Hubbry Logo
Nitrite testNitrite testMain
Open search
Nitrite test
Community hub
Nitrite test
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nitrite test
Nitrite test
from Wikipedia

A nitrite test is a chemical test used to determine the presence of nitrite ion in solution.

Chemical methods

[edit]

Using iron(II) sulfate

[edit]

A simple nitrite test can be performed by adding 4 M sulfuric acid to the sample until acidic, and then adding 0.1 M iron(II) sulfate to the solution. A positive test for nitrite is indicated by a dark brown solution, arising from the iron-nitric oxide complex ion. This test is related to the brown ring test for the nitrate ion,[1] which forms the same complex in a ring. In contrast, nitrites turn the whole solution brown and therefore interfere with that test.[2]

Griess test

[edit]

A common method of quantitative nitrite detection is the Griess test, which relies on the reaction of nitrite with the two components of a Griess reagent to form a red azo dye. This allows the concentration of nitrite to be determined by UV-vis spectroscopy.[3]

Urinary nitrite test

[edit]

A nitrite test is a standard component of a urinary test strip. A positive test for nitrites in the urine is called nitrituria.

This test is commonly used in diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs). A positive nitrite test indicates that the cause of the UTI is a Gram-negative organism, most commonly Escherichia coli. The reason for nitrites' existence in the presence of a UTI is due to a bacterial conversion of endogenous nitrates to nitrites. This may be a sign of infection. However, other parameters, such as leukocyte esterase, urine white blood cell count, and symptoms such as dysuria, urinary urgency, fevers, and chills must be correlated to diagnose an infection.[4]

False-negative nitrite tests in urinary tract infections occur in cases with a low colony forming unit (CFU) count, or in recently voided or dilute urine.[5] In addition, a nitrite test does not detect organisms unable to reduce nitrate to nitrite, such as enterococci, staphylococci (Staphylococcus saprophyticus), Acinetobacter, or adenovirus.[5]

See also

[edit]
  • Nitrate test
  • Saliva testing; salivary nitrite levels can serve as a surrogate biomarker for nitric oxide, a natural cardioprotective factor, derived from nitrate-rich leafy green vegetables which are often found in anti-hypertensive diets, such as the DASH diet[6]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The nitrite test, most commonly performed using the Griess reaction, is a colorimetric analytical method for detecting and quantifying nitrite ions (NO₂⁻) in aqueous samples. In this test, nitrite reacts under acidic conditions with sulfanilamide to form a diazonium salt, which then couples with N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride to produce a stable pink azo dye; the intensity of the color, measured spectrophotometrically at approximately 540 nm, is proportional to the nitrite concentration. This highly sensitive and specific assay, capable of detecting nitrite levels as low as 0.1–1 μM, was originally developed in 1879 by Johann Peter Griess and remains a standard in analytical chemistry due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. The test finds broad applications across multiple fields, including where it assesses nitrite pollution in and , as elevated levels can indicate contamination from fertilizers or and pose health risks such as in infants. In clinical diagnostics, urine tests based on the Griess screen for urinary tract infections by detecting nitrite produced from nitrate reduction by certain bacteria like . Forensic science employs modified versions, such as the modified Griess test, to visualize patterns on fabrics by reacting with nitrites from propellant combustion. Additionally, it is used in to measure residual nitrites in cured meats, which serve as preservatives but can form carcinogenic nitrosamines if excessive. Variations of the nitrite test include enzymatic methods for higher specificity in complex matrices and adaptations for in biological fluids, such as plasma, to study metabolism. Despite its widespread use, the test's sensitivity to interferences like high levels or colored samples necessitates confirmatory techniques like in regulatory contexts.

