Hubbry Logo
IMDbIMDbMain
Open search
IMDb
Community hub
IMDb
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
IMDb
IMDb
IMDb
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

IMDb, historically known as the Internet Movie Database, is an online database of information related to films, television series, podcasts, video games, and streaming content online – including cast, production crew and biographies, plot summaries, trivia, ratings, and fan and critical reviews. As of September 2025, IMDb ranks as the 40th most visited website in the world and the 35th in the United States.[2][3]

Key Information

The database contained some 25.9 million titles, and 14.8 million person records as of September 2025.[4][5]

Features

[edit]

User profile pages show a user's registration date and, optionally, their personal ratings of titles. Since 2015, "badges" can be added showing a count of contributions. These badges range from total contributions made to independent categories such as photos, trivia, and biographies. If a registered user or visitor is in the entertainment industry and has an IMDb page, they can add photos through IMDbPRO.[6]

User ratings of films

[edit]

Rankings

[edit]

The IMDb Top 250 is a list of the top rated 250 films, based on ratings by registered users of the website using the methods described. As of June 11, 2025, The Shawshank Redemption (1994), directed by Frank Darabont, is the highest-ranked film on the list, and has been since 2008.[7][8][9] The "Top 250" rating is based on only the ratings of "regular voters". The number of votes a registered user would have to make to be considered as a user who votes regularly has been kept secret. IMDb has stated that to maintain the effectiveness of the Top 250 list they "deliberately do not disclose the criteria used for a person to be counted as a regular voter".[10] In addition to other weightings, the Top 250 films are also based on a weighted rating formula referred to in actuarial science as a credibility formula.[11] This label arises because a statistic is taken to be more credible the greater the number of individual pieces of information; in this case from eligible users who submit ratings. Although the current formula is not disclosed, IMDb originally used the following formula to calculate their weighted rating:[12]

The IMDb also has a Bottom 100 feature which is assembled through a similar process although only 10,000 votes must be received to qualify for the list.[13]

The Top 250 list comprises a wide range of feature films, including major releases, cult films, independent films, critically acclaimed films, silent films, and non-English-language films. Documentaries, short films and TV episodes are not currently included.

Since 2015, there has been a Top 250 list devoted to ranking television shows.[14]

Reference view

[edit]

IMDb originally used a more sidebar/list-based view on title pages. However, in 2010 the site updated pages to more free-flowing layouts, and offered logged-in users an "advanced view" site preference setting called "Combined view", or this could be done on an ad-hoc basis by simply adding /combined to the end of the URL (e.g. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2358891/combined), for users to choose should they prefer the older page view display method or to aid the editing of data.

In 2017, some alterations were made to this advanced view, and the setting was renamed "Reference view", again also able to be accessed ad-hoc by simply adding /reference to the end of the URL (e.g. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2358891/reference), with the former /combined URLs made to link to the newer /reference ones.[15]

Message boards

[edit]

By February 20, 2017, all the message boards and their content were permanently removed. According to the website, the decision was made because the boards were "no longer providing a positive, useful experience for the vast majority of our more than 250 million monthly users worldwide".[16] Others have mentioned its susceptibility to trolling and disagreeable behavior.[17][18][19] Needham also mentioned in a post some months earlier that the boards received less income from ads, and that their members only made up a very small part of the website's visitors. The boards were costly to run due to the system's age and dated design, which did not make business sense.[20] The decision to remove the message boards was met with outspoken backlash from some of its users, and sparked an online petition garnering over 8,000 signatures.[21] In the days leading up to February 20, 2017, both Archive.org[22] and MovieChat.org[23] preserved the entire contents of the IMDb message boards using web scraping. Archive.org and MovieChat.org have published IMDb message board archives.[24]

IMDbPro

[edit]

Actors, crew, and industry executives can post their own resume and upload photos of themselves for a yearly membership fee to IMDbPro. IMDbPro can be accessed by anyone willing to pay the annual fee of US$149.99. Membership enables a user to access the rank order of each industry personality, as well as agent contact information for any actor, producer, director etc. that has an IMDb page. IMDbPro also allows existing actors to claim their name page, as well as production companies to claim titles they own/manage. Enrolling in IMDbPro enables members who are industry personnel to upload a head shot to open their page, as well as to upload hundreds of photos to accompany their page. Anyone can register as an IMDb user and contribute to the site as well as view its content; however, those users enrolled in IMDbPro have greater access and privileges.[25]

History

[edit]

IMDb began as a fan-operated movie database on the Usenet group "rec.arts.movies" in 1990, and moved to the Web in 1993.

Pre-website

[edit]

IMDb originated in 1990 with a Usenet posting entitled "Those Eyes", by the English film fan and computer programmer Col Needham,[26][failed verification] about actresses with beautiful eyes.

By late 1990, the lists included almost 10,000 films and television series, correlated with actors and actresses appearing therein. On October 17, 1990, Needham converted his private database to an entity that was accessible on the Internet, and thus the database that would become the IMDb was born.[27] At the time, it was known as the "rec.arts.movies movie database".

On the Web

[edit]

The database had been expanded to include additional categories of filmmakers and other demographic material as well as trivia, biographies, and plot summaries. The movie ratings had been properly integrated with the list data, and a centralized email interface for querying the database had been created by Alan Jay. Later, on August 5, 1993,[28] it moved onto the fledgling World Wide Web under the name of Cardiff Internet Movie Database.[29] The database resided on the servers of the computer science department of Cardiff University in Wales. Rob Hartill was the original web interface author. In 1994, the email interface was revised to accept the submission of all information, which enabled people to email the specific list maintainer with their updates. However, the structure remained so that information received on a single film was divided among multiple section managers, the sections being defined and determined by categories of film personnel and the individual filmographies contained therein. Over the next few years, the database was run on a network of mirrors across the world with donated bandwidth.[30]

As an independent company

[edit]

In 1996, IMDb was incorporated in the United Kingdom, becoming the Internet Movie Database Ltd. Founder Col Needham became the primary owner. General revenue for site operations was generated through advertising, licensing and partnerships.[31]

As Amazon.com subsidiary (1998–present)

[edit]

In 1998, Jeff Bezos, founder, owner, and CEO of Amazon.com, struck a deal with Needham and other principal shareholders to buy IMDb outright; Amazon paid $55 million for IMDb and two other companies.[32] Bezos attached it to Amazon as a subsidiary, private company.[33] This gave IMDb the ability to pay the shareholders salaries for their work.[clarify] In the process of expanding its product line, Amazon.com intended to use IMDb as an advertising resource for selling DVDs and videotapes.

From 1996 onwards, an annual newsletter email (archived on the website) has been sent from Col Needham to contributors on the first day of each calendar year. The annual newsletter lists various information about the past year on the site, including stats, top contributors tally for the year (the top 300 users, currently; fewer in previous years), and a perspective on the site's progress and future.[34][35][36]

As an additional incentive for users, as of 2003, users identified as one of the "top 100 contributors" of hard data received complimentary free access to IMDbPro for the following calendar year; for 2006 this was increased to the top 150 contributors, and for 2010 to the top 250.[37]

In 2008, IMDb launched their first official foreign-language version with IMDb.de, in German. Also in 2008, IMDb acquired two other companies: Withoutabox[38] and Box Office Mojo.[39]

The website was originally Perl-based, but IMDb no longer discloses what software it uses for reasons of security, apart from mentioning The Apache Software Foundation.[40] In 2010, the site was filtered in China.[41]

In 2016, The IMDb Studio at Sundance was launched, a talk show that is presented on IMDb and YouTube.[42][43]

The site's message boards were disabled in February 2017. In April 2017, IMDb celebrated its 25th anniversary. As of that year, Needham was still managing IMDb from its main office in Bristol in the Castlemead office tower.[44]

In January 2019, IMDb launched an ad-supported streaming service called Freedive.[45] This was the company's second attempt at a streaming service; it launched a similar service in 2008.[46][47] In June 2019, Freedive was rebranded as IMDb TV.[48] In April 2022, the service was rebranded again as Amazon Freevee.[49] On December 30, 2024, it was closed as an independent site and its content was merged into Amazon Prime Video.[50]

