reservation mandates following a December 1875 requiring and bands to assemble at agencies by January 31, 1876—a deadline many Lakota and Northern Cheyenne groups ignored, prompting war declarations in February. The enlistments provided logistical augmentation to federal forces navigating the , where non-compliance had escalated into widespread resistance by spring 1876.

Leadership as Pipe Carrier and Scout Chief

Half Yellow Face served as the pipe carrier and leader of the six attached to the 7th during the 1876 Great campaign, a role rooted in his seniority and established warrior status among the group. At approximately 40 years old, he was the eldest scout, surpassing the others in age and combat experience, which traditionally qualified him to bear the pipe—a of authority entailing both practical guidance and spiritual oversight for the scouts' collective endeavors. The scouts under his nominal command included , Curley, Goes Ahead, Hairy Moccasin, and , with Half Yellow Face coordinating their actions while deferring to , the half-French, half- interpreter appointed as overall chief of scouts. This leadership emphasized operational command, including maintaining order and relaying intelligence through Bouyer, rather than solely ceremonial pipe rituals, aligning with the scouts' military enlistment under U.S. structure where Half Yellow Face held the rank of . His authority extended to directing the group's movements and ensuring adherence to directives, drawing on Crow customs where the pipe carrier enforced cohesion during expeditions. Interactions with the allied (Ree) scouts further underscored his prominence; the Arikara referred to him as "Big Belly," a nickname reflecting cross-tribal recognition amid the combined efforts against and forces.

The Great Sioux War Campaign

Scouting Missions Prior to Little Bighorn

In mid-June 1876, following the 7th Cavalry's rendezvous with General Alfred Terry's column at the mouth of the Rosebud River on June 21, Half Yellow Face, as pipe carrier and leader of the six attached to Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer's regiment, participated in initial reconnaissance coordination among the converging U.S. forces. Terry's command, returning from the Yellowstone Expedition, shared intelligence from Major Marcus Reno's earlier scout (June 10–17), which had detected abandoned Lakota villages in the upper Rosebud Valley, suggesting recent large-scale movements by hostile and bands. Half Yellow Face's group, including , Goes Ahead, Hairy Moccasin, Curly, and , verified these signs through direct tracking, confirming enemy presence via such as scattered debris and trail widths indicative of substantial pony herds, rather than relying on unconfirmed reports. On June 22, Custer's 7th Cavalry, with the scouts ranging ahead, advanced up the Rosebud Valley to pursue the village trail, covering approximately 12–15 miles daily amid fresh indicators of a massive encampment's passage. The scouts identified extensive pony tracks—estimated in the thousands—along with lodgepole drags and camp refuse, pointing to a village of 1,500–2,000 lodges that had moved westward after clashing with General George Crook's command on June 17. This tracking highlighted the and Cheyenne's mobility and numbers, yet interactions with and John Gibbon's parallel column revealed an underestimation of the consolidated threat, as dispersed trail segments and assumptions of non-combatant-heavy groups led planners to project a force smaller than the reality of 7,000–10,000 warriors and dependents. By , as the column continued up the Rosebud, Half Yellow Face's scouts relayed observations of the trail veering toward the Little Bighorn divide, emphasizing the village's recent departure and scale through measurable track density and direction shifts, which empirically contradicted notions of a fragmented or retreating foe. This intelligence informed Terry's decision to detach Custer for a while Gibbon's moved to block escape routes, though the reliance on partial trail indicators—such as varying track freshness—contributed to misjudging the hostiles' unity and preparedness.

Pre-Battle Intelligence and Warning to Custer

Half Yellow Face, leading the Crow scouts attached to the 7th Cavalry, conducted close reconnaissance of the valley on June 24, 1876, identifying an exceptionally large and encampment spanning several miles, with visual cues including vast pony herds numbering in the thousands, signaling a warrior force of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 combatants. These observations, drawn from the scouts' expertise in terrain reading and herd-to-population ratios honed through decades of intertribal warfare, underscored the encampment's unprecedented scale—far exceeding typical villages encountered in prior campaigns. Through interpreter , Half Yellow Face directly cautioned Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer against frontal engagement, delivering a stark : the command would return home "by a they did not know," implying inevitable amid the overwhelming odds. This assessment stemmed from empirical indicators like the village's linear extent along the river and defensive terrain features, which favored massed Indian resistance over a disorganized retreat Custer anticipated. Custer dismissed the advisory, attributing the scouts' pessimism to inherent rather than data-driven , a view echoed by officers who prioritized white over allied scouts' field intelligence despite the Crow's demonstrated reliability in earlier 1876 skirmishes against bands. Causally, this rejection reflected Custer's overreliance on prior tactical successes, such as the 1868 Washita campaign, where smaller villages yielded to surprise division of forces; here, unheeded numerical and positional realities amplified the risks of his chosen , forgoing consolidation or withdrawal. Post-battle analyses by survivors like Captain validated the scouts' village size estimates, highlighting how command hubris overrode verifiable warnings grounded in observable facts.

