Hubbry Logo
Radon transformRadon transformMain
Open search
Radon transform
Community hub
Radon transform
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Radon transform
Radon transform
from Wikipedia
Radon transform. Maps f on the (x, y)-domain to Rf on the (α, s)-domain.

In mathematics, the Radon transform is the integral transform which takes a function f defined on the plane to a function Rf defined on the (two-dimensional) space of lines in the plane, whose value at a particular line is equal to the line integral of the function over that line. The transform was introduced in 1917 by Johann Radon,[1] who also provided a formula for the inverse transform. Radon further included formulas for the transform in three dimensions, in which the integral is taken over planes (integrating over lines is known as the X-ray transform). It was later generalized to higher-dimensional Euclidean spaces and more broadly in the context of integral geometry. The complex analogue of the Radon transform is known as the Penrose transform. The Radon transform is widely applicable to tomography, the creation of an image from the projection data associated with cross-sectional scans of an object.

Explanation

[edit]
Radon transform of the indicator function of two squares shown in the image below. Lighter regions indicate larger function values. Black indicates zero.
Original function is equal to one on the white region and zero on the dark region.

If a function represents an unknown density, then the Radon transform represents the projection data obtained as the output of a tomographic scan. The inverse of the Radon transform can be used to reconstruct the original density from the projection data, and thus it forms the mathematical underpinning for tomographic reconstruction, also known as iterative reconstruction.

The Radon transform data is often called a sinogram because the Radon transform of an off-center point source is a sinusoid. Consequently, the Radon transform of a number of small objects appears graphically as a number of blurred sine waves with different amplitudes and phases.

The Radon transform is useful in computed axial tomography (CAT scan), barcode scanners, electron microscopy of macromolecular assemblies like viruses and protein complexes, reflection seismology and in the solution of hyperbolic partial differential equations.

Horizontal projections through the shape result in an accumulated signal (middle bar). The sinogram on the right is generated by collecting many such projections as the shape rotates. Here, color is used to highlight which object is producing which part of the signal. Note how straight features, when aligned with the projection direction, result in stronger signals.
Example of reconstruction via the Radon transform using observations from different angles. The applied inversion to the projection data then reconstructs the slice image.[2]

Definition

[edit]

Let be a function that satisfies the three regularity conditions:[3]

  1. is continuous;
  2. the double integral , extending over the whole plane, converges;
  3. for any arbitrary point on the plane it holds that


The Radon transform, , is a function defined on the space of straight lines by the line integral along each such line as: Concretely, the parametrization of any straight line with respect to arc length can always be written:where is the distance of from the origin and is the angle the normal vector to makes with the -axis. It follows that the quantities can be considered as coordinates on the space of all lines in , and the Radon transform can be expressed in these coordinates by: More generally, in the -dimensional Euclidean space , the Radon transform of a function satisfying the regularity conditions is a function on the space of all hyperplanes in . It is defined by:

Radon transform
Inverse Radon transform

where the integral is taken with respect to the natural hypersurface measure, (generalizing the term from the -dimensional case). Observe that any element of is characterized as the solution locus of an equation , where is a unit vector and . Thus the -dimensional Radon transform may be rewritten as a function on via: It is also possible to generalize the Radon transform still further by integrating instead over -dimensional affine subspaces of . The X-ray transform is the most widely used special case of this construction, and is obtained by integrating over straight lines.

Relationship with the Fourier transform

[edit]
Computing the 2-dimensional Radon transform in terms of two Fourier transforms.

The Radon transform is closely related to the Fourier transform. We define the univariate Fourier transform here as: For a function of a -vector , the univariate Fourier transform is: For convenience, denote . The Fourier slice theorem then states: where

Thus the two-dimensional Fourier transform of the initial function along a line at the inclination angle is the one variable Fourier transform of the Radon transform (acquired at angle ) of that function. This fact can be used to compute both the Radon transform and its inverse. The result can be generalized into n dimensions:

Dual transform

[edit]

The dual Radon transform is a kind of adjoint to the Radon transform. Beginning with a function g on the space , the dual Radon transform is the function on Rn defined by: The integral here is taken over the set of all hyperplanes incident with the point , and the measure is the unique probability measure on the set invariant under rotations about the point .

