Hubbry Logo
Close-mid vowelClose-mid vowelMain
Open search
Close-mid vowel
Community hub
Close-mid vowel
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Close-mid vowel
Close-mid vowel
Close-mid vowel
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

A close-mid vowel (also mid-close vowel, high-mid vowel, mid-high vowel or half-close vowel) is any in a class of vowel sound used in some spoken languages. The defining characteristic of a close-mid vowel is that the tongue is positioned about one third of the way from a close vowel to an open vowel.[1]

Partial list

[edit]

The close-mid vowels that have dedicated symbols in the International Phonetic Alphabet are:

Other close-mid vowels can be indicated with diacritics of relative articulation applied to letters for neighboring vowels.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Close-mid vowel

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A close-mid vowel is a type of sound used in many spoken languages, classified by its height in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as one of seven degrees of tongue elevation, positioned between near-close and mid vowels with the tongue raised about halfway from a mid position toward the roof of the mouth. This height category contrasts with higher close vowels (like /i/ or /u/) where the tongue is nearer the and lower open-mid vowels (like /ɛ/ or /ɔ/) where the tongue is more relaxed and lowered. In the IPA vowel chart, are represented by specific symbols depending on backness and rounding: /e/ for the front unrounded variety, /ø/ for the front rounded, /ɘ/ for the central unrounded, /ɵ/ for the central rounded, /ɤ/ for the back unrounded, and /o/ for the back rounded. Articulatorily, these vowels involve a moderate opening and positioning that avoids sufficient to produce a , with the exact (acoustic resonances) varying by speaker and but generally featuring higher second formant frequencies for front close-mid vowels compared to back ones. Close-mid vowels appear phonemically in numerous languages worldwide; for instance, the front unrounded /e/ occurs in Spanish words like mesa ("table"), while the back rounded /o/ is found in Italian sono ("I am") and many other Romance and . In English, close-mid qualities often appear in diphthongs like /eɪ/ (as in "face") or allophones, though monophthongal close-mid vowels are less contrastive in most dialects compared to languages like French or Swedish where /e/ and /ɛ/ form minimal pairs. These vowels play a key role in phonological systems, influencing syllable structure and prosody across linguistic families.

Definition and Classification

Overview

A close-mid vowel, also known as a high-mid or mid-high vowel, is a type of sound in which the tongue is positioned at an intermediate height between that of a close (high) and a mid . This placement typically situates the tongue body roughly halfway along the vertical dimension of the vocal tract from the roof of the mouth downward, distinguishing close-mid vowels from both higher close vowels like and lower open-mid vowels like [ɛ]. In phonetic classification systems, close-mid vowels form the upper tier of mid-height vowels, bridging the perceptual and articulatory gap between the highest and heights. The terminology "close-mid" emerged in early 20th-century , primarily through the work of Daniel Jones, who systematized vowel descriptions to standardize reference points for language teaching and analysis. Jones's framework emphasized consistent tongue positions independent of specific languages, laying the groundwork for modern categorization. In some phonological systems, particularly those analyzing languages like English, close-mid vowels are often classified as tense, involving greater muscular tension in the tongue and surrounding articulators compared to their lax counterparts at similar heights. Within the cardinal vowel system established by Jones, close-mid vowels occupy key reference positions, such as Cardinal Vowel 2 for the front unrounded and Cardinal Vowel 7 for the back rounded . These positions serve as auditory and articulatory anchors for describing vowel inventories across languages. The International Phonetic Alphabet denotes representative close-mid vowels with symbols including , [ø], , and [ɤ].

