Hubbry Logo
Limbic systemLimbic systemMain
Open search
Limbic system
Community hub
Limbic system
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Limbic system
Limbic system
Limbic system
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Limbic system
Cross section of the human brain showing parts of the limbic system from below.
Traité d'Anatomie et de Physiologie (1786)
The limbic system largely consists of what was previously known as the limbic lobe.
Details
Identifiers
Latinsystema limbicum
MeSHD008032
NeuroNames2055
FMA242000
Anatomical terms of neuroanatomy

The limbic system, also known as the paleomammalian cortex, is a set of brain structures involved in emotional processing and motivation in humans and many other animals. In humans it is located on both sides of the thalamus, immediately beneath the medial temporal lobe of the cerebrum primarily in the forebrain.[1]

Its various components support a variety of functions including emotion, behavior, long-term memory, and olfaction.[2]

The limbic system is involved in lower order emotional processing of input from sensory systems and consists of the amygdala, mammillary bodies, stria medullaris, central gray and dorsal and ventral nuclei of Gudden.[3] This processed information is often relayed to a collection of structures from the telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon, including the prefrontal cortex, cingulate gyrus, limbic thalamus, hippocampus including the parahippocampal gyrus and subiculum, nucleus accumbens (limbic striatum), anterior hypothalamus, ventral tegmental area, midbrain raphe nuclei, habenular commissure, entorhinal cortex, and olfactory bulbs.[3][4][5]

Structure

[edit]
Anatomical components of the limbic system

The limbic lobe was originally defined by the French anatomist Paul Broca in 1878, as a series of cortical structures surrounding the boundary between the cerebral hemispheres and the brainstem.[6] The name "limbic" comes from the Latin word for the border, limbus.[7] Further studies began to associate these areas with emotional and motivational processes and linked them to subcortical components that were then grouped into the limbic system.[8]

In recent years, multiple additional limbic fiber connectivity has been revealed using diffusion-weighted MRI. The equivalent fiber connectivity of all these pathways has been documented by dissection studies in primates. Some of these fiber tracts include the amygdalofugal tract, amygdalothalamic tract, stria terminalis, dorsal thalamo-hypothalamic tract, cerebellohypothalamic tracts, and the parieto-occipito-hypothalamic tract.[9]

Currently, it is not considered an isolated entity responsible for the neurological regulation of emotion, but rather one of the many parts of the brain that regulate visceral autonomic processes.[10] Therefore, the set of anatomical structures considered part of the limbic system is controversial. The following structures are, or have been considered, part of the limbic system:[11][12]

Function

[edit]

The structures and interacting areas of the limbic system are involved in motivation, emotion, learning, and memory. The limbic system is where the subcortical structures meet the cerebral cortex.[1] The limbic system operates by influencing the endocrine system and the autonomic nervous system. It is highly interconnected with the nucleus accumbens, which plays a role in sexual arousal and the "high" derived from certain recreational drugs. These responses are heavily modulated by dopaminergic projections from the limbic system. In 1954, Olds and Milner found that rats with metal electrodes implanted into their nucleus accumbens, as well as their septal nuclei, repeatedly pressed a lever activating this region.[13]

The limbic system also interacts with the basal ganglia. The basal ganglia are a set of subcortical structures that direct intentional movements. The basal ganglia are located near the thalamus and hypothalamus. They receive input from the cerebral cortex, which sends outputs to the motor centers in the brain stem. A part of the basal ganglia called the striatum controls posture and movement. Recent studies indicate that if there is an inadequate supply of dopamine in the striatum, this can lead to the symptoms of Parkinson's disease.[1]

The limbic system is also tightly connected to the prefrontal cortex. Some scientists contend that this connection is related to the pleasure obtained from solving problems.[citation needed] To cure severe emotional disorders, this connection was sometimes surgically severed, a procedure of psychosurgery, called a prefrontal lobotomy (this is actually a misnomer). Patients having undergone this procedure often became passive and lacked all motivation.[14]

The limbic system interacts heavily with the cerebral cortex. These interactions are closely linked to olfaction, emotions, drives, autonomic regulation, memory, and pathologically to encephalopathy, epilepsy, psychotic symptoms, cognitive defects.[15] The functional relevance of the limbic system has proven to serve many different functions such as affects/emotions, memory, sensory processing, time perception, attention, consciousness, instincts, autonomic/vegetative control, and actions/motor behavior. Some of the disorders associated with the limbic system and its interacting components are epilepsy and schizophrenia.[16]

Hippocampus

[edit]
Location and basic anatomy of the hippocampus, as a coronal section

The hippocampus is involved with various processes relating to cognition and is one of the best understood and heavily involved limbic interacting structures.

Spatial memory

[edit]

The first and most widely researched area concerns memory, particularly spatial memory. Spatial memory was found to have many sub-regions in the hippocampus, such as the dentate gyrus (DG) in the dorsal hippocampus, the left hippocampus, and the parahippocampal region. The dorsal hippocampus was found to be an important component for the generation of new neurons, called adult-born granules (GC), in adolescence and adulthood.[17] These new neurons contribute to pattern separation in spatial memory, increasing the firing in cell networks, and overall causing stronger memory formations. This is thought to integrate spatial and episodic memories with the limbic system via a feedback loop that provides emotional context of a particular sensory input.[18]

While the dorsal hippocampus is involved in spatial memory formation, the left hippocampus is a participant in the recall of these spatial memories. Eichenbaum[19] and his team found, when studying the hippocampal lesions in rats, that the left hippocampus is "critical for effectively combining the 'what', 'when', and 'where' qualities of each experience to compose the retrieved memory". This makes the left hippocampus a key component in the retrieval of spatial memory. However, Spreng[20] found that the left hippocampus is a general concentrated region for binding together bits and pieces of memory composed not only by the hippocampus, but also by other areas of the brain to be recalled at a later time. Eichenbaum's research in 2007 also demonstrates that the parahippocampal area of the hippocampus is another specialized region for the retrieval of memories just like the left hippocampus.[citation needed]

Learning

[edit]

