Hubbry Logo
Sukhoi Su-7Sukhoi Su-7Main
Open search
Sukhoi Su-7
Community hub
Sukhoi Su-7
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sukhoi Su-7
Sukhoi Su-7
Sukhoi Su-7
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Sukhoi Su-7 (NATO designation name: Fitter-A) is a swept wing, supersonic fighter aircraft developed by the Soviet Union in 1955. Originally, it was designed as a tactical, low-level dogfighter, but was not successful in this role. On the other hand, the soon-introduced Su-7B series became the main Soviet fighter-bomber and ground-attack aircraft of the 1960s. The Su-7 was rugged in its simplicity, but its Lyulka AL-7 engine had such high fuel consumption that it seriously limited the aircraft's payload, as even short-range missions required that at least two hardpoints be used to carry drop tanks rather than ordnance.[1]

Key Information

Design and development

[edit]

After Joseph Stalin's death, the Sukhoi OKB was reopened[2] and by the summer, it began work on a swept-wing front-line[N 1] fighter. The first prototype, designated S-1, was designed to use the new Lyulka AL-7 turbojet engine. It was the first Soviet aircraft to utilize the all-moving tailplane and a translating centerbody, a movable inlet cone in the air intake for managing airflow to the engine at supersonic speeds.[3] The aircraft also had a wing sweep of 60°, irreversible hydraulically boosted controls, and an ejection seat of Sukhoi’s own design.[2]

The S-1 first flew on 7 September 1955 with A. G. Kochetkov at the controls. Fitted with an afterburning version of the AL-7 engine after the first eleven flights, the prototype set a Soviet speed record of 2,170 km/h (1,170 kn, 1,350 mph, Mach 2.04) in April 1956.[3] The prototype was intended to be armed with three 37 mm Nudelman N-37 cannons and 32 spin-stabilized 57 mm (2.25 in) unguided rockets in a ventral tray.[3] The second prototype, S-2, introduced some aerodynamic refinements. Testing was complicated by the unreliable engine, and S-1 was lost in a crash on 23 November 1956, killing its pilot I. N. Sokolov.[2] Only 132 have been produced between 1957 and 1960, and the aircraft entered service as Su-7 in 1959.

Su-7A fighter

[edit]

The first production variant: a frontline[N 1] fighter that saw limited operational use in the Far East from 1958. However, in 1959, a decision was made to prioritize production of the MiG-21, thus less than 200 Su-7As were deployed. The Su-7A was retired in 1965 with operational deployment.[2]

Su-7B fighter-bomber

[edit]
Su-7s of the Polish Air Force.

On July 31, 1958, Soviet tactical aviation (Frontovaya Aviatsiya,[N 1] фронтовая авиация) tasked Sukhoi with developing a ground-attack variant of the Su-7, which could replace the scrapped Ilyushin Il-40. The resulting prototype, designated the S-22, incorporated structural refinements for low-altitude operations at high-speed. The prototype first flew in March 1959; entering service in 1961 as the Su-7B.[3]

Operationally, Su-7s were hampered by a high landing speed of 340–360 km/h.[4] This was dictated by the highly swept wing. Combined with poor visibility from the cockpit and the lack of an instrument landing system, operations were very difficult, especially in poor weather or airfields.[5] In 1961–1962, Sukhoi experimented with blown flaps on S-25 but the benefit was too small to warrant implementation. JATO rockets tested on S-22-4 proved more useful and were incorporated into the Su-7BKL. Attempts to improve takeoff and landing performance eventually resulted in the variable geometry Sukhoi Su-17.

The Su-7B and its variants became the main Soviet ground-attack aircraft of the 1960s. They were also widely exported (691 planes,[2] including some trainers). However, the very short combat radius and need for long runways limited the Su-7's operational usefulness. On the other hand, despite its notoriously heavy controls, the Su-7 was popular with pilots for its docile flight characteristics, simple controls and considerable speed even at low altitudes. It also had a reputation for easy maintenance.

In 1977–1986 the Su-7s remaining in Soviet service were replaced by Su-17s and MiG-27s.

Operational history

[edit]

Egypt

[edit]
An Egyptian Su-7BMK displayed in the Egyptian Military Museum in Cairo Citadel.

The Su-7 saw combat with Egypt in the 1967 Six-Day War, the subsequent War of Attrition, and saw use in the Yom Kippur War by the Egyptians to attack Israeli ground forces.

India

[edit]

The Indian Air Force (IAF) used the Su-7 extensively in the 1971 war with Pakistan. Six squadrons, totaling 140 aircraft, flew almost 1,500 offensive sorties during the war,[4] and undertook the bulk of the daytime attack missions. The IAF managed to retain a very high operational tempo with its Su-7s, peaking at a sortie rate of six per pilot per day.[4] Fourteen or nineteen Su-7s were lost during the war, mostly due to anti-aircraft fire.[4][6] After the war, it was found that the aircraft had high survivability, being able to fly home safely despite receiving heavy damage. For example, Wing Commander H.S. Mangat's Su-7 was badly damaged by a PL-2 missile fired by a Pakistan Air Force F-6. The impact was so severe that half the rudder was missing, the elevators, ailerons, and flaps were severely damaged, and half the missile was stuck in the chute pipe.[4][7] The pilot made it back to his base. The death of at least one Indian pilot can be attributed, at least indirectly, to poor cockpit design. A pilot had moved his seating forward to a dangerous position, "because he found the bombsight and the front gun sight easier to operate" while in that position and was killed on ejection.[8]

Indian Su-7BMKs shot down at least two Shenyang F-6s in the 1971 war,[4] while losing three Su-7s to F-6s according to Pakistani sources, mostly during bombing runs.[9]

Variants

[edit]
S-26 on display at Monino.
Su-7BKL landing gear with the unique skid, and a UB-16 57 mm rocket launcher
Two-seat trainer variant Su-7UMK (NATO designation: Moujik)

A total of 1,847 Su-7 and its variants were built.[2]