Concretely, for the two-dimensional Radon transform, the dual transform is given by: In the context of image processing, the dual transform is commonly called back-projection[4] as it takes a function defined on each line in the plane and 'smears' or projects it back over the line to produce an image.

Intertwining property

[edit]

Let denote the Laplacian on defined by:This is a natural rotationally invariant second-order differential operator. On , the "radial" second derivative is also rotationally invariant. The Radon transform and its dual are intertwining operators for these two differential operators in the sense that:[5] In analysing the solutions to the wave equation in multiple spatial dimensions, the intertwining property leads to the translational representation of Lax and Philips.[6] In imaging[7] and numerical analysis[8] this is exploited to reduce multi-dimensional problems into single-dimensional ones, as a dimensional splitting method.

Reconstruction approaches

[edit]

The process of reconstruction produces the image (or function in the previous section) from its projection data. Reconstruction is an inverse problem.

Radon inversion formula

[edit]

In the two-dimensional case, the most commonly used analytical formula to recover from its Radon transform is the Filtered Back-projection Formula or Radon Inversion Formula[9]: where is such that .[9] The convolution kernel is referred to as Ramp filter in some literature.

Ill-posedness

[edit]

Intuitively, in the filtered back-projection formula, by analogy with differentiation, for which , we see that the filter performs an operation similar to a derivative. Roughly speaking, then, the filter makes objects more singular. A quantitive statement of the ill-posedness of Radon inversion goes as follows: where is the previously defined adjoint to the Radon transform. Thus for , we have: The complex exponential is thus an eigenfunction of with eigenvalue . Thus the singular values of are . Since these singular values tend to , is unbounded.[9]

Iterative reconstruction methods

[edit]

Compared with the Filtered Back-projection method, iterative reconstruction costs large computation time, limiting its practical use. However, due to the ill-posedness of Radon Inversion, the Filtered Back-projection method may be infeasible in the presence of discontinuity or noise. Iterative reconstruction methods (e.g. iterative Sparse Asymptotic Minimum Variance[10]) could provide metal artefact reduction, noise and dose reduction for the reconstructed result that attract much research interest around the world.

Inversion formulas

[edit]

Explicit and computationally efficient inversion formulas for the Radon transform and its dual are available. The Radon transform in dimensions can be inverted by the formula:[11] where , and the power of the Laplacian is defined as a pseudo-differential operator if necessary by the Fourier transform: For computational purposes, the power of the Laplacian is commuted with the dual transform to give:[12] where is the Hilbert transform with respect to the s variable. In two dimensions, the operator appears in image processing as a ramp filter.[13] One can prove directly from the Fourier slice theorem and change of variables for integration that for a compactly supported continuous function of two variables: Thus in an image processing context the original image can be recovered from the 'sinogram' data by applying a ramp filter (in the variable) and then back-projecting. As the filtering step can be performed efficiently (for example using digital signal processing techniques) and the back projection step is simply an accumulation of values in the pixels of the image, this results in a highly efficient, and hence widely used, algorithm.

Explicitly, the inversion formula obtained by the latter method is:[4] The dual transform can also be inverted by an analogous formula:

Radon transform in algebraic geometry

[edit]

In algebraic geometry, a Radon transform (also known as the Brylinski–Radon transform) is constructed as follows.

Write

for the universal hyperplane, i.e., H consists of pairs (x, h) where x is a point in d-dimensional projective space and h is a point in the dual projective space (in other words, x is a line through the origin in (d+1)-dimensional affine space, and h is a hyperplane in that space) such that x is contained in h.

Then the Brylinksi–Radon transform is the functor between appropriate derived categories of étale sheaves

