Hubbry Logo
Horseshoe mapHorseshoe mapMain
Open search
Horseshoe map
Community hub
Horseshoe map
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Horseshoe map
Horseshoe map
from Wikipedia
The Smale horseshoe map  f  is the composition of three geometrical transformations
Mixing in a real ball of colored putty after consecutive iterations of Smale horseshoe map

In the mathematics of chaos theory, a horseshoe map is any member of a class of chaotic maps of the square into itself. It is a core example in the study of dynamical systems. The map was introduced by Stephen Smale while studying the behavior of the orbits of the van der Pol oscillator. The action of the map is defined geometrically by squishing the square, then stretching the result into a long strip, and finally folding the strip into the shape of a horseshoe.

Most points eventually leave the square under the action of the map. They go to the side caps where they will, under iteration, converge to a fixed point in one of the caps. The points that remain in the square under repeated iteration form a fractal set and are part of the invariant set of the map.

The squishing, stretching and folding of the horseshoe map are typical of chaotic systems, but not necessary or even sufficient.[1]

In the horseshoe map, the squeezing and stretching are uniform. They compensate each other so that the area of the square does not change. The folding is done neatly, so that the orbits that remain forever in the square can be simply described.

For a horseshoe map:

  • there are an infinite number of periodic orbits;
  • periodic orbits of arbitrarily long period exist;
  • the number of periodic orbits grows exponentially with the period; and
  • close to any point of the fractal invariant set there is a point of a periodic orbit.

The horseshoe map

[edit]

The horseshoe map  f  is a diffeomorphism defined from a region S of the plane into itself. The region S is a square capped by two semi-disks. The codomain of (the "horseshoe") is a proper subset of its domain . The action of  f  is defined through the composition of three geometrically defined transformations. First the square is contracted along the vertical direction by a factor a < 1/2. The caps are contracted so as to remain semi-disks attached to the resulting rectangle. Contracting by a factor smaller than one half assures that there will be a gap between the branches of the horseshoe. Next the rectangle is stretched horizontally by a factor of 1/a; the caps remain unchanged. Finally the resulting strip is folded into a horseshoe-shape and placed back into S.

The interesting part of the dynamics is the image of the square into itself. Once that part is defined, the map can be extended to a diffeomorphism by defining its action on the caps. The caps are made to contract and eventually map inside one of the caps (the left one in the figure). The extension of f to the caps adds a fixed point to the non-wandering set of the map. To keep the class of horseshoe maps simple, the curved region of the horseshoe should not map back into the square.

The horseshoe map is one-to-one, which means that an inverse f−1 exists when restricted to the image of S under  f.

By folding the contracted and stretched square in different ways, other types of horseshoe maps are possible.

Variants of the horseshoe map

To ensure that the map remains one-to-one, the contracted square must not overlap itself. When the action on the square is extended to a diffeomorphism, the extension cannot always be done in the plane. For example, the map on the right needs to be extended to a diffeomorphism of the sphere by using a “cap” that wraps around the equator.

The horseshoe map is an Axiom A diffeomorphism that serves as a model for the general behavior at a transverse homoclinic point, where the stable and unstable manifolds of a periodic point intersect.

Dynamics of the map

[edit]

The horseshoe map was designed to reproduce the chaotic dynamics of a flow in the neighborhood of a given periodic orbit. The neighborhood is chosen to be a small disk perpendicular to the orbit. As the system evolves, points in this disk remain close to the given periodic orbit, tracing out orbits that eventually intersect the disk once again. Other orbits diverge.

The behavior of all the orbits in the disk can be determined by considering what happens to the disk. The intersection of the disk with the given periodic orbit comes back to itself every period of the orbit and so do points in its neighborhood. When this neighborhood returns, its shape is transformed. Among the points back inside the disk are some points that will leave the disk neighborhood and others that will continue to return. The set of points that never leaves the neighborhood of the given periodic orbit form a fractal.

