Hubbry Logo
Murexide testMurexide testMain
Open search
Murexide test
Community hub
Murexide test
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Murexide test
Murexide test
from Wikipedia

The murexide test is an analytical technique to identify the presence of caffeine and other purine derivatives in a sample. These compounds do not respond to the common alkaloid identification tests such as Dragendorff's test. In this test, crude drugs (to be identified) are mixed with a tiny amount of potassium chlorate and a drop of hydrochloric acid. The sample is then evaporated to dryness and the resulting residue is exposed to ammonia vapour. Purine alkaloids produce a pinkish-purple color in this test[1][2] due to formation of murexide (ammonium purpurate; appears purple in pure state), which the test is named after.[3]

In pure form, murexide appears purple, but when it is produced by reaction of acidified solutions of purines and ammonia, various shades of purple and pink are produced.

Uses

[edit]

Murexide test is a color test for uric acid and some other purines. The (solid) sample is first treated with small volume of a concentrated acid such as hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, which is slowly evaporated away; subsequent addition of ammonia (NH3) gives a purple color if uric acid was present, due to formation of murexide, or a yellow color that turns to red on heating if xanthine or its derivatives are present.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Murexide test is a classic qualitative color test used to detect , particularly , in samples such as biological fluids or urinary calculi. It involves oxidizing the compound with to form intermediates that produce a distinctive color upon addition of , due to the formation of ammonium purpurate (murexide). This test dates to the 19th century and originated from 18th-century observations by in 1776 of color changes in guano-derived treated with oxidizing agents; murexide was later investigated as a purple dye by and in the 1830s before synthetic dyes emerged. Chemically, the reaction entails oxidative degradation of the ring in to and uramil intermediates, which condense to purpuric acid; then yields the colored murexide, whose hue results from absorption in the .

Overview and Chemistry

Definition and Principle

The Murexide test is a qualitative colorimetric analytical technique primarily employed for detecting and other derivatives in biological samples, such as . Developed in the early , it serves as a historical method for qualitative identification in clinical and biochemical contexts, with extensions to compounds like and . The underlying principle relies on the oxidative degradation of bases, exemplified by (C₅H₄N₄O₃), using dilute to generate intermediates such as (C₄H₂N₂O₄) through , ring opening, and steps. These intermediates, including uramil (5-aminobarbituric acid), then undergo condensation and ammonolysis upon addition of , forming ammonium purpurate, commonly known as murexide. This reaction yields a distinctive purple-red coloration, which is stable and specific to the presence of purines. A positive result is indicated by the transformation of the initial yellow or white residue—formed after evaporation of the nitric acid—to a vivid purple hue when exposed to ammonia vapor or dilute solution. Murexide, the endpoint indicator with the molecular formula C₈H₈N₆O₆, is responsible for this color due to its conjugated structure.

Chemical Reaction and Murexide Formation

The murexide test relies on the oxidative degradation of derivatives, such as , to form murexide (ammonium purpurate, C₈H₈N₆O₆), a colored compound used for detection. In the case of (C₅H₄N₄O₃), the reaction begins with oxidation using dilute , which breaks down the ring and yields (C₄H₂N₂O₄) as the primary intermediate, along with byproducts like , , and . This process involves acid-catalyzed hydration of the ring, followed by ring opening, nitramine formation, and , ultimately eliminating to produce . Subsequently, condenses with uramil (an intermediate reduction product, C₄H₅N₃O₃) to form purpuric acid (C₈H₅N₅O₆), a dicarboxylic derivative. Upon addition of , purpuric acid undergoes to yield murexide, characterized by its purple coloration. This two-step pathway—oxidation to and subsequent condensation—highlights the degradative nature of the reaction, where the purine structure is cleaved and reformed into a stable ammonium salt. For other purines like (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine, C₈H₁₀N₄O₂), the oxidation employs in to generate , which oxidizes the ring via hydration, ring opening, and , producing 1,3-dimethylalloxan and related intermediates. This leads to the formation of a purpuric acid analog, such as 1,3,1′,3′-tetramethylpurpuric acid, through condensation with a uramil-like (e.g., 1,3-dimethyluramil). Treatment with then forms a murexide analog, a violet ammonium purpurate salt, enabling similar colorimetric detection. The mechanism involves steps, where is displaced by , adapting the classic pathway to methylated purines. The development of the characteristic color requires specific conditions: the oxidation occurs under acidic conditions, but color formation intensifies at neutral to ammoniacal ( ~7–9), where murexide's is deprotonated, shifting from yellow-red in acid to purple-blue in base. Moderate heating (around 100°C during ) facilitates the reaction without decomposing intermediates, though excessive can degrade the product. Spectroscopically, murexide exhibits an absorption maximum at approximately 520–525 nm in , corresponding to its hue due to π–π* transitions in the conjugated purpurate ; this halochromic allows pH-sensitive color changes for qualitative .

