Hubbry Logo
Wichita peopleWichita peopleMain
Open search
Wichita people
Community hub
Wichita people
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Wichita people
Wichita people
Wichita people
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Wichita people, or Wichita: kirikir?i:s,[2] are a confederation of Southern Plains Native American tribes. Historically they spoke the Wichita language and Kichai language, both Caddoan languages. Their ancestral homelands are in Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas.[2]

Key Information

Today, Wichita tribes, which include the Kichai people, Waco, Taovaya, Tawakoni, Yscani,[2] and the Wichita proper (or Guichita),[1] are federally recognized as the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco and Tawakoni).

Government

[edit]

The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes are headquartered in Anadarko, Oklahoma.[3] Their tribal jurisdictional area is in Caddo County, Oklahoma. The Wichitas are a self-governance tribe, who operate their own housing authority and issue tribal vehicle tags.[4]

As of 2025, the current administration is:[3] The current tribal administration is as follows.

  • President: Amber Silverhorn-Wolfe[5]
  • Vice President: Tasha R. Mousseau, J.D.
  • Secretary: Starr Chavez
  • Treasurer: Vanessa Vance
  • Committee Member: Claudia Spybuck
  • Committee Member: Matt Roberson
  • Committee Member: John Bowman

Economic development

[edit]

The tribe owns the Sugar Creek Casino, several restaurants, the Sugar Creek Event Center, and Hinton Travel Inn in Hinton.[6] It owns a smoke shop, travel plaza, and historical center in Anadarko.[4] Their annual economic impact in 2010 was $4.5 million.

Culture

[edit]

The Wichita language is one of the Caddoan languages. They are related by language and culture to the Pawnee, with whom they have close relations.

The Wichita lived in settled villages with domed-shaped, grass lodges, sometimes up to 30 feet (9.1 m) in diameter. The Wichita were successful hunters, farmers, traders, and negotiators. Their historical homelands stretched from San Antonio, Texas, in the south to Great Bend, Kansas, in the north. A semi-sedentary people, they occupied northern Texas in the early 18th century. They traded with other Southern Plains Indians on both sides of the Red River and south to Waco.

The Wichita made much of their own art, including ceramic pottery that greatly fascinated French and Spanish traders.[7] To the untrained eye Wichita pottery was "virtually indistinguishable from the Osage and Pawnee", two other neighboring Indigenous groups.[8]

Trade beads found at a Wichita village site, c. 1740, collection of the Oklahoma History Center

Historically, for much of the year, the Wichita lived in huts made of forked cedar poles covered by dry grasses. In the winter, they followed American bison (buffalo) in a seasonal hunt and lived in hunting camps. Wichita people relied heavily on bison, using all parts—for clothing, food and cooking fat, winter shelter, leather supplies, sinew, medicine, and even armor. Each spring, Wichita families settled in their villages for another season of cultivating crops. Eventually, horses played a large role in the Wichita people's lifestyle. Increased access to horses in the mid 17th century caused Wichita hunting styles and seasons to become longer and more community-oriented. The Wichita economy also focused on horticulture, root-gathering, and fruits and nuts.

Wichita people wore clothing from tanned hides, which the women prepared and sewed. They often decorated their dresses with elk canine teeth. Both men and women tattooed their faces and bodies with solid and dotted lines and circles.

Wichita people had a history of intermarriage and alliance with other groups. Notably, the women of the Wichita worked with the Pueblo to harvest crops and engage in trade. Pueblo women were recorded to have intermarried with Wichita people and lived together in Wichita villages.

The social structure was organized by ranking of each tribe. Tribes were also led by two chiefs.

Names

[edit]

The Wichita tribes call themselves kirikir?i:s, sometimes spelled Kitikiti'sh ("raccoon-eyed people"), because of the historical practice of tattooing marks around their eyes. The kindred Pawnee called them Kírikuuruks or Kírikuruks ("bear-eyed people") and the Arikara referred to them as Čirikuúnux (a reference to the Wichita practice of tattoos). The Kiowa called them Thoe-Khoot ("tattoo faces").

Bands

[edit]

Wichita people have been a loose confederation of related peoples on the Southern Plains, including such bands or sub-tribes as Taovayas (Tawehash), Tawakonis, Wacos (who appear to have been the Yscani or Iscanis of earlier times), and Guichitas or Wichita Proper; smaller bands are listed as well: Akwits (also Akwesh, Asidahetsh, or Asidahesh, a former northern Pawnee splinter group, which joined the Wichita), Itaz, Kishkat, and Korishkitsu (the two latter names may be a Wichita name for the Kichai). The Taovaya were the most important in the 18th century. The French called the Wichita peoples Panis Piqués (Pawnee Picts) or Panis Noirs (Black Pawnees), because they practiced tattooing; sometimes the Panis Piqués or Panis Noirs are included into the listing of Wichita sub-tribes, but it seems that there were no known separate sub-tribe which can be identified by this name. One Pawnee splinter grouping known as Panismahas moved from what is now Nebraska to the Texas-Arkansas border regions where they lived with the Taovayas.

Language

[edit]

The Wichita people had a unified language system with minor dialectical differences based on the geography of unique tribes. Derived from the Caddoan language, much of the Wichita language was indistinguishable between tribes they shared close alliances with.

Cultural institutions

[edit]

In 2018, the Wichita Tribes opened the Wichita Tribal History Center in Anadarko, which shares Wichita history, archaeology, visual arts, and culture with the public.[9]

The Wichita Annual Dance, a powwow, is held at the Wichita Tribal Park on US-281, north of Anadarko, every August.[10]

History

[edit]

Precontact history

[edit]
See also: Southern Plains villagers

After the man and woman were made they dreamed that things were made for them, and when they woke they had the things of which they had dreamed... The woman was given an ear of corn... It was to be the food of the people that should exist in the future, to be used generation after generation. —Tawakoni Jim in The Mythology of the Wichita, 1904

The Ancestral Wichita people lived in the eastern Great Plains from the Red River in Arkansas north to Nebraska for at least 2,000 years.[11] Early Wichita people were hunters and gatherers who gradually adopted agriculture. Farming villages were developed about 900 CE on terraces above the Washita and South Canadian Rivers in present-day Oklahoma. The women of these 10th-century communities cultivated varieties of maize, beans, and squash (known as the Three Sisters), marsh elder (Iva annua), and tobacco, which was important for religious purposes. The men hunted deer, rabbits, turkey, and, primarily, bison, and caught fish and harvested mussels from the rivers. These villagers lived in rectangular, thatched-roof houses.[12]

Archaeologists describe the Washita River Phase from 1250 to 1450, when local populations grew and villages of up to 20 houses were spaced every two or so miles along the rivers.[12] These farmers may have had contact with the Panhandle culture villages in the Oklahoma and Texas Panhandles, farming villages along the Canadian River. The Panhandle villagers showed signs of adopting cultural characteristics of the Pueblo peoples of the Rio Grande Valley, with whom they interacted.[13] In the late 15th century, most of these Washita River villages were abandoned for reasons that are not known today.[12]

Great Bend settlements and council circles

[edit]

Numerous archaeological sites in central Kansas near the Great Bend of the Arkansas River share common traits and are collectively known as the "Great Bend aspect." Radiocarbon dates from these sites range from AD 1450 to 1700. Great Bend aspect sites are generally accepted as ancestral to the Wichita peoples described by Francisco Vásquez de Coronado and other early European explorers. The discovery of limited quantities of European artifacts, such as chain mail and iron axe heads at several Great Bend sites, suggests contact of these people with early Spanish explorers.[14]

Great Bend aspect peoples' subsistence economy included agriculture, hunting, gathering, and fishing. Villages were located on the upper terraces of rivers, and crops appear to have been grown on the fertile floodplains below. Primary crops were maize, beans, squash, and sunflowers, cultivated for their seeds. Gathered foods included walnut and hickory nuts, and the fruits of plum, hackberry, and grape. Remains of animal bones in Great Aspect sites include bison, elk, deer, pronghorn, and dog,[15] one of the few domesticated animals in the pre-Contact Plains.

Several village sites contain the remains of unusual structures called "council circles," located at the center of settlements. Archaeological excavations suggest they consist of a central patio surrounded by four semi-subterranean structures. The function of the council circles is unclear. Archaeologist Waldo Wedel suggested in 1967 that they may be ceremonial structures, possibly associated with solstice observations.[16] Recent analysis suggests that many non-local artifacts occur exclusively or primarily within council circles, implying the structures were occupied by political and/or ritual leaders of the Great Bend aspect peoples.[17] Other archaeologists leave open the possibility that the council circle earthworks served a defensive role.[18]

One of these sites was the city Etzanoa, located in present-day Arkansas City, Kansas, near the Arkansas River, that flourished between 1450 and 1700.[19]

16th century

[edit]
Wichita camp, 1904

In 1541 Spanish explorer Francisco Vásquez de Coronado journeyed east from the Rio Grande Valley in search of a rich land called Quivira. In Texas, probably in the Blanco River Canyon near Lubbock, Coronado met people he called Teyas who might have been related to the Wichita and the earlier Plains villagers. The Teyas, if in fact they were Wichita, were probably the ancestors of the Iscani and Waco, although they might also have been the Kichai, who spoke a different language but later joined the Wichita tribe.[20] Turning north, he found Quivira and the people later known as the Wichita near the town of Lyons, Kansas. He was disappointed in his search for gold as the Quivirans appear to have been prosperous farmers and good hunters but had no gold or silver. There were about 25 villages of up to 200 houses each in Quivira. Coronado said: "They were large people of very good build", and he was impressed with the land, which was "fat and black."[21] Though Coronado was impressed with Wichita society, he often treated the Wichita poorly in his expedition.[22] Even after Wichita migration, some settlements were thought to have remained in northern Quivira in 1680.[22]

It was also noted: "They eat meat raw/jerky like the Querechos [the Apache] and Teyas. They are enemies of one another...These people of Quivira have the advantage over the others in their houses and in growing of maize".[23]

Tatum, a Wichita woman, 1898

The Quivirans apparently called their land Tancoa (which bears a resemblance to the later sub-tribe called Tawakoni) and a neighboring province on the Smoky Hill River was called Tabas (which bears a resemblance to the sub-tribe of Taovayas).[24] Settlements existed here until the Wichita were driven away in the 18th century.

