Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Quantum imaging
View on WikipediaQuantum imaging[1][2] is a new sub-field of quantum optics that exploits quantum correlations such as quantum entanglement of the electromagnetic field in order to image objects with a resolution or other imaging criteria that is beyond what is possible in classical optics. Examples of quantum imaging are quantum ghost imaging,[3] quantum lithography,[4] imaging with undetected photons,[5] sub-shot-noise imaging,[6][7] and quantum sensing. Quantum imaging may someday be useful for storing patterns of data in quantum computers and transmitting large amounts of highly secure encrypted information. Quantum mechanics has shown that light has inherent "uncertainties" in its features, manifested as moment-to-moment fluctuations in its properties. Controlling these fluctuations—which represent a sort of "noise"—can improve detection of faint objects, produce better amplified images, and allow workers to more accurately position laser beams.[8]
Quantum imaging methods
[edit]Quantum imaging can be done in different methods. One method uses scattered light from a free-electron laser. This method converts the light to quasi-monochromatic pseudo-thermal light.[9] Another method known as interaction-free imaging is used to locate an object without absorbing photons.[10] One more method of quantum imaging is known as ghost imaging. This process uses a photon pair to define an image. The image is created by correlations between the two photons, the stronger the correlations the greater the resolution.[11]
Quantum lithography is a type of quantum imaging that focuses on aspects of photons to surpass the limits of classical lithography. Using entangled light, the effective resolution becomes a factor of N lesser than the Rayleigh limit of .[12] Another study determines that waves created by Raman pulses have narrower peaks and have a width that is four times smaller than the diffraction limit in classical lithography.[13] Quantum lithography has potential applications in communications and computing.
Another type of quantum imaging is called quantum metrology, or quantum sensing. The goal of these processes is to achieve higher levels of accuracy than equivalent measurements from classical optics. They take advantage of quantum properties of individual particles[14] or quantum systems[15] to create units of measurement. By doing this, quantum metrology enhances the limits of accuracy beyond classical attempts.[16]
Photonics
[edit]In photonics and quantum optics, quantum sensors are often built on continuous variable systems, i.e., quantum systems characterized by continuous degrees of freedom such as position and momentum quadratures. The basic working mechanism typically relies on using optical states of light which have squeezing or two-mode entanglement. These states are particularly sensitive to record physical transformations that are finally detected by interferometric measurements.
In practice
[edit]Absolute photon sources
[edit]Many of the procedures for executing quantum metrology require certainty in the measurement of light. An absolute photon source is knowing the origin of the photon which helps determine which measurements relate for the sample being imaged. The best methods for approaching an absolute photon source is through spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC). Coincidence measurements are a key component for reducing noise from the environment by factoring in the amount of the incident photons registered with respect to the photon number.[17] However, this is not a perfected system as error can still exist through inaccurate detection of the photons.
Types of quantum metrology
[edit]Quantum ellipsometry
[edit]Classical ellipsometry is a thin film material characterization methodology used to determine reflectivity, phase shift, and thickness resulting from light shining on a material. Though, it can only be effectively used if the properties are well known for the user to reference and calibrate. Quantum ellipsometry has the distinct advantage of not requiring the properties of the material to be well-defined for calibration. This is because any detected photons will already have a relative phase relation with another detected photon assuring the measured light is from the material being studied.[18]
Quantum optical coherence tomography (QOCT)
[edit]Optical coherence tomography uses Michelson interferometry with a distance adjustable mirror. Coherent light passes through a beam splitter where one path hits the mirror then the detector and the other hits a sample then reflects into the detector. The quantum analogue uses the same premise with entangle photons and a Hong–Ou–Mandel interferometer. Coincidence counting of the detected photons permits more recognizable interference leading to less noise and higher resolution.
Real-world applications
[edit]As research in quantum imaging continues, more and more real-world methods arise. Two important ones are ghost imaging and quantum illumination. Ghost imaging takes advantage of two light detectors to create an image of an object that is not directly visible to the naked eye. The first detector is a multi-pixel detector that does not view the subject object while the second, a single-pixel (bucket) detector, views the object.[18] The performance is measured through the resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNRs are important to determine how well an image looks as a result of ghost imaging. On the other hand, resolution and the attention to detail is determined by the number of "specks" in the image.[19] Ghost imaging is important as it allows an image to be produced when a traditional camera is not sufficient.
