Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Patwin
View on Wikipedia
The Patwin (also Patween and Southern Wintu) are a band of Wintun people in Northern California. The Patwin comprise the southern branch of the Wintun group, native inhabitants of California since approximately 500.[1]
Today, Patwin people are enrolled in three federally recognized tribes:[2]
- Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria
- Kletsel Dehe Band of Wintun Indians
- Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation.
Territory
[edit]
The Patwin were bordered by the Yuki in the northwest; the Nomlaki (Wintun) in the north; the Konkow (Maidu) in the northeast; the Nisenan (Maidu) and Plains Miwok in the east; the Bay Miwok to the south; the Coast Miwok in the southwest; and the Wappo, Lake Miwok, and Pomo in the west.
The "Southern Patwins" have historically lived between what is now Suisun, Vacaville, and Putah Creek. By 1800, the Spanish and other European settlers forced them into small tribal units: Ululatos (Vacaville), Labaytos (Putah Creek), Malacas (Lagoon Valley), Tolenas (Upper Suisun Valley), and Suisunes (Suisun Marsh and Plain).
Language
[edit]The Patwin language is a Southern Wintuan language. As of 2021, one Patwin person was a documented first-language speaker of Patwin.[3] The Patwin language also has two main dialects.[4] The two dialects differentiate based off location. The first Patwin dialect known as River Patwin, which is mainly used along the Sacramento River located in Colusa County. The second dialect is Hill Patwin, which is the language commonly used in the hills and plains to the west of the Sacramento River. The Patwin language is also in a family of other known Indigenous languages such as Nomlaki and also as mentioned before Wintu. All together these three languages belong to the Penutian language family. However these languages are also have close relations to other Indigenous languages such as; Maiduan, Miwokan, Ohlone, and the Yokuts.
As stated earlier, one Patwin person was documented as first-language speaker. However, many tribal members and activist are pursuing the reclamation of the Yocha Dehe Wintu Nation.[5] Bertha Wright Mitchell also known as Auntie Bertha, by many is responsible for keeping the language and culture of the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation together. Teaching Patwin to the younger generation was the key component that Auntie Bertha gave to the community, keeping the language and culture thriving and from steering away of the notion that the Patwin language was becoming extinct after being listed as a at-risk language in 1997.
Population
[edit]Estimates for the pre-contact populations of most native groups in California have varied substantially. Alfred L. Kroeber put the 1770 population of the Wintun, including the Patwin, Nomlaki, and Wintu proper, at 12,000.[6] Sherburne F. Cook (1976a:180-181) estimated the combined population of the Patwin and Nomlaki at 11,300, of which 3,300 represented the southern Patwin. He subsequently raised his figure for the southern Patwin to 5,000.[7]
The migration of American settlers during the Gold Rush, which began in 1848, profoundly affected the indigenous populations of California, particularly the Patwin people. Thousands of migrants, predominantly men, flocked to California in search of wealth. This influx led to the displacement of Native communities, exposing them to diseases, violent raids, and the degradation of their environment due to resource extraction.[8][9]
Prior to the Gold Rush, the Patwin resided in settled villages throughout the western Sacramento Valley, engaging in traditional practices of hunting, gathering, and fishing. The arrival of Western migrants severely disrupted this way of life as settler expansion encroached on their lands. Areas crucial for acorn gathering and access to water were taken or destroyed to make way for mining, ranching, and agricultural development.[10]
Historian Sherburne F. Cooke documents a significant population decline among the Patwin during this period, primarily attributed to disease outbreaks such as smallpox and measles. The indirect effects of colonization and displacement further exacerbated this decline.[11] The Patwin were also compelled to perform unpaid labor in various settings, from domestic residences to mining operations, a practice that has been described as a form of “the other slavery.”[12]
By the late 1850s, the Patwin population had dwindled to a mere fraction of its pre-contact numbers, mirroring the widespread decline experienced by Indigenous tribes in California throughout the Gold Rush era.[13]
Kroeber estimated the population of the combined Wintun groups in 1910 as 1,000. By the 1920s, no Patwin remained along Putah Creek and few were left in the area.[14] Today, Wintun descendants of the three groups (i.e. the Patwin, Nomlaki, and Wintu proper) total about 2,500 people.[15]
Villages
[edit]Archaeology
[edit]Patwin Indian remains were discovered at the Mondavi Center construction site beginning in 1999, and consequently, the University of California, Davis, built a Native American Contemplative Garden within the Arboretum, a project honoring the Patwin.[16][17][18]
Notable Patwin people
[edit]- Mabel McKay (1907–1994), basket weaver and healer
- Sem-Yeto (c. 1798 – c. 1851), 19th-century leader and diplomat, also known as "Chief Solano"
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Golla 2011: 250
- ^ "Native American Contemplative Garden". University of California, Davis. March 16, 2015. Retrieved May 17, 2017.
