Hubbry Logo
Small talkSmall talkMain
Open search
Small talk
Community hub
Small talk
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Small talk
Small talk
Small talk
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Simon Glücklich, Paar im Gespräch (Couple in Conversation), c. 1885

Small talk is an informal type of discourse that does not cover any functional topics of conversation or any transactions that need to be addressed.[1] In essence, it is polite and standard conversation about unimportant things.[2]

The phenomenon of small talk was initially studied in 1923[3] by Bronisław Malinowski in his essay "The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages",[4] who coined the term "phatic communication" to describe it.[5] The ability to conduct small talk is a social skill.[6]

Purpose

[edit]

In spite of seeming to have little useful purpose, small talk is a bonding ritual and a strategy for managing interpersonal distance.[7] It serves many functions in helping to define the relationships between friends, colleagues, and new acquaintances. In particular, it helps new acquaintances to explore and categorize each other's social position.[8]

Small talk is closely related to the need for people to maintain a positive face and feel approved of by those who are listening to them. It lubricates social interactions in a very flexible way, but the desired function is often dependent on the point in the conversation at which the small talk occurs:[9]

  1. Conversation opener: When the speakers do not know each other, it allows them to show that they have friendly intentions and desire some sort of positive interaction. In a business meeting, it enables people to establish each other's reputation and level of expertise. If there is already a relationship between the two talkers, their small talk serves as a gentle introduction before engaging in more functional topics of conversation. It allows them to signal their own mood and to sense the mood of the other person.
  2. At the end of a conversation: Suddenly ending an exchange may risk appearing to reject the other person. Small talk can be used to mitigate that rejection, affirm the relationship between the two people, and soften the parting.
  3. Space filler to avoid silence: In many cultures, silences between two people are usually considered uncomfortable and/or awkward. Tension can be reduced by starting phatic talk until a more substantial subject arises. Generally, humans find prolonged silence uncomfortable, and sometimes unbearable. That can be due to human evolutionary history as a social species, as in many other social animals, silence is a communicative sign of potential danger.[10]

In some conversations, there is no specific functional or informative element at all. The following example of small talk is between two colleagues who pass each other in a hallway:

William: Morning, Paul.
Paul: Oh, morning, William, how are you doing?
William: Fine, thanks. Have a good weekend?
Paul: Yes, thanks. Catch you later.
William: OK, see you.

In that example, the elements of phatic talk at the beginning and end of the conversation have merged. The entire short conversation is a space-filler. This type of discourse is often called chatter.

The need to use small talk depends upon the nature of the relationship between the people having the conversation. Couples in an intimate relationship can signal their level of closeness by a lack of small talk. They can comfortably accept silence in circumstances that would be uncomfortable for two people who were only casual friends.[11]

In workplace situations, small talk tends to occur mostly between workers on the same level, but it can be used by managers as a way of developing the working relationships with the staff who report to them. Bosses who ask their employees to work overtime may try to motivate them by using small talk to temporarily decrease their difference in status.[12]

The balance between functional conversation and small talk in the workplace depends on the context and is also influenced by the relative power of the two speakers. It is usually the superior who defines the conversation because they have the power to close the small talk and "get down to business."[13]

Topics

[edit]

The topics of small talk conversations are generally less important than their social function.[14] The selected topic usually depends on any pre-existing relationship between the two people, and the circumstances of the conversation. In either case, someone initiating small talk will tend to choose a topic for which they can assume a shared background knowledge, to prevent the conversation from being too one-sided.[13]

Topics can be summarised as being either direct or indirect.[15] Direct topics include personal observations such as health or looks. Indirect topics refer to a situational context such as the latest news, or the conditions of the communicative situation. Some topics are considered to be "safe" in most circumstances,[9] such as the weather,[16] sports, and television. Asking about the weather when the weather lacks reason for a follow-up discussion may stall a conversation.[9]

Typically the level of detail offered avoids overstepping the bounds of interpersonal space. When asked "How are you?" by an acquaintance they do not know well, a person is likely to choose a simple, generalized reply such as "I am good, thank you." In this circumstance, it would usually not be appropriate for them to reply with a list of symptoms of any medical conditions they were suffering from.[13] To do so would assume a greater degree of familiarity between the two people than is actually the case, and this may create an uncomfortable situation.

