Hubbry Logo
Maass wave formMaass wave formMain
Open search
Maass wave form
Community hub
Maass wave form
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Maass wave form
Maass wave form
from Wikipedia

In mathematics, Maass forms or Maass wave forms are studied in the theory of automorphic forms. Maass forms are complex-valued smooth functions of the upper half plane, which transform in a similar way under the operation of a discrete subgroup of as modular forms. They are eigenforms of the hyperbolic Laplace operator defined on the upper half plane and satisfy certain growth conditions at the cusps of a fundamental domain of . In contrast to modular forms, Maass forms need not be holomorphic. They were studied first by Hans Maass in 1949.

General remarks

[edit]

The group

operates on the upper half plane

by fractional linear transformations:

It can be extended to an operation on by defining:

The Radon measure

defined on is invariant under the operation of .

Let be a discrete subgroup of . A fundamental domain for is an open set , so that there exists a system of representatives of with

A fundamental domain for the modular group is given by

(see Modular form).

A function is called -invariant, if holds for all and all .

For every measurable, -invariant function the equation

holds. Here the measure on the right side of the equation is the induced measure on the quotient

Classic Maass forms

[edit]

Definition of the hyperbolic Laplace operator

[edit]

The hyperbolic Laplace operator on is defined as

Definition of a Maass form

[edit]

A Maass form for the group is a complex-valued smooth function on satisfying

If

we call Maass cusp form.

Relation between Maass forms and Dirichlet series

[edit]

Let be a Maass form. Since

we have:

Therefore has a Fourier expansion of the form

with coefficient functions

It is easy to show that is Maass cusp form if and only if .

We can calculate the coefficient functions in a precise way. For this we need the Bessel function .

Definition: The Bessel function is defined as

The integral converges locally uniformly absolutely for in and the inequality

holds for all .

Therefore, decreases exponentially for . Furthermore, we have for all .

Theorem (Fourier coefficients of Maass forms)Let be the eigenvalue of the Maass form corresponding to There exist , unique up to sign, such that . Then the Fourier coefficients of are

Proof: We have

By the definition of the Fourier coefficients we get

for

Together it follows that

for

In (1) we used that the nth Fourier coefficient of is for the first summation term. In the second term we changed the order of integration and differentiation, which is allowed since f is smooth in y . We get a linear differential equation of second degree:

For one can show, that for every solution there exist unique coefficients with the property

For every solution has coefficients of the form

for unique . Here and are Bessel functions.

The Bessel functions grow exponentially, while the Bessel functions decrease exponentially. Together with the polynomial growth condition 3) we get (also ) for a unique . Q.E.D.

Even and odd Maass forms: Let . Then i operates on all functions by and commutes with the hyperbolic Laplacian. A Maass form is called even, if and odd if . If f is a Maass form, then is an even Maass form and an odd Maass form and it holds that .

Theorem: The L-function of a Maass form

[edit]

Let

be a Maass cusp form. We define the L-function of as

Then the series converges for and we can continue it to a whole function on .

If is even or odd we get

Here if is even and if is odd. Then satisfies the functional equation

Example: The non-holomorphic Eisenstein-series E

[edit]

The non-holomorphic Eisenstein-series is defined for and as

where is the Gamma function.

The series converges absolutely in for and locally uniformly in , since one can show, that the series

converges absolutely in , if . More precisely it converges uniformly on every set , for every compact set and every .

E is a Maass form

[edit]

We only show -invariance and the differential equation. A proof of the smoothness can be found in Deitmar or Bump. The growth condition follows from the Fourier expansion of the Eisenstein series.

We will first show the -invariance. Let

be the stabilizer group corresponding to the operation of on .

Proposition. E is -invariant.

Proof. Define:

(a) converges absolutely in for and

Since

we obtain

That proves the absolute convergence in for

Furthermore, it follows that

since the map

is a bijection (a) follows.

(b) We have for all .

For we get

Together with (a), is also invariant under . Q.E.D.

Proposition. E is an eigenform of the hyperbolic Laplace operator

We need the following Lemma:

Lemma: commutes with the operation of on . More precisely for all we have:

Proof: The group is generated by the elements of the form

One calculates the claim for these generators and obtains the claim for all . Q.E.D.

