Hubbry Logo
Social Democratic Union of MacedoniaSocial Democratic Union of MacedoniaMain
Open search
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
Community hub
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (Macedonian: Социјалдемократски сојуз на Македонија – СДСМ, Socijaldemokratski sojuz na Makedonija – SDSM, Albanian: Lidhja socialdemokrate e Maqedonisë – LSDM) is a social democratic[1] political party, and the main centre-left[2] party in North Macedonia. The party is pro-European.[3]

Key Information

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia was founded on 20 April 1991 at the 11th Congress of the League of Communists of Macedonia, when it was transformed into the SDSM. The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia is a member of the Progressive Alliance and an associate affiliate of the Party of European Socialists (PES). The party supported a practical solution to the Macedonia naming dispute with Greece, which succeeded under the Prespa Agreement.

History

[edit]

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia was established on 20 April 1991. Its roots can be traced to 1943 upon the formation of the Communist Party of Macedonia (CPM) during World War II in the Democratic Federal Yugoslavia. The CPM became the League of Communists of Macedonia (LCM) in 1952 and was the ruling party of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia. Branko Crvenkovski was elected as the president and Nikola Popovski was elected as the vice president of the party. It retained the resources and the organisation of its predecessor.[4][5] Unlike its rival VMRO-DPMNE, the party has traditionally had support from the urban middle-classes, the former Yugoslav managerial elite and the former nomenklatura.[6]

It formed the first political government in 1992.[7] SDSM experienced its first major split when Petar Gošev established the Democratic Party in 1993.[6] In 1994, SDSM created the Alliance of Macedonia, together with the Socialist Party and the Liberal Party.[8] The party formed a coalition government with the ethnic Albanian Party for Democratic Prosperity.[9] The party's president Crvenkovski served as the prime minister of Macedonia from 1992 to 1998.[10] During 1997 and the first half of 1998, Crvenkovski and his governing centre-left coalition were criticised by the public due to the high unemployment rates (42 per cent in 1997 and 41 per cent in 1998), rampant corruption, insider privatization, dysfunctionally high levels of taxation, failure to attract foreign investment, and the slow pace of reforms aimed at giving ethnic Albanians, Turks, and Roma people equal status with ethnic Macedonians.[11][12] The party lost the 1998 elections.

In 2001, SDSM was part of the short-lived government of national unity during the 2001 insurgency in Macedonia, which also consisted of VMRO-DPMNE, Party for Democratic Prosperity and Democratic Party of Albanians.[13][14] After the 2002 Macedonian parliamentary election, the party became the biggest party, winning 60 out of 120 seats in the Assembly of Macedonia as the largest party of the Together for Macedonia alliance, which it co-led with the Liberal Democratic Party.[4] Together for Macedonia ruled in coalition with the Democratic Union for Integration.

SDSM defines itself as a social democratic party.[8] It was a member of the Socialist International, while it is currently a member of the Progressive Alliance and an associate affiliate of the Party of European Socialists (PES). Crvenkovski won the 2004 presidential elections, becoming the President of Macedonia, a post that he held until May 2009. Vlado Bučkovski became the party's president, serving as party leader and Prime Minister until 2006.[11] On 30 November 2005, a prominent member of SDSM, Tito Petkovski, who ran for president in 1999 and came in second place, left the party to form the New Social Democratic Party. This resulted in the second major split of the party.[6] The party was defeated in the 2006 parliamentary elections, with the main reasons being the high rate of unemployment, corruption scandals, and concessions in favour of the Albanians taken to implement the Ohrid Framework Agreement.[8]

After 2006, SDSM was led by Radmila Šekerinska.[6] In the 2008 parliamentary elections, the coalition Sun – Coalition for Europe (of which SDSM was the leading party) was defeated, receiving 27 of the 120 seats. In the 2009 local elections, the Social Democrats won in 8 out of 84 municipalities in the country.[15] After the electoral defeat, Šekerinska resigned and was succeeded by a mayor of Strumica, Zoran Zaev.[8] In May 2009, after finishing the 5-year-term as President of Macedonia, Crvenkovski returned to the SDSM and was re-elected as leader of the party. He reorganised the party profoundly,[16][further explanation needed] but resigned after the party's defeat in the 2013 local elections. In June 2013, Zaev was elected as the leader.[7]

The party was defeated in the 2014 general elections by the VMRO-DPMNE, but the results were not recognised and the opposition parties boycotted the Parliament. From February to May 2015, Zaev released wiretapped material that incriminated Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski for illegally spying on more than 20,000 citizens. In May, large protests including SDSM members began in Skopje. Large crowds gathered to protest on May 17, demanding resignation from Gruevski, who refused to step down and organized a pro-government rally the following day. The number of protesters was estimated to be more than 40,000. Zaev claimed the number of protesters reached 100,000, and said that some of them will remain there until Gruevski resigns. European Union diplomats offered to mediate a solution to the crisis. The political crisis was resolved with the Pržino Agreement in July 2015, which obliged a resignation from Gruevski, participation of SDSM in the ministries, and early parliament elections.[17] In the elections on 11 December 2016, the party won almost 440,000 votes and 49 MPs which was the second-best result in SDSM's history, after the result from 2002. In April 2017, SDSM formed a coalition with the Albanian parties (Democratic Union for Integration, Besa, and Alliance for Albanians) and in the next month, it formed a government. The party won 57 municipalities in the local elections in October.[18] During the government's rule, North Macedonia joined NATO and agreements with Bulgaria and Greece were also signed, with the latter resolving the Macedonia naming dispute.[19]

Before the 2020 parliamentary elections, the party rebranded, changing its logo to be similar to other European social democratic parties, and changing its primary colour to red. In the elections, it campaigned for continuing to pursue membership in the EU. It created a government in August after winning 46 seats.[14] After its defeat in the 2021 local elections in North Macedonia when it lost 57 municipalities,[18] Zaev stepped down as the party's president.[20] On 12 December 2021, the party's internal leadership elections were held and the former deputy Finance Minister, Dimitar Kovačevski, was elected as the party's president and he became the prime minister in January 2022.[21][14] In the 2024 parliamentary election, the party had its worst result, winning only 18 seats in the Assembly. It resulted in the resignation of the party's leadership.[22] On 30 June, the former health minister of North Macedonia, Venko Filipče, became the party's president.[23]

Party leaders

[edit]
The old logo of SDSM
Old party flag

Election results

[edit]

Presidential elections

[edit]
Election Party candidate Votes % Votes % Result
First Round Second Round
1994 Kiro Gligorov 715,087 78.4% - - Elected Green tickY
1999 Tito Petkovski 343,606 33.1% 513,614 46.8% Lost Red XN
2004 Branko Crvenkovski 385,347 42.5% 550,317 62.6% Elected Green tickY
2009 Ljubomir Frčkoski 202,691 20.54% 264,828 36.86% Lost Red XN
2014 Stevo Pendarovski 326,164 38.56% 398,077 42.67% Lost Red XN
2019 322,581 44.75% 436,212 53.59% Elected Green tickY
2024 180,499 20.49% 251,899 30.99% Lost Red XN

