Hubbry Logo
Thomas HookerThomas HookerMain
Open search
Thomas Hooker
Community hub
Thomas Hooker
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Thomas Hooker
Thomas Hooker
Thomas Hooker
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Thomas Hooker (July 5, 1586 – July 7, 1647) was a prominent English colonial leader and Congregational minister, who founded the Connecticut Colony after dissenting with Puritan leaders in Massachusetts. He was known as an outstanding speaker and an advocate of universal Christian suffrage.

Key Information

Called today "the Father of Connecticut", Hooker was a towering figure in the early development of colonial New England. He was one of the great preachers of his time, an erudite writer on Christian subjects, the first minister of Cambridge, Massachusetts, and one of the first settlers and founders of both the city of Hartford and the state of Connecticut. He has been cited by many as the inspiration for the "Fundamental Orders of Connecticut", which some have described as the world's first written democratic constitution establishing a representative government.[2]

Life

[edit]
Cuckoos Farm, Little Baddow, Essex, Hooker's home around 1629

Early life

[edit]

Thomas Hooker was likely born in Leicestershire at "Marfield" (Marefield or possibly Markfield) or Birstall.[3] He went to Dixie Grammar School at Market Bosworth.[4] Family genealogist Edward Hooker linked Thomas Hooker to the Hooker family in Devon, which produced the theologian and clergyman Richard Hooker. Other Hooker genealogists, however, have traced Thomas Hooker to Leicestershire. Positive evidence linking Thomas to Leicestershire is lacking since the Marefield parish records from before 1610 were lost. Any link to the Rev. Richard Hooker is likewise lacking since the Rev. Thomas's personal papers were disposed of and his house destroyed after his death.[5]

College

[edit]

In March 1604, Hooker entered Queens' College, Cambridge as a sizar but migrated to Emmanuel College.[6] He received his Bachelor of Arts in 1608 and his Master of Arts in 1611.[4][6][7] In 1609 he was elected to a Dixie fellowship at Emmanuel, a position he held until 1619.[4]

Hooker was appointed to St George's Church, Esher, Surrey in 1620, where he earned a reputation as an excellent speaker.[4][7] He also became noted for his pastoral care of Mrs. Joan Drake, the wife of the patron. She was a depressive whose stages of spiritual regeneration became a model for his later theological thinking. While associated with the Drake household, he married Susannah Garbrand, Mrs. Drake's woman-in-waiting (April 3, 1621) in Amersham, Mrs. Drake's birthplace.[8]

Around 1626, Hooker became a lecturer or preacher at what was then St. Mary's parish church, Chelmsford (now Chelmsford Cathedral) and curate to its rector, John Michaelson.[4] In 1629 Archbishop William Laud suppressed church lecturers, and Hooker retired to Little Baddow where he kept a school.[4]

His leadership of Puritan sympathizers brought him a summons to the Court of High Commission. Forfeiting his bond, Hooker fled to Rotterdam in the Netherlands,[7] and considered a position in the English Reformed Church, Amsterdam, as assistant to its senior pastor, the Rev. John Paget.[9] From the Netherlands, after a clandestine trip to England to put his affairs in order,[10] he immigrated to the Massachusetts Bay Colony aboard the Griffin.[1][4]

Hooker arrived in Boston and settled in Newtown (later renamed Cambridge), where he became the pastor of the earliest established church there, known to its members as "The Church of Christ at Cambridge".[11] His congregation, some of whom may have been members of congregations he had served in England,[12] became known as "Mr. Hooker's Company".[4] For a time he lived in Watertown, Massachusetts, but felt that the towns were too close together.[13] When the General Court of Massachusetts allowed residents to split off and found new communities, his group was among the first to go.[13]

Hooker and Company Journeying through the Wilderness from Plymouth to Hartford, in 1636, Frederic Edwin Church, 1846

Voting in Massachusetts was limited to freemen, individuals who had been formally admitted to their church after a detailed interrogation of their religious views and experiences. Hooker disagreed with this limitation of suffrage, putting him at odds with his old friend, the influential pastor John Cotton.

Owing to his conflict with Cotton, discontented with the suppression of Puritan suffrage, and at odds with the colony leadership,[7] Hooker and the Rev. Samuel Stone led a group of about 100[14] who, in 1636, founded the settlement of Hartford. It was named for Stone's birthplace, Hertford in England.[15]

They founded the Connecticut Colony.[4][16] Hooker became more active in politics in Connecticut. The General Court representing Wethersfield, Windsor and Hartford met at the end of May 1638 to frame a written constitution in order to establish a government for the commonwealth. Hooker preached the opening sermon at First Church of Hartford on May 31, declaring that "the foundation of authority is laid in the free consent of the people."[17]

On January 14, 1639, freemen from these three settlements ratified the "Fundamental Orders of Connecticut" in what John Fiske called "the first written constitution known to history that created a government. It marked the beginnings of American democracy, of which Thomas Hooker deserves more than any other man to be called the father. The government of the United States today is in lineal descent more nearly related to that of Connecticut than to that of any of the other thirteen colonies."[18]

In recognition of this, near Chelmsford Cathedral, Essex, England, where Hooker had been town lecturer and curate, there is a blue plaque fixed high on the wall of a narrow alleyway, opposite the south porch, that reads: "Thomas Hooker, 1586–1647, Curate at St. Mary's Church and Chelmsford Town Lecturer 1626–29. Founder of the State of Connecticut, Father of American Democracy."[19]

Death and legacy

[edit]
Hooker's statue by Frances Laughlin Wadsworth

Hooker died during the 1647 North American influenza epidemic on July 7, at the age of 61, two days after his birthday. The location of his grave is unknown, although he is believed to be buried in Hartford's Ancient Burying Ground. A crypt was erected there; in addition a plaque on the back of the First Church refers to his burial.

Because there was no known portrait of him, in the 20th century Frances Laughlin Wadsworth used the likenesses of his descendants to sculpt the commissioned statue of Hooker that was erected in 1938 in front of Hartford's Old State House.

