Hubbry Logo
Window cleanerWindow cleanerMain
Open search
Window cleaner
Community hub
Window cleaner
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Window cleaner
Window cleaner
Window cleaner
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Window cleaners in Dresden
Cleaning the Fernsehturm Berlin
A man cleans windows at a cafe in central Ystad 2025.

Window cleaning, or window washing, is the exterior cleaning of architectural glass used for structural, lighting, or decorative purposes. It can be done manually, using a variety of tools for cleaning and access. Technology is also employed and increasingly, automation.

Commercial work is contracted variously from in-person transactions for cash or barter, to formal tender processes. Regulations, licensing, technique, equipment and compensation vary nationally and regionally.

Tools

[edit]
Window cleaning with a water-fed pole in Shepparton, Australia
  • Chamois and scrim — Chamois is used to loosen and remove dirt, followed by a buffing with scrim or cheesecloth
  • Water and squeegee — Generally, chemicals are added to water, and a device such as a brush or cloth-covered handle is dipped into the resulting solution and used to scrub glass. A squeegee is then used to sluice the dirt and water mixture from the glass. Chemicals added to the solution range from dish soap and glass cleaner to trisodium phosphate and etching salt. In sub-freezing temperatures, anti-freezing chemicals are added to the solution to prevent it from crystallizing on the pane before it is sluiced off.
  • Water-fed poles — Any of a variety of types of telescopic poles, fitted at the upper end with a brush and water jets, fed either from vehicle-borne tanks of deionised water or by on-site production of deionised water using a domestic or commercial water outlet. The water is filtered by either a two-stage or three-stage filtration process, involving a carbon filter, and two de-ionization filters, or a carbon filter, a reverse osmosis membrane filter, and a de-ionization resin filter. The filtered water should contain a TDS (total dissolved solids) of 0 ppm (parts per million) when being used on windows. The reason for this is that if using above zero ppm water, reach and wash water-fed pole window cleaners cannot claim to be purified water window cleaners and subsequently, a reading above 0 ppm could lead to spotting on the glass. The amount of spotting would depend entirely on what mineral composition is the water. The brush is used to agitate the debris off the window, while spraying water, and then the brush is lifted a few inches from the glass to rinse the glass with the pure water jets. Fan jets are used for hydrophobic glass, and "pencil" jets are used for hydrophilic glass. The de-ionized water is lacking in ions, so it will pull solids off the glass and dissolve the solids into the water, aiding in the cleaning process. Because there are no solids dissolved in the water, the windows dry clear without water spots. Water-fed poles vary in length. The longest poles are about 70 feet, and can reach up to six storeys. Water-fed cleaning is also referred to as pure water cleaning. It is common in the UK and becoming common in the US.

In 2012 John Kimmel invented the water-fed squeegee flipper this combines purified water window washing and a microfiber pad to scrub with a top rinse bar just like water fed brushes but it can also squeegee contaminants that might otherwise be left behind with using a water fed brush.

Access

[edit]
A scissor lift aerial work platform, used to access high windows
Window cleaning platform, or suspended scaffold, also known as a swing stage

Methods of access and equipment related to both access and cleaning vary nationally and regionally. If a window is not easily accessible using one type of equipment then it is advisable to combine different tools to be able to clean it properly.

  • Ladders
  • Supported scaffolding — A temporary platform workers can stand on that is rests on a surface below, rather than hanging from above like suspended scaffolding.
  • Aerial work platforms are elevated platforms that workers can stand on, such as a scissor lift, or cherry picker.
  • Suspended access equipment — Unlike supported scaffolding, these are not fixed to a lower surface or the ground, but rather are suspended by wire rope from above. They raise and lower the worker either by hand or with a motor. These include:
    • Suspended platform — An access platform for one or more workers with manual or motor driven devices for raising and lowering via rope. Platforms may be fitted to high rise buildings or skyscrapers, or assembled from components to suit architecture and nature of work being performed. These can be either temporary or permanent. Both having their own unique governing codes and regulations. Permanent suspended platforms are called building maintenance units (BMU), window-cleaning cradles (UK) or gondolas (elsewhere in Europe).
    • Bosun’s chair/boatswain’s chair — A single-person seat designed for controlled descent of rope. Often referred to as ‘rope descent systems’ (RDS), these are typically anchored to a roof structure, counterweight configuration, or connecting points designed for the purpose. These are always temporarily installed for the purpose of access. However, their anchor points can be either temporary or permanent.
  • Rope Access - using abseiling equipment, consisting of a safety harnesses and rope connections to lower individual window cleaners to positions where they are enabled to clean.[1]

Windowsill access

[edit]

Direct access to a window obtained by egress from that window. This method is still used at the Empire State Building in New York City.[2][failed verification]

High rise window cleaning

[edit]
Two window cleaners at work at a building in Hawaii

Windows that needed cleaning became higher as buildings became higher. A trade in window cleaning developed, for instance, in New York City in the late 19th century when early skyscrapers were being built. The height increased the risk to the washers. At first, washers cleaned skyscraper windows by standing on the window ledge and holding onto the frame. Later, leather safety belts attached to anchor bolts were introduced and then scaffolds. For example, the Otis Elevator Company built an electrically operated scaffold for use at Lever House.[3]

Three window cleaners were working at the World Trade Center at the time of the September 11 attacks. Jan Demczur, Polish employee working in the North Tower, survived and helped save five other people who had been trapped in an elevator with him. Roko Camaj and Fabian Soto, working in the South Tower, were killed.[3]

Hazards

[edit]
Window cleaner climbing out of a scaffold in Shanghai

Risks include slipping on water or soap, and falling from heights. In 1932 in New York, an average of one out of every two hundred window cleaners were killed per year.[3] On May 29, 1962, four window cleaners were killed when a scaffold fell at the Equitable Life Building.[3][4][5] In 1993 Local 32BJ, the New York window cleaners' union, launched an apprentice training program, increasing job safety among its members, although increasing numbers of New York window cleaners are non-unionized.[3]

Unlike in Scotland, there is no government licensing in the United States, England or Wales - this means anyone can claim to be a window cleaner. Window cleaning is considered the most dangerous job in the UK.[6] Several window cleaners die each year, and many are injured.[7]

Many window cleaning businesses are claiming that laws are about to come into force due to European Directive 2001/45/EC that will make ladders illegal for window cleaners. However, the government denies this stipulation, as ladder use for window cleaning is "low risk and short duration":[8]