Su-7A
First production version. The only production version that was a tactical air superiority fighter. Factory designation S-2. Manufactured 1957–1960 with 132 built. Remained in operational service until 1965.
Su-7B
The first ground-attack version, factory designation S-22. Manufactured 1960–1962 with 431 built.[10]
Su-7BM
Upgraded AL-7F-1 engine, upgraded fuel system with external piping on either side of the fuselage spine, fuel tanks installed in the wings, "wet" underwing hardpoints for carrying external fuel tanks, capable of carrying tactical nuclear bombs. Manufactured 1963–1965 with 290 built.[10]
Su-7BKL
Rough field-capable variant with skids fixed to the sides of the main landing gear, provision for two SPRD-110 JATO rockets of 29.4 kN (13,300 lbf) thrust, and twin brake parachutes. Introduced in 1965, factory designation S-22KL. Manufactured 1965–1972 with 267 built.[10]
Su-7BMK
A simplified export version of the Su-7BM. Manufactured 1967–1971 with 441 built.[10]
Su-7U (NATO Moujik)
Two-seat trainer version of the Su-7B with reduced fuel capacity. First flight 25 October 1965. Manufactured 1966–1972 in parallel with the export version, designated Su-7UMK.
Su-7UM (NATO Moujik)
Two-seat training version of the Su-7BM.
Su-7UMK (NATO Moujik)
Two-seat training version of the Su-7BMK. All Su-7 trainers amounted to 411 built.[10]
Su-7IG
Experimental variable geometry wing aircraft which was developed into Sukhoi Su-17.
100LDU Control Configured Vehicle
A Su-7U modified with canards and a longitudinal stability augmentation system. It was designed as a testbed for a fly-by-wire system for the Sukhoi T-4. It was later used in 1973–1974 during the development of the Su-27's fly-by-wire system.

OKB-51 designations

[edit]
S-1
(Strelovidnoye [krylo] – swept wings) OKB-51 designation for the first prototype of the Su-7 / Su-9 family.
S-2
OKB-51 designation for the first production version of the Su-7.
S-22
OKB-51 designation for the Su-7B production aircraft.
S-22-2
OKB-51 designation for the prototype of the Su-7BM.
S-22M
OKB-51 designation for the Su-7BM production aircraft.
S-22KL
OKB-51 designation for the Su-7BKL production aircraft, incorporating the short field equipment tested on the S-22-4.
S-23
As a precursor to the S-22-4 tests, the S-23 was tested with a pure ski undercarriage and with skis on the main legs only
S-22-4
An S-22 tested with wheel / ski undercarriage, brake parachute and SPRD-110 JATO boosters for rough/unpaved field operations.
S-25
This aircraft was used for Boundary Layer Control (BLC) tests, with compressor bleed air blown over the leading edges to reduce takeoff length.
S-25T
A Su-7 fitted with the Boundary Layer Control system, rigged especially for use in a full-scale wind tunnel.
S-26
A continuation of the S-22-4 testing with wheel/ski undercarriage, double brake parachute and JATO boosters (The S-26 survives on display at the Russian Air Force Museum, Monino).
S-22MK
A simplified export version of the Su-7BKL, designated Su-7BMK
U-22
A belated trainer version with two seats in tandem in an extended nose based on the Su-7BM.
U-22MK
OKB-51 designation for the export version of the Su-7U, designated Su-7UMK by the Soviet Air Force
S-3
A projected interceptor version of the S-2, with "Izumrud" radar and avionic equipment in a reconfigured nose section.
S-41
OKB-51 designation for an experimental version of the S-1/S-2 with a lengthened nose and area-ruled rear fuselage.
T-1
A delta-wing tactical fighter project, based on the S-2, cancelled with the prototype nearly complete.
T-3
A delta-winged interceptor version of the S-2, developed in parallel to the S-3 and T-1. This would eventually lead to the T-43 prototype of the Su-9 interceptor.

Operators

[edit]
Military operators of the Su-7
  Current
  Former

Current operators

[edit]
 North Korea

Former operators

[edit]

Afghanistan

  • Afghan Air Force – 24 Su-7BMK and 16 Su-7U trainers, were delivered to Afghanistan from 1972. Constant fighting, a high accident rate in the high altitude and poor maintenance caused substantial attrition. An additional 79 used replacements from Soviet stocks were supplied during the 1980s. None remain in service.

 Algeria

 Czechoslovakia

  • Czechoslovak Air Force – the Czechoslovak Air Force was the first foreign operator of the Su-7 in 1963. Totals included 64 Su-7BM, 31 Su-7BKL and Su-7U. During operations service, 30 aircraft were lost in accidents. The remaining aircraft were phased out in 1990.

Egypt

  • Egyptian Air Force – The first batch of 14 Su-7BMK was destroyed during the Six-Day War. From 1967–1972, Egypt received an additional 185 Su-7BMK/SU-7UMK. Those which survived the Yom Kippur War with Israel were retired in the mid-1980s.

 India

Indian Air Force Sukhoi Su-7 preserved at the Indian Air Force Academy Museum
  • Indian Air Force – 140 were delivered in 1968, equipping six squadrons. An additional 14 attrition replacements were provided. The last aircraft were retired in 1986.[12]

Iraq

  • Iraqi Air Force – The first contract for up to 34 Su-7BMK was signed in 1965,[13] with deliveries starting in the spring of 1967.[14] An additional order for 20 Su-7BMK was signed in July 1967.[15] No longer in service.

 Poland

  • Polish Air Force – operated 6 Su-7BM, 33 Su-7BKŁ and 8 Su-7U from July 1964 until June 1990; no longer in service.

 Soviet Union

Syria

  • Syrian Air Force – Shortly after the Six-Day War of 1967, Syria received 25 Su-7s. During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Syria lost most of the aircraft supplied. After 1973, The Soviet Union resupplied Syria with 35 more aircraft. By the mid 1980s, the Su-7 had been transferred to the reserves, and by the 1990s were decommissioned.

Specifications (Su-7BKL)

[edit]
3-view drawing of Sukhoi Su-7

Data from Green,[3] Sukhoi[2]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 16.8 m (55 ft 1 in)
  • Wingspan: 9.31 m (30 ft 7 in)
  • Height: 4.99 m (16 ft 4 in)
  • Wing area: 34 m2 (370 sq ft)
  • Airfoil: root: TsAGI SR-3S (5.9%); tip: TsAGI SR-3S (4.7%)[16]
  • Empty weight: 8,940 kg (19,709 lb)
  • Gross weight: 13,570 kg (29,917 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 15,210 kg (33,532 lb)
  • Fuel capacity: 3,220 kg (7,099 lb)
  • Powerplant: 1 × Lyulka AL-7F-1 afterburning turbojet, 66.6 kN (15,000 lbf) thrust dry, 94.1 kN (21,200 lbf) with afterburner

