Hubbry Logo
Starch gelatinizationStarch gelatinizationMain
Open search
Starch gelatinization
Community hub
Starch gelatinization
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Starch gelatinization
Starch gelatinization
Starch gelatinization
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A crepe being cooked

Starch gelatinization is a process of breaking down of intermolecular bonds of starch molecules in the presence of water and heat, allowing the hydrogen bonding sites (the hydroxyl hydrogen and oxygen) to engage more water. This irreversibly dissolves the starch granule in water. Water acts as a plasticizer.

Process

[edit]

Three main processes happen to the starch granule: granule swelling, crystallite and double-helical melting, and amylose leaching.

  • Granule swelling: During heating, water is first absorbed in the amorphous space of starch, which leads to a swelling phenomenon.[1]
  • Melting of double helical structures: Water then enters via amorphous regions into the tightly bound areas of double helical structures of amylopectin. At ambient temperatures these crystalline regions do not allow water to enter. Heat causes such regions to become diffuse, the amylose chains begin to dissolve, to separate into an amorphous form and the number and size of crystalline regions decreases. Under the microscope in polarized light starch loses its birefringence and its extinction cross. [2]
  • Amylose leaching: Penetration of water thus increases the randomness in the starch granule structure, and causes swelling; eventually amylose molecules leach into the surrounding water and the granule structure disintegrates.

The gelatinization temperature of starch depends upon plant type and the amount of water present, pH, types and concentration of salt, sugar, fat and protein in the recipe, as well as starch derivatisation technology are used. Some types of unmodified native starches start swelling at 55 °C (131 °F), other types at 85 °C (185 °F).[3] The gelatinization temperature of modified starch depends on, for example, the degree of cross-linking, acid treatment, or acetylation.

Gel temperature can also be modified by genetic manipulation of starch synthase genes.[4] Gelatinization temperature also depends on the amount of damaged starch granules; these will swell faster. Damaged starch can be produced, for example, during the wheat milling process, or when drying the starch cake in a starch plant.[5] There is an inverse correlation between gelatinization temperature and glycemic index.[4] High amylose starches require more energy to break up bonds to gelatinize into starch molecules.

Gelatinization improves the availability of starch for amylase hydrolysis. So gelatinization of starch is used constantly in cooking to make the starch digestible or to thicken/bind water in roux, sauce, or soup.

Retrogradation

[edit]
Main article: Starch retrogradation

Gelatinized starch, when cooled for a long enough period (hours or days), will thicken (or gel) and rearrange itself again to a more crystalline structure; this process is called retrogradation. During cooling, starch molecules gradually aggregate to form a gel. The following molecular associations can occur: amylose-amylose, amylose-amylopectin, and amylopectin-amylopectin. A mild association amongst chains come together with water still embedded in the molecule network.

Due to strong associations of hydrogen bonding, longer amylose molecules (and starch which has a higher amylose content) will form a stiff gel.[6] Amylopectin molecules with longer branched structure, which makes them more similar to amylose, increases the tendency to form strong gels. High amylopectin starches will have a stable gel, but will be softer than high amylose gels.

Retrogradation restricts the availability for amylase hydrolysis to occur, which reduces the digestibility of the starch.

Pregelatinized starch

[edit]

Pregelatinized starch (dextrin) is starch which has been cooked and then dried in the starch factory on a drum dryer or in an extruder making the starch cold-water-soluble. Spray dryers are used to obtain dry starch sugars and low viscous pregelatinized starch powder.[citation needed]

Determination

[edit]

A simple technique to study starch gelation is by using a Brabender Viscoamylograph.[citation needed] It is a common technique used by food industries to determine the pasting temperature, swelling capacity, shear/thermal stability, and the extent of retrogradation. Under controlled conditions, starch and distilled water is heated at a constant heating rate in a rotating bowl and then cooled down. The viscosity of the mixture deflects a measuring sensor in the bowl. This deflection is measured as viscosity in torque over time vs. temperature and recorded on the computer. The viscoamylograph allows us to observe: the beginning of gelatinization, gelatinization maximum, gelatinization temperature, viscosity during holding, and viscosity at the end of cooling.[7]

