Hubbry Logo
Crow scoutsCrow scoutsMain
Open search
Crow scouts
Community hub
Crow scouts
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Crow scouts
Crow scouts
Crow scouts
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Crow Scouts
Crow scouts visiting the Little Bighorn battlefield, circa 1913. From left to right; White Man Runs Him, Hairy Moccasin, Curly and Goes Ahead. Joseph Medicine Crow explained the main reason for men like these to enlist. They scouted against a long time Indian enemy, "... who were now in the old Crow country, menacing and often raiding the Crows in their reservation camps."[1]: X 
Active1876 - 1879
Allegiance United States of America
BranchUnited States Army
TypeIndian scouts
EngagementsGreat Sioux War
Commanders
Notable
commanders		James H. Bradley, George A. Custer, Nelson A. Miles, Charles A. Varnum

Crow Scouts worked with the United States Army in several conflicts, the first in 1876 during the Great Sioux War. Because the Crow Nation was at that time at peace with the United States,[2]: xi  the army was able to enlist Crow warriors to help them in their encroachment against the Native Americans with whom they were at war. In 1873, the Crow called for U.S. military actions against the Lakota people they reported were trespassing into the newly designated Crow reservation territories.[3]: 106 

A small group of Crow scouts had witnessed Lieutenant Colonel [Major General during the American Civil War only] George A. Custer's defeat at the Battle of the Little Bighorn in the Crow reservation. Many Crow fought in the Nez Perce War in 1877,[4]: 55–56  and again in the Bannock War the next year.[4]: 122  Crow scouts rode along with Assiniboine, Bannock and Cheyenne during Colonel Nelson A. Miles search for Sitting Bull north of the Missouri in 1879,[4]: 125  and some former scouts fought in the Crow War of 1887.[5]

1860s

[edit]

The "Act to increase and fix the Military Peace Establishment of the United States", enacted on August 1, 1866,[4]: 44  allowed the army to enlist Indigenous scouts. The scouts were supposed to earn the same wages as cavalry soldiers.[4]: 44  Per the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851), the lands west of the Powder River was designated as Crow territory.[6]: 594  In 1866, Lakota were also continuing their traditional bison hunts in the region, and still considered it their territory, as well.[7]: 114  [8]: 170 [9]: 20–31  After 1868, the Crow were living in the newly established Crow Indian Reservation in the heart of the 1851 treaty area in Montana.[6]: 1008 [10]: 43 

The 1871 Yellowstone Surveying Expedition

[edit]

Three Crow guides joined the surveying expedition for the Northern Pacific Railway downstream on the northern bank of Yellowstone River in 1871. Major Eugene M. Baker may not have formally enlisted them. The scouts were "Blackfoot, Wolfbow and Pretty Lodge".[10]: 41  The first two were old hands at helping the army, if they indeed were the Crow chief Blackfoot[3]: 83–84  and the warrior Wolf Bow.[3]: 18 

Service history

[edit]

Great Sioux War

[edit]
Curly, by David F. Barry, circa 1876.
Main article: Great Sioux War

Crow scouts with James H. Bradley

[edit]

Several Crow warriors enlisted in the U.S. army at the beginning of the Great Sioux War in 1876. On April 10, Lieutenant James H. Bradley swore in 23 Crow scouts.[11]: 163  Each scout received a red armband to wear on the left arm above the elbow, to set him apart from other Indigenous people. The Sioux curbed the mobility of the Crow when they got away with all their horses three weeks later.[11]: 184  A few days later Half Yellow Face and Jack Rabbit Bull came back with three Sioux horses, "... proud of their exploit ...".[11]: 186  Bradley describes the grief of the Crow scouts after Custer's defeat.[11]: 220 

Crow with George Crook

[edit]

Around 170 Crows fought with General George Crook at the Battle of the Rosebud without a legal registration.[4]: 116 

The battlefield of the Little Bighorn (1876) in the Crow Indian reservation in Montana and two other battlefields (1870s). "The Battle of the Little Bighorn, where the Sioux and Cheyenne had one of their largest gatherings ever, took place on the Crow reservation.[4]: 113  In 1873, Crow chief Blackfoot had called for U.S. actions against the Indian intruders following a battle with the Sioux on Pryor Creek. Three Crows took part in the Battle of Wolf Mountains in 1877.

Crow with George Armstrong Custer

[edit]

Crow scouts guided Custer's long awaited expedition to the Little Bighorn in the summer of 1876. "I now have some Crow scouts with me, as they are familiar with the country." wrote Custer in his second-last letter to his wife.[12]: 275  Charles A. Varnum, Custer's chief of scouts, wrote "These Crows were in their own country".[13]: 60 

Exactly a year after the fight, Hugh Lenox Scott went to the battlefield with all the Crow scouts serving Custer.[14]: 48 

In 1909, decades after the battle, White Man Runs Him told Joseph K. Dixon how he and Hairy Moccasin had averted Custer's death earlier in the fight by keeping up a brisk fire at the counter-charging Cheyennes.[15]: 140 

Crow with Nelson A. Miles

[edit]

When a group of Crow scouts killed a five-man Lakota peace delegation under flag of truce in late December, 1876, the winter impeded fighting in the Yellowstone area flared up again.[16]: 57  Once more, Crow scouts aided the army locating enemy camps. Three Crow were in action against both Lakotas in camp with Crazy Horse and Northern Cheyennes in the last battle of the Great Sioux War in the Wolf Mountains on January 8, 1877.[16]: 60 

1880s

[edit]

In 1887, some former scouts were involved in the brief Crow War (the Sword Bearer uprising) during which the United States Army fought a successful battle against hostile Crows just north of the Little Bighorn battlefield.[5]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Crow scouts

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Crow scouts were Apsáalooké warriors of the Crow Tribe who enlisted as auxiliaries in the United States Army during the Indian Wars, particularly the , utilizing their expertise in the Northern Plains terrain and longstanding hostilities with the Lakota and Northern to guide and fight alongside American troops against these common adversaries. Allied with the U.S. since early treaties and never formally warring against it, the Crow employed scouts to safeguard their territory from expansionist raids while earning compensation and preserving tribal autonomy amid encroaching settlement. Key figures such as , White Man Runs Him, Goes Ahead, Hairy Moccasin, and Curley served under commanders like and , delivering vital reconnaissance that influenced campaign outcomes. At the on June 17, 1876, Crow and scouts under Crook aggressively engaged a larger Lakota and force, preventing its envelopment of the U.S. column and enabling Crook's retreat. During the subsequent , six Crow scouts warned Custer of the immense hostile village—estimated at over 1,000 lodges—but were released from duty before the divided assaults; Curley, who shadowed Custer's immediate command longer, evaded encirclement and conveyed news of the 7th Cavalry's annihilation to awaiting reinforcements. Their service, documented in enlistment records and oral histories preserved by institutions like the , underscored pragmatic tribal strategy amid existential pressures, though later accounts of Little Bighorn events faced interpretive disputes over translations and emphases in white-authored reports.

