Hubbry Logo
Quality management systemQuality management systemMain
Open search
Quality management system
Community hub
Quality management system
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Quality management system
Quality management system
Quality management system
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A quality management system (QMS) is a collection of business processes focused on consistently meeting customer requirements and enhancing their satisfaction. It is aligned with an organization's purpose and strategic direction (ISO 9001:2015).[1] It is expressed as the organizational goals and aspirations, policies, processes, documented information, and resources needed to implement and maintain it. Early quality management systems emphasized predictable outcomes of an industrial product production line, using simple statistics and random sampling. By the 20th century, labor inputs were typically the most costly inputs in most industrialized societies, so focus shifted to team cooperation and dynamics, especially the early signaling of problems via a continual improvement cycle. In the 21st century, QMS has tended to converge with sustainability and transparency initiatives, as both investor and customer satisfaction and perceived quality are increasingly tied to these factors. Of QMS regimes, the ISO 9000 family of standards is probably the most widely implemented worldwide – the ISO 19011 audit regime applies to both and deals with quality and sustainability and their integration.

Other QMS, e.g. Natural Step, focus on sustainability issues and assume that other quality problems will be reduced as result of the systematic thinking, transparency, documentation and diagnostic discipline.

The term "Quality Management System" and the initialism "QMS" were invented in 1991 by Ken Croucher, a British management consultant working on designing and implementing a generic model of a QMS within the IT industry.

Elements

[edit]
  1. Quality objectives
  2. Quality manual
  3. Organizational structure and responsibilities
  4. Data management
  5. Processes – including purchasing
  6. Product quality leading to customer satisfaction
  7. Continuous improvement including corrective and preventive action
  8. Quality instrument
  9. Document control
  10. Employee training and engagement
  11. Supplier quality management

Concept of quality – historical background

[edit]

The concept of a quality as we think of it now first emerged from the Industrial Revolution. Previously goods had been made from start to finish by the same person or team of people, with handcrafting and tweaking the product to meet 'quality criteria'. Mass production brought huge teams of people together to work on specific stages of production where one person would not necessarily complete a product from start to finish. In the late 19th century pioneers such as Frederick Winslow Taylor and Henry Ford recognized the limitations of the methods being used in mass production at the time and the subsequent varying quality of output. Birland established Quality Departments to oversee the quality of production and rectifying of errors, and Ford emphasized standardization of design and component standards to ensure a standard product was produced. Management of quality was the responsibility of the Quality department and was implemented by Inspection of product output to 'catch' defects.

Application of statistical control came later as a result of World War production methods, which were advanced by the work done of W. Edwards Deming, a statistician, after whom the Deming Prize for quality is named. Joseph M. Juran focused more on managing for quality. The first edition of Juran's Quality Control Handbook was published in 1951. He also developed the "Juran's trilogy", an approach to cross-functional management that is composed of three managerial processes: quality planning, quality control, and quality improvement. These functions all play a vital role when evaluating quality.

Quality, as a profession and the managerial process associated with the quality function, was introduced during the second half of the 20th century and has evolved since then. Over this period, few other disciplines have seen as many changes as the quality profession.

The quality profession grew from simple control to engineering, to systems engineering. Quality control activities were predominant in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. The 1970s were an era of quality engineering and the 1990s saw quality systems as an emerging field. Like medicine, accounting, and engineering, quality has achieved status as a recognized profession.[2]

As Lee and Dale (1998) state, there are many organizations that are striving to assess the methods and ways in which their overall productivity, the quality of their products and services and the required operations to achieve them are done.[3]

Medical devices

[edit]

The two primary, state of the art, guidelines for medical device manufacturer QMS and related services today are the ISO 13485 standards and the US FDA 21 CFR 820 regulations. The two have a great deal of similarity, and many manufacturers adopt QMS that is compliant with both guidelines.

ISO 13485 are harmonized with the European Union Regulation 2017/745 as well as the IVD and AIMD directives. The ISO standard is also incorporated in regulations for other jurisdictions such as Japan (JPAL) and Canada (CMDCAS).

Quality System requirements for medical devices have been internationally recognized as a way to assure product safety and efficacy and customer satisfaction since at least 1983 and were instituted as requirements in a final rule published on October 7, 1996.[4] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had documented design defects in medical devices that contributed to recalls from 1983 to 1989 that would have been prevented if Quality Systems had been in place. The rule is promulgated at 21 CFR 820.[5]

According to current Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), medical device manufacturers have the responsibility to use good judgment when developing their quality system and apply those sections of the FDA Quality System (QS) Regulation that are applicable to their specific products and operations, in Part 820 of the QS regulation.[5] As with GMP, operating within this flexibility, it is the responsibility of each manufacturer to establish requirements for each type or family of devices that will result in devices that are safe and effective, and to establish methods and procedures to design, produce, and distribute devices that meet the quality system requirements.

The FDA has identified in the QS regulation the 7 essential subsystems of a quality system. These subsystems include:

Quality system
  • Management controls;
  • Design controls;
  • Production and process controls
  • Corrective and preventative actions
  • Material controls
  • Records, documents, and change controls
  • Facilities and equipment controls

all overseen by management and quality audits.

Because the QS regulation covers a broad spectrum of devices and production processes, it allows some leeway in the details of quality system elements. It is left to manufacturers to determine the necessity for, or extent of, some quality elements and to develop and implement procedures tailored to their particular processes and devices. For example, if it is impossible to mix up labels at a manufacturer because there is only one label to each product, then there is no necessity for the manufacturer to comply with all of the GMP requirements under device labeling.