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is another method industries use to examine properties of gelatinized starch. As water is heated with starch granules, gelatinization occurs, involving an endothermic reaction.[8]

The initiation of gelatinization is called the T-onset. T-peak is the position where the endothermic reaction occurs at the maximum. T-conclusion is when all the starch granules are fully gelatinized and the curve remains stable.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Starch gelatinization

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Starch gelatinization is an order-to-disorder in which native starch granules, composed primarily of and , absorb water and swell irreversibly upon heating, leading to the disruption of their semi-crystalline structure, leaching of molecules, and formation of a viscous paste or . This process fundamentally alters the physicochemical properties of , transforming insoluble granules into a soluble, hydrated matrix that influences texture, , and digestibility in food systems. Starch, a major reserve in such as cereals, tubers, and , typically consists of (15–25% by weight), a linear of α-D-glucose linked by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds, and (75–85%), a highly branched with additional α-1,6 linkages. The gelatinization range varies by starch source and granule composition, generally occurring between 50–80°C for most botanical starches, with amylopectin branching providing thermal stability and amylose content affecting the of the transition. Mechanistically, heating promotes water penetration into the amorphous regions of granules, breaking intra- and intermolecular bonds within double helices formed by amylopectin chains, which facilitates granule swelling and eventual rupture. Key factors influencing gelatinization include water availability, with excess moisture (>65%) yielding a single endothermic peak in , while limited (35–60%) results in multiple peaks due to sequential melting of amylopectin-amylose complexes. Additives such as salts, sugars, , and proteins can either promote or inhibit the process by altering water mobility, granule stability, or molecular interactions—for instance, form inclusion complexes with , raising gelatinization temperatures. In food applications, controlled gelatinization is essential for achieving desired rheological properties in products like sauces, baked goods, and extruded snacks, while incomplete gelatinization can reduce digestibility and enhance formation for nutritional benefits.

Introduction and Fundamentals

Definition and Overview

Starch gelatinization is the process in which native granules absorb water and heat, leading to irreversible swelling, disruption of their crystalline structure, and a marked increase in as the granules rupture and release and into solution. This transition transforms the ordered, insoluble into a disordered, soluble form, fundamentally altering its physical properties. The process has been integral to cooking practices for centuries, enabling the softening and thickening of foods like grains, tubers, and to achieve desirable textures. Scientific investigation of starch gelatinization began in the , with early researchers using to observe granule swelling and proposing initial theories on the structural changes involved. In modern applications, starch gelatinization is essential to , where it underpins the functionality of thickening agents in products such as sauces, puddings, and baked goods, influencing texture, stability, and . Beyond food, it supports industrial uses like adhesives, where the viscous paste formed provides strong binding capabilities in , textiles, and products. The ultimate outcome of complete gelatinization is the production of a thick, viscous paste or from native , which serves as a versatile base for further formulation in both culinary and manufacturing contexts.

Starch Molecular Structure

is primarily composed of two polysaccharides: and . constitutes approximately 20-30% of native and consists of linear chains of α-D-glucose units linked primarily by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds, forming a helical structure with occasional branches via α-1,6 linkages in some variants. , making up 70-80% of , is a highly branched with α-1,4-linked glucose chains forming the backbone and α-1,6 linkages at branch points every 24-30 glucose units, resulting in a clustered, tree-like molecular . Starch granules exhibit a semi-crystalline , characterized by alternating amorphous and crystalline regions arranged in a radial from a central hilum. The amorphous regions, rich in and branch points of , alternate with crystalline lamellae formed by short chains in double-helical conformations, creating growth rings visible under . This layered structure varies by botanical origin; for instance, granules display large, lenticular shapes with prominent radial channels, while features smaller, polyhedral granules with more compact radial arrangements. Key properties of starch granules stem from this molecular organization. Under , native granules show , manifesting as a characteristic "" pattern, which indicates the radial orientation of crystalline helices. Granules have a high absorption capacity, primarily in amorphous regions, influenced by their range of 5-100 μm, which affects surface area and hydration potential. The amylose-to-amylopectin ratio varies significantly across botanical sources, influencing granule properties. Cereal starches, such as those from corn, wheat, and rice, typically contain 20-30% amylose, leading to more balanced semi-crystalline structures. Tubers like potato have around 20% amylose with higher amylopectin content, resulting in larger granules and greater swelling potential. Legume starches, including pea and lentil, often exhibit higher amylose levels of 30-40%, contributing to denser packing and altered hydration behaviors.