The hippocampus, over the decades, has also been found to have a huge impact in learning. Curlik and Shors[21] examined the effects of neurogenesis in the hippocampus and its effects on learning. This researcher and his team employed many different types of mental and physical training on their subjects, and found that the hippocampus is highly responsive to these latter tasks. Thus, they discovered an upsurge of new neurons and neural circuits in the hippocampus as a result of the training, causing an overall improvement in the learning of the task. This neurogenesis contributes to the creation of adult-born granules cells (GC), cells also described by Eichenbaum[19] in his own research on neurogenesis and its contributions to learning. The creation of these cells exhibited "enhanced excitability" in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the dorsal hippocampus, impacting the hippocampus and its contribution to the learning process.[19]

Hippocampus damage

[edit]

Damage related to the hippocampal region of the brain has reported vast effects on overall cognitive functioning, particularly memory such as spatial memory. As previously mentioned, spatial memory is a cognitive function greatly intertwined with the hippocampus. While damage to the hippocampus may be a result of a brain injury or other injuries of that sort, researchers particularly investigated the effects that high emotional arousal and certain types of drugs had on the recall ability in this specific memory type. In particular, in a study performed by Parkard,[22] rats were given the task of correctly making their way through a maze. In the first condition, rats were stressed by shock or restraint which caused a high emotional arousal. When completing the maze task, these rats had an impaired effect on their hippocampal-dependent memory when compared to the control group. Then, in a second condition, a group of rats were injected with anxiogenic drugs. Like the former these results reported similar outcomes, in that hippocampal-memory was also impaired. Studies such as these reinforce the impact that the hippocampus has on memory processing, in particular the recall function of spatial memory. Furthermore, impairment to the hippocampus can occur from prolonged exposure to stress hormones such as glucocorticoids (GCs), which target the hippocampus and cause disruption in explicit memory.[23]

In an attempt to curtail life-threatening epileptic seizures, 27-year-old Henry Gustav Molaison underwent bilateral removal of almost all of his hippocampus in 1953. Over the course of fifty years he participated in thousands of tests and research projects that provided specific information on exactly what he had lost. Semantic and episodic events faded within minutes, having never reached his long-term memory, yet emotions, unconnected from the details of causation, were often retained. Dr. Suzanne Corkin, who worked with him for 46 years until his death, described the contribution of this tragic "experiment" in her 2013 book.[24]

Amygdala

[edit]
Main article: Amygdala

Episodic-autobiographical memory (EAM) networks

[edit]

Another integrative part of the limbic system, the amygdala, which is the deepest part of the limbic system, is involved in many cognitive processes and is largely considered the most primordial and vital part of the limbic system. Like the hippocampus, processes in the amygdala seem to impact memory; however, it is not spatial memory as in the hippocampus but the semantic division of episodic-autobiographical memory (EAM) networks. Markowitsch's[25] amygdala research shows it encodes, stores, and retrieves EAM memories. To delve deeper into these types of processes by the amygdala, Markowitsch[25] and his team provided extensive evidence through investigations that the "amygdala's main function is to charge cues so that mnemonic events of a specific emotional significance can be successfully searched within the appropriate neural nets and re-activated." These cues for emotional events created by the amygdala encompass the EAM networks previously mentioned.

Attentional and emotional processes

[edit]

Besides memory, the amygdala also seems to be an important brain region involved in attentional and emotional processes. First, to define attention in cognitive terms, attention is the ability to focus on some stimuli while ignoring others. Thus, the amygdala seems to be an important structure in this ability.

Foremost, however, this structure was historically thought to be linked to fear, allowing the individual to take action in response to that fear. However, as time has gone by, researchers such as Pessoa,[26] generalized this concept with help from evidence of EEG recordings, and concluded that the amygdala helps an organism to define a stimulus and therefore respond accordingly. However, when the amygdala was initially thought to be linked to fear, this gave way for research in the amygdala for emotional processes. Kheirbek[17] demonstrated research that the amygdala is involved in emotional processes, in particular the ventral hippocampus. He described the ventral hippocampus as having a role in neurogenesis and the creation of adult-born granule cells (GC). These cells not only were a crucial part of neurogenesis and the strengthening of spatial memory and learning in the hippocampus but also appear to be an essential component to the function of the amygdala. A deficit of these cells, as Pessoa (2009) predicted in his studies, would result in low emotional functioning, leading to high retention rate of mental diseases, such as anxiety disorders.[citation needed]

Social processing

[edit]

Social processing, specifically the evaluation of faces in social processing, is an area of cognition specific to the amygdala. In a study done by Todorov,[27] fMRI tasks were performed with participants to evaluate whether the amygdala was involved in the general evaluation of faces. After the study, Todorov concluded from his fMRI results that the amygdala did indeed play a key role in the general evaluation of faces. However, in a study performed by researchers Koscik[28] and his team, the trait of trustworthiness was particularly examined in the evaluation of faces. Koscik and his team demonstrated that the amygdala was involved in evaluating the trustworthiness of an individual. They investigated how brain damage to the amygdala played a role in trustworthiness, and found that individuals with damaged amygdalas tended to confuse trust and betrayal, and thus placed trust in those having done them wrong. Furthermore, Rule,[29] along with his colleagues, expanded on the idea of the amygdala in its critique of trustworthiness in others by performing a study in 2009 in which he examined the amygdala's role in evaluating general first impressions and relating them to real-world outcomes. Their study involved first impressions of CEOs. Rule demonstrated that while the amygdala did play a role in the evaluation of trustworthiness, as observed by Koscik in his own research two years later in 2011, the amygdala also played a generalized role in the overall evaluation of first impression of faces. This latter conclusion, along with Todorov's study on the amygdala's role in general evaluations of faces and Koscik's research on trustworthiness and the amygdala, further solidified evidence that the amygdala plays a role in overall social processing.

Klüver–Bucy syndrome

[edit]
Main article: Klüver–Bucy syndrome

Based on experiments done on monkeys, the destruction of the temporal cortex almost always led to damage of the amygdala. This damage done to the amygdala led the physiologists Kluver and Bucy to pinpoint major changes in the behavior of the monkeys. The monkeys demonstrated the following changes:

  1. The monkeys would no longer exhibit responses of fear or anger.[30]
  2. The monkeys would inspect and physically touch all objects placed in front of them.[30]
  3. The monkeys forgot rapidly[citation needed].
  4. The monkeys had a tendency to orally examine objects (e.g. biting, licking, etc.).[30]
  5. The monkeys would respond, as if required to, to every stimulus (i.e. Hypermetamorphosis (psychology)).[30]
  6. The monkeys exhibited hypersexuality, demonstrating a sexual drive so strong that they would continuously stimulate their genitalia, copulate repeatedly and for long periods of time, and sometimes sustain small injuries in the process (e.g. due to excessive biting).[30]

This set of behavioral change came to be known as the Klüver–Bucy syndrome.