Background and Context

Crow Tribe History and Territorial Pressures

The Crow, known to themselves as the Apsáalooke or "children of the large-beaked bird," trace their origins to a split from the Hidatsa people between approximately 1450 and 1550, after which they migrated westward from woodland regions near the Great Lakes, through Devil's Lake in present-day North Dakota, and into the Yellowstone River valley by the early 1700s. Adopting horses around 1735 revolutionized their economy, shifting them from semi-sedentary village life to nomadic bison hunting across the northern Plains, with bands dividing into groups such as the Mountain Crow, River Crow, and Kicked-in-their-Bellies by the mid-18th century. Their core territory originally spanned the Bighorn, Yellowstone, and Powder River drainages in what is now Montana and Wyoming, encompassing rich hunting grounds formalized under the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie as roughly 38 million acres. Territorial pressures intensified in the 18th and 19th centuries due to aggressive expansion by neighboring tribes, particularly the Teton Sioux (Lakota) and Cheyenne from the east, who, empowered by horses, firearms acquired via French trade, and displacement from eastern settler incursions, systematically encroached on Crow lands. By the early 1800s, the Sioux had seized the Black Hills and eastern portions of Crow territory, with documented hostilities including the 1785–1786 killings of Crow leaders Bears' Ears and Broken Leg Duck, a 1834 Sioux assault repelled by the Sore Belly band, and the 1860–1861 Battle of Pryor Creek where Sioux forces nearly overran an entire Crow encampment. The Crow also clashed with Blackfeet and Assiniboine to the north and Shoshone to the south, but Sioux-Cheyenne raids proved most devastating, reducing Crow population from an estimated 10,000 in 1830 to about 2,000 by the 1870s through warfare, smallpox epidemics, and resource competition. These incursions forced the Crow westward of the by the 1860s, limiting safe crossings of the Bighorn River to large war parties, and prompted strategic alliances with the as a counter to shared enemies, evident in the 1825 friendship treaty and later military cooperation. Despite the 1851 treaty's protections, ongoing Sioux violations and U.S. settler pressures via trails like the Bozeman (opened 1863) further eroded Crow holdings, culminating in reservation confinement by 1884 after forced relocation of 3,000 individuals over 200 miles southeast.

Inter-Tribal Rivalries with Sioux and Cheyenne

The Crow tribe, residing primarily in the northern along the , faced persistent territorial encroachments from the Lakota and Northern Cheyenne, who sought to dominate prime buffalo hunting grounds and expand westward during the early to mid-19th century. These rivalries stemmed from competition over resources, including vast herds of essential for sustenance and trade, as well as acquired through raiding, which exacerbated intertribal warfare as nomadic groups vied for mobility and prestige. The , particularly and bands, conducted frequent incursions into Crow territory for and coup-counting raids, gradually displacing the Crow from eastern hunting areas and confining them westward toward the . A notable escalation occurred in the 1820s and 1830s, when alliances formed between the and enabled coordinated attacks that further pressured lands, including the Bighorn Canyon region rich in game. By the 1850s, the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 nominally assigned the a territory encompassing much of modern and , yet enforcement was absent, allowing and war parties to continue raids undeterred. In 1861, the Battle of Pryor Creek exemplified this hostility, pitting warriors against a combined force of , , and raiders near present-day Pryor, , resulting in Crow defensive successes despite being outnumbered. Tensions peaked in 1864 during a large-scale engagement where forces, vastly outnumbered approximately ten-to-one by , , and invaders, repelled the assault and prevented deeper penetration into Crow country. These conflicts, characterized by and village raids, depleted Crow resources and population, fostering a strategic calculus where alliance with incoming U.S. forces offered protection against shared adversaries; the Crow viewed American military campaigns as a counterbalance to Sioux-Cheyenne dominance, motivated by rather than affinity for settlers. This enmity persisted into the , influencing Crow decisions to serve as scouts, as their intimate knowledge of enemy movements stemmed directly from decades of direct confrontation.

Initial US-Crow Alliances and Motivations for Scouting

The tribe's alliances with the began to solidify in the mid-1860s, driven by mutual interests against common adversaries in the Northern Plains. Facing relentless pressure from Lakota and war parties that had displaced them from vital buffalo hunting grounds over preceding decades, Crow leaders permitted U.S. military construction along the , which traversed territory recognized as Crow under the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie. This treaty had nominally secured Crow lands but failed to prevent Sioux violations, as those groups exploited ambiguous hunting rights provisions to encroach further, reducing Crow population from an estimated 10,000-12,000 in the early 1800s to around 4,000 by the through raids and resource competition. In 1866, as the U.S. Army established Forts Reno, Phil Kearny, and C. F. Smith to secure emigrant travel and mining routes to , Crow chiefs such as actively cooperated by serving as couriers and providing intelligence, viewing the garrisons as a deterrent to enemy incursions that had intensified since the 1830s. This collaboration insulated Crow communities from attacks during (1866-1868), when Sioux forces targeted the forts but largely spared Crow allies. The U.S. military, in turn, benefited from Crow knowledge of terrain and tribal movements, fostering early informal arrangements that preceded formal enlistments. Crow participation strengthened bilateral ties, with the Army supplying protection and goods in exchange for logistical support amid broader conflicts over resources. Crow motivations for these alliances and subsequent scouting stemmed primarily from pragmatic self-preservation and retaliation against hereditary foes who had seized prime territories, including the Yellowstone and Bighorn valleys, through superior numbers and mobility after acquiring horses. Unlike many Plains tribes resisting U.S. expansion, the prioritized combating and dominance—responsible for countless raids that decimated herds and villages—over pan-Indian unity, seeing American forces as instrumental in reclaiming or safeguarding remnant lands formalized in the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie, which confined to a diminished reservation. appealed as it enabled warriors to conduct sanctioned warfare, earn wages (typically $15-20 monthly plus rations), and accrue prestige through coups against enemies, aligning tribal martial traditions with U.S. campaigns without requiring full assimilation. This calculus reflected causal pressures of demographic decline and ecological strain from inter-tribal competition, rather than ideological affinity, as leaders like later articulated a of to ensure survival amid inevitable influx.