To clarify the situation HSE is not attempting to ban ladders or stepladders, but ladders should not be the automatic first choice of access. They should only be used after a suitable assessment of the alternatives and the prevailing site conditions. The selection process for access equipment is coming under increasing scrutiny at HSE inspections. This guidance clarifies that for short duration work like window cleaning, provided a number of well-recognised precautions are taken, ladders will remain a common tool for many jobs.[7]

The Working at Height Regulations came into force in 2005 and does not ban ladders[8] but merely restricts their use to safe methods, i.e. foot it by person or with a ladder stopper:

4.2.2. The feet of portable ladders must be prevented from slipping during use by securing the stiles at or near their upper or lower ends, by any anti-slip device or by any other arrangement of equivalent effectiveness. Ladders used for access must be long enough to protrude sufficiently beyond the access platform, unless other measures have been taken to ensure a firm handhold. Interlocking ladders and extension ladders must be used so that the different sections are prevented from moving relative to one another. Mobile ladders must be prevented from moving before they are stepped on.[9][10]

The HSE favours the use of scaffold towers, i.e. temporary workstations, for window cleaning but says this is rather awkward:

"For some jobs, a mobile elevating work platform will be the best option. However, for many jobs, especially on domestic and small commercial buildings, risk assessment will demonstrate that because of the short duration of the work and features on the building that cannot be altered, ladders are the only realistic option."[11]

Although water fed pole (WFP) systems are meant to be safer than ladders, the Health and Safety Executive has said that they spill large amounts of water which either the window cleaner or their client could slip on.[11]

Ecology and water shortages

[edit]

Another issue is how "green" window cleaning companies are seen to be. During the spring of 2006 Defra considered banning the non-essential use of water and extending their already tight restrictions to prevent the use of water-fed safer which reach up to 60 ft. Window cleaners could return to the bucket-and-mop method, because Health and Safety Working at Heights allows such for temporary access.[8] Many window cleaners and window cleaning companies argue that their usage of water is minimal in comparison with water usages of large industry and energy companies, and that their water usage accounts for a small percentage of overall water consumption in developed countries.[12] [13]

Technological progress and decline in labor requirements

[edit]
Window cleaners in Britain during World War I

Much progress has been made in the area of minimizing the need for labor in this industry by use of technology. The availability of technology such as the pressure washer has made it more efficient.

More recently, in high tech societies the use of fully automated robotic window cleaners, also for houses, is starting to become common.[14]

Cultural references

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Window cleaner

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A window cleaner is an occupational specialist tasked with removing , smudges, and contaminants from surfaces such as windows, partitions, and mirrors in building interiors and exteriors, typically using buckets of soapy water or chemical cleaners, squeegees, sponges, and cloths to produce clear, streak-free finishes. The profession demands physical stamina for repetitive motions and work, with modern practices incorporating extension poles for reach and harnesses for elevated tasks to mitigate falls, the leading cause of injuries. Techniques have advanced from rudimentary cloth wiping and solutions in ancient times to professional methods employing water-fed poles and suspended platforms for high-rises, enabling efficient cleaning of while addressing challenges. Essential equipment includes protective gear like helmets and non-slip footwear, alongside rigorous protocols to prevent slips, chemical exposures, and equipment failures, underscoring the causal link between height-related hazards and stringent for worker .

History

Origins and Early Practices

The practice of window cleaning originated in ancient civilizations where glass windows first appeared, particularly in around the 1st century AD, when transparent panes became more common in buildings. Early methods relied on simple tools such as sea sponges, cloths, water, , and to remove dirt and grime from surfaces. These rudimentary techniques were typically performed by household servants or family members using buckets and natural cleaning solutions, reflecting the limited scale of usage at the time. By the , as depicted in historical illustrations from , window cleaning involved manual labor with basic implements like rags and buckets, often conducted from ground level or simple ladders for multi-story structures. window cleaning as a distinct emerged in the mid-19th century alongside the proliferation of windows in urban , driven by advancements in mass-produced . In 1878, Marius Moussy established the French Cleaning Institute to formalize and organize window washers, marking an early effort to professionalize the occupation amid growing demand in cities. In the late , particularly in , the construction of early skyscrapers necessitated specialized window cleaning services, where workers used cloths and buckets suspended from ropes or ledges, exposing them to significant hazards without modern safety equipment. The introduction of the for windows began with Anthony L. Lewis's 1892 for a window cleaning device featuring a rubber blade, which improved efficiency over cloth-only methods by allowing streak-free wiping. These early practices laid the foundation for the industry, emphasizing manual dexterity and basic chemical solutions before mechanical innovations.

20th Century Developments

In the early 1900s, the rapid construction of in urban centers such as New York demanded adaptations in window cleaning practices, as traditional ladder-based methods proved inadequate for heights exceeding several stories. Cleaners relied on precarious setups including bosun's chairs—simple seats suspended by ropes from building roofs—and leather straps anchored to window ledges, often without harnesses or fall-arrest systems, earning practitioners the moniker "human flies" for their daring balances on narrow sills. These techniques, while enabling access to upper floors, resulted in frequent accidents, prompting gradual regulatory scrutiny on occupational safety. A pivotal tool innovation occurred in 1933 when the Philip W. Crackett Company developed Windex, an ammonia-based liquid cleaner originally formulated for automobile windshields but quickly repurposed for architectural glass, offering superior streak removal over vinegar or soap mixtures. This was followed in 1936 by Ettore Steccone, an Italian immigrant in Oakland, California, who patented the modern T-shaped squeegee featuring a single flexible rubber blade clamped in a lightweight brass frame, supplanting heavier dual-blade predecessors like the Chicago squeegee for faster, more efficient wiping. Steccone established Ettore Products Company that year to produce the device, which by the 1940s achieved widespread adoption among professionals, reducing cleaning time and improving finish quality through its ergonomic design allowing one-handed operation. Mid-century advancements emphasized safety amid rising high-rise densities and labor advocacy. By the , standardized harnesses tethered to building anchors and rope descent systems became common, mitigating fall risks documented in industrial reports, while suspended scaffolds provided stable platforms for teams rather than individuals. Concurrently, in 1955, Irv Tucker commercialized extendable telescoping poles—up to 6 feet with horsehair brushes and optional soap dispensers—for ground-level reach to second-story windows, diminishing reliance on ladders for low-rise structures. Toward the late 1900s, water-fed extension poles emerged, delivering deionized via lightweight tubing to minimize chemical use and streaks, though initial systems were cumbersome and limited to sources for optimal results. These developments collectively professionalized the trade, aligning with post-World War II urban expansion and stricter building codes.