Views

[edit]
Plaque honoring Hooker's ministry at the First Church of Cambridge, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Thomas Hooker strongly advocated extended suffrage to include Puritan worshippers, leading him and his followers to colonize Connecticut.[4] He also promoted the concept of a government that must answer to the people, stating: "[T]hey who have the power to appoint officers and magistrates, it is in their power, also, to set the bounds and limitations of the power and place unto which they call them" through "the privilege of election, which belongs to the people according to the blessed will and law of God".[4] Hooker argued for greater religious tolerance towards all Christian denominations.[20]

Hooker defended the calling of synods by magistrates, and attended a convention of ministers in Boston whose purpose was to defend Congregationalism.[4] Hooker later published A Survey of the Summed of Church-Discipline in defense of Congregationalism, and applied its principles to politics and government.[7]

Thomas Hooker was a prominent proponent of the doctrine of preparationism, which taught that by making use of the means of grace, a "person seeking conversion might dispose himself toward receiving God's grace."[21] He believed that much of God's favor needed to be re-earned by men.[22] To Hooker, sin was the most crafty of enemies, defeating grace on most occasions. He disagreed with many of the predecessor theologies of Free Grace theology, preferring a more muted view on the subject. He focused on preparation for heaven and following the moralist character.[22]

Family

[edit]
House of Thomas Hooker, Hartford, Connecticut
Coat of Arms of Thomas Hooker

Thomas Hooker came to the colonies with his second wife, Suzanne. Nothing is known of his first wife.

His son Samuel, likely born at Cambridge, Massachusetts, graduated from Harvard College in 1653. He became minister of Farmington, Connecticut, where his descendants lived for many generations.[notes 1] Of Rev. Samuel Hooker, Cotton Mather wrote in Magnalia Christi Americana: "Thus we have to this day among us our dead Hooker, yet living in his worthy son Samuel Hooker, an able, faithful, useful minister at Farmington, in the Colony of Connecticut."

His daughter Mary married Rev. Roger Newton, who was a founder and first minister of Farmington, Connecticut. Newton later was called as minister in Milford, Connecticut.

His grandchildren also had prominent lives. John Hooker, son of Rev. Samuel and grandson of Rev. Thomas, served as Speaker of the Connecticut Assembly, and previously as Judge of the state supreme court. James Hooker, brother of John and son of Rev. Samuel, also became a prominent political figure in Connecticut. He married the daughter of William Leete of Guilford, Connecticut, and subsequently settled there. James Hooker served as the first probate judge, and later as speaker of the Connecticut colonial assembly. Rev. Thomas's granddaughter Mary Hooker, the daughter of Rev. Samuel, married the Rev. James Pierpont. Their daughter Sarah Pierpont married the Rev. Jonathan Edwards.

Other descendants of Thomas Hooker include Henry Hooker, John Hooker, Arthur Atterbury, Charles Atterbury Mary Hooker Pierpont, William Howard Taft, Timothy Dwight V, Aaron Burr, William Gillette, William Huntington Russell, Edward H. Gillette, George Catlin, Emma Willard, J.P. Morgan, Rev. Joshua Leavitt, Rev. Horace Hooker, Roger Hooker Leavitt, Hart Leavitt, Frank Nelson Doubleday, John Turner Sargent, Thom Miller, Adonijah Rockwell and Nathan Watson.[1] On May 16, 1890, descendants of Thomas Hooker held their first reunion at Hartford, Connecticut.[23]

Notable Hooker descendants

[edit]

Works

[edit]
  • The Application of Redemption. 1659.
  • A Brief Exposition of the Lord's Prayer. London: Moses Bell. 1645.
  • The Christian's Two Chief Lessons: Self-Denial and Self-Trial.
  • The Covenant of Grace Opened.
  • The Danger of Desertion Or A Farewell Sermon of Mr. Thomas Hooker.
  • An Exposition of the Principles of Religion. 1645.
  • Hooker, Thomas (1629). The Poor Doubting Christian Drawn to Christ.
  • The Saint's Dignity and Duty. 1651.
  • The Soul's Exaltation. London: John Haviland. 1638.
  • The Soul's Humiliation. International Outreach.
  • The Soul's Ingrafting into Christ. 1637.
  • The Soul's Preparation for Christ: Or, A Treatise of Contrition, Wherein is discovered How God breaks the heart, and wounds the Soul, in the conversion of a Sinner to Himself The Soul's Preparation for Christ. 1632.
  • A Survey Of The Summe Of Church-Discipline: Wherein The Way Of The Churches Of New England Is Warranted Out Of The Word. London: John Bellamy. 1648.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Thomas Hooker

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Thomas Hooker (1586–1647) was an English Puritan minister and colonial leader instrumental in the founding of the Connecticut Colony. Born in Markfield, Leicestershire, England, Hooker graduated from Emmanuel College, Cambridge, where he embraced Puritan theology and began preaching against Anglican practices. Facing persecution under Archbishop William Laud, he fled to the Netherlands before emigrating to the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1633, where he served as pastor in Newtown (now Cambridge). Discontent with the restrictive franchise limited to church members in good standing and the colony's oligarchic tendencies, Hooker led about 100 followers on a arduous overland journey in 1636 to the Connecticut River Valley, establishing the settlement of Hartford. There, he became the spiritual and civic guide for the fledgling community, preaching sermons that emphasized the sovereignty of God through the consent of the governed, as articulated in his 1638 election-day sermon justifying expanded political rights for freemen. Hooker's influence shaped the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut in 1639, considered one of the earliest written constitutions in America, which broadened suffrage to all free male church members and established representative government without a royal charter. A prolific preacher whose works like The Poor Doubting Christian Drawn to Christ were published posthumously, Hooker died in Hartford during an epidemic on July 7, 1647, leaving a legacy as a proponent of covenant theology and proto-democratic principles rooted in biblical authority rather than secular innovation.

Early Life and Education

Birth and Family Background

Thomas Hooker was born circa 1586 in Markfield, , . His father, also named Thomas Hooker (d. 1635), was a farmer of the middling sort, owning modest landholdings sufficient to support a family without dependency on wage labor. The senior Hooker resided in the rural parish of Markfield, part of the region where nonconformist sentiments were emerging amid broader religious tensions in late Elizabethan and early Stuart . Little is documented about Hooker's mother or immediate siblings, though the family's Puritan inclinations—evident in their later support for Thomas's clerical pursuits and his own religious trajectory—aligned with a growing dissatisfaction among provincial and yeomen toward the established Church of England's ceremonies and hierarchy. This background of modest agrarian stability and proto-Puritan piety provided the foundational environment for Hooker's intellectual and spiritual development, contrasting with the more elite pedigrees of some contemporary divines.

