Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Smoothbore
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Cannons |
|---|
A smoothbore weapon is one that has a barrel without rifling. Smoothbores range from handheld firearms to powerful tank guns and large artillery mortars. Some examples of smoothbore weapons are muskets, blunderbusses, and flintlock pistols. The opposite of smoothbore is rifling.
History
[edit]Early firearms had smoothly bored barrels that fired projectiles without significant spin.[1] To minimize inaccuracy-inducing tumbling during flight, their projectiles required an aerodynamically uniform shape, such as a sphere. However, surface imperfections on the projectile and/or the barrel will cause even a sphere to rotate randomly during flight, and the Magnus effect will curve it off the intended trajectory when spinning on any axis not parallel to the direction of travel.[2]
Rifling the bore surface with spiral grooves or polygonal valleys imparts a stabilizing gyroscopic spin to a projectile that prevents tumbling in flight. Not only does this more than counter Magnus-induced drift, but it allows a longer, more streamlined round with greater sectional density to be fired from the same caliber barrel, improving the accuracy, effective range and hitting power.
In the eighteenth century, the standard infantry arm was the smoothbore musket; although rifled muskets were introduced in the early 18th century and had more power and range, they did not become the norm until the middle of the 19th century, when the Minié ball increased their rate of fire to match that of smoothbores.[3]
Artillery weapons were smoothbore until the mid-19th century, and smoothbores continued in limited use until the late 19th century. Early rifled artillery pieces were patented by Joseph Whitworth and William Armstrong in the United Kingdom in 1855. In the United States, rifled small arms and artillery were gradually adopted during the American Civil War. However, heavy coast defense Rodman smoothbores persisted in the US until 1900 due to the tendency of the Civil War's heavy Parrott rifles to burst and lack of funding for replacement weapons.
Current use
[edit]Some smoothbore firearms are still used.
Small arms
[edit]A shotgun fires multiple, round shot; firing out of a rifled barrel would impart centrifugal forces that result in a doughnut-shaped pattern of shot (with a high projectile density on the periphery, and a low projectile density in the interior). While this may be acceptable at close ranges (some spreader chokes are rifled to produce wide patterns at close range) this is not desirable at longer ranges, where a tight, consistent pattern is required to improve accuracy.[4]


Another smoothbore weapon in use today is the 37-mm riot gun, which fires less-lethal munitions like rubber bullets and teargas at short range at crowds, where a high degree of accuracy is not required.[5]
The Steyr IWS 2000 anti-tank rifle is smoothbore. This can help accelerate projectiles and increase ballistic effectiveness. The projectile is a 15.2 mm fin-stabilized discarding-sabot type with armor-piercing capability which the IWS 2000 was specifically designed to fire. It contains a dart-shaped penetrator of either tungsten carbide or depleted uranium, capable of piercing 40 mm of rolled homogeneous armor at a range of 1,000 m, and causing secondary fragmentation.
Artillery and tanks
[edit]The cannon made the transition from smoothbore firing cannonballs to rifled firing shells in the mid-19th century. However, to reliably penetrate the thick armor of modern armored vehicles many modern tank guns have moved back to smoothbore. These fire a very long, thin kinetic-energy projectile, too long in relation to its diameter to develop the necessary spin rate through rifling. Instead, kinetic energy rounds are produced as fin-stabilized darts. Not only does this reduce the time and expense of producing rifled barrels, it also reduces the need for replacement due to barrel wear.[citation needed]
The armour-piercing gun evolution has also shown up in small arms, particularly the now abandoned U.S. Advanced Combat Rifle (ACR) program. The ACR "rifles" used smoothbore barrels to fire single or multiple flechettes (tiny darts), rather than bullets, per pull of the trigger, to provide long range, flat trajectory, and armor-piercing abilities. Just like kinetic-energy tank rounds, flechettes are too long and thin to be stabilized by rifling and perform best from a smoothbore barrel. The ACR program was abandoned due to reliability problems and poor terminal ballistics.[citation needed]
Mortar barrels are typically muzzle-loading smoothbores. Since mortars fire bombs that are dropped down the barrel and must not be a tight fit, a smooth barrel is essential. The bombs are fin-stabilized.
