Hubbry Logo
Midget GemsMidget GemsMain
Open search
Midget Gems
Community hub
Midget Gems
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Midget Gems
Midget Gems
from Wikipedia

Midget Gems
Mini Gems
An assortment of Midget Gems.
Alternative namesMini Gems
TypeConfectionery
Place of originUnited Kingdom
Main ingredientsGelatine, sugar, citric acid, fruit flavouring

Midget Gems (also known as Mini Gems) are chewy, firm sweets similar to wine gums but much harder. They are manufactured from sugar and glucose syrup, corn starch and/or various other starches, animal gelatin, and various colourings and flavouring.

Midget Gems were extremely popular in the North of England and were one of The Lion Confectionery Company's biggest selling brands. In 1995 the company joined forces with Cadbury Trebor Bassett brand Maynard's to market the sweet across the country.[1] At the time the sweet was re-branded under the Maynard's banner, the black Midget Gems were changed from liquorice flavour to blackcurrant, but only in the bagged product – those sold loose, from jars and boxes, remain liquorice. Some of the newer bagged product now have reintroduced the liquorice flavour.

A leading selling point for Midget Gems is that they were often sold loose from a jar or barrel. This made them inexpensive and helped bolster their popularity.[2]

Midget Gems are produced by a wide variety of other companies. Glisten Confectionery manufacture them under their Victoria brand, and in 2007 announced that they were removing all artificial colours and flavourings from the sweets.[3] Many supermarkets and stores such as Asda,[4] Tesco,[5] Marks and Spencer, and Sainsbury's manufacture their own versions.

The sweet is so popular that Liverpool Football Club at one point sold their own branded tubs of Midget Gems,[6] and the sweet frequently appears in lists of "Favourite sweets".[7]

Midget Gems are now sold in wide variety of colours and flavours, adding to the choices consumers have when purchasing them.

In January 2022, Marks & Spencer announced their plan to change the name of their sweet to 'Mini gems', after a campaign by Liverpool Hope University academic Dr. Erin Pritchard who complained the word 'midget', considering its origin in a Victorian freak show which exploited disabled people, was offensive to people with dwarfism.[8] The reaction on social media was mixed. Tesco and Maynards Bassetts followed suit later that year[9][10][11] with other brands starting to follow suit in the following months and years.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Midget Gems are small, firm-textured, chewy sweets shaped like miniature jewels, featuring assorted fruit flavors such as lime, orange, and , and produced primarily from , , , and . Originating in 1903 when brothers Frank and Albert Hillard founded Confectionery in Cleckheaton, , , these hard gum candies were initially made alongside boiled sweets and gained popularity for their economical loose sales and distinctive chewiness that outlasts typical wine gums. Confectionery, now part of , continues to manufacture them using natural colors and flavors derived from sources like anthocyanins and extract, preserving the original formula that includes a returned licorice variant in select assortments. Renowned as a nostalgic British staple enjoyed across generations, Midget Gems have appeared on lists of favorite retro sweets and hold cultural affinity with groups like supporters, though some retailers, such as , rebranded their version to "Mini Gems" in 2022 following advocacy against the term "midget" as potentially derogatory toward individuals with —a contention not adopted by the primary producer.

History

Origins in Early 20th Century Britain

Midget Gems trace their origins to 1903, when brothers Frank and Albert Hardill founded Lion Confectionery in , , initially producing boiled sweets on a small scale from local cottages. The company secured expansion funding from local businessman John Hillard, who stipulated the adoption of the name "Lion Stores" for the enterprise, enabling a shift to larger-scale of chewy, fruit-flavored hard candies designed to mimic miniature jewels in appearance and texture. These early Midget Gems were firmer and smaller than contemporary wine gums, featuring an assortment of flavors such as lime, orange, , , , and , with the variant originally incorporating licorice. The sweets quickly became a staple in , sold affordably loose from jars in shops, reflecting the era's demand for inexpensive, portable confections amid Britain's growing industry. Lion Confectionery's focus on durable, gem-like boiled sweets positioned Midget Gems as one of its earliest and most enduring brands, predating widespread commercialization by larger firms.