Early Military Service

Engagements in the 1860s

In the mid-1860s, amid escalating conflicts over the , Crow warriors initiated cooperation with U.S. Army units to counter Lakota and encroachments on Crow hunting territories west of the Powder River. This alliance, formalized somewhat by the 1866 affirming perpetual peace between the Crow and the , involved Crows alerting garrisoned troops at forts like Fort Reno, , and Fort C.F. Smith to imminent attacks and sharing topographic intelligence to facilitate defenses and patrols. Such aid proved critical during (1866–1868), as forces waged guerrilla campaigns to disrupt emigrant and military traffic, including the devastating Fetterman Fight on December 21, 1866, where 81 U.S. soldiers were killed near ; Crow informants had previously warned of heightened activity in the region, though army overconfidence limited preemptive responses. Crow motivations stemmed from pragmatic self-preservation rather than unqualified allegiance to federal forces, prioritizing retaliation against rivals who had seized prime buffalo grounds and raided camps since the . Warriors occasionally joined small-scale sorties or tracked hostiles, leveraging superior horsemanship and familiarity with the to harass war parties, thereby indirectly bolstering U.S. amid supply shortages and harsh winters. This period marked the inception of Crow auxiliary roles, preceding Congress's August 1, 1866, authorization for up to 1,000 Indian scouts across tribes, though Crow enlistments remained informal and episodic until the 1870s. By war's end in 1868, with U.S. abandonment of the forts via the Treaty of Fort Laramie, Crow support had helped avert total dominance in the , preserving temporary access to contested resources.

1871 Yellowstone Surveying Expedition

The 1871 Yellowstone Surveying Expedition constituted an early U.S. military effort to secure Northern Pacific Railroad route surveys along the valley in , a region encompassing former hunting grounds increasingly contested by war parties. The Northern Pacific, chartered with federal backing for protection against Indian opposition, dispatched surveying teams into unceded territories prone to raids, necessitating Army escorts from Fort Ellis to safeguard engineers and workers amid inter-tribal hostilities. Brevet Eugene M. Baker, commanding elements of the 2nd Cavalry, coordinated aspects of these operations, including reconnaissance to mitigate ambushes from bands exploiting the valley's strategic position for incursions into areas. Crow warriors, motivated by longstanding enmity with the —who had displaced them from prime buffalo grounds—and a desire for U.S. support to reclaim influence over their diminished territory, volunteered as guides and scouts for the expedition. Operating downstream on the northern bank of the Yellowstone, these auxiliaries leveraged intimate terrain knowledge to detect enemy movements, track trails, and facilitate safe passage for the surveyors amid dense riverine cover favorable to . Their service reflected pragmatic Crow strategy: allying with federal forces to counter existential threats from more aggressive Plains tribes, while gaining access to annuities, ammunition, and protection for reservation-based communities under the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty. Tensions peaked in August 1871 when a survey detachment, numbering around 400 troops and civilians, repelled an assault by 400–500 warriors along the Yellowstone, preventing significant disruption to the surveys but confirming the valley's volatility. Crow scouts' contributions in early warning and skirmishing helped avert worse casualties, foreshadowing their expanded roles in later anti- operations. This episode underscored causal dynamics of frontier alliances, where Crow participation stemmed not from abstract loyalty but from calculated defense against territorial losses exceeding 30 million acres since the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty, with expansion directly correlating to declining Crow access and population pressures.

Role in the Great Sioux War

Scouts under James H. Bradley

Lieutenant James H. Bradley, serving as chief of scouts for Colonel John Gibbon's Montana Column in the U.S. Army's campaign against the and , recruited scouts at the Crow Agency near , on April 9, 1876. The following day, April 10, he enlisted 25 warriors as U.S. Indian Scouts, motivated by longstanding tribal animosities toward their enemies who had encroached on lands. These scouts, wearing red armbands for identification amid combat, operated under Bradley's direct command alongside a smaller number of white scouts, providing essential reconnaissance for Gibbon's force of approximately 450 infantry and cavalry starting from Fort Ellis in late May 1876. During the column's advance through the Yellowstone Valley, the Crow scouts tracked enemy movements and located hostile encampments. In mid-May , Bradley led a patrol of 27 soldiers and 6 Crow scouts that discovered a large and village of about 400 lodges—estimated to house 800 to 1,000 warriors—near the Tongue River, enabling to monitor but not engage the group due to its mobility. On May 27, scouts under Bradley re-examined the Rosebud Valley, confirming the village's position roughly 18 miles from the army's camp, which informed Gibbon's strategic positioning to intercept fleeing hostiles. Much of the column's march proceeded on foot due to logistical constraints, with the Crow scouts aiding navigation across rugged terrain and detecting pony trails indicative of presence. As 's command converged with other forces in late June 1876, the Crow scouts played a pivotal role in identifying the massive hostile village along the . On June 25, three Crow scouts relayed initial reports of General George A. Custer's command suffering annihilation by hundreds of Lakota and warriors, though these were initially met with skepticism by superiors. The next day, June 26, Bradley, guided by his Crow scouts, scouted the Little Bighorn Valley, observing a fresh Sioux pony trail, distant smoke signals about 15 miles away, and personal effects abandoned by Crow scouts previously detached to Custer's 7th —six of Bradley's most skilled men lent for that detachment. Bradley's patrol further confirmed the presence of roughly 200 slain U.S. soldiers and cavalry horses across the river, prompting him to relay urgent intelligence of a "horrid" battle and vast village to , who accelerated toward the site but arrived too late to aid Custer. This scouting effort, though unable to avert the defeat, facilitated Gibbon's subsequent burial details and reinforcement of Major Marcus Reno's surviving elements on Reno Hill.