Since it is sufficient to show the differential equation for . We have:

Furthermore, one has

Since the Laplace Operator commutes with the Operation of , we get

and so

Therefore, the differential equation holds for E in . In order to obtain the claim for all , consider the function . By explicitly calculating the Fourier expansion of this function, we get that it is meromorphic. Since it vanishes for , it must be the zero function by the identity theorem.

The Fourier-expansion of E

[edit]

The nonholomorphic Eisenstein series has a Fourier expansion

where

If , has a meromorphic continuation on . It is holomorphic except for simple poles at

The Eisenstein series satisfies the functional equation

for all .

Locally uniformly in the growth condition

holds, where

The meromorphic continuation of E is very important in the spectral theory of the hyperbolic Laplace operator.

Maass forms of weight k

[edit]

Congruence subgroups

[edit]

For let be the kernel of the canonical projection

We call principal congruence subgroup of level . A subgroup is called congruence subgroup, if there exists , so that . All congruence subgroups are discrete.

Let

For a congruence subgroup let be the image of in . If S is a system of representatives of , then

is a fundamental domain for . The set is uniquely determined by the fundamental domain . Furthermore, is finite.

The points for are called cusps of the fundamental domain . They are a subset of .

For every cusp there exists with .

Maass forms of weight k

[edit]

Let be a congruence subgroup and

We define the hyperbolic Laplace operator of weight as

This is a generalization of the hyperbolic Laplace operator .

We define an operation of on by

where

It can be shown that

holds for all and every .

Therefore, operates on the vector space

.

Definition. A Maass form of weight for is a function that is an eigenfunction of and is of moderate growth at the cusps.

The term moderate growth at cusps needs clarification. Infinity is a cusp for a function is of moderate growth at if is bounded by a polynomial in y as . Let be another cusp. Then there exists with . Let . Then , where is the congruence subgroup . We say is of moderate growth at the cusp , if is of moderate growth at .

Definition. If contains a principal congruence subgroup of level , we say that is cuspidal at infinity, if

We say that is cuspidal at the cusp if is cuspidal at infinity. If is cuspidal at every cusp, we call a cusp form.

We give a simple example of a Maass form of weight for the modular group:

Example. Let be a modular form of even weight for Then is a Maass form of weight for the group .

The spectral problem

[edit]

Let be a congruence subgroup of and let be the vector space of all measurable functions with for all satisfying

modulo functions with The integral is well defined, since the function is -invariant. This is a Hilbert space with inner product

The operator can be defined in a vector space which is dense in . There is a positive semidefinite symmetric operator. It can be shown, that there exists a unique self-adjoint continuation on

Define as the space of all cusp forms Then operates on and has a discrete spectrum. The spectrum belonging to the orthogonal complement has a continuous part and can be described with the help of (modified) non-holomorphic Eisenstein series, their meromorphic continuations and their residues. (See Bump or Iwaniec).

If is a discrete (torsion free) subgroup of , so that the quotient is compact, the spectral problem simplifies. This is because a discrete cocompact subgroup has no cusps. Here all of the space is a sum of eigenspaces.

Embedding into the space L2(Γ \ G)

[edit]

is a locally compact unimodular group with the topology of Let be a congruence subgroup. Since is discrete in , it is closed in as well. The group is unimodular and since the counting measure is a Haar-measure on the discrete group , is also unimodular. By the Quotient Integral Formula there exists a -right-invariant Radon measure on the locally compact space . Let be the corresponding -space. This space decomposes into a Hilbert space direct sum:

where

and

The Hilbert-space can be embedded isometrically into the Hilbert space . The isometry is given by the map

Therefore, all Maass cusp forms for the congruence group can be thought of as elements of .

is a Hilbert space carrying an operation of the group , the so-called right regular representation:

One can easily show, that is a unitary representation of on the Hilbert space . One is interested in a decomposition into irreducible subrepresentations. This is only possible if is cocompact. If not, there is also a continuous Hilbert-integral part. The interesting part is, that the solution of this problem also solves the spectral problem of Maass forms. (see Bump, C. 2.3)

Maass cusp form

[edit]

A Maass cusp form, a subset of Maass forms, is a function on the upper half-plane that transforms like a modular form but need not be holomorphic. They were first studied by Hans Maass in Maass (1949).

