Hubbry Logo
Howard JacobsonHoward JacobsonMain
Open search
Howard Jacobson
Community hub
Howard Jacobson
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Howard Jacobson
Howard Jacobson
Howard Jacobson
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Howard Eric Jacobson (born 25 August 1942) is a British novelist and journalist. He writes comic novels that often revolve around the dilemmas of British Jewish characters.[1] He is a Man Booker Prize winner.

Key Information

Early life

[edit]

Jacobson was born in Manchester to parents of Russian-Jewish heritage (his father's parents came from Kamianets-Podilskyi in what is now Ukraine, and his mother's family from Lithuania).[2] He has a brother.[3] He was brought up in Prestwich, and educated at Stand Grammar School in Whitefield, Greater Manchester[4] before going on to study English at Downing College, Cambridge, under F. R. Leavis.[5] He graduated with a 2:2.[6]

He lectured for three years at the University of Sydney before returning to Britain to teach at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He also taught at Wolverhampton Polytechnic from 1974 to 1980.[7]

Career

[edit]

Writing

[edit]

Jacobson's time at Wolverhampton was to form the basis of his first novel, Coming from Behind, a campus comedy about a failing polytechnic that plans to merge facilities with a local football club. The episode of teaching in a football stadium in the novel is, according to Jacobson in a 1985 BBC interview, the only portion of the novel based on a true incident. He also wrote a travel book in 1987, titled In the Land of Oz, which was researched during his time as a visiting academic in Sydney.[citation needed]

His 1999 novel The Mighty Walzer, about a teenage table tennis champion, won the Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize for comic writing.[8] It is set in the Manchester of the 1950s and Jacobson, himself a table tennis fan in his teenage years, admits that there is more than an element of autobiography in it.[9] His 2002 novel Who's Sorry Now? – the central character of which is a Jewish luggage baron of South London – and his 2006 novel Kalooki Nights were longlisted for the Man Booker Prize. Jacobson described Kalooki Nights as "the most Jewish novel that has ever been written by anybody, anywhere".[10] It won the 2007 JQ Wingate Prize.[11]

As well as writing fiction, he also contributes a weekly column for The Independent newspaper as an op-ed writer.[12][better source needed]

In October 2010 Jacobson won the Man Booker Prize for his novel The Finkler Question, which was the first comic novel to win the prize since Kingsley Amis's The Old Devils in 1986.[13] The book, published by Bloomsbury, explores what it means to be Jewish today and is also about "love, loss and male friendship".[14] Andrew Motion, the chair of the judges, said: "The Finkler Question is a marvellous book: very funny, of course, but also very clever, very sad and very subtle. It is all that it seems to be and much more than it seems to be. A completely worthy winner of this great prize."[14] His novel Zoo Time won the Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize (2013), Jacobson's second time winning the prize (the first in 1999 for The Mighty Walzer).[15]

He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature in 2012.[16]

In September 2014, Jacobson's novel J was shortlisted for the 2014 Man Booker Prize.[17]

Broadcasting

[edit]

Jacobson has scripted television programmes including Channel 4's Howard Jacobson Takes on the Turner, in 2000, and The South Bank Show in 2002, which featured an edition entitled "Why the Novel Matters". An earlier profile went out in the series in 1999 and a television documentary entitled "My Son the Novelist" preceded it as part of the Arena series in 1985.[18] His two non-fiction books – Roots Schmoots: Journeys Among Jews (1993) and Seriously Funny: From the Ridiculous to the Sublime (1997) – were turned into television series.[citation needed]

Jacobson presented "Jesus The Jew", episode one of Christianity, A History, on the UK's Channel 4 in January 2009[19] and in 2010 he presented "Creation", the first part of the Channel 4 series The Bible: A History.[20]

On 3 November 2010, Jacobson appeared in an Intelligence Squared debate (stop bashing Christians, Britain is becoming an anti-Christian country) in favour of the motion.[21]

In February 2011 Jacobson appeared on BBC Radio 4's Desert Island Discs. His musical choices included works by J. S. Bach, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Louis Armstrong as well as the rare 1964 single "Look at Me" by the Whirlwinds. His favourite was "You’re a Sweetheart" by Al Bowlly with Lew Stone and His Band.[22]

He wrote and presented the Australian biographical series Brilliant Creatures (2014) on four famous expatriate iconoclasts.[23]

Style and themes

[edit]

Although Jacobson has described himself as "a Jewish Jane Austen" (in response to being described as "the English Philip Roth"),[24] he also states, "I'm not by any means conventionally Jewish. I don't go to shul. What I feel is that I have a Jewish mind, I have a Jewish intelligence. I feel linked to previous Jewish minds of the past. I don't know what kind of trouble this gets somebody into, a disputatious mind. What a Jew is has been made by the experience of 5,000 years, that's what shapes the Jewish sense of humour, that's what shaped Jewish pugnacity or tenaciousness." He maintains that "comedy is a very important part of what I do."[9]

Jacobson's fiction, particularly in the six novels he has published since 1998, is characterised chiefly by a discursive and humorous style.[1] Recurring subjects in his work include male–female relations and the Jewish experience in Britain in the mid- to late-20th century. He has been compared to prominent Jewish-American novelists such as Philip Roth, in particular for his habit of creating doppelgängers of himself in his fiction.[citation needed]

Personal life

[edit]

Jacobson has been married three times.[25] Engaged at 21 while a student at Cambridge, he married his first wife Barbara in 1964 after graduating, when he was 22. They have a son, Conrad Jacobson, born in December 1968. During his time at Cambridge, Barbara attended some of Leavis' seminars with Jacobson. Before leaving Cambridge they attended a party where among the guests were the playwright Simon Gray, and Germaine Greer, whose job Jacobson was filling in Sydney.[citation needed]

In late 1964 Howard and Barbara emigrated to Australia, taking a six-week voyage on P&O's SS Oriana. On arrival, Jacobson took up a lectureship at Sydney University. They returned to Manchester in 1967, living there briefly before moving to London, where Conrad was born. This was followed by Howard teaching at Selwyn College, Cambridge, and running the family business on Cambridge Market selling handbags and leather goods. Jacobson returned to Australia when Conrad was 3 years old. He remained without a teaching post. Jacobson eventually returned to the UK after several years. Barbara divorced him in his absence. They share a granddaughter Ziva, born in 2008.[26][27]

He married his second wife, Rosalin Sadler, in 1978; they divorced in 2004. In 2005, Jacobson was married for the third time, to radio and TV documentary maker Jenny De Yong. He stated, "My last wife. I'm home, it's right".[28]

Political views and opinions

[edit]

In August 2014, Jacobson was one of 200 public figures who signed a letter to The Guardian urging Scots to vote against independence in the run-up to the Scottish independence referendum.[29]

Israel

[edit]

In recent times, Jacobson has, on several occasions, attacked anti-Israel boycotts, and for this reason has been labelled a "liberal Zionist".[12][better source needed] He has argued that an education in science and technology is more conducive to terrorism than an education in the arts and social sciences.[30]

