Hubbry Logo
Integral transformIntegral transformMain
Open search
Integral transform
Community hub
Integral transform
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Integral transform
Integral transform
from Wikipedia

In mathematics, an integral transform is a type of transform that maps a function from its original function space into another function space via integration, where some of the properties of the original function might be more easily characterized and manipulated than in the original function space. The transformed function can generally be mapped back to the original function space using the inverse transform.

General form

[edit]

An integral transform is any transform of the following form:

The input of this transform is a function , and the output is another function . An integral transform is a particular kind of mathematical operator.

There are numerous useful integral transforms. Each is specified by a choice of the function of two variables, that is called the kernel or nucleus of the transform.

Some kernels have an associated inverse kernel which (roughly speaking) yields an inverse transform:

A symmetric kernel is one that is unchanged when the two variables are permuted; it is a kernel function such that . In the theory of integral equations, symmetric kernels correspond to self-adjoint operators.[1]

Motivation

[edit]

There are many classes of problems that are difficult to solve—or at least quite unwieldy algebraically—in their original representations. An integral transform "maps" an equation from its original "domain" into another domain, in which manipulating and solving the equation may be much easier than in the original domain. The solution can then be mapped back to the original domain with the inverse of the integral transform.

There are many applications of probability that rely on integral transforms, such as "pricing kernel" or stochastic discount factor, or the smoothing of data recovered from robust statistics; see kernel (statistics).

History

[edit]

The precursor of the transforms were the Fourier series to express functions in finite intervals. Later the Fourier transform was developed to remove the requirement of finite intervals.

Using the Fourier series, just about any practical function of time (the voltage across the terminals of an electronic device for example) can be represented as a sum of sines and cosines, each suitably scaled (multiplied by a constant factor), shifted (advanced or retarded in time) and "squeezed" or "stretched" (increasing or decreasing the frequency). The sines and cosines in the Fourier series are an example of an orthonormal basis.

Usage example

[edit]

As an example of an application of integral transforms, consider the Laplace transform. This is a technique that maps differential or integro-differential equations in the "time" domain into polynomial equations in what is termed the "complex frequency" domain. (Complex frequency is similar to actual, physical frequency but rather more general. Specifically, the imaginary component ω of the complex frequency s = −σ + corresponds to the usual concept of frequency, viz., the rate at which a sinusoid cycles, whereas the real component σ of the complex frequency corresponds to the degree of "damping", i.e. an exponential decrease of the amplitude.) The equation cast in terms of complex frequency is readily solved in the complex frequency domain (roots of the polynomial equations in the complex frequency domain correspond to eigenvalues in the time domain), leading to a "solution" formulated in the frequency domain. Employing the inverse transform, i.e., the inverse procedure of the original Laplace transform, one obtains a time-domain solution. In this example, polynomials in the complex frequency domain (typically occurring in the denominator) correspond to power series in the time domain, while axial shifts in the complex frequency domain correspond to damping by decaying exponentials in the time domain.

The Laplace transform finds wide application in physics and particularly in electrical engineering, where the characteristic equations that describe the behavior of an electric circuit in the complex frequency domain correspond to linear combinations of exponentially scaled and time-shifted damped sinusoids in the time domain. Other integral transforms find special applicability within other scientific and mathematical disciplines.

Another usage example is the kernel in the path integral:

This states that the total amplitude to arrive at is the sum (the integral) over all possible values of the total amplitude to arrive at the point multiplied by the amplitude to go from to [i.e. ].[2] It is often referred to as the propagator for a given system. This (physics) kernel is the kernel of the integral transform. However, for each quantum system, there is a different kernel.[3]

Table of transforms

[edit]
Table of integral transforms
Transform Symbol K f(t) t1 t2 K−1 u1 u2
Abel transform F, f [4] t
Associated Legendre transform
Fourier transform
Fourier sine transform on , real-valued
Fourier cosine transform on , real-valued
Hankel transform
Hartley transform
Hermite transform
Hilbert transform
Jacobi transform
Laguerre transform
Laplace transform
Legendre transform
Mellin transform [5]
Two-sided Laplace
transform
Poisson kernel
Radon transform
Weierstrass transform
X-ray transform

In the limits of integration for the inverse transform, c is a constant which depends on the nature of the transform function. For example, for the one and two-sided Laplace transform, c must be greater than the largest real part of the zeroes of the transform function.

Note that there are alternative notations and conventions for the Fourier transform.

Different domains

[edit]

Here integral transforms are defined for functions on the real numbers, but they can be defined more generally for functions on a group.