University Years and Intellectual Formation

Thomas Hooker entered the in 1604, initially as a at Queens' College before transferring to Emmanuel College, a center of Puritan scholarship. He earned his degree in 1608 and in 1611, remaining at Emmanuel as a Dixie Fellow and catechist until 1618. During his time at Emmanuel, Hooker encountered the rigorous Puritan theology that dominated the college, emphasizing scriptural authority, , and personal piety over Anglican ceremonialism. This environment shaped his intellectual formation, drawing him toward Reformed doctrines influenced by John Calvin's teachings on grace and . Hooker's exposure to these ideas fostered a commitment to experimental religion, marked by a profound spiritual conversion amid fears of divine . His university years honed Hooker's skills as a and theologian, preparing him for ministry amid growing tensions with authorities, as Puritan thought prioritized congregational and . This formation underscored a causal realism in his views, linking individual to communal covenantal structures grounded in empirical biblical rather than hierarchical .

Ministry in England and Initial Persecution

Ordination and Early Preaching

Thomas Hooker completed his Master of Arts degree at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, in 1611 and subsequently entered the ordained ministry within the Church of England, aligning with the Puritan tradition that sought to reform the established church from within. His early preaching focused on doctrinal purity, emphasizing personal conversion and scriptural authority over ceremonial practices imposed by Anglican hierarchy. By the mid-1620s, Hooker had established a reputation for eloquent and convicting sermons, initially preaching in rural parishes such as in before securing a more prominent role. In 1626, he was appointed curate and town lecturer at in , , a position that allowed him to deliver weekly lectures alongside regular services. His preaching there attracted substantial crowds, drawn by his rigorous exposition of Puritan theology, including preparationism—the idea that sinners must actively prepare their hearts for grace—and critiques of Arminian influences gaining traction under King Charles I. Hooker's tenure in lasted until 1629, when William Laud's campaign against nonconformist lecturers led to his silencing and summons before authorities. Rather than conform, he relocated to Little Baddow, a nearby village, where he opened a at Cuckoo's Farm and privately instructed students in and while fostering a network of Puritan sympathizers. This period marked intensified scrutiny from church officials, as Hooker's school served as a covert center for disseminating nonconformist views amid rising .

Conflicts with Anglican Authorities

Thomas Hooker began his ministry in England as a curate and lecturer, initially at , , and later at Chelmsford, , where his preaching attracted large congregations due to his emphasis on doctrines of personal conversion and opposition to ceremonial elements in the , such as vestments and the in baptism. These views positioned him against the established church's retention of practices he and other regarded as remnants of Roman Catholicism, leading to early scrutiny from ecclesiastical authorities seeking uniformity under the . In 1629, as , then , intensified efforts to suppress nonconformist preaching, Hooker was suspended from his position at for refusing to conform to these rituals, effectively silencing him from public lecturing. To evade further prosecution, he relocated to Little Baddow, , approximately five miles from , where he established a and continued private instruction, employing John Eliot as his usher, while avoiding formal church roles to minimize confrontation. This period reflected broader tensions under Laud's policies, which targeted Puritan lecturers through suppression of unauthorized preaching positions established to promote reformed . By 1630–1631, facing summons to the Court of High Commission and potential severe penalties including or whipping, Hooker forfeited bonds and fled to the in 1631, assisting English exile John Paget in . Upon attempting return, he narrowly escaped arrest in 1633 with aid from Samuel Stone, who misled pursuers, before concealing himself aboard the ship Griffin to sail for that year, marking his third evasion of Anglican enforcement actions. ![Cuckoos Farm, Little Baddow, where Hooker taught privately after suspension][float-right]

Migration and Settlement in New England

Exile to the Netherlands

In 1630, facing intensifying persecution from Anglican authorities under Archbishop for his nonconformist preaching, Thomas Hooker forfeited a £500 bond and fled to the , where Puritan exiles had established communities with greater religious liberty. He initially arrived in and briefly considered a position as assistant to the pastor at the English Reformed Church in , but soon relocated to . In , Hooker served as co-minister alongside John , a Scottish Presbyterian, at the English Nonconformist church, which catered to merchants and refugees; this arrangement lasted approximately two years, from 1630 to 1632, during which he preached freely without the constraints imposed in . There, he published his first book, The Soules Implantation (1630), a on spiritual preparation for emphasizing the need for in conversion. Hooker's time in allowed him to refine his congregationalist views, though tensions arose with more presbyterian-leaning colleagues like over church , highlighting early divides among English exiles. Hooker's exile ended in 1633 when he departed the Netherlands aboard the ship Griffin, arriving in on September 4 with his family and joining other in the ; his Dutch sojourn thus bridged his English ministry and American settlement, providing temporary refuge amid broader Protestant migrations.

Arrival in Massachusetts Bay Colony

Thomas Hooker departed from in the aboard the ship Griffin and arrived in on September 4, 1633, during the Great Puritan Migration. He traveled alongside prominent Puritan ministers John Cotton and Samuel Stone, who were also passengers on the vessel carrying approximately 200 religious dissidents seeking refuge from Anglican persecution. Upon arrival, Hooker settled in Newtowne (present-day Cambridge), Massachusetts, where he took up the position of pastor at the First Parish Church. The congregation, composed of his followers who had preceded or accompanied him, operated under the designation "Mr. Hooker's Company" and anticipated his leadership in establishing a Puritan ecclesiastical structure. Hooker shared pastoral duties with Samuel Stone, focusing on preaching and doctrinal instruction amid the colony's emphasis on covenant theology and church governance. He acquired multiple land holdings in the settlement, including four houses noted in town records by February 1635/6, reflecting his integration into the community's civic and religious life.