Assembly elections

[edit]
Election Party leader In coalition with Votes % Seats +/– Position Government
(Coalition totals) (Coalition totals)
1990 Petar Goshev None 220,748 27.70%
31 / 120
 Increase 31 Increase 2nd Government
1994 Branko Crvenkovski LPM-SPM 329,700 53.50%
95 / 120
 Increase 64 Increase 1st Government
1998 None 279,799 25.14%
30 / 120
 Decrease 60 Decrease 2nd Opposition
2002 LDP-DPT-DLB-USR-DPD 494,744 41.58%
60 / 120
 Increase 33 Increase 1st Government
2006 Vlado Bučkovski LDP-DPT-DLB-USR-DPD 218,164 23.31%
32 / 120
 Decrease 30 Decrease 2nd Opposition
2008 Radmila Šekerinska NSDP-LDP- LPM 233,284 23.64%
27 / 120
 Decrease 5 Steady 2nd Opposition
2011 Branko Crvenkovski NSDP-NSDP-SEB-LPM-SPS-PPER-UTLS-SSD 368,496 32.78%
42 / 120
 Increase 15 Steady 2nd Opposition
2014 Zoran Zaev NSDP-LDP-UM-SPER 283,955 26.22%
34 / 120
 Decrease 8 Steady 2nd Opposition
2016 NSDP-LDP-DOM-SPER 436,981 37.87%
49 / 120
 Increase 15 Steady 2nd Government
2020 "We Can"
BESA-NSDP-LDP-VMRO–NP-DOM-DS-TDP-THP-POPGM 		327,408 35.89%
46 / 120
 Decrease 3 Increase 1st Government
2024 Dimitar Kovačevski "For a European Future"
NSDP-LDP-VMRO–NP-DOM-POPGM 		153,250 15.36%
18 / 120
 Decrease 28 Decrease 2nd Opposition

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Social Democratic Union of Macedonia

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (Macedonian: Социјалдемократски сојуз на Македонија, SDSM) is a centre-left social-democratic in . Founded in 1990 as the successor to the League of Communists of Macedonia—the sole legal party under Yugoslav rule from 1945 to 1990—SDSM transitioned from communist roots to advocate , pro-European integration, and liberal reforms. As one of North Macedonia's two dominant parties alongside the centre-right , SDSM has governed in coalition from 1992 to 1998, 2002 to 2006, and 2017 to 2024, periods marked by efforts toward and alignment amid domestic political crises and ethnic tensions. The party's 2017–2024 tenure under leaders like prioritized Western orientation, culminating in accession in 2020, but faced criticism for stalled progress due to bilateral disputes, challenges, and perceptions, contributing to its sharp electoral decline in 2024 when it garnered only 15.3% of votes.

Ideology and Political Positions

Core Ideological Foundations

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) defines itself as a social democratic party, emphasizing principles of , equality, and as outlined in its , which describes the organization as comprising free and responsible members dedicated to advancing these objectives through democratic means. This foundational self-conception emerged from its origins as a reformed successor to the League of Communists of Macedonia, transitioning in 1991 toward a center-left platform that prioritizes economies combined with robust social welfare provisions to mitigate inequalities arising from capitalist dynamics. Empirical assessments of SDSM's ideological evolution highlight a commitment to progressive redistribution and public investment in , healthcare, and social , reflecting causal links between state intervention and reduced socioeconomic disparities observed in comparable European social democratic models. At its core, SDSM's ideology aligns with modern social democracy's rejection of both unfettered and centralized command economies, advocating instead for a where private enterprise coexists with government oversight to ensure fair competition and worker protections. The party's affiliation with the underscores this orientation, promoting policies that foster equal opportunities without compromising individual liberties, such as universal access to social services funded through progressive taxation. This framework draws on empirical evidence from post-communist transitions, where social democratic governance has correlated with higher human development indices via targeted interventions, though critics note potential inefficiencies in over-reliance on state mechanisms that may distort market signals. SDSM's ideological foundations also incorporate , stressing political pluralism, , and measures as prerequisites for genuine equality, with party documents framing these as essential to countering authoritarian tendencies inherited from prior regimes. Unlike more radical leftist traditions, the party eschews revolutionary change in favor of incremental reforms within parliamentary democracy, evidenced by its historical emphasis on coalition-building and electoral competition to enact welfare expansions, such as pension adjustments and enhancements during governing periods. This pragmatic approach prioritizes causal realism, recognizing that sustainable social progress depends on institutional stability and economic growth rather than ideological purity.

Foreign Policy Orientations

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) maintains a orientation centered on Euro-Atlantic integration, emphasizing membership as a cornerstone of and accession as the primary strategic goal. This stance is articulated in the party's 2020–2024 program, which commits to aligning defense planning with 's processes, including the NATO Defence Planning Process (NDPP), and advancing reforms to meet criteria. SDSM views 's achievement of full membership on March 27, 2020, as a direct outcome of its governance priorities, enhancing regional stability and deterring external threats. A key pillar involves resolving bilateral disputes with neighbors to facilitate integration. During its 2017–2020 coalition government led by , SDSM negotiated and ratified the with on June 17, 2018, which resolved the long-standing naming dispute by adopting "" as the constitutional name, thereby unblocking accession and advancing candidacy progress. The party has defended this accord as enabling economic growth, foreign investment, and security guarantees, despite domestic opposition framing it as a concession on . Relations with represent a persistent challenge, with SDSM advocating dialogue within the framework to address Sofia's objections over history, , and identity, which have stalled accession negotiations since Bulgaria's veto in November 2020. Under (SDSM, 2020–2024), the party proposed constitutional amendments in 2022 to recognize a Bulgarian minority, aiming to fulfill the 2017 and unblock talks, though these failed in parliament due to insufficient support from ethnic Albanian and opposition parties. SDSM has consistently aligned North Macedonia's positions with the 's (CFSP), as noted in assessments, prioritizing multilateralism over bilateral concessions outside oversight. Broader engagements reflect a pro-Western tilt, including support for sanctions against following the 2022 Ukraine invasion and cooperation on regional initiatives like the , while critiquing nationalist alternatives that risk isolation. This approach, however, faced electoral backlash in 2024, with voters attributing stalled progress to unfulfilled investments.

Domestic Policy Emphases

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) prioritizes domestic policies aligned with social democratic tenets, focusing on balancing market-oriented with expanded social protections and institutional reforms. During its coalition governance from 2017 to , SDSM-led administrations implemented measures to advance a , including efforts to attract and simplify regulations for investors in technology and industrial development zones. These initiatives aimed to foster economic diversification and job creation, though implementation faced challenges from slow public investment execution and industrial production declines. On social welfare, SDSM has advocated for strengthening the safety net through policies such as multiple increases, with state subsidies supporting wage hikes for low-income sectors to mitigate employer burdens amid rising costs. The party passed a comprehensive in 2020 to address societal inequalities, particularly affecting ethnic minorities and vulnerable groups, while promoting and protections as part of broader EU-aligned social policies. In its 2024 election program, SDSM emphasized "new economic energy" alongside subthemes targeting employment, social affairs, and to reduce poverty and enhance public services. Institutional reforms constituted a core emphasis, with SDSM governments post-2017 pursuing , depoliticization, and drives to reverse prior . Key actions included vetting judges and prosecutors, establishing special bodies, and aligning domestic frameworks with standards on , though progress remained uneven due to entrenched interests and implementation gaps. These efforts were framed as essential for domestic stability and accession, prioritizing empirical institutional strengthening over short-term political gains.

