Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Neutron cross section
View on Wikipedia| Science with neutrons |
|---|
| Foundations |
| Neutron scattering |
| Other applications |
|
| Infrastructure |
|
| Neutron facilities |
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2011) |
In nuclear physics, the concept of a neutron cross section is used to express the likelihood of interaction between an incident neutron and a target nucleus. The neutron cross section σ can be defined as the area for which the number of neutron-nuclei reactions taking place is equal to the product of the number of incident neutrons that would pass through the area and the number of target nuclei.[1][page needed] In conjunction with the neutron flux, it enables the calculation of the reaction rate, for example to derive the thermal power of a nuclear power plant. The standard unit for measuring the cross section is the barn, which is equal to 10−28 m2 or 10−24 cm2. The larger the neutron cross section, the more likely a neutron will react with the nucleus.
An isotope (or nuclide) can be classified according to its neutron cross section and how it reacts to an incident neutron. Nuclides that tend to absorb a neutron and either decay or keep the neutron in its nucleus are neutron absorbers and will have a capture cross section for that reaction. Isotopes that undergo fission are fissionable fuels and have a corresponding fission cross section. The remaining isotopes will simply scatter the neutron, and have a scatter cross section. Some isotopes, like uranium-238, have nonzero cross sections of all three.
Isotopes which have a large scatter cross section and a low mass are good neutron moderators (see chart below). Nuclides which have a large absorption cross section are neutron poisons if they are neither fissile nor undergo decay. A poison that is purposely inserted into a nuclear reactor for controlling its reactivity in the long term and improve its shutdown margin is called a burnable poison.
Parameters of interest
[edit]The neutron cross section, and therefore the probability of a neutron–nucleus interaction, depends on:
- the target type (hydrogen, uranium...),
- the type of nuclear reaction (scattering, fission...).
- the incident particle energy, also called speed or temperature (thermal, fast...),
and, to a lesser extent, of:
- its relative angle between the incident neutron and the target nuclide,
- the target nuclide temperature.
Target type dependence
[edit]The neutron cross section is defined for a given type of target particle. For example, the capture cross section of deuterium 2H is much smaller than that of common hydrogen 1H.[2] This is the reason why some reactors use heavy water (in which most of the hydrogen is deuterium) instead of ordinary light water as moderator: fewer neutrons are lost by capture inside the medium, hence enabling the use of natural uranium instead of enriched uranium. This is the principle of a CANDU reactor.
Type of reaction dependence
[edit]The likelihood of interaction between an incident neutron and a target nuclide, independent of the type of reaction, is expressed with the help of the total cross section σT. However, it may be useful to know if the incoming particle bounces off the target (and therefore continue travelling after the interaction) or disappears after the reaction. For that reason, the scattering and absorption cross sections σS and σA are defined and the total cross section is simply the sum of the two partial cross sections:[3]
Absorption cross section
[edit]If the neutron is absorbed when approaching the nuclide, the atomic nucleus moves up on the table of isotopes by one position. For instance, 235U becomes 236*U with the * indicating the nucleus is highly energized. This energy has to be released and the release can take place through any of several mechanisms.
- The simplest way for the release to occur is for the neutron to be ejected by the nucleus. If the neutron is emitted immediately, it acts the same as in other scattering events.
- The nucleus may emit gamma radiation.
- The nucleus may β− decay, where a neutron is converted into a proton, an electron and an electron-type antineutrino (the antiparticle of the neutrino)
- About 81% of the 236*U nuclei are so energized that they undergo fission, releasing the energy as kinetic motion of the fission fragments, also emitting between one and five free neutrons.
- Nuclei that undergo fission as their predominant decay method after neutron capture include 233U, 235U, 237U, 239Pu, 241Pu.
- Nuclei that predominantly absorb neutrons and then emit beta particle radiation lead to these isotopes, e.g., 232Th absorbs a neutron and becomes 233*Th, which beta decays to become 233Pa, which in turn beta decays to become 233U.
- Isotopes that undergo beta decay transmute from one element to another element. Those that undergo gamma or X-ray emission do not cause a change in element or isotope.
Scattering cross-section
[edit]The scattering cross-section can be further subdivided into coherent scattering and incoherent scattering, which is caused by the spin dependence of the scattering cross-section and, for a natural sample, presence of different isotopes of the same element in the sample.
Because neutrons interact with the nuclear potential, the scattering cross-section varies for different isotopes of the element in question. A very prominent example is hydrogen and its isotope deuterium. The total cross-section for hydrogen is over 10 times that of deuterium, mostly due to the large incoherent scattering length of hydrogen. Some metals are rather transparent to neutrons, aluminum and zirconium being the two best examples of this.
Incident particle energy dependence
[edit]
For a given target and reaction, the cross section is strongly dependent on the neutron speed. In the extreme case, the cross section can be, at low energies, either zero (the energy for which the cross section becomes significant is called threshold energy) or much larger than at high energies.
Therefore, a cross section should be defined either at a given energy or should be averaged in an energy range (or group).
As an example, the plot on the right shows that the fission cross section of uranium-235 is low at high neutron energies but becomes higher at low energies. Such physical constraints explain why most operational nuclear reactors use a neutron moderator to reduce the energy of the neutron and thus increase the probability of fission which is essential to produce energy and sustain the chain reaction.