Key Manufacturers and Commercial Development

Lion Confectionery Company, founded in by brothers Frank and Albert Hardill in , , pioneered the production of Midget Gems as a core product in its lineup of boiled sweets. The firm specialized in hard, jewel-shaped confections using traditional methods, with Midget Gems emerging as a standout item due to their firm texture and varied fruit flavors. Initial manufacturing focused on regional markets, leveraging local demand in industrial areas where such affordable treats appealed to working-class consumers. By the mid-20th century, Midget Gems had solidified as one of 's top-selling brands, particularly in and , where sales volumes reflected strong consumer loyalty to the product's nostalgic appeal and consistent quality. Commercial growth remained regionally concentrated until 1995, when partnered with Trebor Bassett to distribute under the established Maynard's label, marking a shift toward national availability and broader . This replaced the original black licorice variant with in bagged formats, adapting to evolving preferences while preserving core production techniques. Post-partnership, manufacturing diversified among confectioners, with firms like Glisten Confectionery producing versions under brands such as Victoria, ensuring continued supply amid fluctuating ownership. Original formulations persist in specialty production, emphasizing natural colors and flavors without modern additives, sustaining demand in retro sweet shops and online retailers as of 2023. Annual output specifics remain proprietary, but the sweets' endurance underscores efficient scaling from artisanal origins to commoditized production lines.

Composition and Production

Primary Ingredients and Variations

Midget Gems are primarily composed of glucose syrup and sugar as sweeteners, modified starches such as maize or potato starch for structure, and animal gelatin—typically derived from beef or pork—for the characteristic chewy texture. Acids including citric, lactic, and acetic contribute acidity and flavor balance, while natural or artificial flavorings and colorants like anthocyanins, curcumin, and paprika extract provide taste and appearance mimicking fruits such as raspberry, lime, and blackcurrant. Variations in formulation occur across manufacturers and product lines. Traditional harder varieties, like those from , often incorporate powder alongside beef and for a firmer bite and distinct flavor notes. In contrast, softer midget gems adjust ratios of and to yield a more pliable consistency, sometimes using and additional glazing agents like . Sugar-free adaptations replace and sugar with syrup, maintaining and acid components but omitting animal in some cases to align with dietary restrictions. These differences reflect adaptations for texture preferences, considerations, and reduced-sugar demands, though core elements of - binding remain consistent.

Manufacturing Techniques

Midget Gems are manufactured using the traditional process, a standard technique in the industry for producing shaped -based candies such as wine and jellies, which share similar firm, chewy textures. This method involves creating a pourable gelatin mass from key ingredients including , , bovine , , acids for tartness, and flavorings/colors, followed by deposition into molded starch trays for setting and drying. The process begins with preparing the by soaking it in to , while separately cooking a of , glucose, and to a precise —typically around 105–110°C—to achieve the desired concentration and prevent . The hydrated is then incorporated into the hot , often with added for structure and acids like citric or lactic to balance sweetness and contribute to the characteristic tang. Flavors (e.g., extracts) and colors (natural or approved synthetic) are stirred in at this stage, ensuring even distribution before the mixture cools slightly to a viscous state suitable for deposition. Cooking parameters, such as time and , are critical for texture: higher bloom strength and extended cooking yield the harder consistency distinguishing Midget Gems from softer jellies. In the mogul stage, cornstarch trays are imprinted with small, faceted shapes (often diamond-like for gems) using plaques or dies, creating depressions to hold the mixture. The warm mass is deposited into these molds via automated mogul machines, which handle precise filling to avoid air bubbles and ensure uniformity. Trays are then stacked in controlled humidity environments (around 30–40% RH) for , which can take 48–72 hours or up to 10 days depending on , allowing and gelation to form the firm exterior while retaining chewiness inside. This extended differentiates harder varieties like Midget Gems from quicker-setting products. Post-drying, candies are demolded by sifting or vibrating to separate from , which is recycled after sieving. They may undergo a light coating with glazing agents like or oil for shine and to prevent sticking, followed by inspection, sorting by color/flavor, and . While specific details for brands like Lion's Midget Gems remain proprietary, the mogul process ensures and consistency in industrial production, with modern variants incorporating continuous moguls for higher throughput. focuses on bloom strength (gelatin's gelling power, often 200–250 for firm candies) and moisture content (under 15% for hardness).