The main theorem about this transform is that this transform induces an equivalence of the categories of perverse sheaves on the projective space and its dual projective space, up to constant sheaves.[14]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Radon transform is a fundamental in that maps a multidimensional function to the set of its integrals over a family of hyperplanes, enabling the reconstruction of the original function from these projections. Introduced by Austrian mathematician in 1917, it provides an exact mathematical framework for inverting such line integrals, laying the groundwork for modern imaging techniques. Mathematically, for a function ff defined on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, the Radon transform RfRf at a specified by a unit normal vector θSn1\theta \in S^{n-1} and signed distance sRs \in \mathbb{R} is given by Rf(θ,s)=Rnf(x)δ(sxθ)dxRf(\theta, s) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f(x) \delta(s - x \cdot \theta) \, dx, where δ\delta is the , effectively computing the of ff along the {x:xθ=s}\{x : x \cdot \theta = s\}. This operator is linear, satisfying such as superposition (i.e., R(af+bg)=aRf+bRgR(af + bg) = aRf + bRg for scalars a,ba, b and functions f,gf, g) and rotational symmetry, with analogs to convolution theorems and Plancherel's formula in . The transform is invertible under suitable conditions, such as when ff is compactly supported and sufficiently smooth, allowing recovery via filtered back-projection methods involving the , which links the 1D of projections to slices of the 2D of ff. Beyond pure mathematics, the Radon transform is pivotal in applied fields, particularly computed tomography (CT) in , where it models the of X-rays along projection lines to reconstruct cross-sectional images of the human body from non-invasive scans. Its principles extend to emission (e.g., PET and SPECT), geophysical imaging, and even planetary mapping, such as deriving surface elevations from polar echoes. Since the 1970s, advancements in inversion algorithms have made it indispensable for real-time diagnostics, with ongoing research exploring generalizations like the cone-beam transform for 3D helical scanning.

Introduction

Overview

The Radon transform is a fundamental mathematical tool that captures the essence of a function by integrating its values over straight lines in two dimensions or hyperplanes in higher dimensions, producing a set of projections akin to shadow silhouettes from multiple viewpoints. This integration process intuitively reveals how the function's mass or density is distributed along those directions, much like how beams traverse an object to measure cumulative opacity without direct access to its interior. At the heart of image reconstruction techniques, the Radon transform models the data collection in computed tomography (CT) scans, where projections from various angles enable the recovery of cross-sectional images of the human body, revolutionizing medical diagnostics by allowing precise visualization of tissues and organs. Formally introduced by Austrian mathematician Johann Radon in his 1917 paper, the transform builds on earlier related ideas in integral representations. Its applications extend to geophysics, where it aids in seismic signal processing to delineate underground formations from reflection data, and to pure mathematics, bridging integral geometry—concerned with invariants under group actions on manifolds—and harmonic analysis for studying function decompositions and operator properties.

Historical Development

The origins of the Radon transform can be traced to early developments in geometry, with precursors involving s over curves and surfaces. In 1904, employed s on to study bodies of constant width, laying groundwork for later geometric methods. This was extended by Paul Funk in 1911, who introduced what is now known as the Funk transform, computing mean values of functions on the two-dimensional along to enable reconstruction. The transform was formally defined by in in his seminal paper "Über die Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihre Integralwerte längs gewisser Mannigfaltigkeiten," where he generalized the concept to integrals over hyperplanes in n-dimensional and provided an explicit inversion formula for reconstructing the original function. Radon's work built directly on Funk's spherical integrals but shifted focus to flat manifolds, establishing the mathematical framework for what would later become essential in multidimensional reconstruction problems. However, early formulations, including Radon's, offered primarily theoretical inversion methods that were not yet adapted for practical numerical computation or discrete data. Significant advancements occurred in the mid-20th century through applications to medical imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT). In the 1960s, Allan M. Cormack developed reconstruction algorithms based on Radon-like projections, publishing key results in 1963 and 1964 that addressed the inversion problem for X-ray attenuation data using series expansions and Fourier techniques. Independently, engineer Godfrey N. Hounsfield constructed the first practical CT scanner in 1971 at EMI Laboratories, implementing filtered backprojection for image reconstruction from projection data. Their combined theoretical and engineering contributions revolutionized diagnostic imaging, earning them the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the development of computer-assisted tomography. This era marked the transition from abstract mathematics to real-world application, though inversion methods remained challenged by noise and limited data until refinements in the 1970s provided more stable and complete solutions for practical use. In the , the Radon transform saw expansions into discrete and numerical domains, driven by advances in and . A pivotal contribution was the 1987 introduction of the discrete Radon transform by Gregory Beylkin and colleagues, which enabled exact inversion for finite datasets on uniform grids, facilitating efficient computation in image processing and seismic analysis. These discrete adaptations, including fast algorithms for limited-angle projections, integrated the transform into pipelines, broadening its use in fields like and geophysical imaging while addressing computational efficiency for large-scale data.

