Hubbry Logo
ChecklistChecklistMain
Open search
Checklist
Community hub
Checklist
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Checklist
Checklist
Checklist
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Checklists are useful for displaying main points.

A checklist is a type of job aid used in repetitive tasks to reduce failure by compensating for potential limits of human memory and attention. Checklists are used both to ensure that safety-critical system preparations are carried out completely and in the correct order,[1] and in less critical applications to ensure that no step is left out of a procedure. They help to ensure consistency and completeness in carrying out a task. A basic example is the "to do list".[2] A more advanced checklist would be a schedule, which lays out tasks to be done according to time of day or other factors, or a pre-flight checklist for an airliner, which should ensure a safe take-off.[3]

A primary function of a checklist is documentation of the task and auditing against the documentation.[4] Use of a well designed checklist can reduce any tendency to avoid, omit or neglect important steps in any task.[5] For efficiency and acceptance, the checklist should easily readable, include only necessary checks, and be as short as reasonably practicable.[6]

History

[edit]

It is widely accepted that checklists appeared after the crash of the Boeing B-17 plane on October 30, 1935.[7] Possibly, the source of such common knowledge is The Checklist Manifesto book by Atul Gawande. However, the Oxford English Dictionary states that the word appeared in 1853.[8]

The earliest discovered evidence of the “check-list” usage is seen in the “Journal of the House of Representatives of the State of New Hampshire at Their Session Holden at the Capitol in Concord” issued in 1841 and describing the elections-related events of the autumn of 1840.[9]

Purpose

[edit]

In general, a checklist is a quality management tool, an aid to completing a complex task correctly and completely. It is an aid to recall, provides a reminder of the correct sequence, and uses the operator's knowledge and skill efficiently to ensure that no critical steps are omitted, even when the operator is under stress or has degraded attention due to fatigue or other distractions, It allows cross checking, keeps team members informed of the status of readiness, and can provide a legal record of a sequence of events to indicate due diligence.[10][3] It differs from an instruction manual or operating manual in that it does not normally provide details on how to perform the steps, as it assumes that the operator is competent and familiar with each step.

Applications

[edit]
A pilot of a DC-10 consulting his checklist

Safety critical systems

[edit]

Checklists are used to help avoid accidental omission of important preparation of equipment and systems. These may be routine operations like pre-flight checks on an airliner or relatively infrequent occasions like commissioning a nuclear power station or launching a spacecraft. The value of checklists is proportional to the complexity of the system and the consequences of a system failure. They may also aid in mitigating claims of negligence in public liability claims by providing evidence of a risk management system being in place. A signed off checklist with a document describing the listed checks may be accepted as evidence of due diligence. Conversely, the absence of a mandatory checklist may be considered evidence of negligence.[citation needed]

Aviation and space flight safety

[edit]

Checklists have long been a feature of aviation safety to ensure that critical items are not overlooked.[1] The best known example is the cockpit preflight checklist, which is intended to ensure that the crew correctly configures the aircraft for flight on every flight. A normal checklist is used before critical flight segments, such as takeoff, approach and landing, which are the phases in which the highest incidence of accidents occur due to procedural error. Checklists are also used for troubleshooting, to identify and where practicable, correct malfunctions. They cannot substitute for pilot skill and learned and practiced immediate response to critical malfunctions, but are useful for mitigation attempts when time allows.[3]

Health care

[edit]

In health care, particularly surgery, checklists may be used to ensure that the correct procedure is carried out on each patient.[11] Checklists have been used in healthcare practice to ensure that clinical practice guidelines are followed. An example is the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist developed for the World Health Organization and found to have a large effect on improving patient safety.[11] According to a meta-analysis after introduction of the checklist mortality dropped by 23% and all complications by 40%, but higher-quality studies are required to make the meta-analysis more robust.[12] Checklist use in healthcare has not always met with success and transferability between settings has been questioned.[13] A survey found them to have no statistical effect in a cohort of hospitals in the Province of Ontario in Canada.[14] In the UK, a study on the implementation of a checklist for provision of medical care to elderly patients admitting to hospital found that the checklist highlighted limitations with frailty assessment in acute care and motivated teams to review routine practices, but that work is needed to understand whether and how checklists can be embedded in complex multidisciplinary care.[15]

Underwater diving

[edit]

In professional diving, checklists are used in the preparation of equipment for a dive, and to ensure that the diver and life support systems are fully prepared before they enter the water. To a lesser extent, checklists are used by a minority of recreational divers, and by a larger proportion of technical divers during pre-dive checks.[5][16] Studies have shown checklists to be effective at reducing the number of errors and consequent incidents.[16]

Quality assurance applications

[edit]

For information

[edit]

Effectiveness of checklists

[edit]

Ranapurwala et al. (2017) found:[16]

The use of memorized checklists was similar to not using any checklist at all; hence the use of written checklists should be encouraged, instead.

Characteristics of effective checklists include:[20]

  • Checklists should be simple and convenient to use. Each listed item should be necessary and together they should be sufficient.[20]
  • Checklists focused on the responsibilities of a specific person, or a group who will work together, are less likely to have items left out.[20]
  • Grouping items which can be done at the same time or place, or by the same person, often improves efficiency.[20]
    • A group may have a checkbox to indicate completion of the group. This is more likely to be helpful if there are several groups.
  • Where reasonably practicable the items to be checked by a specific person can be grouped on the list. This makes it easier for them to keep track of what they have done and must still do. In some cases it may help to split them off as a separate checklist.[20]
  • Items should not be over-detailed in description nor ambiguous. A checklist should not try to define or describe procedures which should be familiar to the checker, though critical steps may usefully be listed in order when order is important.[20]
  • Ordering of the list should be logical. Where chronological order is important, it should be indicated by order on the list. Where items to be checked are spatially distributed, an order minimising travel or search time is efficient.[20]
  • The most convenient and reliable checklists are normally completed from top to bottom in a single session. It should be easy to recover from any interruption without risking missing an item or redoing a check unnecessarily.[20]
  • The physical checklist must be convenient to use on site. It should not require special effort to read, or protect it from the environment.[20]
  • It may be useful to cross-reference the checklist to the standard procedure, where the process is definitively described in detail, particularly for training and audit purposes. This makes it easy to check if there is any doubt.[20]
  • Some checklists must be signed off and kept as evidence, others may be re-usable. This may affect the format and materials.[20]
  • Checkboxes at the beginning of each item are easier to find and follow to the next incomplete check. A keyword at the beginning of the text will help ensure that the correct box is ticked.[20]
  • When several checklists are used, due to complexity of the task, or the need for several people to make checks at different places, a master checklist indicating the completion of each subordinate checklist may be used.[20]
  • If instructions are necessary, they should be included. If not, they should be left out as they will distract the user.[20]