Organizational Structure and Leadership

Internal Governance and Key Leaders

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) maintains a centralized typical of post-communist social democratic parties, with the as its supreme body, comprising delegates from municipal branches, elected officials, and central to deliberate on statutes, policies, and elections every four years or as needed for extraordinary sessions. The Executive Committee, led by the president, oversees daily operations and political strategy, supported by a Central Board that adjudicates internal appeals and a National Committee of 50–100 members for policy oversight. Municipal organizations constitute the foundational units, each with local conferences for candidate nominations and input, though remains top-down, limiting horizontal and factionalism while enforcing discipline through membership rules that permit termination for statute violations. Party democracy features selective participation, such as one-third of municipal branches triggering an extraordinary , alongside quotas for youth (20% via the Social Democratic Youth of Macedonia) and women (30% achieved through affiliated lobbies), but internal processes exhibit oligarchic elements with suppressed local voices and no formal factions. Leadership selection emphasizes the presidency, historically elected by delegates but evolving toward direct member primaries, as implemented for the 2024–2025 transition following electoral defeats, reflecting efforts to bolster legitimacy amid declining support. Prominent leaders include founder Branko Crvenkovski, who presided from 1991 to 2004, guiding the party—successor to the League of Communists of Macedonia—through its first governance term (1992–1998) as before ascending to the presidency (2004–2009). Zoran Zaev assumed leadership around 2013, serving as from 2017 to 2021 and navigating accession reforms until resigning amid local election setbacks on October 31, 2021. Venko Filipče, former health minister during the response, was elected president on April 7, 2025, via direct member vote, succeeding interim figures like Radmila Šekerinska, with vice-president Fanny Karanfilova Panovska appointed in November 2024 to support organizational renewal.

Membership Dynamics and Alliances

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) has relied on multi-ethnic coalitions to form governments, primarily partnering with the (DUI), an ethnic Albanian party, from 2017 to 2024. This alliance secured parliamentary majorities and facilitated legislative agendas, including judicial reforms and alignment efforts, but drew accusations of enabling systemic and undue influence by DUI leaders. The dissolved ahead of the 2024 elections amid public disillusionment with outcomes, positioning DUI in opposition alongside SDSM for the first time in over a decade. In opposition since May 2024, SDSM has explored tactical alignments with smaller parties like Levica, though these remain informal and contested by rivals as attempts to undermine the ruling VMRO-DPMNE-led . Internationally, SDSM holds associate membership in the Party of European Socialists (PES), aligning it with European center-left networks focused on and EU integration. This affiliation supports SDSM's pro-Western orientation, including advocacy for membership achieved in 2020 and stalled EU accession talks. Domestically, SDSM previously led the "For a European Future" coalition, incorporating liberal and movement-based groups to broaden its appeal beyond traditional social democratic voters. Membership dynamics within SDSM reflect broader electoral volatility, with the party's support base contracting sharply after the May 2024 parliamentary elections, where it garnered roughly half the votes of amid voter fatigue from unfulfilled promises and . Local elections in October 2025 underscored this trend, as SDSM secured mayoral wins in only a handful of municipalities, primarily in urban centers, while losing ground in ethnic Macedonian-majority areas. Internally, SDSM pioneered direct intra-party primaries for leadership selection, the first in , aiming to democratize decision-making and retain activist engagement despite declining turnout. However, transparency reports indicate persistent challenges in financial disclosure and member mobilization, contributing to perceptions of organizational weakening post-governing tenure.

Historical Evolution

Formation and Early Challenges (1991–2006)

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) was formed on April 20, 1991, as the successor to the League of Communists of Macedonia—Party for Democratic Change (SKM-PDP), through its transformation at the 11th Party Congress amid the dissolution of Yugoslavia and Macedonia's impending independence referendum on September 8, 1991. , a former SKM member, was elected as the party's first president, inheriting its organizational structure and resources while pledging a shift toward , market reforms, and multi-ethnic cooperation in the new democratic context. The party's platform emphasized economic stabilization, EU integration aspirations, and balancing Macedonian national interests with , particularly for the ethnic Albanian population comprising about 22% of citizens. In the November 1990 constituent assembly elections—held under the transitional SKM-PDP banner—SDSM precursors secured a plurality, paving the way for the party to lead Macedonia's first post-independence after formal in 1991. Crvenkovski became in 1992, heading a coalition that prioritized , fiscal , and international recognition despite Greece's over the "Macedonia" name, which triggered a UN-brokered interim reference ("FYROM") and economic embargoes exacerbating and GDP contraction of over 20% in the early . surged above 30% by the mid-1990s, fueled by stalled industrial restructuring and spillover from , including refugee influxes and trade disruptions, while slow administrative reforms bred public disillusionment with the former communist elite's adaptation to pluralism. Governance challenges intensified with the 1997 TAT pyramid scheme collapse, a fraudulent investment operation that defrauded approximately 30,000 depositors of $90 million; several SDSM officials, including major party donors, faced charges of , , and abuse of office, eroding trust in the coalition's pledges. These scandals, compounded by perceptions of in and inadequate response to like , contributed to SDSM's defeat in the parliamentary elections, where the nationalist VMRO-DPMNE-led coalition capitalized on voter fatigue, securing 58 seats to SDSM's 27 amid turnout of 79%. In opposition from to 2002, SDSM critiqued VMRO-DPMNE's authoritarian tendencies and economic mismanagement, but ethnic tensions escalated into the 2001 Albanian insurgency by the National Liberation Army (NLA), prompting the Ohrid Framework Agreement that SDSM endorsed for decentralizing power and enhancing Albanian rights. SDSM returned to power following the 2002 elections, forming a coalition with the Democratic Union for Integration (DUI)—a post-Ohrid Albanian party—and securing 60 seats; Crvenkovski resumed as prime minister until 2004, when he won the presidency, succeeded by Vlado Bučkovski. The 2002–2006 term focused on implementing Ohrid reforms, such as bilingual education and local autonomy, alongside NATO Partnership for Peace entry in 1995 (expanded under SDSM) and EU stabilization talks, but persistent corruption allegations, uneven judicial independence, and failure to resolve the name dispute stalled progress, with GDP growth averaging 2–3% amid fiscal deficits. Bučkovski's government faced intra-coalition strains and public backlash over unaddressed poverty, culminating in SDSM's narrow loss in the July 2006 elections to VMRO-DPMNE's 32% vote share versus SDSM's 23%, marking the end of its early dominance and highlighting vulnerabilities in balancing reformist rhetoric with tangible outcomes.

Opposition and Return to Power (2006–2017)

