Hubbry Logo
SnowplowSnowplowMain
Open search
Snowplow
Community hub
Snowplow
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Snowplow
Snowplow
Snowplow
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
TowPlow and trucks on a Missouri rural Interstate

A snowplow (also snow plow, snowplough or snow plough) is a device intended for mounting on a vehicle, used for removing snow and ice from outdoor surfaces, typically those serving transportation purposes. Although this term is often used to refer to vehicles mounting such devices, more accurately they are known as winter service vehicles,[where?] especially in areas that regularly receive large amounts of snow every year, or in specific environments such as airfields. In other cases, pickup trucks and front end loaders are outfitted with attachments to fulfill this purpose. Some regions that do not frequently see snow may use graders to remove compacted snow and ice off the streets. Snowplows can also be mounted on rail cars or locomotives to clear railway tracks.

Usage

[edit]
A small sidewalk clearing plow in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Skid-steer plow
Tractor with plow blade

A snowplow works by using a blade to push snow to the side to clear it from a surface. Modern plows may include technology to make it easier to perform the work and stay on the road. These include Global Positioning System receivers, head-up displays and infrared cameras.[citation needed]

Large custom snowplows are commonly used at major airports in North America. These plows have oversized blades and additional equipment like a rotating sweeper broom (sometimes called jetblade) and blowers at the rear of the plow.[citation needed]

For sidewalks and narrow lanes small tractor plows (tracked or wheeled) are often used within Canada and the United States.[citation needed]

When snowfall accumulates above a certain height, snowplow operators may be seen clearing the main arteries first (designated as snow routes), in some cases for the exclusive use of emergency vehicles.[citation needed]

Underbody scrapers are sometimes mounted on vehicles in residential and urban settings, operating on principles similar to a road grader, but allowing greater weights and speed along with the carriage of a road treatment applicator.[citation needed]

Newer technology has allowed the use of articulated plow systems which can clear multiple divided highway lanes simultaneously; jurisdictions adopting this technology include the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Ontario and Quebec in Canada,[1] along with 21 states (Colorado, Connecticut,[2] Delaware, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah and Wisconsin) in the US.[3][4][5]

History

[edit]
Snowplows in Sweden (1909)
Snowplows in Finland (1960)
Snowplow plowing in Jyväskylä, Finland (2012)
Snowplows in Ystad, Sweden February (2018)

The first snow plows were horse-drawn wedge-plows made of wood. The earliest reference found by the Oxford English Dictionary was written in 1792 in a description of New Hampshire:[6]

When a deep snow has obstructed the roads, they are in some places opened by an instrument called a snow plough. It is made of planks, in a triangular form, with two side boards to turn the snow out on either hand.[7]

With the advent of rail travel and later, the automobile, a number of inventors set about to improve existing snow plows. In the US, the "snow-clearer" is said to have been patented as early as the 1840s,[8] for railways. The first snow plow ever built specifically for use with motor equipment was in 1913. It was manufactured by Good Roads Machinery in Kennett Square, PA. and was designed to meet the exacting requirements outlined by engineers of the New York City Street Cleaning Bureau.[9] Good Roads is therefore unofficially credited as the originator of the modern snow plow, though their horse drawn steel blade road graders were used to clear roads of snow as early as the company's founding in 1878 under their original name American Road Machinery.[10] Good Roads patented the first four-wheel grader in 1889 thus making it the first pull grading apparatus patented in the United States.[11] Unlike most early snow plow manufacturers, Good Roads continues to manufacture snow removal equipment today under the name Good Roads Godwin, now located in Dunn, North Carolina. In the early 1920s Good Roads often advertised in The American City magazine that "...three out of every four snow plows in use throughout the whole United States are Good Roads Champions." By the mid-1920s Good Roads was manufacturing snow plows of various shapes and sizes for use on a wide variety of motorized equipment. Other snow plow manufactures began to follow suit as motorized plows were proven more efficient than other methods of snow removal.[citation needed]

Carl Frink of Clayton, New York, USA was also an early manufacturer of truck-mounted snowplows. His company, Frink Snowplows, now Frink-America, was founded by some accounts as early as 1920.[12] For the winter of 1919, Carl H. Frink, owner of a tire and machine shop in Clayton (New York), manufactured and equipped a bus with a steel V-blade snowplow for Fred I. Dailey's Clayton to Watertown bus line. In 1920, Frink equipped a Linn halftrack with a snowplow and side-blades for F.W. Carpenter's Black River Bus Lines and started his snowplow business. The Linn Co. immediately started to equip their halftracks with snowplow and heavily promoted their superior traction; they dominated the eastern market until the 30s when the halftracks were supplanted by the much faster four-wheel drive trucks.[13]

In 1923, the brothers Hans and Even Øveraasen of Norway constructed an early snowplow for use on cars. This proved to be the start of a tradition in snow-clearing equipment for roads, railways[14] and airports, as well as the foundation of the company Øveraasen Snow Removal Systems.[citation needed]

Today snow plows are produced by numerous companies around the world and available for different kinds of vehicles such as service trucks, pickup trucks, SUVs and ATVs. They are installed using model specific or universal hardware and mount to the frame of the vehicle to ensure durable connection. There are manual, power and hydraulic operating snow plows. All necessary mounting hardware usually comes in set with a plow. Snow plow blades are available in various sizes depending on a vehicle type. Service trucks usually use a blade sized 96 in (2.4 m) and more. Common blade size for pickup trucks and full size SUVs is 78–96 in (2.0–2.4 m). Smaller ATV snow plow blades are 48–78 in (1.2–2.0 m) wide.[citation needed]