Definition

[edit]

Let k be an integer, s be a complex number, and Γ be a discrete subgroup of SL2(R). A Maass form of weight k for Γ with Laplace eigenvalue s is a smooth function from the upper half-plane to the complex numbers satisfying the following conditions:

  • For all and all , we have
  • We have , where is the weight k hyperbolic Laplacian defined as
  • The function is of at most polynomial growth at cusps.

A weak Maass form is defined similarly but with the third condition replaced by "The function has at most linear exponential growth at cusps". Moreover, is said to be harmonic if it is annihilated by the Laplacian operator.

Major results

[edit]

Let be a weight 0 Maass cusp form. Its normalized Fourier coefficient at a prime p is bounded by p7/64 + p−7/64. This theorem is due to Henry Kim and Peter Sarnak. It is an approximation toward Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture.

Higher dimensions

[edit]

Maass cusp forms can be regarded as automorphic forms on GL(2). It is natural to define Maass cusp forms on GL(n) as spherical automorphic forms on GL(n) over the rational number field. Their existence is proved by Miller, Mueller, etc.

Automorphic representations of the adele group

[edit]

The group GL2(A)

[edit]

Let be a commutative ring with unit and let be the group of matrices with entries in and invertible determinant. Let be the ring of rational adeles, the ring of the finite (rational) adeles and for a prime number let be the field of p-adic numbers. Furthermore, let be the ring of the p-adic integers (see Adele ring). Define . Both and are locally compact unimodular groups if one equips them with the subspace topologies of respectively . Then:

The right side is the restricted product, concerning the compact, open subgroups of . Then locally compact group, if we equip it with the restricted product topology.

The group is isomorphic to

and is a locally compact group with the product topology, since and are both locally compact.

Let

The subgroup

is a maximal compact, open subgroup of and can be thought of as a subgroup of , when we consider the embedding .

We define as the center of , that means is the group of all diagonal matrices of the form , where . We think of as a subgroup of since we can embed the group by .

The group is embedded diagonally in , which is possible, since all four entries of a can only have finite amount of prime divisors and therefore for all but finitely many prime numbers .

Let be the group of all with . (see Adele Ring for a definition of the absolute value of an Idele). One can easily calculate, that is a subgroup of .

With the one-to-one map we can identify the groups and with each other.

The group is dense in and discrete in . The quotient is not compact but has finite Haar-measure.

Therefore, is a lattice of similar to the classical case of the modular group and . By harmonic analysis one also gets that is unimodular.

Adelisation of cuspforms

[edit]

We now want to embed the classical Maass cusp forms of weight 0 for the modular group into . This can be achieved with the "strong approximation theorem", which states that the map

is a -equivariant homeomorphism. So we get

and furthermore

Maass cuspforms of weight 0 for modular group can be embedded into

By the strong approximation theorem this space is unitary isomorphic to

which is a subspace of

In the same way one can embed the classical holomorphic cusp forms. With a small generalization of the approximation theorem, one can embed all Maass cusp forms (as well as the holomorphic cuspforms) of any weight for any congruence subgroup in .

We call the space of automorphic forms of the adele group.

Cusp forms of the adele group

[edit]

Let be a Ring and let be the group of all where . This group is isomorphic to the additive group of R.

We call a function cusp form, if

holds for almost all. Let (or just ) be the vector space of these cusp forms. is a closed subspace of and it is invariant under the right regular representation of

One is again interested in a decomposition of into irreducible closed subspaces.

We have the following theorem:

The space decomposes in a direct sum of irreducible Hilbert-spaces with finite multiplicities :

The calculation of these multiplicities is one of the most important and most difficult problems in the theory of automorphic forms.

Cuspidal representations of the adele group

[edit]

An irreducible representation of the group is called cuspidal, if it is isomorphic to a subrepresentation of .

An irreducible representation of the group is called admissible if there exists a compact subgroup of , so that for all .

One can show, that every cuspidal representation is admissible.