Content and format

[edit]

Data provided by subjects

[edit]

In 2006, IMDb introduced its "Résumé Subscription Service", where an actor or crew member can post their résumé and upload photos[51] for a yearly fee.[52] IMDb résumé pages are kept on a sub-page of the regular entry about that person, with a regular entry automatically created for each résumé subscriber who does not already have one.[53]

Copyright, vandalism and error issues

[edit]

Volunteers who contribute content to the database technically retain copyright on their contributions, but the compilation of the content becomes the exclusive property of IMDb with the full right to copy, modify, and sublicense it, and they are verified before posting.[54] However, credit is not given on specific title or filmography pages to the contributor(s) who have provided information. Conversely, a credited text entry, such as a plot summary, may be corrected for content, grammar, sentence structure, perceived omission or error, by other contributors without having to add their names as co-authors. Due to the time required for processing submitted data or text before it is displayed, IMDb is different from user-contributed projects like Discogs, or OpenStreetMap, or Wikipedia, in that contributors cannot add, delete, or modify the data or text on impulse, and the manipulation of data is controlled by IMDb technology and salaried staff.[55]

IMDb has been subject to deliberate additions of false information; in 2012 a spokesperson said: "We make it easy for users and professionals to update much of our content, which is why we have an 'edit page'. The data that is submitted goes through a series of consistency checks before it goes live. Given the sheer volume of the information, occasional mistakes are inevitable, and, when reported, they are promptly fixed. We always welcome corrections."[56]

The Java Movie Database (JMDB)[57] is reportedly creating an IMDb_Error.log file that lists all the errors found while processing the IMDb plain text files. A Wiki alternative to IMDb is Open Media Database[58] whose content is also contributed by users but licensed under a Creative Commons license (CC BY) and the GFDL. Since 2007, IMDb has been experimenting with wiki-programmed sections for complete film synopses, parental guides, and FAQs about titles as determined by (and answered by) individual contributors.

Data format and access

[edit]

IMDb, unlike other AI-automated queries, does not provide an API for automated queries. However, most of the data can be downloaded as compressed plain text files and the information can be extracted using the command-line interface tools provided.[59] There is also a Java-based graphical user interface (GUI) application available that is able to process the compressed plain text files, which allows a search and a display of the information.[57] This GUI application supports different languages, but the movie related data are in English, as made available by IMDb. A Python package called IMDbPY (since renamed cinemagoer) can also be used to process the compressed plain text files into a number of different SQL databases, enabling easier access to the entire dataset for searching or data mining.[60][61][62]

Podcasts

[edit]

On October 21, 2021, the site added the ability to add podcasts (both as series and episodes) as titles to the site, via an IMDb employee announcement on their Sprinklr forums.[63] As of December 2022, the numbers of podcast series stood at 24,778, with podcast episodes at 3,076,386.[4]

IMDb STARmeter Awards

[edit]

Annually, IMDb STARmeter Awards are presented to industry professionals in various categories. Professionals who have appeared in its annual "top 10 lists" are considered for this award. "IMDb determines its definitive top 10 lists using data from IMDbPro STARmeter rankings, which are based on the actual page views of the more than 200 million monthly visitors to the site."[64] Initially IMDb STARmeter Awards were given in two categories, IMDb Fan favorite STARmeter Award and IMDb Breakout STARmeter Award.[65] Celebrating 20th anniversary of IMDbPro, it launched IMDb Icon STARmeter Award, which is given to prominent artists of the industry who have appeared in the top 10 positions throughout the year.[66] Salma Hayek received the inaugural award.[66]

[edit]

In 2011, in the case of Hoang v. Amazon.com, Inc., IMDb was sued by an anonymous actress for at least US$1,075,000 because the movie website publicly disclosed her age (40, at the time) without her consent.[67] The actress claimed that revealing her age could cause her to lose acting opportunities.[68] Judge Marsha J. Pechman, a US district judge in Seattle, dismissed the lawsuit, saying the actress had no grounds to proceed with an anonymous complaint. The actress re-filed and so revealed that she was Huong Hoang of Texas, who uses the stage name Junie Hoang.[69] In 2013, Pechman dismissed all causes of action except for a breach of contract claim against IMDb; a jury then sided with IMDb on that claim.[70] The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court judgment in March 2015.[71]

Also in 2011, in the case of United Video Properties Inc., et al. v. Amazon.Com Inc. et al.,[72] IMDb and Amazon were sued by Rovi Corporation and others for patent infringement over their various program listing offerings.[73] The patent claims were ultimately construed in a way favorable to IMDb, and Rovi / United Video Properties lost the case.[74] In April 2014, the decision was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.[75]

In January 2017, the State of California enacted state bill AB-1687, a SAG-AFTRA-backed anti-ageism statute which requires "commercial online entertainment employment services" to honor requests by their subscribers for their ages and birthdays to be hidden.[76] By the beginning of 2017, IMDb had received more than 2,300 requests from individuals to remove their date of birth from the site. Included in this group were 10 Academy Award winners and another 71 nominated for Oscars, Emmys, or Golden Globes.[77] On February 23, 2017, Judge Vince Girdhari Chhabria issued a stay on the bill pending a further trial, on the ground that it possibly violated the First Amendment because it inhibited the public consumption of information. He also questioned the intent of the bill, as it was ostensibly meant to target IMDb.[78] In February 2018, Chhabria struck down the statute,[79] and in June 2020, the Ninth Circuit affirmed Chhabria's judgement, holding that the statute was an unconstitutional content-based restriction that violated the First Amendment.[80][81]

IMDb had long maintained that it would keep all valid information, but changed that policy related to birth names in 2019, instead removing birth names that are not widely and publicly known, of persons who no longer use their birth names.[82] This was done in response to pressure from LGBTQ groups against the publication of the birth names of transgender people without their consent (deadnaming). Any name a person had previously been credited under, however, continues to be maintained in the credits section.[82]

Statistics

[edit]

As of 28 March 2025, IMDb tracked 13 categories:[4]

Type Titles
Movie 706,198
TV Series 276,408
Short 1,049,621
TV Episode 8,641,299
TV Mini Series 60,380
TV Movie 150,311
TV Special 51,758
TV Short 10,602
Video Game 41,899
Video 198,604
Music Video 189,149
Podcast Series 74,037
Podcast Episode 11,496,163

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

IMDb

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

IMDb, an abbreviation of Internet Movie Database, is an online database owned by Amazon.com that catalogs information on films, television series, video games, streaming content, and related media, including cast and crew credits, production details, plot summaries, release information, user ratings, and reviews.
Founded in 1990 by British computer scientist [[Col Needham]] as a personal text file listing favorite film actresses, it evolved through volunteer contributions into one of the internet's earliest comprehensive databases, launching publicly online in 1993.
Amazon acquired IMDb on April 24, 1998, for an undisclosed sum estimated around $55 million, integrating it as a subsidiary and enabling its expansion into professional tools like IMDbPro for industry use.
By September 2025, the database encompassed over 25 million titles and 716 million data items, sustained by a global community of contributors whose submissions are moderated for accuracy, though the platform has faced challenges with data verification due to its crowdsourced nature.
A defining feature is its user-generated rating system, which aggregates votes to produce decimal scores out of 10, offering empirical measures of audience reception but vulnerable to coordinated "review bombing" campaigns that temporarily distort scores on controversial releases, prompting IMDb to implement detection warnings.

