Hubbry Logo
ContritionContritionMain
Open search
Contrition
Community hub
Contrition
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contrition
Contrition
Contrition
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Saint Peter Repentant 1823–25, Goya

In Christianity, contrition or contriteness (from Latin contritus 'ground to pieces',[1] i.e. a breaking of something hardened[2]) is repentance for sins one has committed. The remorseful person is said to be contrite.

A central concept in much of Christianity, contrition is regarded as the first step, through Christ, towards reconciliation with God. It consists of repentance for all one's sins, a desire for God over sin, and faith in Christ's redemption on the cross and its sufficiency for salvation (see regeneration and ordo salutis). It is widely referred to throughout the Bible, e.g. Ezekiel 33:11, Psalms 6:7ff, Psalm 51:1–12, Luke 13:5, Luke 18:9–13, and the well-known parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11–32).

In the Catholic Church

[edit]

Origin

[edit]

The Council of Trent defined contrition as "sorrow of soul, and a hatred of sin committed, with a firm purpose of not sinning in the future". It is also known as animi cruciatus (affliction of spirit) and compunctio cordis (repentance of heart).

The word "contrition" implies a breaking of something that has become hardened. Thomas Aquinas in his Commentary on the Master of the Sentences thus explains its peculiar use: "Since it is requisite for the remission of sin that a man cast away entirely the liking for sin which implies a sort of continuity and solidity in his mind, the act which obtains forgiveness is termed by a figure of speech 'contrition'."[3] This sorrow of soul is not merely speculative sorrow for wrong done, remorse of conscience, or a resolve to amend; it is a real pain and bitterness of soul together with a hatred and horror for sin committed; and this hatred for sin leads to the resolve to sin no more. The early Christian writers in speaking of the nature of contrition sometimes insist on the feeling of sorrow, sometimes on the detestation of the wrong committed. Augustine includes both when writing: "Compunctus corde non solet dici nisi stimulus peccatorum in dolore pœnitendi".[clarification needed][3] (translation: “It is not customary to say that the heart is contrite except as an incentive to repent of sins in pain.”)

Nearly all the medieval theologians hold that contrition is based principally on the detestation of sin. This detestation presupposes a knowledge of the heinousness of sin, and this knowledge begets sorrow and pain of soul. "A sin is committed by the consent, so it is blotted out by the dissent of the rational will; hence contrition is essentially sorrow. But sorrow has a twofold signification—dissent of the will and the consequent feeling; the former is of the essence of contrition, the latter is its effect."[3]

Necessity

[edit]

The formal doctrine of the church, announced through the Council of Trent, declares that contrition has always been necessary to obtain pardon of one's sins. Contrition is the first and indispensable condition for pardon. While it is possible for one to receive pardon where confession is impossible, there is no case where sin can be pardoned without contrition.[4]

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, Catholic writers have always insisted that such necessity arises (a) from the very nature of repentance as well as (b) from the positive command of God. From the very nature of repentance, they point out that the sentence of Christ in Luke 13:5, is final: "Except you repent", etc., and from the Church Fathers they cite passages such as the following from Cyprian, De Lapsis, no. 32: "Do penance in full, give proof of the sorrow that comes from a grieving and lamenting soul. ... They who do away with repentance for sin, close the door to satisfaction." Scholastic doctors laid down the satisfaction principle, "No one can begin a new life who does not repent him of the old" (Bonaventure, In Lib. Sent. IV, dist. xvi, Pt. II, art. 1, Q. ii, also ex professo, ibid., Pt. I, art. I, Q. iii), and when asked the reason why, they point out the absolute incongruity of turning to God and clinging to sin, which is hostile to God's law. The Council of Trent, mindful of the tradition of the ages, defined (Sess. XlV. ch. iv de Contritione) that "contrition has always been necessary for obtaining forgiveness of sin". The positive command of God is also clear in the premises. John the Baptist sounded the note of preparation for the coming of the Messiah: "Make straight his paths"; and, as a consequence "they went out to him and were baptized confessing their sins". The first preaching of Jesus is described in the words: "Do penance, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand"; and the Apostles, in their first sermons to the people, warn them to "do penance and be baptized for the remission of their sins" (Acts 2:38). The Fathers followed up with like exhortation (Clement in P.G., I, 341; Hermas iii P.G., II, 894; Tertullian in P.L., II).[5]

Perfect and imperfect contrition

[edit]

In Catholic terminology, contrition arising from the love of God, who is believed to have been grievously offended, is called perfect contrition. Contrition arising from any other motive, such as loss of heaven, fear of hell, or the heinousness of guilt, is called imperfect contrition, or attrition.[6][7]

Perfect contrition

[edit]

Perfect contrition (also called contrition of charity) is a repentance for sin that is motivated by faith and the love of God.[8]: 1452  It contrasts with imperfect contrition, which arises from a less pure motive, such as common decency or fear of Hell.[8]: 1453  The two types of contrition are distinguished by a person's motive for repentance, rather than the intensity of one's feelings or emotions. Catholicism teaches that it is possible for perfect and imperfect contrition to be experienced simultaneously.