Gelatinization Process

Mechanism

Starch gelatinization at the molecular level begins with the disruption of hydrogen bonds that stabilize the interactions between amylose and amylopectin chains within the starch granule. When heated in the presence of water, these bonds weaken, allowing water molecules to penetrate and hydrate the amorphous regions of the granule. This hydration initiates swelling and expansion of the granule structure, as the polymer chains absorb water and increase in volume. The process progresses to the melting of crystallites in the ordered lamellae, where double helices formed by side chains lose their structural integrity. Swelling in the amorphous domains generates mechanical stress on these crystalline regions, leading to their dissociation and an overall loss of molecular order. This is endothermic and entropy-driven, with the increase in disorder (positive ΔS\Delta S) favoring the shift from a crystalline to an amorphous state under elevated temperatures. The energy associated with crystallite melting is captured as the gelatinization enthalpy (ΔH\Delta H), determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which typically ranges from 5 to 20 J/g for various starches, reflecting the heat required to overcome intermolecular forces. Concurrently, viscoelastic changes occur as amylose leaches selectively into the aqueous phase, enhancing solution viscosity without complete granule dissolution, thereby forming a paste-like matrix.

Stages

The gelatinization of starch occurs in distinct sequential stages as granules are heated in the presence of , typically under excess moisture conditions. The initial stage begins at the onset (To), generally ranging from 50 to 70°C depending on the starch source, where granules absorb primarily in their amorphous regions, leading to initial swelling without significant morphological disruption. This uptake destabilizes the crystalline , initiating a gradual loss of observable under , as the pattern begins to fade. For example, in , this stage starts around 62-65°C, with granules remaining intact but undergoing subtle expansion. In the intermediate stage, at the peak temperature (Tp), swelling intensifies, reaching maximum granule volume—often up to 100 times the original for many starches—and peaks as the suspension thickens due to entangled swollen granules. is fully lost, indicating the melting of crystallites, and some larger granules begin to rupture, leaching into the surrounding medium. Microscopic observations reveal deformed and expanded granules, with scanning electron microscopy showing surface irregularities and internal disruption. For , Tp occurs around 70°C, within an overall range of 62-72°C, where swelling is most pronounced before partial breakdown. The final stage concludes at the conclusion temperature (Tc), where remaining granules rupture completely, forming a viscous paste as and fully disperse, eliminating any residual crystallinity. Under standard heating conditions (e.g., excess at a rate of 5-12°C/min), the entire process typically takes 10-30 minutes, with full gelatinization achieved by 75-85°C for . Light microscopy at this point shows no intact granules, only a homogeneous amylose- matrix.

