Hubbry Logo
Raymond GeussRaymond GeussMain
Open search
Raymond Geuss
Community hub
Raymond Geuss
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Raymond Geuss
Raymond Geuss
Raymond Geuss
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Raymond Geuss, FBA (/ɡɔɪs/; born 1946) is an American political philosopher and scholar of 19th and 20th century European philosophy. He is currently Emeritus Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Cambridge. Geuss is primarily known for three reasons: his early account of ideology critique in The Idea of a Critical Theory; a recent collection of works instrumental to the emergence of political realism in Anglophone political philosophy over the last decade, including Philosophy and Real Politics; and a variety of free-standing essays on issues including aesthetics, Nietzsche, contextualism, phenomenology, intellectual history, culture and ancient philosophy.

Key Information

Life

[edit]

Geuss was educated at Columbia University (undergraduate B.A., summa cum laude, 1966, and Ph.D., 1971).[2] His Ph.D. thesis was written under the direction of Robert Denoon Cumming. Geuss was also greatly influenced by Sidney Morgenbesser during his university education.

Geuss taught at Princeton University, Columbia University, and University of Chicago in the United States, and at Heidelberg and Freiburg in Germany before taking up a lecturing post at Cambridge in 1993. In 2000 he became a naturalised British citizen.[3] He was elected a Fellow of the British Academy in 2011.[4]

Geuss has supervised the graduate work of several prominent scholars working in the history of continental philosophy, social and political philosophy and in the philosophy of art. His students include former Southern Poverty Law Center president J. Richard Cohen, filmmaker Ethan Coen and Cornel West.[5]

Work

[edit]

To date, Geuss has published 16 books of philosophy, of which four are collections of essays. They are: The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School; Morality, Culture, and History; Public Goods, Private Goods; History and Illusion in Politics; Glück und Politik; Outside Ethics, Philosophy and Real Politics, Politics and the Imagination, A World without Why, Reality and its Dreams, Changing the Subject: Philosophy from Socrates to Adorno, Who Needs a World View?, Not Thinking like a Liberal, and A Philosopher looks at Work. He has also co-edited two critical editions of works of Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy and Writings from the Early Notebooks. Geuss has also published two collections of translations/adaptations of poetry from Ancient Greek, Latin and Old High German texts.

Reception

[edit]

Alasdair MacIntyre has written the following about Geuss:[6]

No one among contemporary moral and political philosophers writes better essays than Raymond Geuss. His prose is crisp, elegant, and lucid. His arguments are to the point. And, by inviting us to reconsider what we have hitherto taken for granted, he puts in question not just this or that particular philosophical thesis, but some of the larger projects in which we are engaged. Often enough Geuss does this with remarkable economy, provoking us into first making his questions our own and then discovering how difficult it is to answer them.

Books

[edit]
  • Geuss, Raymond (1981). The Idea of a Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521284226.
  • Geuss, Raymond (1999). Morality, Culture, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521632027.
  • Geuss, Raymond (1999). Parrots, Poets, Philosophers, & Good Advice. London: Hearing Eye. ISBN 978-1870841634.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2001). History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521805964.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2001). Public Goods, Private Goods. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691089034.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2004). Glück und Politik [Happiness and Politics]. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. ISBN 978-3830509448.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2005). Outside Ethics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691123417.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691137889.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2010). Politics and the Imagination. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691155883.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2014). A World Without Why. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691155883.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2016). Reality and its Dreams. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674504950.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2017). Changing the Subject: Philosophy from Socrates to Adorno. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674545724.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2020). Who Needs a World View?. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674245938.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2021). A Philosopher Looks at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1108930611.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2022). Not Thinking Like a Liberal. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0674270343.
  • Geuss, Raymond (2024). Seeing Double. Cambridge: Polity. ISBN 978-1509560882.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Raymond Geuss