  • If instead one uses functions on the circle (periodic functions), integration kernels are then biperiodic functions; convolution by functions on the circle yields circular convolution.
  • If one uses functions on the cyclic group of order n (Cn or Z/nZ), one obtains n × n matrices as integration kernels; convolution corresponds to circulant matrices.

General theory

[edit]

Although the properties of integral transforms vary widely, they have some properties in common. For example, every integral transform is a linear operator, since the integral is a linear operator, and in fact if the kernel is allowed to be a generalized function then all linear operators are integral transforms (a properly formulated version of this statement is the Schwartz kernel theorem).

The general theory of such integral equations is known as Fredholm theory. In this theory, the kernel is understood to be a compact operator acting on a Banach space of functions. Depending on the situation, the kernel is then variously referred to as the Fredholm operator, the nuclear operator or the Fredholm kernel.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
An integral transform is a mathematical technique that maps a function from its original domain to a new domain through integration with a specified kernel function, often simplifying the analysis of complex problems such as differential equations. In general form, it is expressed as F(α)=abf(t)K(α,t)dtF(\alpha) = \int_a^b f(t) K(\alpha, t) \, dt, where f(t)f(t) is the original function, K(α,t)K(\alpha, t) is the kernel, and the limits aa to bb define the integration range, which may extend to depending on the transform. This operation is linear, meaning the transform of a of functions is the corresponding of their transforms, facilitating computations in fields like and physics. Prominent examples include the , which decomposes functions into frequency components using the kernel eiωte^{-i \omega t} and is defined as f^(ω)=f(t)eiωtdt\hat{f}(\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-i \omega t} \, dt, with an inverse allowing reconstruction of the original function. The Laplace transform, employing the kernel este^{-st} for ss in the , is given by L{f(t)}(s)=0f(t)estdt\mathcal{L}\{f(t)\}(s) = \int_0^{\infty} f(t) e^{-st} \, dt and is particularly useful for initial value problems in ordinary differential equations by converting them into algebraic equations. Other notable transforms encompass the for multiplicative convolutions, each tailored to specific analytical needs. Integral transforms originated with early work by Euler in the 1760s and evolved through contributions like Laplace's in the 1780s, leading to over 70 variants developed up to the present day for diverse applications. Key properties, such as the transform of derivatives (e.g., L{f(t)}(s)=sL{f(t)}(s)f(0)\mathcal{L}\{f'(t)\}(s) = s \mathcal{L}\{f(t)\}(s) - f(0) for the ) and convolution theorems, enable efficient problem-solving in areas including , control systems, conduction, and . These tools often admit inverse transforms, ensuring reversibility, though numerical methods may be required for complex cases.

Fundamentals

General Form

An integral transform is a linear mapping that converts a function f(t)f(t) defined on a domain, typically time or , into another function F(ξ)F(\xi) in a transformed domain via an integral operation. The general form of such a transform is given by F(ξ)=abf(t)K(t,ξ)dt,F(\xi) = \int_{a}^{b} f(t) \, K(t, \xi) \, dt, where K(t,ξ)K(t, \xi) is the kernel function that encodes the specific type of transform, and the limits aa to bb define the integration range over the original variable tt. This formulation assumes appropriate conditions on f(t)f(t) and K(t,ξ)K(t, \xi) to ensure convergence of the integral. The inverse transform recovers the original function from the transformed one, typically through a similar integral expression: f(t)=cdF(ξ)K1(ξ,t)dξ,f(t) = \int_{c}^{d} F(\xi) \, K^{-1}(\xi, t) \, d\xi, where K1(ξ,t)K^{-1}(\xi, t) is the inverse kernel, and the limits cc to dd correspond to the range in the transformed variable ξ\xi. The measure dξd\xi reflects the standard Lebesgue integration in the transform space, with ξ\xi commonly denoting the transform variable, such as frequency or a complex parameter. Integral transforms can be classified as unilateral or bilateral based on the integration limits. Bilateral transforms integrate over the entire real line, from -\infty to \infty, suitable for functions defined on all real numbers, as in the . Unilateral transforms, like the , integrate from 0 to \infty, applying to causal functions or those with support on the non-negative reals. These distinctions affect the applicability and inversion procedures of the transform.

