Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
SafeMoon
View on Wikipedia
SafeMoon LLC was an American cryptocurrency and blockchain company created in March 2021.[2] The company created the SafeMoon token (SFM) which traded on the BNB Chain blockchain.[3][4][5] The token charged a 10% fee on transactions, with 5% redistributed (or reflected) to token holders and 5% directed to wallets in a different currency, Binance Coin (BNB), controlled by the coin's authors.[6][7] The token reached its all time high market cap in April 2021 of $17b.
Key Information
The SafeMoon company released a minimal-function cryptocurrency wallet and announced plans to release other cryptocurrency products. The company and the token have been the subject of several controversies: having been compared to a ponzi-scheme, not delivering on products, having multiple class-action lawsuits filed against them, and facing serious fraud allegations. In November 2023, the SEC and the United States Department of Justice charged SafeMoon and its executive team with fraud, the unregistered offering of securities, and money laundering.[8][9][10][11] In December 2023, SafeMoon declared Chapter 7 bankruptcy,[12] and as a part of this process was acquired by the VGX Foundation.[13]
History
[edit]SafeMoon logo | |
| Denominations | |
|---|---|
| Code | SFM[14] |
| Development | |
| White paper | Whitepaper |
| Code repository | Safemoon.sol |
| Development status | Discontinued |
| Developer | SafeMoon US LLC |
| Ledger | |
| Block explorer | SafeMoon V2: BscScan |
| Supply limit | SafeMoon V1: 1,000 Trillion
SafeMoon V2: 1 Trillion |
| Website | |
| Website | safemoon |
2021: SafeMoon version 1
[edit]SafeMoon was released in March 2021. A compound of "Safe" and "Moon". The token was released with the slogan of landing "Safely to the moon", derived from the slang phrase used in the cryptocurrency community; "To the moon" which is used to describe a crypto token "to quickly rise in price". The token had no utility and team when it was launched. Upon release, Vice reported that between 14 March and 21 April 2021, SafeMoon increased in value by 23,225% following celebrity endorsements from musicians Lil' Yachty and Nick Carter, YouTuber Logan Paul, social media hype, new exchange listings, and retail investors. At that time, Vice said that "cryptocurrencies like SafeMoon still have no real-world use."[15] These celebrities were later sued by many SafeMoon investors as part of a class-action lawsuit branding SafeMoon to be a part of a pump and dump scheme.[16] After the substantial rise in price, the unknown developers of the token appointed Braden John Karony as the CEO of Safemoon and registered as a Limited liability company with aims of providing utility to the token. Before this appointment, Karony served as a former analyst for the United States Department of Defense from January 2015 to January 2021.[3]
In May 2021, SafeMoon announced making a presentation to The Gambia to provide "technology for innovation and learning purposes".[17] The project was dubbed "Project Pheonix" (the misspelling of Phoenix being intentional), SafeMoon released a familiar crypto pitch of serving the "unbanked" and claimed to be working with local governments to adopt the token as a local currency. A company run by John Karony's mother ECG LC, was set up in May 2021 to deliver this project.[18] On 27 August 2022, John stated that his reasons for discontinuing his work in West Africa were due to supply chain problems, which is disputed by his mother in the ongoing Project Pheonix lawsuit.[19]
In June 2021, the project began beta testing of the SafeMoon wallet.[20][21] The app was officially released on Google Play in September 2021 and the App Store in October 2021.[22] Critics dubbed the wallet to be a copy of the Trust Wallet owned by Binance.[19] Thomas Smith, who was the CTO for Safemoon, left the company in December 2021 for a role as a blockchain advisor for StrikeX, however, was dismissed by the company after the fraud allegations uncovered by Stephen Findeisen.[23][24][non-primary source needed]
2022: Migration to SafeMoon V2
[edit]In December 2021, SafeMoon developed Version 2 of their token (SafeMoon V2), an updated version of the SafeMoon contract.[25] As part of consolidating to V2, the SafeMoon team implemented a deadline to migrate their tokens, or else investors would be faced with a 100% tax. The team also released a decentralised exchange titled "Safemoon Swap" as the only place where this migration could happen. In April 2022, Safemoon announced a new product, the Safemoon card. The Safemoon card was promoted as a debit card that can be used to pay for goods using SafeMoon (and other cryptocurrencies) for a 2.5% fee. Some experts criticized paying an additional fee to pay for goods, contrasting it to Crypto.com's card which instead rewards users with a percentage return in crypto depending on how much of their native token they are holding.[26] Although the card was supposed to be released in July 2022, as of December 2022 its release has been delayed.
Since the appointment of Karony in 2021, SafeMoon has announced plans to launch its own cryptocurrency exchange by October 2021, however, this was pushed to December 2022 and has again been pushed back to the end of 2023. The company also has plans to launch a blockchain, hardware wallet, and to become a macro Internet of things infrastructure on its own blockchain.[27][28][3][29]
2023: LP hack and Fraud Indictment
[edit]On 29 March 2023, hackers exploited a security flaw in the smart contract of SafeMoon's liquidity pool which saw USD 9 million worth of SFM tokens depleted from SafeMoon's liquidity pool causing a drop in the token’s price.[30] After negotiations with the SafeMoon team, the hacker agreed to return only 80% ($7 million) of the stolen liquidity and kept $2 million of the stolen tokens.[31]
On 1 November 2023, a Federal indictment was unsealed, charging SafeMoon's CEO Braden John Karony, Token Founder Kyle Nagy, and former SafeMoon employee Thomas Smith with conspiracies involving securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering in connection with SafeMoon. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York alleged that the defendants misled SafeMoon investors about the accessibility of 'locked' liquidity and engaged in personal trading. The charges reported that as SafeMoon's market capitalization exceeded $8 billion, they fraudulently diverted millions of dollars from the 'locked' liquidity for personal gain. Karony and Smith were arrested, while Nagy remained at large.[32] The charges were brought by the SEC and the Department of Justice with FBI assistance.[33]
In December 2023, SafeMoon declared Chapter 7 bankruptcy,[12] and as a part of this process was acquired by the VGX Foundation.[13]
In 2024 Kyle Nagy resurfaced in Russia, where he filed a complaint with police against two men in the Federal Security Service who extorted 4.5 million dollars from him as "payment for his peaceful stay in the Russian Federation."[34]
Criticisms and legal issues
[edit]
Parallels to a meme coin
[edit]The token was described pejoratively in May 2021 as a "meme coin" alongside Dogecoin and Shiba Inu, with much of its value attributed to the result of the 2021 crypto market frenzy.[2]
The developers of SafeMoon were described as having "little proof of previous success",[5] with the token described by one financial expert as "the furthest thing from safe"[35] and that it "doesn't do anything".[35]
Security issues
[edit]In May 2021, the V1 version of the token was audited by security auditing firm CertiK, which identified a "major issue" that the project's owners have "control over tokens funded by SafeMoon's seller fee".[36][35] An owner address acquire's the liquidity pool tokens generated by the SafeMoon-BNB pool. This gives the owner control over tokens funded by SafeMoon's seller fee. This feature was later the subject of the 2022 Safemoon fraud allegations. London Capital's head of research Jasper Lawler also noted that the Manual Burn aspect of SafeMoon paired with the controlling companies' large stake in the coins opens the project up to manipulation by the project controllers.[37]
Ponzi-scheme comparisons
[edit]After the price of a SafeMoon token multiplied by 12x during a single week in April 2021,[38] opinion columnists in various financial magazines likened SafeMoon to a ponzi scheme[39] or pyramid scheme, where gains to early investors were paid only by incoming investors who expected a similar rate of return, with some citing the fact that each transaction sends a portion of the transacted value to existing holders of the token, as well as a portion of the transacted value to a wallet controlled by the coin's authors.[40] Furthermore, SafeMoon's token economics utilizes a 10% sell tax. This means that for every $1000 sale, an investor would be charged $100. Critics argued that this discouraged investors from selling, as they effectively incur a loss as soon as they invest. The tax from the new investors included distributing a small percentage of it to existing investors.[41]