Railway snowplows

[edit]
Main articles: Wedge plow and Rotary snowplow
A small wedge plow mounted on a passenger train in Lower Austria

In many countries, railway locomotives have small snowplows permanently attached to their bogies, which also serve as pilots. With others, the snowplow forms part of the obstacle deflector below the bufferbeam. Bolt-on versions also exist, and these attach to the bufferbeam or front coupler. However, larger snowplows exist, which tend to be conversions rather than purpose-built vehicles. Steam locomotive tenders, large diesel locomotive bogies and various freight vehicles have been used, with the snowplow body mounted on the original frames. They are one-ended, with conventional coupling equipment on the inner end. In Canada purpose-built snowplow cars (based on a box car with a cupola above and behind the blade) are in use in areas where significant snow falls (especially in Western Canada, Newfoundland and Northern Ontario). These cars were influenced by the Russell Plow from the United States and used in Canada in the 1880s.[15] Most of the Russell-type plows have been retired for smaller custom-built railplow or snow blades attached to hopper cars or locomotives.[citation needed]

Conventional operation may see one or two locomotives running together with a snowplow at either end. This enables a snow clearance train to reverse direction quickly if it gets stuck. Alternatively, a single locomotive with bogie plows can act as a self-propelled snowplow by running light engine.[citation needed]

An example of a locomotive with a snow plow pilot.

Via Rail, among other railways, has integrated plow blades with the front pilots of their locomotive fleet to clear thinner accumulations of snow as trains run.[16]

Self-propelled on-track steel and rubber tired hy-rail equipment can remove snow from railroad tracks. The Pettibone Speed Swing loader and similar machines, both with and without hyrail wheels, can be fitted with a large-capacity snow bucket or a wedge plow to clear the tracks. Ballast regulators, machines designed to shape the profile of the crushed stone ballast that anchors the track in place, can be used without modification or refitted with purpose-built snow blades, blowers and wings to clear snow from the right of way.[citation needed]

Locomotive-propelled Jordan ditcher/spreaders are still sometimes used to plow especially deep snow in the US on the former Wisconsin Central railroad. These machines carry large main plows and hydraulic- or air-powered articulating wings to push snow far from the tracks, sometimes past the next adjacent track, to facilitate clearing snow from yards and sidings. These machines can create ditches and plow the tracks clear of loose material during maintenance operations. Russell plows are still in service at some locations, with large-front wedge plows and shorter hinged air-powered wings suitable only for plowing snow.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]
Snow pusher skid steer

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Snowplow

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A snowplow (also spelled snowplough in ) is any of various devices or attachments intended for mounting on trucks, , or other machinery to remove and from outdoor surfaces such as roads, sidewalks, railways, and runways worldwide. These implements typically feature a or moldboard that pushes or throws aside, often combined with spreading equipment for salt or abrasives to enhance road safety. The term "snowplow" originated in 1792 in , referring initially to simple angled wooden frames pulled by horses or oxen to clear paths. The development of snowplows accelerated in the 19th century amid growing needs for reliable winter transportation in snowy regions. The first U.S. patents for snowplows were issued in the 1840s, with early horse-drawn models deployed in Milwaukee in 1862 using carts to scrape streets. Motorization marked a pivotal advancement; in 1913, Good Roads, Inc., produced the first snowplow specifically designed for a motorized vehicle, deployed by New York City to clear urban roads. By the 1920s, car-mounted plows emerged, and innovations like Chicago's 1920 conveyor-belt snow loader improved efficiency for heavier accumulations. These evolutions were driven by severe events, such as the 1888 Blizzard, which exposed vulnerabilities in unprepared cities and spurred investments in mechanical removal. Snowplows play a critical role in public and economic continuity, operated by municipal crews, agencies, and private contractors during winter storms. In the U.S., agencies like state departments of transportation maintain fleets equipped with hydraulic controls, trip edges for obstacle avoidance, and durable cutting edges made of or rubber. Effective deployment involves formations to clear multiple lanes simultaneously, though operators emphasize caution around these slow-moving, wide vehicles to prevent collisions. As of , integration with GPS for route optimization was implemented in some regions prone to heavy snowfall, alongside efforts toward fuel-efficient designs. More recent advancements as of 2024 include autonomous snowplows and advanced sensor technologies for enhanced efficiency and .

Overview

Definition and Purpose

A snowplow is a device or vehicle-mounted attachment designed to remove and from outdoor surfaces such as roads, railroad tracks, or runways by pushing, throwing, or blowing the material aside. The primary purposes of snowplows include enabling safe vehicular travel by clearing pathways, preventing accidents from snow accumulation and subsequent ice buildup, supporting services access during winter storms, and maintaining economic continuity in regions prone to heavy snowfall by minimizing disruptions to transportation and commerce. Snowplows achieve these goals by rapidly displacing snow to bare underlying surfaces, thereby reducing slip hazards and ensuring operational mobility for essential activities. At a basic level, snowplow operation involves the application of by the to compress and displace the , incorporating principles of compression, , shearing, and inertial forces that govern movement during plowing. This displacement lowers the snow depth on travel surfaces, which in turn reduces the coefficient of caused by icy conditions, improving traction for vehicles and preventing skids. On a global scale, snowplows play a critical role in infrastructure management, with operations clearing millions of kilometers of roads annually in cold-climate countries; for example, in the United States, state agencies like the Utah Department of Transportation alone plowed over 8.6 million kilometers in the 2022-2023 season, while nationwide efforts across snowy regions exceed tens of millions of lane-kilometers per winter. In Canada, municipal fleets such as Toronto's 800+ snowplows contribute to clearing vast urban networks, supporting an industry valued at approximately $4.7 billion annually. Similarly, in Russia, cities like Moscow deploy around 14,000 snow-clearing vehicles each winter to manage extensive road networks amid heavy snowfall.