Drug manufacturers are regulated under a different section of the Code of Federal Regulations:

Organizations and awards

[edit]
See also: List of national quality awards

The International Organization for Standardization's ISO 9001:2015 series describes standards for a QMS addressing the principles and processes surrounding the design, development, and delivery of a general product or service. Organizations can participate in a continuing certification process to ISO 9001:2015 to demonstrate their compliance with the standard, which includes a requirement for continual (i.e. planned) improvement of the QMS, as well as more foundational QMS components such as failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA).[6]

ISO 9000:2005 provides information on the fundamentals and vocabulary used in quality management systems. ISO 9004:2009 provides guidance on a quality management approach for the sustained success of an organization. Neither of these standards can be used for certification purposes as they provide guidance, not requirements.

The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program educates organizations in improving their performance and administers the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The Baldrige Award recognizes U.S. organizations for performance excellence based on the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence. The Criteria address critical aspects of management that contribute to performance excellence: leadership; strategy; customers; measurement, analysis, and knowledge management; workforce; operations; and results.

The European Foundation for Quality Management's EFQM Excellence Model supports an award scheme similar to the Baldrige Award for European companies.

In Canada, the National Quality Institute presents the 'Canada Awards for Excellence' on an annual basis to organizations that have displayed outstanding performance in the areas of Quality and workplace wellness, and have met the institute's criteria with documented overall achievements and results.

The European Quality in Social Service (EQUASS) is a sector-specific quality system designed for the social services sector and addresses quality principles that are specific to service delivery to vulnerable groups, such as empowerment, rights, and person-centredness.

The Alliance for Performance Excellence is a network of state and local organizations that use the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence at the grassroots level to improve the performance of local organizations and economies. browsers can find Alliance members in their state and get the latest news and events from the Baldrige community.

Process

[edit]

A QMS process is an element of an organizational QMS. The ISO 9001 standard requires organizations seeking compliance or certification to define the processes which form the QMS and the sequence and interaction of these processes. Butterworth-Heinemann and other publishers have offered several books which provide step-by-step guides to those seeking the quality certifications of their products.[7][8][9][10][11][12]

Examples of such processes include:

comply with specific requirements e.g. statistical process control and measurement systems analysis,

ISO 9001 requires that the performance of these processes be measured, analyzed and continually improved, and the results of this form an input into the management review process.

Software

[edit]

Quality management software offers the techniques, processes, structure, and resources needed to simplify manufacturing and ERP activities while handling quality concerns efficiently and cost-effectively.

Helps manufacturers to monitor, control, and document quality processes electronically to guarantee that goods are made within tolerance, meet all necessary requirements, and are defect-free. Quality management software is often used in the manufacturing industry to identify potential issues before they occur.[5]

Some benefits of quality management software include:

  • real-time data monitoring
  • issue prevention
  • risk management
  • increased efficiency and productivity
  • process consistency
  • increased employee participation

Quality management software can be integrated with manufacturing execution systems (MES). A MES is a complete, dynamic software system for monitoring, tracking, documenting, and controlling the manufacturing process from raw materials to final products.[13] When combined with QMS, these systems:

  • ensure compliance
  • enable quality programs
  • eliminate waste
  • less product recalls
  • lower per-product cost
  • higher product quality
  • product tracking
  • real-time information for increase in quality control
  • realistic production schedules
  • up-to-date inventory

Quality management software focuses on 4 main elements:[2]

  1. Document management: Quality management software enables companies to manage all product and quality records and documents, including product specifications, work instructions, standard operating procedures (SOPs), quality policies, and training records, among other things, to fulfill highly regulated requirements. Quality management software centralizes the storage of these documents.
  2. Regulatory compliance: To decrease compliance risks, quality management software is used within companies to make sure they comply with ISO, OSHA, FDA, and other industry norms and requirements. The software makes closed-loop corrective and preventive action procedures (CAPA) possible, which result in faster issue resolution and issue prevention.
  3. Feedback loops: Quality management software permits staff to submit feedback or recommendations through centralized software. In turn, this way, managers gather insights from the shop floor creating a feedback loop.
  4. Training and skill management: To maintain product quality, quality management software can provide a fixed system through which employees and staff can be trained. This fixed system provides more clarity in the different tracking processes of the company and simplifies the tracking of different skill levels of employees.

Most quality management software are cloud-based and offer software as a service.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Quality management system

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A quality management system (QMS) is a formalized system that documents processes, procedures, and responsibilities to achieve an organization's quality objectives, ensure consistent product and , and meet customer and regulatory requirements. It integrates functions to direct and control organizational activities with regard to quality, emphasizing continuous improvement and customer focus. The roots of quality management trace back to the late in medieval , where guilds enforced strict quality rules through inspections and marks to maintain craftsmanship standards. During the in the mid-1750s, the factory system in shifted emphasis to product inspection amid . In the early , Frederick W. Taylor's principles prioritized efficiency but highlighted quality issues, leading to dedicated inspection departments. accelerated advancements, with U.S. military adoption of statistical quality control techniques developed by Walter Shewhart in the , including control charts for process monitoring. Post-war, experts like and influenced Japan's quality revolution, fostering (TQM) principles that later spread globally. Modern QMS frameworks, such as the ISO 9001 standard released in 1987 and revised in 2015, with an amendment in 2024 addressing climate action and a full revision planned for 2026, provide internationally recognized requirements for establishing, implementing, and maintaining effective systems. These are built on seven quality management principles: customer focus, , engagement of , process approach, improvement, evidence-based , and relationship management. Key components include leadership commitment, risk-based planning, performance evaluation through metrics, and ongoing improvement via cycles like Plan-Do-Check-Act (). Implementing a QMS reduces , lowers costs, enhances , and supports compliance across industries, from to services.

