Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Salmon
View on Wikipedia
| Salmon | |
|---|---|
| Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Actinopterygii |
| Order: | Salmoniformes |
| Family: | Salmonidae |
| Subfamily: | Salmoninae |
| Groups included | |
| |
| Cladistically included but traditionally excluded taxa | |
|
all other members of Salmoninae | |
Salmon (/ˈsæmən/; pl.: salmon) are any of several commercially important species of euryhaline ray-finned fish from the genera Salmo and Oncorhynchus of the family Salmonidae, native to tributaries of the North Atlantic (Salmo) and North Pacific (Oncorhynchus) basins. Salmon is a colloquial or common name used for fish in this group, but is not a scientific name. Other closely related fish in the same family include trout, char, grayling, whitefish, lenok and taimen, all coldwater fish of the subarctic and cooler temperate regions with some sporadic endorheic populations in Central Asia.
Salmon are typically anadromous: they hatch in the shallow gravel beds of freshwater headstreams and spend their juvenile years in rivers, lakes and freshwater wetlands, migrate to the ocean as adults and live like sea fish, then return to their freshwater birthplace to reproduce. However, populations of several species are restricted to fresh waters (i.e. landlocked) throughout their lives. Folklore has it that the fish return to the exact stream where they themselves hatched to spawn, and tracking studies have shown this to be mostly true. A portion of a returning salmon run may stray and spawn in different freshwater systems; the percent of straying depends on the species of salmon.[1] Homing behavior has been shown to depend on olfactory memory.[2][3]
Salmon are important food fish and are intensively farmed in many parts of the world,[4] with Norway being the world's largest producer of farmed salmon, followed by Chile.[5] They are also highly prized game fish for recreational fishing, by both freshwater and saltwater anglers. Many species of salmon have since been introduced and naturalized into non-native environments such as the Great Lakes of North America, Patagonia in South America and South Island of New Zealand.[6]
Name and etymology
[edit]The Modern English term salmon is derived from Middle English: samoun, samon and saumon, which in turn are from Anglo-Norman: saumon, from Old French: saumon, and from Latin: salmō (which in turn might have originated from salire, meaning "to leap".[7]). The unpronounced "l" absent from Middle English was later added as a Latinisation to make the word closer to its Latin root. The term salmon has mostly displaced its now dialectal synonym lax, in turn from Middle English: lax, from Old English: leax, from Proto-Germanic: *lahsaz from Proto-Indo-European: *lakso-.[8][9]
Species
[edit]The seven commercially important species of salmon occur in two genera of the subfamily Salmoninae. The genus Salmo contains the Atlantic salmon, found in both sides of the North Atlantic, as well as more than 40 other species commonly named as trout. The genus Oncorhynchus contains 12 recognised species which occur naturally only in the North Pacific, six of which are known as Pacific salmon while the remainder are considered trout. Outside their native habitats, Chinook salmon have been successfully introduced in New Zealand and Patagonia, while coho, sockeye and Atlantic salmon have been established in Patagonia, as well.[10]
| Atlantic and Pacific salmon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Image | Common name | Scientific name | Maximum length |
Common length |
Maximum weight |
Maximum age |
Trophic level |
Fish Base |
FAO | ITIS | IUCN status |
| Salmo (Atlantic salmon) |
Atlantic salmon | Salmo salar Linnaeus, 1758 | 150 cm (4 ft 11 in) | 120 cm (3 ft 11 in) | 46.8 kilograms (103 lb) | 13 years | 4.4 | [11] | [12] | [13] | ||
| Oncorhynchus (Pacific salmon) |
Chinook salmon | Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum, 1792) | 150 cm (4 ft 11 in) | 70 cm (2 ft 4 in) | 61.4 kilograms (135 lb) | 9 years | 4.4 | [15] | [16] | [17] | ||
| Chum salmon | Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum, 1792) | 100 cm (3 ft 3 in) | 58 cm (1 ft 11 in) | 15.9 kilograms (35 lb) | 7 years | 3.5 | [19] | [20] | [21] | |||
| Coho salmon | Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum, 1792) | 108 cm (3 ft 7 in) | 71 cm (2 ft 4 in) | 15.2 kilograms (34 lb) | 5 years | 4.2 | [23] | [24] | [25] | |||
| Masu salmon | Oncorhynchus masou (Brevoort, 1856) | 79 cm (2 ft 7 in) | 50 cm (1 ft 8 in) | 10.0 kilograms (22.0 lb) | 3 years | 3.6 | [27] | [28] | Not assessed | |||
| Pink salmon | Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walbaum, 1792) | 76 cm (2 ft 6 in) | 50 cm (1 ft 8 in) | 6.8 kilograms (15 lb) | 3 years | 4.2 | [29] | [30] | [31] | |||
| Sockeye salmon | Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum, 1792) | 84 cm (2 ft 9 in) | 58 cm (1 ft 11 in) | 7.7 kilograms (17 lb) | 8 years | 3.7 | [33] | [34] | [35] | |||
† Both the Salmo and Oncorhynchus genera also contain a number of trout species informally referred to as salmon. Within Salmo, the Adriatic salmon (Salmo obtusirostris) and Black Sea salmon (Salmo labrax) have both been named as salmon in English, although they fall outside the generally recognized seven salmon species. The masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou) is actually considered a trout ("cherry trout") in Japan, with masu actually being the Japanese word for trout. On the other hand, the steelhead and sea trout, the anadromous forms of rainbow trout and brown trout respectively, are from the same genera as salmon and live identical migratory lives, but neither is termed "salmon" .
| This article is part of a series on |
| Commercial fish |
|---|
| Large predatory |
| Forage |
| Demersal |
| Mixed |
The extinct Eosalmo driftwoodensis, the oldest known Salmoninae fish in the fossil record, helps scientists figure how the different species of salmon diverged from a common ancestor. The Eocene salmon's fossil from British Columbia provides evidence that the divergence between Pacific and Atlantic salmon had not yet occurred 40 million years ago. Both the fossil record and analysis of mitochondrial DNA suggest the divergence occurred 10 to 20 million years ago during the Miocene. This independent evidence from DNA analysis and the fossil record indicate that salmon divergence occurred long before the Quaternary glaciation began the cycle of glacial advance and retreat.[37]
Non-salmon species of "salmon"
[edit]There are several other species of fish which are colloquially called "salmon" but are not true salmon. Of those listed below, the Danube salmon or huchen is a large freshwater salmonid closely related (from the same subfamily) to the seven species of salmon above, but others are fishes of unrelated orders, given the common name "salmon" simply due to similar shapes, behaviors and niches occupied:
| Some other fishes called salmon | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common name | Scientific name | Order | Maximum length |
Common length |
Maximum weight |
Maximum age |
Trophic level |
Fish Base |
FAO | ITIS | IUCN status |
| Australian salmon | Arripis trutta (Forster, 1801) | Perciformes | 89 cm (2 ft 11 in) | 47 cm (1 ft 7 in) | 9.4 kilograms (21 lb) | 26 years | 4.1 | [38] | [39] | Not assessed | |
| Danube salmon | Hucho hucho (Linnaeus, 1758) | Salmoniformes | 150 cm (4 ft 11 in) | 70 cm (2 ft 4 in) | 52 kilograms (115 lb) | 15 years | 4.2 | [40] | [41] | ||
| Hawaiian salmon | Elagatis bipinnulata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) | Carangiformes | 180 cm (5 ft 11 in) | 90 cm (2 ft 11 in) | 46.2 kilograms (102 lb) | 6 years | 3.6 | [43] | [44] | [45] | Not assessed |
| Indian salmon | Eleutheronema tetradactylum (Shaw, 1804) | Perciformes | 200 cm (6 ft 7 in) | 50 cm (1 ft 8 in) | 145 kilograms (320 lb) | years | 4.4 | [46] | [47] | Not assessed | |
Distribution
[edit]- Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reproduce in northern rivers on both coasts of the Atlantic Ocean.
- Landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar m. sebago) is a potamodromous (migratory only between fresh waters) subspecies/morph that live in a number of lakes in eastern North America and in Northern Europe, for instance in lakes Sebago, Onega, Ladoga, Saimaa, Vänern and Winnipesaukee. They are not a different species from the sea-run Atlantic salmon but have independently evolved a freshwater-only life cycle, which they maintain even when they could access the ocean.
- Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) are also known in the United States as king salmon or "blackmouth salmon", and as "spring salmon" in British Columbia, Canada. Chinook salmon is the largest of all Pacific salmon, frequently exceeding 6 ft (1.8 m) and 14 kg (30 lb).[49] The name tyee is also used in British Columbia to refer to Chinook salmon over 30 pounds and in the Columbia River watershed, especially large Chinooks were once referred to as June hogs. Chinook salmon are known to range as far north as the Mackenzie River and Kugluktuk in the central Canadian arctic,[50] and as far south as the Central Californian Coast.[51]
- Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) is known as dog salmon or calico salmon in some parts of the US, and as keta in the Russian Far East. This species has the widest geographic range of the Pacific species:[52] in the eastern Pacific from north of the Mackenzie River in Canada to south of the Sacramento River in California and in the western Pacific from Lena River in Siberia to the island of Kyūshū in the Sea of Japan.
- Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) are also known in the US as silver salmon. This species is found throughout the coastal waters of Alaska and British Columbia and as far south as Central California (Monterey Bay).[53] It is also now known to occur, albeit infrequently, in the Mackenzie River.[50]
- Masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou), also known as "cherry trout" (桜鱒 サクラマス, sakura masu) in Japan, are found only in the western Pacific Ocean in Japan, Korea, and Russian Far East. A landlocked subspecies known as the Taiwanese salmon or Formosan salmon (Oncorhynchus masou formosanus) is found in central Taiwan's Chi Chia Wan Stream.[54]
- Pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), known as humpback salmon or "humpies" in southeast and southwest Alaska, are found in the western Pacific from Lena River in Siberia to Korea, found throughout northern Pacific, and in the eastern Pacific from the Mackenzie River in Canada[50] to northern California, usually in shorter coastal streams. It is the smallest of the Pacific species, with an average weight of 1.6 to 1.8 kg (3.5 to 4.0 lb).[55]
- Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) is also known as red salmon in the US (especially Alaska).[56] This lake-rearing species is found in the eastern Pacific from Bathurst Inlet in the Canadian Arctic to Klamath River in California, and in the western Pacific from the Anadyr River in Siberia to northern Hokkaido island in Japan. Although most adult Pacific salmon feed on small fish, shrimp, and squid, sockeye feed on plankton they filter through gill rakers.[57] Kokanee salmon are a landlocked form of sockeye salmon. Their appeal to sport fishermen has led to them being introduced to many places in the United States and Canada.[58]
- Danube salmon, or huchen (Hucho hucho), are the largest permanent freshwater salmonid species.
Life cycle
[edit]
Salmon eggs are laid in freshwater streams typically at high latitudes. The eggs hatch into alevin or sac fry. The fry quickly develop into parr with camouflaging vertical stripes. The parr stay for six months to three years in their natal stream before becoming smolts, which are distinguished by their bright, silvery colour with scales that are easily rubbed off. Only 10% of all salmon eggs are estimated to survive to this stage.[59]
The smolt body chemistry changes, allowing them to live in salt water. While a few species of salmon remain in fresh water throughout their life cycle, the majority are anadromous and migrate to the ocean for maturation: in these species, smolts spend a portion of their out-migration time in brackish water, where their body chemistry becomes accustomed to osmoregulation in the ocean. This body chemistry change is hormone-driven, causing physiological adjustments in the function of osmoregulatory organs such as the gills, which leads to large increases in their ability to secrete salt.[60] Hormones involved in increasing salinity tolerance include insulin-like growth factor I, cortisol, and thyroid hormones,[61] which permits the fish to endure the transition from a freshwater environment to the ocean.
The salmon spend about one to five years (depending on the species) in the open ocean, where they gradually become sexually mature. The adult salmon then return primarily to their natal streams to spawn. Atlantic salmon spend between one and four years at sea. When a fish returns after just one year's sea feeding, it is called a grilse in Canada, Britain, and Ireland. Grilse may be present at spawning, and go unnoticed by large males, releasing their own sperm on the eggs.[62]
Prior to spawning, depending on the species, salmon undergo changes. They may grow a hump, develop canine-like teeth, or develop a kype (a pronounced curvature of the jaws in male salmon). All change from the silvery blue of a fresh-run fish from the sea to a darker colour. Salmon can make amazing journeys, sometimes moving hundreds of miles upstream against strong currents and rapids to reproduce. Chinook and sockeye salmon from central Idaho, for example, travel over 1,400 km (900 mi) and climb nearly 2,100 m (7,000 ft) from the Pacific Ocean as they return to spawn. Condition tends to deteriorate the longer the fish remain in fresh water, and they then deteriorate further after they spawn, when they are known as kelts. In all species of Pacific salmon, the mature individuals die within a few days or weeks of spawning, a trait known as semelparity. Between 2 and 4% of Atlantic salmon kelts survive to spawn again, all females. However, even in those species of salmon that may survive to spawn more than once (iteroparity), postspawning mortality is quite high (perhaps as high as 40 to 50%).

To lay her roe, the female salmon uses her tail (caudal fin), to create a low-pressure zone, lifting gravel to be swept downstream, excavating a shallow depression, called a redd. The redd may sometimes contain 5,000 eggs covering 2.8 m2 (30 sq ft).[63] The eggs usually range from orange to red. One or more males approach the female in her redd, depositing sperm, or milt, over the roe.[57] The female then covers the eggs by disturbing the gravel at the upstream edge of the depression before moving on to make another redd. The female may make as many as seven redds before her supply of eggs is exhausted.[57]
Each year, the fish experiences a period of rapid growth, often in summer, and one of slower growth, normally in winter. This results in ring formation around an earbone called the otolith (annuli), analogous to the growth rings visible in a tree trunk. Freshwater growth shows as densely crowded rings, sea growth as widely spaced rings; spawning is marked by significant erosion as body mass is converted into eggs and milt.
Freshwater streams and estuaries provide important habitat for many salmon species. They feed on terrestrial and aquatic insects, amphipods, and other crustaceans while young, and primarily on other fish when older. Eggs are laid in deeper water with larger gravel and need cool water and good water flow (to supply oxygen) to the developing embryos. Mortality of salmon in the early life stages is usually high due to natural predation and human-induced changes in habitat, such as siltation, high water temperatures, low oxygen concentration, loss of stream cover, and reductions in river flow. Estuaries and their associated wetlands provide vital nursery areas for the salmon prior to their departure to the open ocean. Wetlands not only help buffer the estuary from silt and pollutants, but also provide important feeding and hiding areas.
Salmon not killed by other means show greatly accelerated deterioration (phenoptosis, or "programmed aging") at the end of their lives. Their bodies rapidly deteriorate right after they spawn as a result of the release of massive amounts of corticosteroids.