Background and Principles

Definition and chemistry of nitrites

The , denoted as NO₂⁻, is a polyatomic anion consisting of one atom bonded to two oxygen atoms, carrying a negative charge of -1. It serves as the conjugate base of (HNO₂), a weak acid with a pKa of approximately 3.3, which dissociates in to yield the nitrite and a proton. Nitrous acid itself is unstable and typically exists only in dilute solutions, decomposing to (NO) and (NO₃⁻). Nitrites exhibit dual behavior, functioning as both oxidizing and reducing agents depending on the reaction conditions. As oxidants, they can accept electrons to form or other nitrogen oxides, while as reductants, they donate electrons to yield or dinitrogen oxide. This amphoteric nature arises from the intermediate of (+3) in the nitrite ion, positioning it between (+5) and (+2). In aqueous environments, nitrites are moderately stable at neutral to alkaline but decompose in acidic conditions, highlighting their sensitivity to pH variations. Basic reactions of nitrites include diazotization, where the nitrite ion in acidic media reacts with primary amines to form diazonium salts, a fundamental to analytical detection methods. Additionally, nitrites participate in complex formation by coordinating with ions, such as iron or , to produce stable coordination compounds that aid in qualitative identification. These reactions underscore the ion's versatility in chemical assays without delving into specific procedural applications. Nitrites occur naturally in environmental compartments like , , and biological systems, primarily through microbial processes such as the bacterial reduction of (NO₃⁻) to nitrite via under anaerobic conditions. For instance, genera like and facilitate this reduction, contributing to the and nitrite accumulation in or sediments. Synthetically, nitrites are produced on an industrial scale from or oxidation, serving as intermediates in the manufacture of fertilizers, dyes, and preservatives. These sources make nitrites relevant for detection in medical diagnostics and .

Historical development

The detection of nitrites through chemical reactions began gaining attention in the early , as chemists explored the properties of and its salts, which had been isolated decades earlier. Observations of nitrite's reactivity with various reagents laid the groundwork for qualitative analytical methods, highlighting its role in color-producing transformations useful for identification in solutions. A pivotal advancement occurred in 1858 when German chemist Peter Griess discovered the diazotization reaction of arylamines with , forming stable diazo compounds that provided a foundation for sensitive nitrite detection. This breakthrough, initially pursued in the context of synthesis, enabled the development of a specific colorimetric test for nitrites by 1879, when Griess published a method involving diazotization followed by coupling to produce a red , known as the . In the late 19th century, analytical chemistry saw the emergence of the brown ring test as another qualitative approach for nitrite identification, particularly valued for its simplicity in educational and laboratory settings. This test, involving the formation of a characteristic brown-colored complex upon layering sulfuric acid over a solution containing iron(II) sulfate and nitrite, became a standard tool in qualitative inorganic analysis by the turn of the century, complementing the Griess method for confirming nitrite presence without requiring organic reagents. The brought practical integrations of detection into routine diagnostics, with the incorporation of the Griess-based reaction into commercial urinary tests in the 1970s. More recently, in 2025, researchers elucidated the electronic structure and of iron in the brown ring complex through detailed analysis, including references to prior crystallographic data, resolving long-standing debates about its bonding and reactivity.

Traditional Chemical Methods

Brown ring test using iron(II) sulfate

The brown ring test using iron(II) sulfate is a classic qualitative method for detecting nitrite ions (NO₂⁻) in aqueous solutions. The procedure begins by adding a few milliliters of fresh iron(II) sulfate solution (FeSO₄) to the test sample in a test tube. Dilute sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) is then added to acidify the mixture, followed by the careful layering of concentrated sulfuric acid along the inner wall of the test tube to create a distinct lower layer without mixing. If nitrite ions are present, a brown ring forms at the interface between the two layers due to the localized reaction in the acidic environment. The chemical mechanism involves the protonation of nitrite ions in the acidic medium to form nitrous acid (HNO₂), which decomposes to release nitric oxide (NO):
\ceNO2+H+>HNO2\ce{NO2^- + H^+ -> HNO2}
\ce3HNO2>HNO3+2NO+H2O\ce{3HNO2 -> HNO3 + 2NO + H2O}
The nitric oxide then binds to the iron(II) ion, displacing a water molecule and forming the characteristic brown-colored pentaquanitrosyliron(II) sulfate complex, [Fe(H₂O)₅NO]SO₄, where NO acts as an NO⁺ ligand in a coordination mode that results in the observed color. This complex arises from the coordination of NO to Fe²⁺, with the overall reaction supported by the reducing action of Fe²⁺ in the concentrated acid layer.
This test is highly sensitive, capable of detecting concentrations as low as 0.1 mg/L in aqueous solutions, making it suitable for qualitative of presence in samples such as or chemical mixtures. However, it is inherently qualitative, relying on visual observation of the ring rather than quantitative measurement, and potential interferences arise from ions (NO₃⁻), which can be reduced to NO under the acidic conditions if present in significant amounts, leading to false positives unless pre-treatment steps like reduction control are applied. In contrast to more quantitative colorimetric methods like the , the brown ring test provides rapid visual but lacks precision for concentration .