Evolutionary claims

[edit]

Paul D. MacLean, as part of his triune brain theory (which is now considered outdated [citation needed][31][32]), hypothesized that the limbic system is older than other parts of the forebrain, and that it developed to manage circuitry attributed to the fight or flight first identified by Hans Selye[33] in his report of the General Adaptation Syndrome in 1936. It may be considered a part of survival adaptation in reptiles as well as mammals (including humans). MacLean postulated that the human brain has evolved three components, that evolved successively, with more recent components developing at the top/front. These components are, respectively:

  1. The archipallium or primitive ("reptilian") brain, comprising the structures of the brain stem – medulla, pons, cerebellum, mesencephalon, the oldest basal nuclei – the globus pallidus and the olfactory bulbs.
  2. The paleopallium or intermediate ("old mammalian") brain, comprising the structures of the limbic system.
  3. The neopallium, also known as the superior or rational ("new mammalian") brain, comprises almost the whole of the hemispheres (made up of a more recent type of cortex, called neocortex) and some subcortical neuronal groups. It corresponds to the brain of the superior mammals, thus including the primates and, as a consequence, the human species. Similar development of the neocortex in mammalian species not closely related to humans and primates has also occurred, for example in cetaceans and elephants; thus the designation of "superior mammals" is not an evolutionary one, as it has occurred independently in different species.[dubious – discuss] The evolution of higher degrees of intelligence is an example of convergent evolution, and is also seen in non-mammals such as birds.[citation needed]

According to Maclean, each of the components, although connected with the others, retained "their peculiar types of intelligence, subjectivity, sense of time and space, memory, mobility and other less specific functions".

However, while the categorization into structures is reasonable, the recent studies of the limbic system of tetrapods, both living and extinct, have challenged several aspects of this hypothesis, notably the accuracy of the terms "reptilian" and "old mammalian". The common ancestors of reptiles and mammals had a well-developed limbic system in which the basic subdivisions and connections of the amygdalar nuclei were established.[34] Further, birds, which evolved from the dinosaurs, which in turn evolved separately but around the same time as the mammals, have a well-developed limbic system. While the anatomic structures of the limbic system are different in birds and mammals, there are functional equivalents.[citation needed]

History

[edit]

Etymology and history

[edit]

The term limbic comes from the Latin limbus, for "border" or "edge", or, particularly in medical terminology, a border of an anatomical component. Paul Broca coined the term based on its physical location in the brain, sandwiched between two functionally different components.

The limbic system is a term that was introduced in 1949 by the American physician and neuroscientist, Paul D. MacLean.[35][36] The French physician Paul Broca first called this part of the brain le grand lobe limbique in 1878.[7] He examined the differentiation between deeply recessed cortical tissue and underlying, subcortical nuclei.[37] However, most of its putative role in emotion was developed only in 1937 when the American physician James Papez described his anatomical model of emotion, the Papez circuit.[38]

The first evidence that the limbic system was responsible for the cortical representation of emotions was discovered in 1939, by Heinrich Kluver and Paul Bucy. Kluver and Bucy, after much research, demonstrated that the bilateral removal of the temporal lobes in monkeys created an extreme behavioral syndrome. After performing a temporal lobectomy, the monkeys showed a decrease in aggression. The animals revealed a reduced threshold to visual stimuli, and were thus unable to recognize objects that were once familiar.[39] MacLean expanded these ideas to include additional structures in a more dispersed "limbic system", more on the lines of the system described above.[36] MacLean developed the theory of the "triune brain" to explain its evolution and to try to reconcile rational human behavior with its more "primal" and "violent" side. He became interested in the brain's control of emotion and behavior. After initial studies of brain activity in epileptic patients, he turned to cats, monkeys, and other models, using electrodes to stimulate different parts of the brain in conscious animals recording their responses.[40]

In the 1950s, he began to trace individual behaviors like aggression and sexual arousal to their physiological sources. He postulated the limbic system as the brain's center of emotions, including the hippocampus and amygdala. Developing observations made by Papez, he hypothesized that the limbic system had evolved in early mammals to control fight-or-flight responses and react to both emotionally pleasurable and painful sensations. The concept is now broadly accepted in neuroscience.[citation needed][41] Additionally, MacLean said that the idea of the limbic system leads to a recognition that its presence "represents the history of the evolution of mammals and their distinctive family way of life."[citation needed]

In the 1960s, Dr. MacLean enlarged his theory to address the human brain's overall structure and divided its evolution into three parts, an idea that he termed the triune brain. In addition to identifying the limbic system, he hypothesized a supposedly more primitive brain called the R-complex, related to reptiles, which controls basic functions like muscle movement and breathing. According to him, the third part, the neocortex, controls speech and reasoning and is the most recent evolutionary arrival.[42] The concept of the limbic system has since been further expanded and developed by Walle Nauta, Lennart Heimer, and others.[citation needed]

Academic dispute

[edit]

There is controversy over the use of the term limbic system, with scientists such as Joseph E. LeDoux and Edmund Rolls arguing that the term be considered obsolete and abandoned.[43][44] Originally, the limbic system was believed to be the emotional center of the brain, with cognition being the business of the neocortex. However, cognition depends on acquisition and retention of memories, in which the hippocampus, a primary limbic interacting structure, is involved: hippocampus damage causes severe cognitive (memory) deficits. More important, the "boundaries" of the limbic system have been repeatedly redefined because of advances in neuroscience.[43] Therefore, while it is true that limbic interacting structures are more closely related to emotion, the limbic system itself is best thought of as a component of a larger emotional processing plant.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Limbic system.
This article uses anatomical terminology.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Limbic system