History

Discovery

The murexide test originated in through the work of English and physician William Prout, who was studying the pathological components of and urinary calculi. This built on Carl Wilhelm Scheele's isolation of from urinary calculi in 1776. During experiments, Prout treated pure lithic (—derived from or stones—with dilute , resulting in oxidation and dissolution with . Upon neutralizing the excess acid with and evaporating the solution, he observed the formation of dark red to crystals, which he identified as an salt of a novel acid principle produced from oxidation. This reaction's distinctive coloration provided the basis for an early qualitative test to detect in biological samples. Prout detailed his findings in a seminal paper published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of , describing , properties, and analytical potential of , which he termed purpuric acid due to its vivid hue. The procedure involved careful to deepen the purple color and isolation of the acid by removing with sulfuric or , highlighting its utility in identifying organic nitrogenous substances like . This work represented a key step in the development of specific chemical tests for biomolecules. In the early , Prout's discovery emerged amid the rapid expansion of following the (1799–1815), a period that spurred intensified research in , Britain, and as scientists sought mechanistic explanations for natural substances previously shrouded in . The compound gained commercial significance in the 1830s when from Peruvian (bird excrement) became a scalable source for producing the purple dye, initially for textile applications. In 1838, German chemists Justus Liebig and renamed it murexide, drawing an analogy to the ancient dye extracted from shellfish for its similar deep purple shade, as reported in their publication in Annalen der Chemie. Over subsequent decades, the murexide reaction was extended to detect other derivatives beyond .

Applications in Early Analysis

Following Prout's discovery, the Murexide test gained prominence in the 1830s and 1840s for detecting in biological samples, particularly , to aid in diagnosing conditions such as and disorders. and detailed the test's application in their 1838 study on the oxidation of with , forming as an intermediate that produces the characteristic color upon ammoniation, enabling qualitative identification in clinical settings. This method was adopted in medical chemistry for assessing elevated levels associated with metabolic imbalances, providing an accessible tool before spectroscopic techniques emerged. In during the mid-19th century, the test was employed to evaluate fertilizers, which derive much of their value from derivatives like in bird excrement. Analyses of South American samples in the 1840s confirmed contents up to 25% in some deposits, using treatment to verify the compound's presence and estimate availability for enhancement. This application supported the trade boom, as accurate quantification helped assess quality and economic viability for European . By the 1860s, the Murexide test had become a standard procedure in qualitative organic , integrated into educational texts, which emphasized its reliability for identifying purines in complex mixtures. These works highlighted the test's evaporation of samples with followed by addition to yield the distinctive purple murexide salt, facilitating classroom demonstrations and laboratory protocols. Early adopters noted limitations, including interference from other nitrogenous compounds like or salts, which could mimic the color reaction and lead to false positives. To address this, chemists introduced refinements such as sample dilution and preliminary extraction steps to enhance specificity, as documented in 19th-century analytical reports.

Procedures

Test for Uric Acid

The Murexide test for is a classic qualitative colorimetric primarily used to detect in biological fluids like through oxidation and subsequent color development. The underlying principle involves the -mediated oxidation of to , followed by further reaction to form purpuric acid, which combines with to yield the purple purpurate (murexide).