17th century

[edit]

In 1601, 60 years after Coronado's expedition the founder of New Mexico Juan de Oñate visited Etzanoa, the Wichita city. Oñate journeyed east from New Mexico, crossing the Great Plains and encountering two large settlements of people he called Escanjaques (possibly Yscani) and Rayados, most certainly Wichita. The Rayado city was probably on the Walnut River near Arkansas City, Kansas. Oñate described the city as containing "more than twelve hundred houses" which would indicate a population of about 12,000. His description of the Etzanoa was similar to that of Coronado's description of Quivira. The homesteads were dispersed; the houses round, thatched with grass and surrounded by large granaries to store the corn, beans, and squash they grew in their fields.[25] Oñate's Rayados were certainly Wichita, probably the sub-tribe later known as the Guichitas.[26]

What the Coronado and Oñate expeditions showed was that the Wichita people of the 16th century were numerous and widespread. They were not, however, a single tribe at this time but rather a group of several related tribes speaking a common language. The dispersed nature of their villages probably indicated that they were not seriously threatened by attack by enemies, although that would change as they would soon be squeezed between the Apache on the West and the powerful Osage on the East. European diseases would also probably be responsible for a large decline in the Wichita population in the 17th century.

18th century

[edit]

In 1719, French explorers visited two groups of Wichita. Bernard de la Harpe found a large village near present-day Tulsa, Oklahoma and Claude Charles Du Tisne found two villages near Neodesha, Kansas. Regarding religion, La Harpe noticed that the Wichita people "had little of it". He did, however, gain knowledge on the presence of a Great Spirit that the Wichita worshipped.[27] Coronado's Quivira was abandoned early in the 18th century, probably due to Apache attacks. The Rayados of Oñate were probably still living in about the same Walnut River location. Archaeologists have located a Wichita village at the Deer Creek Site dating from the 1750s on the Arkansas River east of Newkirk, Oklahoma. By 1757, however, it appears that all the Wichita had migrated south to the Red River.[28]

The most prominent of the Wichita sub-tribes were the Taovayas. In the 1720s they had moved south from Kansas to the Red River establishing a large village on the north side of the River at Petersburg, Oklahoma and on the south side at Spanish Fort, Texas. They adopted many traits of the nomadic Plains Indians and were noted for raiding, trading. They had a close alliance with the French, and in 1746 a French brokered alliance with the Comanche revived the fortunes of the Wichita. The village at Petersburg was "a lively emporium where Comanches brought Apache slaves, horses and mules to trade for French packs of powder, balls, knives, and textiles and for Taovaya-grown maize, melons, pumpkins, squash, and tobacco."[29]

The Wichita and their Comanche allies were known to the Spanish as the Norteños (Northerners). The Wichita people and the Comanche attacked a Spanish military expedition in 1759. Afterwards, in response to the destruction by the Norteños of the San Saba Mission the Spanish and their Apache allies undertook an expedition to punish the Indians. Their 500-man army attacked the twin villages on Red River, but was defeated by the Wichita and Comanche in the Battle of the Twin Villages. The Spanish army suffered 19 dead and 14 wounded, leaving two cannons on the battlefield, although they claimed to have killed more than 100 Indians. [30]

The alliance between the Wichita, especially the Taovayas, and the Comanche began to break up in the 1770s as the Wichita sought a better relationship with the Spanish. Taovaya power in Texas declined sharply after an epidemic, probably smallpox, in 1777 and 1778 killed about one-third of the tribe.[31] After the United States took over their territory as a result of the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and the independence of Texas in 1836, all the related tribes were increasingly lumped together and dubbed "Wichita". That designation also included the Kichai of northern Texas, who spoke a different although a related language.

19th century

[edit]
Portrait of Kid-á-day (1834) by George Catlin
Portrait of Káh-kée-tsee (1834) by George Catlin

The principal village of the Wichita in the 1830s was near the Wichita Mountains of Oklahoma. The Tonkawa and Wacos still lived in Texas. In 1855, the United States forced them onto the Brazos Indian Reservation south of Fort Belnap.[2] White settlers attached the reservation in 1859.[2] The tribes were forced out of Texas to a reservation in Indian Territory in 1859. During the Civil War, the Wichita allied with the Union side. They moved to Kansas, where they established a village at the site of present-day Wichita, Kansas.[32] In 1867 they were relocated to a reservation in southwest Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) in the area where most of them continue to reside today.[33] On June 4, 1891, the affiliated tribes signed an agreement with the Cherokee Commission for individual allotments.[34]

Relationships with other Indigenous tribes

[edit]

Wichita relationships are mostly harmonious and cooperative. They traded with the Comanche and Caddo Confederacy.[2] The Wichita were allies with the Comanche. However, they were enemies with groups such as the Pawnee, the Missouri, and the Apache. The Apache were the Wichita's worst enemies, having driven them out of their homes before contact with Europeans.

The Osage people invaded Wichita lands. Their relations is said to have been "cautiously hostile",[27] but many Osage groups attacked them in the 18th century, eventually driving them out of the Arkansas River Basin.

Trade

[edit]

Wichitas tribes traded with Pueblos to the east and Caddo Confederacy tribes to the west since precontact times. The Spanish traded with the Wichitas for agricultural products. The French traded with the Wichita primarily for their horses during the 16th century. The Wichita sensed that trading with the French would be ideal. Their migration in 1714 was partly motivated by their desire to move closer to European traders.

The Wichita first gained their European commodities in the mid-18th century, inspiring them to maintain close ties with the French in the 19th century. French traders were eager to exchange their goods with Wichita settlements as they traveled from Louisiana to Santa Fe.[35]

Population

[edit]

The Wichita had a large population in the time of Coronado and Oñate. One scholar estimates their numbers at 200,000.[36] Villages often contained around 1,000 to 1,250 people per village.[22] Certainly they numbered in the tens of thousands. They appeared to be much reduced by the time of the first French contacts with them in 1719, probably due in large part to epidemics of infectious disease to which they had no immunity. In 1790, it was estimated there were about 3,200 total Wichita. Conflict with Texans in the early 19th century and Americans in the mid 19th century led to a major decline in population, leading to the eventual merging of Wichita settlements. By 1868, the population was recorded as being 572 total Wichita. By the time of the census of 1937, there were only 100 Wichita officially left.

In 2018, 2,953 people were enrolled in the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes.[1] In 2011, there were 2,501 enrolled Wichitas, 1,884 of whom lived in the state of Oklahoma. Enrollment in the tribe required a minimum blood quantum of 1/32, as of 2017.[37]

Notable Wichita

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Wichita people

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![Wichita grass house near Anadarko]float-right The Wichita people, self-designated as Kitikiti'sh or "the eminent ones," constitute a Native American tribe of the Caddoan linguistic family whose ancestors established semi-permanent villages along river valleys in the southern , encompassing present-day southern , western , and northern , from at least A.D. 800 as part of the Southern Plains Village tradition. They maintained a centered on cultivating corn, beans, and squash in fertile floodplains, augmented by seasonal communal hunts of and deer using bows and arrows, which supported populations estimated at 15,000 to 33,000 in early historic accounts. Distinctive for their dome-shaped lodges constructed from grass-thatched frames among more nomadic Plains neighbors, the Wichita developed extensive connections with distant groups, exchanging agricultural surplus and crafted goods like for and European items following initial Spanish contacts in the 1540s. Affiliated historically with the Tawakoni, Waco, and Kichai bands—now unified as the federally recognized Wichita and Affiliated Tribes headquartered in —the group faced displacement southward due to inter-tribal conflicts, including Osage raids, and Euro-American expansion, culminating in relocation to a reservation in by 1859. Matrilineal structured their , with residence patterns favoring the mother's family, and they preserved elements of this system alongside horticultural traditions despite pressures from allotment policies and Christian missions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Today, the tribe numbers around 3,481 enrolled members, sustaining cultural practices such as efforts for the endangered Wichita tongue amid broader challenges of reservation adaptation and maintenance.

Identity and nomenclature

Etymology and self-designation

The exonym "Wichita," used for a of Caddoan-speaking tribes, possesses an uncertain . This designation first received official recognition in an 1835 between the and the Wichita, Waco, and Tawakoni, grouping these bands under the shared name. The Wichita proper—the primary band within the confederation—referred to themselves as Kitikitiʔš (or variants such as Kirikirʔi:s or Kirikirish) in their language. This autonym is most commonly translated as "raccoon-eyed people," alluding to the distinctive black tattoos that Wichita men applied around their eyes, resembling the masked facial pattern of raccoons (Procyon lotor). Such tattooing served as a cultural marker, noted by European observers as early as the and distinguishing Wichita men from other Plains groups. Some linguistic interpretations render the term more generally as "the eminent ones" or "the people," implying tribal preeminence without direct reference to physical markings.