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 1,150 km/h (710 mph, 620 kn) / 0.94 at sea level
2,150 km/h (1,340 mph; 1,160 kn) / M1.74 at high altitude
  • Range: 1,650 km (1,030 mi, 890 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 17,600 m (57,700 ft)
  • Rate of climb: 160 m/s (31,000 ft/min)
  • Wing loading: 434.8 kg/m2 (89.1 lb/sq ft)
  • Thrust/weight: 0.71

Armament

See also

[edit]

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sukhoi Su-7

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The (NATO reporting name ) was a single-seat, single-engine swept-wing supersonic fighter-bomber developed by the Design Bureau (OKB) in the during the mid-1950s. Originating as a response to Western tactical fighters like the , the 's prototype, designated S-1, achieved its first flight on 7 September 1955, leading to the production Su-7B model entering service with the Soviet Air Force (VVS) around 1961. Powered by a Lyulka AL-7F-1 turbojet engine providing up to 90.2 kN of thrust with , it attained a maximum speed of approximately 2,120 km/h (Mach 1.7) at high altitude and carried armament including two 30 mm NR-30 cannons and up to 2,500 kg of bombs, rockets, or missiles on underwing hardpoints. The Su-7B and its variants served as the Soviet Union's primary ground-attack through the , emphasizing high-speed low-level strikes with a rugged aluminum construction suited for frontline operations, though limited by short radius (around 1,450 km with warload) and demanding high speeds that contributed to operational accidents. Production totaled approximately 1,850 units between and , with over 700 exported to more than a dozen nations including , , , , and , often in adapted forms like the rough-field-capable Su-7BKL or export Su-7BMK. Trainer variants such as the Su-7U and Su-7UM facilitated pilot conversion, addressing the type's handling challenges. In combat, the Su-7 demonstrated resilience, as seen in India's use during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War where it flew over 1,500 sorties without loss, but suffered high attrition in Arab-Israeli conflicts, including the 1967 , due to intense air defenses and maintenance issues in austere environments. Its design innovations, such as all-moving horizontal tail surfaces and an adjustable intake cone, marked early advancements in Soviet supersonic tactical aviation, though it was eventually supplanted by more versatile successors like the Su-17 in the 1970s.

Development History

Origins in the 1950s

In response to Soviet Air Force (VVS) requirements for a high-speed tactical fighter to counter supersonic Western aircraft such as the , the Design Bureau (), reestablished in May 1953 under chief designer , initiated conceptualization of what would become the Su-7 in the early . The project stemmed from post-Korean War assessments of emerging threats, prioritizing raw speed and interception capability over agility to achieve parity in and supersonic regimes. By late 1953, Sukhoi engineers completed an outline design for a swept- fighter with 60-degree sweep, which received VVS approval shortly thereafter, building on aerodynamic insights from earlier Soviet designs like the Su-9 and post-World War II exploitation of German research on swept configurations to mitigate effects at high Mach numbers. This approach emphasized linear sweep to delay shockwave onset and reduce drag divergence, favoring straight-line performance metrics derived from data over complex variable-geometry solutions. Initial specifications targeted sustained speeds near Mach 2 at altitude, employing aluminum alloys for the primary structure to optimize strength-to-weight ratios under thermal and aerodynamic stresses anticipated in supersonic flight. Empirical validation began with testing in wind tunnels by 1955, focusing on stability and drag characteristics to inform full-scale layout refinements.

Prototype Testing and Su-7A

The S-1 prototype of the , intended as a high-speed interceptor, performed its on 8 September 1955, with A. G. Kochyetkov at the controls. Powered initially by a non-afterburning , the aircraft quickly transitioned to the afterburning AL-7F variant to enhance supersonic performance. Early trials confirmed the design's potential for straight-line acceleration, reaching 2,170 km/h (approximately Mach 1.7 at altitude) by April 1956 during state acceptance tests. Subsequent testing with the S-2 prototype, which flew in early September 1956 under pilot Nikolay I. Korovushkin, focused on refining and integration. The AL-7F , delivering up to 90.2 kN of in , enabled reliable supersonic dashes but exposed causal limitations in handling: high of around 400 kg/m² contributed to marginal low-speed stability and control, particularly during maneuvers requiring precise . Stability challenges at higher angles of attack were noted, though the airframe's swept-wing configuration provided adequate supersonic trim; however, reliability proved problematic, culminating in the S-1's crash on 23 1957 from mid-flight. These empirical results from the Flight (FRI) trials underscored the Su-7's interceptor viability for intercepting high-altitude bombers, prioritizing dash speed over agility. Refinements addressed some engine teething issues, leading to state acceptance in 1957. Initial production of the Su-7A variant began in spring 1958 at Factory No. 126 in , yielding approximately 20 aircraft equipped with R-98U and K-13 missiles for Soviet interceptor squadrons; these units underwent operational evaluations through 1959, validating Mach 1.7+ capabilities in level flight while confirming persistent high landing speeds of 340–360 km/h as a operational constraint.

Evolution to Su-7B Fighter-Bomber

In the late 1950s, Soviet military doctrine evolved under Nikita Khrushchev's leadership, emphasizing missile systems and tactical nuclear capabilities while reducing reliance on strategic bombers, yet necessitating aircraft for low-altitude delivery of nuclear weapons against enemy defenses. This shift prompted the redesign of the Sukhoi Su-7 from a pure interceptor to a multi-role fighter-bomber, with development of the Su-7B variant beginning in July 1958 to meet Vozdushnye Sily (VVS) requirements for tactical strikes. The prototype incorporated underwing pylons for bombs and reconnaissance pods, enabling ground-attack missions while retaining supersonic performance for penetration tactics. The Su-7B prototype achieved its first flight in April 1959, powered by the AL-7F-1 engine, following intensive testing that addressed the original Su-7's limitations in payload and versatility. Enhancements included improved navigation systems suited for low-level operations, allowing high-speed ingress to evade radar and anti-aircraft fire, as demonstrated in VVS exercises that validated its breakthrough potential over conventional fighters. Entering service with the VVS in 1960, the Su-7B marked a doctrinal pivot towards integrated air-ground support in potential nuclear conflicts. Production of the Su-7B ramped up rapidly at Soviet facilities, reflecting industrial prioritization despite noted challenges in and reliability during early series. By , over 1,000 units of the Su-7B and its initial sub-variants had been manufactured, underscoring the type's role as the VVS's primary tactical strike platform amid Khrushchev-era reforms. This expansion supported widespread adoption for training and operational units, though empirical from field tests highlighted ongoing needs for refined to optimize low-altitude accuracy.