Scouts under George Crook

General George Crook incorporated Crow scouts into his Big Horn and Yellowstone Expedition during the Great Sioux War of 1876, leveraging their enmity toward the Lakota Sioux and Northern Cheyenne who had encroached on Crow hunting grounds. Approximately 175 Crow warriors joined Crook's column alongside 86 Shoshone allies, forming a total of about 260 Indian auxiliaries to augment his 1,050 infantrymen and cavalry troopers. These scouts were not formally enlisted under military contracts at the outset but participated voluntarily, driven by opportunities for plunder from enemy villages and protection of their own interests against non-treaty bands. In the March 1876 Powder River Expedition, and other Indian scouts supported Crook's advance from Fort Fetterman, , providing reconnaissance during the 90-mile march starting March 1 that culminated in the March 17 attack on a Cheyenne village under Dull Knife. Though chief scout Frank Grouard, a civilian of mixed heritage fluent in Lakota, led the village location effort, the Crow auxiliaries assisted in trailing and initial skirmishes, contributing to the partial destruction of the camp despite Colonel Joseph Reynolds' failure to fully secure captured pony herds. The Crow scouts' most prominent role came during the June 17, 1876, in , where Crook's command encountered a force of 1,000–1,500 and warriors under . Acting as an advance guard, the Crow and scouts made first contact with the enemy about seven miles north of Crook's main position, immediately engaging in combat to delay the assault and buy time for deployment. Their familiarity with the rugged terrain and aggressive tactics—aligning with Crook's doctrine of countering Native warriors with allied Natives—proved crucial in blunting the initial rush, preventing a despite the allies suffering disproportionate casualties from the numerically superior hostiles. Crook later credited the scouts' steadfastness for salvaging the engagement into a tactical draw, though the battle forced his retreat to Goose Creek without linking up with other columns. Following the Rosebud, Crow scouts continued service through Crook's fall operations, including reconnaissance and combat support in the September 9–10 , where his forces overran a village and secured provisions amid ongoing hostilities. Their intelligence-gathering disrupted enemy movements, though pay disputes and losses led some to disband by late 1876, reflecting the irregular nature of their alliance predicated on mutual strategic gains rather than sustained enlistment.

Scouts under George A. Custer

In the spring of 1876, six Crow scouts—Half Yellow Face, Curly, White Man Runs Him, Goes Ahead, Hairy Moccasin, and Bobtail Bull—joined the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment under Lieutenant Colonel George A. Custer as part of the campaign against Sioux and Cheyenne forces in the Montana Territory. These scouts were motivated by longstanding enmities with the Sioux, who had encroached on Crow hunting grounds and posed existential threats to Crow territory, viewing alliance with the U.S. Army as a strategic means to counter their rivals. Half Yellow Face, an experienced warrior, served as the lead scout, guiding Custer's column from Fort Abraham Lincoln, departing on May 17, 1876, through the Powder River country toward the Yellowstone River. As Custer's command advanced up the Rosebud Valley and crossed the divide into the Little Bighorn Valley around June 24-25, 1876, the scouts provided critical intelligence on enemy movements and terrain, confirming the presence of a large Sioux-Cheyenne village estimated at 8,000 to 10,000 inhabitants along the . Their knowledge of the local landscape, derived from familiarity with the region, enabled precise navigation and initial reconnaissance, alerting Custer to the village's scale despite underestimations of its defensive capacity. On the morning of June 25, the scouts participated in early skirmishes but were largely directed by chief scout to dismount and return to the pack train before Major Marcus Reno's charge across the river, sparing them from the immediate valley fighting. Curly, the youngest scout at approximately 18 years old, remained longer with Custer's immediate command, observing the battle's progression from a distance and later escaping through enemy lines to report the defeat to pursuing forces under General around June 26. The other Crow scouts regrouped with Reno's surviving elements or evaded capture, with none suffering fatalities during the engagement that resulted in 268 U.S. deaths, including Custer. Their survival and subsequent testimonies provided some of the earliest accounts of the disaster, emphasizing the overwhelming numbers and ferocity of the opposing warriors, though interpretations of their warnings to Custer remain debated among historians due to inconsistencies in scout narratives. Post-battle, the scouts continued service with the , receiving commendations for their loyalty and effectiveness in a context where tribal alliances were driven by pragmatic rather than unconditional .

Scouts under Nelson A. Miles

Colonel , commanding the 5th Infantry at Tongue River Cantonment during the winter of 1876-1877, integrated Crow scouts into his operations against non-treaty and bands in the valley as part of the broader Great Sioux War. These scouts, drawn from the Crow Agency and motivated by longstanding enmities with the Sioux, provided critical intelligence on enemy movements and facilitated rapid pursuits through harsh winter conditions, enabling Miles to conduct aggressive raids on villages and supply lines. Their service complemented Miles' strategy of relentless pressure, which included the destruction of Cheyenne camps along the Powder River in November 1876 and engagements like the on October 21, 1876, where scouts aided in locating and harassing retreating hostiles. A notable incident occurred on December 21, 1876, when scouts ambushed and killed five leaders—identified as emissaries from Sitting Bull's camp—approaching the cantonment for peace talks with Miles, an action that escalated tensions and foreclosed diplomatic opportunities ahead of the subsequent on January 8, 1877. This event underscored the scouts' proactive role in interdicting enemy communications, though it drew criticism for undermining Miles' negotiation efforts; Miles himself reported the killings as occurring without his prior knowledge, attributing them to the scouts' autonomous initiative rooted in tribal vendettas. Approximately 20-30 warriors served in this capacity during the campaign, earning commendations for their endurance in sub-zero temperatures and contributions to capturing over 400 lodges by spring 1877. In September 1877, amid the , Miles dispatched a detachment of the 7th Cavalry under James Doane, augmented by Crow scouts from the Tongue River Agency, to intercept the bands fleeing eastward across the toward potential alliance with or further north. These scouts tracked trails and engaged stragglers, though the main force evaded the detachment and clashed with Miles' primary command at the Bear Paw Mountains from October 1-5, 1877; while Miles relied more heavily on for the climactic battle, the Crow contingent's early reconnaissance helped position forces to block escape routes, contributing to Chief Joseph's surrender on October 5. Their involvement highlighted the Crow's strategic value as allies against multiple threats, with Miles later noting their reliability in navigating rugged terrain and signaling enemy positions via smoke or . Crow scouts under Miles received standard U.S. pay of $15-20 monthly plus rations, with some, like Cold Wind of the 1st U.S. , advancing to leadership roles for their marksmanship and loyalty demonstrated in 1877 pursuits. Their efforts bolstered Miles' reputation for decisive command, though occasional autonomy in actions like the December ambush reflected tensions between military oversight and tribal imperatives. By 1878, as hostilities waned, many transitioned to garrison duties at Fort Keogh, where Miles established a permanent post, continuing auxiliary service until formal scout units were disbanded in the 1880s.