2022 fraud allegations
[edit]
In April 2022, Stephen "Coffeezilla" Findeisen, a prominent independent researcher who investigates crypto scams, accused the SafeMoon team of misappropriating millions of dollars.[42] According to Findeisen, SafeMoon CEO Karony had been removing funds from the liquidity pool which is the primary explanation of the crypto's price pattern (Figure 1). Findeisen found evidence of transactions which showed SafeMoon's liquidity wallet moving funds to a wallet dubbed the "Gabe (6abe) wallet" which withdrew funds to a separate company run by John Karony. Former SafeMoon CTO, Thomas "Papa" Smith, was the only person who responded to Findeisen's claims stating that funds were taken from the "locked liquidity pool" before Karony's appointment. He sent Smith evidence of this in the form of a blockchain transaction showing an outflow of 36.7 trillion tokens from the liquidity pool, dated 5 March 2021.[43]
Class-action lawsuits
[edit]On 18 February 2022, in a class-action lawsuit filed against SafeMoon it was alleged that the company was a pump and dump scheme. Logan Paul was named as a defendant along with musician Nick Carter, rappers Soulja Boy and Lil Yachty, and social media personality Ben Phillips for promoting the SafeMoon token on their social media accounts with misleading information.[16][44] On the same day, the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a lawsuit against Bitconnect that the Securities Act of 1933 extends to targeted solicitation using social media.[45] Findeisen, who had just shone a light on the 2022 SafeMoon fraud allegations, supported the claims that Paul and Phillips were pumping and dumping SafeMoon tokens during this time which saw a decline of 96% in token price.[46] On 22 August 2022, it was documented that David Portnoy, who was also a defendant in this case, was dismissed from the lawsuit after it was revealed that he never received any compensation from Safemoon for promoting the token and that he also lost his investment from buying SFM.[47][non-primary source needed][original research?]
In May 2022, multiple SafeMoon investors filed another class action lawsuit against SafeMoon for security fraud. The lawsuit which is represented by Scott+Scott, was voluntarily terminated by the plaintiff without prejudice per notice in November 2022. This means the case can be retried if the plaintiff wishes to in the future.[48][49][unreliable source?]
Project Pheonix lawsuit
[edit]As part of Project Pheonix, a separate company Emanations Communications Group LC (ECG) was set up and led by SafeMoon CEO John Karony's mother, Jennifer, to provide antenna technology to The Gambia.[50] The company has since been seized by Lex Vest Ltd.[17] As part of this venture, John invested $5 million into the project in June 2021. It was claimed that Karony funded this investment from SafeMoon's liquidity pool which was supposedly locked up.[51] As part of this capital investment John agreed 33.34% stake in the company and future profits, as well as his own personal bills, to come out of the company.[52] ECG determined that John Karony created too many regulatory risks and that due to multiple lawsuits filed against him and his company (SafeMoon), they were uncomfortable accepting any more capital investments from him. As a result, John Karony filed a lawsuit against ECG for breach of contract and accused his mother of legal trickery to remove him from ECG.[53]
ECG developed technology relating to Project Pheonix which was presented to John in December 2021. According to court documents, John had been disclosing information about developing technology for the benefit of SafeMoon to make claims on SafeMoon's website and social media accounts about the technology. He was counselled not to do so by ECG (particularly his mother) because of potential adverse effects on pending patents and other intellectual property.[54][55] In March 2022, John and his counsel met with Project Pheonix partners Sankung Jawara and Pa Alieu Jawara, and offered them an upfront payment of $350,000 to cut Jennifer Karony out of the transaction, which they refused. John then negotiated an offer to pay them of up to $4.5 million, to be paid out over time, with the understanding that Jennifer was again removed from consideration. Sankung and Pa Alieu once more refused, due to the proposed circumvention of the business partnership and John's assertion that there was a way to circumvent the legal and parliamentary procedures required for John's desired bank project.[18]
Karony's mother stated that John had not provided a plan for Project Pheonix and was not interested in the content of the financial documents, but was looking for "opportunities to take pictures of the lab to substantiate his published claims of owning ECG labs which he called 'Area 32' or 'DarkMoon'". Due to the lawsuit, Project Pheonix was abandoned. On 27 August 2022, John stated that his reasons for discontinuing his work in West Africa were due to supply chain problems, which is disputed by his mother.[18][56]
Liquidity pool hack
[edit]On 29 March 2023, it was reported that almost $9 million USD worth of SafeMoon tokens were depleted from SafeMoon's liquidity pool after hackers exploited a security flaw in its smart contracts. As a result, the price of the token fell further in value.[57] The hacker agreed to return only 80% ($7 million) of the stolen liquidity after striking a deal with the team to keep $2 million of the stolen tokens.[58]
Fraud indictment
[edit]On 1 November 2023, a federal indictment was unsealed charging Braden John Karony, Kyle Nagy, and Thomas Smith with conspiracies to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering through SafeMoon.[11] According to the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, "As alleged, the defendants lied to SFM investors concerning whether SFM's use of 'locked' liquidity was inaccessible to the defendants, as well as their personal holding and trading of SFM. As SFM's market capitalization grew to more than $8 billion, the defendants fraudulently diverted and misappropriated millions of dollars' worth of purportedly 'locked' SFM liquidity for their personal benefit." At the time Karony and Smith had been arrested while Nagy remained at large. The charges were brought in parallel by the SEC and the Department of Justice with assistance from the FBI.[9][8][59][10] On 21 May 2025, following a 12-day trial before the federal courthouse in Brooklyn, Karony was convicted of all three charges brought against him.[60]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Safemoon Sundays: 9 January 2022
- ^ a b DeCambre, Mark (18 May 2021). "Here's What Crypto SafeMoon Is and Why It's Trending". Barron's. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- ^ a b c "What is SafeMoon coin? A Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin challenger". Fortune. 17 May 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
- ^ Brooks, Matt (7 May 2021). "What is SafeMoon? New cryptocurrency explained, how to buy in UK - and could it rival Dogecoin in popularity". The Scotsman. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
- ^ a b Conway, Luke (26 May 2021). "Is SafeMoon Really a Safe Investment?". The Street. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
- ^ Ostroff, Caitlin (6 May 2021). "Dogecoin's 12,000% Rally Spurs Hunt for Next Crypto Winner". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
- ^ Harper, Chris (23 April 2021). "What is SafeMoon". BirminghamLive. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- ^ a b "SEC.gov | SEC Charges Crypto Company SafeMoon and its Executive Team for Fraud and Unregistered Offering of Crypto Securities". www.sec.gov. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
- ^ a b "Eastern District of New York | Founders and Executives of Digital-Asset Company Charged in Multi-Million Dollar International Fraud Scheme | United States Department of Justice". U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of New York (Press release). www.justice.gov. 1 November 2023. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
- ^ a b Stempel, Jonathan (1 November 2023). "SafeMoon executives charged in US with fraud related to crypto token". Reuters. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
- ^ a b "SEC Charges Against SafeMoon Continue Trend of Increased Crypto Enforcement by the Agency". The National Law Review. 8 November 2023. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
- ^ a b Sollitt, Shannon (19 December 2023). "Utah crypto company files for bankruptcy amid federal fraud accusations". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved 3 October 2024.