Post-2000 Innovations

The mainstream adoption of pure water-fed pole systems in the early 2000s revolutionized ground-access window cleaning by enabling streak-free results without detergents, using deionized water delivered through lightweight telescopic poles extending up to 20 meters or more. These systems, building on earlier prototypes from the and , incorporated advanced resin-based filtration to remove minerals, allowing cleaners to reach multi-story heights safely from the ground and reducing ladder-related accidents. By the mid-2000s, carbon fiber composites and nano-filtration enhancements improved pole rigidity and water purity, extending effective reach while minimizing operator fatigue. Robotic window cleaners emerged commercially in the , with Windoro introduced around 2011 as the first autonomous model for domestic use, employing vacuum adhesion and scrubbing to navigate frames independently. Subsequent models like Ecovacs Winbot, launched in 2013, integrated AI for and obstacle avoidance, cleaning at speeds up to 2.5 minutes per square meter while adhering to via . For high-rises, advancements culminated in 2024 with Ozmo, the first robotic-armed system deployed on a skyscraper, using and articulated arms to handle complex facades at 45 stories, potentially reducing human exposure to falls by automating repetitive tasks. Drone-based cleaning gained traction post-2020, with pilot programs demonstrating for high-rise exteriors by deploying water jets and brushes from aerial platforms, achieving up to five times faster coverage than manual methods while eliminating suspended risks. Equipped with for precise navigation and high-pressure sprayers, these systems addressed hard-to-reach areas on curved or irregular surfaces, with commercial adoption accelerating after 2021 regulatory approvals in regions like the U.S. and . Such innovations prioritize and , driven by empirical reductions in labor costs and injury rates documented in industry trials.

Methods and Techniques

Residential and Low-Rise Cleaning

Residential window cleaning typically employs manual techniques accessible from the ground or low elevations, focusing on streak-free results through application of solutions followed by wiping and squeegeeing. Professionals and homeowners mix a solution of and liquid —often one per two gallons of —to loosen dirt without leaving residues. This is sprayed or applied via a scrubber or T-bar sleeve onto the after dusting frames and sills to prevent grit scratches. The core technique involves scrubbing from top to bottom to capture , then using a rubber-bladed in an S-pattern or continuous horizontal passes to remove the bulk of liquid, minimizing streaks by maintaining contact and wiping the blade between strokes. Remaining edges and corners are detailed with cloths or lint-free towels to absorb residual moisture, ensuring clarity. For interior surfaces, similar steps apply, often starting with vacuuming tracks to eliminate loose particles. In low-rise structures, up to five stories, extension poles attach to and squeegees, allowing reach without ladders for many upper windows, though sturdy ladders remain essential for precise access and stability. Water-fed pole systems, which deliver through telescoping poles up to 60 feet, provide an alternative by rinsing without detergents, reducing chemical use and enabling faster cleaning from the ground. These methods prioritize efficiency for single-family homes and small multi-unit buildings, where full is impractical. Safety protocols emphasize equipment inspection and placement: ladders must be rated for the load, positioned on firm surfaces at a , and secured against slipping, while poles and buckets are kept clear of pathways to avoid trips. Gloves and non-slip footwear mitigate chemical and fall risks, with professionals adhering to guidelines that report ladder-related injuries as a leading hazard in such work, underscoring the need for training in stable setup and body positioning.

Commercial and High-Rise Cleaning

Commercial window cleaning encompasses the maintenance of surfaces in office buildings, retail establishments, and other non-residential structures, typically employing ground-based or low-elevation access methods such as ladders, extension poles, or water-fed pole systems to apply solutions and remove contaminants without the need for suspended rigging. These techniques prioritize streak-free results through the use of squeegees wielded in an "S" pattern or fanning motion to wipe away soapy after initial scraping of stubborn grime, followed by edge detailing with cloths or lint-free towels. Detergents are selected based on window coatings, avoiding on tinted or low-emissivity to prevent damage. For high-rise structures exceeding four stories, where ground access is infeasible, methods shift to suspended systems including rope descent systems (RDS), two- or four-point suspended scaffolds (swing stages), and permanently installed powered platforms, enabling cleaners to traverse facades while adhering to building anchorages engineered to support specified loads. Cleaning follows similar principles—pre-wetting with purified or soapy water via T-bars or sponges, scraping debris, and squeegeeing in controlled strokes—but requires adjustments for platform sway, wind exposure, and limited mobility, often necessitating teams of two or more for rigging and spotting. OSHA restricts RDS use above 300 feet unless rescue feasibility is demonstrated, favoring scaffolds or bosun's chairs only as backups where other means prove impractical. Safety protocols are paramount, with full-body harnesses, lanyards, helmets, and tool tethers mandatory to mitigate falls—the leading cause of incidents, historically claiming one in 200 cleaners annually in , though modern regulations have reduced fatalities despite an OSHA-recorded 62 deaths in 88 window cleaning accidents from 2005 to 2020. Operations halt at sustained wind speeds over 25 miles per hour, with caution advised above 15 mph, and site evaluations mandate 10-foot clearances from power lines alongside chemical handling precautions. Compliance with ANSI/IWCA I-14.1 standards ensures training in , equipment inspection, and emergency procedures, incorporating IWCA certifications to address hazards like and chemical exposure.

Tools and Equipment

Manual Tools

Manual tools constitute the core equipment for traditional window cleaning, enabling cleaners to apply soapy water, scrub surfaces, and remove excess liquid through manual application of pressure and wiping. These tools emphasize simplicity, portability, and effectiveness for low- to mid-rise applications, often paired with ladders or basic access methods. Key components include squeegees, , buckets, scrapers, and extension poles, with variations in materials like rubber blades for durability or sleeves for streak reduction. The squeegee, a pivotal manual tool, features a rubber or blade affixed to a handle or T-bar, designed to shear water films from surfaces in a single pass, minimizing streaks and drying time. Its modern iteration was patented by Italian immigrant Ettore Steccone in , introducing a metal frame that improved maneuverability over earlier wooden or rigid designs. Blades come in soft rubber for smooth gliding on clean or harder variants for textured surfaces, with widths ranging from 6 to 18 inches to suit different sizes; replacement channels allow for quick swaps to maintain edge sharpness. Scrubbers apply cleaning solutions to loosen grime and consist of a T-bar handle with a removable sleeve made from porous materials such as lamb's wool, , or synthetic foam, which hold without scratching . These sleeves, often 12 to 18 inches wide, are soaked in a bucket of diluted soap—typically 1-2 ounces of neutral cleaner per of water—and pressed against windows to agitate dirt before squeegeeing. T-bars provide ergonomic grip and compatibility with extension poles, reducing arm strain during repetitive motions. Buckets, usually 3.5 to 6 gallons in capacity, store soapy and are selected for stability, with rectangular shapes preferred for fitting at angles up to 22 inches. Durable plastic models resist tipping and include features like measurement markings for precise solution ratios, while hip buckets or tool-integrated designs enhance mobility on scaffolds. Scrapers remove hardened residues like , droppings, or deposits, featuring replaceable or blades held at low angles to avoid damage. These are essential for pre-cleaning stubborn spots, with 4- to 6-inch blades common for precision work. Extension poles, typically aluminum or up to 20 feet, attach to squeegees or via universal clips, allowing ground-level cleaning of upper-story windows without ladders. Lightweight construction—often under 5 pounds—prevents fatigue, though they require practice for maintaining even pressure at height. cloths or huck towels finish edges and frames, absorbing residual moisture without lint.