Motivation

Integral transforms play a pivotal role in mathematical analysis by converting complex differential equations into simpler algebraic equations, thereby facilitating their solution. For instance, differentiation in the original domain often becomes multiplication by a parameter in the transformed domain, while convolutions—integral operations that model systems like linear time-invariant processes—transform into straightforward pointwise multiplications. This algebraic simplification is particularly valuable in engineering and physics, where differential equations describe dynamic systems, allowing analysts to leverage familiar techniques from algebra rather than advanced differential methods./09%3A_Transform_Techniques_in_Physics/9.09%3A_The_Convolution_Theorem) A key advantage of integral transforms lies in their ability to handle boundary value problems and initial conditions through a natural domain shift, embedding these constraints directly into the transformed equations without explicit enforcement during solving. In boundary value problems, such as those arising in conduction or wave , transforms like the Fourier type incorporate spatial periodicity or decay conditions seamlessly, avoiding the need for series expansions or Green's functions in the original variables. Similarly, for initial value problems, the integrates time-zero states into the parameter, simplifying the treatment of transient behaviors in systems like electrical circuits or mechanical vibrations. This approach reduces and error in both analytical and numerical contexts. The conceptual shift enabled by integral transforms—from time or spatial domains to or domains—provides profound insights into oscillatory or periodic phenomena, where direct in the original domain may obscure underlying patterns. In the , components of a signal or wave are decomposed into their constituent frequencies, revealing resonances, , or structures that are difficult to discern amid time-varying complexities. This perspective is essential for understanding phenomena like in structures or electromagnetic waves, where the transformed representation highlights distribution across scales. Beyond these core benefits, integral transforms find broad utility in for filtering noise and compressing data, in physics for modeling wave propagation and quantum scattering, and in numerical methods for efficient approximations via techniques. In , they enable the isolation of bands to enhance or suppress specific features, as in audio equalization or image enhancement. In physics, applications span and acoustics, where transforms simplify the solution of Helmholtz equations governing wave behavior. Numerically, they underpin fast algorithms for solvers, improving accuracy and speed in simulations of or electromagnetic fields. These applications underscore the transforms' versatility in bridging theoretical with practical problem-solving across disciplines.

Historical Development

Early Contributions

The concept of integral transforms emerged from early efforts to solve differential equations arising in physics and astronomy during the , with Leonhard Euler laying foundational groundwork through his work on that anticipated transform methods. In the , Euler explored integrals that would later be recognized as precursors to integral transforms, particularly through his investigations of the beta and gamma functions, which he used to generalize factorials and evaluate infinite products and series in problems of and . These functions, expressed as definite integrals, provided tools for transforming problems in into more tractable forms, influencing subsequent developments in solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Euler's contributions in this period, detailed in his correspondence and publications with the St. Petersburg Academy, marked an early shift toward integral representations in . Pierre-Simon Laplace advanced these ideas significantly in the late 18th and early 19th centuries by developing what became known as the , initially as a method to solve linear ODEs encountered in and astronomy. Beginning in the , Laplace applied integral transformations to analyze planetary perturbations and gravitational interactions, transforming differential equations into algebraic ones for easier resolution. His seminal work in this area appeared in papers from onward, where he used the transform to address probability distributions and mechanical systems, and was further elaborated in his multi-volume Mécanique Céleste (1799–1825), which applied these techniques to the . Laplace's approach, rooted in , demonstrated the power of integrals for inverting differential operators in physical contexts like . Adrien-Marie Legendre contributed to the early theory in the 1780s through his studies of spherical harmonics, which involved integral expansions for representing gravitational potentials on spheres. In 1782, Legendre introduced polynomials that facilitated the decomposition of functions on the sphere into orthogonal series, serving as a transform for problems in geodesy and astronomy. These harmonics, derived from Legendre's work on the attraction of spheroids, provided a basis for integral representations of potentials, influencing later transform methods in three-dimensional settings. His developments, published in Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, emphasized orthogonality and convergence, key features of modern integral transforms. Joseph Fourier's 1822 publication of Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur represented a pivotal advancement by introducing the and integral as tools for solving the in conduction problems. Motivated by empirical studies of heat diffusion, Fourier expanded periodic functions into trigonometric series, enabling the transformation of partial differential equations into ordinary ones via . This work, building on earlier trigonometric series by Euler and Bernoulli, established the Fourier transform's role in for physical phenomena, with applications to wave propagation and . Fourier's methods, rigorously justified through his prize-winning memoir of 1807 and the 1822 treatise, shifted focus toward integral forms for non-periodic functions, setting the stage for broader applications.