Factors Influencing Gelatinization

Intrinsic Factors

Intrinsic factors refer to the inherent properties of granules that govern their gelatinization behavior, independent of external conditions such as or additives. These properties arise from the 's molecular composition and supramolecular , influencing key parameters like onset (To), peak (Tp), conclusion (Tc), gelatinization enthalpy (ΔH), and swelling capacity. Variations in these intrinsic characteristics determine how readily undergoes the disruption of its crystalline during heating in the presence of . Botanical source significantly affects gelatinization due to differences in granule and composition across plant origins. Cereal starches, such as those from , exhibit lower onset temperatures around 58°C, reflecting their A-type crystallinity and relatively compact structure. In contrast, tuber starches like display higher swelling capacities during gelatinization owing to their larger granules and B-type crystallinity, which allows greater hydration despite similar temperature ranges of 58-68°C. These variations stem from evolutionary adaptations in starch storage, with cereal starches optimized for rapid energy mobilization and tuber starches for long-term reserve. For instance, starch gelatinizes between 64.3 and 77.2°C, higher than at 58.9-72.4°C, highlighting intra-cereal differences. The -to- ratio profoundly influences gelatinization dynamics, as amylose acts as a linear, less branched that restricts granule expansion compared to the highly branched amylopectin. High- starches (e.g., 25-30% amylose in normal ) require higher gelatinization temperatures (up to 70-80°C) and exhibit reduced swelling due to amylose's tendency to form tighter helices that stabilize the granule structure. Conversely, low-amylose or waxy starches (nearly 100% ) gelatinize at lower temperatures (around 60-65°C) with greater swelling, as amylopectin's branching facilitates easier crystalline melting and water uptake. This ratio directly correlates with ΔH, where higher content elevates by increasing the energy needed to disrupt more extensive crystalline domains. Granule size and morphology further modulate gelatinization by affecting surface area, water accessibility, and internal organization. Larger granules, typical of (20-100 μm), absorb more water and swell extensively, leading to higher but potentially broader gelatinization ranges as outer layers disrupt before inner cores. Smaller granules, such as those in (2-8 μm), gelatinize more uniformly and at slightly lower temperatures due to their higher surface-to-volume ratio, which enhances and hydration efficiency. Morphology plays a key role: A-type polymorphs in cereals (polygonal, dense) confer thermal stability and higher To compared to B-type in tubers (spherical, less ordered), which promote rapid swelling but lower overall ΔH. These traits arise from the concentric growth of alternating amorphous and crystalline lamellae within granules. Genetic and varietal differences amplify these effects through mutations altering biosynthesis pathways, impacting gelatinization and temperature profiles. For example, waxy varieties (0% ) show lower ΔH (12.0-13.8 J/g) and onset temperatures (65.6-70.7°C) compared to normal (20-25% ), due to reduced crystalline stability from pure composition, resulting in easier melting but higher retrogradation potential. In contrast, high- mutants exhibit elevated ΔH and To, reflecting stronger intermolecular associations. Varietal selections in cereals like demonstrate ΔH variations from 5-15 J/g across genotypes, driven by differences in chain length and granule crystallinity. These genetic traits enable tailored functionality in breeding programs.

Extrinsic Factors

Extrinsic factors play a crucial role in modulating the gelatinization process by altering the conditions under which granules absorb , swell, and lose their crystalline structure. is a primary driver, with gelatinization typically occurring between 60°C and 80°C for most cereal starches such as and , where the onset temperature (To) for ranges from 64.3°C to 77.2°C and for from 58.9°C to 72.4°C under excess conditions. The heating rate influences the breadth of the gelatinization temperature range; higher rates, such as increasing from 1.6°C/min to 10.1°C/min, shift exothermic peaks to higher temperatures and narrow the overall transition range by accelerating granule disruption and reducing the time for . This effect is particularly pronounced at intermediate moisture levels, where slower heating allows more gradual swelling. Water content is essential for initiating gelatinization, requiring a minimum of approximately 25-30% to enable sufficient hydration and granule swelling, as levels below 25% hinder complete disruption even at elevated temperatures. Excess (typically >60-70% content) promotes full of crystallites but can dilute the , leading to reduced without proportional increases in swelling beyond a starch-to- ratio of 1:2. At limited availability, such as 20% during heat- treatment, gelatinization is restricted, resulting in higher content up to 68% in . pH and ionic environment further tune the process; acidic conditions lower the onset temperature (To) by hydrolyzing amorphous regions, reducing peak temperature (Tp) and (ΔH) up to threefold in treated starches. Salts like NaCl compete for and stabilize granule structure at low concentrations (below 7-9%), increasing To and Tp while decreasing ΔH, though higher levels may promote peripheral gelatinization due to exclusion from granule interiors. This dual effect arises from electrostatic interactions that limit penetration. Additives such as sugars elevate To by reducing free water availability and stabilizing crystalline junctions through hydrogen bonding; for instance, increases Tgel more than monosaccharides like glucose or at concentrations above 40% w/w. form inclusion complexes primarily with , inhibiting granule swelling and lowering ΔH, as seen in high-lipid starches where complexation restricts hydration during heating. These complexes, often enhanced by saturated fatty acids, delay full gelatinization and reduce digestibility. Processing conditions like shear and accelerate gelatinization in applications such as , where combined high shear and (e.g., 500 MPa) promote granule breakdown and increase the extent of disruption compared to heat alone, yielding up to 20% in extrudates. facilitates molecular degradation and mixing, while resists swelling without shear but enhances it when paired, leading to faster transition through the standard stages of hydration and .