Powered and Specialized Gear

Water-fed pole systems represent a key powered advancement in window cleaning, employing telescoping carbon fiber or poles extending up to 18 meters (60 feet) connected to a pump-driven supply of deionized or , which cleans surfaces through low- rinsing without detergents or manual wiping in many cases. These systems integrate booster pumps, often 12-volt models for vehicle-mounted portability, to generate 4-6 bars of , ensuring consistent flow rates of 10-20 liters per minute even at maximum extension heights. Purification occurs via and deionization resins, producing water with conductivity below 10 microsiemens per centimeter, which evaporates streak-free upon drying. Industry suppliers report these setups enable ground-level cleaning for mid-rise buildings, reducing reliance on ladders and associated fall risks, with adoption surging since the early among . Electric window vacuums, also known as powered squeegees, provide to extract excess and solution post-scrubbing, minimizing streaks and accelerating on interior and accessible exterior . Devices like the WV series feature lithium-ion batteries offering 35-100 minutes of runtime, with suction powers up to 8 kPa and interchangeable blades for windows up to 280 mm wide, claiming to complete jobs three times faster than manual cloths by eliminating drips on frames. Professional variants, such as those from Unger or Pulex, incorporate ergonomic designs for extended use and compatibility with extension poles, though they are more prevalent in commercial interiors than high-reach exteriors due to power limitations. Specialized powered gear includes high-pressure pure systems for larger-scale operations, often paired with trailer-mounted pumps delivering up to 40 liters per minute at 7 bars for simultaneous multi-story cleaning. Automated attachments, like rotating brush heads on water-fed poles powered by small electric motors, facilitate agitation of stubborn grime on solar panels or heavily soiled facades, with flow-through designs preventing brush clogging. For industrial applications, cleaners with pressures of 4-6 bars and temperatures exceeding 100°C offer chemical-free sanitization, though their use requires caution to avoid damage to seals or coatings on modern glass. These tools prioritize efficiency metrics, such as usage under 5 liters per , supported by empirical tests from manufacturers demonstrating reduced labor times by 50% compared to traditional methods.

Access Methods

Ground-Based Access

Ground-based access in window cleaning encompasses techniques where operators remain on stable terrain, employing extendable poles to reach window surfaces without personal equipment such as ladders or lifts. This approach prioritizes safety by minimizing fall risks and is suitable for residential, low-rise commercial, and accessible multi-story facades up to approximately five stories high. Traditional methods utilize telescoping extension poles attached to scrubbers and squeegees, allowing cleaners to apply soapy solutions from buckets, scrub surfaces, and remove water with rubber blades for streak-free results. Poles, often constructed from aluminum or , extend from 5 to 24 feet, providing reaches up to 30 feet when combined with operator height. Early commercial extension poles emerged in , introduced by Irv Tucker for home and vehicle washing, evolving into specialized window tools with ergonomic designs for better control. Modern water-fed pole systems represent an advancement, delivering deionized or through internal channels to the brush head, enabling rinse-only cleaning without detergents or manual wiping. These poles, typically made of lightweight carbon fiber, achieve heights of 40 to 60 feet while maintaining maneuverability, with purity exceeding 99.9% to prevent spotting upon . Originating in the and gaining prominence in the early , this technique reduces chemical use and enhances efficiency for ground-accessible exteriors. Operators connect poles to units, such as systems, pumping treated upward for continuous flow during operation. Both systems demand precise angling and pressure control to avoid pole flex or water diversion, with carbon fiber variants preferred for reduced weight—often under 5 pounds fully extended—facilitating prolonged use without fatigue. Limitations include diminished precision beyond 40 feet due to leverage and wind interference, restricting application to buildings where full facade access from ground level is feasible. Safety protocols emphasize stable footing, pole inspection for cracks, and avoidance of overhead power lines, aligning with industry guidelines for non-elevated work.

Elevated and Suspended Access

Elevated access utilizes mobile elevating work platforms (MEWPs), such as scissor lifts and articulating boom lifts, to position cleaners at heights typically up to 170 feet, suitable for mid-rise structures where ground maneuverability allows. These self-propelled devices provide stable platforms with guardrails and controls for precise positioning near building facades, reducing reliance on manual suspension systems. OSHA classifies MEWPs under standards requiring operator certification, daily inspections, and fall protection, with scissor lifts limited to vertical while booms offer for offset windows. Suspended access employs rope-based systems, including two-point adjustable suspension scaffolds (swing stages) and bosun's chairs, suspended from roof-mounted davits or outriggers to service high-rise and windows beyond 130 feet. Swing stages consist of a suspended platform hoisted by wire ropes over pulleys, allowing horizontal traversal along building faces, with capacities supporting two workers and equipment up to 500 pounds per side. Bosun's chairs, single-person seats lowered via ropes, offer access to isolated or irregularly shaped areas but demand higher skill levels due to limited stability. Rope descent techniques, akin to industrial rappelling, use dual-life safety lines and harnesses for technicians to abseil down facades, often for spot cleaning on spires or overhangs. Safety protocols for suspended systems mandate galvanized wire ropes with minimum breaking strengths five times the rated load, independent lifelines for each worker, and pre-use testing by raising platforms three feet and braking to verify rope integrity. Anchors must be engineered to sustain four times the intended load, integrated permanently into building structures per OSHA 1926.451, prohibiting use of window cleaners' anchors for suspension. Building maintenance units (BMUs), automated roof cars with powered cradles, enhance efficiency on modern towers by traversing rails while lowering platforms, though initial setup requires structural reinforcements capable of 12.5 pounds per square foot live load. All methods necessitate certified training, personal protective equipment including harnesses and lanyards, and weather restrictions, such as halting operations in winds exceeding 25 mph to prevent sway-induced falls.