Mathematical Definition and Properties

Formal Definition

The Radon transform, originally introduced by Johann Radon in 1917, provides a mathematical framework for integrating a function over hyperplanes in Euclidean space. For a compactly supported continuous function f:RnRf: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}, the Radon transform RfRf is defined as Rf(θ,s)=H(θ,s)f(x)dμ(x),Rf(\theta, s) = \int_{H(\theta, s)} f(x) \, d\mu(x), where H(θ,s)={xRnxθ=s}H(\theta, s) = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid x \cdot \theta = s \} denotes the hyperplane orthogonal to the unit vector θSn1\theta \in S^{n-1} at signed distance sRs \in \mathbb{R} from the origin, and dμ(x)d\mu(x) is the Euclidean surface measure induced on this hyperplane. This parametrization identifies hyperplanes via their normal direction θ\theta on the unit sphere and offset ss. In the specific case of n=2n=2, the Radon transform reduces to line integrals, often expressed in polar coordinates for clarity. Let θ=(cosϕ,sinϕ)\theta = (\cos \phi, \sin \phi) with ϕ[0,π)\phi \in [0, \pi) and sRs \in \mathbb{R}; then Rf(ϕ,s)=f(scosϕtsinϕ,ssinϕ+tcosϕ)dt,Rf(\phi, s) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(s \cos \phi - t \sin \phi, s \sin \phi + t \cos \phi) \, dt, where the integration variable tt parametrizes the line to θ\theta. This form aligns with the by setting the direction as θ=(sinϕ,cosϕ)\theta^\perp = (-\sin \phi, \cos \phi). The definition extends naturally to the space of Schwartz functions S(Rn)\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^n), which are smooth and rapidly decreasing, ensuring RfS(Sn1×R)Rf \in \mathcal{S}(S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}) and preserving key analytic properties under the transform. Further, by duality, it applies to tempered distributions, where RfRf is interpreted via test function integration, facilitating applications in generalized function theory.

Basic Properties

The Radon transform RR, defined as the operator that maps a function ff on Rn\mathbb{R}^n to its over hyperplanes parameterized by direction θSn1\theta \in S^{n-1} and signed distance sRs \in \mathbb{R}, is . Specifically, for scalars a,bRa, b \in \mathbb{R} and functions f,gf, g, it satisfies R(af+bg)(θ,s)=aRf(θ,s)+bRg(θ,s)R(af + bg)(\theta, s) = a Rf(\theta, s) + b Rg(\theta, s). This follows directly from the definition of the transform. The transform is continuous in suitable function spaces. On the Schwartz space S(Rn)\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^n) of rapidly decreasing smooth functions, RR maps to S(Sn1×R)\mathcal{S}(S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}), preserving the rapid decay and smoothness properties, which ensures continuity in the Fréchet topology of these spaces. It extends continuously to Sobolev spaces Hs(Rn)H^s(\mathbb{R}^n) for appropriate ss, mapping to weighted Sobolev spaces on the parameter domain. A key property is the support theorem due to Helgason, which relates the support of ff to that of RfRf. If fC(Rn)f \in C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n) is rapidly decreasing and Rf(θ,s)=0Rf(\theta, s) = 0 for all s>r|s| > r and all θSn1\theta \in S^{n-1}, then f(x)=0f(x) = 0 for all x>r|x| > r; the converse holds without the rapid decay assumption. This theorem enables recovery of the support of ff from its projections alone. If ff has compact support in a of radius AA, then Rf(θ,s)=0Rf(\theta, s) = 0 for s>A|s| > A. Additionally, RfRf is an even function on the Sn1×RS^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}, satisfying Rf(θ,s)=Rf(θ,s)Rf(-\theta, -s) = Rf(\theta, s). The Radon transform is covariant under the actions of and , reflecting its geometric origins. For an () UU, R(Uf)(Uθ,s)=Rf(θ,s)R(Uf)(U\theta, s) = Rf(\theta, s). For a ft(x)=f(xt)f_t(x) = f(x - t), Rft(θ,s)=Rf(θ,sθt)Rf_t(\theta, s) = Rf(\theta, s - \theta \cdot t), which implies a convolution structure along each direction: R(fg)(θ,s)=RRf(θ,t)Rg(θ,st)dtR(f * g)(\theta, s) = \int_\mathbb{R} Rf(\theta, t) Rg(\theta, s - t) \, dt. These properties hold uniformly in n2n \geq 2. In 2D (n=2n=2), projections are over lines; in 3D (n=3n=3), over planes.