During the Gaza war, he spoke out in favour of the Israeli military's campaign in Gaza, and wrote in October 2024 that media coverage of the effects of the war on children in Gaza was a new blood libel. In an interview with Isaac Chotiner of The New Yorker, Jacobson argued that, after 7 October, it wasn’t possible to “measure life for life”. It wasn’t a case of just avenging the deaths in Israel. Instead, he insisted: "in the attempt to make sure that this never happened again, the numbers were going to inevitably have to be high".[31][32]

Antisemitism in the Labour Party

[edit]

In November 2017, Jacobson joined Simon Sebag Montefiore and Simon Schama in writing a letter to The Times about their concern over antisemitism in the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, with particular reference to a growth in Anti-Zionism and its "antisemitic characteristics". Schama and Sebag Montefiore have both written historical works about Israel, while Jacobson has written regularly about Israel and the UK Jewish community in his newspaper columns.[33] In September 2018, Jacobson argued in favour of the motion "Jeremy Corbyn is Unfit to be Prime Minister" in a debate hosted by Intelligence Squared.[34]

Jacobson made a further criticism of the party in July 2019, when he joined other leading Jewish figures in saying, in a letter to The Guardian, that the investigation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission into the party in relation to antisemitism allegations was "a taint of international and historic shame" and that trust between the party and most British Jews was "fractured beyond repair".[35]

Bibliography

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Howard Jacobson

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Howard Jacobson (born 25 August 1942) is a British novelist, journalist, and broadcaster whose comic fiction frequently examines the tensions of , , and intellectual pretension in contemporary Britain. Born in to Jewish parents and raised in the suburb of , Jacobson was educated at Stand Grammar School before studying English literature at , under the rigorous critic , an influence that shaped his early academic career as a lecturer in and elsewhere. His , Coming from Behind (1983), initiated a prolific output of over a dozen works, including The Mighty Walzer (1999), which earned the inaugural for comic writing, and Zoo Time (2012), which secured the award again—a distinction achieved by no other author. Jacobson's breakthrough came with (2010), a satirical exploration of and Jewish self-loathing among intellectuals, which won the —the first explicitly comic novel to do so since Kingsley Amis's in 1986—and elevated his status as a leading voice in British letters. Beyond fiction, he has contributed op-eds to outlets like and scripted arts programs for British and Australian television, often blending humor with pointed cultural critique. His work has drawn controversy for its unapologetic defense of Jewish particularism against what Jacobson perceives as veiled in leftist and academic circles, including critiques of as a proxy for historical Jew-hatred and accusations of "polite" in British society. Recent columns decrying media portrayals of Israel's Gaza operations as modern "blood libels" have intensified debates, with detractors charging him with overlooking Palestinian suffering while supporters view his stance as a necessary counter to biased institutional narratives.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Childhood in

Howard Jacobson was born on August 25, 1942, in , , to Jewish parents Max and Anita Jacobson. His father's family originated from the region around Kamenets-Podolsk in what is now , part of a broader wave of Eastern European Jewish immigration to in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The family belonged to 's working-class Jewish community, which formed 's second-largest Jewish population center outside , concentrated in northern districts during the mid-20th century. Jacobson was raised primarily in Prestwich, a suburb in north Manchester, including the Bowker Vale area, within a tight-knit Jewish enclave that included neighborhoods like Crumpsall and Cheetham Hill. This environment, shaped by post-war Jewish life in Britain, emphasized assimilation into English modernity while retaining cultural Jewishness, as his parents sought to embody "bright, English, very modern Mancunians" despite their immigrant roots. His mother, Anita, an autodidact with a passion for literature and poetry—from Wordsworth to middlebrow novelists—instilled in him an early love of reading and words, fostering his literary inclinations amid the family's modest circumstances. Family dynamics reflected broader tensions in such communities: Jacobson's father, Max, an upholsterer and talker who invented playful, idiosyncratic language blending influences with English, provided exuberant energy but clashed with his son's perceived sensitivity, viewing him as unmanly. Anita's reserved pessimism and bookishness drew Jacobson closer to her, shaping his introspective worldview during a childhood marked by the lingering shadows of and the Holocaust's distant echoes in Manchester's Jewish circles. This upbringing in a "Manchester shtetl" infused his early sense of identity as a "half-Jew, half" assimilated Mancunian, blending humor, cultural duality, and familial expectations.

Academic Pursuits and Early Influences

Jacobson attended Stand Grammar School for Boys in Whitefield, near , before enrolling at , in 1961 to study English, from which he graduated with a degree in 1964. At , he came under the tutelage of the influential literary critic , whose approach emphasized meticulous textual analysis, moral seriousness in literature, and a rejection of ornamental style in favor of evaluative rigor. This Leavisite framework profoundly shaped Jacobson's early intellectual habits, fostering a critical lens that prioritized ethical and cultural judgments over broader sociological or formalist interpretations. Following graduation, Jacobson pursued an academic career by emigrating to , where he lectured in English at the for three years beginning around 1965. Upon returning to circa 1968, he taught at , before taking up a lectureship in English at Wolverhampton Polytechnic, where he remained from 1974 until 1980. These teaching positions exposed him to diverse academic environments, from the elite seminars of to the more utilitarian polytechnic setting, which later informed his satirical depictions of institutional life in early works such as his 1983 debut novel Coming from Behind, drawn directly from his Wolverhampton experiences. Jacobson has reflected that the Leavis-inspired intensity of his Cambridge training, while equipping him with analytical depth, initially constrained his creative impulses by rendering imaginative divergence from canonical standards feel presumptuous or inadequate. This tension between and literary originality marked his early career, as the structured critique of texts under Leavis clashed with the freer demands of , prompting a gradual shift toward comic as a means of reconciling rigor with during his years. His time abroad and in provincial academia further broadened his perspective, countering the insular intensity of with practical engagements that highlighted the absurdities of bureaucratic and pedagogical routines.

Literary Career

Early Novels and Development of Voice

Jacobson's , Coming from Behind, was published in 1983 and drew directly from his experiences as a lecturer at Wolverhampton Polytechnic, depicting the institution's struggles amid mergers and academic mediocrity. The , Sefton Goldberg—a working-class Jewish academic shaped by Leavisite traditions—navigates departmental politics, personal jealousies, and institutional failure with a mix of bitterness and wit. This work introduced recurring elements of Jacobson's style, including caricatured alter egos confronting despair through acerbic humor, after a period of delay in which he struggled to abandon imitative prose for authentic expression. In his second novel, Peeping Tom (1984), Jacobson sustained this comedic intensity through Barney Fugleman, a libidinous narrator fixated on , literature, and voyeuristic impulses, whose reveals obsessions tied to figures like and the . The narrative, spanning the and early , employs first-person confession to satirize intellectual pretensions and erotic failures, refining a voice that blends psychological depth with outrageous . Redback (1986) extended this trajectory abroad, following Karl Leon Forelock—a hyper-literate, guilt-ridden Englishman dispatched to Sydney on a dubious cultural mission—into encounters with Australian complacency and personal disorientation. The novel's first-person protagonist, anxious and sex-obsessed like its predecessors, critiques colonial legacies and self-importance through escalating absurdities, marking Jacobson's growing command of expatriate satire. Across these early works, Jacobson cultivated a "serious comic" voice, deliberately infusing and cultural critique into humor drawn from Jewish sensibilities and academic disillusionment, evolving from tentative beginnings toward a cerebral, unflinching style that prioritizes emotional rawness over mere entertainment. This foundation emphasized male protagonists' internal conflicts—often intellectual Jews adrift in failing institutions or alien environments—foreshadowing denser explorations of identity in later .