Conversational patterns

[edit]

A study of small talk in situations that involve the chance meeting of strangers has been carried out by Klaus Schneider.[17] He theorizes that such a conversation consists of a number of fairly predictable segments, or "moves". The first move is usually phrased so that it is easy for the other person to agree. It may be either a question or a statement of opinion with a tag question. For example, an opening line such as "Lovely weather, isn't it?" is a clear invitation for agreement. The second move is the other person's response. In functional conversations that address a particular topic, Grice's maxim of quantity suggests that responses should contain no more information than was explicitly asked for.[18] Schneider claims that one of the principles of small talk contradicts the maxim of quantity. He suggests that politeness in small talk is maximised by responding with a more substantial answer. Going back to the example of "Lovely weather, isn't it?", to respond factually by just saying "Yes" (or even "No") is less polite than saying, "Yes, very mild for the time of year". Schneider describes that subsequent moves may involve an acknowledgement such as "I see", a positive evaluation such as "That's nice", or what's called "idling behaviour", such as "Mmm", or "Really?".

Gender differences

[edit]

Speech patterns between women tend to be more collaborative than those of men, and tend to support each other's involvement in the conversation. Topics for small talk are more likely to include compliments about some aspect of personal appearance. For example, "That dress really suits you." Small talk between women who are friends may also involve a greater degree of self disclosure. Topics may cover more personal aspects of their lives, their troubles, and their secrets. This self-disclosure both generates a closer relationship between them and is also a signal of that closeness.[19]

By contrast, men's small talk tends to be more competitive. It may feature verbal sparring matches, playful insults, and putdowns.[19] However, in a way these are also both creators and signals of solidarity; the men are signalling that they are comfortable enough with each other's company to be able to say these things without them being taken as insults.

Cultural differences

[edit]

Small talk varies country to country and people to people. Southern Europeans, for example, are said to be very good at using lots of words to convey very little information.[16]

Also, small talk rules and topics can differ widely between cultures. Weather is a common topic in regions where the climate has great variation and can be unpredictable. Questions about the family are usual in some Asian and Arab countries. In cultures or contexts that are status-oriented, such as China, Latin America and Japan,[20] small talk between new acquaintances may feature exchange of questions that enable social categorization of each other.

Differences among members of various cultural groups in aspects of their attitudes to small talk and ways of dealing with small talk situations are considered to be rooted in their socioculturally ingrained perception of interpersonal relationships.[21][22][23][24] In many European cultures it is common to discuss the weather, politics or the economy, although in some countries personal finance issues such as salary are considered taboo.[25][26]

Finland and Sweden have been cited as countries where there is little culture of small talk and people are more comfortable with silence.[27][28]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Small talk

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Small talk is a type of brief, casual conversation centered on trivial, non-controversial topics such as the weather, sports, or recent television shows, designed to initiate social interactions without exchanging substantive or personal information. Defined as "communication whose substance is inconsequential," it functions primarily as a social lubricant, easing transitions between activities and reducing potential awkwardness in encounters with strangers or acquaintances. Unlike deeper discussions, small talk leaves participants knowing roughly the same amount about each other afterward, emphasizing politeness and rapport over information exchange. In social and professional contexts, small talk plays a key role in building relationships and fostering a sense of belonging, particularly in settings like workplaces, networking events, or casual meetings. It helps establish familiarity and positive emotions, contributing to overall by decreasing isolation and enhancing mood, though it does not boost as effectively as meaningful conversations. Research highlights its evolutionary significance as a mechanism for , where even idle chatter promotes connectivity without requiring vulnerability. Studies further reveal that small talk yields benefits like improved employee satisfaction and reduced interpersonal friction in organizational environments. While it may occasionally distract from tasks, its positives—such as heightened sense of connection—generally outweigh negatives, making it an essential skill for navigating diverse social interactions.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