Connections to Other Transforms

Relation to the Fourier Transform

One of the most fundamental connections between the Radon transform and the is provided by the , also known as the . This theorem establishes that the one-dimensional of the Radon transform of a function ff along a projection at angle θ\theta, evaluated at frequency σ\sigma, equals the n-dimensional of ff evaluated at the point σθ\sigma \theta in Fourier space. In mathematical terms, for a function f:RnRf: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R} and its Radon transform Rf(θ,s)Rf(\theta, s), the theorem states that F(Rf)(θ,σ)=f^(σθ),\mathcal{F}(Rf)(\theta, \sigma) = \hat{f}(\sigma \theta), where F\mathcal{F} denotes the one-dimensional with respect to the radial variable ss, and f^\hat{f} is the n-dimensional of ff. This relation holds under suitable assumptions on ff, such as membership in L1(Rn)L^1(\mathbb{R}^n) or the , ensuring integrability. The theorem implies a direct mapping from projection data in the Radon domain to slices in the Fourier domain of the original function, facilitating representation in polar coordinates where the radial coordinate corresponds to the frequency σ\sigma and the angular coordinate to θ\theta. This polar sampling structure is particularly advantageous for computational efficiency, as it allows the use of the (FFT) to interpolate between Cartesian and polar grids, enabling rapid evaluation of the from projection data without full matrix inversion. A sketch of the proof for the two-dimensional case proceeds by direct computation. Consider the Radon transform pθ(r)=f(xcosθ+ysinθ,xsinθ+ycosθ)dyp_\theta(r) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x \cos \theta + y \sin \theta, -x \sin \theta + y \cos \theta) \, dy. The one-dimensional Fourier transform is Pθ(ρ)=pθ(r)ej2πρrdr=f(x,y)ej2πρ(xcosθ+ysinθ)dxdy,P_\theta(\rho) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty p_\theta(r) e^{-j 2\pi \rho r} \, dr = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x, y) e^{-j 2\pi \rho (x \cos \theta + y \sin \theta)} \, dx \, dy, where the interchange of integrals is justified by Fubini's theorem under the integrability assumptions on ff. The right-hand side is precisely the two-dimensional Fourier transform of ff evaluated at (ρcosθ,ρsinθ)(\rho \cos \theta, \rho \sin \theta). The n-dimensional case follows analogously by coordinate rotation and integration over the hyperplane orthogonal to θ\theta.

Dual Radon Transform

The dual Radon transform, also known as the backprojection operator, is the operator RR^* of the Radon transform RR with respect to the L2L^2 inner product. For a function gg defined on the space of hyperplanes, typically parameterized by direction θSn1\theta \in S^{n-1} and signed distance sRs \in \mathbb{R}, the dual Radon transform is given by Rg(x)=Sn1g(θ,xθ)dθ,R^* g(x) = \int_{S^{n-1}} g(\theta, x \cdot \theta) \, d\theta, where the integral is taken with respect to the standard surface measure on the unit Sn1S^{n-1}, and xRnx \in \mathbb{R}^n. This operator maps functions on the cylinder Sn1×RS^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R} to functions on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, effectively integrating the data gg over all hyperplanes passing through the point xx. The adjoint property establishes that RR^* is the formal L2L^2-adjoint of RR, satisfying Rf,gL2(Sn1×R)=f,RgL2(Rn)\langle R f, g \rangle_{L^2(S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R})} = \langle f, R^* g \rangle_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)} for suitable functions fL2(Rn)f \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^n) and gL2(Sn1×R)g \in L^2(S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}), where the inner products are appropriately weighted to account for the invariant measures on the spaces. This duality is fundamental in the analysis of the Radon transform, as it preserves the inner product structure and facilitates the study of inversion problems through operator compositions. The normal operator RRR^* R, formed by composing the dual with the forward transform, acts on functions in Rn\mathbb{R}^n and has a smoothing effect by integrating the projections over all directions. Specifically, for fL2(Rn)f \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^n), (RRf)(x)=Sn1(Rf)(θ,xθ)dθ,(R^* R f)(x) = \int_{S^{n-1}} (R f)(\theta, x \cdot \theta) \, d\theta, which represents the integrated value of the projections of ff along all hyperplanes containing xx. In the Euclidean case, RRR^* R is an elliptic of order 1-1, which attenuates high-frequency components and smooths the input function, adding roughly 1/21/2 in the Sobolev scale. This smoothing property arises because RRR^* R integrates local information globally over directions, reducing singularities while preserving the overall scale of the function. Geometrically, the dual Radon transform can be interpreted as a superposition of projections: for each fixed point xx, Rg(x)R^* g(x) accumulates the values of gg from all lines (or hyperplanes) passing through xx, effectively smearing or backprojecting the line integrals onto the space. This interpretation underscores its role in reconstruction algorithms, where it reverses the line-averaging effect of the forward Radon transform by redistributing projection data uniformly along intersecting lines.

