Hubbry Logo
Iraqi Counter Terrorism ServiceIraqi Counter Terrorism ServiceMain
Open search
Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service
Community hub
Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service
Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service
Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Counter Terrorism Service
Iraqi Special Operations Forces
CTS-ISOF
‏جهاز مكافحة الإرهاب
قوات العمليات الخاصة العراقية
Emblem of the Counter Terrorism Bureau
FoundedApril 2007 (CTS established)
Country Iraq
TypeSpecial Operations Forces
Role
Size14,000 (2024)[1]
Part ofIraqi Armed Forces[a]
Garrison/HQGreen Zone, Baghdad
NicknameThe Golden Division
Motto"Raise The Black"
Colors  Black
Engagements
Commanders
Commander-in-chiefMohammed Shia' Al Sudani
Head of CTSGen. Karim Abboud al-Tamimi[3]
Commander of CTCLt. Gen. Hassan Makenzi
Notable
commanders		Talib Shaghati
Abdul-Wahab al-Saadi
Abdul Ghani al-Asadi
Insignia
ICTB Flag
ISOF Flag

The Counter Terrorism Service (CTS; Arabic: جهاز مكافحة الارهاب) is an Iraqi security and intelligence agency tasked with counterterrorism.[4] The Service’s operational arm is called the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF; Arabic: قوات العمليات الخاصة العراقية). They are an elite special operations force composed of three brigades based in several governorates, and who are often collectively referred to as the Golden Division.[5][6][7]

During the occupation of Iraq, all military, security, and intelligence entities of the country were dissolved by the Coalition Provisional Authority following the issuance of CPA Order 2, and rebuilt from scratch. CTS was created in 2007 and is funded by the Ministry of Defence.[8] The Service played a crucial role in combatting terrorism during the war in Iraq (2013-2017). ISOF have conducted joint operations with the Green Berets.[9]

History

[edit]

Special operations troops of the Iraqi Army were first established when Colonel Khalil Dabbagh built the first royal special units in the name of "Queen Alia Forces" in the mid-1950s. It consisted of Sunni and Shia Arabs, as well as other components of the Iraqi population. They were mainly used on an emergency basis to carry out special missions inside of Iraq and outside when the country was at war.

The 65th Special Forces Brigade, 76th Special Forces Brigade, 78th Special Forces Brigade, and 450th Marine Brigade were active during the Gulf War.[10]

Official ISOF logo from 1980 to 2003. Currently serves as the official logo of the 3rd Battalion.

After the 2003 Invasion of Iraq, the Saddam Hussein-era Iraqi Army was disbanded by the occupation authorities. In late 2003, a commando battalion was recruited from scratch, mostly from Arabs (Shias and Sunnis), but also Kurds, Assyrians and Turkmen.[11] Another more clandestine battalion named the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Force (ICTF), with robust intelligence capabilities and specialised in counterterrorism and hostage rescue, was also formed at the same time. The aforementioned commando battalion was placed in a supporting role to the latter, with the aim that a premier counterinsurgency force would eventually be developed around the two battalions.[12] The first Iraqi Special Operations Forces brigade (ISOF-1) was formed by the Iraqi Army with the help of U.S special operations forces in July 2005.[13] In November 2005, after training in Jordan with Jordanian Special Forces and U.S. Army Special Forces ("Green Berets"), the Iraqi Special Operations Force had 1,440 men trained, composed of two combat battalions, considered equal in training and combat effectiveness to an average U.S. Army infantry battalion, and two support battalions.[14]

In April 2007, the Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) was established with ISOF as its operational arm, and by March 2008, it consisted of a single brigade which in turn was made up of Iraqi Counter-Terrorism Force (ICTF) battalion, three commando battalions, a support battalion and a special reconnaissance unit.[15]

The 2nd Special Operations Forces brigade (ISOF-2) was formed in July 2009.

On April 18, 2010, ISOF troops, supported by U.S. troops, carried out a night-time raid on a terrorist safe house near Tikrit. The ISOF surrounded the building and called on them to surrender, but instead the terrorists fired on them. The ISOF returned fire and assaulted the building. The ISOF killed Abu Ayyub al-Masri and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, the leaders of the Islamic State of Iraq, 16 others were also arrested.[16][17][18]

Counter-terrorism Training
Counter-terrorism Training

After the U.S. left in 2011, the CTS struggled without American intelligence, air strikes, logistical capabilities, and medical care.[19] Journalist/researcher Michael R. Gordon was told that with the withdrawal of the U.S. Army and Air Force, and the fraying of Iraqi capabilities, Maliki had saddled the CTS "with a burgeoning array of missions that included manning checkpoints, escorting convoys, protecting voting centres, and doing battle with militants in densely populated Iraqi cities. A specialised force that had been designed to carry out lightning raids against terrorist cells (with considerable [U.S.] support) had become a jack-of-all-trades that was being tasked to deal with the upheaval in Iraq."[19] Well-respected U.S. Army special operations Major General Mike Nagata found Major General Fadhil Jamil al-Barwari, who led the 1st ISOF Brigade of the CTS, "no longer the confident commander" that he had been in years past.[20]

ISOF-3 during training in Babylon, 2020

The 3rd Special Operations Forces brigade (ISOF-3) was formed in spring 2013.