-
Juvenile salmon, parr, grow up in the relatively protected natal river
-
The parr lose their camouflage bars and become smolt as they become ready for the transition to the ocean.
-
Male ocean-phase adult sockeye
-
Male spawning-phase adult sockeye
Diet
[edit]Salmon are mid-level carnivores whose diet change according to their life stage. Salmon fry predominantly feed upon zooplankton until they reach fingerling sizes, when they start to consume more aquatic invertebrates such as insect larvae, microcrustaceans and worms. As juveniles (parrs), they become more predatory and actively prey upon aquatic insects, small crustaceans, tadpoles and small bait fishes. They are also known to breach the water to attack terrestrial insects such as grasshoppers and dragonflies,[64] as well as consuming fish eggs (even those of other salmon).
As adults, salmon behave like other mid-sized pelagic fish, eating a variety of sea creatures including smaller forage fish such as lanternfish, herrings, sand lances, mackerels and barracudina. They also eat krill, squid and polychaete worms.[65]
Ecology
[edit]
In the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, salmon are keystone species.[66] The migrations of salmon represent a massive retrograde nutrient transfer, rich in nitrogen, sulfur, carbon and phosphorus, from the ocean to the inland freshwater ecosystems. Predation by piscivorous land animals (such as ospreys, bears and otters) along the journey serve to transfer the nutrients from the water to land, and decomposition of salmon carcasses benefits the forest ecosystem.
In the case of Pacific salmon, most (if not all) of the salmon that survive to reach the headwater spawning grounds will die after laying eggs and their dead bodies sink to cover the gravel beds, with the nutrients released from the biodegradation of their corpses providing a significant boost to these otherwise biomass-poor shallow streams.
Bears
[edit]Grizzly bears function as ecosystem engineers, capturing salmon and carrying them into adjacent dry land to eat the fish. There they deposit nutrient-rich urine and feces and partially eaten carcasses. Bears preparing for hibernation tend to preferentially consume the more nutrient- and energy-rich salmon roes and brain over the actual flesh,[67] and are estimated to discard up to half the salmon they've harvested uneaten on the forest floor,[68][69] in densities that can reach 4,000 kg (8,800 lb) per hectare,[70] providing as much as 24% of the total nitrogen available to the riparian woodlands. The foliage of spruce trees up to 500 m (1,600 ft) from a stream where grizzlies fish salmon have been found to contain nitrogen originating from the fished salmon.[71]
Beavers
[edit]
Beavers also function as ecosystem engineers; in the process of tree-cutting and damming, beavers alter the local ecosystems extensively. Beaver ponds can provide critical habitat for juvenile salmon.
An example of this was seen in the years following 1818 in the Columbia River Basin. In 1818, the British government made an agreement with the U.S. government to allow U.S. citizens access to the Columbia catchment (see Treaty of 1818). At the time, the Hudson's Bay Company sent word to trappers to extirpate all furbearers from the area in an effort to make the area less attractive to U.S. fur traders. In response to the elimination of beavers from large parts of the river system, salmon runs plummeted, even in the absence of many of the factors usually associated with the demise of salmon runs. Salmon recruitment can be affected by beavers' dams because dams can:[72][73][74]
- Slow the rate at which nutrients are flushed from the water system; nutrients provided by adult salmon dying throughout the fall and winter remain available in the spring to newly hatched juveniles
- Provide deeper salmon pools where young salmon can avoid avian predators
- Increase productivity through algal photosynthesis and by enhancing the conversion efficiency of the cellulose-powered detritus cycle[clarification needed]
- Create slow-water environments where juvenile salmon put the food they ingest into growth rather than into fighting currents
- Increase structural complexity with many physical niches where salmon can avoid predators
Beaver dams are able to nurture salmon juveniles in estuarine tidal marshes where the salinity is less than 10 ppm. Beavers build small dams of generally less than 60 cm (2 ft) high in channels in the myrtle zone[clarification needed]. These dams can be overtopped at high tide and hold water at low tide. This provides refuges for juvenile salmon so they do not have to swim into large channels where they are subject to predation by larger fish.[75]
Lampreys
[edit]It has been discovered that rivers which have seen a decline or disappearance of anadromous lampreys, loss of the lampreys also affects the salmon in a negative way. Like salmon, anadromous lampreys stop feeding and die after spawning, and their decomposing bodies release nutrients into the stream. Also, along with species like rainbow trout and Sacramento sucker, lampreys clean the gravel in the rivers during spawning.[76] Their larvae, called ammocoetes, are filter feeders which contribute to the health of the waters. They are also a food source for the young salmon, and being fattier and oilier, it is assumed predators prefer them over salmon offspring, taking off some of the predation pressure on smolts.[77][unreliable source?] Adult lampreys are also the preferred prey of seals and sea lions, which can eat 30 lampreys to every salmon, allowing more adult salmon to enter the rivers to spawn without being eaten by the marine mammals.[78][79]
Parasites
[edit]According to Canadian biologist Dorothy Kieser, the myxozoan parasite Henneguya salminicola is commonly found in the flesh of salmonids. It has been recorded in the field samples of salmon returning to the Haida Gwaii Islands. The fish responds by walling off the parasitic infection into a number of cysts that contain milky fluid. This fluid is an accumulation of a large number of parasites.
Henneguya and other parasites in the myxosporean group have complex life cycles, where the salmon is one of two hosts. The fish releases the spores after spawning. In the Henneguya case, the spores enter a second host, most likely an invertebrate, in the spawning stream. When juvenile salmon migrate to the Pacific Ocean, the second host releases a stage infective to salmon. The parasite is then carried in the salmon until the next spawning cycle. The myxosporean parasite that causes whirling disease in trout has a similar life cycle.[80] However, as opposed to whirling disease, the Henneguya infestation does not appear to cause disease in the host salmon—even heavily infected fish tend to return to spawn successfully.
According to Dr. Kieser, a lot of work on Henneguya salminicola was done by scientists at the Pacific Biological Station in Nanaimo in the mid-1980s, in particular, an overview report[81] which states, "the fish that have the longest fresh water residence time as juveniles have the most noticeable infections. Hence in order of prevalence, coho are most infected followed by sockeye, chinook, chum and pink. As well, the report says, at the time the studies were conducted, stocks from the middle and upper reaches of large river systems in British Columbia such as Fraser, Skeena, Nass and from mainland coastal streams in the southern half of B.C., "are more likely to have a low prevalence of infection." The report also states, "It should be stressed that Henneguya, economically deleterious though it is, is harmless from the view of public health. It is strictly a fish parasite that cannot live in or affect warm blooded animals, including man".
According to Klaus Schallie, Molluscan Shellfish Program Specialist with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, "Henneguya salminicola is found in southern B.C. also and in all species of salmon. I have previously examined smoked chum salmon sides that were riddled with cysts and some sockeye runs in Barkley Sound (southern B.C., west coast of Vancouver Island) are noted for their high incidence of infestation."[citation needed]
Sea lice, particularly Lepeophtheirus salmonis and various Caligus species, including C. clemensi and C. rogercresseyi, can cause deadly infestations of both farm-grown and wild salmon.[82][83] Sea lice are ectoparasites which feed on mucus, blood, and skin, and migrate and latch onto the skin of wild salmon during free-swimming, planktonic nauplii and copepodid larval stages, which can persist for several days.[84][85][86]
Large numbers of highly populated, open-net salmon farms[A] can create exceptionally large concentrations of sea lice; when exposed in river estuaries containing large numbers of open-net farms, many young wild salmon are infected, and do not survive as a result.[88][89] Adult salmon may survive otherwise critical numbers of sea lice, but small, thin-skinned juvenile salmon migrating to sea are highly vulnerable. On the Pacific coast of Canada, the louse-induced mortality of pink salmon in some regions is commonly over 80%.[90]
Effect of pile driving
[edit]The risk of injury caused by underwater pile driving has been studied by Dr. Halvorsen and her co-workers.[91] The study concluded that the fish are at risk of injury if the cumulative sound exposure level exceeds 210 dB relative to 1 μPa2 s.[clarification needed]
Wild fisheries
[edit]
Commercial
[edit]
As can be seen from the production chart, the global capture reported by different countries to the FAO of commercial wild salmon has remained fairly steady since 1990 at about one million tonnes per year. This is in contrast to farmed salmon (below) which has increased in the same period from about 0.6 million tonnes to well over two million tonnes.[48]
Nearly all captured wild salmon are Pacific salmon. The capture of wild Atlantic salmon has always been relatively small, and has declined steadily since 1990. In 2011 only 2,500 tonnes were reported.[12] In contrast, about half of all farmed salmon are Atlantic salmon.
Recreational
[edit]
Recreational salmon fishing can be a technically demanding kind of sport fishing, not necessarily intuitive for beginning fishermen.[92] A conflict exists between commercial fishermen and recreational fishermen for the right to salmon stock resources. Commercial fishing in estuaries and coastal areas is often restricted so enough salmon can return to their natal rivers where they can spawn and be available for sport fishing. On parts of the North American West Coast salmon sport fishing has completely replaced inshore commercial salmon fishing.[93] In most cases, the commercial value of a salmon sold as seafood can be several times less than the value attributed to the same fish caught by a sport fisherman. This is "a powerful economic argument for allocating stock resources preferentially to sport fishing".[93]
Farms
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (April 2023) |


Salmon aquaculture is a major contributor to the world production of farmed finfish, representing about US$10 billion annually. Other commonly cultured fish species include tilapia, catfish, sea bass, carp and bream. Salmon farming is significant in Chile, Norway, Scotland, Canada and the Faroe Islands; it is the source for most salmon consumed in the United States and Europe. Atlantic salmon are also, in very small volumes, farmed in Russia and Tasmania, Australia.
Salmon are carnivorous, and need to be fed meals produced from catching other wild forage fish and other marine organisms. Salmon farming leads to a high demand for wild forage fish. As a predator, salmon require large nutritional intakes of protein, and farmed salmon consume more fish than they generate as a final product. On a dry weight basis, 2–4 kg of wild-caught fish are needed to produce one kilogram of salmon.[94] As the salmon farming industry expands, it requires more forage fish for feed, at a time when 75% of the world's monitored fisheries are already near to or have exceeded their maximum sustainable yield.[95] The industrial-scale extraction of wild forage fish for salmon farming affects the survivability of other wild predatory fish which rely on them for food. Research is ongoing into sustainable and plant-based salmon feeds.[96]
Intensive salmon farming uses open-net cages, which have low production costs. It has the drawback of allowing disease and sea lice to spread to local wild salmon stocks.[97]

Another form of salmon production, which is safer but less controllable, is to raise salmon in hatcheries until they are old enough to become independent. They are released into rivers in an attempt to increase the salmon population. This system is referred to as ranching. It was very common in countries such as Sweden, before the Norwegians developed salmon farming, but is seldom done by private companies. As anyone may catch the salmon when they return to spawn, a company is limited in benefiting financially from their investment.
Because of this, the ranching method has mainly been used by various public authorities and non-profit groups, such as the Cook Inlet Aquaculture Association, as a way to increase salmon populations in situations where they have declined due to overharvesting, construction of dams and habitat destruction or fragmentation. Negative consequences to this sort of population manipulation include genetic "dilution" of the wild stocks. Many jurisdictions are now beginning to discourage supplemental fish planting in favour of harvest controls, and habitat improvement and protection.
A variant method of fish stocking, called ocean ranching, is under development in Alaska. There, the young salmon are released into the ocean far from any wild salmon streams. When it is time for them to spawn, they return to where they were released, where fishermen can catch them.
An alternative method to hatcheries is to use spawning channels. These are artificial streams, usually parallel to an existing stream, with concrete or rip-rap sides and gravel bottoms. Water from the adjacent stream is piped into the top of the channel, sometimes via a header pond, to settle out sediment. Spawning success is often much better in channels than in adjacent streams due to the control of floods, which in some years can wash out the natural redds. Because of the lack of floods, spawning channels must sometimes be cleaned out to remove accumulated sediment. The same floods that destroy natural redds also clean the regular streams. Spawning channels preserve the natural selection of natural streams, as there is no benefit, as in hatcheries, to use prophylactic chemicals to control diseases.[citation needed]
Farm-raised salmon are fed the carotenoids astaxanthin and canthaxanthin to match their flesh colour to wild salmon[98] to improve their marketability.[99] Wild salmon get these carotenoids, primarily astaxanthin, from eating shellfish and krill.
One proposed alternative to the use of wild-caught fish as feed for the salmon, is the use of soy-based products. This should be better for the local environment of the fish farm, but producing soy beans has a high environmental cost for the producing region. The fish omega-3 fatty acid content would be reduced compared to fish-fed salmon.
Another possible alternative is a yeast-based coproduct of bioethanol production, proteinaceous fermentation biomass. Substituting such products for engineered feed can result in equal (sometimes enhanced) growth in fish.[100] With its increasing availability, this would address the problems of rising costs for buying hatchery fish feed.
Yet another attractive alternative is the increased use of seaweed. Seaweed provides essential minerals and vitamins for growing organisms. It offers the advantage of providing natural amounts of dietary fiber and having a lower glycemic load than grain-based fish meal.[100] In the best-case scenario, widespread use of seaweed could yield a future in aquaculture that eliminates the need for land, freshwater, or fertilizer to raise fish.[101][failed verification]
Management
[edit]

Salmon population levels are of concern in the Atlantic and in some parts of the Pacific.[103] The population of wild salmon declined markedly in recent decades, especially North Atlantic populations, which spawn in the waters of western Europe and eastern Canada, and wild salmon in the Snake and Columbia River systems in northwestern United States.
Alaska fishery stocks are still abundant, and catches have been on the rise in recent decades, after the state initiated limitations in 1972.[104][105][citation needed] Some of the most important Alaskan salmon sustainable wild fisheries are located near the Kenai River, Copper River, and in Bristol Bay. Fish farming of Pacific salmon is outlawed in the United States Exclusive Economic Zone,[106] however, there is a substantial network of publicly funded hatcheries,[107] and the State of Alaska's fisheries management system is viewed as a leader in the management of wild fish stocks.
In Canada, returning Skeena River wild salmon support commercial, subsistence and recreational fisheries, as well as the area's diverse wildlife on the coast and around communities hundreds of miles inland in the watershed. The status of wild salmon in Washington is mixed. Of 435 wild stocks of salmon and steelhead, only 187 of them were classified as healthy; 113 had an unknown status, one was extinct, 12 were in critical condition and 122 were experiencing depressed populations.[108]
The commercial salmon fisheries in California have been either severely curtailed or closed completely in recent years, due to critically low returns on the Klamath and or Sacramento rivers, causing millions of dollars in losses to commercial fishermen.[109] Both Atlantic and Pacific salmon are popular sportfish.