Varieties and Flavors

Traditional Flavor Profiles

Traditional Midget Gems, originating in early 20th-century Britain, primarily draw from a core set of fruit-derived flavors that emphasize natural tartness and sweetness balanced by the sweets' firm, gelatin-based chewiness. Common profiles include orange, evoking a citrusy ; , delivering sharp acidity; and lime, offering a tangy, herbaceous note reminiscent of unripe . These are typically achieved through flavorings like essential oils or fruit extracts, with colors derived from natural sources such as for yellows or patent blue for greens in traditional formulations. Blackcurrant provides a deep, berry-forward tartness often associated with British palate preferences, while raspberry and strawberry contribute softer, jam-like sweetness with subtle floral undertones. Pear and apricot appear less consistently but add a mellow, stone-fruit subtlety when included, rounding out assortments in multi-flavor packs. The black pieces, historically the most distinctive, were liquorice-flavored for an aniseed bitterness that contrasted the fruity elements, though some manufacturers substituted blackcurrant in later iterations to broaden appeal without altering the core gum texture. These flavors reflect confectionery practices prioritizing simplicity and regional familiarity, with and dominating the base to preserve intensity without dilution. Assortments vary slightly by producer—Lions maintaining a harder gum style with intact, versus softer variants—but the palette remains anchored in these classics, avoiding exotic or synthetic notes until modern expansions.

Modern Adaptations Including Vegan Options

In response to growing demand for plant-based , manufacturers have developed vegan versions of midget gems by omitting , an animal-derived gelling agent traditionally used in these sweets. Free From Fellows, a UK-based brand specializing in alternative sweets, introduced vegan midget gems around 2020 as part of its expanded range of gelatin-free products, sweetened with syrup or stevia-derived alternatives to achieve a sugar-free profile with approximately half the calories of conventional versions. These adaptations maintain the characteristic firm, gem-shaped texture and fruity flavors—such as , , , and others—while incorporating natural colors and flavors without artificial preservatives, , or . Available in 70g or 100g packs, they are distributed through UK retailers including , , and Grape Tree, targeting consumers seeking low-sugar, tooth-friendly options suitable for vegans and vegetarians. Sugar-free formulations represent another key modern tweak, addressing health concerns over high sugar content in originals, with Free From Fellows' variants verified as free from soya, , , and nuts to broaden . Traditional brands like and Co-op continue offering non-vegan versions containing animal-derived ingredients, highlighting the niche but expanding role of these specialized adaptations in the British sweets market.

Naming and Terminology Debate

Historical Context of the Term "Midget Gems"