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The limbic system is a of brain structures situated primarily beneath the , lateral to the , and above the , playing a central role in processing s, forming memories, regulating , and influencing autonomic functions such as olfaction and . Originally conceptualized by in 1878 as the "grand lobe limbique" and later expanded by in 1952 into a broader system linking and , it integrates sensory inputs with higher cognitive processes to generate adaptive responses. Key components of the limbic system include the , which serves as the primary center for emotional processing, particularly fear and reward responses; the hippocampus, essential for spatial navigation and the consolidation of long-term declarative memories; the , which regulates autonomic and endocrine functions like hunger, thirst, and stress responses; the cingulate gyrus, involved in emotional regulation, decision-making, and pain perception; and interconnected structures such as the fornix, mammillary bodies, , and septal nuclei that facilitate communication within the network. These elements form circuits like the , which links the hippocampus, mammillary bodies, anterior thalamus, and cingulate gyrus to support memory and emotional integration, though modern views emphasize its diffuse connectivity rather than a strictly defined "system." Functionally, the limbic system modulates emotional reactions to stimuli, enabling behaviors tied to , such as fight-or-flight responses via amygdala-hypothalamus interactions, and supports learning by associating experiences with affective significance. It is crucial for formation, where hippocampal activity encodes episodic and spatial information, and interacts with the to influence and . Dysfunctions in this system are implicated in disorders including anxiety, depression, , , and neurodegenerative conditions like , highlighting its vulnerability to lesions or imbalances that disrupt emotional and cognitive harmony.

Anatomy

Core Structures

The limbic system comprises a set of interconnected structures situated primarily in the medial aspects of the , encircling the and located lateral to the , beneath the , and above the . These structures, derived embryologically from the telencephalon, , and mesencephalon, form a ring-like arrangement in the medial and adjacent regions, facilitating their collective role in higher brain functions. Hippocampus. The hippocampus is an allocortical structure embedded in the medial , extending approximately 5 cm in length from its anterior end near the to its posterior aspect adjacent to the splenium of the . It consists of the hippocampus proper (subfields CA1, CA2, and CA3) and the , organized in a trilaminate : an outer molecular layer, a middle pyramidal or granular layer, and an inner polymorphic layer. In CA1-CA3 regions, the middle layer contains large pyramidal neurons that are and excitatory, featuring extensive dendritic spines for synaptic input, while such as basket cells provide inhibitory control via recurrent inhibition. The , capping the CA3 region, features a granular layer of small, densely packed granule cells that are also , contributing to the three-layered allocortical organization distinct from the six-layered . Amygdala. Positioned deep within the beneath the and anterior to the hippocampal formation, the forms an almond-shaped complex of approximately 13 nuclei divided into superficial, basolateral, and centromedial groups. The basolateral nuclei exhibit a cortical-like structure with diverse neuronal populations and extensive internal connections, while the central nuclei belong to the centromedial group and feature neurons that release gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) for inhibitory signaling. The cortical nuclei display a layered, allocortex-like organization, integrating sensory inputs within the amygdaloid complex. Overall, the amygdala's subcortical includes a mix of projection neurons and local , with GABA playing a key role in modulating activity across nuclei. Hypothalamus. The occupies the ventral , positioned below the and forming the central core of the limbic system in the medial . Key components include the mammillary bodies, paired nuclei in the posterior region comprising medial and lateral subdivisions with clustered neuronal populations that receive afferent fibers. These nuclei feature small, densely packed neurons organized into distinct clusters without prominent layering, supporting their role as relay stations in hypothalamic circuitry. Cingulate Gyrus. The cingulate gyrus lies dorsal to the , separated by the callosal sulcus, and forms part of the continuous with the via the cingulum bundle. It divides into anterior (perigenual and dorsal) and posterior (ventral and dorsal) portions, exhibiting allocortical characteristics with reduced layering compared to . The anterior division has a thin, agranular layer IV (Brodmann areas 24, 25, 32, 33), while the posterior division features a thicker, granular layer IV (Brodmann areas 23, 29, 30, 31), containing pyramidal neurons and typical of cortical architecture. Fornix. The fornix is a prominent tract originating from the hippocampus, arching over the in the medial to connect with subcortical targets like the mammillary bodies. Composed of myelinated axons from hippocampal pyramidal cells, it forms crura posteriorly, a body in the midline, and anterior columns, lacking neuronal cell bodies and instead serving as a for efferent projections. Septal Nuclei. Located in the medial above the near the , the septal nuclei consist of gray matter regions including medial and lateral divisions with reciprocal connections to the hippocampus via the fornix. Histologically, they contain a heterogeneous population of neurons, including , , and types, organized without strict layering but featuring clustered cell groups for integrative processing.

Interconnections and Pathways

The limbic system exhibits extensive interconnections that integrate its core components with one another and with broader neural networks, facilitating coordinated processing across emotional, mnemonic, and autonomic domains. A seminal pathway is the , originally proposed by James Papez in 1937, which forms a closed loop essential for linking memory and emotion. This circuit begins in the hippocampal formation, particularly the , and projects via the fornix to the mammillary bodies of the . From there, fibers travel through the mammillothalamic tract to the anterior thalamic nuclei, which in turn connect to the cingulate gyrus via thalamocingulate projections. The cingulate gyrus relays information back to the and , ultimately returning to the hippocampus, thereby completing the loop. Extensions of the incorporate additional limbic elements, such as projections from the mammillary bodies to the anterior thalamic nuclei, enhancing the circuit's role in integrative functions. The maintains dense, bidirectional connections that underscore its role as a hub within the limbic system. It links to the primarily through the uncinate fasciculus, a tract that facilitates rapid communication between the amygdala and orbitofrontal as well as ventromedial prefrontal regions, supporting regulatory influences on emotional processing. The amygdala also projects to the , particularly the , via direct pathways that enable autonomic outputs, while reciprocal connections with the hippocampus, especially the ventral and CA1 region, allow for the integration of contextual and emotional information. Hypothalamic integrations extend the limbic system's influence to endocrine regulation through its direct linkage with the . The connects to the via the , a specialized capillary network originating in the , where hypothalamic releasing and inhibitory hormones—such as and —are secreted into portal vessels for transport to pituitary target cells. This vascular pathway, comprising long and short portal veins, ensures targeted delivery without systemic dilution, involving projections from key hypothalamic nuclei like the paraventricular and arcuate nuclei. Broader limbic connections link the system to subcortical and cortical structures for enhanced integration. The ventral striatum, part of the , receives inputs from the and hippocampus, forming amygdalostriatal and hippocampal-striatal pathways that converge in the shell, thereby incorporating limbic signals into reward and motivational circuits. The mediodorsal nucleus of the provides reciprocal connectivity with limbic components, relaying information from the back to prefrontal areas, while the maintains bidirectional links with the and ventral striatum, processing multimodal sensory and reward-related data. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies have elucidated the structural integrity and laterality of these limbic tracts in healthy individuals. For instance, the fornix demonstrates high (FA) values, typically around 0.49–0.54 in its crus and body, indicating robust microstructural organization, with DTI revealing bilateral symmetry but subtle leftward laterality in the cingulum's superior segment (FA difference of approximately 0.03). These findings highlight the tracts' vulnerability to disruption, as reduced FA in the uncinate fasciculus and fornix correlates with impaired connectivity in various conditions, though normative data emphasize their inherent bilateral balance.