Griess test

The Griess test is a colorimetric method for detecting nitrite ions through a diazotization-coupling reaction. In the procedure, nitrite (NO₂⁻) first reacts with sulfanilamide in an acidic medium to form a diazonium salt intermediate. This intermediate then couples with N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine to yield a red azo dye, which exhibits strong absorbance and enables quantification. The dye's absorbance is measured at 540 nm using UV-vis spectroscopy, providing a sensitive indicator of nitrite concentration. The reaction proceeds in two main steps, beginning with the protonation and formation of nitrous acid: NO2+H+HNO2\text{NO}_2^- + \text{H}^+ \rightleftharpoons \text{HNO}_2 followed by diazotization with sulfanilamide (4-aminobenzenesulfonamide, H₂N-C₆H₄-SO₃H): HNO2+H2N-C6H4-SO3H+H+H3O+++N2-C6H4-SO3H\text{HNO}_2 + \text{H}_2\text{N-C}_6\text{H}_4\text{-SO}_3\text{H} + \text{H}^+ \rightarrow \text{H}_3\text{O}^+ + \text{}^+\text{N}_2\text{-C}_6\text{H}_4\text{-SO}_3\text{H} The diazonium salt then undergoes azo coupling with N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine (NED, C₁₀H₇-NH-CH₂CH₂-NH₂): +N2-C6H4-SO3H+C10H7-NH-CH2CH2-NH2azo dye+H+\text{}^+\text{N}_2\text{-C}_6\text{H}_4\text{-SO}_3\text{H} + \text{C}_{10}\text{H}_7\text{-NH-CH}_2\text{CH}_2\text{-NH}_2 \rightarrow \text{azo dye} + \text{H}^+ The resulting azo dye has a high molar absorptivity of approximately 50,000 L mol⁻¹ cm⁻¹ at 540 nm, contributing to the method's sensitivity. This test offers quantitative detection in the range of 0.01–1 mg/L nitrite, suitable for laboratory analysis of environmental and biological samples. Modifications, such as automated flow injection systems, enable high-throughput processing while maintaining precision.

Medical Applications

Urinary nitrite test

The urinary nitrite test is a dipstick-based diagnostic method employed in urinalysis to detect the presence of nitrites in samples, serving as an indicator for urinary tract infections (UTIs). The test strips are impregnated with Griess reagents, which react with nitrites to produce a color change from colorless to pink or red, typically observed after 60–120 seconds of exposure to the sample. This rapid procedure is integrated into routine panels, allowing for point-of-care screening in clinical settings. Biochemically, the test identifies nitrites generated by certain nitrate-reducing that convert dietary —normally present in —into nitrites during . Common culprits include Gram-negative pathogens such as and species, which possess enzymes enabling this reduction. A positive result requires not only the presence of these but also sufficient dietary nitrate intake and a bacterial load exceeding 10^5 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) in the to allow detectable nitrite accumulation. This test is particularly prevalent in Gram-negative bacterial UTIs, which account for approximately 70–80% of community-acquired cases, as these organisms are the primary nitrate reducers encountered in clinical practice.

Clinical interpretation and limitations

A positive urinary nitrite test result indicates the likely presence of a (UTI), as it detects nitrite produced by nitrate-reducing bacteria such as , which is responsible for the majority of cases. The test has a sensitivity of approximately 50% (range 35-85%), meaning it detects about half of true UTIs, and a specificity of around 95%, indicating high reliability when positive. A negative result, however, does not rule out infection, as many UTIs may go undetected due to the test's limited sensitivity. Limitations of the urinary nitrite test include frequent false negatives, which can arise from low bacterial counts (below 10^5 CFU/mL), infections caused by non-nitrate-reducing organisms such as Enterococcus species or Staphylococcus saprophyticus, or insufficient urine retention time in the bladder (less than 4 hours). False negatives are also common in dilute urine with a specific gravity below 1.005, as the nitrite concentration may fall below detectable levels, and high levels of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) can interfere by reducing the nitrite on the dipstick. False positives are rare but may occur due to sample contamination or certain pigments in the urine. In clinical practice, the nitrite test is often combined with the test on urine dipsticks to improve diagnostic accuracy for symptomatic UTIs, as recommended by guidelines from the and the European Association of . It is not suitable for screening , where urine culture remains the gold standard due to the dipstick's insufficient sensitivity.