Gallery
[edit]-
A smooth-bore, cast-iron ship's cannon, from the Grand Turk, a replica of a mid-18th century three-masted frigate
-
Replica of "Twin Sisters" smoothbores used in the Battle of San Jacinto (1836)
-
USS Monitor (1862) with the muzzle of one of its two 11-inch smoothbore Dahlgren guns showing
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Fadala, Sam (17 November 2006). The Complete Blackpowder Handbook. Iola, Wisconsin: Gun Digest Books. p. 308. ISBN 0-89689-390-1.
- ^ Forge, John (24 December 2012). Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research: The Case Against Weapons Research. Springer. pp. 63–64. ISBN 978-94-007-5736-3.
- ^ Denny, Mark (1 May 2011). Their Arrows Will Darken the Sun: The Evolution and Science of Ballistics. JHU Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0-8018-9981-2.
- ^ Haag, Michael G.; Haag, Lucien C. (29 June 2011). Shooting Incident Reconstruction. Academic Press. p. 281. ISBN 978-0-12-382242-0.
- ^ Kolman, John A. (1 January 2006). Patrol Response to Contemporary Problems: Enhancing Performance of First Responders Through Knowledge and Experience. Charles C Thomas. p. 102. ISBN 978-0-398-07656-6.
Smoothbore
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Basics
Barrel Configuration
A smoothbore barrel is characterized by its lack of helical grooves, or rifling, along the inner surface, producing a uniform cylindrical bore through which projectiles travel without induced spin.[1] This design contrasts with rifled barrels, where spiral grooves impart rotational stability to projectiles for improved accuracy over distance.[2] In smoothbores, the bore's smooth interior facilitates straightforward loading and firing, particularly suited to certain ammunition types. Historical examples include muskets, which employed smoothbore barrels to fire round ball projectiles, allowing for rapid muzzle-loading in military contexts.[2] In modern applications, shotguns use smoothbore configurations to disperse multiple pellets effectively for hunting or defensive purposes.[1] Additionally, contemporary tank guns, such as the 120 mm smoothbore cannon on the M1 Abrams main battle tank, fire fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) darts that rely on external fins rather than barrel-induced rotation for stability.[11] Bore diameter, or caliber, in smoothbore weapons is measured as the clear internal diameter of the cylindrical bore.[12] For shotguns, this is typically expressed in a gauge system derived from the historical weight of lead: a 12-gauge bore, for instance, equals approximately 0.729 inches, corresponding to the diameter of 12 lead balls weighing one pound.[1] In rifled firearms, by comparison, caliber is defined as the diameter from the top of one land to the opposite land, excluding the grooves, which makes the effective bore slightly larger to accommodate the bullet.[13] Cross-sectionally, a smoothbore barrel appears as a plain circular profile, ensuring unobstructed passage for projectiles like balls, shot, or darts. In contrast, a rifled barrel's cross-section reveals raised lands separated by helical grooves, forming the spiral pattern essential for spin stabilization.[2]Fundamental Principles
In smoothbore weapons, the barrel lacks helical grooves, so projectiles are not imparted with rotational spin upon exiting the muzzle. This results in spherical or non-rotating projectiles following parabolic trajectories governed primarily by initial velocity, launch angle, gravitational acceleration, and aerodynamic drag, without the gyroscopic stabilization that spin provides for maintaining orientation in rifled systems.[14][15] Under ideal conditions neglecting air resistance, the horizontal range of such a projectile is given by where is the muzzle velocity, is the elevation angle, and is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²). In reality, the lack of spin causes greater sensitivity to air resistance and minor asymmetries, leading to deviations from this ideal path and reduced precision over distance.[14][15] Without imparted rotation, elongated or non-symmetric projectiles are susceptible to tumbling in flight, where the center of pressure shifts ahead of the center of gravity, inducing unstable yaw or pitch motions. This tumbling produces erratic trajectories through varying aerodynamic drag and lift, limiting effective accuracy, particularly for historical round-ball muskets, to ranges of approximately 50-100 yards.[16][17] To counter the instability from absent spin, modern smoothbores rely on alternative stabilization methods, such as finned designs for single projectiles or dispersed shot patterns that enhance hit probability through area coverage rather than precise point targeting. In contrast to rifled bores, smoothbores exhibit lower tolerance for high muzzle velocities with elongated projectiles, as the absence of gyroscopic effects exacerbates tumbling and aerodynamic instability at speeds exceeding typical subsonic regimes.[15][16]Historical Development
Origins in Firearms