Vowel Height Categories

Vowel heights form a hierarchical scale based on the vertical position of the in the vocal tract, ranging from the highest (close) to the lowest (open) positions. The recognizes seven distinct categories: close (e.g., ), near-close (e.g., [ɪ]), close-mid (e.g., ), mid (e.g., [ə]), open-mid (e.g., [ɛ]), near-open (e.g., [æ]), and open (e.g., ). This gradation allows for precise classification in , with close-mid occupying an intermediate position between near-close and mid heights. The primary criteria for distinguishing vowel heights involve the degree of elevation and opening during articulation. Close vowels feature the raised close to the roof of the mouth with minimal depression, creating a small oral cavity. As height decreases, the lowers and the opens progressively; close-mid vowels, for instance, require a partial drop from the close position while maintaining a relatively high body. This articulatory configuration contrasts with open-mid vowels, where greater lowering and depression occur. The categorization of vowel heights evolved in the late through the work of phoneticians like Henry Sweet, who in his 1877 Handbook of Phonetics proposed systematic notations for tongue positions and oral aperture to describe qualities. This laid groundwork for the International Phonetic Association's founding in 1886 and the standardization of the first IPA vowel chart in 1888, which formalized the close-to-open using terms like "close" and "open" to reflect articulatory extremes. In phonological systems, vowel height distinctions carry significant functional load, particularly in languages with large inventories where close-mid vowels often contrast with open-mid counterparts to differentiate lexical items. For example, in Catalan, the close-mid /e/ versus open-mid /ɛ/ contrast maintains a high functional load, enabling numerous minimal pairs, whereas Spanish merges these into a single close-mid category with lower discriminatory demands. Acoustic correlates, such as the first (F1) frequency, support these distinctions, with close-mid vowels typically exhibiting F1 values around 400-500 Hz, intermediate between close (200-400 Hz) and open-mid (500-700 Hz) ranges.

Articulation and Acoustics

Articulatory Features

Close-mid vowels are articulated with the tongue body raised to an intermediate height in the oral cavity, positioned approximately midway between the maximal elevation of close vowels and the lower placement of open vowels. This positioning creates a moderate pharyngeal space without excessive constriction. In front close-mid vowels such as /e/, the tongue body bunches forward toward the hard palate, achieving a close-mid height while maintaining an open vocal tract passage. Central close-mid vowels like /ɘ/ and /ɵ/ involve a more neutral tongue position midway between front and back. Conversely, back close-mid vowels like /o/ and /ɤ/ involve retraction of the tongue body toward the soft palate, with the highest point of the tongue positioned posteriorly to support the backness. The back of the tongue remains stable—neither unduly raised nor depressed—to avoid introducing tenseness or altering the intended height. The jaw adopts a moderate opening during production, greater than for close vowels but narrower than for open-mid vowels. This controlled mouth opening facilitates the tongue's elevation without excessive lowering of the jaw. Lip configuration varies by vowel quality: front close-mid vowels /e/ , central /ɘ/ , and back /ɤ/ are unrounded, with the lips in a neutral or slightly spread position to emphasize frontness or centrality. In contrast, rounded variants such as /ø/ , /ɵ/ , and /o/ involve lip protrusion, where the lips form a pursed shape exposing the inner surfaces (endolabial ), aiding the acoustic rounding effect without over-compressing the oral space. Pharyngeal and velar adjustments are subtle, involving minor shaping of the pharyngeal wall to balance the tongue's height and prevent over-articulation that could lead to . The velum remains elevated to direct orally, with no significant lowering or nasal coupling.

Acoustic Characteristics

Close-mid vowels are characterized acoustically by their formant frequencies, which provide key indicators of vowel height and frontness or backness. The first formant (F1) typically ranges from 300 to 500 Hz, a value lower than the 500–800 Hz range observed for open-mid vowels, attributable to the relatively raised position that reduces the vocal tract's resonant length for the lowest formant. The second formant (F2) shows marked variation based on horizontal tongue positioning: front close-mid vowels, such as /e/, exhibit higher F2 values around 1800–2200 Hz, central variants around 1500–1800 Hz, while back close-mid vowels like /o/ have lower F2 values of approximately 700–1200 Hz. These F1 and F2 patterns emerge from spectral analysis of steady-state vowel portions and distinguish close-mid vowels from both higher close vowels (F1 often below 300 Hz) and lower open-mid vowels through systematic clustering in space. In terms of temporal and amplitude properties, close-mid vowels tend to have longer durations in stressed syllables relative to unstressed contexts, enhancing their perceptual salience. Additionally, in these vowels influences tilt, with tense realizations showing a steeper negative tilt (greater high-frequency energy falloff) due to increased subglottal pressure and glottal adduction, as measured in intensity-normalized spectra. Psychoacoustic experiments demonstrate that close-mid vowels are reliably distinguished from mid or open-mid counterparts primarily through F1 differences, with categorical perception boundaries in formant manipulation tasks. This perceptual separation underscores the role of F1 as a primary cue for , supported by listener identification accuracy in controlled syntheses.