- ^ a b Thuo, Charles (23 December 2024). "SafeMoon up 132% in the past month: can it sustain the surge?". MSN. Retrieved 2 January 2025.
- ^ "Token SafeMoon". Retrieved 13 December 2021.
- ^ "To the Moon: How One Cryptocurrency Made People Millions Overnight". Vice News. 6 May 2021.
- ^ a b Germain, Atahabih (24 February 2022). "Soulja Boy and Lil Yachty Named in Suit Accused of Misleading Crypto Buyers in 'Pump and Dump' Scheme". Atlanta Black Star. Diamond Diaspora Media. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
- ^ a b "Cryptocurrency - SafeMoon To Implement Operation Phoenix in Gambia". The Chronicle Gambia. 18 May 2021. Archived from the original on 13 September 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2021.
- ^ a b c "LEX VEST LTD v. Emanations Communications Group LC (2:22-cv-01226), Nevada District Court". PacerMonitor.
- ^ a b "What Happened to Safemoon, the Hyped-Up Crypto That Promised Riches?". Vice News. 9 May 2022.
- ^ Rearick, Brenden (15 June 2021). "#SafeMoonWallet: What to Know as SafeMoon Launches Its Crypto Wallet". InvestorPlace. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
- ^ Thapa, Anuz (16 June 2021). "SafeMoon Wallet: What Is It?". TheStreet. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
- ^ Jeffries, Scott. "What Is SafeMoon and Is It a Good Investment?". MSN. Retrieved 10 October 2021.
- ^ "Cooli Carlito x HALO - StrikeX". Genius.
- ^ "StrikeX Make Monumental Announcement & Appoint Thomas "Papa" Smith from SafeMoon as a Blockchain Advisor". finance.yahoo.com.
- ^ Gottlich, Max (13 December 2021). "SafeMoon implements V2 upgrade, new wallet features; tokens dip". Seeking Alpha. Retrieved 14 December 2021.
- ^ "Safemoon card. Is it outdated?". www.analyticsinsight.net. 10 April 2022.
- ^ Willing, Nicole. "Safemoon price prediction: will the price break out?". Retrieved 16 November 2021.
- ^ Armstrong, Vanessa (21 December 2021). "SafeMoon's emphatic fanbase won't let it fail". Retrieved 31 December 2021.
- ^ "SafeMoon Introduces Token Monetization Innovation". Web3Wire. 30 December 2022.
- ^ "Safemoon Liquidity Pool Compromised: Almost Lost $8.9 million Due To A Public Burn Bug". FX Leaders. 31 March 2023. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
- ^ "SafeMoon 'burn' bug abused to drain $8.9 million from liquidity pool". BleepingComputer. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
- ^ "SEC.gov | SEC Charges Crypto Company SafeMoon and its Executive Team for Fraud and Unregistered Offering of Crypto Securities". www.sec.gov. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
- ^ Quiroz-Gutierrez, Marco (1 November 2023). "SEC says SafeMoon executives withdrew $200 million from crypto project to spend on McLarens and luxury homes". Fortune. Retrieved 23 November 2023 – via aol.com.
- ^ "Utah $200M Crypto Fraud Suspect Flees to Russia, 'Extorted' by FSB: Report". Newsweek. Retrieved 7 January 2025.
- ^ a b c Daly, Lyle. "Should You (or Anyone) Buy Safemoon?". The Motley Fool – via NASDAQ.com.
- ^ Smith, Sarah (3 May 2021). "SafeMoon Audit: 9 Things to Know About the SafeMoon CertiK Findings". InvestorPlace. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- ^ "Crypto SafeMoon's Rules to Tamp Down Selling Raise Red Flags". Bloomberg. 16 July 2021. Retrieved 20 January 2022.
- ^ "'This is a scam': Crypto influencers speak out about SafeMoon 'pyramid scheme'". 21 April 2021.
- ^ "Is the SafeMoon Crypto a Scam? 3 Insiders Weigh In on the Controversy". markets.businessinsider.com.
- ^ "Is SafeMoon a Pyramid Scheme? Why Some Investors Are Skeptical". Market Realist. 23 April 2021.
- ^ "8 Things to Know Before You Buy Safemoon". 10 July 2021.
- ^ "What Happened to SafeMoon, the Hyped-Up Crypto That Promised Riches?". 9 May 2022.
- ^ "Coffeezilla, the YouTuber Exposing Crypto Scams". The New Yorker. 14 May 2022.
- ^ Cole, Ty (24 February 2022). "Soulja Boy and Lil Yachty Faces Class-Action Lawsuit In Alleged Cryptocurrency Scheme". BET. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
- ^ Lawler, Richard (18 February 2022). "Influencers beware: promoting the wrong crypto could mean facing a class-action lawsuit". The Verge. Vox Media. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
- ^ "CoffeeZilla reveals Jake Paul's alleged crypto scams amid Safemoon lawsuit". 8 March 2022.
- ^ "Bill Merewhuader et al v. SafeMoon LLC et al".
- ^ "SafeMoon Crypto Investors Bring Another Class Action Fraud Suit".
- ^ "Safemoon – Scott+Scott". Scott+Scott.
- ^ Franceschi-Bicchierai, Lorenzo (9 May 2022). "What Happened to SafeMoon, the Hyped-Up Crypto That Promised Riches?". Vice.
- ^ "Five ridiculous claims from the latest SafeMoon court battle". 5 October 2022.
- ^ LEX VEST LTD v. Emanations Communications Group LC ("30 - During certain times after making his investment, John demanded payment of utilities and other personal expenses to be imposed on ECG funds to satisfy his outstanding personal bills in the amount in excess of $50,000."), Text.
- ^ "LEX VEST LTD v. Emanations Communications Group LC". Justia Dockets & Filings.
- ^ Case 2:22-cv-01226-ART-BNW Document 24 Filed 09/09/22 Page 22 of 78
- ^ LEX VEST LTD v. Emanations Communications Group LC ("39 - After June 2021, John has been disclosing more information about developing technology of ECG for the benefit of his cryptocurrency business Safe Moon. 40 - John demanded receipts of ECG Op’s related to technology expenses so he could make claims on Social Media and SafeMoon’s website about the technology Case 2:22-cv-01226-ART-BNW Document 24 Filed 09/09/22 Page 22 of 78 being developed through his personal investment. He was counseled not to do so because of potential adverse effects on pending and future patents and other intellectual property. He proceeded contrary to the wishes of the ECG entities."), Text.
- ^ "Lex Vest Ltd v. Emanations Communications Group LC".
- ^ "Safemoon Liquidity Pool Compromised: Almost Lost $8.9 million Due To A Public Burn Bug". FX Leaders. 31 March 2023. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
- ^ Toulas, Bill (29 March 2023). "SafeMoon 'burn' bug abused to drain $8.9 million from liquidity pool". BleepingComputer. Retrieved 4 August 2023.
- ^ Quiroz-Gutierrez, Marco (1 November 2023). "SEC says SafeMoon executives withdrew $200 million from crypto project to spend on McLarens and luxury homes". Fortune. Retrieved 2 November 2023 – via AOL.com.