Direct Involvement in the Battle of the Little Bighorn

Half Yellow Face joined Major Marcus Reno's battalion of approximately 140 men, including , in the advance toward the southern end of the Lakota and village along the on June 25, 1876. Deployed on the skirmish line after dismounting near the river, he actively engaged enemy warriors who rapidly mobilized in overwhelming numbers, exposing the attackers to intense rifle and carbine fire from concealed positions in the village and timber. The skirmish devolved into a fierce exchange lasting about 20-30 minutes, with Reno's force suffering heavy losses before withdrawing under fire to bluffs overlooking the valley; Half Yellow Face and fellow scout maintained fire from cover in a wooded area to shield the retreat, helping to prevent total annihilation amid more than 40 U.S. casualties, including 28 killed. His sustained involvement reflected the strategic imperative of warriors to combat longstanding and rivals through alliance with U.S. forces.

Immediate Aftermath and Rescue Operations

Assistance to Wounded Comrades

Following Major Reno's retreat from the Little Bighorn valley floor on June 25, 1876, amid intense Lakota and pursuit, scout Half Yellow Face prioritized aiding his severely wounded comrade , who had sustained multiple injuries including gunshot wounds during the valley skirmish. Half Yellow Face led White Swan's horse up the steep bluffs to the defensive entrenchments on Reno Hill, enabling White Swan to ride despite his debilitation, thus ensuring his survival in the chaotic withdrawal where many soldiers and scouts faced imminent peril from pursuing warriors. This immediate intervention reflected Half Yellow Face's adaptation of traditional Crow warrior responsibilities—emphasizing loyalty to kin and allies—to his role in U.S. Army service, forgoing personal flight to the rear in favor of comrade extraction under fire. Fellow , including , later corroborated the account through oral testimonies collected in the decades following the battle, noting the duo's presumed death until their arrival at the hilltop around 5 p.m., which underscored the high risks involved without embellishing individual heroics beyond verified actions. On June 27, after the full scope of Custer's defeat became evident, Half Yellow Face constructed a specialized horse-drawn designed to support in a semi-upright position, accommodating his wounds and preventing further aggravation during transport. He then conveyed down the valley to the , where a boat ferried them across to the Far West for urgent , prioritizing rapid access to professional care over awaiting field aid amid the encampment's disarray. This logistical effort, distinct from the command's organized withdrawal, was attested in scout narratives emphasizing practical ingenuity in sustaining allied personnel post-engagement.

Retreat and Report to Reno's Command

Following Reno's disordered retreat from the valley fight on June 25, 1876, Half Yellow Face, the chief scout attached to the battalion, reached the bluffs with the surviving troops and contributed to the consolidation of defenses by relaying observations of pursuing enemy forces' positions and approximate strengths drawn from the withdrawal. These reports, informed by his frontline experience in the valley skirmish line alongside approximately 10 Indian scouts, assisted Major Reno in positioning the roughly 50-60 remaining effectives into a hasty perimeter on what became known as Reno Hill, fending off intermittent assaults from Lakota and warriors throughout the afternoon and night. As one of only two Crow scouts—alongside the severely wounded —who remained with Reno's command through the siege, Half Yellow Face's presence contrasted sharply with the detachment of most other to Custer's wing, whose 210-man battalion was annihilated without survivors from the ranks. This alignment with Reno's approximately 140 consolidated troops after Captain Benteen's arrival enabled Half Yellow Face to endure the encirclement until the enemy withdrew on the morning of June 26. The scouts' earlier intelligence on the massive hostile village—estimated at 1-2 miles long with thousands of lodges—received partial vindication upon General Alfred Terry's relief column reaching Reno Hill on June 27, 1876, revealing Custer's total defeat, over 260 U.S. dead across the field, and confirmation of enemy numbers exceeding 1,500 warriors in active engagement. Half Yellow Face's debriefs to superiors, including later accompaniment of Colonel Michael Sheridan to the site in 1877, underscored the scouts' prescient warnings of insufficient force against such odds, though specifics on Custer's movements yielded limited new details.