History

Origins as Usenet Lists

The origins of IMDb trace to the rec.arts.movies, a discussion forum for film enthusiasts in the late 1980s and early 1990s. British computer programmer and avid fan began as a hobbyist compiling paper lists of movies, actors, and related data around 1987, but shifted to digital formats for sharing amid growing online film discourse. In 1990, Needham initiated public contributions with a posting titled "Those Eyes," a subjective list ranking actresses by the appeal of their eyes, which sparked further threads on actor attractiveness and credits within the group. This evolved into organized, crowdsourced lists maintained by Needham and volunteers, covering categories such as living and deceased actors, directors, and filmographies, with monthly updates posted to . The lists drew from user-submitted data and manual compilations, reflecting the decentralized, collaborative ethos of before widespread web access. On October 17, 1990, Needham formalized the effort by releasing scripts to the group, enabling rudimentary searching of the aggregated movie data and establishing the "rec.arts.movies movie database" as IMDb's direct precursor. By the early 1990s, these lists had expanded to include thousands of entries, supported by dozens of contributors including academics from two universities who verified and formatted data. Needham's scripts and volunteer oversight ensured basic structure amid Usenet's text-only limitations, prioritizing comprehensive coverage over polish, which laid the groundwork for IMDb's later database integrity despite occasional inaccuracies from unvetted inputs.

Transition to Website and Early Growth

In 1993, following the expansion of the Usenet-based movie lists into a more structured database, founder developed a web interface to make the content accessible via the nascent . This transition marked IMDb's shift from downloadable software and text-based postings in Usenet groups like rec.arts.movies to a browsable online resource, initially hosted on a server at in the . The move capitalized on the web's emerging potential for hyperlinked data, allowing users to search and navigate interconnected entries for films, actors, and production details more efficiently than static lists. The early website relied heavily on volunteer editors who contributed data through submissions and manual updates, fostering as film enthusiasts worldwide added credits, biographies, and . This community-driven model enabled the database to scale rapidly amid the web's adoption in the mid-1990s, with Needham's software scripts handling indexing and searches that outpaced manual maintenance. By providing free, comprehensive access to entertainment information, IMDb attracted a growing audience of cinephiles and industry professionals, distinguishing it from print directories like Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide. Rapid expansion strained the hobbyist operation, leading to incorporation as Internet Movie Database Ltd. in January 1996, with initial shareholders including key volunteers and Needham funding startup costs via credit card. That year, the dedicated domain imdb.com launched in time for the , replacing university hosting and formalizing the site's infrastructure to handle surging traffic. This period solidified IMDb's role as an essential reference, with the database encompassing hundreds of thousands of titles by the late , driven by word-of-mouth and its utility in an era before widespread digital alternatives.

Acquisition by Amazon and Expansion

In 1998, Amazon acquired IMDb for $55 million in stock, marking one of the retailer's earliest expansions beyond into entertainment data services. The deal closed on April 24, with the acquisition announced publicly on alongside two other companies, positioning IMDb as a key asset for Amazon's growing media ambitions. Under founder Col Needham's continued leadership, the acquisition provided IMDb with resources to scale its volunteer-curated database, which had originated as lists, into a more robust commercial platform without immediate overhauls to its core operations. Post-acquisition, IMDb expanded its offerings to include professional tools via IMDbPro, a subscription service delivering industry contacts, advanced analytics, and resume management for filmmakers, , and executives, which evolved from basic enhancements to include features like casting tools by 2014. This professional tier supported revenue diversification beyond ads, with mobile apps launched for subscribers by 2017 to facilitate on-the-go access. Concurrently, the database grew exponentially, incorporating television episodes, video games, and short-form content, while integrating user ratings, reviews, and trailer embeds to enhance engagement, reflecting Amazon's investment in data infrastructure for broader entertainment ecosystems. A significant expansion came in 2019 with the launch of IMDb TV, an ad-supported video-on-demand service initially branded as Freedive, offering free access to movies and series to leverage IMDb's metadata for streaming discovery. Rebranded to Amazon Freevee in April 2022, it expanded internationally, starting with the U.K., and integrated linear channels alongside on-demand titles, positioning it as a low-barrier entry into Amazon's video advertising strategy. These developments deepened IMDb's ties to Amazon Prime Video, providing metadata and recommendations that boosted cross-platform usage, while metrics like streaming performance tracking were added to align with evolving viewer habits toward on-demand and ad-supported models. By the 2020s, such integrations contributed to IMDb's role in Amazon's broader content acquisition, including post-MGM synergies for global distribution.

Modern Era and UI Evolutions

In the , IMDb shifted toward integration and mobile optimization under Amazon's ownership, reflecting broader industry trends toward streaming and on-the-go access. A notable refresh in September 2010, marking the site's 20th anniversary, emphasized embedded video content such as trailers and clips directly on title pages to enhance user engagement with entertainment previews. Subsequent updates in involved iterative changes to core features, including navigation and search functionalities, aimed at streamlining presentation amid growing content volume from television series and video games. The 2020s brought more pronounced UI evolutions, prioritizing responsive design and to accommodate diverse devices. A 2021 overhaul adopted a "mobile-first" philosophy, expanding header options minimally while prioritizing visual media like slideshows, though this drew criticism for obscuring detailed textual data such as full cast lists behind expanded visuals. By 2024–2025, IMDb implemented targeted redesigns, including revamped name pages to facilitate content discovery through improved navigation hierarchies. The title full credits page was updated to consolidate cast and crew information more intuitively, accessible via the "Cast & crew" link on title pages. Similarly, the advanced search interface became fully responsive across screen sizes, with enhancements for compliance and mobile usability. List pages received mobile-optimized navigation, reflecting user feedback on on-the-go access needs. These evolutions coincided with backend advancements, such as the 2025 migration to a new technology platform to support scalability for expanding datasets. For IMDbPro users, an August 2025 redesign refreshed home and name pages, prioritizing quick access to industry metrics like contact details and histories. User reception has varied, with some reporting frustrations over reduced granularity in favor of aesthetic streamlining, as evidenced in community discussions on layout changes complicating filmography reviews. In 2025, founder transitioned from CEO to a strategic role, succeeded by Nikki Santoro, potentially influencing future interface priorities amid ongoing adaptations to user and market demands.

Core Features

Database Search and Reference Views

IMDb's database search allows users to query its catalog of over 14 million titles and 10 million personalities as of 2023, encompassing films, television series, video games, and related media. The standard search interface, accessible via the homepage's search bar, supports keyword-based lookups across titles, , crew, summaries, and , returning ranked results by and popularity. For precise filtering, the Advanced Search tool—available under the "Advanced" link in search dropdowns—offers criteria such as release date ranges (e.g., exact years or decades), runtime durations, certification ratings, genres (from action to documentary), user ratings thresholds, and voting counts to exclude low-data entries. This feature also enables searches for titles involving specific actor collaborations, shared keywords, or production companies, with options to sort results by popularity, user ratings, or release order. content visibility can be toggled per session or globally in account settings to refine results. Name-specific searches extend to personnel via dedicated advanced interfaces, querying by profession (e.g., actors, directors), known aliases, birthplaces, or heights for performers, yielding filmographies and credit histories. A 2024 redesign of Advanced Search introduced three view types—, grid, and map—for titles, enhanced mobile navigation, and topic searches that scan page-associated terms across data types like plot keywords or character names, improving international handling and query precision. These tools draw from IMDb's structured database, prioritizing verified credits over unconfirmed user submissions to maintain result accuracy. Reference views comprise the site's detailed entity pages, which aggregate and display structured data from the database. Title pages function as primary reference hubs, featuring essential metadata like original and alternate titles, plot synopses, cast/crew lists with roles, release dates by territory, runtime, aspect ratios, sound mixes, and budget figures where available. They integrate dynamic elements such as aggregated user ratings (on a 1-10 scale), review excerpts, box office grosses, awards nominations, and trivia sections, with tabs for episodes (in series), parental guides, and external links to streaming or purchase options. These views support industry reference by linking to related titles, soundtracks, and technical credits, forming the scaffold for downstream data like user lists or exports. Person pages, distinct from user profiles, catalog professional credits including full filmographies sortable by job type or chronology, "Known For" highlight reels of top titles, biographical notes, and performer specifics like voice types or skills for verified profiles. Claimable by professionals via IMDbPro, these pages allow image uploads, primary photo selection, and contact handling preferences, emphasizing portfolio visibility over personal . Company pages similarly reference production histories, though less emphasized in public views. Overall, these views prioritize empirical credit data over narrative embellishment, with edit histories and contribution guidelines ensuring traceability.