2016 Battle of Mosul

[edit]

In the Battle of Mosul that began in October 2016, the special ops forces were the first division into the city of Mosul, which had been occupied by Islamic State since 2014.[21] After the fall of Mosul, the ISOF battalions increasingly took up an infantry role the Iraqi army and militias weren't able to provide during operations, a role the unit was unfamiliar with for most of the war against terror. This resulted in a greater number of casualties than in previous operations, which were smaller in scale and shorter in duration.

On 1 November 2016, the 1st Iraqi Special Forces Brigade fought its way into the Gogjali quarter of the city, becoming the first Iraqi unit to enter the city during the offensive.[22] On 10 July 2017, the Iraqi prime minister declared the liberation of Mosul from ISIS.[23] By the end of the battle, CTS forces suffered a 40 percent casualty rate.[24]

Command Structure

[edit]
Counter-Terrorism Service units during a mission in 2021

The Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF) are organized into three primary brigades, each responsible for operations in different regions of Iraq. The structure includes specialized battalions for commando, support, reconnaissance, and tactical operations.

  • 1st Special Operations Brigade (ISOF-1)
    • 1st Battalion (Commando) – Former 36th Battalion
    • 2nd Battalion (ICTF)
    • 3rd Battalion (Support)
    • 5th Battalion (Reconnaissance)

They are based in Baghdad, often referred to as the Golden Division, previously known as the Golden Brigade.[25]

  • 2nd Special Operations Brigade (ISOF-2)
    • 6th Regional Commando Battalion
    • 7th Regional Commando Battalion
    • 8th Regional Commando Battalion
    • 9th Regional Commando Battalion

They operate in Nineveh, Saladin, Kirkuk, Karbala, Diyala, and Al Asad.

  • 3rd Special Operations Brigade (ISOF-3)
    • 10th Regional Commando Battalion
    • 20th Regional Commando Battalion
    • 36th Regional Commando Battalion
    • 45th Regional Commando Battalion

They operate in Basra, Babylon, Najaf, Maysan, Dhi Qar, Muthanna and Qadisiyah. Additionally, the brigade maintains a reconnaissance battalion, a support battalion, and a Special Tactics Unit.[26] [27]

Special tactics unit in 2021

There’s also a hostage rescue and maritime piracy response brigade.[28]

External videos
video icon Anti-hijack training
  • Academia – Formerly the 4th Battalion of the 1st ISOF Brigade, this unit is responsible for screening and training new recruits for the Counter-Terrorism Command (CTC).[29]

Equipment

[edit]

Handguns

[edit]

Assault rifles and battle rifles

[edit]

Submachine guns

[edit]

Shotguns

[edit]

Sniper rifles and anti material rifles

[edit]

Machine guns

[edit]

Launchers and grenade launchers

[edit]

Vehicles

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Iraqi (CTS) is an independent Iraqi security agency operating at a quasi-ministerial level, specializing in intelligence, precision raids, rescues, and against terrorist networks. Its operational component, the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF), comprises three brigades structured for rapid deployment across provinces, emphasizing non-sectarian recruitment and professional standards modeled on U.S. training. Established in the post-2003 era through U.S.-led mergers of initial units like the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Force into ISOF brigades by May 2004, the CTS was formalized in 2006 under the Prime Minister's office to insulate it from broader military politicization. The CTS distinguished itself during the rise of the (ISIS) in 2014 as the sole major Iraqi security element that retained cohesion and combat effectiveness, avoiding the collapses that afflicted conventional forces due to entrenched corruption and sectarian influences elsewhere in the . It spearheaded ground operations to liberate over 70 cities from ISIS control, including pivotal battles for , , , and , often integrating U.S.-provided intelligence, air support, and advisory embeds from Special Operations Joint Task Force - . Between 2004 and 2011 alone, CTS/ISOF units conducted thousands of targeted missions, detaining over 9,000 suspects and disrupting insurgent leadership. Post-caliphate, it continues proactive hunts for ISIS remnants, such as the October 2024 joint operation that eliminated multiple senior figures with coalition assistance. Despite its successes, the CTS faces ongoing strains from equipment attrition in high-intensity fights like —where it suffered heavy casualties—and dependency on external partnerships for advanced capabilities, amid broader Iraqi political efforts to subordinate it to militia-influenced structures. U.S. support, totaling around $800 million in over two decades, has sustained its edge as Iraq's premier non-partisan force, enabling operations against Iran-aligned groups like as well. This resilience underscores the causal impact of merit-based selection and external mentorship in countering ideologically driven threats, contrasting with the failures of less disciplined units.