The term "Midget Gems" was coined in 1903 upon the launch of the eponymous chewy confectionery by Lion Confectionery, a company established that year in , , by brothers Frank and Albert Hardill. The name descriptively combined "," denoting the sweets' size relative to larger gum varieties like wine gums, with "gems" evoking their translucent, jewel-like shapes and colorful fruit flavors. At the time, "" was a neutral English term derived from "," referring to a small gnat or fly, commonly applied to miniature objects or animals without intent. In the early 20th-century British context, such aligned with emphasizing novelty and compactness, as Lion's initial production occurred in modest cottage facilities before scaling with family investment. The sweets quickly became a in , reflecting the era's growing demand for affordable, hard-set gelatin-based treats amid industrialization's expansion of mass-produced candies. The term's usage predated widespread sensitivity to its later associations with human stature, which originated in 19th-century American showmanship (e.g., P.T. Barnum's promotions) but were not inherently linked to the candy's branding. Lion Confectionery retained the name through subsequent ownership changes, including a 1995 partnership with Trebor Bassett, underscoring its entrenched commercial identity for over a century. Historical advertisements and from the period, focused on flavor assortments including licorice, reinforced the size-based without reference to anthropomorphic connotations. This original intent contrasts with modern reinterpretations, where the descriptor's evolution has prompted reevaluation, though primary sources confirm its inception as a straightforward size indicator in 1903.

Recent Renaming Efforts and Criticisms

In January 2022, rebranded its Midget Gems confectionery as Mini Gems following advocacy from Dr. Erin Pritchard, a in at who has , a form of . Pritchard contended that "midget" constitutes , arguing it reduces individuals with to objects of ridicule and perpetuates , a view echoed by organizations like , which has long advocated against the term in reference to people. The retailer stated the change aimed to respect customer sensitivities, implementing it after internal review prompted by Pritchard's campaign, which began gaining traction around 2020. The renaming sparked debate, with critics arguing it exemplified corporate capitulation to linguistic prescriptivism disconnected from the term's historical, non-pejorative use for objects since the early . Figures such as commentator questioned the necessity, noting "midget" derives from the French for "small measure" and had been applied innocuously to sweets for decades without intent to slur, suggesting the offense stemmed more from modern reinterpretation than inherent malice. Public reactions, including backlash, highlighted perceptions of overreach, with some consumers decrying it as an erosion of traditional naming conventions amid broader pressures on brands to align with evolving social norms. While M&S's move influenced discussions, it did not prompt uniform industry-wide changes; competitors like continued marketing Midget Gems without alteration as of 2023, indicating limited commercial momentum beyond isolated rebrands. Proponents of the rename, including Pritchard, maintained it addressed real harms, citing surveys where a majority of people with reported discomfort with the term, though empirical data on its direct impact on sales or consumer behavior remains anecdotal. Critics, however, pointed to potential , such as diluting product recognition in a market where the original name evoked , with no peer-reviewed studies quantifying offense levels specific to contexts.

Nutritional Profile and Health Implications

Macronutrient Breakdown and Caloric Content

Midget Gems, as gelatin-based , derive the majority of their caloric content from , primarily in the form of sugars and , with protein contributed by and minimal . For a standard formulation from , a prominent producer, 100 grams yields approximately 350 kilocalories, comprising 79 grams of (including 58 grams of sugars), 8.8 grams of protein, and 0.2 grams of (of which 0.2 grams are saturated). These values align with the product's composition of , , , and , where the reflects high simple content typical of boiled sweets. Nutritional profiles vary slightly across brands and formulations; for instance, some generic or alternative recipes report 325-338 kilocalories per 100 grams, with protein ranging from 1.2 to 8.8 grams depending on concentration, while fat remains consistently below 0.5 grams. A serving of 12 sweets (approximately 24 grams) typically provides 84 kilocalories, 19 grams of carbohydrates, 2 grams of protein, and 0.1 grams of fat. The following table summarizes the macronutrient breakdown for Midget Gems per 100 grams:
NutrientAmount per 100 g% of typical daily reference intake*
Energy350 kcal18%
Fat0.2 g<1%
of which saturates0.2 g1%
Carbohydrates79 g30%
of which sugars58 g64%
Protein8.8 g18%
*Based on a 2,000 kcal diet for an average adult; actual requirements vary. This composition underscores Midget Gems as an energy-dense treat with limited macronutrient diversity, where nearly all calories stem from digestible carbohydrates rather than fats or fibers.