To qualify as perfect contrition, the motive must be founded on God's own goodness, not merely his goodness to the sinner or to humanity. Catholicism holds that there is no way of knowing with an absolute certainty if one has made an act of perfect contrition, but all that is required is the standard of all human action, moral certainty. If one says an act of contrition truthfully, intending it, then one would likely have moral certainty.[9]

Catholicism teaches that perfect contrition removes the guilt and eternal punishment due to mortal sin, even before the sinner has received absolution in the sacrament of penance, provided that the person has a firm resolution to have recourse to sacramental confession as soon as possible.[10][11] An example of this theological precept is demonstrated in the Code of Canon Law in canon 916, which states: "A person who is conscious of grave sin is not to celebrate Mass or receive the body of the Lord without previous sacramental confession unless there is a grave reason and there is no opportunity to confess; in this case the person is to remember the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition which includes the resolution of confessing as soon as possible."[12]

In the case of imminent death, in which sacramental confession may not be possible, an act of perfect contrition is held to remove the guilt and eternal punishment due to mortal sin.[11]

Imperfect contrition

[edit]
Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article "Attrition".

In contrast to perfect contrition, imperfect contrition (also known as attrition) is defined as a desire not to sin for a reason other than love of God.[8]: 1492  Catholic teaching holds that imperfect contrition does not produce justification, but does dispose the soul to receive grace in the sacrament of penance.[8]: 1453  Catholic theologians generally hold that a person who receives a sacrament while unaware of a mortal sin receives justification if they have imperfect contrition.[6]

The Council of Trent (1545–1563) held that while imperfect contrition is motivated by reasons such as "the consideration of the turpitude of sin or from the fear of Hell and punishment", it also is a gift from God. "If any man assert that attrition ... is not a true and a profitable sorrow; that it does not prepare the soul for grace, but that it makes a man a hypocrite, yea, even a greater sinner, let him be Anathema."[6]

Scriptures cited in support of imperfect contrition include:

Criticism of imperfect contrition
[edit]

In his 1537 Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Philipp Melanchthon argued against the concept of imperfect contrition on the basis that it leaves the penitent person uncertain:[13]

When, however, will a terrified conscience, especially in those serious, true, and great terrors which are described in the psalms and the prophets, and which those certainly taste who are truly converted, be able to decide whether it fears God for His own sake, or is fleeing from eternal punishments?

In his 1537 Smalcald Articles, Martin Luther argued against the Catholic doctrine of imperfect contrition, arguing that "such contrition was certainly mere hypocrisy, and did not mortify the lust for sins; for they had to grieve, while they would rather have continued to sin, if it had been free to them." Instead he argued that "repentance is not piecemeal," and "In like manner confession, too, cannot be false, uncertain, or piecemeal."[14]

Qualities

[edit]

In accord with Catholic tradition, contrition, whether perfect or imperfect, must be interior, supernatural, universal, and sovereign.[6]

Interior

[edit]

Contrition must be real and sincere sorrow of heart.[3]

Supernatural

[edit]

In accordance with Catholic teaching contrition ought to be prompted by God's grace and aroused by motives which spring from faith, as opposed to merely natural motives, such as loss of honour, fortune, and the like (Chemnitz, Exam. Concil. Trid., Pt. II, De Poenit.). In the Old Testament it is God who gives a "new heart" and who puts a "new spirit" into the children of Israel (Ezech. 36:25–29); and for a clean heart the Psalmist prays in the Miserere (Ps. 51, 11 sqq.). Peter told those to whom he preached in the first days after Pentecost that God the Father had raised up Christ "to give repentance to Israel" (Acts, v, 30 sq.). Paul, in advising Timothy, insists on dealing gently and kindly with those who resist the truth, "if peradventure God may give them full repentance" (2 Timothy, 2:24–25). In the days of the Pelagian heresy Augustine insisted on the supernaturalness of contrition, when he writes, "That we turn away from God is our doing, and this is the bad will; but to turn back to God we are unable unless He arouse and help us, and this is the good will." Some of the Scholastic doctors, notably Scotus, Cajetan, and after them Suarez (De Poenit., Disp. iii, sect. vi), asked speculatively whether man if left to himself could elicit a true act of contrition, but no theologian ever taught that what makes for forgiveness of sin in the present economy of God could be inspired by merely natural motives. On the contrary, all the doctors have insisted on the absolute necessity of grace for contrition that disposes to forgiveness (Bonaventure, In Lib. Sent. IV, dist. xiv, Part I, art. II, Q. iii; also dist. xvii, Part I, art. I, Q. iii; cf. Thomas, In Lib. Sent. IV). In keeping with this teaching of the Scriptures and the doctors, the Council of Trent defined; "If anyone say that without the inspiration of the Holy Spirit and without His aid a man can repent in the way that is necessary for obtaining the grace of justification, let him be anathema."