Overview

Definition

A quality management system (QMS) is a coordinated set of activities through which an organization identifies its objectives and determines the processes and resources needed to achieve intended results, while managing the interactions among those processes and resources to deliver value to relevant interested parties. This formalized system documents an organization's policies, procedures, and responsibilities to ensure consistent achievement of quality objectives and fulfillment of customer requirements. The scope of a QMS encompasses , control, assurance, and continuous improvement of quality-related activities spanning products, services, and organizational processes, with applicability to any entity seeking sustained success, customer confidence, and supply chain reliability. It addresses both intended outcomes, such as meeting specifications, and , like inefficiencies, by optimizing across the organization. Key characteristics of a QMS include its systematic and documented nature, which integrates quality considerations into all operational levels, and its emphasis on prevention of defects rather than mere detection through . This integrated approach fosters a proactive focused on process optimization and stakeholder satisfaction. The terminology evolved from the narrower "," which centered on post- inspection in the early , to the broader "" in the late , incorporating total approaches that embed throughout operations. A foundational model for QMS operation is the cycle, which supports iterative improvement.

Benefits and Importance

A quality management system (QMS) delivers primary operational benefits by ensuring consistent product and , which directly enhances through reliable delivery and fewer complaints. Organizations implementing a QMS also achieve reduced costs by minimizing and preventing errors, as structured processes identify inefficiencies early. Furthermore, it improves overall by optimizing workflows and resource allocation, leading to streamlined operations and higher productivity. Strategically, a QMS supports by aligning processes with legal and industry standards, mitigating risks associated with non-conformance. It provides a by demonstrating commitment to , which can differentiate businesses in global markets and foster long-term customer loyalty. Additionally, it cultivates a culture of continuous improvement, encouraging employee involvement and innovation across all levels. Quantifiable impacts from QMS adoption include significant reductions in operational costs; for instance, the typically accounts for 10-15% of operations, and effective QMS implementation can substantially lower this through defect prevention. For instance, in a 2019 , implementation of a QMS based on ISO 9001:2015 reduced the defect percentage from 72% to 36%. Such outcomes underscore the system's role in driving measurable business performance. On a broader scale, a QMS aligns with goals by promoting and waste reduction, meeting stakeholder expectations for environmentally responsible practices in a global market. As of , a revision to ISO 9001 is underway, with the Draft International Standard released in August 2025 and expected publication in late 2026, aiming to address emerging business needs such as digitalization and . Certification to standards like ISO 9001 often serves as a key pathway to realizing these benefits, integrating quality with broader organizational objectives.

Historical Background

Early Concepts of Quality

The origins of quality concepts date back to ancient civilizations, where precision and durability were essential for monumental engineering feats. In circa 2500 BCE, the construction of the pyramids at exemplified early quality practices, as builders employed advanced techniques, precise stone cutting, and rigorous alignment to ensure structural and against environmental stresses. These efforts reflected a systematic approach to quality, with overseers verifying measurements and material fitness to minimize defects in the massive and blocks. Roman engineering further advanced these ideas by prioritizing durability in infrastructure projects from the 1st century BCE onward. Engineers designed aqueducts, roads, and bridges with standardized materials like pozzolanic concrete, which self-healed cracks through chemical reactions, ensuring structures withstood centuries of use and seismic activity. Strict oversight during , including material testing and modular , maintained consistent quality across the empire's vast network, such as the 50,000 miles of roads built to uniform specifications for load-bearing and drainage. In medieval and Renaissance Europe, craft guilds formalized quality enforcement through structured training and regulation, beginning in the 12th and 13th centuries. These organizations in cities like and controlled apprenticeships, typically lasting seven years, where novices learned standardized techniques under master craftsmen to uphold product reliability and protect against substandard work. Guilds imposed rules on materials, tools, and processes, conducting inspections and fining members for violations to preserve the reputation of trades like textiles and metalwork. The marked a transition to systematic in . Frederick Winslow Taylor's principles, detailed in his 1911 publication , emphasized time-motion studies and task optimization, which incorporated inspection-based methods to identify and eliminate defects in lines. This approach shifted quality from artisanal judgment to measurable efficiency, with dedicated inspectors verifying outputs in factories to reduce waste and variability. A pivotal advancement came in 1924 when Walter Shewhart at Bell Laboratories introduced (SPC), developing control charts to distinguish random variation from assignable causes of defects. These graphical tools enabled proactive monitoring of production processes, laying the groundwork for data-driven quality improvements beyond reactive inspection. Following , quality thinking evolved from post-production inspection to prevention-oriented strategies, driven by the need for reliable military supplies. In the United States, this shift was codified in the 1959 military standard MIL-Q-9858, which mandated comprehensive quality programs emphasizing planning, supplier controls, and defect prevention to ensure conformance in defense manufacturing.