Importance in Infrastructure Maintenance

Snowplows play a vital role in mitigating the economic burdens imposed by winter weather, with state and local highway agencies in the United States expending between $2 billion and $4 billion annually on snow and ice removal operations to maintain roadways. These expenditures cover labor, equipment, materials like salt and sand, and related logistics, often escalating during severe seasons; for instance, 23 states collectively surpassed $1 billion in snow clearance costs in a single winter. Without such maintenance, unmaintained roads lead to substantial indirect losses, including business closures and supply chain disruptions that can cost $66 million to $700 million per day across affected regions, as seen in states like New York where a single day's shutdown equates to approximately $700 million in foregone economic activity from halted retail sales, lost wages, and delayed shipments. Hourly workers bear a disproportionate share of these impacts, comprising nearly two-thirds of direct losses from road closures. Beyond economics, snowplows significantly enhance public safety by reducing traffic accidents, injuries, and fatalities associated with winter conditions. In the US, over 1,300 people are killed and more than 116,800 injured annually in crashes on snowy, slushy, or icy pavements, with nearly 900 fatalities and 76,000 injuries occurring specifically during snowfall or sleet. Effective plowing and deicing operations demonstrably lower these risks; for example, before-and-after analyses on four-lane roads indicate a 93% reduction in accidents following deicing treatments, while winter maintenance operations overall improve traffic stability and decrease incident-induced delays during storms. Snow days without maintenance show fewer fatal crashes than dry days (incidence rate ratio of 0.93) but higher rates of nonfatal injury crashes, underscoring the protective effect of timely snow removal in preventing less severe but more frequent incidents. The deployment of snowplows is particularly crucial in ensuring infrastructure access across diverse settings, prioritizing routes that connect essential services in both urban and rural areas. In urban environments, plowing focuses on high-traffic arterials, emergency corridors to hospitals, fire stations, and transit hubs to sustain population centers during storms. Rural operations, by contrast, emphasize clearing isolated roads vital for reaching remote hospitals, schools, and utility infrastructure, where delays can isolate communities and hinder emergency responses or daily services. This targeted approach prevents broader disruptions, such as impeded access to medical facilities or educational institutions, which could otherwise exacerbate vulnerabilities in less densely populated regions. Snowplow operations increasingly integrate with advanced weather forecasting to enable preemptive deployment, optimizing resource allocation and minimizing disruptions. Systems like the Federal Highway Administration's Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) combine real-time road weather information systems (RWIS), numerical weather models, and 48-hour forecasts to generate site-specific recommendations for anti-icing and plowing, allowing agencies to treat high-risk areas before storms intensify. For instance, the Utah Department of Transportation employs in-house meteorologists who provide prestorm briefings and nowcasts to 82 maintenance sheds, reducing preparation times by 50% and facilitating proactive anti-icing to cut chemical usage and costs. Such coordination, including tools like the Road Weather Forecast Tool for 24-hour pavement temperature predictions, supports dynamic risk assessments and ensures snowplows are positioned ahead of accumulating precipitation, enhancing overall infrastructure resilience.

Types

Road and Highway Snowplows

Road and highway snowplows are typically mounted on robust vehicle bases to handle the demands of clearing paved surfaces during winter storms. These vehicles primarily consist of medium- to heavy-duty trucks, such as Class 5 through Class 8 chassis, which provide the necessary power and stability for attaching plows and spreaders. In North America, common examples include municipal plow trucks like the International HX Series, Freightliner 114SD, and Peterbilt 548, which are engineered for severe-duty applications in urban and rural settings. Tractors, including compact models, and light-duty SUVs or pickups like the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 or Nissan Titan, serve as bases for smaller-scale or versatile operations, particularly in less demanding municipal contexts. Blade designs for these snowplows vary to address different snow conditions and road types. Straight blades, the most common and economical option, feature a flat, fixed or reversible edge that pushes snow perpendicularly to the side of the vehicle, making them suitable for general clearing on flat surfaces and ideal for operators new to plowing. V-plows, shaped like an inverted V, excel at cutting through deep drifts and windrows by directing snow outward in a funneling motion, allowing for angled operation to pile snow efficiently along curbs or medians. Underbody plows, mounted beneath the chassis, are specialized for high-speed removal of deep or packed snow, often featuring fixed-angle moldboards up to 10 feet long that scrape the road surface while complementing front-mounted blades to widen the cleared path. Many road snowplows integrate salt or chemical spreaders to enhance de-icing after initial clearing, distributing materials like rock salt or brine blends via rear- or underbody-mounted hoppers. These systems apply de-icers at controlled rates to melt residual ice without overuse, typically ranging from 100 to 300 pounds of salt per lane mile for highways and spot treatments on urban roads, depending on temperature, traffic, and storm severity. This combination allows a single vehicle to plow and treat surfaces sequentially, improving efficiency in anti-icing and maintenance operations. Operations differ significantly between urban streets and interstate highways, reflecting variations in traffic density, geometry, and priorities. In urban environments, snowplows navigate narrow , intersections, and areas at reduced speeds to avoid obstacles, often prioritizing residential and arterial routes with multiple passes for complete clearing. On interstates and highways, plows cover longer stretches at higher but still moderated speeds—commonly 25 to 40 in many jurisdictions—to maintain while effectively displacing , with operators adhering to posted limits adjusted for visibility and conditions.