Safety and Hazards

Primary Risks

Falls from heights represent the predominant risk for window cleaners, accounting for the vast majority of fatalities and severe injuries across both low-rise and high-rise operations. (OSHA) records indicate that, over a 15-year span ending around 2020, 62 of 88 documented window cleaning accidents resulted in death, with falls cited as the primary mechanism in most cases. Ladder mishaps, such as entanglement in overhead wires or instability during extension, constitute the leading subcategory of these incidents, particularly in residential and low-rise settings where ground-based access predominates. In high-rise cleaning, risks stem from failures in suspended rigging systems, including inadequate anchoring or unsecured harnesses, as evidenced by cases where workers plummeted after lines detached. Despite stringent regulations, data from the International Window Cleaning Association shows an average of one high-rise fatality annually between and , underscoring that while rare relative to exposure hours, such events often involve equipment malfunction or procedural lapses. Chemical exposures rank as a secondary but chronic , involving irritants like , acids, and solvents in cleaning formulations that can cause respiratory distress, , or eye damage upon , contact, or accidental . Slips on wet surfaces, trips over tools, and ergonomic strains from repetitive reaching further contribute to non-fatal injuries, though these pale in severity compared to elevation-related trauma. during proximity to power lines adds sporadic acute danger, particularly with conductive tools or water-fed poles.

Safety Measures and Regulations

In the United States, the (OSHA) mandates specific fall protection requirements for window cleaning operations, particularly emphasizing the use of rope descent systems (RDS) for buildings exceeding certain heights where other access methods are impractical. Anchors for window washing must independently support at least 5,000 pounds per worker, with separate anchorages required for lifelines to suspend workers in case of falls, and all RDS components excluding seat boards must bear a minimum load of 5,000 pounds. OSHA limits RDS use to 300 feet above grade unless rescue capabilities are feasible, and boatswain's chairs are permitted only when windows cannot be safely cleaned by other means. Annual inspections of equipment and anchorages are required, along with certification every ten years by a qualified person. The International Window Cleaning Association (IWCA) supplements OSHA with the ANSI/IWCA I-14.1-2001 Window Cleaning Safety Standard, a two-part addressing safe use of access and manufacturing criteria, which incorporates federal regulations and ANSI standards to mitigate risks in residential, commercial, and high-rise cleaning. This standard outlines guidelines for building owners to provide safe access methods, including roof anchors, suspended scaffolds, and ground-supported , while requiring contractors to verify equipment inspections in writing before operations. IWCA promotes passive fall protection like guardrails at least 42 inches high where feasible, alongside active systems such as personal that limits arresting forces to no more than 2,000 pounds. Safety measures universally include mandatory training on hazard recognition, equipment handling, and emergency procedures prior to any elevated work, with OSHA requiring employers to ensure workers are competent in using ladders, scaffolds, and (PPE) like harnesses and lanyards secured to prevent falls. Equipment must be inspected before each use for defects, and operations must incorporate rescue plans, as delays in retrieval can exacerbate injuries from . In , regulations under the Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations reference safety codes for window cleaning, mandating practicable safe methods for all levels and adherence to standards like those for suspended equipment. These protocols, derived from empirical incident data showing falls as the leading cause of fatalities, prioritize causal prevention through engineered controls over reliance on worker compliance alone.

Technological Advancements

Automation and

Automation in window cleaning has primarily focused on addressing the hazards of manual high-rise work, with robotic systems emerging to enhance and efficiency. Wall-climbing robots, equipped with vacuum suction or magnetic adhesion, navigate vertical surfaces using sensors and AI for path planning and obstacle avoidance. These devices apply cleaning solutions and scrub via rotating pads or brushes, often controlled remotely or semi-autonomously. Drones represent another category, utilizing propellers for aerial access to facades, spraying detergents and wiping with integrated arms, particularly suited for irregular or obstructed areas. Prominent commercial examples include Skyline Robotics' Ozmo, deployed since 2021, which integrates AI, , and robotic arms to clean building exteriors up to three times faster than human teams while reducing worker exposure to heights. Lucid Bots' Sherpa drone, integrated into services like Window Hero's operations by August 2024, supports softwash systems for broad surface treatment, emphasizing ease of control and payload capacity for cleaning agents. KTV Eurodrone's systems, approved for autonomous facade cleaning in , handle window washing alongside , leveraging FAA-equivalent certifications for operational reliability. Market analyses project the robotic window cleaners sector to expand by USD 4.335 billion from 2025 to 2029 at a 29.4% CAGR, driven by and labor shortages, though growth varies with estimates of 17.22% CAGR through 2035 in related reports. Effectiveness stems from consistent pressure application and reduced , with systems like Ozmo achieving uniform coverage on flat glass via programmed routes. Safety benefits are quantifiable: drones and robots mitigate falls, a leading cause of fatalities in the industry, by eliminating needs for many tasks. However, limitations persist; current models often underperform on textured frames, heavy grime, or non-flat surfaces due to failures or insufficient scrubbing . Wind susceptibility restricts drone use above certain altitudes, and full remains elusive, requiring human oversight for and malfunction recovery. Noise from motors and incomplete detail work, such as corner smudges, necessitate hybrid human-robotic workflows in commercial settings. Regulatory approvals, including rules for drones, further constrain scalability.

Water and Chemical Innovations

Water-fed pole systems represent a pivotal in window cleaning, utilizing to achieve streak-free results without chemical additives. These systems employ deionization (DI) or (RO) processes to strip minerals, salts, and impurities from , producing ultra-pure water with conductivity levels typically below 10 microsiemens per centimeter. The , pumped through telescopic poles equipped with soft brushes, leverages its inherent polarity and increased —lacking dissolved ions that would otherwise cause spotting upon —to attract and encapsulate particles for mechanical removal. This approach, which reduces reliance on squeegees and detergents, emerged prominently in professional practices during the late , building on earlier experiments with DI tanks in the and , and has since evolved with integrated RO/DI units capable of thousands of liters daily for high-volume operations. Advancements in water purification have further optimized these systems for efficiency and , including hybrid RO/DI setups that extend resin life and minimize , achieving up to 99.9% impurity rejection rates. By forgoing chemicals, this method lowers environmental runoff risks and enhances worker safety, as pure water eliminates exposure to caustic agents, while enabling ground-based cleaning of windows up to 20 meters high without ladders. In parallel, chemical innovations focus on eco-compatible formulations that complement or substitute traditional solutions when purification alone suffices minimally. Modern window cleaning agents increasingly incorporate biodegradable , such as alkyl polyglucosides derived from renewable plant sources, which effectively lower to below 30 dynes per centimeter while degrading rapidly in aquatic environments without . These surfactants emulsify oils and grime more efficiently than legacy ammonia-based formulas, reducing the required concentration by up to 50% and minimizing residue. Recent developments include bio-based and nanotechnology-enhanced detergents that integrate nanoscale particles for improved dirt suspension, allowing lower active ingredient levels—often under 5% —and compatibility with pure systems for hybrid applications. Such formulations, certified under standards like EU Ecolabel for rapid biodegradability (over 60% in 28 days), address regulatory pressures on volatile organic compounds, cutting emissions by 70-90% compared to solvent-heavy predecessors. This shift prioritizes causal efficacy—targeting molecular interactions for —over volume-based chemical aggression, yielding verifiable reductions in pollutant discharge as measured in field trials.