History

Establishment and Early Development (2003-2011)

Following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of , U.S. established the foundational elements of what would become the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) to address gaps in capabilities amid rising threats from and other groups. In November 2003, U.S. advisors formed the 36th Iraqi Corps Battalion, drawing recruits from diverse ethnic and sectarian backgrounds including , Shia, and Sunnis, to provide rapid-response security in volatile areas like . Concurrently, in December 2003, U.S. Secretary of Defense directed the creation of the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Force (ICTF), an elite unit focused on raids, with initial training modeled on U.S. Forces principles emphasizing small-unit tactics and intelligence-driven operations. By May 2004, the 36th Battalion and ICTF merged into the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF) Brigade, headquartered at Complex in August 2004, marking the shift from ad hoc militias to a structured brigade with dedicated , , and support elements. The first Operator Training Course graduated 55 personnel in April 2004 in , initiating a rigorous pipeline that included a three-week assessment and selection process with 40-50% attrition rates to ensure non-sectarian, merit-based . U.S. forces provided embedded advisors, equipment such as HMMWVs and rifles, and over $237 million from the Iraq Security Forces Fund by 2005 to build operational readiness, enabling ISOF to conduct independent raids by late 2004 that disrupted insurgent networks in and surrounding provinces. In October 2006, Iraqi Prime Minister approved the CTS concept, leading to its formal operationalization as a quasi-independent entity under the Prime Minister's office through between December 2006 and April 2007, separate from the Ministries of Defense and Interior to prioritize autonomy. The CTS headquarters and became active in March-April 2007, integrating ISOF units into a unified structure with regional battalions. By 2009, expansion included a second ISOF , and U.S. Department of Defense assessments noted strong , high morale, and low desertion rates, with ISOF/CTS forces reaching approximately 1,600 personnel by mid-2006 and conducting precision operations that detained thousands of suspects, contributing to reduced insurgent attack frequencies in targeted sectors as validated by coalition intelligence. These early efforts culminated in CTS achieving operational independence by the U.S. withdrawal in December 2011, having established itself as Iraq's premier non-sectarian force through empirical training outcomes and targeted disruptions of cells.

Reorganization Amid Instability (2011-2014)

Following the complete withdrawal of U.S. forces from in December 2011, the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) transitioned to full operational independence under the direct authority of the Prime Minister's Office through the Office of the , a structure formalized by executive orders such as Order 61 in 2007, which established CTS as a quasi-ministerial entity separate from the Ministry of Defense. This autonomy allowed CTS to retain a core of U.S.-trained personnel and leadership, including commanders like Fadhel Barwari, whose continuity helped preserve tactical proficiency amid the broader ' vulnerabilities to sectarian divisions and political interference, averting the rapid collapse observed in conventional units during subsequent insurgent surges. In response to the resurgence of (AQI), rebranded as the by 2013, Prime Minister directed the activation of a third CTS brigade in January 2012, expanding the force to approximately 13,000 personnel by fall 2013, with regional battalions deployed to provinces including Anbar to address gaps left by diminished U.S. intelligence and air support. CTS adapted by shifting toward more law-enforcement-style raids and ground operations without enablers, conducting over 700 terrorist arrests between January and September 2013 alone, which demonstrated sustained effectiveness despite equipment shortages and the politicization of promotions that marginalized some experienced junior officers in favor of loyalty-based selections by late 2011. CTS's tactical proficiency was evident in Anbar Province operations from late 2013 to mid-2014, where its regional battalions led clearing efforts in and following AQI/ISIS seizures in December 2013, including the June 2014 rescue of approximately 1,000 students at the University of Anbar in . These actions underscored CTS's disproportionate impact relative to its size, as U.S. assessments and former advisors noted it as the most capable Iraqi unit for , maintaining high operational tempo even as other forces faltered, though heavy casualties in Anbar by May 2014 prompted supplemental training in with residual U.S. and Jordanian assistance.

Pivotal Role in Defeating ISIS Territorial Control (2014-2019)

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) played a leading role in the ground offensive to retake Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city, which ISIS had captured in June 2014. In October 2016, CTS units spearheaded the assault into eastern Mosul, advancing through industrial districts such as Kukjali and Karama amid intense urban combat involving ISIS snipers, suicide bombers, and improvised explosive devices. Coalition after-action assessments noted CTS's requests for close air support to neutralize ISIS fighters, contributing to incremental territorial gains despite initial high casualties from ISIS defensive tactics. By early 2017, CTS forces had recaptured key neighborhoods including Eastern Nineveh, Souq al-Ghanam, and Sihha, pushing ISIS defenders westward across the Tigris River. CTS integrated with Peshmerga forces on Mosul's northern flanks and Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) in supporting roles, enabling coordinated advances that isolated pockets. Precision operations by CTS, often in close coordination with U.S.-led coalition airstrikes, destroyed command nodes and weapon caches, with documented instances of targeting snipers and vehicle-borne threats in districts like Jadidah. By July 2017, CTS contributions helped secure the recapture of Mosul's and the al-Nuri Mosque compound, marking the effective end of 's control over the city after nine months of fighting. These efforts demonstrated CTS's combat effectiveness in high-intensity , though at the cost of significant personnel losses exceeding 40% in some units. In the subsequent clearances of remaining ISIS-held territories, CTS participated in the August 2017 offensive to liberate , deploying alongside Iraqi Army divisions, Federal Police, and PMU to overrun ISIS defenses in the city and surrounding areas within 11 days. CTS elements conducted targeted raids in urban sectors, contributing to the rapid collapse of ISIS resistance and the securing of critical infrastructure. Similar precision tactics were employed in the September-October 2017 Hawija operation, where CTS supported broader advances, helping dismantle ISIS's last major rural stronghold in province through combined ground and air-enabled strikes. These actions underscored CTS's sustained operational tempo, directly linking their elite assault capabilities to the territorial defeat of ISIS's by 2019.