Evidence-Based Health Effects

Consumption of Midget Gems, like other high-sugar gelatin-based , is associated with adverse health outcomes primarily due to their elevated and glucose content, which contributes to excessive caloric intake and . Peer-reviewed analyses indicate that high dietary sugar from such sources elevates risks for , , and cardiovascular diseases through mechanisms including , hepatic fat accumulation, and . An umbrella of prospective studies links increased free sugar intake to higher incidence of cardiometabolic conditions, with no offsetting benefits observed in moderation for these endpoints. The component, derived from , provides like and , which in isolated supplement forms (typically 10-15g daily) show preliminary evidence for reducing and improving elasticity via enhanced synthesis. However, the quantities in Midget Gems—estimated at under 1g per serving based on typical formulations—are insufficient to elicit these effects, and the concomitant high load negates potential properties of peptides. Overconsumption of candies has been anecdotally linked to gastrointestinal distress, such as or from poor digestibility of undissolved , though controlled trials are lacking. Dental health represents another empirically supported concern, as the sticky, sugar-rich nature of these sweets promotes cariogenic proliferation and enamel demineralization. Longitudinal data from cohort studies confirm that frequent intake of sugary confections correlates with elevated caries risk, independent of overall diet. Rare allergic reactions to or added colorants may occur, manifesting as urticaria or respiratory issues, but prevalence is low (<1% in population surveys). Overall, no high-quality evidence supports net health benefits from Midget Gems; their consumption should be limited to align with WHO guidelines capping added sugars at <10% of daily energy intake.

Cultural and Commercial Significance

Popularity in British Confectionery Culture

Midget Gems emerged as a cornerstone of British confectionery in 1903, produced by Lion Confectionery in Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire, rapidly establishing themselves as the company's premier product with strong initial traction in northern England. Their distinctive hard, chewy texture and fruit flavors, often sold loose from jars or barrels, rendered them economically accessible, fostering widespread adoption among consumers of varying ages and solidifying their role as an affordable treat in everyday sweet consumption. The sweets' longevity spans over a century, evoking and maintaining relevance in retro trends, with appearances in films, television, and literature that underscore their embedded place in British . Regional fervor peaked notably in associations like Football Club's distribution of branded tubs, reflecting enthusiast loyalty in the North. A 1995 partnership with Trebor Bassett expanded national availability, sustaining demand through major retailers such as , , and . Consumer surveys affirm ongoing moderate acclaim, with Midget Gems garnering a 52% positive rating and ranking 131st among confectionery items, indicative of persistent, if not dominant, appeal in a competitive market dominated by and softer candies. This enduring presence highlights their niche as a heritage gum sweet, prized for authenticity amid evolving preferences toward vegan and low-sugar alternatives, yet retaining favor among traditionalists.

Market Presence and Consumer Reception

Midget Gems hold a niche but enduring position in the UK market, with Confectionery continuing production under the original name since their introduction in 1903 as one of the company's flagship products, particularly popular in . The sweets are distributed through major retailers including , , and specialist online vendors like SoSweet and AQuarterOf, often in bulk packs ranging from 130g bags to 2kg boxes, catering to both retail and wholesale demands. While some retailers like rebranded their version to Mini Gems in January 2022 amid concerns over terminology, 's Midget Gems remain available without alteration, reflecting sustained demand for the traditional product. Consumer reception remains largely positive, driven by nostalgic associations and sensory qualities such as firm chewiness and intense fruit flavors including lime, , and . A survey ranks Midget Gems as the 131st most popular item among respondents, with 52% expressing favorable views based on 711 participants polled. Retailer feedback, including Amazon listings for variants, reports average ratings of 4.5 out of 5 from hundreds of reviews, praising value, authenticity, and lack of artificial aftertaste, though some note the can challenge dental work. This reception underscores their status as a British treat, with minimal evidence of declining interest despite broader market shifts toward softer or vegan alternatives.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.