Universal

[edit]

True contrition must extend to, at the very least, all mortal sins committed, and not just a select convenient few.[4] This doctrine is intimately bound up with the Catholic teaching concerning grace and repentance. There is no forgiveness without sorrow of soul, and forgiveness is always accompanied by God's grace; grace cannot coexist with sin; and, as a consequence, one sin cannot be forgiven while another remains for which there is no repentance.

The prophet Joel urged men to turn to God with their whole heart (Joel 2:12–19). and Christ tells the doctor of the law that we must love God with our whole mind, our whole strength (Luke 10:27). Ezekiel insists that a man must "turn from his evil ways" if he wish to live (Ezekiel 33:11).

The Scholastics inquired into this question when they asked whether or not there must be a special act of contrition for every serious sin, and whether, in order to be forgiven, one must remember at the moment all grievous transgressions. To both questions they answered in the negative, judging that an act of sorrow which implicitly included all one's sins would be sufficient.

Sovereign

[edit]

According to Mark 8:35–37, Jesus admonished his disciples: "For those who want to save their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for the sake of the gospel, will save it. For what will it profit them to gain the whole world and forfeit their life? Indeed, what can they give in return for their life?" Contrition for sin must take precedence over temporal concerns. When the envoys of the Empress Eudoxia threatened John Chrysostom, he responded, "Go tell the princess that Chrysostom fears only one thing, and that is sin."[4]

Sacrament of Penance

[edit]
See also: Sacrament of Penance and Reconciliation

Contrition is not only a moral virtue, but the Council of Trent defined that it is a "part", and even more, quasi materia, in the Sacrament of Penance. "The (quasi) matter of this sacrament consists of the acts of the penitent himself, namely, contrition, confession, and satisfaction. These, inasmuch as they are by God's institution required in the penitent for the integrity of the sacrament and for the full and perfect remission of sin, are for this reason called parts of penance." In consequence of this decree of Trent theologians teach that sorrow for sin must be in some sense sacramental. La Croix went so far as to say that sorrow must be aroused with a view of going to confession, but this seems to be asking too much; most theologians think with Schieler-Heuser (Theory and Practice of Confession, p. 113) that it is sufficient if the sorrow coexist in any way with the confession and is referred to it. Hence the precept of the Roman Ritual, "After the confessor has heard the confession he should try by earnest exhortation to move the penitent to contrition" (Schieler-Heuser, op. cit., p. 111 sqq.). For repentance is essential for the effectiveness of this sacrament, as the Catechism of the Catholic Church explains:

Jesus' call to conversion and penance ... does not aim first at outward works ... but at the conversion of the heart, interior conversion (1430). Interior repentance is a radical reorientation of our whole life, a return, a conversion to God with all our heart, an end of sin, a turning away from evil, ... the desire and resolution to change one's life, with hope in God's mercy and trust in the help of his grace (1431).

For Catholics, where there is mortal sin, use of the Sacrament of Reconciliation must follow.[15]

Perfect contrition without the Sacrament of Penance

[edit]

Early Church Fathers, including Clement of Rome, Hermas, and Chrysostom, held that sorrow was effective for the remission of sins.[16] Similarly, Scholastics such as Peter Lombard, Thomas Aquinas, and Bonaventure taught that perfect contrition, with the desire of receiving the Sacrament of Penance, restored a sinner to grace at once.[17] Later theologians came to emphasize the desire for the sacrament of penance over the sorrow itself, with the Council of Trent declaring that "though contrition may sometimes be made perfect by charity and may reconcile men to God before the actual reception of this sacrament, still the reconciliation is not to be ascribed to the contrition apart from the desire for the sacrament which it includes."

In Catholic theology, perfect contrition is held to forgive sins due to its connection with love. Bede writes: "What is love but fire; what is sin but rust? Hence it is said, many sins are forgiven her because she hath loved much, as though to say, she hath burned away entirely the rust of sin, because she is inflamed with the fire of love."[18] Accordingly, Gregory XIII condemned Baius's proposition 32, which asserted "that charity which is the fullness of the law is not always conjoined with forgiveness of sins".

Catholic theologians argue that it was possible to recover grace after sinning under the Old Covenant, citing Ezech. 33:11 ("As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live.") They reason that the coming of Christ and the institution of the sacrament of penance could not have increased the difficulty of obtaining forgiveness. Therefore, equating this turning to God with perfect contrition, they conclude that the same method must still be effective.