Environmental and Resource Considerations

Water Usage Patterns

In traditional bucket-and-squeegee window cleaning, is used sparingly to prepare a diluted solution for wetting surfaces before mechanical removal of moisture, typically consuming 2 to 2.5 gallons to clean 100 to 150 windows over a full day of residential work. This translates to roughly 0.013 to 0.025 gallons per window, with much of the liquid recycled within the or discarded after sessions, minimizing overall demand but introducing residues into . Water-fed pole systems, prevalent in modern professional operations for their extension reach and chemical-free rinsing, employ deionized or reverse-osmosis delivered under low , resulting in higher volumes due to prolonged flushing needed for self-drying, streak-free outcomes. Operators often utilize 250 liters (approximately 66 ) from a mobile tank to service 20 residential properties, implying 0.16 to 0.33 per assuming 10 to 20 panes per home, though flow rates of 0.5 to 1 per minute during application can elevate totals for larger facades. Commercial and high-rise cleaning amplifies disparities, where traditional hose-fed methods may expend hundreds of gallons per building via high-pressure sprays for broad coverage, whereas optimized pure-water platforms integrate recirculation or spot to curb excess runoff. Industry adoption of these systems has grown, with projections for the window cleaning sector indicating sustained expansion through amid preferences for eco-adapted techniques, though aggregate freshwater draw remains tied to job scale and regional purification . Sustainable innovations claim up to 75% water savings over legacy high-volume protocols by prioritizing purity over quantity, reducing municipal supply strain in urban applications.

Pollutant Runoff and Mitigation

Window cleaning operations generate runoff containing detergents, , , and other chemicals that, when discharged into storm drains, contribute to pollution by entering surface waters untreated. These can harm aquatic ecosystems through direct —such as acute effects on and —and indirect mechanisms like from phosphates and nitrogen compounds, which promote algal blooms and oxygen depletion. in conventional cleaners persist in waterways, disrupting microbial communities and bioaccumulating in organisms, while volatile organic compounds (VOCs) exacerbate broader degradation. Industry practices, particularly in urban areas, amplify this issue, as high-volume rinsing directs contaminants to municipal systems without , violating regulations in regions enforcing National Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Quantifiable impacts include elevated and in receiving waters from unmitigated runoff, with studies on general cleaning effluents showing surfactant concentrations exceeding safe thresholds for sensitive species at levels as low as 0.1 mg/L. Peer-reviewed assessments of cleaning products indicate that non-green formulations release persistent toxins, whereas biodegradable alternatives reduce aquatic by over 50% in life-cycle evaluations. Mitigation strategies emphasize source reduction and containment: professionals capture runoff using vacuum systems or absorbent barriers before disposal via sanitary sewers or licensed facilities, preventing direct stormwater entry as required by EPA best management practices (BMPs). Switching to deionized or purified water systems minimizes chemical inputs, achieving streak-free results without detergents and cutting pollutant loads by up to 90%. Biodegradable cleaners certified under EPA Safer Choice standards—lacking phosphorus, ammonia, and synthetic surfactants—decompose rapidly in aquatic environments, with peer-reviewed data confirming lower eutrophication potential and no bioaccumulation risks compared to traditional products. Regulatory compliance involves site-specific stormwater pollution prevention plans (SWPPPs) that prohibit outdoor rinsing into drains and promote employee training on spill containment. These measures, when implemented, align with causal pathways reducing downstream ecological harm without compromising cleaning efficacy.

Industry and Economics

Professional Training and Organizations

The International Window Cleaning Association (IWCA), founded in 1989 in , by a group of professional window cleaners, serves as the primary trade organization dedicated to advancing the window cleaning industry through standards in safety, education, advocacy, and research. As a non-profit 501(c)(6) entity, the IWCA promotes member success by providing resources such as annual conventions, trade shows, and regional safety training sessions, while maintaining an with the (OSHA) since March 2020 to develop industry best practices and address hazards like rope descent systems. Professional training within the industry emphasizes and technical proficiency, particularly for high-risk tasks involving suspended access. The IWCA's Campus IWCA online platform delivers courses on protocols, employee , glass surface care, and business fundamentals, accessible to members at discounted rates. Key designations include the Safe Practices for Rope Descent Systems Certification for high-rise technicians, which covers classroom training, testing, and on-rope evaluations conducted by certified instructors, and the OSHA 1910 Safety Certified Technician Training for route, residential, and light commercial operations, ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Additional instructor-level designations, such as Certified Instructor (with unique identifiers like No. 220-000), Scholars, and Fellows, recognize advanced expertise and facilitate in-person or hybrid delivery of these programs. Beyond the IWCA, broader cleaning industry bodies like the ISSA (Worldwide Cleaning Industry Association) offer certifications tailored to cleaners, including window-specific modules available in multiple languages as of April 2025, though these are not exclusively focused on window cleaning. In the , the Master of Window Cleaners operates as a non-profit peer network for practitioners, emphasizing skill-sharing without formal functions. High-rise and rope access training often aligns with standards from organizations like the Society of Rope Access Technicians (SPRAT), which provides multi-level certifications applicable to window cleaning but rooted in general industrial access rather than the trade itself. These programs collectively prioritize empirical risk reduction, with OSHA-acknowledged certificates demonstrating verified competence in hazard mitigation.

Labor Market Dynamics

The window cleaning profession in the United States employs approximately 12,244 workers, predominantly male (89.4%) with a small female representation (10.6%). Entry barriers remain low, requiring minimal formal education—typically a or equivalent—and rather than specialized degrees, enabling quick workforce integration but contributing to high turnover due to physical demands. Median wages for window cleaners averaged $18.11 per hour in 2024, equating to roughly $37,665 annually, though total compensation including tips or bonuses can reach $51,000 for experienced workers. High-rise specialists command higher pay, often $60,000 to $100,000 yearly, reflecting premiums for safety certifications and advanced equipment handling. Variations occur by region and employer type; company-employed cleaners earn $29,410 to $60,840 annually, while self-employed operators may gross $35 to $50 per hour before expenses. Job growth aligns with broader building trends, projected at 2% from 2024 to 2034—slower than the national average—driven by steady demand from commercial and residential expansion but tempered by in low-rise cleaning. The industry exhibits resilience during economic downturns, with the window washing sector maintaining a 1.6% through 2029, fueled by and high-rise construction. Labor supply dynamics favor immigrants and entry-level workers, with limited ; however, safety regulations increasingly mandate , potentially raising skill thresholds and wages in urban markets.