Historical and modern names

The Wichita were known to Spanish explorers as the people of Quivira, a term used by Francisco Vázquez de Coronado's expedition in 1541 to describe their agricultural settlements along the Arkansas River in present-day Kansas, which the Spaniards believed to be a wealthy kingdom. Early French traders and records referred to them as Pani Piqué ("Tattooed Pawnee") or Ouichita, reflecting observations of their distinctive facial tattoos and linguistic ties to other Caddoan groups, with the latter term possibly deriving from a Caddo word for "good hunting grounds." The exonym Wichita entered official U.S. usage in the early , appearing in the treaty between the and the "Wichita, Waco and Tawakoni" tribes, though its precise remains debated, with possible links to phrases denoting "big arbor" in reference to their grass lodges. Today, the group is federally recognized as the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes, a designation formalized in the that unites the Wichita proper with the Keechi (Kichai), Waco, and Tawakoni (Tawakonie) bands under a single tribal government headquartered in , with approximately 2,000 enrolled members as of recent counts.

Tribal confederation and bands

Constituent groups

The Wichita confederation comprised several autonomous Caddoan-speaking bands that allied through , , and mutual defense on the Southern Plains, sharing semi-sedentary village-based lifestyles centered on , , and . Up until around 1800, the principal constituent groups were the Wichita proper, the Taovaya, the Tawakonie, the Yscani, and the Kichai, each maintaining distinct villages but cooperating in regional networks. These bands originated from ancestral Plains Village traditions dating to circa A.D. 800, with migrations southward by the 18th century due to pressures from northern tribes like the Osage and opportunities in French and Spanish . The Wichita proper, also known historically as Guichita or Kirikirʔi:s, formed the core group, residing near the Arkansas River in present-day Kansas before shifting to the Red River vicinity by 1719; they were noted for large grass-house villages encountered by Spanish explorers in 1541 and active roles in buffalo hunts and intertribal exchange. The Taovaya (or Tawehash) band established prominent settlements along the upper Brazos and Wichita rivers, sustaining villages into the 1850s through maize cultivation and trade with Comanches and Europeans, including a notable attack on a Spanish mission in 1758. The Tawakonie and Waco (often linked to the Yscani or Iscani subgroup) bands, closely affiliated with the Wichita proper, relocated southward amid colonial encroachments, with the Waco settling near the Brazos River by the early and both groups joining reservation efforts in before consolidation in . The Kichai, formerly part of a broader Caddoan alliance, integrated into the confederation by the late , contributing to joint defenses and economies; by , combined populations of these bands had declined to an estimated 1,400 due to diseases, warfare, and displacement. In the reservation era post-1859, the Wichita proper, Tawakoni, Waco, and Kichai were formally designated as affiliated bands under U.S. treaties, reflecting their enduring confederative ties despite population losses from epidemics and conflicts with settlers and Plains tribes. This structure persisted into federal recognition as the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes in , encompassing descendants of these groups with headquarters in Anadarko.

Social and political organization

The Wichita people organized as a loose confederation of autonomous bands, including the Wichita proper, Taovayas, Tawakonis, Iscanis (or Yscani), Wacos, and Kichais, which maintained distinct identities while sharing linguistic and cultural ties rooted in Caddoan traditions. This structure facilitated alliances for trade and defense, such as acting as intermediaries between French traders and Spanish colonists, but lacked centralized authority, with each band governing its internal affairs independently. Socially, Wichita society emphasized matrilineal descent and , where households—typically comprising 8–10 members, including women of a maternal lineage, their husbands, minor children, and unmarried male kin—formed the basic unit of and economic cooperation. The society exhibited egalitarian traits, with individual status primarily acquired by men through demonstrated prowess in hunting and warfare, though archaeological and ethnohistoric evidence suggests limited stratification, including elite roles for chiefs or shamans and subordinate "no-count men" who served leaders or performed menial tasks. Division of labor followed gender norms, with women responsible for (cultivating corn, beans, and squash), house construction using grass-covered frames, and gathering wild plants, while men focused on bison hunting, warfare, and ritual activities. Politically, leadership resided in village or band-level chiefs and councils of , with the Wichita proper band led by two principal chiefs who represented the group in negotiations and . Chiefs were often selected by consensus among head warriors for their abilities, though some subgroups like the Tawakonis practiced hereditary succession; responsibilities included selecting village sites, resolving disputes through , and coordinating responses to external threats or opportunities. This decentralized preserved band sovereignty, enabling flexible alliances within the confederation while asserting over members' conduct and resources.

Language

Linguistic classification

The Wichita language belongs to the Caddoan language family, a group of Native American languages historically spoken across the and parts of the . This family encompasses five principal languages: in the southern branch and the northern branch languages Pawnee, , Wichita, and Kitsai. Within the northern Caddoan subgroup, Wichita constitutes a distinct , showing systematic correspondences in , morphology, and with Pawnee and , which form a closer subcluster, while diverging more substantially from due to deeper divergence estimated at several millennia based on glottochronological analysis of retention rates. Shared innovations, such as specific pronominal prefixes and verb conjugation patterns, support the internal subgrouping, with Wichita retaining archaic features like a three-vowel system (/i, a, ə/) not fully paralleled in southern . The classification traces to early 20th-century comparative work by linguists like John P. Harrington and Alfred L. Kroeber, who identified Caddoan unity through reconstructed proto-forms for basic vocabulary items (e.g., numerals and body parts) exhibiting regular sound shifts, such as k > ts in Wichita reflexes of proto-Caddoan velars. No evidence supports broader affiliations beyond Caddoan, despite speculative proposals linking it to Siouan or Muskogean stocks, which lack substantiated regular correspondences.

Current status and revitalization efforts

The , kirikirʔi:s, lacks fluent speakers as of 2024, following the death of Doris Jean Lamar-McLemore, the last known fluent heritage speaker, on August 30, 2016. With no remaining first-language speakers among the approximately 2,100 enrolled members of the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes, the is classified as dormant, though semi-speakers and archival documentation persist. The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes maintain a dedicated Cultural/Language Program under the Department of Preservation to document, teach, and promote kirikirʔi:s. This includes the formation of the Wichita Language Revitalization Committee, which coordinates community outreach via and events to foster basic proficiency and cultural transmission. Federal support through the ' Living Languages Grant Program has enabled the creation of two full-time language instructor positions and monthly Community Language Nights since at least 2023. Ongoing initiatives encompass online Zoom classes for tribal members, such as sessions held on September 15, 2024, focusing on vocabulary and phrases; weekly "Wichita Wednesday" activities introducing everyday expressions; and interactive resources like language apps, crosswords, and video adaptations of children's books. Community-based archives and the tribe's new museum integrate language materials to support immersion and efforts, emphasizing productive ideologies that prioritize tribal-led revival over academic preservation alone. These programs aim to build generational learners, though challenges persist due to the absence of native models and limited funding.

Pre-contact history and culture

Origins and migrations

The Wichita people belong to the Caddoan language family, specifically the Northern Caddoan branch, which links them linguistically to the Pawnee, , and Kitsai, suggesting a common proto-Caddoan ancestry originating in the eastern woodlands or Mississippi Valley regions prior to westward dispersal. Archaeological continuity ties their forebears to the Plains Village tradition, which emerged around 800 AD in the central , marked by the adoption of maize agriculture, permanent or semi-permanent villages with grass-thatched houses, and seasonal hunts using communal drives. By the late 1300s, ancestral Wichita groups had established clusters of settlements along the in what is now south-central , transitioning from smaller village networks to larger polities like , fully developed by approximately 1450 AD. This northward expansion from southern Plains origins, possibly linked to climatic shifts favoring or population pressures, is evidenced by the Great Bend aspect ceramic tradition (ca. 1500–1700 AD), featuring shell-tempered pottery and earthworks. Major sites such as Etzanoa, spanning 3,000 acres near modern , demonstrate peak population densities of up to 20,000 individuals by the , with drone surveys revealing circular earthworks and refuse middens indicating sustained occupation rather than transient camps. These settlements reflect adaptive migrations within the region, driven by resource availability—such as fertile floodplains for corn, beans, and squash cultivation—while maintaining cultural practices like matrilineal clans and earth-lodge architecture derived from earlier influences. Pre-contact movements remained localized, with no evidence of large-scale displacements until European-introduced diseases and inter-tribal conflicts in the 17th–18th centuries prompted southward shifts toward and territories.