The admissibility is needed to proof the so-called Tensorprodukt-Theorem anzuwenden, which says, that every irreducible, unitary and admissible representation of the group is isomorphic to an infinite tensor product

The are irreducible representations of the group . Almost all of them need to be umramified.

(A representation of the group is called unramified, if the vector space

is not the zero space.)

A construction of an infinite tensor product can be found in Deitmar,C.7.

Automorphic L-functions

[edit]

Let be an irreducible, admissible unitary representation of . By the tensor product theorem, is of the form (see cuspidal representations of the adele group)

Let be a finite set of places containing and all ramified places . One defines the global Hecke - function of as

where is a so-called local L-function of the local representation . A construction of local L-functions can be found in Deitmar C. 8.2.

If is a cuspidal representation, the L-function has a meromorphic continuation on . This is possible, since , satisfies certain functional equations.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A Maass wave form, also known as a Maass form, is a real-analytic, non-holomorphic automorphic function on the upper half-plane H\mathbb{H} associated to a Fuchsian group ΓSL(2,R)\Gamma \subset \mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{R}), typically of finite index in SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{Z}), that satisfies a weighted transformation law under the slash operator ukγ=v(γ)uu \mid_k \gamma = v(\gamma) u for γΓ\gamma \in \Gamma, where kRk \in \mathbb{R} is the weight and v:ΓC×v: \Gamma \to \mathbb{C}^\times is a unitary multiplier system, acts as an eigenfunction of the weight-kk hyperbolic Laplacian Δku=λu\Delta_k u = \lambda u with eigenvalue λR\lambda \in \mathbb{R}, and obeys a polynomial growth condition u(gqz)=O(yc)u(g_q z) = O(y^c) at each cusp qq as Im(z)=y\operatorname{Im}(z) = y \to \infty, with gqg_q a scaling matrix normalizing the cusp. These forms generalize holomorphic modular forms by relaxing holomorphicity while preserving automorphy and spectral properties. Introduced by German mathematician Hans Maass in his 1949 paper as solutions to differential equations arising from non-analytic automorphic functions linked to and functional equations, Maass wave forms provide a framework for studying the continuous spectrum of the Laplacian on modular surfaces. Their Fourier expansions at cusps involve coefficients multiplied by or modified of the second kind Ks1/2(2πny)K_{s-1/2}(2\pi n y), where the spectral parameter ss relates to the eigenvalue via λ=s(1s)\lambda = s(1-s), enabling connections to special values of L-functions and arithmetic invariants. Cusp forms, a subclass vanishing at cusps, form an orthonormal basis for the discrete spectrum in L2(Γ\H)L^2(\Gamma \backslash \mathbb{H}), while non-cuspidal span the continuous spectrum. Maass wave forms play a central role in the spectral theory of automorphic forms, facilitating the construction of Hecke operators and trace formulas that yield bounds on eigenvalues and multiplicities, with implications for the in the context of automorphic L-functions. Beyond , they model quantum chaotic systems on hyperbolic surfaces, linking eigenvalue distributions to the Selberg zeta function and theory predictions, and appear in dynamical systems through period functions satisfying three-term functional equations derived from integral transforms. Recent extensions include generalized versions with non-unitary multipliers and complex weights, broadening applications to vector-valued forms and .

Introduction

Overview and motivation

Maass forms are real-analytic functions on the upper half-plane that are invariant under the modular group SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) and act as eigenfunctions of the hyperbolic Laplace operator. These properties position them as non-holomorphic counterparts to classical modular forms, extending the theory of automorphic functions to real-analytic settings while preserving transformation laws under group actions. Their introduction addresses key challenges in , particularly the Selberg eigenvalue problem, which seeks to characterize the discrete spectrum of the Laplacian on non-compact hyperbolic surfaces such as SL(2,Z)\H\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) \backslash \mathbb{H}. Maass forms provide the cusp forms corresponding to discrete eigenvalues in this spectrum, enabling the of the space of square-integrable functions and facilitating applications in , such as the study of L-functions. In distinction from holomorphic modular forms, Maass forms lack an inherent weight parameter in their classical formulation and emphasize both cusp forms, which exhibit at the cusps, and non-holomorphic contributing to the continuous . This framework broadens the scope beyond holomorphy, allowing for real-analytic behaviors that capture broader automorphic phenomena. Hans Maass introduced these forms in 1949 to explore non-holomorphic automorphic functions, motivated by analogies with holomorphic cases and the need for tools to analyze via functional equations.