Later Life and Contributions

Post-Campaign Scouting Duties

Following the on June 25, 1876, Half Yellow Face joined the combined forces of Generals and in pursuit operations targeting the retreating and villages that had fled northward along the Bighorn and Yellowstone rivers. These efforts, conducted primarily in July 1876, involved tracking the hostiles' through challenging terrain, where the scouts' familiarity with local geography enabled more effective navigation and intelligence gathering than alone could achieve. On or about July 5, 1876, during General Gibbon's Column march, Half Yellow Face was provided with James H. Bradley's , named , and sent ahead with another scout, Jack Rabbit Bull, to follow the fresh trail and report on village movements. This deployment highlighted the scouts' role in real-time , aiding and Gibbon's attempt to intercept the main non-treaty encampment before it dispersed toward the or , though the pursuit ultimately failed to force a decisive engagement. Half Yellow Face's contributions extended to broader mapping of hostile routes and support for pacification tactics, as Crow scouts identified water sources, fording points, and potential ambush sites unknown to white officers, thereby facilitating the Army's shift from offensive strikes to containing fleeing bands amid the war's phase. His service underscored the tactical value of allied Native scouts in operations requiring intimate terrain knowledge, distinct from or auxiliaries used elsewhere. Half Yellow Face completed his enlistment term and was discharged around October 10, 1876, coinciding with the expiration of his six-month contract initiated on April 10, 1876, by Lieutenant Bradley at the . This timing aligned with the U.S. Army's consolidation of gains from the 1876 campaigns, which pressured non-treaty groups toward surrender without requiring prolonged scout attachments.

Settlement on the Crow Reservation

Following his discharge from service in October 1876 after a six-month enlistment, Half Yellow Face relocated to Crow Agency, the central settlement on the Crow Indian Reservation in . The reservation, formalized under the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie, initially spanned vast territories but underwent reductions through subsequent agreements, including a significant in 1880 that further constrained tribal lands to about 2.3 million acres. As the pipe carrier and acknowledged leader among the Crow scouts, Half Yellow Face retained prominence as an elder within the tribe during this period of transition. His status likely positioned him to offer counsel on internal matters, though specific records of advisory roles amid emerging land allotment pressures—prefiguring the 1887 —are absent. The Crow's alliance with the , which had yielded temporary benefits like protection from raids and annuity payments, increasingly fostered dependency on federal rations and goods. Reservation life imposed empirical hardships, dismantling the reliant on buffalo and intertribal raiding for and prestige. By the late , declining buffalo herds and confinement to fixed lands eroded self-sufficiency, compelling reliance on inconsistent government provisions that often fell short, exacerbating and cultural disruption without restoring lost . This shift underscored the causal trade-offs of the U.S. partnership: short-term security at the expense of long-term and adaptive capacities honed over generations.

Death and Burial

Circumstances of Death

Half Yellow Face died in 1879 while pursuing a raiding party that had stolen horses along the near present-day Wyola, . This incident occurred on lands and involved a confrontation typical of ongoing intertribal conflicts in the post-Little Bighorn era, where warriors frequently defended against incursions by Lakota and other groups. Accounts of his death derive primarily from Crow oral traditions, with limited contemporary written records due to inconsistent documentation of Native American events and individuals during the late . The 1885 Crow census indirectly corroborates his decease by noting his widow and three children without listing him as living, aligning with reports of his absence from reservation rolls thereafter. No verified evidence links his death to injuries sustained at the three years prior; rather, it stemmed directly from combat in this horse-recovery action, reflecting the hazardous lifeways of Plains warriors into their fifth decade.

Burial Practices and Location

Half Yellow Face, as a prominent Crow warrior and scout, was interred according to traditional Absaroke (Crow) funerary practices, which typically involved scaffold burial to elevate the body above ground level, protecting it from predators and symbolizing spiritual ascent. These scaffolds, constructed from wooden frameworks often placed on bluffs or high ground within tribal lands, were common for esteemed individuals and accompanied by the placement of personal belongings, weapons, or provisions for the ; in cases of high-status warriors, a favored might be killed and positioned nearby as a sacrificial honor. Oral traditions among the Crow indicate that Half Yellow Face's scaffold was erected on ancestral lands near present-day Wyola, , within the boundaries of the Crow Indian Reservation, though the precise site remains undocumented in to preserve tribal and sacred . This location aligns with historical patterns of interring tribal members on reservation bluffs or family plots, contrasting with the marked military graves or memorials accorded to some fellow Custer scouts, such as Curly or , at the . No formal U.S. military grave registry entry exists for Half Yellow Face, reflecting the prioritization of indigenous protocols over assimilation-era documentation. Modern efforts to commemorate have not extended to verified markers at his site, maintaining its status as an unmarked traditional burial consistent with pre-reservation practices.