A simple estimation of energy dependence of any kind of cross section is provided by the Ramsauer model,[4] which is based on the idea that the effective size of a neutron is proportional to the breadth of the probability density function of where the neutron is likely to be, which itself is proportional to the neutron's thermal de Broglie wavelength.
Taking as the effective radius of the neutron, we can estimate the area of the circle in which neutrons hit the nuclei of effective radius as
While the assumptions of this model are naive, it explains at least qualitatively the typical measured energy dependence of the neutron absorption cross section. For neutrons of wavelength much larger than typical radius of atomic nuclei (1–10 fm, E = 10–1000 keV) can be neglected. For these low energy neutrons (such as thermal neutrons) the cross section is inversely proportional to neutron velocity.
This explains the advantage of using a neutron moderator in fission nuclear reactors. On the other hand, for very high energy neutrons (over 1 MeV), can be neglected, and the neutron cross section is approximately constant, determined just by the cross section of atomic nuclei.
However, this simple model does not take into account so called neutron resonances, which strongly modify the neutron cross section in the energy range of 1 eV–10 keV, nor the threshold energy of some nuclear reactions.
Target temperature dependence
[edit]Cross sections are usually measured at 20 °C. To account for the dependence with temperature of the medium (viz. the target), the following formula is used:[3]
where σ is the cross section at temperature T, and σ0 the cross section at temperature T0 (T and T0 in kelvins).
The energy is defined at the most likely energy and velocity of the neutron. The neutron population consists of a Maxwellian distribution, and hence the mean energy and velocity will be higher. Consequently, also a Maxwellian correction-term 1⁄2√π has to be included when calculating the cross-section Equation 38.
Doppler broadening
[edit]The Doppler broadening of neutron resonances is a very important phenomenon and improves nuclear reactor stability. The prompt temperature coefficient of most thermal reactors is negative, owing to the nuclear Doppler effect. Nuclei are located in atoms which are themselves in continual motion owing to their thermal energy (temperature). As a result of these thermal motions, neutrons impinging on a target appears to the nuclei in the target to have a continuous spread in energy. This, in turn, has an effect on the observed shape of resonance. The resonance becomes shorter and wider than when the nuclei are at rest.
Although the shape of resonances changes with temperature, the total area under the resonance remains essentially constant. But this does not imply constant neutron absorption. Despite the constant area under resonance a resonance integral, which determines the absorption, increases with increasing target temperature. This, of course, decreases coefficient k (negative reactivity is inserted).
Link to reaction rate and interpretation
[edit]
Imagine a spherical target (shown as the dashed grey and red circle in the figure) and a beam of particles (in blue) "flying" at speed v (vector in blue) in the direction of the target. We want to know how many particles impact it during time interval dt. To achieve it, the particles have to be in the green cylinder in the figure (volume V). The base of the cylinder is the geometrical cross section of the target perpendicular to the beam (surface σ in red) and its height the length travelled by the particles during dt (length v dt):
Noting n the number of particles per unit volume, there are n V particles in the volume V, which will, per definition of V, undergo a reaction. Noting r the reaction rate onto one target, it gives:
It follows directly from the definition of the neutron flux[3] = n v:
Assuming that there is not one but N targets per unit volume, the reaction rate R per unit volume is:
Knowing that the typical nuclear radius r is of the order of 10−12 cm, the expected nuclear cross section is of the order of π r2 or roughly 10−24 cm2 (thus justifying the definition of the barn). However, if measured experimentally ( σ = R / (Φ N) ), the experimental cross sections vary enormously. As an example, for slow neutrons absorbed by the (n, γ) reaction the cross section in some cases (xenon-135) is as much as 2,650,000 barns, while the cross sections for transmutations by gamma-ray absorption are in the neighborhood of 0.001 barn (§ Typical cross sections has more examples).
The so-called nuclear cross section is consequently a purely conceptual quantity representing how big the nucleus should be to be consistent with this simple mechanical model.
Continuous versus average cross section
[edit]Cross sections depend strongly on the incoming particle speed. In the case of a beam with multiple particle speeds, the reaction rate R is integrated over the whole range of energy:
Where σ(E) is the continuous cross section, Φ(E) the differential flux and N the target atom number.
In order to obtain a formulation equivalent to the mono energetic case, an average cross section is defined:
Where Φ = Φ(E) dE is the integral flux.
Using the definition of the integral flux Φ and the average cross section σ, the same formulation as before is found:
Microscopic versus macroscopic cross section
[edit]Up to now, the cross section referred to in this article corresponds to the microscopic cross section σ. However, it is possible to define the macroscopic cross section[3] Σ which corresponds to the total "equivalent area" of all target particles per unit volume:
where N is the atomic density of the target.
Therefore, since the cross section can be expressed in cm2 and the density in cm−3, the macroscopic cross section is usually expressed in cm−1. Using the equation derived above, the reaction rate R can be derived using only the neutron flux Φ and the macroscopic cross section Σ:
Mean free path
[edit]The mean free path λ of a random particle is the average length between two interactions. The total length L that non perturbed particles travel during a time interval dt in a volume dV is simply the product of the length l covered by each particle during this time with the number of particles N in this volume:
Noting v the speed of the particles and n is the number of particles per unit volume:
It follows:
Using the definition of the neutron flux[3] Φ
It follows:
This average length L is however valid only for unperturbed particles. To account for the interactions, L is divided by the total number of reactions R to obtain the average length between each collision λ:
From § Microscopic versus macroscopic cross section:
It follows:
where λ is the mean free path and Σ is the macroscopic cross section.
