Hubbry Logo
Philadelphi CorridorPhiladelphi CorridorMain
Open search
Philadelphi Corridor
Community hub
Philadelphi Corridor
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Philadelphi Corridor
Philadelphi Corridor
Philadelphi Corridor
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Blockade of the
Gaza Strip
Crossings
2004–2009
2023–present
Gaza Freedom Flotilla
Groups involved

The Philadelphi Corridor, also called Philadelphi Route, is the Israeli code name for a narrow strip of land, some 100 metres wide and 14 km (8.7 miles) long, situated along the entirety of the border between the Gaza Strip and Egypt.[1]

Following Israel's unilateral disengagement from the Gaza Strip in 2005, the Philadelphi Accord with Egypt was concluded, which authorized Egypt to deploy 750 border guards along the route to patrol the border on Egypt's side. The Palestinian side of the border was controlled by the Palestinian Authority until the 2007 takeover by Hamas.[2] The joint authority for the Rafah Border Crossing was transferred to the Palestinian Authority and Egypt for restricted passage by Palestinian ID card holders, and by others by exception.

One purpose of the Philadelphi Route was to prevent the movement of illegal materials (including weapons and ammunition) and people between Egypt and the Gaza Strip.

Background

[edit]

The 1979 Egypt–Israel peace treaty stipulated that the Israel-Egypt border would follow the border of Mandatory Palestine. The new border divided Rafah into two towns, one Palestinian and one Egyptian, separating families on both sides of the border. Following the October 2014 Sinai attacks, Egypt destroyed the Egyptian side of the city and had demolished at least 7,460 buildings by 2020.[3]

Philadelphi Accord

[edit]
IDF soldiers uncover a tunnel near the Philadelphi Route shortly before the disengagement

In 2004, the Israeli Knesset approved a plan to unilaterally withdraw all Israeli citizens and military forces from the Gaza Strip, which went into force in August 2005.[4] The disengagement plan defined the Philadelphi Corridor as "The border area between the Gaza Strip and Egypt".[5] The name Philadelphi was randomly chosen for the 9 mile-long corridor by the Israeli army.[6]

On 1 September 2005, the "Agreed Arrangements Regarding the Deployment of a Designated Force of Border Guards Along the Border in the Rafah Area", known as the Philadelphi Accord, was signed by Israel and Egypt. Under the accord, Egypt was authorized to deploy border guards along the route to patrol the border on Egypt's side.[4] The objective was to prevent smuggling of weapons from Egypt into the Gaza Strip, infiltration and other criminal activity. Egypt would also coordinate operations and share intelligence.[7] Rafah Crossing would be the main border crossing with Gaza. The area near the border (known as Area C) would be a demilitarized zone, with Egypt only permitted to maintain police forces there.[1]

The Accord contains 83 clauses and specifically describes the mission and obligations of the parties, including the specific types of machinery, weaponry and infrastructure permitted.[4]

Egyptian Border Guard Force

[edit]

The Philadelphi Accord created the Egyptian Border Guard Force (BGF) composed of 750 ground personnel divided between headquarters and four companies deployed along the route to patrol the border on Egypt's side. The agreement specified that the Egyptian force is "a designated force for the combating of terrorism and infiltration across the border" and not intended for any military purposes.

The parties acknowledge that the BGF [Border Guard Force] deployment and these Agreed Arrangements, in no way constitute an amendment to or a revision or modification of Annex I to the Peace Treaty. Rather they constitute additional mission-oriented security measures agreed upon by the parties.

— Philadelphi Accord, Article 9

Instead, it "enhance[ed] Egypt's capability to fight smuggling along the border," while ensuring that the forces would not serve any military purposes. Sentry posts, watchtowers and logistical facilities were permitted. Heavy armored vehicles, fortification, military-style intelligence-gathering equipment, and weaponry and equipment beyond the below numbers were prohibited.[4] Israel insisted on the inclusion of provisions indicating that the Accord was not an amendment to the 1979 Peace Treaty. During negotiations Egypt attempted to frame the agreement toward the re-militarization of the Sinai and its borders with Israel and Gaza.[8]

The BGF are equipped with the following:

  • 500 assault rifles
  • 67 light machine guns
  • 27 light anti-personnel launchers
  • ground radar
  • 31 police-style vehicles
  • 44 logistical and auxiliary vehicles[4]

Reaction

[edit]

For strategic reasons, the Israeli defense establishment opposed vacating the Philadelphi route. A primary concern was the threat to Israeli security from militarization of Gaza. However, Israel decided to vacate the corridor in order to prevent friction which could destabilize the region further.[4]

The decision to withdraw from the Philadelphi Route also posed a threat to the neighboring Egyptians through the potential militarization of Gaza. It was feared that Israel's departure would create a power vacuum that the weak Palestinian leadership would not be able to fill, thus creating a void to be filled by radical Islamists.[8] A number of scholars have looked into the legal issue of whether or not the Philadelphi Accord needed to be passed by the Knesset. Generally, the Knesset approves of major treaties either before or after their passage. The issue arose because the Philadelphi Accord would partially militarize Area D of the Egypt–Israel Peace Treaty, changing the treaty and hence needing Knesset approval. This position was advocated by the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairperson, Yuval Steinitz; he was supported by MK Danny Yatom and they jointly filed a petition to the Supreme Court against the Government. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on the other hand, argued that the treaty did not change the "demilitarized" status of Area C, and therefore was not a significant enough treaty that it needed to be ratified. On 6 July 2005, the Attorney General ruled that the government was not bound to seek Knesset approval for the treaty, but convention stipulated that it should.[1]

Rafah border crossing

[edit]
Main article: Rafah border crossing

Following the disengagement from Gaza, Israel signed with the Palestinian Authority the Agreement on Movement and Access (AMA) on 15 November 2005. The Agreement allowed the opening of the Gaza-Egypt border for restricted passage of Palestinian residents, and the export of agricultural products from Gaza. The AMA also promised a link between Gaza and West Bank for buses and trucks, construction of a Gaza Seaport, discussion regarding a Gaza airport, and more freedom of movement within the West Bank.[9] The Rafah Border Crossing was opened near Rafah on 25 November 2005, operated by the Palestinian Authority and US-sponsored[10] Egypt, under supervision of EU observers. During the first six months of 2006, the crossing was opened nine and a half hours a day with an average of 650 people crossing daily each way, which was almost double the average prior to the AMA.[11]

After Hamas kidnapped Gilad Shalit, the Rafah border was closed on 25 June 2006, although the incident did not happen in Rafah. Since then, the crossing was only irregularly opened for very limited cases. The border was never opened for the passage of goods.[11] When Hamas took over the Gaza Strip in 2007, Egypt and Israel closed the borders with Gaza.