Following its defeat in the 2006 parliamentary elections, where the Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) secured 23.3% of the vote and 32 seats in the 120-seat Assembly, the party transitioned to opposition status as the -led coalition formed a government under Prime Minister . SDSM, led initially by until 2009 and later by figures including from 2013, consistently challenged the ruling coalition's policies on media control, , and stalled EU integration efforts during elections in , , and , in which retained power each time. The party's opposition role intensified amid accusations of government , including restrictions on press freedom and electoral irregularities, though SDSM's internal divisions and limited electoral gains constrained its influence. A pivotal shift occurred in early 2015 when SDSM leader publicly released audio recordings—allegedly obtained from foreign intelligence sources—implicating Gruevski and senior officials in corruption, election fraud, and , including the 2014 killing of a political opponent. These "bombshells" sparked mass protests in and other cities, drawing tens of thousands demanding Gruevski's resignation and exposing systemic governance failures that had eroded democratic norms over a decade. The crisis deepened parliamentary boycotts by SDSM and ethnic Albanian parties, leading to - and U.S.-mediated talks that produced the Pržino Agreement on June 15, 2015, which mandated government reforms, special investigations into the scandals, and snap elections by April 2016 (delayed to December). In the December 11, 2016, parliamentary elections, won 51 seats with approximately 39% of the vote, while SDSM's "For Life in Macedonia" coalition obtained 41 seats despite securing a comparable popular vote share of around 37%, reflecting the disproportionate effects of the d'Hondt seat allocation method and coalition structures. Post-election deadlock ensued as President , a VMRO-DPMNE ally, initially refused to award SDSM a mandate, citing unsubstantiated claims of a " pact" to undermine Macedonian identity through alliances with ethnic Albanian parties. Tensions peaked on April 27, 2017, when nationalist protesters stormed parliament during SDSM's push to elect ethnic Albanian as speaker, resulting in injuries and international condemnation of VMRO-DPMNE for inciting violence. Resolution came in May 2017 when relented, granting Zaev a mandate on ; SDSM formed a coalition with the (DUI), , and BESA, securing 62 seats and voter confidence on May 31 with 67 votes in favor. This return to power ended the 2015–2017 crisis, enabling Zaev's government to prioritize rule-of-law reforms and EU/NATO alignment, though critics from argued the Albanian-inclusive coalition compromised national sovereignty—a charge SDSM dismissed as obstructive amid evidence of prior governance capturing state institutions. The shift marked SDSM's resurgence through sustained opposition pressure and international , reversing a decade of marginalization.

Governing Periods and Reforms (2017–2024)

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM), under leader , formed a on May 31, 2017, following a prolonged political crisis that included protests, wiretap scandals, and a parliamentary blockade by the previous administration. The coalition partnered with ethnic Albanian parties, including the (DUI), securing a parliamentary majority to prioritize rule-of-law restoration, , and democratic standards after a decade of perceived under the prior regime. A cornerstone reform was the Prespa Agreement with Greece, signed on June 17, 2018, which resolved the long-standing name dispute by adopting "North Macedonia" as the official name, effective February 12, 2019, after constitutional amendments ratified by parliament on January 11, 2019. This deal unlocked NATO membership, with North Macedonia acceding as the 30th member on March 27, 2020, following ratification by all allies. On the EU front, the government advanced candidacy status and initiated accession negotiations in July 2022, though progress stalled due to bilateral disputes, particularly with Bulgaria over historical and linguistic issues. Domestically, SDSM-led administrations pursued judicial reforms, including a 2017 strategy for system overhaul, vetting of judges and prosecutors, and enhanced anti-corruption measures via the State Anti-Corruption Commission, though implementation faced delays and criticisms for insufficient independence. In the July 15, , snap parliamentary elections—delayed from April due to —SDSM secured 46 seats, forming a renewed with DUI by August 30, , allowing Zaev to resume as amid a . The second term emphasized reforms, adopting a 2018–2022 strategy with action plans for efficiency and depoliticization, alongside economic recovery initiatives post-Prespa and milestones. Facing the , the government implemented lockdowns, fiscal stimulus, and social assistance expansions, but economic contraction reached 4.5% in , with persistent informal and highlighting limited growth impacts. Zaev resigned in January 2022 after DUI's withdrawal over a disputed French proposal, leading to Dimitar Kovačevski's appointment as SDSM leader and on January 16, 2022, who stabilized the coalition and advanced talks despite vetoes. efforts continued as a stated priority, with reforms to services and police, yet scandals, including the 2019 arrest of the special prosecutor, eroded credibility, and GRECO noted partial compliance in measures by 2023. Economic policies focused on job creation and foreign investment, but GDP growth averaged under 2% annually from 2021–2023, hampered by , energy crises, and rule-of-law perceptions deterring investors. The SDSM government's tenure ended with heavy losses in the May 8, 2024, parliamentary elections, where it won only 18 seats amid voter frustration over stalled progress, allegations, and , paving the way for a VMRO-DPMNE-led coalition. Achievements in geopolitical integration contrasted with domestic critiques of uneven reforms, where initial momentum on de-oligarchization waned, contributing to public disillusionment.

Post-Electoral Decline (2024–Present)

In the parliamentary elections held on May 8, 2024, the Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) suffered its most severe defeat in the party's history, securing approximately 14.3% of the vote and 18 seats in the 120-seat Assembly, a sharp drop from its previous governing majority. This outcome reflected widespread voter frustration with the SDSM-led government's handling of stalled accession talks, persistent allegations, and , enabling the center-right coalition to claim a with over 43% of the vote. The concurrent presidential runoff saw SDSM-backed candidate lose decisively to VMRO-DPMNE's Gordana Siljanovska-Davkova, further underscoring the ruling coalition's collapse. The electoral rout triggered immediate internal turmoil within SDSM. On May 22, 2024, party leader and former Dimitar Kovachevski formally resigned, citing responsibility for the loss and calling for a party congress to reorganize leadership. This followed a prolonged intra-party that had eroded SDSM's cohesion since at least , exacerbated by factional disputes and failure to deliver on reform promises. The party's Central Executive Board scheduled internal elections for June, aiming to select a successor amid debates over strategic direction, including whether to pivot toward more assertive opposition tactics or renewed pro-EU moderation. In July 2024, Venko Filipče, a former health minister noted for his role in crisis management, was elected as SDSM's new president, defeating rivals in a contest focused on revitalizing the party's image and addressing voter alienation. Under Filipče's leadership, SDSM transitioned to the opposition benches as the new government under took office in June 2024, prioritizing anti-corruption probes that implicated former SDSM officials. By late 2024, the party grappled with declining membership morale and challenges in countering the government's narrative of SDSM-era mismanagement, though it maintained alliances with ethnic Albanian partners like DUI to sustain parliamentary influence. As of October 2025, SDSM's approval ratings remained subdued, with local elections in October highlighting persistent weaknesses in urban strongholds previously dominated by the party.

Electoral Performance

Parliamentary Elections

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) has contested every parliamentary election in since its founding in 1991 as the successor to the reformed League of Communists. The unicameral Assembly has 120 seats allocated proportionally across six constituencies, with an additional three for expatriates often left vacant. SDSM's performance has fluctuated, with peaks in the mid-1990s and early enabling governing coalitions, followed by opposition periods, a return to power in 2017, and sharp decline after 2020. In the October 1994 elections, SDSM secured 60 seats, forming a under . The party lost ground in the 1998 elections, winning 27 seats and shifting to opposition as took power. SDSM rebounded in September 2002, leading the "Together for Macedonia" coalition to 60 seats and regaining the premiership amid post-Ohrid Framework stabilization efforts. Subsequent elections from 2006 onward marked prolonged opposition for SDSM. It obtained 32 seats in July 2006, followed by 27 seats in June 2008, amid dominance. Losses continued in 2011 and 2014, with SDSM unable to form majorities despite internal leadership changes. The December 2016 elections yielded 49 seats for the SDSM-led coalition, enabling a in May 2017 through alliances with ethnic Albanian parties after prolonged negotiations and a political crisis. SDSM maintained power narrowly in the July 15, 2020 snap elections, where its "We Can" captured 46 seats with 37.4% of the vote, relying on post-election pacts with the (DUI) to reach a majority. However, the , 2024 elections represented a historic , with the SDSM-led "For a European Future" securing only 18 seats amid voter dissatisfaction over stalled EU accession, scandals, and economic stagnation, allowing to form a new government.
Election YearSDSM/Coalition SeatsNotes
199460Formed
199827Entered opposition
200260Regained power
200632Opposition
200827Continued opposition
201649 after alliances
202046 (37.4% vote)Retained power narrowly
202418Heavy defeat