- ^ "Chief Executive Officer of Digital Asset Company Found Guilty in Multi-Million Dollar Crypto-Fraud Scheme". justice.gov. United States Attorney's Office - Easter District of New York. 21 May 2025.
External links
[edit]SafeMoon
View on GrokipediaHistory
Inception and Initial Launch (March 2021)
SafeMoon was launched on March 8, 2021, as a BEP-20 token on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC), with an initial supply of 777 trillion tokens and a starting price of $0.0000000010.[9][10] The project originated from a group of developers aiming to create a deflationary token with mechanisms to incentivize long-term holding, distinguishing it from typical speculative cryptocurrencies through a novel fee structure.[11] Kyle Nagy is identified as the creator of the token's smart contract, while John Karony, previously an equity analyst, assumed the role of CEO shortly after launch, leading a team of six executives based initially in Utah.[12][13] The core tokenomics featured a 10% fee on each transaction: 5% redistributed proportionally to existing holders as "reflections" to reward holding, and the remaining 5% directed toward liquidity provision and token burning to reduce supply over time.[14] This design was marketed with the slogan "Safely to the Moon," emphasizing stability and growth through anti-dump mechanics that penalized frequent trading.[11] The token's smart contract was deployed anonymously at inception, with early liquidity pools established on decentralized exchanges like PancakeSwap, enabling rapid community-driven adoption amid the broader 2021 cryptocurrency bull market.[15] SafeMoon LLC was formed concurrently as the operating entity, positioning the project as a community-focused alternative to volatile meme coins like Dogecoin.[16]Growth and Operations Under Version 1
SafeMoon Version 1 operated as a deflationary BEP-20 token on the Binance Smart Chain, launched on March 8, 2021, with an initial supply of approximately 777 trillion tokens following an immediate burn of 223 trillion from the genesis 1 quadrillion total.[9][10] The core mechanism involved a 10% fee on each buy, sell, or transfer transaction: 5% redistributed as reflections to existing holders proportional to their holdings, incentivizing long-term retention, while the remaining 5% was directed toward liquidity pool additions and token burns to reduce supply over time.[17][18] This structure aimed to automate liquidity provision and create upward price pressure through scarcity, though it introduced selling frictions that critics later argued concentrated control in early holders and the development team.[10] The token's growth accelerated rapidly post-launch due to viral marketing on social media platforms, where the project positioned itself as a community-driven alternative to high-volatility meme coins, amassing over 2.5 million holders by mid-2021.[19] Price surged from an initial $0.000000001 to a peak of approximately $0.000012 by late April 2021, yielding a market capitalization exceeding $5 billion at its height, fueled by endorsements from celebrities including rappers Lil Yachty and musicians like Nick Carter.[20][21] Operations emphasized community governance through Telegram and Twitter channels, with the pseudonymous founding team—later doxxed as including John Karony—conducting frequent updates, AMAs, and announcements of exchange listings on platforms like BitMart and PancakeSwap to enhance accessibility.[10] Liquidity management involved periodic team additions to pools and contract renunciation to mitigate rug-pull concerns, though early trading glitches and high fees drew scrutiny for potentially enabling insider advantages.[22] Under Version 1, operational focus shifted toward ecosystem expansion, including the August 2021 launch of the SafeMoon Wallet app, which encountered immediate technical failures but aimed to facilitate seamless token management and staking.[21] Partnerships were pursued for real-world utility, such as the May 2021 Project Phoenix initiative targeting technological infrastructure in The Gambia, managed by an entity linked to Karony, though progress reports remained limited amid growing investor skepticism.[23] Token burns totaled hundreds of trillions through transaction fees by year-end, reducing circulating supply, while reflections distributed rewards estimated at millions in value to holders, reinforcing the "hold and earn" narrative that drove retention but also contributed to price volatility as hype cycles waned.[22] Despite these efforts, operational transparency issues, including delayed audits and team allocations of liquidity funds for marketing, foreshadowed later legal challenges.[10]Migration to SafeMoon V2 and Technical Upgrades (2022)
In December 2021, SafeMoon launched Version 2 (V2) of its token contract, with the migration process extending through 2022 as individual holders completed manual conversions.[24][17] The upgrade consolidated the token supply at a 1:1000 ratio, converting 1,000 V1 tokens into 1 V2 token to mitigate issues with excessive decimal places and high nominal supply figures in the original contract.[23][22] The V2 smart contract introduced optimizations for scalability, enabling it to process higher transaction volumes more efficiently than V1.[25] It also incorporated enhanced security measures and faster transaction speeds to improve overall reliability and user experience.[26] The fee structure was revised to a 2% transaction tax on buys and sells, allocated toward liquidity provision (0.5%), reflections to holders (1%), and other ecosystem functions, down from V1's 10% total fee, with the intent to reduce friction for everyday use and commercial applications.[17][27] Migration required users to connect compatible wallets, such as Trust Wallet, to the official swap portal at swap.safemoon.net, where V1 tokens were swapped without additional project fees beyond Binance Smart Chain gas costs, typically around $3–$4 per transaction.[17] Centralized exchanges handled conversions automatically for deposited tokens, but self-custody holders faced deadlines and potential risks of incomplete migrations, with support for V1 tokens eventually phased out.[23][22] During 2022, the process encountered user-reported issues like network congestion and interface errors, prompting community guidance and temporary pauses in the portal.[28]Project Phoenix Initiative and Restructuring Efforts
In May 2021, SafeMoon CEO John Karony announced Operation Phoenix (intentionally misspelled as "Pheonix" in some communications), an initiative focused on deploying decentralized technological infrastructure in The Gambia to address access challenges for unbanked populations.[23][29] The project centered on installing wind turbines sourced from Semtive USA for individual households, integrated with IoT devices and cell tower connectivity to enable internet access in remote areas lacking traditional infrastructure.[30][31] Managed by a company operated by Karony's mother, the effort included plans to establish a SafeMoon office in The Gambia and tie the infrastructure to the broader SafeMoon ecosystem, such as through energy generation for metaverse applications or enhanced token utility.[23][30] Proponents positioned it as a means to demonstrate real-world impact, potentially improving SafeMoon's appeal amid growing scrutiny of its tokenomics.[31] By late 2021, promotional materials emphasized macro IoT networks linking windmills across the region, but implementation stalled without verifiable deployments or partnerships beyond initial turbine sourcing.[30] The project was officially discontinued, with SafeMoon attributing failure to supply chain disruptions—a rationale disputed in investor lawsuits alleging mismanagement and lack of progress.[23][32] As SafeMoon's token price crashed through 2022, Operation Phoenix was reframed in community updates and CEO communications as a cornerstone of ecosystem expansion, alongside wallet and exchange developments, in attempts to restructure perceptions of the project's viability.[30] However, it yielded no measurable contributions to liquidity, adoption, or operational stability, exemplifying broader challenges in translating hype into functional utility amid internal leadership tensions and external criticisms.[23][30] No independent audits or third-party verifications confirmed advancements, underscoring transparency gaps in SafeMoon's promotional strategies.[32]Liquidity Pool Exploitation Incident (March 2023)