Phonetic Notation

International Phonetic Alphabet Symbols

The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) designates specific symbols for the six close-mid vowels, positioned in the second row from the top of the vowel quadrilateral chart to reflect their intermediate height between close and open-mid vowels. The is represented by /e/, the by /ø/, the by /ɘ/, the by /ɵ/, the by /ɤ/, and the by /o/. These symbols are placed in pairs across the front-to-back axis, with unrounded variants on the left and rounded on the right, adhering to the IPA's convention for visual pairing based on lip rounding. To denote approximations or variations in height, such as near-close (higher than close-mid) or true mid (lower than close-mid) articulations, the IPA employs diacritics applied to these base symbols. The raising diacritic ⟨̝⟩, resembling an inverted tiny "t," elevates the vowel (e.g., [e̝] for a near-close front unrounded vowel), while the lowering diacritic ⟨̞⟩ lowers it (e.g., [e̞] for a mid front unrounded vowel). These modifiers allow precise transcription of subtle height differences without introducing new base symbols, ensuring flexibility in phonetic descriptions across languages. The placement of these symbols on the IPA chart underscores the systematic organization of vowel space, with the close-mid row dividing the into upper (close and close-mid) and lower (open-mid and open) sections, facilitating comparisons of tongue height and backness. This layout supports the IPA's goal of universal phonetic representation, where close-mid vowels occupy a distinct stratum equidistant from adjacent height levels. The current symbols for close-mid vowels were standardized during the 1989 Kiel Convention of the , which formalized four principal vowel heights—close, close-mid, open-mid, and open—and confirmed the use of the ram's horn ⟨ɤ⟩ for the back unrounded variant to distinguish it from central and near-close sounds. This revision built on earlier developments, including the introduction of ⟨ɤ⟩ in the 1921 Écriture phonétique internationale chart and its approval in 1928, replacing less precise notations like the flat-topped gamma. The 1989 updates also endorsed the tiny-"t" diacritics for height adjustments, enhancing the alphabet's precision for articulatory variations.
SymbolVowel DescriptionChart Position
/e/Close-mid front unroundedFront, unrounded pair
/ø/Close-mid front roundedFront, rounded pair
/ɘ/Close-mid central unroundedCentral, unrounded pair
/ɵ/Close-mid central roundedCentral, rounded pair
/ɤ/Close-mid back unroundedBack, unrounded pair
/o/Close-mid back roundedBack, rounded pair

Non-IPA Representations

In , a system developed for transcribing , the close-mid front unrounded vowel is typically represented by ⟨e⟩, the close-mid front rounded by ⟨ö⟩, and the close-mid back rounded by ⟨o⟩. This notation, rooted in early 20th-century linguistic practices, employs diacritics like the and to indicate height distinctions without relying on IPA symbols in some variants. SAMPA (Speech Assessment Methods Phonetic Alphabet), an ASCII-based adaptation of the IPA for computational use, represents the as ⟨e⟩, the as ⟨2⟩, the as ⟨7⟩, and the as ⟨o⟩. , an extension of SAMPA using diacritics for finer distinctions, follows similar mappings but adds modifiers like @\ for the (equivalent to /ɘ/) and 8 for the (/ɵ/). These systems facilitate machine-readable transcriptions in and , maintaining close correspondence to IPA values for close-mid heights. Historical phonetic systems also employed non-IPA notations for close-mid vowels. In Henry Sweet's (1880), vowel height, including close-mid positions, was indicated by the vertical placement of lines and symbols relative to a baseline, with higher lines denoting closer articulations and specific shapes for front or back qualities. Similarly, Daniel Jones's cardinal vowel system (first detailed in 1917) assigns number 2 to the (/e/) and number 5 to the (/o/), using these numbered references as auditory and articulatory anchors in phonetic description rather than unique symbols. In non-Western linguistic traditions, such as the romanization of Mandarin Chinese via Hanyu Pinyin, the close-mid front unrounded vowel is approximated by ⟨ē⟩ (with the macron indicating tone but the base letter e representing a close-mid quality in contexts like post-initial positions, e.g., in syllables such as "ie" pronounced [je]). This usage adapts Latin letters to approximate phonetic values for tonal languages, where vowel height distinctions like close-mid are conveyed through contextual spelling rather than dedicated diacritics.