Functions

Memory Formation and Retrieval

The hippocampus plays a central role in the formation and retrieval of , which involves the recollection of personal experiences situated in specific contexts, and , which supports and representation of environments. Neuropsychological evidence from patients with hippocampal damage demonstrates profound deficits in forming new episodic memories while sparing other cognitive functions, underscoring its necessity for these processes. Similarly, the hippocampus encodes spatial layouts through place cells, neurons that fire in relation to specific locations, enabling the construction of cognitive maps essential for spatial memory retrieval.00830-9) A key cellular mechanism underlying hippocampal memory formation is long-term potentiation (LTP), a persistent strengthening of synaptic connections between neurons following high-frequency stimulation. LTP was first demonstrated in the hippocampus, where repeated activation of the perforant path leads to enduring enhancements in synaptic efficacy in the and CA1 regions, providing a neurophysiological basis for storage. This process relies on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, which, upon coincident presynaptic glutamate release and postsynaptic , permit calcium influx that triggers intracellular signaling cascades for synaptic modification. LTP adheres to Hebbian learning principles, whereby "neurons that fire together wire together," as synaptic strengthening occurs when pre- and postsynaptic activity are temporally correlated, facilitating associative encoding. The contributes to indexing via the perforant path, its primary projection to the hippocampus, which conveys multimodal sensory information and establishes pointers to distributed cortical representations activated during experiences. This pathway enables the hippocampus to tag and organize neocortical activity patterns, supporting the rapid formation of indices that facilitate subsequent retrieval without storing the full content in the hippocampus itself. The enhances formation for emotionally salient events through interactions with the hippocampus, particularly via noradrenergic inputs from the that amplify consolidation during stress or arousal. This modulation strengthens hippocampal-dependent memories by increasing in target regions, such as through elevated norepinephrine levels that promote LTP in the basolateral and its projections. Memory consolidation involves dynamic interactions between the hippocampus and , as described by systems consolidation theory, where initial memory traces dependent on the hippocampus gradually reorganize into stable representations over time, reducing hippocampal reliance for remote recall. Recent memories activate hippocampal-neocortical circuits transiently, but with repeated reactivation, cortical connections strengthen, allowing independent retrieval of older . studies using (fMRI) reveal consistent hippocampal activation during retrieval tasks, with increased blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals in the posterior hippocampus correlating with successful episodic recall, particularly for spatial details. During retrieval, the hippocampus shows heightened connectivity with prefrontal and parietal regions, supporting the reconstruction of contextual elements from stored indices.

Emotional Processing

The limbic system plays a central role in the generation and modulation of emotions, integrating sensory inputs with autonomic and cognitive responses to produce adaptive emotional states. Key structures within this system, such as the , , and cingulate gyrus, facilitate rapid detection of emotional stimuli, maintenance of emotional , and assessment of emotional significance, respectively. These processes often involve systems that fine-tune emotional intensity and valence. The functions as a primary detector of and threats, enabling quick emotional responses through distinct neural pathways, as conceptualized in fear conditioning studies. A subcortical pathway transmits coarse sensory information from the directly to the amygdala's lateral nucleus, bypassing detailed cortical processing to support instinctive defensive reactions, particularly in animal models. In parallel, a cortical pathway involving the sensory cortex allows for more refined appraisal of the stimulus and contextual evaluation. This dual-route framework, while influential, is now understood as part of multiple integrated pathways that evaluate biological significance, with the amygdala coordinating affective responses across cortical and subcortical networks. The limbic system contributes heavily to subconscious functioning, particularly in automatic emotional responses that influence behavior without conscious input. For example, the amygdala processes sensory information to trigger instinctive fear responses to potential threats, facilitating rapid physiological reactions via connections to the hypothalamus. Many subconscious emotional drives, such as motivations for survival, reward, and avoidance, originate in limbic structures, regulating unconscious aspects of emotion and behavior through integrated neural circuits. The hypothalamus contributes to emotional homeostasis by orchestrating autonomic responses that sustain emotional states, particularly during stress. It activates the sympathetic nervous system to trigger the fight-or-flight response, increasing heart rate and arousal to prepare the body for immediate action. Additionally, the hypothalamus initiates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, releasing corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) from the paraventricular nucleus, which stimulates the pituitary gland to secrete adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), ultimately leading to cortisol release from the adrenal cortex. This cortisol pathway mobilizes energy resources and modulates inflammation, helping to restore balance after emotional perturbations like fear or anxiety. The cingulate , particularly its anterior portion, monitors emotional salience and detects conflicts in ongoing emotional processing. The (ACC) signals discrepancies between expected and actual emotional outcomes, such as errors in under emotional load, by increasing activity during tasks involving response competition or . This conflict-monitoring function enhances awareness of emotionally significant events, promoting adaptive adjustments in attention and behavior to resolve dissonance.01583-2) Through its connections with the and , the ACC integrates emotional valence with cognitive control, amplifying the salience of stimuli that demand heightened vigilance.01583-2) Neurotransmitters within the limbic system further refine emotional processing by modulating the activity of these structures. Serotonin, released from the , influences the to regulate anxiety levels; reduced serotonergic transmission in the basolateral amygdala heightens fear responses, while enhanced activity dampens excessive anxiety through inhibitory effects on principal neurons. Conversely, in the drives reward anticipation, with phasic bursts signaling the motivational value of impending positive outcomes, thereby sustaining goal-directed emotional engagement. These modulatory effects highlight how limbic neurotransmitter dynamics shape the intensity and direction of emotions. Cross-species studies reveal conserved limbic mechanisms for , such as in , which mirrors responses. In fear-conditioned rats, activation of the amygdala's central nucleus elicits immobility () as a defensive posture, mediated by outputs to the and , demonstrating the system's role in innate threat responses across mammals. This behavior, quantifiable as reduced locomotion during cue presentation, provides a model for understanding limbic-driven emotional immobilization in higher .