On March 29, 2023, an attacker exploited a vulnerability in SafeMoon's smart contract on the Binance Smart Chain, draining approximately $8.9 million worth of BNB tokens from the SFM/BNB liquidity pool.[33][34] The incident targeted the protocol's burn function, which was publicly accessible and lacked proper access controls, enabling arbitrary token burns that manipulated pool reserves.[34][35] The exploit proceeded via a series of transactions leveraging a flash loan: the attacker first borrowed 1,000 WBNB, swapped it for SFM tokens, then invoked the burn function to destroy most SFM reserves in the liquidity pool, artificially inflating the value of remaining SFM.[34] This was followed by burning all SFM from the SafeMoon contract itself, syncing the pair's reserves to reflect the imbalance, and finally swapping the manipulated SFM back for BNB at the elevated rate before repaying the flash loan.[34] The vulnerability, introduced or exposed in a recent contract update, allowed this manipulation without authentication checks on the burn operation.[35][34] SafeMoon CEO John Karony confirmed the breach affected only the SFM/BNB liquidity pool, emphasizing that core SFM tokens and the project's decentralized exchange (DEX) remained secure.[33] The team promptly patched the burn function vulnerability and engaged a blockchain forensics consultant to trace the funds and assess the damage.[33] The SFM token price fell over 40% immediately following the exploit before partial recovery.[33] In the aftermath, reports indicated the attacker, possibly operating as an MEV bot, returned a portion of the funds through subsequent transactions, with further recovery efforts leading to the U.S. government forfeiting and returning over $680,000 in stolen cryptocurrency to SafeMoon in June 2025 via civil asset forfeiture proceedings.[36][34] The event highlighted ongoing smart contract risks in DeFi protocols, particularly around un audited public functions post-upgrades.[35]Fraud Indictments, Convictions, and Dissolution (2023–2025)
On November 1, 2023, a federal indictment was unsealed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charging SafeMoon's CEO Braden John Karony, pseudonymous developer Kyle Nagy (known as "Gigamoon"), and executive Thomas Smith with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering.[5] The charges alleged that the executives orchestrated a scheme to defraud investors by secretly extracting over $200 million in SafeMoon tokens from the project's liquidity pools, using the funds for personal luxuries including McLaren supercars, luxury watches, high-end real estate, and private jet travel, while misleading investors about the security of the pools and the locking of team-held tokens.[4] Concurrently, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed civil charges against the same individuals and SafeMoon LLC, asserting violations of antifraud provisions under federal securities laws through similar misappropriation and deceptive practices.[4] In December 2023, amid the mounting legal pressures and following a liquidity pool exploit earlier that year, SafeMoon LLC filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, initiating the liquidation of its assets and effectively dissolving the company's operations.[37] The bankruptcy filing disclosed liabilities exceeding $100 million, with assets primarily consisting of cryptocurrency holdings and intellectual property, marking the end of SafeMoon's active development and token ecosystem under its original structure.[23] Legal proceedings advanced in 2025, with Thomas Smith pleading guilty in February to conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud as part of a cooperation agreement.[38] On May 21, 2025, following a 12-day trial before U.S. District Judge Eric R. Komitee, a federal jury in Brooklyn convicted Karony on all three felony counts, including conspiracy to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering, with potential penalties of up to 45 years in prison and forfeiture of approximately $2 million in proceeds.[6] Kyle Nagy remains a fugitive, with the FBI continuing to seek information from victims to facilitate restitution efforts post-conviction.[39] These outcomes substantiated claims of systemic fraud within SafeMoon's leadership, contributing to the project's permanent cessation as a viable entity by mid-2025.[7]Technical Features and Tokenomics
Core Transaction Fee Mechanism and Reflections
SafeMoon's core transaction fee mechanism, introduced in its Version 1 (V1) smart contract launched on March 12, 2021, imposed a 10% fee on every buy, sell, or transfer transaction involving SFM tokens on the Binance Smart Chain. This fee was divided into two primary components: 5% redistributed proportionally to all existing token holders as "reflections," functioning as an automatic static reward mechanism to incentivize long-term holding by increasing holders' balances without requiring active trading.[40] The remaining 5% was allocated to liquidity provision, where it was used to pair with BNB and add to the project's liquidity pool, indirectly supporting price stability through automated market making.[40] [22] The reflections component operated via the smart contract's reflection finance incentive (RFI) model, where the fee portion was automatically divided among holders based on their proportional ownership of the total supply at the time of the transaction, effectively providing passive income derived from overall trading volume. This design aimed to penalize frequent trading while rewarding passive participants, as reflections accrued only to non-selling addresses and scaled with an individual's share of the circulating supply. However, the high fee rate contributed to reduced transaction volumes over time, limiting the absolute value of reflections received by holders despite the proportional distribution.[10]| Fee Component | Percentage of Transaction | Allocation Details |
|---|---|---|
| Reflections | 5% | Redistributed to all holders proportionally as additional SFM tokens |
| Liquidity | 5% | Swapped partially for BNB and added to the SFM-BNB liquidity pool |
Liquidity and Burning Components
SafeMoon's liquidity mechanism in its Version 1 (V1) token contract, deployed on the Binance Smart Chain in March 2021, allocates 5% of the 10% transaction fee—applicable to both buys and sells—to automatic liquidity provision. This portion is used to acquire BNB via a decentralized exchange and pair it with SafeMoon tokens, which are then added to the project's primary liquidity pool, enhancing pool depth and reducing slippage for larger trades.[10][41] The process aims to support price stability and long-term holding by incrementally growing liquidity without requiring manual interventions from liquidity providers.[22] The burning component in V1 relies on manual reductions in token supply rather than automated per-transaction burns. At genesis, developers immediately burned 223 trillion tokens from the initial 1 quadrillion supply, leaving approximately 777 trillion in circulation after allocations for liquidity (10%), marketing (5%), and team (5%) wallets.[10] The team conducted periodic manual burns thereafter, transferring tokens to a dead wallet address to permanently remove them from circulation, with the intent of creating deflationary pressure to counteract the reflections distributed to holders.[41][42] These burns were announced via official channels, though their frequency and scale varied, and no fixed schedule was contractually enforced.[10] With the migration to SafeMoon V2 in early 2022, the liquidity allocation persisted in a modified form within a revised fee structure—reducing overall taxes to 2% on buys and up to 12% on sells, with portions directed to liquidity pairing similar to V1—but without an integrated automatic burn mechanism or dedicated burn wallet.[10][22] Manual burns continued as a discretionary tool, though the protocol's evolution toward multi-chain support introduced complexities in tracking burned supply across networks.[43] A 2023 smart contract update added a public burn function intended for supply reduction, but it was exploited due to inadequate safeguards, allowing unauthorized burns of liquidity pool tokens and resulting in an $8.9 million drain—highlighting vulnerabilities in the mechanism rather than altering its core deflationary purpose.[44][35]Smart Contract Evolutions and Version Changes