User Ratings and Algorithmic Rankings

IMDb registered users with verified accounts can submit ratings for titles on a scale of 1 to 10, with each user allowed only one rating per title that overwrites prior submissions. These individual ratings are aggregated into a single displayed score representing a weighted rather than a simple , with weights applied variably to individual votes to mitigate manipulation such as ballot stuffing or unusual voting patterns. The exact weighting methodology remains undisclosed to preserve system integrity, though raw mean and values are available in detailed breakdowns on title pages. For algorithmic rankings like the Top 250 Movies and Top 250 TV lists, IMDb employs a Bayesian estimate formula applied exclusively to votes from "regular voters," defined as users who consistently rate multiple titles, though precise qualification criteria are not revealed to deter exploitation. The formula is WR = (v ÷ (v + m)) × R + (m ÷ (v + m)) × C, where WR is the weighted rating, v is the number of valid votes, m is the minimum vote threshold of 25,000, R is the average rating from those votes, and C is the vote across qualified titles (typically around 7.0 to 7.1). This approach balances a title's observed rating against the broader database , favoring established consensus over outliers, with the number of votes (v) crucial for ensuring statistical robustness—particularly for TV series, where it helps prevent inflated ratings from small fan groups or limited evaluations—and eligibility is restricted to feature films for the movies list (excluding shorts, TV movies, and documentaries). The minimum vote threshold was raised from 3,000 to 25,000 on July 19, 2012, to enhance reliability amid growing user base and potential for coordinated voting. These rankings update periodically based on voting volume and patterns, with the Top 250 Movies list, for instance, consistently featuring classics like at the top due to sustained high weighted scores from millions of votes. Similarly, the highest rated TV series in the Top 250 TV list is "Breaking Bad" (2008-2013) with a weighted rating of 9.5/10 based on over 2.2 million votes, followed closely by "Planet Earth II" (9.5) and "Band of Brothers" (9.4); note that rankings may fluctuate slightly with new votes. Lower-volume or niche titles may achieve high raw averages but fail eligibility or regular-voter scrutiny, preventing inflation from targeted campaigns. IMDb also maintains inverse lists like the Bottom 100, applying similar weighted principles to highlight poorly rated titles with sufficient votes.

Professional Tools via IMDbPro

IMDbPro is a paid subscription service launched by IMDb in 2002, designed specifically for entertainment industry professionals such as , filmmakers, agents, and executives to access enhanced tools beyond the free public database. It enables users to manage professional profiles, including hosting resumes, uploading photos, demo reels, bios, and credits, while providing verified contact information for over 300,000 industry contacts. Key professional tools include advanced search capabilities for titles, talent, and companies, allowing filtering by criteria like shared connections or representation details to facilitate networking and opportunity scouting. Users can track in-development projects, monitor attachments of cast and , and access exclusive insights into production statuses, which aid in identifying casting calls or collaboration prospects. For filmmakers, Pro Casting supports unlimited postings to find actors matching specific roles, while talent professionals benefit from tools to submit to projects, research representation, and build customized IMDb pages visible to decision-makers. Subscription pricing as of 2025 includes individual plans at $19.99 per month or $149.99 annually (equivalent to $12.50 monthly), with a group option at $79.99 monthly for up to five users; a 30-day free trial is available for new members. An app, released in December 2017, extends mobile access to these features, including on-the-go contact lookups and profile updates. Industry adoption highlights its value for career advancement, though effectiveness depends on active use for outreach rather than passive profile boosting.

Content Sourcing and Management

Data Contributions and Verification Processes

IMDb maintains its database through a combination of user submissions and editorial review, allowing registered users with free accounts to contribute data such as new titles, credits, , and via dedicated edit interfaces or submission forms. New titles require a specific form, while corrections or additions to existing entries use page-specific edit buttons, with submissions tracked through the Contributor Zone, where contributors can access their personal contribution history to view the status of their submissions (approved, rejected, or modified). Unlike Wikipedia, IMDb does not provide a public edit history or revision log for pages such as titles or names. All user-submitted data undergoes verification by IMDb's staff, who assess accuracy and verifiability at the point of submission; unverified or inaccurate entries are rejected. For credits and other potentially contentious additions, contributors may include additional evidence, such as to sources or , to facilitate approval. vetting applies particularly to new title creations, where internal resources prioritize user submissions over staff-initiated pages to leverage community input while enforcing standards. Contributions adhere to category-specific guidelines, including requirements for biographical data like verifiable sources for dates and identities, and minimum standards for user reviews (e.g., at least 300 characters of substantive content). Processing times vary: high-priority submissions for popular titles or names are handled within one business day, while standard entries take up to five business days; approved data may still require 1-7 additional days to appear publicly. Resubmissions must include clear explanations or evidence justifying changes, as editors enforce policies against unsubstantiated updates. IMDb maintains a user-contribution model for updating its database, where errors are addressed primarily through submission of by registered users or editors. Users cannot directly edit live content but must submit proposed changes via IMDb's contribution interface, providing such as credits or official sources to justify alterations. If a submission contains an error before approval, a new corrected submission must be filed, as direct modifications to pending entries are not permitted. For factual inaccuracies in approved , IMDb's policy emphasizes retaining correct information while allowing verified ; users issues through detailed problem , including URLs and specifics, which are reviewed by the content team. Vandalism, such as unauthorized alterations or of entries, is handled through community reporting and by IMDb's content team. Persistent vandals may face account restrictions or bans, with affected pages reverted based on prior verified data or user-submitted fixes. In sections like parental guides, users are encouraged to correct minor vandalism directly if possible, or escalate repeated instances via reports to prevent ongoing disruption. IMDb monitors contributions under its Conditions of Use, reserving the right to edit or remove malicious content, though the open-editing system relies heavily on volunteer vigilance and post-submission review to mitigate widespread abuse. Copyright matters are governed by U.S. and international laws, with IMDb asserting over its database compilation while prohibiting unauthorized use of its content. Users or rights holders report infringements by submitting detailed notices to IMDb's designated agent, including identification of the material, proof of , and a good-faith statement that the use is unauthorized. Upon validation, infringing materials—such as unlicensed images or text—are removed, in compliance with DMCA procedures. Limited non-commercial scraping or use of data is permitted only if adhering to IMDb's conditions, but commercial redistribution requires explicit licensing, and violations can lead to legal action.

Technical Format and API Access

IMDb maintains its core database in a relational structure comprising entities such as titles (e.g., films, TV episodes), names (e.g., , directors), and principals (e.g., and crew credits), interconnected via identifiers like tconst for titles and nconst for names, where identifiers follow a format of two-letter prefixes followed by at least seven digits. For non-commercial use, subsets of this data are released as downloadable bulk files in gzipped (TSV) format encoded in , including files such as title.basics.tsv.gz (containing title constants, types, primary titles, original titles, release years, runtimes, and pipe-separated genres) and name.basics.tsv.gz (with name constants, primary names, birth and death years in YYYY format, and professions). Large CSV datasets derived from these official TSV files are available on Kaggle, with prominent examples like the "IMDb Extensive Dataset" containing approximately 85,000 movies up to around 2020, often allowing filtering for non-adult content by genre. Processed versions also appear on GitHub, though Kaggle and official sources are generally more reliable for large downloads. For more recent movies (2015-2025), the official IMDb TSV datasets provide the most up-to-date and comprehensive source; users can convert them to CSV if needed, filter for titleType=movie, startYear from 2015 to 2025, and exclude entries with "Adult" in the genres field to focus on non-adult films. These TSV files support local analysis and research, with daily refreshes available, though they exclude sensitive or real-time elements like user ratings. Commercial and advanced access occurs through IMDb's GraphQL-backed , hosted exclusively via AWS Data Exchange, providing on-demand queries to comprehensive title and name datasets including metadata for over 23 million entries across movies, TV series, and video games. subscribers receive unique credentials including an endpoint, , dataset ID, revision ID, and asset ID, enabling programmatic retrieval of structured data in format suitable for integration into applications. This service targets industry users for real-time access, differing from the static TSV downloads by supporting dynamic queries but requiring paid subscriptions without a free tier. Prior undocumented public endpoints existed but were discontinued, leading developers to alternatives, though official policy restricts scraping and mandates licensed access for production use.