Railway Snowplows

Railway snowplows are specialized machines designed to clear snow from rail tracks, ensuring uninterrupted train operations in snowy regions. These plows must navigate fixed rail paths while integrating with locomotive power, differing from road-based equipment by focusing on track integrity and train scheduling. Primary types include wedge plows, which push snow aside using a V-shaped blade mounted on a railcar, and rotary plows, which employ a large rotating auger to throw snow clear of the tracks. Wedge plows are simpler and used for lighter accumulations, while rotary plows handle deeper drifts by pulverizing and ejecting snow via high-speed blades. Most railway snowplows are not self-propelled and require one or more locomotives to push them along the line, with the plow's internal engine powering the cutting mechanism. In North American railroads, such as the Canadian Pacific Railway, rotary snowplows have been essential since the late 19th century for maintaining service through harsh winters. The rotary concept originated from Canadian inventor J.W. Elliott in 1869, with early prototypes built in 1883, and was widely adopted by lines like the Canadian Pacific to clear mountain passes and prairies. These machines demonstrated capacities to handle drifts up to 10-15 feet deep, as seen in operations on routes like the Alaska Railroad, where avalanches and heavy snowfalls exceed typical depths. For instance, BNSF Railway's rotary plows feature an 11-foot-diameter fan capable of cutting through substantial drifts, throwing snow over 200 feet away at speeds of 80-90 RPM. Operational challenges for railway snowplows include preventing derailments caused by uneven snow or ice buildup, which can warp tracks or obstruct switches. Coordination with train schedules is critical, as plowing disrupts normal traffic and requires centralized command centers to monitor weather and adjust operations in real time. Track switching mechanisms must be cleared of snow to avoid freezing, which could halt movements and lead to delays or safety risks. Modern railway snowplows in regions like Scandinavia incorporate advanced hybrid designs that combine snow removal with track maintenance functions, such as ballast cleaning, to support high-speed lines. For example, Norway's Bane NOR operates high-performance snow blowers from Aebi Schmidt, capable of clearing up to 10,000 tonnes of snow per hour while mounted on rail vehicles. These units often feature hybrid road-rail configurations for versatile deployment, ensuring efficient winter operations on electrified and non-electrified tracks.

Airport and Specialized Snowplows

Airport snowplows are engineered for rapid clearance of runways and taxiways to prevent flight delays and ensure operational safety, often operating at speeds of 30 to 50 mph. High-speed blowers, such as the Oshkosh H-Series, utilize a two-stage design with a ribbon auger and impeller to ingest and eject snow, achieving capacities of up to 5,000 tons per hour while throwing material up to 200 feet. Multi-function units, like those from Aebi Schmidt's MB P5000 series, combine plows, brooms, and blowers on heavy-duty chassis, allowing versatile operations for plowing, sweeping, and blowing in a single pass to maintain clear widths efficiently. Specialized snowplows extend beyond aviation to niche environments requiring precision and durability. In ski resorts, snowcats such as PistenBully groomers equipped with dozer blades or pushers clear excess snow from trails and parking areas before grooming, ensuring safe access and optimal slope conditions. For agricultural settings, compact tractors fitted with front-mounted plows or snow pushers, like those compatible with John Deere or Kubota models, maintain farm lanes and barn entrances by displacing snow without damaging soil or crops. Military tundra vehicles, including armored winter service units based on tracked platforms like the Tucker Sno-Cat variants used in Arctic operations, feature reinforced plows for clearing forward operating bases and supply routes in extreme cold and deep snow. Performance metrics for these specialized plows emphasize efficiency in demanding conditions, with clearing widths reaching up to 22 feet for airport brooms and plows to cover broad runways quickly. Blower throw distances typically range from 50 to , enabling snow to be deposited away from operational areas without refreezing hazards. Regulatory standards, outlined in FAA 150/5200-30D, mandate post-clearing assessments using tools like Continuous Friction Measuring Equipment to achieve conditions no worse than "wet" pavement, ensuring Runway Condition Codes support safe . These guidelines require surveys on cleared surfaces to verify contaminant levels below thresholds, such as no more than 25% coverage of or , with closed if braking action is reported as "nil" until remediated.

Design and Operation

Key Components

The , also known as the moldboard, forms the primary snow-contacting surface of a snowplow and is typically constructed from curved high-strength or durable to withstand forces and varying conditions. These materials provide rigidity and flexibility, with offering superior impact resistance and reducing weight while minimizing surface damage to paved areas. The moldboard is hydraulically adjustable for and , allowing operators to optimize snow deflection and clearance; lift capacities commonly range from 4,000 to 10,000 pounds to handle heavy loads. Mounting systems integrate the snowplow with the host vehicle, primarily using A-frames for structural support, hitches for secure attachment, and quick-attach mechanisms for rapid connection and disconnection. A-frames, often articulating, distribute weight and forces evenly across the vehicle's , while quick-attach systems like drive-in mounts enable one-person installation in seconds without heavy lifting. These components are engineered for compatibility with trucks, skid-steers, or loaders, ensuring stability during operation. Power sources for snowplow functions rely on hydraulic pumps driven by the vehicle's , converting into fluid for actuation. These gear or pumps typically operate at pressure ratings of 2,000 to 3,000 , providing sufficient force for blade movement while maintaining in cold environments. The system includes reservoirs, valves, and cylinders to control flow, with pressures adjustable for specific vehicle capabilities. Auxiliary features enhance functionality and safety, including integrated lighting for visibility in low-light conditions, wing extensions to increase effective blade width by up to 20 inches, and cutting edges reinforced with carbide inserts for extended wear resistance against ice and gravel. Modern auxiliary features include adaptive cutting edges like TRACE technology for contour-following and smart controllers for precise hydraulic adjustments. Carbide edges, embedded in steel bases, can last several times longer than standard steel, reducing maintenance frequency. Lights often feature LED modules with multiple patterns, while wings hydraulically deploy to contain windrowed snow. In specialized types, adaptations like rotary augers may supplement these core elements for granular snow handling.