Design Features

Airframe and Aerodynamics

The Sukhoi Su-7 utilized a of circular cross-section, primarily constructed from aviation aluminum alloys to ensure structural integrity under high-speed and maneuver loads. This rugged "flying stovepipe" design prioritized durability for low-altitude tactical operations, with mid-mounted wings exhibiting a 60° sweep at the quarter-chord line to mitigate drag rise and facilitate supersonic dash speeds up to Mach 2.0 at altitude. The high wing sweep and absence of leading-edge slats emphasized aerodynamic efficiency and simplicity, avoiding added weight and high-speed drag penalties associated with complex high-lift devices. This choice, validated by Soviet design priorities favoring speed and ceiling over enhanced low-speed agility, resulted in wing loading around 435 kg/m² in loaded configuration, enabling rapid acceleration but yielding stall-prone behavior at reduced speeds. Consequently, landing approach speeds exceeded 340 km/h, demanding precise pilot technique and dual drag chutes for safe touchdown, as noted in operational feedback. Test pilots appreciated the Su-7's stability during high-speed dives and as a , yet critiqued the unforgiving stall characteristics stemming from the swept-wing profile without slats or advanced in production models. These trade-offs reflected causal aerodynamic principles: the swept planform delayed shock formation for /trans-supersonic flight but elevated minimum controllable speeds, limiting versatility in carrier or short-field scenarios despite Soviet explorations of naval adaptations.

Propulsion and Performance

The Sukhoi Su-7 utilized a single Lyulka AL-7F-1 afterburning turbojet engine, which produced 66.6 kN of dry thrust and 94.1 kN with afterburner. This powerplant, derived from earlier Lyulka designs optimized for supersonic flight, provided a of approximately 0.71, enabling strong acceleration from subsonic to supersonic regimes despite the aircraft's relatively heavy airframe. Engine integration featured a fuselage-mounted installation with air intakes positioned below the for efficient airflow at high angles of attack, though it contributed to high fuel consumption during loiter phases due to the turbojet's inherent inefficiency at sustained subsonic speeds. Performance metrics emphasized speed and climb over endurance, with a maximum speed of 1,700 km/h (Mach 1.6) achieved at high altitude under optimal conditions. The service ceiling reached 17,600 m, supported by instrumented test data validating consistent supersonic dash capabilities in level flight, a trait less reliably demonstrated in certain early Western supersonic fighter-bombers like the during low-altitude operations. Takeoff runs were short for the era, typically under 1,000 m at , facilitated by the engine's full output and the aircraft's high-lift devices, though landing distances exceeded 700 m owing to a high approach speed.
ParameterValue
Maximum speed (high altitude)1,700 km/h (Mach 1.6)
Service ceiling17,600 m
Takeoff run950 m
Combat range (clean)~1,400 km
Range in clean configuration was limited to around 1,400 km, constrained by internal capacity of approximately 3,455 liters and the AL-7F-1's specific fuel consumption, which favored brief high-thrust bursts over extended subsonic cruise; this profile aligned with tactical doctrines emphasizing rapid ingress and egress rather than long-endurance missions. Later production Su-7BM variants incorporated minor engine refinements, such as improved systems, but retained the core AL-7F-1 without transitioning to higher-thrust alternatives like the Lyulka AL-21F series used in successor designs.

Armament and Avionics

The Sukhoi Su-7 featured two fixed NR-30 30 mm autocannons installed in the wing roots, each supplied with 70 rounds of ammunition, providing and strafing capability during ground-attack missions. External stores were accommodated on six pylons—four under the wings (with inner stations rated for heavier loads) and two under the —supporting a total ordnance capacity of up to 2,000 kg. This included high-explosive bombs ranging from 100 kg to 500 kg units, unguided rocket packs such as S-5 or S-24 series, and tactical nuclear weapons like the RN-28 for strategic strikes, reflecting the aircraft's primary role in delivering massed payloads against ground targets. Avionics emphasized reliability for tactical operations over complexity, incorporating the ASP-5ND gyroscopic gunsight linked to basic -ranging for accurate cannon fire and unguided rocket delivery in low-level environments. Navigation relied on rudimentary inertial systems and radio aids to facilitate high-speed ingress and egress, with no onboard for air-to-air interception but provisions for simple identification-friend-or-foe transponders like the SRO-2. Weapon integration prioritized automatic release sequences tied to and altitude parameters, enabling the Su-7 to employ stores effectively in contested while minimizing pilot workload during supersonic dashes. Reconnaissance adaptations utilized under-fuselage mounts for optical cameras, allowing day/night vertical and oblique imaging to support gathering, though sophistication remained secondary to maximizing ordnance flexibility. The overall suite, constrained by 1960s-era technology, lacked advanced electronic warfare or data-linking but ensured robust integration of sighting and release systems for the aircraft's ground-attack .

Variants

Soviet Production Variants

The Su-7B served as the baseline production variant of the Su-7, configured as a single-seat for tactical ground-attack roles in Soviet service. Its first flight occurred in April 1959, leading to series production shortly thereafter, with initial deliveries to the Soviet Air Force beginning in 1961. The Su-7B featured the Lyulka AL-7F-1 turbojet engine, providing afterburning thrust of approximately 9,800 kgf, and was armed with two NR-30 30 mm cannons along with provisions for bombs and rockets under the wings. Subsequent upgrades addressed operational limitations identified in early service. The Su-7BM variant incorporated fixed wingtip fuel tanks to extend combat radius, responding to feedback on the need for improved endurance during ground support missions. This was followed by the Su-7BKL, introduced around 1965, which modified the for rough-field operations by adding retractable skis beneath the main wheels and a low-pressure nosewheel, enabling deployment from unprepared airstrips. The Su-7BKL retained the core but included powder-firing accelerators for short takeoffs, with approximately 700 units produced as the most numerous subvariant. To support pilot training, the Su-7U two-seat tandem trainer entered production in 1966. It featured lengthened to accommodate dual cockpits, reduced internal capacity, and dual controls, while maintaining similar performance to the Su-7B for operational conversion training. Production of the Su-7U continued until 1972, with around 367 built exclusively for Soviet use. Overall, Soviet factories produced approximately 1,847 Su-7 across variants, with the majority allocated to the USSR before exports began. These evolutionary changes reflected iterative improvements based on frontline requirements, prioritizing ruggedness and versatility in tactical .