Metrics and Popularity Measures

STARmeter and Similar Metrics

STARmeter is IMDb's proprietary metric the popularity of over 8.7 million individuals in its database, including actors, directors, writers, and other entertainment professionals, based solely on observed user behavior rather than artistic merit, critical acclaim, or commercial success. The algorithm aggregates data from more than 250 million monthly unique visitors generating over 3 billion page views, prioritizing the frequency and volume of accesses to specific name pages while excluding self-generated traffic or manipulative patterns through built-in detection. Rankings update weekly, typically concluding by the end of , with greater volatility for lower-ranked entries due to smaller sample sizes in user interactions. Access to STARmeter data requires an IMDbPro subscription, and it serves industry professionals for tracking trends in public interest, though fluctuations can stem from external events like film releases or media coverage rather than inherent talent. For instance, following the December 2025 release of the fifth season of Stranger Things, cast members including Millie Bobby Brown, Sadie Sink, and Jamie Campbell Bower dominated the top positions on the STARmeter. Complementing STARmeter, MOVIEmeter applies a to rank titles across IMDb's 11 million entries, such as films and television series, by the intensity of user searches and page views, highlighting "buzzed about" content without regard to quality metrics like user ratings. This metric, also exclusive to IMDbPro, updates weekly and draws from the same vast user dataset, enabling producers and marketers to gauge real-time audience curiosity, as evidenced by spikes following trailers, awards nominations, or viral mentions. Unlike figures, MOVIEmeter emphasizes online engagement on IMDb specifically, potentially diverging from broader market performance. COMPANYmeter extends the framework to production companies, studios, agencies, and other entities, them by analogous user-driven access patterns to reflect operational visibility and interest within the industry . Like its counterparts, it relies on proprietary safeguards against artificial inflation and weekly recalculations, providing talent representatives and executives with indicators of agency prominence tied to client searches rather than deal volume or revenue. These metrics collectively offer a data-driven snapshot of IMDb-specific popularity, but their proprietary nature limits transparency, with IMDb emphasizing they capture transient trends over enduring value.

Usage Statistics and Industry Influence

IMDb receives over 250 million unique monthly visitors, establishing it as one of the most trafficked websites globally. In 2024, this figure reflected sustained high engagement, with users primarily accessing content via mobile devices, accounting for 70.39% of visits as of recent analytics. The platform's skews toward males (62.92%) and the 25-34 age group, driving search behaviors that underpin metrics like popularity rankings. Within the film and television industry, IMDb's data exerts influence through tools like STARmeter, which ranks professionals based on aggregated page views and searches from its user base, providing a real-time proxy for public interest and marketability. Casting directors and producers reference STARmeter rankings to evaluate visibility, with quantitative analyses demonstrating a positive between higher rankings and films' commercial success at the . For instance, studios leverage celebrity status metrics derived from IMDb data to justify high-profile expenditures, as elevated rankings signal potential uplift from draw. IMDbPro extends this impact by offering industry subscribers access to records, insights, and contact directories, facilitating data-driven decisions in production, distribution, and talent acquisition. Analyses using IMDbPro datasets, such as those examining gender-balanced crews, have informed profitability assessments, revealing that films meeting diversity criteria in 2024 outperformed male-dominated counterparts financially. User ratings and algorithmic outputs further shape market dynamics, with empirical studies linking IMDb scores to turnout and studio strategies, though correlations do not imply causation absent controls for factors like budgets.

Business Operations and Ownership

Monetization and Revenue Streams

IMDb's primary revenue streams derive from on its free-to-use website and apps, subscription services via IMDbPro, and licensing of its data and access to third parties. encompasses display ads, video ads on IMDb TV (rebranded as in certain contexts), and programmatic advertising through Amazon's , which targets entertainment-related promotions such as streaming services and merchandise affiliates. These ad revenues support the core site's accessibility without direct user fees, with placements often integrated into title pages to drive traffic to partner content. IMDbPro, a premium tier launched for industry professionals, generates recurring subscription income by providing advanced tools including non-public contact details, resume , advanced search filters, and submission options for credits and awards eligibility. as of 2025 includes individual plans at $19.99 per month or $149.99 annually, with group options available for multiple users at reduced per-person rates, such as approximately $79.95 monthly for teams. This service caters to actors, directors, producers, and agents seeking networking and promotional capabilities, distinguishing it from the ad-supported consumer platform. Additional monetization includes B2B data licensing, expanded in September 2025 through a dedicated platform offering IMDb's metadata—such as titles, , , and ratings—for enterprise use in , recommendation engines, and content discovery. Access to IMDb's datasets is facilitated via a GraphQL-backed available exclusively on AWS Data Exchange, enabling on-demand queries for commercial applications while adhering to usage restrictions. These licensing agreements represent a growing segment, leveraging IMDb's comprehensive database as a asset post-Amazon acquisition in 1998. Overall, these streams integrate with Amazon's ecosystem but operate as distinct levers, with and subscriptions forming the foundational pillars.

Integration with Amazon Ecosystem

Amazon acquired IMDb on April 27, 1998, for $55 million in cash and stock, marking one of its earliest expansions beyond into data services. This purchase integrated IMDb's comprehensive database of film, television, and celebrity information into Amazon's broader ecosystem, enabling data sharing across services like Prime Video and Alexa. Post-acquisition, IMDb's metadata has been leveraged to enhance content discovery and personalization in Amazon's media platforms, such as structuring unstructured video data in Prime Video to address user queries on cast, crew, and plot details. Account integration ties IMDb and IMDbPro access to Amazon's authentication system, requiring users to link or create an Amazon.com account for membership creation, renewal, and sign-in since at least 2023. This linkage facilitates seamless user experiences but does not bundle IMDbPro with Amazon Prime subscriptions, which remain separate paid services without reciprocal discounts. On the content side, IMDb TV, launched as Amazon's free ad-supported streaming service, rebranded to Amazon Freevee on April 27, 2022, expanding access to original series and movies integrated with IMDb's catalog for recommendations and metadata. Technically, IMDb datasets are distributed via AWS Data Exchange, allowing third-party developers and Amazon services to license and process data for applications like search, recommendations, and knowledge graphs powering out-of-catalog queries in Prime Video. In 2024, integrations deepened, with IMDb data enhancing Prime Video's user engagement through enriched catalog metadata and cross-device features on Fire TV. These synergies support Amazon's media strategy by combining IMDb's authoritative ratings and credits with algorithmic personalization, though data usage remains governed by IMDb's terms limiting non-commercial scraping.

Controversies and Criticisms

Review Manipulation and Rating Sabotage

Review bombing on IMDb involves coordinated efforts by users or groups to artificially lower a title's user rating through mass submission of low scores, often motivated by ideological opposition, fan backlash, or cultural grievances rather than engagement with the content. This tactic, distinct from legitimate , exploits IMDb's user-driven , which aggregates scores from verified and unverified accounts to compute a 1-10 . Instances frequently target high-profile releases, particularly those featuring diverse casts or diverging from established franchises, leading to distorted metrics that can influence public perception. Notable cases include the 2023 live-action , where backlash against the casting of as Ariel prompted a surge of 1-star ratings shortly after its May 26 premiere, prompting IMDb to detect "unusual voting activity" and temporarily adjust the displayed rating to exclude suspected anomalies. Similarly, Disney's (released March 21, 2025) faced intense pre- and post-release bombing, dropping its user score to 2.1 and ranking it among IMDb's lowest-rated major films, with the platform issuing a warning on April 5, 2025, for anomalous patterns linked to campaigns against lead actress . Earlier examples encompass the 2022 Marvel series : , review-bombed to a 5.2 average amid complaints over its feminist themes, and the 2016 reboot, which saw coordinated negativity upon announcement of its all-female cast. IMDb counters manipulation through algorithmic detection of irregular voting patterns, such as sudden spikes from new or low-activity accounts, enabling temporary rating holds or disclaimers without disclosing exact thresholds to deter gaming. User guidelines prohibit "false, misleading, or offensive" submissions, with reports funneled to moderators, though enforcement relies on post-submission and lacks preemptive bot-proofing against AI-generated fakes. Critics argue these measures fall short, as brigading persists via coordination on platforms like , where users discuss tactics to evade detection, and positive "up-bombing" by studios or fans symmetrically inflates scores. Despite this, empirical studies indicate bombing rarely sustains long-term damage to performance, as audiences prioritize trailers and word-of-mouth over manipulated aggregates. The prevalence of such sabotage underscores vulnerabilities in crowd-sourced data, where unverified contributions amplify echo chambers, yet IMDb's reluctance to require for ratings—unlike ' verified critic model—preserves accessibility at the cost of integrity. Ongoing debates in user forums highlight inconsistent application, with accusations of selective intervention favoring certain narratives, though platform data shows interventions applied neutrally to outliers regardless of direction.