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Raymond Geuss (born 10 December 1946) is an American-born philosopher and Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge, specializing in political philosophy and the history of Continental philosophy. Originally from Evansville, Indiana, he earned his B.A. and Ph.D. from Columbia University and held academic positions at institutions including Princeton, Columbia, and the University of Chicago before emigrating to the United Kingdom in 1993. Geuss's work critiques dominant strands of normative political theory, particularly those rooted in abstract ideals of justice, advocating instead for a realist approach grounded in the empirical dynamics of power, historical contingency, and actual political practices. His seminal book Philosophy and Real Politics (2008) exemplifies this perspective, arguing that political philosophy should begin from the realities of coercion and order-maintenance rather than presupposing moral consensus or universal principles, thereby challenging figures like John Rawls whose theories Geuss views as detached from causal mechanisms in politics. Earlier, The Idea of a Critical Theory (1981) reconstructed the Frankfurt School's emancipatory aims through a lens skeptical of grand theoretical aspirations, influencing subsequent debates on ideology critique. Geuss's broader oeuvre, including collections like Outside Ethics (2005) and A World Without Why (2014), extends this realism to ethics, aesthetics, and philosophy's cultural embeddedness, emphasizing interpretive depth over foundationalism.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Raymond Geuss was born on December 10, 1946, in Evansville, Indiana, the hometown of his father. His family relocated to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1947 after his father secured employment in a local steel mill. Geuss grew up in a working-class Catholic household; his father worked as a steelworker—or more precisely, a mechanic in the steel industry—in eastern Pennsylvania during the 1950s and 1960s, having himself been raised in Evansville and attempted to leave the working class by training as a Catholic priest, one of the limited avenues available for social mobility at the time. His mother hailed from Pennsylvania, contributing to a devout Catholic family environment that emphasized religious observance and shaped his early worldview. Geuss's father later suffered a serious illness, which strained the family circumstances and influenced his upbringing outside Philadelphia. This background, marked by economic precarity and strong Catholic traditions, distanced him from mainstream American cultural norms and fostered a contrarian perspective from a young age.

Formal Education and Early Intellectual Influences

Geuss received his in the late and early at Devon Preparatory School, a Catholic boarding institution near run by Hungarian émigré priests who had fled the Soviet invasion of Hungary. Admitted at age 13 on scholarship, he encountered a rigorous intellectual environment shaped by scholars emphasizing classical languages, , and anti-communist resilience. He then pursued undergraduate and graduate studies at , entering as a 16-year-old in 1963, earning a BA summa cum laude, and completing a PhD in in 1971. At Devon, Geuss's primary intellectual influence was Father Béla Krigler, a Hungarian priest and teacher whose Thomistic worldview integrated faith with critical inquiry into modernity's illusions, fostering in Geuss an early skepticism toward simplistic rationalism and a appreciation for historical contingency in belief formation. Krigler's emphasis on philosophy as therapeutic critique of ideological distortions left a lasting imprint, evident in Geuss's later rejection of ahistorical moral universalism. Transitioning to Columbia amid the era's political ferment, Geuss credited Sidney Morgenbesser, his most formative university mentor, with embodying a pragmatist approach to philosophy as "practical surrealism"—a method of exposing conceptual pretensions through ironic questioning rather than systematic theory-building. Morgenbesser's dynamic seminars, influenced by Wittgenstein and ordinary language philosophy, taught Geuss to prioritize real-world linguistic practices over abstract ideals, while his involvement in campus protests modeled intellectual engagement with power dynamics. Supplementary influences included Robert Paul Wolff's Marxist-anarchist critiques of authority and Arthur Danto's analytic rigor, which together oriented Geuss toward interdisciplinary scrutiny of ideology and history. This foundation, blending Catholic realism with pragmatic skepticism, underpinned his enduring critique of ethics-first political thought.

Academic Career

Teaching Positions and Professional Trajectory

Geuss began his academic career in as a Wissenschaftlicher Assistent at the Philosophisches Seminar of Ruprecht-Karls-Universität from 1971 to 1973. He then returned to the , serving as of at from 1973 to 1976. Subsequently, Geuss held positions at , first as Assistant Professor of from 1976 to 1979, followed by a return as from 1983 to 1986 and Professor from 1986 to 1987. He also taught at the as of from 1979 to 1983, and later at Columbia as Professor of from 1987 to 1991 and Professor of from 1991 to 1993. These appointments reflect his early focus on philosophy departments in leading American institutions, interspersed with shorter-term roles. In 1993, Geuss relocated to the , joining the as University Lecturer in the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences from 1993 to 1997, then shifting to the Faculty of as University Lecturer from 1997 to 2000. He advanced to Reader in from 2000 to 2007, and was appointed of in 2007, a position he held until retirement, after which he became Professor Emeritus. This trajectory marks a transition from analytic philosophy environments in the to a broader engagement with and political theory in , where he contributed to interdisciplinary faculties. Throughout his career, Geuss undertook visiting appointments, including at (1981), (1986, 1989), Yale (1990–1991), (1992), and (1992, 1999), alongside a fellowship at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu from 1982 to 1983. These roles facilitated his exposure to European intellectual traditions, influencing his later realist turn in .