Types

[edit]
  • Lists of actions for standard procedures, in which details are provided for each step.[16][21]
  • Lists of actions for standard procedures, in which no or very little detail is provided for each step on the assumption that the operator is entirely familiar with each step, and the checklist is used to ensure that no steps are omitted, or the preferred order is followed
  • Project coordination lists, which specify who is responsible for each part of the project.[16][21]
  • Troubleshooting checklists, which may have multiple branches for diagnosis, or a series of procedures for responding to an emergency[16][21]
  • Checklists to increase objectivity in decision-making, to reduce emotional influences.[16][21]
  • Lists of things to be done over a specified period.[21]

Design

[edit]

The design of a checklist should fit the purpose of the list. If a checklist is perceived as a top-down means to control behaviour by the organisational hierarchy it is more likely to be rejected and fail in its purpose. A checklist perceived as helping the operator to save time and reduce error is likely to be better accepted. This is more likely to happen when the user is involved in the development of the checklist.[16]

Rae et al. (2018) define safety clutter as "the accumulation and persistence of 'safety' work that does not contribute to operational safety", and state that "when 'safety' rules impose a significant and unnecessary burden on the performance of everyday activities, both work and safety suffer".[16]

An objective in checklist design that it should promote a positive attitude towards the use of the checklist by the operators. For this to happen it must be realistic, convenient and not be regarded as a nuisance. A checklist should be designed to describe and facilitate a physical procedure that is accepted by the operators as necessary, effective, efficient and convenient.[10]

Mode of use

[edit]

A checklist may be used to identify the action, after which it is done, then checked off as complete and the next item identified, known as the read–do, do–list or call–do–response process, or the tasks may be done, and then the checklist consulted to ensure that nothing has been left out, the do–confirm procedure, in which the status of tasks must be remembered until checked off, which may result in more errors,[16] or challenge, verification, and response process, in which the checklist is used after the tasks have been completed. Both methods have merit and suitable applications, and the most suitable type of checklist will depend on the type of operation.[10]

In the call–do–response system, the checklist is used to lead the operators through a step-by-step procedure where one operator directs the others, following the list. Each item requiring configuration is listed on the checklist and all relevant operators must be present while the checks are done. This method tends to be more detailed and time-consuming. It may be more appropriate for systems which are less familiar to the operators.[10]

In the challenge–verification–response, the operators prepare the system following a standard sequence of actions performed from memory, then use the checklist to verify that the critical items have been correctly configured. One operator reads the challenge part of the checklist, the designated parties verify the status, and one of them provides the appropriate response. This is done in sequence until the list is complete. It may be ticked or signed off as specified. This method is efficient, as each operator can get on with their checks and then when the checklist is run through, all the relevant crew are updated on the system status.[10]

Physical characteristics

[edit]

Physical characteristics are things such as the actual size of the document, contrast, colour, and typography. The main factors in typography are legibility of text and readability in the conditions in which the document is expected to be used.[10]

Legibility of text involves the selection of characters to enable the reader to identify them quickly and positively discriminate them from other characters. Readability is the quality of the word or text which allows rapid recognition of single words, word groups, abbreviations, and symbols.[10]

Thousands of fonts are available, in two major groups: Roman (with serifs) and sans-serif. Research has shown that sans-serif is more legible than Roman as the absence of serifs presents simple and clean typeface. Arial or Helvetica are preferred.[10]

The consensus of researchers is that lowercase is more legible because the pattern of the whole word is more familiar, and the pattern of ascenders and descenders is helpful for recognition. The occasional use of uppercase words for emphasis or in acronyms is acceptable, particularly where this is the common usage.[10]

Font size is important for readability, especially for older operators. A font size between 14 and 20 points is recommended for reasonably well illuminated situations. Font size less than 10 points is not recommended. Checklists for use in poorly illuminated conditions should use a larger font for improved readability. Black text on a white background is generally preferred for best contrast, though in some cases a yellow background is acceptable.[10]

Other factors influencing readability and reducing error include both horizontal and vertical character spacing, stroke width and character height to width ratio, and line length. Italics reduce readability of large areas of text but are acceptable for emphasis of a few words. Bolding does not affect readability significantly, but is useful for emphasis, and is best used with discretion. The use of multiple type faces in body text can be confusing and significantly reduces readability, so should be avoided. Contrast is more useful than colour to provide visibility of characters. White on black can be useful if dark adaptation must be preserved, but is not optimum when illumination is good. If checklists are plastic laminated, an anti-glare finish should be used to prevent disruption by highlights. Opacity of the paper is important if printed on both sides or there is a possibility of backlighting.[22]

Content and layout

[edit]

The workload and time available should be considered.[6] Each listed item should be necessary and together they should be sufficient. Only necessary instructions should be included.[20] A checklist should be as brief as possible without compromising clarity.[6] Items should not be over-detailed in description nor ambiguous. A checklist should not try to define or describe procedures which should be familiar to the checker, though critical steps may usefully be listed in order when order is important.[20] Numbering the items usually helps with place-keeping.[6] It may be useful to cross-reference the checklist to the standard procedure document, where the process is definitively described in detail, particularly for training and audit purposes. This makes it easy to check if there is any doubt, but does not distract the user. Version number and date may be required to ensure that the current authorised version is in use.[20]

Ordering of the list should be logical. Where chronological order is important, it should be indicated by order on the list. The most convenient and reliable checklists are normally completed from top to bottom in a single session. It should be easy to recover from any interruption without risking missing an item or redoing a check unnecessarily. Grouping items which can be done at the same time or place, or by the same person, often improves efficiency. Where items to be checked are spatially distributed, an order minimising travel or search time is efficient.[20]

Checkboxes at the beginning of each item are easier to find and follow to the next incomplete check. A keyword at the beginning of the text will help ensure that the correct box is ticked.[20]

Format

[edit]
Example checklist

Checklists are often presented as lists with small checkboxes down the left hand side of the page. A small tick or checkmark is drawn in the box after the item has been completed. If practicable a check should not be split over two pages.[citation needed]

Other formats are also sometimes used. Aviation checklists generally consist of a system and an action divided by a dashed line, and lack a checkbox as they are often read aloud and are usually intended to be reused.[citation needed]

Some checklists must be signed off and kept as evidence, others may be re-usable. This may affect the format and materials.[20]

Errors

[edit]

