Hubbry Logo
Raman microscopeRaman microscopeMain
Open search
Raman microscope
Community hub
Raman microscope
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Raman microscope
Raman microscope
Raman microscope
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Photo of a confocal Raman imaging microscope
Confocal Raman imaging microscope
Photo of a Raman microscope, with a sample enclosure
Raman microscope

The Raman microscope is a laser-based microscopic device used to perform Raman spectroscopy.[1] The term MOLE (molecular optics laser examiner) is used to refer to the Raman-based microprobe.[1] The technique used is named after C. V. Raman, who discovered the scattering properties in liquids.[2]

Configuration

[edit]

The Raman microscope begins with a standard optical microscope, and adds an excitation laser, laser rejection filters, a spectrometer or monochromator, and an optical sensitive detector such as a charge-coupled device (CCD), or photomultiplier tube, (PMT). Traditionally Raman microscopy was used to measure the Raman spectrum of a point on a sample, more recently the technique has been extended to implement Raman spectroscopy for direct chemical imaging over the whole field of view on a 3D sample.

Imaging modes

[edit]

In direct imaging, the whole field of view is examined for scattering over a small range of wavenumbers (Raman shifts). For instance, a wavenumber characteristic for cholesterol could be used to record the distribution of cholesterol within a cell culture. The other approach is hyperspectral imaging or chemical imaging, in which thousands of Raman spectra are acquired from all over the field of view. The data can then be used to generate images showing the location and amount of different components. Taking the cell culture example, a hyperspectral image could show the distribution of cholesterol,[3] as well as proteins, nucleic acids, and fatty acids.[4][5][6] Sophisticated signal- and image-processing techniques can be used to ignore the presence of water, culture media, buffers, and other interference.

Resolution

[edit]

Raman microscopy, and in particular confocal microscopy, can reach down to sub-micrometer lateral spatial resolution.[7] Because a Raman microscope is a diffraction-limited system, its spatial resolution depends on the wavelength of light and the numerical aperture of the focusing element. In confocal Raman microscopy, the diameter of the confocal aperture is an additional factor. As a rule of thumb, the lateral spatial resolution can reach approximately the laser wavelength when using air objective lenses, while oil or water immersion objectives can provide lateral resolutions of around half the laser wavelength. This means that when operated in the visible to near-infrared range, a Raman microscope can achieve lateral resolutions of approx. 1 µm down to 250 nm, while the depth resolution (if not limited by the optical penetration depth of the sample) can range from 1-6 µm with the smallest confocal pinhole aperture to tens of micrometers when operated without a confocal pinhole.[8][9][10] Since the objective lenses of microscopes focus the laser beam down to the micrometer range, the resulting photon flux is much higher than achieved in conventional Raman setups. This has the added effect of increased photobleaching of molecules emitting interfering fluorescence. However, the high photon flux can also cause sample degradation, and thus, for each type of sample, the laser wavelength and laser power have to be carefully selected.

Raman imaging

[edit]
Chemical Imaging of a pharmaceutical emulsion with confocal Raman microscopy.
Chemical image of a pharmaceutical emulsion acquired by confocal Raman microscopy (alpha300 microscope, WITec; blue: Active pharmaceutical ingredient, green: Oil, red: Silicon impurities).

Another tool that is becoming more popular is global Raman imaging. This technique is being used for the characterization of large scale devices, mapping of different compounds and dynamics study. It has already been used for the characterization of graphene layers,[11] J-aggregated dyes inside carbon nanotubes and multiple other 2D materials such as MoS2[12] and WSe2. Since the excitation beam is dispersed over the whole field of view, those measurements can be done without damaging the sample. By using Raman microspectroscopy, in vivo time- and space-resolved Raman spectra of microscopic regions of samples can be measured. As a result, the fluorescence of water, media, and buffers can be removed. Consequently, it is suitable to examine proteins, cells and organelles.