Operations Against ISIS Remnants (2019-Present)

Following the territorial defeat of in Iraq by 2019, the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) transitioned to low-intensity, intelligence-driven operations focused on disrupting sleeper cells, leadership networks, and logistical support through targeted raids, arrests, and precision strikes, often in partnership with U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces under . These efforts emphasized , reconnaissance, and air-to-ground integration to prevent resurgence, with CTS conducting unilateral operations numbering approximately 172 in 2020 alone, resulting in increased detentions of ISIS suspects. Key operations in 2024 included multiple CTS-led raids in northern and western , such as the destruction of five ISIS hideouts in the and arrests of facilitators including an IED manufacturing cell leader on July 12, an economic cell leader on July 13, and a transporter-smuggler involved in oil derivatives. On August 29, a partnered CTS raid in Anbar killed 15 ISIS fighters, including four leaders such as Ahmad Hamid Husayn Abd-al-Jalil al-Ithawi, disrupting attack planning networks. In late , CTS detachments, supported by CENTCOM , conducted strikes and follow-on raids eliminating multiple senior ISIS members and degrading operational cells. Into 2025, CTS operations continued to yield results, including the precision airstrike in Anbar that killed Abdullah Makki Muslih al-Rifa’i, 's chief of global operations, alongside another operative; quarterly activities since August 2024 accounted for over 50 deaths and several detentions, including those tied to weapons manufacturing. These actions correlate with a sustained decline in attack frequency and capabilities in , reaching the lowest levels recorded since , constrained by persistent military pressure despite no notable advances in tactical sophistication. Amid cross-border threats from reactivation in , CTS has prioritized enhanced training and advisory support from coalition partners in 2024-2025, focusing on countering potential spillovers through improved intelligence sharing and operational readiness. This proactive posture, including capability development in surveillance and exploitation, sustains pressure on remnants while addressing governance vacuums that could enable regrouping.

Organization and Command

Hierarchical Structure and Leadership

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) maintains a hierarchical structure designed for rapid decision-making and operational independence, reporting directly to the as a quasi-ministerial entity separate from the Ministries of Interior and Defense. This positioning insulates it from broader military or partisan influences, including militia infiltration, enabling focused counterterrorism missions. The organization comprises three primary tiers: CTS headquarters for strategic oversight, the Counter-Terrorism Command (CTC) for tactical coordination, and operational Iraqi Forces (ISOF) brigades—typically numbered as the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Brigades—that execute and intelligence-driven operations. Leadership transitions within the CTS have prioritized professional expertise to sustain its autonomy and effectiveness, with U.S. assessments highlighting successes in avoiding politicization despite external pressures from Iran-backed actors. Lieutenant General Abdul-Wahab al-Saadi commanded the CTS from May 2020 until his dismissal in October-December 2023, a period during which the force conducted high-profile raids against ISIS holdouts and integrated intelligence fusion for targeted strikes, earning commendations for stabilizing command structures post-2014 territorial losses. His tenure exemplified resistance to militia encroachment, as the CTS's direct chain to the Prime Minister via the Ministry of Counter Terrorism reinforced non-sectarian operations. Following al-Saadi's removal, Lieutenant General Karim Aboud Mohammed assumed leadership in November 2023, overseeing brigade-level commands while U.S. partners noted ongoing efforts to preserve the service's elite status amid leadership purges. This command framework supports a force specializing in and intel-led operations, with brigade commanders reporting through CTC to CTS headquarters, ensuring unified yet decentralized execution insulated from broader Iraqi security apparatus influences. The structure's emphasis on merit-based promotions and apolitical allegiance has been credited by analysts for the CTS's role as Iraq's premier unit, distinct from conventional forces vulnerable to factionalization.

Units, Personnel, and Recruitment Processes

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) comprises the (CTC) and three Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF) brigades, forming its core operational structure. The 1st Brigade, known as the Golden Division, specializes in operations and raids, while the 2nd Brigade focuses on counterterrorism tasks, and the 3rd Brigade handles . Each brigade oversees specialized battalions, including , Iraqi Counter-Terrorism Force (ICTF), reconnaissance, and support units, with battalion sizes ranging from 440 to 600 personnel. By fall 2013, CTS personnel totaled approximately 13,000, though operational combat strength has been estimated at around 7,600 to 10,000 in subsequent years, reflecting elite focus over sheer numbers. Recruitment draws from civilians nominated by Shi’a, Sunni, and Kurdish community leaders, as well as Ministry of Defense personnel, emphasizing vetting to prevent insurgent infiltration. The selection pipeline begins with a three-week Assessment and Selection Course featuring attrition rates exceeding 40-50%, followed by specialized training such as the 47-day Commando Course or the 98-day Operator’s Training Course, resulting in overall pass rates below 20% in documented cycles, like 18% in a 2008 cohort of 2,200 candidates. This rigor prioritizes physical endurance, , and operational aptitude, fostering superior to conventional Iraqi forces. Personnel composition reflects deliberate multi-ethnic recruitment, with the 1st ISOF Brigade in September 2008 comprising 61% Shi’a, 24% Sunni Arab, 12% Kurdish, and 3% other minorities, more balanced than Iraq's broader demographics and countering sectarian dominance claims. Despite post-2014 efforts to bolster Sunni representation amid territorial losses, CTS remains majority Shi’a, akin to national trends, yet maintains cross-sectarian integration as a model for . Retention faces challenges from battle attrition—up to 40% losses in operations like —but desertion rates remain negligible, contrasting sharply with tens of thousands of desertions in the wider during the 2014 ISIS advance, attributable to high morale and esprit de corps.