Measurement and Characterization

Key Parameters

Starch gelatinization is characterized by several key thermal and rheological parameters that quantify the transition from ordered crystalline structure to a disordered, viscous state. These metrics, primarily determined through techniques like (DSC) for thermal properties and rapid visco analysis (RVA) for pasting behavior, enable standardized comparisons across starch sources and processing conditions. The primary temperature parameters include the onset temperature (To), which marks the initial melting of crystalline regions; the peak temperature (Tp), corresponding to the maximum rate of gelatinization; and the conclusion temperature (Tc), indicating the completion of the process. These values typically range from 57°C to 77°C for To, 62°C to 83°C for Tp, and 67°C to 95°C for Tc, depending on the botanical origin of the starch. The gelatinization temperature range, defined as ΔT = Tc - To, generally spans 5–20°C and reflects the breadth of thermal energy required for complete granule disruption. For example, normal corn starch exhibits To ≈ 64°C, Tp ≈ 69°C, Tc ≈ 75°C, and ΔT ≈ 11°C. The of gelatinization (ΔH) measures the heat absorbed during the melting of crystallites, serving as an indicator of the degree of molecular order and crystallinity in native granules. Higher ΔH values correlate with greater crystalline content, as more is needed to disrupt bonds and helical structures. Typical ΔH for starches ranges from 7 to 18 J/g; for instance, normal shows ΔH ≈ 12 J/g, underscoring its moderate crystallinity compared to starches. Pasting properties, assessed via RVA, describe the viscosity changes during heating and cooling of starch suspensions, providing insights into granule swelling and network formation. Peak viscosity represents the maximum consistency achieved upon granule rupture and leaching, typically 800–1200 cP (or 70–100 RVU) for at standard 8–12% concentrations. Breakdown viscosity quantifies the decline in viscosity under shear and (e.g., 200–400 cP for corn), reflecting granule stability, while setback viscosity measures the increase during cooling (e.g., 100–300 cP for corn), indicating recrystallization tendencies. These parameters, expressed in centipoise (cP) or rapid visco units (RVU, where 1 RVU ≈ 12 cP), are crucial for predicting product texture in applications like sauces and batters. Swelling power and further characterize interactions during gelatinization, with swelling power denoting the mass of sedimented per gram of dry sample (g/g) after hydration and , typically 14–21 g/g for at 90°C, indicative of granule expansion capacity. , expressed as the percentage of leached and low-molecular-weight components, averages 9–11% for under similar conditions, highlighting limited initial solubilization before full disruption. These metrics underscore the balance between hydration-driven swelling and partial dissolution essential for viscous paste formation.