Development of Modern QMS

The development of modern quality management systems (QMS) began in the mid-20th century with influential contributions from key quality experts who shifted focus from inspection-based approaches to systemic improvement. introduced his 14 points for management in the 1950s, emphasizing principles such as creating constancy of purpose, adopting a new , and ceasing dependence on inspection to foster continuous improvement. He also popularized the cycle as a foundational tool for iterative quality enhancement during his lectures to Japanese executives in 1950. Concurrently, Joseph Juran outlined the quality trilogy in 1951, comprising quality planning to establish objectives, quality control to monitor performance, and quality improvement to address variations, providing a structured framework for managerial quality efforts. In the , Kaoru Ishikawa advanced employee involvement through quality circles, small voluntary groups of workers tasked with identifying and solving quality issues, which promoted grassroots participation in process refinement. Post-World War II Japan spearheaded a quality revolution by adopting these Western ideas, transforming its manufacturing sector through rigorous and leading to the emergence of (TQM) as a holistic philosophy integrating quality into all organizational activities. This Japanese success, exemplified by companies like , prompted a U.S. response with the establishment of the in 1987, aimed at recognizing excellence in performance and stimulating quality improvement across American industries. That same year, the (ISO) launched the ISO 9000 series, providing the first globally harmonized standards for QMS to ensure consistent and facilitate international trade. In the , QMS evolved toward more integrated and proactive models, with the 2000 revision of ISO 9001 emphasizing a process-oriented approach that views organizations as interconnected systems of rather than isolated procedures. The update further incorporated risk-based thinking, requiring organizations to systematically identify, assess, and address risks and opportunities throughout their QMS to enhance resilience and . As of August 2025, the Draft (DIS) for the anticipated 2026 revision, published on August 27, 2025, highlights adaptations to contemporary challenges, including greater emphasis on digitalization for automation, to align with environmental goals, and to ensure in operations, though the draft has sparked debates within the quality community over potential dilution of core principles and added complexity.

Principles and Components

Fundamental Principles

The fundamental principles of a quality management system (QMS) provide the philosophical foundation for establishing and maintaining effective quality practices across organizations. These principles guide decision-making, process design, and cultural integration to ensure sustained success and . Central to modern QMS frameworks, particularly those aligned with international standards, are the seven quality management principles outlined by the (ISO). Originally introduced in the ISO 9000:2000 standard as eight principles, these were refined and consolidated into seven in the ISO 9000:2015 edition to better reflect evolving management practices while emphasizing holistic organizational performance. The principles are:
  • Customer focus: Organizations depend on their customers and therefore should understand current and future customer needs, meet customer requirements, and strive to exceed customer expectations to enhance . This principle ensures that value creation aligns with customer interactions, leading to benefits such as increased revenue, , and loyalty.
  • Leadership: Leaders at all levels establish unity of purpose and direction, creating conditions for to achieve quality objectives. By establishing a clear vision and fostering , leaders align strategies with resources, resulting in improved , communication, and organizational capability.
  • Engagement of people: Competent, empowered, and engaged throughout the organization are essential to enhance its capability to create value. This involves recognizing contributions, providing development opportunities, and promoting , which boosts , , and trust within teams.
  • Process approach: Results are consistently achieved more efficiently and effectively when activities are understood and managed as interrelated processes that function as a coherent system. This views the organization as a network of interconnected processes, optimizing performance and reducing inefficiencies for predictable outcomes.
  • Improvement: Successful organizations have an ongoing focus on improvement, using tools like the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle for continual enhancement. This principle drives adaptation to changes, innovation, and risk management, improving processes and customer satisfaction over time.
  • Evidence-based decision making: Decisions based on the and of and are more likely to produce desired results. By relying on objective evidence, organizations minimize risks and uncertainties, enhancing operational effectiveness and the ability to review past decisions.
  • Relationship management: For sustained success, organizations manage their relationships with interested parties, such as suppliers, to optimize their impact on performance. This fosters mutual benefits, stable supply chains, and shared value creation through effective partnerships.
These ISO principles build on earlier quality management philosophies, such as those in (TQM), which emphasize customer-driven quality and total employee involvement to achieve long-term success through process improvement and cultural commitment. In TQM, employee involvement ensures that all staff contribute to quality goals, while customer focus drives organizational priorities toward satisfaction and loyalty. By embedding these principles, a QMS transcends mere procedures to become culturally ingrained, promoting a proactive environment where is a shared responsibility that manifests in practical key elements like policies and objectives.

Key Elements

A management system (QMS) consists of interrelated structural components that ensure consistent achievement of objectives, primarily outlined in the clauses of ISO 9001:2015. These elements form the operational framework, enabling organizations to manage processes effectively while addressing risks and opportunities. Derived from the seven management principles—customer focus, , engagement of people, process approach, improvement, evidence-based decision making, and relationship management—these components provide a systematic approach to . The core elements include and commitment, where top management establishes a and objectives aligned with strategic direction, ensuring customer requirements are met. Organizational roles, responsibilities, and authorities are defined to promote across all levels. encompasses providing necessary , ensuring personnel competence through training and awareness programs, and facilitating effective communication. Planning involves identifying risks and opportunities, setting measurable objectives, and determining changes needed for the QMS. Operational controls focus on and controlling processes to deliver products and services that conform to requirements, including , production, and service provision. Performance evaluation requires monitoring, measurement, analysis, internal audits, and management reviews to assess QMS effectiveness. Non-conformity handling and corrective actions address issues through root cause analysis and preventive measures, while continual improvement drives enhancements based on evaluation results. Documentation forms a critical hierarchy to support these elements, with ISO 9001:2015 emphasizing "documented information" rather than rigid document types, tailored to organizational needs for QMS effectiveness. Organizations may maintain a quality manual to describe the QMS scope, , and objectives, though it is not required. Procedures may outline key processes and controls, work instructions may provide detailed operational guidance, and records must serve as evidence of conformity, such as audit reports and corrective action logs. Organizations must maintain and retain this information to demonstrate compliance and support decision-making. These elements interconnect through a process approach, often following the cycle, where planning and support enable operations, performance evaluation verifies outcomes, and improvement refines the system iteratively. For instance, and (support) underpin operational controls, while findings from performance evaluation inform corrective actions and risk planning, ensuring holistic QMS functionality.