Removal Mechanisms and Techniques

Snowplows primarily displace snow through two main mechanisms: pushing and throwing. Pushing involves using a straight or angled blade to physically shove snow ahead or to the side, relying on the vehicle's momentum and the blade's contact with the surface to create piles or windrows. In angle plowing, the blade is hydraulically adjusted to an angle, typically 30-45 degrees, directing snow laterally for efficient windrowing and allowing bidirectional operation without excessive maneuvering. This technique reduces the formation of large central piles and enables backdragging for cleanup. Throwing, in contrast, employs rotary blowers or fans that ingest snow via an auger and eject it at high velocities through a chute, ideal for deep accumulations where piling is impractical. These systems generate airflow rates ranging from 10,000 to 50,000 cubic feet per minute (CFM), with larger airport models achieving up to 29,000 CFM to propel snow over 100 feet. Operational techniques emphasize controlled sequences to maximize clearance while minimizing refreezing risks. Operators approach snow-covered areas at speeds of 15-25 miles per hour (mph), adjusting based on accumulation depth to maintain blade contact without excessive resistance. For layered or heavy snow, multiple passes—typically 2-3—are standard, with the first pass breaking the surface and subsequent ones refining the cut to achieve bare pavement. Edge cleanup follows main passes, using the plow's wing or angled blade to clear shoulders, curbs, and medians, preventing residual snowmelt from pooling and refreezing into ice patches. These steps leverage the physical principle of shear force from the blade's downward pressure, often augmented by hydraulic systems for precise angle and height adjustments during operation. Handling varies by snow type due to differences in density and adhesion. Dry snow, being light and powdery, flows easily and suits both pushing and throwing, as it offers low resistance and minimal clogging in blowers. Wet snow, denser and heavier from partial melting, behaves more like slush and is better managed by pushing with straight blades to avoid impeller blockages in rotary systems. For slushy conditions, adjustments include switching to rubber or urethane cutting edges, which provide flexible scraping without damaging surfaces and effectively displace adherent wet material. These adaptations ensure consistent performance, as wet snow's higher water content increases frictional drag by 2-3 times compared to dry snow. Efficiency is influenced by factors like snow volume and operational speed, with fuel consumption models showing typical rates of 5-15 gallons per hour for truck-mounted plows under load. Heavier wet snow or idling during stops elevates usage toward the upper end, while optimal speeds of 20-25 mph on lighter loads improve . Operating speeds generally range from 15-35 mph on treated routes, though heavy storms reduce this to 10-15 mph, with equating to 5-15 lane-miles per hour per vehicle under normal conditions and 3-8 in dense storms, accounting for multiple passes and maneuvers. These metrics highlight the balance between displacement force and energy input, prioritizing complete clearance over speed.

History

Early Innovations

In the pre-mechanized era of the 18th and 19th centuries, snow removal in Europe and North America primarily depended on manual labor using hand shovels, with workers loading cleared snow into horse-drawn wagons for disposal. In North American cities like Milwaukee, horse-drawn plows began appearing as early as 1862, marking an initial shift from purely manual methods to animal-assisted scraping. These early devices, often simple wooden or metal blades attached to carts, were used to push aside light accumulations on roads and paths, though they were ineffective against deep drifts. The first significant patents for mechanical snow removal emerged in the mid-19th century, focusing on railroad applications to address blockages from harsh winters. In 1869, Toronto dentist J.W. Elliott received Canadian patent #399 for the "Compound Revolving Snow Shovel," an innovative rotary design featuring a large wheel with flat blades to scoop and eject snow sideways, powered initially by steam. This concept laid the groundwork for more advanced rotary plows, though Elliott never built a working prototype. For roads, early patents in the 1840s introduced horse-drawn scrapers, but adoption remained limited until the late 19th century. By the 1880s, U.S. railroads widely adopted rotary snowplows during severe winters, particularly on lines crossing the northern plains and Rockies, where snowdrifts frequently halted operations. Orange S. Jull, building on Elliott's idea, patented an improved rotary design in 1884 and demonstrated a functional steam-powered model in 1887, which was quickly deployed by railroads like the Union Pacific to clear tracks efficiently. These machines significantly reduced reliance on manual labor gangs, which previously numbered in the hundreds or thousands per storm, by mechanizing the removal of deep snow that wedge plows and hand shoveling could not handle. Canadian inventors played a pivotal role in early innovations tailored to prairie blizzards, where vast open landscapes amplified snow accumulation. Elliott's rotary concept was specifically aimed at Canadian railway challenges, and wedge plows—simple triangular steel blades mounted on the front of locomotives or carts to deflect snow—became common in the late 19th century for lighter clearing on prairie lines. Basic wedge designs featured a V-shaped prow, often 10-15 feet wide, angled to push snow to the sides without ejection, allowing horse- or engine-pulled operation over moderate drifts. These regional adaptations enabled reliable winter transport across Canada's expansive rail network, influencing U.S. designs during cross-border expansions.