Analytical Techniques

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is a widely used technique to quantify starch gelatinization by measuring the onset (To), peak (Tp), conclusion (Tc), and change (ΔH) associated with the endothermic transition during granule disruption. In this method, a small sample of (typically 3-5 mg) is mixed with excess at a of approximately 1:3 (: by weight) to ensure hydration without water limitation, then sealed in a pan and heated at a controlled rate (e.g., 5-10°C/min) from 20°C to 100°C under an inert atmosphere. The resulting thermogram provides precise thermodynamic , with ΔH reflecting the required to melt crystalline regions, typically ranging from 5-20 J/g for native starches depending on botanical origin. The Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) assesses gelatinization through pasting behavior by monitoring changes in a starch- suspension (e.g., 3 g starch in 25 mL ) subjected to programmed heating, holding, and cooling under shear. This instrument profiles key pasting parameters such as peak (indicating maximum granule swelling), breakdown ( loss due to shear and heat), and setback (viscosity increase upon cooling from alignment), with gelatinization onset often observed around 60-70°C for starches. RVA is particularly valuable for simulating like cooking, providing insights into functional properties under dynamic conditions. Microscopy techniques visualize structural transformations during gelatinization, with detecting the loss of as crystalline order disrupts. Native starch granules exhibit strong under crossed polarizers due to radial arrangement of helices, which fades progressively above 50-60°C as hydration swells the granules. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) complements this by revealing morphological changes, such as surface roughening, cracking, and eventual rupture of granules upon heating in , often showing a honeycomb-like internal structure post-gelatinization. Samples for SEM are typically dehydrated and gold-coated to enhance resolution of these alterations. X-ray diffraction (XRD) quantifies the loss of crystallinity during gelatinization by tracking the diminution of characteristic peaks in the diffraction pattern, shifting from A- or B-type crystalline structures to an amorphous profile. Native starches show relative crystallinity of 15-40%, which decreases sharply as heating exceeds Tp, confirming the melting of crystallites. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), particularly low-field proton NMR, probes molecular mobility by measuring transverse relaxation times (T2), where increased water proton mobility signals enhanced granule hydration and chain disentanglement during gelatinization. This technique distinguishes rigid (crystalline) from mobile (amorphous) domains, with T2 values rising from ~10 ms in native starch to over 100 ms post-gelatinization. Recent advances incorporate in-situ synchrotron radiation techniques, such as time-resolved small- and (SAXS/WAXS), to capture real-time dynamics of lamellar and crystalline disruptions during heating at rates mimicking DSC. These methods, developed post-2010, reveal heterogeneous gelatinization mechanisms, including initial melting of defective crystallites followed by ordered disassembly, offering higher temporal and spatial resolution than conventional lab-based XRD.

Post-Gelatinization Phenomena

Retrogradation

Retrogradation is the process by which gelatinized molecules, specifically the linear and branched chains, reassociate into more ordered, crystalline structures during cooling and storage, reversing aspects of the initial gelatinization. This re-association begins immediately after the disruption of native granule order during heating, leading to the formation of double helices and B-type crystallites that contribute to structural reorganization. The kinetics of retrogradation differ markedly between and due to their molecular architectures. Amylose retrogrades rapidly, often within hours, forming short-range ordered structures through quick and propagation of double helices, while amylopectin retrogrades more slowly over days, involving the alignment of its branched chains into crystalline domains via intra- and intermolecular interactions. This two-phase process follows models like the consecutive reaction (CR) model, where serves as the rate-limiting step. The enthalpy of retrogradation (ΔH_r), measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) through re-scanning of stored gels, is typically lower than the gelatinization enthalpy (ΔH_g), often around half or less depending on starch type and conditions; for instance, rice starch stored at 4°C may exhibit ΔH_r values of 3.9–7.0 J/g compared to ΔH_g of 2.6–14.4 J/g at moderate water contents. Specific factors accelerate this process, including higher starch concentration, which promotes chain proximity for association, and temperature cycling (e.g., 4/30°C fluctuations), which enhances crystallite stability over constant low temperatures. Storage at 4°C notably speeds amylopectin crystallization by favoring molecular mobility near the glass transition temperature. Microstructurally, retrogradation results in the aggregation of helices into a firm network, increasing the overall order and leading to texture firming through enhanced intermolecular forces and reduced mobility within the matrix. This network formation is evident in the transition from a viscous paste to a more rigid, opaque structure, particularly driven by amylose's rapid gelation backbone.

Gel Stability Issues

One major stability issue in starch gels is syneresis, the expulsion of water from the gel network due to contraction and reorganization of starch molecules, particularly chains, which reduces the gel's water-holding capacity. This phenomenon is more pronounced in high- starches, such as with approximately 22% amylose content, where syneresis can reach 17-20% after storage at 4°C, compared to lower levels of 10-13% in starch with 16% amylose. Syneresis often stems from retrogradation, where aligned starch helices form a denser structure that squeezes out bound water. Texture degradation in starch-based products, such as firming and in baked goods like , arises from both physical and enzymatic mechanisms. Physically, retrogradation leads to crumb firming by increasing crystallinity and reducing mobility, resulting in a drier, texture over time. Enzymatically, endogenous or added amylases can hydrolyze chains, either accelerating breakdown for softer initial textures or, in controlled applications, mitigating long-term firming by limiting recrystallization. Freeze-thaw instability further compromises gel integrity, as ice crystal formation during frozen storage concentrates solutes in the unfrozen phase, promoting starch aggregation and exacerbating retrogradation upon thawing. This leads to significant syneresis, with some starches like exhibiting up to 2.9% water loss after four cycles, while others show higher expulsion due to disrupted gel networks. These stability issues directly impact in products like puddings and sauces, where syneresis causes visible water separation and reduced . In desserts, this results in and textural deterioration, limiting commercial viability. Non-chemical mitigation strategies include adding hydrocolloids, such as or konjac , which enhance water retention and stabilize the matrix against syneresis without altering structure.