Long or confusing items, an inconvenient order, or any other characteristic that causes the users to perceive it as an obstacle will increase the chances that when constrained for time, the operators will revert to alternative methods, omit items or disregard the checklist entirely.[6]

Error conditions that may occur include:

  • Using the wrong checklist.[6]
  • Difficulty in finding the right checklist.[6]
  • Difficulty in confirming that the checklist is the right one for the situation.[6]
  • Losing track of where one is in the checklist.[6]
  • Missing a step or not completing a step after an interruption.[6]
  • Misunderstanding the action required by the checklist.[6]
  • Difficulty in confirming that an action required by the checklist was done correctly.[6]
  • Difficulty in finding the next step after a conditional statement.[6]
  • Difficulty in reading a checklist.[6]
  • Lack of clarity about who should carry out a checklist action.[6]
  • Failing to complete the checklist.[6]

History

[edit]

During the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) hearings into the crash of Northwest Airlines Flight 255, human factors specialist Earl Weiner testified that he "did not know of any human factors research on how a checklist should be designed". NASA research into the matter concluded that as of 1989, there was basically no human factors research available anywhere specific to aircraft checklists.[10]

The NTSB recommended that the FAA investigate ways of presenting checklists that produce better performance. The Safety Board also recommended that the FAA should specify typography criteria for checklists for commercial operators. Researchers found problems with both the physical design and social issues associated with the use of checklists which degrades effective use. Two documents were produced by NASA, Degani, Asaf; Wiener, Earl L. (May 1990). Human Factors of Flight-Deck Checklists: The Normal Checklist. NASA Contractor Report 177549 (Report). NASA. and Degani, Asaf (December 1992). On the Typography of Flight-deck Documentation. NASA Contractor report # 177605 (Report). NASA.. This was followed by a document from the UK CAA: "CAP 676: Guidance on the Design, Presentation, and Use of Emergency and Abnormal Checklist".[10]

Use

[edit]

Excessive dependence of checklists may hinder performance when dealing with a time-critical situation, for example a medical emergency or an in-flight emergency. Checklists should not be used as a replacement for common sense or necessary skill. Intensive training including rote-learning of checklists can help integrate use of checklists with more adaptive and flexible problem solving techniques.[citation needed]

Experimental work has shown that memorised checklists are less effective than written checklists in identifying unsafe conditions when time is not critical.[5]

See also

[edit]
Look up checklist in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Checklist

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A checklist is a structured form or list used to systematically record data, verify actions, or confirm requirements in a process, serving as a cognitive aid to compensate for limitations in human memory and attention while minimizing errors in repetitive or complex tasks. Originating in aviation during the 1930s, checklists emerged as a critical standardization tool following the October 30, 1935, crash of the Boeing Model 299 prototype at Wright Field, Ohio, where pilot error—failing to remove a gust lock—resulted in the deaths of two crew members and underscored the challenges of managing increasingly sophisticated aircraft. This incident prompted the U.S. Army Air Corps to develop the first formal preflight checklist, which became a foundational element of aviation safety protocols, evolving into the B-17 Flying Fortress used extensively in World War II and later adopted globally by commercial airlines to enhance reliability and reduce human oversight. Beyond , checklists have proven effective across diverse fields, including , , , and , by promoting consistency, fostering team communication, and serving as a against failures. In healthcare, the World Health Organization's 19-item Surgical Safety Checklist, introduced in 2008, targets key phases of surgery (before induction of , before incision, and before leaving the operating room) to verify patient identity, allergies, equipment, and teamwork; a multinational study across eight sites involving over 7,000 patients showed it reduced the rate of major complications from 11.0% to 7.0% and in-hospital mortality from 1.5% to 0.8%. These tools' simplicity and adaptability have made them indispensable for improving outcomes in high-risk environments, with ongoing research emphasizing their role in error prevention and process optimization.

Introduction

Definition

A checklist is a structured tool designed to guide the verification of essential tasks, consisting of a series of predefined items, questions, or criteria organized in a systematic sequence to promote accuracy, completeness, and consistency in execution. Originating from high-stakes fields like , it serves as a cognitive to mitigate by ensuring critical steps are not overlooked, particularly in complex or repetitive processes. Unlike simple to-do lists, which merely outline tasks for completion without inherent verification, checklists incorporate mechanisms for confirmation and standardization to enforce procedural adherence. Similarly, they differ from flowcharts or detailed procedures, which provide pathways or step-by-step instructions; checklists prioritize linear or hierarchical verification over branching logic or action guidance. Basic components of a checklist include actionable items such as checkboxes for binary confirmation, yes/no prompts for quick assessment, or descriptive steps outlining verification criteria, often arranged sequentially by operational logic or system groupings to facilitate efficient use. In modern contexts, checklists extend beyond formats to digital implementations like electronic apps and software interfaces, enabling real-time updates, automated tracking, and integration with workflows in sectors such as healthcare and .

Fundamental Principles

Checklists operate on core principles of , , and verification to enhance reliability in complex tasks. Simplicity ensures that checklists avoid cognitive overload by limiting the number of items to what human can handle, typically recommending no more than five to nine steps to prevent errors from excessive demands on . Standardization involves using consistent wording and formatting across all instances, which minimizes and promotes uniform application regardless of the user or . Verification incorporates built-in confirmation mechanisms, such as read-do or challenge-response protocols where, in multi-crew settings, one person reads the item and another performs and verifies it, thereby catching discrepancies in real time. These principles draw from , particularly in addressing inherent limits to human error-prone processing. A foundational concept is , which posits that capacity is limited to approximately 7 ± 2 items, making unaided recall unreliable for multifaceted procedures and necessitating external aids like checklists to bypass these constraints. By externalizing memory demands, checklists enforce discipline and reduce the associated with multitasking or high-stakes decision-making, serving as a prerequisite for their effectiveness in preventing oversights. Recent studies post-2020 further validate these principles in emerging AI-human hybrid systems, where checklists integrate human oversight with algorithmic outputs to mitigate errors in domains like healthcare and systematic reviews. For instance, a 2025 framework for developing AI checklists in clinical settings aligns implementations with clinical needs, ensuring verification steps that enhance and in collaborative workflows.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Examples