Within stars
[edit]Because 8Li and 12Be form natural stopping points on the table of isotopes for hydrogen fusion, it is believed that all of the higher elements are formed in very hot stars where higher orders of fusion predominate. A star like the Sun produces energy by the fusion of simple 1H into 4He through a series of reactions. It is believed that when the inner core exhausts its 1H fuel, the Sun will contract, slightly increasing its core temperature until 4He can fuse and become the main fuel supply. Pure 4He fusion leads to 8Be, which decays back to 2 4He; therefore the 4He must fuse with isotopes either more or less massive than itself to result in an energy producing reaction. When 4He fuses with 2H or 3H, it forms stable isotopes 6Li and 7Li respectively. The higher order isotopes between 8Li and 12C are synthesized by similar reactions between hydrogen, helium, and lithium isotopes.
Typical cross sections
[edit]
Some cross sections that are of importance in a nuclear reactor are given in the following table.
- The thermal cross-section is averaged using a Maxwellian spectrum.
- The fast cross section is averaged using the uranium-235 fission spectrum.
The cross sections were taken from the JEFF-3.1.1 library using JANIS software.[5]
| Nucleon | Thermal cross section (barn) | Fast cross section (barn) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scattering | Capture | Fission | Scattering | Capture | Fission | ||
| Moderator | 1H | 20 | 0.2 | - | 4 | 0.00004 | - |
| 2H | 4 | 0.0003 | - | 3 | 0.000007 | - | |
| 12C | 5 | 0.002 | - | 2 | 0.00001 | - | |
| Structural materials, others |
197Au | 8.2 | 98.7 | - | 4 | 0.08 | - |
| 90Zr | 5 | 0.006 | - | 5 | 0.006 | - | |
| 56Fe | 10 | 2 | - | 20 | 0.003 | - | |
| 52Cr | 3 | 0.5 | - | 3 | 0.002 | - | |
| 59Co | 6 | 37.2 | - | 4 | 0.006 | - | |
| 58Ni | 20 | 3 | - | 3 | 0.008 | - | |
| 16O | 4 | 0.0001 | - | 3 | 0.00000003 | - | |
| Absorber | 10B | 2 | 200 | - | 2 | 0.4 | - |
| 113Cd | 100 | 30,000 | - | 4 | 0.05 | - | |
| 135Xe | 400,000 | 2,000,000 | - | 5 | 0.0008 | - | |
| 115In | 2 | 100 | - | 4 | 0.02 | - | |
| Fuel | 235U | 10 | 99 | 583[6] | 4 | 0.09 | 1 |
| 238U | 9 | 2 | 0.00002 | 5 | 0.07 | 0.3 | |
| 239Pu | 8 | 269 | 748 | 5 | 0.05 | 2 | |
* negligible, less than 0.1% of the total cross section and below the Bragg scattering cutoff
External links
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ McLane, Victoria; Dunford, Charles L.; Rose, Philip F. (2 December 2012). Neutron Cross Sections. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-14222-9. OCLC 1044711235.
- ^ "ENDF/B-VII Incident-Neutron Data". Los Alamos National Laboratory. 15 July 2007. Archived from the original on 6 April 2012. Retrieved 2011-11-08.
- ^ a b c d e DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory, DOE-HDBK-1019/1-93 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original on 2014-03-19. Retrieved 2023-03-13.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link). - ^ R. W. Bauer, J. D. Anderson, S. M. Grimes, V. A. Madsen, Application of Simple Ramsauer Model to Neutron Total Cross Sections, https://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/641282-MK9s2L/webviewable/641282.pdf
- ^ JANIS software, https://www.oecd-nea.org/janis/ Archived 2020-09-10 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Atlas of Neutron Resonances Thermal Cross Sections & Resonance Integrals". Archived from the original on 2017-02-20. Retrieved 2014-04-11.