Salmon populations have been established in all the Great Lakes. Coho stocks were planted by the state of Michigan in the late 1960s to control the growing population of non-native alewife. Now Chinook (king), Atlantic, and coho (silver) salmon are annually stocked in all Great Lakes by most bordering states and provinces. These populations are not self-sustaining and do not provide much in the way of a commercial fishery, but have led to the development of a thriving sport fishery.
Wild, self-sustaining Pacific salmon populations have been established in New Zealand, Chile, and Argentina.[110] They are highly prized by sport fishers, but others worry about displacing native fish species.[111] Also, and especially in Chile (Aquaculture in Chile), both Atlantic and Pacific salmon are used in net pen farming.
In 2020 researchers reported widespread declines in the sizes of four species of wild Pacific salmon: Chinook, chum, coho, and sockeye. These declines have been occurring for 30 years, and are thought to be associated with climate change and competition with growing numbers of pink and hatchery salmon.[112][102]
As food
[edit]

Salmon is a popular food fish. Classified as an oily fish,[113] salmon is considered to be healthy due to the fish's high protein, high omega-3 fatty acids, and high vitamin D[114] content. Salmon is also a source of cholesterol, with a range of 23–214 mg/100 g depending on the species.[115] According to reports in the journal Science, farmed salmon may contain high levels of dioxins.[medical citation needed] PCB (polychlorinated biphenyl) levels may be up to eight times higher in farmed salmon than in wild salmon,[116] but still well below levels considered dangerous.[117][118] Nonetheless, according to a 2006 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the benefits of eating even farmed salmon still outweigh any risks imposed by contaminants.[119] Farmed salmon has a high omega-3 fatty acid content comparable to wild salmon.[120] The type of omega-3 present may not be a factor for other important health functions.[vague]
Salmon flesh is generally orange to red, although white-fleshed wild salmon with white-black skin colour occurs. The natural colour of salmon results from carotenoid pigments, largely astaxanthin, but also canthaxanthin, in the flesh.[121] Wild salmon get these carotenoids from eating krill and other tiny shellfish.
The vast majority of Atlantic salmon available in market around the world are farmed (almost 99%),[122] whereas the majority of Pacific salmon are wild-caught (greater than 80%). Canned salmon in the U.S. is usually wild Pacific catch, though some farmed salmon is available in canned form. Smoked salmon is another popular preparation method, and can either be hot- or cold-smoked. Lox can refer to either cold-smoked salmon or salmon cured in a brine solution (also called gravlax). Traditional canned salmon includes some skin (which is harmless) and bone (which adds calcium). Skinless and boneless canned salmon is also available.
Raw salmon flesh may contain Anisakis nematodes, marine parasites that cause anisakiasis. Before the availability of refrigeration, the Japanese did not consume raw salmon. Salmon and salmon roe have only recently come into use in making sashimi (raw fish) and sushi.[123]
To the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, salmon is considered a vital part of the diet. Specifically, the indigenous peoples of Haida Gwaii, located near former Queen Charlotte Island in British Columbia, rely on salmon as one of their main sources of food, although many other bands have fished Pacific waters for centuries.[124] Salmon are not only ancient and unique, but it is important because it is expressed in culture, art forms, and ceremonial feasts. Annually, salmon spawn in Haida, feeding on everything on the way upstream and down.[124] Within the Haida nation, salmon is referred to as "tsiin",[124] and is prepared in several ways including smoking, baking, frying, and making soup.
Historically, there has always been enough salmon, as traditional subsistence fishing methods did not result in overfishing, and people only took what they needed.[125] In 2003, a report on First Nations participation in commercial fisheries, including salmon, commissioned by BC's Ministry of Agriculture and Food found that there were 595 First Nation-owned and operated commercial vessels in the province. Of those vessels, First Nations' members owned 564.[125] However, employment within the industry has decreased overall by 50% in the last decade, with 8,142 registered commercial fishermen in 2003. This has affected employment for many fisherman, who rely on salmon as a source of income.[relevant?]
Black bears also rely on salmon as food. The leftovers the bears leave behind are considered important nutrients for the Canadian forest, such as the soil, trees and plants. In this sense, the salmon feed the forest and in return receive clean water and gravel in which to hatch and grow, sheltered from extremes of temperature and water flow in times of high and low rainfall.[124] However, the condition of the salmon in Haida has been affected in recent decades. Due to logging and development, much of the salmon's habitat (i.e., Ain River) has been destroyed, resulting in the fish being close to endangered.[124] For residents, this has resulted in limits on catches, which, in turn, has affected families' diets and cultural events such as feasts. Some of the salmon systems in danger include the Davidon, Naden, Mamim, and Mathers.[124]
Fishing
[edit]History
[edit]
The salmon has long been at the heart of the culture and livelihood of coastal dwellers, which can be traced as far back as 5,000 years when archeologists discovered Nisqually tribe remnants.[126] The original distribution of the genus Oncorhynchus covered the Pacific Rim coastline.[127] History shows salmon used tributaries, rivers and estuaries without regard to jurisdiction for 18–22 million years. Baseline data is near impossible to recreate based on the inconsistent historical data, but there has been massive depletion since the 1900s. The Pacific Northwest once sprawled with native inhabitants who ensured little degradation was caused by their actions to salmon habitats. As animists, the indigenous people relied not only for salmon for food, but spiritual guidance. The role of the salmon spirit guided the people to respect ecological systems such as the rivers and tributaries the salmon used for spawning. Natives often used the entire fish and left little waste by turning the bladder into glue, and using bones for toys and skin for clothing and shoes. The original salmon ceremony, introduced by indigenous tribes on the Pacific coast, consisted of three major parts. First was the welcoming of the first catch, and then the cooking of it. Finally the bones were returned to the sea to induce hospitality so other salmon would give their lives to the people of that village.[128]
Many tribes, such as the Yurok, had a taboo against harvesting the first fish that swam upriver in summer, but once they confirmed that the salmon run had returned in abundance they would begin to catch them in plentiful.[129] The indigenous practices were guided by deep ecological wisdom, which was eradicated when Euro-American settlements began to be developed.[130] Salmon have a much grander history than what is presently shown today. The salmon that once dominated the Pacific Ocean are now just a fraction in population and size. The Pacific salmon population is now less than 1–3% of what it was when Lewis and Clark arrived at the region.[131] In his 1908 State of the Union address, U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt observed that the fisheries were in significant decline:[132][133]
The salmon fisheries of the Columbia River are now but a fraction of what they were twenty-five years ago, and what they would be now if the United States Government had taken complete charge of them by intervening between Oregon and Washington. During these twenty-five years the fishermen of each State have naturally tried to take all they could get, and the two legislatures have never been able to agree on joint action of any kind adequate in degree for the protection of the fisheries. At the moment the fishing on the Oregon side is practically closed, while there is no limit on the Washington side of any kind, and no one can tell what the courts will decide as to the very statutes under which this action and non-action result. Meanwhile very few salmon reach the spawning grounds, and probably four years hence the fisheries will amount to nothing; and this comes from a struggle between the associated, or gill-net, fishermen on the one hand, and the owners of the fishing wheels up the river.
On the Columbia River, the Chief Joseph Dam completed in 1955 completely blocks salmon migration to the upper Columbia River system.
The Fraser River salmon population was affected by the 1914 slide caused by the Canadian Pacific Railway at Hells Gate. The 1917 catch was one quarter of the 1913 catch.[134]
The origin of the word for "salmon" was one of the arguments about the location of the origin of the Indo-European languages.
Commercial fishing
[edit]Recreational fishing
[edit]Mythology
[edit]The salmon is an important creature in several strands of Celtic mythology and poetry, which often associated them with wisdom and venerability. In Irish folklore, fishermen associated salmon with fairies and thought it was unlucky to refer to them by name.[135] In Irish mythology, a creature called the Salmon of Knowledge[136] plays a key role in the tale The Boyhood Deeds of Fionn. In the tale, the Salmon will grant powers of knowledge to whoever eats it, and is sought by poet Finn Eces for seven years. Finally Finn Eces catches the fish and gives it to his young pupil, Fionn mac Cumhaill, to prepare it for him. However, Fionn burns his thumb on the salmon's juices, and he instinctively puts it in his mouth. In so doing, he inadvertently gains the Salmon's wisdom. Elsewhere in Irish mythology, the salmon is also one of the incarnations of both Tuan mac Cairill[137] and Fintan mac Bóchra.[138]
Salmon also feature in Welsh mythology. In the prose tale Culhwch and Olwen, the Salmon of Llyn Llyw is the oldest animal in Britain, and the only creature who knows the location of Mabon ap Modron. After speaking to a string of other ancient animals who do not know his whereabouts, King Arthur's men Cai and Bedwyr are led to the Salmon of Llyn Llyw, who lets them ride its back to the walls of Mabon's prison in Gloucester.[139]
In Norse mythology, after Loki tricked the blind god Höðr into killing his brother Baldr, Loki jumped into a river and transformed himself into a salmon to escape punishment from the other gods. When they held out a net to trap him he attempted to leap over it but was caught by Thor who grabbed him by the tail with his hand, and this is why the salmon's tail is tapered.[140]
Salmon are central spiritually and culturally to Native American mythology on the Pacific coast, from the Haida and Coast Salish peoples, to the Nuu-chah-nulth peoples in British Columbia.[141]
Notes
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC-TM30: Homing, Straying, and Colonization". U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications. Archived from the original on 20 November 2018. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
- ^ Scholz AT, Horrall RM, Cooper JC, Hasler AD (1976). "Imprinting to chemical cues: The basis for home stream selection in salmon". Science. 192 (4245): 1247–9. Bibcode:1976Sci...192.1247S. doi:10.1126/science.1273590. PMID 1273590. S2CID 11248713.
- ^ Ueda H (2011). "Physiological mechanism of homing migration in Pacific salmon from behavioral to molecular biological approaches" (PDF). General and Comparative Endocrinology. 170 (2): 222–32. doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.02.003. hdl:2115/44787. PMID 20144612. S2CID 205779299. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ Lackey, Robert; Lach, Denise; Duncan, Sally, eds. (2006). Salmon 2100: The Future of Wild Pacific Salmon. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society. p. 629. ISBN 1-888569-78-6.
- ^ "Algas nocivas matam mais de 4,2 mil toneladas de salmão no Chile". Retrieved 4 September 2022.
- ^ McDowall, R. M. (1994). The origins of New Zealand's chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Marine Fisheries Review, 1 January 1994.
- ^ "Salmon (n)". Online Etymology Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
- ^ "salmon". Wiktionary. 31 December 2022. Retrieved 1 January 2023.
- ^ "lax". Wiktionary. 12 December 2022. Retrieved 1 January 2023.
- ^ Heiko Schneider (25 August 2011). "Patagonian salmonids-This is the history and present state of salmonid introduction in Patagonia". Global Fly Fisher. Archived from the original on 26 April 2014. Retrieved 25 April 2014.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Salmo salar". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ a b "Species Fact Sheet: Salmo salar, Linnaeus, 1758". FAO. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019.
- ^ "Salmo salar". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ World Conservation Monitoring Centre (1996). "Salmo salar". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 1996 e.T19855A9026693. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.1996.RLTS.T19855A9026693.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Oncorhynchus tshawytscha". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Species Fact Sheet: Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum, 1792)". FAO. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019.
- ^ "Oncorhynchus tshawytscha". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ IUCN (18 September 2020). Oncorhynchus tshawytscha: Hammerson, G.A. & Bogutskaya, N.: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T202639A18231664 (Report). International Union for Conservation of Nature. doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2024-2.rlts.t202639a18231664.en. Accessed on 25 May 2025.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Oncorhynchus keta". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Species Fact Sheet: Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum, 1792)". FAO. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019.
- ^ "Oncorhynchus keta". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ IUCN (23 July 2020). Oncorhynchus keta: Hammerson, G.A. & Bogutskaya, N.: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T202637A18236268 (Report). International Union for Conservation of Nature. doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2024-2.rlts.t202637a18236268.en. Accessed on 25 May 2025.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Oncorhynchus kisutch". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Species Fact Sheet: Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum, 1792)". FAO. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019.
- ^ "Oncorhynchus kisutch". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ IUCN (27 July 2020). Oncorhynchus kisutch: Hammerson, G.A. & Bogutskaya, N.: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T202638A18228780 (Report). International Union for Conservation of Nature. doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2024-2.rlts.t202638a18228780.en. Accessed on 25 May 2025
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Oncorhynchus masou". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Oncorhynchus masou". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Oncorhynchus gorbuscha". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Species Fact Sheet: Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walbaum, 1792)". FAO. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019.
- ^ "Oncorhynchus gorbuscha". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ IUCN (23 July 2020). Oncorhynchus gorbuscha: Hammerson, G.A. & Bogutskaya, N.: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024: e.T202636A18232679 (Report). International Union for Conservation of Nature. doi:10.2305/iucn.uk.2024-2.rlts.t202636a18232679.en. Accessed on 25 May 2025
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Oncorhynchus nerka". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Species Fact Sheet: Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum, 1792)". FAO. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019.
- ^ "Oncorhynchus nerka". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Rand, P.S. (2011). "Oncorhynchus nerka". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2011 e.T135301A4071001. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-2.RLTS.T135301A4071001.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
- ^ Montgomery, David (2004). King of Fish. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press. pp. 27–28. ISBN 0-8133-4299-6.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Arripis trutta". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Arripis trutta". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Hucho hucho". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Hucho hucho". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Freyhof, J.; Kottelat, M. (2008). "Hucho hucho". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2008 e.T10264A3186143. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T10264A3186143.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Elagatis bipinnulata". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Species Fact Sheet: Elagatis bipinnulata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825)". FAO. Archived from the original on 25 November 2018.
- ^ "Elagatis bipinnulata". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.). "Eleutheronema tetradactylum". FishBase. April 2012 version.
- ^ "Eleutheronema tetradactylum". Integrated Taxonomic Information System.
- ^ a b c d Based on data sourced from the relevant FAO Species Fact Sheets
- ^ "Chinook Salmon". Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Archived from the original on 17 December 2006. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
- ^ a b c Stephenson, S. A. "The Distribution of Pacific Salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in the Canadian Western Arctic" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 July 2017. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
- ^ "Chinook Salmon". NOAA Fisheries. 6 April 2012. Archived from the original on 28 May 2012.
- ^ "Chum Salmon". Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Archived from the original on 5 April 2007. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
- ^ "Coho Salmon". NOAA Fisheries. 28 June 2012. Archived from the original on 2 February 2013.
- ^ "Formosan salmon". Taiwan Journal. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 13 December 2006.