Founding of Connecticut

Disputes with Massachusetts Leadership

Upon arriving in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in September 1633 as pastor of the church in Newtown (present-day Cambridge), Thomas Hooker initially aligned with the colony's Puritan leadership, including Governor and pastor John Cotton, sharing their commitment to congregational church polity and reformed theology. However, tensions arose by 1634-1635 over the colony's structure, which Hooker viewed as overly oligarchic, concentrating power in magistrates and restricting participation to a narrow elite of visible saints. He contended that civil authority derived fundamentally from the , drawing on biblical precedents such as the ' election of leaders in the wilderness, rather than divine right vested solely in church-approved rulers. A central point of contention was the 1631 General Court decree limiting freemanship—and thus voting rights and eligibility for office—to male church members who could demonstrate a credible conversion experience, effectively disenfranchising many godly but unregenerate freemen. Hooker opposed this restriction, advocating instead for extended to all freeholders who professed the covenant and adhered to moral order, arguing that such broader consent prevented tyranny and aligned with scriptural principles of . This position clashed with Winthrop's defense of a "mixed " where magistrates exercised paternalistic oversight to preserve the colony's errand into the , leading to debates and Hooker's growing isolation from the . Theological differences exacerbated these political frictions, particularly Hooker's preparationist doctrine—which emphasized gradual moral preparation and self-examination prior to assurance of grace—against 's more experiential emphasis on the Spirit's direct witness, which some interpreted as risking amid the 1636-1638 controversies surrounding . While Hooker affirmed orthodox and opposed Hutchinson's familism, his protracted disputes with over conversion's preconditions and church admission standards fueled perceptions of discord, though contemporary accounts like Winthrop's journal prioritize grievances as the catalyst for Hooker's departure. By late , amid pressures in Newtown and unresolved debates, Hooker petitioned the General Court for leave to migrate southward, securing approval in May 1636 without formal banishment, as leaders preferred relocation over confrontation. This exodus of Hooker's congregation to the Valley underscored a causal rift: ' insistence on purity for political power versus Hooker's vision of restrained magistracy accountable to the commonwealth's freemen.

Journey to the Connecticut Valley and Hartford

In June 1636, Thomas Hooker, dissatisfied with restrictions imposed by Massachusetts Bay Colony authorities, led roughly 100 members of his congregation from Newtown (present-day Cambridge), Massachusetts, on a two-week overland expedition to the Connecticut River Valley. The group included men, women, and children, departing amid tensions over land scarcity and governance in Massachusetts. The migrants traversed approximately 100 miles of untamed wilderness along the Old Connecticut Path, a pre-existing Native American trail extending from into . Hooker's wife, Susanna, physically debilitated by illness, was transported on a horse-borne during the arduous trek, which involved driving and facing potential threats from and terrain. This route, later formalized as a colonial pathway, facilitated the group's progress despite the challenges of dense forests and swamps. Advance parties had already established initial outposts in the valley in 1635, providing a foothold for the main body upon arrival in early July 1636 at the site that became . Hooker's leadership unified the settlers, who constructed basic dwellings and organized community structures, marking the inception of organized European settlement in the area. The migration exemplified Puritan expansionism, prioritizing fertile lands and autonomy over proximity to established centers.

Role in the Fundamental Orders of 1639

Thomas Hooker played a pivotal role in shaping the intellectual foundations of the , adopted on January 14, 1639, by representatives from the towns of , Windsor, and Wethersfield. His sermon delivered on May 31, 1638, in articulated key principles of governance, asserting that "the foundation of authority is laid in the consent of the people" and that magistrates derive power from the free election and subjection of the governed, rather than solely from divine right or clerical hierarchy. This address, drawing from biblical precedents like Deuteronomy and emphasizing covenantal consent, directly influenced the document's preamble and structure, which established a representative assembly—the General Court—elected by freemen (adult male property owners), extending beyond the church membership requirement prevalent in . While Roger Ludlow, a from Windsor, is credited with drafting the text based on the 1636 Massachusetts legal code, Hooker's advocacy as Hartford's minister ensured the incorporation of broader participatory elements, such as annual elections of magistrates and the power of the General Court to admit new freemen and enact laws. Hooker's resistance to the restrictive freemanship oath imposed by authorities in 1631, which limited political rights to approved church members, motivated his push for a where rested on communal consent, reflecting his preparationist that stressed personal covenanting with as a prerequisite for both salvation and civic order. The Fundamental Orders did not explicitly reference Hooker's sermon but embodied its causal logic: authority flows upward from the people's election, checked by regular assemblies to prevent magisterial overreach, a framework that governed until the 1662 charter. Hooker's influence stemmed not from sole authorship—contemporary records show collaborative drafting by town deputies—but from his moral and rhetorical leadership in convening the assembly and promoting these principles amid disputes with over expansion and governance. This role underscored his commitment to a where ecclesiastical purity supported, but did not monopolize, , distinguishing Connecticut's compact from the theocratic model of its northern neighbor.

Theological and Ecclesiastical Views

Doctrines of Conversion and Preparationism

Thomas Hooker's doctrine of conversion emphasized a preparatory process whereby sinners, under the conviction of the law, undergo spiritual humiliation before experiencing the application of saving grace through in Christ. In his view, conversion was not an instantaneous event but involved distinct stages initiated and enabled by the , beginning with the sinner's recognition of their depravity and culminating in . This framework, detailed in sermons and treatises preached during his ministry in and , countered antinomian tendencies by insisting on the law's role in awakening the conscience without implying human merit. Central to Hooker's preparationism was the concept of , wherein God "breaks the heart and wounds the soul" to produce godly sorrow for , as outlined in his 1632 treatise The Soul's Preparation for Christ. He described preparation as involving illumination of 's heinousness through the , leading to conviction, self-loathing, and a turning from worldly comforts toward desperate seeking of . Hooker stressed that these steps—knowledge of , , and resolution to pursue Christ—were ordinary means ordained by God but wholly dependent on divine initiative, not self-generated efforts that could earn grace. Hooker further elaborated this in The Application of Redemption, a posthumous work compiling his sermons, where he delineated conversion's "logic" as a progression from legal terrors to evangelical comforts, using Ramist dichotomies to structure the soul's journey from enmity to reconciliation with . Preparationism, for Hooker, served to humble the proud and expose false assurances, ensuring that rested on Christ's sufficiency rather than presumed experiences; he warned against over-reliance on preparatory signs as infallible proofs of , prioritizing scriptural self-examination. Critics within Puritan circles, such as later hyper-Calvinists, viewed his emphasis on extended preparation as potentially delaying assurance, yet Hooker maintained it aligned with biblical patterns like the Psalmist's convictions.