Today, only three federally recognized Patwin (Wintun) Indian rancherias remain.
- ^ "Patwin – Survey of California and Other Indian Languages". Retrieved 2012-08-30.
- ^ "California Language Archive". California Berkeley, California Language Archive.
- ^ "Language is the Heart of Our Culture". Yocha dehe Wintun Nation.
- ^ Kroeber 1925:883
- ^ Cook 1976b:8
- ^ Madley, Benjamin (2016). An American Genocide: The United States and the California Indian Catastrophe, 1846-1873 (1st ed.). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press (published May 24, 2016). ISBN 9780300181364.
- ^ Lindsay, Brandan C. (2012). Murder State: California's Native American Genocide, 1846-1873 (1st ed.). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press (published August 1, 2012). ISBN 9780803224803.
- ^ Johnson, Patti J. (1978). “Patwin” in Handbook of North American Indians: California, Vol. 8 (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 0160045789.
- ^ Cook, Sherburne F. (1976). The population of the California Indians, 1769-1970 (1st ed.). Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 9780520029231.
- ^ Reséndez, Andrés (2016). The Other Slavery: The Uncovered Story of Indian Enslavement in America (1st ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (published April 12, 2016). ISBN 9780547640983.
- ^ Hurtado, Albert L. (1988). Indian Survival on the California Frontier (1st ed.). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300047981.
- ^ Putah Creek: Flowing through Our Communities and Our Lives, Sacramento, California: Putah Creek Council, 2008, p. 21, ISBN 9780615216027,
When Spanish explorers and Russian fur traders came to California, things quickly changed. New diseases such as smallpox and malaria were fatal to many Native Americans, and an epidemic in 1833 emptied the village of Putah-toi. The Spaniards forced many of the remaining Patwin onto the Solano mission. There, disease and deprivation took a heavy toll. When the missions were secularized in the 1830s, the number of remaining Indians was less than one-third that of the Indians who had been pushed there. By the 1920s, no Patwin remained along the creek and few were left in the area. Native American ecological knowledge was lost and continues to be lost, along with the tending that fostered the growth of many California plants. However, efforts are being made to bring Native Americans and their understanding back into the management of California land. Despite obstacles, Patwin descendants still know the plants of this area and still tend them.
- ^ "Wintun Indians". California Indians and Their Reservations: An Online Dictionary. San Diego State University Library. Archived from the original on 26 July 2010. Retrieved 30 June 2010.