Export and Specialized Adaptations

Export variants of the Sukhoi Su-7 were supplied to numerous non-Soviet operators, totaling over 400 aircraft delivered to countries such as , , , , , and . These versions often incorporated simplified and equipment tailored to recipient nations' requirements, including modified radio systems and identification friend-or-foe (IFF) radar in models like the Su-7UMK trainer. The Su-7BKE, designated for export to Egypt and India, utilized the Lyulka AL-7F1 turbojet engine, which offered enhanced reliability compared to domestic variants while maintaining comparable performance for operations in varied climates. Soviet export practices typically involved downgrading sensitive avionics and restricting advanced weaponry to prevent technology proliferation, though the Su-7's relatively basic instrumentation limited the extent of such modifications. A notable specialized adaptation was the S-22I prototype, also referred to as the Su-7IG, developed in the late from a modified Su-7BM . This demonstrator featured variable-sweep outer wing panels adjustable to 28°, 45°, or 62° to mitigate the original Su-7's limitations in low-speed handling and short-field operations, paving the way for the variable-geometry Su-17 series.

Operational Deployment

Soviet Service

The Su-7B entered service with the Soviet (VVS) in early 1961 as a primary tactical , equipping frontline regiments for and roles. It rapidly became a mainstay of VVS tactical strike forces, emphasizing supersonic low-level dash capabilities suited to rapid reaction scenarios. In the , Su-7 units played a central role in military exercises, simulating deep strikes against NATO targets in as part of offensive doctrinal . These maneuvers tested massed tactical aviation operations, with Su-7s demonstrating their ruggedness in high-intensity, repetitive sorties under simulated combat conditions. The two-seat Su-7U trainer variant, introduced in 1966 with 367 units produced through 1971, enhanced pilot proficiency in advanced tactical maneuvers and delivery, supporting elevated tempos across VVS squadrons. Maintenance challenges from the aircraft's demanding engine and persisted, yet its design permitted sustained operational use in exercise environments. Frontline Su-7 service peaked in the and , lasting approximately 15 years before progressive replacement by successors like the Su-17 starting in the late . The type lingered in training and reserve roles into the until full phase-out, yielding to more versatile platforms amid evolving VVS requirements.

Export to Warsaw Pact Nations

The received its first Sukhoi Su-7 aircraft in July 1964, with deliveries including 6 Su-7BM fighter-bombers, 33 Su-7BKL all-weather variants, and 8 Su-7U trainers, totaling 47 units based primarily at the 3rd Air Regiment in . These aircraft were integrated into operations for tactical ground support and interdiction roles, aligning with Soviet doctrine emphasizing rapid strikes against forces in a potential Central European conflict. Czechoslovakia acquired approximately 60 Su-7s, comprising 64 Su-7BM, 31 Su-7BKL, and associated trainers, which entered service for similar ground attack missions under unified Pact command structures. The East German Air Force (Luftstreitkräfte der NVA) also operated Su-7BM variants, such as serial 5309, for front-line deterrence and training exercises simulating armored breakthroughs. Across these forces, the Su-7's high-speed, low-altitude capabilities supported Pact-wide maneuvers, though its demanding handling characteristics contributed to a steep operational . Training integration revealed challenges, with Czechoslovak operations recording 30 aircraft lost to accidents over the service life, reflecting the type's sensitivity to in instrument flight and rough-field landings inherent to its design. Specific incidents included a June 1, 1966, failure crash of Su-7BM 5332 and an October 10, 1989, loss of Su-7BKL 6424 near Náměšť nad Oslavou. Polish and East German units experienced comparable issues during initial familiarization, underscoring the need for rigorous Soviet-style instruction to mitigate risks in high-threat environments. Following the dissolution of the in 1991, Su-7 fleets were retired by the early 1990s; decommissioned its last units in June 1990 amid arms reduction agreements, while Czechoslovak aircraft were phased out concurrently. These exports bolstered Pact cohesion through standardized equipment but highlighted reliability gaps in non-Soviet maintenance contexts, with no combat deployments recorded.

Operations in India

The initiated procurement of the Su-7BMK in the aftermath of the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War to bolster its tactical strike capabilities with a supersonic . Deliveries of the initial batch began in March 1968, with a total of 140 acquired from the to equip six squadrons, marking the IAF's first operational use of a Soviet-designed supersonic combat . No. 221 Squadron, previously equipped with FB.52s, became the first unit to convert to the Su-7 in , assuming primary responsibilities for strike training and operational conversion of subsequent squadrons. The were integrated into IAF doctrine for , , and tactical , with squadrons distributed across forward bases to enhance rapid response during the late buildup. The Su-7BMK variant, selected for Indian service, incorporated reinforced undercarriage and low-pressure tires optimized for semi-prepared runways, enabling reliable operations amid the challenges of flooding and variable prevalent in operational theaters. This supported year-round training cycles, including low-level and delivery exercises tailored to India's diverse .

Middle Eastern Conflicts

The Egyptian Air Force introduced the Su-7BMK in 1966, with initial deliveries enabling the formation of dedicated ground-attack squadrons based at airfields such as Cairo West. These aircraft, numbering around 64 by mid-1967, were prioritized for rapid operational integration amid escalating tensions with . Syria acquired 25 Su-7s from the shortly after the June 1967 war, while Iraq's first contract for up to 34 Su-7BMK was signed in 1965, followed by deliveries of 18 Su-7BKL variants commencing in 1968 and totaling over 100 aircraft by the mid-1970s. Both nations utilized the type for patrols along volatile borders with and , leveraging its high-speed, low-altitude capabilities for reconnaissance and quick-reaction alerts. Soviet military advisors were embedded in Egyptian and forces to oversee pilot on the Su-7, emphasizing low-level ingress techniques—typically below 200 meters at speeds exceeding Mach 1—to evade detection and surface-to-air threats during approach to targets. regimens included simulated desert runs to acclimate crews to high-speed terrain-following, with advisors reporting completion of over 1,000 joint sorties by 1970 in alone. Desert operations presented logistical hurdles, including frequent engine compressor stalls from sand ingestion in the Lyulka AL-21F turbojet, which necessitated field expedients like pre-flight intake covers and improvised sand traps at forward bases in the Sinai and regions. Egyptian technicians adapted underwing pylons on select Su-7BMK airframes to carry additional fuel tanks, extending loiter times in arid zones by up to 20 percent without compromising payload.