Presidential Elections

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) has participated in North Macedonia's presidential elections since the country's independence, typically fielding or endorsing candidates aligned with its social-democratic platform emphasizing and integration, multi-ethnic governance, and reforms. SDSM candidates or supported nominees have secured victory in two elections ( and ) but faced defeats in others, often amid competition from the center-right party. Participation reflects SDSM's role as the primary center-left force, with outcomes influenced by coalition dynamics, , and national issues like the name dispute with and ethnic tensions. In the 1999 presidential election, SDSM candidate Tito Petkovski advanced to the runoff after securing 33.97% of the vote in the first round on October 31, outperforming VMRO-DPMNE's (21.4%). Petkovski's campaign focused on continuity with outgoing President Kiro Gligorov's policies, but he lost the November 14 runoff with 45.8% to Trajkovski's 52.8%, amid allegations of irregularities noted by international observers. Voter turnout was approximately 68% in the first round. SDSM achieved its first presidential success in 2004 when party leader won the presidency. Crvenkovski obtained 42.5% in the first round on April 14, advancing to the runoff against VMRO-DPMNE's Sasko Kedev. He secured 62.6% in the April 28 runoff, with turnout at 55.2%. Crvenkovski resigned in 2006 to become , highlighting the presidency's ceremonial role under North Macedonia's . The 2009 election saw SDSM's Ljubomir Frčkoski, a former foreign minister, receive 14.4% in the first round on March 22, failing to advance as VMRO-DPMNE's led with 30.4%. Ivanov won the April 5 runoff decisively. Frčkoski's low support reflected SDSM's weakened position after internal splits and opposition status. Turnout dropped to 42.6% in the first round. In 2019, SDSM-endorsed independent Stevo Pendarovski won amid a coalition government push for Western alignment post-Prespa Agreement. Pendarovski garnered 42.8% in the first round on April 21, edging VMRO-DPMNE's Gordana Siljanovska-Davkova (42.6%). He prevailed in the May 5 runoff with 51.7% to her 44.7%, with turnout at 41.7%. The victory bolstered SDSM's reform agenda, though marred by low participation signaling voter apathy. Pendarovski sought re-election in 2024 as SDSM's incumbent but suffered a significant defeat. He received 20.2% in the first round on April 24, behind Siljanovska-Davkova's 44.2%. In the May 8 runoff, she won with 61.3% to his 38.7%, amid high turnout (51.2% first round) and public discontent over stalled progress and corruption perceptions. This loss paralleled SDSM's parliamentary setbacks, attributed to governance fatigue.
Election YearSDSM Candidate/EndorseeFirst Round Vote ShareRunoff OutcomeTurnout (First Round)
1999Tito Petkovski33.97%Lost (45.8%)~68%
200442.5%Won (62.6%)~62%
2009Ljubomir Frčkoski14.4%Did not advance42.6%
201942.8%Won (51.7%)41.7%
202420.2%Lost (38.7%)51.2%
Note: 2014 election omitted as SDSM's supported candidate Stevo Pendarovski did not secure a win, aligning with patterns of opposition-era challenges; data excludes minor or non-competitive rounds.

Local Elections

In the 2017 local elections, held on October 14–15 and 28–29, the Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) secured a decisive victory, winning mayoral positions in 57 of the 80 municipalities as well as control over the City of Skopje. This outcome, with SDSM-led coalitions dominating municipal councils, aligned with the party's national resurgence after years in opposition and the formation of a coalition government under Zoran Zaev. Voter turnout exceeded 50 percent in the first round, reflecting strong mobilization among urban and ethnic Albanian communities supportive of SDSM's pro-EU platform. The 2021 local elections, conducted on October 17 and 31, marked a sharp reversal for SDSM as the incumbent party. The opposition captured a of municipalities, including most major cities outside , resulting in SDSM retaining control in fewer than 30 municipalities after the second round. This defeat, amid a first-round turnout of around 52 percent, stemmed from public frustration over unfulfilled EU integration promises, economic stagnation, and perceived governance shortcomings, eroding SDSM's local strongholds built in 2017. Independent candidates, such as in , further fragmented SDSM's vote in key areas. Local elections on October 19, 2025 (with a second round on November 2), compounded SDSM's challenges post its 2024 parliamentary loss. In the first round, SDSM won outright mayoral victories in only a small number of municipalities, contrasted with VMRO-DPMNE's 32 outright wins across 80 municipalities. The ruling coalition led in over 50 municipalities per preliminary data, signaling SDSM's marginalization at the local level amid broader discontent with stalled reforms and national identity debates. OSCE observers noted competitive campaigning but highlighted persistent issues like vote-buying allegations, though these did not alter the dominant trend against SDSM. Historically, SDSM's local performance mirrored its national trajectory: modest gains in the and early under predecessor coalitions gave way to dominance in 2017, followed by progressive erosion in 2021 and 2025, correlating with voter shifts toward nationalist alternatives and dissatisfaction with center-left governance. Municipal control has enabled SDSM to implement targeted social programs in retained areas, but losses have constrained party resources and influence over local infrastructure projects.

Policies, Achievements, and Outcomes

EU and NATO Integration Efforts

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM), upon forming a government in May 2017 under Prime Minister , prioritized resolving bilateral disputes to advance membership, culminating in the signed on June 17, 2018, with . This accord ended the long-standing naming dispute by adopting "" as the country's official name, subject to constitutional amendments ratified in January 2019, thereby unblocking 's invitation to accession talks issued at the July 2018 summit. Subsequent ratification of the accession protocol by all allies proceeded swiftly, with depositing its on March 27, 2020, becoming the 30th member state amid the SDSM-led coalition's emphasis on military reforms and contributions, including participation in missions. The government's proactive diplomacy, including Zaev's engagements with Secretary General , facilitated this milestone after over a decade of stalled progress under prior administrations. On the EU front, the SDSM administration leveraged the Prespa resolution to secure a decision in June 2018 recommending the opening of accession s, though implementation was repeatedly delayed by Bulgaria's vetoes over historical and linguistic concerns starting in late 2019. resumed with the adoption of a French-German framework in 2022, enabling North Macedonia's first intergovernmental conference with the on , 2022, under continued SDSM governance, which involved committing to constitutional changes acknowledging a Bulgarian minority to address bilateral blockers. Despite these efforts, negotiations advanced minimally by 2024, hampered by ongoing Bulgarian demands and limited cluster openings, with the SDSM coalition implementing judicial and reforms aligned with benchmarks.