Service in the 1880s and Beyond

Key Campaigns and Pursuits

In the immediate aftermath of the Great Sioux War, Crow scouts supported U.S. Army pursuits of Northern Cheyenne bands fleeing southward after their breakout from in September 1878. Colonel , operating from Fort Keogh, employed groups of up to fifteen Crow scouts alongside infantry units to track and engage the fugitives, contributing to the capture of key leaders like Dull Knife by early 1879. These operations involved rapid winter maneuvers across and territories, where Crow familiarity with the terrain aided in intercepting raiding parties. Crow scouts also participated in the of 1878, assisting General Oliver O. Howard's column in tracking Bannock and Paiute warriors responsible for attacks on settlements in and ; approximately two dozen Crow were enlisted for duties amid the campaign's skirmishes, which concluded with the surrender of principal chiefs by . Throughout the 1880s, their service shifted toward smaller-scale pursuits of lingering and raiders near the Crow Reservation, often under commanders at Forts Custer and Keogh, where they conducted patrols to deter horse thefts and border incursions—enlistments typically lasted three to six months, with pay equivalent to regular cavalry troopers. By the early 1890s, amid the uprising among the Lakota, Crow scouts rejoined active campaigns on the Pine Ridge Reservation, providing intelligence during the November 1890–January 1891 operations that culminated in the Wounded Knee engagement on December 29, 1890; their enmity toward the motivated reliable scouting, though numbers were limited compared to earlier wars. These efforts marked some of the last major deployments of Crow scouts before the program's decline, as frontier conflicts waned and enlistments transitioned toward reservation policing by the mid-1890s.

Transition to Reservation Era

By the mid-1880s, as the major phases of the Indian Wars concluded with the subjugation of remaining hostile bands, the U.S. Army reduced its reliance on Crow scouts, leading to the gradual demobilization of most enlistments at posts like Fort Custer. Scouts who had served under officers such as transitioned from active campaigning to reservation-based activities, with service records indicating ongoing but sporadic engagements into the late 1880s before tapering off entirely by the 1890s. This shift aligned with the broader confinement of Plains tribes to reservations, where Crow scouts had previously aided in persuading militants from other nations to surrender and relocate. The Crow Reservation, initially defined under the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie at approximately 2.2 million acres, saw a pivotal relocation in April 1884 from the Absaroka Mountains to a more contained area in the valley, establishing the agency's permanent headquarters and facilitating closer oversight by federal agents. Former scouts reintegrated into tribal life amid intensifying assimilation policies, including land allotments of 320 acres per family head starting in 1881 and mandates for and ranching by the 1890s, though traditional persisted near forts. Land reductions via congressional acts in 1882 and 1891 further contracted the reservation, compensating the tribe with annuities directed toward farming infrastructure and livestock. Tensions during this era surfaced in the 1887 Sword Bearer uprising, a brief revolt led by the prophet Wraps-His-Tail against reservation restrictions and perceived agent overreach, which involved raids into Blackfeet territory and was quelled by tribal police and U.S. troops within weeks, resulting in the leader's death. While most scouts remained aligned with accommodationist leaders like , the event underscored internal divisions over rapid cultural change. By the early , surviving scouts benefited from federal recognition of Indian Wars service, with the Crow Agency in 1921 compiling records to secure pensions and allotments for veterans, including figures like Hairy Moccasin.

Notable Individuals

Curley and the Little Bighorn Account

Curley, born around 1856 and died on May 21, 1923, from , was a scout who enlisted in the U.S. Army on April 10, 1876, initially serving under Colonel before transferring to General George Armstrong Custer's 7th Cavalry column in the Great Sioux War. Selected for his youth and scouting skills, Curley accompanied Custer's regiment as it advanced toward the valley in late June 1876, providing intelligence on Lakota and Northern village locations. On June 25, 1876, as Custer's command approached the Indian encampment along the , the general dismissed most of the and earlier that morning to reduce baggage and due to concerns over their loyalty amid the large enemy numbers. Curley, however, remained with Custer's immediate longer than the others, riding ahead to scout the valley. According to his later recollections, interpreter advised him to leave before the final engagement, as the odds appeared insurmountable; Curley then observed events from a distant high point on the bluffs. From this vantage, Curley reported seeing Major Marcus Reno's detached battalion engage the Indians across the river around 3 p.m., followed by Custer's command—about 210 men—descending into the valley downstream, where they were quickly enveloped by warriors numbering in the thousands. He described intense gunfire resembling "the snapping of threads in tearing a ," with Custer's troops forming a defensive perimeter that held until overwhelmed near sunset, claiming more Indians fell than the 264 soldiers lost. Curley asserted Custer survived until most of his men were dead or wounded, rallying them defiantly before succumbing, though he escaped without direct combat by slipping away undetected, possibly using terrain cover. After the battle, Curley evaded pursuing warriors and reached the Crow scout camp, then rendezvoused with General Alfred Terry's relief column on June 26 or 27, delivering the first fragmentary report of Custer's annihilation via the steamboat Far West. His initial account, published in the Helena Daily Herald on July 16, 1876, and later elaborated in interviews like the Chicago Tribune on July 29, 1876, emphasized the ferocity of the fighting but varied in details across retellings—early versions omitted close observations, while 1930s recollections added specifics like using field glasses. Historians such as Milo Milton Quaife have questioned the credibility of embellished elements, noting Curley's distance precluded eyewitness precision on Custer's final moments, though his core report of defeat aligned with physical evidence and other survivors' testimonies. Despite legends portraying him as the "sole survivor" of Custer's command—a claim he rejected—Curley's intelligence contributed to confirming the disaster's scale.