Standards and Frameworks

ISO 9001 Standard

ISO 9001 is the internationally recognized standard that specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a quality management system (QMS) within organizations of any size, type, or sector. It emphasizes a approach, customer focus, and risk-based thinking to enhance organizational performance and . The current edition, ISO 9001:2015, was published in September 2015 as the fifth version of the standard, replacing the 2008 edition and incorporating updates such as greater emphasis on leadership engagement and integration with other management systems. A revision is underway, with the Draft (ISO/DIS 9001) released in 2025 and full publication anticipated in September 2026; this update introduces requirements for promoting ethical behavior, fostering a quality culture, and strengthening to address contemporary challenges like and . The core requirements of ISO 9001:2015 are structured across Clauses 4 to 10, providing a framework that aligns with the cycle for systematic QMS development and improvement. Clause 4 addresses the context of the , including understanding internal and external issues along with the needs of interested parties. Clause 5 focuses on , requiring top management to demonstrate commitment and establish a . Clauses 6 through 8 cover , support, and operation: Clause 6 involves addressing risks and opportunities, such as through Clause 6.1, which mandates identifying potential risks to the QMS's intended outcomes and planning proportionate actions like avoidance, , or exploitation of opportunities to integrate into processes. Clause 7 ensures adequate support via resources, competence, awareness, communication, and documented information, while Clause 8 outlines operational and control, including product and service provision. Finally, Clauses 9 and 10 deal with performance evaluation—through monitoring, measurement, analysis, internal audits, and reviews—and improvement, including nonconformity handling and continual enhancement. Certification to ISO 9001 is voluntary but demonstrates compliance through independent verification by third-party bodies, such as those recognized by the ANSI National Board (ANAB). The process typically involves a two-stage : an initial (Stage 1) followed by a comprehensive on-site assessment (Stage 2) to confirm effective QMS . Successful results in a certificate valid for three years, during which annual verify ongoing , with a full recertification required at the end of the period. As of , ISO 9001 boasts widespread global adoption, with over 1.4 million valid certifications across more than 190 countries, underscoring its role as the most prevalent QMS framework in industries ranging from to services. This figure reflects a significant increase from prior years, driven by its versatility and proven benefits in enhancing efficiency and market access.

Other Relevant Standards

In addition to the foundational ISO 9001 standard, several sector-specific quality management system (QMS) standards address unique regulatory and operational demands. :2016 specifies requirements for QMS in the design and manufacture of medical devices, emphasizing , , and to ensure product safety and efficacy. Similarly, IATF 16949:2016 outlines QMS requirements for the , focusing on defect prevention, variation reduction, and continual improvement to meet customer-specific needs. For aerospace, AS9100D establishes QMS criteria that include additional controls for safety, , and counterfeit parts prevention, applicable across the , , and defense . Complementary standards integrate environmental, health, and process efficiency aspects into QMS frameworks. ISO 14001:2015 provides requirements for environmental management systems (EMS), enabling organizations to integrate sustainability practices with QMS to minimize environmental impact while enhancing overall performance. ISO 45001:2018 sets forth occupational health and safety management system requirements, promoting proactive risk assessment and worker well-being in alignment with QMS principles. Methodologies like employ data-driven (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) processes to reduce process variation and defects, often augmenting QMS for measurable quality gains. Lean principles, rooted in eliminating waste through and flow optimization, further support QMS by streamlining operations and boosting efficiency without compromising quality. Regional and national variants adapt core QMS concepts to local contexts. The Excellence Model, developed by the European Foundation for Quality Management, offers a non-prescriptive framework for assessing organizational performance across leadership, strategy, and results, widely used in to drive sustainable excellence. In Japan, JIS Q 9001:2015 aligns with ISO 9001 requirements for QMS, incorporating national industrial standards to ensure consistent product quality in sectors. Emerging developments address contemporary challenges like cybersecurity and . ISO/IEC 27001:2022 defines system requirements, which organizations increasingly link with QMS to protect in quality processes. The forthcoming ISO 9001 revision, expected in 2026, will incorporate changes and enhanced sustainability considerations, building on existing structures to address global environmental imperatives.

Implementation

Planning and Design

The planning and design phase of establishing a Quality Management System (QMS) begins with a thorough to evaluate an organization's current processes against established standards, such as ISO 9001, identifying discrepancies in areas like process documentation, , and . This involves assigning responsibilities to a qualified individual, typically with auditing expertise, creating or acquiring a aligned with the standard's requirements, scheduling the assessment, comparing existing practices to the criteria, reporting findings categorized by compliance levels, and developing an initial action plan using methodologies like for prioritization. Such an analysis ensures that the QMS design addresses specific deficiencies, providing a foundation for measurable improvements aligned with organizational goals. Following the , organizations define the QMS scope by determining internal and external issues, needs of interested parties, and boundaries of applicability, while establishing a that top communicates to demonstrate commitment and focus. objectives are then set to be measurable, relevant to the policy, and integrated with , often including timelines and resource considerations to ensure achievability. These elements, guided by ISO 9001 clauses 4 through 6 on context, , and , form the strategic framework for the QMS. Risk assessment is integral to this phase, where potential risks and opportunities are identified and evaluated using tools such as SWOT analysis to categorize internal strengths/weaknesses and external opportunities/threats, or Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to systematically pinpoint failure modes in processes, assess their severity, occurrence, and detection, and prioritize preventive actions. SWOT helps in aligning risks with business strategy, while FMEA provides a structured risk priority number (RPN) for proactive mitigation, ensuring the QMS design incorporates risk-based thinking to enhance effectiveness. Resource allocation during planning involves securing leadership buy-in to champion the QMS, allocating financial and for necessary , and planning programs to build competencies among staff, with top management ensuring alignment of these resources to support QMS objectives and foster a of quality. The phase concludes with initial documentation efforts. While not required by ISO 9001:2015, organizations may choose to create a quality manual or equivalent documented information that outlines the QMS structure, , scope, and , alongside process maps that visually represent key workflows, interactions, and responsibilities to facilitate understanding and . These documents serve as foundational references, promoting consistency and ease of integration across the .