The Wintun Indian people have three divisions: the Wintu (northern), Nomlaki (central), and Patwin (southern). Their traditional territories are in the greater Sacramento Valley, with the Sacramento River a major feature of all the regions. Their lands vary from the Wintu mountain rivers in the north, through the Nomlaki plains, to the marshes, valleys, and hills of the Patwin. Their languages are of the Penutian family. Their diet came from the semiannual runs of king salmon up major rivers, to acorns and other vegetable foods, to game. In the early 1800s, there were approximately 12,000-15,000 members of the Wintun Tribe. Spanish settlers arrived in Wintun territory by 1808, and the Hudson's Bay Company trappers arrived sometime before 1832. Tribal unity was destroyed by the taking of land and the destruction of traditional food and material-gathering areas. Along with the introduction of cattle, hogs, and sheep, the construction of dams, and the Copper processing plants in the 1880s and early 1900s, the Wintun suffered a heavy toll on their health and survival. Today there are over 2,500 people of Wintun descent. Many live on the Round Valley Reservation, and on the Colusa, Cortina, Grindstone Creek, Redding, and Rumsey rancherias.
- ^ Native American Contemplative Garden
- ^ Rockwell, Susanne (16 June 2000). "Second Patwin burial site found". Dateline UC Davis. Retrieved 21 May 2017.
- ^ Jones, Dave (20 October 2006). "Community weaves tribute to Patwin tribe". Dateline UC Davis. Retrieved 21 May 2017.
The plan to honor Indians' connection with the UC Davis land grew out of the discovery of Indian remains at the Mondavi Center construction site in 1999. All of the remains have since been reburied under the direction of a Patwin representative, [campus environmental planner Sid England] said.
References
[edit]- Cook, Sherburne F. 1976a. The Conflict between the California Indian and White Civilization. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Golla, Victor. 2011. California Indian Languages. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 78. Washington, D.C.
Further reading
[edit]- Cook, Sherburne F. 1976b. The Population of the California Indians, 1769-1970. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Johnson, Patti J. 1978. "Patwin". In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 350–360. Handbook of North American Indians, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, vol. 8. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
- Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23228-7 (hbk); ISBN 0-521-29875-X.
External links
[edit]- "Native Tribes, Groups, Language Families and Dialects of California in 1770" (map after Kroeber), California Prehistory
- "Patwin Language", Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of Berkeley
- For a map of regional Native American territories, see map of Sacramento Valley Bioregion by Thayer and Mann.
- History of Quail Ridge Reserve - The Patwin
- "The Patweèns" (1874), Stephen Powers' Overland Monthly article on the Patwin
- Interview with historian Clyde Low Archived 2017-05-25 at the Wayback Machine on Sem-Yeto and the Patwin Indian presence in Suisun Valley, part of a 2003 documentary produced by the City of Fairfield
- NPR story featuring an interview with Patwin elder Bill Wright (2008)
Patwin
View on GrokipediaHistorical Context
Pre-Contact Era
The Patwin, comprising the southern branch of the Wintun linguistic and cultural group, occupied the western margin of California's Sacramento Valley and adjacent Inner Coast Ranges prior to European contact in the late 18th century. Their territory spanned from Colusa County southward to Suisun and San Pablo Bays, including riverine lowlands along the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers' tributaries as well as upland areas in the eastern North Coast Ranges, such as the upper Cache Creek watershed. This landscape supported diverse ecosystems, from riparian zones rich in salmon and waterfowl to oak woodlands and seasonal wetlands, with ancestral presence dating back at least to circa 1400 BCE based on archaeological evidence of early settlements.[9][10][6] Pre-contact population estimates for the Patwin vary due to limited direct records and methodological debates in California ethnography, with Alfred Kroeber's 1770 figure of approximately 2,500 individuals representing a conservative assessment, while other analyses suggest up to 15,000 for River Patwin subgroups before early 19th-century epidemics introduced via indirect European contact. These populations were organized into approximately 50-100 autonomous tribelets, each controlling territories of 50-200 square miles and consisting of 100-500 people across 1-5 villages. Villages, typically sited near water sources for defense and resource access, housed 20-100 residents in semi-permanent dwellings constructed from tule reeds, willow, and earth-covered frames, with larger communal structures for ceremonies.