Cultural Depictions

Media and Idiomatic References

In British popular culture, window cleaners have often been portrayed as cheeky observers of domestic life, a trope exemplified in George Formby's 1936 novelty song "," which humorously recounts risqué glimpses into households from the vantage point of the trade. The song, topping the charts upon release, reinforced the archetype of the window cleaner as an unwitting witness to private indiscretions, influencing subsequent comedic depictions. The 1974 sex comedy film , directed by , features protagonist Tim Daley (played by ) as an inept window cleaner whose job leads to a series of sexual encounters, capitalizing on the voyeuristic stereotype for bawdy humor. The movie, part of the Confessions series, grossed significantly at the British despite critical panning for its lowbrow content, reflecting 1970s trends in British cinema toward permissive, working-class . More recently, the 2025 action thriller , starring as Joey Locke, a former working as a high-rise window cleaner, shifts the portrayal to one of heroism and peril, with Locke thwarting a terrorist plot while suspended on a skyscraper's facade. This film highlights the physical dangers of the profession in a modern context, diverging from comedic traditions. Window cleaning scenes appear in various media as symbols of precarious labor, such as Neo's suspension in (1999), evoking high-altitude maintenance risks during an extraction sequence. Similarly, Wallace and Gromit's inventive contraptions for window cleaning in the 2005 short parody the trade's mechanical challenges with stop-motion absurdity. Idiomatic references to window cleaners remain sparse in standard English usage, with no entrenched phrases akin to those for other trades; however, the profession occasionally surfaces in colloquialisms denoting clarity or intrusion, such as "clean as a window cleaner's bucket" in niche trade humor, though lacking widespread adoption.