Combat Performance

Key Engagements and Outcomes

In the , Su-7BMK squadrons flew nearly 1,500 offensive sorties from early December, focusing on , , and airfield strikes in the western sector. These operations, conducted by six squadrons, destroyed 69 Pakistani tanks, 25 field guns, and 57 B-vehicles per Indian assessments, while also neutralizing aircraft on the ground such as three F-86 Sabres, two B-57 bombers, and one Mirage III at bases including Chander, Shorkot, and Pasrur on December 4. A single confirmed air-to-air victory occurred on December 7, when S.S. Malhotra of No. 32 Squadron downed a Pakistani MiG-19 using cannons during a reconnaissance mission. Indian records attribute the 14 Su-7 losses primarily to antiaircraft fire, with none to Pakistani fighters, enabling sustained operations that supported ground advances in sectors like Chhamb and . Pakistani claims, however, assert three Su-7 shootdowns by F-6 pilots in dogfights, highlighting discrepancies in engagement reports typical of wartime accounting. The Su-7's speed and low-level dash capability contributed to its survival in contested , yielding a favorable ground-attack outcome relative to sortie volume despite vulnerability to defenses. During the Yom Kippur War, Egyptian Su-7s executed initial strikes on October 6, 1973, targeting Israeli fortifications along the to support the surprise crossing under Operation Badr. These low-level attacks, covered by dense SAM umbrellas, facilitated early breakthroughs by Egyptian infantry and armor, disrupting Israeli defenses and enabling the seizure of canal east-bank positions before Israeli air countermeasures intensified. Specific Su-7 contributions included bombing runs that suppressed artillery and troop concentrations, though exact destruction tallies remain limited in declassified accounts. Subsequent sorties faced rising attrition from Israeli fighters exploiting gaps in Egyptian air defenses, with the overall suffering heavy losses after the initial surprise; Su-7s, as frontline fighter-bombers, mirrored this pattern amid Israel's achievement of air superiority by mid-October. Egyptian records emphasize the type's role in the war's opening phase successes, but Israeli assessments note rapid degradation due to radar-directed intercepts, underscoring the Su-7's dependence on ground-based protection for sustained effectiveness.

Effectiveness in Ground Attack Roles

The Sukhoi Su-7 demonstrated notable effectiveness in ground attack roles during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War, where Indian Air Force squadrons flew nearly 1,500 offensive sorties between December 4 and 17, achieving a peak sortie rate of six per pilot per day. These missions primarily targeted enemy armor, artillery, vehicles, and infrastructure, with No. 101 Squadron alone claiming destruction of 69 tanks, 25 field guns, and 57 B-vehicles through low-level strikes using unguided 57mm rockets, M-62 bombs, and strafing. The 's high-speed capabilities enabled rapid penetrations of defended airspace, as seen in strikes on Pakistani airfields such as Chander, Shorkot, and Gujrat, where bomb impacts were photographically confirmed and minimal interceptions occurred due to the Su-7's low-altitude dash speeds exceeding 1,000 km/h. delivery proved reliable against soft and semi-hardened targets, with each mission carrying up to 96 S-5 rockets or 1,102 lb M-62 bombs released in search-and-strike patterns over 10-mile fronts, supporting ground advances like the capture of the Chicken’s Neck salient. In doctrinal terms, the Su-7 excelled in massed, high-tempo attacks suited to operations, outperforming propeller-driven alternatives by delivering concentrated quickly; for instance, four-aircraft formations provided continuous coverage every 30 minutes, neutralizing and supply lines in roles. After-action assessments highlighted its stability at high speeds and maneuverability at low levels with , facilitating effective ordnance release amid intense ground fire.

Loss Rates and Reliability Issues

The Sukhoi Su-7 exhibited a notably high peacetime rate in Soviet service, with a mean time between hull-loss s of approximately 1,770 flying hours recorded in , compared to 3,225 hours for the MiG-21. This elevated rate stemmed largely from handling characteristics that demanded precise pilot inputs, including a high minimum speed often exceeding 180 mph (290 km/h) due to the swept-wing design, which contributed to incidents during approach and touchdown, particularly in adverse weather or without instrument support. Soviet evaluations attributed many such losses to and procedural factors rather than fundamental design defects, as the aircraft's were otherwise predictable at supersonic speeds but unforgiving at low altitudes and speeds. In combat, the Indian Air Force's Su-7 fleet suffered 14 losses during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War across roughly 1,500 sorties, with most attributed to anti-aircraft artillery and a limited number (no more than four) to Pakistani fighters; operational accidents, often linked to poor weather and , accounted for a portion of the remainder. Pakistani sources inflated these figures to 34 Su-7 destructions, a claim later assessments deemed exaggerated . The overall attrition was considered manageable relative to the intense sortie generation, which peaked at six missions per pilot per day, though the type's low-altitude attack profile exposed it to ground defenses. Reliability challenges included substantial maintenance requirements for the and Lyulka AL-7F , which consumed fuel voraciously and necessitated frequent inspections to sustain operational readiness in demanding environments. Despite these demands, the Su-7 proved resilient in high-threat scenarios, with numerous examples returning to base after absorbing significant battle damage from flak, underscoring its structural toughness over inherent fragility.

Operators

Former Military Operators

The Sukhoi Su-7 served as a primary ground-attack aircraft for the Soviet Air Force, which received the majority of the approximately 1,850 units produced between 1959 and 1972, with over 1,000 allocated to Soviet frontal aviation units before retirement in the late . Export deliveries, totaling around 691 aircraft including trainers, reflected the Soviet Union's strategy of bolstering allies and non-aligned partners in Asia and the Middle East through packages during the . India acquired 140 Su-7B and Su-7BMK variants starting in 1968 to equip six squadrons, with the last units phased out by 1986 in favor of more advanced types. operated roughly 120 Su-7BKL aircraft from the late , incorporating them into its air force structure for tactical strike roles until the , supplemented by later deliveries amid ongoing Soviet support. received 30 Su-7BKL and 8 Su-7U trainers between 1964 and the early 1970s, marking it as a key recipient before transitioning to Su-20 variants. Other recipients included (120 units), , (over 90 combined variants), , , (at least 28), , (approximately 30, post-war acquisitions), and , typically in smaller batches tailored to rough-field operations via BKL models. These transfers prioritized ideological allies, with adaptations like ski undercarriage for models to suit diverse operational environments, though all global Su-7 inventories were retired by the mid-1990s due to obsolescence against modern threats.