Behavioral Regulation

The limbic system plays a pivotal role in regulating adaptive behaviors by integrating sensory inputs with motivational states to guide goal-directed actions such as seeking rewards or responding to drives. Structures within and extending from the limbic system, including the (NAc) and (VTA), form key components of the mesolimbic dopamine pathway that modulates and . neurons in the VTA project to the NAc, where they signal reward prediction errors—the discrepancy between anticipated and actual rewards—to facilitate learning and adjustment of toward rewarding outcomes. This signaling enables organisms to prioritize actions that maximize future rewards, such as or , by updating value representations in real time. The , a core limbic structure, orchestrates basic drive states that underpin survival-related behaviors like feeding and reproduction. Specific nuclei within the regulate these drives; for instance, the arcuate nucleus integrates hormonal signals to initiate , while the ventromedial (VMH) promotes and inhibits excessive intake. studies in rats have demonstrated that damage to the VMH leads to hyperphagia and rapid , underscoring its role in suppressing feeding once nutritional needs are met. Similarly, the VMH and medial coordinate sexual by responding to gonadal hormones, driving and through targeted neural circuits that link sensory cues to consummatory actions. Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-limbic loops further refine behavioral regulation by enabling value-based decision-making and flexibility in changing environments. These loops connect the OFC with limbic regions like the and NAc, allowing the evaluation of stimulus rewards and rapid adjustments during contingencies shifts. In reversal learning tasks, where previously rewarded stimuli lose value, OFC activity supports quick behavioral adaptation by encoding updated reward expectancies, as evidenced by impaired performance following OFC lesions in . This flexibility ensures adaptive responses, such as abandoning unprofitable strategies. Olfactory inputs to the limbic system, particularly via direct projections from the to the and , mediate instinctual behaviors triggered by pheromones. These connections bypass higher cortical processing to elicit rapid, unlearned responses, such as or in exposed to conspecific scents. Pheromonal detection in the activates limbic pathways that modulate hypothalamic outputs, promoting species-specific social and reproductive behaviors without conscious deliberation. Lesion studies in animal models highlight the limbic system's necessity for balanced behavioral regulation. Bilateral lesions in monkeys, encompassing and hippocampal areas, result in hyperphagia characterized by compulsive oral and , alongside reduced initiative resembling . Similarly, disruptions to projections from the VTA to the NAc in diminish motivated behaviors, leading to apathy-like states with decreased and reward-seeking, as seen in effort-based choice tasks. These findings illustrate how limbic integrity is essential for sustaining adaptive and preventing maladaptive extremes.

Development and Plasticity

Embryological Development

The limbic system originates from the prosencephalon during early embryonic development, with its core structures deriving from distinct subdivisions of this vesicle. The telencephalon gives rise to the hippocampus and , which form as part of the medial structures. In parallel, the develops into the and , contributing to the subcortical components that integrate with telencephalic elements to form the overall network. The foundational timeline of limbic system development begins with neural tube closure, which completes by the end of the fourth gestational week, establishing the precursor to all structures including the prosencephalon. Limbic primordia emerge shortly thereafter during weeks 5-6, as the prosencephalon divides into telencephalon and , initiating the patterning of allocortical regions like the hippocampal anlage and early amygdaloid precursors. By weeks 13-14, the hippocampal forms as an indentation on the medial surface of the developing telencephalon, marking the initial unfolding of the hippocampus and setting the stage for its later inversion. Genetic regulation plays a critical role in limbic patterning, with genes such as FOXG1 and SHH directing subdivision and ventralization. FOXG1, expressed in the telencephalon, modulates proliferation and regional identity, ensuring proper allocation of cells to hippocampal and amygdaloid fates. Disruptions in SHH signaling, which emanates from the and ventral midline, impair prosencephalic evagination, often resulting in —a condition characterized by incomplete separation of the cerebral hemispheres and malformed limbic structures like the . Cellular migration is essential for assembling limbic nuclei, particularly in the , where radial from the telencephalic ventricular zone scaffold the tangential and radial paths of originating from subpallial domains like the ganglionic eminences. These guide migrating neurons into the developing amygdaloid complex between weeks 6-8, establishing inhibitory circuits that underpin emotional processing precursors. Comparative embryology reveals conserved features of limbic development across vertebrates, with reptilian brains exhibiting homologous prosencephalic derivatives such as the dorsal ventricular ridge, which parallels mammalian amygdaloid primordia in their telencephalic origins and roles in basic behavioral modulation. This similarity underscores the evolutionary continuity of limbic circuitry from reptilian ancestors, where early patterning genes like SHH similarly influence organization.

Postnatal Changes and Plasticity

The limbic system undergoes significant maturation and adaptation after birth, influenced by environmental experiences, hormonal shifts, and genetic factors building on prenatal circuitry. This postnatal phase features dynamic structural and functional changes, particularly in core structures like the hippocampus and , which support emerging emotional regulation, , and social behaviors. These adaptations occur through critical periods of growth, synaptic remodeling, and volumetric shifts, enabling the system to respond to external stimuli while establishing lifelong patterns of resilience or . Critical periods of limbic development highlight rapid structural changes in early life and . In infancy, the hippocampus and exhibit accelerated volumetric growth, with the expanding significantly to process emotional cues and the hippocampus supporting initial formation. This early postnatal surge lays the foundation for later functions, contrasting with the basic circuitry established prenatally. By , marks another key phase, where hormonal surges drive nonlinear increases in volume, peaking around mid- before stabilizing. Hippocampal , prominent in , continues into adulthood albeit at declining rates, with evidence from genetic studies confirming sustained addition in humans; synaptic maturation further refines circuit efficiency. Synaptic plasticity in the postnatal limbic system allows for experience-dependent modifications, particularly in the hippocampus. Environmental enrichment and learning stimuli induce dendritic spine growth on hippocampal neurons, enhancing connectivity and encoding. This process is mediated by (BDNF) signaling, which promotes spine formation and stabilization through TrkB receptor , as demonstrated in organotypic cultures of postnatal hippocampal slices where BDNF application increased spine in activity-dependent contexts. Such plasticity is heightened during sensitive windows, enabling adaptive responses to social and cognitive demands. Hormonal influences during profoundly shape sexual dimorphisms in limbic volumes. Rising levels of and testosterone interact with receptors in the and hippocampus, leading to sex-specific trajectories: males often show greater enlargement correlated with testosterone, while females exhibit more pronounced hippocampal adjustments linked to fluctuations. These changes contribute to divergent emotional processing profiles, with longitudinal data revealing that pubertal timing modulates gray matter volumes in these regions, establishing dimorphic patterns that persist into adulthood. In aging, the limbic system experiences progressive , notably in the hippocampus, where volume reductions of up to 1-2% per year correlate with cognitive decline, including impaired . This arises from neuronal loss, reduced , and vascular factors, exacerbating risks for . However, resilience can mitigate these effects; lifestyle interventions such as and cognitive engagement enhance hippocampal volume and function, buffering against decline through increased neurotrophic support and vascular health, as evidenced in cohort studies of older adults. Neuroimaging studies provide robust evidence of these postnatal dynamics via longitudinal MRI. Scans from birth to reveal initial rapid expansion of limbic volumes in infancy, followed by pubertal refinements: for instance, amygdala growth accelerates in boys during early , while hippocampal subregions show heterogeneous maturation with peak volumes around late childhood. These trajectories, tracked over years in healthy cohorts, underscore the system's plasticity, with volumetric increases in the tied to hormonal markers and hippocampal stability influenced by experiential factors.