Quantum Illumination was first introduced by Seth Lloyd and collaborators at MIT in 2008[20] and takes advantage of quantum states of light. The basic setup is through target detection in which a sender prepares two entangled system, signal and idler. The idler is kept in place while the signal is sent to check out an object with a low-reflective rate and high noise background. A reflection of the object is sent back and then the idler and reflected signal combined to create a joint measurement to tell the sender one of two possibilities: an object is present or an object is absent. A key feature of quantum illumination is entanglement between the idler and reflected signal is lost completely. Therefore, it is heavily reliant on the presence of entanglement in the initial idler-signal system.[21]
Current uses
[edit]Quantum imaging is expected to have a lot of potential to expand. In the future, it could be used to store patterns of data in quantum computers and allow communication through highly encrypted information [citation needed]. Quantum imaging techniques can allow improvement in detection of faint objects, amplified images, and accurate position of lasers. Today, quantum imaging (mostly ghost imaging) is studied and tested in areas of military and medical use. The military aims to use ghost imaging to detect enemies and objects in situations where the naked eye and traditional cameras fail. For example, if an enemy or object is hidden in a cloud of smoke or dust, ghost imaging can help an individual to know where a person is located and if they are an ally or foe. In the medical field, imaging is used to increase the accuracy and lessen the amount of radiation exposed to a patient during x-rays. Ghost imaging could allow doctors to look at a part of the human body without having direct contact with it, therefore, lowering the amount of direct radiation to the patient [citation needed]. Similar to the military, it is used to look at objects that cannot be seen with the human eye such as bones and organs with a light with beneficial properties.[22]
References
[edit]- ^ Lugiato, L. A.; Gatti, A.; Brambilla, E. (2002). "Quantum imaging". Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics. 4 (3): S176 – S183. arXiv:quant-ph/0203046. Bibcode:2002JOptB...4S.176L. doi:10.1088/1464-4266/4/3/372. S2CID 9640455.
- ^ Shih, Yanhua (2007). "Quantum Imaging". IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 13 (4): 1016–1030. arXiv:0707.0268. Bibcode:2007IJSTQ..13.1016S. doi:10.1109/JSTQE.2007.902724. S2CID 147702680.
- ^ Pittman, T. B.; Shih, Y. H.; Strekalov, D. V.; Sergienko, A. V. (1995-11-01). "Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement". Physical Review A. 52 (5): R3429 – R3432. Bibcode:1995PhRvA..52.3429P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R3429. PMID 9912767.
- ^ Boto, Agedi N.; Kok, Pieter; Abrams, Daniel S.; Braunstein, Samuel L.; Williams, Colin P.; Dowling, Jonathan P. (2000-09-25). "Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit". Physical Review Letters. 85 (13): 2733–2736. arXiv:quant-ph/9912052. Bibcode:2000PhRvL..85.2733B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2733. PMID 10991220. S2CID 7373285.
- ^ Lemos, Gabriela Barreto; Borish, Victoria; Cole, Garrett D.; Ramelow, Sven; Lapkiewicz, Radek; Zeilinger, Anton (August 2014). "Quantum imaging with undetected photons". Nature. 512 (7515): 409–412. arXiv:1401.4318. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..409L. doi:10.1038/nature13586. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 25164751. S2CID 4450556.
- ^ Brida, G.; Genovese, M.; Ruo Berchera, I. (April 2010). "Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging". Nature Photonics. 4 (4): 227–230. arXiv:1004.1274. Bibcode:2010NaPho...4..227B. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.29. ISSN 1749-4893. S2CID 118413473.
- ^ Sabines-Chesterking, J.; Sabines-Chesterking, J.; McMillan, A. R.; Moreau, P. A.; Moreau, P. A.; Joshi, S. K.; Knauer, S.; Knauer, S.; Johnston, E.; Rarity, J. G.; Matthews, J. C. F. (2019-10-14). "Twin-beam sub-shot-noise raster-scanning microscope". Optics Express. 27 (21): 30810–30818. Bibcode:2019OExpr..2730810S. doi:10.1364/OE.27.030810. hdl:1983/6c53cba1-83e1-468b-a8d2-937888fcc44d. ISSN 1094-4087. PMID 31684324.
- ^ Newswise: Physicists Produce Quantum-Entangled Images Retrieved on June 12, 2008.
- ^ Schneider, Raimund; Mehringer, Thomas; Mercurio, Giuseppe; Wenthaus, Lukas; Classen, Anton; Brenner, Günter; Gorobtsov, Oleg; Benz, Adrian; Bhatti, Daniel (2017-10-30). "Quantum imaging with incoherently scattered light from a free-electron laser". Nature Physics. 14 (2): 126–129. arXiv:1710.01155. doi:10.1038/nphys4301. ISSN 1745-2473. S2CID 119339082.