Intertwining Property

The relation between the backprojection operator RR^* and the F\mathcal{F} provides an analytic connection between projection data and frequency domain representations, manifesting through the , where the 1D Fourier transform along projections aligns with slices of the nD of the original function, and the backprojection integrates these consistently across directions. More precisely, the of the backprojection RgR^* g of a function gg on the space (angles and offsets) yields a radial integration in Fourier space. For the 2D case, F(Rg)(ξ)=S1g^(θ,θξ)dθ,\mathcal{F}(R^* g)(\xi) = \int_{S^1} \hat{g}(\theta, \theta \cdot \xi) \, d\theta, where g^(θ,σ)\hat{g}(\theta, \sigma) denotes the 1D of g(θ,)g(\theta, \cdot) with respect to the offset variable at σ\sigma. This shows that at each ξR2\xi \in \mathbb{R}^2, the value is the integral over the projected frequencies along the unit circle S1S^1. A key consequence of this property is its role in deriving inversion formulas via filtered projections. The radial integration introduces a smoothing effect equivalent to multiplication by 1/ξ1/|\xi| in Fourier space (arising from the measure on the circle of radius ξ|\xi|), which is counteracted by applying a ramp filter with Fourier multiplier ξ|\xi| to the projections before backprojection. For the 2D case with backprojection over [0,π)[0, \pi), this yields the standard filtered backprojection inversion f(x)=120π(Rf(,θ)h)(xθ)dθf(x) = \frac{1}{2} \int_0^\pi \left( Rf(\cdot, \theta) * h \right) (x \cdot \theta) \, d\theta, where h^(σ)=σ\hat{h}(\sigma) = |\sigma|. The proof relies on the homogeneity of the operators (both the backprojection and preserve scaling degrees) and the rotational invariance of the Radon setup. Starting from the definition Rg(x)=S1g(θ,θx)dθR^* g(x) = \int_{S^1} g(\theta, \theta \cdot x) \, d\theta, the is computed via F(Rg)(ξ)=R2Rg(x)eiξxdx\mathcal{F}(R^* g)(\xi) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} R^* g(x) e^{-i \xi \cdot x} \, dx. Applying Fubini's theorem to interchange the integrals over space and directions, and substituting the 1D Fourier inversion for each fixed θ\theta, reduces the expression to the radial integral over the projected frequencies.

Inversion and Reconstruction

Direct Inversion Formulas

The direct inversion of the Radon transform provides explicit analytical expressions to recover the original function ff from its Radon transform RfRf, assuming ff is sufficiently smooth and compactly supported, and that complete data over all directions and offsets are available. These formulas originated with Radon's foundational work, where he derived inversion expressions using integral operators along hyperplanes. In two dimensions, the classical inversion formula expresses f(x)f(x) in terms of a integral involving second derivatives of the Radon transform: f(x)=14π2S1R2s2Rf(θ,s)1xθsdsdθ,f(x) = \frac{1}{4\pi^2} \int_{S^1} \int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial s^2} Rf(\theta, s) \cdot \frac{1}{x \cdot \theta - s} \, ds \, d\theta, where the inner integral is understood in the sense to handle the singularity. This form, equivalent to Radon's original expression, relies on the Fourier slice theorem to relate projections to the of ff. An equivalent and computationally practical variant is the filtered backprojection formula, which incorporates a ramp filter in the followed by backprojection: f(x)=14π2S1H{σRf^(θ,σ)}(xθ)dθ,f(x) = \frac{1}{4\pi^2} \int_{S^1} \mathcal{H} \left\{ |\sigma| \widehat{Rf}(\theta, \sigma) \right\} (x \cdot \theta) \, d\theta,
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.