Modern Advancements

In the early 20th century, David Hilbert's work on , spanning 1904 to 1912, laid the groundwork for understanding abstract integral operators through the analysis of integral equations. Hilbert's investigations into integral operators revealed the spectral decomposition, where operators could be diagonalized in a continuous spectrum, extending beyond discrete eigenvalues and influencing the formalization of integral transforms as operators on function spaces. This spectral approach, detailed in his six papers on integral equations from 1904 to 1910 and culminating in his 1912 extension to infinite-dimensional spaces, provided a rigorous framework for treating integral transforms as bounded linear operators, bridging classical analysis with modern . The , developed in the 1890s, emerged as a key tool for handling multiplicative convolutions, particularly in problems involving products of functions or scaling properties. Hjalmar Mellin's foundational contributions around 1897 formalized the transform's role in converting multiplicative operations into additive ones via its kernel, enabling efficient solutions to integral equations with power-law behaviors, such as those in and . By the mid-1910s, extensions by Mellin and contemporaries like Barnes emphasized its utility for Mellin-Barnes integrals, which resolved complex contour integrals arising in and physics, solidifying its place in transform theory. In the 1940s, the was introduced to address discrete-time signals in control systems, marking a shift toward digital applications of transforms. Developed amid post-World War II advancements in sampled-data systems, particularly for and servo mechanisms, the transform was formalized by John R. Ragazzini and in their 1952 paper, which adapted continuous Laplace methods to discrete sequences using the approach. This innovation facilitated stability analysis and design of feedback controllers, with early applications in the late 1940s at institutions like , where it enabled the transition from analog to digital . The 1980s saw the rise of wavelet transforms, offering superior localized compared to traditional Fourier methods, especially for non-stationary signals. Jean Morlet's 1982 work on wave propagation in introduced the using Gaussian-modulated plane waves, providing time-frequency resolution ideal for detecting transient features in geophysical data. Building on this, ' 1988 construction of compactly supported orthonormal wavelets enabled discrete implementations with finite preservation, revolutionizing signal compression and multiresolution in fields like . Although introduced in 1917, the Radon transform experienced significant post-1970s advancements in and , leveraging computational power for practical reconstructions. In , Godfrey Hounsfield's 1972 computed (CT) scanner applied the inverse Radon transform to X-ray projections, enabling 3D density mapping with sub-millimeter resolution and transforming diagnostic . In , recent extensions incorporate the Radon transform into schemes, where it reconstructs quantum states from marginal distributions, as explored in symplectic formulations for phase-space representations since the 1990s. Mid-20th-century developments in and profoundly shaped integral transforms by embedding them within Hilbert and Banach spaces. From the 1930s onward, the for compact operators, advanced by figures like , treated integral kernels as Hilbert-Schmidt operators, unifying transforms under bounded linear mappings and enabling convergence proofs for series expansions. This operator-theoretic perspective, consolidated by the 1950s through works on unbounded operators and distributions, facilitated generalizations like pseudo-differential operators, influencing applications in partial differential equations and .

Practical Applications

Illustrative Example

A classic illustrative example of an integral transform in action is the application of the to solve the one-dimensional , which models processes such as conduction in an infinite rod: ut=k2ux2\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = k \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}, where u(x,t)u(x,t) is the temperature at position xx and time tt, and k>0k > 0 is the . To solve this partial differential equation (PDE) with initial condition u(x,0)=ϕ(x)u(x,0) = \phi(x), apply the Fourier transform to both sides with respect to the spatial variable xx. The forward Fourier transform is defined as u^(ω,t)=u(x,t)eiωxdx\hat{u}(\omega, t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} u(x, t) e^{-i \omega x} \, dx. Transforming the PDE yields an ordinary differential equation (ODE) in the frequency domain: u^t=kω2u^(ω,t)\frac{\partial \hat{u}}{\partial t} = -k \omega^2 \hat{u}(\omega, t), with initial condition u^(ω,0)=ϕ^(ω)\hat{u}(\omega, 0) = \hat{\phi}(\omega). This first-order ODE is straightforward to solve: u^(ω,t)=ϕ^(ω)ekω2t\hat{u}(\omega, t) = \hat{\phi}(\omega) e^{-k \omega^2 t}. Applying the inverse Fourier transform, u(x,t)=12πu^(ω,t)eiωxdωu(x, t) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \hat{u}(\omega, t) e^{i \omega x} \, d\omega, gives the solution in the spatial domain: u(x,t)=12πϕ^(ω)ekω2teiωxdωu(x, t) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \hat{\phi}(\omega) e^{-k \omega^2 t} e^{i \omega x} \, d\omega. This can equivalently be expressed as a : u(x,t)=14πktϕ(y)e(xy)2/(4kt)dyu(x, t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi k t}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \phi(y) e^{-(x - y)^2 / (4 k t)} \, dy
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.