Anti-Corruption and Institutional Reforms

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM)-led governments, in power from 2017 to 2024, prioritized measures and institutional reforms as central elements of their platform, framing them as essential for accession and addressing the governance deficits exposed by the 2015 wiretapping scandal under the prior administration. Key initiatives included the establishment of a Coordinating Body for the Fight Against to streamline inter-institutional efforts and enhance oversight. In March 2021, the government adopted a comprehensive Plan focused on preventing graft within current structures, investigating historical cases, and integrating digital tools such as digitized public registers to improve transparency. Additionally, in August 2020, created a dedicated anti-corruption prosecutor's office under Special Prosecutor Vilma Novak Nikovska, intended to target high-level misconduct independently. Institutional reforms targeted the , , and to bolster rule-of-law standards required for EU Chapter 23 negotiations. The SDSM administration pursued multiple packages, including amendments to enhance , efficiency, and accountability, culminating in a Justice Strategy aimed at reducing political interference. Public administration reforms emphasized merit-based recruitment, depoliticization of , and alignment with EU acquis, with progress noted in GRECO evaluations for and police sectors by 2023. Efforts also included proposals for judges and prosecutors to captured institutions, though repeated pledges for full implementation—promised in three consecutive election cycles—were not realized due to legislative resistance and internal coalition dynamics. Outcomes were mixed, with empirical indicators showing modest gains overshadowed by persistent systemic weaknesses. North Macedonia's score rose from 35 in 2017 to 42 by 2021-2022, reflecting some perceptual improvements amid initial reforms, but stagnated around 40-42 thereafter, ranking the country 88th out of 180 in 2024. Prosecution achievements in high-profile cases remained limited, hampered by evidentiary challenges from prior scandals and new allegations implicating SDSM figures, including probes involving officials close to former Prime Minister . assessments highlighted ongoing and weak safeguards, contributing to a decline in the corruption sub-score from 3.25 to 3.00 between 2023 and 2024, as eroded amid unaddressed risks. These shortcomings, coupled with failure to deliver transformative vetting, factored into SDSM's electoral losses in May 2024, underscoring the gap between reform rhetoric and causal effectiveness in curbing entrenched patronage networks.

Economic and Social Initiatives

The Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM), during its governance from 2017 to 2024, prioritized social democratic economic measures aimed at boosting wages and pensions to address and inequality. In May 2017, shortly after taking power, the government increased the from 9,000 to 12,000 Macedonian denars (MKD), fulfilling a key campaign promise to ease burdens on low-income workers. Subsequent annual adjustments continued this trend, with an 18% rise to 18,000 MKD implemented in to combat working , affecting nearly one in five workers. These hikes were tied to a stipulated of 57% between the minimum and average wage, reflecting efforts to align remuneration with productivity gains amid falling . Pension enhancements formed another pillar, with Prime Minister announcing plans for up to 40% increases alongside expansions in 2020, though implementation faced fiscal constraints from prior system shortfalls. The administration addressed a "pensions black hole" inherited from earlier reforms by prioritizing , yet struggles persisted due to demographic pressures and the pay-as-you-go model's vulnerabilities. These policies contributed to broader social transfers, including child allowances and protections, which SDSM highlighted as mechanisms for reducing exclusion. Social initiatives emphasized welfare system modernization, exemplified by the 2019 on Social Protection, which abolished means-testing for and expanded rights for vulnerable groups, enhancing coverage without duplications. The government also pursued reforms in disability assessment and service delivery, supported by international partners, to improve equity in . Ideologically driven expansions in reflected SDSM's center-left orientation, contrasting phases, though critics noted dependencies on EU-aligned funding and uneven outcomes amid high informal . Economically, these measures coincided with moderate growth and labor market improvements: GDP expanded at 1.1% in 2017, accelerating to 3.9% in 2019 before contracting 4.7% in 2020 due to the , with recovery to 4.51% in 2021. Unemployment declined from 22.9% in 2017 to 16.6% in 2020 and further to 13.4% by 2024, attributable partly to wage incentives and pre-existing trends but hampered by gray economy prevalence. Despite these gains, fiscal deficits and stalled EU integration limited long-term impacts, contributing to over perceived unfulfilled promises.

Controversies and Criticisms

Corruption Allegations and Governance Failures

During its tenure in government from 2017 to 2024, the Social Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) faced persistent allegations of corruption, despite initial pledges to eradicate systemic graft exposed by the 2015 wiretapping scandal that propelled the party to power. Critics, including opposition leaders and international observers, argued that SDSM's administration perpetuated a culture of impunity, with selective prosecutions of prior regime figures failing to yield convictions and new scandals emerging involving public procurement, EU fund misuse, and judicial interference. For instance, a 2021 analysis highlighted SDSM's unfulfilled promise to deliver justice post-wiretapping, as high-profile cases stagnated amid accusations of political maneuvering rather than institutional reform. A notable case involved former Zoran Zaev, who in March 2024 was implicated in the "Dimova" scandal, where prosecutors alleged he personally urged a complainant to withdraw charges against Miroslava Dimova for defrauding €2.2 million in EU agricultural subsidies through falsified documentation. The (OLAF) subsequently demanded reimbursement of the misused funds, underscoring failures in oversight during SDSM's rule. Zaev was acquitted in a separate 2018 case involving a €200,000 solicitation for a business favor, but the ruling drew skepticism over under his government. Governance failures compounded these issues, with SDSM's coalition unable to dismantle entrenched inherited from the previous administration, leading to continued of state resources. Public procurement irregularities and stalled prosecutions eroded trust, as evidenced by the 2021 debacle that prompted Zaev's and, later, the 2024 parliamentary rout. President , an SDSM affiliate, issued an in 2020 for officials implicated in election-related offenses, a move condemned internationally for shielding corrupt actors and undermining . Under successor Dimitar Kovachevski, allegations persisted, including coalition partner DUI's scandals, but SDSM's broader record reflected inadequate institutional reforms, with opposition claims of judicial obstruction in major cases post-2024 handover. In December 2024, charges were filed against Zaev and former Deputy PM Artan Grubi for abuse of office and , highlighting lingering from SDSM-led governance. These developments contributed to perceptions of , where transparency norms were violated, weakening democratic foundations.

National Identity Compromises

The Prespa Agreement, negotiated by SDSM-led governments under Prime Minister Zoran Zaev and ratified by the Macedonian parliament on January 11, 2019, required the constitutional renaming of the country from the Republic of Macedonia to the Republic of North Macedonia, effective erga omnes from February 13, 2019. This entailed amending Article 1 of the constitution, revising official state symbols, passports, currency, and public signage to incorporate the "North" qualifier, and prohibiting domestic use of the previous name in official contexts after a transitional period ending July 12, 2019. The deal also mandated recognition of the Macedonian language as a South Slavic tongue, unrelated to ancient Macedonian, and barred implications of territorial claims over Greece's Macedonia region, including removal of irredentist references from state documents. Opponents, led by , condemned these provisions as a profound of , arguing the name alteration severed ties to ancient Macedonian heritage and equated to cultural capitulation, with the opposition boycotting the parliamentary vote and labeling Zaev's actions treasonous. Public protests erupted in and other cities from late 2018 through 2019, drawing tens of thousands who viewed the agreement as prioritizing accession—achieved March 27, —over sovereignty, with polls indicating over 60% opposition to the by early 2019. SDSM defended the concessions as preserving core identity elements, noting Greek acceptance of Macedonian and language in the accord, yet implementation fueled lasting resentment, contributing to VMRO-DPMNE's narrative of SDSM as facilitators of "identity insecurity". Subsequent SDSM policies under Zaev and successor Dimitar Kovachevski extended identity-related concessions amid Bulgaria's veto on talks, including a French-brokered proposal accepted by the government that mandated joint historical commissions to review Macedonian textbooks for alleged distortions of shared history with , effectively endorsing Bulgarian claims that Macedonian identity derives from Bulgarian roots. This involved curriculum revisions portraying figures like Goce Delchev as Bulgarian rather than exclusively Macedonian, prompting accusations of historical revisionism and further dilution of ethnic distinctiveness, with critics citing it as a pattern of SDSM yielding national symbols—name, language specificity, and —for geopolitical gains. Such measures, while advancing candidacy status in , exacerbated internal divisions, as evidenced by declining SDSM support in 2024 elections where identity issues resonated strongly against the party.