A number of Catholic theologians have discussed what forms of love are sufficient to obtain justification. The general consensus is that pure, or disinterested love ((amor benevolentiæ, amor amicitiæ) is effective, and purely selfish love (amor concupiscentia) is not. There is not a general consensus on what motives can constitute perfect love. Some theologians hold that perfect love requires loving God for his great goodness alone; others argue that the love of gratitude (amor gratitudinis) suffices.[19]

Obligation of eliciting the act of contrition

[edit]

In the very nature of things the sinner must repent before being reconciled with God (Sess. XIV, ch. iv, de Contritione, Fuit quovis tempore, etc.). Therefore, whoever falls into grievous sin must either make an act of perfect contrition or supplement the imperfect contrition by receiving the Sacrament of Penance; otherwise reconciliation with God is impossible. This obligation urges under pain of sin when there is danger of death. In danger of death, therefore, if a priest be not at hand to administer the sacrament, the sinner must make an effort to elicit an act of perfect contrition. The obligation of perfect contrition is also urgent whensoever one has to exercise some act for which a state of grace is necessary and the Sacrament of Penance is not accessible. Theologians have questions how long a person may remain in the state of sin, without making an effort to elicit an act of perfect contrition. They seem agreed that such neglect must have extended over considerable time, but what constitutes a considerable time they find it hard to determine (Schieler-Hauser, op. cit., pp. 83 sqq.). Probably the rule of St. Alphonsus Liguori will aid the solution: "The duty of making an act of contrition is urgent when one is obliged to make an act of love" (Sabetti, Theologia Moralis: de necess. contritionis, no. 731; Ballerine, Opus Morale: de contritione).

In other Christian theology

[edit]
David is depicted giving a penitential psalm in this 1860 woodcut by Julius Schnorr von Karolsfeld, a Lutheran

The Augsburg Confession, the primary confession of faith of the Lutheran Church, divides repentance into two parts: "One is contrition, that is, terrors smiting the conscience through the knowledge of sin; the other is faith, which is born of the Gospel, or of absolution, and believes that for Christ's sake, sins are forgiven, comforts the conscience, and delivers it from terrors."[20]

Puritan preacher Thomas Hooker defined contrition as "nothing else, namely, when a sinner by the sight of sin and vileness of it, and the punishment due to the same, is made sensible of sin, and is made to hate it, and hath his heart separated from the same."[21]

Anglo-Catholic rector of St. Mark's Church in Philadelphia, Alfred Garnett Mortimer, pointed out that "feelings" are not an adequate gauge of contrition. The signs of true contrition are a readiness to confess, a readiness to amend one's life and avoid temptation, and a readiness to forgive others.[22]

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Contrition

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Contrition is a profound sorrow and for sins committed, characterized by a humbled or "broken" spirit that fully acknowledges guilt and seeks with , particularly within . This state of heart is essential for genuine , as it rejects and aligns with on wrongdoing. Biblically, contrition is depicted as a quality that God favors, emphasizing His closeness to the humble and repentant, as in :17 ("a broken and contrite heart, O , you will not despise") and Isaiah 57:15 ( dwelling with the contrite to revive their spirit). These passages highlight contrition's role in , , and spiritual renewal. In , contrition is distinguished into perfect (arising from love for ) and imperfect (from fear of punishment) forms, both important for the of ; see "Catholic Perspectives" for details. This distinction underscores contrition's transformative power in restoring one's relationship with the divine, rooted in the scriptural command to love above all (Deuteronomy 6:5; Matthew 22:37).

Definition and Origins

Definition

Contrition, in Christian theology, refers to a profound sorrow of the soul and detestation for sins committed, arising from the recognition that they constitute an offense against God, accompanied by a firm resolution not to sin again. This spiritual disposition involves not merely emotional regret but a deep humility and brokenness before God, where the individual fully acknowledges the gravity of their wrongdoing without excuses. Unlike superficial remorse, which may focus on personal consequences or shame, contrition entails a transformative turning toward divine mercy and a commitment to amendment of life. Within the broader Christian context, contrition forms an integral part of , often linked to the Greek term metanoia, signifying a fundamental change of mind and heart that redirects one's life away from and toward righteousness and reconciliation with . This process emphasizes spiritual renewal, where sorrow for sin leads to in 's forgiveness through Christ, fostering a contrite heart that promises to revive. Biblical illustrations, such as David's plea in for a "broken and contrite heart," exemplify this disposition as essential for receiving divine favor.