[11] Subsistence relied on intensive gathering of acorns from black oak groves, which could yield thousands of kilograms annually per community, processed via leaching and grinding in bedrock mortars or portable slab-and-basket hopper systems; this was supplemented by seasonal salmon fishing in rivers, hunting of deer, elk, and small game using bows and arrows introduced in the Augustine pattern around 500-1000 CE, and collection of roots, seeds, and berries. Resource management included controlled burning to enhance grass for game and acorn production, while trade networks with neighboring Pomo, Maidu, and Miwok exchanged obsidian tools, shell beads, and dried fish for marine shells and prestige goods. Social organization was patrilineal, with descent traced through male lines, and political authority vested in village headmen advised by elders, emphasizing consensus in intertribal alliances and conflicts over hunting grounds.[9][10][4]European Contact and Demographic Collapse
Initial European contact with the Patwin occurred in the late 18th century via Spanish explorers and Franciscan missionaries establishing outposts along California's coast and bays, with indirect effects reaching inland Sacramento Valley territories. Southern Patwin groups near the San Francisco Bay Area had limited involvement with missions like San Francisco de Asís (established 1776), where some individuals were baptized or labored, but the majority of Patwin villages remained outside direct mission control due to their interior location.[12][13] This period introduced Eurasian diseases, though epidemic mortality among Patwin likely intensified in the early 19th century under Mexican rule, as trade and overland expeditions facilitated pathogen transmission without herd immunity.[11] The most severe demographic collapse followed the 1848 California Gold Rush, which drew over 300,000 non-Native migrants by 1855, overwhelming Patwin lands in the Central Valley. Miners and settlers displaced Patwin from villages and fishing sites along the Sacramento and Suisun rivers through land claims, resource depletion, and organized killings; contemporary tribal records note murders by gold prospectors as a direct cause of population loss. Violence was compounded by state-sanctioned militias and lack of legal protections, contributing to California's broader Indigenous decline from approximately 150,000 in 1848 to 30,000 by 1870.[6][14][15] Pre-contact Patwin population is estimated at 8,000 to 12,000, supporting dense village networks across their territory. By the late 1850s, disease, starvation from habitat disruption, and homicide reduced numbers to a small fraction, with southern subgroups nearly extinct; the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs recorded only 11 Patwin descendants in Solano County by 1972, though federal recognition and rancheria establishments preserved remnants into the 20th century.[16][12][11] This collapse mirrored patterns across California Indigenous groups, driven primarily by epidemiological shock and colonial expansion rather than solely intentional extermination, though targeted violence played a measurable role.[15]Adaptation and Persistence in the 19th-20th Centuries
Following the demographic collapse induced by European-introduced diseases, including a 1833 malaria epidemic that killed up to 75% of Central Valley Native populations, Patwin survivors adapted to mission systems in the early 19th century by incorporating elements of ranch labor and neophyte roles at sites like Mission San Francisco de Asís and Mission Sonoma.[12] Leaders such as Chief Solano (Sem-Yeto), a Suisun Patwin baptized around 1810, facilitated persistence through diplomatic alliances with Mexican authorities, commanding Patwin and allied warriors in campaigns during the 1830s and 1840s while securing protections under figures like Mariano Guadalupe Vallejo.[17] These strategies enabled temporary refuge on ranchos amid secularization after 1834, though the 1848 California Gold Rush triggered intensified violence, enslavement, and murders by American prospectors, forcing many into wage labor as miners or farmhands.[6] By mid-century, amid statehood in 1850 and escalating conflicts, Patwin were increasingly relocated to local ranches or nascent small reservations, with Chief Solano's death around 1851 marking the erosion of such alliances.