Positions on Church Discipline and Congregationalism

Thomas Hooker advocated a form of church polity known as Congregationalism, wherein each local congregation operates as an autonomous under Christ's headship, with governance vested primarily in the consenting members rather than external hierarchies or presbyteries. In his posthumously published treatise A Survey of the Summe of Church-Discipline (1648), Hooker defended the practices of churches against critics, arguing that Scripture warrants independent congregations bound by mutual covenant, capable of administering all ordinances—including preaching, sacraments, and censures—without subordination to synods or national assemblies. He described church government as a composite: democratic in the congregation's exercise of judgment, aristocratic in the elders' guiding role, and monarchical under Christ alone, rejecting Presbyterian models of centralized elder rule as unbiblical accretions. Central to Hooker's ecclesiology was the local church's self-sufficiency and autonomy, with each congregation possessing the full "power of the keys" to admit members, ordain officers, and execute discipline independently of other churches. He contended that "one Congregation hath not power over another," allowing even an isolated church—such as "a Church in an Island"—to dispense ordinances without external validation, grounded in passages like Matthew 18:15–17 and 1 Corinthians 5:4–5. Relations between churches were to be voluntary and fraternal, through consociations for counsel or mutual aid (as in Acts 15), but synods held no juridical authority to impose censures or bind consciences, distinguishing his view from Presbyterian assemblies that claimed appellate or coercive power. On church officers, Hooker maintained that pastors, teachers, ruling elders, and deacons derive their authority from congregational election and voluntary subjection, not hierarchical imposition or presbyterial ordination. Drawing from Ephesians 4:11–12 and Acts 6:3–5, he asserted that "the Church by voluntary subjection gives them this united right of rule," with elders preparing disciplinary cases and providing doctrinal guidance while the congregation retains potestatem judicii (power of judgment) to approve or reject actions. A church could exist without officers in its essence, though officers were essential for orderly function, and ordination served as a confirmatory rite by the body rather than a conveying of power from above. Hooker's doctrine of emphasized purity through orderly censures, administered by the congregation to preserve the body from leaven-like corruption (1 Corinthians 5:6–7). The process followed Matthew 18:15–17: private admonition for offenses, escalation to witnesses and public rebuke if unrepentant, culminating in congregational deliberation and potential for heinous or persistent sins like or , with restoration possible upon repentance (2 Corinthians 2:6–7). Elders initiated complaints and framed cases, but final consent required congregational involvement, ensuring over unilateral elder fiat, and tolerating undetected hypocrites until manifest scandal warranted action. This congregational oversight, Hooker argued, mirrored the primitive church's pattern, prioritizing scriptural fidelity over institutional uniformity.

Political Principles

Advocacy for Broader Suffrage and Freemen's Rights

Thomas Hooker challenged the restrictive policies of the , where voting were limited to church members admitted as "freemen" through a rigorous examination of their spiritual qualifications. In , this effectively confined political participation to a minority of visible saints, excluding many property-owning male inhabitants who lacked full church standing. Hooker contended that derived from the covenantal , extending eligibility to all freemen—defined as adult males who swore an and held sufficient property—regardless of status. This position aligned with his emphasis on natural liberty under law, where freemen's included electing magistrates and deputies without arbitrary spiritual barriers. In a pivotal on May 31, 1638, at , Hooker expounded that "the foundation of authority is laid, firstly, in the free of the people," invoking Deuteronomy 1:13 to justify popular selection of leaders based on wisdom and rather than divine alone. He argued against clerical dominance in , insisting that freemen's covenant bound rulers to accountability and that broader participation prevented tyranny. This advocacy stemmed from Hooker's experiences of persecution in and tensions in , where Governor rejected similar pleas for "universal Christian suffrage" in correspondence dated 1638. Hooker's views prioritized pragmatic governance for colony stability over Massachusetts' theocratic model, though still excluding women, non-property holders, and non-Christians. These principles directly influenced the , adopted January 14, 1639, by freemen of , Windsor, and Wethersfield. The document enfranchised all freemen to vote annually for a , magistrates, and a General Court, with no prerequisite—a marked expansion from ' 1631 franchise limited to about 20% of adult males. Under this system, freemen assembled in town meetings to elect deputies, ensuring representation proportional to population and embedding rights to petition and convene courts independently. Hooker's framework thus institutionalized freemen's sovereignty, fostering a representative assembly that balanced executive and legislative powers while upholding property qualifications as a bulwark against unqualified rule. This approach, while not egalitarian by modern standards, represented a causal step toward consent-based in colonial America, predating similar expansions elsewhere. Thomas Hooker articulated a biblical rationale for in his sermon preached on May 31, 1638, at the First Church of , drawing primarily from Deuteronomy 1:13. In this text, instructs the : "Take you wise men, and understanding, and known among your tribes, and I will make them rulers over you," emphasizing a process initiated by the people's selection of qualified leaders before divine ratification. Hooker interpreted this as divine endorsement of governance originating in the , declaring that "the foundation of authority is laid in the free consent of the people, the humblest and supreme, without which no power can be founded amongst men." This view positioned the people's voluntary agreement as the scriptural bedrock of legitimate , rather than inherent aristocratic privilege or unchecked magisterial power. Hooker's exegesis extended to three interconnected principles derived from precedent: first, that the of magistrates resides with the people as an allowance from ; second, that this electoral privilege operates under scriptural limitations, such as requiring rulers to be "wise men" capable of just administration; and third, that the people retain a conditional right to alter or depose leaders who violate their covenantal trust, mirroring Israel's freedom to reject unfit governance under . He rooted these in the covenantal framework of the Hebrew , where authority flowed upward from communal consent rather than downward from elites, arguing that 's ordinance in Deuteronomy precluded any form of rule lacking popular foundation. This interpretation challenged the more hierarchical models in , favoring a broader distribution of power among freemen while insisting on moral and qualifications aligned with Puritan orthodoxy. Critics of Hooker's framework, including some contemporaries like , contended that it risked by elevating popular will over divine , yet Hooker maintained its fidelity to Scripture by analogizing it to the church's congregational autonomy, where members collectively discerned God's will in leadership selection. His sermon thus framed not as secular innovation but as applied to civil order, influencing the adopted in January 1639, which enshrined elective without a royal charter's intermediary. This biblical justification underscored Hooker's conviction that true liberty, as granted by God, demanded active popular participation to prevent tyranny, encapsulated in his call: "As God has given us liberty, let us take it."