The smoothbore firearm emerged in the 15th century as an evolution from earlier hand cannons, which trace back to Chinese examples like the Heilongjiang hand cannon from circa 1288.[18] These were rudimentary metal tubes fitted to wooden handles and fired by manually applying a hot wire or match to loose gunpowder around the touch hole.[19] By the early 1400s, these devices incorporated a shoulder stock and a matchlock mechanism—a serpentine lever that lowered a smoldering match into the priming pan—transforming them into the first practical handheld weapons, known as arquebuses.[20] This innovation allowed for more stable aiming and freed the shooter's hands, marking the transition from siege-oriented handgonnes to portable infantry arms.[19] In Europe and Asia, the Ottoman Empire pioneered widespread adoption of matchlock arquebuses around 1465, equipping Janissary corps with tüfek (handheld firearms) that emphasized volley tactics over individual marksmanship.[21] These smoothbore weapons spread rapidly across continents, becoming standard for line infantry by the 16th century; for instance, the English Brown Bess musket, introduced in the early 1700s, fired .75-caliber round balls with an effective range of approximately 50 to 100 yards due to the unrifled barrel's inherent inaccuracy.[22] Muzzle-loading via loose powder and ball enabled relatively quick reloading—up to three or four shots per minute for trained soldiers—prioritizing massed fire over precision.[23] Smoothbores played a pivotal tactical role in 18th-century warfare, particularly in volley fire doctrines that delivered synchronized barrages at close range to maximize psychological and physical impact.[24] During the American Revolution (1775–1783), both British and Continental forces relied on these muskets for linear formations, where rapid, coordinated volleys at 50 to 80 yards proved decisive in engagements like the Battle of Saratoga, compensating for the weapons' limited accuracy.[23] Beyond military use, smoothbores found early civilian applications in hunting; 16th-century European fowling pieces, lightweight smoothbore guns with barrels 4.5 to 6 feet long, were designed for scattering birdshot to take down fowl and small game, influencing later shotgun development.[25]Evolution in Artillery
The earliest smoothbore artillery pieces emerged in the 14th century as massive bombards, such as the Dulle Griet from the early 15th century (circa 1430s) with its approximately 26-inch (660 mm) caliber capable of firing approximately 650-pound (295 kg) granite balls, primarily for siege warfare as seen in the 1452 siege of Oudenaarde.[26] These wrought-iron weapons evolved into more refined culverins by the mid-1400s, which were longer-barreled guns firing iron or lead balls for greater range and precision in demolishing fortifications.[6] A prominent example is the Mons Meg bombard, cast in 1449 and weighing about six tons with a 20-inch (510 mm) caliber, used by Scottish forces from 1455 to 1513 to hurl stone balls weighing about 386 pounds (175 kg) up to approximately 2 miles (3,200 meters) or heavier iron projectiles in castle sieges.[27] By the 18th century, smoothbore artillery reached its peak in mobility and standardization, exemplified by France's Gribeauval system introduced in 1765, which lightened field guns and emphasized interchangeable parts for rapid deployment.[28] During the Napoleonic Wars (1799–1815), 6- and 12-pounder smoothbore cannons became staples of French field artillery, with the 12-pounder serving as Napoleon's preferred piece for its balance of range and destructive power in aggressive tactics like canister fire against infantry at close quarters.[28] These muzzle-loading bronze guns, often towed by horse teams, dominated European battlefields, enabling massed barrages that supported infantry advances. Ammunition for smoothbores evolved significantly during this period, starting with solid iron shot for direct fire and breaching from the 14th century, transitioning to canister rounds by the 16th century—tin containers packed with musket balls for anti-personnel effects up to 600 yards—and incorporating explosive shells in the 19th century for howitzers and mortars, which used timed fuzes to burst hollow iron spheres behind cover.[6] In the U.S. Civil War (1861–1865), smoothbores like the 12-pounder Napoleon persisted as reliable field pieces despite the rise of rifled artillery, providing shorter-range but versatile fire with solid shot, canister, and shells in battles such as Gettysburg.[29] Their decline accelerated after 1855, when British inventors Sir William Armstrong and Joseph Whitworth patented revolutionary rifled breech-loaders that offered superior accuracy and range, rendering traditional smoothbores obsolete for most field roles.[6] However, heavy Rodman smoothbores, such as the 15-inch coastal guns developed in the 1860s, remained in U.S. fortifications until 1900 due to their reliability against naval threats and the bursting risks of early rifled designs like the Parrott.[29]Design and Mechanics