Linguistic Occurrence

Front Close-Mid Vowels

Front close-mid vowels include the unrounded /e/ and the rounded /ø/, which are articulated with the tongue positioned midway between close and open heights in the front of the oral cavity. These vowels play significant phonological roles in many languages, often contrasting with other mid or close vowels to distinguish meaning. According to the UCLA Phonological Segment Database (UPSID), the unrounded /e/ occurs in approximately 28% of the 451 sampled languages (124 languages), making it one of the more frequent vowel phonemes globally, while the rounded /ø/ is considerably rarer. In Spanish, the front close-mid unrounded /e/ appears in words like mesa [ˈme.sa] 'table', where it occupies a stressed open . Spanish /e/ exhibits allophonic variation between a close realization and a more open [ɛ], influenced by factors such as stress, structure, and ; for instance, the close allophone predominates in open syllables, while the open variant may surface in closed syllables or unstressed positions. Although treats /e/ and [ɛ] as of a single with no minimal pairs, some dialects show heightened distinctions that approximate phonological contrasts, as in potential pairs like peine [ˈpei̯.ne] '' versus a hypothetical open-vowel counterpart. This variation often positions /e/ as a tense counterpart to lower mid vowels in the inventory. The rounded /ø/ is exemplified in French, as in peu [pø] 'little' or 'few', where it contrasts phonemically with other front vowels like /œ/ in peur [pœʁ] 'fear'. In Japanese, /e/ features prominently in words such as ebi [e̞bi] 'shrimp', serving as part of the language's five-vowel system without significant allophonic height variation. In Italian, /e/ contrasts phonemically with open-mid /ɛ/, as in sera [ˈse.ra] 'evening' (/e/) versus sèra [ˈsɛ.ra] 'saw' (/ɛ/), highlighting /e/'s role as the tense member of the mid-vowel pair. Overall, front close-mid vowels frequently function as tense members of mid-vowel pairs, contributing to lexical distinctions in Romance, Germanic, and other language families.

Back Close-Mid Vowels

Back close-mid vowels encompass the unrounded /ɤ/ and the rounded /o/, which feature a tongue position between close and open-mid heights with the tongue body retracted toward the soft palate. These vowels serve phonological functions such as distinguishing lexical items and participating in vowel harmony systems across languages. In Uyghur, the unrounded /ɤ/ appears in words like qïz [qɤz] 'girl' (with back vowel harmony), contributing to the language's vowel system where it contrasts with front /e/. The rounded /o/ appears in words like ota [oˈta] 'fire', forming part of the mid-back series that interacts with consonant environments for harmony distinctions. In English, the /o/ serves as the initial element of the diphthong /oʊ/ in "go" [ɡoʊ], realized as a tense close-mid back rounded vowel before gliding to a near-close position. Russian employs /o/ in stressed syllables, such as the final vowel in "moloko" [məlɐˈko] 'milk', where it maintains a clear close-mid quality under stress while unstressed instances reduce. Phonological contrasts involving these vowels highlight their functional load; for instance, in North Korean, /o/ (from ㅗ) contrasts with /ɔ/ (merger of ㅓ and ㅗ in some realizations), as in loanwords or dialectal forms, underscoring height-based oppositions in the series. This contrast is evident in patterns where rounded back vowels like /o/ trigger labial features, preventing merger with higher or unrounded counterparts. Allophonic variations of /o/ include fronting to [o̟] in certain dialects, such as , where the vowel advances slightly due to regional articulatory tendencies, often resulting in a monophthongal [o̟ː] in words like "goat". This fronting co-occurs with length variations governed by the , affecting pre-voiceless contexts without altering phonemic identity. Back close-mid vowels are less frequent globally than some front counterparts, with /o/ documented in about 60% of sampled languages and /ɤ/ in roughly 3% per cross-linguistic inventories like PHOIBLE. They often merge with true-mid vowels during reduction in unstressed positions, as seen in prosodic weakening across Indo-European and .