Clinical Aspects

Associated Disorders

The limbic system is implicated in various neurological and psychiatric disorders characterized by disruptions in , , and behavior, often stemming from structural or functional alterations in its core components such as the hippocampus and . These conditions highlight the system's vulnerability to pathological processes like , , and aberrant connectivity, leading to profound clinical impairments. In , progressive hippocampal atrophy and tau pathology disrupt limbic memory circuits, resulting in severe deficits and cognitive decline. Tau neurofibrillary tangles accumulate preferentially in the and hippocampus, impairing synaptic function and contributing to neuronal loss in limbic-predominant subtypes. This pathology extends to co-occurring limbic changes, such as amyloid-beta deposition, exacerbating memory impairment in transitioning to . Temporal lobe epilepsy frequently originates in the amygdala-hippocampus complex, where seizures propagate through limbic networks, causing experiential auras, responses, and memory disturbances. Anatomical changes, including and amygdalar volume alterations, underlie the epileptogenic focus, with s often involving hypersynchronous activity across interconnected limbic structures like the . These disruptions can lead to recurrent unprovoked s resistant to medication, reflecting the system's role in seizure initiation and spread. Anxiety disorders, particularly (PTSD), feature hyperactive responses to trauma-related cues, coupled with hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation that sustains heightened stress reactivity. In PTSD, exaggerated amygdalar activation persists even to non-trauma stimuli, such as emotional faces, impairing fear extinction and contributing to symptoms like and flashbacks. Chronic HPA dysregulation, marked by altered levels, further amplifies limbic hypersensitivity, linking trauma exposure to enduring . Major depressive disorder is associated with reduced hippocampal volume and impaired in the , which correlates with persistent , rumination, and cognitive biases. These volumetric changes, observed across multiple studies, reflect stress-induced toxicity on limbic neurons, diminishing and exacerbating mood symptoms. The resultant hippocampal dysfunction disrupts limbic integration of emotional and mnemonic processes, perpetuating the disorder's core affective impairments. Autism spectrum disorder involves atypical growth trajectories, with early enlargement followed by later volume reduction, contributing to deficits in social processing and emotional recognition. These structural anomalies impair amygdalar modulation of , leading to challenges in and face processing. Genetic factors, such as mutations in SHANK3, exacerbate limbic circuit disruptions by altering synaptic scaffolding in the amygdala and , thereby linking molecular deficits to impaired . Schizophrenia is associated with limbic system abnormalities, including reduced hippocampal volume and altered function, which contribute to cognitive deficits, positive symptoms like hallucinations, and . These changes, observed in studies, reflect disrupted connectivity in fronto-limbic circuits and are linked to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative processes in the disorder.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches

Diagnostic approaches to assessing limbic system integrity primarily rely on techniques that evaluate structural, functional, and connectivity aspects of its components. Structural (MRI) enables volumetric analysis of key limbic structures such as the hippocampus, , and fornix, providing quantitative measures of atrophy or developmental variations in healthy and clinical populations. Functional (PET) assesses metabolic activity in fronto-limbic regions, revealing hypo- or associated with mood and . Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) quantifies the integrity of limbic pathways, such as the uncinate fasciculus connecting the to prefrontal areas, by measuring and mean diffusivity to detect microstructural disruptions. Electrophysiological methods complement imaging by capturing dynamic neural activity within the limbic system. (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) are used to detect seizure onset in , where limbic structures like the hippocampus and generate interictal spikes and ictal rhythms that propagate through scalp recordings. In research settings, single-unit recordings from limbic neurons, such as those in the or , provide high-resolution insights into cellular firing patterns during emotional processing or stress responses in animal models and intraoperative human studies. Therapeutic interventions targeting limbic dysfunction encompass pharmacological, neuromodulatory, and behavioral strategies, often informed by feedback. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of limbic targets, such as the , modulates hyperactivity in circuits involved in , with chronic high-frequency stimulation reducing symptoms by altering and connectivity. Pharmacotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) enhances serotonin signaling in the , potentiating reactivity to emotional stimuli and promoting adaptive processing over weeks of treatment. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) induces neuroplastic changes in fronto-limbic networks, as evidenced by showing decreased amygdala-prefrontal connectivity and increased cingulate activation post-treatment, correlating with symptom remission in anxiety disorders. Emerging techniques offer circuit-specific precision for limbic modulation. in animal models allows targeted activation or inhibition of limbic neurons, such as those in prefrontal- pathways, to dissect roles in bipolar disorder-like and test potential translational therapies. In human trials, low-intensity (LIFU) non-invasively stimulates subcortical limbic regions like the or subcallosal cingulate, demonstrating safety and preliminary efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms by altering local neural excitability without invasive electrodes.