20th-Century Developments

The 20th century marked a period of significant mechanization in snowplow technology, transitioning from horse-drawn and early motorized designs to scalable, engine-powered systems that supported expanding infrastructure. In the 1920s, motorized road plows evolved with truck attachments, allowing for faster and more efficient clearing of highways and urban streets. Carl Frink of Clayton, New York, developed one of the first practical truck-mounted snowplows in 1920, prompted by the need to clear bus routes in heavy snow; this design featured adjustable wings and was quickly adopted across the U.S., increasing plowing speeds from under 5 mph to over 30 mph. Similarly, the introduction of snow loaders in cities like Chicago in 1920 used conveyor belts to load cleared snow into dump trucks, reducing manual labor and enabling larger-scale operations; by the 1920-21 season, New York City deployed over 300 blade plows on trucks and tractors alone. These innovations tied directly to the growth of automobile use, making reliable winter road access essential for commerce and daily life. Railway snowplow technology also advanced during this era, with rotary designs—originally conceptualized in the late —becoming staples for deep on tracks. The 1930s and 1940s saw the widespread adoption of diesel-electric to push these rotaries, replacing power and improving reliability in remote, high-snow areas; for instance, the Railroad's rotary plows, initially steam-powered in 1930, were integral to maintaining lines under military control during , ensuring supply routes in extreme northern conditions. By the , conversions to fully diesel-powered rotaries accelerated, as seen with the Road's mid-decade upgrades, which powered the blades via traction motors for greater efficiency without reliance on locomotive . These developments were crucial for industrial rail networks, preventing disruptions from snowdrifts up to 8 feet deep and supporting wartime logistics in regions like the Rockies and . Post-World War II, the boom in U.S. drove standardization and fleet expansion for , particularly with the launch of the in 1956, which necessitated coordinated plowing across thousands of miles of new roads. State highway departments prioritized as a high-priority public service, mobilizing fleets that grew from hundreds in the to thousands by the late to handle increased traffic volumes and suburban expansion; for example, vehicle ownership surges forced rapid deployment of plows for even minor accumulations of 4 inches. Internationally, snowplow adoption spread to regions with extreme climates, with Scandinavian countries leading adaptations for harsh winters. In , Øveraasen developed the world's first car-mounted snowplow in 1923, evolving into robust models for mountainous and conditions by the mid-20th century; these designs emphasized durability for heavy snowfalls, influencing regional standards.

Modern Applications and Challenges

Technological Advancements

Since the early 2000s, GPS and technologies have transformed snowplow operations by enabling route optimization software that minimizes inefficiencies such as overlap and deadheading. These systems use from GPS, forecasts, and traffic conditions to generate efficient paths, potentially reducing plowing time by 28-40% in urban networks, as demonstrated in implementations by departments of . In , the (MnDOT) began integrating GPS tracking into its snowplow fleet during the , with over 80% of vehicles equipped by 2019 to monitor locations and optimize routes in real time, enhancing coordination during storms. Advancements in materials and power systems have further improved efficiency, with lightweight composites replacing traditional in plow blades and frames to reduce and consumption. For instance, composite-based designs, such as those in metalpless plows, contribute to lower emissions and better economy by decreasing overall load, aligning with broader vehicle lightweighting principles that yield 6-8% savings for every 10% weight reduction. Electric have also emerged, replacing conventional systems in some models to enhance precision and use; for example, projects on foldable snowplows offer potential savings through reduced idling and more efficient actuation. Sensor integrations, including real-time snow depth radars and auto-adjusting blades, have enabled more adaptive operations. Radar and LiDAR sensors mounted on plows measure snow accumulation ahead of the vehicle, allowing operators to adjust strategies dynamically, as seen in systems like SnowSat LiDAR that scan up to 50 meters forward for precise depth mapping. Auto-adjusting blades, such as those in the PRODIGY and SPEEDWING models, use mechanical or hydraulic mechanisms to automatically reposition wings from scoop to windrow modes based on plow angle, improving snow displacement without manual intervention. In smart city applications, these technologies have been adopted to streamline winter maintenance; at Oslo Airport, a pioneering implementation of autonomous snowplows since 2018 uses GPS-guided unmanned vehicles for 24-hour readiness, reducing response times from potential delays in manual deployment to near-immediate activation during heavy snowfall. This case illustrates broader efficiency gains, with automation ensuring consistent clearing and minimizing human error in adverse conditions. Building on these foundations, recent developments include the March 2024 introduction of the first fully autonomous commercial snowplow by Teleo and Storm Equipment, enabling remote operation for enhanced and in urban and industrial settings. In 2025, manufacturers like BOSS unveiled innovations such as Technology for improved performance in sub-zero conditions and advanced lighting systems.