Etymology and Biblical Foundations

The term "contrition" originates from the Latin contritio, which denotes "crushing" or "grinding," derived from the verb conterere, meaning "to grind" or "to break into pieces." This etymological root evokes the image of a heart pulverized by sorrow for , symbolizing profound spiritual humiliation and . The word entered as contricion around the , influencing usage by the 14th century, where it first appeared in religious texts to describe a state of penitential . In the , contrition finds its foundational expression in passages that emphasize a "broken" or humbled spirit as pleasing to . :17 states, "The sacrifices of are a broken spirit; a broken and a contrite heart, O , thou wilt not despise," where the Hebrew term נִדְכֶּה (nidkeh) from דָּכָא (dakah), meaning "crushed," conveys a sense of moral and emotional shattering in response to sin. Similarly, 57:15 describes as dwelling "with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit," using דַּכָּא (dakka') from דָּכָא (dakah), meaning "crushed," to highlight divine favor toward the repentant lowly. These verses establish contrition as an internal disposition of essential for with . The builds on this theme, portraying contrition as "godly sorrow" that produces leading to . In 2 Corinthians 7:10, Paul writes, "For godly sorrow worketh to not to be repented of: but the sorrow of the worketh ," with the Greek phrase λύπη κατὰ θεόν (lypē kata theon), meaning "sorrow according to ," underscoring a transformative distinct from mere . This scriptural motif is vividly illustrated in the (:11-32), where the wayward son's heartfelt recognition of his failings—", I have sinned against , and before thee" (:18)—exemplifies contrition as a catalyst for returning to the father's , modeling authentic without explicit doctrinal elaboration.

Theological Framework

Historical Development

The concept of contrition began to take shape in the writings of the as an internal disposition of sorrow essential to Christian and . , writing around 200 AD, portrayed as "an emotion of the mind arising from at some previously cherished worse sentiment," linking it closely to the avoidance of repeated and the pursuit of through penitential discipline. Similarly, (c. 185–254 AD) stressed sorrow for as a vital prerequisite for baptismal renewal, arguing that genuine cleanses the soul from moral stains and facilitates spiritual rebirth, as explored in his Commentary on Romans where he outlines remissions of including . During the broader Patristic era, contrition evolved toward a deeper emphasis on interior transformation rather than mere external rituals. Augustine of Hippo, in his Confessions (c. 397–400 AD), exemplified this shift by recounting his own profound interior sorrow for past sins, describing it as a heartfelt bitterness that pierced the soul and led to conversion, prioritizing genuine compunction over performative acts. This interior focus influenced monastic traditions, as seen in John Cassian (c. 360–435 AD), who in his Institutes highlighted "compunction" as a salutary fear of the Lord arising from awareness of sin, fostering renunciation and spiritual nakedness in the ascetic life. To balance the Western perspective, Eastern patristic thought, particularly in John Chrysostom (c. 347–407 AD), underscored the role of "tears of repentance" as a purifying response to sin, as in his homilies where he urged sinners to lament their offenses with genuine weeping to achieve reconciliation with God. In the medieval period, scholastic theologians refined contrition into a more systematic theological category, distinguishing it from lesser forms of remorse. Peter Lombard (c. 1096–1160), in his Sentences (c. 1150), differentiated contrition—defined as perfect sorrow motivated by love of God—from attrition, which stemmed from fear of punishment, asserting that true contrition alone could remit guilt even prior to sacramental confession. This distinction fueled pre-Trent debates among theologians like Abelard and others, who argued over whether contrition sufficed for forgiveness without oral confession, with some maintaining its independent efficacy while others insisted on the necessity of the full penitential rite. The Council of Trent (1545–1563) ultimately formalized contrition's central role in the sacrament of penance, defining it as "a sorrow of mind, and a detestation of past sin with a firm purpose of amendment," while clarifying that imperfect contrition (attrition) required sacramental absolution to achieve full remission, resolving earlier controversies in response to Reformation challenges.

Necessity for Repentance and Forgiveness

In , contrition represents the initial, grace-enabled response to , serving as a prerequisite for justification and divine . articulates this in the (Tertia Pars, Q. 85), describing contrition as an infused act of the virtue of penance that, through human cooperation with , remits guilt and restores virtues by turning the soul away from toward ; without this sorrowful detestation of offense against divine goodness, neither alone nor sacramental rites suffice for full . As the affective core of —termed metanoia, or a transformative change of mind and heart—contrition drives the progression from interior sorrow to outward and amendment of life, enabling the reception of God's . The Fourth Lateran Council (1215), in Canon 21, required all Christians of discretion to confess sins annually to their and perform imposed , thereby institutionalizing a process rooted in the contrite disposition necessary for sacramental and eucharistic participation. This relational dynamic, where contrition animates the will to forsake , underscores its universal role in Christian , bridging personal renewal with communal forgiveness. A lack of contrition obstructs spiritual maturation, perpetuating alienation from and impeding the path to by allowing unrepented sins to fester. Proverbs 28:13 warns that "whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain ," highlighting how suppressed sorrow yields spiritual barrenness, whereas authentic contrition unlocks and growth toward holiness. Across traditions, this links contrition to redemptive : Catholics view it as essential for justification, Protestants as vital to faith's in turning from , and Eastern Orthodox as key to in , fostering deification through humble return to .