The Booker Prize and "The Finkler Question"

"", published in 2010 by , centres on Julian Treslove, a former producer who, after a , develops an obsession with , influenced by his friendships with the widowed Jewish academic Libor and the celebrity philosopher Sam Finkler. The novel examines themes of Jewish self-hatred, , belonging, and the distinctions between genuine prejudice and cultural critique, through Treslove's attempts to convert to amid personal losses and philosophical debates. On 12 October 2010, Jacobson was awarded the Man Booker Prize for "The Finkler Question" at a ceremony in London's Guildhall, receiving £50,000 and international recognition as the first author to win for an explicitly comic novel since Kingsley Amis's "The Old Devils" in 1986. The judging panel, chaired by Sir Andrew Motion, praised it as "very clever and very funny" yet profound in its exploration of maturity and exclusion, surpassing shortlisted works by authors including Tom McCarthy and Andrea Levy. Jacobson, then aged 68 and on his eleventh novel, described the victory as a late-career "discovery", noting in interviews that the prize validated his humorous style often overlooked in favour of more sombre literary trends. He emphasized the book's unapologetic comedy as a deliberate counter to expectations of Jewish literature dominated by tragedy, arguing that laughter serves as a defence against historical sorrows. The win boosted sales significantly, with over 100,000 copies sold in the UK within months, and prompted discussions on the prize's historical preference for darker narratives over satire.

Later Novels and Evolving Themes

Jacobson's novel Zoo Time, published in 2012, centers on Guy Ableman, a grappling with creative block amid the perceived decline of and personal turmoil, including an illicit attraction to his mother-in-law. The work satirizes the publishing industry and cultural shifts toward and celebrity memoirs, while exploring themes of artistic frustration and familial dysfunction, marking a meta-fictional turn in Jacobson's oeuvre that reflects his own career anxieties. In J (2014), Jacobson ventures into dystopian territory, depicting a future Britain where a euphemistic "What Happened?" obscures a catastrophic event resembling a against , enforced by societal and . The protagonists, Ailinn and Kevern, navigate forbidden love and suppressed identities in this setting, with the narrative probing memory, guilt, and the persistence of through rather than his earlier comedic realism. Shortlisted for the Man , the novel evolves Jacobson's Jewish themes toward warnings about collective forgetting and authoritarian erasure of history. Shylock Is My Name (2016), part of the series, reimagines by pairing the historical with contemporary Jewish philanthropist Simon Strulovitch, who confronts antisemitic tropes, daughterly rebellion, and moral quandaries over revenge. Through dialogues blending Elizabethan and modern sensibilities, Jacobson examines enduring stereotypes of Jewish avarice and outsider status, while critiquing shallow and father-daughter estrangement in affluent British society. This retelling signifies an evolution toward intertextual engagement with canonical literature, using Shakespeare to amplify Jacobson's defense of Jewish particularity against assimilationist pressures. Subsequent works like Live a Little () shift toward intimate explorations of aging and redemption, following an elderly couple's late-life romance amid reflections on loss and , blending humor with poignant realism on mortality. Across these later novels, Jacobson's themes mature from interpersonal Jewish neuroses to broader societal critiques, incorporating dystopian foresight, historical revisionism, and cultural polemic, often in response to perceived rises in European and , while retaining his signature verbal acuity and ironic detachment. This progression underscores a deepening causal link between personal Jewish experience and collective threats, prioritizing unflinching realism over consolation.

Non-Literary Professional Activities

Broadcasting and Media Appearances

Howard Jacobson has contributed extensively to BBC Radio 4's A Point of View, a program featuring weekly on topical issues, where he both wrote and presented segments reflecting on cultural, linguistic, and social matters. His essays often critiqued rhetorical excesses, such as in a 2024 broadcast on , warning against "words prance[ing] about without their clothes, shouting their own importance." In a 2015 episode, he advocated for greater religious content in Radio 4's , arguing that humanists and believers could find common ground in moral discourse. Jacobson delivered the program's reflective final , "Our Revels Now Are Ended," on March 28, 2025, marking nearly two decades of the format with allusions to and the evolution of radio essays. Earlier in his career, Jacobson presented the 1991 television series , a program exploring global narratives through personal reflection. He has also appeared as a guest on broadcast interviews, including BBC Newsnight in April 2017, where he discussed his satirical novel in relation to and . On BBC World Service's , he addressed the impact of on language, contending that it degrades public discourse by altering word usage unfavorably. More recently, in October 2025, he featured on , attributing rising in the UK to leftist influences. These appearances underscore his role as a commentator blending literary insight with current events analysis.

Journalism and Essay Contributions

Howard Jacobson served as a weekly columnist for for approximately eighteen years, beginning in the late 1990s and concluding in March 2016. His columns evolved from anecdotal and ironical personal reflections—often drawn from travels, such as his —to more discursive and occasionally ireful explorations of cultural and political matters, treating each piece as a "little " that prioritized surprise and entertainment over predetermined views. Topics spanned , social media's erosion of nuanced , and broader societal observations, with Jacobson emphasizing a high-serious style blending Rabelaisian excess and Eliot-like depth. Selections from his Independent tenure were compiled into at least two volumes: Whatever It Is, I Don't Like It (2011), which drew from over a decade of contributions, and a subsequent collection covering seventeen years of work across publications including , , , and Tablet. Beyond regular columns, Jacobson penned standalone essays for , such as a 2009 piece challenging anti-Israel rhetoric as veiled prejudice rooted in historical animus rather than policy critique. He has also contributed essays to other outlets, including on persistent antisemitic tropes like accusations (October 2024) and on post-October 7, 2023, manifestations of ignorance-fueled hatred (October 2024), maintaining a focus on psychological and cultural undercurrents over mere events. Earlier journalism included and travel writing, reflecting his academic background in English literature.