Later Years, Death, and Immediate Aftermath

Ministry in Hartford

Thomas Hooker arrived in the area that became in October 1636, leading a group of approximately 100 settlers from , and promptly organized the first Congregational church there, assuming the role of its primary minister. The church, known as the First Church of Christ, constructed a simple in 1636 to serve as the center for worship and community gatherings. Hooker served in this capacity alongside his colleague Samuel Stone, who handled pastoral duties while Hooker focused on teaching and preaching. Over the course of his decade-long ministry until his death in 1647, Hooker conducted regular services, lectures, and catechizing sessions for the congregation, which grew from the initial migrant families. His pastoral leadership emphasized the application of scripture to daily colonial life, fostering a cohesive religious community amid the challenges of frontier settlement, including interactions with indigenous Pequot tribes. By 1639, the church's stability under Hooker's guidance supported the formalization of civil governance through the Fundamental Orders, reflecting the integration of ecclesiastical and civic authority in early . Hooker's residence in , situated on land granted to him as a minister, served as a hub for counseling and theological discourse, underscoring his central role in the spiritual formation of the settlement. Contemporary accounts, such as those preserved by local historical records, highlight his enduring influence on the church's development, which later spawned daughter congregations in nearby towns like Farmington in 1652.

Final Days and Succession

In the summer of 1647, Thomas Hooker fell victim to an epidemical sickness that swept through and claimed numerous lives, initially presenting with minimal symptoms before proving deadly. Despite his weakening condition, Hooker remained mentally sharp, dictating his will on July 7, 1647, wherein he described himself as "being weakened in my body through the tender of , yet through his goodnes of perfect ." He spoke sparingly during his illness, focusing on prior affirmations of divine counsel rather than new discourse, and responded to a bedside mourner with the words, "Brother, I am going to receive ," when informed of his impending reward for labors. Hooker died later that day at age 61, closing his own eyes, smiling faintly, and expiring with a light groan, evincing a serene assurance of salvation cultivated over three decades. Hooker's passing was mourned as a profound loss to the congregation, with contemporaries noting the colony's heavy reliance on his preaching and counsel. The location of his grave remains unknown, though it is presumed to lie within Ancient Burying Ground. Upon Hooker's death, the pastoral leadership of Hartford's First transitioned seamlessly to his co-minister, Reverend Samuel Stone, who had collaborated with him since the settlement's establishment in 1636. Stone, previously serving as teacher while Hooker acted as preacher, became the sole pastor, maintaining doctrinal continuity in Congregational polity and Puritan orthodoxy until his death on July 20, 1663. This arrangement preserved the church's stability amid the colony's growth, with Stone upholding Hooker's emphases on and freemen's rights.

Legacy

Contributions to American Self-Government

Thomas Hooker contributed to American self-government by leading approximately 100 followers from to the Valley in 1636, establishing the settlement of and laying the groundwork for a new colonial framework independent of strict Massachusetts governance structures. His migration emphasized congregational autonomy and broader participation in civil affairs, diverging from the Massachusetts model that restricted voting to church members. In a on May 31, 1638, Hooker preached that "the foundation of authority is laid, firstly, in the free consent of the ," interpreting biblical texts such as Deuteronomy 1:13 and 1 8 to justify magistrates' power deriving from electoral consent rather than divine right alone. This doctrine of , rooted in Hooker's reading of Scripture, rejected absolute rule and advocated limits on magisterial power through the 's will. Hooker's ideas directly inspired the , adopted January 14, 1639, by representatives from , Wethersfield, and Windsor, which formed the first written in colonial America. The document created a general court with elected deputies, required annual elections by freemen (adult male property owners, without church membership tests), and vested in the people rather than a king or alone. This expanded to about twice the proportion of Massachusetts voters, fostering representative institutions that operated without royal sanction until 1662. These principles advanced self-government by institutionalizing consent-based authority and legislative assemblies, influencing subsequent colonial charters and the U.S. Constitution's emphasis on popular election and on power. Hooker's advocacy for freemen's rights over clerical dominance also promoted civic equality among qualified settlers, distinguishing Connecticut's polity as a model of early .

Theological Influence on Puritanism

Thomas Hooker's theological contributions to Puritanism centered on the doctrine of preparationism, which emphasized a structured process of spiritual preparation preceding true conversion and the assurance of saving faith. Drawing from Calvinist antecedents, Hooker argued that unregenerate sinners must first undergo intense under the law, involving stages of awakening to sin's heinousness, self-humiliation, and a deepening sense of God's holiness and majesty, before the Spirit applies redemption. This preparatory "law-work" was not meritorious but necessary to humble the and create a genuine hunger for Christ, countering antinomian tendencies that downplayed human moral awareness in favor of immediate grace. In works such as The Soules Implantation (published 1637 from sermons preached in ) and the posthumous The Application of Redemption (1656), Hooker detailed this progression: the sinner beholds divine sovereignty, experiences terror at personal depravity, and progresses through to via . He warned against superficial conversions, insisting that without thorough preparation, professed lacked root, as evidenced by his critique of those presuming grace without prior brokenness. This framework amplified earlier Puritan emphases from figures like William Perkins but systematized them more rigorously, portraying conversion as a protracted, evidential ordeal rather than a sudden event, thereby shaping pastoral practices in emphasizing self-examination and preaching on sin's depth. Hooker's preparationism influenced Puritan theology, particularly in where his ministry from 1636 onward reinforced a "terrifying " motif—portraying divine justice as awe-inspiring and exacting, demanding total reliance on grace post-preparation. Contemporaries like Thomas Shepard echoed this in their own conversion narratives, while Hooker's covenantal lens integrated preparation into the covenant of grace, viewing it as God's ordained means to awaken covenant people to their need, though unilaterally initiated by divine . His views diverged from stricter predestinarians by highlighting human responsiveness under the Spirit, yet remained orthodox in affirming , thus bolstering Puritan anti-Arminianism amid 1640s controversies. This legacy persisted in subsequent Puritan divines, who adopted his diagnostic stages for discerning true saints amid rising .