Raman microscopy for biological and medical specimens generally uses near-infrared (NIR) lasers (785 nm diodes and 1064 nm Nd:YAG are especially common). This reduces the risk of damaging the specimen by applying higher energy wavelengths. However, the intensity of NIR Raman scattering is low (owing to the ω4 dependence of Raman scattering intensity), and most detectors require very long collection times. Recently, more sensitive detectors have become available, making the technique better suited to general use. Raman microscopy of inorganic specimens, such as rocks, ceramics and polymers,[13] can use a broader range of excitation wavelengths.

A related technique, tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, can produce high-resolution hyperspectral images of single molecules[14] and DNA.[15]

Correlative Raman imaging

[edit]
Correlative Raman-SEM imaging of a hematite.
Correlative Raman-SEM imaging of a hematite (taken with RISE microscope, WITec). The Raman image is overlaid over the SEM image.

Confocal Raman microscopy can be combined with numerous other microscopy techniques. By using different methods and correlating the data, the user attains a more comprehensive understanding of the sample. Common examples of correlative microscopy techniques are Raman-AFM,[16][13] Raman-SNOM,[17] and Raman-SEM.[18]

Correlative SEM-Raman imaging is the integration of a confocal Raman microscope into an SEM chamber which allows correlative imaging of several techniques, such as SE, BSE, EDX, EBSD, EBIC, CL, AFM.[19] The sample is placed in the vacuum chamber of the electron microscope. Both analysis methods are then performed automatically at the same sample location. The obtained SEM and Raman images can then be superimposed.[20][21] Moreover, adding a focused ion beam (FIB) on the chamber allows removal of the material and therefore 3D imaging of the sample. Low-vacuum mode allows analysis on biological and non-conductive samples.

Biological Applications

[edit]

By using Raman microspectroscopy, in vivo time- and space-resolved Raman spectra of microscopic regions of samples can be measured. Sampling is non-destructive and water, media, and buffers typically do not interfere with the analysis. Consequently, in vivo time- and space-resolved Raman spectroscopy is suitable to examine proteins, cells and organs. In the field of microbiology, confocal Raman microspectroscopy has been used to map intracellular distributions of macromolecules, such as proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids and polymeric inclusions, such as poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid and polyphosphates in bacteria and sterols in microalgae. Combining stable isotopic probing (SIP) experiments with confocal Raman microspectroscopy has permitted determination of assimilation rates of 13C and 15N-substrates as well as D2O by individual bacterial cells.[22]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Raman microscope

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A Raman microscope is an analytical instrument that combines the principles of with optical microscopy to enable non-destructive chemical analysis and imaging of samples at microscopic spatial resolutions, typically down to 0.5–1 µm. It utilizes a to illuminate the sample, detecting of light (the Raman effect) to reveal molecular vibrations that provide a unique "fingerprint" of the material's , structure, phase, and crystallinity without requiring . The technique is grounded in the Raman effect, discovered in 1928 by Indian physicist , who observed that a very small fraction (about 0.00001%, or 1 in 10 million) of incident monochromatic light scatters inelastically, shifting in wavelength based on the sample's molecular bonds and vibrations. In a Raman microscope, this is achieved through confocal optics, high-numerical-aperture objectives (e.g., N.A. 0.75 for a ~0.44 µm spot size at 514 nm wavelength), and a spectrometer coupled with a (CCD) detector to collect and analyze the scattered light spectrum. Key advantages include its versatility for solids, liquids, gases, and aqueous solutions; insensitivity to ; and ability to probe subsurface features or stress/strain in materials (e.g., a 10 cm⁻¹ spectral shift per 1% strain in ). Raman microscopy was pioneered in the 1970s in by researchers Michel Delhaye and Paul Dhamelincourt, with the first commercial instrument, the MOLE (Molecular Optical Laser Examiner), introduced by what is now HORIBA Scientific. It has since evolved with advancements in technology (common wavelengths: 244 nm, 514 nm, 785 nm), automated mapping stages for chemical imaging (e.g., scanning 9 mm × 16 mm areas with thousands of spectra in minutes), and integration with other modalities like scanning microscopy for enhanced correlative analysis. Applications span diverse fields, including for semiconductors and polymers, pharmaceuticals for drug formulation and polymorphism, life sciences for cellular imaging, for mineral identification, forensics, and art conservation, where it enables label-free, characterization of complex, heterogeneous samples.