Mentorship and Institutional Impact

Geuss supervised graduate students in and the history of continental thought at both and the , guiding research that interrogated ideology, power, and historical context in politics. At , where he served as from 1976 to 1979 and later as associate and full professor in the 1980s, Geuss co-supervised Cornel West's 1980 PhD dissertation on ethics, historicity, and alongside . This work positioned West as the first African American to receive a from Princeton. In Cambridge's Faculty of Philosophy, Geuss's supervision emphasized non-ideal theory and realism, influencing students to prioritize empirical and causal factors in political analysis over abstract normative ideals. His approach countered prevailing ethics-first methodologies, fostering scholarship attentive to the contingencies of power and . Institutionally, Geuss advanced Cambridge's engagement with continental traditions within its analytic-oriented framework during his tenure from 1993 to 2014. He progressed from university lecturer in social and political sciences (1993–1997) and (1997–2000) to reader (2000–2007) and (2007–2014), shaping curriculum and research toward historically informed political theory. As co-general editor with of the Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought series, published by , he curated accessible editions of foundational works, broadening scholarly access to pre-modern and non-liberal political ideas. Geuss's two decades at , following over a decade at Princeton and other institutions, totaled more than forty years in academia by his 2014 retirement, during which he resisted academic conformism and promoted toward universalist assumptions in . Colleagues acknowledged his role in diversifying the department's intellectual scope amid institutional pressures favoring mainstream liberal paradigms.

Philosophical Development

Engagement with Critical Theory and Ideology

Geuss's initial philosophical engagement with centered on the 's tradition of ideology critique, as elaborated in his 1981 monograph The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. In this text, published by on October 27, 1981, Geuss reconstructed the early approach—drawing from Max Horkheimer's 1937 "Traditional and Critical Theory" and Theodor Adorno's dialectical method—as involving a diagnostic uncovering of distortions in , rather than a purely normative or empirical . He argued that functions not merely as erroneous belief but as a psychologically entrenched mechanism that aligns individuals' perceptions with prevailing power structures, often through unconscious defensive processes akin to Freudian repression. Central to Geuss's analysis was a critique of Jürgen Habermas's efforts to systematize via a theory of and universal pragmatics, which Geuss contended abstracted critique from its historical and causal specificity. Habermas, in works like Knowledge and Human Interests (1968), had sought to ground critique in linguistic and from systematic distortion, but Geuss maintained that this shifted toward an ahistorical , diluting its capacity to address as a concrete, interest-bound deformation of understanding. Instead, Geuss advocated for "," wherein the theorist deploys standards implicit within the ideological object itself to expose its incoherence, without relying on external transcendental norms—a method he traced to Adorno's (1966). Geuss further specified ideology's dual aspects: an "evaluative" dimension, where it masks domination by presenting contingent arrangements as necessary, and a "descriptive" one, involving empirical claims about that sustain power asymmetries. He illustrated this through Marxist precedents, such as Karl Marx's analysis in (1845–1846) of how ruling-class ideas naturalize exploitation, but extended it via innovations to include non-economic ideologies, like those in or . This framework positioned as empirically informed yet distinct from positivist science, emphasizing causal explanations of belief formation rooted in social practices and power relations, rather than detached observation. While Geuss's 1981 intervention defended against Habermas's rationalist turn, it already hinted at limitations in the legacy, such as its occasional overreliance on totalizing diagnoses of . He insisted, however, that effective requires grasping 's adaptive role in stabilizing societies amid conflict, a view informed by historical contingencies rather than utopian projections. This early work established Geuss's commitment to a realism-inflected , prioritizing causal mechanisms over prescriptive ideals.