- ^ White, Andrew G.; Mitchell, Jay R.; Nairz, Olaf; Kwiat, Paul G. (1998-07-01). ""Interaction-Free" Imaging". Physical Review A. 58 (1): 605–613. arXiv:quant-ph/9803060. Bibcode:1998PhRvA..58..605W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.58.605. ISSN 1050-2947. S2CID 125768139.
- ^ Moreau, Paul-Antoine; Toninelli, Ermes; Morris, Peter A.; Aspden, Reuben S.; Gregory, Thomas; Spalding, Gabriel; Boyd, Robert W.; Padgett, Miles J. (2018-03-19). "Resolution limits of quantum ghost imaging" (PDF). Optics Express. 26 (6): 7528–7536. Bibcode:2018OExpr..26.7528M. doi:10.1364/OE.26.007528. ISSN 1094-4087. PMID 29609307.
- ^ Williams, Colin; Kok, Pieter; Lee, Hwang; Dowling, Jonathan P. (2006-09-26). "Quantum lithography: A non-computing application of quantum information". Informatik - Forschung und Entwicklung. 21 (1–2): 73–82. doi:10.1007/s00450-006-0017-6. ISSN 0178-3564. S2CID 25179218.
- ^ Rui, Jun; Jiang, Yan; Lu, Guo-Peng; Zhao, Bo; Bao, Xiao-Hui; Pan, Jian-Wei (2016-03-22). "Experimental demonstration of quantum lithography beyond diffraction limit via Rabi oscillations". Physical Review A. 93 (3) 033837. arXiv:1501.06707. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.033837. ISSN 2469-9926.
- ^ Berchera, I Ruo; Degiovanni, I P (25 January 2019). "Quantum imaging with sub-Poissonian light: challenges and perspectives in optical metrology". Metrologia. 56 (2): 024001. arXiv:1904.01251. doi:10.1088/1681-7575/aaf7b2.
- ^ Hanson, R.; Gywat, O.; Awschalom, D. D. (2006-10-26). "Room-temperature manipulation and decoherence of a single spin in diamond". Physical Review B. 74 (16) 161203. arXiv:quant-ph/0608233. Bibcode:2006PhRvB..74p1203H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.161203. S2CID 5055366.
- ^ "Quantum metrology - Latest research and news | Nature". www.nature.com. Retrieved 2018-12-08.
- ^ Recent advances in metrology and fundamental constants: Varenna on Lake Como, Villa Monastero, 25 July-4 August 2000. Quinn, T. J. (Terry J.), Leschiutta, Sigfrido., Tavella, P. (Patrizia), Società italiana di fisica., IOS Press. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 2001. ISBN 978-1-61499-002-4. OCLC 784969866.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ a b Simon, David S.; Jaeger, Gregg; Sergienko, Alexander V. (2017). Quantum Metrology, Imaging, and Communication. Quantum Science and Technology. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-46549-4.
- ^ Genovese, Marco (2016-07-01). "Real applications of quantum imaging". Journal of Optics. 18 (7) 073002. arXiv:1601.06066. Bibcode:2016JOpt...18g3002G. doi:10.1088/2040-8978/18/7/073002. ISSN 2040-8978. S2CID 118514937.
- ^ Lloyd, Seth (2008-09-12). "Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination". Science. 321 (5895): 1463–1465. Bibcode:2008Sci...321.1463L. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1015.347. doi:10.1126/science.1160627. ISSN 1095-9203. PMID 18787162. S2CID 30596567.
- ^ Shapiro, Jeffrey H.; Pirandola, Stefano; Maccone, Lorenzo; Lloyd, Seth; Guha, Saikat; Giovannetti, Vittorio; Erkmen, Baris I.; Tan, Si-Hui (2008-10-02). "Quantum Illumination with Gaussian States". Physical Review Letters. 101 (25) 253601. arXiv:0810.0534. Bibcode:2008PhRvL.101y3601T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.253601. PMID 19113706. S2CID 26890855.
- ^ "Defense.gov News Article: Army Develops 'Ghost' Imaging to Aid on Battlefield". archive.defense.gov. Archived from the original on 2017-09-30. Retrieved 2018-12-05.
External links
[edit]Bibliography
[edit]- Journal of Modern Optics. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. 53 (5, Quantum Imaging). ISSN 0950-0340.