Allegations of Bias and Policy Enforcement

IMDb has encountered accusations of ideological bias in its review moderation practices, with users claiming selective enforcement that favors content aligned with progressive viewpoints. Numerous reports indicate that negative reviews criticizing elements such as forced diversity or narrative choices in productions like The Rings of Power (2022) and She-Hulk: Attorney at Law (2022) are systematically removed or rejected, while comparable critiques of non-progressive works persist. These allegations, drawn from user forums and video analyses, posit that such deletions artificially inflate ratings for "woke" titles, shielding them from organic audience discontent and reflecting potential corporate influence under Amazon ownership to prioritize certain cultural narratives over unfiltered feedback. Critics further contend that IMDb's policies exacerbate this perceived through opaque and stringent enforcement. The platform's user review guidelines mandate at least 300 characters of substantive content, barring spoilers, promotions, or off-topic rants, yet users frequently report compliant submissions being declined without clear justification, fostering suspicions of manual intervention favoring ideological conformity. In May 2023, IMDb discontinued public access to rating vote breakdowns, including distributions from top 1,000 reviewers, which observers argue obscures detectable patterns of coordinated manipulation or demographic skews in voting, such as male-dominated or Western-centric biases inherent to the user base. Broader policy controversies include claims of uneven handling across content types, with some alleging favoritism toward left-leaning political commentary in permitted reviews. For instance, hostile reviews incorporating partisan critiques have been accused of inconsistent , allowing those aligned with progressive stances while scrutinizing conservative-leaning ones. In a March 2024 , filmmaker S.V. Henson, Jr., via Epic Motion Pictures Group, alleged discriminatory removal of his films featuring predominantly black casts, prompting assertions of an FTC probe into racially biased content takedowns; IMDb countered that actions adhered to standard guidelines against violations like unsubstantiated claims. These disputes underscore tensions between IMDb's stated commitment to combating review bombing via weighted Bayesian adjustments and perceptions of selective transparency, particularly given the platform's role in shaping industry metrics. In 2016, IMDb challenged Assembly Bill 1687 (AB 1687), a backed by that required websites publishing entertainment industry data to remove individuals' birth dates and ages upon request, ostensibly to combat age in . IMDb argued the imposed an unconstitutional content-based restriction on speech, targeting specific factual about figures while exempting general media outlets. A federal district court granted and an against enforcement in 2019, a decision affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on June 19, 2020, which held that AB 1687 compelled speech suppression without adequate justification and risked broader of biographical data. Individual lawsuits have also arisen over disclosure. In 2013, actress Huong Hoang sued IMDb for $1 million, alleging violation of her by listing her actual age of 41, contrary to her professional preference for appearing younger. Separately, in 2020, attorney Jeffrey Singman filed a $500 million claim against IMDb for erroneously dating his The Singman Murder Case to 2002 instead of 2020, seeking correction; the suit was dismissed after IMDb declined to alter the entry absent evidence. User backlash has intensified around IMDb's evolving moderation policies, particularly changes perceived as prioritizing activist demands over factual accuracy or open discourse. In August 2019, following protests from LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, IMDb revised its policy to permit removal of individuals' birth names (often termed "deadnaming" in activist contexts), allowing preferred names to supersede historical identifiers on profiles. This shift drew criticism from users arguing it obscured verifiable biographical facts, potentially misleading consumers about actors' identities in roles tied to their original names. Similarly, a December 2022 policy update enabled verified professionals to withhold age information entirely, conceding to SAG-AFTRA's long-standing push despite IMDb's prior legal victory, which some viewed as a retreat from free speech principles in favor of industry pressure. Review system alterations have fueled further discontent, with users decrying opaque moderation that rejects submissions without clear rationale, often citing violations of guidelines against "spam" or "" content amid rising complaints of in enforcement. Efforts to curb "review bombing"—coordinated low ratings on politically charged titles like Disney's 2025 Snow White remake or 2023's —prompted system tweaks, including delayed rating displays and warnings for "unusual activity," but these were lambasted by detractors as suppressing grassroots opinion aggregation in favor of algorithmic gatekeeping. Broader user forums highlight ongoing frustration with site degradation, such as increased ads, layout overhauls, and removal of features like detailed rating breakdowns, attributing these to Amazon's eroding IMDb's utility as an impartial database.

Cultural and Economic Impact

Role in Film Evaluation and Market Dynamics

IMDb's user-generated , where registered users score on a scale of 1 to 10, aggregates millions of votes to compute an average score weighted by voting eligibility and volume, offering a quantifiable measure of broad reception that contrasts with evaluations. This crowd-sourced approach democratizes evaluation, prioritizing empirical viewer sentiment over curated opinions, and has become a benchmark for assessing entertainment value in a data-driven manner. Unlike critic aggregates, which often emphasize artistic merit, IMDb scores align more closely with populist appeal, frequently diverging from sites like where ratings exceed scores by several points on average. In market dynamics, IMDb ratings exert influence by shaping consumer behavior and industry strategies; high scores enhance a film's visibility through algorithmic recommendations and lists like the Top 250, driving sustained demand via streaming, , and international markets. For instance, inclusion in the Top 250 sustains cultural relevance for older titles, boosting ancillary revenues as seen in shifts where user voting elevated films like to enduring prominence. Empirical analyses reveal correlations between elevated IMDb ratings and revenue outcomes, with user reviews serving as predictors in models for potential, though the relationship reflects post-release reception more than pre-launch causation. Studios leverage these metrics for decisions on sequels, marketing budgets, and talent acquisition, as aggregated informs in an industry where commercial viability hinges on viewer engagement over critical acclaim. While direct causality remains debated—some regressions show insignificant immediate effects from ratings amid factors like budgets and promotion—IMDb scores better capture long-tail dynamics, influencing franchise extensions and investor confidence by signaling scalable appeal. This populist evaluation mechanism disrupts traditional gatekeeping, compelling producers to prioritize accessible storytelling, as evidenced by predictive models incorporating IMDb data for financial forecasting. Overall, the platform's metrics foster a feedback loop where audience validation propels market winners, underscoring its role in aligning production with verifiable demand signals.

Empirical Effects on Audience Behavior and Industry Decisions

A Nielsen survey indicates that over 70% of viewers consult reviews and ratings, including those on , as a primary when selecting to watch. This behavior contributes to self-reinforcing visibility, where high IMDb scores elevate titles in search results and recommendations, prompting greater viewership among undecided audiences. Empirical analyses of streaming datasets further demonstrate that with IMDb ratings above 7.0 tend to accumulate higher play counts on platforms like , as user sentiment aggregated on IMDb correlates with sustained demand post-theatrical release. However, causal links between IMDb ratings and box office revenue show inconsistency across studies. A 2014 examination of IMDb films found no statistically significant between average user ratings and gross earnings (p > 0.05), with financial outcomes more strongly tied to budget-driven prominence that boosts vote volume rather than rating quality itself. In contrast, other research on audience-generated reviews, encompassing IMDb data, identifies a positive association, where each incremental rating point can extend theatrical runs by 10-20% for mid-budget films through enhanced word-of-mouth effects. These divergent results highlight that while IMDb ratings reflect post-viewing sentiment, their pre-release influence on audience turnout often amplifies via secondary channels like social sharing rather than direct causation. Film industry executives utilize IMDb ratings and metadata for in production and distribution decisions. Regression models trained on IMDb datasets, incorporating historical ratings, genre trends, and cast metrics, achieve up to 75% accuracy in forecasting viability, enabling studios to prioritize scripts or talent with proven audience appeal. For , network analyses of IMDb co-affiliations between , directors, and agents reveal patterns of success, such as elevated ratings for projects involving high-centrality nodes, informing agency collaborations and sequel greenlighting as of 2024. Such data-driven approaches mitigate risks in an industry where over 60% of releases fail to recoup costs, though reliance on user votes risks overlooking niche appeal underrepresented in aggregate scores.