Historical development

The concept of automorphic functions, which laid the groundwork for later developments in theory, was pioneered by in the late 1880s and 1890s, particularly through his work on Fuchsian functions and their transformations under group actions on the upper half-plane. In the , advanced the of automorphic forms by studying the eigenvalues of the hyperbolic Laplacian on quotient spaces, providing a framework for analyzing the continuous and discrete spectrum that would prove essential for non-holomorphic forms. Hans Maass introduced non-holomorphic automorphic forms, now known as Maass forms, in his 1949 paper, where he constructed such functions for the SL(2,ℤ) as eigenfunctions of the satisfying automorphy conditions, extending the classical holomorphic theory to real-analytic cases. Following this, Walter Roelcke's 1956 analysis of the of automorphic forms established the of the L²-space into discrete and continuous components, confirming the existence of Maass cusp forms as part of the . In the 1970s, Dennis Hejhal developed numerical methods for explicit computations of Maass forms, enabling the determination of their eigenvalues and Fourier coefficients for specific examples on congruence subgroups, which facilitated further theoretical investigations. Maass forms gained prominence in the from the late 1960s onward, as incorporated them into his framework for automorphic representations of GL(2), linking their L-functions to Galois representations and broader reciprocity conjectures. Advances in the 1980s and 2000s focused on analytic properties, notably subconvexity bounds for L-functions attached to Maass forms; Henryk Iwaniec established key estimates in 1983 for the conductor aspect, while contributed to spectral applications and equidistribution results in the 1990s, enhancing understanding of their distribution and arithmetic significance.

Mathematical Prerequisites

Hyperbolic geometry and the upper half-plane

The upper half-plane H\mathbb{H} is defined as the set {z=x+iyCy>0}\{ z = x + iy \in \mathbb{C} \mid y > 0 \}, equipped with the hyperbolic Riemannian metric ds2=dx2+dy2y2ds^2 = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{y^2}, which induces the hyperbolic distance and models the hyperbolic plane of constant curvature 1-1. This metric ensures that the geometry of H\mathbb{H} differs fundamentally from the , with angles preserved but distances scaled inversely by the imaginary part yy. In this model, geodesics—the shortest paths between points—are either vertical rays from the real axis (semicircles of infinite radius) or semicircular arcs centered on the real axis and orthogonal to it at their endpoints. The hyperbolic area element is given by dA=dxdyy2dA = \frac{dx \, dy}{y^2}, which is invariant under the group actions preserving the metric; for instance, the area of hyperbolic triangles satisfies Gauss-Bonnet, relating it to the defect from π\pi. The SL(2,R)\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{R}) acts on H\mathbb{H} by Möbius transformations γz=az+bcz+d\gamma z = \frac{az + b}{cz + d}, where γ=(abcd)\gamma = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} with a,b,c,dRa, b, c, d \in \mathbb{R} and detγ=adbc=1\det \gamma = ad - bc = 1, preserving the upper half-plane and acting as orientation-preserving isometries. This action is transitive on H\mathbb{H}, meaning any point can be mapped to any other, and it extends to the boundary R{}\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\} via the . A key discrete subgroup is the SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{Z}), consisting of matrices with entries and 1, which acts on H\mathbb{H} with a fundamental domain D={zHRe(z)1/2,z1}D = \{ z \in \mathbb{H} \mid |\mathrm{Re}(z)| \leq 1/2, |z| \geq 1 \}, a hyperbolic ideal with vertices at ρ=e2πi/3\rho = e^{2\pi i / 3}, ρ2\rho^2, and \infty. This domain tiles H\mathbb{H} under the , and its hyperbolic area is π/3\pi/3, reflecting the finite-volume quotient SL(2,Z)\H\mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{Z}) \backslash \mathbb{H}. Functions invariant under the action of such discrete subgroups, satisfying f(γz)=f(z)f(\gamma z) = f(z) for all γSL(2,Z)\gamma \in \mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{Z}), are known as automorphic functions and form the basis for studying objects like Maass forms on this hyperbolic surface.