SafeMoon's initial smart contract, version 1 (V1), deployed on the Binance Smart Chain in March 2021, implemented a 10% transaction fee structure: 5% redistributed as reflections to existing holders proportional to their stake, and 5% allocated to automatic liquidity provision by pairing with BNB and adding to the liquidity pool.[45][9] This design aimed to incentivize holding through passive rewards while supporting price stability via liquidity growth, though it drew criticism for high fees potentially hindering trading volume and utility.[3] On December 13, 2021, SafeMoon launched version 2 (V2) via a new smart contract at address 0x42981d0bfbAf196529376EE702F2a9EB9092fc25, replacing the V1 contract at 0x8076C74C5e3F5852037F31Ff0093Eeb8c8ADd8D3.[46][24] The upgrade featured a mandatory 1000:1 token consolidation for migrated holdings—converting 1,000 V1 tokens to 1 V2 token—to address the inflated supply exceeding 500 trillion tokens, thereby reducing circulating supply to approximately 500 billion while preserving relative holder proportions.[46][25] Migration was voluntary and handled through an official portal, with unmigrated V1 tokens retaining value only on the deprecated contract, effectively stranding non-participants.[47][48] V2's smart contract reduced the transaction fee to 2% to enhance usability and encourage broader adoption: 1% allocated to reflections for holders and 1% to liquidity provision, a shift from V1's higher taxes that aimed to balance rewards with reduced friction for transfers and trades.[1][22] Additional functions were integrated, including automated token burns to promote deflation and a growth fund for ecosystem development, expanding beyond V1's core reflection and liquidity mechanics to include explicit supply reduction and project allocation components during trades.[49] These modifications sought improved scalability and security, such as better access controls and efficiency in fee distribution, though the contract retained central elements like reflection fee interfaces (RFI) for static rewards.[26][50] Subsequent tokenomics adjustments in May 2023 further evolved the model without a full version redeployment, lowering fees to 1% across all transactions while preserving the 0.25% SWaP (SafeMoon Wallet Protocol) fee for internal ecosystem transfers, reflecting ongoing efforts to adapt to market demands amid declining activity.[43] However, these changes occurred post-V2 migration and did not involve a new contract address, distinguishing them from the foundational V1-to-V2 overhaul. No further major smart contract versions were deployed by October 2025, as project dissolution following fraud indictments halted development.[3]Blockchain Migrations and Compatibility Issues
SafeMoon's initial smart contract, version 1 (V1), operated as a BEP-20 token on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC), launched in March 2021. In December 2021, the project introduced SafeMoon V2, an upgraded smart contract on the same blockchain, featuring revised tokenomics including reduced transaction fees (from 10% to 2% split among reflections, liquidity, and burning) and a 1:1,000 token consolidation ratio to address supply inflation concerns. Holders were required to migrate V1 tokens to V2 via an official consolidation tool on the SafeMoon website or compatible wallets, a process that automatically converted eligible V1 holdings while leaving unmigrated tokens subject to a 100% transaction tax post-deadline, effectively immobilizing them.[25] The migration encountered widespread compatibility issues, particularly with wallet integrations and user interfaces. Reports from early 2022 highlighted problems such as V2 tokens failing to appear in wallets like Trust Wallet after consolidation, discrepancies in post-migration token balances (e.g., fewer tokens than expected due to consolidation miscalculations or failed transactions), and errors in blockchain explorers or tax tracking tools like Koinly, where V1 and V2 transactions appeared as separate assets requiring manual reconciliation. These stemmed from the need for users to manually approve contract interactions, refresh wallet data via specific dApps (e.g., PancakeSwap for verification), or handle gas fee optimizations on BSC, exacerbating issues for non-technical holders. Community forums documented thousands of support queries, with some users unable to migrate due to outdated wallet versions or network congestion during peak periods.[28][51] V2 also introduced partial backward incompatibility for certain DeFi protocols; early forks of SafeMoon's contract on PancakeSwap faced transfer failures due to unupdated router addresses, requiring developers to modify approval mechanisms for V2 liquidity pairs. While the upgrade aimed to enhance security and efficiency—such as improved anti-bot measures—the migration process highlighted BSC's limitations in seamless token upgrades without cross-chain bridges, leading to stranded assets for an estimated minority of holders who delayed or botched the process.[52] In March 2025, amid post-dissolution community efforts, the SFM token initiated a migration to the Solana blockchain, shifting from BSC's EVM-compatible environment to Solana's Rust-based, high-throughput architecture to pursue lower fees and faster settlements. Supported by exchanges like Bitrue, this involved token burns (e.g., 2.2 trillion SFM) and airdrops, correlating with a 50% price surge, but introduced new compatibility challenges: Solana's non-EVM nature necessitated fresh wallet setups (e.g., Phantom over MetaMask), disrupted prior BSC DeFi integrations, and risked liquidity fragmentation as BSC pools were deprecated without automated bridges. No major exploits were reported, though the move's viability remained tied to decentralized governance proposals amid the project's legal fallout.[53][54]Community Engagement and Adoption
Viral Marketing and Social Media Strategies
SafeMoon's marketing efforts centered on community-driven hype across social media platforms following its launch on March 12, 2021.[23] The project rapidly amassed followers by branding supporters as the "SafeMoon Army," fostering a sense of collective momentum through slogans like "Safely to the moon," which resonated with speculative crypto enthusiasts seeking rapid gains.[55] Platforms such as Twitter, TikTok, and Reddit served as primary channels, where users shared memes, testimonials, and promotional videos highlighting the token's reflection mechanism—redistributing fees to holders—to incentivize viral sharing and recruitment of new participants.[56] [57] Influencer endorsements played a key role in amplifying reach, with high-profile figures including boxer Jake Paul, rapper Lil Yachty, and YouTuber KEEMSTAR publicly promoting the token in early 2021, drawing in younger demographics unfamiliar with traditional finance.[17] [30] These tactics, combined with organic community shilling motivated by potential rewards from holding and price surges, propelled SafeMoon to over 500,000 holders within weeks, though such strategies relied heavily on speculative fervor rather than utility.[58] The approach mirrored broader meme coin dynamics, where social proof and FOMO (fear of missing out) drove adoption, but it also drew scrutiny for resembling pump-and-dump patterns incentivized by the token's fee structure.[59] By mid-2021, SafeMoon's social media presence expanded to include targeted campaigns on Instagram and YouTube, with influencers like John Karony (operating under handles such as "The Wolf of All Streets") leveraging large followings to tout ecosystem developments and partnerships.[60] This sustained engagement tactics contributed to peak market capitalization exceeding $5 billion in April 2021, though subsequent declines highlighted the fragility of hype-dependent growth absent verifiable fundamentals.[61]Holder Incentives and Long-Term Holding Culture
SafeMoon's core holder incentive was its reflection mechanism, under which 5% of the 10% transaction fee on buys and sells was automatically redistributed as static rewards to existing token holders in proportion to their holdings. This provided passive income from network activity without requiring active trading, thereby encouraging retention to maintain eligibility for ongoing distributions. The design penalized frequent transactions—particularly sells—via the fee deduction, theoretically reducing supply velocity and rewarding patience over speculation.[40][22] This structure fostered a community ethos centered on long-term holding, dubbed "HODLing," with proponents arguing it aligned participant interests toward ecosystem growth rather than quick exits. SafeMoon's developers and early marketing positioned the token as "encoded to benefit long-term holders," cultivating a dedicated "SafeMoon Army" that emphasized loyalty, viral advocacy, and endurance through market volatility. Community forums and official communications reinforced this by highlighting how reflections compounded for steadfast holders, aiming to build a base less susceptible to pump-and-dump dynamics common in meme coins.[62][45] In practice, the incentives initially correlated with rapid holder growth, as the promise of reflections drew in participants seeking dividend-like yields amid 2021's bull market, though sustained efficacy depended on transaction volume for reward generation. Subsequent tokenomic adjustments in SafeMoon V2, effective August 2021, refined fees (to 12% on buys and sells) while preserving reflections, intending to further embed holding behavior amid evolving blockchain migrations.[63][64]Partnerships, Ecosystem Builds, and Developer Activity