Shift to Political Realism

Geuss's philosophical trajectory, initially rooted in and ideology critique as explored in his 1981 work The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School, began to pivot toward political realism in the early 2000s. This shift rejected the emancipatory aspirations of , which he came to view as overly normative and detached from the contingencies of political practice. Instead, Geuss emphasized the need for to engage with the actualities of power, history, and , critiquing dominant approaches that prioritize ethical ideals over empirical realities of . The publication of Philosophy and Real Politics in 2008 crystallized this turn, where Geuss systematically dismantled the "ethics-first" paradigm prevalent in Anglo-American , exemplified by thinkers like and . He argued that such approaches illegitimately derive political norms from abstract moral principles, ignoring the distinct grammar of politics as a realm of coercion, negotiation, and strategic maneuvering rather than rational consensus or justice application. For Geuss, genuine political understanding requires starting from the motivations of real actors—such as the pursuit of advantage or survival—rather than imposing ethical blueprints that fail to account for historical specificity or the inescapability of conflict. This realist orientation positioned politics not as a subordinate domain to ethics but as autonomous, demanding analysis of illusions, ideologies, and power asymmetries without the presumption of universal moral progress. Geuss contended that ethics-first views foster utopianism, leading to prescriptions disconnected from feasible action, as seen in liberal theories that overlook how ethical claims often mask partisan interests. Subsequent essays and works, such as those in Politics and the Imagination (2010), extended this by underscoring the role of narrative and imagination in political legitimacy, further distancing his thought from earlier critical theory's focus on unmasking ideology toward a pragmatic assessment of what sustains order amid contingency.

Key Concepts and Arguments

Critique of Ethics-First Political Philosophy

Geuss distinguishes "ethics-first" political philosophy, which prioritizes abstract moral principles such as justice or rights before engaging with political reality, from a realist approach that begins with the actual practices, power dynamics, and contingencies of politics. In works like Philosophy and Real Politics (2008), he argues that ethics-first methods, dominant in post-Rawlsian analytic philosophy, generate theories detached from how political actors actually behave, rendering them ineffective for understanding or influencing real-world politics. This approach assumes that ethical ideals can be straightforwardly applied to political institutions, but Geuss contends it overlooks the formative role of power in shaping what counts as legitimate action or justification. A core target of Geuss's critique is John Rawls's framework in (1971), which posits an "" to derive principles of under a veil of ignorance, presuming rational consensus on universal norms. Geuss rejects this as incoherent, arguing that it fabricates a fantasy of ignoring the ineliminable conflicts, historical contexts, and strategic maneuvers inherent in ; real agents do not deliberate from such idealized starting points but from situated interests and power asymmetries. He further critiques the method's "alienation" from political practice, where normative theories fail to address questions of feasibility, timing, or the Nietzschean concern with prioritizing ideals amid competing urgencies, such as distinguishing between pursuing now versus maintaining stability. Ethics-first views, in Geuss's analysis, risk becoming ideological by cloaking particular interests in universalist , potentially justifying coercion under the guise of moral necessity. Geuss proposes instead a "politics-first" realism that interrogates the conditions under which ethical claims gain traction in political life, drawing on historical episodes like the Thatcher era's market reforms to illustrate how power precedes and constrains moral discourse. This shift demands examining illusions and ideologies not as mere errors but as functional elements in political maneuvering, challenging the ethics-first presumption that politics ought to mirror ethical theory. While acknowledging the influence of Kantian and liberal traditions, Geuss maintains that such approaches systematically undervalue the craft-like, non-ideal nature of politics as a domain of contestation rather than rational consensus. His critique thus urges political philosophers to prioritize empirical realism over normative prescription, though he cautions against descending into mere description without evaluative potential.

Role of History, Power, and Illusion in Politics

In History and Illusion in Politics (2001), Raymond Geuss argues that contemporary political discourse is marred by illusions stemming from a of historical contingency, whereby concepts such as the state, legitimacy, and are treated as eternal necessities rather than products of specific historical struggles involving power and . He contends that these illusions distort political understanding by presenting contingent arrangements—forged through , , and ideological masking—as inevitable or rationally grounded, thereby obscuring the role of power in their formation and maintenance. For instance, Geuss critiques the liberal of disparate elements like individual rights and democratic procedures, which he sees as historically disjointed yet ideologically fused to legitimize state power without acknowledging underlying conflicts. Geuss emphasizes power as the irreducible core of , rejecting ethics-first approaches that prioritize normative ideals over the empirical realities of , disagreement, and strategic action. In Philosophy and Real Politics (2008), he advocates a historically attuned realism that begins with how power operates in contexts, such as the mobilization of resources and the navigation of social antagonisms, rather than deriving from abstract principles of or . This view posits that effective political must grapple with the ways power shapes institutions and beliefs, often through illusions that naturalize dominance—echoing his earlier critiques but applied to liberal universalism's ahistorical pretensions. Disagreement, not consensus, is fundamental to , and illusions arise when theories ignore this to project harmonious end-states disconnected from historical power dynamics. Geuss's integration of , power, and underscores a genealogical method for , urging scrutiny of how past contingencies inform present structures without deterministic inevitability. He warns that failing to historicize concepts fosters a "view from nowhere" that renders theorists blind to the epoch's illusions, such as the of neutral liberal institutions masking partisan power exercises. This realism demands vigilance against utopian projections, favoring instead pragmatic engagement with power's actual distributions to avoid the pitfalls of ideological distortion.