Neutron cross section
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Definition and measurement
The neutron cross section quantifies the probability of interaction between an incident neutron and a target nucleus, serving as a measure of the likelihood for specific nuclear reactions such as elastic scattering, inelastic scattering, or absorption. Conceptually, it is analogous to the geometric cross-sectional area presented by the nucleus to the incoming neutron, providing an effective interaction "target" that extends far beyond the nucleus's physical radius of about 10^{-15} m due to quantum mechanical effects. This analogy originated in Ernest Rutherford's early 20th-century experiments on alpha particle scattering, where the probability of deflection was interpreted in terms of an equivalent scattering area, laying the groundwork for modern nuclear cross-section formalism.[6][7] The standard unit for expressing neutron cross sections is the barn (b), defined as m², which approximates the order of magnitude of interaction areas observed in nuclear processes involving heavy elements like uranium. Physically, the cross section represents the effective area per nucleus for a given reaction type; for example, a high absorption cross section implies a large effective capture area, increasing the chance that an incoming neutron will be absorbed rather than scattered. This probabilistic interpretation allows cross sections to be used in calculations of reaction rates in nuclear reactors and other applications, where larger values correspond to higher interaction probabilities under identical flux conditions.[8][9] The microscopic cross section is formally defined through the relation where is the reaction rate (reactions per unit volume per unit time), is the neutron flux (neutrons per unit area per unit time), and is the number density of target nuclei (nuclei per unit volume). This equation arises from basic probability considerations: the flux determines the number of neutrons incident on a unit area per unit time, and gives the probability per unit volume that a reaction occurs, yielding as the product .[5] Neutron cross sections are experimentally determined using collimated neutron beams generated in nuclear research reactors or particle accelerators, which provide controlled fluxes of neutrons across thermal to fast energy ranges. In reactor facilities, neutrons are thermalized or filtered to isolate specific spectra, while accelerators produce monoenergetic or shaped beams via reactions such as proton bombardment on light targets. Detection methods include monitoring fission fragments from induced fission in actinide targets or detecting characteristic gamma rays from capture or inelastic scattering events, often using high-resolution spectrometers to identify reaction products.[10][11] Resonance integrals, which capture the integrated cross section over the epithermal energy region where neutron-nucleus resonances dominate, are measured via activation techniques: thin target foils are irradiated in a well-characterized neutron spectrum, and the resulting radioactive isotopes are quantified through gamma spectroscopy relative to monitor reactions with known cross sections. These methods ensure accurate determination of effective interaction probabilities in regimes relevant to reactor design and nuclear astrophysics.[12]Units and notation
The primary unit for neutron cross sections is the barn (b), a non-SI unit equal to m² or cm², chosen to reflect the approximate geometric scale of nuclear interactions.[1] Subunits include the millibarn (mb = b) and microbarn (μb = b), which accommodate the wide range of cross section magnitudes observed in experiments, from thermal neutron absorption values around 1000 b to fast neutron scattering below 1 b.[13] Conversions to SI units are standard in international evaluations, ensuring compatibility with broader particle physics contexts.[14] The term "barn" originated in the early 1940s during nuclear physics research at Purdue University, where it was humorously adopted to denote the effective "target area" of atomic nuclei, roughly the size of a barn door compared to subatomic scales.[13] This nomenclature became widespread in the post-World War II era, particularly with the Manhattan Project's emphasis on neutron-induced reactions in uranium.[1] The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has since formalized notation standards through its neutron cross-section evaluations, promoting consistent use of symbols across global databases and experiments.[14] Standard symbols in neutron cross section literature include for the total microscopic cross section (probability per nucleus), with denoting the absorption component and the scattering component; these distinguish reaction channels in partial cross section analyses.[15] Macroscopic equivalents, representing bulk material interactions, use uppercase , , and , scaled by atomic number density to link microscopic probabilities to reactor-scale transport calculations.[16] For resonance phenomena, the width parameter quantifies the energy breadth of neutron-induced levels, typically expressed in electronvolts (eV), as in the neutron width or radiative width .[17] Angle-dependent interactions employ the differential cross section , where is the solid angle, to describe scattering distributions in barns per steradian (b/sr).[18] These conventions, rooted in the microscopic cross section framework, facilitate precise data compilation in evaluated libraries like ENDF.[19]Types of Cross Sections
Microscopic cross section
The microscopic cross section, denoted as σ, represents the effective interaction probability or "target area" presented by a single target nucleus to an incident neutron, independent of the material's density or number of nuclei. It is formally defined as the ratio of the number of reactions occurring with a single nucleus to the product of the neutron flux φ (neutrons per unit area per unit time) and the number of target nuclei N, given by σ = n_reactions / (φ × N). This quantity, typically measured in barns (1 barn = 10^{-28} m²), quantifies the likelihood of specific neutron-induced reactions such as scattering, absorption, or fission for an individual nuclide.[4][8] From a quantum mechanical perspective, microscopic cross sections are calculated using methods such as partial wave analysis, which decomposes the scattering wave function into angular momentum components to determine phase shifts and thus the interaction probability, particularly effective for low-energy neutrons where s-wave dominance occurs. For higher energies or weaker potentials, the Born approximation provides an perturbative estimate by treating the scattering potential as a first-order perturbation in the plane wave solution of the Schrödinger equation. These approaches enable theoretical predictions that align with experimental measurements for specific nuclides.