- ^ "Pink Salmon". Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Archived from the original on 26 February 2007. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
- ^ "Sockeye Salmon". Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Archived from the original on 6 December 2006. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
- ^ a b c "Pacific Salmon, (Oncorhynchus spp.)". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
- ^ "Kokanee Salmon: Your Complete Guide to Fishing, Facts, Cooking, Conservation, and Gear - Everything About Kokanee Salmon". Kokanee Fishing. 23 May 2025. Retrieved 24 May 2025.
- ^ "A Salmon's Life: An Incredible Journey". U.S. Bureau of Land Management. Archived from the original on 25 February 2009.
- ^ McCormick, Stephen D. (1 January 2012), McCormick, Stephen D.; Farrell, Anthony P.; Brauner, Colin J. (eds.), "5 - Smolt Physiology and Endocrinology", Fish Physiology, Euryhaline Fishes, vol. 32, Academic Press, pp. 199–251, Bibcode:2012eufi.book..199M, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-396951-4.00005-0, ISBN 978-0-12-396951-4, retrieved 26 October 2020
- ^ Björnsson, Björn Th.; Hansson, Tiiu (February 1983). "Effects of hypophysectomy on the plasma ionic and osmotic balance in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri". General and Comparative Endocrinology. 49 (2): 240–247. doi:10.1016/0016-6480(83)90140-5. ISSN 0016-6480. PMID 6840518.
- ^ Vladić, Tomislav; Petersson, Erik, eds. (2015). Evolutionary Biology of the Atlantic Salmon (1st ed.). CRC Press. p. 150. ISBN 978-1-4665-9848-5.
- ^ McGrath, Susan. "Spawning Hope". Audubon Society. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
- ^ Glatz, Kyle (7 December 2021). "What Do Salmon Eat? 12 Foods in Their Diet". AZ Animals. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
- ^ Fisheries, NOAA (3 May 2022). "Fun Facts About Amazing Atlantic Salmon | NOAA Fisheries". NOAA. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
- ^ Willson MF, Halupka KC (1995). "Anadromous Fish as Keystone Species in Vertebrate Communities" (PDF). Conservation Biology. 9 (3): 489–497. Bibcode:1995ConBi...9..489W. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030489.x. JSTOR 2386604. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2011.
- ^ Gende, S.M.; Quinn, T.P.; Willson, M.F. (1 May 2001). "Consumption choice by bears feeding on salmon". Oecologia. 127 (3): 372–382. Bibcode:2001Oecol.127..372G. doi:10.1007/s004420000590. PMID 28547108. S2CID 41395058. Retrieved 14 September 2023.
- ^ Reimchen, TE (2001). "Salmon nutrients, nitrogen isotopes and coastal forests" (PDF). Ecoforestry. 16: 13. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 May 2003.
- ^ Quinn, T.; Carlson, S.; Gende, S. & Rich, H. (2009). "Transportation of Pacific Salmon Carcasses from Streams to Riparian Forests by Bears" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 87 (3): 195–203. Bibcode:2009CaJZ...87..195Q. doi:10.1139/Z09-004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2012.
- ^ Reimchen TE, Mathewson DD, Hocking MD, Moran J (2002). "Isotopic evidence for enrichment of salmon-derived nutrients in vegetation, soil, and insects in riparian zones in coastal British Columbia" (PDF). American Fisheries Society Symposium. 20: 1–12. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 October 2003.
- ^ Helfield, J. & Naiman, R. (2006). "Keystone Interactions: Salmon and Bear in Riparian Forests of Alaska" (PDF). Ecosystems. 9 (2): 167–180. Bibcode:2006Ecosy...9..167H. doi:10.1007/s10021-004-0063-5. S2CID 28989920. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April 2012.
- ^ "Extinction". Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Archived from the original on 1 January 2018. Retrieved 21 December 2007.
- ^ Hyatt, K D; McQueen, D J; Shortreed, K S; Rankin, D P (2004). "Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) nursery lake fertilization: Review and summary of results" (PDF). Environmental Reviews. 12 (3): 133–162. Bibcode:2004EnvRv..12..133H. doi:10.1139/a04-008. S2CID 12930576. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2020.
- ^ Pollock, M. M.; Pess, G. R.; Beechie, T. J. "The Importance of Beaver Ponds to Coho Salmon Production in the Stillaguamish River Basin, Washington, USA" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 September 2006. Retrieved 21 December 2007.
- ^ Hood, W Gregory. "AN OVERLOOKED ECOLOGICAL WEB". Archived from the original on 24 July 2008.
- ^ "Yuba River Steelhead Redd Surveys (preliminary draft)" (PDF). Yuba River Management Team (RMT) Web Site, Yuba County Water Agency. 19 January 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 April 2018.
- ^ "Elder's devotion to ugly fish lives on after his tragic death". Al Jazeera America. 20 August 2014. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018.
- ^ "Pacific Lamprey's Big Year". Redheaded Blackbelt. 18 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018.
- ^ "A Primeval Marvel" (PDF). terra. Oregon State University. 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 May 2018.
- ^ Crosier, Danielle M.; Molloy, Daniel P.; Bartholomew, Jerri. "Whirling Disease - Myxobolus cerebralis" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 February 2008. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
- ^ Boyce, N.P.; Kabata, Z.; Margolis, L. (1985). "Investigation of the Distribution, Detection, and Biology of Henneguya salminicola (Protozoa, Myxozoa), a Parasite of the Flesh of Pacific Salmon" (PDF). Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (1450): 55. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 November 2014.
- ^ "Sea Lice and Salmon: Elevating the dialogue on the farmed-wild salmon story" (PDF). Watershed Watch Salmon Society. 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2012.
- ^ Bravo, S. (2003). "Sea lice in Chilean salmon farms". Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 23: 197–200.
- ^ Morton, A.; Routledge, R; Peet, C; Ladwig, A (2004). "Sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infection rates on juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum (Oncorhynchus keta) salmon in the nearshore marine environment of British Columbia, Canada". Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 61 (2): 147–157. Bibcode:2004CJFAS..61..147M. doi:10.1139/f04-016.
- ^ Peet, C. R. (2007). Interactions between sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus clemensii), juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus keta and Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and salmon farms in British Columbia (PDF) (MSc). Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: University of Victoria. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 October 2016.
- ^ Krkošek, M; Gottesfeld, A; Proctor, B; Rolston, D; Carr-Harris, C; Lewis, M.A. (2007). "Effects of host migration, diversity and aquaculture on sea lice threats to Pacific salmon populations". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 274 (1629): 3141–9. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1122. PMC 2293942. PMID 17939989.
- ^ Morton, Alexandra. "SALMON CONFIDENTIAL: The ugly truth about Canada's open-net salmon farms". WHAT IS A FISH FARM?. Archived from the original on 5 October 2015. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
- ^ Morton, Alexandra; Routledge, Rick; Krkosek, Martin (2008). "Sea Louse Infestation in Wild Juvenile Salmon and Pacific Herring Associated with Fish Farms off the East-Central Coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia" (PDF). North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 28 (2): 523–532. Bibcode:2008NAJFM..28..523M. doi:10.1577/M07-042.1. ISSN 0275-5947. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 August 2013.
- ^ Krkosek, M.; Lewis, M. A.; Morton, A.; Frazer, L. N.; Volpe, J. P. (2006). "Epizootics of wild fish induced by farm fish". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103 (42): 15506–15510. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10315506K. doi:10.1073/pnas.0603525103. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1591297. PMID 17021017.
- ^ Krkošek, Martin (2007). "Declining Wild Salmon Populations in Relation to Parasites from Farm Salmon". Science. 318 (5857): 1772–5. Bibcode:2007Sci...318.1772K. doi:10.1126/science.1148744. PMID 18079401. S2CID 86544687.
- ^ Browman, Howard; Halvorsen, Michele B.; Casper, Brandon M.; Woodley, Christa M.; Carlson, Thomas J.; Popper, Arthur N. (2012). "Threshold for Onset of Injury in Chinook Salmon from Exposure to Impulsive Pile Driving Sounds". PLOS ONE. 7 (6) e38968. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...738968H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038968. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3380060. PMID 22745695.
- ^ Weissglas, G; Appelblad, H (1997). Bengtsson, Bo; Toivonen, A-L; Tuunainen, P (eds.). Wild-spawning Baltic salmon – A natural resource redefined: From food to toys for "boys"?. Socio-economics of recreational fishery: Hotel Royal Wasa, Vaasa, Finland. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers [Nordiska ministerrådet]. pp. 89–95. ISBN 978-92-893-0120-6.
- ^ a b Shaw, Susan; Muir, James (1987). Salmon: Economics and Marketing. Springer Netherlands. p. 250. ISBN 978-0-7099-3344-1.
- ^ Naylor, Rosamond L. "Nature's Subsidies to Shrimp and Salmon Farming" (PDF). Science; 10/30/98, Vol. 282 Issue 5390, p883. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 March 2009.
- ^ "It's all about salmon" (PDF). Seafood Choices Alliance. 2005. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015.
- ^ Fisheries, NOAA (30 December 2019). "Feeds for Aquaculture | NOAA Fisheries". NOAA. Retrieved 14 April 2023.
- ^ "Fish farms drive wild salmon populations toward extinction". SeaWeb. 13 December 2007. Archived from the original on 25 November 2018.
- ^ "Pigments in Salmon Aquaculture: How to Grow a Salmon-colored Salmon". Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 26 August 2007.
- ^ Guilford, Gwynn (12 March 2015). "Here's why your farmed salmon has color added to it". Quartz (publication). Archived from the original on 13 March 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
- ^ a b "The Future of Aquafeeds: DRAFT for public comment" (PDF). NOAA/USDA Alternative Feeds Initiative. November 2010. p. 56. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 October 2011.
- ^ Salmon Recovery Planning. nwr.noaa.gov. p. 57.
- ^ a b Oke, K. B.; Cunningham, C. J.; Westley, P. a. H.; Baskett, M. L.; Carlson, S. M.; Clark, J.; Hendry, A. P.; Karatayev, V. A.; Kendall, N. W.; Kibele, J.; Kindsvater, H. K.; Kobayashi, K. M.; Lewis, B.; Munch, S.; Reynolds, J. D.; Vick, G. K.; Palkovacs, E. P. (19 August 2020). "Recent declines in salmon body size impact ecosystems and fisheries". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 4155. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.4155O. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17726-z. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7438488. PMID 32814776.
Text and images are available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- ^ Lackey, Robert (1999). "Salmon policy: science, society, restoration, and reality". Environmental Science and Policy. 2 (4–5): 369–379. Bibcode:1999ESPol...2..369L. doi:10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00034-9.
- ^ "1878–2010, Historical Commercial Salmon Catches and Exvessel Values". Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Retrieved 6 August 2011.
- ^ Viechnicki, Joe (3 August 2011). "Pink salmon numbers record setting in early season". KRBD Public Radio in Ketchikan, Alaska. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012. Retrieved 6 August 2011.
- ^ Hey, Ellen; Burke, W. T.; Pnzoni, D. (1991). The Regulation of Driftnet Fishing on the High Seas: Legal Issues. Food & Agriculture Org. ISBN 978-92-5-103009-7.
- ^ media.aprn.org Archived 21 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine|low fish returns in Southeast this summer have been tough on the region's hatcheries
- ^ Johnson, Thom H.; Lincoln, Rich; Graves, Gary R. & Gibbons, Robert G. (1997). "Status of Wild Salmon and Steelhead Stocks in Washington State". In Stouder, Deanna J.; Bisson, Peter A. & Naiman, Robert J. (eds.). Pacific Salmon & Their Ecosystems. Springer. pp. 127–144. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6375-4_11. ISBN 978-1-4615-6375-4.
- ^ Hackett, S. & D. Hansen. "Cost and Revenue Characteristics of the Salmon Fisheries in California and Oregon". Archived from the original on 4 June 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
- ^ Correa, Cristian; Moran, Paul (2017). "Polyphyletic ancestry of expanding Patagonian Chinook salmon populations". Scientific Reports. 14338 (1): 14338. Bibcode:2017NatSR...714338C. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14465-y. PMC 5662728. PMID 29084997.
- ^ Iriarte, J. Agustin; Lobos, Gabriel A.; Jaksic, Fabian M. (2005). "Invasive vertebrate species in Chile and their control and monitoring by governmental agencies". Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 78 (78): 143–154.
- ^ "Alaska's salmon are getting smaller, affecting people and ecosystems". phys.org. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ "What's an oily fish?". Food Standards Agency. 24 June 2004. Archived from the original on 10 December 2010.
- ^ "Dietary Supplement Fact Sheet: Vitamin D". National Institutes of Health. Archived from the original on 16 July 2007. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
- ^ "Cholesterol: Cholesterol Content in Seafoods (Tuna, Salmon, Shrimp)". Archived from the original on 20 December 2006. Retrieved 13 December 2007.
- ^ Hites, R. A.; Foran, J. A.; Carpenter, D. O.; Hamilton, M. C.; Knuth, B. A.; Schwager, S. J. (2004). "Global Assessment of Organic Contaminants in Farmed Salmon" (PDF). Science. 303 (5655): 226–9. Bibcode:2004Sci...303..226H. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.319.8375. doi:10.1126/science.1091447. PMID 14716013. S2CID 24058620. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 August 2017. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
- ^ "Farmed vs. wild salmon – which is better?". CTV News. Archived from the original on 8 November 2018. Retrieved 28 April 2013.
- ^ Foran, J. A.; Carpenter, D. O.; Hamilton, M. C.; Knuth, B. A.; Schwager, S. J. (2005). "Risk-Based Consumption Advice for Farmed Atlantic and Wild Pacific Salmon Contaminated with Dioxins and Dioxin-like Compounds". Environmental Health Perspectives. 113 (5): 552–556. Bibcode:2005EnvHP.113..552F. doi:10.1289/ehp.7626. PMC 1257546. PMID 15866762.
- ^ Mozaffarian, Dariush; Rimm, Eric B. (2006). "Fish Intake, Contaminants, and Human Health". JAMA. 296 (15): 1885–99. doi:10.1001/jama.296.15.1885. PMID 17047219.
- ^ Raatz, S. K.; Rosenberger, T. A.; Johnson, L. K.; Wolters, W. W.; Burr, G. S.; Picklo Mj, Sr (2013). "Dose-Dependent Consumption of Farmed Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Increases Plasma Phospholipid n-3 Fatty Acids Differentially". Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 113 (2): 282–7. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.022. PMC 3572904. PMID 23351633.
- ^ "Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition on the use of canthaxanthin in feedingstuffs for salmon and trout, laying hens, and other poultry" (PDF). European Commission—Health & Consumer Protection Directorate. pp. 6–7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 November 2006. Retrieved 13 November 2006.
- ^ Montaigne, Fen. "Everybody Loves Atlantic Salmon: Here's the Catch..." National Geographic. Archived from the original on 1 March 2007. Retrieved 17 November 2006.