Rejection of Utopianism and Universalism

Geuss's rejection of utopianism stems from his view that much contemporary political philosophy, particularly the ethics-first methodology prevalent in analytic traditions, constructs ideal theories that abstract away from the contingencies of power, history, and human motivation. In Philosophy and Real Politics (2008), he criticizes approaches exemplified by John Rawls's A Theory of Justice (1971), which posit universal principles of justice as a starting point independent of societal facts, rendering them akin to wishful thinking rather than viable guides for action. Such utopianism, Geuss argues, neglects the explanatory priority of understanding actual political behaviors—driven by survival, coercion, and strategic maneuvering—over normative aspirations that lack mechanisms for implementation in non-ideal conditions. This critique targets the assumption that politics can be reformed by deducing policies from timeless ethical ideals, which Geuss sees as inverting the proper order: political philosophy should first diagnose the pathologies of existing orders through realist lenses before entertaining transformative visions. He distinguishes his position from outright anti-utopianism by acknowledging a limited role for aspirational elements, but only those tethered to concrete historical analysis rather than detached blueprints; untethered utopianism risks legitimizing illusions that obscure power imbalances. For instance, Geuss highlights how appeals to abstract often fail to address the "tragic" dimensions of , where competing goods cannot be harmonized without compromise or force. Geuss extends his skepticism to universalism, challenging the presupposition of invariant moral truths applicable across diverse contexts without regard for cultural, temporal, or causal variances. In essays and lectures, he questions foundational liberal claims, such as universal human rights, as potentially ideological constructs that project parochial values onto global politics, ignoring how rights discourse has historically served hegemonic interests rather than empirical universality. This stance aligns with his broader realism, prioritizing particularist inquiries into how norms emerge from power relations over decontextualized universals that evade falsification. A 2024 essay on "Universalism" further elucidates this by dissecting conflations among logical, ethical, and political senses of universality, arguing such confusions have distorted philosophical inquiry by prioritizing ahistorical abstractions over causal realism in human affairs.

Major Works and Publications

Foundational Texts on Ideology and Illusion

In The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School, published in 1981 by , Geuss examines the concept of through the lens of the tradition, distinguishing between descriptive and senses of as socially necessary or active serving power interests. He critiques Jürgen Habermas's turn toward universal pragmatics and , arguing that critique requires a historically situated understanding of power rather than abstract rationality, thereby rehabilitating Ideologiekritik as a tool for unmasking how beliefs mask particular interests as universal. Geuss posits three models of —neutral descriptive, negative , and positive emancipatory—emphasizing that effective demands empirical engagement with causal mechanisms of rather than assuming inherent falsehood in non-consensus views. Geuss's analysis in this work underscores 's role in perpetuating illusions that obscure political realities, drawing on Adorno and Horkheimer to reject reductive Marxist while insisting on to trace how ideologies embed historical contingencies. The book, spanning 99 pages in its core arguments, challenges the School's later dilutions of into ethical , advocating instead for a realism that confronts 's adaptive functions in maintaining without presuming through alone. Shifting toward illusion in political historiography, History and Illusion in Politics, published in 2001 by Cambridge University Press, dissects how modern liberal democracies foster illusions about consensus, human rights, and the state as neutral arbiters, treating disagreement not as contingent but as foundational to politics. Geuss contends that appeals to universal rights and ethical norms create a "wide meadow" illusion of harmonious pluralism, ignoring power asymmetries and historical contingencies that render such ideals practically incoherent. At 169 pages, the text critiques the "ethics-first" approach, arguing that political legitimacy derives from situated practices of command and obedience rather than timeless principles, with illusions arising from ahistorical projections of moral consensus onto diverse societies. Geuss employs examples from liberal democratic commitments to illustrate how illusions sustain the state by conflating disparate elements—such as individual with —without resolving underlying conflicts, urging a descent into "the cave" of real over aspirational blueprints. This work builds on his earlier framework by extending to temporal illusions, where history is sanitized to fit normative theories, thereby masking the coercive and contingent nature of political order.