The origins of checklists can be traced to ancient civilizations where structured lists served as precursors for systematic verification and record-keeping. In ancient Egypt around 2500 BCE, during the Old Kingdom period, hieroglyphic inscriptions were employed to create inventory lists documenting goods, resources, and temple offerings, ensuring accurate accounting and administrative control. These lists, often inscribed on papyrus or stone, represented early formalized methods to track items and prevent errors in distribution, laying foundational principles for procedural documentation. Similarly, in the , military muster rolls were kept to record personnel and check losses in battle, aiding in the identification of the dead and maintaining organizational integrity after campaigns. Non-Western examples include the imperial Chinese bureaucracy, where administrative lists emerged as core components of governance from the onward. By the (618–907 CE), comprehensive codes like the Tang Liu Dian (compiled 738–739 CE) outlined procedural lists for official duties, tax assessments, and resource allocation, enabling the vast empire's bureaucratic oversight. In the medieval and early modern periods, such practices extended to emerging technical fields. Late 18th-century ballooning, as an aviation precursor, involved rudimentary pre-launch procedures documented in contemporary accounts, though not yet standardized as modern checklists. By the , early incorporated quality checks through inspection lists in workshops and factories, particularly in armories and mills, to verify product standards amid industrialization. A pivotal milestone occurred in when the U.S. Army Air Corps introduced the first formal checklist following the crash of the Boeing Model 299 prototype. On October 30, , at Wright Field, , the aircraft stalled shortly after takeoff due to locked elevator controls, a human oversight during preflight preparations, resulting in the deaths of Major Ployer P. Hill and Boeing Leslie R. Tower. An investigation by a board led by Frank D. Lackland found no mechanical defects, attributing the incident to procedural lapses in the increasingly complex aircraft. In response, the Army Air Corps mandated checklists for all flight operations, transforming practices and preventing similar errors in future evaluations of the Model 299, which became the B-17 Flying Fortress.

Evolution in the 20th and 21st Centuries

Following , checklists saw widespread institutionalization in high-stakes industries, particularly and . In , checklists transitioned from military applications to mandatory protocols across global airlines, standardizing procedures to mitigate in increasingly complex aircraft operations. NASA's integration of detailed checklists began in the 1960s with the , where they became essential for mission-critical tasks, including launch sequences and lunar surface activities; for instance, the Apollo 11 Command and Service Module Operations Checklist guided astronauts through hundreds of procedures during the 1969 . These developments marked a shift from tools to systematic safeguards in and . In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, checklists expanded into healthcare, driven by efforts to address surgical errors. The (WHO) introduced the Surgical Safety Checklist in 2008, a 19-item tool developed through global consultations to enhance teamwork and reduce complications; its pilot implementation in eight hospitals across diverse settings demonstrated a 47% reduction in postoperative deaths and a 36% drop in complications. Surgeon played a pivotal role in its creation as WHO's lead, drawing from models to emphasize communication and verification; his 2009 book, , further popularized the approach, influencing adoption in over 4,000 hospitals worldwide by promoting checklists as a defense against cognitive overload in complex environments. The brought a , replacing paper-based systems with software for greater accessibility and efficiency. In , electronic checklists (ECLs) emerged in the 1990s, with certifying its first ECL in to automate verification and reduce errors like item skipping; today, tools like provide integrated digital templates that minimize cockpit clutter and support real-time updates. General productivity apps such as Todoist evolved checklists into versatile digital formats, enabling task prioritization and collaboration across sectors since its launch in 2007. Recent innovations incorporate (AI) for adaptive, context-aware checklists. In , AI-driven systems generate predictive prompts for , such as automated defect detection and adjustments, improving compliance and reducing waste. In autonomous vehicles, post-2020 developments include AI-enhanced evaluation checklists like the framework, which uses to retrospectively analyze driving scenarios for safety validation, and readiness models for AI-enabled intelligent transportation systems that dynamically adapt protocols based on .

Purposes and Benefits

Core Objectives

The core objectives of checklists revolve around mitigating , promoting procedural consistency, and enhancing operational efficiency in complex tasks. By systematically listing essential steps or items, checklists serve to catch oversights that might otherwise lead to omissions or mistakes, thereby reducing the incidence of errors in high-stakes environments. This error-reduction function is particularly vital in scenarios where cognitive demands exceed typical mental capacity, as checklists act as cognitive aids to prevent lapses. Additionally, checklists standardize processes by enforcing uniform execution across individuals or teams, minimizing variability in performance and ensuring that critical actions are consistently applied regardless of . They also streamline workflows by breaking down intricate procedures into manageable, sequential components, which accelerates task completion and reduces unnecessary redundancy. In procedural tasks, checklists fulfill the objective of guaranteeing that all sequential steps are followed in order, providing a reliable framework for execution in linear or repetitive processes. For verification purposes, they confirm that prerequisites, resources, or conditions are met before proceeding, serving as a safeguard against proceeding with incomplete preparations. These roles align closely with human factors engineering principles, addressing limitations such as , , or overload by offloading the mental burden of onto an external, tangible tool. In this way, checklists compensate for inherent human vulnerabilities, fostering reliability even under suboptimal conditions like prolonged work sessions or interrupted focus. Emerging objectives for checklists extend to supporting and virtual collaboration, particularly in post-pandemic hybrid team structures where physical oversight is limited. In distributed environments, checklists enable standardized task verification and team alignment through shared digital formats, ensuring completeness in asynchronous workflows and reducing miscommunications across time zones. For instance, they facilitate inclusive virtual processes by outlining steps for collaborative , thereby maintaining efficiency and equity in remote settings.

Evidence of Effectiveness

Empirical evidence demonstrates the effectiveness of checklists in high-stakes environments, particularly through landmark studies in healthcare and . The World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist, evaluated in a 2009 prospective study across eight hospitals in varied economic settings, reduced the rate of major postoperative complications from 11.0% to 7.0%, a relative reduction of 36%, and decreased inpatient mortality from 1.5% to 0.8%. Similarly, the adoption of standardized checklists in after the 1935 Boeing Model 299 crash marked a pivotal shift, significantly mitigating in complex operations and contributing to the industry's overall decline in accident rates over the decades. Metrics from healthcare meta-analyses and trials underscore checklists' role in minimizing errors and enhancing adherence. For instance, a scoping review indicates that checklists reduce errors in clinical procedures, with 79% of studies reporting improvements, such as lower equipment omission rates in pediatric emergencies compared to non-checklist groups. In intensive care units, implementation of checklists has improved protocol compliance rates by 20-40%, with one multi-site study showing an increase from 67% to 90% adherence through accountability measures, leading to fewer missed interventions like central line bundle elements. While checklists prove highly effective in routine, high-volume tasks—such as standardized surgical briefings or daily ICU rounds—their impact diminishes in highly variable emergencies, where cognitive overload and time constraints can lead to incomplete use or oversight of dynamic elements. Studies highlight that in chaotic scenarios, checklists may fail to address unforeseen complexities without adaptive features, resulting in suboptimal performance compared to structured environments. Recent 2020s research on digital checklists extends these benefits to operational domains like , where tablet-based systems have accelerated task completion by 20-30% through real-time tracking and , reducing manual delays in and shipping processes. For example, a 2023 analysis of digital tools in reported efficiency gains of up to 30% in lead times for manufacturers adopting integrated checklist platforms, outperforming paper-based methods in high-throughput settings.