Training and Retirement


The Su-7U served as the primary two-seat trainer variant for transitioning pilots to the single-seat Su-7 series, featuring a arrangement in an extended fuselage derived from the Su-7BM. Development was authorized in 1964 following recognition that earlier trainers like the MiG-15UTI were inadequate for handling; the first flew on 25 October 1965, with 367 units produced from 1966 to 1971. An export version, the Su-7UMK, was built in 44 examples from 1968 to 1971 for nations including and . Pilot training on the Su-7 emphasized overcoming its demanding flight characteristics, including long runs—exacerbated by high approach speeds exceeding 300 km/h—and heavy controls that necessitated assistance for sustained operations. These traits contributed to difficulties for novice pilots, particularly during landings, prompting design adjustments like reinforced gear and dual brake parachutes on trainers. In the , conversion typically involved 4 dual-instructor flights in the Su-7U for experienced pilots with 260-300 hours on prior types like the Hunter or Marut before solo qualification, though this extended to 12-15 rides later due to reduced trainer availability. Soviet Su-7 units were phased out progressively in the , with the bulk of remaining replaced by more advanced Su-17 and MiG-27 types between 1977 and 1986 amid evolving tactical requirements and reliability concerns. The decommissioned its fleet after roughly 20 years of service, with the final squadrons—Nos. 32 and 222—transitioning to MiG-27s by 1984-1985, following losses in conflicts and attrition that depleted spares without full replenishment. Post-retirement, the majority of Su-7 airframes faced scrapping due to wear and unavailability of parts, though select preserved examples remain on display, including at the Museum in Palam, the in , and the Aviation Museum in Kunovice, . Some airframes continued limited use into the 1980s for testing and trials in the .

Specifications

Su-7B General Characteristics

The Sukhoi Su-7B was a single-engine, single-seat supersonic fighter-bomber designed for tactical air support and ground attack roles. It featured a crew of one pilot. Key dimensions included a length of 17.37 meters, a wingspan of 8.93 meters, and a height of 4.57 meters. The aircraft had an empty weight of 8,636 kg and a maximum takeoff weight of 14,800 kg. Internal fuel capacity was 2,940 liters, equivalent to approximately 2,350 kg of jet fuel.
ParameterValue
Maximum speed1,700 km/h at altitude
Service ceiling19,500 m
Operational limits encompassed a maximum of around 1,260 km/h near , with structural tolerances typical for Soviet fighters, estimated at +6 to -3 g based on design parameters, though exact figures from declassified data remain limited in public sources.

Su-7BKL Adaptations

The Su-7BKL (S-22KL) was developed as a rough-field capable variant of the Su-7B, featuring a specialized wheel-ski system known as "kolyosno-lyzhnoe" to enable operations from unprepared airstrips, soft ground, or snow-covered terrain. This included extensible steel skids attached to the main undercarriage legs, which retracted into bulged bays on the gear , along with a reinforced structure to accommodate higher takeoff weights. The nosewheel was enlarged and made hydraulically steerable, requiring modifications to the nosewheel with added bulges. Further adaptations encompassed redesigned flaps for better low-speed performance, provisions for two SPRD-110 rockets to assist takeoff from short or rough runways, and a dual braking system to reduce landing distances. These changes prioritized operational flexibility in austere environments over the standard Su-7B's optimized paved-runway performance, with the Su-7BKL achieving shorter required takeoff and landing distances while supporting increased internal fuel capacity of 4,030 liters compared to the Su-7B's 3,455 liters, and compatibility with larger external drop tanks. The variant's reinforced gear allowed for sustained rough-field use without significant compromises to overall mission payload, typically up to 1,000 kg of ordnance.

Legacy and Assessment

Technological Influence

The Sukhoi Su-7's fixed-wing configuration and emphasis on supersonic performance at low altitudes laid groundwork for evolutionary advancements in Sukhoi tactical aircraft, particularly through experimental modifications that tested variable-geometry wings. In 1965, engineers adapted a hybrid Su-7BM/BKL by grafting variable-sweep wings, reducing takeoff and landing speeds by 50-60 km/h compared to the baseline Su-7 while preserving its Mach 1.7 top speed. This S-32M demonstrator directly informed the Su-17's development, which retained the Su-7's core fuselage, Lyulka AL-7F engine heritage, and single-engine layout but integrated swing-wings for enhanced maneuverability and payload flexibility in ground-attack roles. The Su-7's structural approach, featuring a rugged, circular optimized for high-speed stability and aluminum alloy construction tolerant of , contributed practical insights into supersonic durability that influenced broader Soviet design practices. Early Su-7B operations highlighted the trade-offs of prioritizing dash speed over loiter time, prompting refinements in materials and for successors; for instance, initial Su-24 studies in the early evaluated enlarged Su-7 derivatives to integrate all-weather and heavier ordnance, revealing the original frame's scalability limits but validating its baseline for sustained Mach 1+ flight envelopes. This focus on speed-centric, export-oriented platforms underscored the Su-7's role in Soviet aviation philosophy, where raw performance compensated for versatility gaps, fostering a lineage of "Fitter" variants that prioritized battlefield penetration over multirole adaptability. The 's export of over 700 units to operators in more than a dozen countries affirmed its technological viability, sustaining production lines and influencing post-Cold War marketing of derived designs amid Western competition.

Comparative Evaluation

The Sukhoi Su-7 demonstrated superior maximum speed and low-altitude dash performance relative to the , with operational speeds reaching Mach 1.6 compared to the F-100's Mach 1.3 limit, enabling faster penetration of contested airspace in ground attack configurations. However, its Lyulka AL-7F engine's high fuel consumption restricted combat radius to approximately 460 km (285 miles) under typical loads, inferior to the F-100's extended ferry range exceeding 3,200 km with drop tanks, which constrained the Su-7's utility for missions requiring sustained presence over targets. In terms of payload density, the Su-7 carried up to 2,500 kg of ordnance across six underwing hardpoints, emphasizing pods and unguided bombs suited for high-speed strikes, though this was marginally less than the F-100's capacity for 3,000 kg including nuclear weapons. represented a key disparity, with the Su-7 relying on rudimentary ranging and optical bombsights lacking the F-100's more advanced inertial navigation and terrain-avoidance systems, which analysts critiqued as reducing precision and survivability in electronic warfare environments. Soviet evaluations, conversely, highlighted the Su-7's simplicity as enhancing reliability in forward basing under austere conditions, claiming qualitative edges in raw kinetic performance over Western counterparts optimized for carrier operations. Reliability metrics underscored trade-offs, with the Su-7's mean time between accidents leading to at 1,770 flight hours in 1964 assessments—higher than USAF contemporaries like the F-100, which suffered early supersonic handling issues but benefited from iterative safety upgrades—yet comparable to other initial-generation supersonic jets grappling with compressor stalls and control instabilities. Weaknesses in loiter time, stemming from the engine's thirstiness limiting on-station endurance to under 30 minutes at radii, contrasted with peers like the F-100's better for prolonged tactical , as evidenced by operational data emphasizing the Su-7's dash-in-dash-out profile over sustained battlefield . Relative to the MiG-21, primarily an interceptor, the Su-7 excelled in dedicated ground attack with greater ordnance versatility, including heavier loads and arrays, but sacrificed air-to-air agility for strike specialization, aligning with Soviet doctrinal priorities for massed tactical over multirole flexibility.
AspectSu-7F-100 Super Sabre
Max SpeedMach 1.6Mach 1.3
Combat Radius~460 km~700 km (with tanks)
2,500 kg3,000 kg
MTBA to Loss1,770 hours~2,000-3,000 hours (early models)
NATO critiques focused on the Su-7's vulnerability to intercepts during ingress due to limited electronic countermeasures and high landing speeds exacerbating operational risks, while Soviet sources asserted parity or superiority in mass-production scalability and low-level penetration against defended targets.