Hamas control of Gaza

[edit]

In January 2008, Palestinian militants breached several parts of the wall bordering the town of Rafah. Thousands of Gazans flowed into Egypt in search of food and supplies.[12] As of August 2012 the Egyptian Army continued to destroy tunnels linking Egypt and Gaza and their security source said their demolition will continue "in order to fight any element of terrorism."[13]

After the fall of the Mubarak regime in 2011, Egypt relaxed restrictions at its border with the Gaza Strip, allowing more Palestinians to cross freely for the first time in four years.[14] The Egyptian army continued to destroy Gaza Strip smuggling tunnels, according to the Egyptian army "in order to fight any element of terrorism".[13]

As of April 2013, Egypt reinforced its troops on the border with the Gaza Strip. The Egyptian Army destroyed tunnels by flooding them.[15][16]

In October 2014, Egypt announced that they planned to expand the buffer zone between Gaza and Egypt, following a terrorist attack from Gaza that killed 31 Egyptian soldiers.[17] Between July 2013 and August 2015, Egypt demolished 3,255 private houses on their side of the Egypt-Gaza border in order to create a buffer zone.[18][19] By 2020, at least 7,460 buildings had been demolished.[3]

2023–present Gaza war

[edit]
See also: Rafah offensive

The Rafah area was the site of active conflict in the Gaza war, including the border crossing which was at least partially closed due to military action.[20][21]

On 11 December 2023, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a Knesset Foreign Affairs and Security Committee that Israel will control the Philadelphi Corridor (border between Gaza and Egypt) and that Israel would impose a buffer zone inside the Gaza Strip.[22]

On 16 January 2024, the Egyptian government warned that any occupation of the Philadelphi Corridor by Israeli forces would be a violation of the 1978 Camp David Accords.[23][24]

On 7 May 2024, Israel took control of the Rafah crossing and stationed its forces within the Philadelphi Corridor, violating the terms of the Camp David Accords.[25][26] On 15 May, Israel asked Egypt to open its border so Gazan civilians who wished to, could flee across to Egypt.[27]

The Middle East Monitor reported diplomatic sources said that on 19 August 2024, the Israeli government had asked to cancel the Philadelphi Accord during tripartite diplomatic talks in Cairo between Israel, Egypt and the US which were attempting to reach security understandings. Egypt was reported to have categorically rejected this request.[28]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Philadelphi Corridor

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Philadelphi Corridor is a narrow , approximately 14 kilometers long and 100 meters wide, situated along the border between the and Egypt's . Established as part of the 1979 Israel-Egypt , it functions as a demilitarized strip designed to prevent cross-border infiltration, smuggling of arms, and movement of militants. The corridor derives its name from an Israel Defense Forces code designation for the area on military maps, reflecting its strategic role in securing the frontier. Following Israel's 2005 disengagement from Gaza, the corridor remained under nominal Egyptian responsibility, but lax enforcement enabled , after seizing control in 2007, to construct an extensive network of smuggling tunnels beneath it, facilitating the influx of weapons, funds, and materials that bolstered its military capabilities. These tunnels, some large enough to accommodate vehicles, were empirically documented through Israeli military discoveries, underscoring the corridor's vulnerability to exploitation absent robust oversight. In the context of the 2023-ongoing - war, Israeli forces seized operational control of the Philadelphi Corridor in May 2024 during operations in , revealing and neutralizing numerous underground passages to dismantle terrorist infrastructure. This control has emerged as a pivotal issue in negotiations, with maintaining that sustained presence is essential to avert rearmament and future attacks, while and advocate for withdrawal, citing sovereignty and humanitarian access concerns. The corridor's strategic imperative lies in its capacity to enforce causal isolation of Gaza from external threats, prioritizing empirical security over diplomatic concessions.

Geographical and Strategic Context

Location and Physical Features

The Philadelphi Corridor constitutes a narrow along the entire border between the and Egypt's , spanning approximately 14 kilometers (8.7 miles) in length from the to the eastern tripoint with near . The strip measures roughly 100 meters in width, designed originally as a measure to monitor and prevent cross-border movements. Physically, the corridor traverses the southern edge of the Gaza Strip, encompassing terrain characteristic of the region's , including sandy soils and sparse vegetation conducive to urban development near and more open desert-like expanses toward the east. The area includes the , a key point of controlled passage, amid a landscape marked by low-lying dunes and limited natural barriers, which has historically facilitated unauthorized tunneling activities beneath the surface. The corridor's linear path follows the international boundary, bisecting the densely populated region from Egyptian territory while abutting Israeli-controlled areas at its eastern terminus.

Primary Security Objectives

The primary security objectives of the Philadelphi Corridor center on preventing the smuggling of weapons, ammunition, explosives, and dual-use materials from Egypt into the Gaza Strip, thereby limiting the rearmament and operational capacity of Hamas and other militant groups. This buffer zone, approximately 14 kilometers long and 100 meters wide, was designed to enforce border controls under agreements like the 2005 Philadelphi Accord, ensuring that illicit transfers—facilitated by both overland breaches and underground tunnels—do not bolster terrorist infrastructure capable of launching attacks on Israel. Israeli military assessments identify the corridor as a primary conduit for Hamas's logistics, with historical data showing tunnels used to import Iranian-supplied rockets, anti-tank missiles, and raw materials for manufacturing, which contributed to the buildup preceding the October 7, 2023, assault. A core aim is the detection, destruction, and ongoing monitoring of cross-border networks, estimated at over 50 in the area alone, which enable not only arms flows but also the movement of personnel, funds, and vehicles. IDF operations since May 2024 have uncovered extensive subterranean systems beneath the corridor, confirming its role as an "oxygen line" for sustaining Hamas's military machine despite Egyptian commitments to border security. Without sustained Israeli presence or technological barriers, such as reinforced walls and , smuggling resumes rapidly, as evidenced by pre-2007 patterns where lax enforcement allowed Gaza-based groups to acquire thousands of tons of annually. Long-term objectives include establishing permanent deterrence against threat resurgence, integrating physical barriers with intelligence-driven patrols to secure Israel's southern flank akin to other borders, and preventing Gaza from serving as a launchpad for cross-border incursions. Defense officials stress that full withdrawal risks recreating pre-war vulnerabilities, where exploited the corridor to amass over 20,000 rockets and extensive grids, underscoring the causal link between unchecked and escalated violence. ![IDF-discovered tunnel with wooden reinforcements, exemplifying smuggling threats targeted by corridor controls](./assets/Flickr_-Israel_Defense_Forces-Tunnel_With_Wooden_Walls11