[12] Survival hinged on economic integration into settler economies, including acorn gathering on marginal lands and intermittent trade, though populations dwindled to scattered families; some Patwin served as auxiliaries in early American militias, reflecting pragmatic adaptation over resistance.[11] In the early 20th century, remaining Patwin groups—reduced to approximately 20 adults by the 1900s—were forcibly consolidated onto federal rancherías, such as the Rumsey site along Cache Creek, characterized by dilapidated housing, lack of utilities, and limited arable land, prompting subsistence farming and government dependency.[6] Further relocations, like to Capay Valley in 1940, underscored ongoing displacement, yet communities rejected the U.S. termination policy of the 1950s, which aimed to dissolve tribal status for 41 California rancherías, thereby preserving sovereignty.[12] Intermarriage with Wintun groups bolstered numbers, with only 11 pure Patwin descendants enumerated in 1972, enabling cultural continuity through family-based stewardship despite assimilation pressures like boarding schools that punished language use.[6][12]Contemporary Tribal Sovereignty and Economic Development
The three federally recognized Patwin tribes—the Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community, the Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation of the Cortina Rancheria, and the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation—operate as sovereign entities with elected governing councils that manage internal affairs, land use, and economic enterprises under federal trust responsibilities.[18][19][20] This status, affirmed through Bureau of Indian Affairs processes, grants exemptions from many state laws and enables pursuit of revenue-generating activities to fund self-sufficiency.[21] Gaming has emerged as the cornerstone of economic development for two of these tribes, leveraging the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 to operate Class III facilities via tribal-state compacts. The Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation's Cache Creek Casino Resort, opened after federal restoration of 640 acres of ancestral land in the 1980s, spans 415,000 square feet with 2,350 slot machines and 120 table games, employing over 2,000 individuals as Yolo County's largest private employer and purchasing tens of millions annually from local vendors.[22][23] Resort revenues sustain tribal government services, including healthcare, education, elder care, and Patwin language programs.[24] The Cachil DeHe Band similarly transformed its fortunes with the Colusa Casino Resort, whose operations since the early 2000s have funded welfare, infrastructure, and diversification into energy projects like utility-scale solar development through Colusa Indian Energy.[25][26] The Kletsel Dehe Wintun Nation, on its 160-acre rancheria established in 1907, emphasizes alternative ventures via the Kletsel Economic Development Authority, including a 2025 partnership with Virtual Gaming Worlds for free-to-play social casino platforms to access new markets without traditional brick-and-mortar risks.[27][28] Earlier proposals, such as a 2007 landfill lease, highlighted sovereignty's role in hosting high-risk industries but faced environmental scrutiny and did not materialize at scale.[29] These tribes assert sovereignty through litigation to safeguard economic viability, jointly intervening in federal cases against off-reservation casinos by distant bands, arguing such projects undermine compact-negotiated exclusivity and harm local Patwin interests in the Sacramento Valley.[24][30] For instance, Yocha Dehe and Kletsel Dehe challenged the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians' Vallejo proposal in 2025, citing territorial overlap and archaeological risks.[31]Geography and Subsistence
Traditional Territory
The Patwin traditionally occupied the western portion of the Sacramento Valley in Northern California, with their territory extending from the Sacramento River on the east to the eastern foothills of the Coast Ranges on the west.[3] This area encompassed lands now within modern Yolo, Solano, Colusa, Napa, Lake, and portions of Sonoma counties.[6] Their domain stretched northward approximately to the vicinity of Colusa and southward to Suisun Bay and the Carquinez Strait, including the lower reaches of major tributaries such as Cache Creek and Putah Creek.[11] [32] Villages were primarily situated along riverine corridors, facilitating access to riparian resources and trade routes, with key settlements documented near present-day sites like Woodland, Winters, and Vacaville.[6] The Patwin territory bordered that of neighboring groups, including the Wintu to the north, Valley Nisenan (Maidu) to the northeast, and Miwok peoples to the southwest, reflecting a mosaic of linguistic and cultural boundaries in the region.[33] This landscape supported diverse subsistence patterns centered on acorn gathering, fishing, and hunting within oak woodlands, wetlands, and valley grasslands.[9]Environmental Adaptation and Resource Management