Fundamentals

Principles of Raman Spectroscopy

The Raman effect refers to the of monochromatic light by s, where the scattered s experience a change in energy due to interactions with molecular vibrational, rotational, and other low-frequency modes. This phenomenon, first observed in , results in two primary types of shifts: Stokes scattering, where the scattered light has lower energy (longer wavelength) than the incident light as the molecule gains energy from the photon, and anti-Stokes scattering, where the scattered light has higher energy (shorter wavelength) as energy is transferred from an already excited molecule to the photon. The energy shift, known as the Raman shift, is quantified in wavenumbers (cm⁻¹) by the equation Δν=ν0−ν1,\Delta \nu = \nu_0 - \nu_1, where Δν\Delta \nu is the Raman shift, ν0\nu_0 is the wavenumber of the incident light, and ν1\nu_1 is the wavenumber of the scattered . For Stokes lines, Δν\Delta \nu is positive, corresponding directly to the energy difference between molecular vibrational states, while anti-Stokes lines exhibit a negative shift of equal magnitude but are typically weaker at due to fewer molecules in excited vibrational states. This shift provides a direct measure of the molecular energy levels involved. Raman activity follows specific selection rules: a vibrational mode is Raman-active if it induces a change in the molecular —the ease with which the electron cloud distorts in response to an —during the vibration. This contrasts with (IR) , where activity requires a change in the molecule's dipole moment. As a result, Raman and IR are complementary techniques, with Raman often detecting symmetric modes (e.g., homonuclear diatomic stretches) that are IR-inactive. The Raman spectrum acts as a molecular , with unique band positions arising from specific bond vibrations; for instance, the C-H modes in organic compounds appear around 2900 cm⁻¹, while the amide I band (primarily C=O stretch in proteins) occurs near 1650 cm⁻¹. These signatures enable precise identification of and structures without . However, the Raman effect is inherently weak, with a typical cross-section on the order of 10⁻³⁰ cm² per per , necessitating high-intensity sources to achieve detectable signals.

Historical Development

The Raman effect was discovered in 1928 by Indian physicist Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman, who observed that a small portion of light scattered by molecules undergoes a shift due to , providing a means to probe molecular vibrations. For this groundbreaking work, Raman was awarded the in 1930, marking the inception of what would become . In the decades following the discovery, advanced without lasers, relying on intense light sources like mercury arc lamps for excitation during through , with detection via photographic plates or early spectrophotometers. These early instruments cataloged molecular vibrational frequencies but suffered from weak signals and long exposure times, limiting widespread adoption. The of the continuous-wave helium-neon (He-Ne) in revolutionized the field by providing a coherent, monochromatic light source, enabling the first commercial laser-based Raman spectrometers in the mid-1960s and dramatically improving signal intensity and . Raman microscopy emerged in the 1970s through the integration of with optical , particularly with the development of confocal optics to achieve on the micrometer scale; French researchers Michel Delhaye and Paul Dhamelincourt at the built the first Raman microprobe, known as the MOLE (Molecular Optic Laser Examiner), around 1975. The first commercial Raman microscopes appeared in the 1980s from Instruments SA (now part of HORIBA), commercializing these designs for broader scientific use. Subsequent milestones included the introduction of fully confocal Raman microscopes in the 1990s, such as HORIBA's LabRAM system in 1993, which enhanced depth resolution and enabled three-dimensional chemical . In the 2000s, tip-enhanced (TERS) variants emerged, with the first experimental demonstrations in 2000 using scanning probe tips to achieve nanoscale resolution through plasmonic enhancement. The 2010s saw advances in stimulated (SRS) microscopy, first reported in 2008, which provided faster, background-free by amplifying Raman signals coherently for live-cell and biomedical applications. More recently, post-2020 developments have focused on accessibility, exemplified by the Open Raman Microscopy (ORM) framework introduced in a 2025 , offering modular, and software for customizable, cost-effective Raman systems.