Debunking Operational Myths

A persistent myth portrays the Su-7 as inherently unreliable, akin to a "" aircraft, often propagated through exaggerated adversary claims during conflicts like the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War, where Pakistani sources alleged 34 losses despite actual (IAF) records showing only 14 Su-7s lost across nearly 1,500 offensive sorties flown by six squadrons. This attrition rate, primarily from ground fire with no more than four to , was not excessive given the intense exposure to defenses and the Su-7's role in high-risk , where it neutralized key targets including enemy airfields at Chander and Shorkot, destroyed 69 tanks, 25 field guns, and 57 vehicles, achieving mission success rates exceeding 90% based on sortie completion and target impact data. IAF pilots noted high serviceability and rapid turnaround times, with the aircraft demonstrating robustness by absorbing significant battle damage and returning pilots safely, directly countering narratives of systemic fragility unsupported by operational logs. Handling characteristics of the Su-7, while demanding due to heavy controls and high landing speeds, were mitigated through rigorous and not uniquely flawed compared to contemporaries; pilots reported good stability across the , responsive gust handling, and docile low-level performance suitable for ground attack. Similar challenges existed in era jets like the , which suffered from overpowered engines leading to handling vices in certain regimes and chronic fuel limitations requiring mid-air refueling simulations, yet both succeeded in their roles when properly managed by trained crews. Certain portrayals, often from Western or adversary-aligned media, overlook Soviet industrial feats in mass-producing over 1,800 Su-7s and variants under resource constraints, enabling widespread of 691 units and sustained operational tempos that rivaled more resourced Western programs, privileging anecdotal loss tales over verified production and combat efficacy.

References

  1. https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.php?aircraft_id=69
  2. https://www.airvectors.net/avsu17_1.html
  3. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/su-7.htm
  4. https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/sukhois-s-3-an-su-7-based-fighter.30572/
  5. https://polot.net/en/suchoj-su-7-b-history-1964-6987
  6. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1178669005851970&id=265272490524964&set=a.403266893392189
  7. http://www.aviastar.org/air/russia/su-7b.php
  8. https://warthunder.com/en/news/6738-development-su-7b-new-doctrine-en
  9. https://pickledwings.com/sukhoi-su-7-fitter-fast-and-fiendish/
  10. https://www.airvectors.net/avsu17.html
  11. https://airvectors.net/avsu17_1.html
  12. http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_su7_en.php
  13. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-7_Fitter
  14. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/su-7-specs.htm
  15. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/sukhoi-su-7b
  16. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/su-22.htm
  17. https://old-wiki.warthunder.com/Su-7BKL
  18. https://www.airvectors.net/avsu17_2.html
  19. http://www.livingwarbirds.com/sukhoi-su-7.php
  20. https://flickr.com/photos/thomasbecker/8262045026/in/photostream
  21. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-7
  22. https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/186987
  23. https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/187100
  24. https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2024/oct/doc2024107411201.pdf
  25. https://www.bharat-rakshak.com/iaf/aircraft/past/sukhoi-7/
  26. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bareilly/iaf-removes-aircraft-on-display-from-outside-trishul-airbase/articleshow/69403456.cms
  27. https://forgottenjets.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/FitterFixed.html
  28. http://www.arcforums.com/forums/air/index.php?/topic/127495-su-7-fitter/
  29. https://www.amazon.com/Fitters-Middle-East-7-1967-2022/dp/180451229X
  30. https://www.palquest.org/sites/default/files/The_Syrian_and_Egyption_Campaigns-_Riad_Ashkar.pdf
  31. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/meria/meria01_ano01.html
  32. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AUPress/Books/B_0025_BERGQUIST_AIRPOWER_IRANIRAQ.pdf
  33. http://www.arcforums.com/forums/air/index.php?/topic/283212-148-algerian-su-7-bmk-diorama/
  34. https://theaviationgeekclub.com/pakistani-shenyang-f-6-pilot-tells-the-story-of-a-dogfight-where-he-forgot-his-aircrafts-gunsight-caged-for-strafing-ground-targets-and-failed-to-gun-kill-an-indian-su-7/
  35. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/the-yom-kippur-airlift/
  36. https://www.benning.army.mil/armor/earmor/content/issues/2019/Fall/4Kichen19.pdf
  37. https://www.bharat-rakshak.com/iaf/history/1971war/madhabendra-banerji/
  38. https://idrw.org/air-commodore-kc-kuruvilla-reflects-on-flying-the-sukhoi-7-in-the-1971-war-a-tale-of-ruggedness-and-resilience/
  39. https://www.key.aero/forum/modern-military-aviation/123285-interesting-suhkoi-su-7-fitter-info
  40. https://hushkit.net/2016/05/25/the-ten-worst-soviet-aircraft/
  41. https://www.cescube.com/vp-the-history-of-russian-arms-exports-to-india
  42. https://www.key.aero/article/natos-last-fitters
  43. https://www.eduard.com/out/media/1148.pdf
  44. https://aircraft.fandom.com/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-7
  45. https://wiki.warthunder.com/unit/su-7b
  46. https://16va.be/3.3_appui_tactique_part6_eng.html
  47. https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.php?aircraft_id=194
  48. https://aerocorner.com/aircraft/north-american-f-100-super-sabre/
  49. https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/ac/row/su-7.htm
  50. https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Su-7-compare-to-the-F-105
  51. https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-the-Su-7-Fitter-and-the-Mig-21-and-why-did-the-Mig-win-out-in-the-long-run
  52. https://hushkit.net/2015/11/18/flying-and-fighting-in-the-lightning/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.