Classification

Major Types

Checklists are primarily categorized by their operational modes, which determine how users interact with them during task execution. The two foundational types, as delineated in seminal work on error reduction in complex environments, are read-do and do-confirm checklists. Read-do checklists guide users by requiring them to read each item aloud or silently before performing the corresponding action, ensuring sequential adherence in unfamiliar or high-stakes procedures. This type functions like a , where the checklist is consulted continuously to prevent omissions in step-by-step processes, such as assembling complex equipment or conducting initial surgical setups. For instance, in , a read-do checklist might instruct workers to verify component placement before proceeding to the next assembly stage, minimizing errors in linear workflows. In contrast, do-confirm checklists allow users to execute tasks from memory or habit first, then pause to confirm completion against the list, promoting efficiency in routine operations where expertise is assumed. This approach is prevalent in , where pilots perform pre-flight inspections based on ingrained procedures before using the checklist for verification, reducing during time-sensitive phases. The do-confirm model supports team coordination through challenge-response formats, where one member calls out items and another verifies, enhancing reliability without interrupting flow. Beyond these interaction-based distinctions, checklists vary by structure and verification depth. Static checklists follow a fixed, linear sequence of items applicable to standard scenarios, ideal for predictable tasks like routine equipment inspections where deviations are rare. Dynamic checklists, however, incorporate branching logic that adapts based on real-time conditions, directing users to conditional paths—such as alternative steps if an initial check fails—suited to variable environments like emergency medical responses. This adaptability ensures relevance without overwhelming users in non-linear processes. Checklists also differ in verification granularity: pass-fail types provide binary outcomes for straightforward assessments, such as confirming whether a machine's oil level meets thresholds during preventive , enabling quick monitoring of operational norms. Detailed verification checklists, conversely, include descriptive criteria or measurements for each item, facilitating thorough in technical evaluations, like step-by-step diagnostics that record deviations and rationales. These formats prioritize precision over speed, supporting accountability in . Emerging hybrid types blend traditional modes with digital interactivity, particularly since the early , where tablet- or app-based systems offer real-time feedback, such as automated alerts for missed steps or contextual prompts during dynamic scenarios. In trauma resuscitation simulations, for example, digital checklists have demonstrated improved team performance and reduced unchecked items compared to paper versions by integrating adaptive guidance and immediate verification. These interactive variants extend read-do and do-confirm principles into responsive tools, fostering hybrid use in safety-critical fields. Additional classifications include normal checklists for routine procedures and non-normal checklists for emergencies, particularly in , where the former standardize everyday tasks and the latter provide step-by-step guidance for abnormal situations.

Contextual Variations

Checklists adapt to specific environmental demands, with structural variations emerging across domains to address unique operational needs. In , flow checklists are used for normal procedures as non-linear tools that follow a scan pattern, allowing actions from memory before challenge-response verification. These differ from read-do types, which are employed for non-normal or situations. Analogous adaptations occur in healthcare for routine vs. crisis responses, though specific formats vary. Conversely, in environments characterized by routine operations, repetitive linear checklists are employed frequently to standardize frequent tasks like inspections and machine setups, ensuring consistency and minimizing errors in high-volume production lines. Scale also influences checklist design, tailoring them to the scope of activities involved. Micro-checklists focus on singular, granular tasks, such as daily personal routines or brief pre-shift verifications, promoting formation and immediate in everyday contexts. In contrast, macro-checklists encompass broader project overviews, like comprehensive event planning protocols that coordinate multiple phases from venue setup to attendee management, providing a high-level framework while integrating subordinate task lists for delegation. This adaptation ensures checklists remain practical, avoiding overload in simple scenarios or insufficiency in complex ones. Technological formats further vary checklists to suit and integration requirements. Paper-based versions excel in fieldwork domains, such as construction sites or remote inspections, where durability against environmental factors and lack of power sources outweigh digital limitations, allowing offline use without connectivity dependencies. Electronic checklists, however, dominate in data-heavy fields like healthcare, integrating seamlessly with electronic health records (EHR) systems to enable real-time updates, automated compliance tracking, and error reduction through features like alerts and . Studies have shown electronic formats can improve compliance and reduce errors compared to paper, particularly for repetitive verifications.

Design Principles

Key Components and Layout

Effective checklists incorporate core components that ensure clarity and usability during execution. These include action-oriented items, which specify precise tasks to minimize ambiguity, such as verifying equipment status or confirming patient identity in surgical protocols. Sequencing follows a logical order, aligning steps with operational flow to prevent omissions, as seen in checklists that progress from start to takeoff configurations. Cues, such as bolding or highlighting critical steps, draw attention to high-risk actions, enhancing focus in high-pressure environments like flight decks. Layout strategies optimize the checklist's structure for quick comprehension and error reduction. Hierarchical layouts use indentation for sub-items, grouping related tasks under main categories to reflect nested processes, such as subdividing pre-flight by system (e.g., electrical, ). Tabular formats facilitate comparisons, like aligning equipment with verification columns in checklists. Linear layouts suit sequential tasks, presenting items in a straightforward vertical flow for time-sensitive procedures. Whitespace is strategically employed to separate sections, reducing visual clutter and aiding rapid scanning. Content guidelines emphasize precision to maintain effectiveness without overwhelming users. Each item begins with an action verb, such as "confirm," "adjust," or "verify," to prompt immediate, unambiguous responses and link directly to executable steps. Checklists should limit items to 5-9 per page or section to align with limits, preventing fatigue and errors during use. For in digital checklists, post-2020 standards incorporate features to support neurodiverse users, such as those with ADHD, , or autism. WCAG 2.2 guidelines recommend semantic markup for lists (e.g., ordered lists for sequencing) to ensure compatibility with screen readers, high color contrast for readability, and simplified layouts with ample whitespace to reduce . Clear, jargon-free language and predictable navigation further enhance usability for diverse cognitive needs.