Reagents

The test requires the following materials: concentrated (HNO₃, approximately 70%), dilute (NH₄OH, 2-5%), and the sample (e.g., or other biological fluid). A and a water bath are also essential for controlled heating.

Procedure

To perform the test, place 2-5 drops of the or sample into a clean . Add 2-3 drops of concentrated to the sample. Gently the mixture over a water bath to evaporate the contents to dryness, maintaining low to prevent charring or of organic components. During , observe color changes from yellow to orange to scarlet, confirming purine oxidation. Once dry, allow the residue to cool to . Then, add 1 drop of dilute to the cooled residue and observe the color change. A positive result is indicated by the immediate formation of a persistent purple-red color throughout the residue, confirming the presence of . The color develops due to the formation of murexide and remains stable upon gentle agitation. This method can detect approximately 1 mg of or more, with sensitivity sufficient for typical biological samples.

Precautions

Evaporation must be conducted over a water bath rather than direct flame to avoid excessive temperatures that could decompose or produce interfering byproducts. All glassware and dishes should be scrupulously clean to prevent contamination, and the procedure should be carried out in a well-ventilated area due to the release of nitrogen oxides from . Handle concentrated acids and with appropriate protective equipment to avoid skin contact or inhalation.

Variations

For solid samples suspected to contain , such as urinary calculi or precipitates, first dissolve a small portion (1-2 mg) in a minimal volume of or dilute before adding the and proceeding with the step. This ensures complete oxidation and uniform color development.

Test for Purines and Caffeine

The Murexide test for and is a qualitative analytical method specifically adapted for detecting purine alkaloids such as , , and in samples like extracts, distinguishing it through oxidative degradation followed by color development with . This variant relies on the general principle of murexide formation from purine oxidation products reacting with to yield a characteristic colored complex. The required reagents are potassium chlorate (KClO₃) as the oxidizing agent, concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl), and ammonia vapor (NH₃) for color development. For samples from sources like tea or coffee, initial preparation involves extracting the alkaloids to isolate purines: the plant material is boiled in water to obtain an aqueous extract, which is then partitioned with chloroform in a separating funnel to transfer caffeine into the organic layer; the chloroform extract is evaporated to dryness on a water bath, yielding a residue suitable for testing. The procedure begins by placing a small amount of the prepared sample residue (or pure crystals) in a dish or , adding a few crystals of KClO₃ and 1-2 drops of concentrated HCl, and mixing thoroughly. The mixture is then evaporated to dryness on a or water bath, typically taking 5-10 minutes, to facilitate oxidation. The dry residue is exposed to ammonia vapor by holding it over concentrated hydroxide or adding a drop of the solution; no heating is required at this stage. A positive result is indicated by the development of a to purple color in the residue, with shades varying by type—lighter for and deeper purple for derivatives like . The test allows qualitative detection of in alkaloid-rich extracts. Unlike the variant, which employs evaporation for direct oxidation of acidic purines in biological fluids, this method uses oxidation in HCl to handle less reactive, methylated purines like that resist degradation.

Applications

Clinical and Biochemical Uses

The Murexide test serves as a qualitative screening method for detecting in , aiding in the identification of conditions associated with elevated , such as . Biochemically, the test targets end-products of , such as derived from and breakdown, providing insight into metabolic pathways disrupted in hyperuricemic states. The test primarily remains qualitative. Today, it finds niche application in educational laboratories for demonstrating detection and in resource-limited settings for initial qualitative confirmation of presence (as of 2025). The reagent itself is non-toxic, but the procedure involves concentrated , requiring careful handling to avoid burns or fumes; results should always be corroborated with modern enzymatic methods, such as those employing uricase for specific quantification.