Catholic Perspectives

Types of Contrition

In , contrition is classified into two primary types: perfect contrition and imperfect contrition, distinguished primarily by their motivating principles and sacramental effects. Perfect contrition arises from a pure above all things, involving sorrow of the and detestation for committed, coupled with a firm resolution not to sin again. This form of contrition, rooted in charity, remits venial sins completely and obtains for mortal sins even prior to sacramental confession, provided there is an to receive the as soon as possible. The efficacy of perfect contrition stems from its motivation, which aligns the penitent's will directly with divine , thereby restoring grace independently of the sacrament's administration in cases of necessity. Imperfect contrition, also known as attrition, originates from a of sin's ugliness or the fear of eternal damnation and other punishments, serving as an initial stirring of prompted by the . While it suffices to dispose the soul for the forgiveness of sins within the Sacrament of Penance, imperfect contrition alone does not remit mortal sins, requiring sacramental for their full pardon. This type of sorrow, though genuine, is motivated by rather than pure charity, thus necessitating the sacrament's grace to achieve complete . The distinction between these types was historically debated in medieval theology but was definitively clarified by the , which affirmed contrition's necessity while upholding the validity of attrition when united to the , rejecting views that dismissed fear-based sorrow as insufficient or merely human. Theologian (1548–1617) further elaborated on the motives in his De Poenitentia, aligning with the view that perfect contrition's love of God surpasses attrition's fear, enabling immediate justification with the desire for , whereas attrition provides a preparatory grace that perfects only through the . Comparatively, perfect contrition offers immediate efficacy for sin remission under the specified conditions, highlighting its role in extraordinary circumstances, while imperfect contrition's effects remain conditional upon sacramental reception, underscoring the Church's emphasis on the ordinary . Post-Vatican II teachings, as reflected in the , integrate both types within a broader framework of , encouraging the faithful to cultivate perfect contrition while recognizing imperfect contrition's accessibility as a merciful entry point to and (CCC 1451-1453). This approach emphasizes God's initiative in stirring the heart toward sorrow for , fostering a holistic understanding of contrition as a pathway to .

Essential Qualities

In , genuine contrition is characterized by specific essential qualities that distinguish it as a profound spiritual act of , rooted in the soul's response to as an offense against . These qualities ensure that contrition transcends mere emotional regret or fear, fostering a transformative sorrow that aligns the penitent with divine will. The interior quality of contrition requires it to be a heartfelt and voluntary sorrow arising from the depths of the soul, rather than external coercion or superficial sentiment. According to , contrition is an act of the will that crushes the hardness of through personal sorrow, targeting one's own willful faults and demanding sincere internal detestation. This interior disposition is emphasized in the , which describes contrition as a "sorrow of mind" involving genuine hatred of past sins, without which no true occurs. Unlike coerced , this quality ensures contrition is an authentic movement of the heart, free from external pressure. Contrition must also possess a supernatural quality, meaning it is inspired by God's grace and informed by in His , rather than arising solely from natural emotions or human reasoning. The teaches that this sorrow is supernatural when it stems from faith in divine and includes a firm purpose of amendment, enabling it to remit sins through charity (CCC 1451-1453). Aquinas further explains that contrition is vivified by grace, aligning the with God's and relying on Christ's merits for justification, thus distinguishing it from purely psychological responses. The underscores this by requiring confidence in God's as integral to contrition's efficacy. The universal quality demands that contrition encompass sorrow for all sins, both past and present, without exception or partiality, including even forgotten mortal sins through a general detestation. Aquinas holds that true contrition extends to every committed, as partial sorrow would undermine its restorative power. This universality is affirmed in the , which insists on detestation for the committed alongside resolution against future , covering the entirety of one's moral life (CCC 1451). The reinforces that contrition involves hatred of all past sins and a resolve for a new life free from them. Finally, contrition exhibits a , wherein the motive is supremely directed toward as the offended party, prioritizing for Him above self-interest or worldly concerns, viewing as the greatest possible evil. The teaches that this sovereign sorrow prefers any suffering to sinning again, ensuring the penitent's will is ordered toward divine over personal gain. In this way, as Aquinas describes, contrition restores the proper ordering of by detesting for its offense against 's infinite goodness. To avoid confusion with modern psychological concepts, Catholic teaching distinguishes theological contrition—a healthy, grace-filled sorrow leading to conversion—from clinical guilt, which may manifest as pathological or self-reproach without redemptive purpose. While perfect contrition, motivated by pure , exemplifies these qualities at their height, all genuine contrition shares them to varying degrees.