Literary Style, Themes, and Critical Comparisons

Comic Technique and Jewish Dilemmas

Howard Jacobson's comic technique draws heavily from the tradition of Jewish self-deprecating humor, employing satire, irony, and exaggeration to dissect the internal conflicts of British Jewish characters. He has described this approach as a "masochistic strategy," where Jews preempt external criticism by mocking their own traits—such as neurosis, vanity, and moral scrupulosity—thereby achieving a form of moral superiority that redirects discomfort onto observers. In novels like The Finkler Question (2010), this manifests through characters' banter that oscillates between Holocaust invocations and accusations of self-hatred, using absurd escalations to highlight the perpetual tension between Jewish particularism and assimilationist pressures in England. Jacobson rejects viewing such humor solely as a defensive mechanism, insisting it encompasses deeper cultural and erotic dimensions, as seen in his youthful pursuit of laughter to attract women, linking comedy to tragedy in a Shakespearean vein where the two are "intimately linked." Central to his work are dilemmas of , including an ingrained among English Jews, who grapple with unromanticizable self-perception amid historical safety now questioned by rising . Jacobson populates his narratives with archetypes like Sam Finkler, embodying conflicted egoism and , drawn from observed Jewish figures who embody "this of ." Non-Jewish protagonists, such as Julian Treslove in , provide comedic distance, fetishizing Jewish qualities through bumbling emulation—like obsessive gestures or fixations—that underscore the outsider's romanticized view against insiders' self-laceration. This technique exposes dilemmas of paranoia and shame, as in Kalooki Nights (2006), where humor intertwines sexuality, suffering, and , preempting tragedy through masochistic inversion. Jacobson's style, often likened to a "Jewish ," adapts the ' comic mode to twentieth- and twenty-first-century complexities, using and ironic detachment to probe stereotypes without resolution, as in Shylock Is My Name (2016), where black humor retells to confront persistent anti-Jewish tropes. His preemptive joking—"we tell jokes against ourselves, before anyone else gets to do it"—serves not mere deflection but a truth-telling imperative, illuminating causal roots of Jewish unease in existence, from ego-driven moralism to fears of societal rejection. This approach yields novels that are "funny and furious," blending levity with indictment of identity's burdens.

Influences from Roth, Amis, and Others

Jacobson's literary style draws significant inspiration from , whom he has named among his heroes alongside and , praising Roth's ability to fuse seriousness with comedy in works such as , which influenced his own novel No More Mr Nice Guy (). Critics have repeatedly dubbed Jacobson the "British " for shared explorations of Jewish male anxieties, sexuality, and identity through irreverent humor, though Jacobson has distanced himself from the label, emphasizing that such comparisons overlook his English sensibilities. While less overt, Jacobson has acknowledged past admiration—verging on envy—for Martin Amis's stylistic prowess, with reviewers occasionally noting echoes of Amis's biting satire in Jacobson's work, particularly in its unflinching portrayal of human flaws and social absurdities. However, Jacobson maintains that his core influences remain rooted in English literature rather than Amis's postmodern edge. Jacobson explicitly positions himself within the tradition of Jane Austen and Charles Dickens, declaring his work to operate in their vein of moral scrutiny and institutional critique, and self-identifying as the "Jewish Jane Austen" to underscore his focus on social manners infused with Jewish particularity. Formative texts include Austen's Mansfield Park for its tragic social observation, Dickens's Little Dorrit for its satirical gusto during his Cambridge years, D.H. Lawrence's Sons and Lovers for probing familial tensions, and Mario Vargas Llosa's Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter for farcical narrative energy. Early idols like George Eliot further shaped his adolescent literary worldview, reinforcing a commitment to English novelistic depth over ideological or American imports.

Public Commentary on Antisemitism and Jewish Identity

Defining and Combating Modern Antisemitism

Howard Jacobson defines as a rooted in historical Jewish experience, asserting that "most Jews know what is and what it isn’t," with its "history... written on the Jewish character in blood," making false invention of it a "." He characterizes modern as often manifesting through , which provides a for expressing otherwise taboo Jew-, particularly by desacralizing discourse around to permit unrestricted hostility. In the UK context, it appears as a "polite ," detectable in subtle linguistic cues, tonal inflections, and disproportionate scrutiny of —such as equating its actions with "" or "apartheid" absent similar standards for other nations. Jacobson identifies contemporary traits including the exhilaration derived from Jewish suffering, as seen post-October 7, 2023, attacks, where he describes as "the passion dead arouse in their killers to kill more of them," evidenced by "hysterical glory in the slaughter of sleeping babies" among some critics. This form exploits progressive rhetoric to veil ancient prejudices, fostering environments where face social media abuse, physical incidents like spitting accompanied by references, and institutional hostility in leftist circles or universities. He emphasizes that while not all criticism qualifies as antisemitic, its persistence in denying Jewish or historical legitimacy often reveals underlying bias, as have endured attacks across since anti-Zionism's rise. To combat it, Jacobson advocates intellectual vigilance and unapologetic naming, urging Jews to reject and cease defensive apologies that concede ground to accusers. He promotes exposing through precise linguistic dissection, distinguishing genuine policy critique from prejudicial double standards, and fostering resilience via preserved rather than physical retaliation. In practice, this involves public writing and debate to counter denial, as seen in his critiques of Labour Party tolerance under , where he argued failure to confront such bias erodes Jewish security. Ultimately, combating modern requires affirming Jewish historical legitimacy without dilution, ensuring that anti-Zionist veils are pierced to reveal and isolate core hatred.

Distinctions Between Legitimate Criticism and Prejudice

Jacobson has articulated that legitimate must adhere to principles of fairness and consistency applied to any , such as scrutinizing specific policies like settlement expansion or military operations without imputing collective moral depravity to its citizens or denying its foundational right to . In a , he argued that true critique engages 's actions proportionally, akin to how other nations' flaws are debated, rather than framing them as uniquely demonic or genocidal, which echoes historical antisemitic tropes of as eternal conspirators or bloodthirsty. He contrasted this with , which manifests in double standards—demanding dismantle itself while ignoring comparable territorial disputes elsewhere—or in rhetoric that portrays Jewish as inherently illegitimate, a not extended to other ethnic nationalisms. This distinction, per Jacobson, is rooted in empirical observation of discourse patterns: legitimate criticism advances policy alternatives grounded in realism, whereas prejudice fixates on Israel's existence as the problem, often displacing broader antisemitic anxieties onto Zionism. In 2015, he referenced a British parliamentary inquiry affirming that antisemitism charges are not mere tools to "silence fair criticism" but responses to verifiable hatred, such as synagogue attacks or campus harassment tied to anti-Israel fervor, urging discernment without hypersensitivity. He has rejected claims that Jews invoke antisemitism cavalierly to shield Israel, insisting in 2018 that "Jews know what antisemitism is and what it isn't—to invent it would be a sacrilege," and that conflating the two insults Jewish historical acuity in detecting prejudice. Jacobson exemplified prejudice in anti-Zionist denial of the antisemitic pogroms and expulsions that necessitated Israel's creation, a historical erasure not demanded of other refugee-founded states. In advising Jewish students in 2021, Jacobson stressed insisting on this boundary when accused of stifling debate: if criticism employs unique vitriol, such as equating Israeli security measures with —a standard absent for other conflicts—it crosses into , not protected speech. He maintains that failing to draw this line enables the normalization of under the guise of , as seen in disproportionate media focus on Israeli casualties versus those in intra-Arab conflicts, which he attributes not to neutral journalism but to latent biases favoring narratives of Jewish villainy.