Applications and Modifications

Food Industry Uses

Starch gelatinization plays a pivotal role in the for thickening and stabilizing various products, particularly sauces, soups, and instant puddings. When heated in the presence of , starch granules swell and rupture, releasing and molecules that form a viscous network, enhancing and preventing separation. In sauces and soups, native starches like or corn provide a smooth texture at concentrations of 2-5%, with combinations such as and maintaining stability for up to three months under storage. For instant puddings, pre-gelatinized native starches enable rapid hydration and thickening in cold liquids, eliminating the need for cooking and ensuring quick preparation. In and processes, gelatinization is essential for developing structure and texture. During , partial gelatinization of in creates an elastic network that traps , contributing to loaf volume and softness; higher degrees of gelatinization from pregelatinized additions can increase while reducing hardness. In cooking for puffed snacks, high shear forces and temperatures of 100-150°C promote complete gelatinization of starches, leading to moisture flash-off, expansion, and a crispy, low-density product with improved . This process, often applied to corn or , achieves high degrees of gelatinization, typically 90-100%, under controlled moisture (12-22%), enhancing digestibility without chemical additives. Gelatinization also influences texture in and applications. In production, controlled starch gelatinization stabilizes the by increasing and preventing formation, resulting in a smoother during freezing and storage. For gummy candies, native or lightly processed starches, such as , contribute to gel formation alongside sugars, where gelatinization temperature is modulated by high levels to achieve a chewy consistency without syneresis. From a nutritional perspective, gelatinization enhances digestibility in food products by disrupting crystalline structures, allowing faster enzymatic breakdown and glucose release in the , which is desirable for energy provision in items like baked goods and cereals. This process reduces the formation of , which resists and acts as a ; thus, full gelatinization in processed foods helps avoid unintended content that could lower glycemic availability. Recent trends in the emphasize clean-label approaches using native starches, often processed via physical methods like cooking to mimic functionality without chemicals. These starches provide thickening and stabilization in ready-to-eat cereals and snacks, aligning with demands for transparency while maintaining product under high-temperature .

Types of Modified Starches

Modified starches are altered through various processes to enhance their gelatinization properties, such as , , stability, and resistance to retrogradation, making them suitable for specific industrial applications. These modifications can be physical, chemical, or enzymatic, each targeting different aspects of structure to control the onset (To), peak (Tp), change (ΔH), and gelatinization range (ΔT). Pregelatinized starch undergoes pre-swelling through methods like drum-drying or , where starch slurries are heated and dried to disrupt granule structure partially. This results in instant solubility in cold water without requiring for gelatinization, as the process eliminates the need for the typical endothermic transition observed in native . Such starches exhibit high cold paste and are commonly used in foods for easy preparation and thickening. Chemical modifications involve introducing functional groups or linkages to starch molecules, significantly altering gelatinization behavior. Cross-linking, often using (STMP), forms intra- and inter-molecular bonds that raise To and Tp while maintaining ΔH, enhancing shear resistance and stability under high temperatures or acidic conditions. Acetylation and hydroxypropylation, which substitute hydroxyl groups with acetyl or hydroxypropyl groups, lower the gelatinization temperature, increase paste clarity and , and reduce retrogradation by disrupting crystalline order. These changes improve freeze-thaw stability, making them ideal for processed foods. Physical modifications rely on heat and moisture without chemical agents to reorganize structure. Annealing involves pre-heating in excess at temperatures below To, which narrows ΔT by promoting uniform crystalline perfection and increasing thermal stability. Heat-moisture treatment (HMT), conducted at limited moisture (10-30%) and temperatures of 90-120°C, elevates To and Tp, reduces swelling and , and enhances paste stability against shear and acid. Both methods minimize retrogradation without altering molecular weight. Enzymatic modifications use specific enzymes to hydrolyze chains, tailoring functional properties. α-Amylase cleaves α-(1,4) glycosidic bonds, reducing molecular weight and while increasing and lowering the gelatinization temperature. Dual enzymatic modifications, combining α-amylase with branching enzymes like pullulanase, further improve freeze-thaw resistance by creating shorter chains with more branch points, reducing syneresis in gels. These approaches are valued for their specificity and clean-label appeal. As of 2025, advances in starch modification include to produce starches with enhanced and water absorption, as well as emerging physical techniques like ultrasonication and high hydrostatic pressure, which improve functional properties for sustainable food applications without chemical additives. Overall, these modifications preserve or adjust key gelatinization parameters; for instance, cross-linked starches show unchanged ΔH but higher Tp, ensuring structural integrity during processing. Post-2000 advances, including dual chemical-physical combinations, have expanded applications in frozen foods by enhancing gel stability and reducing water separation after thaw cycles.