Realism-Focused Books and Essays

Philosophy and Real Politics (2008) represents Geuss's seminal contribution to political realism, comprising three lectures delivered at that critique dominant "ethics-first" approaches in contemporary . Geuss contends that philosophers must begin by analyzing how real political agents act, driven by power relations, historical contexts, and contingencies, rather than deriving politics from prior moral ideals, as seen in the works of and . The book divides into two parts: the first defends realism by invoking thinkers like and to emphasize politics' autonomy from ethics; the second examines "failures of realism" through case studies, such as the pitfalls of ethical interventions in foreign policy, exemplified by the 2003 Iraq invasion, where moral rhetoric masked power interests. Geuss stresses that effective political thought requires genealogical inquiry into the origins and functions of norms, rejecting ahistorical . Subsequent essays extend this realist framework, notably in Reality and Its Dreams (2016), a collection probing the tension between political reality and aspirational "dreams" like utopian ideals. Key pieces include "Realism and the Relativity of Judgment," which explores how realist analysis accommodates contextual variability in political evaluation without descending into , and "Dystopia: The Elements," dissecting modern failures of grand narratives through historical lenses. Geuss argues here that realism demands vigilance against ideological illusions—such as faith in perpetual —while permitting limited utopian impulses grounded in empirical feasibility, drawing on examples from European intellectual history. These essays, originally published in journals between 2009 and 2015, reinforce Geuss's view that should diagnose power's operations, as in his analysis of ethical chaos in post-Cold War orders. Geuss's realist essays also appear in earlier collections like Outside Ethics (2005), where pieces such as those on critique norm-driven theories for ignoring human motivations rooted in desire and command rather than reason. However, his post-2008 output sharpens the focus on realism's implications for and , as in contributions to debates rejecting rights-based in favor of situated power assessments. By 2022, Geuss expressed reservations about the "political realism" label, arguing it obscured his emphasis on historical critique over mere descriptive accuracy.

Recent Essays and Collections

Geuss's Reality and Its Dreams (2016), published by , assembles four essays originating as lectures at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, scrutinizing the disjunctions between liberal political aspirations—such as equality and individual rights—and their historical implementations, arguing that such ideals often function as compensatory fantasies amid systemic failures. The collection extends his realist critique by analyzing phenomena like the Arab Spring and neoliberal economics, emphasizing how political theories distort rather than illuminate power dynamics. In Who Needs a World View? (2020), another volume, Geuss compiles reflective pieces questioning the necessity and coherence of comprehensive worldviews in and , tracing their evolution from Kantian to modern ideologies and contending that they impose artificial unity on fragmented human experience, thereby obscuring contingent historical conditions. This work reinforces his rejection of universalist frameworks, favoring situated, genealogical inquiries into belief systems. Not Thinking like a Liberal (2022), issued by , draws on autobiographical elements and intellectual history to dissect 's dominance, incorporating essays that contrast it with alternatives like thought and , portraying as an ahistorical doctrine that privileges abstract reason over concrete social embeddedness. Geuss attributes his perspective to formative experiences outside liberal norms, using these to challenge assumptions of sovereign individuality and neutral deliberation. The 2024 collection Seeing Double, from Polity Press, gathers previously published essays spanning ancient historiography to contemporary hope, advocating pluralistic "seeing double"—entertaining multiple incompatible perspectives—as essential for philosophical realism, while critiquing monistic views that foster dogmatism in ethics and politics. Topics include Herodotus's narrative strategies and the illusions of moral progress, underscoring Geuss's commitment to historical contingency over normative universality. Standalone recent essays, such as "" (published August 2024 in European Journal of Social Theory), argue that conflating moral universality with institutional universality has undermined political thought by prioritizing abstract norms over practicable orders. These publications collectively advance Geuss's oeuvre by applying realist diagnostics to evolving global challenges, prioritizing of illusions over prescriptive .