Defense of Israel's Foundational Legitimacy

Howard Jacobson defends 's foundational legitimacy by framing not as a colonial enterprise but as a restorative act of Jewish , grounded in millennia of historical ties to the land and the imperative of refuge after prolonged and . He contends that portraying the establishment of in as ignores the reality of Jewish returnees who were fleeing systemic , such as pogroms in Europe and the , rather than imposing foreign dominion. This perspective aligns with his broader argument that represents the end of Jewish homelessness, enabling sovereignty in the ancestral homeland where maintained continuous, albeit diminished, presence for over 2,000 years following the Roman expulsion in 70 CE. Central to Jacobson's reasoning is the rejection of as a denial of Jewish rights equivalent to those afforded other peoples, emphasizing that Israel's existence as a fulfills a unique national aspiration born from historical necessity rather than conquest. In his view, emerged as a , countering the narrative of by highlighting Jewish vulnerability—exemplified by the Holocaust's toll of six million lives—which underscored the existential need for a secure . He asserts that European critiques of , often couched in terms of Palestinian dispossession, overlook this context and exhibit a selective moral outrage, as no other indigenous group's right to statehood faces comparable scrutiny. Jacobson further elaborates that supporting Israel's legitimacy stems from intellectual conviction, not mere ethnic solidarity, positioning as a rational response to Jewish history's patterns of expulsion and . He describes it as "the expression of a people's soul," encompassing longing, historical insight, and pragmatic solution to perennial insecurity, rendering any state embodying Jewish self-rule inherently justifiable. This defense implicitly critiques sources that equate Israel's founding with settler-colonialism, such as certain academic narratives, by prioritizing empirical Jewish continuity in the region—evidenced by archaeological records and pre-1948 immigration waves—over ideological deconstructions that he sees as ahistorical.

Post-October 7, 2023, Commentary and Holocaust Analogies

Following the attacks on October 7, 2023, which killed over 1,200 and took more than 200 hostages, Jacobson described the events as a that shattered illusions of safety for , emphasizing that initial global pity for the victims was swiftly supplanted by political equivocations, such as UN Secretary-General António Guterres's remark that "did not happen in a vacuum." On the first anniversary, he lamented how politics intruded where empathy alone should have prevailed, turning the aftermath into a "second atrocity" amid rising on Western streets and campuses. Jacobson contended that events since demonstrate Jews remain "not fully liberated from Auschwitz," as the Holocaust's lessons—chiefly the unprecedented calamity inflicted on —persist in being unknown, disbelieved, or met with callous ignorance, undermining the "" imperative. He argued that societal and artistic reluctance to engage Jewish suffering, evident in films facing skepticism or accusations of opportunism, reflects a broader failure to internalize the Holocaust's scale, with 's horrors similarly minimized or denied. In response to genocide accusations against , Jacobson characterized them as an inversion of victimhood, charging Jews with the very crime perpetrated against them during the Shoah, thereby annulling Jewish historical suffering. He traced this to an evolution in , from equating Zionists with Nazis to alleging Israeli atrocities like organ harvesting, intensified post-October 7 as a form of retrospective justification for antisemitic persecution. Jacobson drew analogies between contemporary media coverage of over 15,000 Palestinian child deaths in Gaza and medieval tropes accusing of ritual , such as the 1255 case of Little Hugh of Lincoln, claiming such relentless nightly depictions frame as "merciless infanticides" and stoke hatred echoing pre-Holocaust prejudices. He contrasted this disproportionate focus—relative to coverage of child casualties in —with balanced reporting needs, arguing it distorts the post-October 7 context where Israel's response aims to eradicate to prevent recurrence, not equate lives simpliciter. These views, reiterated in interviews, faced criticism for allegedly rationalizing Gaza civilian tolls, though Jacobson maintained they address biased narratives heightening Jewish vulnerability.

Critiques of Political Movements and Figures

Analysis of Antisemitism in UK Labour Party

Howard Jacobson, a lifelong Labour supporter, emerged as one of the most vocal Jewish critics of the party's crisis following Jeremy Corbyn's election as leader on September 12, 2015, arguing that the leadership's tolerance of anti-Zionist rhetoric fostered an environment where antisemitic tropes proliferated unchecked. He contended that Labour's reluctance to discipline figures like , who in April 2016 claimed Hitler supported before going mad, exemplified a pattern of excusing historical distortions that echoed classic antisemitic conspiracies about Jewish collaboration. In his October 6, 2017, New York Times op-ed, Jacobson dismissed the inquiry—commissioned in May 2016 amid rising complaints—as a superficial exercise that interviewed few accusers and failed to grasp the visceral nature of the prejudice, instead recommending avoid without addressing root causes like the party's of criticism with Jewish vilification. He highlighted persistent incidents at the 2017 Labour conference, including motions to bar Jewish organizations from events, endorsements of Livingstone's remarks, and fringe speakers questioning consensus, as evidence that remained entrenched rather than fringe. Corbyn's elevation of Chakrabarti to the shortly after, Jacobson argued, signaled disdain for Jewish concerns, prioritizing ideological loyalty over accountability. Jacobson co-signed an open letter on November 6, 2017, with historians and , decrying the "tone and direction" of Labour's debates on and , which they said masked "widespread" under the guise of policy critique, urging the party to adopt the (IHRA) definition without exceptions. In a March 29, 2018, Jewish Chronicle column titled "Enough is enough," he lambasted Labour's denialism, noting that even as evidence mounted—including over 100 complaints by mid-2016—the deflected by accusing of exaggeration to sabotage Corbyn, a tactic he saw as inverting victimhood and deepening alienation among traditional Labour-voting . Central to Jacobson's analysis was the causal link between left-wing and : he maintained that portraying as uniquely demonic revived blood libels and collective Jewish guilt, with Corbyn's "cold-eyed contempt" exemplified by his associations with groups like and , whom he called "friends" in 2014, and reluctance to unequivocally condemn such alliances. Unlike right-wing variants rooted in racial , he described Labour's form as moralistic, assuming fabricated claims to shield , an insult that, per Jacobson, —historically attuned to genuine —would never invent given its sacrilegious weight post-Holocaust. By 2019, he warned in outlets like that a Corbyn government posed existential risks to , citing polling where 85% of Jewish voters distrusted Labour on the issue. Jacobson's critique extended to institutional failures, such as delayed suspensions of members sharing antisemitic content—e.g., claims of Jewish media control—and the party's resistance to IHRA until 2018, which he viewed as an attempt to redefine antisemitism narrowly to accommodate anti-Israel activism. In a September 2018 Jewish Chronicle speech, he emphasized that this was not mere incompetence but a cultural shift where antisemitism thrived via plausible deniability, eroding Labour's historic philo-Semitism. Even after Corbyn's 2020 ouster, Jacobson attributed ongoing UK antisemitism spikes partly to leftist legacies, as in an October 2025 interview blaming decades of Israel stigmatization for normalizing prejudice. His analysis prioritized empirical incidents over abstract defenses, underscoring causal realism in how unchecked rhetoric metastasized into party policy.