Small talk refers to brief, polite, and superficial conversations on non-controversial subjects, typically aimed at building initial between individuals without exploring personal or substantive matters. It serves as a low-risk form of social interaction, often occurring among strangers or acquaintances in fleeting encounters, and is characterized by its light, inconsequential nature. Unlike deeper discussions, small talk avoids sensitive topics and focuses on neutral, shared observations to ease social tension. Linguistically, small talk is often described as phatic communication, a term coined by Bronisław Malinowski in 1923 to denote speech primarily for establishing social bonds rather than conveying substantive information. The term "small talk" originated in the mid-17th century, with its earliest recorded use in 1650 by English clergyman John Trapp, but it gained prominence in 18th-century English literature and society, evolving from casual exchanges in salons and polite gatherings. During this period, known as the " of small talk," it reflected the era's emphasis on refined as a marker of social grace among the upper classes. Key characteristics of small talk include its transient and low-stakes quality, where exchanges are brief and carry minimal emotional or intellectual weight, functioning primarily as social lubrication to maintain harmony. It often exhibits ritualistic elements, following predictable patterns of , comment, and farewell, which signal willingness to engage without commitment to prolonged dialogue. For instance, remarks on the , compliments about someone's attire, or neutral comments on immediate surroundings exemplify this , allowing participants to connect momentarily without .

Purpose

Small talk primarily functions to establish between individuals by creating a sense of connection and mutual understanding in initial encounters. It also reduces by providing a low-stakes way to engage others, thereby alleviating the discomfort of uninitiated interactions. Additionally, small talk fills awkward silences that might otherwise disrupt the flow of conversation, maintaining a comfortable social . Finally, it signals approachability, indicating openness to further interaction without demanding immediate depth. Small talk acts as a social lubricant, easing the transition from superficial exchange to more substantive while preventing in group settings. This role is evident in how brief exchanges build familiarity and reduce interpersonal , much like a in mechanical systems. From an evolutionary perspective, small talk is rooted in the need for affiliation, functioning as a social-bonding mechanism inherited from ancestors. on ring-tailed lemurs demonstrates that vocal exchanges reinforce close bonds without physical contact, paralleling how human chitchat fosters group cohesion and prevents exclusion. This perspective is supported by sociolinguistic studies, such as Tannen's 1980s and work on conversational rituals, which highlight small talk's role in ritualized rapport-building to fulfill affiliation needs. In practical terms, small talk eases transitions in professional networking by quickly assessing compatibility and building trust among colleagues or contacts. It similarly enhances interactions by humanizing exchanges, making clients feel valued and increasing satisfaction. Even in everyday scenarios like , it facilitates smoother encounters by mitigating tension in shared spaces.

Content and Strategies

Common Topics

Common topics in small talk are typically neutral and superficial, designed to foster without delving into sensitive or divisive areas. These subjects are universal, allowing participants from diverse backgrounds to engage easily while maintaining a light tone. Research in identifies key categories such as , non-political current events, hobbies, , , and sports, which serve as safe entry points for interaction. In workplace settings, small talk often revolves around weekend plans or recent activities, such as holidays or social outings, to build among colleagues. In casual environments like or events, observations about shared surroundings—such as traffic conditions or ongoing local happenings—provide immediate, relatable openers. These contextual examples highlight how small talk adapts to the immediate situation while staying non-intrusive. To preserve the superficial nature of small talk, certain topics are generally avoided, including , , finances, and personal relationships, as they risk eliciting strong opinions or discomfort. emphasize steering clear of these to prevent escalation into deeper or contentious discussions. Surveys from the and later indicate that remains the most frequent opener, with 43% of respondents reporting they often use it to initiate conversations, underscoring its role in over four in ten interactions. This prevalence aligns with its neutrality and observability, making it a staple across various settings.