Forensic and Industrial Applications

In , the Murexide test is utilized for the presumptive detection of as an in illicit substances, such as samples confiscated during enforcement operations. The procedure involves treating a sample aliquot with and , evaporating it to dryness, and exposing the residue to vapor, which yields a characteristic color confirming caffeine presence. This application aids in rapid screening of drug residues and adulterated beverages suspected of containing undeclared purines. Additionally, in 20th-century , the test supported investigations of purine-based poisonings, including caffeine intoxication cases, where a purple coloration upon testing biological samples indicated the alkaloid's involvement. The test has found utility in industrial for quantification in and , particularly to verify levels in commercial products and during verification. For example, in analyses of various samples, a positive Murexide reaction—producing a or violet hue after acid treatment and ammoniation—confirms the presence of s like , ensuring compliance with labeling standards. In pharmaceutical testing, the Murexide test detects contaminants, such as and , in drug formulations and raw materials like extracts, providing a straightforward identification step prior to advanced quantification. Today, while complemented by (HPLC) for precise measurements, the Murexide test retains value for its low cost and speed in field-based presumptive screening across these domains (as of 2025).

Limitations and Considerations

Interferences and Sensitivity

The murexide test, while useful for qualitative detection of and certain , is prone to interferences from other nitrogen-containing compounds. For instance, , a related , can produce a brownish coloration rather than the characteristic purplish-red upon exposure, leading to potential misidentification or false positives. Similarly, in cases of adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) deficiency, 2,8-dihydroxyadenine stones may yield false positives with the murexide reaction, as this compound mimics 's response in spot tests. However, common urine constituents such as and do not interfere, as they fail to produce any color change under the test conditions. The test's sensitivity is limited to qualitative assessment, typically requiring only a few milligrams of sample for visible color development, but it lacks the precision of modern quantitative methods. It is less sensitive than techniques like UV spectroscopy. Factors such as sample matrix complexity can further reduce accuracy; in complex biological fluids like urine, high levels of proteins or other interferents may mask the color or lead to inconsistent results. Overheating during evaporation can also degrade intermediates, potentially yielding allantoin instead of the expected purpurate complex, though specific error rates vary. Qualitative spot tests like murexide show overall accuracy below 50% in renal stone analysis without prior purification. To mitigate these issues, sample dilution and the use of blank controls are recommended to minimize matrix effects, while adjustment to the alkaline range (around 8-9) optimizes ammonia-induced color formation. Purification steps, such as extraction or , help reduce false negatives in complex matrices. These strategies enhance reliability but underscore the test's outdated status compared to enzymatic or chromatographic alternatives.

Modern Alternatives

Contemporary methods have largely replaced the Murexide test due to advancements in specificity, , and quantitative accuracy for detecting and related purines. Enzymatic assays, particularly the uricase-peroxidase method, offer high specificity for determination by oxidizing to and , which is then quantified colorimetrically via coupling. This approach, automated in clinical laboratories since the , enables rapid processing of serum and samples with minimal interferences from other compounds. Chromatographic techniques such as (HPLC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) provide quantitative analysis of s and with detection limits around 0.1 mg/L, far surpassing the qualitative nature of the Murexide test. These methods separate and identify analytes based on retention times and mass spectra, making them essential in forensic investigations for trace detection and pharmaceutical for derivatives. For instance, HPLC with UV detection achieves linearity from 0.1 µg/mL for and its metabolites, ensuring precise quantification in complex matrices. Spectroscopic methods further enhance structural and quantitative insights. UV-Vis spectroscopy measures absorbance at 290 nm under neutral conditions, providing a direct, non-destructive with low interference in biological samples. For structural confirmation of purines, (NMR) spectroscopy elucidates molecular configurations through analysis, particularly useful in identifying tautomers and conformers in research settings. These alternatives excel in precision and reduced interferences compared to the Murexide test, as exemplified by the Folin-Wu colorimetric method introduced in 1912, which improved quantitative uric acid measurement in via phosphotungstate reduction, avoiding the subjective color interpretation of murexide. Despite these advancements, the Murexide test persists in low-resource environments and educational laboratories for its simplicity and minimal equipment needs, serving as an accessible qualitative tool.

References

  1. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/359537449_Gravimetric_Estimation_of_Caffeine_in_Different_Commercial_Kinds_of_Tea_Found_in_the_Iraqi_Market
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.