Broader Indictments of Left-Wing Ideologies

Jacobson has contended that left-wing ideologies have been undermined by an overemphasis on and intersectional victimhood, which he views as diverting attention from universal liberal principles to competitive claims of oppression that disadvantage . In a , he described how "the liberal side of the argument has got sidetracked by the endless posturing of and intersectional victimhood," arguing this shift erodes broader societal discourse and enables populist backlash by prioritizing tribal grievances over shared values. He attributes this trend to a rejection of expertise and linguistic precision within progressive circles, where sophistication is dismissed as , fostering a "war on words" that hollows out from within. In Jacobson's analysis, these ideological currents facilitate a resurgence of antisemitism by framing anti-Zionism as legitimate critique while excusing underlying prejudices, particularly through a post-Holocaust lens where Israel's existence "desacralizes" sensitivities around Jewish vulnerability, allowing "everything... [to be] allowed again." He argues that the left's selective accommodation of bigotry—evident in tolerance for inflammatory rhetoric against Israel—stems not from overt hatred but from a cultural reluctance to confront it, as "too many among them have been willing to accommodate bigotry" under the guise of solidarity with other marginalized groups. This dynamic, he posits, creates a hierarchy of victimhood where Jewish concerns are subordinated, enabling a "polite hatred" that permeates leftist media and intelligentsia coverage of Jewish issues. Jacobson extends this indictment to the left's broader failure to uphold Enlightenment , replaced by ideological fervor that stigmatizes Jewish self-assertion and equates with oppression in a manner that echoes historical antisemitic tropes. The pitch of such criticisms, he observes, often exceeds policy disagreement to resemble "a kind of ," reflecting systemic biases in left-leaning institutions that prioritize narratives of Palestinian victimhood over balanced reckoning with . Through essays and novels, he warns that this erosion of principled not only isolates but consumes the left's moral authority, substituting empirical scrutiny for emotional alliances that blind adherents to their own contradictions.

Controversies and Responses to Accusations

Charges of Bias in Gaza Coverage

In an October 6, 2024, column for The Observer, Jacobson argued that intensive media emphasis on images of dead Palestinian children in Gaza constituted a modern iteration of the antisemitic "blood libel" trope, historically used to falsely accuse Jews of ritual child murder, and suggested this framing ignored the context of Hamas's tactics and Israel's defensive necessities. This piece elicited charges of pro-Israel bias, with critics contending it minimized documented civilian casualties—exceeding 42,000 deaths as reported by Gaza health authorities—and deflected from allegations of Israeli war crimes by invoking historical Jewish victimhood. Louise Adler, Jacobson's former publisher, publicly rebuked him in a October 13, 2024, Guardian letter, asserting that his blood libel analogy demonstrated a selective blindness to "atrocities" in Gaza, including the destruction of infrastructure and high child mortality rates, and urged him to prioritize empirical evidence of Israeli military conduct over analogies to medieval prejudices. Similarly, a New Yorker analysis framed Jacobson's commentary as an attempt to "rationalize the horrors" of the conflict, implying his emphasis on media distortion overlooked verifiable data from humanitarian organizations on famine risks and displacement affecting over 90% of Gaza's population. These critiques emanated from outlets and commentators often aligned with progressive viewpoints sympathetic to Palestinian narratives, raising questions about their own interpretive biases in conflict reporting. Earlier instances amplified accusations of Jacobson's partiality; in February 2024, during a BBC Newsnight appearance, he charged the broadcaster with anti-Israel prejudice for disproportionately airing visuals of Palestinian suffering, prompting counter-claims that such complaints reflected his unwillingness to engage unfiltered casualty data from sources like the , which documented over 30,000 deaths by that point. An Al Jazeera opinion piece from March 20, 2024, cited this episode as evidence of Jacobson prioritizing Zionist advocacy over balanced scrutiny, particularly amid reports of systematic restrictions on Gaza aid convoys. Detractors, including bloggers and left-leaning analysts, have recurrently portrayed his defenses—such as during the 2009 Gaza operation, where he dismissed much " as veiled —as indicative of a pattern wherein factual divergences in death tolls (e.g., 1,400 Israeli vs. thousands Palestinian in recent escalations) are subordinated to identity-based rationales. Jacobson has maintained that such charges misconstrue his critique of narrative framing rather than disputing , insisting in subsequent interviews that acknowledging Hamas's in areas—corroborated by IDF releases of operational footage—necessitates contextualizing coverage beyond selective imagery. Nonetheless, the controversy underscores broader debates over whether his interventions exhibit bias by underweighting independent verifications, such as reports on potential disproportionate force, in favor of countering perceived anti-Jewish tropes in .

Rebuttals and Defense of Intellectual Consistency

Jacobson has rebutted accusations that his defense of equates all criticism of its policies with , emphasizing that , informed by millennia of , possess an acute ability to identify without fabricating it. In a 2018 Guardian essay, he argued that inventing would constitute a "sacrilege" against , while acknowledging Jewish self-hatred as a real phenomenon that does not invalidate genuine threats. He has consistently maintained that legitimate policy disagreements—such as over settlements or military actions—differ from rhetoric that denies 's right to exist or revives blood libels, as seen in his 2009 Independent column where he stated that while one need not be to criticize , such animus often facilitates disproportionate vilification. Regarding charges of selective outrage or bias in his focus on left-wing antisemitism, Jacobson defended his positions by pointing to empirical patterns in UK politics, particularly under Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party leadership from 2015 to 2020. In a 2017 New York Times opinion piece, he dismissed claims that Jews invoke antisemitism to stifle Israel critiques as a "tired canard," instead highlighting Labour's tolerance of anti-Zionist tropes masked as anti-racism, which he co-condemned in open letters with figures like and . These responses underscore his intellectual consistency, as evidenced by decades-spanning works from Kalooki Nights (2006) to essays post-2023 Hamas attacks, where he critiques universalist ideologies that erode Jewish particularity while affirming Israel's defensive necessities without endorsing every government action. Jacobson has also addressed post-October 7, 2023, accusations of downplaying Gaza casualties by arguing that media overemphasis on Palestinian suffering, absent equivalent scrutiny of tactics, perpetuates narratives akin to historical libels. In interviews and columns, such as a 2024 New Yorker discussion, he contended that this imbalance fosters a "victimhood Olympics" where Jewish security concerns are marginalized, consistent with his long-standing rejection of between aggressor and defender. His rebuttals prioritize —tracing contemporary to ideological conflations of with —over politically motivated equivalence, reinforcing a principled stance unswayed by accusations of .