Formatting and Physical Aspects

Checklists can be implemented in various formats to suit different environments and user needs, including paper-based, digital, and hybrid approaches. checklists, often laminated for enhanced durability against wear, spills, or harsh conditions, remain prevalent in field operations such as and healthcare where reliability in low-tech settings is essential. Digital checklists, delivered via mobile apps or electronic flight bags, incorporate features like auto-save functionality and real-time to prevent and enable collaborative updates across teams. Hybrid formats combine printed materials with digital integration, such as QR codes embedded on checklists that link to online versions for updates or supplementary details, facilitating seamless transitions between offline and online use in dynamic workflows. Physical characteristics of checklists are designed to prioritize readability, resilience, and ease of handling. A minimum font size of 12 points is recommended for body text to ensure legibility, particularly in high-stress or low-light conditions, with fonts like or preferred for their clarity. Durable materials, such as waterproof or plasticized coatings, protect against environmental damage in applications like outdoor inspections or surgical suites, extending over repeated cycles. Portability varies by context: pocket-sized (e.g., A5 dimensions) formats support mobile users like pilots, while larger wall-mounted versions aid team-based reviews in control rooms, with secure binding like spirals ensuring quick access without obstruction. Visual elements enhance scanning efficiency and reduce during checklist execution. Color-coding assigns hues to priority levels—such as red for critical steps and green for completions—in task-oriented interfaces, though it must be paired with alternatives for color-blind users. Icons serve as supplementary cues for rapid recognition, depicting actions like a checkmark for verification or an alert for warnings, but require accompanying text labels to avoid and ensure universal comprehension. For digital adaptations on mobile devices, touch-friendly elements include enlarged tap targets (at least 44x44 pixels) and scalable interfaces that maintain hierarchy across screen sizes. By , digital checklist trends emphasize integration with wearables and voice to boost hands-free in safety-critical domains. Voice-activated systems, often embedded in headsets or smartwatches, allow users to navigate items via spoken commands, minimizing physical interaction during procedures like and integrating with biometric monitoring for contextual alerts. These advancements, supported by AI-driven , enable adaptive checklists that adjust in real-time based on user input or environmental data, surpassing traditional formats in responsiveness and error prevention.

Applications

Safety-Critical Domains

In safety-critical domains, checklists serve as vital tools to mitigate risks in environments where errors can lead to catastrophic outcomes, such as loss of life or environmental disasters. These domains demand rigorous, standardized procedures to ensure systematic verification of critical steps, often mandated by regulatory bodies to enforce compliance and prevent oversights under high-pressure conditions. Aviation exemplifies the use of checklists in life-or-death scenarios, particularly through pre-flight and do-confirm checklists required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). These checklists guide pilots in verifying aircraft systems, fuel loads, and environmental conditions before takeoff, significantly reducing crash risks by addressing potential mechanical failures or human errors. For instance, the FAA's Airplane Flying Handbook emphasizes that proper use of checklists during preflight assessments mitigates hazards like surface contamination or control issues, contributing to aviation's strong safety record. In space exploration, NASA's Apollo 11 mission relied on extensive checklists, including over 200 pages for the Command Module Operations, which were instrumental in managing the lunar module's powered descent and preventing mission-aborting anomalies during the 1969 landing. Modern space tourism extends this legacy; SpaceX's Crew Dragon missions, including 2024 commercial flights to the International Space Station, incorporate FAA-approved pre-flight checklists aligned with NASA protocols to verify spacecraft integrity, life support systems, and abort sequences, ensuring passenger safety in suborbital and orbital tourism. In healthcare, checklists have transformed surgical and pharmacological processes to avert preventable deaths. The World Health Organization's (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist, introduced in 2008, mandates verification of patient identity, site marking, and anesthesia equipment across 19 steps, leading to a one-third reduction in surgical complications and up to a 47% decrease in postoperative mortality in global trials across eight countries. Similarly, medication reconciliation checklists prevent errors during patient transitions by comparing current medications against hospital orders, reducing omissions, duplications, and dosing mistakes that contribute to adverse drug events; the WHO's High 5s project highlights how this process improves accuracy and cuts error rates by ensuring a complete medication list at admission, transfer, and discharge. Nuclear power plants employ checklists for emergency shutdown sequences to contain radiation risks and achieve safe reactor states. The U.S. (NRC) mandates Operating Procedures (EOPs) that include detailed checklists for shutdowns, such as verifying flow, valve alignments, and integrity during low-power or outage conditions, as outlined in NUREG-1449, which addresses vulnerabilities in non-operational modes to prevent accidents like core meltdowns. For example, shutdown safety assessment checklists at facilities like systematically evaluate fire conditions and system redundancies to guide operators through scrams and cooldowns. Underwater diving protocols also utilize checklists to manage emergencies in isolated, high-risk environments. Organizations like Divers Alert Network (DAN) and the Professional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI) recommend predive checklists using the BWRAF acronym (Buoyancy, Weights, Releases, Air, Final okay) to confirm equipment functionality and diver readiness, preventing issues like equipment failures that could lead to or . In emergencies, DAN's Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) provide sequential checklists for responses such as lost buddy searches or oxygen administration, with studies showing that written checklists reduce mishaps and fatalities by promoting consistent, error-free actions among recreational and professional divers.

Quality and Operational Contexts

In manufacturing , checklists serve as essential tools for verifying processes and ensuring compliance with standards such as ISO 9001, which emphasizes systematic to minimize defects and enhance operational consistency. These checklists typically include steps for inspecting raw materials, monitoring production stages, and confirming final product specifications, thereby supporting proactive error detection. A study in the automobile manufacturing industry demonstrated that implementing tools, including check sheets as checklists, reduced defects by 90% on the line (from 132 to 13 incidents) and by 80% on the trim line (from 157 to 28 incidents) over a four-month period, highlighting their role in root cause analysis and process standardization. In business operations, checklists facilitate structured oversight in and inventory management to uphold efficiency and accuracy. For instance, in agile , sprint review checklists guide teams through inspecting completed work, gathering stakeholder feedback, and adapting backlogs, ensuring alignment with project goals as outlined in Scrum frameworks. Inventory audit checklists, which cover physical counts, cutoff analysis, and of records, help identify discrepancies and optimize stock levels; regular use has been shown to reduce inventory shrinkage—losses due to errors or —by up to 50%, thereby improving financial accuracy and operational flow. Service industries leverage checklists to standardize protocols and maintain across repetitive tasks. Hotel housekeeping checklists outline sequential actions for room preparation, such as sanitizing surfaces, restocking amenities, and inspecting fixtures, promoting uniformity and guest satisfaction. A survey of hotel professionals found that 61.1% strongly agreed digital checklists effectively maintained cleaning quality standards by reducing rework and enhancing task organization. In software deployment pipelines, checklists within processes verify code reviews, environment configurations, and testing outcomes, mitigating misconfigurations that contribute to 60% of deployment failures and ensuring reliable releases. Emerging in the , modern checklists incorporate integration to enhance and compliance verification beyond traditional methods. These digital checklists embed for immutable logging of transactions, supplier validations, and product , addressing complexities in global operations. A comprehensive review of applications in notes that such integrations improve , , and trust by enabling real-time audits and reducing disputes, with implementations across industries demonstrating up to 30% faster resolution of compliance issues.