Conversational Patterns

Conversational patterns in small talk refer to the structured sequences of verbal and nonverbal behaviors that facilitate brief, low-stakes interactions, often framed within the concept of phatic communication. Coined by anthropologist in 1923, phatic communion describes language use that primarily serves to establish, maintain, or discontinue social bonds rather than convey substantive information, emphasizing expressions like greetings or casual remarks to affirm mutual attention and . In small talk, these patterns build on neutral topics as foundational elements, structuring exchanges to ensure smoothness without delving into personal depth. Initiation typically begins with strategies that signal approachability and invite reciprocity, such as open-ended questions, compliments, or shared observations about the immediate environment. Open-ended questions, like "What brings you here today?", encourage elaboration beyond yes/no responses and foster engagement by prompting the other person to share briefly. For example, instead of the common query "How was your weekend?", communication experts recommend alternatives such as "What was the highlight of your weekend?" or "What was the best part of your weekend?", which assume positivity, prompt a specific anecdote, and lead to natural follow-ups, thereby avoiding dead-end answers. Compliments, such as "I like your jacket," convey positive intent and nonverbal immediacy through smiling or (maintained 50-70% of the time), which links to perceptions of liking and . Shared observations, exemplified by "Nice weather today, isn't it?", serve as low-risk entry points that align with phatic functions by confirming social presence without requiring commitment. These techniques, drawn from studies, help overcome initial awkwardness in transient settings like service encounters or networking events. Maintenance involves techniques that sustain the flow through and balanced reciprocity, preventing lapses while keeping the exchange superficial. Nonverbal cues like nodding and brief affirmations (e.g., "That's interesting") signal attentiveness and encourage continuation, aligning with and mutual gaze principles that build subtle . Reciprocal sharing occurs via short responses or follow-up questions that mirror the other's input without probing deeply, such as responding to a comment on with "Yeah, it's always busy this time," followed by a light pivot. Assessments or repetitions, like "Sounds fun!" to echo a mention, further prolong the interaction phatically, focusing on positivity and avoiding to preserve . Studies on EFL interactions highlight how these methods, including self-repairs for clarity, ensure continuity in resource-limited contexts. Termination employs polite signals to conclude gracefully, often through pre-closing phrases that acknowledge the exchange and ease disengagement. Common exits include "It was nice chatting with you" or "I should get going—talk soon," which provide mutual face-saving and align with phatic aims of amicable closure. Transitioning phrases, such as "Anyway, enjoy your day," shift focus outward while reinforcing positivity, particularly in time-constrained scenarios. indicates that such signals are crucial, as conversations often extend beyond participants' preferences, with only 2% ending ideally; explicit closings thus mitigate discomfort and support future interactions.

Social Variations

Gender Differences

Research in has identified distinct styles in small talk associated with , often framed as "rapport-talk" versus "report-talk." Women tend to engage in rapport-talk, using small talk to build relationships through sharing personal anecdotes, expressing , and fostering emotional connections. In contrast, men typically employ report-talk, leveraging small talk to exchange information, assert status, or negotiate social hierarchies. These patterns, observed in everyday interactions, reflect broader gendered communication norms where relational bonding prioritizes connection for women, while informational exchange emphasizes independence for men. While these styles are commonly discussed, differences in communication are subject to debate, with research showing they may be overstated or vary by context and . Post-2010s research on and non-binary experiences extends these binary frameworks, highlighting unique challenges in small talk navigation. Non-binary individuals often adapt small talk strategies to avoid gendered assumptions, such as steering clear of topics that prompt binary pronouns or using neutral language to disclose identity gradually. Studies indicate that such adaptations can lead to social friction, as non-binary speakers using gender-neutral terms in casual exchanges are sometimes perceived as less competent or approachable by interlocutors. These evolving views emphasize the fluidity of gender in communication, where small talk becomes a site for identity beyond traditional dichotomies.

Cultural Differences

Small talk practices vary significantly across cultures, often shaped by foundational frameworks like Edward T. Hall's distinction between high-context and low-context communication styles introduced in his 1976 book Beyond Culture. In high-context cultures, such as , small talk tends to be indirect and implicit, relying heavily on nonverbal cues, shared cultural understanding, and context to convey meaning, with conversations emphasizing harmony and subtlety rather than explicit details. Conversely, low-context cultures like the favor direct and explicit small talk, where speakers state intentions clearly through verbal content, minimizing reliance on unspoken assumptions to build rapport quickly. Regional variations further illustrate these differences. In Latin American cultures, small talk often involves personal questions about family or background early in interactions, reflecting a relational orientation that prioritizes warmth and connection before transitioning to formal topics. In contrast, Northern European societies, such as , exhibit restraint in initial exchanges, with small talk minimized or avoided altogether in favor of silence or directness, viewing excessive chit-chat as unnecessary or intrusive. Etiquette norms in small talk also diverge, influencing nonverbal elements like , personal space, and taboo subjects. For instance, in many Asian contexts, prolonged during small talk may be perceived as confrontational or disrespectful, prompting participants to use indirect gazes to maintain . Personal space tends to be smaller in Latin American interactions, allowing closer proximity to foster intimacy, while Northern Europeans prefer greater distance to respect individual boundaries. Additionally, topics like age can be sensitive in some Asian settings, where discussing it openly might imply or evoke discomfort in modernizing societies, leading to avoidance in casual exchanges. Globalization has led to hybridization of small talk in multicultural urban environments, where immigrants blend native and host norms, as seen in studies of diverse cities. For example, research on in globalized settings shows how migrants in urban areas like those in and adapt by incorporating direct questions from low-context influences into traditionally implicit high-context routines, creating hybrid forms that ease .