Settlements and architecture

The Wichita maintained semi-permanent villages in the southern Great Plains, primarily along river valleys such as the Arkansas River in present-day Kansas and Oklahoma, where they established fields for agriculture and clusters of dwellings near water sources. Archaeological evidence indicates some villages were fortified with palisades, as seen at sites like Edwards I (34BK2) and Duncan (34WA2) in west-central Oklahoma, dating between A.D. 1450 and 1650. These settlements served as bases for farming communities during spring, summer, and early fall, supporting cultivation of crops like corn, beans, and squash, while villages were often abandoned in winter for mobile buffalo hunts. The characteristic architecture consisted of dome-shaped grass houses, constructed with a frame of poles—often cedar—set firmly into the ground and bent inward to meet at a central peak supported by an internal post-and-beam system. Horizontal stringers were tied to the rafters for stability, and the exterior was thickly thatched with bundles of bluestem or prairie grass, lashed and secured with additional rods to withstand weather. Interiors featured a central for cooking and heating, a smoke hole at the apex, raised reed platforms along the walls for sleeping, and typically one or more entrances, often oriented eastward; these structures housed extended families of 10 to 12 individuals and measured up to 40 feet in diameter. For seasonal mobility during hunts or warfare, the Wichita used portable tents covered in animal skins, contrasting the fixed grass houses of villages. Grass houses required communal repairs each spring after winter exposure, involving family teams cutting and bundling fresh thatch, reflecting adaptations to the Plains environment where wood was scarce but grass abundant. This architectural form persisted into the historic period, with villages noted as distinctive landmarks by European observers due to their organized layout and thatched domes.

Subsistence economy

The Wichita maintained a dual centered on and , supplemented by gathering wild plants, which supported their semi-sedentary village life for over two millennia prior to significant European influence. Women primarily managed farming, cultivating fields of , beans, and squash near permanent grass-house villages during spring, summer, and early fall. These crops formed the dietary staple, with ground into meal for bread, beans interplanted to climb stalks, and squash or pumpkins grown on spreading vines; excess was preserved by roasting, drying, and storing in underground cache pits or buffalo-hide bags. Men focused on hunting bison, deer, , , and small game, using , and communal drives, with large-scale bison pursuits occurring in late fall and early winter when herds migrated southward. During these seasonal expeditions, families relocated to temporary tipis, where women processed meat by slicing, drying, and storing it for year-round use in soups or alongside boiled vegetables. This pattern allowed return to villages by early spring for planting and house repairs, balancing crop tending with protein acquisition from the Plains environment. Gathering complemented these activities, with collection of wild seeds, , and sunflowers providing additional nutrition, particularly during growing seasons. While fishing occurred in rivers like the , it played a minor role compared to terrestrial resources in their central Plains . The introduction of in the via enhanced hunting efficiency but did not fundamentally alter the pre-existing reliance on diversified, seasonal strategies.

Social structure and governance

The Wichita maintained a matrilineal kinship system, tracing descent and inheritance through the female line, which reinforced solidarity among maternal relatives. Residence patterns were matrilocal, with husbands relocating to the households of their wives' families upon marriage, typically centered around an elder matriarch such as a grandmother. Extended families formed the core social unit, comprising women of a single lineage, their spouses, dependent children, and unmarried male kin, who collaborated in agriculture, household maintenance, and child-rearing. Villages operated as semi-autonomous units within the broader , each governed by a primary chief responsible for internal affairs, , and coordination of communal activities like farming and ceremonies. positions, including chiefs, were generally selected by consensus among warriors or elders rather than inherited strictly patrilineally, allowing capable individuals to assume roles based on demonstrated and prowess. Many villages featured a dual structure with two principal chiefs—one focused on civil and , the other on matters—facilitating balanced in a context of inter-village alliances and external threats. Governance emphasized enforced through councils of headmen and elders, addressing conflicts via rather than codified penalties, with chiefs wielding to negotiate treaties or mobilize for defense. This decentralized system supported the Wichita's adaptation to a of and bison , where village allowed flexible responses to environmental pressures while ties enabled coordinated trade and warfare. Social was relatively flat, with status accruing from age, skill in or rituals, and contributions to communal welfare rather than rigid class divisions.

Inter-tribal relations

Trade networks


The Wichita maintained extensive inter-tribal trade networks across the Southern Plains prior to European contact, leveraging their position as semi-sedentary agriculturalists and bison hunters to exchange surplus crops for animal products from nomadic groups. Villages along the and Red Rivers served as central hubs, facilitating trade with tribes such as the , , Pawnee, and proto-Comanche bands, where Wichita provided , beans, squash, and in return for meat, hides, robes, and . These exchanges integrated the Wichita into broader regional systems, evidenced by archaeological finds of long-distance goods like , pendants, shell beads, and glazed originating from villages in . Following initial European contact in the , Wichita trade networks expanded to incorporate alliances with horse-mounted nomads, particularly the , who supplied horses, mules, and captives in exchange for agricultural produce and European-derived goods obtained by the Wichita as intermediaries. By the early , Wichita bands acted as pivotal middlemen between raiders from the southwest and French traders along eastern routes, trading -procured items like slaves and livestock for firearms, metal tools, and cloth, which were then redistributed through inter-tribal channels. This role persisted into the mid-18th century, as seen at sites like Deer Creek, where excavations reveal concentrations of , iron implements, and gun parts indicative of robust exchange with neighboring tribes facilitated by French presence. Declines in buffalo herds by the late 19th century shifted Wichita trade toward surplus garden produce exchanged directly with , , and groups, compensating for the loss of traditional bison-based while maintaining inter-tribal economic ties until reservation confinement curtailed mobility. These networks underscored the Wichita's strategic to ecological and demographic pressures, prioritizing resource complementarity over conquest in inter-tribal relations.

Alliances and diplomacy

The Wichita people, along with affiliated bands including the Waco, Tawakoni, Taovaya, and Kichai, formed a loose that facilitated mutual defense and resource sharing across the southern Plains prior to sustained European contact. This internal enabled coordinated responses to external pressures, with villages often clustering for while maintaining semi-autonomous . Inter-tribal diplomacy emphasized trade and non-aggression pacts, particularly with nomadic groups like the , whose alliance from the early onward allowed the Wichita to serve as intermediaries in regional commerce, exchanging agricultural surplus for horses and hides. A pivotal diplomatic achievement occurred in , when French traders brokered a formal between the Wichita and , stabilizing southern Plains relations and countering Spanish incursions from . This pact, renewed through ongoing French mediation, bolstered Wichita influence by integrating mobility with Wichita sedentary villages, though it remained pragmatic rather than ideological. Relations with northern tribes such as the Osage and Pawnee were more strained, marked by sporadic raids over hunting territories, yet the Wichita pursued selective diplomacy to avoid escalation, leveraging their central position in trade routes to negotiate truces. European powers influenced these dynamics: the Wichita cultivated closer ties with French explorers and merchants from Louisiana starting around 1720, granting access to villages in exchange for firearms and metal goods, which enhanced their leverage against Spanish expeditions. Spanish diplomatic overtures, including missions in the 1750s, met resistance; in 1759, Wichita warriors repelled a Spanish punitive force led by Diego Ortiz Parrilla near the Red River, underscoring their preference for French partnerships over coerced submission. These alliances prioritized economic and military pragmatism, with French support proving instrumental in preserving Wichita autonomy amid colonial rivalries.

Warfare and conflicts

The Wichita engaged in frequent inter-tribal warfare, primarily defensive in nature, against nomadic raiders and territorial rivals who sought to displace them from their semi-sedentary villages in the Southern Plains. Their chief pre-contact enemies included the Apache, who had driven Wichita groups westward and southward from ancestral territories in the Arkansas River valley prior to European arrival, compelling migrations toward the Red and Brazos Rivers. Conflicts with the Osage intensified in the 18th century, as Osage incursions from the east forced Wichita bands to relocate southward to fortified villages along the Red River, where they balanced trade alliances with defensive warfare. The Pawnee and Missouri tribes also raided Wichita settlements, contributing to a pattern of skirmishes over hunting grounds and resources, though specific battle records remain sparse due to reliance on oral traditions and fragmented archaeological evidence. Wichita warfare tactics emphasized fortified defenses and prestige-based combat, with villages protected by log palisades and warriors gaining status through close-quarters stabbing of enemies rather than solely or ranged . Alliances proved crucial; Wichita groups occasionally partnered with bands against common foes like the , employing to harass invaders while leveraging village fortifications for prolonged sieges. In , approximately 700 Wichita warriors launched a coordinated raid against Osage settlements, demonstrating offensive capabilities amid ongoing territorial pressures, though such expeditions were rare compared to defensive postures. European contact escalated conflicts, particularly with Spanish forces seeking to curb French-influenced native resistance. The most significant engagement was the Battle of the Twin Villages on October 7, 1759, near the Red River in present-day and , where a Spanish expedition of about 1,000 men under Colonel Diego Ortiz Parrilla assaulted Taovaya (Wichita) and allied villages. Wichita defenders, bolstered by and auxiliaries armed with French firearms, repelled the attackers after a day-long , inflicting heavy casualties—including the loss of Spanish artillery—and forcing a retreat; this victory marked the largest 18th-century battle in the region and halted Spanish expansion northward. Relations with French traders remained largely peaceful, facilitating arms acquisitions that enhanced Wichita capabilities against Spanish incursions. In the , U.S. expansion brought direct military confrontations, often intertwined with Wichita alliances against shared threats like raiders. Wichita bands defended their lands against settler encroachments following independence in 1836, culminating in sporadic clashes until relocation pressures mounted. The Battle of Wichita Village on October 1, 1858, near Rush Springs, , saw U.S. Second Cavalry troops under Captain assault a Comanche encampment adjacent to Wichita territories, resulting in over 70 Comanche deaths; while Wichita were not primary combatants, the action occurred amid broader campaigns affecting their region and alliances. During the Civil War, some Wichita leaders signed a provisional with Confederate forces in 1861, which the tribe later disavowed, reflecting survival strategies amid federal neglect rather than ideological commitment. These conflicts, compounded by disease and displacement, reduced Wichita numbers dramatically, shifting warfare from inter-tribal raids to resistance against American sovereignty.