References

  1. https://www.imdb.com/pressroom/stats/
  2. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/workplace/imdb-ceo-col-needham-amazon-anniversary
  3. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/imdb-founder-col-needham-ceo-nikki-santoro-1236112229/
  4. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/movies/2025/02/23/imdb-internet-history-col-needham/
  5. https://my.linkedin.com/posts/imdb-com_imdb-anamazoncompany-activity-7056277943865536513-gQvF
  6. https://contribute.imdb.com/czone/top_msg
  7. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni65223493/
  8. https://www.theringer.com/2019/06/12/tv/imdb-rating-system-problems-chernobyl
  9. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni65216876/
  10. https://www.webdevelopersnotes.com/imdb-started-as-a-usenet-posting
  11. https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/22/arts/imdb-went-online-30-years-ago-this-month/
  12. https://giganews.com/2008/12/worst-top-10-list-ever-10-things-started-on-usenet/
  13. https://www.wired.com/story/superusers-behind-imdb-the-internets-favorite-movie-site/
  14. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/created-one-worlds-first-websites-110030604.html
  15. https://medium.com/workandlife/the-founder-files-col-needham-c69d4dc80800
  16. https://thehistoryoftheweb.com/timeline/?page&pagename=timeline&date_from=1989&date_to=1994
  17. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2013-jan-19-la-fi-himi-needham-20130120-story.html
  18. https://www.filmindependent.org/blog/imdbs-col-needham-on-the-websites-start-independent-film-and-why-right-now-is-so-exciting/
  19. https://www.imdb.com/pressroom/imdb-leadership/
  20. https://mergr.com/amazon.com-acquires-imdb.com
  21. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/entertainment/behind-the-scenes-at-imdb
  22. https://variety.com/2014/digital/news/imdb-raises-price-of-imdbpro-with-addition-of-casting-tools-1201129433/
  23. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/imdbpro-launches-iphone-app-available-130440126.html
  24. https://variety.com/2022/tv/news/imdb-tv-amazon-freevee-1235231612/
  25. https://www.geekwire.com/2022/imdb-tv-streaming-service-will-rebrand-as-amazon-freevee/
  26. https://deadline.com/2022/04/imdb-tv-rebrand-amazon-freevee-1235001502/
  27. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni65115707/
  28. https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/ongoing-changes-to-several-imdb-features/5f4a79c38815453dba89c776
  29. https://medium.com/illumination/the-ui-destruction-of-imdb-e9a2bc2010f0
  30. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni63857395/
  31. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/new-features-updates/title-full-credits-redesign/GTYSEUDJJTCGW895
  32. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/new-features-updates/advanced-search-redesign/G73SLJ6K33AA6NB5
  33. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/new-features-updates/list-pages-redesign/GLF7EF3VJPXM34XG
  34. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/new-features-updates/redesigned-imdbpro-mobile-app/G2GGZ5DYQUD6B9KV
  35. https://www.reddit.com/r/imdb/comments/1lyrd5d/so_short_sighted_to_remove_this_useful_data_from/
  36. https://www.imdb.com/
  37. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/discover-watch/using-the-advanced-search-feature/GLUEUYWPQNPTEVPU
  38. https://www.imdb.com/search/common/
  39. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/discover-watch/how-can-i-find-adult-titles-on-imdb/GT2L8RJBBDGFR4G3
  40. https://www.imdb.com/search/name/
  41. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/titles/adding-a-new-title/GNXTSSVTJTFCRZGN
  42. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/industry-research/where-can-i-find-box-office-information-on-imdbpro/GTFKKHTFGPYPCDLE
  43. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/what-s-the-difference-between-an-imdb-page-and-user-profile/GHQEDYZ5DJ5Y8G5S
  44. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/industry-research/name-title-company-pages-faq/GLY9HY48QGA9F5QC
  45. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/manage-your-imdb-page/claim-your-page/GXWAJBBV8EVPF3PE
  46. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/images-videos/images-guidelines/G27LPBQZA7EAZGJW
  47. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/track-movies-tv/ratings-faq/G67Y87TFYYP6TWAV
  48. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/track-movies-tv/weighted-average-ratings/GWT2DSBYVT2F25SK
  49. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/featured-content/why-doesn-t-a-title-with-the-average-user-vote-of-9-4-appear-in-your-top-250-movies-or-tv-list/GTU67Q5QQ8W53RJT
  50. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls050731519/
  51. https://www.imdb.com/chart/toptv/
  52. https://beebom.com/imdbpro-explained/
  53. https://www.britannica.com/topic/IMDb
  54. https://pro.imdb.com/signup/index.html?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpro.imdb.com%2F
  55. https://www.indiewire.com/features/craft/imdbpro-iphone-app-1201903397/
  56. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/membership-benefits/which-imdbpro-subscription-is-right-for-me/GH39495X7KWY4PMP
  57. https://zackarnold.com/10-imdbpro-networking-features/
  58. https://pro.imdb.com/content/article/entertainment-industry-resources/featured-articles/how-do-i-find-industry-companies-and-professionals-i-want-to-work-with/GRPRX2T2GYMP9GB7
  59. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/membership-benefits/pro-tips-for-talent/GHQ5W5C2BJ2KWP77
  60. https://writeseen.com/blog/imdb-subscription-price
  61. https://pro.imdb.com/membership/premium?ref_=m_apl_stdlp_nav
  62. https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2017/12/04/imdb-launches-first-app-for-pro-version.html
  63. https://www.actorsite.com/blog/imdb-pro
  64. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjOQSMV_j9A
  65. https://www.imdb.com/help/?adding/
  66. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/contribution-information/how-do-i-contribute-data-to-imdb/GVZTHQ48SWS47WDK?ref_=helpart_nav_2
  67. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/contribution-information/contribution-history/G2BYV38VYPXM5L4F
  68. https://contribute.imdb.com/
  69. https://contribute.imdb.com/czone
  70. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/contribution-information/how-can-i-submit-additional-verification-for-a-credit-submission/GN93ME9NVXHVE36E
  71. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/industry-resources/learn-about-imdb-content-partnerships/GDZPCNMJXALLGYAQ?ref_=__seemr
  72. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/names-biographical-data/biographical-data-guidelines/GMT9T242VQADZUQM
  73. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/contribution-information/user-review-guidelines/GABTWSNLDNFLPRRH
  74. https://contribute.imdb.com/times
  75. https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/how-are-contribution-resubmissions-processed/683b65c11702be52a6660631
  76. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/contribution-information/i-made-a-mistake-with-a-submission-how-can-i-correct-it-before-it-goes-live/GQA7BXLPXHZJKR3Y
  77. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/how-to-effectively-report-problems/G8UFAVKZND9M5HXL
  78. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/contribution-information/i-tried-to-delete-data-but-it-still-appears-on-imdb-why/GBC4F3QWUTSVFV3B
  79. https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/problems-and-vandalism/67181885929069498610a579
  80. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/titles/parental-guide/GF4KYKYJA4PKQB32
  81. https://www.imdb.com/conditions
  82. https://help.imdb.com/article/contribution/contribution-information/how-do-i-report-copyrighted-material/GQGQXYTN68GCEGS2
  83. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/can-i-use-imdb-data-in-my-software/G5JTRESSHJBBHTGX
  84. https://developer.imdb.com/documentation/key-concepts
  85. https://developer.imdb.com/non-commercial-datasets/
  86. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ashirwadsangwan/imdb-dataset
  87. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/stefanoleone992/imdb-extensive-dataset
  88. https://minimaxir.com/2018/07/imdb-data-analysis/