A symbolic name can be given to all the orbits that remain in the neighborhood. The initial neighborhood disk can be divided into a small number of regions. Knowing the sequence in which the orbit visits these regions allows the orbit to be pinpointed exactly. The visitation sequence of the orbits provide a symbolic representation of the dynamics, known as symbolic dynamics.

Orbits

[edit]

It is possible to describe the behavior of all initial conditions of the horseshoe map. An initial point u0 = (x, y) gets mapped into the point u1 = f(u0). Its iterate is the point u2 = f(u1) = f 2(u0), and repeated iteration generates the orbit u0, u1, u2, ...

Under repeated iteration of the horseshoe map, most orbits end up at the fixed point in the left cap. This is because the horseshoe maps the left cap into itself by an affine transformation that has exactly one fixed point. Any orbit that lands on the left cap never leaves it and converges to the fixed point in the left cap under iteration. Points in the right cap get mapped into the left cap on the next iteration, and most points in the square get mapped into the caps. Under iteration, most points will be part of orbits that converge to the fixed point in the left cap, but some points of the square never leave.

Iterating the square

[edit]
Pre-images of the square region

Under forward iterations of the horseshoe map, the original square gets mapped into a series of horizontal strips. The points in these horizontal strips come from vertical strips in the original square. Let S0 be the original square, map it forward n times, and consider only the points that fall back into the square S0, which is a set of horizontal stripes

The points in the horizontal stripes came from the vertical stripes

,

which are the horizontal strips Hn mapped backwards n times. That is, a point in Vn will, under n iterations of the horseshoe, end up in the set Hn of vertical strips.

Invariant set

[edit]
Intersections that converge to the invariant set
Example of an invariant measure

If a point is to remain indefinitely in the square, then it must belong to a set Λ that maps to itself. Whether this set is empty or not has to be determined. The vertical strips V1 map into the horizontal strips H1, but not all points of V1 map back into V1. Only the points in the intersection of V1 and H1 may belong to Λ, as can be checked by following points outside the intersection for one more iteration.

The intersection of the horizontal and vertical stripes, HnVn, are squares that in the limit n → ∞ converge to the invariant set Λ (this set is an intersection of a Cantor set of vertical lines with a Cantor set of horizontal lines[2]). The structure of this set can be better understood by introducing a system of labels for all the intersections—a symbolic dynamics.

Symbolic dynamics

[edit]
The basic domains of the horseshoe map

Since HnVnV1, any point that is in Λ under iteration must land in the left vertical strip A of V1, or on the right vertical strip B. The lower horizontal strip of H1 is the image of A and the upper horizontal strip is the image of B, so H1 = f(A)f(B). The strips A and B can be used to label the four squares in the intersection of V1 and H1:

The set ΛB•A consist of points from strip A that were in strip B in the previous iteration. A dot is used to separate the region the point of an orbit is in from the region the point came from.

The notation can be extended to higher iterates of the horseshoe map. The vertical strips can be named according to the sequence of visits to strip A or strip B. For example, the set ABBV3 consists of the points from A that will all land in B in one iteration and remain in B in the iteration after that:

Working backwards from that trajectory determines a small region, the set ABB, within V3.

The horizontal strips are named from their vertical strip pre-images. In this notation, the intersection of V2 and H2 consists of 16 squares, one of which is

All the points in ΛAB•BB are in B and will continue to be in B for at least one more iteration. Their previous trajectory before landing in BB was A followed by B.

Periodic orbits

[edit]

Any one of the intersections ΛP•F of a horizontal strip with a vertical strip, where P and F are sequences of As and Bs, is an affine transformation of a small region in V1. If P has k symbols in it, and if  f kP•F) and ΛP•F intersect, the region ΛP•F will have a fixed point. This happens when the sequence P is the same as F. For example, ΛABAB•ABABV4H4 has at least one fixed point. This point is also the same as the fixed point in ΛAB•AB. By including more and more ABs in the P and F part of the label of intersection, the area of the intersection can be made as small as needed. It converges to a point that is part of a periodic orbit of the horseshoe map. The periodic orbit can be labeled by the simplest sequence of As and Bs that labels one of the regions the periodic orbit visits.