Construction Materials
Early smoothbore muskets were constructed using wrought iron barrels, which were forged from strips or bars hammered around a mandrel and welded into hoops or staves for durability and cost-effectiveness in production.[30] In contrast, artillery pieces like cannons favored bronze alloys, typically comprising about 90% copper and 10% tin.[31] In modern smoothbore designs, high-strength steel alloys dominate, with 4140 chrome-molybdenum steel widely employed in shotgun barrels due to its balance of toughness, machinability, and resistance to fatigue under repeated firing.[32] For lightweight mortars, composite materials such as carbon fiber-reinforced polymers have been developed to reduce weight while maintaining structural integrity, as demonstrated in prototypes for 81mm systems.[33] Tank gun barrels often feature chrome-lining applied to the bore interior to enhance wear resistance against erosive propellants and high-velocity projectiles.[34] Fabrication of smoothbore barrels emphasizes processes suited to uniform, unrifled interiors; historical artillery pieces were cast in bronze molds and then bored to achieve the desired bore diameter, while modern methods involve drilling, reaming, and honing steel blanks to ensure smooth, precise surfaces without the need for rifling tools like button pullers.[35] Barrel length-to-diameter ratios vary widely, typically from 10 to 55 calibers in historical and modern designs to optimize projectile stability and velocity, where longer ratios contribute to improved ballistic performance.[36] Safety in smoothbore construction includes rigorous proof-testing, where barrels are subjected to elevated pressures—often 10,000 to 20,000 psi for small arms like shotguns—to verify integrity before service, exceeding standard operating loads by 50% or more to account for material variations and manufacturing tolerances.[37]Loading and Firing
In muzzle-loading smoothbore firearms, the charging process begins with measuring a precise quantity of black powder, typically 100-150 grains for muskets, and pouring it down the barrel to form the propellant charge. A lubricated patch or wad is then placed over the powder to seal the bore and prevent gas escape, followed by the projectile seated firmly against the wad using a wooden or metal ramrod to ensure complete combustion and safe ignition. This sequential method, distinct from breech-loaders that load from the rear, requires careful compaction to avoid air gaps that could lead to inconsistent performance.[39] Ignition systems for smoothbores have progressed from the matchlock mechanism, introduced in the early 15th century, which lowered a glowing match into a priming pan via a trigger to ignite the main charge, to the flintlock in the 17th century, where a hinged hammer released a flint to strike a steel frizzen, producing sparks for reliable all-weather firing. The percussion cap system, developed in the 1820s, further advanced this by placing a fulminate-filled copper cap on a nipple, struck by the hammer to detonate the primer and main charge instantaneously. These evolutions improved reliability and speed over open-pan designs while maintaining compatibility with the smoothbore's simple barrel configuration.[40] Breech-loading smoothbores differ markedly from muzzle-loaders by accessing the chamber from the rear, as seen in modern shotgun designs with break-action mechanisms that pivot the barrel open via a lever for direct cartridge insertion and extraction. Pump-action variants use a fore-end slide to cycle the action, chambering shells from a tubular magazine while ejecting empties, allowing repeated firing without full disassembly. In smoothbore mortars, loading involves dropping the fin-stabilized round into the vertical tube, where gravity propels it downward until its base strikes a fixed firing pin, igniting an integrated propellant cartridge in a drop-fire process that contrasts with horizontal breech mechanisms.[41][42] The uniform diameter of a smoothbore facilitates pressure dynamics that permit higher propellant charges and resulting muzzle velocities compared to rifled bores, where grooves increase frictional resistance and limit peak pressures. However, this lack of rifling constraints heightens the bursting risk from rapid gas expansion, requiring robust barrel construction to withstand internal forces exceeding 20,000 psi in high-velocity loads. Material strength plays a critical role in containing these pressures without deformation.[36]Applications
Small Arms and Shotguns