Establishment and Agreements

Israeli Disengagement from Gaza in 2005

The Israeli disengagement from Gaza, initiated under Prime Minister , aimed to unilaterally withdraw all civilian settlements and military installations from the to reduce friction with Palestinian populations and refocus security efforts on external perimeters. The revised plan, outlined in April 2004, specified the evacuation of all permanent Israeli presence inside Gaza while retaining control over airspace, territorial waters, and key external borders, including initial military deployment along the Philadelphi Route—the fortified strip separating Gaza from —to counter threats. The Israeli cabinet approved the plan on June 6, 2004, with the endorsing it on October 26, 2004, despite internal political opposition from right-wing factions arguing it would embolden terrorism without reciprocal concessions. Implementation proceeded in phases during summer 2005, beginning with the dismantling of 21 settlements housing Israeli civilians. Forced evacuations of remaining residents occurred from to 22, 2005, involving coordinated operations by IDF and police to relocate thousands amid protests and resistance from . Military withdrawal followed immediately, with IDF forces systematically removing infrastructure and equipment; the process concluded on September 12, 2005, when the last soldiers exited Gaza territory, marking the end of 's physical ground presence inside the Strip after 38 years. Post-withdrawal, retained oversight of external access points, but the handover to Palestinian Authority control exposed vulnerabilities, as evidenced by subsequent smuggling reports. Central to the disengagement's border security provisions was the Philadelphi Route, where the plan explicitly called for sustained IDF presence to dismantle s and monitor cross-border movements, given historical patterns of arms and contraband influx from Sinai. Legal and operational reviews, however, led to full withdrawal from this 14-kilometer corridor by September 12, 2005, contingent on prior arrangements with to assume patrolling duties and mitigate immediate risks. This shift reflected pragmatic assessments that indefinite Israeli holdout was untenable without broader diplomatic backing, though it later correlated with escalated activity under laxer enforcement.

Details of the Philadelphi Accord

The Philadelphi Accord, signed on September 1, 2005, between and , regulated security arrangements along the Philadelphi Route following Israel's unilateral disengagement from the . The agreement permitted to deploy 750 armed border guards along the approximately 13-kilometer border strip to curb arms smuggling, terrorist infiltration, and other illicit activities. These forces were authorized to operate with light weaponry, supplemented by units, helicopters for aerial , and naval elements for coastal monitoring. As an addendum to the 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty, the accord required Israeli Knesset approval due to its implications for and treaty-making powers. It assigned joint responsibility to and the Palestinian Authority for maintaining border security, including preventing unauthorized crossings and . The terms emphasized non-militarized deployment on the Egyptian side, with provisions for coordination between Egyptian and Israeli forces to address breaches. Implementation involved Egypt establishing checkpoints and patrols, though the accord lacked detailed mechanisms for regulating civilian and goods passage, contributing to subsequent enforcement challenges. retained oversight through intelligence sharing and the right to respond to threats originating from Gaza. The agreement aimed to balance 's security concerns post-disengagement with Egypt's over its border, amid ongoing tensions over routes.

Egyptian Border Guard Force Deployment

In September 2005, following Israel's unilateral disengagement from the , Israel and concluded a bilateral agreement authorizing the deployment of 750 Egyptian personnel along the Egyptian side of the 14-kilometer Philadelphi Corridor border. These forces, drawn from Egypt's units, were designated as lightly armed policemen rather than troops, with restrictions prohibiting heavy weaponry, tanks, or to align with the 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty's demilitarization provisions for Sinai. The deployment aimed to monitor and prevent cross-border of arms, explosives, and militants into Gaza, with Egyptian patrols conducting routine inspections, fence maintenance, and coordination with Palestinian authorities on the Gaza side. The agreement, formalized as the Philadelphi Accord and approved by Israel's on September 19, 2005, included provisions for joint Israel-Egypt coordination mechanisms, such as intelligence sharing and liaison officers, to verify compliance and address breaches. Egyptian forces assumed positions starting in late September 2005, establishing checkpoints and observation posts along the Rafah crossing and the corridor's length, supplemented by non-lethal equipment like vehicles and surveillance gear. This arrangement transferred border security responsibilities from Israeli control of the corridor—previously maintained since —to Egyptian oversight on their territory, while the Palestinian Authority retained nominal control over the Gaza-side strip. Subsequent adjustments occurred after Hamas's 2007 takeover of Gaza; Egypt incrementally increased deployments to approximately 1,200-1,500 personnel by 2008-2009, incorporating additional engineering units for barrier construction and anti-tunnel measures, though these expansions remained confined to the Egyptian side and subject to Israeli approval. By 2023, prior to the attack, maintained around 1,000-2,000 border guards with enhanced surveillance technology, including cameras and sensors, but the core mandate from the 2005 accord persisted without fundamental changes.

Pre-War Operations and Challenges

Control Under Palestinian Authority

Following Israel's completion of its disengagement from the Gaza Strip on September 12, 2005, the Palestinian Authority (PA) assumed nominal control over the Gaza side of the Philadelphi Corridor, a 14-kilometer buffer zone along the border with Egypt designed to curb smuggling. This transfer aligned with prior Israel-Egypt understandings allowing Egyptian deployment of 750 border guards on the Sinai side, while the PA was expected to secure its territory to prevent illicit cross-border activity. The (AMA), signed between Israel and the PA on November 15, 2005, formalized PA responsibilities for border management, including oversight of the crossing—initially with Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) monitors—and measures to detect and deter smuggling along the corridor. The PA deployed police and to the area, but internal divisions between and factions undermined enforcement, with reports of corruption and inadequate training limiting effectiveness. operated intermittently under PA and EUBAM supervision from late 2005 until the monitors' withdrawal in June 2006 amid rising violence, after which PA control weakened further. Despite these arrangements, persisted through pre-existing and newly dug s under the corridor, facilitating the influx of consumer goods, fuel, and into Gaza. Israeli assessments during 2005–2007 documented increased activity, with PA forces often unable or unwilling to dismantle networks due to militant infiltration and economic incentives tied to economies. For instance, prior to the 2005 handover, annual arms smuggling was estimated at around one ton; post-disengagement under PA oversight, flows escalated as infrastructure expanded, though precise quantification remained challenging absent comprehensive PA-Egypt coordination. This period highlighted the corridor's vulnerability, as PA governance—plagued by factionalism and resource shortages—failed to achieve the zero-tolerance security envisioned in the AMA, setting the stage for Hamas's consolidation of power.

Hamas Seizure of Gaza and Initial Smuggling

In June 2007, forcibly seized control of the from the rival faction of the Palestinian Authority amid violent clashes that resulted in over 160 deaths and the expulsion of forces. This takeover granted unchallenged authority over Gaza's southern border along the Philadelphi Corridor, a 14-kilometer strip separating the territory from Egypt's . Prior to the seizure, smuggling tunnels under the corridor existed on a smaller scale, primarily for commercial goods, but 's fragmented control limited their militarization. Immediately following the takeover, imposed a tightened blockade on Gaza, coordinated with 's closure of the Crossing, to curb weapons inflows and isolate politically. In response, accelerated and operations along the Philadelphi Corridor, regulating the network through taxation and oversight to fund its and military buildup. Smuggling volumes surged, with tunnels facilitating the entry of arms such as Katyusha rockets, anti-tank weapons, and explosives, alongside civilian commodities like fuel, cement, and electronics, which diverted for dual-use purposes including fortification and rocket production. Egyptian efforts to flood or demolish tunnels proved inconsistent, allowing an estimated annual smuggling value of $30 million by late , comprising up to 90% of Gaza's market activity. Hamas consolidated dominance over the tunnel economy by early 2009, seizing control of all major routes from independent operators and clans, thereby centralizing revenue streams estimated at hundreds of thousands of dollars monthly. This initial phase marked the corridor's transformation into a primary conduit for 's rearmament, with intercepted shipments revealing Iranian-supplied Grad rockets and other munitions transiting via Sinai networks. Despite Egyptian deployments of guards and barriers under the 2005 Philadelphi Accord, lax enforcement—attributed to local complicity and Sinai instability—enabled persistent breaches, underscoring the corridor's vulnerability to exploitation.