European contact and colonial era

Initial encounters (16th-17th centuries)

The first recorded European contact with the Wichita people occurred in 1541 during Francisco Vázquez de Coronado's expedition seeking the mythical kingdom of Quivira. Guided by Native informants including the Pawnee speaker known as El Turco, Coronado's forces traversed the Texas Panhandle and entered central Kansas, reaching a series of villages near present-day Lyons in Rice County. These settlements, comprising about 25 villages of grass-thatched houses occupied by up to 1,000 people each according to expedition chronicler Pedro de Castañeda, were inhabited by agricultural communities identified by historians as ancestral Wichita groups. The inhabitants subsisted on maize, beans, and squash cultivated in irrigated fields, and provided the Spaniards with food supplies, though Coronado found no gold or urban wealth, leading to the execution of El Turco for alleged deception. A subsequent Spanish expedition under in 1601 encountered another major Wichita settlement at Etzanoa, located along the near modern Arkansas City in southeastern . Oñate's party of approximately 70 soldiers and support personnel documented a dispersed urban complex spanning five miles, with an estimated 20,000 inhabitants living in thatched structures amid extensive farmlands producing corn, beans, and pumpkins. The locals, referred to as Escanzaque or Rayados due to their facial tattoos, engaged in brief trade exchanges with the Spaniards for metal goods but dispersed amid rumors of impending attack, prompting Oñate to retreat without establishing permanent relations. Archaeological evidence, including earthworks and village remnants, corroborates the site's scale as one of the largest pre-contact settlements in the Plains. Throughout the 17th century, direct Spanish expeditions into Wichita territories waned, as colonial efforts prioritized consolidating against raids and logistical hardships deterred deep Plains incursions. Sporadic in horses and agricultural products occurred indirectly via or intermediaries from the , but no large-scale contacts are documented, reflecting Spanish wariness of nomadic raiders and the Wichita's eastward shifts amid inter-tribal pressures. Early exposure to European pathogens during the 1541 and 1601 visits likely initiated demographic declines, with smallpox and other diseases spreading through networks, though systematic data remains elusive until later accounts.

18th-century interactions and displacements

During the early 18th century, the Wichita established trade relations with French explorers and traders who ventured into the Arkansas River valley from the Mississippi region, exchanging goods such as horses, hides, and agricultural products for European items including metal tools, beads, and firearms. This commerce began around 1720 and intensified as French influence expanded westward, providing the Wichita with commodities that enhanced their economic position amid regional rivalries. French intermediaries also brokered a significant peace agreement between the Wichita and Comanche in 1746, reducing hostilities with western nomadic groups and facilitating safer trade routes across the southern plains. Spanish interactions were more limited but notable, with expeditions from occasionally encountering Wichita bands, though sustained alliances formed later in the century. By the 1780s, some Wichita groups allied with Spanish colonial forces against common enemies, exemplified by a 1789 joint attack involving 700 Wichita warriors and Spanish troops under Governor Juan de Ugalde targeting Osage settlements to the east. These European engagements introduced not only but also indirect pressures through disease transmission and competition for resources, though direct demographic impacts were more pronounced in subsequent decades. Persistent inter-tribal conflicts drove major displacements, particularly pressure from Osage raids originating from the northeast, which harassed Wichita villages and prompted southward migrations starting in the early 1700s. Combined with threats from Apache and Comanche groups to the west, these hostilities decentralized Wichita settlements, shifting them from northern Kansas and Oklahoma territories toward the Red River watershed by the mid-18th century. Lured by French trading posts and seeking defensible positions, Wichita bands, including the prominent Taovayas subgroup, established fortified villages along the upper Red River near present-day Texas and Oklahoma borders around 1750, where they maintained control over regional commerce until the early 19th century. This relocation preserved Wichita autonomy amid escalating pressures but fragmented their traditional confederacy into smaller, more mobile clusters.

Impacts of disease and demographic decline

The Wichita Confederacy experienced profound demographic collapse following indirect and direct exposure to European-introduced pathogens, primarily through trade networks and colonial expeditions beginning in the late . , , and other diseases, to which Native populations lacked acquired immunity, spread rapidly in densely settled villages, causing mortality rates often exceeding 50% in affected communities. Early Spanish accounts from the 1540s describe large Wichita settlements along rivers in present-day and , with individual villages housing 1,200 to 2,000 inhabitants, suggesting a confederacy-wide potentially numbering in the tens of thousands during the protohistoric period. By the late , cumulative epidemics had reduced these numbers dramatically, with estimates placing the total Wichita at approximately 3,200 in 1790. A particularly devastating smallpox outbreak struck the Taovaya band—a key Wichita subgroup—in 1777–1778, killing an estimated one-third of its members and eroding the band's regional influence amid ongoing intertribal pressures. This epidemic, likely transmitted via Spanish missions or nomadic , exemplifies how diseases amplified existing vulnerabilities, as survivors faced labor shortages for and defense, contributing to further dispersal and assimilation with allied groups. Subsequent waves, including in the 1830s and 1840s, accelerated the decline; by mid-century, agency censuses recorded Wichita numbers dwindling to around 800, reflecting not only direct mortality but also reduced from social disruption and in the epidemic aftermath. These pandemics engendered a vicious cycle of demographic attrition, as high death rates among elders and warriors undermined traditional knowledge transmission and governance, rendering communities more susceptible to raids by and Osage groups. Historical records indicate that Wichita villages, once semi-sedentary hubs of cultivation and trade, fragmented into smaller, mobile bands by the early , a shift directly linked to post-epidemic depopulation. Tribal oral histories describe this era as the "days of darkness," marked by recurrent illness that halved populations within single seasons and eroded cultural continuity. While warfare and displacement compounded losses, epidemiological evidence underscores as the primary driver, with autopsy and survivor accounts confirming the absence of and the virulence of pathogens like variola major in unvaccinated populations.

19th-century history

Relations with American expansion

The United States asserted sovereignty over much of the Wichita homeland following the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, which encompassed the Arkansas River valley in present-day Kansas where the Wichita maintained villages. American traders and explorers increasingly penetrated the region, exchanging goods for furs and horses, though direct military confrontations remained limited until later decades. The Wichita, already displaced southward by Osage raids in the early 1800s, experienced indirect pressure from U.S. policies promoting settlement and removal of eastern tribes into Indian Territory after 1830. To secure peace among Plains tribes and facilitate westward expansion, the U.S. negotiated the Treaty of Camp Holmes on August 24, 1835, near the Canadian River in the , involving the Wichita alongside , , and other bands. The agreement pledged perpetual friendship, permitted U.S. construction of forts and roads through tribal lands, and aimed to curb intertribal warfare that hindered migration routes; in exchange, the Wichita received annuities of $6,000 annually for ten years. Despite Wichita leaders' sincerity in upholding the treaty, ongoing raids by nomadic tribes and the influx of Texan settlers after Texas's independence in 1836 eroded these relations, as Wichita defended their territories against encroachments while facing retaliatory expeditions. Texas's annexation by the U.S. in 1845 intensified conflicts, with settlers viewing Wichita villages along the Brazos and Red Rivers as obstacles to grazing and farming. In response to persistent hostilities, including Wichita participation in raids on frontier posts, the U.S. government established a reservation for the Wichita and affiliated bands on the upper Brazos River in 1855, comprising approximately 12,000 acres to confine them and reduce friction with Texans. However, settler demands and inadequate protection led to further displacement; by 1859, the Wichita were relocated to the Leased District in Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma), between the 98th and 100th meridians, sharing space with Delaware, Caddo, and others amid ongoing threats from Comanche and buffalo hunters depleting herds essential to Wichita subsistence. During the Civil War, initial overtures from Confederate agents prompted a short-lived pact in 1861, which the tribe later repudiated amid Union sympathies. In 1863, Confederate forces under General William Steele compelled the Wichita to abandon their reservation, prompting a northward flight to for refuge under protection at the site of present-day Wichita. This exodus, covering over 200 miles, resulted in severe hardships, including exposure to and outbreaks that halved the population to around 822 survivors by 1867. The episode underscored the Wichita's precarious position amid American sectional conflict and expansionist pressures, as Union authorities provided limited rations but prioritized over tribal welfare.

Treaties, reservations, and relocations

The Wichita entered into their first formal with the in at Camp Holmes, near present-day Lexington, , alongside the and other Plains tribes, establishing perpetual peace, mutual forgiveness of past hostilities, and rights to hunt in the Great Prairie west of the . The agreement also permitted U.S. citizens safe passage through tribal lands to and obligated the tribes to mediate disputes and compensate for property damages. This recognized Wichita claims but did little to halt pressures from settler expansion and intertribal conflicts. In the 1850s, amid escalating hostilities with Texas settlers, the Wichita and affiliated bands like the Tawakoni and Waco were assigned to the Reservation in in 1855, though ongoing violence prompted relocation to the area in . By 1859, the U.S. government designated a reservation for the Wichita in the Leased District of , bounded by the 98th and 100th meridians between the Canadian and Red Rivers, where they were joined by , , Tawakoni, Waco, and groups. During the Civil War, Confederate forces compelled the Wichita to abandon their reservation in 1863, forcing a flight northward to amid starvation, , and outbreaks that decimated survivors. Only 822 Wichita returned to Indian Territory in 1867 following the war's end, but portions of their prior reserve were ceded to , , , under the Medicine Lodge Creek Treaty of that year. The 1872 agreement with the Wichita and affiliated tribes, concluded in Washington, D.C., on October 19, formalized a permanent reservation in to resolve lingering land claims, with the Wichita ceding all rights to territories in , , and elsewhere outside the designated tract. This reservation, located primarily in present-day , and encompassing parts of adjacent counties, was bounded by the , , 98th meridian, and 98°40' west longitude, though Congress did not ratify the boundaries until later adjustments. These relocations and cessions reflected broader U.S. policies of confining Plains tribes to diminished lands amid American expansion.