SafeMoon announced multiple partnerships during its early growth phase, primarily with niche cryptocurrency projects and services aimed at expanding utility. In 2021, the project revealed a collaboration with Simplex, a fiat-to-crypto payment processor, to enable easier on-ramps for users purchasing SFM tokens.[65] Additional announcements included token partnerships with EverGrow Coin in February 2022 for cross-promotion and liquidity support, and with Pige Inu in July 2022 to integrate meme coin branding with NFTs and streetwear.[66][67] In July 2022, MetFX, a watch-to-earn platform, disclosed a corporate tie-up to leverage SafeMoon's community for content distribution.[68] Later efforts, such as a 2025 partnership with CabanaExchange for enhanced trading features and Fitburn_ai for AI-driven fitness NFTs, appeared promotional via social media but lacked evidence of substantive implementation or sustained activity.[69] Ecosystem development focused on building DeFi tools like SafeMoon Swap, a decentralized exchange (DEX) launched to facilitate token swaps with integrated reflection mechanics, though trading volume remained untracked and low post-launch.[70] The project also released a cryptocurrency wallet in 2022, described as minimal-function for storing and managing SFM, alongside plans for NFT marketplaces and payment solutions that were announced but not fully realized amid operational challenges.[25] V2 smart contract upgrades in 2022 aimed to improve compatibility and reduce fees, including migrations to support broader chain integrations, but these faced compatibility issues and contributed to liquidity concerns.[25] By 2025, community-driven initiatives emerged, such as burning 2.2 trillion SFM tokens and planning a memecoin launch on Solana to revive liquidity, though these diverged from the original BSC-based ecosystem.[71] Developer activity was limited, with primary GitHub repositories hosting forked smart contracts for the RFI tokenomics and auto-liquidity features but showing sparse commits beyond initial deployment in 2021.[72] The core protocol remained largely closed-source, restricting external contributions, and public reports noted near-nonexistent updates by mid-2021.[73] Following U.S. Department of Justice indictments in November 2023 for fraud and the project's dissolution, official development ceased, shifting any residual efforts to community forks or unrelated clones rather than sustained ecosystem expansion.[4][36]Market Performance
Early Price Surges and Peak Valuation
SafeMoon was launched on March 8, 2021, on the Binance Smart Chain, starting with an initial price of $0.0000000010 and a total supply of 777 trillion tokens.[9][74] The token experienced rapid early adoption driven by social media promotion and its unique tokenomics, which included a 10% transaction fee redistributing rewards to holders, fostering a "hold and earn" incentive.[9] From March 12 to April 20, 2021, SafeMoon's price surged over 55,000%, reflecting intense speculative interest amid the broader cryptocurrency bull market and meme coin hype.[12] This growth propelled the token to its all-time high price of approximately $0.00001399 on April 20, 2021.[75] At its peak, SafeMoon achieved a market capitalization of $5.7 billion, marking its highest valuation before subsequent declines.[12][76] The surge was characterized by high trading volumes and listings on decentralized exchanges like PancakeSwap, amplifying liquidity and visibility.[21]Volatility, Declines, and Influencing Factors
SafeMoon's SFM token displayed extreme volatility characteristic of speculative meme coins, surging rapidly in its early months before experiencing prolonged declines exceeding 99% from its peak. The token reached its all-time high of approximately $0.000014 on April 20, 2021, driven by viral social media promotion and hype around its reflection mechanism, achieving a market capitalization briefly over $5 billion.[75] [20] Following this peak, the price began a sharp descent amid the broader cryptocurrency market correction in mid-2021, dropping to around $0.0000015 by year-end, a decline of over 89% from the high, as investor enthusiasm waned and selling pressure mounted from early holders cashing out.[20] Subsequent declines were exacerbated by project-specific risks, including tokenomics changes and security vulnerabilities. The transition to SafeMoon V2 in late 2021 involved a 12:1 token consolidation that effectively burned 90% of the supply to address scalability issues, but this adjustment failed to stem the price erosion, with values continuing to slide into 2022 amid the crypto winter and revelations of internal mismanagement. By early 2022, the token had lost over 77% of its value from February highs, reflecting diminished liquidity and fading community trust.[77] A major catalyst for further volatility occurred on March 28, 2023, when an exploit in the updated smart contract allowed a hacker to drain $8.9 million in tokens from the liquidity pool via a manipulated burn function, triggering an immediate price plunge and heightened fears of protocol instability. Although the attacker later agreed to return 80% of the funds ($7.1 million), the incident underscored ongoing technical flaws, contributing to sustained downward pressure.[78][79] Legal developments amplified the declines, with federal indictments unsealed on November 1, 2023, charging founders Braden Karony, Kyle Nagy, and Thomas Smith with securities fraud and money laundering for allegedly diverting over $200 million in investor funds to personal luxuries like luxury cars and mansions. The token's market capitalization halved from about $50 million within hours of the announcement, dropping to lows not seen since launch. This was followed by a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing in December 2023, which caused an additional 18% price crash, signaling operational collapse. Karony's conviction on May 21, 2025, for fraud further eroded any remaining investor confidence, leaving the token trading at fractions of a cent with minimal liquidity.[80][4][6] Key influencing factors included the token's reliance on hype-driven demand without substantial utility, low trading volumes amplifying swings, and cascading negative events like exploits and regulatory scrutiny, which collectively destroyed perceived value and deterred new entrants. Broader market sentiment, such as Bitcoin's halving cycles and macroeconomic pressures, interacted with these internal failures to perpetuate the downward trajectory, resulting in a 99.9% loss from peak by mid-2023.[81]Trading Metrics, Listings, and Liquidity Dynamics
SafeMoon V2 (SFM) exhibits subdued trading metrics as of October 2025, with 24-hour trading volumes typically ranging from $14,000 to $21,000 across aggregated exchanges, reflecting diminished market interest compared to its 2021 launch period when daily volumes exceeded millions during peak hype.[82][83] The token's price hovers around $0.000010 USD, with circulating supply exceeding 500 billion tokens post-burns and migrations, contributing to high volatility but low absolute liquidity.[82] Historical data indicates sporadic surges, such as a 30% price jump in early 2025 tied to announced Solana migration efforts, yet overall metrics underscore a contraction from initial speculative fervor.[49] Listings for SFM remain concentrated on decentralized exchanges (DEXes) like PancakeSwap on Binance Smart Chain, with limited centralized exchange (CEX) presence including Gate.io and occasional fiat ramps via aggregators.[84][17] Early expansions to CEXes such as Bitforex and BitMart in 2021 were reversed amid regulatory scrutiny and internal scandals, leading to delistings that constrained accessibility and further depressed trading activity.[85] No major tier-1 CEX listings persist as of late 2025, with trading primarily occurring on BSC and emerging Solana pairs, amplifying reliance on DEX liquidity.[86] Liquidity dynamics are governed by the protocol's fee structure, where a portion of transactions (historically 5-10%) automatically accrues to liquidity pools, aiming to stabilize pricing through constant product automated market makers (AMM). However, the March 2023 liquidity pool exploit, which drained approximately $8.9 million via manipulated token approvals and faulty migration code, severely eroded pool depths and investor confidence, resulting in fragmented and shallow liquidity thereafter.[33] Post-exploit, pool sizes have remained modest, with current estimates under $1 million in total value locked across primary pairs, exacerbated by chain migrations from BSC to Solana and reduced transaction throughput.[35] This has fostered illiquidity risks, including slippage on larger trades and vulnerability to whale manipulations, despite ongoing burns intended to contract supply.[87]Status as of October 2025