Relation to the Sacrament of Penance

In , contrition plays an integral role in the Sacrament of Penance, forming one of the three essential acts—along with and satisfaction—required for the full and perfect remission of sins and for by the . The specifies that these acts constitute the "matter" of the sacrament, with contrition being the first, involving sorrow for sin and a firm purpose of amendment that disposes the penitent to receive . Perfect contrition, arising from charity or above all else, can forgive even mortal sins outside the , provided it includes the firm resolution, with God's grace, to confess those sins sacramentally as soon as possible. This extraordinary efficacy applies in situations where sacramental confession is unavailable, such as imminent or remote contexts where access to a is impossible, thereby reconciling the soul to ante sacramentalem absolutionem while still obligating the intention to seek the later if life continues. In contrast, imperfect contrition (attrition), motivated by fear of punishment or the ugliness of sin rather than pure love, cannot forgive mortal sins on its own but suffices within the Sacrament of Penance to dispose the soul for justifying grace and absolution. It prepares the penitent by manifesting a genuine, though lesser, sorrow that the sacrament perfects through the priest's ministry. Post-Vatican II teachings, as reflected in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, emphasize contrition's place in an "integral confession" that fosters ongoing conversion, integrating sorrow for sin with the sacrament's communal and ecclesial dimensions (CCC 1451-1454). A common misconception is that perfect contrition replaces the need for sacramental confession; however, it does not exempt the faithful from the obligation to confess mortal sins when possible, as the sacrament remains the ordinary means instituted by Christ for reconciliation.

Practical Obligations

In Catholic teaching, the faithful are obliged to elicit an act of perfect contrition before receiving the if conscious of grave sin and unable to confess sacramentally, as stipulated in Canon 916 of the Code of Canon Law, which requires such contrition along with the intention to confess as soon as possible unless a grave reason prevents confession. This obligation extends to an annual duty of sacramental confession, established by the in 1215, which mandates that all faithful confess their sins at least once a year and receive the at , implying the necessity of contrition to fulfill this precept. Catholics are encouraged to practice acts of contrition through traditional prayers, such as the , which expresses sorrow for sins out of love for and resolves to amend one's life. Fostering contrition often involves the examen of conscience, a reflective prayer examining one's thoughts, words, and deeds to identify sins and stir genuine repentance, typically performed daily or before . In liturgical settings, acts of contrition are integrated into the Rite of Penance, where penitents recite prescribed formulas during individual or communal celebrations to express sorrow before . In extraordinary circumstances, such as danger of death without access to a , an act of perfect contrition—arising from charity and love for above all—obtains of mortal sins immediately, provided it includes the resolution to receive sacramental confession if possible, as taught in the (CCC 1452). Modern Vatican guidance emphasizes contrition as essential to ongoing conversion, with Pope John Paul II's Reconciliatio et Paenitentia (1984) describing it as a profound drawing near to God's holiness that renews the penitent's relationship with Him and the Church.

Perspectives in Other Christian Traditions

Protestant Views

In Protestant theology, contrition is understood as a heartfelt, godly sorrow for sin that arises from faith and leads to genuine repentance, distinct from mere attrition motivated by fear of punishment. Martin Luther, in his 1520 treatise The Babylonian Captivity of the Church, critiqued the scholastic distinction between contrition and attrition, arguing that true contrition is not a prerequisite for justification but a fruit of it, born from the recognition of God's grace through Christ. He emphasized that attrition, as granted by Catholic doctrine to the unrepentant, effectively abolishes authentic contrition by reducing sorrow to self-interest rather than love for God. This view underscores the Reformation principle of sola fide, where contrition flows from trust in Christ's atonement rather than human effort. John Calvin further developed this perspective in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536), describing contrition as a Spirit-wrought humility and godly sorrow that enables believers to experience assurance of pardon. Unlike Catholic categorizations of perfect and imperfect contrition, Calvin rejected such divisions, focusing instead on the authenticity of repentance as evidenced by turning from sin toward God. John Wesley, in Methodist tradition, echoed this by framing "conviction of sin" as an ongoing repentance for justified believers, involving a deep awareness of remaining sinfulness that prompts continual reliance on divine grace. Wesley distinguished genuine repentance from false forms, such as superficial regret, aligning it with the transformative work of the Holy Spirit. Protestant views anchor contrition in Scripture, particularly 2 Corinthians 7:10, which contrasts "godly sorrow" that produces leading to with worldly sorrow that yields death. This biblical emphasis rejects the necessity of sacramental for , asserting that pardon comes directly through faith in Christ without intermediary rites. In Reformed and evangelical traditions, contrition thus manifests as a personal, faith-driven response to , fostering and obedience without reliance on structures. Modern Protestant thought, particularly in evangelical and Reformed circles, integrates these theological emphases with psychological insights in , viewing godly sorrow as a catalyst for emotional from guilt and . For instance, approaches in biblical counseling distinguish contrition's role in addressing relational brokenness, combining scriptural with therapeutic techniques to promote mental . Studies have explored repentance-focused interventions, such as writing exercises, that draw on both and psychological principles to reduce rumination and enhance , highlighting contrition's practical impact on personal transformation.