- ^ Jiang, Jess (18 September 2015). "How The Desperate Norwegian Salmon Industry Created A Sushi Staple". National Public Radio. Archived from the original on 24 April 2019. Retrieved 14 January 2017.
- ^ a b c d e f "Haida Gwaii Strategic Land Use Agreement" (PDF). Council of the Haida Nation. September 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015.
- ^ a b Garner, Kerri; Parfitt, Ben (April 2006). First Nations, Salmon Fisheries and the Rising Importance of Conservation (Prepared for the Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council) (PDF). Vancouver, BC: Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council. ISBN 1-897110-28-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015.
- ^ Wilkinson, Charles (2000). Messages from Frank's Landing: A Story of Salmon, Treaties, and the Indian Way. University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-98011-9. OCLC 44391504.
- ^ Nadel., Foley, Dana (1 January 2005). Atlas of pacific salmon: the first map-based status assessment of salmon in the North Pacific. California University Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24504-4. OCLC 470376738.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Amoss, Pamela T. (1987). "The Fish God Gave Us: The First Salmon Ceremony Revived". Arctic Anthropology. 24 (1): 56–66. JSTOR 40316132.
- ^ Lichatowich, Jim (1999). Salmon Without Rivers: A History of the Pacific Salmon Crisis. Island Press. ISBN 978-1-55963-360-4. OCLC 868995261.
- ^ E., Taylor, Joseph (2001). Making Salmon: An Environmental History of the Northwest Fisheries Crisis. Univ of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-98114-7. OCLC 228275619.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Mcdermott, Jim (2017). "Endangered Salmon". Archived from the original on 15 November 2006.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) - ^ "Columbia River History: Commercial Fishing". Northwest Power and Conservation Council. 2010. Archived from the original on 11 December 2010. Retrieved 26 January 2012.
- ^ Roosevelt, Theodore (8 December 1908). "State of the Union Address Part II by Theodore Roosevelt". Archived from the original on 30 January 2013. Retrieved 31 January 2012.
- ^ Babcock, John P (1920). Fraser River Salmon Situation a Reclamation Project. Victoria, B.C: W. H. Cullin. pp. 5.
- ^ Ní Fhloinn, Bairbre (2018). Cold Iron Aspects of the occupational lore of Irish fishermen. University College Dublin. pp. 105–123. ISBN 978-0-9565628-7-6.
- ^ "The Salmon of Knowledge. Celtic Mythology, Fairy Tale". Luminarium.org. 18 January 2007. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 1 June 2010.
- ^ "The Story of Tuan mac Cairill". Maryjones.us. Archived from the original on 27 March 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
- ^ "The Colloquy between Fintan and the Hawk of Achill". Ucc.ie. Archived from the original on 31 December 2018. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
- ^ Parker, Will. "Culhwch ac Olwen: A translation of the oldest Arthurian tale". Culhwch ac Olwen. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 17 January 2018.
- ^ "The Poetic Edda". Translated by Henry Adams Bellows. Archived from the original on 6 May 2019. Retrieved 27 April 2011.
- ^ "Tribal Salmon Culture: Salmon Culture of the Pacific Northwest Tribes". Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. Archived from the original on 13 May 2019.
Further reading
[edit]- Atlas of Pacific Salmon, Xanthippe Augerot and the State of the Salmon Consortium, University of California Press, 2005, hardcover, 152 pages, ISBN 0-520-24504-0
- Making Salmon: An Environmental History of the Northwest Fisheries Crisis, Joseph E. Taylor III, University of Washington Press, 1999, 488 pages, ISBN 0-295-98114-8
- Trout and Salmon of North America, Robert J. Behnke, Illustrated by Joseph R. Tomelleri, The Free Press, 2002, hardcover, 359 pages, ISBN 0-7432-2220-2
- Come back, salmon, By Molly Cone, Sierra Club Books, 48 pages, ISBN 0-87156-572-2 – A book for juveniles describes the restoration of 'Pigeon Creek'.
- The salmon: their fight for survival, By Anthony Netboy, 1973, Houghton Mifflin Co., 613 pages, ISBN 0-395-14013-7
- A River Lost, by Blaine Harden, 1996, WW Norton Co., 255 pages, ISBN 0-393-31690-4. (Historical view of the Columbia River system).
- River of Life, Channel of Death, by Keith C. Peterson, 1995, Confluence Press, 306 pages, ISBN 978-0-87071-496-2. (Fish and dams on the Lower Snake River.)
- Salmon, by Dr Peter Coates, 2006, ISBN 1-86189-295-0
- Lackey, Robert T (2000) "Restoring Wild Salmon to the Pacific Northwest: Chasing an Illusion?" In: Patricia Koss and Mike Katz (Eds) What we don't know about Pacific Northwest fish runs: An inquiry into decision-making under uncertainty, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. Pages 91–143.
- Mills D (2001) "Salmonids" In: pp. 252–261, Steele JH, Thorpe SA and Turekian KK (2010) Marine Biology: A Derivative of the Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences, Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-08-096480-5.
- NEWS January 31, 2007: U.S. Orders Modification of Klamath River – Dams Removal May Prove More Cost-Effective for allowing the passage of Salmon
- Salmon age and sex composition and mean lengths for the Yukon River area, 2004 / by Shawna Karpovich and Larry DuBois. Hosted by Alaska State Publications Program.
- . Popular Science Monthly. Vol. 61. July 1902.
- Trading Tails: Linkages Between Russian Salmon Fisheries and East Asian Markets. Shelley Clarke. (November 2007). 120pp. ISBN 978-1-85850-230-4.
- The Salmons Tale, one of the twelve Ionan Tales by Jim MacCool
External links
[edit]- "Last Stand of the American Salmon", G. Bruce Knecht for Men's Journal (archived 11 May 2012)
- Plea for the Wanderer, an NFB documentary on West Coast salmon Archived 27 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- Arctic Salmon on Facebook research project studying Pacific salmon in the Arctic and potential links to climate change
- University of Washington Libraries Digital Collections – Salmon Collection A collection of documents describing salmon of the Pacific Northwest.
- Salmon Nation Archived 25 November 2002 at the Library of Congress Web Archives A movement to create a bioregional community, based on the historic spawning area of Pacific salmon (CA to AK).
- Arctic Salmon – Pacific salmon distribution and abundance seems to be increasing in the Arctic. Links to a Canadian research project documenting changes in Pacific salmon and studying Pacific salmon ecology in the Arctic.
Salmon
View on GrokipediaTaxonomy and Nomenclature
Etymology and Common Names
The term "salmon" entered Middle English as samoun or samon around the early 13th century, derived from Anglo-French saumon and ultimately from Latin salmonem or salmo, denoting the fish.[10] [11] This Latin root is thought to stem from salīre, meaning "to leap," in reference to the species' characteristic upstream leaps during spawning migrations.[10] [12] The modern silent "l" in English pronunciation was a later orthographic insertion in the 16th century to align more closely with the Latin form, despite its absence in earlier pronunciations.[13] Initially, the name applied specifically to the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), a species native to North Atlantic and Arctic waters.[14] Common names for salmon species vary by region, often reflecting physical traits, indigenous languages, or commercial designations, while encompassing true salmons from the genera Salmo and Oncorhynchus in the family Salmonidae. The Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is simply termed "Atlantic salmon" in English-speaking contexts. Pacific salmon species include: Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, known as Chinook (from the Salish tribal name) or King salmon due to its large size; O. kisutch, called Coho (from indigenous terms for the fish) or Silver salmon for its appearance; O. nerka, referred to as Sockeye (possibly from Sahaptin "sukkegh," meaning fish) or Red salmon from breeding coloration; O. gorbuscha, named Pink salmon for its hues or Humpback for males' dorsal humps; and O. keta, termed Chum (from Chinook jargon for spotted markings) or Dog salmon for aggressive behavior.[15] [16] [17] These names, standardized by bodies like the American Fisheries Society, distinguish the five primary North American Pacific species, though regional synonyms like "quinnat" for Chinook persist in historical records.[17]True Salmon Species
True salmon species are anadromous fish in the family Salmonidae, primarily from the genera Salmo and Oncorhynchus, distinguished by their migration from marine to freshwater environments for spawning.[18] These species exhibit distinct morphological traits, such as adipose fins and parr marks, and semelparity in most Pacific species, where adults die post-spawning, unlike the iteroparous Atlantic salmon.[18] The genus Oncorhynchus encompasses Pacific salmons, while Salmo salar represents the sole true Atlantic salmon species.[19] The Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) inhabits rivers draining into the North Atlantic Ocean, from Ungava Bay in Canada to the Iberian Peninsula in Europe, with populations historically numbering in the millions before overfishing and habitat loss reduced them significantly by the 19th century.[19] Adults typically reach 70-100 cm in length and 4-6 kg, though exceptional individuals exceed 1.5 m and 30 kg, feeding on crustaceans, fish, and squid in oceanic phases.[20] Pacific true salmons include five primary species in Oncorhynchus: Chinook (O. tshawytscha), known for large size up to 1.5 m and high fat content; coho (O. kisutch), averaging 60-70 cm; chum (O. keta), with vertical bars in spawning males; pink (O. gorbuscha), the smallest and most abundant, maturing in two years; and sockeye (O. nerka), which spends one to five years in freshwater lakes before ocean migration.[21] These species spawn in North Pacific rivers from California to Alaska and Siberia, with annual runs varying by species; for instance, pink salmon dominate with over 200 million individuals in even-year Alaskan returns as of 2020 data.[22] Masu salmon (O. masou), native to East Asia, is occasionally classified separately due to its primarily freshwater or short anadromous life.[18]| Species | Scientific Name | Average Adult Length | Key Habitat Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic salmon | Salmo salar | 70-100 cm | North Atlantic rivers and coasts [19] |
| Chinook salmon | Oncorhynchus tshawytscha | 70-150 cm | North Pacific, large river systems[23] |
| Coho salmon | Oncorhynchus kisutch | 60-70 cm | Coastal streams, North Pacific [21] |
| Chum salmon | Oncorhynchus keta | 60-100 cm | Lower river reaches, estuaries [21] |
| Pink salmon | Oncorhynchus gorbuscha | 50-70 cm | Shallow streams, biennial cycles [21] |
| Sockeye salmon | Oncorhynchus nerka | 60-80 cm | Lake-fed rivers, sockeye lakes [21] |
Non-Salmon Species Commonly Called Salmon
Several marine fish species outside the Salmonidae family bear the common name "salmon" due to superficial resemblances in body shape, schooling behavior, or silvery coloration, though they lack the anadromous life cycle and distant spawning migrations characteristic of true salmon.[24] The most prominent examples are in the genus Arripis (family Arripidae), native to the southern coasts of Australia and New Zealand.[25] The eastern Australian salmon (Arripis trutta), also known as kahawai in New Zealand, inhabits continental shelf waters from shallow estuaries to depths of about 40 meters, forming large schools that migrate seasonally along southeastern Australian and New Zealand coasts.[25] Adults typically reach lengths of 60-80 cm and weights up to 3 kg, with a diet primarily of small fish and crustaceans; despite the name, it is not closely related to Salmonidae and does not undertake long freshwater spawning runs.[26] Similarly, the western Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus) occurs along southwestern Australian coasts, growing to comparable sizes (up to 85 cm) and exhibiting analogous schooling and predatory habits in nearshore waters up to 55 meters deep.[27] These species are commercially and recreationally fished, with eastern stocks assessed as sustainably managed in 2012 reports, though overfishing concerns have prompted size and bag limits in some regions.[24] Other unrelated species occasionally misnamed as salmon include certain tropical or subtropical fish like the "salmon catfish" (Hexanematichthys bleekeri), a freshwater species in the Ariidae family from Southeast Asia, valued for its pinkish flesh but lacking any salmonid traits. Such naming conventions often arise from local culinary or visual analogies rather than phylogenetic affinity, highlighting the risk of confusion in fisheries and trade.[28]Biological Characteristics
Global Distribution and Habitat
Salmon species, belonging to the family Salmonidae, exhibit a primarily Northern Hemisphere distribution centered on the North Atlantic and North Pacific Oceans, with no native populations in the Southern Hemisphere.[16] [22] The Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) inhabits rivers draining into the North Atlantic from the Arctic Circle southward to Portugal in Europe and historically to Connecticut in North America, though viable populations are now largely confined to eastern Canada, Maine, and parts of Scandinavia and the British Isles.[29] [20] Pacific salmon of the genus Oncorhynchus—including five species native to North American waters (Chinook/O. tshawytscha, coho/O. kisutch, chum/O. keta, sockeye/O. nerka, and pink/O. gorbuscha)—range across the North Pacific from the Russian Far East (e.g., Kamchatka and Magadan) eastward to Alaska, British Columbia, and southward to central California, with some species extending to northern Japan and Korea.[21] [22] [16] Habitat requirements vary by life stage but universally demand cold, oxygen-rich waters. Juveniles (parr and smolts) occupy shallow, gravel-bedded freshwater streams and rivers with low sediment loads and stable flows, often in forested or mountainous watersheds that provide thermal refuge from warming trends.[19] [30] Adults migrate to nutrient-abundant marine environments, including coastal seas and the open North Pacific or Atlantic gyres, where they feed on zooplankton, fish, and squid while tolerating salinities up to 35 ppt and temperatures below 15°C (59°F).[21] [31] Spawning occurs in natal freshwater systems, favoring riffles with coarse gravel substrates for redd construction, typically at water temperatures of 7–12°C (45–54°F) and dissolved oxygen levels exceeding 8 mg/L.[19] [30] Landlocked or "kokanee" forms of certain Pacific species, such as sockeye, persist in isolated lakes like those in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, completing their life cycles without oceanic migration but still requiring deep, oligotrophic waters for thermal stratification and upwelling-driven plankton blooms.[32] Human-introduced populations have established in regions like the Great Lakes and Patagonia, though these often face genetic dilution and habitat mismatches, with success limited by predation and water quality degradation.[29] [22] Across distributions, salmon avoid tropical or subtropical latitudes due to thermal intolerance, with range edges correlating to isotherms below 20°C (68°F) in summer surface waters.[21] [33]Life Cycle and Reproductive Strategies
Salmon undergo an anadromous life cycle, hatching in freshwater, migrating to the ocean for growth, and returning to freshwater streams to spawn.[34] This cycle varies by species, with Pacific salmon (genus Oncorhynchus) typically completing it in 2 to 7 years, while Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) may take 4 to 7 years.[35] Adults home to natal spawning grounds using olfactory imprinting during the parr stage and geomagnetic cues detected via the lateral line system.[36][37] Spawning occurs in gravel beds where females construct redds by flipping stones with their tails, depositing 2,000 to 30,000 eggs per female depending on species and size; males then fertilize the eggs externally.[2] Eggs incubate for 40 to 150 days at temperatures of 4–10°C before hatching into alevins, which remain buried and absorb their yolk sacs for nutrition over 2–12 weeks.[2] Alevins emerge as fry, which disperse and begin exogenous feeding on aquatic insects and plankton.[2] Juvenile salmon progress to the parr stage in freshwater, developing vertical parr marks for camouflage and residing 3 months to 3 years, with species like sockeye spending up to 3 years while coho may take 1–2 years.[35] Smoltification follows, a physiological transformation involving endocrine changes, gill chloride cell proliferation, and osmoregulatory adaptations to tolerate full-strength seawater, often coinciding with silvering of scales and loss of parr marks; this process imprints juveniles on stream odors for later homing.[38] Smolts migrate seaward, entering the ocean where they grow rapidly on a diet of zooplankton, fish, and squid, attaining 1–5 years of marine residence before maturation.[35] Pacific salmon employ semelparity, expending all energy in a single spawning event, leading to post-spawning mortality from exhaustion, infection, and physiological breakdown, which enriches natal streams with nutrients via carcass decomposition.[18] Atlantic salmon exhibit iteroparity, with adults potentially surviving to spawn 2–8 times, though repeat spawners comprise only 3–11% of populations due to high post-spawning mortality risks.[19][39] Homing precision supports reproductive strategies by concentrating spawning in optimal habitats, though straying occurs at rates of 1–10% to facilitate gene flow and recolonization.[40]Physiological Adaptations