References

  1. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/legacy/files/SCADirectVers5.pdf
  2. https://windowcleaningfieldsafetyguide.com/
  3. https://jracenstein.com/expert-advice-learning/the-history-of-window-cleaning
  4. https://www.markeluk.com/articles/what-are-the-risks-for-window-cleaners
  5. https://novawindowcleaning.square.site/history-of-window-cleaning
  6. https://www.aus.com/blog/history-window-washer
  7. https://theblackwallsttimes.com/2023/09/14/anthony-l-lewis-invented-the-window-cleaner-squeegee-in-1892/
  8. https://www.thisoldhouse.com/tools/21015209/great-moments-in-squeegee-history
  9. https://joffie.com/blogs/news/daredevils-of-the-past-the-first-high-rise-window-cleaners
  10. https://ettore.com/pages/about-us
  11. https://celebratecalifornia.library.ca.gov/the-invention-of-squeegees/
  12. https://www.simpleshine.com.au/post/a-brief-history-of-window-cleaning-from-squeegees-to-robots
  13. https://www.midwaycleaning.co.uk/post/traditional-vs-modern-window-cleaning-methods
  14. https://usa.ungerglobal.com/blog/from-squeegees-to-nano-filtration-the-evolution-of-ungers-window-cleaning-technology/
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254050364_Windoro_The_world%27s_first_commercialized_window_cleaning_robot_for_domestic_use
  16. https://eafacappl.com/window-cleaning-robots-guide/
  17. https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/worlds-1st-window-robot-cleans-skyscraper
  18. https://www.reliablemaintenance.ca/sky-high-shine-how-drones-are-transforming-window-cleaning-at-reliable
  19. https://www.foxtechrobotics.com/a-news-innovative-window-cleaning-drones-how-lidar-improves-efficiency
  20. https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/business/article263258723.html
  21. https://gocitywide.com/blog/the-future-of-window-cleaning-how-technology-is-changing-the-game/
  22. https://www.familyhandyman.com/list/how-to-wash-windows/
  23. https://www.thisoldhouse.com/windows/21017231/how-to-wash-windows-like-a-pro
  24. https://www.grainger.com/know-how/equipment/kh-must-have-window-cleaning-supplies-and-tools
  25. https://usa.ungerglobal.com/blog/squeegee-window-cleaning-for-a-streak-free-shine/
  26. https://www.pella.com/ideas/windows/how-to-clean-windows/
  27. https://home.howstuffworks.com/home-improvement/household-hints-tips/cleaning-organizing/10-window-cleaning-apartment.htm
  28. https://www.windowcleaningservicenw.com/window-cleaning-techniques-for-different-types-of-commercial-buildings-window-cleaning-services-northwest
  29. https://performancewindowcleaning.com/low-rise-window-cleaning/how-professional-low-rise-window-cleaning-prioritizes-safety/
  30. https://commercialcleaningcorp.com/commercial-window-cleaning-tips-best-practices/
  31. https://psi-info.net/about/high-rise-window-cleaning-faq.php
  32. https://www.fallprotect.com/blog/techtalk/new-osha-regulations-window-washing-anchors-and-rds
  33. https://squeegeesquad.com/window-washing/how-dangerous-is-high-rise-window-cleaning/
  34. https://www.healthday.com/a-to-z-health/public-health/window-washers-646930.html
  35. https://downloads.regulations.gov/OSHA-2007-0072-0309/attachment_3.pdf
  36. https://usa.ungerglobal.com/solution/traditional-cleaning/
  37. https://www.getjobber.com/academy/window-cleaning/window-cleaning-supplies/
  38. https://www.scottsdalewindowcleaningcompany.com/s/stories/the-history-of-window-cleaning
  39. https://windowcleaner.com/pages/window-cleaning-supplies-tools
  40. https://www.homedepot.com/p/Unger-Total-Pro-Kit-with-14-in-Scrubber-12-in-Squeegee-and-6-ft-Telescoping-Connect-and-Clean-Pole-988900/323406916
  41. https://windowcleaner.com/collections/buckets
  42. https://harryfalk.com/buckets/
  43. https://gorilladesk.com/learn/best-window-cleaning-tools/
  44. https://windowcleaner.com/pages/water-fed-poles
  45. https://xeroproducts.com/collections/booster-pumps
  46. https://purewaterpower.com/
  47. https://www.streamline.systems/product-category/waterfed-poles-and-brushes/
  48. https://www.kaercher.com/us/home-garden/window-vac.html
  49. https://www.target.com/p/k-rcher-window-vac-wv-1-plus-white/-/A-93533389
  50. https://usa.ungerglobal.com/product-category/window-glass-cleaning-kits/
  51. https://www.ipcworldwide.com/us/products/professional-window-cleaning-equipment/
  52. https://ettore.com/collections/professional-window-cleaning-kits
  53. https://www.discountcleaningproducts.com/Water-Fed-Pole-Systems-s/3110.htm
  54. https://www.consumerreports.org/home-garden/home-maintenance-repairs/best-way-to-clean-high-windows-a4299337606/
  55. https://www.facebook.com/groups/491725720861746/posts/9619581408076086/
  56. https://www.extend-a-reach.com/products/7-24-ft-window-washing-squeegee-kit-with-extension-pole-30-foot-reach-window-cleaning-tool-window-washer-combo-with-telescopic-extension-pole-best-indoor-outdoor-window-washing-equipment
  57. https://www.aquafactors.com/aluminium-water-fed-poles-carbon-fibre-water-fed-poles/water-fed-poles-a-brief-history/
  58. https://www.dlcleanwindows.co.uk/2024/01/07/the-evolution-of-water-fed-pole-window-cleaning-a-streak-free-revolution-in-the-uk/
  59. https://ramclean.com/inexpensive-multi-story-window-cleaning-from-the-ground/
  60. https://ntpropertycare.com/aerial-platforms-window-cleaning/
  61. https://www.certifymeonline.net/blog/the-5-types-of-aerial-work-platforms/
  62. https://www.osha.gov/etools/scaffolding/suspended/two-point
  63. https://www.scaffoldingsolutions.com/services/suspended-scaffolding/window-washing/
  64. https://bigapplewindowcleaning.com/window-cleaning-access-methods/
  65. https://www.valcourt.net/blog/the-tallest-challenges-window-cleaning-for-skyscrapers-and-high-rises/
  66. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.451
  67. https://www.archtoolbox.com/window-washing-equipment-design/
  68. https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/osha/osha20160310-1
  69. https://skyswc.com/how-dangerous-is-high-rise-window-cleaning/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9250289/
  71. https://www.osha.gov/ords/imis/accidentsearch.search?acc_keyword=%2522Window%2520Washer%2522&keyword_list=on
  72. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1986-12-09
  73. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/1982-05-21
  74. https://iwca.org/page/I-14Standard
  75. https://ascentbuildingservice.com/osha-window-cleaning-regulations/
  76. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-86-304/page-2.html
  77. https://www.osha.gov/alliances/iwca/iwca
  78. https://www.skylinerobotics.com/
  79. https://www.lucidbots.com/
  80. https://www.therobotreport.com/?p=580266
  81. https://ktvworkingdrone.com/
  82. https://howtorobot.com/expert-insight/window-cleaning-robots
  83. https://www.ecovacs.com/au/blog/do-robot-window-cleaners-work
  84. https://everythingexterior.com/blog/do-you-need-a-window-cleaning-robot/
  85. https://freshframeswindows.com/blogs/how-water-fed-pole-technology-is-revolutionizing-residential-window-cleaning
  86. https://usa.ungerglobal.com/product-category/poles-waterfed/
  87. https://trymywindowguys.com/blog-the-science-behind-eco-friendly-window
  88. https://frontierwindowcleaning.com/understanding-the-active-ingredients-in-most-window-cleaners/
  89. https://cuttingedgewindowcleaningservices.com/what-are-the-latest-innovations-in-window-cleaning-technology-for-2025/
  90. https://servicepro911.com/how-eco-friendly-cleaning-solutions-are-transforming-the-window-cleaning-industry/
  91. https://usa.ungerglobal.com/blog/green-window-cleaning-is-a-win-win-for-professional-window-cleaners/
  92. https://windowcleaningforums.co.uk/threads/water-usage-per-sqm-and-cleaning-intervals.35223/
  93. https://www.reddit.com/r/WindowCleaning/comments/1dyf9bw/is_it_normal_to_use_your_clients_water/
  94. https://nickswindowcleaning.ca/blog/water-fed-pole-vs-squeegee/
  95. https://windowcleaningforums.co.uk/threads/how-much-water-per-day.7453/
  96. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvQyKsjh8Jo
  97. https://simonswindows.com/the-environmental-impact-of-window-cleaning-sustainable-practices-and-innovations/
  98. https://www.fishwindowcleaning.com/franchise/about/blog/window-washing-industry
  99. https://www.windowgenie.com/blog/window-cleaning-industry-statistics/
  100. https://www.epa.gov/npdes/npdes-stormwater-program
  101. https://www.epa.gov/greenerproducts/identifying-greener-cleaning-products
  102. https://www.ewg.org/cleaners/products/2505-WindexGlassCleanerOriginal/
  103. https://bowercollective.com/blogs/news/how-toxic-cleaning-products-harm-aquatic-life
  104. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK561657/
  105. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277938924_Leveraging_Life_Cycle_Assessment_to_Evaluate_Environmental_Impacts_of_Green_Cleaning_Products
  106. https://www.epa.gov/npdes/national-menu-best-management-practices-bmps-stormwater
  107. https://medbrite.com/blog/window-cleaning-maintenance-guide
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545541/
  109. https://dublinohiousa.gov/dev/dev/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Stormwater-Pollution-Prevention-for-Small-Businesses.pdf
  110. https://iwca.org/
  111. https://iwca.org/page/SafetyTrainingDesignations
  112. https://www.issa.com/emea/education-certification/
  113. https://www.mgwc.org/
  114. https://www.window-cleaning-supply.com/high-rise-training/
  115. https://www.zippia.com/window-cleaner-jobs/demographics/
  116. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/building-and-grounds-cleaning/janitors-and-building-cleaners.htm
  117. https://www.ziprecruiter.com/Salaries/Window-Cleaner-Salary
  118. https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/window-cleaner-salary-SRCH_KO0%2C14.htm
  119. https://www.bellafsm.com/window-cleaner-salary/
  120. https://www.getjobber.com/academy/window-cleaning/how-much-do-window-cleaners-make/
  121. https://blog.bidclips.com/window-cleaning/window-cleaning-industry-trends
  122. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071357/
  123. https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/-cleaner-action-film-focuses-on-ex-soldier-turned-window-cleaner-232479813802
  124. https://www.industrynewscorp.com/famous-window-washing-scenes-in-movies/
  125. https://community.windowcleaner.com/t/favorite-sayings-for-window-cleaning/24517
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.