Legacy and Historical Evaluations

Recognition in Military History

Half Yellow Face served as the leader, or "pipe carrier," of the six attached to the during the –1877, a role acknowledged in U.S. Army enlistment records and campaign dispatches for his experience in warfare and guidance of the column through the Rosebud and Little Bighorn valleys. His direction of efforts, including spotting enemy encampments from elevated positions like the on June 25, 1876, was documented in survivor testimonies and official after-action reviews, highlighting the scouts' value in providing topographic intelligence amid hostile terrain. In the aftermath of the Little Bighorn campaign, the U.S. Congress authorized Medals of Honor for Indian scouts who demonstrated gallantry against and forces, with three from Half Yellow Face's detachment—Goes Ahead, Hairy Moccasin, and —receiving the award in 1877 for actions including fighting alongside Major Marcus Reno's command. Half Yellow Face's overarching leadership in organizing and deploying the scouts for these engagements was referenced in reports as instrumental to their collective effectiveness, though he himself did not receive an individual medal. Half Yellow Face appears in early 20th-century military histories as a key informant on battle terrain and scout movements, with details from accounts integrated into compilations like Walter M. Camp's notes on the Custer fight, which drew from interviews with surviving participants. Contemporary commemorations at include the Indian Memorial, established following the 1991 congressional redesignation of the site, featuring interpretive panels that honor ' service to the U.S. Army against larger tribal coalitions. These elements emphasize the scouts' strategic contributions without individual plaques for Half Yellow Face.

Debates on Scout Effectiveness and Custer's Decisions

Historians have debated the accuracy and impact of Half Yellow Face's intelligence assessments during the approach to the Little Bighorn on June 25, 1876, with some emphasizing the scouts' prescient warnings against Custer's aggressive tactics. Half Yellow Face, as chief of the Crow scouts, observed a massive pony trail indicating thousands of Indians and relayed through interpreter that the enemy village was far larger than anticipated, prophetically stating to Custer, "You and I are going home tonight by a road we do not know," implying certain death. This echoed reports from fellow scout Curley, who estimated over 1,000 tipis and urged caution, yet Custer dismissed such counsel, prioritizing a rapid envelopment to prevent the village's dispersal—a pattern consistent with his prior campaigns where boldness against fleeing foes had succeeded. Proponents of scout effectiveness argue this dismissal stemmed from Custer's overconfidence, as archaeological evidence later confirmed a village of 600–800 lodges housing 7,000–15,000 people, including 1,500–2,500 warriors, validating the Crow's scale assessments and positing their ignored advice as a causal factor in the 7th Cavalry's annihilation. Counterarguments highlight potential biases in Crow reporting due to longstanding tribal animosities with the and , traditional Crow adversaries who had raided their lands for generations, suggesting scouts may have amplified threats to provoke U.S. intervention against mutual enemies. Custer's decision to divide his 600-man into battalions—assigning Major Reno to probe the valley while ridges for escape routes—aligned with the campaign's pincer strategy under Generals and , reflecting incomplete but rational intel that assumed a mobile, non-concentrated foe rather than a consolidated host; thorough was forgone to maintain surprise, as delays risked the village scattering as in previous encounters. Critics of the "hubris" narrative contend Custer's history of successful Indian pursuits, including accurate prior reliance on scouts, indicates calculated risk amid foggy intelligence, not blind arrogance, with the scouts' early withdrawal before the final charge further complicating claims of their indispensability. These debates reject simplistic depictions of scouts as passive victims of command folly, underscoring Half Yellow Face's proven track record as a reliable guide in earlier operations, such as tracking Lame Deer's band, yet attributing the defeat primarily to systemic U.S. underestimation of Plains Indian cohesion rather than isolated scout neglect. Empirical data from survivor testimonies and analysis affirm the scouts' tactical acumen in navigating the divide but highlight Custer's independent judgment—shaped by eight years of experience—as the decisive variable, where partial on a 10-mile pony trail did not deter a divide-and-conquer approach deemed viable against historically fragmented resistance.