Salmon exhibit remarkable physiological adaptations to their anadromous life cycle, enabling transitions between freshwater and marine environments. Central to this is osmoregulation, the maintenance of internal fluid and electrolyte balance despite external salinity shifts. In freshwater, salmon are hyperosmotic to their surroundings, minimizing water influx through reduced drinking and impermeable skin while actively absorbing sodium and chloride ions via specialized gill chloride cells and producing copious dilute urine to excrete excess water. Upon entering seawater during smoltification, they become hypoosmotic, drinking large volumes of seawater and relying on hyperdeveloped gill chloride cells to actively excrete excess salts through increased Na+/K+-ATPase pump activity, while kidneys produce isotonic urine to conserve water.[41][42][43] Smoltification, the parr-to-smolt transformation occurring in juveniles typically after 1-3 years in freshwater, orchestrates these osmoregulatory shifts alongside morphological and behavioral changes. Triggered by photoperiod, temperature, and hormonal cues such as elevated cortisol, growth hormone, and thyroid hormones, this process enhances seawater tolerance by proliferating seawater-type chloride cells in the gills, increasing gill Na+/K+-ATPase enzyme levels up to 10-fold, and altering ion transport mechanisms. Accompanying changes include silvery skin pigmentation for camouflage, elongation of the body, and suppression of freshwater-specific osmoregulatory traits, preparing smolts for oceanic migration where survival rates hinge on successful adaptation within days.[44][45][46] During the upstream spawning migration, mature salmon undergo catabolic physiological remodeling to fuel extreme exertion without feeding, relying on lipid reserves accumulated during marine growth phases. White muscle tissue shifts metabolically, increasing reliance on anaerobic glycolysis and fatty acid oxidation to sustain bursts of activity like leaping obstacles, while plasma cortisol surges to mobilize energy stores and suppress non-reproductive functions. Cardiovascular adaptations include elevated cardiac output and hematocrit levels to enhance oxygen delivery amid falling temperatures and hypoxia in rivers. In Pacific species, males develop secondary sexual characteristics such as a kype (elongated lower jaw) and dorsal humps via testosterone-driven remodeling of skeletal and muscular tissues.[47][2][48] Returning adults reverse smoltification over days to weeks in estuarine waters, reactivating freshwater osmoregulatory mechanisms: chloride cell morphology regresses, Na+/K+-ATPase activity declines, and prolactin and cortisol levels adjust to promote ion uptake and water excretion suited to hypotonic conditions. These adaptations, while enabling semelparity in most Pacific salmon (spawning once before death), impose high energetic costs, with mortality often exceeding 50% due to exhaustion, predation, or osmoregulatory stress if migrations are prolonged.[41][48][19]Feeding Habits and Nutritional Physiology
Juvenile salmon in freshwater habitats, including species such as Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), exhibit opportunistic feeding primarily on aquatic invertebrates, including insects, crustaceans, and planktonic organisms, which supports rapid growth during the parr stage.[49] As smolts transition to marine environments, their diet shifts to include small fish, squid, eels, and shrimp, enabling substantial biomass accumulation through higher caloric intake from protein- and lipid-rich prey.[34] In the North Pacific, adult Pacific salmon consume a diverse array of zooplankton, fish, and nekton during summer feeding periods, with diet composition varying by species and region but consistently emphasizing energy-dense marine forage to build reserves for reproduction.[50] Adult salmon cease feeding upon entering freshwater for spawning migration, relying instead on pre-accumulated energy stores to fuel upstream travel, gonadal maturation, and gamete production, a physiological adaptation that minimizes predation risk and conserves energy amid reduced foraging opportunities.[51] This fasting period, lasting up to several months, leads to progressive depletion of somatic lipids, with muscle fat content dropping significantly; for instance, Pacific pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) show selective fatty acid utilization from skeletal triacylglycerols during this phase.[52] Delays at obstacles like dams exacerbate lipid loss, as salmon maintain elevated metabolic rates without intake, potentially compromising post-spawning survival in iteroparous populations.[53] Salmon digestive systems feature a complete suite of enzymes—proteases, amylases, and lipases—that hydrolyze dietary proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids into monomers for intestinal absorption, with activity optimized for marine-derived high-protein feeds.[54] Nutrient uptake occurs primarily in the proximal intestine, where glucose, amino acids, and dipeptides are absorbed via carrier-mediated transport at rates measurable in vitro at 10°C, reflecting adaptation to cold waters; for Atlantic salmon, dipeptide absorption exceeds that of free amino acids, enhancing efficiency from peptide-rich prey.[55] Gut transit times vary by region—stomach retention around 10-20 hours, pyloric caeca 5-10 hours—facilitating thorough enzymatic breakdown before hindgut water reabsorption.[56] Lipid physiology in salmon emphasizes storage as triacylglycerols in muscle and viscera during ocean growth, providing catabolizable energy (yielding ~9 kcal/g) for anaerobic bursts during migration and semelparous senescence; prespawning king salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) load muscles with fats averaging 10-20% of wet weight, which decline to near-zero by spawning.[57] This mobilization prioritizes long-chain fatty acids like 20:1 and 22:1 from forage fish, sparing structural phospholipids until late stages, while protein catabolism supplies amino acids for osmoregulation and reproduction.[52] Whole-body composition shifts across stages, with marine-phase salmon exhibiting higher lipid (15-25%) and lower water content compared to freshwater juveniles, underscoring nutritional plasticity tied to habitat-specific diets.[58]Ecological Dynamics
Role in Food Webs as Prey and Predator
Salmon occupy mid-trophic positions in marine and freshwater food webs, preying on lower-level organisms while serving as forage for higher predators across life stages. Juvenile salmon in streams and rivers primarily consume aquatic invertebrates, with over 50% of their diet comprising insects such as those falling from riparian vegetation, including mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies, blackflies, and riffle beetles; this predation influences benthic invertebrate populations and supports salmon growth prior to seaward migration.[59][60] In oceanic phases, salmon diets shift to zooplankton, squid, and small schooling fish like herring, eulachon, and capelin, with species-specific variations—such as sockeye, pink, and chum salmon heavily utilizing these prey—exerting top-down control on forage fish abundances and contributing to size-structured predator-prey dynamics where larger salmon target bigger prey items.[61][62][63] As prey, salmon sustain diverse predators, with vulnerability varying by size, habitat, and density. Fry and smolts face high mortality from piscivorous fish like trout and northern pikeminnow, avian predators including gulls, cormorants, and mergansers, and occasionally small mammals; non-native predators and altered flow regimes in rivers can amplify these losses, exceeding 50% in some Central Valley Chinook salmon cohorts under modeled conditions.[64][65][66] Marine juveniles and adults are targeted by salmon sharks, larger pelagic fish, seals, sea lions, and orcas, with pinniped predation documented to consume substantial portions of returning stocks—such as far exceeding prior estimates for Puget Sound Chinook—amid recovering marine mammal populations post-protection.[67][64][68] During spawning migrations, adult salmon become focal prey for riparian and avian species, including black and grizzly bears, bald eagles, and river otters, which harvest millions of individuals annually in Pacific Northwest systems; bears, for instance, redistribute nutrients via scat and uneaten carcasses, linking aquatic and terrestrial webs.[69][68] Collective behaviors like ocean schooling in coho and other Pacific species mitigate per-capita predation risk, though density-dependent effects intensify pressure during low-abundance periods.[70] These interactions position salmon as foundational to predator population stability—evident in correlated declines of orcas and sharks with salmon reductions—while highlighting predation as a key driver of salmon dynamics beyond habitat factors alone.[64][71]Interactions with Mammals and Other Fauna
Salmon serve as a critical prey resource for various mammalian predators, particularly during spawning migrations. Brown bears (Ursus arctos) and black bears (Ursus americanus) consume substantial numbers of adult Pacific salmon in coastal streams of Alaska and the Pacific Northwest, with predation rates reaching 20–80% of annual runs in smaller rivers where capture is facilitated by shallow waters.[72][73] Bears selectively target larger individuals and nutrient-rich body parts such as brains, eggs, and skin, leaving carcasses that decompose and transport marine-derived nutrients inland via scat and uneaten remains, enhancing forest productivity.[73] Wolves (Canis lupus) and river otters (Lontra canadensis) also prey on adult and juvenile salmon, though at lower intensities compared to bears.[64] Marine mammals exert significant pressure on salmon populations, especially endangered Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) stocks. Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) aggregate at river mouths and dams, such as Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River, where they consume adult salmon migrating upstream; in Puget Sound, these pinnipeds take six times more salmon than combined tribal and recreational fisheries.[74][75] Resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) preferentially feed on Chinook salmon, with historical consumption patterns indicating a reliance on this prey that correlates with salmon availability.[76] Population booms in seals and sea lions, recovering from past commercial harvests, have amplified predation impacts on declining salmon runs, prompting management actions like lethal removals authorized under the Marine Mammal Protection Act.[75][77] Among other fauna, avian predators target both juvenile and adult salmon, often at high rates in estuaries and rivers. Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), ospreys (Pandion haliaetus), and great blue herons (Ardea herodias) scavenge spawning adults and prey on smolts, while double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) and Caspian terns (Hydroprogne caspia) consume up to millions of juvenile salmon annually in the Columbia River Basin, with cormorant colonies on East Sand Island numbering around 13,600 breeding pairs.[78][79] Emerging threats include American white pelicans (Pelecanus erythrorhynchos), whose expanding range increases overlap with salmon migration routes.[79] Piscivorous fish represent another major interaction, preying predominantly on juvenile salmon during outmigration. Native species like northern pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) and cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) consume smolts in rivers and reservoirs, while introduced predators such as smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) and walleye (Sander vitreus) exacerbate mortality in the Pacific Northwest.[80][65] These interactions underscore salmon's role in supporting diverse predator populations, but intensified predation—driven by habitat alterations and predator recoveries—contributes to empirical declines in salmon abundance, as evidenced by mark-recapture studies and PIT-tag recoveries.[67][81]Parasites, Pathogens, and Disease Vectors
Salmon are susceptible to a range of parasites, including ectoparasites like sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus elongatus), which attach to the skin and feed on mucus, epithelial tissue, and blood, often causing osmoregulatory failure, secondary bacterial infections, and mortality rates exceeding 80% in heavily infested juvenile fish under 100 grams.[82][83] Infestations are exacerbated in high-density aquaculture settings, where lice burdens can reach thousands per fish, but wild populations also experience natural cycles, with peaks correlating to seasonal migrations.[84] Empirical data from Norwegian salmon farms indicate that sea lice have contributed to reductions of 29,000 to 50,000 returning wild Atlantic salmon annually in certain years, though Pacific studies show no causal link between farm lice levels and wild population declines when accounting for ocean migration patterns.[85][86] Other notable parasites include the monogenean Gyrodactylus salaris, which proliferates on freshwater stages of Atlantic salmon, causing gill damage and up to 100% mortality in naive populations, as observed in Norwegian rivers since its introduction in the 1970s.[87] Myxozoan parasites, such as Parvicapsula minibicornis in Pacific salmon, induce proliferative gill disease, leading to respiratory distress and prespawning mortality rates of 30-95% in infected Oncorhynchus species during riverine upriver migrations.[87][88] Internal helminths like tapeworms (Diphyllobothrium spp.) occur in wild salmon but pose minimal direct harm to hosts, serving primarily as zoonotic vectors to humans via consumption of undercooked flesh.[89] Viral pathogens include infectious salmon anemia virus (ISAV), an orthomyxovirus causing systemic infection in Atlantic salmon with hemorrhages, anemia, and mortality rates up to 90% in naive farm populations, first identified in Norway in 1984 and subsequently in Canada and Chile.[90][91] Piscine orthoreovirus (PRV) induces heart and skeletal muscle inflammation (HSMI), with prevalence exceeding 90% in some Norwegian farm cycles since 2010, though subclinical in many wild infections.[92] Bacterial pathogens, notably Renibacterium salmoninarum causing bacterial kidney disease (BKD), lead to granulomatous lesions in kidneys and mortality in juveniles, with vertical transmission via infected eggs persisting across generations in both wild and hatchery stocks.[93][94] Furunculosis (Aeromonas salmonicida) manifests as skin ulcers and septicemia, with outbreaks documented in wild Atlantic salmon populations correlating to stress from low water flows.[87] Disease vectors primarily involve waterborne transmission, amplified in aquaculture by high host densities facilitating horizontal spread via fecal shedding and direct contact, contrasting with sparser wild exposures limited by migration and immunity.[95] Farm-to-wild spillover is evidenced by genetic matching of PRV strains between Atlantic salmon farms and Pacific wild stocks in British Columbia, with continuous transmission documented since at least 2013, potentially elevating pathogen loads in endangered runs.[96][97] Conversely, Norwegian data indicate minimal bacterial or viral transfer from farms to wild fish, attributing most wild infections to endemic reservoirs rather than aquaculture.[98] Sea lice serve as mobile vectors, dispersing from farms to nearby wild juveniles during planktonic stages, with models estimating exposure times of 1-2 hours sufficient for infestation in co-migrating schools.[99] Management interventions, such as chemical delousing, have reduced farm lice counts by over 90% in some regions post-2014, but resistance emergence underscores the need for integrated controls.[100]Responses to Physical and Chemical Environmental Changes