In contemporary civilian applications, smoothbore shotguns remain a staple for hunting and sport shooting, with 12-gauge and 20-gauge models being the most prevalent due to their versatility and manageable recoil. The Remington Model 870, a pump-action shotgun produced since 1950, exemplifies this category, available in both 12-gauge and 20-gauge configurations for pursuing game such as deer, turkey, and waterfowl.[43] When loaded with buckshot, these shotguns deliver effective patterns for medium-range engagements, typically up to 40 yards, where the spread ensures reliable hits on vital areas without excessive dispersion.[44] Law enforcement agencies widely employ smoothbore riot guns chambered in 37mm for less-lethal interventions, prioritizing non-military roles in maintaining public order. These launchers fire bean bag rounds—cloth projectiles filled with silica sand or lead pellets—that incapacitate individuals at distances of 20 to 35 feet, minimizing the risk of permanent injury while allowing for targeted crowd control.[45] Complementing these are 37mm gas munitions, such as CS irritant rounds, which disperse chemical agents to disperse groups during riots or protests, enabling de-escalation without resorting to lethal force.[46] Such tools are standard in police arsenals for scenarios like correctional facility disturbances or urban unrest, where precision and reduced lethality are paramount.[47] Military adoption of smoothbore small arms is exceedingly rare in modern contexts, with the Steyr IWS 2000 anti-tank rifle representing a notable exception from the late 20th century. Developed by Steyr-Mannlicher in the 1980s, this 15.2×169mm bolt-action weapon features a smoothbore barrel to accommodate fin-stabilized discarding sabot projectiles, achieving penetration of 40mm of rolled homogeneous armor at 1,000 meters.[48] Despite its innovative design for engaging light armored vehicles or low-flying helicopters, production was limited, and it saw minimal field deployment due to the rise of guided munitions.[48] Legal frameworks significantly influence civilian ownership of smoothbore small arms worldwide, with variations reflecting cultural attitudes toward hunting and self-defense. In the United States, the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 classifies short-barreled shotguns—those with barrels under 18 inches in length—as regulated Title II weapons, requiring a $200 transfer tax, background checks, and ATF registration to curb potential misuse in close-quarters scenarios.[49] Globally, shotgun ownership trends favor rural and hunting-oriented regions, with the U.S. exhibiting particularly high rates: approximately 54% of firearm owners possess at least one shotgun (as of 2017), driven by recreational hunting that accounts for approximately 14.4 million participants annually (as of 2022).[50][51] In contrast, stricter regulations in Europe and Asia limit civilian access, though shotguns remain popular for sporting clays and game management in countries like the United Kingdom and Canada, where ownership has stabilized amid rising interest in conservation-based hunting.[52]Artillery and Armored Vehicles
In modern military applications, smoothbore artillery systems play a critical role in providing indirect fire support, particularly through mortars. These weapons are muzzle-loaded smoothbores designed for portability and rapid deployment by infantry units. A representative example is the 81mm L16 mortar, which weighs 35.3 kg and achieves a maximum range of 5,650 meters when firing high-explosive fin-stabilized projectiles with a muzzle velocity of 225 m/s.[53][54] The fin-stabilized bombs, such as the 4.2 kg HE L3682 round, ensure stability during high-angle trajectories without relying on spin from rifling, enabling effective indirect fire against area targets.[55] Smoothbore configurations also dominate main armament in post-World War II armored vehicles, especially main battle tanks, where high-velocity kinetic energy rounds require minimal barrel interference. The Leopard 2 tank employs the Rheinmetall Rh-120 L/44 or L/55 120mm smoothbore gun, while the M1 Abrams uses a licensed variant of the same system.[56] These guns fire armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) rounds, such as the DM63, at muzzle velocities around 1,700 m/s, providing effective engagement ranges exceeding 3 km against armored threats. The smoothbore design accommodates the long, slender penetrators of APFSDS ammunition, which derive stability from rear fins rather than rotational spin.[57] In large-caliber systems like these, smoothbores offer key production and maintenance advantages over rifled alternatives. Fin-stabilized munitions are simpler and less costly to manufacture, as they avoid the complexities of spin-stabilization compatible with rifling grooves. Additionally, the absence of rifling eliminates wear from the high-speed passage of saboted projectiles, extending barrel life to over 1,500 effective full charges compared to rifled guns, which degrade faster under similar stresses.[58] This durability supports sustained operations in high-intensity conflicts without frequent barrel replacements. Smoothbore artillery and tank guns remain integral to 21st-century warfare, with no major innovations in their core designs noted between 2020 and 2025. Mortars and artillery have historically accounted for up to 70% of battlefield casualties in conflicts like the Russo-Ukrainian War, though by 2025, drones have emerged as a primary cause (up to 70%), complementing the role of fin-stabilized smoothbore projectiles amid evolving threats.[59][60] Ukrainian forces have relied on systems like 82mm and Soviet-era 240mm mortars for suppressive fire, highlighting the enduring reliability of fin-stabilized smoothbore projectiles.[61][62]Performance Characteristics