[20][21] Microscopic cross sections exhibit significant isotopic specificity, varying markedly between nuclides due to differences in nuclear structure and binding energies. For instance, uranium-235 (U-235) has a thermal neutron fission cross section of approximately 583 barns, a radiative capture cross section of 98 barns, and elastic scattering cross section of about 10 barns, yielding a total of approximately 691 barns, whereas uranium-238 (U-238) shows negligible thermal fission (near 0 barns) and a capture cross section of 2.7 barns, with a total around 11 barns dominated by elastic scattering (~8.5 barns). Such variations underpin selective neutron interactions in nuclear applications, like fission in U-235 but not in U-238 at thermal energies.[22] For fissile materials, the total microscopic cross section σ_t is the sum of the absorption cross section σ_a (including radiative capture σ_γ and fission σ_f) and the scattering cross section σ_s (elastic and inelastic components), expressed as This decomposition highlights the competing reaction channels available to the neutron. The macroscopic cross section, in turn, derives from the microscopic one by multiplying by the atomic number density of the material.[4][8]Macroscopic cross section
The macroscopic cross section, denoted as , quantifies the likelihood of neutron interactions within a bulk material and is defined as the product of the atomic number density (number of atoms per unit volume) and the corresponding microscopic cross section , expressed as .[4] This parameter has units of inverse length, typically cm⁻¹, reflecting its role as an interaction probability per unit path length rather than per individual nucleus.[23] Unlike the microscopic cross section, which pertains to single-target interactions, incorporates material density effects, making it essential for describing neutron propagation in extended media such as fuels or moderators in nuclear reactors.[24] In neutron transport calculations, the macroscopic cross section appears prominently in the Boltzmann transport equation, which governs the angular flux distribution of neutrons. A common simplification, the diffusion approximation, yields the steady-state equation for the scalar neutron flux : where is the diffusion coefficient (related to the transport cross section), is the macroscopic absorption cross section, and represents the neutron source term.[25] This form is widely used in reactor design to model flux profiles and reactivity, as it balances neutron leakage, absorption, and production while assuming isotropic scattering and small absorption relative to scattering.[26] The total macroscopic cross section (sum of absorption, scattering, and other components) determines the overall attenuation of a neutron beam through a material of thickness , following the exponential law: where is the initial intensity and the transmitted intensity; this Beer's law analog is fundamental for shielding assessments.[4] For heterogeneous materials, such as composite reactor fuels or structural assemblies, the effective macroscopic cross section is typically computed as a volume-weighted average over the constituent phases to homogenize the medium for transport simulations.[27] This averaging assumes spatial uniformity on scales larger than local heterogeneities and preserves key transport properties like reactivity and flux depression. The mean free path, defined as the reciprocal of , provides a characteristic length scale for neutron travel between interactions in such homogenized systems.[23]Continuous and average cross sections
Neutron cross sections are fundamentally represented as continuous functions of the incident neutron energy, denoted as , where captures the energy-dependent probability of interaction between the neutron and target nucleus. This continuous form arises from quantum mechanical descriptions, such as the R-matrix theory, which parameterizes cross sections through resonance parameters and scattering phases. In practice, is often visualized on log-log scales to highlight the wide dynamic range of values, spanning orders of magnitude from thermal energies (~0.025 eV) to fast neutron regimes (>1 MeV), facilitating analysis of trends like thresholds and peaks.[28] A key feature of in the resolved resonance region (typically 0.1 eV to a few keV) is the handling of isolated resonances, modeled using the Breit-Wigner formula for single-level approximations. For an isolated s-wave resonance, the cross section is given by where is the de Broglie wavelength of the neutron, and are the total and target nucleus spins, and are the neutron and total widths, and is the resonance energy. This Lorentzian-shaped form peaks sharply at with a maximum value proportional to , reflecting the enhanced interaction probability near the compound nucleus formation energy. The formula assumes negligible interference from neighboring resonances and is widely applied in evaluated nuclear data libraries for accurate representation of capture and scattering processes.[28] In scenarios involving polychromatic neutron beams or spectra, such as those in reactors or astrophysical environments, the continuous is often replaced by an average cross section to compute effective reaction rates. This is defined as where is the neutron flux spectrum. For thermal neutrons in equilibrium with a Maxwellian distribution at temperature , , yielding the Maxwellian-averaged cross section (MACS), which weights toward lower energies where capture dominates. Similarly, for fission spectra approximating a Watt distribution, integrates over the broader fast-neutron tail, reducing sensitivity to thermal resonances. These averages are essential for multi-group transport calculations, where the continuous spectrum is discretized into finite energy groups with constant averaged cross sections within each group; evaluations often incorporating statistical fluctuations in unresolved resonance regions.[15][28] At low energies below the first resonance (epithermal to thermal regime), an effective approximation known as the 1/v law simplifies , where the absorption cross section scales inversely with neutron velocity , or . This behavior emerges from the constant partial width in the Breit-Wigner form as , combined with the incoming wave normalization proportional to , leading to for a reference velocity . The 1/v law holds well for many isotopes like ^{238}U and ^{59}Co in the thermal range, enabling straightforward scaling in reactor design but deviates near zero energy or for isotopes with anomalous thresholds.[28]Dependencies
Energy dependence