Development of Underground Tunnel Networks

Underground tunnel networks along the Philadelphi Corridor emerged in 1982, following the division of Rafah by the buffer zone established under the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty, with initial excavations from home basements enabling smuggling of consumer goods like food, clothing, and fuel to bypass restrictions. These rudimentary passages, often hand-dug and spanning up to 0.5 miles, were driven by economic needs and family reunifications across the border, predating major political shifts in Gaza. The networks proliferated during the Second Intifada (2000–2005), as demolished approximately 1,700 homes in to disrupt tunneling, yet smuggling persisted under both Palestinian Authority and emerging militant groups. After 's 2005 disengagement from Gaza and Hamas's 2007 seizure of control, the tunnels expanded into a vast , employing around 15,000 workers by 2011 and supplying up to two-thirds of Gaza's consumer goods amid the . Hamas shifted the tunnels' role toward militarization, importing weapons components, rocket materials from , and enabling operations like the June 2006 cross-border abduction of Israeli soldier through an offensive . Construction techniques advanced modestly, incorporating wooden supports, winches, rails, electricity, and ventilation in some shafts, though many remained unstable and collapse-prone due to sandy soil and manual labor. Egypt responded in December 2009 by building a 10–11 km underground steel barrier extending 18–30 meters below ground to seal existing tunnels and deter new digs, demolishing at least 35 passages by 2011. Tunnelers circumvented it by excavating deeper or parallel routes, sustaining hundreds of active conduits along the Philadelphi Route into the 2010s for dual economic and military .

Evidence of Smuggling and Security Breaches

Types of Contraband and Weapons Flows

![IDF-discovered smuggling tunnel under the Philadelphi Corridor](./assets/Flickr_-Israel_Defense_Forces-Tunnel_With_Wooden_Walls(1) The tunnels beneath the have primarily enabled the influx of weapons and military materiel into Gaza, sustaining Hamas's arsenal despite Egyptian border controls. Small arms such as rifles, handguns, grenades, bullets, and have been routinely smuggled, often originating from stockpiles linked to Iranian supply chains. Larger weaponry, including anti-tank missiles, Kassam rocket components, and Iranian-made long-range missiles like variants, has traversed these routes, with components assembled in Gaza workshops. Explosives and ammunition caches discovered in networks underscore the corridor's in evading international arms embargoes, with estimates indicating hundreds of such passages operational by the early . Civilian contraband flows through the same infrastructure have included everyday commodities, luxury goods, and illicit substances, generating revenue for via taxation on operators. Cigarettes, , materials, and vehicles have been transported in significant volumes, with documented seizures revealing cars and like calves pulled from exits. Exotic items, such as a live in and cargoes, highlight the versatility of these paths for non-military , often under the guise of commercial trade. Drugs and operatives have also crossed, facilitating personnel movements for abroad and the return of fighters equipped with . While weapons peaked post-2007 takeover, dual-use tunnels have blurred lines between military resupply and economic evasion of blockades, with Egyptian monitoring credited for some disruptions but criticized for persistent breaches. Specific interceptions, such as vehicle-sized tunnels uncovered in 2024, revealed stockpiles of munitions alongside consumer goods, affirming the corridor's centrality to Gaza's parallel economy.

Specific Tunnel Discoveries and Operations

In October 2006, Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) troops discovered a 12-meter-deep beneath the Philadelphi Route in southern Gaza, intended for transferring weapons and contraband from . Two days later, on October 19, the IDF demolished five additional arms- tunnels along the same border corridor, bringing the total identified and destroyed that month to at least six. These operations, conducted amid heightened intelligence on cross-border activity following the 2005 disengagement, highlighted early post-withdrawal efforts to disrupt underground networks facilitating weapons inflows to Palestinian militant groups. Overall, the IDF reported demolishing 13 such in 2006, underscoring the route's role as a conduit for illicit transfers despite Egyptian commitments under the Philadelphi Accord. Subsequent discoveries relied heavily on intelligence-driven aerial operations, as ground access inside Gaza was restricted after disengagement. On August 11, , the struck and collapsed a confirmed linking Gaza to near , in response to rocket and mortar attacks traced to smuggled munitions. This targeted bombing sealed the passage, which intelligence indicated had been used to ferry arms and explosives across the border. Such strikes continued sporadically, informed by surveillance and , though comprehensive mapping remained challenging without sustained presence along the corridor. During Operation Cast Lead (December 27, 2008–January 18, 2009), IDF ground incursions into Gaza, including , exposed elements of the smuggling infrastructure, though primary efforts focused on offensive tunnels toward ; indirect targeting via airstrikes and artillery disrupted several Philadelphi-adjacent shafts used for weapons resupply. Egyptian forces, coordinating intermittently with , flooded or demolished dozens of tunnels from their side during this period, but Israeli assessments indicated incomplete eradication, with new excavations quickly replacing destroyed ones. By 2013–2014, amid Egypt's Sinai campaign, joint intelligence sharing led to the confirmed destruction of over 1,000 tunnels by Egyptian military, many originating in , though Israeli sources emphasized persistent gaps in enforcement allowing to rebuild networks for arms procurement. ![IDF image of a tunnel with wooden walls discovered along the border](./assets/Flickr_-Israel_Defense_Forces-Tunnel_With_Wooden_Walls(1) Pre-2023 operations revealed tunnels varying in sophistication, from rudimentary hand-dug shafts 10–20 meters deep to reinforced passages capable of transporting vehicles or heavy weaponry, often equipped with ventilation, electricity, and rail systems. Intelligence from captured operatives and seismic sensors frequently pinpointed locations, enabling precise demolitions using explosives or flooding, yet the porous 14-kilometer corridor sustained smuggling of rockets, anti-tank missiles, and dual-use materials essential to Hamas's military buildup. These repeated discoveries demonstrated the corridor's centrality to Gaza's underground economy and terror infrastructure, with Israeli military estimates indicating hundreds of tunnels operational at peaks despite intermittent disruptions.