Quantum imaging
View on GrokipediaFundamentals
Definition and principles
Quantum imaging is a field within quantum optics that utilizes non-classical properties of light, such as quantum correlations, entanglement, superposition, and non-classical states, to achieve imaging capabilities surpassing the limitations of classical optics, including sub-shot-noise sensitivity and enhanced resolution.[2] These advancements stem from exploiting quantum mechanical effects to reduce noise and improve signal detection in low-light conditions.[4] At the core of quantum imaging lie several key principles. Classical light sources exhibit Poissonian photon statistics, where the variance in photon number equals the mean, leading to shot-noise-limited performance. In contrast, non-classical light sources produce sub-Poissonian statistics, with variance less than the mean, enabling sub-shot-noise sensitivity by suppressing photon arrival fluctuations.[4] Quantum entanglement, particularly in biphoton pairs, introduces non-local correlations that allow joint measurements to extract information unattainable with independent photons, enhancing image formation through spatial or temporal coincidences. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle imposes fundamental limits on simultaneous measurements of conjugate variables like position and momentum, setting the standard quantum limit for resolution in classical imaging; however, quantum resources such as entanglement can approach the Heisenberg limit, scaling precision as the inverse of the photon number rather than its square root.[5] Typical quantum imaging systems employ a source of entangled photons generated via spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in a nonlinear crystal pumped by a laser, producing correlated signal and idler photon pairs.[2] These pairs are spatially separated, with one beam interacting with the object of interest and the other serving as a reference; detection schemes, such as coincidence counting with single-photon detectors or bucket detectors, reconstruct the image by correlating the outputs.[4] Non-classical correlations from such setups improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by suppressing noise below the classical shot-noise level.[4]Quantum advantages over classical imaging
Quantum imaging offers significant improvements in resolution over classical methods by leveraging quantum correlations to resolve features below the diffraction limit. In classical optical imaging, the Rayleigh criterion limits resolution to approximately λ/(2NA), where λ is the wavelength and NA is the numerical aperture, but quantum approaches can achieve effective resolutions down to λ/(2N), with N the number of entangled photons. For instance, quantum lithography using entangled photon pairs enables pattern resolutions twice that of classical lithography, as the nonlinear correlation function scales as cos²(Nk·r), allowing subwavelength features.[6] Similarly, quantum centroid estimation techniques have demonstrated the ability to localize point sources with variances approaching the Heisenberg limit, surpassing the standard quantum limit by factors of up to 2 in one dimension.[7] Sensitivity gains in quantum imaging arise from sub-shot-noise performance, which reduces the uncertainty in photon counting below the classical Poisson limit, enabling reliable detection in low-light conditions where classical imaging would be noise-dominated. By correlating photon detections, quantum methods suppress background noise and achieve signal-to-noise ratios superior to classical direct imaging, with noise reduction factors as low as 0.5 in spatial correlation measurements.[8] This is particularly evident in quantum illumination protocols, where entangled states allow detection of weak targets against high noise, improving contrast by factors of 6 dB over classical strategies in certain regimes. Quantum imaging also enhances speed and efficiency through parallel processing of quantum correlations, permitting faster image acquisition with reduced exposure times in noisy or low-flux environments. For example, ghost imaging with entangled photons reconstructs images using fewer total photons per pixel—often below one—compared to classical methods requiring hundreds for comparable quality, thereby minimizing exposure durations and sample damage.[9] This efficiency stems from the ability to extract spatial information from correlation statistics rather than sequential intensity measurements, achieving acquisition rates that scale favorably with photon budget in dim conditions.[10] Quantitative comparisons between quantum and classical imaging are often framed using information-theoretic metrics such as the Fisher information, which quantifies the amount of usable information about image parameters in the measurement data. The classical Cramér-Rao bound sets a lower limit on the variance of estimators as Var(θ) ≥ 1/F_C, where F_C is the classical Fisher information, but quantum methods can access higher values via the quantum Fisher information F_Q ≥ F_C. In imaging tasks like object localization, F_Q can exceed F_C by factors approaching N for N-particle entangled states, tightening the bound and enabling precisions unattainable classically. The quantum Cramér-Rao bound formalizes this advantage for parameter estimation in imaging: where F_Q represents the maximum extractable information from the quantum state, often surpassing the classical limit F_C by leveraging non-classical resources like entanglement. For two-point resolution, quantum strategies have shown variances reduced by up to 40% below classical bounds in simulations and experiments.[11]| Metric | Classical Limit | Quantum Advantage Example |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution (effective λ) | λ/2 (diffraction limit) | λ/(2N) with N entangled photons[6] |
| Variance in localization | 1/F_C (standard quantum limit) | 1/(N F_C) approaching Heisenberg limit[7] |
| Signal-to-noise ratio | Shot-noise limited (√N scaling) | Sub-shot-noise, noise reduction factor as low as 0.5[8] |
| Photons per pixel | ~100 for low-noise image | <1 for ghost imaging reconstruction[9] |