Operational Doctrine and Achievements

Core Missions and Tactics

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) primarily mandates the execution of precision operations, including the targeting and elimination of terrorist networks through judicially warranted actions, the development of a national strategy, and interagency coordination to disrupt threats nationwide. Established as an independent entity under the in October 2006, CTS emphasizes rapid-response capabilities suited to , where insurgents embed within civilian populations, necessitating operations that prioritize speed, surprise, and minimal over large-scale conventional engagements. Core tactics revolve around small-team infiltration and company-level raids, often conducted nightly and completed within 24 hours, enabling high-tempo disruptions of insurgent cells before they can relocate or execute attacks. Hostage forms a specialized mandate, with units like the 2nd of the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Force trained for such scenarios as early as April 2004 in , demonstrating adaptability in high-risk extractions. gathering underpins these efforts via a robust (HUMINT) network, augmented by (SIGINT) integration achieved by July 2009 through linkages to the , facilitating preemptive strikes that have infiltrated and dismantled plots, such as CTS operatives embedding within networks in November 2014 to induce enemy battlefield losses. In urban and improvised explosive device (IED)-prevalent environments, CTS tactics adapt through reconnaissance teams using civilian vehicles for covert surveillance and precision cordon-and-search operations, as evidenced in clearances where IEDs were encountered every 20 meters, such as in in July 2014. This special operations focus outperforms conventional Iraqi forces empirically, with CTS maintaining operational cohesion amid the collapse of 60 out of 243 battalions by June 2014, due to causally superior training in small-unit autonomy, which yields higher effectiveness in kill-or-capture ratios by exploiting insurgent vulnerabilities to surprise rather than relying on mass mobilization prone to infiltration and desertion. Between 2004 and December 2011, CTS detained approximately 9,000 suspects through such targeted raids, underscoring the doctrinal preference for elite, flexible units in countering non-state actors' guerrilla tactics.

Key Operations and Measurable Successes

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) has conducted targeted operations that have neutralized key ISIS personnel, disrupting the group's command structure and operational planning. In October 2024, CTS detachments, alongside other Iraqi forces and under oversight, executed strikes that killed multiple senior ISIS members, including those integral to attack networks in . Earlier that month, a CTS-involved operation eliminated four ISIS operatives, among them a senior leader responsible for coordinating activities. These efforts exemplify CTS's focus on elimination, which has degraded ISIS's ability to orchestrate large-scale assaults. Such operations have measurably weakened 's residual presence, contributing to a post-2017 decline in the overall volume of terrorist attacks across . U.S. assessments note that while complex ISIS tactics persist, the frequency of incidents has decreased following the territorial losses inflicted by Iraqi forces, with CTS maintaining pressure through persistent raids and intelligence-driven strikes. This impact is evident in reduced ISIS-claimed operations in key regions, where CTS density has correlated with lower attack rates, though the group adapted by shifting to insurgent-style . CTS achievements reflect intense operational tempo, with units sustaining heavy casualties in urban and rural engagements against entrenched ISIS elements. Frontline CTS commandos, often leading assaults in contested areas, have incurred thousands of fatalities since , highlighting the service's exposure to high-risk missions without diminishing its effectiveness in sustaining offensive momentum.

Equipment and Armament

Small Arms and Personal Weapons

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS), as part of the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF), employs a selection of modern small arms optimized for operations, with many items procured through U.S.-funded programs like the Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund (CTEF). These weapons emphasize modularity, allowing attachments such as optics (e.g., EOTech 512 or Aimpoint Comp M2/M4), laser aimers (AN/PEQ-2/15), and suppressors, which enhance close-quarters battle (CQB) and raid effectiveness in urban environments. Standard handguns include government-issued Croatian HS-9 (9×19mm) and HS-45 (), alongside U.S.-influenced models such as 17/19 (9×19mm) and /Model 92 (9×19mm). These sidearms are carried in drop-leg, hip, or chest holsters, often customized with aftermarket grips like Emerson Universal models, providing reliable backup for operators in high-risk engagements. Primary assault rifles consist of AR-15 pattern firearms chambered in , including the Rock River Arms LAR-15 (14.5-inch barrel, 3-round burst capability) and SIG Sauer M400 (11.5-inch barrel, select-fire), procured in large batches with STANAG-compatible 30-round magazines. Submachine guns like the supplement these for CQB scenarios. Compared to the Iraqi Army's predominant variants (), CTS's Western-caliber rifles offer superior accuracy, lighter weight, and compatibility with coalition-supplied ammunition and accessories, contributing to operational effectiveness differentials observed in joint missions. Sniper systems feature U.S. surplus Remington M24 (7.62×51mm NATO, effective to 800m) for precision overwatch and the semi-automatic M14 Enhanced Battle Rifle (EBR-RI) for designated marksman roles. Additional acquisitions include Russian Orsis T-5000 bolt-action rifles (7.62×51mm), obtained via a 2014 deal exceeding 1,000 units, often deployed with suppressors in urban counter-ISIS operations. Maintenance under CTEF ensures high field reliability, with modular designs facilitating rapid repairs in austere conditions.