Eastern Orthodox Approaches

In , contrition is understood as penthos, a profound spiritual compunction characterized by a sorrowful yearning for God that arises from awareness of and separation from divine communion. This godly grief, distinct from worldly despair, manifests as tears of repentance that purify the soul and foster a "joyful sorrow," leading ultimately to theosis, or deification, through union with God. St. John Climacus, in his 7th-century , describes this in Step 7 on mourning, where compunction produces a "spiritual laughter of the soul" that cleanses the heart and draws the believer toward divine purity and beatitude. Unlike Western distinctions between perfect and imperfect contrition, views as a dynamic progression without rigid categorization, emphasizing stages that evolve from initial fear and shame to transformative love and . St. Symeon the New Theologian (949–1022) portrays contrition as a passionate, lifelong response to God's initiative, where serve as a "second " elevating the sinner directly to mystical communion, regardless of the depth of past sins. This process integrates with liturgical life, where canons of —penitential disciplines assigned by spiritual fathers—prepare the faithful for the by cultivating interior and with the Church. Participation in the , including the Prayer Before Communion, reinforces contrition as a pathway to Eucharistic union, transforming personal sorrow into shared divine light. Patristic sources further illuminate contrition's role in combating spiritual despondency; (345–399) contrasts — of listlessness and self-focused aversion—with contrite vigilance, urging monks to persevere in ful awareness to overcome paralysis and restore fervent longing for God. Practical expressions of contrition emphasize unceasing , such as the ("Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner"), recited continuously to maintain inner stillness and repentance. to a spiritual father remains essential, serving not as judgment but as a witness to God's , fostering ongoing metanoia (change of mind) within the communal life of the Church. The hesychastic tradition, rooted in the , deepens this interior contrition by directing the mind to the heart, where silent, vigilant dissolves distractions and aligns the soul with divine mercy.

References

  1. https://www.gotquestions.org/contrite-contrition.html
  2. https://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/contrite-contrition/
  3. https://www.catholic.com/qa/whats-the-difference-between-contrition-and-attrition
  4. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+6%3A5%3B+Matthew+22%3A37&version=NIV
  5. https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-terms/what-is-contrition-bible-meaning-of-a-contrite-heart.html
  6. https://higherthings.org/content/the-two-parts-of-repentance/
  7. https://www.goarch.org/-/turning-toward-god-in-repentance
  8. https://biblehub.com/lexicon/psalms/51-17.htm
  9. https://biblehub.com/lexicon/isaiah/57-15.htm
  10. https://biblehub.com/interlinear/2_corinthians/7-10.htm
  11. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0320.htm
  12. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7772/1/Post_Viva_Thesis.pdf
  13. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3296/3296-h/3296-h.htm
  14. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/350704.htm
  15. https://www.oodegr.com/english/psyxotherap/homily_on_repentance.htm
  16. https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11305-a-case-study-of-scholasticism-peter-abelard-and-peter-lombard-on-penance/attachment/27838.pdf
  17. https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/trent/fourteenth-session.htm
  18. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/4085.htm
  19. https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum12-2.htm
  20. https://biblehub.com/proverbs/28-13.htm
  21. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/the-christian-and-repentance/
  22. https://www.oca.org/orthodoxy/the-orthodox-faith/worship/the-sacraments/penance
  23. https://www.crossroadsinitiative.com/media/articles/five-paths-of-repentance-john-chrysostom/
  24. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11618c.htm
  25. https://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c2a4.htm
  26. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/5002.htm
  27. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1080/08873260701274272
  28. https://canonlaw.ninja/?nums=916
  29. https://www.usccb.org/prayers/act-contrition
  30. https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/sacraments-and-sacramentals/penance/examinations-of-conscience
  31. http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_02121984_reconciliatio-et-paenitentia.html
  32. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.v.iv.html
  33. https://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/the-sermons-of-john-wesley-1872-edition/sermon-14-the-repentance-of-believers/
  34. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/learn/institute/th511-wesleyan-theology-ii/th511-03-wesley-on-repentance
  35. https://digitalcommons.hope.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1566&context=faculty_publications
  36. https://orthochristian.com/91509.html
  37. https://www.orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/1.2020/JohnAnthonyMcGuckin.pdf
  38. https://www.goarch.org/-/repentance-and-confession-introduction
  39. https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2014/08/09/acedia-the-noonday-demon/
  40. https://www.saintsophiadc.org/hesychasm-sweet-repose/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.