Instrumentation and Configuration

Optical Components and Setup

A Raman microscope integrates a Raman spectrometer with an optical microscope to enable spatially resolved chemical analysis at the micrometer scale. The core hardware includes a laser source for excitation, a beam expander to adjust the beam diameter, a dichroic mirror to direct the incident light, a high-numerical-aperture (NA) objective lens for focusing, a sample stage for positioning, a notch filter to suppress Rayleigh scattering, a spectrometer for dispersing the signal, and a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector for recording the spectrum. This setup typically employs either an upright or inverted microscope configuration, with upright systems suitable for opaque or thick samples and inverted ones ideal for transparent or liquid-containing specimens. High-NA objectives, such as 100× with NA 1.4, focus the laser beam to the diffraction limit, achieving spot sizes of approximately 200–500 nm, which defines the spatial resolution for sample interrogation. The beam path in a standard Raman microscope follows a 180° backscattering to maximize signal collection efficiency. The beam passes through the beam expander to match the objective's , then reflects off the dichroic mirror toward the objective lens, which tightly focuses it onto the sample. The inelastically scattered Raman light, along with elastic , is collected back through the same objective and transmitted through the dichroic mirror, which is designed to reflect the excitation wavelength while passing longer wavelengths. A notch filter subsequently removes the intense Rayleigh component, allowing the weaker Raman signal to enter the spectrometer for wavelength dispersion and analysis by the CCD detector. Sample handling in Raman microscopes relies on precision stages that enable controlled 2D or 3D translation for mapping across regions of interest. These stages, often motorized and computer-controlled, accommodate a variety of sample types, including solids, powders, and biological materials, with minimal preparation required. For aqueous or hydrated samples, immersion objectives—such as water or oil types—minimize mismatches, reducing aberrations and improving depth penetration. Safety and alignment procedures are integral to Raman microscope operation due to the use of high-power lasers classified as Class 3B or 4. Enclosures, interlocks, and protective eyewear are standard to prevent exposure, while automated alignment systems use beam-steering optics and feedback mechanisms to ensure the laser focuses precisely at the sample plane, optimizing signal-to-noise ratios. Proper alignment of the spectrometer entrance slit with the focused beam is critical to avoid signal loss and maintain spectral fidelity.