Reception and Controversies

Influence on Realist Political Theory

Geuss's advocacy for a realist approach in , emphasizing the priority of understanding actual political practices over abstract ethical ideals, has significantly shaped contemporary debates within the field. His targets the "ethics-first" methodology prevalent in analytic political theory, particularly the Rawlsian framework, arguing instead for theories grounded in historical contingency, power dynamics, and the illusions shaping political action. This perspective positions realism not as mere description but as a form of ideological that exposes how normative claims often mask interests and legitimize existing orders. The 2008 publication of Philosophy and Real Politics marked a watershed, explicitly contrasting realist inquiry—which begins with "why real political actors behave as they actually do"—against ideal theorizing that presupposes moral consensus. Geuss's arguments therein have influenced a resurgence of political realism, inspiring scholars to reorient the discipline toward questions of feasibility, timing, and the non-universal nature of political norms, drawing on thinkers like Nietzsche and Weber. This work, alongside Bernard Williams's contributions, established Geuss as a foundational voice in the "new realism," prompting a factional divide between liberal realists (closer to Williams) and radical realists who adopt Geuss's more skeptical stance on normativity and universalism. Geuss's influence extends to broader methodological shifts, encouraging political theorists to integrate historical analysis and power relations as central to normative evaluation rather than peripheral constraints. For instance, his emphasis on as a domain of conflict and has informed discussions on the limits of utopian projects and the role of in sustaining hierarchies, resonating in critiques of . This has fostered a subfield where realism serves as a diagnostic tool for dissecting how ethical obscures causal realities in , influencing journals and symposia on realism's implications for and . However, his of realism—prioritizing descriptive adequacy over prescriptive ideals—has also provoked contention, with some viewing it as undermining constructive , yet it undeniably catalyzed a reflexive turn away from ahistorical in the discipline.

Criticisms from Liberal and Idealist Perspectives

Critics from liberal and idealist traditions argue that Geuss's rejection of an "ethics-first" approach in political philosophy deprives his realism of a coherent normative framework capable of guiding or evaluating political action. Without moral standards derived from universal principles, such as those in Rawlsian theory, Geuss's emphasis on power dynamics and historical contingency leaves theorists unable to define political legitimacy or distinguish coercive authority from arbitrary rule. For example, ideal theorists contend that this approach risks justifying unethical power structures by prioritizing descriptive realism over prescriptive ideals, undermining the capacity to sanction illegitimate governance. In defenses of against Geuss's critique, scholars like Paul Raekstad reconstruct Geuss's objections—that Rawlsian fails to uncover distortions in intuitions, legitimates them, and diverts focus from power struggles—and counter that an expanded "very wide " can integrate and critique tools. This adaptation, they argue, preserves the moral reflexivity of ideal theory while engaging empirical realities, avoiding the or quietism that Geuss's purer realism allegedly invites by eschewing normative anchors. Such responses highlight ideal theory's role in providing aspirational standards for , which Geuss's dismisses as utopian illusions disconnected from feasible politics. Idealists further criticize Geuss's radical realism as methodologically barren, particularly in its aversion to "" or normativism, which they see as essential for motivating institutional reform and upholding universal rights against contingent power imbalances. By framing primarily through and power relations, Geuss's framework is faulted for its own ideological blind spots, such as overlooking trends toward international and convergence in global institutions, thereby limiting its practical applicability in addressing legitimacy deficits. These objections maintain that ideal theory's principled , far from being ideological distortions, enable critical distance from status quo power, a distance Geuss's realism purportedly erodes into descriptive resignation.

Debates on Normativity and Historical Determinism

Geuss's realist critique of posits that abstract ethical principles, such as those in Kantian or Rawlsian frameworks, distort understanding by prioritizing ideals over the concrete dynamics of power, , and contingency in . In Philosophy and Real Politics (2008), he argues for commencing inquiry with actual political practices rather than moral , viewing the latter as often anachronistic or ideological constructs that obscure rather than illuminate. This approach challenges the foundational assumption of much contemporary political theory that precedes and judges , proposing instead a "radical realism" where evaluative standards emerge immanently from historical and social realities. Critics contend that Geuss's rejection of explicit normativity undermines the capacity for political theory to guide action or critique injustice, rendering it descriptively barren and potentially conservative. For example, analyses highlight that without moral benchmarks, his framework struggles to define political legitimacy or reasonableness, conflating coercion with authority and failing to differentiate ethical from arbitrary power exercises. Others, engaging from Kantian perspectives, rebut his dismissal of moral metaphysics by arguing that politics inherently requires normative foundations to constrain realist impulses toward relativism or quietism, as pure historical contingency cannot sustain coherent judgments of better or worse orders. These debates underscore tensions between Geuss's anti-moralism and the need for some transcendental or universal criteria to avoid ideological endorsement of prevailing power structures. Geuss's , which insists on as embedded in specific cultural and temporal contexts—such as rights emerging as late medieval innovations rather than timeless truths—invites charges of , where outcomes appear ineluctably shaped by past contingencies, marginalizing agency or aspirational norms. In History and Illusion in Politics (1999), he examines how historical narratives and illusions underpin legitimacy, yet critics argue this emphasis risks a priori privileging of "the political" domain, overlooking broader social totalities and fostering a by curbing utopian elements essential for systemic critique. Geuss counters that such is illusory, as realistic engagement with discloses openings for non-utopian change, though detractors maintain his aversion to forward-looking limits transformative potential beyond incremental adjustments.