Cultural Significance in Crow Oral Tradition

In Crow oral histories documented in the early , Half Yellow Face emerges as a respected and pipe-bearer who led scouts in alliances with U.S. forces against Lakota incursions, actions framed as essential to safeguarding Crow territorial claims in the Powder River region during the . These narratives emphasize pragmatic over intertribal , portraying such as a means to repel enemies who had repeatedly raided Crow camps and hunting grounds, thereby preserving amid declining buffalo herds and mounting pressures from nomadic Plains tribes. Accounts collected by Frank B. Linderman in the 1930s, including those from Pretty Shield—Half Yellow Face's niece and wife of fellow scout Goes Ahead—depict his survival and return from engagements like the on June 25, 1876, as a profound relief, underscoring his embodiment of tribal resilience through calculated adaptation to American military power. This depiction integrates Half Yellow Face into broader Crow identity as a symbol of strategic realism, where enlisting as scouts from 1876 onward enabled the tribe to leverage U.S. campaigns—such as those under Generals Crook and Terry—to evict rivals from contested areas, countering romanticized pan-Indian unity narratives that overlook historic enmities. Verifiable details in these traditions, including his role directing the six Crow scouts and devising a travois to evacuate the severely wounded White Swan to Reno's entrenchments post-battle, corroborate U.S. Army reports from participants like Lieutenant Charles De Rudio, affirming his leadership without reliance on unsubstantiated supernatural elements. Such consistency highlights how oral recountings prioritize empirical contributions to tribal defense, distinguishing Crow historiography from adversarial Sioux perspectives that vilify collaborators.

References

  1. https://american-tribes.com/Crow/bio/HalfYellowFace.htm
  2. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Half_Yellow_Face
  3. https://www.astonisher.com/archives/museum/white_man_runs_him_little_big_horn.html
  4. https://littlebighorn.info/Articles/Scouts.htm
  5. https://mhs.mt.gov/education/docs/CirGuides/Rzeczkowski-Transportation.pdf
  6. https://centerofthewest.org/2025/07/22/scout-warrior-witness-the-legacy-of-white-man-runs-him/
  7. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1627487000825176/posts/3697600720480450/
  8. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstreams/27b8d7fe-d256-4d6e-8c60-e2f9f47d5751/download
  9. https://www.nps.gov/libi/learn/a-chronology-of-the-battle-of-the-little-bighorn.htm
  10. https://lbha.proboards.com/thread/1469/half-yellow-face
  11. https://sheridanmedia.com/news/157532/history-custers-crow-scouts-at-the-battle-of-little-big-horn/
  12. https://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/crow-scouts-play-part-in-little-bighorn-battle/article_6d406252-61c5-563b-8048-ef42546de5e6.html
  13. https://americanindian.si.edu/collections-search/edan-record/ead_component%253Asova-nmai-ac-001-033-ref94
  14. https://www.historynet.com/the-arikaras-custers-13th-company/
  15. https://npshistory.com/handbooks/historical/1b/hh1f.htm
  16. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Goes_Ahead
  17. https://www.americanheritage.com/road-they-did-not-know
  18. https://www.historyhit.com/why-was-the-battle-of-little-bighorn-significant/
  19. https://www.historynet.com/little-bighorn-myths/
  20. https://helenair.com/news/state-regional/history-lesson-crow-scouts-played-complex-role-in-little-bighorn/article_f1687c04-be88-11e1-ab97-001a4bcf887a.html
  21. https://american-tribes.com/Crow/bio/WhiteSwan.htm
  22. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/White_Swan%2C_Crow_Indian_Scout
  23. https://www.nps.gov/libi/learn/historyculture/battle-story.htm
  24. https://www.lib.montana.edu/digital/objects/coll2204/2204-B05-F13.pdf
  25. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA274339.pdf
  26. https://mtbeyond.com/native-america/history-crow-indian-tribe/
  27. https://nativepartnership.org/montana-crow-reservation/
  28. https://blog.nativehope.org/children-of-the-large-beaked-bird-crow-tribe-history-and-culture
  29. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/119975989/half_yellow_face
  30. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1420&context=ocj
  31. https://www.nps.gov/libi/learn/historyculture/indian-scouts.htm
  32. https://www.nps.gov/libi/learn/historyculture/indian-memorial.htm
  33. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1049958.pdf
  34. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4211&context=gradschool_theses
  35. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4kp6p4b6/qt4kp6p4b6_noSplash_2c3c2949611ad061c23693c9815e8580.pdf
  36. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA521725.pdf
  37. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=hist_etds
  38. https://astonisher.com/pretty-shields-story-of-the-battle/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.