Laser Sources and Detectors

Laser sources in Raman microscopy primarily consist of solid-state, , and tunable lasers, which provide the monochromatic excitation light necessary for generating Raman scattering signals. Solid-state lasers, such as frequency-doubled Nd:YAG lasers emitting at 532 nm, are commonly used for their stability and efficiency in visible-range applications. lasers, particularly those at 785 nm, offer compact, cost-effective options with low power consumption, making them suitable for routine microscopy setups. Tunable lasers, like Ti:Sapphire systems, allow flexibility across a broad spectrum (e.g., 700-1000 nm) for specialized experiments requiring variable excitation. Common excitation wavelengths include 532 nm (green), 785 nm (near-infrared), and 1064 nm, selected based on the sample's to optimize signal intensity while minimizing interference. The cross-section scales with the of the excitation , favoring shorter wavelengths like 532 nm for stronger signals in non-fluorescent materials, but longer wavelengths such as 785 nm or 1064 nm are preferred for biological samples to reduce autofluorescence from electronic transitions. For instance, near-infrared (e.g., 785 nm) provide a balance between efficiency and low fluorescence background, essential for imaging organic tissues without sample damage. Laser power at the sample typically ranges from 1 to 100 mW, with 5-50 mW common to achieve sufficient signal without inducing or heating effects. Detection in Raman microscopy relies on spectrometers and sensitive array detectors to disperse and capture the weak inelastically scattered light. Grating-based spectrometers in Czerny-Turner configuration, featuring an entrance slit, two concave mirrors, a , and an exit port, are standard for their high throughput and ability to resolve Raman shifts. These systems achieve spectral resolutions of approximately 1-5 cm⁻¹, determined by grating groove density (e.g., 1200 lines/mm) and slit width, enabling clear separation of vibrational bands. Charge-coupled devices (CCDs) serve as primary detectors due to their high quantum efficiency (>90% in the visible range) and low noise, ideal for integrating the dispersed across multiple pixels. For low-light conditions prevalent in Raman imaging, electron-multiplying CCDs (EMCCDs) enhance sensitivity through on-chip amplification, achieving sub-electron readout and detecting signals at exposure times as short as 5 ms. Array detectors like CCDs and EMCCDs enable parallel acquisition of the full , outperforming single-point detectors in speed and resolution for applications. Scientific (sCMOS) detectors are increasingly used as alternatives, offering faster readout rates (>50 Hz) and larger for brighter signals, though with slightly higher than EMCCDs in ultra-low-light scenarios. Noise reduction is critical for reliable Raman detection, with thermoelectric (Peltier) cooling of detectors reducing dark current—thermally generated electrons that mimic signal—by 50% for every 5-7°C temperature drop. Cooled CCDs and EMCCDs, often maintained at -30 to -70°C below ambient using single- or two-stage Peltier elements, minimize dark noise to negligible levels, enhancing signal-to-noise ratios in quantitative biological imaging. This cooling also suppresses at low frequencies, allowing longer integration times without thermal saturation.

Imaging Modes

Point Illumination and Scanning

In point mapping mode, the beam is focused to a diffraction-limited spot of approximately 1 μm in diameter on the sample surface, allowing for precise localized excitation of . The illumination point is then raster-scanned across the region of interest using either a motorized XY translation stage or galvanometer-controlled mirrors to systematically cover the area by . This sequential acquisition approach typically requires an integration time of seconds to minutes per point to achieve sufficient , depending on the power, sample properties, and desired spectral quality. The resulting dataset forms a hyperspectral datacube, where each spatial position (x, y) is associated with a full Raman spectrum across wavelengths (λ), enabling multidimensional chemical analysis. Post-acquisition, spectral unmixing algorithms are applied to decompose the datacube into constituent chemical components, facilitating the generation of false-color chemical maps that highlight spatial distributions of specific molecular species. This mode offers high signal-to-noise ratios for detecting weak Raman signals, as the entire power is concentrated on a single point, maximizing collection efficiency from that location. It is particularly well-suited for heterogeneous samples, where fine spatial variations in composition require targeted, high-fidelity measurements to resolve subtle chemical gradients. Software processing is essential for , including baseline correction to remove fluorescence-induced offsets and cosmic ray removal to eliminate spurious spikes from high-energy particles. Point illumination and scanning are commonly employed for high-resolution chemical profiling in two-dimensional surface mappings and three-dimensional volumetric reconstructions, such as delineating phase distributions in composite materials or tracking molecular changes within layered structures.