White Man Runs Him and Other Key Figures

White Man Runs Him, born in 1858 in the of what became , belonged to the Big Lodge Clan of tribe and received his name from a childhood incident involving evasion of white men. At age 18, he volunteered as a U.S. scout on April 10, 1876, motivated by Crow territorial losses to and Northern incursions, enlisting alongside compatriots to counter these traditional enemies. Assigned to the 7th Cavalry under Lieutenant Colonel , he participated in the campaign's reconnaissance efforts during the Great Sioux War, scouting village locations along the in late June 1876. During the on June 25, 1876, rode with Custer's immediate command down Medicine Tail Coulee toward the vast Sioux-Cheyenne encampment but was released from duty shortly before the final clash, alongside fellow scouts Goes Ahead and Hairy Moccasin, after delivering intelligence on the enemy's overwhelming numbers—estimated at 7,000 to 9,000 warriors. He later recounted the scouts' warnings of insufficient U.S. forces, emphasizing the village's scale visible from high ground on June 24, and described Custer's dismissal of their counsel to proceed aggressively. In subsequent years, revisited the battlefield multiple times, including in 1913 with surviving scouts and at the 1926 semicentennial, where he demonstrated scouting techniques and affirmed the alliance's strategic necessity against existential tribal threats. He died in 1929, leaving a legacy as grandfather to Joseph Medicine Crow, the last chief, who drew on family oral histories for his own war records. Among other prominent Crow scouts, Half Yellow Face served as chief scout for the 7th Cavalry contingent, coordinating the six-man team—himself, White Swan, Goes Ahead, Hairy Moccasin, Curly, and White Man Runs Him—and advising on terrain and enemy movements based on decades of intertribal warfare experience. Goes Ahead, who enlisted concurrently with White Man Runs Him, provided a corroborating account of the scouts' pre-battle observations, noting the release order from Custer to avoid endangering the Indians amid the impending rout. Hairy Moccasin, also volunteering on April 10, 1876, contributed to locating the hostile village and survived the campaign to join later commemorations, underscoring the scouts' role in intelligence that, though unheeded, highlighted the mismatch in forces. These individuals exemplified Crow military pragmatism, allying with federal forces on April 10, 1876, to reclaim lands pressured by Lakota expansion since the 1860s.

Military Effectiveness and Strategic Impact

Achievements in Intelligence and Combat

Crow scouts demonstrated proficiency in intelligence gathering by leveraging their intimate knowledge of the northern Plains terrain, enemy tribal movements, and tracking skills honed through intertribal warfare. During the , scouts under Lieutenant Colonel , including , utilized field glasses to locate and assess the massive and encampment along the on June 25, 1876, reporting its approximate size and layout to enable the regiment's approach. Similar efforts by Crow scouts serving Brigadier General identified hostile villages during the Powder River Expedition in March 1876, guiding U.S. forces to surprise attacks that destroyed supplies and dispersed non-combatants, thereby disrupting logistics. These reconnaissance missions often involved small parties venturing ahead of columns to detect trails, estimate warrior numbers, and warn of ambushes, providing the U.S. Army with actionable data amid vast, trackless landscapes where regular troops lacked comparable expertise. In combat, Crow scouts augmented U.S. and by engaging hostiles directly, often initiating fights to protect main forces. At the on June 17, 1876, approximately 40 and scouts under Crook charged into a superior Lakota and force numbering over 1,000 warriors, delaying their advance and buying time for the column to form defenses, which prevented a potential of the 1,300-strong command. Scouts participated in skirmishes during pursuits, such as killing stragglers and raiding horse herds of fleeing bands in 1877 under , actions that weakened enemy mobility and contributed to the exhaustion of Chief Joseph's group before its surrender at Bear Paw Mountains on October 5, 1877. Their dual role as trackers and fighters earned commendations in military dispatches for bravery, with instances of scouts capturing enemy weapons and horses in close-quarters combat, mirroring traditional Crow coup-counting practices adapted to Army service. These achievements extended the effective range of U.S. operations against mobile non-reservation tribes, as scouts' reports informed strategic decisions like dividing forces or pressing pursuits across rivers and . By 1880, their intelligence had facilitated the roundup of remnant hostile bands, including support for Miles' campaigns against northern and , where tracking skills led to the and dispersal of winter camps, hastening submissions to agencies. Overall, Crow scouts' contributions reduced U.S. casualties through early warnings and amplified offensive capabilities, proving indispensable in campaigns where numerical inferiority and unfamiliar geography otherwise favored adversaries.