References

  1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119735
  2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115481
  3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113790
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18772106/
  5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/star.201400201
  6. https://www.ifst.org/lovefoodlovescience/resources/carbohydrates-gelatinisation
  7. https://patents.google.com/patent/CN102419305A/en
  8. https://bakerpedia.com/processes/starch-gelatinization/
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9147152/
  10. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Biological_Chemistry/Chemistry_of_Cooking_%28Rodriguez-Velazquez%29/01%253A_Thickening_and_Concentrating_Flavors/1.05%253A_Gelatinization
  11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00614-7
  12. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112263
  13. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01213/full
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9778140/
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1043452608004051
  16. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-21451-5
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8430406/
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/food-science/starch-gelatinization
  19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-022-02761-z
  20. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf0529114
  21. https://www.cerealsgrains.org/publications/cc/backissues/1993/Documents/CC1993a52.html
  22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/star.19730251104
  23. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/5/670
  24. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=42262
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141813017342046
  26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2021.1992607
  27. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/160/1/012003/pdf
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9943765/
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8056912/
  30. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/star.201000014
  31. https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-pdf/93/2/615/23768610/615.pdf
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6915554/
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349226472_Effects_of_processing_and_additives_on_starch_physicochemical_and_digestibility_properties
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11754347/
  35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bip.1061
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268005X18309664
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7353504/
  38. https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.12550
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268005X17303648
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9407177/
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814606003074
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4573107/
  43. https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb07586.x
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0008621591801143
  45. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0cf6r30w/qt0cf6r30w.pdf
  46. https://www.perkinelmer.com/category/rva
  47. https://www.thaiscience.info/journals/Article/CJSR/10324260.pdf
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/star.19900420305
  49. https://www.cerealsgrains.org/publications/cc/backissues/1988/Documents/65_443.pdf
  50. https://www.cerealsgrains.org/publications/cc/backissues/1996/Documents/73_297.pdf
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9714470/
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep28271
  53. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/87559129.2024.2347467
  54. https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1541-4337.12143
  55. https://ojs.wiserpub.com/index.php/FSE/article/download/2939/3157/61843
  56. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep20965
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10178128/
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0733521009000411
  59. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00158
  60. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/star.200600544
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996924013310
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268005X23006033
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3551143/
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144861724004995
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590157522002437
  66. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/39936
  67. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6209/4/3/31
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024076126
  69. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/star.202200195
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377840124000221
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7847421/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10459083/
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590259822000012
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9957318/
  75. https://www.myfoodresearch.com/uploads/8/4/8/5/84855864/_14__fr-2019-245_to_2.pdf
  76. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10942912.2024.2318427
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144861713012423
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814698001307
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996911004455
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370480565_Physicochemical_Properties_of_Enzymatically_Modified_Starch_A_Review
  81. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44340-025-00033-y
  82. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00260
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222047604_Effect_of_Crosslinking_on_Thermal_and_Microscopic_Transitions_of_Rice_Starch
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8535135/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.