Execution and Maintenance

Execution of a quality management system (QMS) begins with the rollout of defined procedures across organizational processes, ensuring that all activities align with established quality objectives. This involves deploying operational controls as outlined in ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8, which requires planning and implementing processes to meet customer and regulatory requirements throughout the product or service life cycle. Staff is a critical component, focusing on building competence and awareness to support effective QMS operation, as specified in Clause 7, where organizations must determine necessary competencies, provide , and evaluate effectiveness. Internal audits, conducted at planned intervals under Clause 9.2, verify compliance with QMS requirements and identify opportunities for improvement, typically involving objective evidence collection and reporting to management. The (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle serves as a foundational tool for controlling and iterating QMS execution. In the "Do" phase, procedures are implemented on a small scale to test changes; the "Check" phase involves reviewing results through assessments and audits; and the "Act" phase standardizes successful practices or restarts the cycle for further refinement. This iterative approach ensures ongoing control and adaptation, promoting sustained quality performance. Monitoring QMS effectiveness relies on key performance indicators (KPIs) to track metrics such as defect rates, , and process efficiency, as required by ISO 9001:2015 Clause 9.1 for monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation. Management reviews, held at predetermined intervals under Clause 9.3, assess QMS performance against objectives, reviewing audit results, customer feedback, and resource needs to inform strategic decisions. Corrective and preventive actions address identified issues: corrective actions mitigate nonconformities that have occurred, while preventive actions eliminate potential causes, both involving root cause analysis. The 5 Whys technique, an iterative questioning method, uncovers underlying causes by repeatedly asking "why" until the root issue is revealed, often integrated into corrective action processes to prevent recurrence. Maintenance of a QMS emphasizes long-term through recertification audits, typically conducted every three years by accredited bodies to confirm ongoing compliance, alongside annual audits to monitor progress. Continual improvement is driven by from audits, reviews, and performance data, as mandated in Clause 10, where organizations analyze nonconformities, implement improvements, and update the QMS accordingly. Handling nonconformities involves documenting the issue, performing root cause analysis, implementing , and verifying effectiveness to prevent repetition, ensuring the system's adaptability. Common challenges in QMS execution include employee resistance to change, stemming from fear of disruption or lack of understanding, and inadequate that hinders adoption. Mitigation strategies involve strong commitment to foster a supportive , comprehensive communication to explain benefits, and ongoing programs to build buy-in and skills, thereby embedding quality practices into daily operations.

Applications

General Industry Applications

In industries, quality management systems (QMS) emphasize process to minimize defects and ensure consistent output, particularly through tools like (SPC), which monitors production variables in real-time to detect variations early. For instance, in automotive assembly lines, SPC is applied to track dimensions and tolerances during component fabrication and assembly, reducing scrap rates and rework by identifying deviations from specifications before they propagate. This approach enables manufacturers to maintain high precision in high-volume environments, fostering reliability and cost across operations. In the services sector, QMS principles support the development of standardized protocols that enhance reliability and satisfaction by embedding quality checks into service delivery processes. These protocols often incorporate cycle times and error rates as key metrics, allowing service providers to refine interactions and adapt to varying demands without compromising consistency. Across industries, QMS facilitates integration by extending quality controls end-to-end, from sourcing to final distribution, ensuring seamless oversight of interdependent processes. In the food sector, for example, Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is integrated within broader QMS structures to manage safety risks throughout the , such as monitoring critical points like during transportation to prevent contamination. This holistic integration promotes and rapid response to issues, safeguarding product integrity from suppliers to consumers. QMS demonstrates , adapting effectively from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to large corporations by providing flexible frameworks that align with organizational size and , enabling consistent improvements regardless of scale. A prominent case is Toyota's implementation of a lean QMS, rooted in the , which eliminated waste through just-in-time inventory and continuous improvement, resulting in enhanced efficiency and global competitiveness for the large enterprise. Such outcomes illustrate how QMS supports growth by standardizing practices that yield measurable reductions in variability and operational costs.