Personal Life

Marriages, Family, and Relationships

Jacobson has been married three times. He married his first wife, , in 1964 shortly after graduating from Cambridge University; the couple had one son, Conrad, born in 1968, before divorcing in 1972. They relocated to for several years during the marriage, where Jacobson lectured at the . His second marriage was to Rosalin Sadler in 1978; it lasted until their in 2004 and was marked by residence in . In 2005, Jacobson married Jenny de Yong, a radio and producer, with whom he has collaborated professionally on projects including adaptations of his work. No children have been reported from his second or third marriages.

Health Issues and Personal Reflections

In 2017, at age 75, Howard Jacobson engaged a who diagnosed lifelong improper patterns, manifested in breath-holding during exertion and challenges with despite lessons. This led to a regimen including for fluid, meditative movements and core exercises like the "dying bug," performed in three sets twice weekly, which alleviated bodily tension, improved posture, and enhanced his sense of well-being. He contrasted these disciplined habits with the self-destructive lifestyles of canonical writers, suggesting a writer's vitality need not equate to physical neglect. Jacobson has reflected on emotional maturation, recounting his late-life discovery of as a profound shock, having previously avoided romantic vulnerability and cinematic tears. He attributes greater spousal kindness to advanced age, advising marriage at sixty as optimal after his own three unions, the first at 22 when he deemed himself ill-suited. Aging, he noted in 2016 at 73, evokes melancholy over dwindling opportunities for admiration of elder women. Literarily, Jacobson traces personal transformation to escapist reading amid self-dislike, crediting by with satirical gusto that salvaged him during Cambridge despondency. by resonated with his maternal bond, illuminating themes of and depressive relief. These works, alongside later influences like Mario Vargas Llosa's , propelled his shift from academic frustration to novelistic voice, culminating in Coming from Behind (1983).

Awards, Recognition, and Overall Reception

Key Literary Honors and Achievements

Howard Jacobson received the Man Booker Prize on October 12, 2010, for his novel The Finkler Question, marking the first time a comic novel had won the award since Kingsley Amis's Old Devils in 1986. The judges praised the work for its exploration of Jewish identity and antisemitism through humor, with chair Sir Andrew Motion noting its "profound seriousness" beneath the comedy. Jacobson was shortlisted for the Man again in 2014 for J, a dystopian addressing themes of and , though it did not win. He won the inaugural for comic fiction in 2000 for The Mighty Walzer, a about a ping-pong prodigy, selected over competitors including Helen Fielding's : The Edge of Reason. Jacobson became the first author to win this prize twice upon receiving it again in 2013 for Zoo Time, which satirizes the publishing industry and literary decline; the award included a Gloucestershire Old Spot pig, presented at the . These accolades underscore Jacobson's reputation for blending humor with incisive social commentary, particularly on Jewish themes, in a career spanning over two dozen books.

Critical Praises, Criticisms, and Debates

Jacobson's novels have garnered praise for their incisive humor and probing examinations of Jewish identity and neurosis, with critics frequently likening him to Philip Roth or dubbing him the "Jewish Jane Austen" for his satirical take on ethnic anxieties. His 2010 Booker Prize-winning The Finkler Question received acclaim for blending comedy with serious themes of antisemitism and assimilation, described as a "riotous morass of jokes and worries about Jewish identity" that evokes Roth at his peak. Reviewers highlighted its wit, warmth, and intelligence in dissecting British Jewishness, calling it both "funny and furious." Criticisms of Jacobson's oeuvre often focus on perceived repetitiveness in male-centric narratives and an overreliance on ethnic stereotypes, with some arguing that works like perpetuate "dismal stereotypes of 'Jewishness'" appealing to metropolitan tastes. Later novels such as J (2014), a dystopian of and historical erasure, drew rebukes for and a lack of subtlety, as the narrative's mystery yields to overt warnings about prejudice, rendering it "obviously about ." Critics noted its bleak tone abandons humor for unease, with sparse plot development making it challenging to engage. Debates surrounding Jacobson's reception center on the balance between literary and polemical advocacy, particularly in addressing amid Israel-Palestine tensions; engages without descending into politics, yet prompts discussions on unresolved Jewish self-hatred and external threats. His shift from irony in earlier works to apocalyptic directness in J—explicitly leaving behind—has fueled arguments over whether such evolution enhances prophetic depth or sacrifices narrative finesse. Interpretations of J as a caution against collective amnesia vary, with some viewing its obscured Holocaust-like event as a stark warning, while others critique its heavy-handedness in evoking real-world prejudices.