For every sequence of As and Bs there is a periodic orbit.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The horseshoe map, also known as Smale's horseshoe, is a fundamental example of a chaotic in , defined on the unit square and characterized by a geometric stretching, squeezing, and folding process that produces a hyperbolic invariant set resembling a horseshoe. Introduced by mathematician in 1967, it models the complex orbital behavior observed in systems like the , capturing essential features of chaos such as sensitivity to initial conditions, topological mixing, and a dense collection of unstable periodic orbits. The map's construction begins with the unit square, which is first stretched vertically by a factor greater than 2, then compressed horizontally by more than 2, and finally folded into a U-shape (the horseshoe) before being placed back over the original square, leaving gaps in the middle and at the edges while overlapping at the top and bottom. This operation, iterated repeatedly, generates an invariant Cantor set-like structure called the horseshoe Λ\Lambda, where points are mapped in a way that uniformly expands in and contracts in the perpendicular direction, ensuring hyperbolicity. The dynamics on Λ\Lambda are topologically conjugate to the full shift on two symbols, allowing representation via binary sequences and revealing 2n2^n periodic points of period dividing nn for each nn. Historically, Smale developed the horseshoe in 1960 while in Rio de Janeiro, inspired by earlier work on forced oscillations by Cartwright, Littlewood, and Levinson, to rigorously demonstrate chaotic behavior arising from transverse homoclinic points in smooth systems. Its significance lies in providing a clear geometric prototype for hyperbolic dynamics, influencing the conjecture and modern applications in areas like , , and nonlinear electronics, where similar stretching-and-folding mechanisms produce unpredictable long-term behavior. The horseshoe remains a cornerstone for proving the existence of chaos in higher-dimensional maps and flows, underscoring the transition from ordered to disordered dynamics in and physics.

Background and Definition

Historical development

The foundations of the trace back to early 20th-century developments in , particularly Poincaré's exploration of recurrence and homoclinic tangles in . Poincaré's 1890 analysis of the revealed the complexity arising from transverse intersections of and unstable manifolds, laying groundwork for understanding the stretching and folding mechanisms central to behavior. Building on this, George David Birkhoff's in the 1920s and 1930s, including his 1931 pointwise ergodic theorem, provided tools for studying long-term statistical properties of orbits, influencing later models of hyperbolic dynamics. In the 1960s, advanced these ideas through his work on , conceiving the horseshoe map as a canonical example of hyperbolic behavior during a 1960 visit to Rio de Janeiro. Smale was motivated by the earlier analyses of forced oscillations in the van der Pol equation by , Norman Levinson, and , which demonstrated chaotic behavior and the existence of infinitely many periodic orbits. He formalized the horseshoe in his seminal 1967 paper "Differentiable Dynamical Systems," where it served as a model for robust chaotic dynamics in smooth systems, demonstrating the persistence of homoclinic structures under perturbations. The horseshoe map gained broader recognition in the 1970s as emerged, with David Ruelle and Floris Takens incorporating similar hyperbolic structures into their 1971 analysis of strange attractors to explain the onset of in dissipative systems. This work highlighted the horseshoe's role in producing structurally stable chaotic attractors, bridging Smale's topological insights with applications in nonlinear physics. , initially developed by and others, was later adapted to encode the horseshoe's itineraries, reinforcing its paradigmatic status.

Mathematical formulation

The horseshoe map is a piecewise linear defined on the unit square [0,1]×[0,1]R2[0,1] \times [0,1] \subset \mathbb{R}^2. It is given by the formula T(x,y)=(12x12,{y2if x<12,1y2+12if x12.).T(x,y) = \left( 1 - 2\left|x - \frac{1}{2}\right|, \begin{cases} \frac{y}{2} & \text{if } x < \frac{1}{2}, \\ \frac{1 - y}{2} + \frac{1}{2} & \text{if } x \geq \frac{1}{2}. \end{cases} \right).
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.