Public Backlash and Internal Divisions

The SDSM government under Prime Minister faced significant public discontent following the 2018 with , which mandated changes to North Macedonia's name, language, and national symbols, viewed by many as a capitulation eroding Macedonian identity. This sentiment intensified with Bulgaria's subsequent on EU accession talks, stalling progress despite SDSM's emphasis on . In the October 2021 local elections, SDSM lost key strongholds, including the Skopje mayoralty, prompting Zaev's resignation as and , as the results reflected voter frustration over unfulfilled EU promises and perceived governance shortcomings. Public backlash peaked in July 2022 amid protests against a French EU compromise proposal, which included constitutional amendments recognizing a minority and historical narrative adjustments to resolve the dispute. Thousands gathered in , with demonstrations turning violent as protesters clashed with police, injuring 47 officers and leading to arrests; critics, including opposition parties like Levica, accused the SDSM-led coalition of further national compromises for elusive benefits. These events underscored broader disillusionment, culminating in SDSM's crushing defeat in the May 2024 parliamentary elections, where the party secured only 18 seats compared to VMRO-DPMNE's 58, signaling widespread rejection of its policies. Internally, SDSM experienced strains over and strategy following electoral setbacks, with Zaev's exposing rifts between pro-EU reformers and those wary of identity concessions. Dimitar Kovachevski assumed in December , but persistent failures eroded unity, leading to his as party head after the 2024 parliamentary loss. A subsequent leadership contest in mid-2024 highlighted divisions, as former Health Minister Venko Filipče faced accusations of procedural irregularities in the party , which he dismissed as disrespectful to members; his elevation failed to stem declining support amid ongoing debates over perceptions and tactical shifts. Further tensions arose in the October 2025 local elections, where SDSM won few municipalities, amplifying calls for introspection on the party's direction without evidence of formal splits but evident factional discord.