Salmon species demonstrate behavioral thermoregulation to maintain optimal water temperatures, seeking cooler refugia during warming events to mitigate metabolic stress.[101] Elevated temperatures accelerate metabolism, growth, and oxygen demand while impairing migration, spawning success, and disease resistance; for instance, sublethal thresholds above 20–22°C for Pacific salmonids disrupt upstream migration and increase mortality via heightened pathogen susceptibility.[102][103] In Chinook salmon, chronic exposure to temperatures rising 2–4°C over months reduces aerobic scope and genetic expression of stress proteins, compounding hypoxia effects from warmer, lower-dissolved-oxygen waters.[104][105] Climate-driven alterations in streamflow and temperature further desynchronize migration phenology, with juvenile outmigration advancing or delaying unpredictably, potentially mismatching ocean conditions and reducing marine survival by up to 50% in affected cohorts.[106][107] Low dissolved oxygen levels, often exacerbated by warming or eutrophication, trigger avoidance behaviors in salmon, with tolerances varying by life stage; juveniles and spawning adults suffer gill hyperplasia and reduced swimming performance below 5–6 mg/L.[108][109] Combined hypoxia and temperatures exceeding 18°C lower thermal tolerance limits, leading to mass die-offs in rivers like the Klamath, where post-smolt Atlantic salmon exhibit critical thresholds around 60–70% oxygen saturation before ventilatory failure.[110][111] Ocean acidification, reducing seawater pH by 0.1–0.3 units since pre-industrial levels, impairs olfactory function in coho and pink salmon, diminishing predator detection and prey location by up to 50% at pCO₂ levels projected for 2100 (around 800–1000 µatm).[112][113] This neurobehavioral disruption elevates juvenile mortality threefold over 25-day exposures, independent of feeding status, while also curbing maximum metabolic rates and growth in early life stages.[114][115] Chemical pollutants, including stormwater-derived heavy metals and pharmaceuticals, elicit avoidance or toxic responses; copper and zinc at bioavailable concentrations above 10–20 µg/L delay or prevent spawning migrations in Pacific salmon by disrupting chemosensory cues.[116] Urban runoff contaminants, such as tire particles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, induce rapid cardiac toxicity in coho salmon, causing death within hours at exposure doses mimicking urban streams (e.g., 6-hour pulses).[117][118] Groundwater pollution further stunts chum salmon fry growth by over 10% and accelerates premature development, amplifying vulnerability during rearing.[119] Pharmaceutical residues, at ng/L levels, alter risk assessment, prompting bolder foraging and hastened migration that mismatches environmental optima.[120] Salmon bioaccumulate these contaminants during ocean phases, vectoring them to spawning grounds and amplifying trophic transfer.[121]Human Utilization and Economics
Nutritional Profile and Health Implications
Salmon is a nutrient-dense food, providing high-quality protein, essential fatty acids, and various micronutrients. A 100-gram serving of cooked wild Atlantic salmon contains approximately 182 calories, 25 grams of protein, and 8 grams of fat, primarily polyunsaturated fats including omega-3 fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) at levels around 1.5-2 grams.[122][123] Farmed Atlantic salmon, by contrast, offers about 206 calories, 22 grams of protein, and 12 grams of fat per 100 grams, with higher omega-3 content at roughly 2.3 grams due to elevated fat deposition from controlled feeds.[123][124] Both types are rich in vitamin B12 (7-8.5 micrograms, exceeding 300% of the daily value), vitamin D (up to 11 micrograms or 55% DV in wild varieties), niacin (5.8-8.4 milligrams), and selenium (35-52 micrograms).[125][123][126]| Nutrient (per 100g cooked) | Wild Atlantic Salmon | Farmed Atlantic Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 182 | 206 |
| Protein (g) | 25 | 22 |
| Total Fat (g) | 8 | 12 |
| Omega-3 (EPA+DHA, g) | ~1.8 | ~2.3 |
| Vitamin B12 (mcg) | 7-8 | 3-5 |
| Vitamin D (mcg) | ~10 | ~11 |
| Selenium (mcg) | ~40 | ~35 |
Commercial Wild Harvesting
Commercial wild harvesting of salmon focuses predominantly on Pacific species—pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), chum (O. keta), sockeye (O. nerka), coho (O. kisutch), and chinook (O. tshawytscha)—due to their abundance in marine and nearshore waters, while Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) wild commercial fisheries are heavily restricted or prohibited in regions like the United States to support conservation. Harvesting employs gear types adapted to salmon schooling and migration behaviors: purse seining encircles dense schools in open water, gillnetting deploys vertical nets that entangle fish by gill size (drift gillnets in rivers or set nets from shore), and trolling uses baited lines trailed behind vessels to selectively target larger individuals. These methods emphasize hand-processing at sea, including bleeding and chilling to preserve quality, with selectivity varying—trolling yields higher-value product but lower volumes, while seining maximizes catch efficiency for abundant odd-year pink salmon runs.[141][142][143] The North Pacific, particularly Alaska, accounts for the majority of global wild salmon production, with Bristol Bay's sockeye fishery recognized as the world's largest. Other key areas include British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, Russia, and Japan, where fisheries align with seasonal migrations into coastal and riverine zones up to 3 nautical miles offshore. In Alaska alone, commercial harvests averaged 152 million fish annually from 1975 to 2023, peaking at over 200 million fish in strong years. The 2023 Alaska harvest totaled 230.2 million salmon, a 43% increase from 2022's 160.7 million, driven by robust pink and sockeye returns despite variability in chinook. Globally, wild salmonid catches reached approximately 990,000 metric tons in 2023, contrasting sharply with over 2.8 million tons of farmed production, underscoring wild harvest's secondary but ecologically managed role. North Pacific catches in 2024 fell to 285 million fish (528,000 metric tons), the lowest since 1988, reflecting natural fluctuations and environmental pressures.[144][145][146] Management emphasizes stock-specific quotas, escapement goals (ensuring sufficient spawners reach rivers), and data-driven regulations to sustain yields, with Alaska's system—enforced by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game—certified sustainable by bodies like the Marine Stewardship Council for many fisheries due to in-season monitoring and habitat protections. Economic value derives from export markets, with Alaska's 2023 ex-vessel value exceeding $800 million in prior peak years, though low prices and competition from aquaculture challenge profitability. Declines in some stocks, such as Prince William Sound pinks and chums at 75% and 57% below five-year averages in recent data, highlight risks from climate variability and bycatch, necessitating ongoing adjustments like area closures. Wild harvesting's sustainability hinges on these empirical controls, avoiding overexploitation seen historically, though global estimates for 2025 project 760,000 metric tons amid downward size trends in catches.[147][148][149][150]Aquaculture Systems and Production
Salmon aquaculture predominantly involves the farming of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using open net pen systems in coastal marine waters, where juvenile fish, known as smolts, are transferred from freshwater hatcheries to sea cages after reaching approximately 100 grams.[151][152] These net pens allow for high-density rearing, with fish grown to harvest size of around 5 kilograms over 18-24 months in the marine phase.[153] Alternative systems include land-based recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), which use filtered and recycled water in tanks to rear fish entirely on land, and semi-closed containment systems that partially enclose marine pens to reduce environmental interactions.[154][155] Global production of farmed Atlantic salmon reached approximately 2.87 million metric tons in 2023, accounting for about 70% of total salmon supply worldwide, with projections exceeding 3.12 million metric tons by 2025.[156][148] Norway leads as the largest producer, contributing over 50% of global output, followed by Chile at around 27%, with additional significant volumes from Scotland, Canada, and the Faroe Islands, together representing over 90% of production.[157][158] In 2024, global Atlantic salmon supply for January to September totaled about 2.02 million metric tons, reflecting steady growth driven by demand and technological improvements in feed and disease management.[159] While open net pens remain the dominant method due to cost-effectiveness and scalability, closed systems like RAS are expanding in regions with limited coastal access or regulatory restrictions, though they currently represent a minor fraction of total production owing to higher energy and operational costs.[160][152] Production relies on formulated feeds high in fishmeal and oil, with ongoing shifts toward sustainable alternatives like plant-based proteins to reduce reliance on wild capture fisheries.[161]Recreational and Traditional Fishing Practices
Recreational salmon fishing primarily targets anadromous species such as Chinook, coho, sockeye, and Atlantic salmon during their spawning migrations in rivers and coastal marine areas, employing techniques like trolling, mooching, jigging, drift fishing, and fly-fishing to catch fish in concentrated runs.[162][163] In the Pacific Northwest, anglers often fish from boats in marine waters or wade in tributaries like those of Lake Ontario, positioning upstream to observe salmon in pools or riffles before casting lures or flies.[163] Seasons align with species-specific runs, typically spanning late spring to early fall with peak activity in summer; for instance, Chinook runs occur from spring through summer, while coho peak in late summer to fall, influencing annual quotas and closures to prevent overharvest amid declining wild stocks.[164][34] Regulations enforce bag limits, size restrictions, and gear constraints, such as prohibiting snatching or gaffing in certain U.S. waters, with commercial and recreational harvest of Atlantic salmon banned in the United States since the late 20th century to aid recovery.[151][165] State agencies like Washington's Department of Fish and Wildlife and Oregon's Department of Fish and Wildlife monitor weekly catch indices, adjusting openings based on preseason forecasts; for example, Oregon's 2025 ocean salmon seasons included targeted recreational fisheries with effort caps to sustain escapement goals.[166] Economically, recreational salmon angling contributes to broader U.S. saltwater fishing impacts, supporting over 691,000 jobs nationwide in 2022 through equipment sales, travel, and guiding, though salmon-specific data highlight regional dependencies in Alaska and the Pacific Northwest where runs drive tourism.[167] Traditional fishing practices among Pacific Northwest Indigenous tribes, such as those in the Columbia River Basin, relied on low-impact methods like dip-netting from wooden platforms, spearing in rapids, and constructing fish weirs—river-spanning barriers funneling salmon into traps—to harvest during seasonal runs without depleting stocks.[168][169][170] These techniques, documented in oral histories and archaeological evidence, emphasized selective harvesting of surplus fish, often releasing weaker individuals, and integrated governance rules allocating catches by family or clan to maintain ecological balance.[171][172] Historical disruptions from colonial settlement and infrastructure reduced access, prompting mid-20th-century "fish-ins" by tribes like the Nisqually and Puyallup to assert treaty rights, culminating in court affirmations of off-reservation fishing privileges.[173] Modern applications of these practices demonstrate sustainability; a 2020 analysis found Indigenous-managed fisheries using weirs and dip nets achieve higher escapement rates than industrial methods, informing potential restoration strategies amid contemporary declines.[174][175] Such approaches prioritize long-term run viability over maximization, contrasting with some recreational pressures, though both face shared challenges from habitat loss and climate variability.[169]Conservation, Management, and Controversies
Population Trends and Empirical Data
Wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations have experienced substantial declines across their North Atlantic range. In the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment, returns have plummeted from historical highs, with adult returns averaging fewer than 1,000 fish annually since the 2000 Endangered Species Act listing, compared to pre-industrial estimates in the tens of thousands per river.[19] Globally, the species was reassessed by the IUCN in 2023 from Least Concern to Near Threatened, reflecting a population reduction exceeding 30% over three generations driven by habitat degradation, overexploitation, and marine mortality factors.[9] In Great Britain, populations declined 30-50% between 2006 and the 2024 IUCN reassessment to Endangered status, with projections indicating 50-80% further loss by 2025 absent interventions; river-specific counts, such as in the Tweed, show spawning escapements dropping from over 100,000 in the 1980s to under 20,000 in recent cycles.[176][177] Across the broader North Atlantic, wild adult abundance fell approximately 70% over the past few decades, with North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization estimates indicating a drop to around 3.38 million fish by 2016 from higher 1990 levels, though decline rates have moderated since 2006 due to harvest reductions.[178] Pacific salmon species exhibit heterogeneous trends, with some Alaskan stocks stable or cyclic but many southern populations in protracted decline. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Salish Sea have decreased 60% since 1984 tracking began, with escapements often below conservation thresholds; for instance, Fraser River sockeye (O. nerka) cycles show boom years exceeding 20 million but persistent lows, as in the 2019-2021 "blob" aftermath with returns under 1 million.[179] In British Columbia, the Pacific Salmon Foundation's 2025 State of Salmon report documents 78% of conservation units in poor status, with escapement data revealing sockeye declines of 40-60% in key systems like the Skeena since the 1990s.[180] Alaskan escapements remain more robust, with approximately 300 goals met for pink (O. gorbuscha) and chum (O. keta) stocks averaging millions annually, though Chinook trends downward—Taku River large Chinook averaged 32,000 spawners from 1973-2023, ranging from 7,271 in 2018 to 114,938 in 1997.[181] Canada's Pacific salmon catches, proxying abundance, hit record lows in 2019 (under 20 million total) and 2021, reflecting broader marine heatwave impacts and habitat pressures.[182] Empirical metrics beyond raw counts indicate ecosystem-wide shifts: Pacific salmon body sizes have declined 10-30% over six decades in Alaskan fisheries, correlating with density-dependent competition and nutritional limits in ocean phases, potentially reducing per-fish biomass contributions to predators.[183] Sterol-based paleolimnological proxies confirm historical sockeye abundances in lakes like those feeding the Fraser were 2-5 times current levels pre-1950s industrialization.[184] These trends contrast with global production surges to over 3 million metric tons annually by 2023, dominated 70%+ by aquaculture, underscoring that while harvested supply has stabilized, wild reproductive populations—gauged by escapement and smolt output—continue contracting in most monitored regions due to cumulative anthropogenic pressures including dams, warming waters, and mixed-stock fisheries.[185]| Region/Species | Key Trend Metric | Time Frame | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Atlantic (S. salar) | 70% abundance decline | Last few decades | [web:12] |
| Gulf of Maine (S. salar) | <1,000 adults/year returns | Post-2000 | [web:10] |
| Salish Sea Chinook | 60% decline | 1984-present | [web:8] |
| BC Pacific salmon CUs | 78% poor status | As of 2025 | [web:23] |
| Alaska Chinook (Taku) | Avg. 32,000 spawners | 1973-2023 | [web:30] |
Regulatory Frameworks and Interventions
The Pacific Salmon Treaty, signed by the United States and Canada on January 28, 1985, establishes a cooperative framework for conserving and rationally managing Pacific salmon stocks shared between the two nations, emphasizing equitable harvest allocation based on origin and abundance.[186] The treaty mandates that each country achieve benefits from salmon originating in its waters equivalent to the production levels, with the Pacific Salmon Commission overseeing implementation through annual quotas, escapement targets, and abundance-based fishing regimes that adjust harvests dynamically to prevent overexploitation.[187] For instance, the 2019-2028 agreement includes a 7.5% reduction in Chinook salmon harvests in Southeast Alaska to comply with U.S. Endangered Species Act obligations and support weak stocks.[188] In North America, the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 has listed 28 evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) of Pacific salmon and steelhead as threatened or endangered since the 1990s, triggering federal interventions such as strict harvest restrictions, critical habitat designations, and requirements for fishery management plans to ensure recovery.[189] These listings prohibit "take" of listed populations, including incidental capture in fisheries targeting healthier stocks, and compel agencies like NOAA Fisheries to integrate salmon recovery into dam operations, water diversions, and hatchery practices.[190] For Atlantic salmon, U.S. regulations ban all commercial and recreational fishing since 2000, with all marketed fish derived from aquaculture, reflecting the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment's endangered status under the ESA.[19] The North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO), established under the 1982 Convention for the Conservation of Salmon in the North Atlantic Ocean, coordinates regulatory measures across Canada, the United States, and European states, prohibiting salmon fishing beyond 12 nautical miles from baselines except in limited zones off Greenland (40 nautical miles) and the Faroe Islands.[191] NASCO's agreements have enforced moratoria and quota reductions in distant-water fisheries, such as at West Greenland and the Faroe Islands, reducing interceptions of mixed-stock fisheries that previously depleted vulnerable populations.[191] In the European Union, the Common Fisheries Policy integrates salmon management with habitat directives, imposing catch limits and bycatch mitigation to sustain stocks above conservation limits, though enforcement varies by member state.[192] Aquaculture regulations increasingly address interactions with wild salmon, with frameworks in major producers like Norway, Chile, and Canada mandating containment standards to minimize escapes, which can introduce diseases and genetic dilution to native stocks.[193] Norway's 2025 aquaculture white paper sets targets for mortality below 0.15% through improved site regulations and technology requirements, while global assessments highlight inconsistent escape prevention across 14 production regions, prompting calls for standardized international guidelines under bodies like the FAO.[194][193] These interventions aim to balance farmed production—exceeding 2.5 million metric tons annually—with wild conservation, though empirical data on long-term efficacy remains debated due to variable compliance and monitoring.[192]Effectiveness of Hatcheries and Stock Enhancement