Assessments of Egyptian Monitoring Effectiveness

Egypt has maintained a military presence along the Philadelphi Corridor since the 2005 Israeli disengagement from Gaza, deploying thousands of troops, constructing an underground steel barrier starting in 2009, and conducting operations to flood or fill tunnels with concrete and seawater. Egyptian officials assert these measures have effectively curtailed major routes, claiming the destruction of primary tunnels years prior and the prevention of weapons or personnel transfers across the . Despite these efforts, assessments from Israeli security analyses indicate persistent vulnerabilities, with an estimated 50 cross-border tunnels linking Gaza to Egypt's facilitating the of weapons, funds, personnel, and goods even after Egyptian interventions. Israeli has documented ongoing tunnel activity, including discoveries of operational shafts during the 2023–present that suggest incomplete sealing by Egyptian forces, contributing to Hamas's armament with advanced weaponry prior to , 2023. Critics, including reports from U.S.-based defense think tanks, highlight Egypt's reluctance to permit joint monitoring or share real-time on the , which has limited comprehensive verification of containment success. Empirical evidence of smuggling persistence includes black-market flows of construction materials and dual-use goods through Rafah, which evaded Egyptian oversight and supported Hamas's tunnel network expansion, as evidenced by post-war Israeli excavations revealing extensive subterranean infrastructure. Egyptian denials of active tunnels as of August 2024 contrast with these findings, underscoring a gap between official claims and on-ground realities, where rapid tunnel re-excavation by militants outpaces periodic demolitions. Overall, while Egypt's deployments have reduced overt breaches compared to pre-2013 levels, the corridor's monitoring has proven insufficient to eliminate clandestine networks, prompting Israeli insistence on direct control to enforce verifiable security.

Role in the 2023–Present Israel-Hamas War

Israeli Military Advance into Rafah

In May 2024, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) initiated a ground offensive in , southern Gaza, to dismantle military infrastructure, eliminate remaining militant capabilities, and secure the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border. The operation began on May 6 with evacuation orders for over 100,000 civilians in eastern , followed by limited ground incursions on May 7 that included crossing into the Philadelphi Corridor, a 14-kilometer historically prone to tunnels. IDF forces encountered fighters deploying explosive devices and anti-tank missiles, resulting in close-quarters combat and the neutralization of dozens of militants during initial advances. By late May, Israeli tanks had pushed into central neighborhoods, expanding operational control over key areas adjacent to the corridor. On May 29, the IDF announced it had seized effective control of the entire Philadelphi Corridor, enabling systematic searches for underground tunnels and weapons caches along the . This advance disrupted logistics, with reports of unearthed tunnel networks used for smuggling arms and contraband from , confirming long-standing Israeli concerns about breaches. The operation faced international criticism for humanitarian impacts but was defended by Israeli officials as essential to preventing rearmament. Subsequent phases through June 2024 involved deeper incursions into Rafah's Tel al-Sultan and Shaboura areas, where IDF engineering units demolished tunnel shafts and fortified positions to maintain corridor dominance. By the end of May, the IDF reported operational superiority across the border strip, shifting focus to intelligence-driven raids rather than broad sweeps. This control persisted into 2025, with the corridor serving as a security buffer amid ongoing hostilities.

Seizure and Fortification of the Corridor

On May 6, 2024, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) initiated a ground offensive in , southern Gaza, targeting militant positions and smuggling infrastructure along the Philadelphi Corridor. The operation aimed to sever 's supply lines from by securing the 14-kilometer border strip. Israeli forces seized the Gaza side of the with on May 7, 2024, closing the terminal and halting the flow of and personnel through the sole non-Israeli-controlled entry point into Gaza. This action disrupted operations previously managed by Egyptian and Palestinian authorities, with the IDF citing the need to prevent weapons smuggling via tunnels beneath the . By May 29, 2024, the IDF announced it had established operational control over the entire Philadelphi Corridor, approximately 9 kilometers of which had been secured since the offensive's start, including the crossing area. Troops advanced methodically, using engineering units to expose and demolish underground tunnels connecting Gaza to Egyptian Sinai, with at least 10 such cross-border shafts identified during the push. Fortification efforts involved deploying brigades, armored units, and systems along the corridor's length to create a buffer against infiltration and . The IDF positioned observation posts and barriers, drawing on pre-2005 precedents when maintained a zone to curb flows estimated in the thousands of tons annually. By June 2024, full occupation was completed, fragmenting Gaza's territorial contiguity and enabling systematic searches for rocket launchers and weapons caches embedded in the border zone. These measures, while effective in interdicting immediate threats, have sustained a presence amid ongoing combat with holdouts in .

Demolition Efforts and Findings

Following the Israeli seizure of the Philadelphi Corridor in May 2024, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) initiated systematic demolition operations targeting underground tunnel networks and associated infrastructure along the Gaza-Egypt border. These efforts involved engineering units mapping, investigating, and neutralizing tunnel shafts and routes using controlled explosions, flooding, and structural collapses, with over 200 tunnel shafts and 35 underground passages identified in initial sweeps near . By August 2024, IDF troops had demolished at least 50 tunnels in a single month of operations, focusing on cross-border smuggling paths that extended into Egyptian territory. Demolition activities revealed a sophisticated array of tunnels, including multi-level structures and a 10-foot-tall passage capable of accommodating vehicles for smuggling weapons and contraband, discovered in early August 2024. At least 10 tunnels were confirmed to connect directly from Gaza into Egypt, underscoring prior breaches in Egyptian border monitoring despite Cairo's claims of pre-October 2023 blockages. Additional findings included rocket launchers, weapon caches, and fortified underground routes linked to Hamas's Rafah Brigade, with over 150 tunnels ultimately neutralized by late August 2024, representing approximately 80% of identified border infrastructure. Israeli military assessments highlighted the tunnels' role in sustaining rearmament, with discoveries of extensive wooden reinforcements and ventilation systems indicating long-term investment in evasion tactics. However, an Israeli military analyst reported in 2024 that no fully operational cross-border tunnels remained intact post-demolition, though IDF operations continued to address residual shafts amid ongoing threats from tunneling attempts under forward positions. These efforts contributed to the declared collapse of 's Brigade by August 2024, though broader Gaza tunnel networks persisted, with Defense Minister stating in October 2025 that over 60% of 's overall underground systems remained undestroyed.

Controversies and Criticisms

Israeli Perspectives on Necessity

Israeli security officials and military analysts regard control of the Philadelphi Corridor as indispensable for preventing from rearming and reconstituting its terrorist infrastructure, viewing the 14-kilometer border strip between Gaza and as a primary conduit for weapons, explosives, and militants. has repeatedly emphasized that relinquishing the corridor would enable to resume large-scale imports of arms via underground tunnels and surface routes, undermining Israel's post-October 7, 2023, objectives of dismantling the group's military capabilities and ensuring long-term demilitarization of Gaza. From the (IDF) perspective, maintaining a physical presence along the corridor facilitates ongoing operations to detect and neutralize smuggling tunnels, which have historically numbered in the hundreds and facilitated the influx of Iranian-supplied rockets, anti-tank missiles, and other critical to Hamas's arsenal. (res.) Efie Defrin, former head of the IDF's , has argued that Israeli forces must enforce an underground barrier, aboveground fortifications, and real-time to interdict these threats, as prior Egyptian efforts proved inadequate in stemming the flow despite bilateral agreements. This stance is informed by empirical evidence from IDF raids since May 2024, which uncovered active tunnels and weapon caches in the corridor, reinforcing the causal link between lax and Hamas's ability to sustain attacks. Israeli strategic assessments, including those from the for Public Affairs, further posit that corridor control deters broader regional actors like and its proxies by signaling resolve against hybrid threats, while enabling rapid IDF interventions to prevent Gaza's re-militarization. Netanyahu has linked this requirement directly to hostage negotiations, stating in 2024 that Israel would not withdraw until mechanisms guarantee the corridor's non-use as a supply line, prioritizing national security over temporary diplomatic concessions. Critics within , such as those at the , note public divisions on Netanyahu's motivations, with some attributing insistence on the corridor to political longevity rather than pure security needs, though polls indicate majority support for sustained military oversight to avert future incursions akin to the massacre.