Neutron cross sections exhibit a strong dependence on the incident neutron energy, reflecting the quantum mechanical nature of neutron-nucleus interactions and the varying probabilities of processes like absorption, scattering, and fission across energy regimes. In the thermal neutron regime, where energies are below 0.5 eV, absorption cross sections typically follow the 1/v law, proportional to the inverse of the neutron velocity, or equivalently σ ∝ 1/√E, due to the dominance of s-wave capture where the interaction probability increases as the neutron spends more time near the nucleus.[5] This behavior arises from the constant neutron flux in velocity space for low energies, making slower neutrons more likely to be captured.[29] For s-wave capture, the cross section is given by where σ₀ is the cross section at the reference thermal velocity v₀ = 2200 m/s (corresponding to E ≈ 0.025 eV), and v is the neutron velocity; this relation holds well for many isotopes like ¹²⁵Te and ¹⁵¹Eu.[5][15] For example, the fission cross section of ²³⁵U is approximately 585 barns at 0.025 eV under this regime.[30] The epithermal and resonance region spans energies from about 0.5 eV to 100 keV, characterized by highly structured cross sections with narrow peaks at specific resonance energies where the incident neutron energy matches excited states of the compound nucleus, enhancing reaction probabilities through resonant scattering or capture.[5] These resonances, described by the Breit-Wigner formalism, appear as Lorentzian-shaped peaks with a central energy E_r and width Γ, leading to cross sections that can exceed thousands of barns at peak values before dropping sharply.[31] For instance, ²³⁸U shows prominent resonances around 6.67 eV, influencing capture and scattering in reactor spectra.[32] In some heavy nuclei, broader features akin to giant resonances may contribute, but narrow isolated peaks dominate for most practical analyses in this range.[5] For fast neutrons with energies above 100 keV, cross sections generally decrease with increasing energy as the neutron's de Broglie wavelength shortens, reducing the effective interaction time with the nucleus and lowering probabilities for absorption or fission compared to lower energies.[5] In this regime, total cross sections stabilize around 2–4 barns due to geometric shadowing in the optical model, while absorption components remain small (e.g., ²³⁵U fission cross section ≈ 1 barn at 1 MeV), with further suppression in reactions emitting charged particles due to the Coulomb barrier.[5][33] This decline underscores the need for moderation in applications like nuclear reactors to exploit higher low-energy cross sections.[5]Temperature dependence
The temperature dependence of neutron cross sections originates from the thermal motion of target nuclei, which introduces a distribution of relative velocities between the incident neutron and the nucleus in the laboratory frame. Although the intrinsic microscopic cross section in the center-of-mass frame remains independent of temperature, the observed cross section in the lab frame requires averaging over the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution of the target atoms. This averaging yields an effective cross section that accounts for the relative velocity , expressed as where is the zero-temperature cross section as a function of relative speed, and is the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution for the target's thermal velocities.[34] This effect is particularly pronounced for low-energy neutrons, where thermal motions significantly alter the interaction probabilities compared to the zero-temperature baseline from energy dependence considerations. A key manifestation of this thermal averaging is Doppler broadening, which widens the sharp resonances in the cross section energy profile due to the Doppler shift induced by target motion. Resonances, typically Lorentzian-shaped with natural width , convolve with a Gaussian distribution from the velocity spread, resulting in an effective resonance width , where is the Doppler term. The Doppler broadening is quantified by with the resonance energy, Boltzmann's constant, the temperature, and the target's mass number; this Gaussian widening reduces peak heights and fills valleys between resonances, smoothing the overall cross section profile.[35] In high-temperature regimes, such as those in plasmas relevant to fusion research, the thermal velocities approach relativistic speeds, introducing minor corrections to the non-relativistic averaging and kinematics. These relativistic effects modify the velocity distribution and relative energy calculations but remain negligible for typical plasma temperatures below several keV, where for ions.[36]Target and reaction type dependence
The neutron cross section exhibits strong dependence on the target nucleus's isotopic identity and structural features, reflecting underlying nuclear shell model effects. Nuclei with odd mass numbers (odd-A) typically display higher radiative capture cross sections than adjacent even-even isotopes, a phenomenon known as odd-even staggering. This arises from the pairing interaction in even-even nuclei, which increases the energy gap to the first excited state and reduces the density of accessible final states for neutron capture, leading to lower average resonance strengths.[37] Closed-shell or magic nuclei further accentuate this target dependence, often showing suppressed absorption cross sections due to their exceptional stability from filled neutron or proton shells. For example, the neutron magic nucleus ^{90}Zr (N=50) has a notably low thermal neutron capture cross section, acting as a bottleneck in the s-process nucleosynthesis by hindering neutron flow through the isotopic chain.[38] In contrast, certain isotopes far from closed shells exhibit exceptionally high absorption, such as ^{113}Cd, which possesses a thermal radiative capture cross section of about 20,000 barns owing to favorable resonance parameters near the neutron separation energy, making it a potent neutron poison in nuclear reactors.[39] Beyond target structure, cross sections vary markedly by reaction type, with distinct partial cross sections for different interaction channels. Elastic scattering dominates at low energies for most targets, conserving the neutron's kinetic energy while deflecting it; inelastic scattering becomes prominent at higher energies, exciting the nucleus and leading to gamma emission. Absorption reactions, including radiative capture ((n,γ)) and fission ((n,f)) for fissile nuclei, remove the neutron from the incident flux, with capture prevalent in light and medium-mass targets and fission in heavy actinides like ^{235}U. The scattering cross section σ_s aggregates elastic and inelastic contributions, while the absorption cross section σ_a sums capture and fission pathways.[8] These partial cross sections collectively determine the total interaction probability, as expressed by the microscopic cross section framework: where the sum runs over all open channels (elastic, inelastic, capture, fission, etc.), ensuring conservation of the total reaction probability.[8] This decomposition highlights how target-specific nuclear properties modulate individual channel contributions, influencing overall neutron behavior in materials.Related Concepts