Other Applications

Environmental and water quality testing

Nitrites enter aquatic environments primarily from agricultural runoff, which carries fertilizers and into surface waters and , as well as from effluents and industrial discharges containing nitrogenous wastes. These anthropogenic inputs elevate concentrations, contributing to and posing direct health risks, including the potential for —known as ""—in infants exposed through contaminated . To mitigate these risks, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces a maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 1 mg/L for nitrite in public systems, measured as nitrogen, under the . For laboratory analysis in environmental monitoring, the Griess test is commonly adapted into colorimetric protocols, where nitrite reacts with sulfanilamide and N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine to produce a measurable azo dye, enabling quantification in raw water, wastewater, and groundwater samples with detection limits as low as 0.0005 mg/L. In field applications, portable test kits using reagent-impregnated strips offer rapid, semi-quantitative screening of nitrite levels, typically achieving detection limits around 0.15 mg/L through visual color comparison, facilitating on-site assessments during pollution events or routine surveys. Monitoring protocols involve systematic sampling and analysis of nitrite in rivers, groundwater aquifers, and wastewater treatment effluents to track compliance with water quality standards and detect pollution hotspots, often integrated into national programs like the EPA's National Rivers and Streams Assessment. Elevated nitrite concentrations frequently correlate with higher nitrate levels, as denitrifying bacteria reduce nitrate to nitrite under anoxic conditions in sediments or low-oxygen water zones, influencing overall nitrogen cycling and remediation strategies.

Industrial and food safety uses

In the food industry, nitrite testing plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety of preserved meats by verifying compliance with regulatory limits on added nitrites, which are used as preservatives to inhibit the growth of Clostridium botulinum and prevent botulism. For instance, in cured meats such as bacon and ham, sodium nitrite is typically added at ingoing levels of 100–200 ppm to achieve these antimicrobial effects while maintaining product color and flavor. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) enforce maximum ingoing nitrite levels of 200 ppm for most cured products like ham, 156 ppm for sausages, and 120 ppm for bacon in the finished product to balance preservation benefits against health risks. Similarly, the European Union has recently tightened these limits under Regulation (EU) 2023/2108, reducing the maximum levels of added nitrites in cured meat products to 80 mg/kg for non-heat-treated items (with residuals up to 45 mg/kg; previous added levels up to 150 mg/kg), effective from 9 October 2025, primarily to minimize the formation of carcinogenic N-nitrosamines from reactions between nitrites and amines during processing or cooking. Routine testing, often via colorimetric methods like the Griess reaction adapted for food matrices, confirms residual nitrite levels post-curing to ensure they do not exceed these thresholds and to mitigate nitrosamine risks, which are classified as probable human carcinogens by regulatory bodies. In industrial manufacturing, nitrite testing is essential for process control and in sectors involving and . During fertilizer production, particularly for nitrate-based products like , on-line spectrophotometric monitoring of concentrations in process streams helps detect unwanted intermediates or impurities that could affect product stability and efficacy, with systems capable of analyzing up to 49 samples per hour for real-time adjustments. In the explosives industry, where nitro compounds such as are synthesized, testing monitors potential by-products or decomposition intermediates in reaction mixtures and waste streams to ensure safe handling and compliance with production standards, as nitrites can form during processes involving . For textile dyeing operations, which often generate containing nitrites from reduction or chemical auxiliaries, regular testing quantifies nitrite levels to prevent environmental discharge violations and optimize treatment processes like biological . Electrochemical sensors have emerged as a preferred tool for these applications, offering portable, real-time detection with limits as low as 0.1 μM in complex industrial matrices, enabling continuous monitoring for process optimization without disrupting operations. Occupational health and safety protocols incorporate nitrite testing to protect workers from exposure in handling environments, such as fertilizer plants or processing facilities, where of nitrite dust or fumes can lead to . Although the (OSHA) has not established a specific (PEL) for in air, exposure is managed under general dust standards (5 mg/m³ respirable fraction) and related gas limits, such as 5 ppm for , which can form from nitrite . Rapid field tests, including electrochemical or colorimetric kits, are deployed to verify ambient nitrite levels below action thresholds, ensuring compliance with workplace safety regulations and preventing acute toxicity incidents among employees. These measures underscore the role of nitrite testing in maintaining safe industrial and food production settings by integrating detection into routine hazard assessments.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.