Advantages Over Rifled Bores
Smoothbores offer significant manufacturing advantages over rifled bores due to their simpler construction, which eliminates the need for cutting helical grooves into the barrel interior. This straightforward boring process reduces production time and costs, making smoothbores more economical for mass production in both historical and modern contexts.[63] A key benefit of smoothbores is their versatility with various projectile types, as the absence of rifling avoids imparting unwanted spin that could distort patterns or trajectories. In shotguns, for instance, this allows multiple spherical pellets to disperse in a wide pattern for effective close-range engagement without spin-induced clustering. Similarly, in large-caliber applications like tank guns, smoothbores accommodate fin-stabilized projectiles, such as armor-piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) rounds, which rely on rear fins for stability rather than gyroscopic spin.[64] Smoothbores exhibit reduced barrel wear compared to rifled bores, primarily because they lack grooves that erode from high-velocity projectile contact and driving band engraving. This results in less mechanical degradation and extended service life, particularly under repeated high-pressure firings in artillery and armored vehicle applications. For example, modern smoothbore tank guns can achieve over 1,500 effective full charges (EFC) before significant wear, surpassing typical rifled counterparts.[65] In historical small arms, smoothbores enabled a higher rate of fire owing to quicker muzzle loading, as the round projectile required no precise alignment with rifling grooves. Soldiers could fire three smoothbore musket shots in the time needed to load one rifle, enhancing volley effectiveness in line infantry tactics.[63]Limitations and Comparisons
One primary limitation of smoothbore firearms is their inherent accuracy deficit compared to rifled weapons, stemming from the absence of spin imparted by rifling grooves, which causes projectiles to tumble in flight and deviate unpredictably. Historical testing demonstrates this starkly: a smoothbore musket like the Model 1842 achieved 74-86% hit rates on targets at 100 yards with ball ammunition, dropping to 36-48% at 200 yards and ≤18% at 300 yards, whereas a rifled musket such as the Model 1861 Springfield maintained 96-100% at 100 yards, 64-82% at 200 yards, and 46-58% at 300 yards.[4] As a result, the effective range of smoothbore muskets was typically limited to about 100 yards, in contrast to rifled muskets exceeding 300 yards for practical combat use.[66] This instability also creates velocity and stability trade-offs, rendering smoothbores unsuitable for projectiles reliant on spin stabilization, such as the Minié ball introduced in the 1850s. Invented by French Captain Claude-Étienne Minié in 1849 and adopted by the U.S. Army in 1855, the Minié ball's expanding base allowed it to engage rifling upon firing, enabling rifled muskets to match the loading speed of smoothbores—up to three rounds per minute—while achieving superior range (up to 500 yards) and accuracy, thereby underscoring smoothbores' obsolescence for such ammunition.[67] Prior to this innovation, rifled weapons had been hindered by slow loading with tight-fitting balls, but the Minié ball eliminated that barrier, amplifying rifled superiority in both fire rate and terminal effectiveness.[66] In modern contexts, smoothbores continue to exhibit these limitations, performing well in short-range scenarios like shotguns for home defense or hunting, where slug ammunition provides reliable hits within 50-75 yards but loses precision rapidly beyond 100 yards due to ballistic instability.[68] Rifles, by contrast, maintain pinpoint accuracy at several hundred yards, making smoothbores inadequate for precision tasks such as sniping. Similarly, in armored vehicles, contemporary tank smoothbores (e.g., 120mm guns on the M1 Abrams) achieve parity with rifled designs through fin-stabilized discarding sabot (APFSDS) rounds that provide stability without spin, but this necessitates more intricate ammunition engineering—incorporating fins, sabots, and penetrators—compared to the simpler spin-stabilized projectiles viable in rifled barrels, increasing production complexity and per-round costs.[58] Overall, these drawbacks led to the phasing out of smoothbores for most infantry applications by the 1860s, as rifling advancements during the American Civil War rendered them obsolete for line infantry, confining their role to specialized or short-range uses thereafter.[66]References
- https://tpwd.[texas](/page/Texas).gov/education/hunter-education/online-course/primitive-hunting/firing-muzzleloaders