Reaction rate linkage
The reaction rate for neutron-induced nuclear reactions quantifies the number of interactions occurring per unit volume per unit time and is fundamentally tied to the neutron cross section, providing a probabilistic measure of interaction likelihood in ensembles of particles. In a system where neutrons interact with target nuclei, the reaction rate density is expressed as for a monoenergetic neutron beam, where is the target nucleus density, is the neutron flux, and is the microscopic cross section for the specific reaction.[32] This formulation interprets the cross section as the effective interaction area per target nucleus, enabling the prediction of reaction probabilities in dynamic systems like chain reactions, where successive neutron captures or fissions amplify the overall rate.[32] In realistic scenarios involving non-monoenergetic neutron beams, such as those in nuclear reactors or astrophysical environments, the reaction rate requires integration over the neutron energy spectrum to account for varying cross sections. The effective reaction rate becomes , where is the differential flux, equivalent to with the spectrum-averaged cross section and total flux .[40] This averaging ensures accurate rate calculations by incorporating the full flux distribution, highlighting how cross section energy dependence directly influences the macroscopic behavior of neutron populations. The macroscopic cross section further links to flux attenuation in these rates, simplifying volume-integrated predictions.[32] In stellar nucleosynthesis, where both neutrons and target nuclei follow thermal velocity distributions, the reaction rate adopts a form emphasizing relative velocities: , with and as the densities of neutrons and targets, the velocity-averaged product of cross section and relative speed, and if the particles are identical (to avoid double-counting) or 0 otherwise.[41] This equation captures the thermonuclear reaction probability in plasmas, where integrates over the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, underscoring the cross section's role in determining element formation rates under stellar conditions.[42]Mean free path
The mean free path, denoted as , represents the average distance a neutron travels before undergoing an interaction with a nucleus in the surrounding material. It is defined as the reciprocal of the total macroscopic cross section, , where quantifies the overall probability of interaction per unit length.[43] This concept derives from a probabilistic model of neutron transport, assuming interactions occur randomly along the neutron's path. The probability that a neutron travels a distance without interaction and then interacts in the interval follows an exponential distribution: the probability density function is . The mean free path is the expected value of this distribution, , reflecting the characteristic scale over which neutrons propagate freely.[4] The value of depends on both the neutron's energy and the properties of the medium. At thermal energies, absorption cross sections are often larger, leading to shorter mean free paths in materials with high-affinity absorbers; for instance, in boron-containing compounds, can be on the order of millimeters due to the exceptionally high thermal neutron absorption cross section of B (approximately 3840 barns). In contrast, in light water, for thermal neutrons is typically several centimeters, illustrating how material composition influences neutron penetration. In the context of neutron diffusion theory, assuming isotropic scattering and low absorption, the diffusion coefficient —which describes the spatial spread of the neutron flux—is approximated as , where here refers to the transport mean free path. This relation connects the microscopic interaction probabilities, aggregated in , to macroscopic transport behavior.[44]Applications
In nuclear reactors
Neutron cross sections play a central role in nuclear reactor physics by determining the balance between neutron production and loss, which governs criticality. The effective multiplication factor quantifies this balance as the ratio of neutrons produced by fission in one generation to the number absorbed or lost by leakage in the previous generation; a reactor is critical when , subcritical when , and supercritical when . In an infinite, homogeneous medium, the infinite multiplication factor simplifies to , where is the average number of neutrons emitted per fission (typically around 2.43 for U-235), is the macroscopic fission cross section, and is the macroscopic absorption cross section encompassing both fission and capture processes. For finite reactors, , with the non-leakage probability accounting for neutron escape.[45][46] Moderation and absorption cross sections are crucial for sustaining the chain reaction in thermal reactors, where fast fission neutrons must be slowed to thermal energies for efficient fission. Hydrogen-1 in light water serves as an effective moderator due to its high scattering cross section (total ~82 barns for bound H in H₂O, with elastic component ~20 barns for free H) and low absorption cross section of 0.33 barns at thermal energies, enabling neutrons to lose significant energy per collision—up to half their speed on average—while minimizing parasitic absorption.[47] In contrast, the thermal fission cross section of U-235 is substantially higher at about 583 barns, allowing moderated neutrons to induce fission and produce new neutrons, thus maintaining the chain. This interplay ensures that scattering in the moderator dominates over absorption until neutrons reach energies optimal for fuel fission.[48] Fuel burnup progressively alters neutron cross sections through isotope depletion and transmutation, impacting reactor performance over the fuel cycle. As fissile isotopes like U-235 deplete, decreases, reducing and necessitating compensatory measures such as control rods or fuel shuffling; simultaneously, neutron capture on U-238 produces Pu-239, which has its own fission cross section but shifts the overall isotopic composition, leading to spectral hardening and changes in absorption probabilities. These effects require burnup-dependent cross section libraries in reactor simulations to predict reactivity evolution accurately.[49][50] The four-factor formula provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how cross sections influence in thermal reactors: . Here, (reproduction factor) is , reflecting neutrons produced per absorption in fuel; (fast fission factor) accounts for additional fissions in fertile material via fast neutron cross sections; (resonance escape probability) depends on the ratio of scattering to absorption cross sections in the epithermal range, favoring materials with high scattering like hydrogen; and (thermal utilization factor) is , the fraction of thermal absorptions occurring in fuel versus coolant or structure. Each factor ties directly to microscopic and macroscopic cross sections, enabling precise reactor design and optimization. In thermal reactors, these rely on low-energy cross sections, unlike fast reactors where higher-energy dependencies prevail.[51][45]In stellar nucleosynthesis