Safety and Environmental Considerations

Snowplow operations involve significant safety risks due to reduced visibility, slippery conditions, and interactions with other vehicles. Drivers undergo specialized training to enhance visibility, utilizing features such as amber flashing lights on the cab and rear of the vehicle, along with extended mirrors to monitor blind spots effectively. Public awareness campaigns, such as "Give Plows Space" promoted by state departments of transportation, emphasize maintaining a minimum distance of 200 feet behind operating plows to avoid collisions from flying debris or sudden maneuvers. Accident statistics highlight the hazards, with causes including hidden obstacles under snow, tailgating, and improper passing. In the United States, snowplow-related crashes vary by state; for instance, Michigan reports approximately 225 incidents annually involving snow and ice removal equipment. Iowa averages 32 snowplow accidents each winter (2015-2024 data), often resulting in vehicle damage and injuries due to these factors. Nationally, while comprehensive data on snowplow-specific fatalities is limited, broader winter road crashes claim over 1,300 lives yearly, underscoring the need for vigilant operation. Environmental impacts from snowplow activities primarily stem from de-icing agents, with road salt contributing to freshwater salinization. The U.S. applies 15 to 32 million metric tons of road salt annually for snow removal, leading to runoff that contaminates waterways, harms aquatic life, and elevates chloride levels in rivers and lakes. This pollution exacerbates ecosystem stress, including vegetation damage and soil erosion near treated roads. Alternatives like beet juice mixed with brine reduce salt usage—such as by 20% in some municipalities—while lowering the freezing point and corrosiveness, though they require careful application to avoid staining or attracting pests. Regulations address these concerns through federal guidelines on de-icer use and emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides best management practices for de-icing material application and storage, recommending tracking systems for routes and rates to minimize environmental release, along with certification under programs like Design for the Environment for safer products. Additionally, EPA noise emission standards under 40 CFR Part 205 apply to snowplow trucks as heavy-duty vehicles, limiting sound levels to protect public health during operations. These measures promote sustainable practices without compromising road safety.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/snowplow
  2. https://apps.azdot.gov/ADOTLibrary/publications/project_reports/PDF/AZ253.pdf
  3. https://www.etymonline.com/word/snow-plow
  4. https://magazine.northeast.aaa.com/daily/life/cars-trucks/auto-history/history-of-snowplows/
  5. https://www.codot.gov/travel/winter-driving/snow-removal-and-safety
  6. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-system-information/documents/final-reports/ca15-2336-finalreport-a11y.pdf
  7. https://www.serviceautopilot.com/snow-removal/5-snow-removal-industry-statistics-and-trends-in-2023/
  8. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/snowplow
  9. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/snowplow
  10. https://www.nektyd.com/read-this-guide-before-you-rush-off-to-buy-snow-equipment/
  11. https://citywidebc.ca/blog/why-snow-removal-is-important/
  12. https://dmcsnow.com/how-snow-removal-services-improve-safety-for-employees-and-customers/
  13. https://www.facilitynetwork.com/post/why-commercial-snow-plowing-is-critical-for-business-continuity-in-winter
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022489822000568
  15. https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Civil_Engineering/Book%253A_The_Delft_Sand_Clay_and_Rock_Cutting_Model_%28Miedema%29/03%253A_The_General_Cutting_Process/3.06%253A_The_Snow_Plough_Effect
  16. https://www.udot.utah.gov/connect/2023/11/16/udot-snow-plow-operators-are-ready-for-winter/
  17. https://civmin.utoronto.ca/u-of-t-engineering-students-dig-through-snowplow-data-to-measure-torontos-response-to-winter-storms/
  18. https://www.zensurance.com/blog/how-to-start-a-snow-removal-business-in-canada
  19. https://www.rbth.com/science-and-tech/332928-moscow-transport-winter
  20. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/weather/resources/publications/tech_briefs/tech_briefs.htm
  21. https://thehustle.co/why-snow-costs-america-a-fortune-every-year
  22. https://www.wcvb.com/article/survey-states-spent-heavily-to-clear-winter-snow-and-ice/8221871
  23. https://safewinterroads.org/commerce/
  24. https://www.accuweather.com/en/blogs-webinars/hidden-costs-of-snowstorms-protect-your-business-this-winter/1705252
  25. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/weather/weather_events/snow_ice.htm
  26. https://www.highways.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Brochure-FINAL-LoRes.pdf
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457524003828
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1449863/
  29. https://www.auroragov.org/residents/right_of_way_maintenance_snow_removal/snow_removal
  30. https://cdn.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=66599708cc894e5f82e2061221d5cba0
  31. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/31299/dot_31299_DS1.pdf
  32. https://www.kentucky.com/news/weather-news/article298008713.html
  33. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec126.pdf
  34. https://municipal.monroetruck.com/municipal-trucks/
  35. https://www.freightliner.com/blog-and-newsletters/mother-nature-not-a-match-for-114sd/
  36. https://www.international.com/industries/government-and-municipal/snow-plows
  37. https://www.snowplowsdirect.com/top-trucks
  38. https://westernplows.com/products/impact/
  39. https://www.winterequipment.com/resources/blog/snow-plow-blade-types-explained/
  40. https://snowexproducts.com/resource-articles/which-plow-is-right-for-you/
  41. https://www.hendersonproducts.com/underbody-scrapers.html
  42. https://monasheemfg.com/products-services/under-body-plows/
  43. https://www.swensonproducts.com/support/guide-to-deicing/file
  44. https://www.dot.state.wy.us/news/top-10-list-of-things-snow-plow-operators-want-drivers-to-know
  45. https://deldot.gov/About/faqs/index.shtml?dc=snowFAQ
  46. https://www.american-rails.com/plows.html
  47. https://www.bnsf.com/news-media/railtalk/heritage/rotary-snow-plow.html
  48. https://utahrails.net/pdf/Rotary-Snow-Plows_UP-Info_Dec-1971_Jan-1972.pdf
  49. https://www.alaskarails.org/ARR-snow-fighting.html