Civil War involvement and survival strategies

At the outset of the in 1861, representatives of the Wichita signed a pact with the Confederate States, though the tribe subsequently repudiated this agreement. This fragile alignment reflected the broader instability in , where Confederate forces sought to secure tribal loyalties amid Union withdrawals. By 1863, Confederate troops compelled the Wichita to evacuate their reservation along the , prompting a northward flight to as refugees. This displacement aligned the Wichita with Union interests by default, as they sought safety under federal protection in , away from Confederate incursions in . The move exacerbated existing vulnerabilities, with the tribe numbering among displaced groups from the Leased District reservations established in 1859. From 1863 to 1867 in , the Wichita endured severe hardships without allocated land for agriculture or reliable allies, leading to widespread . Epidemics of and further decimated their population during this refugee period. hinged on mobility and evasion of conflict zones, with the maintaining cohesion through networks amid floods, disease, and sporadic attacks from neighboring groups upon eventual return efforts. In 1867, following the war's conclusion, only 822 Wichita individuals returned to , resettling amid ongoing territorial disputes and federal negotiations. This post-war underscored their adaptive resilience, prioritizing relocation over sustained military engagement to preserve communal survival against demographic collapse and regional chaos.

20th-21st century developments

Federal recognition and land allotments

The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes (encompassing the Wichita, Keechi, Waco, and Tawakonie) hold continuous federal recognition as a sovereign entity, stemming from U.S. treaties dating to 1835 and reaffirmed through government-to-government relations without interruption or termination. This status was formalized under the of 1934 and the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act of 1936, enabling the tribe to adopt a constitution, establish an elected executive committee, and access federal services via the . As of the ' annual listings, the tribe remains among the 574 federally recognized entities eligible for funding and services, headquartered in , with approximately 2,150 enrolled members as of 2002. Land allotments for the Wichita reservation, established in 1872 along the Washita River in present-day Caddo and Grady counties, Oklahoma, followed negotiations with the Jerome (Cherokee) Commission in 1891, where the tribe and affiliated bands agreed to divide tribal holdings into individual parcels in exchange for ceding surplus lands. Ratified by Congress in 1895 and upheld by a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court decision resolving disputes over boundaries and implementation, the process yielded 957 allotments totaling 152,714 acres—typically 160 acres per allottee, split evenly between farmland and pasture—with the remaining 586,468 acres classified as surplus and opened to non-Indian settlement via presidential proclamation and lottery on August 6, 1901. This allotment mirrored the federal assimilation framework of the Dawes Act of 1887, which aimed to break up communal reservations but resulted in substantial tribal land loss, as non-Indian acquisition of allotments through inheritance, sale, or tax delinquency fragmented holdings and eroded the original 739,182-acre base. By 1900, the policy had dismantled traditional grass house villages and communal land use, contributing to economic hardship and cultural disruption amid broader demographic declines from prior epidemics and relocations.

Assimilation policies and cultural resilience

U.S. assimilation policies in the early 20th century targeted Wichita communal structures through the allotment of reservation lands into individual 160-acre parcels beginning in 1900, effectively dissolving traditional grass house villages and promoting individual land ownership to erode tribal cohesion. Children faced forcible enrollment in boarding schools, where native language use was strictly prohibited as part of efforts to impose English-only education and sever cultural ties. The Code of Indian Offenses, implemented from 1883 to 1978, outlawed traditional practices including dances, ceremonies, and religious observances such as the Ghost Dance and peyote rituals, with government agents actively suppressing these among the Wichita to enforce cultural conformity. Wichita responses included adaptive survival strategies, such as selective adoption of through missionary influence alongside clandestine continuation of peyote-based practices that evolved into the , and leadership resistance exemplified by Tawakoni Jim's opposition to allotment encroachments. The of 1934, supplemented by the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act of 1936, provided a policy pivot by authorizing tribal reorganization, which the Wichita utilized to establish a formal comprising a president and council, thereby reclaiming elements of after decades of fragmentation. Cultural resilience manifested in the creation of informal refuges like the ichaskhah site near Camp Creek, active from the 1930s to the early 1960s, where Wichita gathered for handgames, dances, communal meals, and , fostering intergenerational continuity despite ongoing prohibitions on traditional assemblies. These efforts countered the demographic and social strains from prior epidemics and displacements, which had reduced Wichita numbers to around 800 by the late , by repurposing allotted lands into spaces for subtle assertion. In the late 20th and 21st centuries, preservation initiatives have sustained linguistic and ceremonial heritage, including digital resources for instruction and campaigns for remains of children interred at institutions like the Carlisle Indian School. Legal actions underscore enduring defiance, as evidenced by the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes' May 2025 class-action against the U.S. , which demands a full of approximately $23.3 billion in tribal trust funds allegedly misappropriated to finance abusive operations that contributed to child deaths and cultural erasure. In 2024, the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes received a U.S. Department of Energy grant to develop a project aimed at powering their tribal and operations in , as part of broader efforts to enhance energy independence and sustainability. This initiative aligns with the tribe's Industrial Development Commission activities, which focus on expanding the tribal base through purchases and fostering via enterprises like Wichita Tribal Enterprises and Quivera Enterprises. Quivera Enterprises, for instance, returned $600,000 to the commission in 2021 to support reinvestment in tribal development projects. Additional economic support includes a $595,000 grant from the U.S. Department of and Urban Development in 2025 for housing construction, repair, and related services, contributing to improvements alongside other federal funding for enhancements, environmental initiatives, and programs. On the legal front, the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes, in collaboration with the Washoe Tribe of and , filed a class-action against the U.S. government on May 22, 2025, in the U.S. District for the Middle District of , seeking a full accounting of approximately $23.3 billion in tribal trust funds allegedly misappropriated to finance the federal Indian system, including the . The suit contends that these funds, derived from treaties involving land cessions, were improperly diverted to institutions documented for , , forced labor, and cultural erasure, violating fiduciary duties under federal law. As of October 2025, the case remains pending, with potential implications for restitution and policy reforms regarding historical trust mismanagement.

Modern governance and economy

Tribal government structure

The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes operate under a sovereign tribal government centered on a seven-member Tribal Executive Committee, which exercises legislative, executive, and administrative authority over tribal affairs. This committee includes a president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, and three at-large committee members, with the president serving as the chief executive responsible for representing the tribe in external relations and overseeing operations. The structure derives from the tribe's Governing Resolution, ratified by tribal members on May 8, 1961, which establishes the committee's powers to enact ordinances, manage resources, enter contracts, and handle day-to-day governance while preserving ultimate authority with the tribal membership. Elections for committee positions occur periodically, with the most recent held on July 20, 2024, determining officeholders for terms typically lasting two to four years depending on the role. An independent oversees the process, verifying candidate eligibility, conducting voting (often at the tribal community building in ), and certifying results to ensure transparency and adherence to the Governing Resolution. Eligible voters are enrolled tribal members aged 18 and older, reflecting a democratic framework adapted post-1934 influences while maintaining Caddoan cultural emphases on consensus. The Annual General Council, comprising all enrolled members, functions as the tribe's ultimate decision-making body, convening at least once yearly—such as the July 19, 2025, meeting—to ratify budgets, amend the Governing Resolution, and address issues like land management or federal negotiations. This assembly balances the Executive Committee's delegated powers with direct membership oversight, preventing centralized control and aligning with historical Wichita practices of council-based leadership among village bands. Supporting the core structure are specialized entities, including a for adjudicating internal disputes under the Wichita Tribal Code and boards for sectors like housing and health, which report to the Executive Committee but operate with semi-autonomous authority to address specific needs. As a federally recognized since reorganization in the mid-20th century, this framework enables over approximately 1,500 enrolled members and reservation lands in , while navigating federal compacts on gaming and resources.