Criticisms and Historical Reassessments

Thomas Hooker's advocacy for Congregational church polity drew sharp criticism from Presbyterian theologians, who viewed his emphasis on local church autonomy and covenantal independence as fostering and undermining unity. , in his 1648 work A Free Disputation Against Pretended Liberty of Conscience, critiqued Hooker's Survey of the Summe of Church-Discipline (1648), arguing that Hooker's model elevated congregational consent over presbyterian , potentially leading to in church governance. This debate reflected broader transatlantic tensions, with Rutherford accusing Hooker of antiecclesiastical tendencies rooted in separatist principles, though Hooker maintained his views aligned with patterns of gathered churches. Theologically, Hooker's preparationist —insisting on rigorous stages of humiliation under the law before assurance of faith—faced charges of legalism from antinomian-leaning critics during the 1630s in . Opponents contended that such preparation delayed liberty and imposed undue works-oriented prerequisites on conversion, contrasting with views prioritizing immediate free grace; Hooker's sermons, like those in The Poor Doubting Christian (1628), were seen by some as terrorizing consciences rather than comforting them. His departure from Massachusetts in 1636 stemmed partly from disputes with magistrates over and magisterial overreach, with perceiving Hooker's broader freemen's rights as eroding elite authority. Historical reassessments have tempered earlier hagiographic portrayals of Hooker as a proto-democratic founder, emphasizing instead the covenantal and theocratic bounds of his political thought. While his 1638 on Deuteronomy 1:13 influenced the by asserting popular choice of magistrates, scholars note this derived from biblical , not secular individualism, and retained religious qualifications for among property-holding freemen. Perry Miller's mid-20th-century analyses recast Puritan influences like Hooker's as intellectually rigorous yet confined to providential moral orders, challenging myths of direct lineage to modern liberalism; recent works similarly highlight how Connecticut's expanded electorate still excluded non-church members and women, underscoring the era's hierarchical realism over egalitarian ideals.

Personal Life

Marriage and Family

Thomas Hooker married Susanna, whose maiden name is uncertain and has been variously speculated as Garbrand, Pym, or Pynchon without definitive primary evidence. The marriage likely occurred before 1626 in , possibly on April 3, 1621, at or , , though records are inconsistent and no contemporary document confirms the exact date or her origins. The couple had at least five children who survived to adulthood: Joanna (born circa 1615–1616, died April 28, 1646), who married William Shepard; Mary, who married Richard Newton; Sarah (born 1629–1630 in Little Baddow, England, died August 20, 1725, in Braintree, Massachusetts); John (born circa 1626, died 1684 in Maids Moreton, Buckinghamshire, England); and Samuel (born 1633, died November 6, 1697, in Farmington, Connecticut). Hooker's 1647 will bequeaths property to his wife Susannah, sons John and Samuel, unmarried daughter Sarah, and the two surviving children of deceased daughter Joanna Shepard, confirming these immediate family members but noting uncertainties about additional offspring or a possible prior marriage yielding Joanna and Mary. In 1633, Hooker, Susanna, and their five younger children emigrated from England to the Massachusetts Bay Colony aboard the Griffin, settling initially in Newtown (now Cambridge). Susanna outlived Hooker, who died in 1647, and reportedly remarried Elder William Goodwin before her own death in Farmington, Connecticut. Samuel pursued a clerical career, succeeding his father in Hartford before moving to Farmington, while John remained in England; the daughters integrated into colonial society through marriages that produced notable descendants. Genealogical records highlight ongoing debates over precise birth orders and potential additional children due to incomplete English parish registers.

Notable Descendants

Thomas Hooker's lineage produced several influential figures in American politics, finance, and culture. His third great-grandson, (1756–1836), served as the third of the under and is known for his role in the duel with in 1804. Burr's descent traces through Hooker's daughter Mary Hooker, who married Richard Lord, and subsequent generations in families. Another prominent descendant was (1857–1930), the 27th (1909–1913) and later of the (1921–1930), connected as Hooker's sixth great-grandson via multiple Hooker lines entering the Taft ancestry through the Rawson family. Taft's forebears included Hooker descendants who settled in early , reflecting the Puritan migrant's enduring ties to and . In finance, (1837–1913), the American banker and art collector who founded , was Hooker's fifth great-grandson, with the connection passing through Hooker's son Samuel Hooker and Hartford-area families before linking to Morgan's paternal line. His son, (1867–1943), continued the banking dynasty and extended philanthropic efforts, inheriting the Hooker lineage as a seventh great-grandson. Other descendants include Revolutionary War spy ring leader (1754–1835), a second great-grandson through Hooker's daughter , who leveraged family networks in for operations. These figures illustrate how Hooker's progeny contributed to foundational American institutions, often building on the democratic and religious principles he advocated in the colonies.

Principal Works

Major Publications and Their Themes

Thomas Hooker's publications primarily consisted of sermons and treatises rooted in Puritan theology, many compiled and edited posthumously by associates from his preaching in and , reflecting themes of personal piety, assurance of salvation, and ecclesiastical order. His works emphasized experiential religion, preparation for grace, and covenantal frameworks derived from Scripture, often countering perceived or rigid formalism in contemporary debates. The Poor Doubting Christian Drawn to Christ, first published around 1628 during his English ministry, targets believers hindered from full assurance by doubts, legalistic fears, or unbelief; it delineates four principal barriers—such as and misapprehension of God's mercy—and prescribes scriptural remedies to draw the soul toward , underscoring Hooker's preparationist approach where precedes comfort. In A Survey of the Summe of Church-Discipline (1648), edited from notes after his death, Hooker systematically defends the congregational church model of against English Presbyterian objections, warranting independent congregations with covenant-based membership, elder-led discipline, and separation from civil magistracy interference as biblically mandated for preserving purity and liberty in worship. The Application of Redemption, appearing in multiple volumes from 1656 to 1657, examines the progressive realization of Christ's in the believer's life through union with Him, detailing stages from effectual calling to while stressing active faith amid trials, as an extension of Hooker's that integrates justification with sanctification. Other notable treatises, such as The Soul's Preparation for Christ (1632) and The Christian's Two Chief Lessons (1640), reinforce motifs of contrition, self-denial, and exaltation in Christ, drawn from Hooker's sermons on humiliation and divine sovereignty, influencing later Puritan emphases on inward spiritual experience over mere orthodoxy.