Informational and Everyday Uses

In , checklists serve as simple yet effective tools for personal organization, helping individuals manage routine tasks without the high stakes of professional environments. Unlike structured protocols in industries such as or healthcare, these applications emphasize individual efficiency and memory aids in low-pressure settings, reducing and preventing oversights. For personal , checklists are widely used to streamline activities like travel preparation and grocery . Travel packing lists, for instance, categorize essentials such as , toiletries, and documents by trip type—whether a trip or a family vacation—ensuring nothing is forgotten and minimizing last-minute stress. A comprehensive packing checklist might include items like passports, chargers, and weather-appropriate attire, adaptable for carry-on or checked luggage scenarios. Similarly, grocery lists promote healthier habits by guiding purchases toward planned items, avoiding impulse buys. shows that frequent use of such lists correlates with improved diet quality, including higher intake of fruits, , and whole grains, and is associated with slightly lower body weight (0.21 kg less per list use frequency category) among low-income adults at risk for chronic diseases. In informational contexts, checklists facilitate accurate and learning. Journalists employ templates to verify story elements systematically, such as cross-referencing ages, dates, quotes, and sources before publication. The accuracy checklist, for example, prompts reporters to double-check 13 key areas like numbers, historical facts, and web addresses, serving as a portable reminder to uphold journalistic integrity during fast-paced reporting. In , study guides often take the form of checklists outlining steps for tasks like analyzing texts or solving math problems, helping students track progress and build executive functioning skills. For instance, a checklist for informational reading might include verifying text features, main ideas, and supporting details, which supports deeper comprehension without overwhelming learners. Checklists also support daily life management in areas like event planning and tracking. For events such as weddings, timelines break down preparations into monthly milestones, from booking venues 12 months in advance to final RSVPs a week before the date, ensuring coordinated execution across vendors, attire, and logistics. This structured approach transforms complex planning into actionable steps, reducing anxiety for individuals handling personal milestones. In , adherence apps incorporate checklist features to log doses and set reminders, improving compliance for chronic conditions. Studies indicate these apps boost adherence rates by up to 20% compared to standard care, with users checking off taken medications in digital logs that track patterns and share data with providers. Emerging consumer apps further enhance everyday checklist use through AI integration, particularly in 2025 trends toward personalized assistance. Google Keep, for example, allows users to generate tailored lists via AI prompts, such as creating a "packing list for a camping trip with 2 kids in summer," which populates items like tents and snacks for quick editing and sharing. This feature, available in the Android app through Google Workspace Labs, reflects broader shifts in consumer tools toward proactive, context-aware organization, though adoption remains experimental in early 2025.

Implementation and Use

Techniques for Effective Application

Effective application of checklists involves structured methods to ensure thorough execution during tasks. In team settings, verbal confirmation—where each team member audibly acknowledges completion of an item—enhances accountability and reduces errors, as demonstrated in protocols where pilots and crew verbalize responses to prevent miscommunications. For individual use, a silent review technique allows users to mentally or quietly check off items without disrupting , particularly useful in fast-paced environments like , where surgeons pause briefly to verify steps against the list. Pausing at each checklist item, regardless of the setting, promotes deliberate attention and minimizes omissions, a practice validated in high-reliability industries such as operations. Adapting checklists to user expertise is crucial for optimal performance; for novices, simpler formats with explicit instructions and fewer items reduce cognitive overload, while experts benefit from concise versions that allow quick scanning. In high-stress scenarios, integrating mandatory pauses—such as brief timeouts before critical steps—helps maintain focus and has been shown to improve compliance rates in emergency medical procedures. These adaptations ensure the checklist aligns with the user's skill level and environmental demands without altering the core content. Monitoring checklist effectiveness requires tracking completion rates through simple metrics, such as the percentage of items fully addressed per use, which can reveal patterns of non-compliance for targeted improvements. based on user feedback, such as debriefs after application, allows refinement; for instance, if certain items are frequently skipped, they can be repositioned or clarified in future versions. Post-2020, techniques for virtual teams have emerged to address remote collaboration challenges, including shared digital checklists integrated into platforms like Zoom or , where participants can real-time mark items and receive notifications for verification. This approach, adopted in distributed project management, facilitates synchronous confirmation via screen sharing and asynchronous updates, improving task alignment in hybrid work environments.

Training, Adoption, and Challenges

Adopting checklists within organizations often begins with pilot testing in small groups to evaluate feasibility and refine the tool before broader rollout. This approach allows for the identification of integration issues and user feedback in a controlled environment, minimizing risks associated with full-scale implementation. For instance, in clinical settings, pilot programs assess intervention readiness by evaluating contextual factors, capabilities, and potential challenges, ensuring checklists align with operational realities. Securing leadership buy-in is crucial for successful adoption, as executives who model checklist use can foster a culture of and encourage widespread compliance. Hospital leaders, for example, commit to checklists by engaging relevant committees and using targeted communication strategies to highlight benefits like reduced errors, thereby gaining organizational support. This top-down endorsement helps overcome initial and promotes sustained use across teams. Training methods for checklist application vary by domain complexity, with simulations proving effective in high-reliability sectors like healthcare and to build proficiency in dynamic scenarios. These hands-on exercises enhance reliable communication and increase checklist adherence by simulating real-world pressures, allowing participants to practice without risking actual outcomes. For digital checklists, e-learning modules provide accessible, scalable training through interactive modules that cover tool navigation, customization, and integration with software systems, often incorporating quizzes and progress tracking to reinforce learning. Common challenges in checklist implementation include resistance from staff who perceive them as bureaucratic impositions that disrupt workflows or undermine expertise. This pushback often stems from poor design, lack of involvement in development, or hierarchical barriers that discourage open feedback, leading to inconsistent use. Additionally, over-reliance on checklists can foster complacency, where users develop a false sense of security and neglect professional judgment, potentially causing "checklist fatigue" and reduced vigilance over time. Inadequate exacerbates these issues, as insufficient preparation results in misuse or abandonment of the tool. In 2025, the integration of AI into checklists introduces new challenges related to data privacy, particularly in training and use phases where sensitive information may be memorized or exposed. AI-assisted tools risk leaking personal data through retrieval-augmented generation for personalization or during model training on large datasets, violating regulations like GDPR and lacking robust deletion mechanisms. These concerns are amplified in sectors such as healthcare, where AI checklists process patient data, necessitating enhanced anonymization and cybersecurity measures to balance utility with privacy protections.