Neutron cross sections play a pivotal role in stellar nucleosynthesis, particularly in the production of heavy elements beyond iron through neutron capture processes. In the slow neutron capture process (s-process), which occurs primarily in the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase of low- to intermediate-mass stars (typically 1.5 to 8 solar masses), neutron absorption cross sections (σ_a) determine the efficiency of sequential captures on seed nuclei like iron-group elements. These captures proceed slowly compared to beta decay, allowing the nucleosynthesis path to follow the valley of beta stability, with σ_a values typically measured in the keV energy range to match stellar conditions. The main neutron source is the ^{13}C(α,n)^{16}O reaction, activated at temperatures around 0.8–1 × 10^8 K, while a secondary source, ^{22}Ne(α,n)^{25}Mg, operates at higher temperatures of 3–3.2 × 10^8 K in more massive AGB stars.[52][53] In contrast, the rapid neutron capture process (r-process) takes place in explosive environments such as core-collapse supernovae or neutron star mergers, where extremely high neutron fluxes (n_n ≈ 10^{20}–10^{30} cm^{-3}) enable dozens of captures within seconds, outpacing beta decay and driving the path far from stability toward neutron-rich isotopes. Here, neutron cross sections exhibit broad energy dependence due to the high-velocity neutrons (energies up to several MeV), with capture rates influenced by neutron separation energies around 2–3 MeV near magic neutron numbers (e.g., N=82, 126), leading to abundance peaks in elements like gold and uranium. Unlike the s-process, the r-process relies on transient, high-density conditions where photodisintegration competes with capture, shaping the final isotopic distribution through subsequent beta decays and fission.[54][53] Temperature and density in stellar plasmas necessitate the use of Maxwellian-averaged cross sections, denoted as ⟨σ v⟩, which integrate the velocity-dependent cross section over a thermal Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of neutron energies, typically evaluated at kT ≈ 5–100 keV corresponding to stellar temperatures of ~10^8 K. This averaging accounts for the thermal motion in AGB envelopes or supernova ejecta, with ⟨σ v⟩ values for key isotopes like ^{56}Fe or ^{209}Bi typically spanning 10^{-20}–10^{-16} cm^3 s^{-1}, directly impacting nucleosynthesis yields. The reaction timescale for neutron capture, τ = 1 / (n_n ⟨σ v⟩), governs the competition with beta-decay half-lives (λ_β = ln(2)/t_{1/2}), determining whether the process is "slow" (τ >> t_{1/2} in s-process) or "rapid" (τ << t_{1/2} in r-process); for instance, in s-process sites, τ ≈ 10^2–10^4 years at n_n ≈ 10^7–10^9 cm^{-3}.[55][56][53]Other applications
Neutron cross sections are essential in radiation shielding, where macroscopic cross sections determine the attenuation of neutron fluxes in materials such as water, concrete, or lead, protecting against radiation damage. In nuclear medicine, they underpin therapies like boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), relying on high absorption cross sections of ^{10}B (~3840 barns thermal). Additionally, in materials science, these cross sections model radiation-induced damage and transmutation in structural materials exposed to neutron fluxes.[5][28]Typical Values
Absorption cross sections
Absorption cross sections quantify the probability of a neutron being absorbed by a nucleus, leading to reactions such as radiative capture or fission, and are crucial for understanding neutron removal in nuclear systems. These cross sections exhibit strong energy dependence, particularly at thermal energies (around 0.025 eV), where the 1/v law often applies for many nuclides, resulting in high values for certain isotopes used as neutron poisons. For instance, the thermal absorption cross section for is 3840 barns, primarily due to the reaction, making it an effective absorber in control rods. Similarly, has an exceptionally high thermal capture cross section of 254,000 barns, attributed to a low-energy resonance that enhances absorption efficiency.[57][58] Fission cross sections represent a subset of absorption processes where the nucleus splits, releasing energy and additional neutrons. In fissile materials, these are prominent at thermal energies; for , the thermal fission cross section is 582 barns, enabling sustained chain reactions in reactors. For , it is 747 barns, reflecting its higher reactivity compared to uranium, which influences fuel cycle design. These values highlight how absorption via fission dominates neutron interactions in nuclear fuels.[59][60] For non-fissile structural materials, absorption is typically dominated by radiative capture without fission. Iron-56, a common component in reactor vessels, has a thermal capture cross section of approximately 2.5 barns, which is relatively low but accumulates over time to affect long-term neutron economy. Such modest values underscore the minimal absorption impact of light elements compared to dedicated absorbers.[61] These representative values are drawn from the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF/B-VIII.0) library, released in 2018, which incorporates IAEA neutron standards and extensive experimental data for over 500 isotopes. Recent evaluations in ENDF/B-VIII.1 (2024) include minor refinements to absorption data for select actinides and structural materials, ensuring continued accuracy for applications.[62][63]| Nuclide | Reaction Type | Thermal Cross Section (barns) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorption () | 3840 | |
| Capture () | 254,000 | |
| Fission | 582 | |
| Fission | 747 | |
| Capture () | 2.5 |
| Element | Thermal Absorption Cross Section (barns) |
|---|---|
| H | 0.332 |
| C | 0.0035 |
| O | 0.00019 |
| Pb | 0.171 |
| W | 18.3 |
| U | 7.57 |
| Si | 0.171 |
| Al | 0.232 |
| Ca | 0.43 |
| Fe | 2.56 |
| B | 767 |
| Na | 0.53 |