References

  1. https://connecticuthistory.org/thomas-hooker-connecticuts-founding-father/
  2. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook_print.cfm?smtid=2&psid=3581
  3. https://connecticuthistory.org/people/thomas-hooker/
  4. https://www.foundersofhartford.org/the-founders/reverend-thomas-hooker/
  5. https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/explorers/intro25.htm
  6. https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/thomas-hooker/
  7. https://todayincthistory.com/2025/05/31/may-31-rev-thomas-hooker-declares-the-people-the-foundation-of-government-3/
  8. https://digitalpuritan.net/thomas-hooker/
  9. http://www.intoutreach.org/hooker.html
  10. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6966&context=etd
  11. https://www.chelmsford.gov.uk/leisure-theatres-and-museums/blue-plaques-information-boards-and-public-art/blue-plaques-in-chelmsford/thomas-hooker-father-of-american-democracy/
  12. http://www.intoutreach.org/biog.html
  13. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/thomas-hooker
  14. https://banneroftruth.org/uk/resources/articles/2001/thomas-hooker-beholding-the-majesty-of-god/
  15. https://www.harvardsquarelibrary.org/cambridge-harvard/mr-hooker/
  16. https://www.americanrealities.com/hooker-thomas.html
  17. https://biblicalelearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Walker_Thomas_Hooker.pdf
  18. https://www.the-highway.com/Hooker-on-Conversion_Murray.html
  19. https://www.thehookerfamily.com/the-father-of-american-democracy/
  20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/364884.pdf
  21. https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/it-happened-today/9/4
  22. https://americanheritage.org/this-is-why-thomas-hooker-favored-democracy-over-an-aristocracy/
  23. https://www.colonialsociety.org/node/1248
  24. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=2&psid=3581
  25. https://connecticuthistory.org/hookers-journey-to-hartford/
  26. https://www.tankerhoosen.info/history/old_ct_path.htm
  27. https://patch.com/connecticut/vernon/tank-tales-thomas-hooker--the-old-connecticut-path
  28. https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=93035
  29. https://sites.google.com/a/oldconnecticutpath.com/oldconnecticutpath/4-0-finding-our-family-heritage-on-the-old-connecticut-path/3-rev-thomas-hooker
  30. https://www.colonialwarsct.org/1636.htm
  31. https://connecticuthistory.org/the-fundamental-orders-of-connecticut/
  32. https://todayincthistory.com/2023/05/31/may-31-thomas-hooker-speech/
  33. https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/dailyquote/5/31
  34. https://americanheritage.org/father-of-american-democracy/
  35. https://nowweknowem.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/thomas-hooker-influenced-the-fundamental-orders-of-connecticut-the-first-constitution-that-created-a-government-and-was-ratified-today-in-1639-now-we-know-em/
  36. https://firstliberty.org/news/two-pillars-of-freedom/
  37. https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/the-constitution-as-covenant
  38. http://media.bloomsbury.com/rep/files/primary-source-104-the-fundamental-orders-of-connecticut.pdf
  39. https://rsc.byu.edu/book-mormon-mosiah-salvation-only-through-christ/government-voice-people-witness-warning
  40. https://www.reformedonline.nl/hooker-law-and-conversion/
  41. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A03611.0001.001?view=toc
  42. https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/hooker/Soul%27s%2520Preparation%2520for%2520Christ%2520-%2520Thomas%2520Hooker.pdf
  43. https://archive.org/details/surveyofsummeofc00hook
  44. http://quintapress.webmate.me/PDF_Books/Survey_of_the_Summe_of_Church_Discipline_v1.pdf
  45. https://www.monergism.com/survey-summe-church-discipline-ebook
  46. https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=3&psid=72
  47. https://newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/fundamental-orders-connecticut-constitution-declaration-independence/
  48. https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/chr/article/56/2/173/269904/Thomas-Hooker-s-1638-Letter-to-John-Winthrop
  49. https://www.originalfoundingfathers.com/the-fundamental-orders-1639
  50. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/the-fundamental-orders-of-connecticut/
  51. https://connecticuthistory.org/fundamental-orders-understand-how-connecticut-taught-the-world-to-govern-2/
  52. https://todayincthistory.com/tag/thomas-hooker/feed/
  53. https://www.ctinsider.com/connecticut/article/Old-State-House-in-Connecticut-s-Capital-Is-a-Key-16894069.php
  54. https://pulpitandpen.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/hooker.pdf
  55. https://www.foxnews.com/media/pastor-morgan-reflects-on-thomas-hookers-deuteronomy-sermon-naming-him-father-of-democracy
  56. https://www.colonialwarsct.org/1639.htm
  57. https://centerchurchhartford.org/about/history/
  58. https://www.bartleby.com/lit-hub/a-library-of-american-literature/the-life-and-death-of-master-thomas-hooker/
  59. https://ourwebsite.org/hooker/gendata-o/p561.htm
  60. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography%2C_1885-1900/Hooker%2C_Thomas
  61. https://www.foundersofhartford.org/the-founders/reverend-samuel-stone/
  62. http://larkturnthehearts.blogspot.com/2018/10/founders-of-hartford-ct-part-iv.html
  63. https://www.nativenortheastportal.com/bio/bibliography/stone-samuel-rev
  64. https://www.colonialwarsct.org/constit_state_political.htm
  65. https://connecticuthistory.org/the-free-consent-of-the-people-thomas-hooker-and-the-fundamental-orders/
  66. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=nd_naturallaw_forum
  67. https://digitalcommons.calvin.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=cts_dissertations
  68. https://digitalcommons.calvin.edu/cts_dissertations/3/
  69. https://journal.rts.edu/review/prepared-by-grace-for-grace-the-puritans-on-gods-ordinary-way-of-leading-sinners-to-christ/
  70. https://www.ushistory.org/us/3f.asp
  71. https://www.cga.ct.gov/hco/books/Descendants_of_Rev_Thomas_Hooker_1909.pdf
  72. https://mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/gen/report/rr02/rr02_309.html
  73. https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-chart.php?name=8692%2Bthomas%2Bhooker&kin=13925%2Baaron%2Bburr
  74. https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-menu.php?name=8692%2Bthomas%2Bhooker
  75. https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-chart.php?name=8691%2Bthomas%2Bhooker&kin=13136%2Bwilliam%2Bhoward%2Btaft
  76. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Ancestry_of_William_Howard_Taft_%2528IA_ancestryofwillia00wash%2529.pdf
  77. https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-chart.php?name=8692%2Bthomas%2Bhooker&kin=16321%2Bjp%2Bmorgan
  78. https://famouskin.com/famous-kin-chart.php?name=8691%2Bthomas%2Bhooker&kin=7747%2Bjp%2Bmorgan%2Bjr
  79. https://www.monergism.com/poor-doubting-christian-drawn-christ-ebook
  80. https://puritanboard.com/threads/the-poor-doubting-christian-drawn-to-christ-thomas-hooker.92889/
  81. https://www.apuritansmind.com/puritan-favorites/thomas-hooker-1586-1647/
  82. https://www.librarything.com/nseries/99172/Works-of-Thomas-Hooker
  83. https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupname?key=Hooker%252C%2520Thomas%252C%25201586%252D1647
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.