Sector-Specific Examples

Quality management systems (QMS) in specialized sectors adapt core principles to address unique regulatory, technical, and operational demands, often extending from ISO 9001 as a foundational framework. These adaptations ensure compliance with industry-specific standards while enhancing product reliability, safety, and efficiency. In , QMS integrate frameworks like the (CMMI) to assess and improve process maturity across the development lifecycle, enabling organizations to benchmark capabilities and drive performance. Complementing this, ISO/IEC 25010 provides a product quality model that evaluates software based on characteristics such as functional suitability, performance efficiency, and , applicable to and communication technology products. For instance, in agile processes, these models support defect tracking through and quality gates, reducing errors and accelerating delivery without compromising reliability. For medical devices, establishes specific requirements for QMS, focusing on , , and supplier oversight to ensure device safety and throughout . Key elements include of components and processes, as well as validation of procedures to prevent or failures. In the United States, the (FDA) aligns its Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) with , mandating compliance for device manufacturers to harmonize international standards with domestic oversight, effective from February 2026. In broader healthcare settings, QMS incorporate alignment with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to safeguard protected health information (PHI) within quality assurance workflows, ensuring secure handling, access controls, and breach response mechanisms. This integration extends QMS processes to include privacy risk assessments and audit trails, promoting patient trust and regulatory adherence in service delivery. For IT services, ISO/IEC 20000 defines requirements for establishing and maintaining a , emphasizing continual and alignment with business objectives to deliver high-quality IT support. It is frequently paired with IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) practices, which provide detailed guidance on , transition, and operation, enabling certified QMS that enhance and service level agreements. Sector-specific QMS face distinct challenges, particularly the regulatory intensity in , where stringent validation and post-market surveillance under demand extensive documentation and audits to mitigate patient risks. In contrast, QMS offer greater flexibility, allowing iterative agile methodologies under ISO/IEC 25010 to adapt quickly to changes, though software as a medical device introduces hybrid regulatory hurdles like frequent update approvals.

Organizations and Awards

Prominent Organizations

The (ISO), founded in 1947, serves as the primary global body for developing and publishing international standards, including the ISO 9000 family of quality management standards first issued in 1987. Headquartered in , , ISO coordinates 175 national standards bodies to create consensus-based standards that enhance organizational efficiency and customer satisfaction worldwide. The (ASQ), established in 1946, is a leading professional organization focused on advancing practices through , , and . With members in over 130 countries, ASQ offers s such as Certified Engineer and Certified Manager of , alongside programs in areas like and quality auditing. It also conducts influential , including the annual Global State of Organizational Excellence report, which surveys thousands of professionals to identify trends in . The British Standards Institution (BSI), founded in 1901 as the world's first national standards body, played a pivotal role in originating ISO 9001 by developing the precursor British Standard BS 5750 in 1979, which formed the basis for the international standard released in 1987. Incorporated by , BSI continues to contribute to standard development, , and , promoting quality systems across industries. On the industry-specific front, the (IAF) is a global association of accreditation bodies that ensures the competence and consistency of certification bodies issuing credentials for management systems, including those aligned with ISO 9001. Through its Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA), IAF facilitates international acceptance of accredited certifications, reducing trade barriers and enhancing trust in quality audits. In the United States, the ANSI National Accreditation Board (ANAB), a of the (ANSI), accredits bodies to perform audits against standards like ISO 9001, ensuring compliance with ISO/IEC 17021-1 requirements for systems . As the largest multi-disciplinary accreditor in the , ANAB supports over 3,000 organizations across 90 countries (as of 2024), bolstering the reliability of U.S.-based assessments. These organizations collectively drive standard development, provide essential training and services, and conduct research to evolve practices, while some also administer related recognition programs.

Quality Awards

Quality awards in systems (QMS) recognize organizations and individuals that demonstrate exceptional performance, innovation, and sustained excellence in implementing QMS principles, often extending beyond mere compliance to holistic organizational impact. These awards evaluate criteria such as , , customer focus, process , and measurable results, serving as benchmarks for global best practices. The , established by the U.S. Congress in 1987 and first presented in 1988, honors U.S. organizations for superior performance across seven categories: leadership, strategy, customers, measurement, analysis and knowledge management, workforce, operations, and results. Administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), it emphasizes organizational resilience, long-term success, and favorable trends in performance metrics. The award's impact is evident in recipients like , the 1988 winner, which leveraged its recognition to pioneer and popularize methodologies, achieving significant quality improvements and cost savings. The , instituted in 1951 by the Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) to honor W. Edwards Deming's contributions to , recognizes outstanding application of (TQM) principles in organizations worldwide. It assesses factors including management policies, organization, process control, and human resource development, with categories for companies, divisions, and individuals. The prize has influenced global TQM adoption, with winners demonstrating comprehensive quality integration that drives continuous improvement and . In , the Excellence Award, launched in 1992 by the European Foundation for Quality Management (), identifies organizations excelling through the Excellence Model, which uses logic—Results, Approach, Deployment, Assessment, and Refinement—to evaluate enablers (, , , partnerships and resources, processes) and results (, customer, society, and key performance). Open to organizations operating in a European context, it promotes sustainable excellence and has recognized diverse sectors for balanced performance beyond regulatory adherence. Sector-specific awards include the Shingo Prize for Operational Excellence, founded in 1988 by and named after , a key figure in . It evaluates alignment with the Shingo Model's principles, such as respect for every individual and flow and pull, focusing on cultural transformation and sustainable lean practices rather than tools alone. Recipients exhibit world-class outcomes in productivity, quality, and cost reduction across manufacturing and service industries. The (ASQ) administers individual awards, such as the Deming Medal, recognizing lifetime contributions to quality theory and practice; for example, it honors professionals for advancing statistical methods and organizational excellence. These awards highlight personal impact on QMS evolution, complementing organizational recognitions.