Economic enterprises

The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes derive significant revenue from gaming operations, particularly the Sugar Creek Casino in Hinton, , which opened in recent years and attracts visitors along Interstate 40. This facility, complemented by an on-site smoke shop, represents a core component of tribal economic diversification, with expansions including a new financed in April 2024 to enhance services. In October 2024, the tribe announced plans for a project featuring rooftop and parking canopy panels to supply power to the casino and adjacent inn, aiming to reduce operational costs through renewable sources. Beyond gaming, the tribe operates Wichita Tribal Enterprises (WTE), a fully tribally owned entity established as a cornerstone of long-term financial independence, specializing in information technology, cybersecurity, and financial management services for federal government clients. WTE functions under Quivera Enterprises, LLC, the parent holding company that oversees multiple subsidiaries, including Wichita Government Services, to broaden service offerings in government contracting. Industrial ventures include Anadarko Industries, 51% owned by the tribe, which supports and workforce development initiatives. The Wichita Tribe Industrial Development Commission (WTIDC) coordinates these efforts, focusing on business retention, expansion, land acquisition for economic use, and to foster opportunities for tribal members. These enterprises collectively aim to leverage tribal for sustainable growth, distinct from historical subsistence economies based on and trade. The Wichita confederacy experienced severe population decline during the 18th and 19th centuries, primarily due to epidemics of Eurasian diseases such as , intertribal warfare, and conflicts with and later American forces. By 1790, estimates placed the total Wichita population at approximately 3,200 individuals. This number further diminished to around 1,400 by 1820, encompassing affiliated bands including the Waco, Tawakoni, Taovaya, and Kichai. By 1859, on the eve of the Civil War, the population had contracted to about 1,100, reflecting ongoing losses from displacement and violence. The occurred in the , with only 153 recorded Wichita individuals, a fraction of pre-colonial estimates that may have exceeded 10,000 in the early 1700s for the broader group. In the 20th century, following federal allotment policies and the establishment of reservations in Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma), the population began to stabilize through natural increase and formalized enrollment criteria under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934. Enrolled membership in the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes stood at 2,150 in 2002, with over half residing in Oklahoma near Anadarko. By 2016, enrollment neared 3,000. As of 2023, official tribal records reported 2,783 enrolled members, reflecting modest growth driven by births, adoptions, and eligibility verifications rather than large-scale immigration. Recent tribal statements approximate total membership at 3,800, likely including descendants and affiliates, though precise demographics remain tied to enrollment rolls maintained for federal services and governance. Contemporary Wichita demographics show concentration in Caddo, Grady, and surrounding counties, with smaller communities in and linked to historical migrations. U.S. data for tribal service areas indicate a broader American Indian and Alaska Native population of around 9,240 in relevant locales as of recent estimates, though this encompasses multi-tribal households and not solely enrolled Wichitas. Age distributions align with national Native American trends, featuring a relatively young median age and higher fertility rates compared to the general U.S. population, contributing to ongoing numerical recovery. No significant out-migration or assimilation-driven losses have been documented in recent decades, with cultural preservation efforts supporting community cohesion.

Cultural practices and preservation

Traditional religion and ceremonies

The Wichita traditionally held animistic beliefs, attributing supernatural powers to elements of the earth and sky, with every animate and inanimate object possessing a spirit. Animals frequently appeared in dreams or visions to confer lifelong guardian spirits and powers upon individuals, guiding personal and communal actions. These visions shaped mythology emphasizing natural forces, including creation narratives and flood stories that predated European contact and reflected environmental influences rather than extensive ritual structures. Their religious system centered on a star cult, akin to but less elaborate than that of the Pawnee, with ceremonies led by Morning Star priests focusing on celestial bodies for spiritual insight and seasonal renewal. This cosmology integrated stars into perceptions of the infinite, as evidenced in legends where cosmic entities influenced human origins and cycles of life. Key ceremonies included the Deer Dance, performed by during the emergence of new grass in spring, corn ripening in summer, and harvest in fall to invoke agricultural success. The Calumet Ceremony involved presenting a feathered pipe stem to a prominent figure to secure tribal benefits, such as bountiful resources or safe returns from parties. Additional rituals addressed buffalo abundance, warfare outcomes, and rainfall, often accompanied by specialized songs—including healing, prayer, , Morning Star, and ceremonial rain dance variants—tied to economic and seasonal needs from the 1750s onward. These practices, documented ethnographically since the early , underscored a pragmatic aligned with Plains Village agricultural-hunting adaptations rather than highly formalized priesthood-dominated rites.

Artifacts and material culture

The Wichita people constructed distinctive circular grass houses as their primary dwellings, featuring a framework of forked wooden posts and horizontal logs covered with thick layers of thatched grass. These structures measured 16 to 33 feet in diameter, with a central fire pit for heating and cooking, raised earthen beds along the interior walls for sleeping, and a smoke hole in the roof for ventilation. Villages typically consisted of multiple such houses spaced about 20 meters apart, sometimes fortified or built over basin-shaped depressions. Pottery formed a key element of Wichita material culture, with archaeological sites yielding numerous potsherds alongside evidence of trade-acquired ceramics. Local vessels included utilitarian types for storage and cooking, while traded items encompassed engraved pottery from Caddo settlements and glazed examples from Pueblo villages. Stone and bone tools were prevalent, including chipped-stone scrapers, arrow points, knives, drills, gravers, and bison bone hoes used for agriculture. Grinding implements such as manos and basins, along with clay and stone pipes, supported food processing and ceremonial practices. Clay figurines depicting humans, animals, and birds have also been recovered from village sites. Clothing utilized natural materials like deerskin, buffalo , and woven fibers to create skirts, ponchos, moccasins, shirts, and robes, with men wearing breechcloths and women shorter skirts. Adornments included earrings, necklaces of shell beads, and pendants obtained through , complemented by facial and body tattoos featuring lines, circles, and dots. European contact introduced iron tools, knives, axes, guns, and glass beads via French traders, evident in artifacts from sites like Spanish Fort.

Contemporary institutions and education

The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes maintain a Department of Education that provides financial, cultural, and academic support to enrolled tribal members to promote self-sufficiency and enhancement. This department oversees programs including higher education assistance through the Adult Vocational Training (AVT) initiative, which targets enrolled members residing within the tribe's service area in for vocational skill development. Participants must demonstrate enrollment status and area residency, with additional resources like device loans for chromebooks and mobile hotspots to facilitate remote learning during semesters. For K-12 education, the tribe administers Johnson-O'Malley (JOM) funding specifically at Gracemont Public Schools, serving enrolled students from pre-kindergarten through 12th grade with supplemental academic and cultural enrichment activities. This program emphasizes culturally relevant support to address educational gaps, though it is limited to that district. Broader youth initiatives, such as the Tribal Youth Program under Juvenile Services, target native youth aged 12-17—prioritizing Wichita members—for skill-building and prevention services that intersect with educational outcomes. Cultural preservation efforts integrate with education through the Department of Preservation's Cultural and Program, which documents and teaches Wichita history, traditions, and the Kirikirìs to combat endangerment. The Wichita Revitalization Committee actively promotes language acquisition via community lessons, including introductory phrases shared publicly as of July 2025, leveraging tribal resources for accessible materials and recordings. Academic analyses, such as a 2018 study, highlight the tribe's archival access as conducive to revitalization, enabling members to engage with for fluent speaker development. Partnerships like Reach Higher further extend in fields such as enterprise development and , tailored for tribal members pursuing degrees at regional institutions.

Notable Wichita individuals

Historical figures

Wee-ta-ra-sha-ro served as head chief of the Wichita in the early , hosting U.S. Army dragoons under in his village during their 1834 expedition through the southern Plains. He was portrayed by artist that year, depicted as an elder leader extending hospitality amid increasing Euro-American incursions into tribal lands. Kid-á-day, known as a distinguished brave, exemplified Wichita warrior traditions in the 1830s, as captured in George Catlin's 1834 during the artist's travels among Plains tribes. His depiction highlights the tribe's facial tattooing customs and , reflecting status earned through raids and defense against nomadic enemies like the Osage and . Káh-kée-tsee, referred to as "Thighs" in Catlin's notation, represented Wichita women's roles in sustaining village life through and craftsmanship; Catlin painted her in , noting her traditional attire and the tribe's grass-house settlements near tributaries. Among affiliated bands, Quiscat led the Tawakoni in the late 18th century, with his village—named Quiscat—situated on the ; he journeyed to de Béxar in 1772 seeking Spanish peace amid raids, though conflicts persisted into the early . Tawakoni Jim, a later Tawakoni-Wichita head chief and U.S. government scout, bridged tribal diplomacy and federal relations from the 1870s through the early 1900s, appearing in photographs at events like the 1904 . Early European contacts, such as Francisco Vázquez de Coronado's 1541 expedition to (Wichita heartland), involved unnamed leaders hosting but yielding no , leading to strained relations; a Wichita slave named Ysopete later guided remnants of the party southward. Written records of pre-19th-century chiefs remain sparse, attributable to the Wichita's oral traditions and decimation from diseases and warfare post-contact.

Modern contributors

Myles Stephenson Sr. (1929–2021), a lifelong tribal member, served as president of the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes for eight years and for four years, contributing to administrative stability and tribal operations during the mid-to-late . He participated in efforts to secure per-capita payments and land-related legal actions alongside figures like Newton Lamar and attorney John Montgomery, aiding the tribe's economic foundation post-1961 governing resolution. Terri Parton, elected president in 2012 and 2016, has focused on by promoting tribal enterprises that bolster rural communities, emphasizing that tribal revenues recirculate locally unlike external industries. She initiated programs, including seed contributions to children's savings accounts to counter generational banking gaps, and advocated for increased federal funding for health services and veterans' support. Other 20th- and 21st-century leaders, including Newton Lamar and Amber Silverhorn-Wolfe, have upheld executive roles in governance, supporting enrollment, health programs, and cultural events like the annual dance, though specific individual impacts beyond leadership continuity are less documented in public records.