References

  1. https://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/cvsimplex.pdf
  2. https://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/people/teaching-research-pages/geuss
  3. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/interview-raymond-geuss
  4. https://www.asau.ru/files/pdf/3155166.pdf
  5. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/beyond-liberalism-on-raymond-geusss-not-thinking-like-a-liberal
  6. https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/anti-liberal
  7. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2022/08/an-illiberal-life/
  8. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/kiss-goodbye-to-freedom/403456.article
  9. https://robertpaulwolff.blogspot.com/2022/06/not-thinking-like-liberal.html
  10. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/jspp.2023.0045
  11. https://thepointmag.com/criticism/who-needs-a-world-view/
  12. https://www.the-tls.com/regular-features/in-brief/who-needs-a-world-view-raymond-geuss-review-hugo-drochon
  13. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii125/articles/john-baptiste-oduor-a-pragmatist-maverick.pdf
  14. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/jspp.2023.0045
  15. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/pir/2023-v43-n2-pir08095/1100431ar.pdf
  16. https://www.truthandpower.com/blog/?p=1645
  17. https://philpeople.org/profiles/raymond-geuss
  18. https://studylib.net/doc/25766431/dr.-cornel-west-biography-and-influence
  19. https://tocqueville21.com/books/raymond-geuss-does-not-think-like-a-liberal/
  20. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/8ae84a7f-c480-482b-b45f-4cf2ab296150/download
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/philosophy/political-philosophy/idea-critical-theory-habermas-and-frankfurt-school
  22. https://undsoc.org/2013/04/01/critical-theory-in-the-frankfurt-school/
  23. https://thepointmag.com/politics/idea-critical-theory/
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/657296
  25. https://humanidades.uprrp.edu/filosofia/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/critical-theory-as-distinct-from-scientific-theory-its-distinctive-features-and-import-kai-nielsen.pdf
  26. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691137889/philosophy-and-real-politics
  27. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/philosophy-and-real-politics/
  28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24hr9j
  29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120658
  30. https://www.truthandpower.com/?p=1683
  31. https://guiltandindustry.medium.com/philosophy-and-real-politics-a-return-to-realism-21bd9a8101d6
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13698230.2021.1891377
  33. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/647908
  34. https://www.publicreason.ro/articol/142
  35. https://patchenmarkell.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/geuss-final-ms.pdf
  36. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/41763/summary
  37. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/374010
  38. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/54509
  39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44483103
  40. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1468795X241264416
  41. https://txteo.tumblr.com/post/153306002330/geuss-ideology
  42. https://www.cambridge.org/9780521000437
  43. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%257CA117036641&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00405817&p=LitRC&sw=w
  44. https://www.amazon.com/History-Illusion-Politics-Raymond-Geuss/dp/0521000432
  45. http://www.lpbr.net/2008/12/philosophy-and-real-politics.html
  46. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674504950
  47. https://web.nypl.org/research/research-catalog/bib/hb990145392240203941
  48. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/reality-and-its-dreams/
  49. https://philpapers.org/rec/GEURAI-2
  50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.12669
  51. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674270343
  52. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=seeing-double--9781509560875
  53. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/seeing-double/
  54. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/phc3.12162
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276450873_Raymond_Geuss%27_radicalization_of_realism_in_political_theory
  56. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism-intl-relations/
  57. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0191453715583711
  58. https://www.publicreason.ro/pdfa/142
  59. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/194744779/The_radical_realist_critique_of_Rawls_a_reconstruction_and_response.pdf
  60. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14748851221107198
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327417758_Politics_and_Normativity_A_Kantian_Rejoinder_to_Raymond_Geuss%27_Dismissal_of_the_Metaphysics_of_Morals
  62. https://www.cambridge.org/fr/universitypress/subjects/philosophy/political-philosophy/history-and-illusion-politics
  63. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/137091/1/Verov%25C5%25A1ek%2520-%2520Imperfect%2520Theorizing%2520in%2520an%2520Imperfect%2520World%2520accepted%2520version.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.