Hyperbolic Laplace operator

The hyperbolic Laplace operator is a fundamental acting on smooth functions on the upper half-plane H={z=x+iyy>0}\mathbb{H} = \{ z = x + iy \mid y > 0 \}. It is explicitly given by Δ=y2(2x2+2y2).\Delta = -y^2 \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} \right). This operator is self-adjoint and positive semi-definite with respect to the invariant measure dμ=dxdy/y2d\mu = dx\, dy / y^2 on H\mathbb{H}, making it suitable for spectral analysis in the context of automorphic forms. The operator Δ\Delta is invariant under the action of SL(2,R)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R}) on H\mathbb{H} via Möbius transformations zγz=(az+b)/(cz+d)z \mapsto \gamma z = (az + b)/(cz + d) for γ=(abcd)SL(2,R)\gamma = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} \in \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R}), meaning Δ(fγ)=(Δf)γ\Delta(f \circ \gamma) = (\Delta f) \circ \gamma for any smooth function f:HCf: \mathbb{H} \to \mathbb{C}. To see this, note that the hyperbolic metric ds2=(dx2+dy2)/y2ds^2 = (dx^2 + dy^2)/y^2 is preserved by SL(2,R)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R}), as the transformation induces yy/cz+d2y \mapsto y / |cz + d|^2, which scales the partial derivatives in a way that compensates exactly to leave Δ\Delta unchanged; a direct confirms that the chain rule applied to the coordinates yields the invariance. This invariance arises because Δ\Delta corresponds to the Casimir operator of the Lie algebra sl(2,R)\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{R}), the universal enveloping algebra element that commutes with the group action. Specifically, identifying HSL(2,R)/SO(2)\mathbb{H} \cong \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R}) / \mathrm{SO}(2), the Casimir C2=L02+12(L1L1+L1L1)\mathcal{C}_2 = -L_0^2 + \frac{1}{2}(L_1 L_{-1} + L_{-1} L_1), where LnL_n are the basis generators satisfying the sl(2,R)\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{R}) relations, realizes as C2=y2(x2+y2)\mathcal{C}_2 = -y^2 (\partial_x^2 + \partial_y^2) when restricted to right-SO(2)\mathrm{SO}(2)-invariant functions, thus equating to Δ\Delta up to normalization. Eigenfunctions uu of Δ\Delta satisfy the equation Δu=λu\Delta u = \lambda u, where the spectral parameter λ\lambda parameterizes the . For the continuous spectrum, λ=s(1s)\lambda = s(1 - s) with s=1/2+irs = 1/2 + ir and rRr \in \mathbb{R}, yielding λ=1/4+r21/4\lambda = 1/4 + r^2 \geq 1/4; discrete eigenvalues below 1/41/4 may occur on quotients but are absent on H\mathbb{H} itself. This parameterization facilitates the study of eigenfunction expansions and relates to via principal series induced from the parabolic subgroup.

Modular group and automorphic functions

The , denoted Γ=SL(2,Z)\Gamma = \mathrm{SL}(2, \mathbb{Z}), consists of all 2×22 \times 2 matrices with integer entries and 1, on the upper half-plane H={zC(z)>0}\mathbb{H} = \{ z \in \mathbb{C} \mid \Im(z) > 0 \} via Möbius transformations γz=az+bcz+d\gamma z = \frac{az + b}{cz + d} for γ=(abcd)Γ\gamma = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} \in \Gamma. This group is generated by the transformations T:zz+1T: z \mapsto z + 1, corresponding to the matrix (1101)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, and S:z1zS: z \mapsto -\frac{1}{z}, corresponding to the matrix (0110)\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}. These generators satisfy the relations S4=IS^4 = I, (ST)3=S2(ST)^3 = S^2, and together with the presentation, they fully describe the structure of Γ\Gamma as a free product amalgamated along a cyclic . A fundamental domain for the action of Γ\Gamma on H\mathbb{H} is the region D={zHz1,12(z)12}D = \{ z \in \mathbb{H} \mid |z| \geq 1, -\frac{1}{2} \leq \Re(z) \leq \frac{1}{2} \}, which tiles H\mathbb{H} under the , with identifications along its boundaries via SS and TT. Every point in H\mathbb{H} is equivalent under Γ\Gamma to a unique point in the interior of DD, except for boundary points identified pairwise, ensuring that the quotient Γ\H\Gamma \backslash \mathbb{H} is a non-compact with a cusp at . An automorphic function for Γ\Gamma is a function f:HCf: \mathbb{H} \to \mathbb{C} satisfying the invariance condition f(γz)=f(z)f(\gamma z) = f(z) for all γΓ\gamma \in \Gamma and zHz \in \mathbb{H}. Such functions are constant on Γ\Gamma-orbits and descend to well-defined functions on the quotient Γ\H\Gamma \backslash \mathbb{H}. Automorphic functions for Γ\Gamma are classified into , which are non-cuspidal and exhibit growth at the cusps of the fundamental domain, and cusp forms, which vanish at all cusps, including the point at infinity. This distinction arises from the behavior at the boundary of DD, where cusp forms decay exponentially as (z)\Im(z) \to \infty, while grow logarithmically.