Egyptian and Palestinian Objections

Egypt has repeatedly rejected Israeli military control over the Philadelphi Corridor, citing risks to and bilateral relations. In January 2024, Egyptian officials warned that continued IDF presence threatened the 1979 and could jeopardize diplomatic ties. has demanded Israeli withdrawal from the corridor and the Palestinian side of the crossing to enable joint Egyptian-Palestinian administration, arguing that Israeli forces obstruct flows and the Palestinian Authority's return to Gaza governance. Specific Egyptian concerns include Israeli , such as communications towers installed along the corridor, which officials claim enable monitoring of Egyptian and undermine sovereignty. In August 2024, declined an Israeli proposal to construct eight watchtowers along the border as part of talks, viewing it as an extension of unauthorized presence. has reaffirmed this stance into late 2024, linking corridor access to broader demands for unrestricted operations under its oversight. Palestinian authorities, including the presidency, have condemned Israeli presence in the Philadelphi Corridor as an infringement on and a barrier to post-war reconstruction. In September 2024, the Palestinian leadership rejected Netanyahu's statements on maintaining control, asserting it perpetuates occupation and restricts . , governing Gaza, has opposed any permanent IDF deployment, framing it as a mechanism to arms inflows and civilian movement, though Egyptian assessments note 's prior exploitation of smuggling routes under Cairo's monitoring. Palestinian officials argue that corridor seizure exacerbates humanitarian crises by halting aid convoys, with Rafah's Palestinian terminal under IDF oversight since May 2024 leading to prolonged closures.

International Diplomatic Tensions

Israel's military advance into and subsequent control of the Philadelphi Corridor in late May 2024, during operations in , elicited strong objections from , which interpreted the move as a breach of the 2005 Philadelphi Accord authorizing Egyptian border security forces along the Gaza frontier. Egyptian officials maintained a public stance of restraint initially, issuing no formal condemnation, but privately conveyed dismay over the perceived violation of sovereignty and the 1979 Israel- peace treaty's demilitarized provisions in Sinai, amid fears of domestic backlash from public opinion sympathetic to Palestinian causes. These bilateral frictions strained the historically pragmatic but cool -Egypt relationship, exacerbated by 's repeated assertions of effective prevention despite evidence of persistent activity, shifting responsibility onto for border interdiction. In August 2024, dispatched a delegation to to negotiate potential long-term troop deployments and joint surveillance mechanisms, reflecting efforts to mitigate escalation while addressing Egypt's demands for restored access and inspection rights. By October 2024, analysts warned that sustained Israeli presence risked reigniting hostilities, given Egyptian domestic pressures and 's reluctance to appear complicit in Gaza's isolation. Internationally, the corridor's status emerged as a flashpoint in cease-fire negotiations mediated by the , , and , with Israeli Prime Minister insisting on indefinite military oversight to curb arms smuggling, a condition rejected by and complicating truces. The U.S. has tacitly supported Israel's security rationale while urging to preserve regional stability, though broader reactions from entities like the focused more on humanitarian access than border specifics. As of October 2025, ongoing bilateral talks explored postwar alternatives such as technology-aided monitoring to satisfy both nations' needs without permanent Israeli forces, signaling tentative diplomatic progress amid persistent war fatigue.

Current Status and Strategic Debates

Military Presence as of October 2025

As of October 2025, the (IDF) continue to hold and fortify positions throughout the Philadelphi Corridor, a 14-kilometer strip along the Gaza-Egypt border, following their seizure of the area in May 2024 during the offensive. Israeli military deployments include infantry brigades, engineering units for detection and , and assets such as drones and ground sensors, aimed at enforcing a to curb weapons smuggling via underground networks. This presence extends to the Gaza side of the crossing, where IDF troops directly control access points, delaying reopenings amid security concerns over activities. Under the terms of the October 2025 Gaza ceasefire, the IDF executed a partial redeployment from northern and central Gaza but explicitly retained forces in the Philadelphi Corridor, Khan Younis, and other border enclaves to maintain operational control. Prime Minister affirmed on October 10, 2025, that capturing and holding the corridor was essential despite international pressures, with no full withdrawal stipulated in the agreement. Ongoing IDF operations in the area, including strikes on targets in on October 20, 2025, underscore active patrolling and response capabilities, with reports indicating over 60% of identified smuggling tunnels destroyed by late October. Egypt maintains a separate on the Sinai side of the border, enforcing its own anti-smuggling measures under the 2005 Philadelphi Accord, but does not operate within the corridor itself, leading to bilateral talks on enhanced joint monitoring without conceding Israeli ground control. elements have been largely displaced from the corridor, though sporadic incidents of attempted breaches persist, prompting sustained IDF vigilance. Israeli assessments, echoed in public statements, project a long-term presence at the corridor alongside two other Gaza sites ( Corridor and Tel al-Muntar) to deter rearmament, irrespective of phases.

Implications for Cease-Fire Negotiations

Israel's seizure of the Philadelphi Corridor in May has emerged as a central obstacle in cease-fire negotiations between and , with Israeli officials insisting on indefinite military presence or robust inspection mechanisms to curb weapons from . Prime Minister has repeatedly conditioned any truce on retaining control of the corridor, arguing that historical —facilitated by hundreds of tunnels discovered since the , 2023, attacks—necessitates such measures to prevent rearmament and ensure long-term security. This stance, rooted in empirical evidence of illicit arms flows via the border, contrasts with 's outright rejection of any post-cease-fire Israeli foothold in Gaza, viewing it as a violation of Palestinian and a barrier to territorial contiguity. Egypt, a key mediator in the talks, has firmly opposed Israeli control, citing the 1979 Egypt- peace which delineates the corridor as a under Egyptian oversight, and warning that prolonged Israeli presence risks treaty violations and heightened bilateral tensions. Egyptian officials have rejected proposals for Israeli troops along the crossing or corridor, emphasizing that withdrawal is non-negotiable to maintain border security arrangements and avoid domestic backlash from perceived concessions to . These positions have repeatedly stalled negotiations, as seen in August-September 2024 when demands for corridor control derailed progress, and persisted into 2025 amid fragile truces where retained phased control during initial releases but faced threats of renewed conflict if resumed. The corridor's role underscores broader strategic debates in cease-fire frameworks, where Israel's emphasis on verifiable demilitarization—supported by intelligence on Egyptian border laxity—clashes with Egyptian and Palestinian priorities for restored Palestinian Authority or international oversight, potentially prolonging the conflict absent compromise mechanisms like multinational monitoring. In the October 2025 Gaza deal, Israel maintained oversight of over 50% of the Strip, including the corridor, with provisions for conditional withdrawal tied to smuggling cessation, though Netanyahu warned of reoccupation if demands falter, highlighting the corridor's leverage in enforcing truce durability. Failure to resolve this impasse risks diplomatic isolation for Israel, particularly with Egypt, while yielding to withdrawal demands could enable Hamas resurgence, as evidenced by pre-2023 smuggling volumes exceeding thousands of tons annually.