References

  1. https://asq.org/quality-resources/quality-management-system
  2. https://www.iso.org/quality-management/what-is-qms
  3. https://asq.org/quality-resources/history-of-quality
  4. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/45481/7a88f2b85cec4438a96de8da61970d1c/ISO-9000-2015.pdf
  5. https://www.juran.com/blog/quality-management-system/
  6. https://asq.org/quality-resources/cost-of-quality
  7. https://asq.org/quality-resources/total-quality-management
  8. https://asq.org/quality-resources/iso-9001
  9. https://www.iso.org/news/2012/10/Ref1665.html
  10. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8760816
  11. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/375
  12. https://www.iso.org/standard/88464.html
  13. https://now.northropgrumman.com/how-the-pyramids-were-built-inspires-engineering-historians
  14. https://news.mit.edu/2023/roman-concrete-durability-lime-casts-0106
  15. https://www.history.com/articles/10-innovations-that-built-ancient-rome
  16. https://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/arth200/artist/guilds.html
  17. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/HIST363-7.1.3-Frederick-W-Taylor.pdf
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2464836/
  19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224065.2023.2282926
  20. http://www.cshindustries.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mil-q-9858a-the-origin-of-iso-9001.pdf
  21. https://deming.org/explore/fourteen-points/
  22. https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/research/dstools/demings-14-points/
  23. https://blog.lifeqisystem.com/kaoru-ishikawa
  24. https://asq.org/quality-resources/malcolm-baldrige-national-quality-award
  25. https://asq.org/quality-resources/iso-9000
  26. https://datamyte.com/knowledge-base/how-iso-9000-and-9001-2000-have-an-impact-on-measurement-systems/
  27. https://www.effivity.com/blog/what-is-risk-based-thinking
  28. https://blog.softexpert.com/en/iso-9001-2026/
  29. https://www.lrqa.com/en-us/latest-news/iso-9001-revision-update-draft-international-standard-dis-now-published/
  30. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/iso-90012026-a-familiar-disaster-making-why-experts-sounding-farooq-kiqbf
  31. https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100080.pdf
  32. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/29280/6c57aac7b0b84d918b45ba0c91c5347a/ISO-9000-2000.pdf
  33. https://www.iso.org/iso/pub100080.pdf
  34. https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/documented_information.pdf
  35. https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
  36. https://www.iso.org/news/2015/09/Ref2002.html
  37. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-IE/insights-and-media/insights/blogs/the-iso-9001-revision-a-new-era-for-quality-management/
  38. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#!iso:std:62085:en
  39. https://www.iso-9001-checklist.co.uk/6.1-actions-to-address-risks-and-opportunities.htm
  40. https://anab.ansi.org/accreditation/iso-9001-quality-management-systems/
  41. https://anab.ansi.org/standard/iso-9001/
  42. https://www.zengrc.com/blog/what-is-an-iso-surveillance-audit/
  43. https://www.oxebridge.com/emma/iso-survey-2024-analysis-iaf-takes-over-survey-data/
  44. https://www.iso.org/the-iso-survey.html
  45. https://www.iso.org/standard/59752.html
  46. https://www.iatfglobaloversight.org/
  47. https://iaqg.org/standard/9100-qms-requirements-for-aviation-space-and-defense-organizations/
  48. https://www.iso.org/standard/63787.html
  49. https://asq.org/quality-resources/six-sigma
  50. https://asq.org/quality-resources/lean
  51. https://efqm.org/the-efqm-model/
  52. https://www.iso.org/standard/27001
  53. https://www.iso-9001-checklist.co.uk/how-to-do-a-gap-analysis-for-iso-9001-in-6-steps.htm
  54. https://advisera.com/9001academy/knowledgebase/iso-9001-requirements-and-structure/
  55. https://the9000store.com/iso-9001-2015-requirements/
  56. https://www.nqa.com/en-us/resources/blog/may-2017/benefits-of-swot-iso-9001
  57. https://asq.org/quality-resources/fmea
  58. https://raso360.com/blog/the-role-of-leadership-in-the-success-of-qms-implementation/
  59. https://www.iso-9001-checklist.co.uk/quality-manual.htm
  60. https://asq.org/quality-resources/statistical-process-control
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263244699_The_effectiveness_of_the_ISO_9001_quality_management_system_in_service_companies
  62. https://www.qualityone.com/blog/the-food-safety-guide
  63. https://www.alleratech.com/blog/food-quality-management-system
  64. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14783363.2018.1456010
  65. https://global.toyota/en/company/vision-and-philosophy/production-system/index.html
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342988606_Toyota_Quality_System_case_study
  67. https://cmmiinstitute.com/cmmi/dev
  68. https://www.iso.org/standard/78176.html
  69. https://cmmiinstitute.com/agile
  70. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/quality-system-qs-regulationmedical-device-current-good-manufacturing-practices-cgmp/quality-management-system-regulation-final-rule-amending-quality-system-regulation-frequently-asked
  71. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html
  72. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/security/laws-regulations/index.html
  73. https://www.iso.org/standard/70636.html
  74. https://advisera.com/20000academy/knowledgebase/iso-20000-and-itil-how-are-they-related/
  75. https://www.greenlight.guru/blog/iso-13485-medical-device-qms
  76. https://www.mcra.com/news-publications/publications/medical-device-quality-why-software-more-challenging-hardware
  77. https://globalforum.diaglobal.org/issue/december-2019/regulatory-challenges-of-software-as-a-medical-device-samd/
  78. https://www.iso.org/about
  79. https://asq.org/about-asq/how-we-do-it/history
  80. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-US/about-bsi/our-history/
  81. https://iaf.nu/en/home/
  82. https://anab.ansi.org/about-anab/
  83. https://www.ansi.org/resource-center/annual-report-2024/annual-report-2024-anab
  84. https://www.nist.gov/baldrige/baldrige-award
  85. https://www.juse.or.jp/deming_en/
  86. https://shingo.org/about/the-shingo-prize/
  87. https://asq.org/about-asq/asq-awards
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.