  89. https://developer.imdb.com/
  90. https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/seller-profile?id=0af153a3-339f-48c2-8b42-3b9fa26d3367
  91. https://developer.imdb.com/documentation/api-documentation/getting-access/
  92. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/introducing-the-imdb-api/G49M5Y59L5N4WABM?ref_=helpart_nav_45
  93. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1966503/does-imdb-provide-an-api
  94. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/industry-research/starmeter-moviemeter-and-companymeter-faq/GSPB7HDNPKVT5VHC
  95. https://www.imdb.com/chart/moviemeter/
  96. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni65647893/
  97. https://www.imdb.com/pressroom/press-pull-quotes/
  98. https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/imdb-facts-statistics/
  99. https://www.semrush.com/website/imdb.com/overview/
  100. https://www.similarweb.com/website/imdb.com/
  101. https://www.actingscience.com/post/6-ways-to-improve-imdb-com-score
  102. https://www.jsr.org/hs/index.php/path/article/download/2498/1718/25617
  103. https://pro.imdb.com/content/article/entertainment-industry-resources/featured-articles/how-is-the-success-of-films-and-tv-shows-measured/GLFTC8ZLBBUSNTM3
  104. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250325570435/en/ReFrame-Analysis-of-IMDbPro-Data-Finds-Gender-Balanced-Films-are-More-Profitable-Than-Those-That-Hire-Mostly-Men
  105. https://nofilmschool.com/how-ratings-and-algorithms-impact-your-filmmaking-career
  106. https://bmucsanyi.github.io/assets/pdf/data_literacy_project.pdf
  107. https://verticaltemplate.com/blogs/news/how-imdb-makes-money-imdbpro-imdb-tv-and-api
  108. https://vizologi.com/business-strategy-canvas/imdb-business-model-canvas/
  109. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/how-much-does-using-imdb-cost/G47U365PP8GQVQYV?ref_=helpart_nav_32
  110. https://www.vp-land.com/p/imdb-transforms-entertainment-metadata-with-new-b2b-data-licensing-platform
  111. https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/imdb-col-needham-ceo-nikki-santoro-1236277656/
  112. https://pages.awscloud.com/rs/112-TZM-766/images/Top%25203%2520Ways%2520IMDb%2527s%2520third-party%2520data%2520enhances%2520user%2520engagement_PDF.pdf
  113. https://enterprise-knowledge.com/metadata-use-case-imdb-in-amazon-prime-video/
  114. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdbpro/your-account/can-i-join-imdbpro-without-linking-to-an-amazon-account/GPWEHGB7ZVZ39RW5
  115. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/use-your-amazon-account-for-imdb-and-imdbpro/GAW6LFMJ8HBGPKXL?ref_=helpart_nav_2
  116. https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/imdbprocom/amazon-prime-and-free-membership/63765fc1939e3c05b0f3c416
  117. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni63594961/
  118. https://aws.amazon.com/partners/success/tableau-imdb/
  119. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/part-1-power-recommendation-and-search-using-an-imdb-knowledge-graph/
  120. https://blog.justoneapi.com/post-1/post-20250904165851407.html
  121. https://help.imdb.com/article/imdb/general-information/can-i-use-imdb-data-in-my-software/G5JTRESSHJBBHTGX?ref_=helpart_nav_20
  122. https://variety.com/2023/digital/news/little-mermaid-review-bombing-imdb-ratings-change-1235630089/
  123. https://www.pasabi.com/insights/what-is-review-bombing
  124. https://screenrant.com/she-hulk-review-bombing-imdb-ratings-problem/
  125. https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/04/01/snow-white-flagged-by-imdb-due-to-intense-review-bombing/
  126. https://www.imdb.com/list/ls564571596/
  127. https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/lyicb6/imdb_has_become_a_cesspool_of_review_manipulation/
  128. https://movieweb.com/snow-white-imdb-warning-review-bombing/
  129. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5336870
  130. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/227-movies-new-and-upcoming-releases/80461900
  131. https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/another-film-falls-victim-to-political-hate-rating/63b340e48a78b241087289b8
  132. https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1jnys60/does_imdb_not_have_any_protections_against/
  133. https://www.reddit.com/r/lotr/comments/x46870/imdb_have_deleted_all_the_negative_reviews_for/
  134. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32700019
  135. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScUq2mOhseU
  136. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.imdb.com?page=6
  137. https://www.reddit.com/r/imdb/comments/t3fx3e/lets_discuss_imdbs_review_censorship_not/
  138. https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/13p0a5k/imdb_removes_rating_breakdown_most_importantly/
  139. https://www.quora.com/Are-the-user-ratings-in-IMDb-biased
  140. https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/review-process-is-blatantly-rigged/63123d2672837f15dbbff4d0
  141. https://community-imdb.sprinklr.com/conversations/data-issues-policy-discussions/incredible-bias-of-imdb/61f850c49ae52c4a67538b88
  142. https://www.prlog.org/13014018-title-imdb-under-ftc-investigation-for-allegedly-discriminatory-content-removal.html
  143. https://www.quora.com/How-does-IMDB-prevent-studios-from-artificially-inflating-a-movies-rating
  144. https://deadline.com/2020/06/imdb-age-law-violates-first-amendment-california-1202296413/
  145. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/imdbs-age-censorship-win-affirmed-by-appeals-court-1299490/
  146. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/18-15463/18-15463-2020-06-19.html
  147. https://www.loeb.com/en/insights/publications/2020/06/imdbcom-inc-v-becerra
  148. https://www.olshanlaw.com/Advertising-Law-Blog/IMDb-Washington-Publication-Age
  149. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/imdb-beats-lawyers-suit-over-alleged-film-date-error-4062087/
  150. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/aug/13/imdb-names-policy-transgender-protest-dead-naming-lgbtq
  151. https://deadline.com/2019/08/imdb-birth-name-policy-lgbtq-transgender-1202666936/
  152. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/imdb-changes-policies-ending-age-215631529.html
  153. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/imdb-changes-allow-professionals-control-age-name-information-1235281269/
  154. https://www.quora.com/Is-anyone-else-having-problems-with-their-reviews-being-denied-on-IMDB-and-Amazon
  155. https://www.cbr.com/snow-white-imdb-warning/
  156. https://www.reddit.com/r/entertainment/comments/13wljb1/imdb_changes_review_system_after_bots_review_bomb/
  157. https://www.reddit.com/r/imdb/comments/1e6h1ke/imdb_just_gets_worse_and_worse_and_for_what/
  158. https://reelmind.ai/blog/imdb-movie-ratings-ai-assisted-film-industry-data-analysis
  159. https://www.getafollower.com/blog/imdb-ratings/
  160. https://d197for5662m48.cloudfront.net/documents/publicationstatus/270016/preprint_pdf/fd241880eeea4f7add11b0f8fcffaf63.pdf
  161. https://thelearningfellow.medium.com/a-tale-of-two-ratings-audience-vs-critics-in-imdbs-top-100-d5ae809b12f6
  162. https://brightlightsfilm.com/tracking-mass-ideology-on-imdbs-top-250-how-shifts-in-societal-values-appear-in-the-popular-film-canon/
  163. https://techpolicyinstitute.org/publications/miscellaneous/rotten-tomatoes-and-imdb-reviews-strongly-correlated-with-movie-revenues/
  164. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-11740-9_41
  165. https://www.garyshood.com/look-at-imdbs-system/
  166. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369770847_Impact_of_Movie_Audience_Ratings_and_Critics_Ratings_on_Box_Office_Outcome
  167. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15108071
  168. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282133920_Predicting_Movie_Success_Based_on_IMDB_Data
  169. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-92430-w
  170. https://medium.com/mlearning-ai/data-analysis-of-netflix-original-films-and-imdb-scores-e349791b2ec4
  171. https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23213
  172. https://arxiv.org/html/2408.06393v1
  173. https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s41109-024-00673-9
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.