References

  1. https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=WI001
  2. https://wichitatribe.com/culture/history/in-the-beginning-1540-1750/
  3. https://wichitatribe.com/culture/history/people-of-the-grass-house-1750-1820/
  4. https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.na.127.html
  5. https://wichitatribe.com/justice/
  6. https://accessgenealogy.com/kansas/wichita-tribe.htm
  7. https://wichitatribe.com/culture/history/days-of-darkness-1820-1934/
  8. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/wichita-indians
  9. https://www.redriverhistorian.com/post/the-wichitas-natives-of-the-cross-timbers
  10. https://www.nps.gov/places/coronado-quivira-museum.htm
  11. https://mexicounexplained.com/journey-to-the-mythical-land-of-quivira/
  12. https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot-info/env/toolkit/415-10-rpt.pdf
  13. https://wichitatribe.com/
  14. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/696/1378/329090/
  15. https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.na.058.html
  16. https://www.texasbeyondhistory.net/tejas/fundamentals/languages.html
  17. https://www.sorosoro.org/en/caddoan-languages/
  18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/985468
  19. https://history.nebraska.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/doc_publications_NH1979NorthernLang.pdf
  20. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/language-and-linguistics/caddoan-language-family
  21. https://ictnews.org/archive/doris-mclemore-last-fluent-wichita-speaker-walks-on/
  22. https://www.kmuw.org/history/2016-09-01/last-fluent-speaker-of-wichita-tribal-language-dies
  23. https://dobes.mpi.nl/posters/print/americas-wichita-print.pdf
  24. https://shareok.org/items/04895a83-06aa-43f4-a960-b9271ed7d41f
  25. https://wichitatribe.com/department-of-preservation/
  26. https://www.facebook.com/wichitalanguagerevitalization/
  27. https://www.bia.gov/service/grants/llgp
  28. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=566186209600986&id=100086288354969&set=a.105354279017517
  29. https://www.instagram.com/p/DBrdHqgxGyQ/
  30. https://wichitatribe.com/department-of-preservation/wichita-language-night-2/
  31. https://shareok.org/bitstreams/109d47e0-f47a-4a97-9ee1-6a17c5118b0f/download
  32. https://theactiveage.com/wsu-prof-quivira-civilization-underestimated/
  33. https://home.dartmouth.edu/news/2020/10/drone-survey-reveals-large-earthwork-ancestral-wichita-site-kansas
  34. https://cchsm.com/images/books/celebrate_cc_history/2016/farrar.pdf
  35. https://www.oudaily.com/news/ancient-village-of-wichita-tribe-combed-through/article_6d2dae70-e618-5367-b318-85e5682325e5.html
  36. https://www.okhistory.org/learn/archaeology3
  37. https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.arc.001.html
  38. https://accessgenealogy.com/kansas/wichita-tribe-houses.htm
  39. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/wichita-tribe
  40. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/united-states-and-canada/north-american-indigenous-peoples/wichita-indians
  41. http://wanderingbull.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Leaflet-40.pdf
  42. https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.na.117.html
  43. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10761-018-0473-2
  44. http://www.texasindians.com/wichita.htm
  45. https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=TW005
  46. https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=WI004
  47. https://plainshumanities.unl.edu/encyclopedia/doc/egp.ii.048.html
  48. https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=CO062
  49. https://www.etzanoa.net/etzanoa/
  50. https://themercury.com/features/kansas-profile-etzanoa-conservancy-preserves-history-of-lost-city/article_d7a1e7be-2b43-4906-bae2-a957bb84cb8b.html
  51. https://www.nps.gov/fols/learn/historyculture/spanish-exploration.htm
  52. https://shareok.org/bitstreams/5ea1d160-2b1a-4ccb-93f6-3d78d09841f0/download
  53. https://treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/treaty-with-the-comanche-etc-1835-0435
  54. https://digitreaties.org/treaties/treaty/147968177/
  55. https://treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/agreement-with-the-wichita-and-affiliated-tribes-1872-22669
  56. https://wichitatribe.com/culture/history/wichita-indian-reservation/
  57. https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc2031480/
  58. https://wichitatribe.com/culture/history/a-new-beginning-1934-present/
  59. https://www.bia.gov/sites/default/files/dup/assets/bia/ois/ots/pdf/Oklahoma_All_Tribes_2.pdf
  60. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/11/2023-17195/indian-entities-recognized-by-and-eligible-to-receive-services-from-the-united-states-bureau-of
  61. https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=WI005
  62. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/anchoring-sovereignty-in-space-documenting-places-of-wichita-community-building-in-the-twentieth-century/0787F04BB412F6FD5B2891BCF403D85F
  63. https://wichitatribe.com/culture/
  64. https://www.kosu.org/news/2025-05-29/oklahoma-tribal-nation-sues-u-s-government-over-federal-indian-boarding-schools
  65. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/06/07/native-american-boarding-schools-tribal-lawsuit/84053709007/
  66. https://www.kosu.org/energy-environment/2024-10-03/wichita-and-affiliated-tribes-plans-solar-project-to-power-hotel-casino
  67. https://wichitatribe.com/wtidc/
  68. https://www.wichita-quivera.com/wte-services
  69. https://www.wichita-quivera.com/new/blog-post-title-two-n2c97
  70. https://www.southwestledger.news/news/hud-announces-grant-funding-tribal-housing-projects
  71. https://ictnews.org/archive/wichita-and-affiliated-tribes-seeking-business-success/
  72. https://ictnews.org/news/two-tribes-file-groundbreaking-lawsuit-to-force-us-to-account-for-boarding-school-funds/
  73. https://dicellolevitt.com/wichita-and-affiliated-tribes-washoe-file-landmark-lawsuit-against-u-s-government-over-indian-boarding-school-program/
  74. https://www.law360.com/cases/68c9eabf5fb695963038193d
  75. https://wichitatribe.com/government/
  76. https://wichitatribe.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Resolution-WT-25-69.pdf
  77. https://wichitatribe.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/resolution-wt-17-171__adopting_membership_ordinance_.pdf
  78. https://wichitatribe.com/2024-general-election-official-results/
  79. https://wichitatribe.com/2024-wichita-tribal-election-filings/
  80. https://wichitatribe.com/election-commission/
  81. https://wichitatribe.com/tribal-enrollment/
  82. https://wichitatribe.com/category/government/
  83. https://wichitatribe.com/wec-meeting-minutes-agendas-resolutions/
  84. https://oklaw.org/resource/wichita-tribal-code
  85. https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/osde/documents/services/american-indian-education/Tribes%20of%20OK%20-%20Wichita%20and%20Affiliated%20Tribes%20Oklahoma.pdf
  86. https://www.bia.gov/as-ia/oig/gaming-compacts/2018-08-17/wichita-and-affiliated-tribes-tribal-state-gaming-compact
  87. https://wichitatribe.com/the-wichita-and-affiliated-tribes-closes-on-financing-for-new-hotel/
  88. https://wichitatribe.com/industrial-development-commission/
  89. https://www.wichita-quivera.com/who-we-are
  90. https://wichitatribe.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09.14-wichita_newsletter-final.pdf
  91. https://wichitatribe.com/the-wichita-and-affiliated-tribes-reacquire-historically-and-culturally-significant-property-within-ancestral-homelands/
  92. https://oklahomanativenews.com/tribal-directory/wichita-affiliated-tribes-wichita-keechi-waco-tawakonie/
  93. https://www.census.gov/tribal/?st=40&aianihh=5955
  94. https://homework.study.com/explanation/what-did-the-wichita-tribe-wear.html
  95. https://edwardcurtisphotos.com/store/wichita-native-american-photos/
  96. https://derbykshistorymuseum.org/blog/f/wichita-tribe-artifacts-relate-to-early-derby-area-history
  97. https://wichitatribe.com/education/
  98. https://wichitatribe.com/education/higher-education-programs/
  99. https://wichitatribe.com/education/pk-12-education-and-jom/
  100. https://wichitatribe.com/justice/juvenile-services-tribal-youth-programs/
  101. https://www.facebook.com/wichitalanguagerevitalization/posts/good-evening-assihahhere-is-a-short-lesson-on-how-to-introduce-yourself-in-kirik/1146372747533341/
  102. https://reachhigherok.org/dc_partners/wichita-and-affiliated-tribes/
  103. https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/wee-ta-ra-sha-ro-head-chief-tribe-4451
  104. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/na-wichita/
  105. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/tawakoni-indians
  106. https://www.cartermuseum.org/collection/tawakoni-jim-head-chief-p19672005
  107. https://wichitatribe.com/government/wichita-tribal-presidents/myles-stephenson-sr/
  108. https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/name/myles-stephenson-obituary?id=31754657
  109. https://wichitatribe.com/government/former-tribal-leaders/newton-lamar/
  110. https://apnews.com/general-news-b71bf06f4e264950a1d6fa9f2aa5176c
  111. https://www.facebook.com/unitedforoklahoma/videos/terri-parton-tribal-money-stays-in-oklahoma/3165054173733414/
  112. https://journalrecord.com/2017/07/18/tribes-banking-on-financial-literacy-for-citizens/
  113. https://ncuih.org/2022/02/07/tribal-leaders-highlight-need-for-increased-urban-indian-health-funding-in-fiscal-year-2024-area-reports/
  114. https://wichitatribe.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/01.24-President-Veterans-Report-Distributed-01.02.24.pdf
  115. https://wichitatribe.com/government/wichita-tribal-presidents/
  116. https://wichitatribe.com/government/former-tribal-leaders/amber-silverhorn-wolfe/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.