Central Close-Mid Vowels

Central close-mid vowels include the unrounded /ɘ/ and rounded /ɵ/. These occur in fewer languages but play roles in vowel systems. For example, /ɘ/ appears in Malay as in bərak [bərak] 'cement', contrasting with /ə/ in some analyses. The rounded /ɵ/ is found in Dutch, as an allophone or in words like eu [ɵ] in some realizations, and phonemically in languages like Buryat.

References

  1. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/full-ipa-chart
  2. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics2/chapter/3-5-describing-vowels/
  3. https://ocw.uci.edu/upload/files/vowels.pdf
  4. https://www.spanishdict.com/pronunciation/mesa
  5. https://blog.duolingo.com/italian-pronunciation-guide/
  6. https://wstyler.ucsd.edu/talks/phonmedia/vowelcharts_english.txt
  7. https://pressbooks.txst.edu/minoritylanguages/chapter/language-features-2/
  8. https://www.singwise.com/articles/vowels-formants-modifications
  9. https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/engp13/chapter/classification-and-description-of-speech-sounds-english-vowels/
  10. https://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/jcoleman/CardinalVowels.htm
  11. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/2-8-vowels/
  12. https://www.britannica.com/science/phonetics/Vowels
  13. https://archive.org/details/ahandbookphonet00sweegoog
  14. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/content/history-ipa
  15. https://corpus.eduhk.hk/english_pronunciation/index.php/2-2-formants-of-vowels/
  16. https://sheffield.ac.uk/linguistics/home/all-about-linguistics/about-website/branches-linguistics/phonetics/what-do-phoneticians-study/articulatory
  17. https://theswissbay.ch/pdf/Books/Linguistics/A%20Course%20in%20Phonetics%206th%20Edition%20-%20Peter%20Ladefoged%2C%20Keith%20Johnson.pdf
  18. https://brucehayes.org/103/Charts/VChart/
  19. https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~francisa/Articles/Zhang-etal_JASA08.pdf
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14340446_Spectral_tilt_as_an_acoustic_correlate_of_linguistic_stress
  21. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00677973/document
  22. https://ia801006.us.archive.org/6/items/intonation-practice/Handbook_of_the_IPA.pdf
  23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300003868
  24. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/IPAcharts/IPA_hist/IPA_hist_2018.html
  25. https://rpd.artsci.utoronto.ca/docs/pdfs/SAMPA.pdf
  26. http://web.meson.org/write/vs-overview.php
  27. https://www.hackingchinese.com/a-guide-to-pinyin-traps-and-pitfalls/
  28. http://web.phonetik.uni-frankfurt.de/upsid_segment_freq.html
  29. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-spanish-linguistics/vowels/746433CF330D0E705DF649C4686D45F1
  30. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/39111110.pdf
  31. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110550283-007/pdf
  32. https://community.wanikani.com/t/japanese-phonology-chart-with-ipa/48255
  33. https://open.maricopa.edu/essentialsoflinguistics/chapter/2-8-vowels/
  34. https://pressbooks.nvcc.edu/eng200h5p/chapter/3-5-describing-vowels/
  35. https://soundsamerican.net/article/vowel_sound_oh_as_in_go
  36. https://russian.stackexchange.com/questions/25684/examples-of-mid-open-and-mid-closed-vowels-in-russian
  37. https://www.academia.edu/1091594/A_contrastivist_view_on_the_evolution_of_the_Korean_vowel_system
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Distribution-of-Scottish-English-monophthongal-variant-of-goat-vowel-for-Rrst-second-and_tbl2_227736510
  39. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137034717_7
  40. https://phoible.org/parameters
  41. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013274
  42. https://www.eksss.org/archive/view_article?pid=pss-16-3-1
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.