Evolutionary and Historical Context

Evolutionary Origins

The hypothesis, proposed by , posits that the brain evolved in three successive stages, with the limbic system representing the "paleomammalian" layer responsible for emotional and motivational behaviors, overlaid on a more primitive reptilian core and later neocortical additions. This model suggests the limbic structures emerged around 150-200 million years ago in early mammals to integrate affective responses with basic survival instincts. However, the hypothesis has been critiqued for oversimplifying brain evolution by implying strict hierarchical layering rather than integrated, adaptive development across vertebrate lineages. Comparative anatomy reveals rudimentary limbic-like structures in non-mammalian vertebrates, indicating deep phylogenetic conservation. In teleost fish, a hippocampus homolog in the pallium supports spatial navigation, as evidenced by place cell-like activity during active exploration and route learning. Reptiles possess amygdala homologs, such as the lateral and central amygdala nuclei, which process predator-related cues and facilitate avoidance behaviors through fear conditioning and autonomic responses. In mammals, limbic expansions reflect ecological adaptations. Birds, despite lacking a true hippocampus, exhibit an enlarged hippocampal formation relative to body size in food-caching species like chickadees, enabling memory of thousands of cache sites for seasonal survival. In primates, the amygdala has undergone significant expansion, particularly in the basolateral and corticomedial regions, supporting complex social emotions such as empathy and alliance formation, driven by increased group living pressures. Genetic mechanisms underscore this conservation, with orthologs of human limbic genes like DLX1/2 expressed across vertebrates to regulate development in structures including the and . These genes promote differentiation essential for inhibitory circuits in emotional processing, a role preserved from to mammals. Fossil endocasts provide direct evidence of limbic evolution in hominids, showing temporal lobe enlargement—housing key limbic components like the and hippocampus—beginning with relative increases in early around 3-4 million years ago, correlating with enhanced social and navigational demands. This expansion continued in species, approaching modern proportions in later stages of evolution, such as after 0.6 million years ago, as seen in broader temporal imprints on endocasts.

Historical Development of the Concept

In 1878, French anatomist identified a distinctive medial cortical formation in the mammalian brain, which he termed the "great " (le grand lobe limbique), highlighting its ring-like structure formed by the cingulate gyrus and hippocampal formations along the inner border of the cerebral hemispheres. Broca's observation emphasized the anatomical continuity of these regions across species, viewing them as a unified cortical rim distinct from the more lateral neocortical expansions. Building on Broca's description, neuroanatomist James Papez proposed in 1937 a functional circuit linking emotion to higher brain processes, involving a closed loop from the hippocampal formation through the fornix to the mammillary bodies, anterior thalamic nuclei, cingulate gyrus, and back to the hippocampus. This Papez circuit posited that emotions arise from neural activity circulating within this pathway, integrating visceral sensations with conscious experience and memory, thereby providing an early mechanistic explanation for affective disorders. The modern term "limbic system" was introduced by Paul MacLean in 1952, who expanded Broca's lobe and Papez's circuit to encompass a broader network of cortical and subcortical structures, including the , , and orbital frontal cortex, involved in visceral and emotional regulation. In the 1950s and 1960s, MacLean further popularized the concept through his model, framing the limbic system as an evolutionarily intermediate "paleomammalian" layer mediating basic emotions between reptilian instincts and rational neocortical functions. In some self-help or outdated models based on MacLean's theory, the limbic system (plus reptilian structures) is portrayed as the "subconscious" or "emotional brain" contrasting with the rational neocortex, though this is an oversimplification as the brain is highly integrated and subconscious processes span multiple regions. His work, drawing from and electrical stimulation studies, shifted focus from isolated structures to interconnected systems underlying and . By the 1980s and 1990s, the limbic system concept faced significant challenges, with neuroscientists like Joseph LeDoux arguing that it oversimplified emotional processing by implying a discrete, homogeneous entity rather than distributed, parallel circuits tailored to specific functions such as fear conditioning via the amygdala. Critics highlighted inconsistencies in anatomical boundaries and functional unity, favoring evidence from lesion and tracing studies that emotions emerge from interactions across neocortical, subcortical, and brainstem networks. This debate prompted a reevaluation, emphasizing modularity over Papez-MacLean holism. Since the early 2000s, refinements have integrated the limbic system into frameworks, using diffusion MRI and to map dynamic functional networks rather than rigid , revealing how limbic hubs like the and hippocampus interact with prefrontal and sensory regions in adaptive emotional processing. High-resolution imaging has addressed prior disputes by demonstrating consensus on core limbic contributions to valence and , while incorporating extended circuits for context-dependent behaviors, as seen in updated models of the Papez pathway. These advances underscore a shift toward network-based interpretations, enhancing therapeutic targeting in affective disorders.

References

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538491/
  2. https://journals.lww.com/sujh/fulltext/2024/01000/a_brief_review_of_limbic_system_anatomy%2C_function%2C.5.aspx
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/limbic-system
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2917081/
  5. https://nba.uth.tmc.edu/neuroscience/m/s4/chapter05.html
  6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537102/
  7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537192/
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11475818/
  9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537077/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8297467/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5586112/
  12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11060/
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3673595/
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9436700/
  15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279126/
  16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92777/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7976161/
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12625466/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3025529/
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/limbic-system
  21. https://www.visiblebody.com/blog/anatomy-physiology-limbic-system
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2599116/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/ventromedial-nucleus
  24. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/physrev.00037.2008
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544221/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4872443/
  27. https://radiopaedia.org/articles/amygdala?lang=us
  28. https://neurondevelopment.org/diencephalon-development/
  29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542285/
  30. https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Neural_-_Hippocampus_Development
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213671122000546
  32. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1002524
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8696165/
  34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cne.25580
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165017302001807
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4406946/
  37. https://www.science.org/content/article/genetic-evidence-our-brains-make-new-neurons-adulthood-may-close-century-old-debate
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40816272/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9167750/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12573837/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7012375/
  42. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41168814/
  43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK580614/
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11972686/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2913468/
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3182008/
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3181836/
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11401111/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3756889/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7513405/
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4896837/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210496/
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8074600/
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10449720/
  55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9561515/
  56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15850737/
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22552939/
  58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/57852/
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22139792/
  60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24950819/
  61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18463627/
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30096948/
  63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37781027/
  64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39111747/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9010774/
  66. https://elifesciences.org/articles/44119
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2375767/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2830249/
  69. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-022-00506-y
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6188538/
  71. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.843794/full
  72. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.25027
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3236374/
  74. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10548-023-00955-y
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.