Wide-Field and Global Imaging

In wide-field Raman microscopy, an expanded beam illuminates the entire simultaneously, enabling parallel acquisition of Raman signals from multiple spatial points without mechanical scanning. This approach typically employs a continuous-wave focused at the back focal plane of the objective to achieve homogeneous illumination over areas up to 110 × 110 μm². Wavelength selection is facilitated by tunable filters, such as tunable filters (LCTFs), which allow continuous spectral tuning (e.g., 420–730 nm) with a bandwidth of about 10 nm (300 cm⁻¹), isolating specific Raman bands like the peak at 520.7 cm⁻¹. Detection occurs via high-sensitivity 2D array detectors, such as electron-multiplying charge-coupled devices (EMCCDs) with 512 × 512 pixels operating at up to 56 frames per second, cooled to minimize noise. Global Raman imaging extends this parallelism by incorporating spatial light modulators (SLMs) or structured illumination to enhance resolution and throughput in full-field detection setups. For instance, structured illumination Raman microscopy (SIRM) uses a (DMD) as an SLM to project interference fringes onto the sample, modulating high-frequency spatial information that is later demodulated via phase-shift algorithms for down to 80 nm spatially and 50 cm⁻¹ spectrally. Full-field detection relies on 2D array detectors like sCMOS cameras (e.g., ORCA-Flash 4.0), capturing across the entire illuminated area in a single exposure or a few sequential frames. This method supports excitation tailored with sparse-sampling masks in variants like spatial light-modulated stimulated (SLM-SRS). These techniques offer significant speed advantages over point illumination scanning, which requires sequential pixel-by-pixel acquisition and can take hours for large fields, by enabling image acquisition in seconds to minutes—for example, 9 seconds for a 32 × 32 μm² megapixel image in SIRM or 38 minutes for a 512 × 512 Raman using Fourier-transform approaches. However, the parallel nature reduces signal intensity per due to distributed power, leading to lower (e.g., 2.7 × 10³ W/cm² versus 10⁶ W/cm² in scanning) and potential trade-offs in or spectral fidelity, often necessitating multiple acquisitions (e.g., 9 frames) for reconstruction. A common variant, line-scanning Raman microscopy, uses slit illumination to project a line-shaped beam across the sample, combined with one-axis mechanical scanning, providing a compromise between the full parallelism of wide-field methods and the high signal-to-noise of point scanning. This setup focuses through a spectrometer slit onto a 2D detector, achieving imaging speeds over 100 times faster than confocal scanning (e.g., 185 seconds per frame versus hours) while maintaining diffraction-limited resolution. Data handling in these modes often involves multivariate analysis for image reconstruction, such as (PCA) for and clustering of hyperspectral datasets, or multivariate curve resolution (MCR) to decompose mixed spectra into pure components and concentration maps, enhancing contrast and specificity in complex samples.

Resolution and Limitations

Spatial and Spectral Resolution

The spatial resolution of a Raman microscope is fundamentally limited by , governed by the excitation λ and the NA of the objective lens. The lateral resolution is approximately λ/(2 NA), yielding typical values of 250–500 nm for visible lasers (λ ≈ 500–800 nm) with high-NA objectives (NA ≈ 0.9–1.4). Axial resolution, which determines depth selectivity, is poorer and scales as λ/NA², typically achieving 1–2 μm under similar conditions due to the elongated focal volume along the . Spectral resolution in Raman microscopy refers to the spectrometer's ability to distinguish closely spaced Raman shifts, primarily determined by the diffraction 's groove density (lines per ) and the illuminated grating area. The minimum resolvable wavenumber shift Δν is approximated by Δν = 1/(d sin θ), where d is the grating spacing (d = 1/groove density) and θ is the diffraction angle; practical systems with 600–1800 grooves/ gratings and narrow slits achieve 1–10 cm⁻¹ resolution. This underpins chemical resolution, enabling the identification of distinct molecular species through separation of vibrational peaks differing by as little as 10 cm⁻¹, such as the symmetric and asymmetric stretches in ions. Standard calibration of spectral resolution often employs beads or films, whose well-characterized Raman bands (e.g., at 1001 cm⁻¹) serve as traceable references for verifying instrument performance per ASTM E1843 guidelines.