As of October 2025, SafeMoon V2 (SFM) trades at approximately $0.000010 USD, reflecting a market capitalization under $100,000 and negligible 24-hour trading volume around $14,000.[82][8] The token's liquidity remains fragmented across decentralized exchanges on the Binance Smart Chain, with no significant relistings on major centralized platforms following earlier delistings amid regulatory scrutiny.[88] Community-driven trading persists at low levels, but holder counts have substantially declined from peaks in 2021, correlating with sustained price erosion and loss of retail interest.[89] Legal resolutions have further diminished SafeMoon's operational viability. On May 21, 2025, former CEO Braden John Karony was convicted by a federal jury in Brooklyn on charges including conspiracy to defraud the United States, wire fraud, and money laundering, stemming from allegations of siphoning over $200 million in investor funds through opaque token mechanics and personal enrichment schemes.[90][38] SafeMoon US LLC, the entity's primary operating arm, entered Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation, with a trustee proposing a $12 million settlement to a class of defrauded investors on September 18, 2025, funded partly from recovered assets.[91] The U.S. Department of Justice continues victim restitution efforts via civil asset forfeiture, having returned over $680,000 in cryptocurrency tied to SafeMoon-related thefts by June 2025, though full recovery remains limited.[36] No active development or ecosystem expansions have occurred since the 2023 multichain migration failures and a prior liquidity pool exploit, leaving the protocol stagnant without audited upgrades or new utility integrations.[23] Regulatory designations as a fraudulent scheme by U.S. authorities, including ongoing SEC actions, have entrenched SafeMoon's reputation as a cautionary example of unsustainable meme coin models, with investor claims processes ongoing but payouts capped far below peak valuations.[92][32]Controversies and Criticisms
Meme Coin Characteristics and Speculative Nature
SafeMoon exemplifies meme coin traits through its emphasis on viral community engagement and symbolic branding over substantive technological or economic utility. Originating in March 2021 on the Binance Smart Chain, the token drew inspiration from deflationary mechanics and holder rewards, akin to predecessors like Dogecoin, but positioned itself via aggressive social media promotion targeting retail investors seeking quick gains.[93] Its nomenclature and marketing rhetoric, including phrases like "to the moon," reinforced a speculative, hype-driven narrative detached from verifiable fundamentals.[94] Central to its design were tokenomics imposing a 10% fee on transactions: 5% redistributed proportionally to holders as reflections to encourage retention, and 5% directed toward liquidity provision and token burns to simulate scarcity.[9] While proponents argued this fostered a "hodl" culture reducing sell pressure, critics highlighted how such reflections rely on perpetual transaction volume from new entrants, creating a feedback loop vulnerable to market sentiment shifts rather than intrinsic value generation.[95] This structure amplified speculation, as early price appreciation—peaking at over $10 billion market capitalization within weeks of launch—stemmed primarily from FOMO-induced buying rather than adoption of any ecosystem services.[96] By early 2025, SafeMoon's developers publicly embraced a pure memecoin identity, burning 2.2 trillion tokens and forgoing centralized utility development in favor of decentralized community governance.[97] This pivot underscored the project's speculative core, where value derives from collective belief and meme propagation on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), absent robust use cases beyond trading and holding.[98] High transaction fees further deterred practical utility, positioning SafeMoon as a high-volatility gamble prone to pump-and-dump dynamics, with post-peak declines exceeding 99% from highs, illustrating meme coins' reliance on exogenous hype over sustainable economics.[23][99]Ponzi Scheme Analogies and Sustainability Debates
SafeMoon's tokenomics featured a transaction fee structure of approximately 10-12% on buys and sells, allocating portions to token burns for deflation, reflections distributed to existing holders, and additions to liquidity pools. Critics analogized this to Ponzi or pyramid schemes, arguing that reflections primarily benefited early holders through fees extracted from new participants, creating a dependency on continuous inflows to sustain rewards and price appreciation, while high sell fees discouraged exits and incentivized recruitment of additional buyers.[10][41][100] Analyst Coffeezilla, in investigative videos released in 2022, described SafeMoon's model as enabling a "billion dollar fraud," highlighting how the fee mechanism masked underlying extraction of funds by insiders while resembling pyramid dynamics in rewarding holders disproportionately from newcomer activity. Similarly, comparisons were drawn to the BitConnect scheme, where tokenomics promised yields funded by new investments without underlying value generation.[101][41] The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in its November 1, 2023, charges against SafeMoon executives, alleged misleading promises of value accrual that failed to materialize, though focusing on unregistered securities and fund misappropriation rather than explicitly labeling the tokenomics as Ponzi-like.[4] Supporters countered that SafeMoon differed from classic Ponzi schemes, as rewards were transparently coded into smart contracts without centralized control or guaranteed returns, positioning it as an innovative DeFi protocol fostering long-term holding via aligned incentives. Community advocates emphasized the absence of admin keys for arbitrary payouts and the project's roadmap for utility development, such as wallets and exchanges, as evidence of sustainable intent beyond speculation.[10] Debates on sustainability centered on the model's reliance on hype-driven adoption absent robust utility; empirical data showed a peak market capitalization exceeding $5 billion in April 2021 followed by over 99% decline by late 2023, underscoring vulnerability to waning inflows.[57] Analysts noted that while deflationary burns aimed to enhance scarcity, the lack of real-world applications and repeated delays in ecosystem deliverables rendered the protocol prone to collapse once growth stalled, fueling arguments that such designs prioritize short-term pumps over enduring economic viability.[10][17] Legal proceedings, including fraud convictions, further eroded confidence, with critics viewing the tokenomics as inherently unstable without external value drivers.[4]Security Flaws Beyond the 2023 Hack
SafeMoon's smart contract for version 1, deployed in March 2021, exhibited significant centralization risks identified in independent audits conducted shortly after launch. CertiK's audit, completed in early May 2021, uncovered 13 issues, including one major concern related to centralized control in theaddLiquidity function, which allowed the contract owner to accumulate a disproportionate share of liquidity provider (LP) tokens over time, potentially enabling manipulation of the liquidity pool.[102] This centralization contradicted claims of decentralization, as the owner retained privileges to alter fee structures, exclude specific addresses from transaction fees and rewards, blacklist addresses to block transfers, and pause contract operations entirely.[103]
A concurrent audit by HashEx, also in May 2021, identified 12 vulnerabilities, two of which were rated critical and three high-risk, highlighting a potential "backdoor" mechanism permitting the owner to adjust transfer commissions up to 100%, which could facilitate a rug pull by draining liquidity or rendering tokens worthless.[104] Additional flaws included the ability to selectively exclude holders from reflection rewards—undermining the token's deflationary incentive model—and to block arbitrary addresses from participating in transfers, exposing users to arbitrary censorship risks without recourse.[104] These features, while intended for administrative flexibility, created exploitable asymmetries where a compromised or malicious owner could extract value from the $167 million liquidity pool at the time, affecting over 2 million holders.[104]
The migration to SafeMoon V2 in late 2021 introduced further risks, as the updated contract was not audited by CertiK and retained elements of owner control, amplifying vulnerabilities in an unaudited codebase.[102] Minor but persistent issues from V1, such as non-withdrawable BNB trapped in the swapAndLiquify function and the potential for owners to regain control post-renouncement via lock mechanisms, carried over or persisted in design philosophy, eroding trust in the protocol's immutability.[103] Collectively, these flaws underscored a pattern of prioritizing developer convenience over robust, decentralized security, rendering the protocol susceptible to insider abuse rather than external exploits alone.