The Patwin inhabited the Sacramento Valley and adjacent Coast Ranges, adapting to a mosaic of riverine floodplains, tule marshes, oak woodlands, and grasslands characterized by seasonal flooding and Mediterranean climate variability.[9] Their subsistence economy emphasized diversified foraging, with acorns from black oak (Quercus kelloggii) and valley oak (Quercus lobata) serving as a dietary staple, yielding an estimated 227-454 kg per mature tree annually in productive groves.[9] Communities processed acorns through leaching to remove tannins, supplementing with gathered clover, wild oats, manzanita berries, buckeye nuts, pine nuts, and roots such as Indian potatoes.[6][9] Hunting targeted large ungulates including tule elk (Cervus canadensis nannodes), deer, antelope, and bears, often in cooperative group efforts using bows, arrows, snares, and possibly dogs, while smaller game and birds were taken with traps and nets.[9] Fishing in the Sacramento River and tributaries focused on salmon runs, supplemented by perch and suckerfish, employing bone harpoons, nets, and weirs to exploit anadromous migrations.[6][9] Seasonal mobility followed resource availability, with winter villages near oak groves and summer camps in uplands or wetlands, utilizing tule reeds for mat-covered earth lodges and watercraft suited to marshy terrains.[9] Resource management incorporated controlled burns to rejuvenate native grasses like blue wild rye (Elymus glaucus), boost seed yields for gathering and basketry, control pests such as grasshoppers, and stimulate post-fire forb growth to attract grazing herbivores, thereby enhancing huntable biomass.[6][9] These practices, rooted in observational knowledge of ecological cycles, promoted habitat mosaics that sustained biodiversity and prevented overexploitation, as evidenced by the long-term stability of pre-contact populations in the region.[6] Inter-tribal trade networks exchanged surplus local resources—such as coastal shells for inland acorns—further buffering environmental fluctuations.[9]Language and Linguistics
Classification and Dialects
The Patwin language belongs to the Wintuan family, a small genetic grouping of three closely related but mutually unintelligible languages indigenous to Northern California: Wintu (northern branch), Nomlaki (central branch), and Patwin (southern branch).[34] The family is considered a linguistic isolate within North America, with no established genetic ties to broader proposed phyla such as Penutian, despite historical hypotheses linking it thereto based on shared vocabulary and structural features that remain unproven under rigorous comparative methods.[35] Patwin exhibits typical Wintuan traits, including polysynthetic morphology, subject-object-verb word order, and a phonemic inventory with glottalized consonants, though it diverges from northern relatives in vocabulary and certain grammatical markers.[36] Patwin encompasses at least two main dialects, with scholarly accounts varying on whether a third constitutes a distinct variety or subdialect: River Patwin (also termed Valley Patwin), spoken historically along the Sacramento River in Colusa and Yolo counties; and a southern dialect complex encompassing Hill Patwin in the interior Coast Ranges of Lake, Napa, and Yolo counties.[2] Some analyses further subdivide the southern form into Hill Patwin proper and Southern Patwin, the latter attested in Solano and Sonoma counties near Suisun Bay, distinguished by lexical innovations and phonetic shifts such as vowel reductions not prominent in River Patwin.[37][36] Dialect boundaries aligned with geographical and subsistence divides, with River speakers oriented toward riverine floodplain resources and Hill/Southern groups adapted to upland oak woodlands and seasonal migrations.[2] Documentation remains limited to early 20th-century field notes and recent revitalization efforts, as fluent speakers numbered fewer than 10 by 2000, rendering dialectal mutual intelligibility untestable in practice.[38]| Dialect | Traditional Area | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| River Patwin | Sacramento River valley (Colusa, Yolo counties) | Retained conservative phonology; riverine lexicon dominant.[2] |
| Hill Patwin | Coast Range hills (Lake, Napa, Yolo counties) | Upland terminology; some vowel harmony variations.[37] |
| Southern Patwin | Suisun Bay region (Solano, Sonoma counties) | Lexical divergence; potential substrate influences from neighboring Yukian languages.[36] |