Heavy Weapons, Vehicles, and Support Systems

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) relies on for enhanced mobility and protection in operations, primarily consisting of High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled (HMMWVs) and Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) variants supplied via U.S. assistance programs. These facilitate rapid deployment and survivability against improvised explosive devices and ambushes, as demonstrated in post-2014 operations against ISIS. Up-armored HMMWVs, refurbished through programs like those managed by U.S. Central Command, have been delivered to Iraqi units including CTS components to bolster frontline capabilities. Heavy weapons employed by CTS include automatic grenade launchers and anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), such as TOW systems integrated into vehicle platforms for engaging fortified positions and armored threats. Training on these systems, often conducted with coalition support, emphasizes precision to complement tactics. In the 2020s, upgrades funded by the U.S. Counter-ISIS Train and Equip Fund (CTEF) have sustained and modernized these assets, enabling CTS to maintain firepower superiority in remnant ISIS engagements. Support systems critical to CTS operations encompass devices for conducting raids under cover of darkness, contributing to higher success rates in capturing high-value targets, and emerging unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. The establishment of a dedicated CTS wing in 2025, as reported by U.S. assessments, incorporates drone capabilities to extend operational reach and reduce reliance on ground convoys. However, post-2019 maintenance strains from prolonged combat wear have led to equipment downtime, with institutional challenges in the CTS and Ministry of Defense exacerbating readiness issues despite foreign sustainment efforts.

Training and International Support

Internal Selection and Training Regimens

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) employs a rigorous, process emphasizing physical endurance, marksmanship, and to ensure non-sectarian, high-caliber personnel. Candidates undergo a three-week Assessment and Selection Course at the CTS Academia in , featuring intensive physical assessments, rifle qualification on ranges, and basic military drills, with attrition rates exceeding 40-50% to filter for elite performers independent of tribal or sectarian affiliations. Top graduates advance based solely on pass/fail metrics, countering pervasive in broader through vetted, diverse recruitment from Shi'a, Sunni, and Kurdish backgrounds. Subsequent training regimens unfold in phased cycles at the CTS Academia, comprising Initial Entry Training for foundational skills, Special Operations Qualification for tactical proficiency, and Special Operations Advanced Training for specialized roles. The Commando Course, lasting 47 days, hones raid execution, vehicle maneuvers, and close-quarters battle simulations mimicking urban environments, while the Operator Training Course (condensed to 52 days by the early 2010s) stresses advanced marksmanship and mission planning. These annual iterations produce deployable units, with final assessments including live-fire exercises and operational simulations to verify competency before graduation. Post-2014 ISIS territorial defeat, CTS regimens evolved to prioritize counter-remnant intelligence , integrating gathering and low-level decision-making into core curricula to sustain precision strikes against insurgent holdouts, leveraging retained skills from earlier meritocratic pipelines despite equipment constraints. Regional training centers in , Ninawa, Anbar, and Diyala support decentralized cycles, yielding operators with demonstrated low operational error rates in remnant hunts, as evidenced by sustained effectiveness in targeted raids.

Foreign Assistance, Primarily from the United States and Coalition Partners

Special Operations Forces initiated advisory support for the precursors to the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service in late 2003, establishing the Iraqi Special Operations Forces brigade in 2004 and formalizing the CTS structure by 2007 with embedded advisors at operational levels. This assistance focused on building non-sectarian, professional capabilities, including training in precision operations and junior leadership development, which contrasted with broader ' challenges. Post-2011 withdrawal temporarily reduced advising, but support resumed in 2014 with approximately 300 SOF personnel deployed to bolster CTS against ISIS advances. U.S. funding through mechanisms like the Counter-ISIS and Equip Fund has provided around $800 million in to CTS over two decades, enabling acquisition of advanced gear and sustainment despite representing less than 3% of total U.S. aid to Iraqi forces. Annual allocations, such as $22 million prior to 2025 reductions, supported training pipelines and operational readiness, yielding high returns through CTS-led disruptions of networks. Department of Defense assessments highlight these inputs' role in elevating CTS effectiveness, with coalition-wide efforts under contributing to territorial defeats of by 2017. Coalition partners augmented U.S. efforts, with NATO's Mission Iraq launching advisory training in 2018 to enhance institutional capacities and the providing instruction to over 111,000 Iraqi security personnel by 2024, including CTS elements. These contributions from 2014 to 2025 measurably improved CTS and sustainment, as documented in oversight reports tracking readiness gains amid ongoing counter-ISIS operations. The reliance on Western models demonstrates their superior causal impact on CTS proficiency, as non-U.S. remains marginal and often tied to less effective regional lacking emphasis on apolitical . Limited external inputs beyond the U.S.-led have not replicated the empirical successes in force-building, underscoring the targeted efficiency of American and allied investments in yielding a capable, ISIS-defeating unit.