Definition and Basic Properties

Classic Maass forms for SL(2,Z)

Classic Maass forms for the full SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) are real-analytic functions f:HCf: \mathbb{H} \to \mathbb{C} on the upper half-plane H={zCIm(z)>0}\mathbb{H} = \{ z \in \mathbb{C} \mid \operatorname{Im}(z) > 0 \} that satisfy the automorphy condition f(γz)=f(z)f(\gamma z) = f(z) for all γSL(2,Z)\gamma \in \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) and are eigenfunctions of the hyperbolic Laplace-Beltrami operator Δ=y2(2x2+2y2)\Delta = -y^2 \left( \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} \right) with eigenvalue s(1s)s(1-s), where s=12+its = \frac{1}{2} + it for tRt \in \mathbb{R} ensures the eigenvalue λ=14+t2>0\lambda = \frac{1}{4} + t^2 > 0. These forms are non-holomorphic analogs of classical modular forms and arise as solutions to the spectral problem on the modular surface SL(2,Z)\H\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) \backslash \mathbb{H}. The distinction between types of Maass forms depends on their growth behavior at the single cusp \infty of SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}). For Maass cusp forms, the function satisfies f(z)=o(yϵ)f(z) = o(y^\epsilon) as y=Im(z)y = \operatorname{Im}(z) \to \infty for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, ensuring square-integrability with respect to the hyperbolic measure dμ=y2dxdyd\mu = y^{-2} \, dx \, dy over a fundamental domain. In contrast, , which are non-cuspidal Maass forms, exhibit polynomial growth f(z)=O(y1/2+ϵ)f(z) = O(y^{1/2 + \epsilon}) as yy \to \infty for every ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 and correspond to continuous contributions. Both types maintain moderate overall growth f(z)yN|f(z)| \ll y^N for some fixed N>0N > 0 in the fundamental domain. A standard normalization for these forms, particularly Eisenstein series, is f(iy)ysf(iy) \sim y^s as yy \to \infty, which aligns the asymptotic behavior with the parameter ss. For the specific case of on SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}), there exists a unique such form up to scalar multiple satisfying the automorphy, eigenvalue, and growth conditions. This uniqueness stems from the explicit construction via summation over the group, ensuring it spans the of such functions.

Fourier expansion

The Fourier expansion of a Maass form provides a crucial decomposition that facilitates the study of its analytic properties and spectral behavior on the modular surface. For a Maass form ff on the upper half-plane H\mathbb{H} associated to the modular group SL(2,Z)\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}), with Laplace eigenvalue λ=s(1s)\lambda = s(1-s) where Re(s)=1/2\mathrm{Re}(s) = 1/2, the expansion at the cusp \infty is derived by considering the integral of f(z)f(z) against the additive characters ψn(x)=e2πinx\psi_n(x) = e^{-2\pi i n x} for nZn \in \mathbb{Z}, yielding the coefficients via unfolding the automorphy factor. The explicit form of this expansion is f(z)=n=ρf(n)yKs1/2(2πny)e2πinx,f(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} \rho_f(n) \sqrt{y} \, K_{s-1/2}(2\pi |n| y) \, e^{2\pi i n x},
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.