Criticisms of Reliability and Coordination

Despite their value in reconnaissance, Crow scouts faced accusations of unreliability during critical engagements, most notably at the on June 25, 1876. Of the six Crow scouts attached to George A. Custer's 7th —Half , Goes Ahead, , Hairy Moccasin, Teets, and Curly—five departed the column shortly before or after Major Marcus Reno's detachment initiated combat, having assessed the Lakota and village as vastly superior in numbers, estimated at 7,000 to 10,000 warriors. later recounted remaining until Reno's skirmish line faltered around 3:15 p.m., after which he withdrew to report to General , but contemporaries interpreted these departures as amid imminent battle, eroding trust in their commitment under fire. Only Curly lingered briefly with Custer's immediate command before escaping, yet even he was disputed by fellow scouts for allegedly fabricating his proximity to the final stand. These actions stemmed from the scouts' pragmatic assessment of survival odds, rooted in Crow tribal warfare norms prioritizing over suicidal charges, but they clashed with U.S. Army expectations of disciplined adherence. Coordination suffered from such independent maneuvers, as the scouts' abrupt exits left Custer without their on-the-ground expertise during the regiment's division into battalions, exacerbating intelligence gaps despite prior warnings about the village's scale. Language barriers compounded issues, necessitating interpreters like , whose translations occasionally faltered under stress, leading to miscommunications between Crow observations and command decisions. Under in the late 1870s campaigns against Northern Cheyenne holdouts, similar reliability concerns arose. During pursuits near Fort Keogh in 1877–1878, Crow scouts reportedly violated terms of surrender by executing Cheyenne warriors approaching under a flag of truce, driven by longstanding tribal animosities rather than military restraint. This indiscipline prompted Miles to replace them with Cheyenne auxiliaries, deeming the switch an improvement in operational control, as the Crows' actions undermined efforts to secure prisoners and prolong pursuits through negotiated compliance. Such episodes underscored broader coordination challenges: Native scouts often operated via fluid, individualistic tactics ill-aligned with the Army's rigid chain of command, occasionally prioritizing vengeance over strategic capture or restraint. Historians have noted these patterns reflected not outright disloyalty but cultural mismatches, where Crow warriors viewed service as alliance against enemies like the Sioux, not unconditional subordination, yet army reports emphasized the resultant lapses in dependability during high-stakes operations. Overall, while effective in open , the scouts' episodes of withdrawal and protocol breaches fueled skepticism among officers about their integration into maneuvers.

Controversies and Viewpoints

Crow Pragmatism vs. Accusations of Betrayal

The tribe's enlistment as scouts for the U.S. Army during the reflected a calculated strategy of self-preservation amid intensifying pressures from and incursions. These rival tribes had systematically raided Crow territory, appropriating prime hunting grounds in the Powder River region and contributing to a drastic population drop—from approximately 10,000 in 1830 to around 2,000 by the 1870s—through warfare, displacement, and associated hardships. Crow leaders recognized the U.S. military as a counterbalance to these threats, offering alliance in exchange for protection of remaining lands and resources, as articulated by emerging figures like , who prioritized tribal viability over resistance to American settlement. This pragmatism yielded tangible benefits: by scouting for campaigns against their adversaries, the Crow helped secure a reservation of over 9,300 square kilometers post-1877, larger than those allotted to many non-cooperative Plains tribes, while averting further existential losses. Tribal elders framed the partnership not as capitulation but as leveraging external power dynamics—prevalent in pre-contact Plains —to neutralize enemies who had already reduced Crow numbers and autonomy. Such decisions aligned with first-hand accounts from scouts like , who viewed service as defending Crow interests against Sioux aggression rather than aiding colonial erasure. Opposing tribes, particularly the Lakota, condemned Crow scouts as betrayers for enabling U.S. victories that fragmented resistance, including intelligence that facilitated pursuits after the June 25-26, 1876, . Cheyenne and Lakota warriors saw the Crow's role—tracking villages and guiding troops—as direct complicity in the subjugation of fellow Plains nations, intensifying historical animosities into accusations of disloyalty during and after the conflict. Later pan-Indian interpretations, emphasizing unified Native opposition to U.S. expansion, have echoed these charges, portraying Crow actions as undermining collective despite the absence of such unity amid resource-driven intertribal warfare that predated white contact by centuries. Crow defenders counter that imposing modern solidarity ignores empirical realities of tribal , where alliances shifted based on immediate needs rather than ethnic .

Inter-Tribal Perspectives and Long-Term Consequences

The Crow tribe's decision to serve as scouts for the U.S. Army was rooted in longstanding inter-tribal rivalries, particularly with the Lakota , Northern , and , who had repeatedly raided Crow territory and decimated their horse herds in conflicts such as the Battle of Pryor Creek on July 26, 1861, where Crow warriors clashed with a large coalition of these enemies. These raids, ongoing since the early , had driven the Crow to view the and as existential threats, prompting their alliance with American forces as a strategic means of and rather than of a pan-Native unity. From the perspective of their adversaries, however, Crow scouts were derided as traitors who facilitated the subjugation of fellow Plains tribes; Lakota and accounts portrayed them as mercenaries aiding white expansion into sacred lands like the , exacerbating animosities that persisted beyond the –1877. In the long term, the 's scouting alliances secured a degree of favor from the U.S. government, enabling the establishment of the Crow Reservation via the Treaty of Fort Laramie in 1868, which spanned approximately 30 million acres initially and allowed the tribe to avoid the total defeat suffered by resistant groups like the . This pragmatic alignment preserved Crow territorial claims against traditional foes, as evidenced by their relative peace during the Sioux outbreaks of the , but it came at the cost of subsequent land reductions—shrinking the reservation to 2.3 million acres by 1906 through allotments and sales—while enforcing assimilation policies that eroded traditional nomadic lifeways. Inter-tribally, the enmity deepened divisions, fostering lasting distrust with the and that influenced 20th-century disputes over resources and historical narratives, though it also positioned the Crow as distinct collaborators in U.S.-Native relations, contributing to internal tribal debates on adaptation versus resistance.

Modern Historical Assessments

Modern historians assess the Crow scouts' alliance with the during the as a calculated strategy driven by existential threats from Lakota expansion, which had displaced the Crow from prime buffalo hunting grounds in the [Powder River country](/page/Powder River_Country) since the 1840s. By enlisting as scouts, Crow warriors under leaders like Major James Brisbin secured military protection against their traditional enemies, enabling the tribe to retain control over diminishing resources amid rapid environmental and demographic pressures from white settlement and intertribal conflict. This partnership, formalized through enlistments totaling around 40 Crow men for Custer's 7th Cavalry alone, reflected tribal pragmatism rather than cultural subservience, as the Crow had avoided outright war with the since their first in 1825. Scholarly evaluations emphasize the scouts' operational effectiveness, crediting their topographic expertise and reconnaissance skills with critical intelligence that informed campaigns, such as pinpointing Lakota village locations along the Rosebud and Little Bighorn rivers in June 1876. Figures like and Curley provided post-battle testimonies that corroborated archaeological findings of the 7th Cavalry's tactical errors, underscoring how scout reports of overwhelming enemy numbers—estimated at 1,500-2,000 warriors—were dismissed by commanders like George Custer. Recent analyses, drawing on declassified Army records and oral histories preserved in tribal archives, affirm that scout fidelity enhanced U.S. mobility in hostile terrain, contributing to victories like the Yellowstone Expedition of 1873, though coordination lapses at Little Bighorn highlighted broader command flaws rather than scout unreliability. Critiques in contemporary , often from interdisciplinary works integrating and , reject romanticized narratives of scouts as mere auxiliaries, instead framing their service as an exercise of Native agency amid . While some pan-Indian perspectives, influenced by mid-20th-century , label the alliance as collaborationist, evidence from structures and reservation-era records demonstrates it prolonged tribal , averting the land losses suffered by non-allied Plains tribes by over a decade. Peer-reviewed studies caution against overattributing U.S. successes solely to scouts, noting that precedents showed similar Indigenous scouting innovations were underutilized due to institutional biases in the , yet affirm the Crow's role in catalyzing a model for later enlistments of over 1,000 Native scouts by 1890.