Applications and Impacts

Psychological Effects

Engaging in small talk has been shown to reduce feelings of by fostering brief s that counteract isolation. A 2022 experimental study demonstrated that a week-long intervention encouraging participants to initiate conversations with strangers significantly lowered perceived barriers to and decreased levels, with effects persisting beyond the intervention period. These interactions, even when superficial, provide opportunities for positive social feedback, which helps individuals feel more integrated into their social environment. Small talk can also boost mood through the release of oxytocin, a associated with bonding and positive emotions during social exchanges. Face-to-face interactions, including casual conversations, trigger oxytocin release, leading to enhanced feelings of trust and . Furthermore, regular engagement in such dialogues enhances skills by promoting and emotional attunement in everyday encounters. However, for introverts and neurodiverse individuals, such as those on the autism spectrum, small talk can induce stress and exhaustion due to the cognitive demands of navigating ambiguous social norms. Psychological research from the 2020s indicates that autistic individuals often experience social overload from masking non-autistic conversational patterns, leading to heightened anxiety and fatigue during brief interactions. Similarly, introverts report small talk as draining because it overstimulates their preference for deeper, less frequent exchanges, contributing to emotional depletion. In therapeutic contexts, practicing small talk within (CBT) helps build social confidence by gradually exposing individuals to conversational scenarios. CBT protocols for incorporate small talk exercises to challenge avoidance behaviors and reinforce adaptive responses, leading to improved interpersonal efficacy. Over the long term, habitual small talk contributes to stronger social networks, which correlate with greater psychological resilience. Extensions of the Harvard into the 2020s affirm that robust social ties, initiated through everyday interactions, buffer against stress and promote and emotional stability.

Contexts and Adaptations

Small talk serves as a foundational social in traditional contexts, such as networking events, where it facilitates initial rapport-building and opens doors to deeper connections. According to , effective small talk in these settings involves preparing open-ended questions about shared experiences, like recent industry trends, to ease discomfort and foster genuine interactions. In casual environments like elevators, brief exchanges about neutral topics, such as the or building amenities, help mitigate awkward silences and promote a among strangers. Similarly, in service-oriented retail interactions, cashiers and customers often engage in light conversation about products or daily routines to enhance satisfaction and encourage repeat visits, as these phatic exchanges signal attentiveness and warmth. In digital adaptations, small talk has evolved within online chats, where emojis function as proxies for emotional cues and phatic communication, allowing users to maintain connections without verbose text. indicates that emojis enrich semantic content in messages, simulating the brevity and expressiveness of face-to-face small talk by conveying tone and personality efficiently. Post-2020 pandemic studies highlight how video calls have shortened small talk exchanges due to "," with participants favoring concise greetings over extended chit-chat to conserve cognitive energy during prolonged virtual meetings. Emerging applications include AI interactions, where chatbots in the incorporate small talk scripts to boost user by mimicking human-like before addressing queries. For instance, conversational AI systems use contextual openers, such as commenting on user preferences, to personalize experiences and increase retention in platforms. In social spaces, small talk adapts through immersive nonverbal cues like head nodding and gestures, enabling more natural interactions in multi-user environments that replicate real-world mingling. Studies show that engaging in small talk with crowds of virtual humans elicits positive emotional responses, such as reduced anxiety and heightened social inclusion. Adapting small talk for and global teams presents challenges like diminished , addressed through intentional strategies such as dedicated "watercooler" Slack channels for casual check-ins. For global teams, brevity in texting is key; short, emoji-enhanced messages about time zones or holidays preserve while keeping exchanges light and efficient. Tips include starting virtual meetings with 2-3 minute icebreakers focused on non-work topics to rebuild rapport without overwhelming schedules. These adaptations underscore small talk's role in sustaining psychological benefits like reduced isolation in distributed settings.