Controversies and Criticisms

Political Interference and Sectarian Pressures

Since the territorial defeat of ISIS in 2018, the Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) has faced sustained efforts to integrate it with the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), a coalition dominated by Iran-aligned Shia militias, which Iraqi leaders have largely rejected to preserve CTS's operational independence and non-sectarian character. Proponents of integration argued it would unify anti-terrorism efforts under state control, but critics, including U.S. officials, warned that subsuming CTS into PMF structures would expose it to militia influence, potentially compromising its effectiveness against both ISIS remnants and Iran-backed groups. CTS leadership has resisted these pushes, maintaining its status as a quasi-independent entity reporting directly to the prime minister, which has allowed it to conduct operations like the 2020 arrest of 14 Kata'ib Hezbollah members without militia interference. A prominent example of politicization risks occurred in September 2019, when Adil Abdul-Mahdi reassigned Abdul-Wahab al-Sa'adi, then deputy of CTS and a figure admired for his role in recapturing from , to a lesser post at the Ministry of Defense. Iraqi officials anonymously attributed the move to by pro- PMF factions, who viewed al-Sa'adi's close U.S. ties—stemming from joint training and operations—as a liability amid escalating U.S.-Iran tensions. The decision sparked widespread protests from Iraqi personnel and civilians, who decried it as an "" and punishment for professionalism over factional loyalty, highlighting fears that such reshuffles could prioritize sectarian agendas over merit. Al-Sa'adi was reinstated and promoted to CTS in May 2020 by Mustafa al-Kadhimi, whose administration emphasized rooting out militia influence, though the episode underscored the double-edged nature of leadership probes: potential for purging corruption versus enabling politically motivated purges. Iran-backed militias continue to pose existential threats through infiltration attempts, as noted in U.S. assessments from 2024, which describe CTS as a prime target for penetration due to its status as Iraq's most capable force and a bulwark against both and militia overreach. These efforts exploit Iraq's fragmented politics, where Shia-majority factions seek to "Shia-ize" security institutions, potentially diluting CTS's Sunni outreach essential for gathering in ISIS-prone areas. Iraqi sources assert CTS's resilience, citing its non-sectarian composition and direct prime ministerial oversight as safeguards against such . Critics, however, including Western analysts, argue that unchecked militia encroachments could erode this autonomy, drawing parallels to the infiltration of other agencies like the National Security Service since 2022.

Allegations of Misconduct and Human Rights Issues

Human Rights Watch documented allegations of beatings, unlawful killings, and executions by Iraqi security forces against men and boys fleeing Mosul during the 2017 battle against ISIS, including instances where suspects were thrown from cliffs after screening. The organization also reported torture to coerce confessions from children suspected of ISIS ties, involving electric shocks, beatings, and stress positions by federal Iraqi forces in detention facilities post-Mosul. Amnesty International highlighted similar detainee abuses, including public humiliations and torture by Iraqi forces and affiliated groups during the Mosul offensive, often targeting perceived ISIS sympathizers in revenge-driven roundups. The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS), which led high-risk urban assaults in Mosul's Old City and operated sites, faced implied involvement in these screenings and holdings, though specific CTS-perpetrated cases remain less directly attributed compared to broader Iraqi or federal police units. Iraqi government probes into Mosul-era abuses, prompted by video evidence of executions, yielded investigations but limited public convictions, with Prime Minister ordering inquiries in July 2017 amid international pressure. These allegations occurred amid counter-terrorism imperatives, where rapid intelligence extraction from detainees was prioritized to disrupt cells embedding among civilians via human shields and booby-trapped environments. CTS tactics, informed by U.S. training, focused on targeted raids and precision clearance, correlating with lower in their sectors relative to 's deliberate civilian massacres—estimated at thousands executed in alone—despite overall battle tolls exceeding 10,000 civilian deaths from combined factors including defenses and coalition support fire. Such wartime necessities do not justify verified excesses, but assessments underscore CTS's relative operational restraint in a conflict where 's causal tactics amplified risks to non-combatants.

Vulnerabilities to Corruption and External Threats

The Iraqi Counter Terrorism Service (CTS) faces ongoing attempts by Iran-backed militias to infiltrate its ranks via financial inducements and smuggling networks, as these groups seek to erode its operational independence and loyalty to the central government. U.S. assessments highlight such penetration efforts as a strategic priority for these actors, given CTS's role as Iraq's most effective counter-ISIS force, though documented cases remain limited compared to broader Iraqi security institutions. Internal frailties, including isolated embezzlement incidents tied to risk allowance funds, underscore risks from pay-offs that could facilitate insider threats, even as CTS has avoided the systemic graft plaguing other units. To counter these vulnerabilities, CTS employs stringent self-policing measures, including processes and dismissals of personnel suspected of external ties, which have sustained its reputation for high cohesion and merit-based recruitment. These efforts have reportedly preserved loyalty rates exceeding 90% in core units, per evaluations, distinguishing CTS from militia-influenced forces amid Iraq's sectarian pressures. External threats compound internal risks, with ISIS exploiting rural strongholds for attacks on Iraqi forces, including CTS operations; notable incidents include a May 13, 2024, assault on an outpost in Diyala and Salahuddin provinces that killed five soldiers and a commanding officer. Approximately 1,000 ISIS fighters remain active in Iraq as of early 2024, fueling plots that hybridize with militia disruptions to strain CTS resources. The U.S.-led coalition drawdown, transitioning to advisory roles by 2026, heightens these exposures by curtailing real-time intelligence and reconnaissance, potentially enabling ISIS consolidation and Iranian proxy advances in a post-Assad Syria spillover. Iraqi officials have urged extensions of U.S. presence to mitigate this, warning of resurgent instability without sustained external enablers.