Long-Term Viability and Alternatives

Israeli military and security experts maintain that long-term control of the 14-kilometer is essential to prevent from rearming through networks originating in , as evidenced by the discovery of over 50 tunnels during operations in 2024. Prior to 's 2005 withdrawal from Gaza, control of the corridor effectively curtailed such activities, but subsequent lapses enabled the influx of weapons, operatives, and funds that fueled 's military buildup. Holding the corridor, however, presents logistical challenges, including the need for sustained troop deployments along a narrow, exposed strip vulnerable to guerrilla attacks and the high resource demands of patrolling sandy terrain interspersed with urban areas in . Diplomatic strains further complicate viability, particularly with , which has demanded Israeli withdrawal citing concerns and potential violations of bilateral understandings, though has itself fortified its side of the border with barriers and patrols since 2007. As of October 2025, continues to station forces along the corridor as a precondition for any , amid ongoing talks exploring joint mechanisms, but analysts note that without Israeli oversight, could resume rapidly given historical patterns of extending up to 30 meters deep. Alternatives to direct Israeli control include enhanced Egyptian-led fortifications, such as the underground wall constructed in 2009-2013, which previously advocated but now deems insufficient against sophisticated evasion tactics like flooding or manual digging. Proposals for international peacekeeping forces, limited to border monitoring, have surfaced from think tanks, potentially involving or Arab contingents to oversee demilitarization without Israeli troops, though such arrangements risk enforcement failures seen in past UN missions like UNIFIL in . Israeli strategists counter that technological solutions—drones, sensors, and AI-monitored barriers—cannot fully replicate and rapid response capabilities needed to dismantle underground networks, asserting physical presence as irreplaceable for causal deterrence of smuggling incentives.