  50. https://www.bnsf.com/news-media/railtalk/service/rotary-snowplow.html
  51. https://www.trains.com/trn/train-basics/abcs-of-railroading/railroad-snow-plow-methods-in-north-america/
  52. https://www.up.com/customers/track-record/tr110519-winter-weather-preparedness-tips.htm
  53. https://www.aar.org/issue/climate-resiliency/
  54. https://www.aebi-schmidt.com/en/news/2025/10/28/two-high-performance-snow-blowers-for-the-norwegian-state-railways/
  55. https://rollingstockworld.com/track-machines/aebi-schmidt-snow-blower-undergoes-testing-in-norway/
  56. http://www.oshkoshairport.com/hubfs/2017%20Brochures/H-SeriesBlowerSpecSheet_A4_092013_HR.pdf
  57. https://flysbn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Technical-Specifications-SRE.pdf
  58. https://www.aebi-schmidt.com/en-us/products/mb/runway-clearing/mb5/
  59. https://www.skiutah.com/blog/authors/lexi/a-night-in-the-life-of-a-snowcat/
  60. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/news/2008/dec/113101.htm
  61. https://military.polaris.com/en-us/applications/military/
  62. https://www.jalarue.com/airport-brooms-and-plows/
  63. https://overaasen.no/889
  64. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/150-5200-30d.pdf
  65. https://dmcwearparts.com/snow-plow-blades/cutting-edges/
  66. https://www.bossplow.com/en/product/dxt-plows
  67. https://seahydrosys.com/hydraulic-cylinders-for-snow-plow-equipment/
  68. https://www.magisterhyd.com/product/1-5inch-bore-x-6inch-stroke-snow-plow-western-hydraulic-cylinder/
  69. https://www.4qte.com/prd-1293-fisher-hdx-snow-plow
  70. https://snowplows.hiniker.com/truck-plows/quick-hitch-snowplow-mounting-systems/
  71. https://www.buyersproducts.com/product/snowdogg-quick-link-plow-hitch-6289
  72. https://kageinnovation.com/snow-plow-attachment-systems-how-they-connect/
  73. https://www.amazon.com/Magister-Hydraulic-Power-Double-Acting/dp/B0CPR5CXDJ
  74. https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/maxim-single-acting-snowplow-cylinder-15-in-bore-x-6-in-stroke-15-in-rod-dia
  75. https://www.magisterhyd.com/product/8-qts-steel-reservoir-snow-plow-power-unit-12v-dc-double-acting/
  76. https://www.plowsite.com/threads/western-pump-pressure.7743/
  77. https://fisherplows.com/news-events/new-products-2024/
  78. https://www.grote.com/warning-hazard/directional-warning-lights/wing-tip-led-snowplow-light/
  79. https://kageinnovation.com/snow-plow-cutting-edge-materials/
  80. https://www.amazon.com/Buyers-Products-PW22-Pro-Wings-Extension/dp/B009Z22LIS
  81. https://everestequipment.com/snow-plow-wings-systems/
  82. https://www.snowwolfplows.com/the-edge-blog/snow-pusher-or-angle-plow-how-to-choose
  83. https://grouperpmtech.com/en/our-equipment
  84. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/06-19_Final_Report_Revised.pdf
  85. https://wsdot.wa.gov/travel/operations-services/snow-and-ice-plan
  86. https://www.kolpin.com/en-us/plow-tips-and-tricks/snow-clearing-planning-and-practices/
  87. https://www.landofsnows.com/2023/03/02/different-types-of-snow-removal-techniques/
  88. https://dmcwearparts.com/snow-plow-blades/
  89. https://www.mass.gov/doc/attachment-b-fuel-adjustment-worksheet-2025-2026-winter-season/download
  90. https://apps.azdot.gov/ADOTLibrary/publications/project_reports/PDF/AZ461.pdf
  91. https://regencyredingote.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/snow-in-the-regency/
  92. https://www.marketplace.org/story/2014/02/14/brief-history-snow-removal
  93. https://www.gent.name/on:rotarysnowplow
  94. https://heattrak.com/blogs/homeowner/snow-removal-through-the-years
  95. https://www.asme.org/about-asme/media-inquiries/press-releases/oldest-railroad-snow-plow-earns-landmark-status
  96. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/rotary-snowplough
  97. https://www.midcontinent.org/equipment-roster/service-equipment/oregon-short-line-762/
  98. https://www.wwnytv.com/2024/01/12/history-lesson-where-would-we-be-without-claytons-carl-frink/
  99. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/sr/sr115/115-001.pdf
  100. https://utahrails.net/up/snowplows-rotary.php
  101. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trcircular/447/447-009.pdf
  102. https://overaasen.no/1057
  103. https://www.mankatofreepress.com/mankatomagazine/columns/road-saviors/article_a8f319b4-3b8d-11e9-9e04-03d91376c5b5.html
  104. https://www.startribune.com/now-you-can-see-where-mndot-snowplows-are-and-what-the-roads-look-like/411850106
  105. https://lanoequip.com/news/winter-ready-the-rise-of-metalpless-snow-plows.html
  106. https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/lightweight-materials-cars-and-trucks
  107. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1454503/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  108. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/73091/dot_73091_DS1.pdf
  109. https://www.snowsat.com/en/lidar
  110. https://www.highmotor.com/en/radar-lidar-tambien-utiliza-maquinas-quitanieves.html
  111. https://westernplows.com/products/prodigy/
  112. https://snowexproducts.com/products/speedwing/
  113. https://www.key.aero/article/how-oslo-airports-autonomous-snow-removal-tech-works
  114. https://www.airport-technology.com/news/avinor-trial-self-driving-snowploughs-oslo-airport/
  115. https://info.bossplow.com/blog/2025-new-innovations-from-boss-clone
  116. https://fox11online.com/news/local/fox-cities/snowplow-drivers-share-tips-on-how-to-stay-safe-on-the-road-during-winter-weather-outagamie-county-highway-department-green-lights-plows-snow-ice-salt-brine-amber-yellow-advisory-storm-
  117. https://www.foxweather.com/weather-news/snow-plow-involved-crashes
  118. https://www.killinofirm.com/news/snowplow-accidents-an-unrecognized-winter-hazard
  119. https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2025/02/14/iowa-dot-snowplows-record-number-accidents-dashcam-crashes-i-80/78627509007/
  120. https://www.caryinstitute.org/our-expertise/freshwater/road-salt
  121. https://www.epa.gov/snep/winter-coming-and-it-tons-salt-our-roads
  122. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2018/12/11/road-salt-harms-environment/
  123. https://weather.com/science/environment/news/2023-12-15-beet-juice-road-deicer-salt-brine
  124. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-11/bmp-deicing-material-application-and-storage.pdf
  125. https://www.responsiblepurchasing.org/purchasing_guides/deicers/naspo_rpn_deicers_purchasing_guide.pdf
  126. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-G/part-205
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.