References

  1. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jacobson-howard
  2. https://www.bookbrowse.com/biographies/index.cfm/author_number/1952/howard-jacobson
  3. https://literaturfestival.com/en/authors/howard-jacobson-spe-er/
  4. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/authors/14271/howard-jacobson/
  5. https://thebookerprizes.com/the-booker-library/authors/howard-jacobson
  6. https://www.curtisbrown.co.uk/client/howard-jacobson
  7. https://www.dow.cam.ac.uk/people/howard-jacobson
  8. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/a-polite-hatred-1-jacobson
  9. https://www.newstatesman.com/ideas/2023/11/founding-israel-palestine-anti-semitism
  10. https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/howard-jacobson-accuses-london-review-of-books-of-jew-baiting-uxrzzkb4
  11. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/jacobson-howard-1942
  12. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/russia-my-homeland
  13. https://ingeveb.org/articles/cod-yiddish-from-across-the-pondj
  14. https://www.jewthink.org/2021/12/29/howard-jacobson-prestwich-and-me/
  15. https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/books/features/howard-jacobson-the-day-the-holocaust-came-to-manchester-6096540.html
  16. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/whats-on/going-out/the-man-who-cant-stop-writing-1035947
  17. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/feb/12/howard-jacobson-im-my-mothers-son-which-was-terrible-news-for-my-father
  18. https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/march-2022/very-essence-of-a-jewish-writers-life/
  19. https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/howard-jacobson-is-on-a-guilt-trip/
  20. https://www.thetimes.com/culture/books/article/mothers-boy-by-howard-jacobson-review-a-revelatory-memoir-by-the-booker-winner-3zmj6g75g
  21. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/mar/17/howard-jacobson-on-manchester-i-lack-its-passion-for-football-and-noel-gallagher-
  22. https://biography.jrank.org/pages/4461/Jacobson-Howard.html
  23. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/aug/07/howard-jacobson-life-writing
  24. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/18/once-upon-a-life-howard-jacobson
  25. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/culture/38417/a-superabundance-of-life-howard-jacobsons-sublimely-intelligent-memoir
  26. https://catherinebrown.org/howard-jacobson-in-conversation/
  27. https://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/news/honorary-graduate/comedic-novelists-award-in-recognition-of-his-lifes-work/
  28. https://www.complete-review.com/reviews/jacobsh/peepingt.htm
  29. https://www.nytimes.com/1985/08/25/books/barney-the-obscure.html
  30. https://curtisbrown.co.uk/client/howard-jacobson/work/redback
  31. https://astrofella.wordpress.com/2016/08/17/redback-howard-jacobson/
  32. https://www.bookrags.com/studyguide-the-finkler-question/
  33. https://www.enotes.com/topics/the-finkler-question
  34. https://aish.com/the_finkler_question/
  35. https://www.npr.org/2010/10/11/130425312/finkler-questions-the-meaning-of-jewishness
  36. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/oct/12/howard-jacobson-the-finkler-question-booker
  37. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-11526278
  38. https://thebookerprizes.com/the-booker-library/books/the-finkler-question
  39. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/books/13booker.html
  40. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/oct/13/howard-jacobson-booker-winner-interview
  41. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/books/19jacobson.html
  42. https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/the-booker-goes-to-howard-jacobson
  43. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-oct-13-la-et-1013-booker-20101013-story.html
  44. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/feb/07/my-name-is-shylock-review-howard-jacobson-shakespeare-merchant-of-venice
  45. https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/book/shylock-is-my-name
  46. https://sapirjournal.org/authors/howard-jacobson/
  47. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qng8/episodes/player
  48. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002752n
  49. https://www.bbc.com/audio/play/b06sd27k
  50. https://www.bbc.com/audio/play/m00297f8
  51. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvjHTwjHhWI
  52. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csty34
  53. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T1AQA4a4l4
  54. https://www.the-independent.com/voices/it-is-hard-being-a-columnist-for-eighteen-years-here-s-how-i-got-through-it-a6952481.html
  55. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/sep/11/howard-jacobson-whatever-it-review
  56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1dhpgtg
  57. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/howard-jacobson/howard-jacobson-let-rsquo-s-see-the-criticism-of-israel-for-what-it-really-is-1624827.html
  58. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/06/tales-of-infanticide-have-stoked-hatred-of-jews-for-centuries-they-echo-still-today
  59. https://unherd.com/2024/10/a-year-of-hatred/
  60. https://catherinebrown.org/howard-jacobson-and-anti-semitism/
  61. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v30/n18/sam-thompson/wannabe-pervert
  62. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/aug/14/finkler-question-howard-jacobson-review
  63. https://www.npr.org/2010/12/06/131848784/howard-jacobson-meet-the-jewish-jane-austen
  64. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/conversation-howard-jacobson-winner-of-the-2010-man-booker-prize
  65. https://www.penguin.co.uk/discover/articles/howard-jacobson-shelf-life-favourite-books
  66. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/roger-boylan-howard-jacobson/
  67. https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/1999/aug/15/featuresreview.review4
  68. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/07/howard-jacobson-jews-know-what-antisemitism-is-and-what-it-isnt-to-invent-it-would-be-a-sacrilege
  69. https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/howard-jacobson-im-glad-my-mother-and-father-arent-alive-to-hear-what-the-jew-haters-accuse-us-of-now/
  70. https://www.wsj.com/articles/howard-jacobson-we-can-no-longer-stay-silent-on-anti-semitism-1424029102
  71. https://sapirjournal.org/continuity/2021/advice-to-a-jewish-freshman/
  72. https://jscn.org.uk/antisemitism/criticism-israel/
  73. https://www.algemeiner.com/2016/05/02/famed-writer-howard-jacobson-european-opposition-to-zionism-amounts-to-chutzpah-with-blood-in-it-video
  74. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/disappointment-howard-jacobson
  75. https://www.the-independent.com/voices/commentators/howard-jacobson/howard-jacobson-when-i-argue-on-the-side-of-zionism-it-is-because-it-seems-intellectually-right-to-do-so-5335115.html
  76. https://www.thejc.com/opinion/politics-stepped-in-where-pity-alone-at-least-for-a-while-should-have-spoken-qji07bbj
  77. https://www.thejc.com/opinion/we-have-still-not-been-fully-liberated-from-auschwitz-f30mi4so
  78. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/dec/03/charging-jews-with-genocide-declare-them-guilty-precisely-what-was-done-to-them-middle-east
  79. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/rationalizing-the-horrors-of-israels-war-in-gaza
  80. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/opinion/labour-jeremy-corbym-anti-semitism.html
  81. https://www.thejc.com/news/schama-sebag-montefiore-and-jacobson-unite-to-condemn-labour-antisemitism-g16um4ih
  82. https://www.thejc.com/opinion/enough-is-enough-hxqx7c8c
  83. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-reason-jews-are-scared-of-a-corbyn-government/
  84. https://www.ecaj.org.au/howard-jacobson-jeremy-corbyn-antisemitism/
  85. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/apr/02/howard-jacobson-pussy-interview-trump-in-white-house-must-never-feel-normal
  86. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/04/opinion/the-british-lefts-jewish-problem.html
  87. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/13/howard-jacobson-gaza-israel-cruelty-louise-adler
  88. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/3/20/censorship-is-a-crucial-complement-of-genocide
  89. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZEtoz-sPFi
  90. https://dansmithsblog.com/2009/02/22/gaza-criticising-israel-and-howard-jacobson/
  91. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/no-israel-isnt-deliberately-killing-children-in-gaza/
  92. https://www.thecanary.co/global/world-analysis/2024/10/18/howard-jacobson-israel/
  93. https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/2017-11-06/ty-article/jewish-writers-condemn-anti-semitism-in-britains-labour-party/0000017f-e668-df2c-a1ff-fe7936ef0000
  94. https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/european-judaism/55/2/ej550202.xml?rskey=FdgoFS&result=3&print
  95. https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/books/the-man-who-came-in-from-the-cold-20110514-1endm.html
  96. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/feb/15/howard-jacobson-greedy-in-my-pleasures-indian-restaurants
  97. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jul/08/howard-jacobson-personal-trainer-tai-chi
  98. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/feb/13/howard-jacobson-this-much-i-know
  99. https://www.theguardian.com/books/bollingereverymanwodehouseprize
  100. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/may/15/howard-jacobson-wins-second-wodehouse-prize
  101. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-22527209
  102. https://bookmarks.reviews/reviews/all/the-finkler-question/
  103. https://bookertalk.com/the-finkler-question-bookreviews/
  104. https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2010/sep/28/howard-jacobson-booker-novel
  105. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/17/j-review-howard-jacobson
  106. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/book-review-j-by-howard-jacobson-is-a-chilling-tale-of-our-anti-semitic-future/2014/10/14/ad965836-4f34-11e4-aa5e-7153e466a02d_story.html
  107. https://sevencircumstances.com/2017/05/13/flummoxed-by-a-j-j-a-novel-by-howard-jacobson/
  108. https://www.australianbookreview.com.au/abr-online/archive/2010/december-2010-january-2011-no-327/45-december-2010-january-2011/185-howard-jacobson-the-finkler-question
  109. https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/book/the-finkler-question
  110. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/sep/13/howard-jacobson-man-booker-interview
  111. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/21/j-howard-jacobson-review-british-dystopian-novel-time
  112. https://www.jewishbookcouncil.org/book/j-a-novel
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.