Factors Affecting Resolution

Autofluorescence represents a primary limiting resolution in Raman microscopy, arising from the excitation of endogenous in biological samples, such as aromatic amino acids like and , which produce broad bands overlapping the Raman signal. This background interference significantly reduces the signal-to-background (SBR), often by orders of magnitude in pigmented or organic-rich specimens. Mitigation strategies include shifting to longer excitation wavelengths, such as 1064 nm, which minimize fluorophore excitation and can improve the SBR by reducing fluorescence intensity compared to shorter wavelengths like 785 nm, thereby enhancing effective resolution in challenging samples. Sample heterogeneity, particularly in turbid media like tissues, introduces scattering losses that degrade resolution by diffusing the incident and collected light, confining to approximately 100 μm in conventional setups. In such media, multiple events cause photons to follow random paths rather than ballistic trajectories, leading to signal and spatial blurring that limits the achievable detail. This effect is pronounced in biological tissues with high or cellular content, where Mie and dominate, further reducing contrast and effective resolution. Instrumental noise sources, including , read noise, and thermal effects, impose operational limits on resolution by introducing variability in the detected Raman signal. , governed by Poisson statistics, scales with the square root of count and becomes prominent in low-signal regimes typical of . Read noise originates from detector electronics during signal readout and remains constant regardless of exposure, while thermal effects generate dark current through electron-hole pairs in the detector, exacerbating noise at elevated temperatures. These noises collectively lower the , effectively broadening spectral features and diminishing spatial fidelity during imaging. Alignment issues, such as beam walk-off or focus drift during extended scans, arise from mechanical vibrations, thermal expansions, or optical misalignments, causing deviations in the focal plane and resultant resolution loss. In long-duration acquisitions, even minor drifts can shift the excitation spot by several micrometers, leading to inconsistent sampling and artifacts in reconstructed images. Maintaining precise alignment through active stabilization or periodic recalibration is essential to preserve resolution over time. Overall, these factors can degrade resolution by up to twofold in biological samples compared to ideal conditions, primarily due to mismatch between the sample (typically n ≈ 1.4–1.5) and the objective's immersion medium (e.g., air n = 1 or water n = 1.33), inducing spherical aberrations that elongate the axial . This mismatch distorts the focal volume, reducing both lateral and depth resolution in practice, though it aligns with theoretical spatial limits under .

Enhancement Techniques

Confocal and Tip-Enhanced Methods

Confocal Raman microscopy employs a pinhole , typically sized between 10 and 100 μm, positioned in the to reject out-of-focus light, thereby enhancing the spatial selectivity of the Raman signal collection. This configuration significantly improves axial resolution to approximately 0.5–1 μm, compared to the diffraction-limited baseline of several micrometers in non-confocal setups, enabling optical sectioning for three-dimensional imaging of samples. The pinhole acts as a , confining the detection volume and allowing for depth-resolved analysis without physical slicing, which is particularly useful for layered or heterogeneous materials. Tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) overcomes the diffraction limit of conventional Raman microscopy by using plasmonic tips, such as those coated with silver (Ag) or (Au) nanoparticles, to localize the and amplify the Raman signal by factors of 10 to 100 times. This near-field enhancement achieves spatial resolutions below 10 nm, enabling nanoscale chemical mapping of surfaces and interfaces. TERS configurations are broadly classified into apertureless and apertured types; apertureless setups rely on scattering from the tip apex in (AFM) or scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) modes, while apertured variants integrate a subwavelength in the tip, often combined with STM for precise control. Excitation schemes in TERS include normal (top or bottom) illumination, where the is directed along the tip axis, and side illumination, which focuses the beam perpendicular to the tip-sample gap to minimize background scattering. Key challenges in TERS include maintaining tip stability during scanning to avoid signal fluctuations and achieving reproducible enhancement across multiple probes due to variations in tip geometry and plasmonic properties. The enhancement factor GG arises primarily from the electromagnetic mechanism and is given by G=∣ElocalEinc∣4,G = \left| \frac{E_\text{local}}{E_\text{inc}} \right|^4,
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.