Hatchery programs for salmon involve rearing juveniles in controlled environments before releasing them into natural habitats to augment wild populations and support fisheries. These efforts, widespread since the late 19th century, particularly for Pacific species like chinook, coho, and pink salmon, aim to offset declines from overfishing, habitat loss, and dams. However, empirical studies indicate limited long-term success in enhancing wild stocks, with hatchery-origin fish often contributing minimally to natural reproduction due to reduced fitness.[195][196] A global synthesis of 208 peer-reviewed publications found that 70% reported adverse effects of hatcheries on wild salmonids, 13% minimally adverse effects, and only 3% beneficial outcomes, primarily in short-term abundance boosts rather than sustained productivity. Hatchery fish typically exhibit lower survival rates in the wild, with nonlocal stocks reproducing poorly and even local broodstock-derived fish showing 20-50% reduced fitness compared to wild counterparts, attributed to domestication selection favoring traits maladaptive in natural environments. In the Pacific Northwest, large-scale releases have led to density-dependent competition, increasing predation and reducing overall cohort productivity.[197][195] Genetic impacts further undermine effectiveness, as interbreeding between hatchery strays and wild fish erodes diversity and adaptive traits. DNA analyses of chinook salmon reveal detectable genetic divergence after just a few generations in hatcheries, with reduced effective population sizes and heritability for traits like migration timing. A study of pink salmon enhancement in Alaska showed initial demographic boosts from strays but diminished genetic effects only with very large release scales, insufficient to prevent long-term diversity loss. In British Columbia, despite releasing 300 million juveniles annually, hatchery contributions to wild escapements remain below 10% in many systems, with ecological risks including disease amplification.[198][199][200] Stock enhancement success varies by species and region; for example, Alaska's pink salmon programs have sustained fisheries through high release volumes, yielding positive net biological impacts in some rivers based on 50 years of catch data. Yet, even here, enhancement often substitutes for rather than supplements wild production, with hatchery fish comprising over 90% of returns in enhanced systems but failing to restore natural resilience. Atlantic salmon hatcheries face similar challenges, with stocking downstream improving short-term survival but not overcoming low overall return rates below 1-2%. Regulatory evaluations emphasize that without rigorous broodstock management and monitoring, enhancement exacerbates declines rather than reversing them.[201][202][203]Wild vs. Farmed Debates: Environmental and Genetic Impacts
Salmon aquaculture, primarily of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), has grown to dominate global supply, accounting for over 80% of harvested salmon in recent years, thereby reducing harvest pressure on wild populations that face overfishing and habitat degradation.[204] However, this expansion has intensified debates over unintended environmental costs, including nutrient pollution from uneaten feed and fecal waste, which can lead to localized eutrophication and algal blooms in coastal areas near net-pen farms.[205] Disease and parasite transmission, such as sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis), from high-density farms to wild salmon migrating nearby has been empirically linked to elevated mortality in wild juveniles, with meta-analyses indicating reduced survival rates of up to 39% in affected rivers.[206] While proponents argue that improved biosecurity and site fallowing mitigate these risks, independent studies highlight persistent outbreaks, as seen in Norwegian farms where bacterial kidney disease (BKD) affected escapees in 2024, potentially amplifying pathogen loads in wild systems.[207] Escaped farmed salmon, estimated at hundreds of thousands annually despite underreporting due to chronic leakage from net pens, exacerbate ecological disruptions by competing with wild fish for resources and introducing non-native strains into native habitats.[208] In regions like British Columbia and Norway, where farming intensity correlates with higher escape rates, these intrusions have been associated with shifts in wild salmon foraging behavior and increased vulnerability to predation, though some reviews claim minimal population-level effects when escapes are low relative to wild abundance.[209] Conversely, wild salmon fisheries, while regulated to prevent overexploitation—such as through quotas limiting Pacific salmon catches to sustainable biomass levels—continue to suffer from broader habitat losses, including river fragmentation, which aquaculture does not directly address and may indirectly worsen via escaped fish altering ecosystem dynamics.[210] Empirical data suggest aquaculture's feed demands, historically requiring 2-3 kg of wild forage fish per kg of farmed salmon, contribute to bycatch pressure on non-salmonid stocks, though recent formulations have improved feed conversion ratios to near 1:1.[211] Genetically, interbreeding between escaped farmed salmon—selected over generations for traits like rapid growth and high fat content—and wild populations introduces maladaptive alleles, eroding local adaptations to specific riverine and oceanic conditions. Studies across 68 Norwegian populations found introgression levels of 10-50% farmed ancestry in severely affected wild stocks, correlating with reduced lifetime fitness and lower smolt-to-adult survival rates for hybrid offspring compared to pure wild progeny.[212] Field experiments confirm that farmed salmon descendants exhibit 20-50% lower reproductive success in natural environments, driven by heritable traits ill-suited to wild challenges like starvation or predation, leading to long-term dilution of genetic diversity essential for population resilience.[213] This introgression has persisted for over half a century in some Atlantic systems, with genomic analyses revealing altered gene expression in hybrids that compromises traits such as migration timing and disease resistance.[214] While closed-containment systems are proposed to curb escapes, their scalability remains limited, sustaining the debate over whether aquaculture's production gains outweigh these irreversible genetic risks to wild salmon metapopulations.[193]Human Infrastructure Effects: Dams, Development, and Restoration Efforts
Dams in major salmon-bearing rivers, such as those in the Columbia River Basin, have obstructed upstream migration routes and inundated spawning and rearing habitats, blocking access to more than 40 percent of historically available areas for Pacific salmon species like Chinook and steelhead.[215] Construction of hydroelectric dams, including the four Lower Snake River dams completed in the 1970s, has correlated with declines exceeding 90 percent in wild Snake River salmon populations, as barriers delay or prevent adults from reaching spawning grounds and expose juveniles to higher predation and mortality during downstream passage.[216] These structures alter river hydrology by slowing flows, elevating water temperatures, and creating reservoirs that favor warm-water predators over cold-water salmonids, contributing to reduced survival rates; for instance, the Columbia Basin's pre-dam annual returns of 10-16 million salmon and steelhead have fallen to an average of about 2.3 million from 2014 to 2023.[217][218][219] Urban and agricultural development exacerbates habitat degradation through impervious surfaces, riparian zone removal, and pollutant inputs, which increase stream temperatures, flashier hydrographs, and toxic runoff containing pyrethroid insecticides lethal to juvenile salmon during storm events.[220][221] In Pacific Northwest urban streams, these changes manifest as "urban runoff mortality syndrome," where salmon smolts experience suppressed immune function, disease susceptibility, and direct toxicity, reducing outmigration success by altering water quality and increasing sedimentation that smothers eggs.[222] Logging, farming, and shoreline armoring associated with development have further fragmented habitats, with studies indicating that expanded impervious cover correlates with diminished juvenile salmon health and prey availability in perennial streams.[223][224] Restoration efforts have included installing fish ladders and spillways to facilitate passage, as seen in systems like the Lake Washington Ship Canal, where such structures aim to bypass barriers and improve juvenile survival through increased water spill over dams, though effectiveness varies with dam height and river conditions.[225] Dam removals represent a more direct intervention; the 2024 removal of four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River restored connectivity to 420 miles of habitat, enabling fall Chinook salmon to reach upper basin areas like the Williamson and Sprague rivers—unaccessed for over a century—within one year, with detections confirming migration nearly 300 miles upstream by October 2025.[226][227] Similar projects, such as those on the Elwha River, have shown post-removal increases in salmonid diversity by up to 200 percent in restored reaches, though full population recovery requires addressing concurrent factors like ocean conditions and predation.[228] These actions prioritize hydraulic reconnection over mitigation technologies, yielding empirical gains in access but demanding long-term monitoring to quantify net population benefits amid ongoing development pressures.[229] Citizen-led initiatives in Japan exemplify community contributions to salmon restoration and habitat preservation. The "Furusato no Kawa ni Sake yo Kaere!" project on the Yura River in Kyoto Prefecture engages individuals through donations, home rearing of salmon fry, and volunteering for egg collection and release events, facilitating egg incubation, fry rearing, and stocking to promote salmon returns.[230] Likewise, the "Come Back Salmon Movement" on the Toyohira River in Sapporo incorporates river cleanup, educational outreach via a salmon science museum, and monitoring activities, fostering public involvement in enhancing river environments and sustaining salmon stocks.[231]Cultural and Historical Context
Symbolism in Mythology and Indigenous Traditions
In Irish mythology, the Salmon of Knowledge, known as Bradán Feasa, is depicted as a creature that acquires profound wisdom by consuming the hazelnuts from the sacred hazel tree overhanging the Well of Segais, granting the consumer all earthly knowledge upon tasting its flesh.[232] The tale centers on the poet Finegas, who captures the salmon after years of pursuit, instructing his apprentice Fionn mac Cumhaill to cook it without damaging the skin; Fionn accidentally burns his thumb on a blister from the fish, sucks it to soothe the pain, and thereby inherits the wisdom, enabling him to lead the Fianna warriors through prophetic insight gained by sucking the thumb in moments of need.[233] This narrative underscores the salmon's role as a conduit for inspiration and intellectual mastery in Celtic lore, where the fish's upstream journey mirrors the pursuit of esoteric truths.[234] Among Pacific Northwest Indigenous peoples, such as the tribes affiliated with the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission—including the Nez Perce, Umatilla, Warm Springs, and Yakama—salmon embody renewal, abundance, and spiritual reciprocity, viewed as kin who voluntarily return from the sea to nourish communities as one of the "First Foods" alongside roots, berries, and water.[235] Ceremonial practices, like the First Salmon Feast, honor this cycle, with rituals expressing gratitude to prevent the salmon's extinction and ensure their annual resurgence, reflecting empirical observations of the fish's predictable migration patterns tied to ecological rhythms.[235] In oral traditions of groups like the Tlingit and Haida, salmon are portrayed as supernatural beings with human spirits residing in underwater villages, transforming into fish to provide sustenance before shedding scales to revert to humanoid form, symbolizing themes of sacrifice, resilience, and the interdependence of human and natural systems.[236] These traditions highlight salmon not as mere resources but as agents in causal ecological narratives, where their life cycle—spawning death yielding future generations—instills lessons of perseverance against physical barriers like waterfalls, informing tribal stewardship practices documented in ethnographic records spanning millennia.[237] While European mythological accounts emphasize individual enlightenment, Indigenous interpretations prioritize communal sustenance and cosmic balance, grounded in observable salmon behaviors that sustained populations through seasonal harvests estimated at tens of thousands of fish per run in pre-colonial eras.[238]Historical Fishing and Economic Evolution
Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest, including tribes along the Columbia River, have harvested salmon for at least 10,000 years, relying on the fish as a dietary staple, trade commodity, and cultural cornerstone through methods such as weirs, dip nets, spears, and seasonal runs that supported ancient trade networks across the region.[239][235] These practices emphasized sustainability, with communities performing ceremonies like the First Salmon Feast before harvesting to ensure future abundance, and evidence from oral histories and archaeological sites indicates regulated catches that maintained populations without industrial-scale depletion.[240][174] European-American commercial fishing emerged in the early 19th century, with trading companies beginning to purchase salmon from indigenous fishers for export as early as 1828 along the Columbia River, marking the transition from subsistence and local trade to international markets driven by demand in urban centers.[241] By the 1860s, the first salmon canneries were established in the Pacific Northwest, capitalizing on annual returns estimated at 16 to 20 million fish in the Columbia Basin alone, which fueled rapid industry growth as canning technology enabled preservation and shipment to global consumers.[242] This period saw the proliferation of up to 55 canneries by the 1880s, transforming salmon into a cornerstone export commodity that supported coastal economies and employed thousands in processing hubs.[242] The economic boom peaked in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with Pacific salmon fisheries generating substantial revenues through high-volume harvests—such as over 100 million pounds annually in Alaska's Bristol Bay by the 1920s—sustaining communities via commercial gillnetting, trolling, and fixed traps that maximized efficiency but initiated overexploitation pressures.[243] However, unchecked expansion led to stock declines by the 1930s and 1940s, prompting regulatory interventions like the banning of fish traps in Washington waters in 1935 and quotas in Alaska, which shifted economic reliance toward more selective gear and laid groundwork for sustained-yield management models.[243][244] Post-World War II, the salmon fishing economy evolved amid habitat losses and competition, with commercial catches in the U.S. Pacific Northwest dropping from peaks of over 200 million pounds in the 1930s to under 50 million by the 1980s, redirecting value toward recreational angling—which generated millions in angler expenditures—and limited-entry permits that stabilized fleets but reduced overall employment in traditional wild harvest sectors.[245] In regions like Alaska, where fisheries retained prominence, economic contributions persisted through adaptive practices, underpinning billions in annual value by integrating with processing innovations, though persistent declines elsewhere underscored the limits of wild fishing without addressing upstream causal factors like dams and urbanization.[246][247]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/salmon