References

  1. https://americanindian.si.edu/why-we-serve/topics/army-scouts-1866-1890/
  2. https://www.nps.gov/libi/learn/historyculture/indian-scouts.htm
  3. http://lib.lbhc.edu/index.php?q=node/90
  4. https://opi.mt.gov/Portals/182/Page%20Files/Indian%20Education/Social%20Studies/K-12%20Resources/Crow%20Timeline.pdf
  5. https://text-message.blogs.archives.gov/2015/05/27/life-and-times-of-hairy-moccasin/
  6. https://magazine.wsu.edu/2021/11/08/scouting-for-a-forgotten-few/
  7. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=hist_etds
  8. https://www.nps.gov/bica/learn/historyculture/the-crow-nation.htm
  9. https://mhs.mt.gov/education/docs/CirGuides/Rzeczkowski-Transportation.pdf
  10. http://lib.lbhc.edu/index.php?q=node/89
  11. https://www.intermountainhistories.org/items/show/548
  12. https://centerofthewest.org/2025/07/22/scout-warrior-witness-the-legacy-of-white-man-runs-him/
  13. https://opi.mt.gov/Portals/182/Page%2520Files/Indian%2520Education/Social%2520Studies/K-12%2520Resources/Crow%2520Timeline.pdf
  14. https://blog.nativehope.org/children-of-the-large-beaked-bird-crow-tribe-history-and-culture
  15. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstreams/27b8d7fe-d256-4d6e-8c60-e2f9f47d5751/download
  16. https://treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/treaty-with-the-crow-1866-22644
  17. https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.war.022.html
  18. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/fetterman-massacreon-the-bozeman-trail/
  19. https://www.wyohistory.org/encyclopedia/red-clouds-war
  20. https://www.americanheritage.com/discovering-yellowstone
  21. https://www.sdhspress.com/journal/south-dakota-history-37-2/captain-javan-b-irvine-and-the-1871-eastern-yellowstone-surveying-expedition/vol-37-no-2-captain-javan-b-irvine-and-the-1871-eastern-yellowstone-surveying-expedition.pdf
  22. https://fortparkerhistory.org/the-history-of-fort-parker/
  23. https://www.nps.gov/libi/learn/a-chronology-of-the-battle-of-the-little-bighorn.htm
  24. https://www.historynet.com/march-montana-column/
  25. http://mthistoryrevealed.blogspot.com/2014/12/james-bradleys-historical-baggage.html
  26. https://www.wyohistory.org/encyclopedia/crooks-powder-river-campaigns-1876
  27. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/446755/battle-rosebud-17-jun-1876
  28. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA273160.pdf
  29. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/rosebud-creek/
  30. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/battle-rosebud-montana/
  31. https://sheridanmedia.com/news/157532/history-custers-crow-scouts-at-the-battle-of-little-big-horn/
  32. https://www.sdhspress.com/journal/south-dakota-history-48-2/unbounded-ambition-colonel-nelson-a-miles-as-revealed-in-hist-private-correspondence-with-general-william-t-sherman-during-the-sioux-and-nez-perce-campaigns-187620131877/4802_greene.pdf
  33. https://history.army.mil/Research/Reference-Topics/Army-Campaigns/Brief-Summaries/Indian-Wars/
  34. https://www.victorianvoices.net/ARTICLES/CENTURY/Century1891B/C1891B-GeneralMiles.pdf
  35. https://historicmt.org/items/show/3519
  36. https://www.rootsweb.com/~mtygf/county/nezperce.htm
  37. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/30300000/History/ftkeogh.pdf
  38. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2009/summer/indian.html
  39. https://www.mtmemory.org/nodes/view/3399
  40. https://www.archives.gov/innovation-hub/projects/indian-scouts
  41. https://spartacus-educational.com/WWcurly.htm
  42. https://www.astonisher.com/archives/museum/curley2_little_big_horn.html
  43. https://www.astonisher.com/archives/museum/white_man_runs_him_little_big_horn.html
  44. https://www.nps.gov/bica/learn/historyculture/joseph-medicine-crow.htm
  45. https://www.astonisher.com/archives/museum/goes_ahead_big_horn.html
  46. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/nepe/greene/notes10.htm
  47. https://truewestmagazine.com/article/hero-or-goat/
  48. https://www.astonisher.com/archives/museum/goes_ahead2_big_horn.html
  49. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4211&context=gradschool_theses
  50. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1049958.pdf
  51. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4kp6p4b6/qt4kp6p4b6.pdf
  52. https://centerofthewest.org/2025/08/27/from-warrior-to-statesman-the-leadership-of-chief-plenty-coups/
  53. https://lasvegassun.com/news/1999/oct/01/indian-side-of-little-bighorn-presented-in-new-boo/
  54. https://adrienne-morris.com/2018/09/18/why-did-native-americans-turn-scout/
  55. https://indianz.com/News/show.asp?ID=edu/6212001-1
  56. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cew7SNy7LkM
  57. https://lib.lbhc.edu/index.php?q=node/89
  58. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistory/comments/1aobijj/what_is_the_biggest_historical_beef_between_two/
  59. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1006&context=hist_etds
  60. https://rex.libraries.wsu.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=01ALLIANCE_WSU&filePid=13359453540001842&download=true
  61. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/3043/chapter/5714085/The-Eyes-of-the-Army-Indian-Scouts-and-the-Rise-of
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.