References

  1. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2021/09/deep-conversations-strangers
  2. https://business.ku.edu/news/article/2021/11/11/office-small-talk-proves-more-beneficial-distracting-employees-study-finds
  3. https://news.arizona.edu/news/study-small-talk-not-bad-previously-thought
  4. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/21g-221-communicating-in-american-culture-s-spring-2019/pages/discussion-topics/the-art-of-american-small-talk/
  5. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/out-the-ooze/202001/why-small-talk-is-big-deal
  6. https://www.princeton.edu/news/2015/12/14/chitchat-and-small-talk-could-serve-evolutionary-need-bond-others
  7. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/small-talk
  8. https://www.verywellmind.com/small-talk-topics-3024421
  9. https://www.berkeleywellbeing.com/small-talk.html
  10. https://www.poised.com/blog/small-talk
  11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/284183
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368565359_The_evolution_of_the_English_small_talk_a_cognitive-pragmatic_analysis
  13. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/small-talk_n
  14. https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-the-science-behind-why-small-talk-is-so-awkward-and-so-essential
  15. https://www.vox.com/2015/7/7/8903123/small-talk
  16. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/gaining-and-sustaining/202404/small-talk-cringe-worthy-yet-essential-for-connection
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4893548_Schmooze_or_Lose_Social_Friction_and_Lubrication_in_E-Mail_Negotiations
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347215003474
  19. https://www.everettsd.org/cms/lib07/WA01920133/Centricity/Domain/965/tannen.pdf
  20. https://www.execunet.com/the-big-benefits-of-small-talk/
  21. https://www.flowspeak.io/articles/improve-your-customer-service-unlock-the-power-of-small-talk
  22. https://www.sfu.ca/airp/news-events/blog/social-connections.html
  23. https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/centres-and-institutes/language-in-the-workplace/docs/short-articles/ND-LWP-Small-talk-at-work.pdf
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597819301177
  25. https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-media/media-centre/weather-and-climate-news/2025/people-spend-over-two-days-a-year-talking-about-the-weather-amid-potential-record-breaking-summer-warmth
  26. https://iuuk.mff.cuni.cz/~andrew/EAP/PhaticCommunion.pdf
  27. https://www.hpu.edu/research-publications/tesol-working-papers/spring-2022/1nishimura_etal_interaction.pdf
  28. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1075&context=ctamj
  29. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/17/avoid-awkward-superficial-small-talk-make-one-little-change-communication-expert.html
  30. https://www.wondermind.com/article/small-talk/
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216623002436
  32. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2011809118
  33. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1521&context=cmc_theses
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9192499/
  35. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231214374
  36. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/communication-and-mass-media/high-context-and-low-context-cultures
  37. https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/small-talk-around-globe
  38. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20181016-how-the-finnish-survive-without-small-talk
  39. https://virtualspeech.com/blog/cultural-differences-in-body-language
  40. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9848/babe62fa3e5924bd75c860b49dae3d5129dc.pdf
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394064811_The_Impact_of_Globalization_on_Intercultural_Communication_and_Education_A_Qualitative_Study
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103122000750
  43. https://www.fastcompany.com/3036935/why-you-need-to-actually-talk-to-your-coworkers-face-to-face
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750946722001775
  45. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/field-guide-to-families/202503/the-enormity-of-small-talk-as-an-introvert
  46. https://nationalsocialanxietycenter.com/2017/11/15/social-anxiety-small-talk-nuts-bolts-making-conversation/
  47. https://www.6seconds.org/2025/07/28/harvard-grant-study/
  48. https://hbr.org/tip/2024/03/get-more-comfortable-making-small-talk
  49. https://www.fastcompany.com/40534613/eavesdropping-on-elevator-chitchat-taught-me-the-secret-to-small-talk/
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365406320_Starting_conversations_with_new_customers_a_research_note_on_the_moderating_effect_of_experience_on_responses_to_small_talk
  51. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/69271
  52. https://hbr.org/2021/03/remote-workers-need-small-talk-too
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000410
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363205848_Effects_of_Small_Talk_With_a_Crowd_of_Virtual_Humans_on_Users%27_Emotional_and_Behavioral_Responses
  55. https://zapier.com/blog/how-to-make-small-talk-at-work-remotely/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.