References

  1. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/david-witty-paper_final_web.pdf
  2. https://www.mei.edu/publications/maintaining-best-thing-us-built-iraq-continued-support-iraqi-counterterrorism-service
  3. https://www.army.mil/article/280128/a_new_approach_to_defeating_an_old_enemy_army_special_operations_forces_in_operation_inherent_resolve
  4. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/3943013/iraqi-security-forces-target-kill-multiple-senior-isis-members-with-support-fro/
  5. https://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2006-02-Report.pdf
  6. https://warontherocks.com/2017/07/the-best-thing-america-built-in-iraq-iraqs-counter-terrorism-service-and-the-long-war-against-militancy/
  7. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-37847506
  8. https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2023/01/19/e9325e8b/17-24u-mosul-study-group-what-the-battle-for-mosul-teaches-the-force-sep-17-public.pdf
  9. https://www.voanews.com/a/iraqi-forces-push-into-is-held-pocket-in-mosul/3679338.html
  10. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/iraqi-forces-take-one-of-four-districts-in-mosuls-is-held-enclave-idUSKBN18T2GP/
  11. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/NEWS-ARTICLES/News-Article-View/Article/1193707/executive-summary-of-the-investigation-of-the-alleged-civilian-casualty-inciden/
  12. https://www.stateoig.gov/uploads/report/report_pdf_file/oir_dec2016_11_-_a.pdf
  13. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/1284014/isf-begin-offensive-to-liberate-tal-afar/
  14. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/8/25/iraqi-forces-break-through-isil-lines-in-tal-afar
  15. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2017/09/iraqi-forces-launch-offensive-against-islamic-state-in-hawijah.php
  16. https://oig.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/OIR_Q4_Sep2024_Final_508_1.pdf
  17. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1147956.pdf
  18. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/3856148/centcom-forces-and-iraqi-security-forces-conduct-partnered-raid-in-western-iraq/
  19. https://www.stateoig.gov/uploads/report/report_pdf_file/oir_q2_fy25_final_report.pdf
  20. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2025/FY2025_CTEF_J-Book.pdf
  21. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-iraqi-counter-terrorism-service/
  22. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/how-washington-can-salvage-iraqs-counter-terrorism-service
  23. https://taskandpurpose.com/news/us-supported-iraqi-general-leads-elite-force/
  24. https://shafaq.com/en/Iraq/Major-leadership-changes-in-Iraq-s-CTS-under-new-commander
  25. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PE300/PE353/RAND_PE353.pdf
  26. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/sites/default/files/pdf/PolicyFocus157-Witty-3.pdf
  27. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/3939218/iraqi-security-forces-partnered-with-combined-joint-task-force-operation-inhere/
  28. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2022/iraq
  29. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/3840981/defeat-isis-mission-in-iraq-and-syria-for-january-june-2024/
  30. https://armamentresearch.com/isof-arms-equipment-part-1-personal-equipment/
  31. https://armamentresearch.com/isof-arms-equipment-part-2-precision-rifles/
  32. https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/NEWS-ARTICLES/News-Article-View/Article/883445/iraqi-troops-get-up-armored-humvees/
  33. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/4236394/heavy-weapons-training-iraqi-counter-terrorism-services
  34. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2020/FY2020_CTEF_J-Book.pdf
  35. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-news/air/iraqi-cts-establishing-air-wing
  36. https://www.dcpas.osd.mil/sites/default/files/iraq_osc-i_-_senior_logistics_advisor.pdf
  37. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA545722.pdf
  38. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/counter-terrorism.htm
  39. https://www.europeafrica.army.mil/VideoPlayer/?videoid=645271
  40. https://www.dvidshub.net/image/4996440/iraqi-cts-students-engage-exercise-before-graduation
  41. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/234581/iraqi-counter-terrorism-service-successes-ground-and-recruiting
  42. https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/Article/1189785/assessment-of-us-and-coalition-plans-and-efforts-to-train-advise-assist-and-equ/
  43. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_166936.htm
  44. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-response-to-the-conclusion-of-the-global-coalitions-military-mission-in-iraq
  45. https://www.militarytimes.com/flashpoints/2019/09/29/iraqs-removal-of-counterterrorism-chief-sparks-controversy/
  46. https://www.france24.com/en/20190928-controversy-grips-iraq-after-removal-of-top-commander
  47. https://www.arabnews.com/node/1561426/middle-east
  48. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/iraqs-new-prime-minister-reinstates-popular-general-head-counter/
  49. https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/06/30/iraq-new-abuse-execution-reports-men-fleeing-mosul
  50. https://www.hrw.org/report/2019/03/06/everyone-must-confess/abuses-against-children-suspected-isis-affiliation-iraq
  51. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/11/iraq-tribal-militia-tortured-detainees-in-revenge-attacks-during-mosul-offensive/
  52. https://2021-2025.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/iraq/
  53. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-40593405
  54. https://mwi.westpoint.edu/urban-warfare-project-case-study-2-battle-of-mosul/
  55. https://nazaha.iq/en_body.asp?id=3307
  56. https://www.stimson.org/2024/is-isis-reviving-in-iraq/
  57. https://newlinesinstitute.org/state-resilience-fragility/iraqi-military-forces-capacity-in-the-wake-of-a-likely-u-s-withdrawal-from-iraq/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.