References

  1. https://digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/all-workflow-tools/checklist
  2. https://www.acc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/200135/where-did-checklists-come-from/
  3. https://aerocrewnews.com/2019/08/01/the-history-of-the-pre-flight-checklist/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2811937/
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330561453_Checklists_A_Review_of_Their_Origins_Benefits_and_Current_Uses_as_a_Cognitive_Aid_in_Medicine
  6. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944106000815
  8. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19910017830/downloads/19910017830.pdf
  9. https://skybrary.aero/articles/checklists-purpose-and-use
  10. https://www.flighttestsafety.org/images/BTJ_Checklist_full1.pdf
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046416301186
  12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-008-0044-4
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S073761461200007X
  14. https://xmed.jmir.org/2025/1/e65565
  15. https://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/brovarski_fs_simpson1996.pdf
  16. https://lieber.westpoint.edu/dead-bodies-war-legal-historical-context/
  17. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=alr
  18. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/PDF/MagazineArchive/Documents/2013/August%202013/0813checklist.pdf
  19. https://www.nasa.gov/history/afj/ap11fj/a11-csmocindex.html
  20. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/research/safe-surgery/tool-and-resources
  21. https://atulgawande.com/book/the-checklist-manifesto/
  22. https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1112&context=ijaaa
  23. https://foreflight.com/products/checklist/
  24. https://zapier.com/blog/best-todo-list-apps/
  25. https://thinkaicorp.com/the-smart-qa-checklist-how-ai-is-revolutionizing-quality-control-in-manufacturing/
  26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15389588.2024.2435620
  27. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/78879
  28. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/checklists
  29. https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/making-a-list/
  30. https://patientsafety.pa.gov/ADVISORIES/Pages/201609_122.aspx
  31. https://www.analesdepediatria.org/en-the-checklists-a-help-or-articulo-S2341287920301253
  32. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003957
  33. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2024-12/FAAST_dirtydozen.pdf
  34. https://www.hr.vt.edu/benefits/optional-benefits/telework-information/remote-telework-guidelines.html
  35. https://www.edi-toolkit.org/governance/develop-leadership-and-talents/virtual-collaboration-covid-19/
  36. https://www.flightsafetyaustralia.com/2018/11/one-thing-at-a-time-a-brief-history-of-the-checklist/
  37. https://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/S1876-2859(25)00107-X/fulltext
  38. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201410-494OC
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278789222_The_problem_with_checklists
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8563565/
  41. https://www.cargoson.com/en/blog/what-is-transport-management-system-tms-for-businesses
  42. https://blog.tryleverage.ai/blog/supply-chain-visibility-checklist-for-manufacturers
  43. https://ia601306.us.archive.org/6/items/TheChecklistManifesto/AtulGawandeTheChecklistManifestoHowToGetThingsRight2010.pdf
  44. https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/24/7/428
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6205694/
  46. https://www.emaint.com/blog-how-to-create-the-ultimate-preventive-maintenance-checklist/
  47. https://www.dynaway.com/blog/maintenance-checklist-work-order
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6800573/
  49. https://blog.falcony.io/en/9-widely-used-checklists-in-manufacturing
  50. https://www.safetyculture.com/topics/sustainable-manufacturing/repetitive-manufacturing
  51. https://www.manifest.ly/use-cases/manufacturing/production-line-setup-checklist
  52. https://www.solist.blog/paper-vs-digital-checklists-vs-pilots-asked/
  53. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/patient-safety/safe-surgery/checklist-adaptation.pdf
  54. https://users.cs.northwestern.edu/~robby/courses/395-495-2017-winter/checklists/Degani%20Human%20Factors%20of%20Flight-Deck%20Checklists%20The%20Normal%20Checklist.pdf
  55. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-11/VNTSC%20Rpt%20DTO-VNTSC-FAA-91-7.pdf
  56. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#info-and-relationships
  57. https://qref.com/
  58. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_91-78A.pdf
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12573887/
  60. https://help.safe365global.com/checklists/create-a-qr-code-for-a-checklist
  61. https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP676.pdf
  62. https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-12/advisory-circular-91-22-aircraft-checklist.pdf
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9792669/
  64. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/icon-usability/
  65. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/the-fourth-crewmember-37046329/
  66. https://www.faa.gov/media/71481
  67. https://www.who.int/news/item/11-12-2010-checklist-helps-reduce-surgical-complications-deaths
  68. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/patient-safety/high5s/h5s-sop.pdf?sfvrsn=594d8e49_4
  69. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0634/ML063470582.pdf
  70. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0520/ML052030188.pdf
  71. https://dan.org/alert-diver/article/checklists/
  72. https://www.dansa.org/blog/2022/06/28/how-to-create-an-effective-emergency-action-plan-eap
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5457958/
  74. https://ijcem.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/EVALUATING-THE-IMPACT-OF-QUALITY-CONTROL-TOOLS-ON-DEFECT-REDUCTION-IN-THE-AUTOMOBILE-MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRY-1.pdf
  75. https://www.atlassian.com/agile/scrum/sprint-reviews
  76. https://vservesolution.com/blogs/vserves-inventory-audit-checklist-for-your-businesss-success/
  77. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jmca/papers/Vol12-Issue3/Ser-1/B12031526.pdf
  78. https://dasmeta.com/cloud-infrastructure-blog/production-readiness-checklist-ensuring-a-smooth-golive-for-your-new-service
  79. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-025-00546-0
  80. https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-checklists-classroom-enhance-efficiency/
  81. https://www.travelperk.com/en-ca/blog/the-business-travelers-checklist/
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4430323/
  83. https://www.npr.org/sections/npr-training/2025/05/31/g-s1-65871/an-accuracy-checklist-to-take-with-you
  84. https://www.brides.com/story/brides-wedding-checklist-custom-wedding-to-do-list
  85. https://www.jmcp.org/doi/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.4.550
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3919626/
  87. https://support.google.com/keep/answer/14626262?hl=en
  88. https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/chapters/conduct/assessing-feasibility/pilot-testing/
  89. https://www.falltips.org/implement-fall-tips/step-1/
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3205016/
  91. https://www.cdc.gov/training-development/php/about/develop-training-quality-e-learning-checklist.html
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341287920301253
  93. https://www.private-ai.com/en/blog/ai-safety-report-2025-privacy-risks
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.