References

  1. https://www.aipac.org/resources/philadelphi-corridor
  2. https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-egypt-philadelphi-corridor-cd15c27cecffe70322becd933cf38909
  3. https://forward.com/news/650820/what-is-the-philadelphi-corridor-and-why-is-it-such-a-big-deal-to-netanyahu/
  4. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-08-21/ty-article-magazine/.premium/the-two-corridors-that-are-stymieing-a-gaza-israel-deal/00000191-7500-d2f3-afdf-7dd97ce70000
  5. https://jcpa.org/article/israeli-presence-on-the-philadelphi-corridor-is-vital/
  6. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/08/04/truck-height-hamas-tunnel-discovered-on-gaza-egypt-border/
  7. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/idf-releases-photos-of-unusually-large-smuggling-tunnel-uncovered-on-gaza-egypt-border-last-week/
  8. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2024/05/idf-unearths-more-tunnels-gains-control-of-philadelphi-corridor.php
  9. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/gazas-philadelphi-corridor-its-importance-ceasefire-talks-2024-09-06/
  10. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/will-philadelphia-corridor-reignite-tensions-between-egypt-and-israel
  11. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/12/31/whats-the-philadelphi-corridor-border-zone-that-israel-wants-to-control
  12. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/03/what-is-the-philadelphi-corridor-israel-gaza-egypt-netanyahu
  13. https://jcpa.org/securing-the-philadelphi-corridor-a-strategic-imperative-for-israel/
  14. https://www.arij.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/2005-environmental-impact-assessment-of-the-planned-expansion-of-the-Philadephi-corridor-at-the-southern-border-of-the-gaza-strip.pdf
  15. https://jinsa.org/jinsa_report/holding-the-line-strategy-for-securing-the-philadelphi-corridor/
  16. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/op_eds/2024/09/03/israels-challenges-in-long-term-control-of-philadelphi-corridor/
  17. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/israel-seizes-control-of-strategic-gaza-land-border-claims-area-is-awash-in-smuggling-tunnels
  18. https://honestreporting.com/the-philadelphi-corridor-how-hamas-smuggles-terror-into-gaza/
  19. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/s1ja82ksyl
  20. https://www.misgavins.org/en/misgav-israeli-control-of-the-philadelphi-corridor/
  21. https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2024/05/israeloptdisengagementplan2004.pdf
  22. https://www.gov.il/en/pages/israeli-disengagement-plan-20-jan-2005
  23. https://www.gov.il/en/pages/exit-of-idf-forces-from-the-gaza-strip-completed-12-sep-2005
  24. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/new-reality-egypt-gaza-border-part-i-contents-new-israel-egypt-agreement
  25. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/egypt-agrees-to-police-philadelphi-route-after-israeli-disengagement-august-2005
  26. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/israeli-egyptian-agreement-on-gaza-border-following-disengagement-september-2005
  27. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/s14dqrfc0
  28. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/israel-law-review/article/treatymaking-power-approval-of-the-israelegypt-philadelphi-accord-by-the-knesset/A4B1654D31D373422DDAC2CA4C3A81D2
  29. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/faq/article-815297
  30. https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/gaza-conflict-cascading-effects-the-rafah-question/
  31. https://www.haaretz.com/2005-08-15/ty-article/0000017f-f09a-d487-abff-f3fea5340000
  32. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-871529
  33. https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-philadelphi-corridor-gaza.html
  34. https://reliefweb.int/report/israel/exit-idf-forces-gaza-strip-completed
  35. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2005/8/31/knesset-approves-egypt-border-role
  36. https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/l/2005/87237.htm
  37. https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2005/10/3c3a67c36e81be69852570d60058f2ff_Third_Party_Role.pdf
  38. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/rafah-invasion-has-israel-coordinated-egypt-attack
  39. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/hamas-arms-smuggling-egypts-challenge
  40. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA476600.pdf
  41. https://www.aei.org/articles/egypts-role-in-gaza-arms-smuggling/
  42. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/hamass-military-capabilities-after-gaza-takeover
  43. https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/GazaCrisis_ENG-129-140.pdf
  44. https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/42605
  45. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/oct/22/hamas-gaza-tunnels-smuggling-egypt
  46. https://www.jpost.com/israel/hamas-takes-control-of-all-gaza-tunnels
  47. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/140721-gaza-strip-tunnels-israel-hamas-palestinians
  48. https://israel21c.org/a-brief-modern-history-of-the-gaza-strip/
  49. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/10/egypt-underground-wall-gaza
  50. https://www.fpri.org/article/2010/07/egypts-wall-with-gaza-the-emergence-of-a-new-middle-east-alignment/
  51. https://www.jns.org/a-hollow-peace-cairo-facilitated-weapons-smuggling-to-hamas/
  52. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/10/28/hamas-tunnels-to-egypt-played-key-role-in-arming-hamas/
  53. https://www.npr.org/sections/pictureshow/2012/11/19/165506231/rockets-cigarettes-and-a-lion-just-a-few-of-the-things-smuggled-into-gaza
  54. https://www.reuters.com/news/picture/gaza-tunnel-smuggling-idUSRTR2HCP7/
  55. https://www.jpost.com/israel/12-meter-deep-tunnel-found-on-philadelphi-route
  56. https://www.jpost.com/israel/gaza-idf-destroys-5-more-arms-smuggling-tunnels
  57. https://www.wired.com/2009/08/israel-strikes-gaza-smuggling-tunnel/
  58. https://mwi.westpoint.edu/urban-warfare-project-case-study-14-operation-cast-lead/
  59. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2024.2347843
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S003043871000027X
  61. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/13/world/middleeast/philadelphi-corridor-israel-gaza-egypt.html
  62. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-08-26/ty-article/.premium/egypt-denies-israeli-claims-that-active-tunnels-still-run-across-border-with-gaza/00000191-8ab7-d8c0-abff-9aff5cb20000
  63. https://www.jns.org/the-implications-of-rafahs-cross-border-tunnels/
  64. https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Egypt-Gaza-Tunnels-Pose-Threat-to-Israels-War-Aims-3-12-24-PDF-1.pdf
  65. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/01/23/egypt-claims-it-destroyed-hamas-tunnels-but-smuggling-continues/
  66. https://jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Philadelphi-Corridor-Control-is-Decisive-Strategic-Factor-in-Gazas-Future-8-8-1.pdf
  67. https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/28/middleeast/israeli-tanks-advance-central-rafah-gaza-intl
  68. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-sends-tanks-into-rafah-raids-amid-gaza-wide-offensive-2024-05-29/
  69. https://www.npr.org/2024/05/08/1249657561/rafah-timeline-gaza-israel-hamas-war
  70. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/israels-military-says-its-taken-control-of-a-strategic-corridor-near-rafah-along-gazas-border-with-egypt
  71. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/30/israel-idf-philadelphi-corridor-rafah-gaza-control-palestine-war-hamas
  72. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1994g22ve9o
  73. https://abcnews.go.com/International/israel-takes-control-rafah-creating-new-security-corridor/story?id=120744447
  74. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/05/07/rafah-israel-gaza-egypt-crossing/
  75. https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-news-05-29-2024-7952f779552f41ef6fb44c3b662f5c48
  76. https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-hamas-war-gaza-news-05-29-24
  77. https://jcpa.org/philadelphia-corridor-update/
  78. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israeli-military-cut-across-gaza-strip-leaving-territory-fragmented/3402300
  79. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hyhki2j5r
  80. https://www.jns.org/halevi-idf-ready-for-all-scenarios-at-philadelphi-corridor/
  81. https://www.jns.org/idf-uncovers-multi-level-tunnels-under-philadelphi-corridor/
  82. https://nypost.com/2024/08/04/world-news/idf-uncovers-massive-smuggling-tunnel-for-vehicles-on-gaza-egypt-border/
  83. https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-813202
  84. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240905-no-operational-tunnel-found-by-israel-along-gaza-egypt-border-corridor-israeli-analyst/
  85. https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-hamass-rafah-brigade-has-collapsed-80-of-border-tunnels-neutralized/
  86. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/netanyahu-says-israel-will-not-leave-gaza-border-corridor-until-it-is-secure-2024-09-04/
  87. https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-819746
  88. https://en.idi.org.il/articles/55813
  89. https://www.timesofisrael.com/asked-to-decide-between-hostages-or-philadelphi-netanyahu-said-to-prefer-latter/
  90. https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-783285
  91. https://sis.gov.eg/Story/194802/FM-Israeli-presence-in-Rafah-crossing%2C-Philadelphi-aims-to-hinder-Palestinian-authority%27s-Gaza-return/?lang=en-us
  92. https://www.palestinechronicle.com/egypt-renews-rejection-of-israeli-presence-at-rafah-philadelphi-corridor/
  93. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-868724
  94. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/08/27/egypt-rejects-israeli-offer-to-build-watchtowers-along-philadelphi-corridor/
  95. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240827-egypt-reiterates-its-opposition-to-israeli-presence-at-philadelphi-corridor/
  96. https://english.news.cn/20240904/c08ad2c6b73448a8a197504eb6e27b98/c.html
  97. https://www.timesofisrael.com/egypt-is-embarrassed-to-admit-failure-to-control-philadelphi-says-exiled-analyst/
  98. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/06/five-factors-shaping-future-egypt-israel-relations
  99. https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-egypt-gaza/
  100. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/30/egypt-israel-relations-gaza-philadelphi-corridor-buffer-zone-takeover
  101. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/amid-gaza-cease-fire-hope-where-does-the-egypt-israel-relationship-stand/
  102. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/08/23/israel-egypt-discuss-philadelphi-deployment/
  103. https://jcpa.org/will-the-end-of-the-gaza-war-ease-tensions-between-egypt-and-israel/
  104. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/daliaziada_egypt-israel-rafah-activity-7237136441640632321--bEt
  105. https://www.timesofisrael.com/gaza-ceasefire-starts-as-idf-completes-partial-withdrawal-hamas-has-72-hours-to-return-hostages/
  106. https://www.britannica.com/place/Philadelphi-Corridor
  107. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/16/israel-delays-rafah-crossing-reopening-as-gaza-awaits-much-needed-aid-surge
  108. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/idf-says-gazans-may-return-north-via-approved-routes-warns-against-approaching-troops/
  109. https://www.trtworld.com/article/788ec22996b8
  110. https://www.gov.il/en/pages/statement-by-pm-netanyahu-10-october-2025
  111. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/israel-katz-tells-jd-vance-094202654.html
  112. https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/10/09/israel-hamas-agree-to-gaza-deal-in-egypt/
  113. https://english.ahram.org.eg/News/554402.aspx
  114. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-plans-to-maintain-military-presence-at-3-strategic-sites-in-around-gaza-after-prisoner-deal-report/3707872
  115. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/3/netanyahu-pushes-back-as-pressure-grows-to-secure-gaza-ceasefire-deal
  116. https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/talks-at-impasse--egypt-rejects-israeli-presence-on-philadel
  117. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-demands-troops-gaza-blocking-truce-deal-sources-say-2024-08-22/
  118. https://www.timesofisrael.com/after-signing-gaza-deal-pm-threatens-return-to-war-if-demands-not-met-the-easy-way/
  119. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/09/04/philadelphi-corridor-israel-gaza-cease-fire/
  120. https://unherd.com/2024/09/why-israel-cant-give-up-the-philadelphi-corridor/
  121. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/peacekeeping-force-gaza-philadelphi-corridor/
  122. https://www.inss.org.il/publication/gaza-strategic-alternatives/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.