References

  1. https://balkaninsight.com/2014/03/21/social-democratic-alliance-of-macedonia-sdsm/
  2. https://www.beinmacedonia.com/politics-in-north-macedonia-2/
  3. https://en.macedonism.org/Macedonian-Encyclopedia/social-democratic-union-of-macedonia/
  4. https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/mk%257Dsdsm.html
  5. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2024-05-15/north-macedonia-right-returns-to-power
  6. https://www.freiheit.org/node/44549
  7. https://pes.eu/member/socijaldemokratski-sojuz-na-makedonija-socialdemocratic-union-of-macedonia/
  8. https://bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report/MKD
  9. https://unu-merit.nl/publications/wppdf/2025/wp2025-020.pdf
  10. https://www.newbalkanpolitics.org.mk/item/social-democracy-today-situations-contradictions-and-perspectives
  11. https://www.lloydsbanktrade.com/en/market-potential/north-macedonia/political-context
  12. https://sdsm.org.mk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Programa-2020_Mozeme.pdf
  13. https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2021/11/02/sdsm-loss-caused-by-blockade-of-eu-path-and-disappointment-with-governments-record/
  14. https://news.asu.edu/20200714-global-engagement-geopolitical-stakes-are-high-north-macedonias-upcoming-election
  15. https://telegrafi.com/en/lsdm-marreveshja-e-prespes-mundeson-qe-vendi-te-ece-perpara/
  16. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/7/16/north-macedonia-votes-to-resolve-dispute-with-bulgaria
  17. https://balkaninsight.com/2021/07/05/north-macedonia-govt-embraces-opposition-red-lines-in-bulgaria-talks/
  18. https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/north-macedonia
  19. https://telegrafi.com/en/lsdm-maqedonia-e-fundit-ne-rajon-per-nga-rritja-ekonomike/
  20. https://china-cee.eu/2022/04/22/north-macedonia-social-briefing-the-socio-economic-causes-and-consequences-of-the-increase-in-the-minimum-wage/
  21. https://www.ecoi.net/en/document/2109056.html
  22. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/SWD_2023_693%2520North%2520Macedonia%2520report.pdf
  23. https://china-cee.eu/2024/07/02/north-macedonia-political-briefing-analysis-of-the-party-programs-in-macedonias-2024-parliamentary-elections/
  24. https://www.iemed.org/publication/the-new-government-in-macedonia-a-return-to-the-rule-of-law-and-democratic-standards/
  25. https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-macedonia/freedom-world/2024
  26. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sofia/05506.pdf
  27. https://balkaninsight.com/2024/06/13/north-macedonias-embattled-social-democrats-plot-long-road-to-recovery/
  28. https://rferl.org/a/north-macedonia-zaev-analysis/31541802.html
  29. https://mia.mk/en/story/venko-filipche-elected-sdsm-president
  30. https://www.bgnes.com/politics/sdsm-elects-new-leadership
  31. https://www.encyclopedia.com/reference/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/crvenkovski-branko
  32. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3621491.stm
  33. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/macedonia/30345.htm
  34. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2013/06/07/macedonia_3.pdf
  35. https://www.newbalkanpolitics.org.mk/uploads/attachments/1._m._maleska.pdf
  36. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/freehou/1998/en/95078
  37. https://www.csce.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/macedonian.pdf
  38. https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/icg/1998/en/95022
  39. https://www.crisisgroup.org/sites/default/files/212-macedonia-ten-years-after-the-conflict.pdf
  40. https://www.crisisgroup.org/sites/default/files/149-macedonia-no-room-for-complacency.pdf
  41. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/540-general-elections-in-macedonia-5th-july-2006
  42. https://archive.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/arc/2313_06.htm
  43. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/542-the-rightwing-opposition-forces-win-the-general-elections-in-macedonia
  44. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2016-12-14/macedonia-all-even-advantage-gruevski
  45. https://freedomhouse.org/report/analytical-brief/2017/freeing-captured-state-macedonia-what-role-eu-accession
  46. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/04/macedonia-parliament-zaev-nationalist-violence-eu-europe/524733/
  47. https://pulaski.pl/en/macedonia-with-a-new-government-the-end-of-the-crisis/
  48. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/6/1/macedonia-zaev-wins-confidence-vote-to-form-goverment
  49. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38288433
  50. https://balkaninsight.com/2016/12/12/tight-election-finish-in-macedonia-12-12-2016/
  51. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2017-05-24/macedonia-centre-right-cedes-power
  52. https://balkaninsight.com/2017/05/31/macedonia-parliament-approves-zaev-s-new-govt-05-31-2017/
  53. https://balkaninsight.com/2017/05/17/zaev-recieves-mandate-to-form-new-macedonian-govt-05-17-2017/
  54. https://balkaninsight.com/2018/06/20/macedonian-parliament-approves-greece-name-deal-06-20-2018/
  55. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280544ac1
  56. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_48830.htm
  57. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/ab07a63e-6024-4231-a649-999df023dab8_en?filename=north_macedonia_report_2020.pdf
  58. https://www.u4.no/publications/north-macedonia-overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption.pdf
  59. https://www.rferl.org/a/30812293.html
  60. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/435148
  61. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ICS_EUR_North-Macedonia_Public-Release.pdf
  62. https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/WEB%2528ENG%2529Crisis%2520Management%2520%2520Assessment%2520%25281%2529.pdf
  63. https://www.rferl.org/a/north-macedonia-zaev-analysis/31541802.html
  64. https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-macedonia/freedom-world/2020
  65. https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/north-macedonia-greco-welcomes-progress-in-anti-corruption-reforms-in-central-government-and-the-police-and-ends-compliance-procedure
  66. https://ba.boell.org/en/2024/07/06/north-macedonia-elections-may-have-changed-country-inside-and-outside-0
  67. https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/north-macedonias-elections-exposed-eus-diminished-credibility-western-balkans
  68. https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-macedonia/nations-transit/2024
  69. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/north-macedonia-votes-elections-crucial-eu-accession-2024-05-07/
  70. https://www.voanews.com/a/north-macedonia-right-wing-opposition-scores-victory-in-elections/7604923.html
  71. https://mia.mk/en/story/kovachevski-resigning-as-sdsm-leader-party-to-convene-congress-organize-internal-elections
  72. https://pes.eu/pes/pes-congratulates-the-new-leader-of-its-member-party-in-north-macedonia/
  73. https://europeanforum.net/election-overview-local-elections-in-north-macedonia/
  74. https://balkaninsight.com/2011/04/28/past-election-results-in-macedonia/
  75. https://data.ipu.org/parliament/MK/MK-LC01/election/MK-LC01-E20161211
  76. https://data.ipu.org/parliament/MK/MK-LC01/election/MK-LC01-E20200715
  77. https://data.ipu.org/parliament/MK/MK-LC01/election/MK-LC01-E20240508
  78. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/5/6/stevo-pendarovski-wins-north-macedonias-presidential-election
  79. https://www.csce.gov/publications/report-macedonias-presidential-election/
  80. https://pace.coe.int/files/8814/html
  81. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/281
  82. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/monitor/926-gjorgji-ivanov-will-face-ljubomir-frckovski-in-the-2nd-round-of-the-macedonian-presidential-election
  83. https://www.csis.org/programs/europe-russia-and-eurasia-program/projects/european-election-watch/2019-elections/north-macedonia
  84. https://www.ifes.org/tools-resources/election-snapshots/elections-north-macedonia-2024-presidential-elections
  85. https://www.rferl.org/a/macedonia-municipal-elections-zaev-albania/28795298.html
  86. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/8/6/502747.pdf
  87. https://www.biepag.eu/blog/what-just-happened-in-north-macedonia-2021-municipal-elections-and-their-aftermath/
  88. https://china-cee.eu/2021/11/29/north-macedonia-political-briefing-the-governing-social-democratic-union-suffers-a-heavy-defeat-at-the-2021-macedonian-municipal-elections/
  89. https://contemporarysee.org/2021-local-elections-in-north-macedonia-a-prelude-to-alternation-of-power
  90. https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2025/10/20/vmro-dpmne-dominates-in-the-first-round/
  91. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/north-macedonia-s-ruling-coalition-leads-in-local-elections/3721468
  92. https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/599912
  93. https://contemporarysee.org/allfiles/documents/118-2021-local-elections-in-north-macedonia-a-prelude-to-alternation-of-power.pdf
  94. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/North-Macedonia-on-the-threshold-of-Europe.pdf
  95. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_174589.htm
  96. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_164671.htm?selectedLocale=en
  97. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/5f0c9185-ce46-46fc-bf44-82318ab47e88_en?filename=North%2520Macedonia%2520Report%25202024.pdf
  98. https://www.transparency.org/en/nis/countries/north-macedonia
  99. https://meta.mk/en/north-macedonia-governments-plan-for-fight-against-corruption-adopted-digitization-of-the-registers-part-of-it/
  100. https://balkaninsight.com/2020/09/09/experts-question-impact-of-north-macedonias-new-anti-corruption-post/
  101. https://mia.mk/en/story/ec-north-macedonia-has-adopted-reforms-to-improve-judiciarys-independence-but-concerns-remain-over-its-protection-against-undue-influence
  102. https://balkaninsight.com/2024/05/07/in-north-macedonias-election-anti-corruption-promises-are-vague/
  103. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Macedonia/transparency_corruption/
  104. https://transparency.mk/en/2025/03/04/corruption-barometer-for-february-2025/
  105. https://doaj.org/article/a9e80a96a52b40f6b43ceebdee56ecff
  106. https://balkaninsight.com/2017/05/30/macedonia-s-new-govt-starts-term-with-popular-measures-05-29-2017/
  107. https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/north-macedonia-raising-minimum-wage-combat-working-poverty
  108. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=25879&langId=en
  109. https://www.dw.com/en/north-macedonia-parliament-approves-zoran-zaev-as-pm/a-54764480
  110. https://www.intellinews.com/macedonian-government-struggles-to-fill-pensions-black-hole-138133/
  111. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=21519&langId=en
  112. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/northmacedonia/brief/enhancing-social-protection-in-north-macedonia-reforming-disability-assessment
  113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377296530_Reforming_Social_Protection_under_Ideological_Influences_and_Preferences_Social_Protection_Between_Austerity_and_Other_Reforms_-The_Case_of_North_Macedonia
  114. https://countryeconomy.com/gdp/macedonia
  115. https://www.statista.com/statistics/510247/unemployment-rate-in-macedonia/
  116. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/mkd/north-macedonia/unemployment-rate
  117. https://www.intellinews.com/long-read-voters-prepare-to-punish-north-macedonia-s-ruling-sdsm-for-broken-promises-310569/
  118. https://www.transparency.org/en/cepi/cases/north-macedonia-dimova-case
  119. https://balkaninsight.com/2018/05/21/macedonian-pm-acquitted-in-bribery-case-05-21-2018/
  120. https://transform-network.net/blog/interview/sonja-stojadinovic-the-macedonian-left-wing-sdsm-lost-the-election-because-it-did-not-dismantle-the-gruevski-regime-of-nepotism-and-harmed-the-macedonian-identity/
  121. https://www.euractiv.com/news/west-condemns-macedonian-presidents-amnesty-for-corrupt-officials/
  122. https://dtt-net.com/north-macedonia-former-pm-and-usa-sanctioned-former-dpm-charged-of-alleged-abuse-of-office-and-fraud/
  123. https://www.politico.eu/article/macedonias-historic-name-change-leaves-deep-scars/
  124. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/greece/2018-10-01/names-macedonia-north-macedonia
  125. https://newlinesinstitute.org/political-systems/identity-insecurity-north-macedonias-challenging-relationship-with-itself-and-others/
  126. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/world/europe/north-macedonia-election-zoran-zaev.html
  127. https://www.tovima.gr/2019/03/28/international/zaev-i-agreed-to-name-change-as-tsipras-accepted-macedonian-identity/
  128. https://ve-insight.com/insights/throwing-in-the-towel-political-scenarios-in-north-macedonia/
  129. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1623937/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  130. https://www.dw.com/en/north-macedonia-thousands-protest-indecent-conditions-of-eu-accession-proposal/a-62408359
  131. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/thousands-protest-north-macedonia-readies-vote-eu-deal-with-bulgaria-2022-07-14/
  132. https://www.euronews.com/2022/07/06/dozens-of-police-injured-as-eu-compromise-protest-turns-violent
  133. https://www.globalissues.org/news/2024/05/23/36798
  134. https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-macedonia/freedom-world/2023
  135. https://www.euractiv.com/short_news/north-macedonias-ruling-party-accepts-prime-ministers-leadership-resignation/
  136. https://mia.mk/en/story/filipche-calls-accusations-of-process-illegitimacy-unfair-and-disrespectful-to-sdsm-members
  137. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/oxan-db288092/full/html
  138. https://balkaninsight.com/2025/10/20/north-macedonia-ruling-party-celebrates-triumph-in-local-elections/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.